Loading...
Hatch Mott MacDonald - 2016 AgreementAGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (For contracts over $5,000 - CONSULTANT) This AGREEMENT made this 26 day of May, 2016, between: CITY: City of Gilroy, having a principal place of business at 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California and CONSULTANT: Hatch Mott McDonald, having a principal place of business at 1300 -B First Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. ARTICLE 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT This Agreement will become effective on May 25, 2016 and will continue in effect through May 26, 2019 unless terminated in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of this Agreement. Any lapse in insurance coverage as required by Article 5, Section D of this Agreemen��o terminate this Agreement regardless of any other provision stated herein. LL[[��(( Initial ARTICLE 2. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS It is the express intention of the parties that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee, agent, joint venturer or partner of CITY. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee between CITY and CONSULTANT or any employee or agent of CONSULTANT. Both parties acknowledge that CONSULTANT is not an employee for state or federal tax purposes. CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any of the rights or benefits afforded to CITY'S employees, including, without limitation, disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, retirement benefits or any other employment benefits. CONSULTANT shall retain the right to perform services for others during the term of this Agreement. ARTICLE 3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT A. Specific Services CONSULTANT agrees to: Perform the services as outlined in Exhibit "A" ( "Specific Provisions ") and Exhibit "B" ( "Scope of Services "), within the time periods described in Exhibit "C" ( "Milestone Schedule "). B. Method of Performing Services CONSULTANT shall determine the method, details and means of performing the above - described services. CITY shall have no right to, and shall not, control the manner or determine the method of accomplishing CONSULTANT'S services. 4835- 2267 -03610 LAC104706083 C. Employment of Assistants CONSULTANT may, at the CONSULTANT'S own expense, employ such assistants as CONSULTANT deems necessary to perform the services required of CONSULTANT by this Agreement, subject to the prohibition against assignment and subcontracting contained in Article 5 below. CITY may not control, direct, or supervise CONSULTANT'S assistants in the performance of those services. CONSULTANT assumes full and sole responsibility for the payment of all compensation and expenses of these assistants and for all state and federal income tax, unemployment insurance, Social Security, disability insurance and other applicable withholding. D. Place of Work CONSULTANT shall perform the services required by this Agreement at any place or location and at such times as CONSULTANT shall determine is necessary to properly and timely perform CONSULTANT'S services. ARTICLE 4. COMPENSATION A. Consideration In consideration for the services to be performed by CONSULTANT, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT the amounts set forth in Exhibit I'D" ( "Payment Schedule "). In no event however shall the total compensation paid to CONSULTANT exceed $88,000. B. Invoices CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for all services rendered. C. Payment Payment shall be due according to the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit "D ". No payment will be made unless CONSULTANT has first provided City with a written receipt of invoice describing the work performed and any approved direct expenses (as provided for in Exhibit "A ", Section M incurred during the preceding period. If CITY objects to all or any portion of any invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT of the objection within thirty (30) days from receipt of the invoice, give reasons for the objection, and pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. It shall not constitute a default or breach of this Agreement for CITY not to pay any invoiced amounts to which it has objected until the objection has been resolved by mutual agreement of the parties. D. Expenses CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all costs and expenses incident to the performance of services for CITY, including but not limited to, all costs of equipment used or provided by CONSULTANT, all fees, fines, licenses, bonds or taxes required of or imposed against CONSULTANT and all other of CONSULTANT'S costs of doing business. CITY shall not be 4835 - 2267 -0361 v1 LAC104706083 responsible for any expenses incurred by CONSULTANT in performing services for CITY, except for those expenses constituting "direct expenses" referenced on Exhibit "A." ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT A. Tools and Instrumentalities CONSULTANT shall supply all tools and instrumentalities required to perform the services under this Agreement at its sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT is not required to purchase or rent any tools, equipment or services from CITY. B. Workers' Compensation CONSULTANT agrees to provide workers' compensation insurance for CONSULTANT'S employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless, defend with counsel acceptable to CITY and indemnify CITY, its officers, representatives, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, suits, damages, costs, fees, demands, causes of action, losses, liabilities and expenses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of CONSULTANT'S employees. C. Indemnification of Liability, Duty to Defend 1. As to professional liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, through counsel approved by CITY (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, representatives, agents and employees against any and all suits, damages, costs, fees, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, liabilities and expenses, including without limitation attorneys' fees, to the extent arising or resulting directly or indirectly from any willful or negligent acts, errors or omissions of CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT'S assistants, employees or agents, including all claims relating to the injury or death of any person or damage to any property. 2. As to other liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall defend, through counsel approved by CITY (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, representatives, agents and employees against any and all suits, damages, costs, fees, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, liabilities and expenses, including without limitation attorneys' fees, arising or resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT'S assistants, employees or agents, including all claims relating to the injury or death of any person or damage to any property. D. Insurance In addition to any other obligations under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall, at no cost to CITY, obtain and maintain throughout the term of this Agreement: (a) Commercial Liability Insurance on a per occurrence basis, including coverage for owned and non -owned automobiles, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence for all damages due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person, and damage to property, 4835- 2267 -0361 v1 _3_ LAM04706083 including the loss of use thereof; and (b) Professional Liability Insurance (Errors & Omissions) with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate; provided however, Professional Liability Insurance written on a claims made basis must comply with the requirements set forth below. Professional Liability Insurance written on a claims made basis (including without limitation the initial policy obtained and all subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements) must show the retroactive date, and the retroactive date must be before the earlier of the effective date of the contract or the beginning of the contract work. Claims made Professional Liability Insurance must be maintained, and written evidence of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after the completion of the contract work. If claims made coverage is canceled or non - renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the earlier of the effective date of the contract or the beginning of the contract work, CONSULTANT must purchase so called "extended reporting" or "tail" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work, which must also show a retroactive date that is before the earlier of the effective date of the contract or the beginning of the contract work. As a condition precedent to CITY'S obligations under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish written evidence of such coverage (naming CITY, its officers and employees as additional insureds on the Comprehensive Liability insurance policy referred to in (a) immediately above via a specific endorsement) and requiring thirty (30) days written notice of policy lapse or cancellation, or of a material change in policy terms. E. Assignment Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations of CONSULTANT under this Agreement may be assigned or subcontracted by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY, which CITY may withhold in its sole and absolute discretion. F. State and Federal Taxes As CONSULTANT is not CITY'S employee, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for paying all required state and federal taxes. Without limiting the foregoing, CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that: • CITY will not withhold FICA (Social Security) from CONSULTANT'S payments; • CITY will not make state or federal unemployment insurance contributions on CONSULTANT'S behalf; • CITY will not withhold state or federal income tax from payment to CONSULTANT; • CITY will not make disability insurance contributions on behalf of CONSULTANT; • CITY will not obtain workers' compensation insurance on behalf of CONSULTANT. 4835 - 2267 -0361 v1 4- LAC104706083 ARTICLE 6. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY A. Cooperation of City CITY agrees to respond to all reasonable requests of CONSULTANT and provide access, at reasonable times following receipt by CITY of reasonable notice, to all documents reasonably necessary to the performance of CONSULTANT'S duties under this Agreement. B. Assignment CITY may assign this Agreement or any duties or obligations thereunder to a successor governmental entity without the consent of CONSULTANT. Such assignment shall not release CONSULTANT from any of CONSULTANT'S duties or obligations under this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. Sale of Consultant's Business/ Death of Consultant. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of the proposed sale of CONSULTANT's business no later than thirty (30) days prior to any such sale. CITY shall have the option of terminating this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receiving such notice of sale. Any such CITY termination pursuant to this Article 7.A shall be in writing and sent to the address for notices to CONSULTANT set forth in Exhibit A, Subsection V.H., no later than thirty (30) days after CITY' receipt of such notice of sale. If CONSULTANT is an individual, this Agreement shall be deemed automatically terminated upon death of CONSULTANT. B. Termination by City for Default of Consultant Should CONSULTANT default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any of its provisions, CITY, at CITY'S option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written notification to CONSULTANT. For the purposes of this section, material breach of this Agreement shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. CONSULTANT'S failure to professionally and/or timely perform any of the services contemplated by this Agreement. 2. CONSULTANT'S breach of any of its representations, warranties or covenants contained in this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to payment only for work completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through the date of the termination notice, as reasonably determined by CITY, provided that such payment shall not exceed the amounts set forth in this Agreement for the tasks described on Exhibit C" which have been fully, competently and timely rendered by CONSULTANT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if CITY terminates this Agreement due to CONSULTANT'S default in the performance of this Agreement or material breach by CONSULTANT of any of its provisions, then in addition to any other rights and remedies CITY 4835- 2267 -03610 _5_ LAC104706083 may have, CONSULTANT shall reimburse CITY, within ten (10) days after demand, for any and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY in order to complete the tasks constituting the scope of work as described in this Agreement, to the extent such costs and expenses exceed the amounts CITY would have been obligated to pay CONSULTANT for the performance of that task pursuant to this Agreement. C. Termination for Failure to Make Agreed -Upon Payments Should CITY fail to pay CONSULTANT all or any part of the compensation set forth in Article 4 of this Agreement on the date due, then if and only if such nonpayment constitutes a default under this Agreement, CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT'S option, may terminate this Agreement if such default is not remedied by CITY within thirty (30) days after demand for such payment is given by CONSULTANT to CITY. D. Transition after Termination Upon termination, CONSULTANT shall immediately stop work, unless cessation could potentially cause any damage or harm to person or property, in which case CONSULTANT shall cease such work as soon as it is safe to do so. CONSULTANT shall incur no further expenses in connection with this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall promptly deliver to CITY all work done toward completion of the services required hereunder, and shall act in such a manner as to facilitate any the assumption of CONSULTANT's duties by any new consultant hired by the CITY to complete such services. ARTICLE 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Amendment & Modification No amendments, modifications, alterations or changes to the terms of this Agreement shall be effective unless and until made in a writing signed by both parties hereto. B. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Throughout the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall comply fully with all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( "the Act ") in its current form and as it may be amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall also require such compliance of all subcontractors performing work under this Agreement, subject to the prohibition against assignment and subcontracting contained in Article 5 above. The CONSULTANT shall defend with counsel acceptable to CITY, indemnify and hold harmless the CITY OF GILROY, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from and against all suits, claims, demands, damages, costs, causes of action, losses, liabilities, expenses and fees, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees, that may arise out of any violations of the Act by the CONSULTANT, its subcontractors, or the officers, employees, agents or representatives of either. 4835 - 2267 -0361v1 _6_ LAC104706083 C. Attorneys' Fees If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. D. Captions The captions and headings of the various sections, paragraphs and subparagraphs of the Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered nor referred to for resolving questions of interpretation. E. Compliance with Laws The CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of all State and National laws and all municipal ordinances and regulations of the CITY which in any manner affect those engaged or employed in the work, or the materials used in the work, or which in any way affect the conduct of the work, and of all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same. Without limiting the foregoing, CONSULTANT agrees to observe the provisions of the Municipal Code of the CITY OF GILROY, obligating every contractor or subcontractor under a contract or subcontract to the CITY OF GILROY for public works or for goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or subcontracting practices on the basis of the race, color, sex, religious creed, national origin, ancestry of any employee, applicant for employment, or any potential subcontractor. F. Conflict of Interest CONSULTANT certifies that to the best of its knowledge, no CITY employee or office of any public agency interested in this Agreement has any pecuniary interest in the business of CONSULTANT and that no person associated with CONSULTANT has any interest that would constitute a conflict of interest in any manner or degree as to the execution or performance of this Agreement. G. Entire Agreement This Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by CONSULTANT for CITY and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of such services in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. No other agreements or conversation with any officer, agent or employee of CITY prior to execution of this Agreement shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in any documents comprising this Agreement. Such other agreements or conversations shall be considered as unofficial information and in no way binding upon CITY. 4835 - 2267 -0361v1 _�_ LAM04706083 H. Governing Law and Venue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to the conflict of laws provisions of any jurisdiction. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue with respect to any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be in state and federal courts located in Santa Clara County, California. I. Notices Any notice to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be effected either by personal delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing in Exhibit "A ", Section V.H. but each party may change the address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed delivered as of actual receipt; mailed notices will be deemed delivered as of three (3) days after mailing. J. Partial Invalidity If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. K. Time of the Essence All dates and times referred to in this Agreement are of the essence. L. Waiver CONSULTANT agrees that waiver by CITY of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. Executed at Gilroy, California, on the date and year first above written. CONSULTANT: Hatch Mott By: LW f Name: Keith B. Higgins Title: Vice President Social Security or Taxpayer Identification Number 22- 3831806 4835 - 2267 -0361v1 _g_ LAC104706083 CITY: CITY OF GILROY Na c'� Name: Gabriel A. Gonzalez Title: City Administrator Approved as to Form ity Atto ey 4835- 2267M61v1 LAC104706083 -9- EXHIBIT "A" SPECIFIC PROVISIONS I. PROJECT MANAGER CONSULTANT shall provide the services indicated on the attached Exhibit "B ", Scope of Services ( "Services "). (All exhibits referenced are incorporated herein by reference.) To accomplish that end, CONSULTANT agrees to assign Jeff Waller, who will act in the capacity of Project Manager, and who will personally direct such Services. Except as may be specified elsewhere in this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish all technical and professional services including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise to perform all operations necessary and required to complete the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. II. NOTICE TO PROCEED /COMPLETION OF SERVICE A. NOTICE TO PROCEED CONSULTANT shall commence the Services upon delivery to CONSULTANT of a written "Notice to Proceed ", which Notice to Proceed shall be in the form of a written communication from designated City contact person(s). Notice to Proceed may be in the form of e-mail, fax or letter authorizing commencement of the Services. For purposes of this Agreement, Henry Servin and Lisa Gabrielsen shall be the designated City contact person(s). Notice to Proceed shall be deemed to have been delivered upon actual receipt by CONSULTANT or if otherwise delivered as provided in the Section V.H. ( "Notices ") of this Exhibit "A ". B. COMPLETION OF SERVICES When CITY determines that CONSULTANT has completed all of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall give CONSULTANT written Notice of Final Acceptance, and CONSULTANT shall not incur any further costs hereunder. CONSULTANT may request this determination of completion when, in its opinion, it has completed all of the Services as required by the terms of this Agreement and, if so requested, CITY shall make this determination within two (2) weeks of such request, or if CITY determines that CONSULTANT has not completed all of such Services as required by this Agreement, CITY shall so inform CONSULTANT within this two (2) week period. III. PROGRESS SCHEDULE The schedule for performance and completion of the Services will be as set forth in the attached Exhibit "C ". IV. PAYMENT OF FEES AND DIRECT EXPENSES Payments shall be made to CONSULTANT as provided for in Article 4 of this Agreement. 4835 - 2267 -03610 _ 1 LAC104706083 Direct expenses are charges and fees not included in Exhibit "B ". CITY shall be obligated to pay only for those direct expenses which have been previously approved in writing by CITY. CONSULTANT shall obtain written approval from CITY prior to incurring or billing of direct expenses. Copies of pertinent financial records, including invoices, will be included with the submission of billing(s) for all direct expenses. V. OTHER PROVISIONS A. STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, skills and licenses necessary to perform the Services, and its duties and obligations, expressed and implied, contained herein, and CITY expressly relies upon CONSULTANT'S representations and warranties regarding its skills, qualifications and licenses. CONSULTANT shall perform such Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Any plans, designs, specifications, estimates, calculations, reports and other documents furnished under this Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to CITY. The minimum criteria for acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well - organized, technically and grammatically correct, checked and having the maker and checker identified. The minimum standard of appearance, organization and content of the drawings shall be that used by CITY for similar purposes. B. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the coordination of the Services furnished by it under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for the accuracy of any project or technical information provided by the CITY. The CITY'S review, acceptance or payment for any of the Services shall not be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement, and CONSULTANT shall be and remain liable to CITY in accordance with applicable law for all damages to CITY caused by CONSULTANT'S negligent performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement. C. RIGHT OF CITY TO INSPECT RECORDS OF CONSULTANT CITY, through its authorized employees, representatives or agents, shall have the right, at any and all reasonable times, to audit the books and records (including, but not limited to, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, time cards, etc.) of CONSULTANT for the purpose of verifying any and all charges made by CONSULTANT in connection with this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall maintain for a minimum period of three (3) years (from the date of final payment to CONSULTANT), or for any longer period required by law, sufficient books and records in accordance with standard California accounting practices to establish the correctness of all charges submitted to CITY by CONSULTANT, all of which shall be made available to CITY at the CITY's offices within five (5) business days after CITY's request. 4835 - 2267 -0361 v1 _2_ LAC104706083 D. CONFIDENTIALITY OF MATERIAL All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, manufacturing procedures, data (including, but not limited to, computer data and source code), drawings, descriptions, documents, discussions or other information developed or received by or for CONSULTANT and all other written and oral information developed or received by or for CONSULTANT and all other written and oral information submitted to CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by CONSULTANT and shall not, without the prior written consent of CITY, be used for any purposes other than the performance of the Services, nor be disclosed to an entity not connected with the performance of the such Services. Nothing furnished to CONSULTANT which is otherwise known to CONSULTANT or is or becomes generally known to the related industry (other than that which becomes generally known as the result of CONSULTANT'S disclosure thereof) shall be deemed confidential. CONSULTANT shall not use CITY'S name or insignia, or distribute publicity pertaining to the services rendered under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper or other medium without the express written consent of CITY. E. NO PLEDGING OF CITY'S CREDIT. Under no circumstances shall CONSULTANT have the authority or power to pledge the credit of CITY or incur any obligation in the name of CITY. F. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIAL. All material including, but not limited to, computer information, data and source code, sketches, tracings, drawings, plans, diagrams, quantities, estimates, specifications, proposals, tests, maps, calculations, photographs, reports and other material developed, collected, prepared (or caused to be prepared) under this Agreement shall be the property of CITY, but CONSULTANT may retain and use copies thereof subject to Section V.D of this Exhibit "A ". CITY shall not be limited in any way in its use of said material at any time for any work, whether or not associated with the City project for which the Services are performed. However, CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for, and City shall indemnify CONSULTANT from, damages resulting from the use of said material for work other than PROJECT, including, but not limited to, the release of this material to third parties for work other than on PROJECT. G. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY. This Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties, and no third party or parties shall have any claim or right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever. 4835- 2267-0361v1 _3_ LAC104706083 H. NOTICES. Notices are to be sent as follows: CITY: Rick Smelser, City Engineer City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 CONSULTANT: Keith B. Higgins Hatch Mott MacDonald 1300 -B First Street Gilroy, CA 95020 I. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS. ❑ If the box to the left of this sentence is checked, this Agreement involves federal funding and the requirements of this Section V.I. apply. ® If the box to the left of this sentence is checked, this Agreement does not involve federal funding and the requirements of this Section V.I. do not apply. 1. DBE Program CONSULTANT shall comply with the requirements of Title 49, Part 26, Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR 26) and the City- adopted Disadvantaged Business Enterprise programs. 2. Cost Principles Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31, shall be used to determine the allowable cost for individual items. 3. Covenant against Contingent Fees The CONSULTANT warrants that he /she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he /she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Local Agency shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. 4835 - 2267 -0361A LAC104706083 EXHIBIT "B" SCOPE OF SERVICES 4835 - 2267 -0361v1 LAC04706083 M MOTT M MACDONALD Lisa Gabrielsen City of Gilroy Public Works Department 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 Program 1: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SUPPORT COUNCIL APPROVED STAFF REPORTS DATED 3/21/16 AND 5/16/16 RE: Multi -Way Stop Control Warrant Evaluation -- Master Agreement 14- GC— Master Pro4.docx May 25, 2016 1300 -B First Street Gilroy CA 95020 Dear Lisa: United States of America Mott MacDonald (formerly Hatch Mott MacDonald) is pleased to submit this revised T +1 (408) 848 3122 F +1 (408) 848 2202 proposal for transportation - related services for a master agreement for multi -way www.mottmac.com /americas stop warrant evaluation at various intersections within Gilroy, California. This agreement — referred to in the City Council staff report dated May 16, 2016 — covers the evaluation of multi -way stop warrants at a maximum of 14 intersections through the end of the Fiscal Year 2016 -2017. Three of the 14 intersections have been identified at this time (listed in order of priority): 1. Miller Avenue/ San Justo Road; 2. Taryn Lane / Welburn Avenue; and 3. Princevalle Street / Second Street. The remaining 11 intersections will be determined at a later date by the City of Gilroy. Mott MacDonald will include an overall recommendation and its approaches regarding improvement options at the intersections. A. Scope of Work The Multi -Way Stop Control Warrant contained within the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014 CA MUTCD) can be evaluated based upon the following four sets of criteria: 1) Meeting a signal warrant; 2) Collision history; 3) Vehicle and pedestrian volumes; and 4) Other Criteria (i.e. left turn activity, vehicle /pedestrian conflicts, sight distance restrictions or streets of similar function and characteristics). Each of the 14 intersections will be evaluated using the above criteria. The proposed scope of work for each warrant evaluation is as follows: MTask 1: Data Collection MVehicle, pedestrian and bicycle traffic movement volumes will be collected over a MOTT 12 -hour period at the study intersection on a weekday between 7:00 AM and 7:00 MACDONALD PM. From these counts, the eight hours with the highest traffic volumes will be identified, for use in the warrant evaluation. A site visit will also be performed at the study intersection, in order to assess any existing issues at the intersection that may influence the need for multi -way stop control. Particular attention will be paid to available vehicle and pedestrian sight distance at the intersection. Task 2: Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation — Volumes The traffic volumes from each of the eight highest hours (as identified in Task 1) will be averaged and compared to the volume thresholds identified in the 2012 CA MUTCD Multi -Way Stop warrant. In addition, level of service operations will be evaluated during the highest one -hour period of the day and compared to the delay threshold. If the average of all eight hours meets the thresholds and the peak hour delay on either leg of the minor street exceeds the delay threshold, the warrant will be declared as met. Task 3: Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation — Collision History A minimum of two years (preferably three years) of the most recent collision history available will be obtained from the City of Gilroy for the study intersection. The types and causes of said collisions will be tabulated and reviewed to identify if the types of collisions specified in the 2012 CA MUTCD occurred at the required frequency. If the collision history meets the required frequency, the warrant will be declared as met. Note: If insufficient collision data is available, this task will not be performed. Task 4: Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation — Other Criteria The other four criteria will be evaluated as applicable. This includes: 1) Left Turn Activity — evaluating whether the addition of multi -way stop control would help to control any existing left turn conflicts; 2) Vehicle /Pedestrian Conflicts — evaluating whether the addition of multi -way stop control would help to control any vehicle /pedestrian conflicts if the volume of crossing pedestrians is high; 3) Sight Distance — evaluating whether the addition of multi -way stop control is a viable method to compensate for poor side- street sight distance; and 4) Similar Streets — evaluating whether the two intersecting streets are both neighborhood collector streets of similar design and operating characteristics If any of these four criteria are found to be met, the warrant will be declared as met. Task 5: Documentation The study results and conclusions will be summarized in a technical memorandum, including appropriate graphics. This will include an overall recommendation and its approaches regarding improvement options at the intersection. The memorandum will be initially submitted to you for your review. Your comments will be incorporated into a revised memorandum for your use. Lisa Gabrielsen I May 25, 2016 1 Page 2of4 MNote: Responses to comments from the general public are not included within this Mscope of work, but can be prepared for an additional fee. MOTT Not Included MACDONALD Not included in the above scope of work are additional analysis beyond what are specifically outlined above, additional analysis required by any governmental agency, attendance at any project - related meetings (including project meetings, public hearings, Planning Commission meetings, or City Council meetings), evaluation of truck turning templates, design of any roadway feature or traffic control device, cost estimates for recommended mitigation measures or design alternatives, more than five copies of any draft of the project documentation, or any other task not specifically described in the scope of work. Any additional work required to that described under the Scope of Services above will be considered extra work. Receipt of written authorization for any additional work beyond our Scope of Services will be required prior to performing any additional work beyond what is specifically described in this proposal. B. Budget The "Not -to- Exceed" cost to perform the scope of work described above is $4,680 per intersection, or "Not -to- Exceed" $65,520 for the entire agreement, i.e. all 14 intersections. A sample fee estimate for each intersection evaluation is included as Attachment A. We are prepared to start work on this project immediately upon receipt of authorization to proceed. C. Schedule Attachment B provides an anticipated sample timeline for completion of a multi - way warrant evaluation at a single intersection. It is estimated that it will take approximately three to four weeks to complete an evaluation and provide a draft report summarizing our findings. The final report will be provided within one week of receiving comments from the City of Gilroy. Note that delays in this schedule may occur pending timely receipt necessary data — such as intersection collision data — and the time of year. D. Terms of Agreement The terms of this agreement would be subject to the agreement between the City of Gilroy and Hatch Mott MacDonald (Mott MacDonald), of which this scope of work would become an amendment to said agreement. Lisa Gabrielsen I May 25, 2016 1 Page 3 of 4 M MOTT M MACDONALD Lisa Gabrielsen I May 25, 2016 1 Page 4 of 4 E. Conclusion If you have any questions regarding the contents of this proposal or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Jeff Waller. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this proposal or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Jeff Waller at your convenience. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Respectfully submitted, Ig g Keith B. Higgins, PE, TE Vice President T T +1 (408) 848 3122 F 1+ (408) 848 2202 keith.higgins @mottmac.com kbh:jmw enclosures EXHIBIT "C" MILESTONE SCHEDULE 4835 -2267 -0361 v1 LAC\04706083 Attachment B PROGRAM 1: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SUPPORT Multi -Way Stop Control Warrant - Master Agreement Gilroy, CA Sample Schedule (per Intersection) Submitted by Mott MacDonald May 25, 2016 Project Work Task (per Intersection) Estimated Duration Data Collection (Task 1) 1 Week Analysis (Tasks 2 -4) 1 -2 Weeks Draft Report (Task 5A) 1 Week Total (Draft Report): 3 -4 Weeks Final Report (Task 5B) 1 week (after receive city comments) Note: Duration of tasks may vary, depending on timely receipt of necessary data (e.g. collision history) and time of year. 14-GC—Master Schedule_Sample2.xls EXHIBIT "D" PAYMENT SCHEDULE 4835 - 2267 -0361 A LAC104706083 Attachment A PROGRAM 1: TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN SUPPORT Multi -Way Stop Control Warrant - Master Agreement Gilroy, CA Fee Estimate Submitted by Mott MacDonald May 25, 2016 Project Work Task (per intersection) Personnel and Hourly Billing Rates Total Hours Traffic count Lump Sum Total Fee vice President Project Engineer $285 $155 1. Data Collection Traffic Counts 1 1 $750 $905 Field Visit 1.5 1.5 $233 2. Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation - Volumes 0.5 4 4.5 $763 3. Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation - Collision History 0.5 4 4.5 $763 4. Multi -Way Stop Warrant Evaluation - Other Criteria 0.5 2 2.5 $453 5. Documentation Draft 0.5 6 6.5 $1,073 Final 0.5 2 2.5 $453 Total Hours : 2.5 20.5 23 $4,640 Staff Expenses : $713 1 $3,178 1 23 1 $750 1 $4,640 Travel Expenses : Printin , Shi in ,etc.: $10 $30 Total Costs (per intersection): $4,680 Total Costs (14 intersections): $65,520 14-GC—Master Budget_Sample2.xls Hourly Rate Schedule Chris Metzger Principal -in- Charge Keith Higgins Principal Project Manager Raj Murthy Principal Project Manager Richard Davies Principal Project Manager Chwen Slripocanont Principal Project Manager (QA /QC) Mike Canepa Principal Project Manager Leo Trujillo _ Principal Engineer Scotf Hensler Senior Project Manager (Quality) Moe Amini Principal Project Manager (Structural) Bob Wilson Principal Engineer (Systems) Brian Hughes _ Senior Specialist (Estimating) Dan Takacs Senior Traffic Engineer (Specialist) Jon Elson ITS /Technology Brian Wiedmann Senior Project Engineer (Structural/6 Bill Baker I Senior Project Engineer Yvonne Liao Senior Project Engineer Margaret Parkhill Senior Project Engineer Allen N_ le _ Senior Traffic Engineer (Modeler) Shruti Malik _ Senior Traffic Engineer Christoffer Brodbaek _Senior Project Manager(Geotechnical) Ravi Narayanan Traffic Modeler Ali Shahabl Senior Design Engineer Lori Weiss Surveying/Base Mapping Russell Thompson Senior Project Engineer Celina Lee Design Engineer Renee Cranford Design Engineer Katie Chou Design Engineer Jeff Waller Traffic Engineer Jason Nesdahl Traffic Engineer $295 $285 $285 $285 $285 $250 $215 $270 $212 $192 $192 $21_ 5 $205 $205 $200 $195 $175 $1 165 Julie Oates Traffic Engineer $155 Amy H_enschka Civil Engineer $105 Me Kirk yer Civil Engineer $105 EMC Planning Group Terri Wissler Adam Environmental $210 • Janet Kan Geotechnical $220 Hanna : Brunetti John Brunetti Land Surveyor $165 Reza Hossein! ITS/Technology Lead Daniel Cossack ITS /Technology (Software/Systems) Mehran Hadipour ITS/Technology (Hardware /Comm) Allison Daniels Right-of-Way CITY OF GILROY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL STUDIES SUPPORT SERMES - NO.16- RFP -PW -386 $185 $180 $155 Bruce Brubaker John Hykes Seung Yen Hong Bob Van Boening 1 Bob Van Boenin g Complete Streets, Bike & Pedestrian Planning, Urban Design Landscape Architecture Complete Streets, Bike & Pedestrian Planning, Urban Design Two -Hour Intersection Turning Movement Count - Vehicles, Bicycles and Pedestrians 24 -Hour Pneumatic Hose Volume Count $180 $165 $135 $175 Michelle Wendler Parking Studies $265 *Hourly rates are effective through December 31, 2016 and are subject to annual increases that are generally in line with CPI increases * *Additional subconsultant support staff maybe utilized depending on each task /project need. Those hourly rates can be provided upon request. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL STUDIES SUPPORTSERVCIES —NO. 16- RFP -PW -386 �' HATCMOT -01 SHETTYSHT CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE 5/(MMIDD (MM /DD/YYYY) 6 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Willis of New Jersey, Inc. Go 26 Century Blvd P.O. Box 305191 NAME: Willis Towers Watson Certificate Center PHONE 877 g45 -7378 AX (A'C' No Ell: ( ) AC No): (888) 467 -2378 EMAIL S: cerbficates@willis.com Nashville, TN 37230 -5191 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURER (S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAC # INSURER A: Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company 25615 $ 1,000,00 INSURED INSURER B: Hartford Fire Insurance Company 19682 Hatch Mott MacDonald, LLC INSURER c: Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest 37478 INSURER D: Underwriters at Lloyd's London 115792 111 Wood Avenue South Iselin, NJ 08830 -4112 INSURER E: MED EXP (Any one person) INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM1DDlYWY POLICY EXP MMlDD/YYYY LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,00 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR X 630 - 98510634- COF -15 06/30/2015 06/30/2016 PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 1,000.00 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,00 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,00 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,00 POLICY a JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP /OPAGG $ 2,000,00 $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT a Ea ccident $ 1,000,00 B X ANY AUTO X 13UENVY8062 06/30/2015 06/30/2016 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE DED RETENTION $ $ C WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y� OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) N/A X 13WBBY3692 06/30/2015 06/30/2016 X PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,00 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,00 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1 ,000,00 D Professional Liab B080120388P1 06130/2015 06/30/2016 Per Occurrence /Agg: 1,000,00 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Division #WSC /SBA. Re: HMM Project No. 372692 Gilroy AWSC Warrants 2016. For the State of California Insurer A: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America - NAIC #25674. City of Gilroy, its employees, officers, officials, and volunteers are included as Additional Insureds as respects to General Liability and Auto Liability as per written contract or agreement. SEE ATTACHED ACORD 101 I C 1-9VLUMM SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street ©1988 -2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AGENCY CUSTOMER ID: HATCMOT -01 SHETTYSHT LOC #: 1 ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page 1 of 1 AGENCY NAMEDINSURED Willis of New Jersey, Inc. Hatch Mott MacDonald, LLC 111 Wood Avenue South Iselin, NJ 08830 -4112 POLICY NUMBER EE PAGE 1 CARRIER NAIC CODE EE PAGE 1 SEE P 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: SEE PAGE 1 AUUI I IUNAL THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: ACORD 25 FORM TITLE: Certificate of Liability Insurance Description of Operations /LocationsNehicles: General Liability and Auto Liability policies shall be Primary and Non - Contributory with any other insurance in force for or which may be purchased by Additional Insureds as agreed to by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation applies in favor of Additional Insureds with respects to Worker's Compensation as agreed to by written contract for all states and as permitted by law. ACORD 101 (2008/01) 0008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Policy Number: 630- 9B510634 -COF Effective: 6/30/2015- 6/30/2016 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. INSURER AMENDMENT ENDORSEMENT THIS ENDORSEMENT MODIFIES INSURANCE_ PROVIDED UNDER THE COVERAGE PART(S) INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE BELOW. SCHEDULE= This endorsement applies to the following Coverage Part(s): All Coverage Parts forming a part of this policy. The Coverage Part(s) shown below. State Insurer Coverage Parts (if "Alf' is not applicable) CA (TIL) Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement. When indicated in the State column, "— shall mean "ail other states'.) PROVISIONS: The insuring company abbreviation(s) shown in Item 4 or the Common Policy Declarations islare replaced with the abbreviation(s) shown above for the respective state(s) and Coverage Part(s) shown above. IL T3 05 12 99 Page 1 of 1 Policy Number: 630 - 96510634 -COF Effective: 6/30/2015- 6/30/2016 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY- PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED - WRITTEN CONTRACTS (ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS) This endorsement modif;es insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART 1. The following is added to SECTION 11 - WHO IS AN INSURED: Any person or organization that you agree in a "\4 itten contract requiring insurance" to include as an additional insured on this Coverage Part, but; a. Only with respect to Lability for " bodily injury ", "property damage" or "personal injury"; and b. If, and only to the orient that the injury or damage is caused by acts or omissions of you or your subcontractor in the performance of "your work" to which the "written contract requiring insurance" applies. The person or organization does not qualify as an additional insured with respect to the independent acts or omissions of such perscn or organization. The insurance provided to such additional insured is limited as follows: c. In the event that the Limits of Insurance of this Coverage Part shown in the Declarations exceed the limns of liability required by the "written contract requiring insurance ", the in- surance provided to the additional Insured shall be limited to the limits of liability required by that "written contract requiring insurance". This endorsement shall not increase the limits of insurance described in Section III - Limits Of Insurance. d. This insurance does not apply to the render- plies only to such "bodily injury" or "property damage" that occurs before the end of the pe- riod of time for which the "written contract re- qulring insurance" requires you to provide such coverage or the end of the policy period, whichever is earlier. 2. The following is added to Paragraph 4.a, of SEC- TION IV - COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS: The insurance provided to the additional insured -mss- �ceess- over -2rty- valid- and- �o}ieetfblr"ot#ter --tn- surance ", whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the addi- tional insured for a loss we cover. However, if you specifically agree in the "written contract requiring insurance" that this insurance provided to the ad- ditional insured under this Coverage Part must apply on a primary basis or a primary and non- contributory basis, this insurance is primary to "other insurance" available to the additional in- sured which covers that person orornaniz_ation as a named insured for such loss, and we will not share with that "other insurance ", But this insur- ance provided to the additional insured still is ex- cess over any valid and collectible "other insur- ance", whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the additional insured when that person or organization is an additional insured under any 'other insurance ". ing of or failure to render any "professional 3. The following is added to SECTION IV - COM- services" or construction management errors MERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS: or omisslons. Duties Of An Additional Insured e. This insurance does not apply to 'bodily in- As a condition of coverage provided to the addi- _°— jury" cr "property damage" caused I y "your tienal insured: work" and included in the 'products a- The additional insured must ire us written completed operations hazard' unless the g "written contract requiring insurance' specifi- notice as soon as practicable of an "occur- cally requires you to provide such coverage rence" or an offense which may result in a for that additional insured, and then the insur- claim. To the extent possible, such notice ance provided to the additional insured ap- should include: CG D4 14 04 118 © 2006 The Travelers Companies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 C03753 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY i. Hew, when and where the "occurrence" or offense took place; ii. The names and addresses of any injured persons and witnesses; and iii. The nature and location of any injury or damage arising out of the "occurrence" or offense. b. If a claim is made or "suit" is brought against the additional insured, the additional insured must: i. Immediately record the specifics of the claim or "suit" and the date received; and n. Notify us as soon as practicable_ The additional insured must see to it that we receive written notice of the claim or "suit" as soon as practicable. c. The additional insured must immediately send us copies of all legal papers received In con- nection with the claim or "suit ", cooperate with us in the investigation or settlement of the claim or defense against the "suit ", and oth- erwise comply with ali.policy r-ondi`Inns d. The additional insured must tender the de- fense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to any provider of other insurance which would cover the additional insured for a toss we cover_ However, this condition does not affect whether this insurance provided to the addi- tional insured is primary to that other Insur- ance available to the additional insured which covers that person or organization as a named insured. 4_ The following is added to the DEFINITIONS Sec- tion. "Written contract requiring insurance" means that part of any written contract or agreement under which you are required to include a person or or- ganization as an additional insured on this Cover- age Part, provided that the `bodily injury" and .property damage" occurs and the "personal in- jury" is caused by an offense committed: a. After the signing and execution of the contract or agreement by you; b. While that part of the contract or agreement is in effect; and c. Before the end offhe po�ic�p_epi?d�..�_..�____ Page 2 of 2 @ 2008 The Travelers Companies, Inc. CG D4 14 04 08 POLICY NUMBER: 630- 9B510634 -COF Effective: 6130/2015- 6/30/2016 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EARLIER NOTICE OF CAN CELLATIONMONRENEWAL PROVIDED BY US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: ALL COVERAGE PARTS INCLUDED IN THIS POLICY SCHEDULE CANCELLATION: Number of Days Notice: 30 WHEN WE DO NOT RENEW (Nonrenewal): PROVISIONS: A. For any statutorily permitted reason other than nonpayment of premium, the number of days re- quired for notice of cancellation, as provided in the CONDITIONS Section of this insurance, or as amended by any applicable state cancellation endorsement applicable to this insurance, is in- creased to the number of days shown in the SCHEDULE above. Number of days Notice: 30 B. For any statutorily permitted reason other than nonpayment of premium, the number of days re- quired for notice of When We Do Not Renew (Nonrenewal), as provided in the CONDITIONS Section of this insurance, or as amended by any applicable state When We Do Not Renew (Nonrenewal) endorsement applicable to this in- surance, is increased to the number of days shown in the SCHEDULE above. IL T3 20 09 97 Copyright, The Travelers Indemnity Company, 1997 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: 13 UEN VY8062 Effective: 6/30/2015 - 6/30/2016 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER(S) This policy is subject to the following additional Conditions: A. If this policy is cancelled by the Company, other than for nonpayment of premium, notice of such cancellation will be provided at least thirty (30) days in advance of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company. B. If this policy is cancelled by the Company for nonpayment of premium, or by the insured, notice of such cancellation will be provided within (10) days of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company. If notice is mailed, proof of mailing to the last known mailing address of the certificate holder(s) on file with the agent of record or the Company will be sufficient proof of notice. Any notification rights provided by this endorsement apply only to active certificate holder(s) who were issued a certificate of insurance applicable to this policy's term. Failure to provide such notice to the certificate holder(s) will not amend or extend the date the cancellation becomes effective, nor will it negate cancellation of the policy. Failure to send notice shall impose no liability of any kind upon the Company or its agents or representatives. Form IH 03 13 06 11 Page 1 of 1 2011, The Hartford THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER(S) Policy Number: 13WBBY3692 Effective Date: 6/30/2015 Effective hour is the same as stated on the Information Page of the policy. Named Insured and Address: HATCH MOTT MACDONALD GROUP INC 111 WOOD AVENUE SOUTH ISELIN NJ This policy is subject to the following additional Conditions: A. If this policy is cancelled by the Company, other than for non - payment of premium, notice of such cancellation will be provided at least thirty (30) days in advance of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company. B. If this policy is cancelled by the Company for non - payment of premium, or by the insured, notice of such cancellation will be provided within ten (10) days of the cancellation effective date to the certificate holder(s) with mailing addresses on file with the agent of record or the Company. Form WC 99 03 94 Printed in U.S.A. If notice is mailed, proof of mailing to the last known mailing address of the certificate holder(s) on file with the agent of record or the Company will be sufficient proof of notice. Any notification rights provided by this endorsement apply only to active certificate holder(s) who were issued a certificate of insurance applicable to this policy's term. Failure to provide such notice to the certificate holder(s) will not amend or extend the date the cancellation becomes effective, nor will it negate cancellation of the policy. Failure to send notice shall impose no liability of any kind upon the Company or its agents or representatives. © 2011, The Hartford Policy Number #B080120388P15 Effective: 6/30/2015 Endorsement No 6 CANCELLATION If the Company cancel this policy prior to its expiry date by notice to the Insured for any reason, the Company will send written notice of cancellation to the persons or organisations listed in the schedule to be created and maintained by the Insured (the "Cancellation Notice Schedule ") at least 30 days prior to the cancellation date applicable to the policy. This notice will be in addition to any notice to the Insured. The Insured will provide an updated copy of the Cancellation Notice Schedule to the Company on a monthly basis. The notice referenced in this endorsement is intended only to be a courtesy notification to the person(s) or organisation(s) named in the Cancellation Notice Schedule in the event of a pending cancellation of coverage. The Company has no legal obligation of any kind to any such person(s) or organisation(s). Any failure to provide advance notice of cancellation to the person(s) or organisation(s) named in the Cancellation Notice Schedule will impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the Company, will not extend any policy cancellation date and will not negate any cancellation of the policy. The Company are not responsible for verifying any information in any Cancellation Notice Schedule, nor is the Company responsible for any incorrect information that the Insured may use. Section 11 - HMM 2015 wording Policy Number. 630 - 96510634 -COF COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Effective: 6/30/2015- 6/30/2016 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED (CONTRACTORS) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ORGANIZATION(S): CITY OF GILROY, IT'S OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES 7351 ROSANNA STREET GILROY, CA 95020 1. WHO IS AN INSURED - (Section II) is amended b) The insurance provided to the additional in- to include the person or organization shown in the sured does not apply to "bodily injury", "pro; - = Schedule above, but: erty damage" or "personal injury" arising out -O a) Only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", of the rendering of, or failure to render, any �= "property damage" or "personal injury"; and professional architectural, engineering or sur- veying services, including: =_ b) If, and only to the extent that, the injury or °— damage is caused by acts or omissions of 1. The preparing, approving, or failing to °= you or your subcontractor in the performance prepare or approve, maps, shop draw of "your work" on or for the project, or at the prep, opinions, reports, surveys, field or- u location, shown in the Schedule. The person dens or change orders, the preparing, or organization does not qualify as an addi- approving, or failing to prepare or ap- tional insured with respect to the independent prove, drawings and specifications; and °- acts or omissions of such person or organiza- ii. Supervisory, inspection, architectural or tion. engineering activities. 2. The insurance provided to the additional insured c) The insurance provided to the additional in- by this endorsement is limited as follows: sured does not apply to "bodily injury" or ° —_ a) In the event that the Limits of Insurance of "property damage" caused by "your work" this Coverage Part shown in the Declarations and included in the "products- completed op- °— exceed the limits of liability required by a erations hazard" unless a "written contract �= "written contract requiring insurance" for that requiring insurance" specifically requires you additional insured, the insurance provided to to provide such coverage for that additional the additional insured shall be limited to the insured, and then the insurance provided to limits of liability required by that "written con- the additional insured applies only to such ° tract requiring insurance ". This endorsement "bodily injury" or "property damage" that oc- shall not increase the limits of insurance de- curs before the end of the period of time for scribed in Section III - Limits Of Insurance. which the "written contract requiring insur- ance" requires you to provide such coverage 000576 CG D2 47 08 05 ® 2005 The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY or the end of the policy period, whichever is earlier. 3. The insurance provided to the additional insured by this endorsement is excess over any valid and collectible 'other insurance ", whether primary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the additional insured for a loss we cover under this endorsement. However, if a "written contract requiring insurance" for that ad- ditional insured specifically requires that this in- surance apply on a primary basis or a primary and non - contributory basis, this insurance is pri- mary to 'other insurance" available to the addi- tional insured which covers that person or organi- zation as a named insured for such loss, and we will not share with that 'other insurance ". But the insurance provided to the additional insured by this endorsement still is excess over any valid and collectible 'other insurance ", whether pri- mary, excess, contingent or on any other basis, that is available to the additional insured when that person or organization is an additional in- sured under such 'other insurance ". 4. As a condition of coverage provided to the additional insured by this endorsement: a) The additional insured must give us written notice as soon as practicable of an "occur- rence" or an offense which may result in a claim. To the extent possible, such notice should include: i. How, when and where the 'occurrence" or offense took place; ii. The names and addresses of any injured persons and witnesses; and iii. The nature and location of any injury or damage arising out of the 'occurrence" or offense. b) If a claim is made or "suit' is brought against the additional insured, the additional insured must: I. Immediately record the specifics of the claim or "suit" and the date received; and ii. Notify us as soon as practicable. The additional insured must see to it that we receive written notice of the claim or "suit" as soon as practicable. c) The additional insured must immediately send us copies of all legal papers received in connection with the claim or "suit ", cooperate with us in the investigation or settlement of the claim or defense against the "suit ", and otherwise comply with all policy conditions. d) The additional insured must tender the de- fense and indemnity of any claim or "suit" to any provider of 'other insurance" which would cover the additional insured for a loss we cover under this endorsement. However, this condition does not affect whether the insur- ance provided to the additional insured by this endorsement is primary to 'other insur- ance" available to the additional insured which covers that person or organization as a named insured as described in paragraph 3. above. S. The following definition is added to SECTION V. — DEFINITIONS: "Written contract requiring insurance" means that part of any written contract or agreement under which you are required to include a person or organization as an additional in- sured on this Coverage Part, provided that the "bodily injury" and "property damage" oc- curs and the "personal injury" is caused by an offense committed: a. After the signing and execution of the contract or agreement by you; b. While that part of the contract or agreement is in effect; and c. Before the end of the policy period. Page 2 of 2 ® 2005 The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. CG D2 47 08 05 M MOTT M MACDONALD Date: 7/1/2016 Henry Servin, P.E., City Engineer City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 -6197 Dear Mr. Servin, Mott MacDonald 181 Metro Drive, Suite 510 San Jose, CA 95110 T 408.572.8800 www.mottmac.com We are pleased to provide our list of staff positions that we will make available immediately for an initial task order with City of Gilroy as part of Traffic Engineering Design and Operational Studies Support Services No. 16- RFP -PW -386, Program 6. The work will be related to the High Speed Rail elements that have to do with: • Alignments • Profiles • Undercrossings / overcrossings • Utility relocations • Roadway sections The roles in the attachment are from the Hourly Rate Schedule of Mott MacDonald staff in our proposal (No.16- RFP -PW -386). Should City of Gilroy desire additional positions to be filled by our firm or by sub - consultants or should you want to modify this list we are available to make those changes. 1 M MMott MacDonald MOTT 181 Metro Drive, Suite 510 MACDONALD San Jose, CA 95110 T 408.572.8800 www.mottmac.com We are also aware that you are interested in our experience with highway /railroad overcrossings and highway interchanges where Caltrans is involved, specifically our capabilities in preparing and dealing with Project Study Reports (PSR's) the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAED) and Project Reports (PR's). Please see the attached resumes of our local staff members with many years of experience on multiple Caltrans projects. This is a selection of individuals who can offer their experience specific to the Caltrans project development policies and procedures. Mott MacDonald can provide support staff from approximately 100 employees in the San Francisco Bay Area, 70 of which are local to the South Bay. I would look forward to meeting with you to discuss how Mott MacDonald might be of service to the City of Gilroy for future projects involving the Caltrans PSR /PAED /PR process. If you have any questions or need further information please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chris Metzger Mott MacDonald Vice President/South Bay Area Manager Attachment Rates Escalated annually per CPI July 1- Dec. Jan. 1- Dec. 31 Jan. 1- July 30 31 2016 2017 2018 Staff Classifications /Roles Principal -in- Charge $295 $304 $313 Senior Project Manager (Quality) $270 $278 $286 Principal Project Manager (Rail) $250 $258 $265 Principal Engineer (Roadway) $215 $221 $228 Senior Traffic Engineer (Modeler) $215 $221 $228 Senior Project Engineer (Rail) $212 $218 $225 Senior Traffic Engineer $205 $211 $217 Traffic Modeler $200 $206 $212 Senior Design Engineer $195 $201 $207 Senior Project Engineer $168 $173 $178 Design Engineer $165 $170 $175 Traffic Engineer $155 $160 $164 Structural Engineer $130 $134 $138 Civil Engineer $105 $108 $111 Hatch Mott AF MacDonald Chris Metzger, PE, LEE®® AP Education Experience Summary MS, Civil /Structural Engineering, Stanford University, CA, 1985 Mr, Metzger has more than 30 years of experience in transportation, water resources and structural engineering p lannin g, design, construction. He is an experienced Project and Program Manager and BS, Civil Engineering, is a LEED Certified Professional. Chris' technical expertise covers a wide range of projects California Polytechnic State University, San including transit/rail, highway, flood control, public works, and multimodal facilities. He has Luis Obispo, 1981 extensive experience working with Federal, State and local agencies on high - profile projects. He has served in technical, Project Manager and Principal in Charge roles. Registration Professional Engineer Recent major efforts have included serving as Highway Program Manager for Santa Clara Valley CA, C40947,1986 Transportation Authority (VTA), overseeing the development of a $600M Express Lane Program HI, CE- 13321, 2009 and a variety of transportation projects financed with Federal, State and local agency funds. Chris Leadership in Energy and was the Engineering Manager for VTA's $2.3B SVBX BART extension to San Jose during the Environmental Design development and startup.of the $780M C700 Design Build package to design and construct the Line, (LEED) Accredited Track, Systems and Stations for this 10 mile heavy rail extension. Chris was the Design Manager for Professional, 2004 a Design Build pursuit for a $400M Light Rail project in Honolulu in 2009. Years In Practice - 30 In his various roles of managed technical staff of up to 160 personnel over the last 15 years, Mr. Metzger has served as Principal in Charge on transportation, water resources and public works Memberships projects throughout Northern California. Often Chris assumes the role of public outreach coordinator American Public Works and has frequently presented at public meetings; to City Councils and special district Boards. As Association (APWA) Project Manager, Chris has been directly responsible for planning and design of major new transit Fellow and freeway facilities, design of new and maintenance of existing roadways; pedestrian and bicycle American Society of Civil facilities including park trails and urban paths with grade crossings; park improvements including Engineers (ASCE) grading, drainage, and parking; flood control and water storm drain studies; and utility upgrade and Consulting Engineers and rehabilitation. Land Surveyors of California (CELSOC) Mr. Metzger has filled the role of campus engineer for San Jose State University, acted as Town San Jose / Silicon Valley Engineer for the Town of Portola Valley, and provided program management services for Santa Chamber of Commerce Clara County, San Francisco, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, and Mann County. Mr. American Road & Metzger's transportation planning and engineering assignments have included projects in Santa Transportation Builders Clara, San Mateo, Sonoma, San Luis Obispo, Sacramento, Calaveras, Colusa, Tuolumne, Marin, Association (ARTBA) Stanislaus and Santa Barbara counties. Selected Project Experience Highway Program Management, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Santa Clara County, CA Highway Program Manager. As the Highway Program Manager for VTA, Chris oversaw the development and construction of the VTA's highway program. This program consists of the development (preliminary engineering and environmental documentation) of the $600M Express Lane Program to convert and expand the HOV/Express Lane system on Highways 237, 101 and 85, implementation of regionally funded freeway performance improvements, and locally sponsored transportation improvements. Efforts include conceptual studies, Preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, and construction management/oversight. Silicon Valley BART Extension to Berryessa (SVBX) Project, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Santa Clara County, CA Engineering Manager. Providing design management oversight services for the VTA for the guideway, stations and campuses for the 10 mile extension of the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) from Wane Springs to Berryessa Road just north of Highway 101 in San Jose. Services include oversight of multiple design firms in the development of preliminary engineering, Environmental Clearance, Right of Way acquisition; Utility Relocation; oversight for the technical development of the two new Station Campuses (Milpitas and Benyessa) and affiliated roadways, transit centers, surface parking and Parking Garages; preparation of the technical elements of the solicitation documents for the $800 M contract for the 10 mile Line, Track, Systems and Stations C700 Design Build Contract; development and implementation of the design review process; and technical coordination within VTA's multiple disciplines as well as local and/or stakeholder agencies. Hatch Mott Chris Metzger, PE, LEED® AP MacDonald Page 2 Among the many complex aspects of this project, multiple on -going coordination efforts with BART, the Cities of Fremont, Milpitas and San Jose, and the SCVWD are required to ensure proper development of the transit facility while addressing impacts to existing facilities such as roadways, utilities, existing flood plains, creek improvements, new bridges and outfalls. Critical activities for which Mr. Metzger was directly involved in to mitigate VTA's risk and maintain overall project schedule included the first year (2011) construction of the realignment, expansion and reconfiguration of Upper Penitencia Creek to provide mitigation for all 10 miles of the project; relocation of over 6 miles of MCI and Chevron utilities to clear the BART alignment; relocation of SCVWD's 42" Milpitas Pipeline and 66" Central Pipeline. Technical coordination efforts also include: acquisition of over 100 different properties; relocation and/or impact mitigation for 20 different utility owners, adherence to environmental mitigations related to cultural, biological, traffic, sound and vibration impacts. Silicon Valley BART Extension to Downtown San Jose/Santa Clara (SVSX) Project, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Santa Clara County, CA Providing Engineering support services for the environmental re- evaluation of the planned 6 mile extension of BART from Berryessa Station (under construction) to downtown San Jose and Santa Clara. Multiple alternatives are being developed to assess the financial viability and consider fundable options for the next phase of the overall SVRT BART to San Jose program. Route 85/101 (1) Interchange Complex Reconstruction, VTA, Mountain View, CA Project Manager for $140 million signature highway project of Santa Clara County's 1996 Measure A/B program. Team prepared Project Study Report (PSR), Project Report (PR) (including preliminary engineering) and final PS &E for reconfigured freeway to freeway interchange complex (includes four separate interchanges within 1.5 miles) and constructed HOV direct connection flyovers. Active pedestrian, bicycle and aesthetic groups were engaged. Project required strong project management skills employing complete process knowledge, local agency relationships, and planning skills, allowing project to progress from concept through construction and meet VTA's aggressive schedule and budget. PANED Route 1 Widening/HOV Project, Santa Cruz County Transportation Commission ( SCCRTC), Santa Cruz County, CA Project Manager for Preliminary Engineering leading to Project Approvals ( PA/ED), environmental technical studies, and preparation of Project Report and Environmental Document for proposed mobility improvements along Route 1 corridor south of Morrissey Boulevard in Santa Cruz County. Nine -mile stretch of 1960s vintage highway includes nine interchanges, seven waterway crossings; local road overcrossings, two UPRR crossings, and multiple frontage roads. Project cost is $400 million. Two alternatives under consideration are addition of HOV lanes for full nine miles, or addition or ramp metering and auxiliary lanes (TSM alternative). Complex project management efforts included extensive coordination with local agencies, multiple Caltrans entities (Districts 5 & 59, HQ and Central Region, planning, engineering and environmental branches) in order to develop acceptable approaches for this high profile project for Santa Cruz community. Also provided quarterly updates to and communicated directly with 12- member commission, and was point person for integrated public outreach effort. Flexible project development approach and high quality engineering performed helped SCCRTC secure CMIA funds for independent utility project within footprint of corridor. Separate environmental clearance and project development effort for $16 million project has met aggressive deadlines and remained within budget. Express Lane Traffic and Revenue Study, Transportation Authority of Marin (TAM), Marin County, CA Project Manager. Provided.Project Management support for TAM's study to assess the viability of implementing Express Lanes on Highway 101 in Marin County. Supported TAM in their coordination efforts with Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) during the early development of the overall Express Lane program for the San Francisco Bay Area. Worked integrally with TAM staff to prepare an RFP to perform a county focused study, participated in the selection of the consultant to perform the study, and actively monitored progress and managed the consultant as the study progressed. Services included update reports to the Board and organization of Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and focus groups to ensure public input was incorporated into the study. / Hatch Mott Chris Metzger, PE, LEED® AP MacDonald Page 3 Prado Road/Route 101 PSR, City of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA Project Manager. Prepare PSR for new interchange on US 101 south of Madonna Road. Moffett Gateway Access Study, City of Mountain View, Santa Clara County, CA Project Manager for this study supporting the City of Mountain View to assess opportunities to acquire a remnant parcel from Caltrans and create a developable parcel. Major issue for the study revolved around potential access from Moffett Blvd to the site, which is currently severely restricted due to historic Caltrans access control limits. Worked closely with City planning and Caltrans District 4 to identify and analyze options acceptable to both entities. Sustainable Transportation and Access Rating System (STARS) Development Provided Peer Review services to a team developing a rating system for assessing and influencing the future development of sustainable transportation facilities. Effort focused on engaging sustainable approaches during the planning phases of projects to assess long term impacts of the project on accessibility and versatility. I -680/1 -880 Cross Connector Study, VTA, Santa Clara/Alameda Counties, CA Project Manager for study with collaboration with Alameda County, City of Fremont, City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County and Caltrans. Transportation network in eight mile long, one mile wide corridor experiences congestion resulting from traffic coming from north and south I -680 into Golden Triangle area of Silicon Valley. Extensive traffic analysis and conceptual geometric analysis of over 100 project alternatives resulted in recommendation for over $500 million in cross connector improvements on six separate east -west corridors to distribute and manage heavy demand in area. Balanced plan was approved by all agencies involved and projects are being implemented by local sponsors as funding becomes available. US Route 101 North Corridor Study, VTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager for VTA and City of San Jose sponsored highway corridor study which reviewed freeway operations on nine -mile reach of US 101 between Alum Rock Avenue and Lawrence Expressway. Study area includes two UPRR underpasses, seven local road interchanges, and freeway to freeway interchanges with I -880 and SR 87. Geometric improvements were developed; traffic modeling was used to evaluate additional auxiliary lane locations, ramp reconfigurations, and two potential new interchanges. Results of planning study are helping VTA with long -term VTP 2030 Planning document, identifying freeway improvement projects for next 25 years. I -68011 -880 Cross Connector Study, VTA, Fremont and Milpitas, CA Project Manager for this area wide study conducted for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency, in collaboration with Alameda County, City of Fremont, City of Milpitas, Santa Clara County and Caltrans. The transportation network in this eight mile long, one mile wide corridor experiences congestion resulting from traffic coming from north and south I -680 into the Golden Triangle area of Silicon Valley. Extensive traffic analysis and conceptual geometric analysis of over 100 project alternatives resulted in a recommendation for over $500M worth of cross- connector improvements on six separate east -west corridors to distribute and manage the heavy demand in this area. The balanced plan was approved by all agencies involved and projects are being implemented by local sponsors as funding becomes available. Stevens Canyon Road, Santa Clara County Roads & Airports, Santa Clara County, CA Project Manager responsible for project delivery, design oversight, client interaction and budget management for widening of narrow, two -lane rural roadway. Provided design of roadway profile to be above 10 -year storm event, widening roadway along existing alignment, stream bank protection, and coordination with community and permitting with California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and Regional Water Quality Control Board. I- 80/I- 680 /SR 12 Interchange Project, Solano Transportation Authority, Solano County, CA Joint Venture Manager for ongoing preliminary engineering and EIR/EIS for interchange area. Project centers on series of interchanges on I -80 including interchanges with Route 12 West, Green Valley Road, I -680, Suisun Valley Road, Route 12 East, Abernathy Road, and West Texas Street. Project also encompasses improvements to local facilities, existing truck scales, I.680 and Route 12. F Hatch Mott Chris Metzger, PE, LEED® AP 5&0=1 MacDonald Page 4 Route 85 /Almaden Expressway Interchange, Santa Clara County Traffic Authority (SCCTA), San Jose, CA Project Manager. Prepared final plans, specifications, and estimate for new interchange on Route 85 in south San Jose. Almaden Expressway is an eight lane north south facility with major retail adjacent to the interchange and is a critical corridor to Almaden Valley. Route 101 Widening, Trimble Road to Route 880, SCCTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager. Prepared final plans, specifications, and estimate to widen US 101 from four to eight lanes, incorporating HOV lanes. Incorporated construction of new interchange at Brokaw Road requiring raising US 101, reconstruction of multiple interchanges, and widening structure over VTA's light rail while maintaining traffic on highway, light rail, and local street system. Route 101 Widening, Berryessa Road to McKee Road, SCCTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager. Prepare final plans, specifications, and estimate to widen US 101 from four to eight lanes incorporating HOV lanes. Project included replacement of Taylor Street Bridge and SPRR undercrossing, widening of Coyote and Silver Creek bridges, and reconstruction of McKee Road Interchange. Route 101 Interim Widening, Route 880 to Old Oakland Road, SCCTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager. Prepare preliminary plans and specifications and perform cost analysis studies to provide interim widening or US 101, pending full development and implementation of entire reconstruction of this portion of highway Route 101/Route 880 Interchange (MSA202 B), SCCTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager for final PS &E to replace independent I -880 separation structures, reconstruct seven ramps, and lower and widen US 101 from six to 10 lanes through interchange ($20 million). Included significant staged construction and retaining walls. Tasman Corridor LRT Extension, VTA, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara, CA Project Manager for the preparation of preliminary and final PS &E for multiple new and upgraded structures to accommodate the $ 332M Tasman West Light Rail Project, a 7.6 mile extension from San Jose to Sunnyvale which includes 12 stations and one new Park & Ride lot, and services four cities.. The structures included new and retrofitted bridges over State Route 237. The two new bridges (one vehicular, one light rail) were designed and constructed to accommodate a future center pier relocation when Route 237 is re- aligned and widened from a six lane to eight lane facility. Other structures included retrofit and widening of bridges over multiple waterways, tie back walls under existing highway under- crossings, and a depressed "boat" section to avoid air space in front of Moffet Naval Air Station. Chris was also responsible for review, final assembly and QC of all aspects of the specifications for one of the two construction packages for this light rail extension. Old Redwood Highway /Route 101, City of Petaluma, Petaluma, CA Project Manager. Final PS &E for operational improvements to interchange to increase safety and capacity. Route 84 Operational Improvements, San Mateo Transportation Authority, Menlo Park, CA Project Engineer to prepare PS &E to widen Route 84 on emergency basis following Loma Prieta Earthquake. Route 166 Operational Improvements, Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), Santa Barbara County, CA Project Manager. Prepare PS &E for widening six miles of conventional highway to provide shoulders and turning pockets. Millbrae Avenue Grade Separation, City of Milbrae, Millbrae, CA Project Manager. Prepare PS &E for railroad grade separation for Millbrae Avenue prior to extension of BART to SFO. Route 85/101 Interchange (South), SCCTA, San Jose, CA Project Manager. Prepared final PS &E for $30 million SR -85 interchange system at US 101 in South San Jose (0.4 miles of new four -lane freeway and modification of 1.6 miles of existing freeway). Hatch Mott Chris Metzger, PE, LEED® AP MacDonald Page S Power Inn Road Grade Separation, Sacramento Regional Transit District, Sacramento, CA Civil Project Manager for grade separation of Sacramento RT and UPRR rail lines with Power Inn Road. Two RT and one UPRR spur lines were to remain in service throughout construction with interruptions only on weekends. Design required "top down" construction for three new structures spanning six -lane facility. RT structures were pre -cast with rail attached prior to placement and successfully placed over allowable service closure window. UPRR structure was designed as direct fixation (very unusual for UP to allow), rather than ballast to accommodate vertical clearance requirements. Extensive roadway staged construction, drainage design, and utility relocations were required to lower roadway profile roughly 20 ft within constrained location. Greenville Road Grade Separation Replacement, City of Livermore, Livermore, CA Project Manager. Perform preliminary studies and prepare final PS &E to widen Greenville Road from two to six lanes under UPRR. Page Mill Road at Foothill Expressway, City of Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA Project Manager. Prepare PS &E for intersection improvement project. Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Study and Final Design, City of Mountain View, Mountain View, CA Project Manager for 1.6 -mile Feasibility/Location Study for extension of valued city asset. Project required significant stakeholder coordination to define alignment and project parameters acceptable to both local neighborhoods and bicycle community. Provided final design services for portion of trail crossing under El Camino Real (six -lane SR -82), adjacent to and impacting SR -85 interchange. Structural design of tunnel incorporated skylights in median of state facilities, greatly enhancing user experience of facility.. I- 80/Leisure Town Interchange, City of Vacaville, Vacaville, CA QA/QC Manager. Responsible for QA/QC for widening of Leisure Town Road from two lanes to six lanes from Orange Drive to Vaca Valley Parkway, and to reconstruct existing Leisure Town Road/I -80 Interchange. State College Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA Project Manager of 35% PS &E for traffic signal, signing and striping and street lighting for eleven intersections as a part of an undercrossing of the Metrolink rail line in Anaheim, California. Temporary traffic signals during construction were provided at two intersections. Conceptual geometric design support was provided as well. Hatch Mott MacDonald Michael L. Canepa, PE Education Experience Summary BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, 1988 Mr. Canepa has 25 years of experience managing large highway and rail transit projects. He has held progressive titles of associate vice president, senior project manager and operations manager notably serving as project manager for several large public works and transportation projects. He has Registrations extensive experience as a senior project manager in designing and managing highway, rail transit, Professional Engineer rail yard and maintenance facilities, public infrastructure and land development projects throughout CA, C48676,1992 the South Bay Area and western U.S. He is skilled in budget control, billing, manpower allocation, HI, 13744 -C, 2009 engineering design, CADD systems, civil design software and preparing plans, specifications and estimates, and engineering reports. Mr. Canepa is also proficient in traffic and railway signal design, Years In Practice —25 railroad alignment, trackway and roadway geometrics, grading and paving design, signing and striping modifications. He has coordinated field surveying, potholing and utility protection, managed Affiliations storm drain, sanitary sewer and utility relocations and performed modifications for the design. He President, American Public has coordinated and managed production of CADD files for several large public projects and has Works Association, been responsible for production of Project Study Reports for bridges and grade separations using the South Bay Area Chapter Caltrans model. (2008) Board of Directors & Selected Project Experience Executive Board Member, American Capitol Expressway Light Rail Corridor , Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Public Works San Jose, CA Association, South Bay Project Manager and Project Engineer responsible for a 3.5 -mile light rail extension for the Valley Area Chapter (2003- Transit Authority along Capitol Avenue in San Jose. Coordinated with the Santa Clara Valley Water 2008) District on the Penitencia Creek Bridge Replacement. Managed the production of an overland flow study and final drainage report for the corridor. Responsible for design of trackway and roadway geometrics; storm drain, sanitary sewer and utility relocations; and signing and striping modifications to Capitol Avenue and adjoining side streets for the northern half of the project and its impacts to the percolation pond facilities, and Caltrans and the City of San Jose for their respective jurisdiction improvements. Supervised the contract plans, specifications and estimates and reports, and provided technical assistance and construction support for the duration of the project assisting VTA in meeting it project completion date. Eden Avenue Traffic Calming, San Jose, CA Project manager and a project engineer responsible for producing design documents to install traffic calming devices along approximately 1.5 -mile of Eden Avenue. The traffic calming design included traffic circles, chicanes, intersection bulb -outs and imprinted, colored asphalt crosswalks. He designed other improvements, including new or replacement sidewalks, driveways, curb ramps and drainage facilities to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act standards and improve problem drainage areas. Route 17/85 Interchange Improvements - Los Gatos, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA — Project Manager responsible for replacement of a loop ramp with a direct connector through an existing tunnel and new flyover from northbound Highway 17 to northbound Highway 85 in Los Gatos. Mike managed the design and preparation of PS&E for utility relocations, storm drain design, drainage reports, design of a fire line for the tunnel, construction staging, signing and striping. He also coordinated field surveying, potholing and utility protection and modifications for the design. He met tight submittal deadlines through numerous design and scope changes from jurisdictional agencies. VTA SR 152 Safety Improvements, Santa Clara Valley Transports_ tion Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA Project and billing manager responsible for U.S. 101 and SR 152 improvements in Gilroy, including four separate plans, specifications and estimates packages. These improvements included adding a new on ramp and auxiliary lane and ramp modifications at two other locations, widening SR 152 from two to four lanes, a bridge widening, modifying traffic signals and intersections, and improving soundwalls. His specific duties included preparing monthly invoices and budget tracking documents, providing quality assurance reviews, and design assistance and oversight with plans, specifications and estimates packages, technical reports, and resource allocation. Hatch Mott MacDonald Michael L. Canepa, PE Page 2 Caltrain Safety Improvements — Phase 2, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Santa Clara County, CA Project Manager responsible for managing and coordinating the design for $10 million of pedestrian safety improvements for the Caltrain Corridor within Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right -of -way. Project activities included reviewing and evaluating the current railroad safety systems, roadway safety standards, pedestrian and vehicular traffic and conditions at existing at -grade crossings and developing proposed improvements to these systems and facilities. The proposed improvements were developed through a collaborative and programmatic approach to grade crossing safety between the Valley Transportation Authority, JPB, CPUC, UPRR and the local roadway maintenance jurisdictions. Silicon Valley Rapid Transit - Yard & Shops Design Segment, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA Civil Engineering Design Manager responsible for managing all civil deign and trackwork associated with a proposed $230 million design-build BART maintenance facility for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority's Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Project in San Jose and Santa Clara. Design management responsibilities included coordinating with the railroads Caltrain and Union Pacific, adjacent design segments including bridges and tunnels, stations and systems, and interfacing with local agencies: the cities of San Jose and Santa Clara, BART, VTA as well as adjacent property owners and utilities. Further responsibilities consisted of managing the design of all civil site improvements, mainline track and trackway, utility design while integrating other design disciplines within the yard and shops segment design team, including line electrical, third rail and traction power, architectural, mechanical, communications and systems. Tasman West Light Rail, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), Santa Clara, CA Design Engineer and CADD Coordinator responsible for preparing roadway and railway geometric, and storm drain and sanitary sewer design for four design packages totaling approximately 2.5 miles of light rail from Lockheed Way in Sunnyvale to Old Ironsides Drive in Santa Clara. Role as a CADD coordinator included managing production plans and CADD files of all four design packages, including 800 drawings from four subconsultants. Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT), Northern Area Guideway, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA Quality Assurance Manager for the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit (SVRT) Northern Area Guideway in the cities of Fremont, Milpitas and San Jose. Responsibilities included managing and updating the Quality Management System Manual, preparing quality plans and procedures, performing quality audits for internal and external design and development activities to verify design implementation control procedures, and preparing assessment reports and supporting documentation for the project management team and client. This guideway represents the northern portion of the overall $700 million SVRT/Bay Area Rapid Transit to San Jose extension. Mary Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing, Cupertino, CA Senior Engineer on $12 million award - winning pedestrian bridge responsible for preparing the combined project study report and project report for this cable - stayed bridge over I -280 in Santa Clara County. Also responsible for preparing the plans and estimates for the 35 percent submittal. Forty -four structural strand stay cables support the new bridge, suspended from cables attached to two 90 -foot structural steel towers with a clear span length of 325 feet over the existing freeway. Evelyn Avenue Improvements, Mountain View, CA Project Manager responsible for a 1.5 -mile roadway widening and infrastructure reconstruction project conducted in three stages from Castro Street to Bernardo Avenue. Designed and managed a project study report with three design and cost alternatives, produced three separate bid packages for the roadway reconstruction plus a fourth for replacing an associated sewer and water main. Coordinated and managed several subconsultants, the bridge widening, landscaping, street lighting and traffic signal design. Provided design interfaces with two light rail stations, a park -and -ride lot and a trail overpass that were under construction within the duration of this widening project. IN%Hatch Mott MacDonald Education BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 1998 Registration Civil Engineer CA, 63950, 2002 Traffic Engineer CA, 2458, 2008 Years in Practice —18 Leo Trujillo, PE, TE Experience Summary Mr. Trujillo has 18 years of experience during which he has managed and designed numerous traffic- related and general civil engineering projects. His experience includes highway lighting design, traffic signal design, intersection geometrics design, lighted crosswalk design, traffic control design, street design, hydrology analysis /studies, storm drainage design, and grading/drainage /paving design. Mr. Trujillo has provided construction support services on many traffic signal and roadway improvement projects and has experience in the collection of topographic field survey data. He currently oversees all design work produced by Hatch Mott MacDonald's Gilroy office. From 2009 to 2015, he also gained rail design experience while working on the Sylmar -to- Palmdale sub- section of the California High Speed Rail (HSR) Project. Mr. Trujillo has also provided oversight support (QA / QC) for other HSR disciplines in the Sylmar -to -Los Angeles segment, as well as for alignment disciplines for the Fresno -to- Palmdale segment. Selected Project Experience California High Speed Train: Sylmar to Palmdale Sub- Section, CA Lead Alignment and Grade- Separation Engineer. Prepared approximately 15 preliminary horizontal and vertical alignment alternatives for the sub - section stated above. Studied and compared possible station locations near Santa Clarita and the City of Palmdale. In addition, approximately 15 grade - separations and roadway realignments were prepared within this HSR sub - section. State College Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation, Anaheim,. CA Project Manager of 35% PS &E for traffic signal, signing and striping and street lighting for eleven intersections as a part of an undercrossing of the Metrolink rail line in Anaheim, California. Temporary traffic signals during construction were provided at two intersections. Conceptual geometric design support was provided as well. Lark Ave / University Ave Intersection Improvements, Town of Los Gatos, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the preparation of PS &E for roadway and traffic signal improvements at the Project Intersection. The design included roadway improvements (i.e. roadway, sidewalk, curb and gutter, ADA curb ramps, etc.), signing and striping modifications, and the installation of a new traffic signal at the Project Intersection. Improvements to storm drain lines and inlets were designed, and many at -grade utilities (covers) were modified and/or relocated to accommodate the proposed roadway & signal improvements. Cochrane Road Widening Project, City of Morgan Hill, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the preparation of PS &E for roadway widening improvements along Cochrane Road between Sutter Boulevard to the Highway 101 NB On -Ramp. The design included roadway improvements (i.e. roadway, bike lane, sidewalk, curb and gutter, ADA curb ramps, etc.), signing and striping modifications, and traffic signal modifications at the Project Intersections. Several roadway striping and widening options were explored in order to minimize impacts and cost, while still maintain adherence to Caltrans standards. As part of the roadway widening necessary to accommoate a new bike lane, many at -grade utilities were modified and/or relocated. These included street lights, pull boxes (electrical, telephone, & cable), man holes (storm drain & telephone), water valves, backflow preventors, fire hydrants, and other miscelaneous utilities. This PS &E package was submitted to Caltrans District 4 for review and approval as part of the encroachment permit process. Airport Blvd -Green Valley Rd Roadway & Signal Improvements, Santa Cruz County, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the preparation of PS &E for roadway and traffic signal improvements at the Project Intersection. Roadway improvements involved a combination of pavement treatments including overlay, grind & overlay, transition overlay, and full pavement reconstruction. Other roadway improvements included sidewalk, curb and gutter, ADA curb ramp, and signing & striping improvements. Strom drain inlet and culvert improvements were also designed for this project. Due to the roadway improvements, all existing signal equipment had to be replaced with new equipment. All affected utility facilities (manholes, drain inlets, waver valves, gas Hatch Mott Leo Trujillo, PE, TE MacDonald Page 2 valves, etc.) were also modified / adjusted to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements. Blossom Hill / University Ave Intersection Improvements, Town of Los Gatos, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the preparation of PS &E for roadway and traffic signal improvements at the Project Intersection. The design included roadway improvements (i.e. roadway, bike lane, sidewalk, curb and gutter, ADA curb ramps, etc.), signing and striping modifications, and the complete replacement of the existing traffic signal at the Project Intersection. Improvements to storm drain lines and inlets were designed, and many at -grade utilities (covers) were modified and/or relocated to accommodate the proposed roadway & signal improvements. Aptos Village Railroad Crossing Signal Modification, Santa Cruz County, CA Project Manager for HMM's on -call contract with Santa Cruz County. Contract includes civil design project at Aptos Village shopping center. Primary goals include conforming to varying pedestrian conditions (i.e. concrete sidewalks vs. wooden plank walkways) and meeting accessibility requirements. Because project includes traffic signal and roadway improvements at several at -grade railroad crossing intersections, considerable coordination is necessary with Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). As part of the traffic signal improvements at the project intersections, signal interconnect with the new railroad controller(s) will also be included in order to provide railroad preemption. The two new traffic signals will be hard -wire interconnected with two other existing traffic signals. This stretch of corridor will then be analyzed and coordinated as part of this project. Construction support services will also be provided once the project has been approved and awarded. Front St (SR 146) Traffic Signal & Intersection Improvements, Soledad, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the preparation of PS &E for a 0.7 mile roadway segment on Front Street (SR 146), including four intersections [Front Street (SR 146) / Nestles Road, Front Street (SR 146) / H. De La Rosa Street (formerly 4t' Street), Front Street (SR 146) / Oak Street, and Front Street (SR 146) / East Street (SR 146)] in the City of Soledad. Since the intersections are located on a state highway, the PS &E packages were prepared to meet Caltrans standards and were reviewed and approved by both agencies. Improvements for the Front Street (SR 146) / H. De La Rosa Street intersection included right -of -way acquisition. Hatch Mott MacDonald provided the City with plans and quantities needed to determine right -of -way costs and information necessary for right -of -way acquisition. Improvements for the Front Street (SR 146) / Oak Street intersection included the design for the installation of a right northbound right turn lane on Front Street (SR 146). The roadway widening associated with these improvements included the removal of an existing sloped concrete wall and installation of a new vertical retaining wall. The project also included the relocation of underground and aboveground utilities. Rio Del Mar Mini - Roundabout, Rio Del Mar, Santa Cruz County, CA Project manager for the design of roundabout improvements at the intersection of Rio Del Mar Blvd / Aptos Beach Drive / Venetian Road / Esplanade Driveway. The design included the preparation of Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS &E) for roadway improvements including; roundabout, grading & drainage, signing & striping, curb & gutter, ADA curb ramps, and utility improvements. FHWA guidelines were used for the overall roundabout layout. Santa Cruz County standards and Caltrans standards were used for all roadway - specific details. Heller Drive & Empire Grade Road Signal Project, UCSC, Santa Cruz County, CA Project Manager & Design Engineer for the installation of a new traffic signal at the Heller Drive / Empire Grade Road intersection in the UC Santa Cruz campus. The project also included roadway (i.e. roadway, sidewalk, AC dike, pedestrian curb ramps, etc.) and signing & striping improvements. Roadway & Traffic- Related Plan Checking Services, City of Morgan Hill, CA Provide plan checking services on an as- needed basis for the City of Morgan HiII on roadway and traffic- related design (i.e.: traffic control plans, traffic signal plans, intersection geometrics, general roadway design, etc.). Hatch Mott MacDonald Raj M u ithy, PE Education Experience Summary BS, Civil Engineering, Bangalore University, 1985 Mr. Murthy has 28 years of multidisciplinary experience in construction management, project and MS, Civil Engineering, San program management on various transportation projects: highways and bridge projects, rail, and Jose State University, 1988 airport projects. His areas of specialization are construction management, project and program SAVE International, Value management, project controls, contract administration, implementation strategy, scheduling, cost Engineering Seminar control, constructability reviews, value engineering, construction claims & dispute resolution, and contract development. His extensive experience on self- -help county projects in Santa Clara County Registration (1984 Measure A and 1996 Measure AB) and Alameda County (Measure B) has helped him Professional Engineer develop strong technical and program level strategic implementation skills. He has also supported CA, #52629,1994 program management for the Orange County Transportation Authority's (OCTA) Highway and Grade Separation Programs. He is experienced in many types of infrastructure projects including Years in Practice - 28 highway interchanges, seismic retrofit, and utilities, implemented under various contracting methods. Memberships CMAA Raj's impressive record in completing two self help county '/2 cent sales tax measures is equivalent or greater than any peer can report o£ Raj worked on both Measure A (1984) and Measure B (1996) in Santa Clara County. In the performance of design management and construction management services for both of those Measure programs Raj's exceptional knowledge of the Caltrans processes and requirements, helped to move projects forward in a timely manner and also greatly assisted in the avoidance of excessive Change Orders and Claims. He has also served as Program Manager for Alameda CTC implementing projects under three sales tax measures. In addition, he delivered I -80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project, which is the first of its kind in California. Selected Project Experience Alameda CTC Project Controls / Project Management, Alameda County, CA As the Program Manager for PM/PC consultant team, Raj led and managed the projects team to provide project controls and project management to deliver the agency's portfolio of projects through all phases. Some of the highlights in this capacity are: • Developed strategies for the implementation of the capital program • Track and drive project and program level issues to resolution • Developed funding plans with projects & programming staff for all projects • Developed and implemented a Project Control System (PCS) based on agency's business practices • Coordinated with local agency stakeholders on their priority projects • Represented projects team at Committee and Commission meetings • Represented Alameda CTC at Caltrans, MTC, BART, AC Transit, and other agencies • Managed consultant and subconsultant contracts. • Developed procurement documents, supported procurement process, and negotiated professional services and other agency agreements on behalf of the agency. • Direct the Project Management / Project Controls (PM/PC) team to resolve issues, and establish recommendations for decision - making. • Manage, coordinate, and administer all project activity related to design, construction, schedule, budget, quality assurance, initial operation, and closeout requirements of Capital Projects. • Oversee designated managers (or staff) in project controls, project delivery, administration, and finance. • Identify and track program level issues and evaluate resolution alternatives, and manage project delivery. • Coordinate with local, state, and private entities to bring each of the Capital Program projects to a successful conclusion, within budget, schedule, and quality objectives Relevant Projects: • I -580 EB & WB Express Lanes • I -880 SB HOV Lane • 1 -880 23rd /29th Avenue Operational Improvements Hatch Mott Raj Murthy, PE MacDonald Page 2 C SR -84 Widening - North & South Segments C I -80 ICM Project e I -880 Broadway Jackson Area Project e I -680 NB Express Lane Project Y I -80 Gilman IC e East West Connector • East Bay Greenway • SR -84 Pigeon Pass to I -680 Widening Project I -80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project, Alameda County Transportation Commission, Alameda County, CA In addition to his responsibilities as the Program Manager, Raj also served as a Project Manager for the I -80 ICM Project, first of its kind in the region. The project consists of implementing several Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements such as variable speed limit, incident management, Automated Traffic Management (ATM) technologies to alleviate congestion on the most congested corridor in the Bay area. Raj was responsible for delivering the project from development through construction, managing the design contract, system integration, project controls, fund management, and preconstruction support. He negotiated design and CM consultant contracts, driving project development phase to ensure timely key deliverables, set up and maintain cost control tools to assign and track multiple funding sources. He also negotiated funding agreements, MOUs, and cooperative agreements with project partners. The project encompasses implementation of several Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) elements such as variable speed limit, incident management, and Automated Traffic Management (ATM) technologies to alleviate congestion on the most crowded corridor in the Bay area. Project Manager. Alameda Co. Transportation Commission. East Bay Smart Corridors, Alameda County, CA Responsible for operations and maintenance of Eastbay Smart Corridor infrastructure along East Bay Corridors. The East Bay Smart Corridors Program is a cooperative effort by the Alameda CTC and 17 other partner agencies to operate and manage a multi -modal Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) on four corridors - Interstate 80 /San Pablo Avenue Corridor, Interstate 880 Corridor, International Boulevard/Telegraph Avenue/East 14th Street (INTEL) Corridor, and Interstate 580/680 Tri- Valley Corridor. The ATMS on these corridors help alleviate congestion and improve safety for traveling public, as well as disseminate current traffic data to the public through the website. Measure B Highway Program and VTA 2020 Highway Program, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), San Jose, CA Deputy Program Manager / Construction Manager - The Program consisted of design development and construction management for major highway projects totaling $750 million developed and constructed under Caltrans oversight. Major projects included I -880 widening ($45 mil), U.S. 101 widening ($32 mil), Route 85/87 interchange ($25 mil), Route 85/101 interchange (North) ($60 mil), Route- 85/101 interchange (south) ($41 mil), Route 237/880 interchange ($27 mil), Route 152 Improvements ($11 mil), I880 /Coleman Interchange ($47 mil), Route 87 North HOV ($26 mil), US 101/ Bailey Interchange ($16 mil), Route 85 Noise mitigation ($5 mil) and Route 17 Improvements ($18 mil). During construction phase, Raj managed a team of 55 construction management staff consisting of resident engineers, structure representatives, inspectors, office engineers, and safety inspection staff on a multiple project program in Caltrans District 4 (San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley). Raj set up the construction program in accordance with Caltrans Construction Manual and Local Agency Procedures Manual (LAPM). Raj was Instrumental in the implementation of Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) safety and training program for project staffmg assignments. He was responsible for peer review of roadway and structures on all projects. Opened multiple field offices while overseeing project staff resource requirements. US 101 Auxiliary Lanes Project, Caltrans/San Mateo County Transportation Authority, San Mateo, CA FM!AOAA&. Hatch Mott Raj Murthy, PE MacDonald page 3 Provided construction management support including schedule management and claims support. Responsible for reviewing contractor schedules, notice of potential claims (NOPC), and providing CM input for Caltrans- administered project. He also represented Caltrans in the dispute resolution board (DRB) process. He has a successful track record in representing owners at DRB or other Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) hearings. Highway and Grade Separation Program, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County, CA As part of the program management team for the Authority, Raj set up and implemented a cost estimate validation program for various stages of the projects. Necessitated by the volatile bidding environment, the cost verification program helped the Authority program appropriate budgets for the projects and fine tune them along the project development process. The validation program utilizes appropriate level of effort in determining cost estimates based on the project development stage. The project cost estimates also included estimates for project soft costs such as Right of Way, Utilities, COZEEP support, Design services, Construction Management, etc. Raj implemented the program for various highway and grade separation projects. Caltrans Independent Cost Estimating Services, Caltrans, Sacramento, CA Project Manager for on -call contract to independently determine probable construction bid costs prior to bidding. Information was used by Caltrans to ensure adequate programming of funds for various projects in Districts 4, 7, 8, 11 and 12. Duties included managing team of six subconsultants to identify needs of task order utilizing estimating teams; coordinating estimating teams to assure timely delivery of estimates; preparing and publishing estimating reports for task orders; and preparing monthly reporting to Caltrans on utilization, invoicing and other items. I -5803 -680 Interchange Project, Alameda County Transportation Authority (ACTC), Dublin, CA Construction Manager. Responsible for contract administration, scheduling, cost control, public outreach, and change management. Project involved addition of new segmental concrete box girder direct connector bridges, widening of existing bridges and roadways, construction of retaining walls and MSE walls to improve existing interchange including relocation of utilities and frontage roads. Project also involved complex stage construction strategies to build multi -level bridge connector over BART, freeways and creeks at construction cost of $58 million. Raj was a key member of the construction management team that was procured by ACTA to assist Caltrans in implementing the construction phase. San Mateo - Hayward Bridge Seismic Retrofit, Caltrans District 4, Oakland, CA Project Controls Engineer. Responsible for schedule analysis, cost and resource tracking, claims analysis, and training. Project involved seismic retrofit of a two -mile long high -rise section of bridge across San Francisco Bay. Project utilized various retrofit strategies for foundations; bearings, steel box girders, concrete and steel columns. Key features of construction were 12 -foot diameter cast in steel shell piles, replacement of bearings, encasing concrete columns with steel jackets, and pre -cast foundation frames at total construction cost of $110 million. Route 237, Central Expressway to US 101, Santa Clara County Traffic Authority, Mountain View, CA Resident Engineer. Responsible for contract administration, schedule analysis, dispute resolution, quality control, change management, and design modifications to accommodate field conditions. Project involved construction of new four -lane freeway with urban interchanges to replace signalized road, and consisted of two bridges, ramps, embankments, roadway, seven "Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE)" walls, utilities, and traffic signals. The project was constructed in several stages in order to maintain existing capacity of roadway, at a total construction cost of $18 million. Route 85 between Russo Ave and Bascom Ave, Santa Clara County Traffic Authority, San Jose, CA Assistant Resident Engineer. Responsible for assisting in contract administration, quality control, schedule analysis, and design modifications to accommodate field conditions, dispute resolution, and Hatch Mott Raj Murthy, PE MacDonald Page 4 change management. Depressed six -lane freeway was constructed through urban area constituting four -mile section of new 12 -mile freeway addition. Key technical highlights: three overpasses, three interchanges for local roads, PCC pavement, and numerous retaining walls and sound walls. A majority of local roads were converted to cul -de -sacs and required modifications to City drainage systems. Total project construction costs were $45 million. US 101 Corridor, I-680 to Trimble Road, Santa Clara County Traffic Authority, San Jose, CA Construction Engineer, Scheduling & Claims. Construction of five highways and bridge projects on US 101 between Trimble and I -280/I -680 interchange with total construction value of $105 million. Projects were constructed utilizing complex staging to minimize traffic impact through busy urban corridor and were administered under then newly adopted Caltrans CPM scheduling specifications. • Responsible for Schedule and Claims control for Highway and Bridge projects under Santa Clara County Measure A Program. Solely responsible for Project Scheduling to meet delivery parameters set by the Traffic Authority. Also assisted in Contract Administration for two projects. • Develop & Analyze baseline schedules for constructability and contract compliance. • Monitor & evaluate project progress and Maintain As -built schedules. • Prepare / review schedule updates and revisions. • Analyze effects of Changes & negotiate compensation. • Identify / Analyze delays & problem areas; and propose mitigation alternatives / work - around schedules. • Evaluate and resolve Potential claims & Claims. • Prepare Demonstration schedules for dispute resolution. • Prepare Summary schedules & Progress reports for management. • Scheduling coordination between projects Project Control System, Contra Costa County, CA Project Controls Engineer. Responsible for developing and implementing computerized project control system for functional units of Public Works Department. Project involved analyzing business processes of functional units, setting up typical project networks and interdependencies, integrating networks into master schedule, and providing training for County personnel in use of system. San Jose International Airport, City of San Jose, San Jose, CA Project Engineer. Responsible for schedule monitoring, cost control, change orders and document control. Reviewed shop drawings, submittals and RFIs. Assisted in change order process and progress reporting, and coordinated design modification issues with architects, contractors, agencies, and utilities. Project involved six - level, cast -in- place, post - tensioned structure with 2,330 stalls, pre - cast/granite cladding, and included construction of baggage handling facility, access roads, and site improvements. San Jose Communication Center, City of San Jose, San Jose, CA Junior Civil Engineer. Responsible for inspection, field engineering, and schedule monitoring. Inspected structural steel, concrete, finishes, roofing, pre -cast panel erection, and conduits. Coordinated material testing as required. Project involved four -level office and parking structure (essential structure) constructed using steel framing and concrete shear walls with pre -cast concrete cladding, to serve as an emergency call center and police facility. AFMHatch Mott AM-41 MacDonald Lam Q. Tri n h, PE Education Experience Summary BS, Civil Engineering (Military Science minor), Lam Trinh has over 25 years of engineering and management experience in transportation University of California, projects, primarily in roadway/highway, bridge, and Express Lanes also known as high occupancy Davis, 6/1990 toll (HOT) lane projects with knowledge of civil design and construction of the state highway United States Military Police systems. He is also experienced in structure construction such as bridgework, retaining walls, Academy, Alabama, mechanically stabilized embankment (MSE) walls, and pump houses. He has successfully 12/1990 delivered two State of California's CMIA projects in Santa Clara County totaled at $150 million, Registrations & and is currently managing the VTA Highway Program includes countywide corridor studies, Certifications interchange improvements projects, and various Express Lanes projects in Santa Clara County, Professional Engineer CA. (Civil) CA, #066783 Selected Project Experience Years In Practice - 25+ VTA Express Lanes Program, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), CA US 101 Express Lanes Project -from Dunne Avenue in Morgan Hill to Santa Clara/San Mateo county line: VTA Project Manager. Responsible for the preliminary designs, budgets, and Special Training schedule of a 36 -mile, $430 million Express Lanes project in Santa Clara County - US 101 Resident Engineer Academy Express Lanes Project from Dunne Avenue in Morgan Hill to Santa Clara/San Mateo county line. Falsework Academy Managed and the engineering consultant team regarding all aspects of project development activities for the Project Initiation Documentation (PID) phase, Project Approval/Environmental Office Engineer Academy Document ( PANED) phase, which includes preliminary engineering studies, traffic study and Structure Steel Welding and analysis, traffic revenue analysis, concept of operations and system enforcement management Painting plan, electronic tolling system, environmental documents and clearance, right -of -way documents Structure Inspection and acquisitions, utility relocation plans, and project report. Ensure all work complies with current CPM Scheduling FHWA and Caltrans standards and requirements for managed lanes. This Project was environmentally clear in August 2015 and currently in final designs (PS &E) phase under various phase - projects. SR 237 Express Lanes Project —from Zanker Road in Milpitas to Mathilda Avenue in Sunnyvale: VTA Project Manager. Responsibilities same as above for the PID and PANED phases of this $30 million Express Lanes conversion project in Santa Clara County, which were completed in June 2015. Project is currently in final designs and slated for construction in 2017. US 101/Zanker Road Interchange Project — I -880 to N. First Street in San Jose. VTA Project Manager. Responsibilities same as above for the PID phase of this $140 million new interchange project which was sponsored and funded by City of San Jose. Future PANED and PS &E phases will follow the completion of PID, currently slated for Spring 2017. I- 280IWolfe Road Interchange Improvements Project— Lawrence Express to De Anza Boulevard in Cupertino: VTA Project Manager. Responsibilities same as above for the PID phase of this $65 million interchange improvements project which was sponsored and funded by City of Cupertino. Future PA/ED and PS &E phases will follow the completion of PID, currently slated for Summer 2017. VTA Capital Projects, VTA CMA, CA VTA Project Manager. Successfully delivered two major State's Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) highway projects in Santa Clara County, Caltrans District 4:1-880 HOV Lane - Widening Project from US 101 in San Josd to SR 237 in Milpitas ($68 million); and US 101 Auxiliary Lanes Project from SR 85 in Mountain View to Embarcadero Road in Palo Alto ($72 million). Managed the engineering consultant team regarding all aspects of project development activities for the PANED, ROW, PS &E, & Construction phases of the projects. Provided oversight and design supports during construction to Caltrans construction team. Worked closely with Caltrans, cities, and various stakeholders to obtain their concurrences on project designs for implementations in construction. RMl and TBSR Program Monitoring Project, Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Bay Area Toll Authority, San Francisco Bay Area, San Diego, and Los Angeles, CA Hatch Mott Lam Q. Tri n h, PE MacDonald Page 2 Performed constructability review of project plans and specifications for the 100% PS &E submittal prior to advertising bid for the I -80 Stormwater Treatment Measures Project (SF /Oakland Bay Bridge), KP 2.5/5.6 from 0.04 miles west of Toll Plaza to 0.3 miles south of Powell Street Undercrossing. Program Management, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency (CMA), CA Performed Constructability review of project plans and specifications for the 95% PS &E submittal for the I -680 HOV/HOT Lane. Member of the Joint Resolution Team (JRT) to evaluate and review project plans, specifications, and estimates for submittal to CMA. SR 237/880 Interchange Stage C Project, Phase II, VTA, Milpitas, CA VTA Resident Engineer /Structure Representative for this $27.5 million new freeway -to- freeway HOV direct connectors and interchange improvement project. Responsible for its overall field construction operations and management of engineering support services such as surveying, material testing, estimating, and design. Resolved field problems by proposing and/or approving of new construction methods /alternative solutions. Issued field changes to facilitate project progress. Performed cost analysis and negotiation of contract change orders; reviewed and approved monthly progress payment to contractor. Planned, assigned work, and supervised a construction team of about 11 staff included office engineers, office administrators, and field inspectors. SR 17 Auxiliary Lane Project (Camden to Hamilton Ave.), VTA, Campbell, CA VTA Resident Engineer /Structure Representative for this $10 million project. Responsible for its overall field construction operations and management of engineering support services such as surveying, material testing, estimating, and design. Resolved field problems by proposing and/or approving of new construction methods /alternative solutions. Issued field changes to facilitate project progress. Performed cost analysis and negotiation of contract change orders; reviewed and approved monthly progress payment to contractor. Planned, assigned work, and supervised a construction team of about 11 staff included office engineers, office administrators, and field inspectors. SR 85 Noise Mitigation Project, VTA, Santa Clara County, CA VTA Resident Engineer /Structure Representative for a 13 -mile, $5.5 million project encompassed the cities of San Jose, Cupertino, Campbell, and Los Gatos in Santa Clara County. Responsible for project's overall field construction operations. Coordinated with Caltrans and municipalities' engineering staffs to ensure that construction activities would not impact local traffic. Planned, assigned work, and supervised a construction staff of office engineers, office administrators, and field inspectors. Route 152 Improvements, Phase A, VTA, Gilroy, CA SB Route 17 Hamilton Avenue Exit Ramp, VTA, Campbell, CA Route 237 /880 Interchange Stage C Project, Phase I, VTA, Milpitas, CA NB Route 17 Auxiliary Lane from SR 85 to Camden, VTA, Campbell, CA VTA Assistant Resident Engineer, responsible for projects' day -to -day field operations. Resolved field problems and proposed alternative solutions. Issued field changes to facilitate project progress. Performed cost analysis and negotiation of contract change orders, reviewed and processed monthly progress payment to contractor. Planned, assigned, and supervised office engineer and field inspectors. Route 87/880 Bridge and MSE Walls, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Route 87 /Airport Parkway MSE Walls and Pump House, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Route 280/Wolfe Road Widening and Retaining Wall, Caltrans, Cupertino, CA Route 87/85 Connector Joint Seals, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Caltrans Assistant Structure Representative, responsible for overall bridgework inspection, shoring and falsework calculations and reviews, concrete mix designs calculation, surveying, material control and testing, contract change order preparation, field observation of traffic conditions, public and contractor's employee safety, on -site decisions to facilitate job progress, and office engineering - related work. Assisted Structure Representative in cost analysis and negotiation of contract change order works. Participated in constructability reviews of upcoming projects in Caltrans District 4. State Highway Route 130 Chip Seal, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Hatch Mott Lam Q. Trinh, PE MacDonald State Highway Route 17/Lark Ave., Caltrans, Campbell, CA Caltrans Resident Engineer, responsibilities included project scheduling, meeting, price negotiating of contract change order work, and monthly progress payment to contractor. Planned, assigned, and supervised office engineer and field inspectors. State Highway Route 101/880 Interchange, Caltrans, San Jose, CA State Highway Route 85/280 Interchange Project, Caltrans, Cupertino, CA San Jose Multi -Modal Transportation Terminal, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Caltrans Assistant Resident Engineer/Lead Inspector, responsible for assisting Resident Engineer in supervising and assigning tasks to field staff. Responsible for project's overall daily field activities, which included construction inspection of contract and change order work. State Highway 87 Corridor, Caltrans Project Development Branch, San Jose, CA Transportation Engineer — Project Design Team, responsible for preparing contract plans, specifications, project reports, and estimates. Used computer -aided drawing design (CADD)/IGRDS for designing highway geometrics such as horizontal and vertical curves, superelevation, cross sections, and grade profiles. Participated in Value Engineering Team to analyze cost and effectiveness of proposed project. State Highways 1, 84, and 280, Caltrans, San Francisco, CA Transportation Engineer — Maintenance Services Design Team, responsible for field investigation, recommendation, coordination between departments, and plans and estimates preparation. Projects included proposed improvements and repairs on roads, freeways, ramps, drainages, bridges, and other traffic safety improvements. Completed contract bid packages for Minor -B rehabilitation projects throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. Provided construction oversight and project close- out. Guadalupe Corridor Transportation Project, Caltrans, San Jose, CA Transportation Engineer — Project Design Team, responsible for the preparation of final phase of PS &E design for a new freeway project that consisted of a four -lane freeway, light -rail tracks, bicycle path, and transfer facilities to bus and train on SR 87. Reviewed project plans, specifications, quantity estimates, and construction staging. Hatch Mott MacDonald Maren Schram, PE Education Experience Summary BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, 1992 Maren Schram has 22 years of experience in the design of managed lanes, highway, local roadways, commuter rail and transit stations, grade separation, and public works projects. Maren's work experience demonstrates a balance between design, construction, and project management. Maren has prepared Caltrans project approval reports, plans, specifications, and estimates, as well as Registrations coordinated with Caltrans District 4, local agencies, and utility companies, provided construction Professional Engineer inspection and observation, prepared status reports, and performed other project control tasks. She CA, #65454 has an understanding of the permitting process and has experience preparing applications for several agencies. Years in Practice - 22 Selected Project Experience Memberships American Public Works Hatch Mott MacDonald San Jose CA Association Senior Project Manager. Responsibilities include planning, organizing, and working with technical and management groups in the delivery of a range of transportation projects. Develops and presents deliverables to clients for status and updates and reports to political board and subcommittees. Manages subconsultants to keep projects on budget, schedule and within agreed upon scope. Participates with senior leaders in the establishment of short-and long -term plans for transportation programs. Key Project: Silicon Valley Express Lanes Program which includes conversion of existing HOV lanes to express lanes and construction of new express lanes along SR -85, US 101, and SR -237 to provide congestion relief in Santa Clara County. Mark Thomas & Company, San Jose, CA Project Manager. Acted as project engineer during the project approval /environmental documents (PA/ED) phase and/or plans, specifications & estimate (PS &E) phase of transportation projects. Acted as a project manager for design services during construction tasks. Coordinated environmental, traffic, other technical studies, permits and project related issues with other consultants, subconsultants, regulatory agencies and stakeholders. Supervised assigned engineers and interns. Managed quality, budget, and schedule of assigned projects. Assisted Principals and Division Managers in preparing proposal elements such as scope of work, fee proposals and schedule for inclusion in project proposal and project interview materials. Participated in the development of the division's business plan and staffing projects. Key Projects: Solano Transportation Authority's I -80 Express Lanes Project, VTA's SR -237 Express Lanes Project, Phase 2 Project, City of Livermore's Isabel Avenue (Route 84)/I -580 Interchange. Parsons, San Jose, CA Senior Civil Engineer. Acted as design or project engineer during PA/ED phase and PS &E phase of transportation projects. Acted as project coordinator for a highway project. Coordinated environmental, traffic, other technical studies, permits and project related issues with other consultants, subconsultants, regulatory agencies, and stakeholders. Trained assigned engineers. Assisted in the preparation of scopes of works and agreements for environmental subconsultants working on a highway project. Key Projects: Transportation Agency for Monterey County's (TAMC) Monterey Peninsula Fixed Guideway, Track Restoration and Bus Guideway Project, Alameda County Congestion Management Agency's 1 -580 HOV Lane Project, SamTrans' Bus Stop Improvements Project. San Mateo County Transit District, Planning and Engineering Department, San Mateo County Transportation Authority, San Carlos, CA Assistant Engineer. Reviewed and approved project budget against city invoices and monthly progress status reports. Assisted in the preparation of monthly status reports for Management and/or TA Board of Directors' meetings. Monitored project schedule and scope creep. Observed and inspected projects during construction and attended construction progress meetings. Reviewed reports, plans, and specifications and estimates prepared by others. Participated in meetings with Caltrans and local agencies on projected funded by the TA. Key Projects: US 101/13ritton Avenue Southbound Ramps in San Carlos, Highway 92 Climbing Lanes between Highway 35 and Pilarcitos Creek in Half Moon Bay, US 101/Marsh Road Interchange in Redwood City. Hatch Mott Maren Schram, PE '0® MacDonald Page 2 City of Sacramento, Public Works Department, Street Division, Sacramento, CA Assistant Engineer. Assisted in the inventory of pavement conditions including roadway features and compiled the proposed street maintenance schedules for street overlays and seals using the city's Pavement Management System software. Coordinated projects with utility agencies and companies. Assisted in the overall maintenance of the Pavement Management System and Traffic Signs and Markings database and provided technical support to the system operators. Prepared plans, specifications and estimates for various city projects. Reviewed city project plans prepared by others. Key Projects: Pavement Management System which included the assessment of the whole street network using the city's software to develop a cost effective rehabilitation program, Annual Street Resurfacing, and Handicap Access Program which included the design and construction of curb ramps as well as prioritizing the locations. City of Menlo Park, Engineering Division, Menlo Park, CA Junior Engineer. Prepared plans, specifications and estimates for various city projects and reviewed city project plans prepared by others. Key Projects: Annual Sidewalk Repair, Willows Neighborhood Traffic Plan which included installation of traffic calming devices such as traffic circles and chicane within the neighborhood, and Gateway Wall Project along westbound Willow Road from US 101 to Route 84Bayfront Expressway. ® Hatch Mott MacDonald Celina Lee, PE, TE Education Experience Summary BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, 2003 Ms. Lee has over 12 years of experience during which she has designed numerous traffic- related and g eneral civil engineering P ro j ects. Specific design experience includes streets and highway design, intersection geometrics design (including signing and striping), grading and drainage design, Registrations Civil Engineer construction traffic control design, traffic signal and street lighting design, and rail alignment design. CA, 72233, 2008 Transportation planning experience includes traffic impact analyses, shared parking analyses, and Traffic Engineer signal warrant analyses. She also has experience in traffic signal timing and coordination studies. CA, 2561, 2010 Ms. Lee is experienced in the collection of topographic survey data, and tying field surveys into existing benchmarks and property lines. Ms. Lee is proficient in AutoCAD, MicroStation, InRoads, Years In Practice — 12 PowerRailTrack, Synchro, and Traffix. Memberships Selected Project Experience American Society of Civil Engineers California High -Speed Rail (Palmdale to Burbank), California High -Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), Los Angeles, CA Project Engineer. Prepared track and roadways alignment alternatives for the Palmdale to Burbank section. Explored numerous track alignment alternatives using Quantm software for the Palmdale to Sylmar and Bakersfield to Sylmar sub - sections and compiled information for the Alternative Analysis (AA) Report. Assisted with the 15% HST track and roadways alignment designs for the section and provided oversight support (QA/QC) for other HST disciplines. In addition, lead the right -of -way discipline for the 15% HST alignments. Track design effort included the design of mainline tracks, station tracks, crossovers, and MOI sidings. Station alternatives were designed for Palmdale, Santa Clarita and Burbank. Plan & profile and typical section sheets were prepared for multiple HST and grade separation alternatives. Aiignment design challenges included fault zone crossings, CA Aqueduct crossings, tunnel vent -shaft accommodation, crossing highly sensitive and politically sensitive locations, and freeway crossings. Also, designed track re- alignment alternatives for Union Pacific and Metrolink rail lines and roadway re- alignments for grade separation alternatives along the proposed HST alignment at most freeway, highway, streets and rail crossings for the Palmdale to Sylmar sub- segment at 15% design level. Rio Del Mar Mini - Roundabout, Rio Del Mar, Santa Cruz County, CA Project engineer for the design of roundabout improvements at the intersection of Rio Del Mar Blvd / Aptos Beach Drive / Venetian Road / Esplanade Driveway. The design included the preparation of Plans, Specifications, & Estimate (PS &E) for roadway improvements including; roundabout, grading & drainage, signing & striping, curb & gutter, ADA curb ramps, and utility improvements. FHWA guidelines were used for the overall roundabout layout. Santa Cruz County standards and Caltrans standards were used for all roadway - specific details. State College Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation, Anaheim, CA Project Engineer for traffic analysis and traffic signal, signing and striping design of 11 intersections to determine the traffic related design requirements of an undercrossing of the Metrolink rail line in Anaheim, California. Prepared 35% design plans including traffic signal design and modifications, street lighting design, signing and striping design at multiple project intersections, and design of temporary traffic signals for various construction phases. Planning level cost estimates were also prepared for the project. Pearl District Operational Improvements, Portland, OR Project Engineer. Prepared signing, striping, traffic signal and street lighting design plans for multiple intersections in downtown Portland. Design included a one -way to two -way street conversion on N.W. 12th Avenue between N.W. Couch Street and N.W. Davis Street, and connecting some of the project intersections to an existing signal interconnect system. Engineer's estimate of probable construction cost was also prepared. Aptos Village Railroad Crossing Signal Modification, Santa Cruz County, Aptos, CA Project Engineer. Performed level of service and traffic signal timing and coordination analysis; assisted in the preparation of technical specifications and special provisions document, cost estimates, geometric design plans, signing and striping design plans, and traffic signal design plans AFAHatch Mott Celina Lee, PE, TE MES1 MacDonald Page 2 at the intersections of Soquel Drive/Aptos Creek Road and Soquel Drive/Trout Gulch Road. As part of traffic signal improvements at project intersections, signal interconnect with new railroad controller(s) will also be included in order to provide railroad preemption. The project includes the design of track replacement at three intersections and design of the signals, control and railroad preemption. 2012 -2011 and 2010 -2011 Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Main Replacements, City of Mountain View, Mountain View, CA Project Engineer. Prepared temporary traffic control plans for the city-wide project. Traffic control plans included phasing, staging and detours. HMM was contracted for the design of rehabilitation and replacement of over one mile of water mains, almost two miles of sanitary sewer mains, and a storm force main repair. A full set of PS &E package was prepared and construction support was provided. Heller Drive Bike Lane, University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz County, CA Project Engineer. Provided traffic engineering services for the installation of bike lane improvements on Heller Drive in the UCSC campus. At the onset of the project, several bike lane options were explored: 1) bike lanes on both sides of Heller Drive, 2) bike lane on the uphill side only, 3) bike lane on the downhill side only. The options were then reviewed and discussed with university representatives. The uphill bike lane improvement was selected as the preferred option, and a downhill bike lane was also installed where ever existing roadway width was sufficient to accommodate it. Bike lane striping and signing PS &E documents were then prepared for the preferred option. A significant amount of field data was collected due to the narrow roadway widths and mountainous terrain in which the bike lane improvements were proposed. Airport Blvd -Green Valley Rd Roadway & Signal Improvements, Santa Cruz County, Santa Cruz County, CA Project Engineer. Conducted a topography survey and provided support for the PS &E preparation for roadway and traffic signal improvements at the Project Intersection. Roadway improvements involved a combination of pavement treatments including overlay, grind & overlay, transition overlay, and full pavement reconstruction. Other roadway improvements included sidewalk, curb and gutter, ADA curb ramp, and signing & striping improvements. Strom drain inlet and culvert improvements were also designed for this project. Due to the roadway improvements, all existing signal equipment had to be replaced with new equipment. All affected utility facilities (manholes, drain inlets, waver valves, gas valves, etc.) were also modified / adjusted to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements. Amgen Tour of California, Medalist Sports, LLC, Various Locations, CA Project Engineer: Prepared traffic control and traffic management plans for the event. The AMGEN Tour of California is an annual bicycle event that started in 2005. HMM prepared traffic control and management plans for the event from 2006 to 2009. The project involved coordinating with Amgen Tour staff, Caltrans, California Highway Patrol, and multiple cities' staff to prepare plans for various locations, including areas within Yolo, Sonoma, Marin, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara counties. Transbay Terminal Development Program, Transbay Joint Powers Authority, San Francisco, CA Traffic Management Review. Performed technical review of the Transportation Management Plan prepared for the project and provided comments and recommendations. Plan included traffic analysis and traffic control of surrounding project area along with proposed mitigations for disturbance to pedestrians, bus routes, and parking. Front St (SR 146) Traffic Signal & Intersection Improvements, City of Soledad, Soledad, CA Project Engineer. Conducted topography surveys at the project intersections and provided support for the PS &E preparation for four intersections [Front Street (SR 146) / Nestles Road, Front Street (SR 146) / H. De La Rosa Street (formerly 4b Street), Front Street (SR 146) / Oak Street, and Front Street (SR 146) / East Street (SR 146)] in the City of Soledad. Since the intersections are located on a state highway, the PS &E packages were prepared to meet Caltrans standards and were reviewed and approved by both agencies. Improvements for the Front Street (SR 146) / H. De La Rosa Street Hatch Mott Celina Lee, PE, TE MacDonald Page 3 intersection included right -of -way acquisition. Hatch Mott MacDonald provided the City with plans and quantities needed to determine right -of -way costs and information necessary for right -of -way acquisition. Improvements for the Front Street (SR 146) / Oak Street intersection included the design for the installation of a right northbound right turn lane on Front Street (SR 146). California State University of Monterey Bay (CSUMB) Traffic Impact Study, CSUMB, Marina, CA Project Engineer. Assisted in the traffic impact analysis and prepared conceptual plans and preliminary cost estimates for the CSUMB campus expansion. The project included student and faculty housing which required analyses of both internal and external project trips. This traffic study included analysis of 37 intersections and 73 roadway segments within state, county and city jurisdictions. Weaving analysis at multiple freeway interchanges was performed. Prepared conceptual improvement plans and preliminary cost estimates based on the recommendations / mitigations from the traffic study. At times, conceptual plans and cost estimates were prepared for various options, including roundabouts, at multiple intersections. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) On -Call Traffic Engineering Services, LLNL, Livermore, CA Project Analyst and Data Collection Lead. Prepared traffic calming, intersection, and pedestrian improvement plans at various locations throughout the campus. Performed traffic signing and striping inventory for entire campus and recommended improvements, and performed pedestrian and bicycle safety evaluations at multiple locations on campus. Multiple projects were performed throughout a three -year contract with LLNL. Extensive manual traffic counts and miscellaneous data collection were also performed to determine existing pedestrian and bicycle traffic volumes and their preferred routes with respect to motor vehicles. Soledad Plaza EIR, Creekbridge, Soledad, CA Project Analyst and Designer. Assisted with the preparation of the traffic impact analysis and prepared conceptual layouts and traffic signal design plans based on recommended improvements. The Soledad Plaza Shopping Center project site is located across from the northern Highway 101 /Front Street interchange in Soledad, California. This interchange is planned to be reconstructed. The project involved providing conceptual improvement plans of the interchange configuration and nearby roadways based on mitigations recommended in the traffic study, which included removal of the existing northbound on- and off - ramps, extension of an existing roadway with a new bridge over Highway 101, construction of the new northbound on- and off - ramps, roadway widening and signalization of several intersections. Conceptual roundabout layouts for several intersections were also prepared as an alternative. Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, SCRAMP, Monterey County, CA Project Designer. Prepared way- finding signage plan, and prepared traffic control plans for both on- site and off - site. The Mazda Raceway holds multiple race events throughout ayear and attracts thousands of people on -site. Special event signage and traffic control is needed to direct attendees both on- and off -site in an efficient and orderly manner. A traffic flow map was developed for the site based on the collection of historical data, evaluating entry and exit operations at the race track during special events, and conducting an off -.site sign inventory on routes leading to the site. Off -site traffic control plans were also prepared to obtain a Caltrans encroachment permit. Hatch Mott MacDonald Education MS, Civil /Structural Engineering, San Jose State University, 1996 BS, Structural Engineering, University of California - San Diego, 1993 Registration Professional Engineer CA, #C60639,2000 Years in Practice - 22 Charmaine S. Zamora, PE Experience Summary Ms. Zamora is a senior project engineer with over 22 years of experience, including engineering on transportation projects such as freeway interchanges and roadway widenings. Her experience also includes various public works projects, including pedestrian and bicycle trail design, civil site design, roadway improvements, intersection design, utility coordination, and parking lot layouts. Charmaine has served as both a project engineer and a project manager on various local and State funded projects. Ms. Zamora has comprehensive knowledge in an extensive amount of software, including the following: • Microsoft Office, including Word, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint • AutoCAD, AutoTum Selected Project Experience Transportation/Civil Highway Safety Improvement Projects (HSIP) for Watsonville Road, Stevens Canyon Road, Clayton Road and Uvas Road, Santa Clara County, CA Project manager for the final design and construction to improve four rural County roadways under the HSIP program. Responsibilities include coordinating with Santa Clara County Roads and Airports staff, Caltrans, subconsultants and internal staff. Other responsibilities include checking plan preparation, technical specifications and cost estimating. All four roadway projects have federal funding, and each project involves preparation of bid documents (PS &E) for shoulder widening, pavement delineation and other safety features such as shoulder turnouts, shoulder clearing, metal beam guard railing and Class I delineators. Calaveras Boulevard Widening PSR Project, Milpitas, CA Project engineer assisting the project manager in preparing a Caltrans' Project Study Report (PSR) as a method to obtain final approval by the City of Milpitas, VTA and Caltrans for the proposed widening of Calaveras Boulevard. The project will widen Calaveras Boulevard from four lanes to six lanes beginning at Town Center Drive on the east to Abel Street on the west. The proposed widening will require replacement of the bridges over Main Street, Union Pacific Railroad and the proposed BART extension. Responsibilities included coordination of the traffic analysis and Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (PEAR) work, and monitoring all for adherence to Caltrans District 4 procedures. Tasks also included coordination with the client, stakeholders and utility companies, preparation of design exceptions, PSR plan exhibits and right -of -way data sheets. Central Expressway Auxiliary Lanes (Phase I and II), Sunnyvale, CA Project engineer for the design and delivery of PS &E to add auxiliary lanes on Central Expressway. The project is approximately 1 1/4 miles in length of roadway widening to add auxiliary lanes in both directions of travel. The widening occurred between Mathilda Avenue and Fair Oaks Avenue, approximately 3,500 feet in length, and roadway improvements included storm drainage facility corrections, bicycle access on the outside shoulders, and metal beam guard railing adjustments at the existing bridges. Roadway design responsibilities consisted of overseeing the design of the project, including coordination with the County staff and internal team, checking layout, profile and cross - section work, and preparation of plans and cost estimates at all design levels, from preliminary to final bid documents. SR 1 Soquel to Morrissey Auxiliary Lanes/Widening Project, Santa Cruz, CA Project engineer responsible for preparing design plans, specifications and engineer's estimate, which includes coordination with Santa Cruz Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) staff, utility owners, and other stakeholders. Other responsibilities included coordinating subconsultant work and internal staff tasks, including cost estimating of bid items and utility relocation costs. The project is approximately 3,400 feet in length and adds a third lane in each direction along Route 1. The project involved preparation of documents (PS &E) for construction of auxiliary lanes between Soquel Avenue and Morrissey Boulevard in Santa Cruz. The project also includes reconstruction of the La Fonda Avenue Bridge overcrossing and construction of retaining walls and soundwalls. The roadway improvements include grading and drainage design and coordination with Caltrans, City and County of Santa Cruz staff, and local residents. Hatch Mott Charmaine S. Zamora, PE MacDonald Page 2 Puerto Suello Hill Multi -Use Path, San Rafael, CA Project engineer for the final design of a pedestrian and bicycle path extension in San Rafael within the US 101 right -of -way for the Transportation Agency of Marin. The project consisted of an asphalt -paved Class I trail designed to meet Americans with Disabilities (ADA) criteria and included an accelerated design schedule in order for the design to be incorporated into Caltrans' roadway - widening project. Major tasks involved coordinating design between internal staff and subconsultants, assisting project manager with utility, Caltrans and client coordination, and preparation of PS &E documents. Tasks also included development of preliminary alternatives and cost estimating from conceptual design to bid documents. Route 85/101 Interchange Improvements, Santa Clara County, CA Civil designer responsible for the preparation of plans and details for the widening of US 101 at the SR 85 interchange, including the design of on- and off -ramps using AutoCAD and Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Other tasks included profile work, design of mechanically - stabilized embankment (MSE) retaining walls, detailing of plans, quarterly calculations and drafting Advanced Planning Studies (APS) for six bridges within the project limits. This $142 million project involved integrating the on- and off - ramps of four interchanges within a mile of freeway and included both gravity and pressure pipe design. The design called for the construction of nine new merging lanes, five new bridges, widening of a creek overcrossing, and a new freeway to freeway direct HOV connector. Within the one mile stretch of US 101, the project discharged to two creeks and the City -owned drainage system. Union City Boulevard Lane Configuration Study, Union City, CA Project engineer responsible for the preparation of a study report. The project studied 2'/i miles of roadway between the Fremont City limit and Smith Avenue and considered the addition of a 3rd lane in both directions of travel along Union City Blvd by widening into the existing median. Tasks included writing the study report, preliminary design layout of roadway, presentation to City Council on alternatives, and coordination of internal team. Homer Avenue Undercrossing Project, Palo Alto, CA Project engineer for the design of a pedestrian and bicycle tunnel below two Caltrain railroad tracks (accommodates the ultimate 4 -track alignment). Challenges and constraints of the project included the design of ADA access ramps to /from the undercrossing, preservation of trees, fiberoptic line relocations, severely limited construction budget and schedule. Major tasks included coordinating project design criteria for the tunnel design with the architect, City staff, JPB representatives and other subconsultants, horizontal and vertical layout, construction detailing and construction support. Vineyard Road Bridge at Laguna Creek, Sacramento, CA Roadway project engineer responsible for the roadway design portion of this new replacement bridge over Laguna Creek on Vineyard Road. The new replacement structure is a concrete slab bridge designed to clear the 100 -year floodplain while maintaining a low profile required by the road geometrics. The existing road was removed and widened for approximately 2,000 feet and includes the addition of concrete sidewalks, ADA ramps, multi -use trail, and a concrete median. Responsibilities for roadway design work included overseeing the preparation of construction PS &E documents, coordinating internal staff tasks, checking all roadway design elements with bridge designer, and providing bid and construction support to County staff. Old County Road Bridge, Santa Cruz County, CA Roadway project engineer for design of a replacement bridge for a 1917 timber structure supported on shallow concrete spread footings. Services include field survey, topographic mapping, right -of -way engineering, hydraulic analyses and documentation, bridge and roadway design, bridge alternatives analyses and type selection, environmental clearance and permitting, construction document preparation, bidding assistance, and construction support services. Responsibilities included coordination with bridge designer, design of roadway elements and cost estimate preparation through PS &E documents. Hatch Mott Charmaine S. Zamora, PE MacDonald Page 3 Thorne Road Bridge Bridge Replacement Project at Arroyo Seco River, Monterey County, CA Roadway project engineer for the final geometric design services to replace the existing bridge across the Arroyo Seco River and the roadway approaches to the bridge. The bridge was a low - water crossing consisting of a 30- foot -wide reinforced concrete slab placed over an earthen berm with concrete aprons, six 24 -inch corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culverts, and four 36 -inch CMP culverts. Once the existing crossing was removed, it was re- graded and Thorne Road was raised. The new bridge is a 600 -foot, four -span, cast -in- place, post- tensioned concrete box girder bridge supported by a driven pile foundation. Responsibilities included roadway design of the approaches to the bridge and delivery of PS &E documents. Roadway design work consisted of project coordination with the County, utility relocation coordination, contour grading of the Arroyo Seco River channel, reconfiguration of the intersection of Los Coches Road and Thorne Road, modifying the profile of Thorne Road, and pavement delineation /signing design. Anzar Road Bridge over San Juan Creek, San Juan Bautista, CA Roadway engineer responsible for leading the design team of an HBP- funded single -span replacement of the existing two -span structure over San Juan Creek. The existing bridge is functionally obsolete and will be replaced with a new 55- foot -long bridge on a higher profile with standard lanes and shoulder widths. The project will also include approximately 400 feet of roadway approach work on either side of the bridge. The project is expected to utilize a traffic detour over local roads to allow a full closure of the existing roadway. Closure of the existing roadway will allow expedited construction, saving the project time and money. Responsibilities include horizontal and vertical layout, construction detailing and cost estimation. Newell Road Bridge Replacement at San Francisquito Creek, Palo Alto, CA Roadway engineer for replacement of a structurally and hydraulically deficient bridge at San Francisquito Creek. This bridge replacement is part of an overall project to increase the hydraulic capacity of the San Francisquito Creek channel and provide 100 -year flood protection. Funding for this project is coming in part from the federal HBP. Responsibilities include alternatives analysis for project selection of preferred alignment of roadway, impact analysis to adjacent private properties, cost estimation, design exception work and internal staff coordination of design tasks. Crows Landing Road Bridge at San Joaquin River, Stanislaus County, CA Lead roadway engineer responsible for the design of Crows Landing Road, including overseeing the preparation of construction PS &E, along with coordinating internal staff tasks. The project includes a bridge replacement, raising and widening Crows Landing Road, and conforming design along Carpenter Road. The replacement structure consists of a five -span, post - tensioned, concrete box- girder bridge with an overall length of 686 feet. It is located approximately four miles east along Crows Landing Road from the junction of Crows Landing Road and SR 33 and crosses the San Joaquin River. I -680/1 -880 Cross Connector Study, Santa Clara/Alameda Counties, CA Project engineer responsible for developing corridor alternatives, cost estimates, and preparation of study leading to conceptual alternatives for reducing congestion in the east -west direction between I -680 and I -880 in the cities of Fremont and Milpitas. The purpose of the study was to determine how best to address the congestion resulting from traffic coming from north and south I -680 into the Golden Triangle. With extensive traffic analysis and consideration of over 100 project alternatives, a recommendation for cross- connector improvements was made. The results were compiled in 2 documents, called the Cross Connector Brainstorming Summary Report and the Cross Connector Conceptual Study Report. Leisure Town Overcrossing and I -80 Interchange Road Improvements, Vacaville, CA Civil designer responsible for preparing erosion control plans and details, including Temporary Water Pollution Control details along Leisure Town Road and Interstate 80. Tasks included coordinating design issues and information with the project manager and other team members in other offices and preparing construction documents. Hatch Mott Charmalne S. Zamora, PE MacDonald Page 4 Pope - Chaucer Street Bridge Replacement at San Francisquito Creek, Palo Alto, CA Roadway engineer for replacement of the arch bridge to increase the hydraulic capacity of the crossing, allowing passage of the 100 -year storm event. Efforts include extensive public outreach, update of hydrology and hydraulic models for the creek, evaluation of bridge type alternatives, development of roadway profiles, identification of creek restoration opportunities, and preparation of PS &E. Schulte Road Sport Complex, Tracy, CA Project engineer for the preparation of final design and bid documents for a 140 -acre sports complex comprising of baseball, softball, and soccer fields. The project also consisted of widening Schulte Road, which included developing plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the County of San Joaquin. Responsibilities included overall coordination of design between internal staff and subconsultants, City and County staff, and third party utility companies along with roadway design work. Veterans Memorial Park - Broadway Road Widening, American Canyon, CA Project manager for the preparation of plans; construction notes, and details for the Broadway Road widening between the Vallejo City limits and American Canyon Road. The roadway widening is in front of the existing park on the west side of the road; however, the east side of the road is also being widened along portions of Broadway Road. Tasks included project management and scheduling of internal personnel, preparing construction documents and specifications, and coordinating design issues with the architect. Lozanos Road at Auburn Ravine Bridge Replacement, Placer County, CA Roadway project engineer for preparation of civil plans, construction notes and details for Lozanos Road Bridge replacement at Auburn Ravine between Bald Hill Road and Geraldson Road. The replacement structure is a single -span, cast -in- place, post - tensioned box girder bridge which incorporated a tight horizontal curve, vertical curve, and superelevation in its alignment. Tasks included project management and scheduling of internal personnel, roadway geometric design, coordinating design issues and information with the project manager and other team members in other offices, and preparing construction documents and cost estimates. Carlo Street Ramp Conversion Project, Milpitas, CA Project engineer for the final design of an off -ramp. The existing on -ramp from Carlo Street to eastbound Calaveras Blvd was converted to an off -ramp from Calaveras Blvd to Carlo Street. Tasks included coordination with the client and other stakeholders, preparing plans, specifications, and cost estimates. San Martin Parking Lot & Street Improvements, San Martin, CA Project engineer for the final design to widen San Martin Avenue between Depot Street and Monterey Road, including improvements to a Caltrain overflow parking lot. Tasks included coordination with the client, County representatives, and subconsultants along with preparation of the PS &E package. Tuolumne Road North Bypass Project, Tuolumne County, CA Project engineer responsible for the design of a major county collector roadway that allows traffic to bypass the small community of Tuolumne City on the way from Sonora to the new Black Oak Casino. Because of narrow roadways and tight turns within the town, buses going to the casino were formerly required by Tuolumne County to use a different route which reaches snow elevations during the winter. The project included approximately 3,500 feet of new roadway. Major tasks included plan and profile work, contour grading, retaining wall layout, stage construction design and construction detailing for the project. Power Inn Road Grade Separation, Sacramento, CA Civil designer assisting project engineer with the horizontal geometry and revised profile of the roadway. Power Inn Road was separated from the light -rail trains by changing the profile of the roadway to go under the tracks. Major tasks included layout of retaining walls, stairways, construction details, utility locations, staged construction, drafting of plans, calculating quantities, and preparing cost estimates.