Loading...
02/04/2021 Planning Commission Regular Agenda PacketRegular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda February 4, 2021 6:30 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Reid Lerner: reid.lerner@cityofgilroy.org Fabian Morales Medina: fabian.morales@cityofgilroy.org Manny Bhandal: manny.bhandal@cityofgilroy.org Chair: Tom Fischer: tom.fischer@cityofgilroy.org Joan Lewis: joan.lewis@cityofgilroy.org John Doyle: john.doyle@cityofgilroy.org Andrew Ridley: andrew.ridley@cityofgilroy.org PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE www.cityofgilroy.org VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ON THE CITY WEBSITE www.cityofgilroy.org. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THIS MEETING WILL BE LIMITED. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE ENCOURAGED TO PARTICIPATE BY EMAILING ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS TO CHRISTINA RUIZ AT christina.ruiz@cityofgilroy.org OR BY LEAVING A VOICE MESSAGE COMMENT BY CALLING (408) 846-0269, PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 4, 2021. THE FEBRUARY 4, 2021 MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 In order to minimize the spread of the COVID 19 virus, the City will be offering telephone and email options for public comments at this meeting. The public is encouraged to participate in this meeting by telephone or email as follows: You are strongly encouraged to watch the meeting live on the City of Gilroy’s website at www.cityofgilroy.org or on Cable Channel 17. To view from the website, select the Council Agendas and Videos button from the home page. PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.COMMENTS MAY BE EMAILED TO THE CLERK PRIOR TO OR DURING THE MEETING AT christina.ruiz@cityofgilroy.org AND MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE THE CHAIR OPENS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE ITEM. ADDITIONALLY, COMMENTS MAY BE MADE BY LEAVING A VOICE MESSAGE AT (408) 846-0269, PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 4, 2021. IMPORTANT: identify the Agenda Item Number or PUBLIC COMMENT in the subject line of your email. The Clerk will read the first three minutes of each email into the publ ic record. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Governors Order N -29-20, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please cont act the Community Development Department a minimum of 2 hours prior to the meeting at (408) 846-0269. If you challenge any planning or land use decision made at this meeting in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing held at this meeting, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please take notice that the time within which to seek judicial review of any final administrative determination reached at this meeting is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. A Closed Session may be called during this meeting pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) if a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the City on the advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Planning Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. REPORT ON POSTING THE AGENDA AND ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three-minute time limit). This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Planning Commission on matters not on the agenda. The law does not permit the Planning Commission action or extended discussion of any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Planning Commission action is requested, the Planning Commission may place the matter on a future agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR RELATED PROJECT APPLICATIONS WILL BE HEARD CONCURRENTLY AND ACTION WILL BE TAKEN INDIVIDUALLY. COMPANION PROJECTS UNDER NEW BUSINESS WILL BE TAKEN UP FOR ACTION PRIOR TO, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE RELATED PUBLIC HEARING. THIS REQUIRES DEVIATION IN THE ORDER OF BUSINESS AS NOTED WITHIN THE AGENDA. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. December 3, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Architectural and Site Review and Conditional Use Permit requests for expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray Avenue. 1. Staff Report: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner 2. Open Public Hearing 3. Close Public Hearing 4. Planning Commission Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications 5. Possible Action: Staff has analyzed the proposed project, and recommends that the Planning Commission: a) Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit CUP 20-01 (20050042), Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray, subject to certain findings and conditions. b) Adopt a resolution approving Architectural & Site Permit AS 20-09 (20050041), Architectural & Site Review for the expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray, subject to certain findings and conditions. (Roll Call Vote) VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Selection of Planning Commission Chair and Vice-Chair for 2021 1. Staff Report: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair B. 2021 Planning Commission Task Force/Committee Assignments 1. Staff Report: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Review Planning Commission assignments and make adjustments as necessary. C. 2021 Gilroy City Council Meeting Planning Commission Presentation Schedule 1. Staff Report: Karen Garner, Community Development Director 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Review the presentation meeting schedule and select dates. VII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A. January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log VIII. PRESENTATION BY MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IX. REPORTS BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner John Doyle - Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Commissioner Fabian Morales Medina - Historic Heritage Committee X. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT XI. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT XII. ADJOURNMENT to the Next Meeting of March 11, 2021 at 6:30 P.M. Planning Commission Regular Meeting of DECEMBER 3, 2020 I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. REPORT ON POSTING THE AGENDA AND ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Reid Lerner Planning Commissioner Remote Casey Estorga Vice Chair Remote Fabian Morales Planning Commissioner Remote John Doyle Planning Commissioner Remote Tom Fischer Chair Remote III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. October 1, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Vice Chair Estorga, seconde d by Commissioner Morales Medina to consent the minutes from the Regular Planning Commission Meeting on October 1, 2020. Roll Call Vote: Aye's: Doyle, Estorga, Lerner, Morales Medina, Fischer No's: None Abstain: None Absent: None Motion Passes 5-0-0-0 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Map application TM 20-02. (Roll Call Vote) 1. Staff Report: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner 2. Public Comment 3. Planning Commission Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications 4. Possible Action: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner presented the report. Comments were received by Commissioner Estorga and Lerner. Chair Fischer opened public hearing. No public comments. Chair Fischer closed public hearing. Planning Commission Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communication: 4.1 Packet Pg. 4 Communication: December 3, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (CONSENT AGENDA) Commissioner Lerner spoke with Gloria Ballard from MH Engineering regarding concerns with the project. Motion was made by Commissioner Doyle, seconded by Commissioner Lerner to adopt a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of Tentative Map application TM 20-02. Yes: Estorga, Doyle, Lerner, Morales Medina, Fischer No: None Abstain: None Absent: None Motion Passes 5-0-0-0 VI. NEW BUSINESS - NONE VII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A. October 26, 2020 Planning Division Current Project Log Commissioner Lerner requested an update on the Housing Element. Senior Planner, Kraig Tambornini and Assistant City Attorney, Jolie Houston will provide an update on the Annual Housing Element Progress and Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) at the next regular Planning Commission meeting. VIII. PRESENTATION BY MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION - NONE IX. REPORTS BY COMMISSION MEMBERS Chair Tom Fischer - General Plan Advisory Committee - No meeting; no report. Vice Chair Casey Estorga - Street Naming; No meeting; no report. High Speed Rail Authority; meeting was held but unable to attend; will provide report at the next meeting. Commissioner John Doyle - Bicycle Pedestrian Commission; No meeting; no report. Commissioner Fabian Morales Medina- Historic Heritage Committee; No meeting; no report. X. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT XI. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT XII. ADJOURNMENT to the Next Meeting of January 7, 2021 at 6:30 P.M. Christina Ruiz, Management Assistant 4.1 Packet Pg. 5 Communication: December 3, 2020 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (CONSENT AGENDA) Karen L. Garner DIRECTOR Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197 Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429 http://www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: February 4, 2021 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Architectural and Site Review and Conditional Use Permit requests for expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has analyzed the proposed project, and recommends that the Planning Commission: a) Adopt a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit CUP 20-01 (20050042), Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray, subject to certain findings and conditions. b) Adopt a resolution approving Architectural & Site Permit AS 20-09 (20050041), Architectural & Site Review for the expansion of an existing self-storage facility at 8900 Murray, subject to certain findings and conditions. (Roll Call Vote) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Extra Space Mini-Storage project requests Conditional Use Permit and Architectural and Site Review approvals to construct a new 30,978 square foot, two- story self-storage building on an existing 71,085 square foot self-storage facility site. The facility is located on a 4.8-acre property within the M1 Limited Industrial District, Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combing District, at 8900 Murray Avenue; APN: 835-04-069. The applicant has provided a project statement in support of this request, which has been attached to this report. The mini-storage facility currently has seven one-story storage buildings and one two- story office and caretaker building at the front of the site. The office area is 850 square foot and the caretaker unit is 1,050 square foot with a one-car garage. The facility also has recreational vehicle (RV) storage area along the north side of the site. The new two- 5.A Packet Pg. 6 2 story building would replace approximately one-half of the recreational vehicle storage area. Building forms are primarily rectangular. The new two-story building includes variation in height profile and minor articulation of elements to give additional visual relief. A mixture of material finishes is proposed to add visual interest, including pre-finished metal siding, masonry walls, composite metal panels, stucco plaster, and fixed vision glass windows with anodized aluminum framing. The color palette includes a mix of off-whites and greys, with “extra-space wasabi green”, providing a contrasting color on all sides of the building. Additional improvements include replacement of the cyclone fencing in the front yard with a 6’-0” high aluminum picket fence with a Tricorn Black finish, new landscaping and trees along the front and rear of the site, five-foot side yard landscaping along the side of the new building, and building signage. BACKGROUND: The property was originally entitled as a mini-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility on October 11, 1998 with Architectural & Site Review AS 97-29. The self-storage use did not require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) at the time of establishment. The original site plan showed the location of a potential phase II with additional self-storage in the proximity of the currently proposed building. The owner has placed temporary containers for additional storage in this area. The owner has been advised these containers must be removed and would need to be replaced with a building for permanent storage. The current zoning ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for establishment or expansion of any mini-storage facilities in the M1 zone, along with the Architectural and Site Review (AS) for design and site improvements. Conditional Use Permits, and Architectural and Site Review permits for property in the Murray – Las Animas Overlay District, both require Planning Commission review and approval at a public hearing. Property owners and residents of the entire overlay district are required to be noticed. Project plans were reviewed by the City Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) which includes Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire staff. Recommendations of the TAC members have been incorporated into the project plans and/or are included as recommended conditions in attached resolution(s). This internal TAC review is conducted to ensure that proposed development may proceed to the construction phase without any significant changes to the design or use. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses: LOCATION EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project Site Mini-storage Facility Industrial Park M1/Limited Industrial North Vacant Industrial Park M1/Limited Industrial South Drainage Channel (W. Park and PF/Public Facility 5.A Packet Pg. 7 3 LOCATION EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Llagas Creek) Recreation Facility East Highway 101 N/A N/A West Multi-tenant Industrial Industrial Park M1/Limited Industrial Environmental Assessment: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, In-fill Development Projects, exempts those projects from further environmental review characterized as “in-fill development” that meet the following criteria: a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable plan policies as well as applicable zoning designation and regulations. b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. c) The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services . The project qualifies for this exemption as it consists of permitted urban in-fill development comprising less than 5 acres which can be served by existing utilities. Further, the project does not require submittal of an application for Private Development projects, pursuant to the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan, which is implemented by the City for local projects. The plan allows the City to issue local permits for any impacts to protected wildlife or habitat as a result of development within the City. The project will be assessed for payment of nitrogen deposition only mitigation fees prior to construction, in compliance with the regional habitat plan. Information on Project Permitting and Fees can be found on the Habitat Agency website: Project Permitting & Fees | Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency, CA (scv-habitatagency.org) ANALYSIS: The following discussion provides the basis for staff recommending approval of the Architectural and Site Review permit and Conditional Use Permit, subject to findings and conditions. General Plan Consistency: The City's General Plan designates the subject site for Industrial Park uses, which supports the proposed project request. As such, the proposal conforms to the goals and policies of the General Plan. Key goals and policies, which pertain to the proposed project are discussed below: POLICY # SUMMARY ANALYSIS LU 1.1 Ensure an orderly, contiguous pattern of development that prioritizes infill development. The project is an infill development intensifying the use on an existing site within the requirements established by the zoning ordinance. 5.A Packet Pg. 8 4 LU 1.3 Phased commercial growth. Encourage development in the following order of priority:1.) within the urban service area, and; 2.) outside of it if the proposed development is too large or properties within the urban service area are unable to accommodate it. The property is located within the urban service area. LU 5.1 Ensure that new industrial developments contribute to the overall attractiveness of the community. The proposal was reviewed and modified to comply with the Industrial Design Guidelines and the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District Policy in order to ensure that the project contributed to the overall attractiveness of the community. LU 5.3 Encourage the screening of loading areas and open storage areas so that they are not visible from major roads. Additional trees and landscaping are proposed within a five-foot landscaping buffer along the rear of the property, to screen the existing storage buildings from Highway 101. Rehabilitation of the front landscaping, including additional trees and a new fence is proposed along the property frontage that will screen the storage areas from Murray Avenue. LU 8.3 Encourage new developments facing U.S. 101 to provide landscape screening. Additional landscaping with perennials and trees is proposed along the rear of the property adjacent to U.S. 101. LU 8.7 Enforce sign regulations and design standards to reduce sign clutter and illegal signage along corridors. Proposed signage evaluated programmatically as part of Architectural & Site review. The square footage complies with the maximum allowable square footage in the M1 zone. The illegal banner oriented toward the freeway along the rear of the property facing U.S. 101 is also being removed as a condition of approval for this permit. LU 8.13 Encourage measures to limit light pollution from outdoor sources. New lighting on the building has been oriented in a way to prevent off-site glare. The General Plan map and policies can be accessed online at: 2040 General Plan | Gilroy, CA - Official Website (cityofgilroy.org). 5.A Packet Pg. 9 5 Zoning Code Development Standards Compliance: The project complies with the M1 zoning district development standards, as follows (Note that setbacks and height shown are for the proposed structure, while lot coverage, off-street parking, and landscaping were analyzed for the entire site): STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED CONFORMS? Lot Coverage 60% Maximum 45% coverage Yes Front Setback 41 feet 323 feet Yes Rear Setback 0 feet 43 feet-2 inches Yes North Side Setback 0 feet 5 feet-4 inches Yes South Side Setback 0 feet 247 feet (+/-) Yes Building Height 35 feet/2 stories 33 feet /2 stories Yes Off-street parking 5 spaces 6 spaces Yes Front Landscaping 20 feet 40 feet (+/-) Yes Side/Rear Landscaping 5 feet Varies, 5’-4” min. depth Yes The zoning code map can be accessed online at: Zoning-Map (civicplus.com). The M1 and overlay purpose can be found in chapter Zoning 30.20 M1 LIMITED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (codepublishing.com) and the land use types and development standards can be found in chapter Zoning 30.23 INDUSTRIAL TABLES (codepublishing.com). Conditional Use Permit (CUP 20-01) Analysis: Gilroy City Code, Zoning Chapter Zoning 30.50 PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS (codepublishing.com), section 30.40.30, provides the standards for review of a CUP request. The Planning Commission may approve a use contingent upon acceptance and observance of specified conditions. In general, this review is conducted to ensure operations would not conflict with zoning standards, policies or the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Commission can approve the use if the following findings can be made: 1) That the proposed use is properly located in relation to the general plan and to the community as a whole and to other land uses and to transportation and service facilities in the vicinity. 2) That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity, or cause any damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property. Industrial lands support local needs, warehousing, manufacturing and storage. Uses that create employment are more desirable. Mini storage uses do not create significant job growth and may serve regional as well as local needs. The CUP review ensures new facilities are evaluated on a case-by-case basis to satisfy City needs and policies. 5.A Packet Pg. 10 6 This proposal would expand an existing site and area already used for mini-storage operations. A residential neighborhood is nearby south of Llagas Creek. Mini storage is a low noise and traffic generator. Expansion of this lower-impact light industrial use would not adversely affect or cause nuisance to these residential properties. There are also no compatibility concerns with the use and surrounding light industrial uses. Based on this analysis, staff supports approval of the project based on satisfaction of the above findings and subject to conditions, as reflected in the draft Resolution of Approval CUP 20-01. A condition of approval is recommended to confirm all unpermitted cargo container units are removed prior to issuance of a building permit. Architecture and Site Review (AS 20-09) Analysis: Gilroy City Code, Zoning Chapter Zoning 30.50 PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS (codepublishing.com), section 30.40.40, provides the scope of for review for an AS request. This review includes evaluation for compliance with the Murray-Las Animas Avenue overlay combining district policy (Microsoft Word - Murray- Las Animas Avenue Overlay POLICY adopted 1- 5- 09.doc (cityofgilroy.org)). The Murray Avenue zoning overlay and related policy are used to soften the impact of industrial buildings fronting Murray Avenue, especially when they are across the street from existing residential homes and ensure: • Enhanced landscaping - increased streetscape buffering landscaping • Front yard setbacks to match homes across the street • Aesthetically pleasing fencing - same rules as residential • Appropriate building heights - similar to residential • Respect of important view sheds • Attractive architecture - with front facades looking residential with windows & overhangs • Building materials - limit the number of metal buildings and encourage multi- material buildings • Suitable building colors - natural tones with one to three accent colors • Appropriate number of driveways - minimizing the number of driveways • Incorporation of site considerations - achieving a campus industrial look along Murray Avenue This site is located north of Llagas Creek. Residential uses on Murray are south of the site and creek, on the same street side. Thus, thus site is not adjacent to residential fronting Murray Avenue, so the more stringent residential compatibility policies are not deemed applicable. Enhanced design, fencing and landscaping improvements of the policy have been considered. Staff recommends the project adequately addresses the applicable review requirements contained in Gilroy City Code Section 30.50.40, as follows: a. Traffic Safety and Efficiency. Review is required to evaluate the use with regard to traffic conditions, site access and pedestrian circulation, any necessary roadway or 5.A Packet Pg. 11 7 streetlight improvements, adequacy of on-site parking, lighting and landscaping, and location of loading facilities. Off-street parking demand was established for the original use based on the size of the rental office, and for the caretaker’s quarters at the front of the site. Parking is required as follows: ➢ 850 square feet office requires 1 space/300 square feet = 2.83 spaces ➢ Caretakers Dwelling = 2 spaces Total = 4.83 is rounded up to 5 spaces required. The site currently has 6 parking spaces, 5 uncovered and 1 covered garage space. The project does not propose modification to the existing parking and access driveway, which still comply with current city standards. The 3 parking spaces associated with the office are adequate for occasional customer visits. Typically, loading and unloading along the drive aisle adjacent to a unit. In response to concerns regarding fire access, the applicant has provided a fire truck circulation plan and designated loading and unloading areas near the new building. Sheet C5.0 of the project plans shows fire access. The designated loading and unloading areas are designated on the site plan sheet A-1.1. Staff also commented on the initial photometric that all off -site glare must be controlled. The applicant relocated the lighting fixtures on the sides of the building to eliminate off-site glare. b. Outdoor Advertising and Signs. Review of appearance, compatibility with adjacent development, location, type, size, illumination, etc. is conducted to ensure signage will result in a favorable image of the city and not create traffic hazards. The proposed project includes the removal of an illegal banner oriented toward the freeway. The project also includes a seven-square foot directional sign designating the loading area, and two 62 square foot building mounted Extra Space Storage channel letter signs. The new signage complies with the maximum one-square foot per lineal foot of building frontage maximum and is located on the north and south building faces, as shown in sheet A-3.1 of the project plans. c. Site Development. Review is conducted to ensure the site is physically suited for the development, is in harmony with its setting, provides adequate spacing and setbacks, results in orderly placement and orientation of structures and uses, and would not conflict with easements. The proposal fully complies with the requirements of the zoning ordinance as analyzed above. In addition, the proposed development is maintaining the 43’ rear setback from highway 101 that was included as part of the original Architectural and Site approval AS 97-29 to visually separate the development from the freeway. 5.A Packet Pg. 12 8 The plans illustrate the detail and materials proposed to provide a more attractive design of the two-story building. This palette ties together the new building with the existing ones visible along Murray Avenue to achieve architectural cohesion within the development. In response to staff concerns with reflectivity of paint finish, the applicant revised “wasabi green” from semi-gloss to matte. The use of the matte finish, and review of a panel sample have been included as proposed conditions of approval for this development. d. Landscaping/Fencing: Review is conducted to ensure the project is in harmony with adjacent development, provides screening of outdoor storage and utilities, preserves healthy trees, and ensures continued maintenance. The width of the proposed rear and side landscape buffer varies, but a minimum width of 5’ of dedicated landscaping with trees and perennials is included, as required by the City industrial landscape requirements. Landscaping includes a mix of perennials along with planting used as part of the required storm water detention basin improvements. In response to staff comments regarding the visibility of rollup doors from US 101 and the adequacy of the rear landscaping buffer, the applicant added additional shade trees along the rear of the property to screen the one-story storage buildings. Rehabilitation of the frontage landscaping is also being included in this development, and includes preservation of the existing trees, addition of new shade trees, and a mixture of perennials and ginger tone three-quarter inch (3/4”) crushed rock. In response to staff comments regarding the existing front chain link fencing, the applicant is proposing a 6’-0” high aluminum picket fence with a Tricorn Black finish. The enhanced fencing brings the fencing in line with the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District Policy requirement for high-quality fencing. FINDINGS: Staff recommends the following findings can be made in support of the Architectural and Site permit request: i) The proposed Architectural & Site request is generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the Industrial Design Guidelines. ii) The proposed Architectural & Site request is generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District Policy. iii) The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. iv) The proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the City's Subdivision and Land Development Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act. v) Public utilities and infrastructure improvements needed in order to serve the proposed project are in proximity. vi) There will be no significant environmental impacts as a result of this project. 5.A Packet Pg. 13 9 The draft PC Resolution AS 20-09 includes recommended findings and conditions to support project approval. Noticing: Property owner and resident information (i.e. list, labels, and map) for all properties within the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District were generated by a Title Company using current ownership data. Notice is required to be given at least 10 days prior to the meeting. On or before January 22, notices of this Planning Commission meeting were mailed to the property owners and residents along within other interested parties. In addition, notice was published in the Gilroy Dispatch and the property has been posted with on- site signage notifying of pending development. The Planning Commission public hearing packets are also made available through the City's webpage. Appeal Procedure: In accordance with Section 30.51.50 of the Gilroy City Code, the Planning Commission's decision may be appealed, in writing, to the City Council within 20 days of adoption of the resolution. Appeal forms may be obtained from the City Clerk and must be submitted with the appropriate fee before the end of the appeal period. Next Steps: The next steps to act on this approval would be removal any remaining non-permitted containers or banners and obtain a building permit. The building permit must be secured within one (1) year of the project approval. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 3. Applicants Findings and Justification 4. CUP 20-01 Draft PC Resolution 5. AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution 5.A Packet Pg. 14 Note: Map is for reference purposes only. Vicinity Map 7,840 City of Gilroy, GIS Services 1,306.7 1:NAD_1983_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Feet 653.33 Feet1,306.70 AS 20-09, CUP 20-01 - 8900 Murray Avenue 5.A.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Vicinity Map (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 12"W(P)12"W(P)W(P)WW(P) W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)12"W(P)12"W(P)12"W(P)W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P)W(P)15"SS(P)15"SS(P)SS 96"SD(P)96"SD(P)96"SD(P)24"SD(P)24"SD(P)15"SD(P) 18"SD(P)48"SD(P)36"SD(P)36"SD(P)36"SD(P)18"SD 18"SD 18"SD OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHG.2"PL(P)G (P )G.2"PL(P)G.2"PL(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)40' 39'-11.97" 10' 207.0 2 0 8 .0209.0 HIGHWAY 101LANDS OFSTATE OF CALIFORNIAN68‘18'49"E 617.89' S68‘18'49"W 617.37'N21‘41'11"W109.86'R=1200.00'D=4‘54'12"L=102.70'R=1200.00'D=4‘54'12"L=102.70'20.01'BASIS OFBEARINGSN21‘41'11"W1231.95'442.25'N23‘11'21"W315.11'43.78'210.53 SET CROSS209.33 SET CROSS208.57 FND 1IN IP209.07 SET MAG209.04 SET MAG207.76 SET CROSS207.60 SET CROSS210.76 SET MAG NAIL206.47 FND 2" IP207.53 FND 1 3/4IN IPTM u r r a y A v e n u eS o u t h V a l l e y F r e e w a y ( U. S. 1 0 1 )15' - 8"28' - 8"62' - 8"1 STORY 5,150 S.F. Existing Building B 1 STORY 8,104 S.F. Existing Building C 1 STORY 25,964 S.F. Existing Building F 1 STORY 6,603 S.F. Existing Building D 1 STORY 6,502 S.F. Existing Building E 1 STORY 7,327 S.F. Existing Building G 1 STORY 8,056 S.F. Existing Building H TO REMAIN Existing RV Parking 2 STORIES 30,978 S.F. S-1 IIB W/ AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS Proposed Building EXISTING PREFABRICATED STORAGE CONTAINERS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PREFABRICATED STORAGE CONTAINERS TO BE REMOVED Project North James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper Expansion of an Existing Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-1.1 Site Plan Context Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 1929 Site 02 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture Sheet Index A-1.1 Site Plan Context Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 A-1.2 Site Plan Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 A-1.3 Existing Site Photos Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 A-1.4 Existing Site Photos Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 A-1.5 Site Lighting Photometrics Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C1.0 Topographic Survey Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C2.0 Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C3.0 Preliminary Utility Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C4.0 Stormwater Management Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C4.1 Stormwater Management Notes & Details Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 C5.0 Fire Access Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 L1 Landscape Concept Planning Submittal -Sept. 29, 2020 L-2 Plant Images & Water Use Planning Submittal -Sept. 29, 2020 A-2.1 Floor & Roof Plans Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 A-2.2 Roof Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 A-3.1 Exterior Elevations Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 A-4.1 Project Views Planning Submittal - November 19, 2020 A-5.1 Colors & Materials Planning Submittal - November 19, 2020 1. Non-permitted banner signage, facing highway 101 will be removed. 2. New signage is shown for reference only. Separate application for new signage will be submitted. 5.A.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 12"W(P)12"W(P)W(P)WW(P) W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)W(P)12"W(P)12"W(P)12"W(P)W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P) W(P)W(P)15"SS(P)15"SS(P)SS 96"SD(P)96"SD(P)96"SD(P)24"SD(P)24"SD(P)15"SD(P) 18"SD(P)48"SD(P)36"SD(P)36"SD(P)36"SD(P)18"SD 18"SD 18"SD OHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHG.2"PL(P)G (P )G.2"PL(P)G.2"PL(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)E(P)40' 39'-11.97" 10' 207.0 2 0 8 .0209.0 LANDS OF 9015 MURRAY AVE LLC APN: 835-04-068 HIGHWAY 101LANDS OFSTATE OF CALIFORNIAN68‘18'49"E 617.89' S68‘18'49"W 617.37'N21‘41'11"W109.86'R=1200.00'D=4‘54'12"L=102.70'R=1200.00'D=4‘54'12"L=102.70'20.01'BASIS OFBEARINGSN21‘41'11"W1231.95'442.25'N23‘11'21"W315.11'43.78'210.53 SET CROSS212.71 SET HUB & MAG209.33 SET CROSS208.57 FND 1IN IP209.07 SET MAG209.04 SET MAG207.76 SET CROSS207.60 SET CROSS210.76 SET MAG NAIL206.47 FND 2" IP207.53 FND 1 3/4IN IPT 15' - 8"28' - 8"62' - 8"M u r r a y A v e n u eS o u t h V a l l e y F r e e w a y ( U. S. 1 0 1 )1-STORY3,438 S.F. FOOTPRINTExisting Building A2 STORIES 1,005 S.F. FOOTPRINT 2,010 S.F. TOTAL Existing Office 1 STORY 5,150 S.F. Existing Building B 1 STORY 8,104 S.F. Existing Building C 1 STORY 25,964 S.F. Existing Building F 1 STORY 6,603 S.F. Existing Building D 1 STORY 6,502 S.F. Existing Building E 1 STORY 7,327 S.F. Existing Building G 1 STORY 8,056 S.F. Existing Building H TO REMAIN Existing RV Parking 2 STORIES 30,978 S.F. S-1 IIB W/ AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS Proposed BuildingLANDSCAPE BUFFER5' - 0"BIORETENTION BASIN -SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS PROPERTY LINE NEW LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE TO PROTECT IN PLACE NEW CURB & GUTTER SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS STAGING AREA FOR TRUCK/VAN LOADING SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS NEW FIRE HYDRANT NEW CONCRETE GUTTER JOIN W/ EXISTING EXISTING CONCRETE GUTTER TO REMAIN STAGING AREA FOR TRUCK/VAN LOADING SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING PARKING SPACES TO REMOVE EXISTING PARKING SPACES TO REMOVE 22' - 4"262' - 8"17' - 7"5' - 4"62' - 8"NEW FIRE HYDRANT EXISTING POWER LINE EASEMENT NEW LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENT 43' - 2"262' - 8" NEW 6'-0" HIGH ALUMINUM PICKET FENCING -SW 6258 TRICORN BLACK STAGING AREA FOR TRUCK/VAN LOADING SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 27' - 11" ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL85' - 3"33' - 3"30' - 2"15' - 9"31' - 11"Site Notes: 1. 48" minimum width accessible path of travel. 2. There are no abrupt changes in elevation along the path of travel shown on the drawings. The run slope along the path of travel shall not exceed 5% and the cross slope shall not exceed 2% (inspector to verify) 3. A path of travel connecting the buildings is not required per CBC Section 11b-206.2.2 Exception: “an accessible route shall not be required between accessible buildings, accessible facilities, accessible elements, and accessible spaces if the only means of access between them is a vehicular way not providing pedestrian access" 4. Frontage used for allowable area increases per CBC 506.2 shall be permanently maintained. 5. FSD = fire separation distance per CBC 202. The distance measured from the building face to one of the following: A. The closest interior lot line B. To the centerline of a street, an alley or public way; or C. To an imaginary line between two buildings on the property. The distance shall be measured at right angles from the face of the wall. Project North James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper Expansion of an Existing Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-1.2 Site Plan Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 1929 Site 02 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture 0 Feet 20' 40' 5.A.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-1.3 Existing Site Photos Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Extra Space Storage Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture From South Valley Freeway Looking South Photo Taken: September, 2019 From South Valley Freeway looking NW Photo Taken: Setpember, 2019 From Murray Avenue Looking East Photo Taken: March, 2019 From Murray Avenue Looking North Photo Taken: March, 2019 5.A.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-1.4 Existing Site Photos Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Extra Space Storage Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture Taken May, 2019 5.A.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Project North James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper Expansion of an Existing Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-1.5 Site Lighting Photometrics Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 1929 Site 01.3 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture 5.A.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) PARCEL 3(697 M 35)APN: 835-04-069C1.0TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comABBREVIATIONSLEGENDNOTES”MURRAY AVENUE 5.A.bPacket Pg. 21Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) FF VARIESLEGENDC2.0PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGEUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comMURRAY AVENUEGRADING DETAIL1" = 10'SITE PLAN1" = 20'SEE GRADING DETAILNOTECONFORM TO EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM CROSSSLOPE OF 1:48 (2.083%) WITH NO HEIGHT CHANGES GREATER THAN12" - WITH 14" VERTICAL PER FOOT.SOURCE CONTROL & SITE DESIGN MEASURESSITE DESIGN:·MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCESITE DESIGN:·BENEFICIAL LANDSCAPING (MINIMIZES IRRIGATION, RUNOFF, PESTICIDES ANDFERTILIZERS; PROMOTES TREATMENT)·COVERED DUMPSTER AREA, DRAIN TO SANITARY SEWER)5.A.bPacket Pg. 22Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) C3.0PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comLEGENDMURRAY AVENUE 5.A.bPacket Pg. 23Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) PARCEL 3(697 M 35)APN: 835-04-069DMA 01(195,037 SF)C4.0STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comTCM 01*BIOTREATMENT SIZING BASED ON COMBINATION FLOW & VOLUME METHODBIOTREATMENT SUMMARY TABLEAREATCMTREATMENT TYPETOTAL AREA(SQ. FT.)IMPERVIOUSAREA (SQ. FT.)TREATMENTAREA REQ. (SQ.FT.)TREATMENTAREA PROVIDED(SQ. FT.)PONDINGDEPTH (IN.)*DMA 0101BIOTREATMENT POND195,037175,9985,0265,07412LEGENDPERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACES COMPARISON TABLEOVERALL TREATMENT AREA TOTALSMURRAY AVENUE DETENTION SUMMARY TABLEAREADETENTION METHODTOTAL AREA(SQ. FT.)IMPERVIOUSAREA (SQ. FT.)DETENTIONVOLUME REQ.(CU. FT.)DETENTIONVOLUME PROVIDED(CU. FT.)DMA 01BIOTREATMENT PONDGRAVEL LAYER195,037175,9982,5262625ON-SITE SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES······STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES5.A.bPacket Pg. 24Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES & DETAILSUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comC4.118" MIN. BSM NOTE:SURFACE AREA OF THE BIOTREATMENT SOIL SHALL EQUAL 4% OF THE AREA OFTHE SITE THAT DRAINS TO TREATMENT MEASURE, UNLESS SIZING CALCULATIONSARE SUBMITTED DEMONSTRATING THAT PROVISION C.3 REQUIREMENTS ARE METUSING A SMALLER SURFACE AREA.3 MAX6"6" MIN.SLOPE WITHPIPE6" MIN PONDING18" MIN. BSM18" MIN. BSM 118" MIN. BSM18" MIN. BSM4" DIA PERFORATED OR SLOTTEDSLOPED UNDERLAIN (SLOPED AT 0.50%MIN) WITH PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEEPLAN FOR CONNECTION TO C.B. & FORINVERT ELEVATION12" MIN OF CLASS II PERMEABLEROCK PER CALTRANS SPECIFICATIONS.CLEANOUT WITH CAP AT FIN.GRADE (SEE MUNICIPALSTANDARD DRAWING)BEGINNING OF LINE.NATIVE SOILDO NOT COMPACTGRAVITY DRAIN TOSTORM DRAIN ORDISCHARGE;BOTTOM-OUT ORSIDE-OUT OPTIONS(USE CHRISTY V12DRAIN BOX FORSIDE-OUT OPTION)OPTIONAL MOUNDING PARAMETERS:PLANTING MOUNDS CONSTRUCTED OF BSM MAY BEPROVIDED SUBJECT TO MUNICIPAL APPROVAL. TOPOF MOUNDS AT LEAST 2" BELOW CREST OFOVERFLOW RISER, LOW POINTS NO MORE THAN 12"BELOW CREST OF OVERFLOW RISEROVERFLOW RISER WITH GRATECHRISTY V12 12"X12" DRAIN BOX OR APPROVED EQUAL.DOME GRATE MAY BE ADEQUATE IN SOME CASES,SUBJECT TO LOCAL AGENCY APPROVAL.6-INCH MINIMUM12-INCH MAXIMUMABOVE LOW POINT OF PLANTING AREABIO-TREATMENT SOIL MIX (BSM)PER C.3 SPECIFICATIONS.INFILTRATION RATE MIN 5"/HRMAX 10"/HRBIORETENTION POND5.A.bPacket Pg. 25Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperJames GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comC5.0FIRE ACCESS5.A.bPacket Pg. 26Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 40'39'- 11.97"10'210.53 SET CROSS 2 1 2 . 7 1 S E T H UB & M A G209.33 SET CROSS208.57 FND 1IN IP209.07 SET MAG209.04 SET MAG207.76 SET CROSS207.60 SET CROSS210.76 SET MAG NAIL 2 0 7 . 5 3 F N D 1 3 / 4 I N I P M U R R A Y A V E N U E S O U T H V A L L E Y F R E E W A Y ( U. S. 1 0 1 ) Existing Building AExisting OfficeExisting Building BExisting Building CExisting Building FExisting Building DExisting Building EExisting Building GExisting Building HExisting RV ParkingProposed BuildingARBUTUS 'MARINA'MULTI-TRUNKMARINA MADRONEBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEPLANT LEGENDLANDSCAPE NOTESAll LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM.LANDSCAPING IS TO CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES & ORDINANCES.PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE LANDSCAPING AS SHOWN.SIZEQUANTITYWATER USE24" BOXSYMBOLCHONDROPETALUMTECTORUMSMALL CAPE RUSH5 GAL1 GAL37036" O.C.LOWLOWHETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIATOYONLOW7LOWMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSDEER GRASSACACIA REDOLENS'LOW BOY'PROSTRATE ACACIA1 GAL36" O.C.LOW5 GAL52RHAMNUS CALIFORNICACOFFEEBERRYLOW5 GAL87PRUNUS ILICIFOLIAHOLLYLEAF CHERRY24" BOX12LOW5 GAL619LOWCALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN'DWARF BOTTLE BRUSHLANTANA MONTEVIDENSISPURPLE TRAILINGLANTANA1 GAL36" O.C.LOWQUERCUS AGRIFOLIACOAST LIVE OAK24" BOX4VERY LOWROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS'HUNTINGTON CARPET'ROSEMARY1 GAL36" O.C.LOWCRUSHED ROCK, (75% 34" AND 25% 8' - 12')EXISTING TREE (PRESERVE IN PLACE)N/A8LOWRHAPHIOLEPIS INDICAINDIAN HAWTHORNELOW5 GAL114James GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comProject NorthUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperAn Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for:8900 Murray Ave.Gilroy, California 95020Landscape ConceptPlanning Submittal - Sept. 29, 2020Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture0Feet2060L1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLANVICINITY MAPProject Location5.A.bPacket Pg. 27Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) James GoodmanA R C H I T E C T U R EAn Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.comProject NorthUse Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" PaperAn Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for:8900 Murray Ave.Gilroy, California 95020Landscape ConceptPlanning Submittal - Sept. 29, 2020Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture0Feet2060L2 PANT IMAGES AND WATER USERHAMNUS CALIFORNICAARBUTUS 'MARINA'ROSMARINUS 'HUNTINGTON CARPET'HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIAIMAGE BOARDACACIA REDOLENS 'LOW BOY'OMITPRUNUS ILICIFOLIAMUHLENBERGIA RIGENSLANTANA MONTEVIDENSISCRUSHED ROCK 34", GINGERCHONDROPETALUM TECTORUMCALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN'QUERCUS AGRIFOLIARHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA5.A.bPacket Pg. 28Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 5X55X55X55X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X105X55X5 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X55X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X15 5X15 5X155X15 5X155X155X155X15 10X1010X1010X1010X10 10X1010X1010X1010X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X20 10X20 10X20 10X20 10X20 10X25 10X2010X2010X2010X20 10X2010X2510X2510X2510X2510X2510X2510X2510X2510X25 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 5X15 5X15 5X1510X2072.22 SF Elev Mach 70.89 SF Elevator 3057.31 SF Corridor 194.67 SF Stair 01 200.00 SF Stair 02 433.02 SF Covered Loading 5X15 5X155X15 5X5 5X5 5X55X55X5 10X109' - 8"5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X7.5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X5 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X10 5X105X105X105X105X105X10 5X155X155X155X155X155X15 5X15 5X15 5X15 5X15 5X15 5X12.5 5X12.5 5X12.55X155X155X155X155X155X155X155X155X155X15 5X15 5X15 5X15 5X15 7.5X107.5X107.5X12.510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X15 10X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X15 10X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1510X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X10 10X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X1010X10 10X20194.67 SF Stair 01 200.00 SF Stair 02 70.89 SF Elevator 2902.36 SF Corridor Display Display Project North James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-2.1 Floor Plans Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture Ground Floor Plan Second Floor Plan 0 Feet 8'16' 5.A.b Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) PREFINISHED METAL GUTTER SINGLE PLY ROOFING ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED 1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"SINGLE PLY ROOFING ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED PREFINISHED METAL GUTTER Project North James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-2.2 Roof Plan Planning Submittal - October 06, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture 5.A.b Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" PARAPET 03 28' -6" PARAPET 02 27' -6" ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT 35' -0" PARAPET 01 25' -0" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BASALITE A-705(R) SHOTBLAST HOLLOW METAL DOOR & FRAME EXTRA SPACE WASABI GREEN PREFINISHED COMPOSITE METAL PANELS EXR WASABI GREENEXTERIOR LIGHTING PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE 27' - 6"28' - 6"PREFINISHED METAL COPING SW 7063 ARGOS STEEL CANOPY SW 7069 IRON ORE PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE FIXED VISION GLASS IN ANODIZED NATURAL ALUMINUM FRAMING PREFINISHED METAL DOWNSPOUT & SCUPPER PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 4" BOX RIB SW 7065 ARGOS PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 8" BOX RIB SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE 1' - 0"7' - 1" GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" SITE LEVEL -0' -8" PARAPET 03 28' -6" ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT 35' -0" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BASALITE A-705(R) SHOTBLAST FIXED VISION GLASS IN ANODIZED NATURAL ALUMINUM FRAMING HOLLOW METAL DOOR & FRAME SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE EXTERIOR LIGHTING 28' - 6"GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" SITE LEVEL -0' -8" PARAPET 03 28' -6" T.O. SIGN 33' -0" PARAPET 02 27' -6" ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT 35' -0" ELEVATOR CLEARANCE 25' -7"PARAPET 01 25' -0" GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" SITE LEVEL -0' -8" PARAPET 03 28' -6" T.O. SIGN 33' -0" PARAPET 02 27' -6" PARAPET 01 25' -0" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BASALITE A-705(R) SHOTBLAST PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PREFINISHED METAL COPING SW 7063 ARGOS PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE FIXED VISION GLASS IN ANODIZED NATURAL ALUMINUM FRAMING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 4" BOX RIB EXR WASABI GREEN 28' - 6"27' - 6"33' - 8"PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 4" BOX RIB SW 7065 ARGOS PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 8" BOX RIB SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" PARAPET 02 27' -6" ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT 35' -0" PARAPET 01 25' -0" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BASALITE A-705(R) SHOTBLAST HOLLOW METAL DOOR & FRAME SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER SW #7063 NEBULOUS WHITE EXTERIOR LIGHTING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 4" BOX RIB SW 7065 ARGOS 27' - 6"2' - 6"PREFINISHED METAL SIDING CMI 8" BOX RIB SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE GROUND FLOOR 0' -0" SECOND FLOOR 10' -4 1/2" ROOF BEARING 21' -4 1/2" SITE LEVEL -0' -8" PARAPET 03 28' -6" T.O. SIGN 33' -0" PARAPET 02 27' -6" ZONING HEIGHT LIMIT 35' -0" ELEVATOR CLEARANCE 25' -7"PARAPET 01 25' -0" James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com Use Graphic Scale if this drawing is not printed on 30"x42" Paper An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-3.1 Exterior Elevations Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020 1929 02.1 John Bennett - Program Manager Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture 0 Feet 8'16' South Elevation East Elevation North Elevation West Elevation 1.Non-permitted banner signage, facing highway 101 will be removed. 2.New signage is shown for reference only. A separate application for new signage will be submitted. Loading Sign 7.00 s.f. Proposed Wall Sign - South Wall 62.00 s.f. Proposed Wall Sign - South Wall 62.00 s.f. Existing Wall Sign: 24.00 s.f. Existing Monument Sign: 40.00 s.f. Allowable sign area - 1 s.f. per l.f. 196.41 s.f. Building Frontage on Murray Avenue: 196.41 l.f. Allowable Sign... 5.A.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-4.1 Proposed Project Views Final Planning Submittal - November 19, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Extra Space Storage Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture From South Valley Freeway looking South From South Valley Freeway looking Northwest From Murray Avenue looking Southwest From Murray Avenue looking North 5.A.b Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Portland Cement Plaster Sherwin Williams 7063 Nebulous White Prefinshed Metal Doors & Coping Sherwin Williams 7063 Nebulous White Prefinshed Metal Window Trim & Band Sherwin Williams 7065 Argos Prefinshed Steel Canopy Sherwin Williams 7069 Iron Ore Prefinshed 4" Box Rib Metal Siding Sherwin Williams 7065 Argos Prefinshed 8" Box Rib Metal Siding Sherwin Williams 7063 Nebulous White Janus Prefinished Roll-Up Doors EXR Wasabi Green Aluminum Storefront Anodized Natural Aluminum Masonry Walls Basalite A-705(R) Shotblast Composite Metal Panels EXR Wasabi Green Aluminum Picket Fencing Sherwin Williams 6258 Tricorn Black James Goodman A R C H I T E C T U R E An Architectural Corporation Member American Institute of Architects 26901 Camino de Estrella, Suite A, Capistrano Beach, California 92624 949.493.0740 information@jgaia.com An Expansion of a Self-Storage Facility for: 8900 Murray Avenue Gilroy, California 95020 Kier & Wright - Civil Engineering A-5.1 Exterior Colors & Materials Final Planning Submittal - November 19, 2020 1929 John Bennett - Extra Space Storage Emerald Design - Landscape Architecture 5.A.b Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Plans Extra Space Storage_11-23-20 (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Prepared by La Tierra Consulting, LLC Findings and Justification v1.docx EXTRA SPACE STORAGE 8900 MURRAY AVENUE, CITY OF GILROY FINDINGS AND JUSTIFICATION REQUEST The applicant, ESS Properties 114 LLC (“Applicant” or “Extra Space Storage”) is requesting the following: Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”), pursuant to Gilroy City Code (“GCC”) §§30.23.10 and 30.50.30, to allow the expansion of an existing mini-storage facility, to consist of demolition of site improvements for a portion of an outdoor recreational vehicle (“RV”) storage area and the construction of a two-story, 30,978 square- foot mini-storage building. Architectural and Site Review, pursuant to Gilroy City Code §30.50.41(a)(1), in connection with construction of the proposed mini-storage building in the M-1 zone and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District. Class 32 Categorical Exemption. The Planning Commission find that California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15332, exempts from environmental review, projects meeting the following conditions: 1) Proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; 2) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and plan policies and the applicable zoning designation and regulations; 3) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; 4) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and, 5) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is located at 8900 Murray Avenue (“Project Site”) on a 195,036 square-foot (4.48 acres) lot that is developed with a mini-storage and outdoor recreational storage facility operated by Extra Space Storage. The development consists of nine buildings, as follows: Building Name Use Height (Stories) Square-Footage Un-named office Office Two 2,010 Building “A” Mini-storage One 3,438 Building “B” Mini-storage One 5,150 Building “C” Mini-storage One 8,104 Building “D” Mini-storage One 6,603 Building “E” Mini-storage One 6,502 Building “F” Mini-storage One 25,964 Building “G” Mini-storage One 7,327 Building “H” Mini-storage One 8,056 TOTAL 73,154 The northerly portion of the Project Site is being utilized for outdoor RV storage. The Applicant proposes to demolish site improvements within a portion of the RV storage area to construct a new two-story, 30,978 square-foot mini- storage building (“Proposed Project”). When complete, the Proposed Project will achieve a maximum height of 33 feet (two stories). Twenty-five off-street automobile parking spaces—consisting of 24 full-size spaces and 1 in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act—are proposed in the surface parking lot. Two off-street bicycle parking spaces are proposed. Five automobile parking spaces—including the single ADA-compliant space—located at the main entrance at the southwest corner of the Project Site will remain. The remainder of the automobile parking spaces will remain along the northerly portion of the Project Site for outdoor RV storage. The existing driveway along Murray Avenue at the southwest corner of the Project Site will remain. LOCATION The Project Site is approximately 195,036 square feet (4.48 acres) and consists of single lot in the M-1 zone (Limited Industrial District) and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District with a land use designation of Industrial Park in the General Plan. The Project Site is developed with a mini-storage facility consisting of nine buildings and outdoor RV storage. Figure 1, below, is an aerial image of the Project Site. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 2 of 7 Figure 1. Aerial photo of Project Site. Source: Google. SURROUNDING USES AND PROPERTIES North: The property adjoining the Project Site to the north is zoned M-1 (Limited Industrial) and Murray- Las Animas Overlay Combing District with an Industrial Park land use designation. It appears to be undeveloped. East: Adjoining the Project Site to the east is the 101 Highway. South: Adjoining the Project Site to the south is a flood channel. It is zoned PF (Park / Public Facility) with a Park and Recreation Facility land use designation. West: Separated by Murray Avenue, the property to the west is zoned M-1 (Limited Industrial) and Murray-Las Animas Overlay Combing District with an Industrial Park land use designation. It is developed with an industrial park. ZONING CONFORMANCE Use The Proposed Project is located in the M-1 zone (Limited Industrial District) and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District. “Mini-Storage and Locker Storage” is allowed with a CUP [GCC §30.23.10(c)]. Floor Area Ratio and Total Floor Area The GCC does not impose a maximum floor area ratio (“FAR”) for the M-1 zone and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District. With a lot area of 195,036 square feet and a total of 103,703 square feet of floor area, the FAR for the Project Site will be 0.53:1 upon completion of the Proposed Project. Height A maximum of two stories and 35 feet is allowed for properties in the M-1 zone [GCC §30.23.20(c)]. The Proposed Project is for two stories and a maximum of 33 feet, to the top of the sign element. Yards GCC §30.23.20(c) requires yards for properties in the M1 zone as follows: Front: 41 feet, measured from the face of the curb. Side: 31 feet when adjacent to a street; otherwise, none. Rear: 20 feet. Off-Street Automobile Parking GCC §30.31.26 requires for warehouses over 10,000 gross square feet, one (1) space per 5,000 gross square feet, minimum of ten (10) space per parcel. Accordingly, 21 spaces are required. Twenty-five spaces are proposed. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 3 of 7 FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS Gilroy City Code §30.50.30(b) provides that the Planning Commission “shall approve the issuance of a [CUP] only if the evidence presented…establishes” the following: 1. That the proposed use is properly located in relation to the general plan and to the community as a whole and to other land uses and to transportation and service facilities in the vicinity. General Plan consistency Located at 8900 Murray Avenue, the Project Site is approximately 4.48 acres and has an Industrial Park land use designation in the General Plan with corresponding zoning designations of M1 (Limited Industrial) and CM (Commercial Industrial). The Industrial Park land use designation allows for light industrial uses and a maximum building height of 35 and two stories. The Proposed Project is consistent with the Industrial Park land use designation and conforms to the following General Plan goals and policies: Policy 1.01. Pattern of Development. Ensure an orderly, contiguous pattern of development that prioritizes infill development, phases new development, encourages compactness and efficiency, preserves surrounding open space and agricultural resources, and avoids land use incompatibilities. The Proposed Project is an infill development that will not impact surrounding open space and agricultural resources and is compatible with existing on-site and neighboring land uses. Policy 2.06. Development Impact Fees. Require that new developments pay all of the incremental public service costs that they generate. Any impact fees that apply to the Proposed Project will be paid prior to issuance of the building permit. Policy 3.03. Commercial and Industrial Design Standards. Ensure that new commercial and industrial developments contribute to the overall attractiveness of the community through appropriate site design, architectural design, and landscaping. The Project Site is located within the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District. As discussed separately, the Proposed Project complies with the citywide Industrial Design Guidelines, including, but not limited to, the following guidelines: Parking areas should be easily accessed from the street so that circulation to parking areas does not interfere with other site activities. Visitor parking should be located at the entrance of the building and clearly marked. Automobile parking shall be separated from loading areas and truck parking areas. Parking areas should be screened form public streets by means of landscaping, walls, soil berms, etc. Adequate on-site staging areas shall be supplied for trucks waiting to unload. Lighting should be placed where it can best aid in illuminating activity areas. The site should not be over-lit. Lights should be integrated within the architectural design for the buildings. Light sources (light bulbs) should not be visible. They should be shielded to reflect down onto the ground and not out into streets or neighboring property. If night activity is expected, there should be lighting at entrances for definition of pedestrian ways. Policy 3.09. Landscaping in Industrial Areas. Require the screening of loading areas and open storage areas so that they are not visible from major roads. Also, require landscape buffering where industrial uses abut designated scenic highway corridors. Existing landscaping along Murry Avenue will be maintained. The Proposed Project will be located at the rear of the Project Site (along the northerly boundary), furthest away from Murray Avenue. The portion of the Project Site that abuts the proposed building and the 101 Highway will be landscaped at a depth greater than the current landscape buffer adjoining three existing buildings. The proposed landscape buffer, depicted in Figure 2, below, is at a varying depth, as much as 43’-2”. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 4 of 7 Figure 2. Excerpt from site plan depicting landscape buffer along 101 Highway. Relation to community: Other land uses, transportation and service facilities The Proposed Project consists of the expansion of a light industrial use that is compatible with nearby light industrial uses. Existing site access and transportation and service facilities are adequate to serve the development. 2. That the proposed use, if it complies with all conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity, or cause any damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property. Expansion of the mini-storage facility will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity or cause any damage, hazard or nuisance to person. A mini-storage facility has operated in at the Project Site in harmony with the surrounding community and has provided an essential service to the City of Gilroy. The floor channel south of the Project Site has and will continue to provide a buffer to residential uses to the south. The new building will be located on the side of the Project Site opposite from the residential uses. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW FINDINGS Gilroy City Code §30.50.43 requires the Planning Director to ensure the project adequately meeting the requirements discussed below. Furthermore, GCC §30.20.40 requires the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing for any project located within the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District which requires an Architectural and Site Review application. a) Traffic safety and efficiency. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles, parking and traffic. b) Outdoor advertising and signs. Signage is proposed at the north and south elevations. c) Site development. Citywide Industrial Design Guidelines Scale. The proposed two-story building is allowed in the M1 (Limited Industrial) zone and represents an appropriate scale with nearby buildings, including several two-story office park buildings west and northwest of the Project Site. Circulation and site access. Access to the site through a single driveway along Murray Avenue will remain the same. The proposed site layout will provide adequate circulation to existing buildings and to the new building, including an approximately 22-foot wide drive aisle. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 5 of 7 Landscaping. Landscaping is proposed along the portions of the Project Site that abut northerly and easterly (along the 101 Highway) of the new building. Drainage. Design features will be incorporated into the project in compliance with applicable state and local regulations, including the bioretention basin proposed at the corner of the north end of the Project Site. Lighting. Exterior lighting will be shifted downward to provide illumination while minimizing glare on nearby properties. Murry-Las Animas Overlay Combing District Policy Enhanced landscaping. As depicted in Figure 2, above, the portion of the Project Site that abuts the proposed building and the 101 Highway will be landscaped at a depth greater than the current landscape buffer adjoining three existing buildings. The proposed landscape buffer is at a varying depth, as much as 43’-2”. Attractive architecture. The new building will be a contemporary industrial design consisting of several materials, including Portland cement plaster, aluminum storefront with metal canopy at the main entrance and accents in the signature “Extra Space Wasabi Green” color. The building’s design and materials are appropriate for nearby similarly light-industrial uses. Building materials. Consistent with the Murry-Las Animas policy to limit metal buildings and encourage multi-material buildings, the mix of materials includes Portland cement, masonry, steel and aluminum. Minimizing the number of driveways. The single driveway will remain. No new driveways are proposed. d) Landscaping. Areas of the Project Site that are not hardscaped for access, parking and circulation will be landscaped, including along the northerly portion of the new building and the easterly portion adjoining the 101 Highway. e) Drainage and floor control and health standards. As new construction, the Proposed Project will be required to comply with applicable regulations for drainage, including stormwater management. f) Fire protection. The Proposed Project will comply with applicable local and state requirements related to fire suppression systems and fire apparatus access. g) Environmental impacts. As an infill development, the Proposed Project is exempt from further review under CEQA. CEQA CLASS 32 JUSTIFICATION Article 19 of CEQA (CEQA Guidelines §§15300 to 15333) includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and as a result, are exempt from review under CEQA. CEQA Guidelines §15332 describes Class 32 as consisting of “projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described” below: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. As discussed above, the Proposed Project is consistent with its general plan land use designation, zoning designation, citywide Industrial Design Guidelines and the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District policy. 2. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The Project Site is located within the limits of the City of Gilroy on a 4.48-acre site, surrounded by industrial parks, dwelling units and the 101 Highway. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 6 of 7 3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The Project Site is developed and substantially covered by structures, hardscape and landscaping and therefore, not expected to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. 4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The project is not expected to result in any impacts beyond those contemplated in the Gilroy 2020 General Plan and the Final Environmental Impact Report, relating to traffic, noise, air quality and water quality. 5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project will be adequately served by all required utilities and public services and where appropriate, will be subject to impact fees. CEQA Guidelines §15300.2(a) outlines six exceptions to a categorical exemption. None of the six exceptions apply to the Proposed Project. 1. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The Proposed Project qualifies for a Class 32 categorical exemption which is not listed as one of the classes in this exception. Furthermore, the Project Site is surrounded by urban uses and is not located in a sensitive environment. 2. Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The Proposed Project will be developed in one phase. No successive projects of the same type in the same place are contemplated. Future projects nearby will undergo their own discretionary permit review and CEQA analysis which will incorporate mitigation measures, as appropriate. Therefore, no cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project are expected. 3. Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. There are no known unusual circumstances that are applicable to the Proposed Project and Project Site. The Project Site is located in an area substantially surrounded by urban uses. 4. Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. The Proposed Project will not result in damage to any scenic resources within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Extra Space Storage 8900 Murray Avenue Findings and Justification Page 7 of 7 5. Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The Project Site is not included in the Cortese List. 6. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. No features on the Project Site have been designated as a historical resource. 5.A.c Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: Applicants Findings and Justification (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPOSING EXPANSION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8900 MURRAY AVENUE, APN: 835-04-069 (FILE NUMBER CUP 20-01) WHEREAS, On June 24, 2020 applications were filed by James Goodman and Judy Lee in behalf if David L. Rasmussen, Manager for ESS Properties 114 LLC proposing a two story storage building addition on a 4.8 acre site located at 8900 Murray Avenue and within the M1 Limited Industrial and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay zone district; and WHEREAS, the application submittals were accepted as complete on December 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, the project qualifies for an exemption from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act which applies to in-fill development on less than 5 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public meeting on February 4, 2021, at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the staff report as well as all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the subject project CUP 20- 01 and associated conditional use permit request AS 20-09; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the project approval is based is the Community Development Department, Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby find as follows: FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is properly located in relation to the general plan and to the community as a whole and to other land uses and to transportation and service facilities in the vicinity given that it consists of expansion of an existing mini-storage light industrial use, which is consistent with the Industrial Park General Plan 2040 land use designation, and will not create noise, traffic or other nuisance impacts to surrounding uses including residences south of the site and across Llagas Creek. 2. The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity, or cause any damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property. 5.A.d Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: CUP 20-01 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2020-__ Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby approves CUP 20-01 (20050042), subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________________ __________________________________ ___________, Secretary _____________, Chairperson 5.A.d Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: CUP 20-01 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2020-__ Page 3 ATTACHMENT A STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL __________ Note: The following abbreviations identify the City department or division responsible for determining compliance with these conditions. The first group listed has responsibility for compliance at plan check, the second confirms compliance with the condition at final inspection, prior to final occupancy or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or as specified in the condition. If only one group is identified, they have responsibilities from initial review through compliance verification. In the context of these Conditions of Approval, the term “Developer” means permit applicant, property owner, operator, permittee, lessee, and/or tenants using the space(s) for the intended use(s). Developer shall comply with project conditions for the life of the project. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS BL Building Division/Inspectors PK Parks/Landscape Design CA City Attorney PL Planning Division CC Chemical Control Agency PW Public Works/Engineering FP Fire Prevention TR Traffic Division PD Police Department WW Wastewater/Source Control PLANNING CONDITIONS The following GENERAL conditions authorize specific terms of the project ENTITLEMENT(S). 1. APPROVED PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit approval CUP 20-01 (20050042) is granted for a mini-storage facility expansion consisting of a 30,978 square foot, two-story self-storage building addition to an existing 71,085 square foot self- storage facility. The facility includes seven one-story storage buildings, a two-story storage building, a two-story building at the front of the site containing an 850 square foot office and 1,050 square foot caretaker’s quarters with a one-car garage, and recreational vehicle storage at the northwest corner of the site. The facility is located on a 4.8-acre property within the M1 Limited Industrial District, Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combing District, at 8900 Murray Avenue; APN: 835-04-069. Build-out of the project use shall conform to the approved plans associated with concurrent approval AS 20-09 (20050041), except as otherwise specified in these conditions. Any future adjustment or modification to the plans shall be considered by the Community Development Director or designee, may require separate discretionary approval, and shall conform to all City, State, and Federal 5.A.d Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: CUP 20-01 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2020-__ Page 4 requirements, including subsequent City Code requirements or policies adopt ed by City Council. 2. APPLICABILITY: The use of the property shall be operated in compliance with the scope and characteristics of the project approval, as conditioned herein. Intensification of the approved use shall require an amendment to this Permit o r a new Conditional Use Permit. 3. PERMIT EXPIRATION: The expiration date of this approval is one year from the decision date, on February 4th 2022, during which time the applicant shall initiate the use by obtaining all required building permits and then pursuing the project to completion under a valid (not expired) building permit. If development has not obtained building permits within one (1) year from the date of notification of approval, the approval shall expire. Upon application, an extension of time may be granted by the Community Development Director or designee. Should Developer intend to request an extension to the permit expiration date, Developer must submit to the Planning Division a written application with applicable fees prior to the expiration date. Only timely requests may be considered pursuant to the City Code. 4. RELATED ENTITLEMENTS: This conditional use permit shall be subject to ongoing compliance with conditions of approval granted for related Architectural and Site Review approval AS 20-09 (20050042), which has been granted for the improvements required for the use to operate. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS: If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the Developer, owner or tenant shall b e subject to permit revocation or enforcement actions pursuant to the City Code. All costs associated with any such actions shall be the responsibility of Developer, owner or tenant. 6. INDEMNIFICATION: Developer agrees, as a condition of permit approval, at Developer’s own expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Gilroy (“the City”) and its officers, contractors, consultants, attorneys, employees and agents from any and all claim(s), action(s) or proceeding(s) brought against the City or its officers, contractors, consultants, attorneys, employees, or agents to challenge, attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this resolution or any condition attached thereto or any proceedings, acts or determinations taken, including actions taken under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, done or made prior to the approval of such resolution that were part of the approval process. 5.A.d Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: CUP 20-01 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW PROPOSING EXPANSION OF A MINI-STORAGE FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8900 MURRAY AVENUE, APN: 835-04-069 (FILE NUMBER AS 20-09) WHEREAS, On June 24, 2020 applications were filed by James Goodman and Judy Lee in behalf if David L. Rasmussen, Manager for ESS Properties 114 LLC proposing a two story storage building addition on a 4.8 acre site located at 8900 Murray Avenue and within the M1 Limited Industrial and Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay zone district; and WHEREAS, the application submittals were accepted as complete on December 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, the project qualifies for an exemption from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act which applies to in-fill development on less than 5 acres; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public meeting on February 4, 2021, at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the staff report as well as all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the subject project AS 20-09 (20050041) and associated conditional use permit request CUP 20-01 (20050042); and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the project approval is based is the Community Development Department, Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby find as follows: FINDINGS 1. The proposed Architectural and Site request is generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the Industrial Design Guidelines given that the in-fill project provides vertical and horizontal articulation of the two story building with varied colors and materials chosen that are in harmony with and an upgrade to existing development, individual letter wall signage, required five foot side and rear yard landscaping, upgraded front yard fencing and front and rear landscaping with screening of views from US 101, with existing adequate parking and access, adequate fire lanes and dedicated loading and unloading areas on the site. 2. The proposed Architectural & Site request is generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the Murray-Las Animas Avenue Overlay Combining District Policy given that the project is located to the rear of an existing developed site and includes fencing and landscaping upgrades to screen and improve the site appearance, upgraded attractive 5.A.e Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 2 architecture and building materials for the new building consistent with the requirements of the policy for this location. 3. The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City of Gilroy 2040 General Plan (adopted November 2020) given the light industrial development is anticipated within the Industrial Park land use designation and is in substantial conformance with the applicable policies LU1.1, LU1.3, LU 5.1, LU 5.3, LU 8.3, LU 8.7 and LU 8.13 as it results in orderly and attractive in-fill development including signage visible from US 101, proposes durable and appropriate materials with matte finishes, provides upgraded and new landscape screening, and lighting that is shielded to prevent glare. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the City's Subdivision and Land Development Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act given that it involves development of a legal lot that would not conflict with easements and which complies with all applicable requirements of the M1 zoning district land use tables and site and building standards. 5. Public utilities and infrastructure improvements needed in order to serve the proposed project are in proximity, at Murray Avenue. 6. There will be no significant environmental impacts as a result of this project which consists of expansion of an existing developed industrial site, which qualifies for an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15332 of the CEQA guidelines, and the project will require payment of any required nitrogen deposition only habitat fees in compliance with the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan prior to issuance of a building permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby approves AS 20-09 (20050041), subject to the conditions attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: 5.A.e Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 3 _________________________________ __________________________________ ___________, Secretary _____________, Chairperson 5.A.e Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 4 ATTACHMENT A STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS 20-09 Note: The following abbreviations identify the City department or division responsible for determining compliance with these conditions. The first group listed has responsibility for compliance at plan check, the second confirms compliance with the condition at final inspection, prior to final occupancy or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or as specified in the condition. If only one group is identified, they have responsibilities from initial review through compliance verification. In the context of these Conditions of Approval, the term “Developer” means permit applicant, property owner, operator, permittee, lessee, and/or tenants using the space(s) for the intended use(s). Developer shall comply with project conditions for the life of the project. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS BL Building Division/Inspectors PK Parks/Landscape Design CA City Attorney PL Planning Division CC Chemical Control Agency PW Public Works/Engineering FP Fire Prevention TR Traffic Division PD Police Department WW Wastewater/Source Control PLANNING CONDITIONS The following GENERAL conditions authorize specific terms of the project ENTITLEMENT(S). 1. APPROVED PROJECT: Architectural and Site Review Permit AS 20-09 (20050041) is granted to construct a 30,978 square foot, two-story self-storage building addition to an existing 71,085 square foot min-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility, and associated fencing, paving and landscaping, located on Assessor Parcel No. 835-04-069,as shown on Project Plans received by the Planning Division prepared by James Goodman Architecture, Kier & Wright Civil Engineering and Emerald Design Landscape Architecture for Extra Space Storage, dated November 23, 2020 (as Planning Submittal Update - November 23, 2020),and consisting of 18 sheets. Build-out of the project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions. Any future adjustment or modification to the plans shall be considered by the Community Development Director or designee, may require separate discretionary approval, and shall conform to all City, State, and Federal requirements, including subsequent City Code requirements or policies adopted by City Council. 2. PREVIOUS APPROVALS: For regulatory purposes, previous permit AS 97-29 5.A.e Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 5 conditions of approval shall remain valid, except as amended by this approval. 3. PERMIT EXPIRATION: The expiration date of this approval is one year from the decision date, on February 4, 2022. If any development for which architectural and site approval has been granted has not obtained building permits within one (1) year from the date of notification of approval, the approval shall be deemed automatically revoked. Upon application, an extension of time may be granted by the Community Development Director or designee. Should Developer intend to request an extension to the permit expiration date, Developer must submit to the Planning Division a written application with applicable fees prior to the expiration date. Only timely requests may be considered pursuant to the City Code. 4. RELATED ENTITLEMENTS: This permit is subject to the finding and conditions of approval of conditional use permit CUP 20-01 (20050042) (i.e. related and/or concurrent entitlement requests). 5. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS: If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the Developer, owner or tenant shall be subject to permit revocation or enforcement actions pursuant to the City Code. All costs associated with any such actions shall be the responsibility of Developer, owner or tenant. 6. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: For the life of the project, Developer shall maintain landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans, except as otherwise permitted or required by law. Significant changes to the number, placement, and selection of plant species may require a modification to this approval, to be determined by the Community Development Director or designee 7. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES: Developer shall limit outdoor storage as described in the project application and to the locations shown on the project plans. Developer shall maintain screening of storage and use area(s) from adjacent properties and public vantage points for the life of the project. The requisite screening shall match the predominant design and materials of the main structure on the project site. The following conditions shall addressed prior to issuance of permits for site construction. 8. HABITAT PERMIT: Developer shall submit a Habitat Permit application to the City of Gilroy. The application shall consist of the Nitrogen Deposition Only Application (available on the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency website: https://www.scv-habitatagency.org/). The grading permit will be issued only after approval of the Habitat Plan permit and payment of assessed fees. 9. SIGNS: A Sign Permit application is required prior to installation of any signage 5.A.e Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 6 shown on plans. Signs are not approved as part of this application. Prior to issuance of a sign permit for this site, Developer shall propose well-designed, quality signs that comply with the allowances of the City Code and are to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or designee. Cabinet or box- style signs will not be permitted. 10. EXISTING VIOLATIONS: Developer shall correct all violations of the City Code, if any, existing on the project property, including but not limited to removal of any unpermitted storage containers or signage on the site. 11. WATER LIMITATIONS: Developer shall be advised that the approval is subject to the drought emergencies provisions pursuant to the Gilroy City Code Chapter 27.98. 12. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Developer shall include a plan sheet(s) that includes a reproduction of all conditions of approval of this permit, as adopted by the decision-maker. 13. COLORS AND MATERIALS: Plans submitted for building permit applications shall include all exterior building materials and colors, including product and finish manufacturer name, color name and number, and surface finish type (e.g. stucco with sand finish, plaster with smooth finish) to be used in construction. Paint finishes shall be matte finish. 14. LIGHTING PLAN: Developer shall include a lighting plan with the application for building permit. Developer shall shield lighting, so the light source is not directly visible from any public area. The lighting plan must be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 15. FENCES AND WALLS: All approved fencing and walls are to be shown on construction drawings submitted for building permit review. 16. REFUSE STORAGE/ENCLOSURE: Developer shall show location of refuse, and recycling bins or containers necessary to serve the use. The storage location shall not be within a garage. 17. ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT: Developer shall ensure rooftop mechanical equipment, including but not limited to heating and cooling systems, plumbing vents, ducts, antennas and other appurtenances protruding from the roof are recessed or otherwise screened so that they will not be visible from the front of the property or other major public vantage points. Details of the roof equipment and roof screens shall be included in the building permit drawings and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 7 18. ROOF AND BUILDING DRAINPIPES: Developer shall install all roof and building drainpipes and downspouts inside building elements. These items shall not be visible on any exterior building elevations. 19. LANDSCAPING: Proposed landscaping shall be shown on the site plan and submitted with the construction drawings for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 20. LANDSCAPE MULCH: As part of the Landscape Plan submittal, Developer shall clarify a minimum three (3) inch layer of mulch to be applied on all exposed soil surfaces, as required by the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). 21. INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES: Developer shall not include any invasive plant species, such as those listed by the California Invasive Plant Council. 22. LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE: Prior to issuance of building permits or initiation of the proposed use, whichever comes first, Developer shall submit a completed Landscape Documentation Package, including a soil analysis/management report along with appropriate application review fees, to the Community Development Department, including required documentation for compliance verification, and obtain approval of such plans. 23. IRRIGATION SENSORS: Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall (as part of the irrigation system) indicate on construction drawings sensors that suspend or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather conditions (e.g. automatic rain shut-off devices). 24. LOADING ZONES: Developer shall show striping of all loading zones for loading and unloading activities only and shall post a sign prohibiting storage or other non- loading activity within the designated loading zone. The following conditions shall be met prior to Occupancy. 25. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION: Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or building permit final sign-off, Developer shall complete installation of all landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans. 26. LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION: Prior to occupancy or initiation of the proposed use, or completion of each build-out phase of development, Developer shall submit a signed Certificate of Completion, along with all necessary supporting documentation and payment to the Community Development Department, for compliance verification of the landscape installation. Developer is required under the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance 5.A.e Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 8 (MWELO) to provide a copy of the approved Certificate of Completion to the property owner or his or her designee. 27. PLANNING INSPECTION: Inspection(s) required by the Planning Division for framing, application of exterior materials, and final completion shall be requested to ensure that the construction matches the approved plans. Requests shall be made a minimum of 48 hours in advance by contacting the project planner or Planning Department during business hours. 28. PAINT SAMPLES: The applicant shall paint a portion of the building with the proposed color scheme for inspection by the Community Development Director or designee. Proposed primary and secondary (accent) paint c olors should be painted next to each other on the building, to the extent feasible, for purposes of inspection. The color(s) shall not be considered approved until after inspection. 29. SITE CLEAN-UP: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Developer shall remove all construction materials, debris, and vehicles from the subject property. The following shall be complied with at all times During Construction. 30. CONSTRUCTION RELATED NOISE: To minimize potential construction-related impacts to noise, Developer shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the subject site “During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the following measures at the construction site: a. Limit construction activity to weekdays between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and on Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Construction noise is prohibited on Sundays and City-observed holidays; b. Locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction project area; c. Construct sound walls or other noise reduction measures prior to developing the project site; d. Equip all internal combustion engine driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment; e. Prohibit all unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines; f. Utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists; and g. Designate a “disturbance coordinator’ who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g. bad 5.A.e Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 9 muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem.” 31. CONSTRUCTION RELATED AIR QUALITY: To minimize potential construction- related impacts to air quality, Developer shall require all construction contractors to implement the basic construction mitigation measures recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the project site “During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the following basic control measures at the construction site: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g. parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day; b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material onsite or offsite shall be covered; c. All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited; d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads or pathways shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used; f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipmen t off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 248 5 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points; g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator; and h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.” 32. DISCOVERY OF CONTAMINATED SOILS: If contaminated soils are discovered, the Developer will ensure the contractor employs engineering controls and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize human exposure to potential contaminants. Engineering controls and construction BMPs will include, but not be limited to, the following: 5.A.e Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 10 a. Contractor employees working on-site will be certified in OSHA’s 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training; b. Contractor will stockpile soil during development activities to allow for proper characterization and evaluation of disposal options; c. Contractor will monitor area around construction site for fugitive vapor emissions with appropriate filed screening instrumentation; d. Contractor will water/mist soil as it is being excavated and loaded onto transportation trucks; e. Contractor will place any stockpiled soil in areas shielded from prevailing winds; and f. Contractor will cover the bottom of excavated areas with sheeting when work is not being performed. 33. DISCOVERY OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: If a fossil is discovered during construction of the project, excavations within 50’ of the find shall be temporarily halted or delayed until the discovery is examined by a qua lified paleontologist, in accordance with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The City shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. If the find is determined to be significant and if avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall design and carry out a data recovery plan consistent with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. 34. DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: In the event of an accidental discovery of archaeological resources during grading or construction activities, Developer shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the project site: “If archaeological or cultural resources are discovered during earth-moving, grading, or construction activities, all work shall be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the find and the area shall be staked off immediately. The monitoring professional archaeologist, if one is onsite, shall be notified and evaluate the find. If a monitoring professional archaeologist is not onsite, the City shall be notified immediately, and a qualified professional archaeologist shall be retained (at Developer’s expense) to evaluate the find and report to the City. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be formulated by the professional archaeologist and implemented by the responsible party.” 35. DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS: In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Developer shall include the following language in all grading, site work, and construction plans: 5.A.e Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 11 “If human remains are found during earth-moving, grading, or construction activities, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the coroner of Santa Clara County is contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendent (MLD) from the deceased Native American. The MLD may then make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance if: a) the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission; b) the descendent identified fails to make a recommendation; or c) the landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendent, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.” 36. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND PARKING: The Developer shall implement a construction staging and parking management plan to address parking demands and impacts during the construction phase of the project by contractors or other continued operations on-site. The construction parking management plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. 37. DISTURBANCE COORDINATOR: The Developer shall designate a “disturbance coordinator” who will be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise. The coordinator (who may be an employee of the general contractor) will determine the cause of the complaint and will require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number of the noise disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site fence. The sign must also list an emergency after- hours contact number for emergency personnel. ENGINEERING CONDITIONS The following GENERAL ENGINEERING Conditions of Approval shall be complied 5.A.e Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 12 with as specified herein. 1. GENERAL - At first improvement plan submittal, utility sheets shall show appropriate line types and labels to identify different type of utilities and pipe sizes. Clearly identify both public and private utilities. 2. GENERAL - Improvement plans (as second sheet in plan set) shall contain Approved Conditions of Approval. 3. GENERAL - Improvement plans shall include General Notes found in the City of Gilroy General Guidelines. 4. GENERAL - Improvement plan cover sheet shall include a table summarizing all facilities (Streets, Utilities, Landscaping, etc.), showing the ownership of all facilities, and the maintenance responsibilities of all facilities. 5. GENERAL - The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits from federal, state, and local agencies as required to construct the proposed impr ovements. A copy of these permits will be provided prior to building permits. 6. GENERAL - All existing public utilities shall be protected in place and if necessary, relocated as approved by the City Engineer. No permanent structure is permitted within City easements without the approval of the City of Gilroy. 7. GENERAL - Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City. 8. GENERAL - All improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Gilroy Municipal Code and Standard Specifications and Details and is subject to all laws of the City of Gilroy by reference. 9. GENERAL - Prior to issuance of any building permits, developer shall submit for City approval water, sewer and storm drain studies for the development. These studies shall provide supporting hydraulic calculation for pipe sizing per City standard design guideline. 10. GENERAL - At first improvement plan submittal, developers engineer shall submit a calculation for sanitary sewer and water generation per the City’s Master Plan design criteria. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 13 11. FEE - The project is subject to the City’s Traffic, and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. Latest City impact fee schedule is available on the City’s website. Payment of Impact Fees is required at first building permit issuance. Fees shall be based on the current comprehensive fe e schedule in effect at the time of fee payment, consistent with and in accordance with City policy. 12. FEE - Prior to plan approval, developer shall submit a detailed project cost estimate by the project engineer, subject to City Engineer approval. Cost es timate shall be broken out into on-site and off-site improvements. 13. FEE - Prior to final plan approval, Developer shall pay 100% of the plan check and processing fees and other related fees that the property is subject to. 14. GRADING & DRAINAGE - All grading activity shall address National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) concerns. If all or part of the construction occurs during the rainy season, the developer shall submit an Erosion Control Plan to the Public Works Director for review and approval. This plan shall incorporate erosion control devices and other techniques in accordance with Municipal Code § 27C to minimize erosion. Specific measures to control sediment runoff, construction pollution and other potential construction contamination sediment runoff, construction pollution and other potential construction contamination shall be addressed through the Erosion Control Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall supplement the Erosion Control Plan and project improvement plans. These documents shall also be kept on-site while the project is under construction. A Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board, with a copy provided to the Engineering Division before a g rading permit will be issued. WDID# shall be added to the grading plans prior to plan approval. 15. GRADING & DRAINAGE - Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant’s Geotechnical Engineer shall review the final grading, pavement design and drainage plans to ensure that said designs are in accordance with their recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant’s Geotechnical engineer’s approval shall then be conveyed to the City either by letter or by signing the plans. 16. GRADING & DRAINAGE - At first improvement plan submittal, the developer shall submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The SWMP shall analyze the existing and ultimate conditions and facilities, and the study shall include all off-site tributary areas. Study and the design shall be in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Management Guidance Manual (latest edition). Existing offsite drainage patterns, i.e., tributary areas, drainage amount and velocity shall not be altered by the development. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 14 17. GRADING & DRAINAGE - All grading and improvement plans shall identify the vertical elevation datum, date of survey, and surveyor. 18. GRADING & DRAINGE - Improvement and grading plans shall show existing topo and features at least 50’ beyond the project boundary. Clearly show existing topo, label contour elevations, drainage patterns, flow lines, slopes, and all other property encumbrances. 19. GRADING & DRAINAGE – Geotechnical Engineer to confirm infiltration rates by conducting Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing with appropriate safety factors of all stormwater detention and/or retention facilities. 20. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - The developer shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal and all new improvements that are damaged or removed because of developer's operations. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. 21. CONSTRUCTION - All construction water from fire hydrants shall be metered and billed at the current hydrant meter rate. 22. CONSTRUCTION - The City shall be notified at least ten (10) working days prior to the start of any construction work and at that time the contractor shall provide a project schedule and a 24-hour emergency telephone number list. 23. CONSTRUCTION - Construction activity shall be restricted to the period between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for general construction activity. No work shall be done on Sundays and City Holidays. The Public Works Director will apply additional construction period restrictions, as necessary, to accommodate standard commute traffic along arterial roadways and along school commute routes. 24. CONSTRUCTION - All work shown on the improvement plans, if applicable, shall be inspected. Uninspected work shall be removed as deemed appropriate by the Public Works Director. 25. CONSTRUCTION - If the project has excess fill or cut that will be off-hauled to a site or on-hauled from a site within the city limits of Gilroy, an additional permit is required. This statement must be added as a general note to the Grading and Drainage Plan. 26. CONSTRUCTION - It is the responsibility of the contractor to make sure that all dirt tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up daily. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris shall not be washed into the City’s storm drains. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 15 27. CONSTRUCTION - At least one week prior to commencement of work, the Developer shall post at the site and mail to the Engineering Division and to owners of property within (300') three hundred feet of the exterior boundary of the project site a notice that construction work will commence on or around the stated date. The notice shall include a list of contact persons with name, title, phone number and are a of responsibility. The person responsible for maintaining the list shall be included. The list shall always be current and shall consist of persons with authority to initiate corrective action in their area of responsibility. The names of individuals responsible for dust, noise and litter control shall be expressly identified in the notice. 28. CONSTRUCTION - Prior to final inspections, all pertinent conditions of approval and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Engineer. 29. TRANSPORTATION - Any work in the public right-of-way shall require a traffic control plan prepared by a licensed professional engineer with experience in preparing such plans. Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared in accordance w ith the requirements of the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Traffic Control Plan shall be approved prior to the commencement of any work within the public right of way. 30. UTILTIES - The Developer/Contractor shall make accessible any or all City utilities as directed by the Public Works Director. The following PROJECT SPECIFIC ENGINEERING Conditions of Approval shall be complied with as specified herein. 31. FEE - The project is subject to the City’s Traffic and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. The following are approximate impact fees based on planning phase square footage and other information for an industrial project. Actual fees will be based on Final Design information. a. Traffic Impact = $120,752 b. Public Facilities = $44,082 Latest City impact fee schedule is available on the City’s website. Payment of Impact Fees is required at building permit issuance. Fees shall be based on the current comprehensive fee schedule in effect at the time of fee payment, consistent with and in accordance with City policy. 32. TRANSPORTATION – Applicant shall obtain a review letter from Recology confirming serviceability and site accessibility of solid waste pickup. Contact Lisa 5.A.e Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 16 Patton, Operations Manager 408-846-4421. Include Recology review letter with first building permit submittal. 33. GENERAL - A current Title Report dated within the last six months shall be submitted with first submittal improvement plans. An existing site plan shall be submitted showing all existing site conditions and title report easements. Include bearings and distances for all Right of Way and Easements on the plans. 34. GRADING & DRAINAGE - All grading operations and soil compaction activities shall be per the approved project’s design level geo technical report. All grading activities shall be conducted under the observation of, and tested by, a licensed geotechnical engineer. A report shall be filed with the City of Gilroy for each phase of construction, stating that all grading activities were performed in conformance with the requirements of the project’s geotechnical report. The developer shall add this condition to the general notes on the grading plan. 35. CONSTRUCTION - All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the City, or a minimum of three times daily. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director, or at least once a day. 36. TRANSPORTATION - Developer shall submit final photometric plans with first building permit submittal. 37. TRANSPORTATION - At first plan submittal developer shall model all Solid Waste Vehicle circulation movements, as a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be prepared to the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled with AutoTurn swept analysis software, all turning and street circulation movements. 38. TRANSPORTATION - At first plan submittal developer shall model all Emergency Vehicle circulation movements, as a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be prepared to the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled with AutoTurn swept analysis software, all turning and street circulation movements. 39. UTILITIES – All new services to the development shall be "underground service" designed and installed in accordance with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, AT&T (phone) Company and local cable company regulations. Transformers and switch gear cabinets shall be placed underground unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. Underground utility plans must be submitted prior to installation. 40. UTILITIES - A note shall be placed on the joint trench composite plans which states that the plan agrees with City Codes and Standards and that no underground 5.A.e Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 17 utility conflict exists. The Joint consultant shall provide the City a separate “proje ct utility composite plan” showing all Civil, Landscape, electrical, and joint trench information to confirm that there are no conflicts with joint trench plan utilities. 41. UTILITIES – Storm, sewer, and water lines in private areas shall be privately owned and maintained. This should be noted on the title sheet of the project improvement plan. 42. UTILITIES - Prior to any construction of the dry utilities in the field, the following will need to be supplied to the City: i. A professional engineer signed original electrical plan. ii. A letter from the design Electrical or Civil Engineer that states the electrical plan conforms to City codes and Standards, and to the approved improvement plans. 43. UTILITIES - Sanitary sewer laterals and/or water meters located in driveways shall have traffic rated boxes and lids. 44. UTILITIES - The Developer shall perform Fire Hydrant test to confirm water system will adequately serve the development and will modify any part of the systems that does not perform to the standards established by the City. Developer shall coordinate with Fire Department for the Fire Hydrant test. 45. UTILITIES - The project shall fully comply with the measures required by the City’s Water Supply Shortage Regulations Ordinance (Gilroy City Code, Chapter 27, Article VI), and subsequent amendments to meet the requirements impo sed by the State of California’s Water Board. This ordinance established permanent voluntary water saving measures and temporary conservation standards. 46. WATER QUALITY - Proposed development shall comply with state mandated regional permits for both pre-construction and post-construction stormwater quality requirements per chapter 27D of the Gilroy Municipal Code, and is subject to, but not limited to, the following: a. At first improvement plan submittal, project shall submit a design level Stormwater Control Plan Report (in 8 ½ x 11 report format), to include background, summary, and explanation of all aspects of stormwater manag ement. Report shall also include exhibits , tables, calculations, and all technical information supporting facts, including but not l imited to, exhibit of the proposed site conditions which clearly delineates impervious and pervious areas on site. Provide a separate hatch or shading for landscaping/pervious areas on -site including those areas that are not bioretention areas. This storm water control plan report format does not replace or is not in lieu of any stormwater control plan sheet in improvement plans. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 18 b. The stormwater control plan shall inc lude a signed Performance Requirement Certifications specified in the Stormwater Guidance Manual. c. At developer’s sole expense, the stormwater control plan shall be submitted for review by an independent third party accepted by the City for compliance. Result of the peer review shall be included with the submittal for City evaluation. d. Prior to plan approval, the Developer of the site shall enter into a formal written Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Agreemen t with the City, including Exhibit A and Exhibit B. i. The City shall record this agreement against the property or properties involved and it shall be binding on all subsequent owners of land served by the stormwater management treatment BMPs. The City-standard Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Agreement will be provided by Public Works Engineering. ii. This Agreement shall require that the BMPs not be modified and BMP maintenance activities not alter the designed function of the facility from its original design unless approved by the City prior to the commencement of the proposed modification or maintenance activity. iii. This Agreement shall also provide that in the event that maintenance or repair is neglected, or the stormwater management facility becomes a danger to public health or safety, the city shall have the authority to perform maintenance and/or repair work and to recover the costs from the owner. iv. All on-site stormwater management facilities shall be operated and maintained in good condition and promptly repaired/replaced by the property owner(s) or other legal entity approved by the City. v. Any repairs or restoration/replacement and maintenance shall be in accordance with City-approved plans. vi. The property owner(s) shall develop a maintenance schedule for the life of any stormwater management facility and shall describe the maintenance to be completed, the time period for complet ion, and who shall perform the maintenance. This maintenance schedule shall be included with the approved Stormwater Runoff Management Plan. e. Stormwater BMP Operations and Maintenance Agreement shall include inspections to be required for this project and shall adhere to the following: i. The property owner(s) shall be responsible for having all stormwater management facilities inspected for condition and function by a certified third party QSP or QSD. ii. Stormwater facility inspections shall be done at least twice per year, once in Fall by October 1st, in preparation for the wet season, and once in Winter by March 15 th. Written records shall be kept of all inspections and shall include, at minimum, the following information: 1. Site address; 2. Date and time of inspection; 3. Name of the person conducting the inspection; 4. List of stormwater facilities inspected; 5. Condition of each stormwater facility inspected; 6. Description of any needed maintenance or repairs; and 7. As applicable, the need for site re-inspection. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 19 f. Upon completion of each inspection, an inspection report shall be submitted to Public Works Engineering no later than October 1st for the Fall report, and no later than March 15th of the following year for the Winter report. g. Before commencing any grading or construction activities, the developer shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and provide evidence of filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board. 47. WATER QUALITY - The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and implement such measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations or a project stop order. 48. WATER QUALITY - The developer shall secure a QSD or QSP to maintain all erosion control and BMP measures during construction. The developers QSD or QSP shall provide the City weekly inspection reports. 49. WATER QUALITY – Sequence of construction for all stormwater facilities (bioswales, detention/retention basins, drain rock, etc.) shall be done toward final phases of project to prevent silting of facilities and reduce the intended use of the facilities. Prior to final inspection, all stormwater facilities will be tested by a certified QSP or QSD to meet the minimum design infiltration rate. All tests shall be made at on 20 ft x 20ft grid pattern over the surface of the completed stormwater facility. 50. LANDSCAPING - Landscaping plans shall not conflict with the stormwater management water treatment plan. FIRE PREVENTION CONDITIONS The following FIRE conditions shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal 1. Plans submitted for permit shall maintain fire access as shown on approved plans (i.e., 22’4” wide adjacent to the proposed building. This width would meet the minimum drive aisle width (i.e. fire lane must be at least 20 ’ wide and have 13’6” of vertical clearance height)). 2. The project designer shall use Autoturn software (or other similar accepted software) to demonstrate that a fire engine can navigate the property, as indicated on approved plans. 3. The proposed building shall have a fire sprinkler system designed to the 2016 Edition of NFPA 13. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Resolution No. 2021-__ Page 20 4. The property manager shall maintain all driving aisles free of obstructions. 5.A.e Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: AS 20-09 Draft PC Resolution (3163 : Extra Space Storage Expansion) Karen L. Garner DIRECTOR Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197 Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429 http://www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: February 4, 2021 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Christina Ruiz, Management Assistant SUBJECT: Selection of Planning Commission Chair and Vice-Chair for 2021 RECOMMENDATION: Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair Background: Each calendar year the Planning Commission selects the Chair and the Vice Chair. Staff recommends the Commission make these appointments. 6.A Packet Pg. 65 Karen L. Garner DIRECTOR Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197 Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429 http://www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: February 4, 2021 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Christina Ruiz, Management Assistant SUBJECT: 2021 Planning Commission Task Force/Committee Assignments RECOMMENDATION: Review Planning Commission assignments and make adjustments as necessary. Background: The Planning Commission is requested to review the Planning Commission assignments to various task forces and committees, and to make adjustments, as necessary. Each year, the Planning Commission has an opportunity to review their assignments to various task force and committees. The annual review is an opportunity to change assignments and update the list, as appropriate. Presently, the assignments are as follows: Task Force/Committee Commissioner Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Doyle Gilroy Downtown Business Association High Speed Rail Authority Historic Heritage Committee Morales Medina South County Joint Planning Advisory Committee Street Naming 6.B Packet Pg. 66 Karen L. Garner DIRECTOR Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197 Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429 http://www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: February 4, 2021 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 2021 Gilroy City Council Meeting Planning Commission Presentation Schedule RECOMMENDATION: Review the presentation meeting schedule and select dates. Background: Annual presentations of the Boards, Committees and Commission to the Council will resume beginning in the month of May. These presentations provide the opportunity for the commission to highlight accomplishments of the year, and any work plan items they are addressing. To facilitate scheduling for the year, the Planning Commission is asked to select first choice and second choice presentation dates. See the attached calendar included in your meeting packet. Staff will email the selected dates to the City Clerk and report back to the commission once the dates are confirmed. Dates will not be confirmed until March 22nd. Attachments: 1. 2021 BCC Presentations to City Council (003) 6.C Packet Pg. 67 2021 GILROY CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOARD, COMMISSION & COMMITTEE PRESENTATION SCHEDULE Monday, May 3, 2021 Youth Commission Monday, May 17, 2021 Monday, June 7, 2021 Monday, June 21, 2021 Thursday, July 1, 2021 Monday, August 2, 2021 Monday, August 16, 2021 Monday, September 13, 2021* Monday, September 20, 2021 Monday, October 4, 2021 Monday, October 18, 2021 Monday, November 1, 2021 Monday, November 15, 2021 Open Government Commission Monday, December 6, 2021 * If a regular meeting falls on a holiday, it is rescheduled to the following Monday, with the exception of the single regular meeting in July, which will fall on the first day of the month not a holiday, or a Friday, Saturday or Sunday Adopted: 9/21/2020 6.C.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 2021 BCC Presentations to City Council (003) (3177 : 2021 Planning Commission Presentation Schedule) Planning Current Project Log 1 ADDRESS (Or Location)STATUS FILE # (PROJECT #)PARCEL NUMBER(S)PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLANNER APPLICANT CONTACT PHONE GENERAL PLAN (2020)ZONE DATE FILED or APPROVED NON-RES (SF)RES UNITS (#) BMR (# by Type- LI/VLI/M/S) City of Gilroy Planning Division Dated:1/28/2021 Legends: App Type:Planning Staff:Staff Directory Link AS Architectural and Site Review M CM Cindy McCormick CUP Conditional Use Permit MM KT Kraig Tambornini DUP Downtown Use Permit TM MAD Melissa Durkin GPA General Plan Amendment VMD JW Julie Wyrick HP Habitat Permit Z MC Miguel Contrera M Miscellaneous HD/HS Unassigned ADDRESS (Or Location)STATUS FILE # (PROJECT #)PARCEL NUMBER(S)PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLANNER APPLICANT CONTACT PHONE GENERAL PLAN (2020)ZONE DATE FILED or APPROVED NON-RES (SF)RES UNITS (#) BMR (# by Type- LI/VLI/M/S) GLR Specific Plan; Northeast of Santa Teresa & West of Miller A. Proposed A/S 20-24 (20110003) 808-18-003, 808-18-024, 808-18-025, 808-18-026 Architectural and Site Review for 171 lots in the Glen Loma Ranch Malvasia, Nebbiolo an The Glen neighborhodds MAD Augie Dent 408-847-4224 GLR GLR 11/5/2020 171 9130 & 9160 Kern Avenue A. Proposed AS 20-20 (20090052) / TM 20-06 (20090050) / Z 20-06(20090049) 790-17-002, 790-17-003 The Cottages at Kern. Inlcudes Tentative Map, Planned Unit Development, and Architectural & Site review for a 29-lot subdivision along Kern Avenue, near St. Clar Avenue. Reference DRG M 20-14. MC Chris Zaballos 925-225-7474 Medium Density Residential R3 10/2/2020 29 GLR Specific Plan; Northeast of Santa Teresa & West of Miller A. Proposed TM 20-05 (20090053) / AS 20-18 (20100002) / AS 20-19 (20100003) 808-18-003, 808-18-024, 808-18-025, 808-18-026 Tentative Map for GLR specific plan Canyon Creek, Rocky Knoll, and Malvasia neighorhoods. Totals 40 single-family units and 74 townhouse units. Includes Architectural & Site review for the 40-unit multi-family Malvasia neighborhood and and 34-unit multi-family Rocky Knoll neighborhood. MAD Augie Dent 408-847-4224 GLR GLR 9/29/2020 114 GLR Specific Plan; Northeast of Santa Teresa & West of Miller A. Proposed AS 20-18 (20100002) 808-18-003, 808-18-024, 808-18-025, 808-18-026 Architectural & Site review for the 40-unit multi-family Malvasia neighborhood MAD Augie Dent 408-847-4224 GLR GLR 9/29/2020 GLR Specific Plan; Northeast of Santa Teresa & West of Miller A. Proposed AS 20-19 (20100003) 808-18-003, 808-18-024, 808-18-025, 808-18-026 Architectural & Site review for the 34-unit multi-family Rocky Knoll neighborhood.MAD Augie Dent 408-847-4224 GLR GLR 9/29/2020 5935 & 5975 Rossi A. Proposed AS 20-15 (20090030)841-76-026, - 025 New Industrial building to expand existing Silva Sausage operation.CM John Schattensburg 510-476-1700 Genderal Industrial M2 9/28/2020 305 Gurries A. Proposed AS 20-17 (20090039)799-35-053 2x new Duets, with 2x ADU's KT Michael Davis 408-778-7005 Medium Density Residential R3 9/23/2020 6 8000 Camino Arroyo A. Proposed M 20-12 (20070016) 841-069-028, 841-069-039, 841-080-005 Data Center CM Dan Westley (PE)425-876-9680 General Industrial M2 7/20/2020 450 9th Street; Tenth and Chestnut A. Proposed AS 20-14 (20070017), TM 20-03 (20070020), Z 20-04 (20070021) 841-66-010, - 011, -014, and -015. Ohlone Garlic Center KT Eric Triolo 408-842-2188 General Services Commercial C3/CM 7/20/2020 Description: This log contains all major current planning projects. Contact the planning division at PlanningDivision@CityofGilroy.org or call (408) 846-0440 if you have any questions regarding this information. G:\COMDEV\PLANNING\Applications\_APPLICATION LOGS\PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28 7.A Packet Pg. 69 Communication: January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log (INFORMATIONAL ITEMS) Planning Current Project Log 2 1520 Hecker Pass Highway A. Proposed AS 20-10 (20060031) / Z 20-03 (20060030)810-66-012 100 affordable units SW corner Hecker Pass @ S. Teresa KT Jonathan Emami 408-728-3636 MDR R3 6/26/2020 100 100% 8900 Murray A. Proposed AS 20-09 (20050041) / CUP 20-01 (20050042)835-04-069 Expansion of existing self storage facility with addition of new two-story building.KT Judy Lee 949-829-3286 General Industrial M1 6/24/2020 2202 Columbine A. Proposed AS 20-05 (20020025)783-72-061 new, 5,574 square foot home with a 720 square foot attached garage.MC Tomas Osinski 323-226-0576 Residential Hillside 2/18/2020 1 395 Lewis Street A. Proposed AS 20-02 (20010012) TM 20-01 (20010014) 4-lot subdivision (TM) with 4 new homes (AS)CM Qui T Son / Hung Quoc Nguyen (Owner) 01/21/20 4 Citywide A. Proposed M 20-17 Create uniform Conditions of Approval for all departments MC City 12/4/2019 Glen Loma Ranch Specific Plan A. Proposed M 19-10 Traffic study - Tenth Street Bridge Construction/Modification to consider elimination of bridge requirement MAD Glen Loma Group 09/24/19 7888 Monterey B. Approved AS 19-07 (1903038)Mixed use 3-story bld. 2 commercial "live/work" units + 10 residential units, ground level parking MC Efrain Coria, Applicant 03/20/19 10 UPRR Right of Way A. Proposed M 18-22(#18080054)High Speed Rail Gilroy Alignment study - Ongoing (HSRA adopted plan 9.2020 KT City 08/21/18 Citywide A. Proposed M 18-18 (#18080001)Special Events Permit/Temporary Use Permit MAD City 08/02/18 Citywide A. Proposed M 18-13 (#18060036)Historical Resource Inventory JW/CM City 06/27/18 Automall Pkwy. A. Proposed AS 18-09 (#18050017) Z 18-04 (18050018) Zoning Amendment - Sign Ordinance - 80' Freeway electronic message pylon sign Gilroy Auto Mall CM Arroyo Sign, c/o: Richard Luchini 510-715-5488 05/04/18 Citywide A. Proposed M 18-02 (#18010039)Parklet policy CM City 01/24/18 North of Santa Teresa Blvd A. Proposed Z 17-02 (#17030053)Glen Loma Ranch Specific Plan update MAD Tim Filice, Developer 408-847-4224 09/04/16 Tenth Street Glen Loma A. Proposed M 16-10 (#16090007)CEQA analysis of 10th Street bridge project - construction project MAD City 09/02/16 W. Luchessa and Miller Ave.A. Proposed AS 16-33 (#16080044)New Glen Loma Ranch Fire Station MAD City of Gilroy 08/25/16 Downtown A. Proposed GPA 15-02 (#15120002), Z 15-12 (#15120004) High Speed Rail Station Area Plan - Reactivation of project Contract w HSRA expirs 12/21 KT City 12/02/15 Citywide A. Proposed GPA 13-02 (#13100001)2040 General Plan Update CM City 07/13/13 Vickery & Kern Avenues A. Proposed USA 14-02 (#14070058), USA 12-01 (#12070023) Urban Service Area amendment to incorporate of 55.66+/- acres into Gilroy’s Urban Service Area (USA)MAD Wren Investors, Developer 408-779-3900 7/17/12 N/A 7363 - 7371 Monterey A. Proposed MA 20-01 Mills Act Application CM Toni Bowles 7511 Carmel A. Proposed MA20-02 Mills Act Application CM Mariana McNamara Citywide A. Proposed M 20-10 (20050033)LEAP Grant CM City Citywide A. Proposed SB2 - Objective Design Standards CM City Citywide A. Proposed M 20-05 SB 330 Compliance Checklist CM City Citywide A. Proposed Mills Act Program - Ordinance, site visits, annual reports CM City Camino Arroyo A. Proposed AS 20-21 (20100021), CUP 20-02 (20100022), TM 20-07 (20100023), Z 20-07 (20100024) 841-18-082 Split APN 841-18-082 into three lots, develop two with industrial/distribution facility buildings totaling 407,580 square feet, and have one remainder commercial parcel. KT 301 & 303 E Tenth St A. Proposed TM 20-02 Lot Split 303 E Tenth for O'Reilly Building KT Citywide A. Proposed Z 15-03 Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Update & Admin Draft Zoning Map (Concurrent w GP 2040 GPA 13-02 Project)KT Rescind RDO A. Proposed Z 20-05 (20090043)City-Wide Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to Rescind RDO MAD City Revise Affordable Housing Policy A. Proposed M 20-18 City-Wide Revise affordable housing policy MAD City 7121 B. Approved AS 20-16 (20090034)799-10-049 New Canopy, repainting of primary building, and re-striping of parking lot.Juvenal Quezada 831-229-4581 Downtown Specific Plan DED 9/21/2020 6805Silacci Way B. Approved AS 20-07 (20050016)New Office / Warehouse buildings. Reference M 20-01 for DRG pre-application file.MC Jeffrey Krausse (Architect)991-327-1311 General Industrial M2 5/18/2020 7533, 7530, 7539Monterey B. Approved AS 20-04 (20020013)799-06-049 Retro-fitting of historic URM building. Proposal for mixed-use building with (3) restaurants and (3) residential units.CM Jose Montes 408-710-2703 02/07/20 3 0 1505 Welburn Avenue B. Approved AS 20-03 (20010033)783-23-046 Second floor addition to existing residential hillside home CM John Krukar (Architect)800-332-6035 01/30/20 Existing G:\COMDEV\PLANNING\Applications\_APPLICATION LOGS\PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28 7.A Packet Pg. 70 Communication: January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log (INFORMATIONAL ITEMS) Planning Current Project Log 3 6585 Eagle Ridge Court B. Approved AS 20-01 810-72-0260 Construct a new, 5 bed, 5.5 bath, 2 story, 4312 sq. ft. single family residence, with attached 3 car accessory garage.MC Gary Moore 707-543-6381 Residential Hillside RH 1/17/20 1 7880 Monterey B. Approved AS 19-27 (19120038)Demolition of Fosters and the construction of a new dentist office in the downtown expansion district. Deepak Patankar / Architect (415) 312- 0454 Downtown Specific Plan DED 12/31/19 95 Farrell Avenue B. Approved AS 19-17 TM 19-01 (See Also Z 19-03) Subdividing single 43,592 SF lot into 4 single family lots. 3 will be 6,694 SF parcels and one will be a 15,710 flag parcel.KT M Huang 12/12/19 4 1870 Carob Court B. Approved AS 19-26 (19120012)New 4,862 sq. ft. hillside residence with 1,349 sq. ft. lower level garage.MC Debra Mercado 12/11/19 1 10 West 7th Street B. Approved AS 19-24 (19110035)Remodel of an existing commercial building KT Steve Hernandez 11/27/19 7797 Monterey B. Approved AS 19-23 (19110032)Architectural remodel for a beer garden and brew house in a historic home.MC Larissa Dickerson 11/27/19 7797 Monterey B. Approved CUP 19-01 (19110033)Conditional Use Permit for a beer garden and brew house in a historic home.MC Larissa Dickerson 11/27/19 Foxglove Court B. Approved AS 19-22 Single-family hillside home MC Debra Mercado 10/16/19 1 7648 Monterey B. Approved AS 19-21 Re-roofing and rollup door replacement at boxing gym MC Ruben Gurrero 10/15/19 165 Martin Street B. Approved AS 19-20 Historic Restoration of Single Family Home MC Alfred Y. Gaetos 408-262- 8400x143 10/04/19 N/A 7300 Monterey B. Approved AS 19-16 (19090002)TI to convert gas station to 40 seat coffee shop (indoor and outdoor seating area)MC Andrew Raymundo 09/04/19 Glen LomaTown Center B. Approved M 19-14 BMR Apartments Affordable housing policy exception MAD Pacific West/Caleb Road 09/03/19 9005 Mimosa Court B. Approved AS 19-15 Construct a new single story 3,145 square foot single-family house with a 709 square foot garage in an RH District.MC Darryl Smith 408-799-0558 08/05/19 1 First Street and Kern Avenue B. Approved AS 19-12 (19050022) HP 17-02 (#17070020) 4-story, 120-unit apartment on approximately148,456 in-fill multi-family property adjacent to C-3 KT Jonathan Emami 05/15/19 120 B. Approved M 18-29 Sports Complex Phase 3 CM city 05/06/19 8350 Winter Green Court B. Approved AS 19-11 (19040026)Single Family Hillside Home MC Loret Mussallem 04/19/19 1 2281 Banyan Court B. Approved AS 19-09 (19040007)Single Family Hillside Home MC Warren Geisert 04/02/19 1 9025 Mimosa Court B. Approved AS 18-34 (#18110037)Single Family Hillside Home MC Tony Rivellini (408)607-3248 11/21/18 1 Citywide B. Approved M 18-25 (#18090009)Land Management System (LMS) Acquisition JW City 09/11/18 Southeast corner of Santa Teresa Blvd and 1st St B. Approved AS 18-20 (#18090005)Architectural modification for 202 townhome units KT William J. McClintock, Engineer 408-779-7381 09/06/18 N/A; Refer to AS 13-35 & TM 13-11 B. Approved M 18-17 (#18070050)Cities Association RHNA Sub-Region CM City 07/16/18 SW of Santa Teresa, S of Ballybunion/S.Teresa B. Approved TM 13-03 (#13040049)TM 13-03 Time Extension for Kroeger Subdivision: Six SFR lots, three open space parcels, and a private street MAD RJA: Chris Patton 408-848-0300 01/25/18 6 6503 Cameron Blvd & 1001 Ventura Way B. Approved AS 18-01 (#18010011)Two single-story warehouse buildings totaling 173,740 SF in McCarthy Ranch Industrial PUD KT McCarthy Gilroy LLC, Developer 408-356-2300 01/09/18 2282 Gunnera B. Approved AS 17-34 Single-Family Hillside Home - Expires 9/3/20 MC D&Z Designs 10/25/17 1 2475 Hecker Pass B. Approved AS 17-02 (#17010029)Commercial and residential mixed use in HPSD MAD Hecker Pass Commercial, LLC, Developer 408-836-9290 01/26/17 22 Glen Loma Ranch B. Approved TM 16-01 59 SFR Lots (McCutchin and Palomino)MAD Glen Loma Group 12/21/16 59 Hecker Pass/Autumn Drive B. Approved TM 18-01 and AS 18-03 Hecker Pass North Cluster MAD Ryder Homes (925) 768- 8338 72 Thomas Lane B. Approved TM 16-02 (#16050031)TM for subdividing 14 single-family residential lots. KT R.J. Dyer Real Property Investment, Inc. 408-847-1553 05/18/16 14 6845 Camino Arroy #40 B. Approved SP 20-33 Sign Permit - Two (2) internally illuminated channel letter signs with a total sign area of 100 square feet CM True Color Signs Monterey D. Under Construction AS 20-11 (20060035)790-27-036 Alpine Landscaping Remodel of Existing Site KT Laura Hennessee 408-621-4695 General Services Commercial CM 6/29/2020 Monterey D. Under Construction AS 20-06 (20030015)799-06-054 Façade modifications to vines and pints building DHD district.KT 799-06-054 Downtown Specific Plan DHD 3/15/2020 1500 Southside DR D. Under Construction AS 19-18 New Maintenance Facility Upgrades - no expansion of use KT SCRWA 09/24/19 1905 Saffron Court D. Under Construction AS 19-13 (19060033)New swimming pool/ retaining walls in Residential Hillside. P19050179 KT Steve Caspari, Jr 06/27/19 N/A 8200 Kern D. Under Construction MM 19-13 (19050039) VMD 19-02 New fence and gate for apartment complex security (resubmitted 10/16/19)KT Avery Cypress Point LC 06/07/19 N/A 8797 Monterey D. Under Construction MM 19-17 (BP#19010082)Establish contractor yard on existing unoccupied site KT 06/07/19 6455 Automall Pkwy. D. Under Construction AS 19-10 (#19040011)New 3,250 sq. ft. freestanding metal canopy. Building Permit #19080090 KT/MC Joe Magana 04/05/19 660 Birdsong Street D. Under Construction AS 18-35 (18120021)Addition of 963 sq.ft to existing SFR MC Richard/ Holly Hartman 408-995-0496 12/19/18 0 G:\COMDEV\PLANNING\Applications\_APPLICATION LOGS\PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28 7.A Packet Pg. 71 Communication: January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log (INFORMATIONAL ITEMS) Planning Current Project Log 4 8950 Mimosa Court D. Under Construction AS 18-32 (#18110014)Single Family Hillside Home MC Jason Guera, Symmetry Design Build, 408-813- 8760 11/07/18 1 Miller Ave. & Santa Teresa D. Under Construction AS 18-25 (#18100020) and TM 16- 03 (#16080041) Blanc and Noir (formerly the Grove) neighborhood in Glen Loma Ranch: 113 single-famiy dwelling units MAD TriPointe Homes, Scott Kramer, 925- 804-2278 10/08/18 113 Syrah Court D. Under Construction AS 18-16 (#18080044)808-43-005 Burgundy (Formerly Home Ranch) Neighborhood in Glen Loma Ranch: 52 single-family detached homes MAD Sergio Perez, Project manager 925-730-1373 08/16/18 52 S of Solorsano Middle School; E of Santa Teresa D. Under Construction AS 18-17 (#18080045)808-18-017 Margaux (Formerly Montonico) Neighborhood in Glen Loma Ranch: 84 single-family detached homes MAD Sergio Perez, Project manager 925-730-1373 08/16/18 84 Merlot Drive D. Under Construction AS 18-14 (#18080026)808-18-014, 808-18-018 Provence (Formerly Wild Chestnut) Neighborhood in Glen Loma Ranch: 43 single-family detached homes MAD Sergio Perez, Project manager 925-730-1373 08/09/18 43 1981 Lavender Way D. Under Construction AS 18-10 (#18050024)3,715 SF Single-Family Hillside Home MC Tony Rivellini, Owner Phone: 408-607- 3248 05/04/18 1 E of Miller btwn Santa Teresa & Luchessa D. Under Construction AS 18-05 (#18020002)A private park: a trail, a dog park, and other amentities in GLR MAD RJA: Chris Patton 408-848-0300 02/01/18 G:\COMDEV\PLANNING\Applications\_APPLICATION LOGS\PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28 7.A Packet Pg. 72 Communication: January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log (INFORMATIONAL ITEMS) Planning Current Project Log 5 8955 Mimosa Ct.D. Under Construction AS 18-04 4418 sf SFR Hillside. D & Z Design, Architect 408-778-7005 01/17/18 1 Santa Teresa Blvd D. Under Construction AS 17-37 (#17120021)158-unit apartment project at Glen Loma Ranch MAD Caleb Roope, Applicant 530-906-6967 12/15/17 158 7373 Monterey D. Under Construction DUP 17-03 (#17100049)Lonely Oak Brewery. P18040068 KT Greg Jaso, Developer 10/25/17 8735 Wild Iris Drive D. Under Construction AS 17-19 (#17040037)Single-Family Hillside Home. P18030015 Issued 10/11/18 KT Alexander Angkawijaya, Architect 408-431-2952 04/26/17 1 Gurries D. Under Construction AS 17-18 2846 sf duplex on R3 lot KT 04/19/17 2 Hollyhock Lane D. Under Construction AS 17-16 (#17040001)Single-Family Hillside Home. Building Permit 18040102 KT D & Z Design, Architect Phone: 408-778- 7005 04/03/17 1 Eagle Ridge D. Under Construction AS 17-15 (#17030085)16-lot single-family hillside residential development in Eagle Ridge JW D & Z Design, Architect Phone: 408-778- 7005 03/30/17 16 1820 Carob Court D. Under Construction AS 17-13 (#17030062)Single-Family Hillside Home. P18040085 & 19030092 for ADU KT James Baldwin, Architect 408-448-2012 03/21/17 1 2185 Hollyhock D. Under Construction AS 17-11 4878 sf DFR Hillside MC D & Z 03/09/17 1 9010 Tea Tree Way D. Under Construction AS 17-09 4ksf Hillside SFR MC 03/07/17 1 2242 Columbine D. Under Construction AS 17-05 5,027sf New Hillside Residence 02/07/17 1 205 Mayock Road D. Under Construction AS 17-04 10,000 sf addition to industrial building. B17080178 KT 02/06/17 1405 1st Street and Kelton Avenue D. Under Construction AS 17-25 (#17070046) Z18-05 (18080018)12KSF commercial PUD. P18120128,29,30 etc KT Chris Vanni, Applicant 408-847-9190 09/11/16 North of Santa Teresa Blvd D. Under Construction AS 17-12 (#17030051) TM 17-01 (#17030052) Tentative Maps for GLR Town Center Multi-Family Area 125- unit townhomes at GLR Town Center Multi-Family Area MAD Tim Filice, Developer 408-847-4224 09/04/16 125 1980 Lavender Way D. Under Construction AS 16-39 NSFR Hillside G Moore 09/02/16 1 7430 Sunnydale Way D. Under Construction AS 16-30 NSFR Hillside G Moore 08/12/16 1 2261 Mantelli Drive D. Under Construction AS 16-26 SFR, Hillside w ADU Truong 07/01/16 2 450 E 8th Street D. Under Construction MM 19-26, AS 16-08 Repairs and accessibility upgrades KT Eden Housing 03/24/16 N/A 8981 Tea Tree Way D. Under Construction AS 16-49 NSFR Hillside R Sharma 01/01/16 1 2241 Columbine D. Under Construction AS 15-38 SFR, Hillside John Kennedy 11/06/15 1 7320, 7330, 7340 Monterey D. Under Construction AS 15-37 (#15100042)Renovation of a downtown URM building. Approved 5/26/17 KT George Ramstad, Architect 408-842-9942 10/26/15 360-380 Obata Way D. Under Construction AS 15-34 (#15100018)Two industrial lots -- construction storage yards. Bgrade 18030094 issued 10/17/19 KT Carl Salinas/Hanna & Brunetti/Lon Davis, 408-842- 2173 10/12/15 G:\COMDEV\PLANNING\Applications\_APPLICATION LOGS\PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28PLANNING CURRENT PROJECT LOG_2021-01-28 7.A Packet Pg. 73 Communication: January 28, 2021 Planning Division Current Project Log (INFORMATIONAL ITEMS)