Loading...
09/15/2021 Historic Heritage Committee Regular Agenda PacketHistoric Heritage Committee Study Session Agenda September 15, 2021 at 6:00 P.M. HISTORIC HERITAGE COMMITTEE MEMBERS Chair: David Matuszak Council Member Representative: Rebeca Armendariz Vice Chair: Kathleen Chavez Member: Ian Bruesehoff Planning Commissioner Representative: Adilene Jezabel Moreno THIS MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 MEETING MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE www.cityofgilroy.org. In order to minimize the spread of the COVID 19 virus, the City will be offering telephone and email options for public comments at this meeting. The public is encouraged to participate in this meeting by as follows: VIEW THE MEETING LIVE ON FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/GilroyCityHallMeetings PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE HISTORIC HERITAGE COMMITTEE. COMMENTS MAY BE EMAILED PRIOR TO OR DURING THE MEETING TO CHRISTINA RUIZ AT christina.ruiz@cityofgilroy.org AND MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE THE CHAIRPERSON OPENS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR THE ITEM. ADDITIONALLY, COMMENTS MAY BE MADE BY LEAVING A VOICE MESSAGE AT 408-846-0269, PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2021. IMPORTANT: identify the Agenda Item Number or PUBLIC COMMENT in the subject line of your email. The Clerk will read the first three minutes of each email into the public record. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Governors Order N-29-20, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City a minimum of 2 hours prior to the meeting at (408) 846-0269. I.OPEN MEETING II.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1 III. REPORT ON POSTING THE AGENDA AND ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. August 18, 2021 Meeting Minutes V. PRESENTATIONS BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: (Three-minute time limit). This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Historic Heritage Committee on matters not on the agenda. The law does not permit Historic Heritage Committee action or extended discussion of any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Historic Heritage Committee action is requested, the Historic Heritage Committee may place the matter on a future agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. VI. OLD BUSINESS: A. Workplan Item: Historic Ordinance Update 1. Presentation: Cindy McCormick 2. Public Comment: 3. Possible Action: Review memo and provide input. No formal action will take place at this time. VII. NEW BUSINESS – NONE VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS - NONE IX. ORAL REPORTS BY MEMBERS OF THE HISTORIC HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Miscellaneous information and updates (no action) ADJOURNMENT to the Next Regular Meeting of October 20, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. Know your rights under the Gilroy Open Government Ordinance Government’s duty is to serve the public reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, task forces, councils and other agencies of the City exist to conduct the people’s business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that the City operations or deliberations are conducted before the people and that the City operations are open to the people’s review. For information on your rights under the open Government Ordinance, to receive a free copy of the ordinance, or to report a violation of the Ordinance, contact the open Government Commission staff at (408) 846-0204 or e-mail cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org 2 Historic Heritage Committee Meeting August 18, 2021 at 6:00 P.M. I.CALL TO ORDER Chair Matuszak called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m. II.INTRODUCTIONS Senior Planner McCormick introduced Planning Commissioner Representative, Adilene Jezabel Moreno. III.STUDY SESSION A.Workplan Item: Historic Ordinance Update Senior Planner McCormick presented the report. Committee members discussed and suggested the following: 1.To create a webpage with resources dedicated to the Historic Ordinance Workplan. 2.For any property that is sold within the Historic Neighborhood, the City of Gilroy and Historic Heritage Committee be notified of the new owners. 3.To provide the HRI Homeowners/Buyers Application Packet to new homeowners and provide a handout explaining the program. 4.Definitions to be kept in section 30.27.25. 5.Include definition for “rehabilitation” and “restoration”. 6.Be consistent with the use of the word “combining district”. 7.Include information on mills act program eligibility (e.g., what “qualifies). 8.Include information on the City’s website about the Mills Act. IV.ADJOURNEMENT at 6:50 p.m. to the next Regular Meeting of September 15, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. _____________________________ Christina Ruiz, Management Assistant 3 City of Gilroy COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy CA 95020 (408) 846-0451 (408) 846-0429 (fax) www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: September 15, 2021 TO: Historic Heritage Committee FROM: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Historic Ordinance WorkPlan RECOMMENDATION: Review and provide input on staff’s suggested draft amendments to sections 30.27.30 and 30.27.35. BACKGROUND On August 18th, the Historic Heritage Committee (HHC) began working on their workplan item to update Article 27 - Historic Site and Historic Neighborhood Combining Districts. At that time, the HHC accepted the goals of the update (referenced below) and provided feedback on draft changes to sections 30.27.10 (purpose), 30.27.20 (conditional uses), and 30.27.25 (new definitions), as illustrated in Attachment 1. 1)Clarify, streamline, and simplify the overall ordinance 2)Eliminate redundancies and superfluous language. 3)Define and distinguish City Council designated “historic districts”, City Council designated “historic sites”, and other “contributing historic resources” that are included in the Historic Resource inventory. 4)Provide a clear and easy to understand process for rehabilitating or making modifications (e.g., additions) to buildings listed on the HRI depending on whether they are a contributing historic resource, a designated historic site, or located within a designated historic district. 5)Simplify and consolidate the existing standards for demolition. 6)Codify the Mills Act Program as an economic incentive for preservation. 4 Historic Context Statement: The City of Gilroy Historic Context Statement and Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) update project was undertaken by the City to enhance and streamline the City’s historic preservation program. Historic Context Statements provide the foundation for identifying and evaluating historical resources and establish a framework for grouping information about resources that share common themes and patterns of historical development. The Historic Context Statement presents the history of Gilroy’s built environment from pre-history to present, identifies important themes, events, and patterns of development, and describes the different property types, styles, builders, and architects associated with these important periods and themes. The Historic Context Statement also includes resource evaluation criteria that consider both historical significance and integrity requirements. The recommended edits to Gilroy Municipal Code sections 30.27.30 and 30.27.35 are modeled after the attached Historic Context Statement, and in particular Chapter 7 (pages 129-162) of that document. DISCUSSION DRAFT Amendments: The following suggested deletions are noted by strikethrough, while suggested additions are underlined. A clean copy of the draft amendments without the underlining and strikethroughs is included in Attachment 1 for easier reference. Definitions: Based on feedback received by the HHC at the August 18 th meeting, staff drafted two new definitions and changed the term “Historic Neighborhood Combining Districts” to “Historic District” for simplicity throughout the draft ordinance. “Contributing historic resource” was also amended for consistency with “site” and “district”. 30.27.25 Definitions (new amendments) “Contributing Historic Resource” means a historic resource that has been listed in the historic resources inventory as a contributing historic resource by Resolution of the City Council, in accordance with the criteria of this Chapter. “Historic District” means an area or combination of sites within the city that has been designated by Ordinance of the City Council as a historic district in accordance with the criteria of this Chapter. “Rehabilitation” means the process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. Rehabilitation is the primary means of preservation in Gilroy and acknowledges the need to alter or add to a historic property to meet continuing or changing uses while retaining the property's historic character. “Restoration” means the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. 5 Possible Action: Accept or modify staff’s suggested amendments to the definitions. 30.27.30 Contributing Historic Resources (NEW SECTION) Discussion (a) The establishment of a contributing historic resource on the Historic Resource Inventory shall be processed by Resolution of the City Council, following a review and recommendation by the Historic Heritage Committee and the Planning Commission. Fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the establishment of, but not the rescission of, a contributing historic resource. Added new section to distinguish contributing historic resources from historic sites and historic districts. (b) Any structure or property within the city may be established as a contributing historic resource if it meets any one (1) of the following findings: (1) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or (2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or (3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or methods of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer or architect. 30.27.350 Establishment of hHistoric sites and neighborhood combining historic districts. Discussion (a) The designation or rescission of a historic site or historic district shall be processed by Ordinance of the City Council, following a review and recommendation by the Historic Heritage Committee and the Planning Commission. Fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the designation of, but not the rescission of, a historic site or historic district. Moved up from next section for clarity (b) Historic District. The establishment of a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district may be in combination with any residential, commercial, industrial or other base district as defined in this chapter. The establishment or removal of either a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district shall be processed as a zone change. The historic heritage committee shall review all applications for historical designation or removal of historical designation and pass its recommendations on to the planning commission and city council. The zone change fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the establishment of, but not the removal of, either a historic site or neighborhood combining district. (a) Any area or combination of sites within the city may be designated as a historic neighborhood combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following findingscriteria: Moved up for clarity Replaced “criteria” with “findings” 6 (1) The neighborhood district possesses a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects unified by past events or physical development; or (2) The neighborhood district represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community; or (3) The collective historic value of the district neighborhood taken together is of greater value than each individual structure. (cb) Historic Site. Any site property within the city may be designated as a historic site combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following criteria: the findings for establishment of a contributing resource and it meets all of the following additional findings of integrity described in Chapter 7 of the Historic Context Statement. (1) The structure retains the original roofline and roof form; and (2) The structure retains the original fenestration pattern; and (3) The structure retains the majority of its original ornamentation (e.g., decorative trim, racketed eaves, cornice line); and (4) The structure retains its original porch configuration and materials; and (5) The structure does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., cladding or elaborate details that are inconsistent with the original period of construction or architectural style); and (6) The structure does not have later additions that are visible from the public right-of-way and impact integrity. These additional findings were taken from the integrity criteria identified in the Historic Context Statement, Chapter 7 (pages 135-162). (1) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or (2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or (3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or methods of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer or architect. Moved up to contributing resource section Possible Action: Accept or modify staff’s suggested amendments to Sections 30.27.30 and 30.27.35. Next Steps: Based on feedback from the HHC, staff will return with further amendments to sections 30.27.25, 30.27.30, and 30.27.35 (if necessary), and recommended edits to additional sections of the Ordinance. It is staff’s intent to go through the entire Ordinance between now and the end of the 2021 calendar year. The entire Zoning Ordinance, including any modifications to Chapter 30.27, are tentatively scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council at public hearings in mid-2022. * Please note that the October 20th HHC meeting will be cancelled due to a scheduling conflict (City Council Study Session). * 7 30.27.10 Statement of intent. (revised) The intent of this article is: (a) To preserve historic sites and historic districts that represent important elements of Gilroy’s past or contribute to the community’s identity or educational resources; (b) To enhance the visual character of Gilroy by encouraging and regulating the compatibility of architectural styles within historic districts; (c) To identify and designate historic sites or historic districts that have a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings or objects unified by past events or physical development; (d) To encourage the rehabilitation or restoration of historic buildings throughout the city. e) To encourage the preservation of character defining features of contributing historic resources. 30.27.20 Conditional use permits. (revised) Any use that is listed as a conditional use for the base zoning district may be allowed to locate within a historic resource subject to the planning commission finding that the proposed conditional use is compatible with the historic nature of the property and would require minimal alteration to the building or site. 30.27.25 Definitions. (new) "Alteration" means any exterior modification to a historic resource, including but not limited to a new addition or removal of existing architectural features. Alteration shall not include routine maintenance and repair such as any work involving the in-kind replacement of existing material for the purpose of protective or preventative measures. "Alteration, Significant" means any alteration, destruction, relocation, demolition, or partial demolition that may have a significant adverse effect on the character-defining features of a historic resource. An alteration that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards is not generally considered a significant alteration. “Contributing Historic Resource” means a historic resource that has been listed in the historic resources inventory as a contributing historic resource by Resolution of the City Council, in accordance with the criteria of this Chapter. "Historic Context Statement" means a narrative report on the geography, history and culture that shaped Gilroy’s built environment and provides the basis for evaluating historic significance and integrity. “Historic Heritage Committee” means the five (5) members appointed by the city council to act as an advisory board to the city council and planning commission on issues relating to the identification, protection, retention and preservation of historic sites and historic districts in the City of Gilroy. 8 “Historic District” means an area or combination of sites within the city that has been designated by Ordinance of the City Council as a historic district, in accordance with the criteria of this Chapter. "Historic Resource" means a contributing historic resource, historic site, or historic district that is officially listed in the historic resources inventory. "Historic Resource Inventory" means the official City Council approved register of contributing historic resources, historic sites, and historic districts. “Historic Site” means an object, building, structure, or site that has been designated by Ordinance of the City Council as a historic site in accordance with the criteria of this Chapter. "Mills Act" means a state law enacted in 1972 that grants participating local governments the authority to enter into contracts with owners of a qualified historic resource who actively participate in the rehabilitation and maintenance of the historic resource while receiving property tax relief. “Restoration” means the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period of time by means of the removal of features from other periods in its history and reconstruction of missing features from the restoration period. “Rehabilitation” means the process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values. Rehabilitation is the primary means of preservation in Gilroy and acknowledges the need to alter or add to a historic property to meet continuing or changing uses while retaining the property's historic character. The “Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties” (Standards) are principles that promote historic preservation best practices that will help protect Gilroy’s historic resources. 30.27.30 Contributing Historic Resources. (new) (a) The establishment of a contributing historic resource on the Historic Resource Inventory shall be processed by Resolution of the City Council, following a review and recommendation by the Historic Heritage Committee and the Planning Commission. Fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the establishment of, but not the rescission of, a contributing historic resource. (b) Any structure or property within the city may be established as a contributing historic resource if it meets any one (1) of the following findings: (1) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or (2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or (3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or methods of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or 9 (4) It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer or architect. 30.27.35 Historic sites and historic districts. (revised) (a) The designation or rescission of a historic site or historic district shall be processed by Ordinance of the City Council, following a review and recommendation by the Historic Heritage Committee and the Planning Commission. Fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the designation of, but not the rescission of, a historic site or historic district. (b) Historic District. The establishment of a historic district may be in combination with any residential, commercial, industrial or other base district as defined in this chapter. Any area or combination of sites within the city may be designated as a historic district if it meets any one (1) of the following findings: (1) The district possesses a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects unified by past events or physical development; or (2) The district represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community; or (3) The collective historic value of the district taken together is of greater value than each individual structure. (c) Historic Site. Any property within the city may be designated as a historic site if it meets the findings for establishment of a contributing resource and it meets all of the following additional findings of integrity described in Chapter 7 of the Historic Context Statement. (1) The structure retains the original roofline and roof form; and (2) The structure retains the original fenestration pattern; and (3) The structure retains the majority of its original ornamentation (e.g., decorative trim, racketed eaves, cornice line); and (4) The structure retains its original porch configuration and materials; and (5) The structure does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., cladding or elaborate details that are inconsistent with the original period of construction or architectural style); and (6) The structure does not have later additions that are visible from the public right-of-way and impact integrity. End of edits 10 30.27.40 Design review procedures. (unedited to date) Applications to construct new structures, alter, change, modify, remove or significantly alter the exterior of any structure within a historic site or neighborhood combining district shall require architectural and site approval according to the provisions of section 30.50.40. An application shall be denied if the changes would jeopardize the building’s or neighborhood’s architectural or historical value. Interior remodeling or routine maintenance or repair of the exterior features of a structure in a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district shall not require architectural and site review. (a) In a historic neighborhood combining district, the design of the following proposed structures or remodeling shall be reviewed according to the provisions of section 30.50.40: (1) Construction of any type of a building that will affect the exterior appearance of the site, neighborhood, or any structure on the site or in the neighborhood; (2) New construction; (3) Relocation of any structure in or removal from a historic neighborhood combining district; (4) Remodeling of fifty percent (50%) or more of the facade of any structure. (b) In a historic site combining district, but not in a historic neighborhood combining district, the design of the following proposed structures or remodeling shall be reviewed according to the provisions of section 30.50.40: (1) Exterior alterations to any building; (2) Interior alterations that would affect the exterior of a building; (3) Construction of any type on a building that will affect the exterior appearance of the site, or any structure on the site; (4) New construction; (5) Relocation of any structure into or removal from a historic site combining district. 30.27.50 Demolition procedures. (unedited to date) All demolition applications for historically or culturally important structures located in either a historic site or neighborhood combining district shall be reviewed by the historic heritage committee which shall forward its recommendations to the planning commission. The planning commission shall review the demolition request and either deny it or forward a recommendation of approval to the city council in accordance with sections 30.27.51 and 30.27.52. Architectural and site approval shall not be given for any new construction until the city council has approved the demolition request, or a demolition permit has been issued by the city, whichever comes first. Upon application for demolition where a structure or portion of a structure in a historic site or neighborhood combining district has been substantially destroyed by fire, explosion, earthquake or flood, the chief building inspector and planning director, after inspection of the damage, may issue the demolition permit immediately, only when they both determine that there is imminent 11 danger to life, limb or health of the public and the structure is obviously not restorable due to such damage. 30.27.51 Historic neighborhood demolition procedures. (unedited to date) After review of each request for demolition, the planning commission may recommend approval or conditional approval upon making the findings set forth below, or may deny the request. The planning commission determination for denial shall be final unless a written appeal to the city council is filed within twenty (20) days. If the planning commission recommends approval or conditional approval, the planning director shall forward to the city council the demolition request with the planning commission’s recommendation. After review of the request, the city council may approve, conditionally approve or deny the request. In order to approve or conditionally approve a demolition request within a historic neighborhood combining district, the city council prior to its approval must make the following findings: (a) Demolition of the structure will not have a significant impact on the historic character of the neighborhood; or (b) The structure proposed for demolition is not restorable. 30.27.52 Historic site demolition procedures. (unedited to date) Within a historic site combining district, nonhistoric accessory buildings may be demolished through the procedure set forth above for structures in a historic neighborhood combining district. Demolition or relocation of a historically significant structure within a historic site combining district shall first require removal of the historic site combining district designation through the zone change process as provided in this chapter. Removal of the historic site combining district is not required where a historically significant structure would remain on the site, despite the demolition of other historic or nonhistoric structures on the site. A request for demolition or relocation may be processed concurrently with the request for a change of district. In order to approve or conditionally approve a demolition request within a historic site combining district, the historic heritage committee, the planning commission and city council must make the following findings: (a) The structure proposed for demolition is not restorable; and (b) The applicant has unsuccessfully attempted to preserve the structure through all means available, including, but not limited to: (1) Documented advertisements publicizing the availability of the structure for purchase for restoration purposes; and (2) A map showing investigation into possible sites for relocation of the structure; and (3) Documented letters offering the donation of the structure to nonprofit organizations for relocation. 12 The planning commission or city council may suspend action on removal of the historic site combining district designation and demolition application for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days to allow sufficient time for necessary steps to be taken to preserve the structure. Thereafter, the planning commission may recommend approval and the city council may approve the application for removal of the historic site combining district designation and demolition following a determination that no means of preservation is feasible and that the requested zone change is appropriate. 30.27.53 General demolition procedures. (unedited to date) Each request for the demolition of any building over fifty (50) years old which is not in a historic site or neighborhood combining district, but meets any of the four (4) findings of criteria defined under section 30.27.30(b) as determined by the planning division, shall be accompanied by one (1) clear photograph, of the front of the building, submitted by the applicant. The age of the structure shall be determined or verified through public records or from an inspection. A demolition permit shall not be issued for such building until the planning director, with assistance from the historic heritage committee, has had a period not to exceed thirty (30) days to investigate, document and photograph the building and attempt to arrange for the preservation of the building. After the expiration of the thirty (30) day period, the permit may be issued in accordance with the building department procedures. The thirty (30) day period may be waived by the chief building inspector where there is imminent danger to life, limb or health of the public which requires immediate demolition. 13 PREPARED BY: Samantha Murray, MA, Sarah Corder, MFA, Kate Kaiser, MSHP Fallin Steffen, MPS, Nicole Frank, MSHP, and Sarah Brewer BA July 2020 725 Front Street, Suite 400 Santa Cruz, California 95060 PREPARED FOR: 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, California 95020 Contact: Julie Wyrick, AICP Planning Division Manager CITY OF GILROY Historic Context Statement and Historic Resources Inventory Update 14 City of Gilroy Historic Context Statement and Historic Resources Inventory Update Prepared for: City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, California 95020 Contact: Julie Wyrick, AICP, Planning Division Manager Prepared by: Samantha Murray, MA, Sarah Corder, MFA, Kate Kaiser, MSHP, Fallin Steffen, MPS, Nicole Frank, MSHP, and Sarah Brewer BA 725 Front Street, Suite 400 Santa Cruz, California 95060 JULY 2020 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. 11165 Table of Contents i July 2020 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Team ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Survey and Research Methodology ....................................................................................................... 2 1.4.1 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4.4 Historic Context Statement ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 How to Use This Document .................................................................................................................... 6 2 PREVIOUS SURVEYS AND STUDIES ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Previously Completed Local Inventories ............................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Gilroy Historic Resource Inventory (1986) .............................................................................. 7 2.1.2 Santa Clara County Heritage Inventory Update: South County (2003) ................................. 7 2.1.3 County of Santa Clara Historic Context Statement 2004 (rev. 2012) ................................... 8 2.2 Other Previous Studies ........................................................................................................................... 8 3 SIGNIFICANT PERIODS, THEMES AND PROPERTY TYPES ............................................................................. 9 3.1 Chronological Periods ............................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Significant Themes ................................................................................................................................. 9 3.2.1 Residential Development ...................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2 Commercial Development ..................................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Civic and Institutional Development ..................................................................................... 10 3.2.4 Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 10 3.2.5 Agriculture, Manufacturing and Industry .............................................................................. 10 3.3 Associated Property Types .................................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Residential Properties ........................................................................................................... 10 3.3.2 Commercial Properties .......................................................................................................... 11 3.3.3 Industrial Properties .............................................................................................................. 11 3.3.4 Civic and Institutional Properties .......................................................................................... 11 3.3.5 Transportation Properties ..................................................................................................... 12 4 HISTORIC CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Prehistory of Santa Clara County ........................................................................................................ 13 4.1.1 Paleo-Indian (10,000 BP or older) ........................................................................................ 14 4.1.2 Millingstone (5,500 – 10,000 BP) ........................................................................................ 15 4.1.3 Early (2,600 – 5,500 BP) ...................................................................................................... 15 4.1.4 Middle (950 – 2,600 BP) ...................................................................................................... 16 4.1.5 Middle-Late Transition (700 – 950 BP) ................................................................................ 17 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Table of Contents ii July 2020 4.1.6 Late (181 – 700 BP) .............................................................................................................. 18 4.2 Ethnohistoric Context .......................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Spanish, Mexican, and Pioneer Period (1777-1868) ....................................................................... 19 4.3.1 Spanish Period (1777-1822) ................................................................................................ 19 4.3.2 Mexican Period (1822–1848) .............................................................................................. 21 4.3.3 Pioneer Period (1848-1868) ................................................................................................. 22 4.4 Initial Development (1868-1904) ...................................................................................................... 30 4.4.1 Residential Development ...................................................................................................... 36 4.4.2 Commercial Development ..................................................................................................... 38 4.4.3 Civic and Institutional Development ..................................................................................... 40 4.4.4 Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 46 4.4.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing .............................................................................. 47 4.5 Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development (1904-1941) ......................................................... 52 4.5.1 Residential Development ...................................................................................................... 52 4.5.2 Commercial Development ..................................................................................................... 54 4.5.3 Civic and Institutional Development ..................................................................................... 56 4.5.4 Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 67 4.5.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing .............................................................................. 70 4.6 World War II and Post-War Development (1941-1975) .................................................................... 72 4.6.1 Residential Development ...................................................................................................... 72 4.6.2 Commercial Development ..................................................................................................... 74 4.6.3 Civic and Institutional Development ..................................................................................... 76 4.6.4 Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 80 4.6.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing .............................................................................. 80 4.7 Modern Gilroy (1975-Present) ............................................................................................................ 85 4.7.1 Residential Development ...................................................................................................... 85 4.7.2 Commercial Development ..................................................................................................... 86 4.7.3 Civic and Institutional Development ..................................................................................... 87 4.7.4 Transportation Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 88 4.7.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing .............................................................................. 89 5 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES ............................................................................................................................ 91 5.1 Residential Properties ......................................................................................................................... 91 5.2 Commercial Properties ...................................................................................................................... 100 5.3 Civic and Institutional Properties ...................................................................................................... 107 5.4 Industrial Properties .......................................................................................................................... 114 6 ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS .................................................................................................................... 117 6.1 Architects ........................................................................................................................................... 117 6.1.1 William H. Weeks (1864-1936) .......................................................................................... 117 6.1.2 William Binder/ Ernest N. Curtis / Binder & Curtis (1918-1953) ..................................... 118 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Table of Contents iii July 2020 6.1.3 Albert Roller (1891-1981) ................................................................................................... 119 6.1.4 Reid Brothers (1891-1932) ................................................................................................ 120 6.1.5 Samuel Newsom (1852-1908) with Wolfe & McKenzie ................................................... 121 6.2 Builders .............................................................................................................................................. 121 6.2.1 Orrin F. Hanson (1840-1921) ............................................................................................. 121 6.2.2 Holmes Brothers (circa 1918-1926) .................................................................................. 122 6.2.3 George Renz (1893-1988) .................................................................................................. 122 6.2.4 J. Howard Carl (1871-1944) ............................................................................................... 123 6.2.5 William Radtke Sr (1888-1969) ......................................................................................... 123 6.2.6 Howson Brothers Construction Company (1928-1962) .................................................... 126 6.2.7 Robert Grant (1844-1919) .................................................................................................. 127 6.2.8 Other Builders ...................................................................................................................... 127 7 GUIDANCE FOR ASSESSING SIGNIFICANCE .............................................................................................. 129 7.1 Designation Criteria and Integrity Requirements ............................................................................ 129 7.1.1 National Register of Historic Places ................................................................................... 129 7.1.2 California Register of Historical Resources ........................................................................ 130 7.1.3 Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory .................................................................................... 131 7.2 Property Types and Registration Requirements .............................................................................. 132 7.2.1 Initial Development Period (1868-1904) ........................................................................... 132 7.2.2 Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development (1904-1941) .......................................... 142 7.2.3 World War II and Post-War Development (1941-1975) .................................................... 153 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 163 8.1 Citywide Survey Findings ................................................................................................................... 163 8.1.1 Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................... 163 8.1.2 City HRI Eligible/Listed Properties ...................................................................................... 163 8.1.3 CRHR and NRHP Eligible/Listed Properties ....................................................................... 174 8.1.4 Ineligible Properties ............................................................................................................. 174 8.1.5 Unevaluated Properties ....................................................................................................... 177 8.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 185 8.2.1 Additional Study ................................................................................................................... 185 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................................................................................................... 187 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Table of Contents iv July 2020 APPENDICES A Confidential Records Search Results B Master Spreadsheet of Findings C Tables of Findings D State of California DPR Forms E Applicable Local Codes and Regulations FIGURES Figure 1. Project Location ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Rancho Las Animas (left) and the three partitions of Rancho San Ysidro (right), circa 1859. Llagas Creek divided the two Ranchos. John Gilroy’s portion of San Ysidro is the middle portion of three. Quintin Ortega’s portion is the southern most of the three, and Isabel Ortega owned the northern-most portion (pink outline). (Land Case Map F-316, Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) ................................................ 20 Figure 3. Inset from map south of Santa Clara County area, depicting “Gilroy” (left center) and “old Gilroy” (center) locations, by Thompson & West, 1876 (David Rumsey Map Collection) ...................................................... 24 Figure 4. David Holloway’s Hotel, circa 1855 (Clyde Arbuckle Photograph Collection, San José Public Library, California Room) ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 5. El Camino Real route as drawn by Mabel Emerton Prentiss, 1903 (UCLA Library Special Collections) ... 28 Figure 6. City of Gilroy town map, by Thompson & West, 1876 (David Rumsey Map Collection) ............................ 31 Figure 7. Gilroy’s Chinatown, 1896 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ........................................... 32 Figure 8. Looking west on 5th Street, Music Hall on left, early 1900s (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................................................................................................ 34 Figure 9. Birds eye view of Gilroy by F.W. Blake. 1885 (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) ........... 35 Figure 10. 1886 (left) and 1892 (right) Sanborn Fire Insurance maps of residential neighborhood just west of Monterey Road. (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) ........................................................... 37 Figure 11. Stationer’s storefront on 7400 block of Monterey Road, 1880 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................................................................................................ 39 Figure 12. Looking north on Monterey Road, with utility poles, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) ......................................... 41 Figure 13. Gilroy Public School, 1893 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ....................................... 42 Figure 14. Gilroy churches, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) ................................................................................................... 43 Figure 15. First I.O.O.F. Hall, no date (Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................... 44 Figure 16. Southern Pacific Depot building, circa 1900 (California History Section Picture Catalog, California State Library) ............................................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 17. Dairying scene at George Rea’s farm, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) ............................................................... 48 Figure 18. Prune drying at B.F. Thomas farm. Circa 1900 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ...... 49 Figure 19. Gilroy Chinatown, looking south on Monterey Road towards 9th Street (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) ........................................................................................................................................... 51 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Table of Contents v July 2020 Figure 20. Postcard showing Residential Development along Eigleberry Street, c.1910s (California Historical Society) .............................................................................................................................................................. 53 Figure 21. Hotel Milias in 1922 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ................................................. 55 Figure 22. The Strand Theatre as it appeared in 1931. The Masonic Temple designed by W.H. Weeks pictured at the left. (Gilroy Historical Museum) ................................................................................................................. 56 Figure 23. The newly completed City Hall Building in 1907, prior to the installation of the clock faces in the tower (California Room, San José Public Library) ...................................................................................................... 59 Figure 24. The Gilroy Free Library, c.1920, photo by Frasher Foto. (Pomona Public Library Online Archives) ........ 60 Figure 25. Postcard depicting Gilroy High School. Date Unknown. (California Room, San José Public Library) ...... 61 Figure 26. Wyckoff & White’s 1927 rendering of the 7th and 8th Grade Elementary School. (History San José) ..... 62 Figure 27. Wheeler Hospital Detail as it appeared in 2011, (NoeHill) ........................................................................ 65 Figure 28. Excitement at the Gymkhana. Unknown Date. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ....... 66 Figure 29. Photo Looking Down Monterey Road in 1911 before it was paved. (California State Library) ................ 67 Figure 30. Photo Looking south Monterey Road c.1920s after paving. (California State Library) ............................ 68 Figure 31. The New SPRR Gilroy Station, circa 1920. (Gilroy Historical Museum) .................................................... 69 Figure 32. Looking west on Monterey Road, c.1940s-1950s. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum). 74 Advertisements for new businesses visible on the side of building. ........................................................................... 74 Figure 33. New IOOF Building in 1954, Eigleberry Street, looking west. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................................................................................................ 75 Figure 34. Kiyoshi Hirasaki and part of his family outside their family home in Gilroy in 1945. The Japanese-style building was originally part of an exhibition at the 1939 World’s Fair in San Francisco and was bought and relocated to Gilroy by Kiyoshi. (War Relocation Authority Photograph Collection, University of California Berkeley) ............................................................................................................................................................ 77 Figure 35. The Gentry Plant in 1962. (Gilroy Dispatch) ............................................................................................... 81 Figure 36. Men Shaping Sheet Metal, BeGe Manufacturing, c.1940s, (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................................................................................................ 83 Figure 37. BeGe Manufacturing, c.1940s, (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................... 83 Figure 38. Recently completed outlet mall, 1990 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) .................... 86 Figure 39. Employees process garlic for Christopher Ranch Farms, c. 1980 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) ............................................................................................................................................................ 89 Figure 40. City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Properties ....................................................................... 165 Figure 41. City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Districts ........................................................................... 169 Figure 42. City of Gilroy NRHP and CRHR Eligible/Listed Properties ........................................................................ 175 Figure 43. City of Gilroy Properties Recommended Ineligible.................................................................................... 179 Figure 44. City of Gilroy Properties Requiring Additional Study ................................................................................. 183 TABLES Table 1. California Central Coast Prehistoric Chronology............................................................................................. 13 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy ................................................................................ 91 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Table of Contents vi July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy ............................................................................. 100 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy ............................................................. 107 Table 5. Architectural Styles for Industrial Properties in Gilroy ................................................................................. 114 Table 6. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1868-1904 .......................................... 134 Table 7. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1868-1904 ......................................... 137 Table 8. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1868-1904 ......................................... 139 Table 9. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1904-1941 .......................................... 144 Table 10. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1904-1941 ....................................... 147 Table 11. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1904-1941 ....................................... 150 Table 12. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1941-1975 ........................................ 154 Table 13. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1941-1975 ....................................... 157 Table 14. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1941-1975 ....................................... 160 Table 15. Summary of Existing and Recommended HRI Historic Districts ............................................................... 167 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 1. Introduction 1 July 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Description The City of Gilroy Historic Context Statement and Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) update project was undertaken by the City’s Community Development Department to enhance and streamline the City’s historic preservation program by bringing consistency to preservation planning efforts. Historic Context Statements provide the foundation for identifying and evaluating historical resources and establish a framework for grouping information about resources that share common themes and patterns of historical development. This document presents the history of the City of Gilroy’s built environment from pre-history to present, identifies important themes, events, patterns of development, and describes the different property types, styles, builders, and architects associated with these important periods and themes. This document also develops registration requirements for resource evaluation that is specific to the City of Gilroy, in consideration of both historical significance and integrity requirements. Finally, this document concludes with a discussion of recommendations for future study/action by the City to facilitate and streamline the historic preservation program. 1.2 Project Team The Dudek project team responsible for this project include Principal Architectural Historian and Project Manager Samantha Murray, MA; Senior Architectural Historian Sarah Corder, MFA; and Architectural Historians Kate Kaiser, MSHP, Fallin Steffen MPS, and Nicole Frank, MSHP. The Historic Context Statement and all associated archival research efforts was co-authored/completed by Ms. Kaiser and Ms. Steffen; and the citywide reconnaissance-level survey effort was organized and led by Ms. Corder with assistance from Ms. Steffen. The entire Dudek team meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in Architectural History, History, and/or Historic Preservation. Additional support for the pedestrian survey was provided by Dudek cultural resources technicians Ibeth Adame, B.A. and Jennifer De Alba, B.A; and Dudek Archaeologist Sarah Brewer, B.A. contributed to the prehistory and ethnographic sections of the Historic Context Statement. All project work was coordinated with Julie Wyrick, AICP, City of Gilroy Planning Division Manager; Pamela Wu, AICP, Senior Planner; Sue O’Strander, AICP, Deputy Community Development Director; and Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner of the Community Development Department. Dudek also worked closely with Connie Rogers, President of the Gilroy Historical Society, and Tom Howard of the Gilroy Historical Museum. The Historic Context Statement was also reviewed and recommended for adoption by the City’s Historic Heritage Committee (HHC). CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 1. Introduction 2 July 2020 1.3 Project Study Area The study area for the Gilroy Historic Context Statement and HRI update project includes the entire City of Gilroy (Figure 1). The City of Gilroy is located in Santa Clara County, approximately 16 miles south of San José and north of San Benito County. The eastern half of the City contains the vast majority of all historic built environment resources over 45 years old, with the western half of the City comprising mostly post-1960s and more recent residential and commercial developments. All properties over 45 years of age (built in 1974 or earlier) within city limits were surveyed as part of the project. 1.4 Survey and Research Methodology 1.4.1 Survey Dudek collected publicly available parcel data from the Santa Clara County Assessor, which served as a baseline for identifying properties over 45 years old within city limits. This was compiled into a spreadsheet that included details such as Assessor parcel numbers, street addresses, dates of construction, zoning, and owner information. Assessor data was supplemented with information obtained from the City’s list of designated HRI properties. These combined data sources were used to create an ArcGIS web map viewer with color-coded parcels based on dates of construction and current designation status. These data tools allowed surveyors to identify properties over 45 years old in the field, and areas within the city where historic age buildings are clustered. Throughout the course of the survey, numerous data gaps were identified pertaining to dates of construction. Therefore, all properties within the downtown core of the City were visually assessed for an approximate built date. In instances where the built date could not be verified by Assessor data or survey, aerial photography was reviewed to determine an approximate date of construction. During the course of the survey, the project team also identified properties that warranted additional research, were not visible from the public right of way, and were demolished since the last citywide survey effort in the 1980s. The survey was primarily conducted over a period of approximately five weeks between September and October 2018. The field survey included 4-6 individuals working in teams of two throughout the City. All pedestrian survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. Properties not visible from the public right-of-way are documented in the survey findings (Section 8.1.5). Properties were recorded using iPad field forms designed to replicate the information required on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Series 523A (Primary Record), 523J (Location Map), and 523B (Building, Structure, and Object Record) forms. The iPad field forms capture all required locational and descriptive information about each property, utilizing drop down menus, check boxes, as well as custom text fields for inputting additional details. The iPad forms also captured photographs of each property from multiple angles and produced custom Sketch Maps for each property. Date: 1/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Project_Location.mxdCity of Gilroy £¤101 Ä152 Ä25 Bloo m f i e l d AveF erg u s o n R d W10thStW elburn Ave Sant a T e r e s a B l v d Mantelli Dr F razier Lake R dLeavesleyRd BolsaRd Pachec oPassHwyHollisterRd H ec ker Pa ss H w y E 10thStMo n t e r e y R d 1 s t S t S Val l ey FwyProject Location City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1.2 50.6 25 Milesn City of Gilroy Limits and CitywideSurvey Study Area FIGURE 1 MapExtent Gilroy MorganHill LosGatos Campbell Cupertino SantaClara San Jose MilpitasPalo Alto Monterey Pacific Grove Marina Salinas Hollister Santa Cruz Watsonville Scotts Valley LosBanos Gustine New man PattersonMenloPark Capitola San JuanBautista M e r c e dCounty M o n t e r e y C o u n t y S a nBen i t oCounty S a n t a C l a r aCounty S a n t a C r u zCounty S t a n i s l a u sCounty £¤101 ÄÆ1 ÄÆ85 ÄÆ82 ÄÆ87 ÄÆ218 ÄÆ183 ÄÆ237 ÄÆ17 ÄÆ33 ÄÆ140 ÄÆ84 ÄÆ236 ÄÆ68 ÄÆ130 ÄÆ156 ÄÆ9 ÄÆ152 ÄÆ25 §¨¦680§¨¦880 §¨¦5 §¨¦280 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 1. Introduction 4 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 1. Introduction 5 July 2020 1.4.4 Historic Context Statement The Gilroy Historic Context Statement is arranged by chronological sections that relate to the major development periods of Gilroy’s history from pre-history to the present. The organization of the document is based on the preferred format laid out by the National Park Service (NPS) guidelines of National Register Bulletin No. 15 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation; National Register Bulletin No. 16A How to Complete the National Register Registration Form; National Register Bulletin No. 16B How to Complete the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form; and National Register Bulletin No. 24 Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning. Additional California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) resources and guidelines were also consulted, including the OHP Preferred Format for Historic Context Statements, Instructions for Recording Historical Resources, and Writing Historic Contexts. Research for the Gilroy Historic Context Statement was gathered from both primary and secondary sources held at a variety of local, regional, state, national and online repositories. Archival materials were predominately assembled from the Gilroy Historical Society and Museum collections, the San José Public Library (California Room), the California Historical Society, and the Bancroft Library (University of California, Berkeley). Primary sources consulted for the purposes of this project included historical maps, historic aerial photographs, Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Maps, measured architectural drawings, historical traveler’s guides, census data, contemporary historical accounts, and historical photographs. Secondary sources include books, newspapers articles, the 1986 Historic Resource Inventory forms, historical reports, surrounding area historic contexts, and online repositories. Historical accounts, information, and photographs provided by the public on the City of Gilroy’s Your Voice portal and during the course of Public Meetings were also incorporated into the Historic Context Statement. Dates of construction were largely derived from Santa Clara County Assessor records, however this data presented some gaps. Many dates of construction for buildings built prior to 1904 were listed as “missing” in assessor data, creating a data gap. Where data gaps were an issue, Dudek researchers tried to confirm a date of construction from other available primary sources such as aerial photographs. The earliest available aerial photograph for the Gilroy region dates to 1937, thus when no date of construction could be found through other means, buildings will have a “pre-1937” construction date if they appeared on the aerial. Though Sanborn fire insurance maps also existed for the City of Gilroy as early as 1886, these maps proved unreliable sources in distinguishing between similar-plan buildings, such as commercial properties along Monterey or simple rectangular-plan houses on residential streets. The Historic Context Statement is divided into six chronological periods, each of which is further divided into thematic subsections that reflect the significant themes identified in Gilroy (Section 3.2). The end of each Context section includes a summary of the various property types and architectural styles associated with each period of development and defines specific registration requirements for assessing historical significance and integrity. The Historic Context Statement includes numerous historical images of and pertaining to the history of Gilroy that were gathered from both primary and secondary sources during the course of research. The use of these images within this Historic Context Statement is intended to be consistent with the U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Policy which permits the use of copyrighted materials in the case of “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 1. Introduction 6 July 2020 scholarship, or research.”1 (Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17) / Chapter 1, 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use). 1.5 How to Use This Document The Gilroy Historic Context Statement and HRI Update presents a detailed citywide context that identifies important themes and patterns of development, property types, architectural styles, and registration requirements. This document was designed to function as a tool for use by the City, its residents, and property owners to better understand, interpret, evaluate, and protect the City’s historical resources. This document is organized into the following major sections:  2. Previous Surveys and Studies summarizes all known previously conducted historic resource surveys, inventories, and evaluations completed in Gilroy.  3. Significant Periods, Themes, and Property Types provides a framework for future property evaluations by providing an overview of local, state, and national designation criteria; a summary of significant themes; an overview of identified property types; and guidelines for evaluation of historic significance and integrity.  4. Historic Context serves as a detailed narrative of Gilroy’s history broken-up into major chronological periods of development that are supported by important themes and patterns of development.  5. Architectural Styles provides an overview of all major architectural styles identified as a result of the city-wide survey. This section includes a representative photograph of each style (organized by property type), the style’s associated period of significance in Gilroy, and a list of major character-defining features.  6. Architects and Builders provides an overview of all identified architects and builders associated with major periods of development in Gilroy.  7. Guidance for Assessing Significance provides a discussion of the national, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements and also identifies associated property types, architectural styles, and registration requirements for assessing historical significance in Gilroy.  8. Findings and Recommendations provides a summary of the citywide survey and HRI update, including the results of the intensive-level building survey; recommendations for integration of the survey data into existing City programs and processes; and recommendations for future work.  9. Bibliography: provides a complete list of references for all footnotes listed throughout the document. 1 United States Copyright Office. 2018. Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17) / Chapter 1, 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 2. Previous Surveys and Studies 7 July 2020 2 Previous Surveys and Studies 2.1 Previously Completed Local Inventories 2.1.1 Gilroy Historic Resource Inventory (1986) The City of Gilroy commissioned an HRI in 1986 from the Firm of Bonnie Bamburg in San José. The inventory intended to capture city, county and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-designated resources located within the City’s 1945 boundaries with a survey and documented properties on State of California DPR forms. This inventory was designed to build upon a previous survey of pre-1926 structures conducted in the early 1980s. Bamburg heavily utilized local citizens and student volunteers to accomplish the survey, training volunteers in weekly meetings. The survey documented approximately 400 buildings and rated them from 1 to 5, with 1 being most significant and 5 being least significant. The survey resulted in the identification of 75 commercial, 6 industrial, 11 civic, and 293 residential buildings. The inventory has an accompanying report titled City of Gilroy Historic Preservation Survey 1985-1986, which includes a brief historical background; a discussion of survey methods and results; recommendations for future historic preservation work; recommendations for amendments to the City’s historic preservation program; and includes a variety of appendices. The inventory also resulted in completion of a spreadsheet of properties and their ratings, historic names, and property types as determined by the 1986 surveyors. Each surveyed property has an accompanying DPR form that documents location, physical appearance, construction date, architect/builder, and provides a short significance paragraph. 2.1.2 Santa Clara County Heritage Inventory Update: South County (2003) Following the establishment of the Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission in 1972, Santa Clara County published an official inventory in 1975 called the Heritage Resource Inventory and updated this document in 1979. Prior to the 2003 update, the most recent Heritage Resource Inventory was published in 1999 and limited listing to properties located within unincorporated areas of the county. The 2003 South County survey update consists of the re-survey of 57 properties listed in the Santa Clara County Heritage Resources Inventory, and intended to update and re-evaluate properties in the unincorporated areas of the county that were previously identified and listed in the Inventory, but that lacked technical supporting documentation. While the historic context statement associated within this report discusses Gilroy, no resources were identified within the city. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 2. Previous Surveys and Studies 8 July 2020 2.1.3 County of Santa Clara Historic Context Statement 2004 (rev. 2012) This 2004 (rev. 2012) historic context statement for Santa Clara County served as accompaniment to previous surveys as a means by which to evaluate buildings, structures, objects, sites, and districts in unincorporated county lands or county-owned parks for significance within their historic context. The context statement does provide critical information for regions of the City of Gilroy that were historically unincorporated Santa Clara County, but later annexed or incorporated into to the City of Gilroy. 2.2 Other Previous Studies Some Resources in the City of Gilroy were individually documented through Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS), National Register nominations, cultural resource investigations, technical studies, and individually prepared DPR forms. Such documents were created by different consultants and were conducted within the City of Gilroy between 1973 and 2018. These documents can be found at the City of Gilroy website, the Library of Congress, or at the State of California Office of Historic Preservation’s Northwest Information Center (NWIC). An NWIC records search of the entire City was completed on October 15, 2018. This search included their collections of mapped prehistoric, historic, and built environment resources, Department of Parks and Recreation Site Records, technical reports, and ethnographic references. Additional consulted sources include historical maps of the study area, the NRHP, the CRHR, the California Historic Property Data File, the lists of California State Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, and the Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility. The confidential records search results are provided in Confidential Appendix A. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 3. Significant Periods, Themes, and Property Types 9 July 2020 3 Significant Periods, Themes and Property Types This section presents an overview of the major chronological periods of the Historic Context Statement and a summary of the significant themes and property types associated with these major periods of development. This section also includes a discussion of applicable national, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements that were used to assess historical significance citywide. 3.1 Chronological Periods The Historic Context Statement divides the prehistory and history of the City of Gilroy into chronologically ordered periods of development, which are further divided into overarching themes:  Prehistoric Period  Spanish, Mexican & Pioneer Period (1777-1868)  Initial Development Period (1868-1904)  Early Twentieth Century Period (1904-1941)  World War II and Post-War Development Period (1941-1975)  Modern Development Period (1975-2018) 3.2 Significant Themes National Register Bulletin 15 defines a theme as a “means of organizing properties into coherent patterns based on elements such as environment, social/ethnic groups, transportation networks, technology, or political developments of an area during one or more periods of prehistory or history. A theme is considered to be significant if it can be demonstrated through scholarly research, to be important to American history.”2 Important themes have been distilled into residential development, commercial development, civic and institutional development, transportation infrastructure, and agriculture industry and manufacturing. Themes related to architectural significance are addressed in Architectural Styles (Section 5) and Architects and Builders (Section 6). Each chronology section begins with a general historical overview of Gilroy for that given time period. The overview will generally summarize events, persons, and overarching developments for each chronological period for the City of Gilroy. The overview is followed by an in-depth analysis of themes associated with the chronological period. 2 NPS. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, 1990: 8 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 3. Significant Periods, Themes, and Property Types 10 July 2020 3.2.1 Residential Development This section will discuss the important persons or architects in a given period’s residential development. It will include settlement patterns, population growth, additions to the City of Gilroy, architectural styles, and property types associated with a given time period. 3.2.2 Commercial Development This section will discuss major businesses and important business owners in the City of Gilroy for a given time period. It will also briefly discuss outside influences that brought new commercial ventures to Gilroy or drove other commercial ventures to fail. This section will also discuss the architecture and development of the commercial core on Monterey Road. 3.2.3 Civic and Institutional Development This section will discuss the growth of Gilroy’s city government as well as influential people and town institutions such as schools, churches, clubs, and benevolent organizations. This section will categorize the establishment of such institutions and discuss their associated property types for a given period. 3.2.4 Transportation Infrastructure This section discusses major transportation themes for a given period. This includes the coming of the railroad and its influence on Gilroy, major transportations routes, toll roads, and highways that connect Gilroy to the greater Santa Clara County area, major cities, and the rest of the country. 3.2.5 Agriculture, Manufacturing and Industry This section discusses Gilroy’s industries, from its beginnings in dairy and livestock, to its agricultural prowess, to the establishment of major manufacturing businesses. This section also discusses local and immigrant workforces, agricultural and labor associations, and their influence on industries in Gilroy. 3.3 Associated Property Types The historic built environment serves as an illustration of significant themes in Gilroy within each period of development. Therefore, a section for associated property types is included at the end of each development period discussion. The discussion consists of relevant architectural styles and building types that are prevalent throughout Gilroy during the identified period of development. The following property types were identified in Gilroy as part of the citywide survey: 3.3.1 Residential Properties Residential properties vary in size, scale, and style throughout Gilroy. Residential properties are most often categorized as either multi-family residences or single-family residences. Single-family residences are easy to CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 3. Significant Periods, Themes, and Property Types 11 July 2020 identify and do not vary in their use patterns. However, multi-family residences are more complex and present in a variety of ways in Gilroy. Some of the most common examples of multi-family residences are bungalow courts, apartment buildings, and duplexes. While there were numerous examples of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) identified during the survey, single-family residences with these units to the rear of the main house are still classified as single-family residences. Residential properties were also recorded as one property, even if multiple buildings were present at the site. For example, a single-family residence, with a shed and garage on the same parcel were all recorded as one residential property. Similarly, a bungalow court with multiple units and a rental office were all recorded as one residential property. 3.3.2 Commercial Properties Commercial properties also vary throughout Gilroy, but typically were 1-3 stories in height, and were the dominant building on their parcel. Commercial uses were restricted to the Monterey Road corridor from the founding of the city until 1949. After 1949, commercial buildings were allowed on Eigleberry Street and were typically mixed-use with retail space on the first floor and office or residential space on the upper floors. As the twentieth century progressed, some single-family residences on Eigleberry Street were converted into commercial offices spaces. The second half of the twentieth century also showed a pattern of commercial expansion along First Street to the west of Monterey Street, where boxy, mass produced building forms and strip malls began to dominate the commercial landscape. 3.3.3 Industrial Properties Industrial properties in Gilroy include any building where things are made, stored, or repaired. This includes industrial buildings along the railroad corridor, related to Gilroy’s historical role as a shipping center for agricultural goods. In Gilroy, industrial properties can be lumber mills, factories, canneries, creameries, and warehouses, as well as automotive-related industries such as auto-repair shops and garages. Industrial properties were historically limited to the areas near the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and depot, Monterey Road outside of the commercial core, Hecker Pass Highway, Pacheco Pass Highway, and Old Gilroy Road for ease of shipping, but have since shifted and spread into less developed areas to the southeast of the City limits and to the east of the 101 Freeway. 3.3.4 Civic and Institutional Properties Institutional properties include any building where a public or civic function is performed. While usually city- or publicly owned, they may be privately owned (such as fraternal organization halls), but usually have a public use, and provide large, accessible spaces for people to congregate. In Gilroy, these may include libraries, city government buildings, schools, churches, funeral homes, post offices, hospitals, public auditoriums, social halls, fraternal society meeting halls, union halls, and utilities. Though not intensively surveyed during the citywide survey, cemeteries, public parks, and recreational facilities also fall under this category. Institutional property buildings are typically scaled much larger and more ornate than other property types. They are usually associated with the city or other government entity (such as the United States Postal Service), or are associated with a particular group or organization (such as Independent Order of Odd Fellows). Another important institutional property type seen in Gilroy are religious buildings. Buildings from this category present in a variety of sizes, scales and styles throughout Gilroy. The buildings range in style from Italianate to Contemporary and were constructed at various points during Gilroy’s history. In most cases, institutional buildings, as a property type, were also more likely to have been CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 3. Significant Periods, Themes, and Property Types 12 July 2020 designed by an architect or engineer in Gilroy and many of them represent important elements of the City’s architectural development patterns. 3.3.5 Transportation Properties Transportation properties may be categorized as any building or structure that is solely associated with transportation and includes depots, terminals, stations, roads, bridges, and road-related infrastructure such as signposts. Transportation properties were rare among the recorded resources for this citywide survey, because many automotive related properties are covered under commercial (e.g., gas stations, automotive stores, roadside motels), or industrial (e.g., automotive repair shops). However, one transportation property, the Southern Pacific Depot building, serves as an excellent example of the property type. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 13 July 2020 4 Historic Context 4.1 Prehistory of Santa Clara County The prehistory of indigenous groups living within Santa Clara County follows general patterns identified within the archaeological record of the greater Central Coast area of California. These patterns represent adaptive shifts in settlement, subsistence strategies and technological innovation demonstrated by prehistoric people throughout the Holocene period and earlier. The California Central Coast Chronology presents an overview of prehistoric life ranging upwards of 10,000 years.3 Six temporal periods describe changes in prehistoric settlement patterns, subsistence practices, and technological advances. (Table 1). Table 1. California Central Coast Prehistoric Chronology Temporal Period Date (BC- AD)* Date (BP)** Artifact Assemblage Example Sites Paleo-Indian (highly- mobile) pre-8000 BC 10,000 BP or older Isolated fluted points, sparse lithic scatters Possibly SCL-178 and SCR-177 Millingstone/ Early Archaic (highly mobile) 8000 - 3500 BC 5,500 – 10,000 BP Millingstones, handstones, core-cobble tools, lancolate or large side-notched projectile points, eccentric crescents, Olivella beads: thick rectangular (L-series) SCL-65, SCL-178, SCL-237, SCR-7, SCR-60/130, SMA- 134, MNT-229 Early (sites in more varied contexts) 3500 - 600 BC 2,600 – 5500 BP Mortar and pestle introduced, formalized flaked stone tools (Rossi Square- stemmed and Ano Nuevo long-stem points), Olivella beads: Spire-lopped (A), End-ground (B2b and B2c), Cap (B4), and Rectangular (L-series) SCL-33, SCL-178, SCL-163, SCR-7, SCR-38/123, MNT- 108, MNT-238, MNT- 391, MNT-1918 Middle (more long-term residences) 600 BC to AD 1000 950 – 2,600 BP Mortars and pestles (but still some millingstone/handstones), contracting- stemmed projectile points, greater variety of Olivella shell beads, Haliotis ornaments, circular shell fishhooks, bone tools, grooved stone net sinkers SCL-178, SCL-163, SCL-613, SCR-9, SMA-77, SMA-218, MNT-101, MNT-229, MNT-234, MNT-282 Middle-Late Transition (social reorganization due to Medieval Climatic Anomaly) AD 1000- 1250 700 – 950 BP Mortars and pestles (but still some millingstone/handstones), bow/arrow technology introduced, Olivella shell bead types: B2, B3, G1, G2, G6, and K1, notched net sinkers, hopper mortars, and circular shell fishhooks SCL-690, MNT-1233, MNT-281, MNT- 1754, MNT-745 3 T.L. Jones, N.E. Stevens, D.A. Jones, R.T. Fitzgerald and M.G. Hylkema. “The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu.” In California Prehistory Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, (Lanham, Altamira Press, 2007): 125- 146 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 14 July 2020 Table 1. California Central Coast Prehistoric Chronology Temporal Period Date (BC- AD)* Date (BP)** Artifact Assemblage Example Sites Late (more permanent residential sites with additional seasonal sites) AD to 1250- 1769 181 – 700 BP Mortars and pestles (but still some millingstone/handstones), Cottonwood (or Canaliño) and Desert Side-notched arrow points, flaked stone drills, steatite and clamshell disc beads, Haliotis disc beads, Olivella bead types: E1, E2, B2, B3, G1, G6, K1 types SCL-119/SBN-24/H, SCL-272, SCL-828, SCL-341, SCR-177, MNT-879, MNT- 1765, MNT-1485/H MNT-1486/H Source: Jones et al. 2007. *BC-AD = Before Christ (BC) - anno domini (AD) **BP = Before the Present 4.1.1 Paleo-Indian (10,000 BP or older) The Paleo-Indian era represents people’s initial occupation of the region. These were highly mobile hunters who focused subsistence efforts on large mammals. Multiple migrations into the region may have occurred both terrestrially and by sea.4 Although no coastal Paleo-Indian sites in the Central California Coast region have been discovered, they may have been inundated as a result of rising ocean levels throughout the Holocene.5 Evidence of this era was generally found through isolated artifacts or sparse lithic scatters.6 In the San Luis Obispo area, fluted points characterizing this era were documented near the town of Nipomo7 and Santa Margarita,8 but so far, no fluted points have been found in the Central Coast north of the greater Santa Barbara region. Possible evidence for Paleo-Indian occupation was reported in buried contexts in CA-SCL-178 in the Santa Clara Valley and at CA-SCR-177 in Scotts Valley9. The early radiocarbon dates from charcoal, however, pose questions of validity.10 4 J.M. Erlandson, M.H. Graham, B.J. Bourque, D. Corbett, J.A. Estes, and R.S. Steneck. The Kelp Highway Hypothesis: Marine Ecology, the Coastal Migration Theory, and the Peopling of the Americas. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2(2) (2007): 161– 174. 5 T.L. Jones and D. Jones. “Elkhorn Slough Revisited: Reassessing the Chronology of CA-MNT-229.” Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 14 (1992): 159-179. 6 E. Bertrando. “Evidence and Models for Late Pleistocene Chronology and Settlement Along California’s Central Coast.” In Emerging from the Ice Age: Early Holocene Occupations on the California Central Coast, edited by Ethan Bertrando and V.A. Levulett, (San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Papers no. 17, 2004): 93-105 7 .W. Mills, M.F. Rondeau, and T.L. Jones. “A Fluted Point from Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California.” Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 25:214-220. (2005) 8 R.O. Gibson. Results of Archaeological Monitoring for Unocal Soil Testing Program along Pipelines near Santa Margarita, San Luis Obispo County, California. Gibson’s Archaeological Consulting, Paso Robles. (Report submitted to UNOCAL CERT, San Luis Obispo, 2006) 9 R. Cartier. The Scotts Valley Site: CA-SCR-177. The Santa Cruz Archaeological Society, Santa Cruz (1993). 10 Jones et al. 2007. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 15 July 2020 4.1.2 Millingstone (5,500 – 10,000 BP) Settlement in the Central Coast appears with more frequency in the Millingstone Period. Sites of this era have been discovered in Big Sur,11 Moss Landing,12 Watsonville13 and in the Coyote Creek area of Santa Clara.14 Similar to the Paleo-Indian era, people living during the Millingstone era were likely highly mobile. Assemblages are characterized by abundant millingstones and handstones, cores and core-cobble tools, thick rectangular (L-series) Olivella beads, and a low incidence of projectile points, which are generally lanceolate or large side-notched varieties.15Eccentric crescents were also found in Millingstone components. Sites are often associated with shellfish remains and small mammal bone, which suggest a collecting-focused economy. Stable isotope studies on human bone, from a coastal Millingstone component at CA-SCR-60/130, indicate a diet composed of 70%–84% marine resources.16 Contrary to these findings, deer remains are abundant at other Millingstone sites,17 which suggests a flexible subsistence focus. 4.1.3 Early (2,600 – 5,500 BP) The Early Period corresponds with the earliest era the “Hunting Culture” which continues through the Middle-Late Transition.18 The Early Period is marked by a greater emphasis on formalized flaked stone tools, such as projectile points and bifaces, and the initial use of mortar and pestle technology. Early Period sites are located in more varied environmental contexts than millingstone sites, suggesting more intensive use of the landscape than practiced previously.19 Early Period artifact assemblages are characterized by Large Side-notched points, Rossi Square-stemmed points, Spire-lopped (A), End-ground (B2b and B2c), Cap (B4), and Rectangular (L-series) Olivella beads. Other artifacts include less temporally diagnostic Contracting-stemmed and Año Nuevo long-stemmed points, and bone gorges. Ground stone artifacts are less common relative to flaked stone tools when compared with Millingstone-era sites. 11 T.L. Jones. “Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Culture History.” Pacific Coast Archaeological Quarterly. (1993); T.L. Jones. Prehistoric Human Ecology of the Big Sur Coast, California. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley. (2003); R.T. Fitzgerald and T.L. Jones The Milling Stone Horizon Revisited: New Perspectives from Northern and Central California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 21:65-93. (1999) 12 S.A. Dietz W.R. Hildebrandt, and T. Jones “Archaeological Investigations at Elkhorn Slough: CA-MNT-229 A Middle Period Site on the Central California Coast.” Papers in Northern California Anthropology, Number 3. (1988); Jones and Jones 1992; R.J. Milliken, Nelson, W.R. Hildebrandt, and P. Mikkelsen. The Moss Landing Hill Site: A Technical Report on Archaeological Studies at CA-MNT- 234 in 1991 and 1997-1998. (Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis 1999). 13 B.J. Culleton, R. H. Gargett and T. L. Jackson. Data Recovery Excavations at CA-SCR-60/130 for the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency Local Water Supply and Distribution Project. (Pacific Legacy, Santa Cruz, California., 2005) 14 W. Hildebrandt and P. Mikkelsen Archaeological Test Excavations at Fourteen Sites along Highways 101 and 152, Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California. (Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Davis, California. 1993) 15 Jones et al. 2007. 16 S.D. Newsome, D.L. Phillips, B.J. Culleton, T.P. Guilderson, P. Koch. Dietary Reconstruction of an Early to Middle Holocene Human Population from the Central California Coast: Insights from Advanced Stable Isotope Mixing Models. Journal of Archaeological Science 31 (2004):1101-1115. 17 T.L. Jones, J.F. Porcasi, J.W. Gaeta, and B.F. Codding. “The Diablo Canyon Fauna: A Coarse-grained Record of Trans-Holocene Foraging from the Central California Mainland Coast.” American Antiquity 73 (2008): 289–316. 18 D.B. Rogers. Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast. (Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, 1929). 19 T.L. Jones, and G. Waugh. Climatic Consequences or Population Pragmatism? A Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Central California Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast During the Middle Holocene, edited by J.M. Erlandson and M.A. Glassow. Perspectives in California Archaeology 4. (Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1997): 111-128 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 16 July 2020 Early Period sites are common and often found in estuary settings along the coast or along river terraces inland. Coastal sites dating to this period include CA-MNT-108,20 CA-SCR-7,21 and CA-SCR-38/123.22 Inland sites include CA-SCL-33, CA-SCL-178 and CA-SCL-163.23 Archaeologists have long debated whether the shift in site locations and artifact assemblages during this time represent either population intrusion as a result of mid-Holocene warming trends, or an in-situ adaptive shift.24 The initial use of mortars and pestles during this time appears to reflect a more labor-intensive economy associated with the adoption of acorn processing.25 4.1.4 Middle (950 – 2,600 BP) The trend toward greater labor investment is apparent in the Middle Period. During this time, there is increased use of plant resources, more long-term occupation at habitation sites, and a greater variety of smaller “use-specific” localities. Artifacts common to this era include contracting-stemmed projectile points, a greater variety of Olivella shell beads and Haliotis ornaments that include discs and rings.26 Bone tools and ornaments are also common, especially in the richer coastal contexts,27 and circular shell fishhooks are present for the first time. Grooved stone net sinkers are also found in coastal sites. Mortars and pestles become more common than millingstones and handstones at some sites28. Important Middle Period sites include CA-MNT-282 at Willow Creek,29 CA-SCR-9 in the 20 G. Breschini and T. Haversat. Preliminary Excavations at CA-MNT-108, Fisherman’s Wharf, Monterey County, California. In Archaeological Investigations of Some Significant Sites on the Central Coast of California, edited by H. Dallas, Jr. and G.S. Breschini. (Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 37, Salinas., 1992a.): 39–47. 21 D. Jones and W.R. Hildebrandt. Archaeological Investigation at Sand Hill Bluff: Portions of Prehistoric Site CA-SCr-7, Santa Cruz County, California. (Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis, 1990) 22 S. Bryne. Archaeological Monitoring of the Wilder Ranch Bike Path Construction and Mitigation Related to Archaeological Site CA- SCR-38/123/H. (Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo, 2002); D. Jones and W.R. Hildebrandt. Archaeological Investigations at Sites CA-SCR-10, CA-SCR-17, CA-SCR-304, and CA-SCR-38/123 for the North Coast Treated Water Main Project, Santa Cruz County, California. (Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., 1994) 23 Hildebrandt and Mikkelsen 1993 24 P. Mikkelsen, W.R. Hildebrandt and D.A. Jones. Prehistoric Adaptations on the Shores of Morro Bay Estuary: Excavations at Site CA-SLO-165, Morro Bay, California. Occasional Paper No. 14, (San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California, 2000). 25 M.E. Basgall.” Resource Intensification Among Hunter-Gatherers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric California.” Research in Economic Anthropology 9 (1987): 21–52. 26 Jones 2003. 27 T.L. Jones and J.A. Ferneau. Prehistory at San Simeon Reef: Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-179 and -267, San Luis Obispo, California. San Luis Obispo Archaeological Society Occasional Paper No. 16. (2002a); T.L. Jones and G. Waugh. Central California Coastal Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology No. 3, (Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. 1995) 28 Jones et al. 2007. 29 Jones 2003; Z.S. Pohorecky. Archaeology of the South Coast Ranges of California. University of Archaeological Research Facility 34, (Berkeley 1976) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 17 July 2020 Santa Cruz Mountains,30 CA-SMA 218 at Año Nuevo,31 CA-SCL-613 at San Fransisquito Creek, and a continued presence at SCL-178, SCL-163.32 The Middle Period is a continuation of the “Hunting Culture” because of the greater emphasis on labor-intensive technologies that include projectile and plant processing.33 Additionally, faunal evidence highlights a shift toward prey species that are more labor intensive to capture, either by search and processing time or technological needs. These labor-intensive species include small schooling fishes, sea otters, rabbits, and plants such as acorn. Early and Middle Period sites are difficult to distinguish without shell beads due to the similarity of artifact assemblages.34 4.1.5 Middle-Late Transition (700 – 950 BP) The Middle-Late Transition corresponds with the end of the “Hunting Culture”.35 It also corresponds with social reorganization across the region due to a period of rapid climatic change known as the Medieval Climatic Anomaly.36 The Medieval Climatic Anomaly is characterized by drastic fluctuations between cool-wet and warm-dry climatic conditions.37 Archaeological sites are rarer during this period, which may reflect a decline in regional population.38 Artifacts associated with the Middle-Late Transition include contracting-stemmed, double side-notched, and small leaf-shaped projectile points. The latter are thought to represent the introduction of bow and arrow technology to the region. A variety of Olivella shell bead types are found in these deposits and include B2, B3, G1, G2, G6, and K1 varieties, notched line sinkers, hopper mortars, and circular shell fishhooks.39 Sites that correspond with this time are CA-MNT-1233 and CA-MNT-281 at Willow Creek,40 CA-MNT-1754, and CA-MNT-745 in Priest Valley41 (Hildebrandt 2006) and CA-SCL-690 in San José.42 30 M.G. Hylkema. Prehistoric Native American Adaptations along the Central California Coast of San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties . Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Jose State University. (University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, 1991). 31 Ibid. 32 J. Rosenthal and J. Meyer. Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record: A Geological Study of the Southern Santa Clara Valley and Surrounding Region. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication Number 14. (Regents of the University of California, Davis, 2004) 33 Jones et al. 2007; Rogers 1929 34 T.L. Jones and J. Haney. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-910, -1748/H, -1919, and -2182, Fort Hunter Liggett Military Installation, Monterey County, California. (California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 2005) 35 Rogers 1929. 36 S. Stine. Extreme and Persistent Drought in California and Patagonia during Medieval Time. Nature 369 (1994): 546-549. 37 T.L. Jones, G. M. Brown, L.M. Raab, J.L. McVickar, W.G. Spaulding , D.J. Kennett, A. York, and P.L. Walker. “Environmental Imperatives Reconsidered: Demographic Crises in Western North America During the Medieval Climatic Anomaly.” Current Anthropology 40 (1999): 137-170 38 T.L. Jones and J.A. Ferneau. “Deintensification along the Central Coast.” In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by J.M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, (University of California, Los Angeles, 2002b): 205-232. 39 T.L. Jones. Transitions in Prehistoric Diet, Mobility, Exchange, and Social Organization Along California’s Big Sur Coast. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology (University of California, Davis, California, 1995); Jones et al. 2007. 40 Pohorecky 1976 41 W.R. Hildebrandt. Archaeological Evaluation of the Priest Valley Knoll Sites (CA-MNT-745), Eastern Monterey County, California. (Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. 2006) 42 M.G. Hylkema. Santa Clara Valley Prehistory: Archaeological Investigations at CA-SCL-690, The Tamien Station Site, San Jose, California. (Center for Archaeological Research, Davis, California, 2007). CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 18 July 2020 4.1.6 Late (181 – 700 BP) Late Period sites are found in a variety of environmental conditions and include newly occupied task sites and encampments, as well as previously occupied localities. Artifacts associated with this era include Cottonwood (or Canaliño) and Desert Side-notched arrow points, flaked stone drills, steatite and clamshell disc beads, Haliotis disc beads, Olivella bead types E1 and E2, and earlier used B2, B3, G1, G6, and K1 types. Millingstones, handstones, mortars, pestles, and circular shell fishhooks also continue to be used.43 Sites dating to this era are found in coastal and interior contexts. Coastal sites dating to the Late Period tend to be resource acquisition or processing sites, while evidence for residential occupation is more common inland.44 Late Period sites include CA-MNT-143 at Asilomar State Beach,45 CA-MNT-1765 at Moro Cojo Slough,46 CA-MNT-1485/H and -1486/H at Rancho San Carlos,47 and CA-SCR-177 at Davenport Landing.48 Late sites in Santa Clara County include CA-SCL-119/SBN-24/H, CA-SCL-272, CA-SCL-341 and CA-SCL-828.49 4.2 Ethnohistoric Context The City of Gilroy lies within the territory occupied by people called “Costanoan” by the Europeans at the time of contact. Many modern descendants prefer to be called “Ohlone,” and are referred to as such hereafter. The Ohlone spoke eight separate Penutian dialects and lived between the vicinities of what is now Richmond in the north to Big Sur in the south. They were organized under approximately fifty autonomous polities or tribelets.50 At the time of European contact, two separate Ohlone dialects were reportedly spoken within Santa Clara County. Speakers of the Tamyen Ohlone dialect lived in the northern portion of the county in the vicinity of modern-day San José. People who spoke the Mutsun Ohlone dialect lived in the Pajaro Valley watershed, which included the vicinity of Gilroy and San Juan Bautista inland and the Watsonville and Moss Landing areas closer to the coast. Roughly 1,200 Tamyen speakers and 2,700 Mutsun speakers were documented at the advent of the Mission system in 1770.51 Ethnographic accounts of Ohlone at the time of contact described them as living in permanent villages, but also spending time in smaller camps to collect or process seasonal resources such as acorn or shellfish.52 43 Jones et al. 2007 44 Ibid. 45 R.J. Brady, Farquhar, T. Garlinghouse, and C. Peterson. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-143 for the Asilomar Boardwalk Replacement Project, Asilomar State Beach, Pacific Grove, California. (Albion Environmental, Inc., Santa Cruz, 2009). 46 R.T. Fitzgerald, J.L. Edwards, J.M. Farquhar, and K. Loefler. Archaeological Test Excavation at CA-MNT-1765, for the Moro Cojo Standard Subdivision Project (SH93001), Monterey County, California. (Biosystems Analysis, Inc., Santa Cruz, 1995) 47 G. Breschini and T. Haversat. Baseline Archaeological Studies at Rancho San Carlos, Carmel Valley, Monterey County, California. (Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 36, Salinas, 1992b) 48 R.T. Fitzgerald and A. Ruby. Archaeological Test Excavations at CA-SCR-117, the Davenport Landing Site. (Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo, 1997) 49 Rosenthal and Meyer 2004. 50 R. Levy. Costanoan. Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 8. Edited by Robert F. Heizer. (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 1978) 51 Ibid. 52 Ibid. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 19 July 2020 4.3 Spanish, Mexican, and Pioneer Period (1777-1868) 4.3.1 Spanish Period (1777-1822) The European presence in the Santa Clara County region began with the English explorer and privateer Sir Francis Drake, who landed on July 17, 1579, in the San Francisco Bay Area and claimed the region for England. After Drake's departure, it took nearly two centuries before any European power settled the region. Spanish explorers operating out of Spanish-controlled Mexico first arrived in the Santa Clara County area in the 1770s. In an effort to prevent the establishment of English and Russian colonies in northern Alta California, Don Gaspar de Portolá, the Governor of Baja, sought to establish military and religious control over the area in 1769, leading to the establishment of Presidio of San Diego. Padre-Presidente Franciscan Fr. Junípero Serra founded Mission San Diego de Alcalá, the first of the 21 missions that established in Alta California. From San Diego, Portola and Serra embarked on an overland exploratory mission that led to the establishment of three missions at the northern extent of Spanish-held Alta California: San Carlos Borromeo de Carmelo Mission (1770), and San Francisco de Asis, Mission Dolores (1776), and Santa Clara de Asis Mission (1777).53 Soldiers and their families previously stationed at the Mission Dolores moved to the Santa Clara Mission at the request of Father Tomas de la Pena, who led the effort to establish the mission, in the spring of 1777. The local Native American groups, such as the Ohlone, were immediately pressed into service as “neophytes,” and forced to build the mission church and auxiliary structures from local timber, limestone, and adobe, as well as cultivate wheat, barley, beans, corn, and lentils for the mission Padres and soldiers. Mission Santa Clara de Asis’s lands from San Francisquito Creek in present day Palo Alto to Llagas Creek in present day Gilroy, were dedicated largely to cattle ranching, as the lands closer to the mission were given over to cultivation. In the fall of 1777, Spanish Governor Don Felipe de Neve encouraged the establishment of San José de Guadalupe, two and a half miles from the Santa Clara Mission, to increase the Spanish presence in the region. In 1782, Lieutenant Moraga was directed to partition mission lands to nine Spanish settlers, close to San José.54 While settlement around San José grew to the north, the mission at Monterey was also parceling out lands to settlers, mostly to former soldiers of various Presidios, Missions, or Pueblos in lieu of pay. In 1803, Viceroy Félix Berenguer de Marquina of Spain awarded the 26,520-acre Rancho Las Ánimas to José Mariano Castro, a former soldier stationed at the Monterey garrison. A few short years later in 1809, the former mayordomo at Mission San Gabriel and another ex-soldier, Ygnacio Ortega was awarded the 13,066-acre Rancho San Ysidro by Governor José Joaquín de Arrillaga (Figure 2). Both men primarily raised cattle on their lands. Non-Spanish settlers in the region were rare. Often credited with being the first white settler in the region, in 1814, John Cameron emigrated from Scotland to Monterey, before being baptized Juan Bautista Gilroy at the Carmelo Mission. Gilroy moved northeast and married Maria Clara Ortega, daughter of Ygnacio Ortega in 1821. Another was Philip Doak, who disembarked 53 CIRCA. Historic Context Statement for the City of Morgan Hill. Prepared for the City of Morgan Hill. (San Francisco: CA: CIRCA Historic Property Development, 2006), 19-20; Douglas E. Kyle. Historic Spots in California. 5th ed. (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002); NPS (National Park Service). “Early History.” Santa Clara County: California’s Historic Silicon Valley: A NRHP Travel Itinerary. Accessed November 6, 2018. https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/santaclara/history.htm; Eugene T. Sawyer. History of Santa Clara County, California. (Los Angeles, CA: Historic Record Company, 1922), 46-48; Charles Shortridge. Santa Clara County and Its Resources, Historical, Descriptive, Statistical: a Souvenir of the San Jose Mercury . (San Jose, CA: San Jose Mercury Publishing and Print Company, 1895): 12-13. 54 Sawyer 1922: 35-36 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 20 July 2020 at Monterey in 1822, and lived on the Rancho Las Animas lands of José Mariano Castro as a block-and-tackle maker, and Matthew Fellom, who traveled from Russian territory in the north to Santa Clara Valley in 1823.55 Figure 2. Rancho Las Animas (left) and the three partitions of Rancho San Ysidro (right), circa 1859. Llagas Creek divided the two Ranchos. John Gilroy’s portion of San Ysidro is the middle portion of three. Quintin Ortega’s portion is the southern most of the three, and Isabel Ortega owned the northern-most portion (pink outline). (Land Case Map F-316, Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) 55 Sawyer 1922: 42, 292; J.P. Munro-Fraser. History of Santa Clara County, California. (San Francisco CA: Alley, Bowen & Co, 1881), 274; Truda Cooling Nelson. John Gilroy: A Biography. Master’s Thesis presented to the Department of Social Science= at San Jose State University. (San Jose CA: San Jose State University, 1981): 30 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 21 July 2020 4.3.2 Mexican Period (1822–1848) After more than a decade of intermittent rebellion and warfare, New Spain (Mexico and the California territory) won independence from Spain in 1821. The newly established Mexican government began the process of secularizing the area’s mission and within a few years, the Alta California missions and towns recognized Mexican rule. In 1822, the Mexican legislative body in California ended isolationist policies designed to protect the Spanish monopoly on trade, and decreed California ports open to foreign merchants, which increased foreign settlers in California. Both Castro and Ortega successfully applied to the Mexican government to reconfirm their grants, enabling them to keep their lands, and pass it to their heirs.56 When Castro died in 1828, his widow Josefa Romero de Castro received half of Rancho Las Animas lands, and his eight children received an equal portion of the remaining lands (1/16th of total lands). Though Castro died in 1828, it took until 1835 for the Mexican Governor José Figueroa to confirm the grant to his heirs. In 1847, three of Castro’s children sold their lands to José Maria Sanchez, followed by their mother, Josefa Romera De Castro who sold her half interest, and one other child, who sold their 1/16th interest in the rancho to José Maria Sanchez as well. Sanchez was also the owner of Rancho Llano de Tesquisquita and Rancho Lomerias Muertas, south of present-day Gilroy. The remaining four heirs’ shares, which amounted to one quarter of the original rancho, sold their shares in the remaining years. In 1850, Vicente Castro sold his 1/16th to Alexander Godey, who sold it later the same year to Thomas Rea. In 1858, Josefa Castro sold her 1/16th to Martin Murphy, and it passed to his daughter Johanna Murphy Fitzgerald in 1860. In 1863, Encarnacion and Maria Lugarda Castro sold their combined 1/8th interest in the rancho to Henry Miller.57 Ygnacio Ortega died in 1833, the same year that John (Juan Bautista) Gilroy, his son-in-law became a naturalized Mexican citizen. Ortega’s Rancho San Ysidro was divided between Ortega’s adult children and their spouses. His daughter Isabel Ortega and husband Julian Cantua received the northern-most 4,167 acres and renamed it Rancho La Polka. Maria Clara Ortega and husband John Gilroy received the middle 4,167 acres. Quintin Ortega received the largest and southern-most section, 4,439 acres. All three sections were confirmed by survey and received US land patents in 1860. The line dividing Gilroy’s section from Quintin Ortega’s section was the old road from Gilroy to Pacheco Pass, according to the survey, though their houses were reportedly close to one another, just across the road. John Gilroy’s role eventually became that of a traditional Mexican ranchero, or landowner, and supplemented his subsistence farming with his “industries” of soap making, onions, and flour from his gristmill business, while his brother-in-law Quintin maintained livestock on the lands.58 Gilroy was also alcalde, or magistrate, of San Ysidro from 1836 to 1848.59 Julius Martin also arrived in the 1840s prior to the Gold Rush and the Mexican-American War. Martin, his wife, and three daughters emigrated to the Gilroy region from Missouri. In 1844, Martin constructed a small horse-powered flourmill in San Ysidro (Old Gilroy), at the intersection of the Pacheco Pass Road and El Camino Real (future Monterey Road). Martin briefly left during the early months of the Gold Rush to seek his fortune, but left his family in Gilroy. Another early businessperson was Thomas O. Larkin, who established a soap factory with partner José Maria Sanchez at the eastern boundary of Rancho Las Animas, three miles from Martin’s mill and San Ysidro. Larkin lived in Monterrey, but had multiple business dealings in the Gilroy area. José Maria Sanchez was Larkin’s major 56 NPS 2018; Kyle 2002; Munro-Fraser 1881: 78-79. 57 Kyle 2002: 442. 58 Munro-Fraser 1881: 274-276; Nelson 1981: 43. 59 Munro-Fraser 1881: 274; Nelson 1981: 44. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 22 July 2020 regional partner; however, other rancheros, including John Gilroy, regularly produced soap and other goods on their ranchos between 1833 and 1848 to pay their debts to Larkin.60 According to letters between Larkin and his business representative Talbot H. Green, there was apparently a single kettle for soap making shared among the rancheros so they could produce the soap from the local tequesquite, an alkali substance for soap making. Larkin marketed the soap in Monterey, but the trade was short-lived as Larkin and Sanchez’s partnership ceased in 1848.61 Larkin would go on to become the United States Consul to Mexico at Monterey in 1843.62 Immediately prior to the gold discoveries at Sutter’s Mill and California statehood, few other European or American settlers moved to the region. Beginning in the 1840s, American settlers began to move west to Oregon via the Oregon Trail. While most took the Salt Lake City-Humboldt River route, some took the Santa Fe passage via Los Angeles, before turning north to the Territory of Oregon. This is how Martin Murphy, eventual purchaser of Josefa Castro’s share of Rancho Las Animas, came to reside in Santa Clara County. Settlement of non-Mexican nationals in California was also aided by the disarray of the Mexican government beginning as early as 1836. In 1842, California Governor Alvarado and General Vallejo, who managed Alta California, declared California independent and waged war with Mexico and General Micheltrona, who finally retreated in 1845. The victory was short-lived. In 1845, Captain John C. Frémont led the survey of Oregon and California, on orders from the United States. Accused initially of stealing horses, Frémont’s expedition eventually retaliated and wrested control of the California away from the newly formed Republic. In spring 1846, instigated by Frémont, American settlers in California revolted and formed the Bear Flag Republic, which sparked the Mexican-American War. Though several battles in this war were fought in Santa Clara County, there was little direct relationship with the City of Gilroy. The Mexican-American War concluded in 1848 with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo, just days before the announcement of the gold discovery at Sutter’s Mill.63 4.3.3 Pioneer Period (1848-1868) The Pioneer Period saw an influx of Americans after the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo turned over the State of California to United States control. Many American settlers came for the promise of gold, while others came to profit from the Gold Rush itself, selling goods and service. San Ysidro became increasingly known as “Gilroy,” after John Gilroy, the proprietor of this portion of Rancho San Ysidro. When Gilroy was officially chartered in 1868, San Ysidro became known as “Old Gilroy.”64 Sometime prior to 1850, after increased flooding from Llagas Creek, El Camino Real was realigned from running through San Ysidro (Old Gilroy) to its present position along Monterey Road in present day Gilroy (New Gilroy).65 Many of the well-known Gilroy pioneers and the first Anglo-Americans settlers in the region arrived in the 1850s. One of the first Anglo-American settlers was James Houck, who is credited with building the first house at Gilroy in 1850, as well as a small roadside inn and stable intended to service travelers moving between Monterey and San José on El Camino Real. Houck was followed by Lucien Everett, and the two formed a partnership running the inn. Houck, noted as illiterate, was also credited as the first postmaster, collecting mail dropped along El Camino Real for early residents. A Post Office was established in 1851 for a town of “Gilroy,” and consisted of a box on the side 60 Nelson 1981: 45 61 Munro-Fraser 1881: 276, 616-617; Sawyer 1922: 346. 62 Nelson 1981: 45, 73 63 Munro-Fraser 1881: 105-126, 274-275; Sawyer, 1922: 46-61. 64 Munro-Fraser 1881: 274 65 Leslie A. G. Dill, Kara Oosterhous, Charlene Duval. Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory Update. South County Survey Report. (Los Gatos, CA: Dill Design Group, 2003): 13. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 23 July 2020 of Houck’s house where mail could be picked up by the mail stage. Houck remained postmaster until 1854, when he was succeeded by A.C. Everett.66 After the inn was established, more Anglo-American settlers moved to the area. Julius Martin returned after attaining his fortune in the 1848 Gold Rush and purchased 1,220 acres from John Gilroy in 1850, paying cash and settling just a half mile from Old Gilroy. Lawrence O’Toole, James and John Fitzgerald, and M.T. Holsclaw also moved to San Ysidro, opening various shops including Holsclaw’s blacksmith shop. Horace Willson, a bricklayer, moved to San Ysidro in 1853 and is credited with some of the early brick construction in San Ysidro.67 West of Llagas Creek, a different settlement called “New Gilroy” started on Rancho Las Animas lands. After José Maria Sanchez’s death in 1852 and the distribution of his shares of Rancho Las Animas to his heirs, more American settlers arrived and purchased lands from Sanchez’s wife and children, or simply squatted on land with other Anglo- Americans. John Eigleberry settled in Gilroy during this time, building a house in New Gilroy in 1852 at the present location of 4th Street and Eigleberry Street. The same year, Lucien Everett expanded his holdings and established a store at the present-day corner of Lewis Street and Monterey Road to support road traffic and travelers’ needs. Within the next couple of years, David Holloway opened the first hotel in the winter of 1853-1854.68 In 1852, Thomas Rea emigrated from Wisconsin to San Francisco. Rea worked first in the gold mines in northern California, then married and returned to California with his bride in 1853. In 1857, Rea and his wife moved to Gilroy and bought a portion of Rancho Las Animas just outside of the town to establish a dairy business. Rea built a house in the town of Gilroy and remained a present and active business owner and politician in the town. Thomas Rea’s brother, Samuel Rea, soon joined him in 1859 and they co-operated the dairy.69 A number of settlers arrived over the course of the next decade, including prominent families for whom some streets in Gilroy are named: Reither, Bell, Rea, Holloway, Wood, Zuck, Chappell, Patton, Anson, Thomas, Reynolds, Wentz, Watson, Wilson, Doan, Dunn, and Hanna, to name only a fraction of the new settlers. Construction efforts continued with a blacksmith shop (1853), and saddlery (1853), and a Methodist Church (1854). In addition to construction, cross-streets were established along El Camino Real (now Monterey Road), and houses of more settlers were built along them.70 Another early landowner, whose lands would eventually be absorbed into present day Gilroy, was “Cattle King” Henry Miller. In 1859, Henry Miller (Heinrich Alfred Kreiser) purchased 1,800 acres of Rancho Las Animas from the Sanchez heirs. The year before Miller had officially partnered with Charles Lux, and the partners began to purchase large swaths of land in California from former Mexican landholders. At his Rancho Las Animas lands, Miller started Bloomfield Ranch, which was to be a feeding stopover for cattle herds on their way to San Francisco market.71 In the 1860s, promoters did their best to present Gilroy as a town destined for importance, and local residents began trying to attract the Santa Clara & Pajaro Railroad (later bought by Southern Pacific) to come through the settlement. Freeman Rogers, a dentist, James C. Zuck, a lawyer, and W.L. Hoover another local speculator, 66 H.S. Foote. Pen Pictures from the Garden of the World or Santa Clara County, California. (Chicago, IL: Lewis Publishing, 1888): 202; Munro-Fraser 1881: 278-280. 67 Munro-Fraser 1881: 277-278; Sawyer, 1922: 292. 68 Sawyer, 1922: 292. 69 Foote, 1888: 336-337; Patricia Loomis. “Signposts Gilroy’s Pioneer Tom Rea: Short on Words—Long On Deeds.” San Jose News. March 29, 1974, pg. 31; Munro-Fraser, 1881: 277-279, 624-625; Sawyer, 1922: 292. 70 Ibid. 71 G.S. Breschini., T. Harvest, and R.P. Sampson. A Cultural Resources Overview of the Coast and Coast-Valley Study Areas [California]. (Salinas, CA: Coyote Press 1983); Dil et al. 2003: 13. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 24 July 2020 partnered in 1867 to form Zuck, Rogers & Hoover to purchase and develop real estate. The firm purchased 30 acres from Lafayette F. Bell on the east side of Monterrey Street, which would later facilitate the Southern Pacific Railroad Line through the town. The firm also bought other small tracts and subdivided them into residential lots, shaping the early streets along Monterey. The firm’s efforts attracted the attention of the state, and local physician and master surveyor Dr. David Huber officially surveyed the town site in 1868. Huber ultimately confirmed street locations and otherwise laid out the city.72 Residential Development Settlement in the area of Gilroy began with two separate communities that grew out of Rancho San Ysidro and Rancho las Animas, respectively (Figure 3). They are described in brief, below. Figure 3. Inset from map south of Santa Clara County area, depicting “Gilroy” (left center) and “old Gilroy” (center) locations, by Thompson & West, 1876 (David Rumsey Map Collection) San Ysidro (Old Gilroy) Old Gilroy was the settlement that grew out of the Rancho San Ysidro settlement of John Gilroy and his brother in law Quintin Ortega. Old Gilroy was located east of Llagas Creek, two miles southeast of the future location of the City of Gilroy. The town was first known as San Ysidro after the original rancho name, but this shifted to “Gilroy” and then “Old Gilroy” as American settlers moved into the area.73 The first, permanent, American settler here was Julius Martin, who arrived in 1843 with his wife and children.74 More settlers did not arrive until after the gold rush had begun, which brought more travelers through on the main road, El Camino Real. Martin also won some success at 72 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 281. 73 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 278-279 74 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 276 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 25 July 2020 the mines and in 1850, purchased 1,220 acres from John Gilroy on Rancho San Ysidro, just west of Llagas Creek.75 New waves of American settlers came to San Ysidro, but renamed it Gilroy after John Gilroy. Small residential homes were built along the main road, including some later residencies of brick, constructed by bricklayer Horace Willson. Between 1854 and 1859. San Ysidro was renamed Gilroy and then “Old Gilroy” when New Gilroy was incorporated as a town in 1868. It remained a separate, unincorporated town throughout this period.76 New Gilroy Settlement in New Gilroy began with the construction of Julius Martin’s wood frame home just west of Llagas Creek in 1850. Early settlers were mostly American and built homes in support of the inn and hotel businesses that served the travelers on El Camino Real. Homes were typically wood frame structures, and were established along El Camino Real (later Monterey Road) and just off the main road. Though side streets were established in this period, they were not formalized until Gilroy was incorporated as a town in 1868.77 Commercial Development Prior to the formal founding of the town of Gilroy in 1868, there were few commercial businesses in New Gilroy and San Ysidro (Old Gilroy). As mentioned before, James Houck’s inn, established in 1850 was the first recorded business in the area, and was set up to serve the travelers along El Camino Real. Just two years later, other businesses that might be categorized as roadside services were established: Lucien Everett’s dry goods store (1852), David Holloway’s blacksmith shop (1853), and Eli Reynold’s saddlery (1853). In the winter of 1853-1854, Holloway also established a formal, 2-story hotel, with a saloon and eatery (Figure 4). As more settlers were attracted to the area, businesses shifted from mostly traveler-oriented services, to services to benefit the settlers at New Gilroy. As Gilroy grew, businesses along Monterey Road/El Camino Real began to include offices, saloons, groceries, furniture stores, and general merchandise stores.78 75 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 277 76 Gilroy Dispatch. “San Ysidro Settled First.” (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Dispatch, 1970), December 21, 1970 77 Munro-Fraser 1881: 279-281. 78 Munro-Fraser 1881: 280; Sawyer 1922: 292. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 26 July 2020 Figure 4. David Holloway’s Hotel, circa 1855 (Clyde Arbuckle Photograph Collection, San José Public Library, California Room) Civic and Institutional Development Though Gilroy did not have an established government until 1868, some government services were available in the Pioneer Period. According to most sources, the first Post Office in Gilroy (New Gilroy) was established in 1851, by the hanging of a mailbox at James Houck’s residence. Prior to an order by Congress in 1857, mail services were privately contracted and not guaranteed by law. The U.S. Postal Service began to guarantee mail service in California in 1858, contracting with John Butterfield of the Butterfield Overland Mail Company that operated from 1858-1961. Gilroy was along the Southern Route, also called the Butterfield Line, which advertised delivery from St. Louis to San Francisco in fifteen days. The Overland Mail Company’s contract was guaranteed by an authorization by Congress in 1857, specifically for this route, to better connect the disparate coasts of the country. After 1857, one of the mail stations was managed by David Holloway from his home at Gilroy, on the east side of Monterey Road between Lewis Street and Martin’s Lane. The other nearest mail stations along the route were at Pacheco Pass and north in San José. Gilroy was also the home station and junction point for other mail routes for the state including the Inland Route and the Coast Route.79 79 Roscoe P. Conkling and Margaret B. Conkling. The Butterfield Overland Mail 1857-1869. Volume 1. (Glendale, CA: Arthur H. Clark Company, 1947): 129 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 27 July 2020 Transportation Infrastructure El Camino Real (“the Royal Highway”), now Monterey Road, was a major transportation route, which linked Spanish Missions, presidio outposts, and pueblos in the eighteenth century (Figure 5). The segment of El Camino Real that passed through Gilroy facilitated all travel between Spanish California capital Monterey and the northern Spanish and later Mexican and American establishments: San José, Sonoma, the northern Missions, and Sutter’s Fort. In 1822, the previously closed California was opened to trade by Mexico, and Monterey became a major port and banking center for the region. As a result, El Camino Real brought regular foot and horse traffic through San Ysidro in the Spanish period and was frequented by traders, travelers, and settlers after 1822. San Ysidro’s role in this capacity was one of the stops that were no more than a day’s ride apart between Monterey and San José. In the Pioneer Period, El Camino Real became a stage road and stops along it were often noted by mile marker (e.g. the Morgan Hill stop was the “21-Mile House”). In the Mexican period, the Ortega rancho and John Gilroy’s home was a stop called San Ysidro. In the early Pioneer Period, James Houck’s redwood house and inn was one of these stops. The business from El Camino Real arguably brought the first businesses to San Ysidro/Old Gilroy: blacksmiths, stables, hotels, stand stores. Consistent flooding a Llagas Creek, however, eventually prompted the realignment of El Camino Real further west to pass through New Gilroy.80 80 Munro-Fraser 1881: 280, 272 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 28 July 2020 Figure 5. El Camino Real route as drawn by Mabel Emerton Prentiss, 1903 (UCLA Library Special Collections) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 29 July 2020 Pacheco Pass Road intersected El Camino Real and facilitated foot and horse traffic traveling east from Santa Clara Valley to San Joaquin Valley, today called the Central Valley. It was originally surveyed by Lieutenant Gabriel Moraga in 1805. The road became a toll road in 1854, after Andrew W. Firebaugh built a road through the pass over the next four years. Firebaugh’s Pacheco Pass Turnpike Company organized in 1858, about the same time Butterfield overland mail routes were being confirmed. The intersection of Pacheco Pass Road and El Camino Real at Gilroy is often credited as the reason why Gilroy’s location was so successful.81 Agriculture, Industry, and Manufacturing In the Spanish and Mexican periods, agricultural practice in the Gilroy region was dominated by cattle and horse raising by the Spanish, and later Mexican rancheros. After Mexico gained California in 1822, the Mexican government began to secularize the Mission lands, dividing each mission’s agricultural lands among political favorites and military personnel as ranchos. Ranchos operated independently with the ruling family controlling money and hiring a few skilled vaqueros to manage the day-to-day management of cattle. Cattle and stock raising would remain a major economic driver in the region until a major drought in 1864.82 As more Anglo-American settlers arrived in the areas in the late 1840s and 1850s, wheat, dairy, dried fruits, wine, brandy, and tobacco grew as popular agricultural products of the Gilroy area. Prominent dairymen include the Rea family, the Reeve Brothers, Sargent & Butterfield, Donnelly & Laughlin, Bryant, Ellis, Watson, Rowland, Zuck, Dexter, Doan, Eschenburg, Maze, A. Wilson, Davis & Cole, E.A. Davidson, and Henry Miller’s Bloomfield Ranch. Early grain mills such as Julius Martin’s small grain mill at San Ysidro and J.M. Browne’s mill in Gilroy provided the first processing centers for grain in 1844 and 1852 respectively. In 1859, J.D. Culp moved to Gilroy and by 1862 erected a tobacco factory just two miles outside of Gilroy, when this factory burnt down, Culp built another in 1869 located in the City of Gilroy, at Fourth Street between Church and Rosanna Streets.83 81 Dill et al. 2003: 14; Patricia Loomis. “Signposts: Old Indian Pass.” San Jose News, October 29, 1971. Copy held by the Gilroy Historical Museum;. Conkling and Conkling 1947: 296-297. 82 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 272. 83 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 272; Gilroy Dispatch. “Dairy Industry Once a Major Gilroy Business.” Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. On file at the Gilroy Historical Museum; Gilroy Dispatch. “Early Settlers Turn to Agriculture.” Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970;“Tobacco Culture in Gilroy and the Consolidated Tobacco Company.” No date. From the Tobacco Subject File at the Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 30 July 2020 4.4 Initial Development (1868-1904) The town site of Gilroy was officially surveyed by Dr. David Huber, at the request of real estate firm Zuck, Rogers & Hoover in 1868. On February 18th, 1868 the Town of Gilroy was officially incorporated under California’s Act for the Incorporation of Towns (1856) law (Figure 6). Approximately one month later, the first officials of the town were elected: trustees, a treasurer, assessor, marshal and town clerk.84 The city limits after incorporation were recorded as: Beginning at a point situated south twenty degrees east forty-six chains from the center of Monterey Street[sic]85 where the South side of Bodfish Street intersects the same, said point of beginning being in the center of Monterey Street[sic]; thence running westerly and at right angles to Monterey Street[sic] forty chains;86 thence northerly, and parallel to said Monterey Street, and in a straight line, one hundred and ten chains; thence easterly and at right angles to the last-mentioned line, eighty chains; thence southerly, and at right angles to the last-mentioned line, one hundred and ten chains; and westerly at right angles, to the place of beginning.87 The town’s incorporation also involved the re-designation of earlier street names from older names to numbered streets (e.g., renamed Sargent Street to 1st Street). New streets were also opened, including sections of Eigleberry Street and Farman (6th) Street.88 Because of the new layout, a business district was focused along Monterey Road to take advantage of proximity to the railroad and stage traffic along the established road to Monterey and San José. Residential development took place west of downtown initially, along Eigleberry, Church, Rosanna, and Hanna Streets, but there was also settlement east of Monterey along Alexander Street and Forest Street. The new town charter called for wide roads, tree plantings, and wide, covered sidewalks along Monterey Road.89 84 Eugene T. Sawyer. History of Santa Clara County, California. (Los Angeles, Ca: Historic Record Company, 1922): 292. 85 In this initial document, and some historical documents the road is referred to as “Monterey Street.” In some other documents, the road is also referred to as Monterey Road and Monterey Avenue. For consistency, the author has chosen to call this road “Monterey Road” to avoid any confusion, and for consistency with the modern designation. 86 One chain is equal to 66 feet; 80 chains is equal to one mile; therefore Gilroy’s 1868 boundaries, as established, were one mile wide from west to east, and 1.375 miles long from north to south, bisected from north to south down its center by Monterey Street. 87 J.P. Munro-Fraser. History of Santa Clara County, California; Including its Geography, Geology, Topography, Climatography and Description. (San Francisco, CA: Alley Bowen & Co, Publishers, 1881): 282. 88 Munro-Fraser 1881: 283. 89 Ibid. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 31 July 2020 Figure 6. City of Gilroy town map, by Thompson & West, 1876 (David Rumsey Map Collection) After the town’s official designation, the Santa Clara & Pajaro Railroad (SC&PRR) was extended from San José to Gilroy. The entire town and a brass band turned out for the arrival of the first passenger train to Gilroy, marking the beginning of sustained economic and population growth in Gilroy, and the ability to ship goods to and from San José and beyond. In early 1870, the Southern Pacific Railroad Company (SPRR) purchased the SC&PRR.90 . Southern Pacific opened an official depot in Gilroy as well, on land acquired by Zuck, Rogers & Hoover. Nearby farms either had their own sidings along the new rail line, such as Henry Miller’s cattle loading stop three miles south of town, or brought their crops to Gilroy for loading and shipping.91 With town lots for sale and the railroad coming through town, Gilroy’s downtown business district core was ready for growth. In 1868, Adam Riehl and Jacob Reither established the Gilroy Brewery.92 The brewery would change owners, but remain in operation until 1919, when Prohibition was passed.93 With the railroad and a depot came travelers, and as a result several hotels were established along Monterey Road between 1869 and 1872. These were located across from the railroad depot, and north along Monterey Road. Some of these hotels and boarding 90 CIRCA. Historic Context Statement for the City of Morgan Hill. Prepared for the City of Morgan Hill. (San Francisco, CA: CIRCA Historic Property Development, 2006): 36; Gilroy Evening Dispatch. “Gilroy Celebrates Arrival of the Railroad in 1869.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Evening Dispatch, 1969a). January 10, 1969, pg. 7A; Gilroy Dispatch. “Railroad Opens Up New Era.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch, 1970). December 21, 1970 91 Ibid. 92 Both men would go on to serve as mayor of Gilroy. Adam Riehl in 1878-1880, and Jacob Reither for two terms from 1882-1886 93 Richard Barretta. N.D. Fifty Years of Beer: the Gilroy Brewery. (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Historical Society, no date) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 32 July 2020 houses did not come with food, so eateries were also opened along Monterey Road. 94 Church congregations that had previously met in houses or smaller buildings took the opportunity to build larger, official buildings, or relocate to more prominent lots in town.95 Like churches, both public and private schools emerged from people’s homes and one-room schoolhouses into more formal settings in the first years of the town.96 Other notable beginnings were the establishment of the Gilroy Advocate newspaper in 1869 by G.M. Hanson and C.F. Macy. Another start-up was the William Hanna lumber mill on Church Street (1869) and the Gilroy Wagon and Blacksmith shop (1869) opened on Monterey Road. Though not the first for the community, a third cemetery for Gilroy citizens was established north of town on 25 acres land donated by Henry Miller in 1870; this consisted of 20 acres for a plotted cemetery and 5 acres for a potter’s field. The location of the town’s first cemetery is debated, as it was built over and all buried there relocated, and the second was located at or near St. Mary’s Church.97 Between 6th and 9th Streets Chinese immigrants were concentrated in an informal Chinatown settlement. Prior to the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, which stifled immigration, many Chinese immigrants in Gilroy were employed as seasonal agricultural workers, and others in year-round professions often associated with Chinese immigrants: gardeners, cooks, and launderers (Figure 7).98 Figure 7. Gilroy’s Chinatown, 1896 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) 94 Elizabeth Barratt. “Gilroy Gets Its First Hotels.” The Pinnacle: Yesterday & Today. (Gilroy CA: Elizabeth R. Barratt, 2003): 1-4. 95 Gilroy Evening Dispatch. “Religion Plays Prominent Role in Early Gilroy.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Evening Dispatch, 1969b). January 10, 1969, pg. 11A 96 Gilroy Dispatch. “Schools Grow From Modest Start into Unified District.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch, 1970). December 21 1970; Eugene F. Rogers. Gilroy School History: A Short Sketch of the Past and Present of the Gilroy Schools 1853-1888. Publisher unknown, pamphlet held by California Historical Society (1888) 97 Sawyer 1922: 117; Munro-Fraser 1881: 285, 302; Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum 98 Sam Shueh. Images of America: South Santa Clara County. (Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2008): 60-62. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 33 July 2020 In March 1870, an act was passed by the state legislature incorporating Gilroy as “City of Gilroy”, endowing it with a mayor, tax collector, marshal, and city council.99 This was quickly followed by the incorporation of utilities such as the Pacific Pneumatic Gas Company’s subsidiary, the Gilroy Gas Company (1870), Gilroy Water Company (1871), the Fire Department (1872), and a new jail (1872). Despite the positive growth, the official recognition prompted Henry Miller, owner of the Bloomfield Ranch and prominent California cattle man and developer, to dispute land rights in Gilroy. The dispute over land rights was a hindrance to City growth. Individual partitions and boundaries within Rancho Las Animas had not been officially filed with the state, making the boundaries set in land titles within the city difficult to enforce. In 1871, Henry Miller filed a complaint against the 1,032 claimants to the Las Animas Rancho, including the entire town of Gilroy (Henry Miller et. al. versus Massey Thomas et. al.). As a result of the complaint, County Surveyor Herrmann surveyed and “set off” each owner’s interest in the land tract, and new construction during this period was minimal until the issue of ownership was resolved.100 While the survey carried on, Santa Clara County suffered a damaging flood in 1872, and the effects of the nationwide Depression were felt in 1873 and 1874.101 The town of Gilroy suffered three fires in one season in 1874, despite the urging for new fire equipment by the city Fire Chief. As a result, the mid-1870s saw sporadic development along Monterey Road. The Gilroy Music Hall (later called the Opera House and the Armory) was erected in 1874 (Figure 8).102 In 1878, the Gilroy Brewery built a brick building on Monterey Road, despite a saloon license tax meant to discourage drinking passed the previous year.103 By 1880, the population of Gilroy had reached 1,621. In 1883, the City bought the previously privately-owned Gilroy Water Works and began distributing their own water. In 1886, the telegraph, a new utility, was introduced to Gilroy when Western Union received a permit to erect poles and lines around Gilroy. The same year, Miller’s land dispute was settled and the town began to build new buildings.104 99 California State Legislature. “Chapter 180: An Act To Incorporate the City of Gilroy.” The Statutes of California Passed at the Eighteenth Session of the Legislature 1869-1870. (Sacramento, CA: D.W. Gelwicks, state printer, 1870) 100 Sawyer 1922: 292; Munro-Fraser 1881: 285-290. 101 The Long Depression began with the Panic of 1873 and lasted until 1879, and the economy remained relatively unstable until 1901; L.L. Paulson. Handbook and Directory of Santa Clara, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Monterey and San Mateo Counties . (San Francisco, CA: L. L. Paulson, 1875) :23 102 Sacramento Daily Union. 1874. “City Intelligence: Incorporation.” )Riverside, CA: UCR California Digital Newspaper Collection, The Sacramento Daily Union): April 7, 1874, pg. 3. 103 Munro-Fraser 1881: 290, 301; Foote, 1888: 203; San Jose Mercury Herald. “Ancient Gilroy Armory, Music Hall Goes Into Limbo After 70 Years of Service.” (San Jose, CA: The San Jose Mercury-Herald., 1940): November 17, 1940, pg. 16. 104 Sawyer 1922: 292; Gilroy Dispatch. “Miller Plays Role in Town’s Development.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch, 1970). December 21, 1970; Phil Cox. Notes “Compiled from Gilroy City Council Minutes.” (Gilroy, CA: City of Gilroy City Clerk’s Office, N.D.) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 34 July 2020 Figure 8. Looking west on 5th Street, Music Hall on left, early 1900s (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) In the late 1880s, the downtown core was centered along Monterey Road between 4th Street and 7th Street, with residential buildings on large lots on the surrounding streets (Figure 9). Up until this decade, Gilroy and the entire South Santa Clara County area were dominated by agricultural industry. While cattle and dairying were the primary agricultural industries, J.D. Culp’s tobacco farm and processing plant was also a significant agricultural enterprise. However, in the 1870s an agricultural expansion began with the introduction of fruit orchards, and by the 1880s fruit processing plants were established in Gilroy. Two of these plants were the Gilroy Fruit Packing Company (1888) and the South Santa Clara Fruit Drying and Packing Company (circa 1890). The companies shipped stable fruits, but also began drying soft and stone fruits such as raisins, prunes, and apricots for sale to the eastern states.105 Despite the expansion of the agricultural economic system in the 1880s, population growth still showed only a marginal increase: from 1,621 in 1880 to 1,694 in 1890. Another utility was added in 1890: the Gilroy Telephone Company, which erected poles and lines throughout the city. In the 1890s, the city turned towards its younger citizens and the Daughters of Rebekah, a branch of the local Independent Order of Odd Fellows (I.O.O.F.) organization, opened a children’s home in 1897.106 The next year the City of Gilroy opened bidding for a public high school in a separate building.107 After these initial growing pains, and settling of utilities, schools, businesses and industries, Gilroy was ready to begin a period of civic and economic expansion. In 1900, the population reached 1,820 and the city began again to experience sustained growth. City Council adopted a resolution to fund a new City Hall building that included a jail and courtroom. Around the city, local farmers and fruit growers joined the California Cured Fruit Association. In 105 Foote 1888: 340 106 Cox N.D.: 9; San Francisco Call. “Plans for the New Orphanage.” (San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call), January 16, 1897, pg. 9 107 San Francisco Call. “Gilroy’s New High School.” (San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Call, 1898) April 9, 1898. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 35 July 2020 1902, another fruit packing plant was opened in Gilroy by Dunlap Realty & Produce Company, on land leased from Henry Miller along the SPRR line.108 Figure 9. Birds eye view of Gilroy by F.W. Blake. 1885 (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) 108 San Francisco Call. “Join the Fruit Association.” (San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call), March 14, 1900, pg. 9; San Francisco Call. “Packing Plant for Gilroy.” (San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call), April 26, 1902, pg. 9. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 36 July 2020 4.4.1 Residential Development Residential growth in this period was minimal. The overall population grew from 1,625 in 1870 to 1,820 in 1900.109 Minor additions were made to the city in the first decade after incorporation. These mostly comprised of large residential lots subdivided by landowners that preceded the founding of the town such as Lewis Addition and Zuck & Rogers Additions made on the east side of the SPRR tracks, while the Eigleberry Addition and Zuck, Rogers & Hoover Additions were responsible for expanding the residential streets west of Monterey Road. Additions by Henry Miller, Thomas P. Thomas, and J.P. Sargent in the 1870s and 1880s also free up residential, development allowing more room for the small town to grow.110 According to the earliest Sanborn maps from 1886 and 1892, in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904), residential development in this period typically consisted of a wood-frame 1 and 2-story dwellings and associated outbuildings (outhouse, shed, stables) (Figure 10). In 1886, the western extent of town was at Hanna Street, the southern extent was 7th Street, the northern extent was roughly at 3rd Street, but some sparse residences were located as far north as 1st Street and the eastern boundary of settlement was Railroad Street.111 By the 1892 map, residential settlement had expanded north to Broadway Street, South to 9th Street, and east to Chestnut Street.112 109 Bay Area Census. “City of Gilroy, Santa Clara County.” Accessed December 6, 2018. http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/cities/Gilroy50.htm#1940 ; Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission. “Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory.” (San Jose, CA: SCC Historical Heritage Commission, 1979), pg. 63-66 110 Thompson & West. “City of Gilroy.” Map published in Historical Atlas Map of Santa Clara County. (San Francisco, CA: Thompson & West, 1876) Accessed December 1, 2018. http://www.davidrumsey.com/maps33.html 111 Sanborn Map Company. “Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” Map. 5 sheets. (Sanborn Map Company, August 1886). Accessed August 14, 2018. https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn00566_001/ 112 Sanborn Map Company. “Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” Map. 11 sheets. (Sanborn Map Company, May 1892). Accessed August 14, 2018. https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn00566_002/ CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 37 July 2020 Figure 10. 1886 (left) and 1892 (right) Sanborn Fire Insurance maps of residential neighborhood just west of Monterey Road. (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 38 July 2020 4.4.2 Commercial Development Just before and after the official incorporation of Gilroy, the downtown core established along Monterey Road, concentrated between 4th and 7th Streets, with some businesses, hotels, churches, fraternal organization clubhouses, and municipal buildings off of the main road on the side streets.113 In the earliest Sanborn, six distinctive hotels,114 several saloons, the brewery, the Smith Bros. Flour Mill, and restaurants crowd Monterey Road between 6th and 7th Streets.115 Between 5th and 6th Street, businesses along Monterey Road consisted of banks, general merchandise, groceries, cobblers, clothiers (tailors, seamstresses, and millenaries), doctor’s offices, barbers, livery and feed stores, and at least five saloons (Figure 11). Between 4th and 5th Streets, the buildings transition from continuous blocks to individual buildings, but still contained groceries, saloons, a hotel, as well as some intermixed dwellings, the Masonic Hall, some wagon shops, paint and tin shops, and hardware stores. These buildings seemed to be mostly of wood frame construction, with occasional brick buildings according to the 1886 Sanborn.116 By the 1892 Sanborn map, Monterey Road gained a few more brick buildings, but was still dominated by wood frame buildings.117 Off Monterey Road, a few large-scale businesses dominated the side streets. Between Church and Rosanna Streets at 6th Street was the Gilroy Lumber and Planing Mill, originally started by William Hanna in 1869, but subsequently owned by Whitehurst & Hodges in the 1880s. Along 6th Street, between Monterey and Church Streets, there were a few mills, a wheelwright, a blacksmith shop, and several carpenters, all occupying stone buildings.118 113 “Commercial Building Survey.” Held by the Gilroy Historical Museum, 1985. 114 According to the 1886 Sanborn map these include the Gilroy Hotel, Swiss Hotel, Southern Pacific Hotel, and Union Hotel, the William Tell Hotel and the Helvetia Hotel 115 Elizabeth Barratt. “Gilroy Gets Its First Hotels.” The Pinnacle: Yesterday & Today. (Gilroy Ca: Elizabeth R. Barratt, 2003): 1-4. 116 Sanborn 1886. 117 Sanborn 1892 118 Sanborn 1886; Patricia Loomis. “Hanna’s a Name Always Important in Gilroy.” (San Jose, CA: The San Jose Mercury, 1977), December 7, 1977, pg, 30. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 39 July 2020 Figure 11. Stationer’s storefront on 7400 block of Monterey Road, 1880 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) Hotels were of particular importance and abundance in Gilroy’s early years, and influenced where the city’s downtown commercial core would be located. With the arrival of the railroad in 1869, several hotels opened between 1869 and 1870. The arrival of the SPRR line and depot brought recreational traffic through Gilroy beginning in 1869. The Williams Hotel and Exchange Stage Hotel were the first to be established in 1869, opening on Monterey Road in close proximity to the SPRR depot. The next to open was the Gilroy Hotel at a new location at 6th Street and Monterey Road (1870). The Idaho Hotel opened in late 1870 opposite the SPRR Depot, with a saloon and serving male travelers only.119 In 1871, the Railroad House opened on the neighboring lot. Two hotels stood out as the fine establishments of Gilroy: the Williams Hotel (1869) and the Hanna House (1870), later the American Hotel and eventually replaced by the Southern Pacific Hotel) which were both several stories, 40+ rooms apiece, and billed as particularly fine accommodations.120 Hotels typically did not offer meal services, except at the more upscale establishments, and saloons and restaurants such as the Eagle Chop House (1869) and T.N. Killey’s 119 Barratt 2003: 1-4. 120 H. Coffin. Gilroy as a Home: Its Geography, Climate, Location, Soil, Productions, and Institutions. (Gilroy, CA: Advocate Book and Job Printing Office, 1873): 22-23 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 40 July 2020 Restaurant (1869) on Monterey Road opened as a result. Hotels also offered stage services to nearby towns and to the Gilroy Hot Springs and Hotel (1864), a local resort nearly 15 miles from town limits.121 Other notable businesses established in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904) are the Gilroy newspapers. The Gilroy Advocate, a weekly newspaper, was founded in 1867, operating from the second story offices above Hall’s Clothing Store at 6th Street and Monterey Road as of 1868. Opening just a few years after the Civil War’s Conclusion, the newspaper openly declared themselves a Union Republican Party-affiliated paper. Gilroy Advocate was followed by the California Weekly Leader (1869) and the Enterprise (1871), a semi-weekly paper, in 1869. A short-lived paper, the Gilroy Union operated from 1869-1872. The Enterprise became the Gilroy Telegram in 1870, and then promptly closed after the 1872 political campaign, leaving only the conservative Gilroy Advocate paper. As Gilroy grew more liberal, The Valley Record, another weekly paper opened in 1881, but changed its name in 1885 after a sale to the Gilroy Gazette. The Gilroy Advocate remained the principal conservative paper in town, but the Gilroy Gazette became a more liberal-leaning paper as the nineteenth century drew to a close.122 4.4.3 Civic and Institutional Development Gilroy established its government in 1868 after the official town incorporation. This afforded for a board of trustees, a treasurer, assessor, marshal and town clerk.123 The first “mayor” of Gilroy was William Gill Mills, who had been serving as president of the trustees prior to 1870.124 Elections were originally held annually, but after 1872, The City of Gilroy transitioned to biennial elections.125 Many important business owners and influential landowners would hold the role of mayor in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904). In the 1870 election, John M. Browne was the first elected mayor, a dry goods shop owner and grain miller. He was succeeded by Volney Howard.126 William Furlong, a dairyman and landowner, succeeded Howard in 1874, then by William Hanna, owner of the lumber mill on Church Street, in 1876. In 1878 Adam Riehl, the owner of the Gilroy Brewery, was elected mayor, then John G. Otto in 1880, and Jacob Reither, another owner of the Gilroy Brewery in 1882.127 Reither served two terms, and was succeeded by Thomas Rea, a dairyman, in 1886. Rea was followed by Louis Loupe in 1888 who also served two terms. In 1892, Lyttleton A. Whitehurst, owner of the Whitehurst & Hodges Lumber Mill was elected mayor, followed by Michael Casey in 1894. Heverland Rogers Chesbro, a prominent doctor, was elected Mayor in 1898, served three terms, and was succeeded by George Dunlap in 1904.128 Other than the establishment of the Gilroy town government, established in 1868, and altered when incorporated as a city in 1870, Gilroy quickly established three utilities to serve residents: a Fire Department, a Water Company, and a Gas Company. These services began as private entities with some city council oversight, and in the initial period of development operated independently. The Gilroy Water Company (also known as Gilroy Water Works) was given the City’s contract of supplying water in August 1870. The company built a dam on Uvas Creek and transported water via flume to the city, then stored it in tanks, until it was supplied to customers via pipes. The Gilroy Gas Company was a branch established in 1871 by the Pacific Pneumatic Gas Company of San Francisco. Gas was stored at a warehouse on Railroad Street, and piped to customers. The Gilroy fire services ran on a volunteer basis 121 Barratt 2003: 3; Coffin 1873: 30-31. 122 Shortridge, 1895: 62; Foote, 1888: 106; Michael E. Melone. “Gilroy’s First Newspaper: The Advocate.” The Californian. Volume 12, No. 3. (Santa Clara, CA: California History Center Foundation, De Anza College, 1991): pgs. 6-9. 123 Sawyer 1922: 291 124 Cox, N.D.: 1-2. 125 Harrison, 1888: 7 126 Arbuckle, 1970: 4; Cox, N.D.: 4. 127 Arbuckle, 1970: 4; Cox, N.D.: 6-7. 128 Arbuckle, 1970: 4; Cox, N.D.: 10-11. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 41 July 2020 for the first two years, 1869 to 1871. The first organized fire company in Gilroy was the Eureka Hook & Ladder Company, organized in 1871. It merged with the Neptune Hose Company in 1879 and operated from a building on Monterey and 5th street.129 The City of Gilroy eventually attempted to purchase its other privately owned utilities. In 1882, the City tried to buy the Gilroy Water Company after a too-high water bill. Voters approved the purchase in 1883. After the purchase, Gilroy was the second city in the state to own its own water utility. The City of Gilroy voters approved bonds in 1889 to improve the purchased water system and build cisterns within town limits. 130 In 1886, the Western Union Telegraph Company was granted permission to erect poles and string wires, connecting Gilroy to San José. Poles were initially limited to Monterey Road when first constructed, but eventually branched onto some side streets near the downtown core (Figure 12).131 In 1890, Western Union was followed by the Gilroy Telephone Company, which received permission to erect separate poles and were contracted as a franchise for 25 years.132 In 1891, F.W. Swanton of Santa Cruz had an electric light franchise approved by the Council, and received a 50-year franchise. Another utility, the Gilroy Gas Light Company also applied for a franchise with the city council in 1899. The Gilroy Gas Light Company was eventually purchased by the city in 1902, buying out the franchise, and again owning its utilities.133 Figure 12. Looking north on Monterey Road, with utility poles, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) 129 Munro-Fraser, 1881: 300-301; Coffin 1873: 28-29; 130 Cox, N.D.: 7-8 131 Cox, N.D.: 8. 132 Cox, N.D.: 9. 133 Cox, N.D.: 11. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 42 July 2020 The First Schools The earliest account of a school was an unchartered schoolhouse, east of town, opened in 1853. The location supposedly moved to Monterey Road, however, early Gilroy school records prior to 1867 were destroyed in a fire so this could not be confirmed. In 1868, the building that was being used for a school was determined to be too small, and an official, chartered public school was to be opened by the Gilroy Trustees (later the City Council). A new building was funded and opened in 1869, and enlarged in 1873. Both the grammar school and high school occupied this building until 1898 (Figure 13). In 1898, Gilroy’s first separate public high school building was built on Church Street between 3rd and 4th Streets. By 1875, the school began accepting non-local students for a tuition fee, and was again determined to be too small. The City Council and voters agreed to levy a tax to fund necessary additions to the school.134 Figure 13. Gilroy Public School, 1893 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) Gilroy also had several private schools in its earliest years. In 1867, Sarah Severance opened a girl’s seminary and boarding school, which operated until 1885.135 The Convent of the Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic School, located one mile north of the center of town on Broadway and Monterey Road, opened in 1870. The Catholic School took local girls and boys as well as boarders, and taught gender-separated classes. A private high school was opened in 1872, and operated at the Methodist Episcopal Church—South until 1876 when it became a public school. 136 By 1873, the town boasted four private schools, and primary schools were turning away students. In 1877, a new grammar school was organized and high school started, both housed in the Gilroy Public School building built in 1875.137 134 Gilroy Dispatch, 1970; Rogers1888: 2-7;Sawyer 1922: 1138. 135 Gilroy Dispatch, 1970. 136 Rogers 1888: 9. 137 Gilroy Dispatch, 1970. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 43 July 2020 Churches Though several churches had already established congregations in the Gilroy area at the beginning of the Initial Development Period (1868-1904), the official establishment of the town of Gilroy marked a move to more permanent buildings for the various religious denominations in Gilroy (Figure 14). For example the first Protestant church met in W.R. Bane’s home, beginning in 1852. The Methodist Episcopal Church South was organized in 1853 and met for its first years in people’s homes. Its first building, built in 1855, was eventually razed and its permanent church building was built in 1872. The Methodist Episcopal Church North was organized 1857 and moved from meeting in private homes to its first official church building in 1872. The Christian (Campbellite) Church of Gilroy was organized 1855 and met in a one-room church on 3rd Street built in 1857. The Christian Church moved the building into its permanent location at Eigleberry Street and 5th Street location in 1887. The Presbyterian Church was organized 1860, and its first building built 1869. The Catholic congregation first met at St. Martin’s Church, erected in 1855, located north of Gilroy in what is now the town of San Martin. However, the Catholic congregation living in Gilroy soon established its own church on Martin Murphy’s ranch lands, building St. Mary’s near Monterey Road and Broadway in 1865 and adding a convent and school in 1870.138 Figure 14. Gilroy churches, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) 138 Gilroy Evening Dispatch. “Religion Plays Prominent Role in Early Gilroy.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Evening Dispatch, 1969b). January 10, 1969, pg. 11A; John T. Dwyer, rev. “St. Mary’s First Century.” In St. Mary’s Church (Gilroy, CA: St. Mary’s Church, 1965): 25; Munro-Fraser 1881: 291-295. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 44 July 2020 Fraternal and Benevolent Organizations Though churches did provide for portion of the social lives of Gilroy’s citizens, fraternal organizations, benevolent societies, and social clubs provided opportunities for citizens of Gilroy to meet and engage in social activity as well as socially beneficial programs for the poor or disadvantaged, widows and orphaned children, funeral and burial services, integration of immigrant groups, and strengthening social and political bonds. Fraternal lodges and social group clubhouses were also venues for entertainment, political groups, and speakers. Many fraternal organizations founded their Gilroy chapters in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904).139 The first recorded fraternal organization to officially be established in Gilroy was the Free and Accepted Masons (Freemasons), which chartered the Keith Lodge No. 187 in 1868. An earlier attempt to establish a Freemasons lodge in 1862 was unsuccessful, and dissolved by 1864. The original Masonic Lodge building was built in 1869 and another built at Monterey and Lewis Streets in 1902, designed by master architect William H. Weeks.140 The Independent Order of Odd Fellows (I.O.O.F.) Gilroy Lodge 154 was founded in 1869. The first I.O.O.F. hall was established on Monterey Road and Martin Street in 1869 (Figure 15). When this hall was demolished, another would be built on Eigleberry Street in 1954. The women’s branch of I.O.O.F., called the Rebekahs, also played a prominent in Gilroy’s history. The Unity Rebekah Lodge No. 24 was established in 1870. In 1897, Caroline Hoxett, president of the Rebekahs, successfully lobbied to have the Children’s Home of Northern California established at Gilroy. The orphanage, then called the I.O.O.F Childrens’ Home, opened in 1897 with five children receiving services. The I.O.O.F and the Freemasons also collaborated to open a cemetery along Bodfish Road (Hecker Pass Road), on land purchased from Henry Miller, in 1873.141 Figure 15. First I.O.O.F. Hall, no date (Gilroy Historical Museum) 139 Elizabeth Barratt. “Early Fraternal and Benevolent Societies Played Large Role.” The Pinnacle: Yesterday & Today. (Gilroy, CA: Elizabeth Barratt, 2005): 1 140 Cox N.D. 10; Munro-Fraser 1881: 300; Barratt 2005: 1 141 Cox N.D. 10; Munro-Fraser 1881: 300; Barratt 2005: 2; Rebekah Children’s Services. “Our History.” (Accessed March 26, 2019). http://www.rcskids.org/about/history; Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum; San Francisco Call 189; This cemetery is not to be confused with another cemetery, also purchased from Henry Miller in 1870., CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 45 July 2020 The Gilroy’s Ladies Benevolent Society (G.L.B.S.) was founded in 1867 and met at the Temperance Hall on Martin Street (1868). Incorporated in 1872 and funded mostly by donations, the G.L.B.S. raised funds for needy families, occasionally even going so far as to finding housing for homeless families. A large bequest of property in 1876 secured housing and future funding for the group which lasted well into the 20th century.142 Other clubs and societies founded during this period included: the Ancient Order of United Workmen, a Grange, the Columbia Lodge of the International Lodge of Good Templars, the Ancient Order of Hibernarians, the Blue Ribbon Club, and the Knights of Pythias. The Columbia Lodge was founded in 1874 with ten members and met at member’s homes. Grange No. 168 was also founded in 1874, and later re-established in 1922 as the Gilroy Grange No. 398. The Ancient Order of United Workmen (A.O.U.W.) was chartered in 1878 and met at the Freemason Lodge. This group established as a life insurance group and members had to undergo a medical examination to qualify for the policy. The Ancient Order of Hibernarians, Division No. 3 was also organized in 1878 as a benevolent group for Irish immigrants and descendants to assist sick and disabled community members and provide funereal services. The Blue Ribbon Club also organized in 1878, but as a temperance society offering a reading room and coffee house as a saloon alternative. The reading room was somewhat unsuccessful, and the Club turned its attention and funding instead towards forming one of Gilroy’s first circulating libraries, which operated from their reading room in the back of a photographic gallery on Monterrey Street. In 1885, the Knights of Pythias, Bloomfield Lodge No. 102 was founded as a friendship society and met at the I.O.O.F. Hall.143 Early Cemeteries The first cemeteries preceded the establishment of the town, interring the earliest settlers such as Lucien Everett.144 The earliest such cemetery was supposedly established in 1853, however all bodies were disinterred in the early 1870s. The reason for this is unclear and is either because the location was desired for a new “civic center,” or because it routinely flooded, making it impossible to hold burials in a timely fashion. The original location of this first cemetery may have been related to the original location of the Christian Church, which was located at Church and Third Street but moved in 1886 to its present location. The next cemetery was likely the “Old” St. Mary’s Catholic Cemetery and opened at the same time as the completion of St. Mary’s Church in 1865. This cemetery was not moved, but a new St. Mary’s Cemetery was opened in 1918 near the Freemason and I.O.O.F. Cemetery/Gavilan Hill Memorial Park property.145 The first official cemetery to establish in Gilroy after the town was established was a 20-acre cemetery plot and a 5-acre potter’s field that the City of Gilroy purchased from Henry Miller in 1870.146 Many of the bodies disinterred from the original cemetery were relocated here in the 1870s, or to the Freemason and I.O.O.F. Cemetery. The 142 Sarah Severance. “The Harrison Bequest.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, 1879) June 28, 1879. On File at the Gilroy Historical Museum; Ruth Forsyth. “Gilroy Ladies Benevolent Society: 1872-1967.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, 1969), May 26, 1969; Coffin 1873: 22; Barratt 2005: 2 143 Munro-Fraser 1881: 300; Barratt 2005: 2-4 144 Information about Gilroy’s earliest cemeteries is not well recorded. Resource were mostly secondary references, of which neither the author nor the date was recorded with the documentation. Some of this information is in the Cemetery Subject File held by the Gilroy Historical Museum and consists of unpublished, undated, authorless manuscripts detailing multiple researchers’ notes on Gilroy cemeteries, without listing author sources. One resource indicated that “cemetery surveys and maps” were held by the Gilroy Historical Museum, but these records were not furnished and may no longer be at the museum. 145 Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum. 146 Munro-Fraser 1881: 285 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 46 July 2020 Freemason and I.O.O.F. lodges managed the cemetery until 1989, when it was purchased by a private family and renamed Gavilan Hills Memorial Park.147 Notably, a Chinese Cemetery was established sometime between 1899 and 1906 outside the eastern boundary of Gilroy, near a “pest house” and City reservoir on Bodfish Road (now Hecker Pass Road). This location is now just west of the Gilroy Golf Course on Hecker Pass Road. The cemetery fell into disrepair and town boundaries expanded, leading to the disinterment of those buried at this cemetery. From 1920 to 1928, bodies were removed and cremated or sent to San Francisco for shipment to China. The Chinese Cemetery was abandoned in 1928.148 4.4.4 Transportation Infrastructure Probably the most important change in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904) was the coming of the SC&PRR completed to Gilroy in 1869. Prominent Gilroy developers Zuck, Rogers & Hoover had been campaigning for four years to convince the railroad to come through Gilroy, all but assuring the city’s growth as a result.149 The first freight train arrived in March 1869, and the first passenger train followed a month later. The train would become the primary means for travelers to visit Gilroy, and for Gilroy-area farmers to ship their goods to San José and Monterey. In 1870, the SPRR purchased the line, and built a one-story, wood-frame depot at their Gilroy station (Figure 16). They also extended the line south of Gilroy, intending to link Gilroy, San José and San Francisco on its California Southern line to Fort Mojave.150 In 1882, a turntable, water tower, and three-stall engine house were added to the Gilroy stop.151 147 Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum 148 Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum; Gilroy Dispatch. 2004. “Plaque Honors Chinese Cemetery.” (Gilroy CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. April 5, 2004.) https://gilroydispatch.com/2004/04/05/plaque-honors-chinese- cemetery/. 149 Gilroy Advocate. “Railroad Inauguration – Six Thousand People Celebrating!” (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Advocate, 1869) April 10, 1869; San Jose Mercury. “When San Jose Was Young: October 21 to 27, 1865.” (San Jose: The San Jose Mercury October 28, 1935); The California Farmer. “Opening of the Southern Pacific Railroad to Gilroy.” The California Farmer and Journal of Useful Sciences, Volume 31, No. 13, (April 15, 1869) 150 Hubert Howe Bancroft. History of California Vol VII 1860-1890. (San Francisco, CA: The History Company, 1890): 599. 151 Mark Duncan. The San Francisco Peninsula Railroad Passenger Service – Past Present Future.(Mark Duncan, 2005): 93 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 47 July 2020 Figure 16. Southern Pacific Depot building, circa 1900 (California History Section Picture Catalog, California State Library) Roads in and around Gilroy also generally improved. El Camino Real was renamed the San José-Monterey Road and enjoyed a short life as a toll road before being declared a free highway in 1874.152 The roads in the city itself were set to determined widths, set forth in the 1868 charter, which determined the official width of Monterey Road (86 feet wide), side streets (75 feet wide), crossroads (66 feet wide), and their sidewalks (14 feet on Monterey and 10 feet on remaining streets). The 1868 charter also opened the existing roads beyond their 1868 distances: e.g., Eigleberry Street was extended from Farman to Martha Street. Ordinance No. 7 of the charter also renamed streets in Gilroy: “Sargent, to be First street; Martha, to be Second street; Looser, to be Third street; Bodfish to be Fourth street; Levy, to be Fifth street; Farman to be Sixth Street; and Furlong to be Seventh street.”153 4.4.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing Transitioning from a rural settlement to an established small city in the late nineteenth century, more agricultural practices were relegated to the areas outside of Gilroy. However, Gilroy’s new SPRR depot earned a role as the shipping center for the region’s agricultural products. In the late nineteenth century, cattle raising had lessened in importance as Gilroy’s cheese industry took off (Figure 17). Dairies established in the Gilroy area included those of James C. Zuck; A. W. Furlong, A. Fornii, George Rea, Samuel Rea, J. P. Sargent, A. Watson, James H. Ellis, M T. Holsclaw, Dexter Bros., Rodney Eschurburg, E. A. Maze, A. Wilson, and J. Murdock.154 By 1879, the Gilroy dairies had produced 700,000 pounds of cheese and 78,000 pounds of butter, gaining importance in California and across the country as the state’s leading cheese producer by volume.155 In the 1880s, dozens of dairies were in operation 152 Foot 1888: 119-120. 153 Munro-Fraser 1881: 283. 154 Pacific Rural Press. “Santa Clara: The Dairy.” (San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. Volume 44. No 25, 1892.) December 17, 1892, pg. 516. 155 Pacific Rural Press. “The Cheese Region of Gilroy and Hollister.” (San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press, Volume 21, No. 14. 1881). April 2, 1881, pg. 242. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 48 July 2020 in Gilroy and production surpassed 1,000,000 pounds of cheese.156 By 1892, Gilroy’s cheese production was up to 1,800,000 pounds, equal to one-fifth of the of the entire state of California’s cheese production.157 Figure 17. Dairying scene at George Rea’s farm, 1895 (Shortridge 1895) Tobacco farming, which was particularly concentrated around Gilroy due to the tobacco farm of J.D. Culp, gained maturity in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904). J.D. Culp established a tobacco factory at 4 th Street and Rosanna Street in 1869, but sold this location in 1871. Culp went on to patent a method for curing tobacco leaf in 1872, and a fabric bag for packing and holding tobacco leaves in 1876.158 Culp relocated to San Felipe, but retained his Gilroy land holdings, employing many locals. As Culp’s business and agricultural land holdings increased, he eventually organized the Pacific Tobacco Manufacturing Company and the San Felipe Havana Tobacco Company to manufacture product.159 In addition to already established industries of dairying and tobacco farming, fruit orchards and dried fruit production rose to prominence in the 1870s. French prunes160 were introduced to Santa Clara County in 1856, but the first orchards took investment and lands to purchase and grow the trees as well as a few years to mature and 156 Pacific Rural Press. “Green Cheese.” (San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. Volume 23, No 18, 1882) May 6, 1882, pg. 346; Pacific Rural Press. “The Dairy: Gilroy Cheese Dairies.” (San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. Volume 29, No 26, 1885) June 27, 1885, pgs. 594-595; Shortridge 1895: 56; E.S. Harrison. Gilroy: The Most Favored Section of Santa Clara Valley. (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Board of Trade, 1888): 12. 157 Pacific Rural Press 1892: 516. 158 Coffin 1873: 16; United States Patent Office. “Patent No 6779” Specifications and Drawings of Patents Issued from the United States Patent Office for December 1875. (Washington D.C: Government Printing Office, 1876): pg. 243; Gilroy Historical Museum Subject Files. “Tobacco Culture in Gilroy and the Consolidated Tobacco Company.” From the Tobacco Subject File at the Gilroy Historical Museum. No Date. 159 Pacific Rural Press “Miscellaneous.” (San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press, 1892). Volume 44, No 13, September 24, 1892, pg. 252; Coffin 1873: 16. 160 A small plum, originally imported by the Pellier Brothers into San Jose in the 1850s. (DeSantis 2016) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 49 July 2020 produce a sellable crop. In 1873, the Gilroy area was still described mostly as dairying land with grain fields, relegating orchards to small plantings near homes.161 After the success of prunes in the 1870s, other stone fruits slowly appeared until they were proven to be suitable to the regional soil and climate conditions of Gilroy (Figure 18).162 In the 1880s, prunes and other stone fruit orchards would eventually become the dominant agricultural product of South Santa Clara County, overtaking tobacco.163 Grapes were also enjoying a local resurgence in South Santa Clara County, as early as 1880 when Henry Miller dedicated a portion of his grazing lands near Gilroy to raising grapes.164 After multiple vineyard diseases in the 1870s, grape crops recovered in the late 1880s, and by 1904, the California Wine Association established a winery in Gilroy.165 Figure 18. Prune drying at B.F. Thomas farm. Circa 1900 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) 161 Coffin 1873: 12-13 162 Harrison, 1888: 12-13. 163 CIRCA 2006: 50; Munro-Fraser 1881: 272. 164 Carol A. DeSantis “Miller Red Barn.” National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination Form (Gilroy, CA: Miller Red Barn Committee, draft, April 5, 2016): 9-12 165 Gilroy Advocate. “Big Winery Coming: California Wine Association Will Erect Plant in Gilroy.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, 1904) July 23, 1904. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 50 July 2020 Food processing and agribusiness began to take place in Gilroy in the 1880s. Agribusiness emerged in Gilroy in the form of support services for the agricultural products being grown in Gilroy, versus the previous tradition of shipping agricultural goods to San José for processing. Such businesses, including flourmills, lumber mills, and fruit drying and packing plants, were established in Gilroy in this period. The Santa Clara Valley Flour Mill was established by Alex Hay in 1873.166 Another flourmill, the Gilroy Flour Mill, organized by the Smith Brothers was established in 1886, and had a plant on Monterey Road between 6th Street and Old Gilroy Road.167 In the late 1880s, after dried prunes and apricots were gaining momentum, the Gilroy Fruit Packing Company, located at Monterey and Leavesley Streets was organized by O.M. Welburn in 1888.168 Another packing company, the South Santa Clara Fruit Drying and Packing Company, was organized around 1900 by soon-to-be-mayor George Dunlap.169 Gilroy’s farmers turned outward in the 1900s, when the Gilroy Fruit Growers opted to join the California Cured Fruit Association, one of the many fruit growers’ co-operatives in California at the turn of the twentieth century.170 Immigrant Labor and Farming Immigrants from China in the nineteenth century, and later Japan and Italy in the twentieth century, comprised a large portion of the laborers involved in agricultural and industrial jobs in Santa Clara County, and around Gilroy. Given the Gilroy area’s growing importance in the tobacco, fruit orchards, vineyard, and seed production agribusinesses, low-cost foreign laborers were favored.171 Chinese immigration to California had peaked in the 1850s and 1860s, when many Chinese workers emigrated to North America to work on railroad infrastructure and mines. After the initial railroad work lapsed, displaced Chinese workers sought work in agricultural communities as seasonal crop pickers and farming tenants. Such a large influx of Chinese immigrants undercutting Anglo-American work forces brought about political change in 1879 when the working classes began unionizing and forcing the terms for the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act.172 However, not all landowners abided by laws forbidding Chinese labor. For example, J.D. Culp employed at least 100 Chinese laborers at his tobacco farms outside Gilroy and later at San Felipe.173 Nearly 65 Chinese worked for C.C. Morse of the Ferry-Morse Seed Company, near Hollister and Gilroy.174 At the time, these labor practices were perceived as a favorable, since Chinese migrants were forced to accept lower pay, longer hours, and harder work conditions as a result of the ban on employment. Chinese migrants were also willing to pay high rents for land to raise crops.175 Samuel Rea, a dairy owner, found it more profitable to lease portions of his land to Chinese sharecroppers who would raise berries, onions, potatoes, corn and vegetables on rented land, pick the crops, and then allow Rea, as proprietor, to market the crops. In return, the Chinese sharecroppers would earn a small portion of the net profits, leaving most to Rea. By the close of the nineteenth century, nearly 1,000 Chinese were reported to be living in the greater Gilroy area.176 Those that lived in town lived below 7th street in the informal Chinatown, mostly in wood frame tenements (Figure 19). There were several shops run by Chinese in this section of town including laundries, dry goods, and restaurants. As anti-Chinese sentiment 166 Coffin 1873: 21 167 Sanborn 1886, 1892. 168 Foote 1888: 340 169 Miller Lux v. Dunlap, 152 P. 309 (California Court of Appeal, 1915). Accessed December 3, 2018, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3280481/miller-lux-v-dunlap/? 170 San Francisco Call. “Join the Fruit Association.” (San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call), March 14, 1900, pg. 9. 171 Claudia Salewske. Images of America: Gilroy. (Chicago, IL: Arcadia Publishing, 2003); Shortridge 1895: 180. 172 Sawyer 1922: 144. 173 Dill et. al. 2003: 14; Shortridge 1895: 180; Salewske 2003 174 Gilroy Dispatch. “Early Settlers Turn to Agriculture.” (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Dispatch, 1970), December 21, 1970. 175 Shortridge 1895: 106; Sawyer 1922: 112 176 Salewske 2003 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 51 July 2020 increased in the 1880s, culminating in the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, living conditions were generally poor in this portion of town, and the area was prone to anti-Chinese violent crime.177 Figure 19. Gilroy Chinatown, looking south on Monterey Road towards 9 th Street (Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley) Just after the turn of the twentieth century, Japanese immigrants began to settle in California. The first wave of Japanese immigration had arrived in the 1880s after the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, and the second in 1898 when Japanese migrated from Hawaiʻi after the territory was annexed. In 1902, Gilroy’s first Japanese immigrant, Tamiro Nakashiki settled near present-day site of Soares and Nunes Dairy on Old Bolsa Road. In 1904, Nakashiki was followed by Shigeru Yamane and Kiyoshi (Jimmy) Hirasaki. Hirasaki would go on to become the first major producer of garlic in the region.178 The twentieth century brought increased Italian immigration to the Santa Clara Valley and the Gilroy region. The Sturla family had settled near San Ysidro (Old Gilroy) as early as the 1860s, eventually bringing their extended relations to the region as well. In Gilroy, they engaged in vineyards, olives, fruit, and vegetable farming, but were landowners rather than migrant labor. By 1900, the Sturla family group had expanded to many interrelated Italian immigrant families, including the Conrotto, Bertero, Princevalle, Filice, and Perrelli families, settling around Gilroy, Coyote, and Madrone and would eventually found the Bisceglia Cannery in 1907.179 177 Munro-Fraser 1881: 237, 482 178 Gilroy Dispatch. “Japanese Immigrants Were First Big Garlic Growers.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch, 1970). December 21, 1970.; Dill et al. 2003: 19 179 Dill et al. 2003:19; Arbuckle 1970: 20-21 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 52 July 2020 4.5 Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development (1904-1941) The dawn of the twentieth century in Gilroy carried with it a strong desire to develop, improve, and evolve beyond a small town. By 1900, a substantial percentage of California’s population resided in large urban centers, such as San Francisco and Los Angeles, because the municipal infrastructure advancements of larger cities offered a higher quality of life than was available in smaller, rural towns in the State.180 With a population under 2,000, Gilroy was one such rural agricultural community located in the Santa Clara Valley, and was predominately populated by farmers and ranchers. Aided by the arrival of the SC&PRR to the area in the 1869 and its subsequent purchase by SPRR in 1870, the farmers and ranchers were able to haul their goods in greater quantities to the inhabitants of larger, surrounding cities like San José and San Francisco. However, exposure to the public services available in such municipalities sparked the desire for civic and economic advancement at home in Gilroy. Gilroy residents were inspired by the City Beautiful Movement, a city planning and beautification philosophy that was gaining immense popularity throughout the United States at the time. With the leadership of progressive politicians like George Dunlap and James Princevalle, the steady push of civic-minded organizations, and the generous donations of wealthy benefactors, Gilroy was on a steady course towards modernization during this period. 4.5.1 Residential Development Residential development during the first two decades of the twentieth century was characterized by expansion into the previously undeveloped sections of the initial Gilroy city grid. Many private residences were erected during this period, aided by the prospect of piped utilities like natural gas, water and electricity (Figure 20). The population expanded by thirty-three percent in the first decade of the twentieth century from 1,820 in 1900 to 2,437 in 1910.181 By 1916, as the population continued to rise, the Advocate noted that, “The building boom which has struck Gilroy, continues with prospects of many more stores and residences than have been erected in years gone by.”182 180 Angela Woollacott, Carroll Pursell and Chuck Myer. Gilroy’s Old City Hall: 1906-1989. (Cupertino, California: California History Center and Foundation, De Anza College, 1991). 181 “Population of the City of Gilroy, 1870-1997.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 182 Gilroy Advocate. “Building Boom Goes Merrily On.” (Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, March 25, 1916). Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 53 July 2020 Figure 20. Postcard showing Residential Development along Eigleberry Street, c.1910s (California Historical Society) However, the forward residential progress would be momentarily halted by the entrance of the United States into World War I. The war effort placed a large strain on resources throughout the country, and in an effort to conserve building materials, the City Council of Gilroy banned the distribution of all building permits between 1917 and 1918 unless a license for the work was issued directly from the Federal War Industries Board. This effectively halted progress on private building projects during this period, including residential development. 183 Despite the hardships and brief building freeze caused by World War I, the population of Gilroy continued expanding gradually. The 1920 United States census recorded the population at 2,862 persons.184 James Princevalle was elected Mayor during the same year and contemporary sources suggest that Gilroy underwent a renewed period of residential development during his time in office between 1920 and 1932.185 Popular local builders such as William Radtke Sr., J. Carl Howard and the Holmes Brothers began producing affordable small and mid-sized houses in popular architectural styles. The increased development activity during the 1920s period was keeping pace with a third consecutive decade of sizeable growth in the City. By the start of the 1930s, the population of Gilroy measured 3,502 persons.186 The difficulties wrought by the Great Depression were widespread in Gilroy during the 1930s, and as a result, the accelerated growth of the City seen in previous decades stagnated, and the population increased only by a nominal 113 people between 1930 and 1940.187 183 White. N. D. 184 “Population of the City of Gilroy, 1870-1997.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 185 Eugene Sawyer. “James Princevalle” in History of Santa Clara County, California. (Historic Record Co.: Los Angeles, California, 1922). 186 “Population of the City of Gilroy, 1870-1997.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 187 “Population of the City of Gilroy, 1870-1997.” Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 54 July 2020 In 1936, the City of Gilroy zoned the city into five distinctive districts: Single Family Residences; Multiple Family Residences; Business Districts; Industrial Districts; and Residential-Agricultural. The single family district was located between Hanna, Princevalle, First, and Seventh Streets. The Multiple Family residence district constituted an area approximately double that designated for single family residences an area between Eigleberry and Hanna Streets, and First and Tenth Streets as well as a section to the east of Monterey Street between Old Gilroy and Lewis Street.188 As the 1940s got underway and the United States entered into World War II in 1941, it became clear that the deceleration of the population in Gilroy was only a short-lived phenomenon. In 1941, the San José Mercury-News reported on the increasing value of the property in the area despite the apparent stagnation in population growth and the number of water meters added during the most economically trying years of the Depression. Steady growth of Gilroy is reflected noticeably in two comparisons, those of assessed property valuation and home building. City property valuation in 1940 was $3,151,236, as compared to $2,867,408 in 1933. Home building, based on number of water service meters installed by the city, shows steady increase. In 1940, there were 1,125 meters in service, while in 1933 there were 900.189 4.5.2 Commercial Development In 1906, the great San Francisco Earthquake caused nearly $500,000 damage in the City of Gilroy. On Monterey Road, the new City Hall was damaged, multiple roofs collapsed, and there was severe damage to the front facades of the Gilroy Post Office, Johnson’s Drug store, and a private hospital. At the hospital building at Monterey and 5th Street, walls cracked and pulled apart, causing an evacuation. Plate glass store windows along Monterey were also severely damaged. After the earthquake a considerable rebuilding period began. 190 Commercial development during the first two decades of the twentieth century was characterized by rapid expansion and growth of commercial businesses related to the everyday needs of Gilroy’s citizens. A large number of storefronts were erected during this period, aided by the advent of city sidewalks, paved streets and new municipal buildings drawing increased pedestrian traffic to the commercial areas of the city. Local builder William Radtke Sr. arrived in Gilroy in 1911, and immediately embarked on the construction of several construction projects along Monterey Road including the First National Bank at 7498 Monterey Road in 1912, The Gilroy Advocate Building at 55 W. 6th Street (just off Monterey Road) in 1910, and the Gilroy Dispatch newspaper Building at 7466 Monterey Road in 1917.191 However, similar to the residential areas of Gilroy, the entrance of the United States into World War I resulted in the stagnation of private commercial development between 1917 and 1918. The banning of all building permits by the City Council of Gilroy during this period effectively halted progress on private building projects throughout the city until the beginning of the 1920s. By the start of the 1920s however, the commercial sector mirrored the same patterns of growth seen elsewhere in the city.192 While a little over a dozen buildings had been built along Monterey Road between 1904 and 1920, beginning in 1920, 15 new one and two-part commercial blocks were erected. These often comprised multiple buildings of an entire block, including the entire odd-numbered 7500 block of 188 Eugene Lewis Conrotto. The Urbanization of the Southern Santa Clara Valley: Gilroy. (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Historical Museum, 1951). 189 San Jose Mercury-News. 1941. “Gilroy’s Fame Comes from Ranches.” (San Jose, CA: The San Jose Mercury-News, June 20, 1941). Held by San Jose Public Library. 190 Conrotto 1951; Salewske 2003 191 Ibid. 192 Salewske 2003. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 55 July 2020 Monterey. Twelve of these 15 new buildings built between 1920 and 1922 were built by William Radtke, Sr. Radtke continued to take Downtown Gilroy work on Monterey Road, often in collaboration with local regional architects. In 1920, he collaborated with prolific Bay-area architect William H. Weeks on the Firestone Tires/Ellis Garage building at 7390 Monterey Road. The Louis Hotel and Café, a collaboration between Radtke and architect firm Binder & Curtis of San Jose, opened in 1921, and in addition to offering visitors and guests a pleasant, eclectic place to stay during their travels, the hotel also featured a large hall utilized by social and civic clubs for their meetings, fundraisers and banquets.193 Weeks also designed the Hotel Milias, Restaurant, and Steak House (Figure 21), which opened on the corner of Monterey and Sixth Streets, cattycorner from the City Hall in 1922. . The restaurant and hotel served local elites of Gilroy as well as several Hollywood celebrities.194 Figure 21. Hotel Milias in 1922 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) The Strand Theatre was completed on Monterey Road beside the Masonic Temple in 1921 (Figure 22). The program from the formal opening of the Theatre on December 3, 1921 states that the Neoclassical-style building designed by architects Reid & Reid of San Francisco was built by William Radtke Sr. and furnished at a cost of $175,000.195 The theater was a venue for musical performances plays, motion picture films accompanied by live music from the theatre’s $15,000 pipe organ, and benefit events for Gilroy’s community organizations like the Elks’.196 In response to the increased traffic brought to town by the completion of State Route 101 through Gilroy, and the relatively inexpensive cost of mass-produced automobiles like Ford’s Model T, Lilly’s Auto Camp was established by Allen and Alice Lilly on the Monterey Road north of Leavesley Road in 1927. Auto camps emerged in California in the mid- 1920s along the newly completed State Highways, and they are thought to be the precedent to the modern drive-up Motel. Lilly’s Auto Camp featured fifteen California bungalow-style cabins furnished austerely with a gas 193 Salewske. 2003. 194Rick Sprain. 2018. Postcard History Series: Santa Clara County. (Arcadia Publishing: Charleston, South Carolina, 2018). 195 Strand Theatre Program. 1921. Vol. 1, No. 1, December 3, 1921. As featured in Salewske. 2003. 196 Salewske. 2003. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 56 July 2020 stove, bed, table, chairs and a toilet. Showers were housed in a small detached building while the main building fronting Monterey Road served as an office, restaurant, grocery, and service station. 197 The economization of the automobile offered other commercial opportunities to people living in Gilroy. By the beginning of the 1940s there were a sizeable number of businesses associated with the automobile clustered along Monterey Road. These establishments included service stations, repair garages, auto-dealers, and several Auto Courts (motels).198 Figure 22. The Strand Theatre as it appeared in 1931. The Masonic Temple designed by W.H. Weeks pictured at the left. (Gilroy Historical Museum) 4.5.3 Civic and Institutional Development In response to civic advancements in communities such as Hollister and Los Gatos, the Gilroy Advocate appealed to the citizens of Gilroy in February of 1904 claiming that: Towns of fewer natural advantages are steadily forging ahead of Gilroy. Some of our valley settlements bid fair in a few years to outdo us in population and enterprise. To make progress, we must get out of our dormant condition and show more public spirit…199 As evidenced by this newspaper article, the citizens of Gilroy were primed for change, and a chance to keep up with surrounding districts. The Gilroy Board of Trade, concerned with the commerce and industry of the town, rebranded itself the Promotion Society (later it would become the Chamber of Commerce) in order to update its role in the advancement of Gilroy’s economic ventures. The rhetoric of hopeful politicians reflected the citizen’s refrain of improvement and change was embraced enthusiastically by entrepreneurs such as George T. Dunlap, who ran for 197 Historic American Buildings Survey. Post-1933. “Lilly's Auto Camp, 8877 Monterey Highway, Gilroy, Santa Clara County, CA.” Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/ca0920/ 198 Sanborn Map Company. 1943. “Gilroy, California.” 199 Gilroy Advocate. February 27, 1904. As quoted in Woollacott et al. 1991. p3 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 57 July 2020 the Mayoral office in 1904. He ran alongside what the Gilroy Advocate dubbed a “Ticket of Progressive Business Men.”200 Dunlap was an accomplished capitalist who headed the Dunlap Realty and Produce Company, owned the Coyote Cattle Company and was the president of the South Santa Clara Fruit Drying and Packing Company. Dunlap’s progressive stance won him the office of Mayor in 1904, alongside three reformist candidates elected to the City Council. Armed with a new, progressive government, Gilroy was set to push forward into a new era. A New City Hall Although Gilroy had an existing City Hall building located on Monterey Road and Fifth Street, the City had adopted a resolution for the creation of a fund to construct a New City Hall building as early as 1900. However, the project stagnated and never came to fruition. In his inaugural speech, Mayor George Dunlap highlighted his hopes to see the project through, claiming that: nothing is a better index of the enterprise and stability of a community than the general appearance and character of its public buildings…We shall be sadly delinquent as a city if we do not give early and earnest thought to the subject of erecting a new city hall201 The new City Council took Dunlap’s social and architectural commentary seriously and committed to the construction of a New City Hall during the City Council meeting on August 1, 1904. The northeastern corner lot at the intersection of Monterey and Sixth Streets was purchased from the Hotaling family for the prestigious project. The purchase of this lot would place the New City Hall at the strategic intersection of Gilroy’s main commercial corridor, Monterey Road, and 6th Street, the only street that crossed completely over Monterey Road between Old and New Gilroy at this time. 202 Owing to their reputation for working well within a wide range of styles, prominent San José Architects Samuel Newsome, Frank D. Wolfe, and Charles McKenzie were selected to create the design for the new building. Frank D. Wolfe had established a contracting firm in San José following a move from Newton, Kansas in 1888. He quickly gained notoriety in San José and Santa Clara County- and subsequently transitioned his firm to architecture in 1895. Charles McKenzie joined the firm as a partner in 1899. The pair designed a large number of prominent homes and buildings in San José during their 11-year partnership between 1899 and 1910.203 The New City Hall Building was an eclectic mix of Richardsonian Romanesque, and other, popular revival styles to be built using local stone offered by Henry Miller from his quarry on Glen Ranch.204 The layout included meeting space for the City Council, a police courtroom, office space for the city superintendents in charge of gas and water, and a basement level for use by the fire crew. Additionally, as the Santa Clara county seat was located over thirty miles away in San José, for convenience it was decided that this building would include a jail. The County subsequently offered $5,000 towards the project in lieu of having to build a branch jail in the area.205 During 1905, while the stonework for the New City Hall was underway by the Granite Construction Company of Watsonville, the progressive City Council under Mayor Dunlap continued the modernization of the city by initiating the process to introduce further infrastructure improvements to Gilroy. As part of this process, A.E. Holloway was 200 Gilroy Advocate. April 9, 1904. As quoted in Woollacott et al. 1991. p3 201 Gilroy Advocate. June 11, 1904. As quoted in Woollacott et al. 1991. P4 202 Woollacott et al. 1991: 7. 203 Unknown Author. 2014. “Frank Delos Wolfe: San Jose’s Most Enduring Architect.” http://www.frankdeloswolfe.com/fdw.html. Accessed November 21, 2018. 204 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” November 11, 1904. Gilroy Historical Museum. 205 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” August 6, 1904. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 58 July 2020 appointed to create a cost estimates for a city-wide sewer system, an electric light grid system, and improvements to the municipal water works which totaled $51,000.206 The Independent Producers Union also received a 50-year contract from the City for the construction and operation of a pipeline to provide Gilroy with oil, natural gas, and petroleum during this year.207 The structural competency of the new monumental City Hall was tested heavily during the earthquake centered in San Francisco on April 18, 1906. The New City Hall Building was nearly completed by the start of April 1906 at a cost of $19,890, under the efficient management of local contractor, George Seay.208 The earthquake was the result of the northernmost 296-miles stretch of the San Andres fault rupturing between Cape Mendocino to the northwest of San Juan Bautista, a mere 13 miles from Gilroy.209 While the Richter magnitude scale would not be developed for another several decades following the 1906 earthquake, the shaking lasted approximately 45-60 seconds and was felt as far away as southern Oregon, Nevada, and Los Angeles.210 Newspapers reported approximately $50,000 in damages to Gilroy buildings, but no injuries or deaths.211 The New City Hall had experienced some cosmetic damage, but many other buildings in Gilroy were not as fortunate. In the days following the quake, a special meeting of the City Council was called to assess the action needed to repair damage throughout the area. In response to the widespread destruction of property in Gilroy, a special police force was convened, and Wolfe was retained by the city to inspect City Hall as part of a wider effort to inspect and evaluate buildings for safety and structural integrity throughout Gilroy.212 Repairs commenced on City Hall the following month, and by summer of 1906, the building was repaired to the state it was at prior to the earthquake. As final finishes were being applied to the spaces inside and out, it became clear that the extra costs of the repairs had considerably depleted the resources available for furnishing the lavish interior rooms and offices. Despite this fact, the City Council opted to move into the unfurnished space and held the first meeting in the New City Hall on October 1, 1906, in the Marshal’s room, instead of the Assembly Hall. 213 As it took an additional year from the point of this first meeting to when the remainder of City Hall was actually furnished for use, the bold 1905 date emblazoned on the edifice of City Hall remains more representative of the planning stages of the building than the actual completion and use timeline (Figure 23). On October 7, 1907, the first meeting of the City Council was held in the furnished main Assembly Hall. 206 Phil Cox Notes “Compiled from Gilroy City Council Minutes.( Gilroy, CA: City of Gilroy City Clerk’s Office, no date). 207 Cox. N.D. 208 Woollacott et al. 1991. P. 11. 209 USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2018. “The Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake.” https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/events/1906calif/18april/. Accessed November 28, 2018. 210 USGS. 2018. 211 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” April 21, 1906. Gilroy Historical Museum. 212 Woollacott et al. 1991: 17 213 Woollacott et al. 1991: 19-20. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 59 July 2020 Figure 23. The newly completed City Hall Building in 1907, prior to the installation of the clock faces in the tower (California Room, San José Public Library) The funds for the four-dialed Seth Thomas Tower Clock were donated to the City in 1913 by a wealthy benefactor who requested to remain anonymous. However, by the time H.J. Musgrave of San Francisco was finished with the installation, it was common knowledge that Mrs. Caroline Hoxett was the generous donor. Caroline Hoxett, the wealthy widow of Thomas Hoxett, was very involved in her community and donated large sums and land towards civic-minded projects during her lifetime. The formal presentation of the new clock tower by Mrs. Hoxett took place on March 2nd, 1914.214 The Gilroy Free Library Following the declined request by a committee of women associated with the Promotion Society to use the former City Hall site on Fifth Street as a site for a new public library, nearly one quarter of the eligible voters in Gilroy signed a petition in favor of a committee who could oversee the establishment of a public library in Gilroy.215 The Library Board was established by public ordinance in January 1906 and they immediately set about trying to secure a Carnegie Library Grant to erect a library building. Andrew Carnegie, an American-Scottish entrepreneur and philanthropist, offered the City of Gilroy a $10,000 grant in March of 1906 for the construction of a public library, if the City would agree to provide a site for the building and set aside $1000 per year for its continued operation.216 Additionally, the conditions of the grant stated that a temporary library space be established until the new building could be completed, so a library room was opened in the New City Hall for use as the interim public library in December of 1907.217 214 Connie Rogers. “Local Women in History: Caroline Amelia Brooks Osborne Hoxett.” (Gilroy, CA:Gilroy Patch, 2012) https://patch.com/california/gilroy/local-women-in-history-caroline-amelia-brooks-osborne-hoxett. Accessed December 18, 2018; Woollacott et al. 1991: 25. 215 Woollacott et al. 1991; White, Armand. N.D. “Timeline”. Gilroy Historical Museum. 216 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” March 17, 1906. Gilroy Historical Museum. 217 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” December 14, 1907. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 60 July 2020 The Doolittle property on the corner of Fifth Street and Church was purchased by Caroline Hoxett and donated to the Library Board as the site for the future Gilroy Free Library in June of 1909 (Figure 24).218 William Henry Weeks, the prominent Canadian-born architect responsible for designing a large number of schools, libraries, post offices and private residences throughout the Bay Area, Santa Cruz, Watsonville, and Salinas was chosen to design the building. Weeks designed as many as 23 buildings in Gilroy between 1894 and 1909,219 including both private residences for prominent community members such as George Dunlap (1900), as well as institutional buildings such as Rucker School (1894) and the Masonic Temple on Monterey Road (1902).220 Weeks designed the Gilroy Free Library in the Neoclassical Style and it featuring a traditional, full-height pediment entry porch atop grouped, Tuscan columns. Plans for the new library were approved by the Carnegie Foundation in October and the project was completed in July of 1910.221 Overall, the New City Hall and the Carnegie Library development projects triggered an escalation in the number of construction projects throughout Gilroy, both in the public and the private sectors. This sudden increase reflects the concern for forward progres, and extended to all sectors of the city. Figure 24. The Gilroy Free Library, c.1920, photo by Frasher Foto. (Pomona Public Library Online Archives) 218 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” June 12, 1909. Gilroy Historical Museum. 219 National Register Nomination for Wheeler Hospital. 1990. Gilroy Historical Museum. 220 Gilroy Historical Museum N.D. 221 Various Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” October 2, 1909. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 61 July 2020 Schools As the population of Gilroy grew, so too did the number of school-aged children who required an education. Although several schools had already been established within the City, the need for a separate facility to house secondary education was answered during the 1910s. Funding for Gilroy High School was secured through bonds, and the simplified Beaux Arts-style facility was subsequently designed by W. H. Weeks and constructed on I.O.O.F. Avenue in 1913 (Figure 25).222 Figure 25. Postcard depicting Gilroy High School. Date Unknown. (California Room, San José Public Library) 222 Gilroy Historical Museum. “Schools” Subject files. No date. Held at Gilroy Historical Museum; Gilroy High School, c.1915. Photograph. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 62 July 2020 Two additional schools were established during the 1920s to account for a sharp rise in population between 1920 and 1930. A new elementary School, named Jordan School after the President of Stanford University, David Starr Jordan, was built in 1923 on a site located at Third Street between Hanna and Carmel Streets.223 Eliot Elementary School, named after the Harvard University President, Charles Eliot, was designed by prominent San José architects, Ralph Wyckoff and Hugh White as a school for 7th and 8th graders, and was completed in 1927 on Old Gilroy Street (Figure 26).224 Figure 26. Wyckoff & White’s 1927 rendering of the 7th and 8th Grade Elementary School. (History San José) Firemen In 1915 and 1916, the City invested heavily to support and unify the two brigades of volunteer firemen, the Eureka Hook and Ladder Co. and the Vigilant Engine Co., to protect the City from the devastating effects of fires. Following the installation of a new fire alarm system at a cost of $1,940 in 1915225, the City purchased the first motor-driven vehicle for use by the city fire department in March 1916. The American La France was described by the Gilroy Advocate as a “Chemical Auto Engine”226 and the person who earned the honor of being the engineer and first paid member of either fire crew was a young man named Shirley Johnson.227 In June of 1916, the Advocate featured a small article about the new fire house planned for the Old City Hall site on Fifth Street. The two-story brick building was designed by San José Architect William Binder, and William Radtke Sr. served as the contractor in charge of erecting the building which would contain space for the new engine, the new alarm system, a meeting room, and bedrooms.228 The completion of the building in September of 1916 meant that the two crews, who had maintained a competitive relationship since their inception, were finally united under one roof. 223 Gilroy Dispatch. 2006. “Campus Name Game.” April 12, 2006. http://gilroydispatch.com/2006/04/12/campus-name-game/. Accessed December 5, 2018. 224 Gilroy Dispatch. 2006. 225 White. N.D. 226 Gilroy Advocate. “Gilroy’s Latest Addition to Fire Department Equipment.” March 25, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. 227 Woollacott et al. 1991. 228 Gilroy Advocate. 1916. “The New Fire House.” June 10, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 63 July 2020 Gilroy Women’s Civic Club While it was formed in 1912, by 1914 the Gilroy Women’s Civic Club (GWCC) had made considerable headway in the Gilroy enhancement effort. Working as the female auxiliary organization of the Chamber of Commerce, the GWCC was a social society comprised of the elite wives, widows, and daughters of Gilroy’s founding families, wealthy benefactors, and well-off entrepreneurs including Caroline Hoxett and Catherine Schafer-Ryan. During their first few years the GWCC: …accomplished great things especially in beautifying the town. This club has urged the removal of fences, the parking of sidewalks, the removal of [wooden] awnings on Monterey Street, the appointment of a board of forestry for the preservation and planting of shade trees, the passage of an ordinance compelling owners of dogs to keep them off the public street, and has established a cozy rest room for shoppers and visitors to the town on Martin Street.229 In 1927, long time member and benefactor Caroline Hoxett died and left her Italianate home at 338 Fifth St. to the GWCC to use as a headquarters. The club continued to engage in civic promotional activities like campaigning for signs, trees, and speakers or entertainers to visit Gilroy. The GWCC used Hoxett’s former residence until roughly 1973.230 Utilities and Other Civic Improvements Despite a declaration of financial hardships by Mayor Dunlap following the earthquake, installation of new civic infrastructure projects continued uninterrupted as citizens of Gilroy pressed their public representatives towards forward progress in other areas of the City during 1906. A capable man named C.M. Barker from San José was employed to begin work constructing a city sewer system.231 After the completion of the electric plant, the first electric streetlights along Monterey Road were lit on St. Patrick’s Day, 1906. The same year, the Promotion Society advocated for a publicity space within the newly completed City Hall to display agricultural goods produced in Gilroy and the surrounding Santa Clara Valley, in order to “…attract the eyes of visitors.“232 Continued infrastructure projects planned under Mayor A.A. Martin after 1910 reflected an expansion of the community and anticipation of sustained future growth. As part of this growth initiative, engineer A.B. Ward was awarded a contract to erect a pumping plant to supply to City with municipal water in 1910.233 In 1911, concrete sidewalks were installed on major streets throughout Gilroy. Considerable advancements in 1912 and 1913 included the installation of electric transmission lines by Sierra & S.F. Power Co., and a levee constructed near Dowdy Street to control an area subject to seasonal flooding from the Uvas River. In 1913, $25,000 in bonds was secured to pave the interior of the city reservoir. The work on the reservoir was managed by prominent local contractor, William Radtke, whose work ostensibly saved the City 8.5-million gallons of water monthly.234 In 1912, 229 Unknown Author. 1914. “Gilroy Ready for Her Guests.” Article. Gilroy Historical Museum. 230 Gilroy Dispatch. 2005. “If Walls Could Talk.” Web article. March 16, 2005. Accessed March 4, 2020. https://gilroydispatch.com/if-walls-could-talk/ 231 Cox. N.D. 232 Gilroy Gazette. February 2, 1907. As quoted in Woollacott et al. 1991. Pg. 20 233 Cox. N.D. 234 Cox. N.D. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 64 July 2020 a private utility called Coast Counties Gas & Electric Company purchased the Gilroy Gas Works and its plant on Railroad Street.235 The citizens of Gilroy elected James Princevalle as the new mayor in 1920. After serving five City Council terms, the Gilroy native and the esteemed owner of both an ice cream manufacturing plant in town and a prominent grocery store on the corner of Monterey and Fourth streets, hoped to continue on the foundation of forward progress laid out by Mayor Dunlap in 1904. Mayor Princevalle orchestrated and oversaw a number of critical infrastructure improvements during his six consecutive terms in office between 1920 and 1932. In 1923, a bond measure secured the $87,000 necessary to order and install water meters throughout the town to monitor and charge for water usage. In 1926, the City Council passed a resolution to obtain $110,000 for major improvements to the municipal sewer system, including the purchase of 187-acres of land for use as a sewer farm.236 Wheeler Family Contributions to Gilroy There was, however, a limit to the amount of money that Gilroy could allocate for projects within the City. Wealthy benefactors had historically been responsible for donating their own money when it came to medical facilities in Gilroy. Following a move from the initial location at the corner of Fifth Street and Monterey Road in 1920, the Gilroy Private Hospital, founded by Dr. Jonas Clark in 1895, was experiencing substantial financial difficulties. Dr. John Clark, the son of Dr. Jonas Clark, attempted to continue the hospital operations from his residence on Railroad Street, but citing the need for expanded capital to cover the cost of equipment and general operations, the hospital closed its doors in 1924.237 Apart from several physicians also practicing from their homes, Gilroy was without a hospital facility between 1924 and 1929.238 When his wife became gravely ill between 1926 and 1927, Lin Wheeler, owner of the successful Pieters-Wheeler Seed Company, felt the substantial strain of trips as far as San José and San Francisco to receive medical care. With the aid of a steering committee, Wheeler sought to determine the feasibility of establishing a community hospital. Finding the need for such a facility absolutely necessary, Wheeler offered to allocate $25,000 of the substantial profit he had earned through the operation of the seed production company he had purchased in 1910 towards the construction of a 29-bed non-profit public hospital.239 When subscriptions for the remaining necessary funds did not materialize, Wheeler offered to match an additional $15,000, and the total needed for the project was raised shortly thereafter. Plans for the new hospital were drawn up by W. H. Weeks in 1928, and the construction overseen by William Radtke. The two-story, Spanish Colonial Revival Wheeler Hospital was completed in July of 1929 (Figure 27).240 Despite the economic downturn effecting the U.S. during the Great Depression, city-backed development projects persisted throughout the remainder of the 1930s with financial assistance from prominent Gilroy families like the Wheelers. The Gilroy Gymkhana Roundup (Figure 28), a recreational equestrian event started in 1929, had secured regional notoriety by the late 1930s, so Linwood Wheeler donated the grounds he owned to the City in 1938 where 235 Superintendent of State Printing. Decisions of the Railroad Commission of the State of California, Volume 1. Sacrament, CA: State Printing. 1913): 399-402. 236 White. N.D. 237 Vernon C. Gwinn. 1982. “History of Hospitals in Gilroy.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 238 Gwinn. 1982. 239 Pacific Coast Architecture Database (PCAD). 2018. “Wheeler Hospital, Gilroy CA.” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/building/7911/. Accessed December 5, 2018. 240 Gwinn. 1982. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 65 July 2020 the annual event had taken place across the road from the Pieter-Wheeler plant since it began.241 The Wheeler family also donated a majority of the funds to construct a Civic Auditorium for use by Gilroy, which was completed on the corner of Church and Sixth Streets in 1940. The Art Deco-style building was designed by San José Architects William Binder and Ernest N. Curtis and built by George Renz at cost of $51,000. 242 Figure 27. Wheeler Hospital Detail as it appeared in 2011, (NoeHill) 241 Cox. N.D. 242 White. N.D.; Pacific Coast Architecture Database. 2018. “City of Gilroy, Wheeler Municipal Auditorium, Gilroy CA.” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/building/7909/. Accessed December 6, 2018. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 66 July 2020 Figure 28. Excitement at the Gymkhana. Unknown Date. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 67 July 2020 4.5.4 Transportation Infrastructure Highway 101 Growth and development in the transportation sector also impacted the development pattern of Gilroy in the early twentieth century. One such transportation project was the state highway system. Statewide California elections in 1910 approved the 1909 State Highways Act, allocating $18 million dollars towards the acquisition and construction of a state highway system.243 This project prompted Gilroy to evaluate its own transportation infrastructure, and when the first state highway construction began in 1912 on the Highway 1, Pacific Coast route, rumors circulated that the subsequent highway projects would skirt the edge of the Santa Clara Valley instead of passing through it.244 Proud citizens and the City Council elected to pave their main thoroughfare, Monterey Road, so that it might be “…equal in every way to the roadway to be constructed by the State Highway Commission.”245 (Figure 29) Figure 29. Photo Looking Down Monterey Road in 1911 before it was paved. (California State Library) 243 Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2018. “Important Events in Caltrans History.” Accessed December 4, 2018. http://www.dot.ca.gov/paffairs/timeline.html. 244 Caltrans. 2018; Woollacott et al, 1991. 245 Gilroy City Council Minutes. 1912. “Meeting of June 7, 1912.” As quoted in Woollacott, 1991. “Thousands Will Pass Through Our City.” P. 31. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 68 July 2020 Despite the estimate of paving Monterey Road within city limits costing more than the yearly budget to run the entire town (roughly $24,000 annually), the City Council concurred with the public, the Chamber of Commerce (formerly the Promotion Society), and the newly formed GWCC that the returns from having the road pass through Gilroy far outweighed the burden of initial cost for the work.246 With the invention of the affordable Model T automobile by the Ford Motor Company in 1908, motor tourists were at the forefront of an emerging tourism industry that allowed previously rural and isolated regions of the state to become accessible.247 Gilroy wanted to be at the forefront of this movement, so following a bond election in May of 1913, the compulsory funds were secured and a 24-foot wide swatch of paving down Monterey Road was completed the following year (Figure 30).248 Upon the completion of the project, the Highways system was indeed routed through the center of Gilroy and the Gilroy Advocate reported that “our citizens are rejoicing over the completion of the Monterey Road pavement […] It is one of the finest streets in the state, and being on the State Highway, thousands will pass through our city.”249 Picking up from the initial paving of Monterey Road in 1914, Old Gilroy and First Streets were paved within city limits in 1922.250 Figure 30. Photo Looking south Monterey Road c.1920s after paving. (California State Library) 246 Woollacott et al. 1991. 247 Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018. “Model T Automobile.” https://www.britannica.com/technology/Model-T. Accessed December 4, 2018. 248 Woollacott et al. 1991. 249 Gilroy Advocate. May 16, 1914. As quoted in Woollacott. 1991. Pg. 31. 250 Cox. N.D. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 69 July 2020 A New Passenger Depot In 1917, Gilroy City officials convinced the Southern Pacific Railroad Company to replace the original depot station with a new facility. The two-story, redwood framed “Mission Style”251 depot was designed by SPRR architects, constructed by SPRR contractors, and completed in April of 1918 at a cost of around $13,000 [Figure 31].252 It featured a red tile roof, a cement plaster (stucco) exterior, and “…an electric sign with the letters “Gilroy””253 The interior spaces included fine oak woodwork, separate men’s and women’s rest rooms finished in marble, a baggage room, and a ticket office. In December 1918, the Gilroy Advocate remarked that the original depot station was currently under demolition, following the completion of the new passenger station. “The S.P. Co. is removing the old passenger depot just north of the present handsome depot. This depot is an old landmark, having been used for half a century.254” Figure 31. The New SPRR Gilroy Station, circa 1920. (Gilroy Historical Museum) Pacheco Pass As the automobile became more affordable and accessible, so too did the dirt highways which connected Gilroy to other areas of California. The first automobiles rambled across the Pacheco Pass in the 1920s, which at this time connected Gilroy to Califa (near present-day Chowchilla) and was known as State Route 32.255 Increasing traffic volumes over the pass encouraged Santa Clara and Merced Counties to purchase the route in 1923. Work to upgrade the roadway into the section of Highway 152, known as the Pacheco Pass today, included widening and paving the roadway. The enhancements to the roadway improved the quality of travel across the pass while 251 Gilroy Advocate. “New Depot Formally Opened.” May 4, 1918. Gilroy Historical Museum. 252 Mark Duncan. The San Francisco Peninsula Railroad Passenger Service – Past, Present and Future. (Askmar Publishing: Menlo Park, California, 2005); Connie Rogers. "Gilroy Southern Pacific Railroad Depot." DRAFT National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination Form. (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Historical Society, 2018). 253 Gilroy Advocate 1918 254 Gilroy Advocate. “Old Depot Being Torn Down.” December 28, 1918. Gilroy Historical Museum. 255 Chuck Myer. “Pacheco Past: A History of the Gateway to Santa Clara Valley.” (Santa Clara, CA: California Pioneers of Santa Clara County, 1992). Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 70 July 2020 decreasing the time it took to travel between Gilroy and locations in the San Joaquin Valley. As vehicles operated at increasing speeds over the pass, it gained a reputation as a dangerous roadway.256 Hecker Pass Henry Hecker relocated to Gilroy from Marion Ohio in 1883, and quickly established himself as a successful member of the Gilroy community. In addition to owning a successful grocery business in Gilroy, Hecker served both as the treasurer of Gilroy between 1892 and 1916 and as the president of the Bank of Gilroy between 1908 and 1916 before leaving these positions to join the Santa Clara Board of Supervisors between 1916 and 1945. During his thirty-year tenure on the Board of Supervisors, Hecker was influential in the completion of a many infrastructure projects in Santa Clara County, including the construction of a road connecting Gilroy to Watsonville. Hecker saved the road funds allotted to him yearly for use on county road projects and in 1928, he made a deal with Santa Cruz County to construct a road between Gilroy and Santa Cruz County. The road would be routed along Mount Madonna Pass, through the Mount Madonna property he negotiated to purchase from the Henry Miller estate in 1927 for use as a County Park.257 The graded, shale-rock roadbed cost approximately $90,000 and opened a vital link between the two counties.258 On May 27, 1928, approximately 6,000 people attended the highway’s dedication ceremony picnic held near the summit of the pass. A plaque was unveiled that day, located at the summit near the Mount Madonna Inn, which read “HECKER PASS: This testimonial dedicated to Henry Hecker whose foresight made possible the completion of the Yosemite to the Sea Highway. May 27, 1928.”259 On Arbor Day 1930, prompted by a Statewide focus on town beautification, the Gilroy Rotary planted a row of 75 Deodar cedar trees along Hecker Pass with the assistance of local school children and helpful citizens, the Elks, the American Legion Auxiliary, the Boy Scouts, and the Camp Fire Girls. Another 65 cedars were added to the row on Arbor Day the following year. This row of “Living Christmas Trees” persists to present day along this stretch of highway and was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2007.260 4.5.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing Immigrant Farmers Italian immigrants were among some the earliest settlers to the Gilroy area, including the Princevalle, Arena, Porcella, Bisceglia, Filice, and Perrelli families. They established successful vineyards and orchards on many properties surrounding Gilroy, producing wine, raisins, apricots, cherries, prunes and walnuts. Italians are credited with introducing the propagation of tomatoes, onions and garlic to the area and they were among the first prominent grocers and canners in the community.261 First-generation Japanese (Issei) families begun settling in the area as early as 1902.262 Along with their American- born children (Nisei), the Nakashiri, Yamane, and Hirasaki families were among the leading growers of seed 256 Michael Morser. “A Historical Reconstruction Study of Highway 152 (Pacheco Pass).” (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Historical Museum, 1989). 257 Chuck Myer. 1993. “Hecker Pass…A Historical Adventure: A History of the Southwestern Gateway to Santa Clara County.” (Santa Clara, CA: 1993) Pioneers of Santa Clara County. Gilroy Historical Museum. 258 CalTrans (California Department of Transportation). “National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Highway 152 Tree Row, Santa Clara County, California.” (Sacramento, CA: Caltrans, 2007) Gilroy Historical Museum. 259 Myer. 1993. p.6. 260 CalTrans. 2007: Sec. 8, p. 1. 261 “Italian Influence Brings a Change to Agriculture.” No Date. Newspaper Article. Gilroy Historical Museum. 262 Gilroy Dispatch. 1970. “Japanese Immigrants were First Big Garlic Growers.” December 21, 1970. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 71 July 2020 varieties for prominent seed companies in the area, such as the Pieter-Wheeler Seed Co. Common varieties of seeds were onion, lettuce and mustard.263 The Japanese also found considerable success in growing row crops like strawberries and garlic. In 1919, Kiyoshi Hirasaki leased 130 acres that would later become the Hirasaki Farms. Initially growing plants for a seed business, Hirasaki switched to other crops, including garlic. Hirasaki, an Issei, had to purchase all land in his Nisei children’s names, as they were American citizens by birth and eligible to own property where he was not.264 By 1941, Kiyoshi Hirasaki was one of California’s largest garlic producers, with 1,500- acres of garlic in cultivation on his Gilroy ranch.265 Live Oak Creamery Gilroy was at the heart of Santa Clara Valley’s prosperous dairy industry during the beginning of the Twentieth Century. When it was constructed in 1908 on Martin Street, the Live Oak Creamery was the first creamery in Gilroy producing high-quality cheese and butter. The simple, one-story masonry false front building along Railroad Street featured an innovative insulated area for the storage of dairy products. 266 Pieters-Wheeler Seed Company Linwood Wheeler purchased the A.J. Pieters Seed Company in 1910, rebranded the company the Pieters-Wheeler Seed Company, and relocated the company to Gilroy the same year. The company produced a wide range of domestic vegetable seeds using both fields owned by the company as well as contracting out production to area farmers, especially Japanese Farmers. The Pieters-Wheeler Seed Company was extremely successful and gained the family a great deal of wealth and notoriety within the Gilroy community. The Wheeler family donated generously to civic projects in Gilroy including the Wheeler Hospital, the Gymkhanna Grounds, and the Wheeler Civic Auditorium.267 Filice & Perrelli Cannery The Bisceglia Cannery was foundedwhen Joseph, Bruno and Alfonso Bisceglia opened a facility on Lewis Street in 1907. Following a fire that destroyed the plant, two young employees, Gennaro Filice and John Perrelli, raised and borrowed the funds needed to buy the defunct plant and reopened it in 1914 under the name Filice & Perrelli. In 1929, the company expanded and opened an F & P Brand plant in Richmond, and when the 1914 plant burned again in 1931, many employees transferred to Richmond to maintain employment and train new employees while the Gilroy facility was rebuilt. The New Gilroy Cannery opened in April of 1933 and continued to employ a work force through the worst years of the Depression between 1937 and 1938. 268 C. B. Gentry Chili Powder Company Although there was little demand yet for dehydrated garlic and onion products, the C. B. Gentry Chili Powder Company found Gilroy as a suitable location to diversify their product line in the late 1930s. Founded in Los Angeles in 1918 by Charles Gentry and his wife, Lydia Clausen, Gentry specialized in processing peppers into ground chili 263 Manabi Hirasaki and Naomi Hirahara. A Taste for Strawberries: The Independent Journey of Nisei Farmer Manabi Hirasaki. (Japanese American National Museum: Los Angeles, California, 2003). 264 Pauline Adema. Garlic Capital of the World. (Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press, 2009): 11-12. 265 Gilroy Dispatch. 1970. 266 Historic American Building Survey. Post-1933. “Live Oak Creamery.” Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/hhh.ca0928.sheet/?sp=1&st=single. Accessed December 11, 2018. 267 Gilroy Dispatch. 1973. “Pieters-Wheeler Seed Plant Sold.” September 7, 1973. Gilroy Historical Museum. 268 Gilroy Cannery Timeline. 2006. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 72 July 2020 and paprika seasonings for sale to food manufactures throughout the United States. After several failed attempts to establish plants in other areas of California, Gentry erected a small dehydration plant in Gilroy in the late 1930s on the Pacheco Pass Highway. Capitalizing on the success of early row crop farmers producing garlic in the area, such as Japanese immigrant Kiyoshi (Jimmy) Hirasaki, Gentry became the preeminent producer of dehydrated garlic products during this period.269 BeGe Manufacturing & Welding Co. A small company called BeGe Manufacturing & Welding Co. was formed in 1932 when farmer Albert Gurries solicited blacksmith James Bussert to create a prototype of a land-leveling scraper and hydraulic pump control unit that could be affixed to the front of a tractor. The two men named their new company by taking the first letter of each of their last names followed by an ‘e’, forming the name BeGe.270 By 1936, the product was a hit, and Gurries and Bussert expanded their operation to a larger building near Leavesley Street and Monterey Road and hired a small team of employees. Despite the economic hardships experienced by people throughout California during the 1930s, farmers continued to invest in the BeGe Manufacturing product. Additionally, their equipment was used in large land leveling projects across the state, including the Bay Meadows racetrack in San Mateo (1934). The success of their product line allowed the company to maintain a workforce throughout the Depression period. 271 4.6 World War II and Post-War Development (1941- 1975) Like so many other cities in California, Gilroy was unable to evade the lasting effects brought by World War II. The entrance of the United States into the war effort following the Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, laid the foundation for permanent shifts in Gilroy’s history: population growth, expansion of City territory, and enlarged manufacturing, food production and processing capabilities. 4.6.1 Residential Development The population of Gilroy grew substantially between 1940 and 1946 from 3,615 persons to 4,388.272 This growth was spurred by a combination of service members returning from the war to establish families, and people who were attracted to the area in search of job opportunities created by the war effort in Gilroy at companies like C.B. Gentry and BeGe Manufacturing. The rapid population growth placed strain on the community burdened with the responsibility to provide housing during a period when construction materials were being allocated towards the war. 273 When no plans were underway for new residential development, the owner of BeGe Manufacturing, Albert Gurries, took the matter of housing his employees into his own hands. Designating a portion of the land he owned north of 269 Clausen Jr., George E. 2007. “History of Gentry and Gilroy Foods.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 270 Barrett, Elizabeth. 2019. “Notes on Be-Ge Manufacturing.” 271 Ginn, Phil. 1947. “About Albert Gurries: From ‘Perfectionist’s’ Dream Cam More Efficient Machine.” San Jose Mercury-News. October 26. 1947. Gilroy Historical Museum; Barrett. 2019 272 Cox, N.D. 273 “Population of the City of Gilroy 1870-1997. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 73 July 2020 First Street between Hanna and Church Streets, Gurries resolved to build his own employee housing in April 1945, beginning with three, four-unit apartment buildings.274 Following the end of World War II, Gurries announced in January 1946 that 50 additional houses would be developed on his land as housing for employees and returning soldiers.275 Presently, remnants of these modest, Minimal Traditional-style Gurries Tract houses still stand on Gurries Drive. Residential development in Gilroy during the post-war period continued in the pattern established by early subdivision developers like Albert Gurries, who sub-developed a property just outside the city-limits and had the property annexed to become part of the City. Like many other cities in California, Gilroy’s population continued to grow in the decade following the close of World War II, and the need for residential development required more space than the remaining undeveloped areas within the City limits could allow. In order to house Gilroy’s many incoming residents, annexation of new territory by the mid-1950s was essential to keep pace with the steadily rising demand for housing. Reports like this from the San José Mercury-News in 1954 were common during this period: “Workmon Homes will commence building 20 more units in September, making a total of 77 new homes in the northwest sector of town.”276 The area of the City of Gilroy grew gradually in this way for the next several decades. By 1960, the population of Gilroy had soared to 7,348 persons, from 4,951 persons recorded in 1950. The influx of people to the City required even more newly annexed areas devoted to residential developments as well as supporting infrastructure like schools, parks, churches and commercial centers. During 1965, the City annexed 750-acres of land, effectively increasing the area of the City by 50 percent during that year alone.277 Many of these annexed regions were sub-developed into modern residential neighborhoods, like Sherwood Park, Eschenberg Park, and Castlewood Park. By 1970, when the population of Gilroy had nearly doubled within the decade to 12,665 persons, there were approximately 3,000 residences housing the people of Gilroy.278 274 Hollister Free Lance. 2006. 275 Hollister Free Lance. 2006. 276 San Jose Mercury-News. 1954. “Gilroy Building for the Future.” (San Jose, CA: San Jose Mercury News, August 15, 1954). Gilroy Historical Museum. 277 San Jose Mercury-News. 1966. 278 Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. “Standard Industrial Survey Report: Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” (Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Chamber of Commerce, March, 1969). Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 74 July 2020 4.6.2 Commercial Development Commercial development continued at a moderate rate in Gilroy during the course of World War II (Figure 32). There were several standard business that changed hands but maintained the same basic function, such as the Gilroy Hardware Company (1928-1939) at 7428 Monterey Road becoming the Chappell Hardware Company in 1940 and Espindola’s Grocery (1926-1940) at 7533 Monterey Road becoming Bettencourt’s Market in 1941, before moving north of Fourth Street in. Little new construction was completed for the purposes of commercial development during this period, as most business that began during the war years were established in existing commercial buildings. There were at least a few entrepreneurs willing to take the chance. Perhaps recognizing the imminent growth of the City, A.W. Brown with the expertise of contractor William Radtke, erected a new Streamline Moderne-Style Real Estate office at 7495 Monterey Road.279 Figure 32. Looking west on Monterey Road, c.1940s-1950s. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum). Advertisements for new businesses visible on the side of building. 279 Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. “Commercial Building Survey.” 1985. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 75 July 2020 In 1949, following the recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council passed an ordinance allowing restricted businesses to operate for the first time on a section of Eigleberry Street between First and Seventh Streets.280 One of the first commercial developments in this new commercial sector was the International Order of Odd Fellows Lodge. In 1953, the original I.O.O.F. building constructed in 1869 on Martin Street was demolished to make way for the construction of a new American Trust Co. bank. A replacement I.O.O.F lodge was designed by structural engineer O.B. Christiansen from Santa Clara and built by contractor William Radtke & Son on its present site at Eigleberry Street between Fifth and Sixth Streets for $112,000 in 1954. The two-story, Mid-Century-Modern building was designed with four commercial spaces on the ground level below the lodge hall, and also housed the offices of Coast Counties Gas & Electric Company, a doctor’s office, and offices for Howard Electric Co. (Figure 33).281 Additional commercial development in 1954 included the completion of the American Trust Co. bank on Monterey at Martin Street, and the new modern Arizona Flagstone Post Office building on Third Street. Figure 33. New IOOF Building in 1954, Eigleberry Street, looking west. (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) Commercial Development in the 1960s and 1970s was largely confined to the newly developed areas of the City. These areas required the installation of new facilities like shopping centers to service the outlying residential developments. Commercial development along Monterey Road in the downtown corridor did not see sizeable new projects during this period. Comparative to the World War II period, new commercial ventures were initiated in the storefronts of pre-existing buildings. 280 Gilroy Dispatch. 1949. “Eigleberry Street Rezoning Ordinance Adopted.” January 25, 1949. Gilroy Historical Museum. 281 Gilroy Evening Dispatch. 1954. “First Big Project on Eigleberry: Work to Start on New IOOF Building.” January, 1954. Gilroy Historical Museum; San Jose Mercury News 1954 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 76 July 2020 4.6.3 Civic and Institutional Development Alien Registration During the War Years Prior to the formal declaration of war by the United States on Japan and Germany, the Alien Registration Act (Smith Act), was signed into law in June of 1940.282 The final provision of the act required all resident, non-citizen adults living in the United States to register with the federal government. Registration began in cities throughout the country and by January 1941, nearly 4.7-million resident aliens had been registered.283 Following United States involvement in World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Presidential Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527, which stated that: all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation[s] being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.284 Gilroy began their registration program shortly after the war began, operating out of different locations in town including the Post Office and City Hall.285 The residents being registered were identified, fingerprinted, asked for information pertaining to their birthplace, their family’s ethnic heritage and then they would receive a passport-like booklet bearing all the information in addition to a physical description.286 By this time, Gilroy was home to a wide array of first and second-generation immigrants from Europe and Asia, many of whom were both well-established members of the community and prominent producers of agricultural products. Many Japanese families living in Gilroy destroyed evidence connecting their families to Japan in an effort to disassociate themselves with the fear following the attack on Pearl Harbor. The ensuing registration process had an especially profound effect on these families, as prominent members of the community who had been in Gilroy for decades were among the first arrested by the FBI and those relocated to internment camps. There were also a number of Nisei from Gilroy who were drafted and served throughout the war, and others who volunteered to serve with the all-Japanese 442nd Regiment during their time in one of the many internment camps throughout the country.287 Kiyoshi Hirasaki (Figure 34) was arrested by the FBI in Gilroy in 1941. He was sent to Sharp Point internment camp in Pacifica, California before being sent to Fort Lincoln in Bismarck, North Dakota. He was released in 1942 and was able to rejoin his family in Grand Junction, Colorado. Kiyoshi’s wife and eight children had ‘voluntarily resettled’288 in Grand Junction in 1942, where they waited out the duration of the war. When the war ended, the Hirasaki family returned to Gilroy to find that a kind neighbor had ensured that their home and farm had remained safe during their absence.289 282 Encyclopedia Britannica. 2017. “Smith Act.” https://www.britannica.com/event/Smith-Act. Accessed December 8, 2018. 283 The New York Times. 1941. “Alien Total So Far is Put at 4,741,971.” (New York: New York Times, January 13, 1941.) https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1941/01/13/88097082.html. Accessed December 8, 2018. 284 “Alien Enemies--Japanese.” Proc. No. 2525, Dec. 7, 1941, 6 F.R. 6321, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1700. 285 Woollacott et al. 1991. 49. 286 Woollacott et al. 1991. 49 287 Gilroy Dispatch. 1970. “Japanese Immigrants were First Big Garlic Growers.” December 21, 1970. Gilroy Historical Museum. 288 Prior to Japanese families being interned forcibly, the United States government encouraged them to voluntarily leave the designated coastal military zones following with the passage of the Executive Order 9066 in February 1942. 289 Densho Encyclopedia. 2015. “Kiyoshi Hirasaki.” Accessed March 31, 2019. http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Kiyoshi_Hirasaki/ CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 77 July 2020 Figure 34. Kiyoshi Hirasaki and part of his family outside their family home in Gilroy in 1945. The Japanese- style building was originally part of an exhibition at the 1939 World’s Fair in San Francisco and was bought and relocated to Gilroy by Kiyoshi. (War Relocation Authority Photograph Collection, University of California Berkeley) Civilian Defense Organization City Hall also became the headquarters of the civilian defense organization in Gilroy during World War II, and was the site of at least one event on November 19, 1942 inspiring support for the war. The rally was organized as part of a tour of a captured Japanese Submarine called the ‘Tojo Cigar,’ which was displayed at sites along a nationwide tour intended to promote the war effort and encourage Americans to purchase war bonds.290 Standard Building, Electrical and Plumbing Codes Although the City established a Planning Commission by ordinance in 1936, several more years passed before a Uniform Building Code and Standard Electrical and Plumbing codes were adopted in 1941.291 Noticing a distinguished rise in the number of building permits issued between 1940 and 1952, the City took steps to control and curb unbridled development through the adoption of additional ordinances, such as the 1945 ordinance forbidding shacks and unsightly structures.292 These types of ordinances were implemented in an effort to standardize the quality and safety of buildings in Gilroy. Additionally, zoning ordinances were passed to help 290 Woollacott et al. 1991. 291 Cox. N.D. 292 San Jose Mercury-News. 1954. “Gilroy Building for Future.” August 15, 1954. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 78 July 2020 maintain the character of certain neighborhoods and protect the residential areas from becoming dotted with commercial use. Schools The original Gilroy High School building was condemned and demolished in 1956 after the construction of new high school buildings to the east on the same property. Owing to the extensive expansion of the city limits in the 1960s, by 1972, the Community Economic Profile released by the Gilroy Chamber of Commerce boasted six elementary schools, one junior high, one high school, and one junior college serving the Gilroy community.293 A New City Charter The gradual expansion of the City’s territory through annexation during the 1950s shed light on some aspects of Gilroy’s government structure, which had not been updated since the original city charter was adopted in 1870. In 1949, the San José Mercury-News reported that Gilroy’s City Charter was “…believed to be the only early-day charter still in effect in California.”294 A new City Charter was adopted in 1960, which included key updates such as lengthening the two-year term for the office of Mayor to four years and the elected position of City Marshal would be replaced by an appointed Chief of Police.295 New Civic Center In 1963, all City offices except the Police Department were relocated from City Hall to in the west side of the Wheeler Auditorium. A new Justice Court building was also completed during 1963 on Rosanna Street near to the Wheeler Auditorium, creating the foundation of the Gilroy Civic Center complex presently. In 1965, following the completion of a new police administration building on the corner of Hanna and Seventh Streets on the edge of the Civic Center, the Gilroy Police Department vacated their office in the Old City Hall. Newly vacant, the fate of Old City Hall was unknown until the Gilroy Historical Society formed in 1965 and worked to nominate the Old City Hall Building for placement on the National Register of Historic Places by 1975.296 In 1975, the City Public Library was moved from the Carnegie Library building into a new facility on the corner of Sixth and Rosanna Streets beside the Civic Center Complex; however, this building was demolished to make way for the most recent library building, completed in 2013. In 1976, the Carnegie Library Building was dedicated as the Gilroy Historical Museum to house the ever-growing collection of Gilroy-related historical materials initially compiled by City Historian, Armand White.297 New Gilroy-Morgan Hill Sewer Line and Future Treatment Plant In 1965, anticipating the eventual need to expand sewer and water treatment infrastructure to keep pace with population growth, Gilroy agreed to a $370,000 deal that would connect Morgan Hill’s sewer line to their own. The 293 Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. 1972. “Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California: Community Economic Profile.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 294 San Jose Mercury-News. 1949. “City of Gilroy 79 years Old: 1870 Charter Still in Effect.” March 13, 1949. Gilroy Historical Museum. 295 “Through the Decades 1950 – 1960.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 296 “Through the Decades: 1960s.” 297 White, Armand. No Date. “Timeline”. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 79 July 2020 sewer line was completed in 1969 with future plans to build a joint treatment plant south of Gilroy. 298 Planning on the new sewage treatment plant was underway by 1971.299 Street Improvements and Numbering System Municipal infrastructure improvements during 1955 included the installation of a center divider and new street lamps to replace the 1906 cast iron lamps on Monterey Road. In 1966, a joint effort between Gilroy and Morgan Hill resulted in the adoption of a system standardizing house and street numbering in the south of the county, starting from the Santa Clara-San Benito county line and moving north. This effectively replaced the previous numbering system which was based on labeling streets north of Sixth Street ‘North” and those south of Sixth Street ‘South’ in the downtown area. The new numbering system simplified this by eliminating the north south labels in favor of a sequential numbering system and would take place over “the next two years.” 300 New Hospital In 1962, a new hospital facility was completed for the people of Gilroy in 1962. The new facility was constructed behind the original Wheeler hospital facing south to Sixth Street, and was capable of accommodating 50 patients, 21 more patients than the original 29-bed Wheeler hospital facility could serve.301 Gavilan College The Gavilan College District was approved for the eventual move of the community college from the City of Hollister to a new site southwest of Gilroy in 1963. The new, 2,700 square mile Community College district placed the college astride both Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, offering students from both counties an opportunity to attend. A local bond in 1966 appropriated the fund necessary to build the new campus and the new campus opened in 1968.302 Christmas Hill Park Improvements to the 28-acre Christmas Hill Park also in the southwest of Gilroy started in 1965, and the park opened during the summer of 1966.303 The unusual name for the park stems from the Toyon Trees, or California Holly, that once grew on the slope above the park. These trees bear bright red berries in the late fall and early winter that Gilroyans harvested for use as festive Christmas décor. Eventually the Toyon trees were gone, but the namesake of the place remained.304 Chesbro and Uvas Dams While not located within city limits, the Chesbro Dam and the Uvas Dam located northwest of Gilroy, were completed respectively in 1956 and 1957.305 Chesbro Dam was named for Dr. Elmer Chesbro, who was a doctor and civic 298 San Jose Mercury-News. 1966. 299 San Jose Mercury News. 1984. “Cover-up Led to Resignations...” January 4, 1984. San Jose Public Library. 300 San Jose Mercury-News. 1966. 301 “Through the Decades: 1960s.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 302 Gavilan College. 2018. “History of Gavilan College.” http://www.gavilan.edu/about/history.php. Accessed December 20, 2018. 303 San Jose Mercury-News. 1966. “Gilroy’s Top Problems Attacked During 1965.” January 30, 1966. San Jose Public Library. 304 Gilroy Dispatch. 2006. “The Story Behind Christmas Hill Park.” http://gilroydispatch.com/2006/01/23/the-story-behind- christmas-hill-park/. Accessed December 20, 2018. 305 Cox n.d. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 80 July 2020 leader in Gilroy. He was serving as the President of the South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District at the time the dam and reservoir bearing his name were planned and constructed.306 4.6.4 Transportation Infrastructure The increased number of people living and working in Gilroy resulted in increased traffic through town. As early as 1965, Gilroy, in conjunction with Morgan Hill, appealed to the State Highway Commission to route Highway 101 around the City instead of along Monterey Road in order to alleviate traffic congestion. By the time the Highway 101 bypass was complete in 1973, the population of Gilroy was recorded at over 12,600 persons.307 During this time, the railroad depot fell into decline, and in April 1971, the final service to the station ran until 1992. The station was rehabilitated and service restored in 1998.308 4.6.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing The War Effort The notion that “Where Our Men are Fighting, Our Food is Fighting” was at the heart of several important food production and manufacturing expansions during the World War II period.309 American Troops abroad required huge and regular quantities of food, and so a primary mission in the war effort focused on the production, processing and home front rationing of food on a national scale. The U.S. Department of Agriculture promoted the cultivation of private gardens, called Victory Gardens, to help bolster family supplies during heightened periods of rationing. Gilroy’s prominent agricultural history helped to support the war effort in a few unique ways. The Bracero Program As the Japanese community in Gilroy either voluntarily moved away or was forcibly sent to internment camps beginning in the 1941, the large-scale production farms surrounding Gilroy experienced an acute shortage of labor to assist in the harvest, processing, and shipping of their products.310 The labor shortage was not unique to the Gilroy area, but rather was a problem across the agricultural regions of the Unites States, which was being further exacerbated by the increased demands of food for the war effort. On August 4, 1942, the United States signed a bilateral agreement with Mexico arranging the use of migratory farm labor from Mexico which was known as the Mexican Farm Labor Program Agreement.311 The program was managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and it allowed Mexican citizens to enter the United States and work on a farm for a pre-determined period of time before returning to Mexico. The program attracted men who could not find employment during the Mexican economic downturn, as well as young Mexican men who were educated and saw the program as an opportunity to experience a new life in the United States. Either way, the participants in the program were often subjected to meager pay for difficult work and poor living conditions, which were only guaranteed on a contractual, seasonal basis. The program 306 Santa Clara County Parks. 2019. “Chesbro Reservoir County Park.” https://www.sccgov.org/sites/parks/parkfinder/Pages/ChesbroReservoir.aspx . Accessed March 14, 2019. 307 “Population of the City of Gilroy 1870-1997”. Gilroy Historical Museum. 308 Rogers 2018 309 Poster. “Where our men are fighting, our food is fighting.”1943. Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2004678605/. Accessed December 8, 2018. 310 CIRCA 2006. 311 Texas State Historical Association. 2010. "BRACERO PROGRAM," Handbook of Texas Online, Fred L. Koestler. Accessed March 31, 2019, http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/omb01. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 81 July 2020 quickly earned the name Bracero, Spanish for ‘arm-man’ or manual laborer.312 Though it began as short-term relief from labor shortages during World War II, the program ended up lasting until the 1960s with approximately 1 million people filling 4.6 million work contracts.313 The Bracero Program established a pattern of Mexican migration to the Santa Clara Valley between 1942 and 1964 that is the historical basis for the vibrant Latino and Mexican American population in Gilroy today. C.B. Gentry Company Having established a small plant to dehydrate onion and garlic in Gilroy during the 1930s, the C. B. Gentry Company was conscripted to begin providing dehydrated food products for the armed forces during World War II (Figure 35). The initial limited facility was not sufficient for the scale of production required, so a new facility was constructed on the present site of Gilroy Foods, using funds provided by the federal government.314 Hundreds of people from the Gilroy community labored at the new facility, which functioned 24-hours a day producing dehydrated varieties of locally grown food for the troops, eventually earning the Company an Army Navy Production Award for their assistance in the war effort.315 Figure 35. The Gentry Plant in 1962. (Gilroy Dispatch) 312 Ibid. 313 Bracero History Archive. 2019. “About” Webpage. Accessed March 26, 2019 http://braceroarchive.org/about 314George E Clausen Jr. 2007. “History of Gentry and Gilroy Foods.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 315 Clausen Jr. 2007. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 82 July 2020 Gilroy Foods, Inc. Gilroy Foods incorporated in 1958 as a processing plant specializing in dehydrated garlic. Construction on the first generation 20,000-ft plant began in the same year.316 The new company completed its first production cycle in October 1959, at which time employees sorted locally sourced garlic bulbs by hand. The company became a subsidiary of the famous spice brand, McCormick & Company, in 1961, causing production demands to spike. Between 1985 and 1988, McCormick purchased Gentry Foods (the brand was formally absorbed by Gilroy Foods, Inc.).317 Between the two Gilroy plants, Gilroy Foods, Inc. maintained a successful handle on the garlic market in the United States, and was processing and/or packing approximately 90 percent of the world’s garlic for the wholesale and mainstream consumer markets by the end of the 1980s.318 Gilroy Foods, Inc. was historically the largest employer in the Gilroy area, and still maintains a huge share of local employment presently. BeGe Manufacturing The BeGe Manufacturing Company was founded in the early-1930s to produce agricultural machinery products, but when the U.S. involvement in World War II began, their product line expanded to include the production of steel- plate ship sections, armored amphibious tank sections, and the 76 MM Tank gun (Figures 36, 37).319 The Gilroy Dispatch noted, “additional precision machinery makes BeGe one of the finest machine shops in state…”320 The considerable enlargement of the company necessitated a substantial workforce, and during peak war-time production the plant supported a workforce of 175 men and women.321 In 1944, BeGe announced further plans to expand the facility and workforce, just as soon as housing became available to accommodate them.322 316 ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2009. “Garlic: the root of it all.” Gilroy Foods and Flavors. 317 Warren Brown. “Ah, The Sweet Smell of Success.” The Washington Post. (June 13, 1988). Accessed March 26, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1988/06/13/ah-the-sweet-smell-of-success/943da8cf-5ca9-432a-bb4b- a6c5cc0d4b12/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3aa851095843 318 The San Francisco Chronicle. 1986. “Gilroy is Going in for More Than Garlic These Days.” July 24, 1986. Gilroy Historical Museum. 319 Elizabeth Barratt. “BeGe-Manufacturing Co. Notes.” No Date. Gilroy Historical Museum; Madera Daily News-Tribune. 1953. “Oliver Corporation Buys BeGe Manufacturing Co.” November 17, 1953. P. 5. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi- bin/cdnc?a=d&d=MT19531117&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------1. Accessed December 7, 2018. 320 Gilroy Dispatch. 1944. December 5, 1944. As quoted in Barratt. No Date. Gilroy Historical Museum. 321 Hollister Free Lance. 2006. “BeGe Manufacturing Co. Played Major WWII Role.” November 24, 2006. https://sanbenito.com/2006/11/24/yesterday-today/. Accessed December 9, 2018. 322 Hollister Free Lance. 2006. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 83 July 2020 Figure 36. Men Shaping Sheet Metal, BeGe Manufacturing, c.1940s, (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) Figure 37. BeGe Manufacturing, c.1940s, (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 84 July 2020 Christopher Ranch Following in the footsteps of their Danish immigrant Father, Ole Christopher, who was a famous producer of prunes in the Santa Clara Valley region, Don and Art Christopher set out in 1956 to create a ranch of their own. They purchased some acreage in Gilroy and decided to cultivate a crop that was gaining popularity in the area: garlic. They initially planted French and Italian varieties, and eventually settled on a variety from the Piedmont area in northwest Italy, which would become their signature garlic crop, Monviso.323 Gilroy Invites New Industry By 1954, the farmland surrounding Gilroy was cultivating a wide variety of agricultural products, including prunes, apricots, pears, strawberries, walnuts, lima beans, garlic, sugar beets, tomatoes and cucumbers.324 Yet, despite the success of these goods, the Gilroy Chamber of Commerce sought to attract new industries which might move the community away from the seasonal nature of agricultural based industry, noting that currently “…industrial employment [in Gilroy] now draws 4,000 workers for a three months’ period, requiring only about 200 the rest of the year.”325 Realizing the geographical advantages of their location, the City identified 250-acres of available land to the southeast of town near to the rail line and the highway available for industrial development because “Gilroyans owe their daily bread largely to farm operations, but industry accounts for an enormous share of the local pay roll.”326 In 1961, a Standard Industrial Survey Summary of Gilroy found that Gilroy’s six largest manufacturing plants included BeGe Manufacturing Co. (300 employees), Gentry (60 to 400 seasonal employees), Filice & Perrelli Canning Co. (80 to 800 seasonal employees), National Fiberglass Corporation (25 employees), Air-O-Fan Corporation (12 employees), and Sandoe Hanna Welding Co. (10 employees). By 1972, Gilroy boasted 37 manufacturing plants in the area. Food processing still accounted for the largest employer in the area with California Canners & Growers, Gentry’s Inc., and Gilroy Foods employing around 1,850 people. The production of modular buildings by Dukor Industries employed 175 people, while paper products produced at companies like Crown Zellerbach Co. and Pacific Central Co. employed another 130.327 323 Christopher Ranch. 2018. “About Us.” https://www.christopherranch.com/the-ranch/. Accessed December 20, 2018. 324 San Jose Mercury-News. 1954. 325 San Jose Mercury-News. 1954. 326 San Jose Mercury-News. 1954. 327 Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. 1972. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 85 July 2020 4.7 Modern Gilroy (1975-Present) The continued development of Gilroy during the modern period can be largely defined by the City’s close proximity to the rapid expansion of Silicon Valley’s tech industry, efforts by engaged community members to safeguard the agricultural and architectural heritage of the community in the face of becoming a bedroom district to the tech industry in San José, and the rebranding of the City as the Garlic Capital of the World. 4.7.1 Residential Development Residential development continued through the close of the 1970s, as the overwhelming expansion of San José drifted into the Southern area of the county. The population of Gilroy had grown from 12,684 in 1970 to 21,550 in 1980.328 In the early 1980s, the South Santa Clara Valley was named “…one of the five new San Josés in the Bay Area.”329 Realizing that their proximity to the booming tech industry meant unavoidable future growth, the relatively small communities in the Valley like Gilroy and nearby Morgan Hill quickly felt the pressure to plan for future expansion of their infrastructure. The development potential of Gilroy was at its core, predicated on the capacity of its sewer system. A new joint sewer treatment plant servicing Gilroy and Morgan Hill was planned for a site off Luchessa Lane, two miles south of Gilroy, as early as 1971.330 The new plant cost approximately $4 million dollars to complete and replaced the older treatment plant, which had been functioning since 1927. The new plant began operation in 1981 and was capable of processing 6.1 million gallons of wastewater per day. However, capacity issues with operation began after completion. In response, Gilroy’s City Council passed a measure limiting residential development to 375 units per year.331 Unfortunately, the selected site of the treatment plant was subject to frequent flooding, making the isolation of the various percolation treatment ponds very difficult.332 Two years into its operation, the plant was imperiled, showing signs of overuse and was at almost constant risk of flooding.333 As a result of environmental issues stemming from the overuse of the plant and mistreatment of sewage, the State of California imposed a sewer hookup moratorium for the City of Gilroy, which effectively halted the pace of growth in the city to a crawl during a period of rapid expansion in other parts of Santa Clara County in the 1980s.”334 Despite the difficulties wrought by the sewer treatment plant and the resulting sewer hook-up ban, the population of Gilroy continued to gradually expand throughout the 1980s. While there was a marked deceleration in the rate of growth when compared previous decades, the City was still attracting new residents to the suburban residential developments that creeped towards the hills west and south of the City. In 1986, the area constituting Gilroy encompassed 6,270-acres, and by 1997, the city limits held 9,366-acres of land and a population of 35,267 people. 335 As the tech industries in San José and Silicon Valley continued to grow through the 1990s and early 328 “Population of the City of Gilroy 1870-1997.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 329 People for Open Space as quoted in San Jose Mercury-News. 1984. “Cover-up Led to Resignations…” January 4, 1984a. San Jose Public Library 330 San Jose Mercury-News. 1984a. 331 San Jose Mercury News. 1984b. Sweepstakes for Builders.” January 5, 1984. San Jose Public Library. 332 San Jose Mercury-News. No Date. “New Plant Never Really Did its Job.” San Jose Public Library. 333 San Jose Mercury-News. 1984a. 334 Gilroy Councilmember Sharon Albert. 1984. As quote in the San Jose Mercury-News. 1984a. 335 “Area of the City of Gilroy.” No Date. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 86 July 2020 2000s, the reputation of Gilroy as a bedroom community grew alongside it. As of 2010, the population of Gilroy reached 48,821 persons, a massive increase from the nominal 3,000-person count recorded in 1870 at the time Gilroy became a City.336 4.7.2 Commercial Development Gilroy Premium Outlets As the City of Gilroy grew, so too did the commercial needs of the City. The largest contribution to commercial change for the city came in 1990 with the construction of the sixty store Pacific West Outlet Center on Leavesley Road (Figure 38). The shopping complex would continue to expand, eventually reaching its current size of 575,000 square feet of built area containing over 145 outlet stores. Today the complex is called the Gilroy Premium Outlets.337 Figure 38. Recently completed outlet mall, 1990 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) Gilroy Gardens In 2001, another important commercial venture in Gilroy opened to the public following over two decades of planning and development. Gilroy Gardens is the product of Michael Bonfante’s, the owner of Nob Hill Foods, love of nature. The natural world offered Bonfante an escape from the hectic realities of day to day life, and by the mid- 1970s he was innovating ways to share his passion for trees with others. Bonafante Gardens opened in 2001 as a horticultural theme park, which aimed to educate children and their families about the importance of horticulture 336 “Population of the City of Gilroy 1870-1997.” 337 San Jose Mercury News. 2005. “Gilroy Timeline.” November 12, 2005. https://www.mercurynews.com/2007/02/05/gilroy- timeline/. Accessed December 21, 2018; Gilroy Premium Outlets. 2018. “About Gilroy Premium Outlets.” https://www.premiumoutlets.com/outlet/gilroy/about. Accessed December 21, 2018. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 87 July 2020 in a fun and memorable environment.338 The City of Gilroy purchased the park and the 536 acres it sits on in 2006 and changed the name to Gilroy Gardens in 2007 to foster a more clear connection between the park and its location.339 4.7.3 Civic and Institutional Development Gilroy Garlic Festival In the summer of 1978, three local Gilroyans hosted a modest luncheon event that featured garlic as the star attraction. The luncheon was a raving success and so the idea conceived by Dr. Rudy Melone, Val Filice and Don Christopher of Christopher Ranch, expanded with the support of City officials to become the first official Gilroy Garlic Festival. The event was held at the Bloomfield Ranch on August 4-5, 1979, and all proceeds would be returned to the Gilroy Community. Over 15,000 people attended in the first year alone and the festival raised over $19,000 dollars through the sale of tickets, garlic themed dishes, and beer. The following year, the festival moved to its permanent home at Christmas Hill Park.340 The Gilroy Garlic Festival celebrated its 40th year in 2018 and raised more than $11 million dollars for use by Gilroy schools and local non-profit organizations to date. The Garlic Festival continues to be a huge success and draws garlic-loving crowds from all over the world.341 Sadly, on July 28, 2019, the annual Gilroy Garlic Festival became the site of a mass-shooting that killed three people and wounded at least 13 others.342 . After the shooting, a local movement, known as Gilroy Strong (#gilroystrong), grew to support the grieving community. In January 2020, the Gilroy Strong Resiliency Center at The Neon Exchange, 7365 Monterey Road, was celebrated with a grand opening. The center will offer counseling, trauma education and compensation for victims of the mass shooting343. Mexican-American Murals Following the Mexican Revolution in 1910, murals served an important role in Mexico helping to educate citizens, who were sometimes illiterate, about the possibilities of a national consciousness and the opportunities of new civic leadership in Mexico. The content and subjects of Mexican murals differed from American and Western-style murals, which traditionally featured views of the ruling class. The Mexican mural frequently featured the laboring and peasant classes, often in the process of overcoming the ruling classes. This visual language saw a resurgence during the American civil rights movements of the late 1960s when it was used as a way for Mexican-Americans to assert the importance of their individual cultural heritage in the face of a mainstream American culture that touted the value of homogeneity.344 Three important mural projects by self-identified Chicano muralists date from the late 1970s in Gilroy and maintain connections to this social identity and heritage movement of this period. The Ball Players (Tlachit) was painted in 1978 in present-day San Ysidro Park by the Tortuga Partrol, which was a student- 338 Gilroy Gardens. 2018. “About Us.” https://www.gilroygardens.org/explore/about-us. Accessed December 21, 2018. 339 Gilroy Gardens. No Date. “Michael Kiosk Booklet.” Gilroy Historical Museum. 340 Gilroy Garlic Festival. 2018. “History.” https://gilroygarlicfestival.com/about/history/. Accessed December 21, 2018; Adema 2009: 25-26 341 Gilroy Garlic Festival. 2018. 342 Evan Sernoffsky. 2019. “Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting: Killer had more guns, survival gear and a clown mask.” (San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Chronicle, Aug 8, 2019). https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/Gilroy-Garlic-Festival-shooting-Killer-had- more-14291480.php 343 Bay City News. 2020. “Gilroy Strong Resiliency Center to Open Tuesday with Ceremony.” Source: https://patch.com/california/gilroy/gilroy-strong-resiliency-center-open-tuesday-ceremony 344 Cockcroft, Eva Sperling and Holly Barnet-Sanchez. 1990a. “Signs from the Heart: California Chicano Murals.” In Humanities Network. Fall 1990: Vol. 12/Num. 4,: pg. 2. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 88 July 2020 group from Watsonville led by artists Ray Romo and Ralph D’Oliveira. Also in 1978, the Tecolote Corps painted a large outdoor mural on a building at South Valley Middle School on IOOF Avenue.345 Another large mural by an unknown Mexican-American muralist during the same period depicts a 30-foot tall circular Aztec Calendar on the rear of a building located on Hornlein Court. A fundraiser to revitalize this mural is presently underway with funds being raised to hire veteran Chicano muralist, Guillermo Aranda, to oversee the restoration.346 4.7.4 Transportation Infrastructure Gilroy Depot The Gilroy Depot, which had its last train service in 1971, gained new life as a multi-modal transportation station for local and intra-city bus service in 1986, and train service was restored in 1992. In 1998, the depot building was reopened after a years-long rehabilitation project. The rehabilitation of the depot involved significant improvements including interior rehabilitation, remodeling of the southeast wing into a snack bar, remodeling of the northwest wing into an open-air covered waiting area, and seismic retrofit.347 Caltrain Service In 1992, Caltrain extended a twice-daily commuter train service line from Dridon Station in San José to Gilroy. The frequency of Caltrain service has expanded and thinned at various points during the years, but currently offers three AM and three PM trains a day Monday through Friday with special weekend services offered during the Gilroy Garlic Festival.348 California High-Speed Rail After California voters passed Proposition 1A in 2008, California began preparation on a Statewide-High-Speed Rail system that would eventually create a route between San Francisco and Los Angeles. As the approved route for the project will pass through Gilroy, Gilroy entered into an agreement with the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) in 2015 to create a Station Area Plan (Plan) within the downtown community area of Gilroy utilizing grant monies received from High-Speed Rail (HSR). While the Station Area Plan focused on the development of a downtown station, the Plan was intended to serve as a guide for future community development in the private and public sectors for the next 25 years. Following the study of various land use and circulation plans for the City concerning the implementation of such a large project, four viable routes were identified for the path of the project into Gilroy. Following the negative concurrent findings between City officials and CHSRA concerning the Highway 101 option in 2017, the City of Gilroy moved to place the Station Area Plan on hold and wait to choose the final alignment path from the remaining choices until the completion of CHSRA Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) for the San José to Merced segment of the HSR project.349 345 Cockcroft, Eva Sperling and Holly Barnet-Sanchez. 1990b. Signs from the Heart: California Chicano Murals. University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque, NM. 346 GofundMe. 2018. “Aztec Calendar Restoration Project.” Accessed March 31, 2019. https://www.gofundme.com/aztec-calendar- restoration-project 347 Rogers 2018 348 Caltrain.2018.”Gilroy Station.” http://www.caltrain.com/stations/gilroystation.html. Accessed December 21, 2018. 349 California High-Speed Rail Authority. 2018. “Gilroy Station.” https://www.hsr.ca.gov/programs/station_communities/gilroy_station.html. Accessed December 21, 2018. ; City of Gilroy. 2018. “Your Voice: Gilroy High Speed Rail Alignment.” https://yourvoice.cityofgilroy.org/high-speed-rail-alignment. Accessed January 4, 2019. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 89 July 2020 In 2018, CHSRA released a Draft Business Plan, which outlined an agreement with Caltrain to expand electrification of tracks south of San José to Gilroy as part of the HSR project. Caltrain will receive needed funds to improve infrastructure and ridership, while the HSR project will be able to avoid contentious community scenarios in congested areas by utilizing existing Caltrain infrastructure.350 4.7.5 Agriculture, Industry and Manufacturing In many ways, the present Gilroy agricultural, manufacturing, and general industry reflects patterns, which were established early in the City’s development. Agriculture and agricultural product processing continues to maintain a huge share of the employment market in Gilroy, followed closely by manufacturing and industrial ventures (Figure 39). However, as the City becomes more desirable as a commuter suburb to Silicon Valley, the balance within the community is tipping as former agricultural lands are converted into land for housing. Figure 39. Employees process garlic for Christopher Ranch Farms, c. 1980 (Photograph Collection, Gilroy Historical Museum) 350 California High-Speed Rail Authority. 2018. Draft 2018 Business Plan. Accessed March 31, 2019. http://www.hsr.ca.gov/docs/about/business_plans/Draft_2018_Business_Plan.pdf CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 4. Historic Context 90 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 91 July 2020 5 Architectural Styles The following (Tables 2 through 5) presents an overview of all major architectural styles by property type (i.e., residential, commercial, civic and institutional, and industrial properties), as identified during the citywide survey. 5.1 Residential Properties Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Carpenter Gothic (1840-1880s) • Simple rectangular house form • Wood frame construction • Symmetrical façades • Strong vertical design elements • Steeply pitched front facing gables with scroll work barge boards • Carved porch railings • Board and batten, horizontal, or vertical wood siding • Pinnacles as decorative elements • Pointed cathedral style windows and doors 7311 Alexander Street (pre-1937) Italianate (1840-1885) • One to two stories in height • Rectangular massing and form • Roof with gently sloping sides and deeply overhanging eaves • Tall and slim window openings, often rounded at the top • Columned entryways typically single storied in height • Squared tower or cupola centrally placed just above the roofline • Decorative brackets below the roofline • Bay windows 7531 Rosanna Street (pre-1937) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 92 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Folk National (1860-1920) • Modestly sized, 1-2 stories in height • Uses a standard Folk plan and roof plan: gable front; gable front-and-wing; hall and parlor (side gabled, 1 room deep); I-House (side gabled 2 story, 1 room deep, usually with rear addition); pyramidal; or massed plan side gable (more than 1 room deep) • Predominantly wood cladding • Overly simple exterior ornamentation, if at all: can be Greek revival inspired (molded cornice, eave returns); Victorian/Queen Anne (gable pendants, spindlework porch components); or Colonial revival (bilateral symmetry; pediments) especially for Pyramidal forms • Non-integral porches: stoop, portico, partial width, full width, wraparound, or 2-story; will usually be shed or hip roofed • Usually with simple or turned wood posts and wood railing balustrade. • May have wood bracket detailing • Windows are typically 1-over-1, 2-over-2, 4-over-4, 6- over-6, or multi-light-over-single light single-hung or double hung, wood sash windows and are usually placed individually on the elevation, not grouped or paired 7221 Forest Street (pre-1937) Stick/Eastlake (1860-1895) • Gabled roof/cross gable with tower, hipped roof with front-facing gable or town house with flat roof and parapet • Steeply pitched roofs • Wooden wall cladding • Ornamentation in gable ends including: decorative trusses, braces, patterned stickwork or siding applied in various directions • Horizontal and vertical and sometimes diagonal banding created by belt courses, trim, paneling, and corner boards • Box bay windows • Decorative brackets under the eave, emphasizing vertical lines of trim and corners of box bay if present • Elaborated bargeboards, especially when paired with trusses; occasionally flared 7528 Eigleberry Street (pre-1937) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 93 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Folk Victorian (ca. 1870-1910) • Simple folk house form • Symmetrical façade, except gable front and wing • Single-story porch, either partial- or full-width with spindlework • Wood primary material for both construction and decorative details • Boxed or open roof-wall junctions, if boxed then the cornice typically display brackets, and simple window surrounds or may have a simple pediment above • Pre-manufactured wood detailing such as turned posts, spindlework detailing, and decorative brackets at cornice line and around the porch • occasionally utilized Italianate, Gothic Revival, and Queen Anne style details, such as eave trim or porch decoration, but are overall much less decorative and follow Folk building forms 7425 Church Street (pre-1937) Shingle (1880-1900) • Asymmetrical façade • Wall cladding and roofing of continuous wood shingles • Irregular, steeply pitched roof line, usually with cross gables • Shingled walls without interruption at corners • Multi-level eaves • Towers • Extensive porches (may be smaller or absent in urban examples) • Shingles curve into recessed windows or balconies • Windows include equal sized sashes (most common), Palladian windows, strips of three or more windows, one- or two-story bay windows, and dormer windows 264 Martin Street (pre-1937) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 94 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Queen Anne (1880-1910) • Asymmetrical built forms with protruding balconies, turrets, bays, overhangs, towers, and wall projections • Steeply pitched roof in an irregular shape, usually with front- facing gable • Partial or full-length asymmetrical porch, usually one-story in height with ornamental turned wood porch supports and balustrades • Wood framed • Wooden weatherboard siding was frequently accompanied by several decorative shingle designs to avoid smooth- walled appearance • Decorative elements utilized include half-timbering, spindlework, and patterned masonry • The use of common Greek and Roman decorative motifs such as swags, garlands, classical columns, and the tri- partite Palladian window • Windows and dormers of inconsistent sizes unevenly placed throughout the façade • Beveled, etched, or stained glass in doors and feature windows to help enhance transoms and entries Holloway House, 7539 Eigleberry Street (1903) Colonial Revival (1880-1955) • Symmetrical facades with rectangular massing, may have a side porch or sunrooms on either of both sides • Typically one- to two-stories in height • Medium pitch side-fable roof with narrow eaves or hipped roof with dormer windows • Brick or wood clapboard most common siding material • Accentuated front door with decorative crown supported by pilasters or columns, may be hooded to create covered extended porch • Windows frequently seen in pairs, typically double hung sashes and multi-plane glazing in one or both sashes • Other decorative elements include classical columns, two- story pilasters, quoins at corners, window shutters, dentil trim under eaves, and Palladian windows 286 5th Street (1922) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 95 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Tudor Revival (1890-1940) • Asymmetrical and irregular massing, typically L-shaped in plan or with a broad front • Façade dominated by one or more steeply pitched front- facing gables and massive chimneys • Other elements include battlements, overhanging gables at second-story, varied eave heights , and arcaded wing walls • Projecting gable or small portico porch • Can feature a porte cochere or early-attached garage • Typically wood frame construction covered in stucco, stone, and/or brick veneer, brick usually utilized on the first-story while stucco, stone, or wood cladding on gables or upper stories • Decorative half-timber in gables • Front doors and windows feature rounded or pointed Tudor arch with stone tabbed detailing • Windows are tall and narrow, commonly in groups with multi-lite glazing • Informal patterned stonework or brickwork • False thatching at roofline 7590 Princevalle Street (1938) Prairie (1900-1920) • Geometric and rectangular massing, typically two-stories in height • Low pitched roof, usually hipped with wide overhanging eaves, typically boxed • One-story porches with massive square supports • Eaves, cornices, and details emphasizes horizontal lines • Broad flat chimney • Exterior walls typically brick or painted stucco • Restrained use of applied ornamentation • Tall casement windows either grouped or paired in horizontal bands sometimes wrapping around corners • Doors typically multi-pane with sidelights 7531 Church Street (1917) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 96 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Craftsman (1905-1930) • Rectangular massing one or one-half stories in height • Bungalows are common building types within this style. • Partial or full width porches supported by squared columns • Columns frequently continue to ground level • Exterior walls clad in either stucco, wood classing, stone, or brick • Low-pitched front gabled roof, occasionally hipped, with wide unenclosed eave overhangs • Multiple roof planes • Exposed roof rafters, decorative false beams or braces under gables • Numerous windows, typically cottage windows with decorative transoms above broad bottom lite • Lines of three or more windows • Slopped or battered foundation • Decorative elements include extra stickwork in gables or porch, stone exterior chimneys, window boxes and balconies, slopping battered foundation 7801 Rosanna Street (pre-1937) Bungalow Court (c. 1910-1940) • Predominately one-story in height • Composed of multiple detached buildings • Typically occupy a single or double residential lot • Exterior walls clad in either stucco or wood • Low-pitched front gabled roof, occasionally hipped, often with exposed rafter tails • Units oriented around a central common area creating a u- shape in plan • Primary entrances to the units are accessed from a shared walkway • Presence of a unified architectural style, which is most commonly the Craftsman style 7360 Railroad Street (1930) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 97 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940) • Simple rectangular or L-shaped massing, typically one- to two-stories in height with round, square, or polygonal towers • Bungalows are common building types within this style. • Asymmetrical facades • Low-pitched side or cross-gabled roof, occasionally a hipped or flat roof section • Minimal eaves with little to no overhang • Red clay tile roofs either Spanish (S-shaped) or Mission (half-cylinder) • Painted stucco exterior walls in natural colors typically white or tan, walls extend into gable without a break • Fenestration irregularly placed and recessed • Elaborately carved wood entry doors with rounded arches above both doors and windows • Decorative details typically include wrought-iron balconies, interior decorative tile work, and elaborate chimney tops • Outdoors spaces take the form of courtyards with or without covered arcaded walkways 7548 Princevalle Street (1932) French Eclectic (1920-1935) • Tall, steeply pitched, hipped roof • Eaves commonly flared upward • Masonry wall cladding of stone or brick; often stuccoed • Rounded Norman towers are common • Massive chimneys • Range of architectural detail including quoins, pediments, pilasters • Windows may be casement or double hung and French doors are used 731 5th Street (1934) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 98 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965) • One- to two-stories in height • Low, boxy, horizontal proportions • Simple geometric forms with a lack of exterior decoration • Commonly asymmetrical • Flat roofed without coping at roof line; flat roofs hidden behind parapets or cantilevered canopies • Expressed post-and-beam construction in wood or steel • Exterior walls are flat with smooth sheathing and typically display whites, buffs, and pale pastel colors • Mass-produced materials • Simple windows (metal or wood) flush-mounted and clerestory • Industrially plain doors • Large window groupings 500 Broadway (1953) Ranch (c. 1935-1975) • Long rectangular U- or L-shaped building plan • One-story in height with broad low shape • Asymmetrical front façade built low to the ground • Front entry typically located off-center and sheltered under main roof of the house • Low-pitched, commonly hipped roof with moderate to wide roof overhang and no dormers • Variety of wall cladding including brick veneer, board-and- batten, stone veneer, horizontal or wood boards, and shingles that changes at base of window, entry area, and gable end • Garage typically attached to main façade • Large picture windows usually present on main elevation with more traditional windows on the rest of the house 8141 Hanna Street (1953) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 99 July 2020 Table 2. Architectural Styles for Residential Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Minimal Traditional (c. 1935-1950) • Small scale and one-story in height typically located on small lots • Typically features a low- or intermediate-pitched gable roof with little to no eave overhang • Roof dormers are rare • Features a variety of exterior materials including vertical and horizontal wood boards, shingles, brick veneer, and board-and-batten siding • Minimal added architectural detail • Typically feature double-hung windows with either multi- pane or simulated multi-pane 7931 Carmel Street (1949) Contemporary (1945-1990) • Small scale and one-story in height typically located on a small lot • Asymmetrical main façade • Low pitched gable roofs • Exposed roof beams • Wide, overhanging eaves • Windows generally in gable ends • Materials (wood, brick, glass concrete block) evoking a variety of textures • Recessed or obscured entry • Broad expanses of uninterrupted wall surface 701 5th Street (1948) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 100 July 2020 5.2 Commercial Properties Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy False Front (1868-1950) • Simple rectangular floor plan • One to two stories in height • Wood frame construction • Vertical extension of the front of the building extends beyond the roofline • Horizontal wood exterior cladding • Windows are usually placed individually on the elevation and not grouped or paired • Lack of ornamentation 7648 Monterey Road (1920) Stucco Commercial (c. 1870-1960) • One to three stories in height • Rectangular forms • Either attached or freestanding in commercial districts • Brick masonry or board form concrete structure, with stucco façade • Minimal decoration • Typically had a parapet roofline obscuring the roof shape • Recessed doorway • Sign band between parapet and tops of fenestration • Main elevation features a unified elevation with side and rear elevation displaying no distinctive decoration 7430-7434 Monterey Road (1914) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 101 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Brick Commercial (c. 1880-1940) • One to three stories in height • Brick masonry walls • Rectangular forms • Either attached or freestanding in commercial districts • Typically had a parapet roofline obscuring a flat roof • Recessed doorway • Sign band between parapet and tops of fenestration • Main elevation features a unified elevation with side and rear elevation displaying no distinctive decoration 7529 Monterey Road (circa 1910) Mission Revival (1890-1920) • Rectangular massing • Porch supported by large square piers with an arch above • Occasionally display rectangular bell towers • Low-pitched gable or hipped roof with red tile, wide overhanging eaves • Mission shaped dormer or roof parapet • Exterior material stucco painted natural color, sometimes display decorative carving or painted tiles • Details include quatrefoil windows or vents, Islamic inspired ornament, and coping • Windows and doors with rounded arches above 7747 Monterey Road (1930) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 102 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Mediterranean Revival (1890-1940) • simple massing, rectangular floor plan, stressing the horizontal • 1-3 stories • massive, symmetrical façade • stucco exterior walls (rarely, brick or cast stone) • clay tile roofs or roof trim, typically hipped • arched openings, including arched focal windows • wood or wrought iron balconies with window grilles • articulated door surrounds • limited use of applied ornamentation 7387 Monterey Road (1920) Neo-Classical (1895-1955) • Symmetrically balanced main façade with rectangular massing • Main façade typically dominated by full-height porch with roof supported by classical columns • Columns have either Ionic or Corinthian capitals • Doors typically have elaborate, decorative surrounds based on Greek Revival, Federal, or Georgian designs • Rectangular multi-pane double-hung windows with broken pediments above • Window types include bay windows, paired windows, triple windows, transom or arched windows • Decorative elements include cornice-line balustrades, raised full-width platform porch, and boxed eave cornice with moderate overhang 20 Martin Street (1912) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 103 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940) • Simple rectangular or L-shaped massing, typically one- to two-stories in height with round, square, or polygonal towers • Asymmetrical facades • Low-pitched side or cross-gabled roof, occasionally a hipped or flat roof section • Minimal eaves with little to no overhang • Red clay tile roofs either Spanish (S-shaped) or Mission (half-cylinder) • Painted stucco exterior walls in natural colors typically white or tan, walls extend into gable without a break • Fenestration irregularly placed and recessed • Elaborately carved wood entry doors with rounded arches above both doors and windows • Decorative details typically include wrought-iron balconies, interior decorative tile work, and elaborate chimney tops • Outdoors spaces take the form of courtyards with or without covered arcaded walkways 7560 Monterey Road (1931) Art Deco (1920-1940) • Irregular building forms with sharp edges and a linear appearance • Stepped or setback front façade with towers and other vertical projections • Smooth wall surface typically stucco • Stylized decorative elements using geometric forms such as zigzags and chevrons • Feature low relief decorate panels with strips of windows with decorative spandrels • Reeding and fluting around doors and windows 7411 Monterey Road (1910) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 104 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Mansard (1940-1980) • One to two stories in height • Mansard roof shape • May have dormer windows • Simplistic exterior details dominated by the roof form 8295 Monterey Road (1974) Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965) • One- to two-stories in height • Low, boxy, horizontal proportions • Simple geometric forms with a lack of exterior decoration • Commonly asymmetrical • Flat roofed without coping at roof line; flat roofs hidden behind parapets or cantilevered canopies • Expressed post-and-beam construction in wood or steel • Exterior walls are flat with smooth sheathing and typically display whites, buffs, and pale pastel colors • Mass-produced materials • Simple windows (metal or wood) flush-mounted and clerestory • Industrially plain doors • Large window groupings 7451 Eigleberry Street (1954) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 105 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Ranch (ca. 1935-1975) • Long, rectangular, U-, or L-shaped building plan • One-story in height with broad low shape • Asymmetrical front façade built low to the ground • Front entry typically located off-center and sheltered under main roof of the house • Low-pitched, commonly hipped roof with moderate to wide roof overhang and no dormers • Variety of wall cladding including brick veneer, board-and- batten, stone veneer, horizontal or wood boards, and shingles that changes at base of window, entry area, and gable end • Garage typically attached to main façade • Large picture windows usually present on main elevation with more traditional windows on the rest of the house 312 1st Street (1947) Contemporary (1945-1990) • Small scale and one-story in height typically located on a small lot • Asymmetrical main façade • Low pitched gable roofs • Exposed roof beams • Wide, overhanging eaves • Windows generally in gable ends • Materials (wood, brick, glass concrete block) evoking a variety of textures • Recessed or obscured entry • Broad expanses of uninterrupted wall surface 8655 Monterey Road (1966) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 106 July 2020 Table 3. Architectural Styles for Commercial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Googie (c. 1940s-1960s) • Upswept rooflines • Curvaceous and geometric shapes • Bold use of glass, steel, and neon • Characterized by space age designed and symbolized by motion with shapes such as boomerangs, atoms, and parabolas 8405 Monterey Road (1962) Shed (1965-1990) • Shed roof forms • Multidirectional • Wood wall cladding (diagonal, vertical, horizontal, or shingles) • Smooth roof-wall junction commonly with little to no overhang 700 W 6th Street (1968) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 107 July 2020 5.3 Civic and Institutional Properties Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Italianate (1840-1885) • One to two stories in height • Rectangular massing and form • Flat roof with gently sloping sides and deeply overhanging eaves • Tall and slim window openings, often rounded at the top • Columned entryways typically single storied in height • Squared tower or cupola centrally placed just above the roofline • Decorative brackets below the roofline 200 5th Street (1869) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 108 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Greek Revival (c. 1850-1900) • Geometric and rectangular massing, typically two-stories in height • Large transoms above entry points • Elaborate entry doors • Boxed eaves • Rectangular, multi-lite windows • Inset pilasters • Bracketed eaves • Wood clad • Wood frame construction • Multiple rooflines, with one being a front facing gable or partial gable 160 5th Street (1857) False Front (1860-1905) • Simple rectangular floor plan • One to two stories in height • Wood frame construction • Vertical extension of the front of the building extends beyond the roofline • Horizontal wood exterior cladding • Windows are usually placed individually on the elevation and not grouped or paired • Lack of ornamentation 8191 Swanston Lane (1927) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 109 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Richardson Romanesque (c. 1870s-1900) • Massive structural appearance • Facades are typically asymmetrical • Thick masonry walls • Rounded (sometimes square) towers with conical roof • Round arches over windows and/or entryways • Polychromatic facades with contrasting building materials • Bold ornament including oversized carvings 7400 Monterey Road (1907) Brick Commercial (c. 1880-1940) • One to three stories in height • Brick masonry walls • Rectangular forms • Either attached or freestanding in commercial districts • Typically had a parapet roofline obscuring a flat roof • Recessed doorway • Sign band between parapet and tops of fenestration • Main elevation features a unified elevation with side and rear elevation displaying no distinctive decoration 60 W 6th Street (1920) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 110 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Mission Revival (1890-1920) • Rectangular massing • Porch supported by large square piers with an arch above • Occasionally display rectangular bell towers • Low-pitched gable or hipped roof with red tile, wide overhanging eaves • Mission shaped dormer or roof parapet • Exterior material stucco painted natural color, sometimes display decorative carving or painted tiles • Details include quatrefoil windows or vents, Islamic inspired ornament, and coping • Windows and doors with rounded arches above 290 IOOF Avenue (1920) Neoclassical (1895-1955) • Symmetrically balanced main façade with rectangular massing • Main façade typically dominated by full-height porch with roof supported by classical columns • Columns have either Ionic or Corinthian capitals • Doors typically have elaborate, decorative surrounds based on Greek Revival, Federal, or Georgian designs • Rectangular multi-pane double-hung windows with broken pediments above • Window types include bay windows, paired windows, triple windows, transom or arched windows • Decorative elements include cornice-line balustrades, raised full-width platform porch, and boxed eave cornice with moderate overhang 195 5th Street (1910) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 111 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940) • Simple rectangular or L-shaped massing, typically one- to two-stories in height with round, square, or polygonal towers • Asymmetrical facades • Low-pitched side or cross-gabled roof, occasionally a hipped or flat roof section • Minimal eaves with little to no overhang • Red clay tile roofs either Spanish (S-shaped) or Mission (half-cylinder) • Painted stucco exterior walls in natural colors typically white or tan, walls extend into gable without a break • Fenestration irregularly placed and recessed • Elaborately carved wood entry doors with rounded arches above both doors and windows • Decorative details typically include wrought-iron balconies, interior decorative tile work, and elaborate chimney tops • Outdoors spaces take the form of courtyards with or without covered arcaded walkways 7600 Church Street (pre-1937) Mediterranean Revival (1920-1930s) • Rectangular floor plan • Massive symmetrical primary facades • One or two stories in height • Stuccoed exterior walls • Red tile roofs • Window in the shape of arches or circles • Wrought iron balconies with window grilles and articulated door surrounds • Decorative keystones • Ornamentation may be simple or dramatic 650 5th Street (1929) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 112 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Art Deco (1920-1940) • Irregular building forms with sharp edges and a linear appearance • Stepped or setback front façade with towers and other vertical projections • Smooth wall surface typically stucco • Stylized decorative elements using geometric forms such as zigzags and chevrons • Feature low relief decorate panels with strips of windows with decorative spandrels • Reeding and fluting around doors and windows 250 W 6th Street (1940) Stripped Classicism (1930-1945) • use of conservative elements and materials such as concrete • monumental feel • rectangular massing • zigzag ornamentation or very stripped classical ornamentation • balanced and symmetrical forms based on Classical design principles • windows arranged as vertical recessed panels • Stucco, concrete, stone, or brick walls 7400 Railroad Street (1930) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 113 July 2020 Table 4. Architectural Styles for Civic and Institutional Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965) • One- to two-stories in height • Low, boxy, horizontal proportions • Simple geometric forms with a lack of exterior decoration • Commonly asymmetrical • Flat roofed without coping at roof line; flat roofs hidden behind parapets or cantilevered canopies • Expressed post-and-beam construction in wood or steel • Exterior walls are flat with smooth sheathing and typically display whites, buffs, and pale pastel colors • Mass-produced materials • Simple windows (metal or wood) flush-mounted and clerestory • Industrially plain doors • Large window groupings South Valley Middle School, 277 IOOF Avenue (circa 1956) Contemporary (1945-1990) • Small scale and one-story in height typically located on a small lot • Asymmetrical main façade • Low pitched gable roofs • Exposed roof beams • Wide, overhanging eaves • Windows generally in gable ends • Materials (wood, brick, glass concrete block) evoking a variety of textures • Recessed or obscured entry • Broad expanses of uninterrupted wall surface 8455 Wren Avenue (circa 1968-1980) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 114 July 2020 5.4 Industrial Properties Table 5. Architectural Styles for Industrial Properties in Gilroy Description of Style Representative Example in Gilroy Concrete Industrial (1900s-present) • Rectangular or square floorplan • Exterior materials include corrugated metal, stucco, or brick • Lack of exterior decorative elements • Simple windows and doors 7110 Alexander Street (1962) False Front (1868-1950) • Simple rectangular floor plan • One to two stories in height • Wood frame construction • Vertical extension of the front of the building extends beyond the roofline • Horizontal wood exterior cladding • Windows are usually placed individually on the elevation and not grouped or paired • Lack of ornamentation 7491 Railroad Street (1908) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 115 July 2020 Utilitarian (1868-present) • Simple rectangular floor plan, with large open volume • One story plan, but usually a larger volume (1.5 or two- story) in height • Wood or metal framing • Wood or metal cladding • Simple roof forms: gable ended, sawtooth, vaulted roof, or shed roofs are common • Devoid of decoration • Minimal and simple, de-emphasized fenestration • Fenestration includes a vehicle-sized door on the main or side elevation • Roof or gable ended ventilation 7595-7565 Railroad Street (pre-1937) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 5. Architectural Styles 116 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 117 July 2020 6 Architects and Builders 6.1 Architects No local or state-recognized architects were born or lived in Gilroy however a select group of Bay-area architects have contributed several residential, commercial, civic, and entertainment buildings to Gilroy throughout its history. The first of these architects was William H. Weeks of Watsonville who designed four houses (including one remodel) for prominent citizens of Gilroy in 1900. Weeks returned to contribute more buildings until 1929, just a few years before company troubles and his death. Another Bay-area architect to take an interest in Gilroy was Samuel Newsom of Oakland and San Francisco who was responsible for the Gilroy City Hall. Below is a biographical synopsis and list of works for each architect that has designed buildings in Gilroy. 6.1.1 William H. Weeks (1864-1936) Born in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island in 1864, Weeks was the fourth child of Richard Weeks, a proficient builder and designer. The Weeks family moved extensively when Weeks was young, but moved to Denver, Colorado in 1880, where from age 16-25, Weeks attended the Brinker Institute boarding school for his secondary and collegiate coursework. Weeks initially went into the construction business with his father upon graduation, but soon moved to Oakland California to start his own company. Weeks’ first California contract was the Christian Church in Watsonville, CA 1892. In 1894, Weeks opened an office in Watsonville and began accepting architectural contracts for schools and homes. After opening a second office in Salinas, Claus Spreckels engaged Weeks for factory buildings for the Spreckels Sugar Factory in Salinas in 1897. The exposure led to Weeks bidding on buildings in Monterey, Pacific Grove, Santa Cruz, Paso Robles, San José, and Gilroy. Following the San Francisco earthquake of 1906, Weeks opened an office there the same year. By 1915, Weeks and his firm had designed 1,000 buildings. In 1924, he partnered with his son Harold Weeks to form the firm Weeks and Weeks, which opened offices in Oakland and San José (Lewis 1985; PCAD 2019a; Salewske 2003; WRP 1995). Weeks was especially notable for designing 22 of the 142 Carnegie Libraries in California including: Santa Cruz (1902), Watsonville (1903, demolished), San Luis Obispo (1903), Santa Cruz main (1904), Paso Robles (1906), Nevada City (1906-1907), Monterey (1907), San Leandro (1907), Imperial (1909), Lompoc (1909), Livermore (1909), Gilroy (1910), Richmond (1910), Roseville (1911), Oroville (1911), Orland (1913), Yreka (1915), Bayliss (1916), and Yolo (1917). Weeks’ civic buildings became popular, and Weeks also designed multiple public and private schools throughout the state (Lewis 1985; PCAD 2019a; Salewske 2003; WRP 1995). Weeks’ business suffered with the oncoming Great Depression period of the 1930s. Weeks was accused of negligence and cost inflation, and lost his architect’s license in 1931. Then his company was accused of being several thousand dollars in debt. Weeks eventually had his license reinstated and cleared the rumors, but died of heart failure just a few years later in 1936, leaving the business to his son and partner, Harold (Lewis 1985; PCAD 2019a; Salewske 2003; WRP 1995). CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 118 July 2020 Weeks’ first building in Gilroy was the Rucker School, completed in 1894. He continued to work on Gilroy-area projects for his remaining years, switching exclusively to the Mediterranean/Spanish Colonial Revival form after it was popularized in the 1915 Panama-California Exposition in San Diego (Lewis 1985; PCAD 2019a; Salewske 2003; WRP 1995). A list of his Gilroy-area work is listed below:  The Rucker School (1894)  Dr. Clarence R. Weaver House, 60 5th Street (1900)  Wilson House, 7341 Alexander Street (1900)  Residence, Robinson Cottage, 264 Martin Street (1900)  Dunlap House remodel, 7320 Forest Street (1900)  Montgomery Auto Parts/Masonic Temple, 7598 Monterey Street (1902) with Radtke  Edgar Holloway House, 7539 Eigleberry (1903)  Gilroy Free Library, 195 5th Street (1910)  Gilroy High School, (1913) and additions (1932)  Robinson Hardware Company Building, 7541 Monterey Street (1915)  Hersman House, 225 4th Street (1917)  IOOF Children’s Home, 290 IOOF Ave (1921)  Ellis Garage Building, 7390 Monterey Street (1920) (with Radtke)  Milias Hotel, 7387 Monterey St, (1922)  Habing Funeral Home, 129 4th Street (1928) (and Radtke)  Wheeler Hospital 1929 (and Radtke) 6.1.2 William Binder/ Ernest N. Curtis / Binder & Curtis (1918-1953) William Binder, AIA (1871-1953) started his architectural career in 1890 working for architect George W. Page in San José. Binder began his own firm in 1897, and quickly gained popularity after the 1906 earthquake for his use of steel reinforced concrete construction. Binder hired Ernest Curtis (1889-1956), who had also worked for Page, as a draftsman in 1911. In 1914, both men briefly served in World War I, but upon the end of the war, Binder partnered with Curtis to form Binder & Curtis (1918). Binder & Curtis worked almost exclusively on modernist civic, education, commercial, and other buildings. Binder & Curtis became the area’s premier institutional architect, designing schools managing the Civic Center project on North First Street, and overseeing the work of the architects designing specific buildings in the complex. After Binder’s death in 1953, Curtis continued the firm until his death in 1956 (Maggi 2014; Page & Turnbull 2009; PCAD 2019b). Examples of Binder & Curtis’ work in Gilroy and San José, includes:  T. & D. DeLuxe Theatre, San José , California (c. 1912)  Gilroy Fire Station, Gilroy (1916) with Radtke  Hippodrome Theatre, San José (1919) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 119 July 2020  Louis Hotel (Gilroy Hotel and café), 7363-7371 Monterey Street, Gilroy (1921) with Radtke  Commercial Building, San José (1926)  Towne Theater, San José (1927, formerly Hester Theater)  Salvation Army building, San José (1928)  Byers Ford Dealership, 7747 Monterey, Gilroy (1930) with Radtke  Hale’s Department Store, San José (1931)  Willow Glen Theater, San José (1933)  Burrell Building, Hall of Justice, Civic Auditorium, San Jose (1934-1936)  San José Water Works, San José (1934)  Wheeler Civic Auditorium, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy (1940) with Renz  Fire Station No. 1, San José (1951) 6.1.3 Albert Roller (1891-1981) Albert Roller was a San Francisco-based architect who designed dozens of commercial buildings in Northern and Southern California. Roller began his career working as draftsperson for San Francisco firms Coxhead & Coxhead and Ward & Blohme. He established his own firm Albert F. Roller, Architect in 1925, and continued working from the Bay area until his death in 1981 (Architect & Engineer 1929; Bowker 1962, 1970; PCAD 2019c). A sample of Roller’s work is listed below:  Oak Hill Mausoleum, San José (1928)  Guarantee Building & Loan Association, Oakland (1929)  Pacific Savings bank building, San Diego (1929)  Pacific Savings & Loan Building, Fresno (1930)  Sommer & Kaufman Building, San Francisco (1930)  Fords Department Store/ Elks Building, 7560-7562 Monterey Street, Gilroy (1931) (with Radtke)  Breuner's Furniture Company Retail Store and Office Building, Oakland (1932)  Gas Company Building, Watsonville (1932)  National Broadcasting Company (NBC) Studios, San Francisco (1942)  Rexall Drug Co building, Los Angeles (1948)  Aclifornia Masonic Memorial Temple, San Francisco (1958)  U.S. Federal Building, San Francisco (courts and office) (1963) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 120 July 2020 6.1.4 Reid Brothers (1891-1932) The Reid Brothers began architectural operations in Evansville, IN, with James W. Reid and Merritt J. Reid from 1880-1891. James headed West in late 1886 with youngest brother Watson to open an office in San Diego, CA, which lasted until 1899. James then reestablished the firm's headquarters in San Francisco, CA, between 1889- 1891 while Merritt came west to open a Portland, OR office in 1891 (created while the office designed the Portland Oregonian Newspaper Building). Watson remained in San Diego until 1899, when he chose to return to New Brunswick, Canada. The Reid Brothers' San Francisco office were favorites of the Spreckels family initially, but prospered after the Great Earthquake of 04/18/1906, receiving many contracts in the Bay Area. In the 1920s, they became known for their theater building designs, completing over 20 theaters in California. Over the years, the Reid Brothers maintained offices in the Flood Building, Mills Building, and the Call Building in San Francisco. Offices in the Call Building occupied its 18th floor, then the tallest point in the city. James closed the Reid Brothers firm after Merritt's death in 1932 (PCAD 2019d). A sample of Reid & Reid’s work is included below:  Darius Ogden Mills Building, San Francisco (1891)  Spreckels Temple of Music and Concourse, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA (1894)  Emma Spreckels Building, San Francisco (1895)  Claus Spreckels House #2, san Francisco (1897)  Bijou Theatre, San Francisco, CA (1896)  Douglas Building, Downtown, Los Angeles, CA (1898)  American Theatre #2, San Francisco (1907)  Sterling Building, San Francisco, (1907)  Drexler Estate Building, San Francisco (1908)  Pacific Union Club, San Francisco (1908)  Carnegie Library, San Rafael (1909)  Colombo Building, Financial District, San Francisco (1913)  Coliseum Theatre #2, San Francisco (1918)  Rowell and Foley Theatre, Fresno (1920)  Strand Theater, 7588-7578 Monterey Street, Gilroy (1921)  Balboa Theatre #1, San Francisco (1922)  Roosevelt Theatre, San Francisco (1924)  Oaks Theatre, Berkeley (1925)  Fairfax Theatre, Oakland (1926)  Grand Lake Theatre, Grand Lake, Oakland (1926)  Riviera Theatre, Haight-Ashbury, San Francisco (1927) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 121 July 2020 6.1.5 Samuel Newsom (1852-1908) with Wolfe & McKenzie Samuel Newsom was born in Canada in 1852 and settled near Oakland in 1868 at 14 to live with his elder brother John J. News, also an architect. At 21, Samuel began apprenticing for his brother as a draftsman, before partnering to become Newsom & Newsom, Architects in 1877. The firm, based in San Francisco, continued as a partnership until Samuel’s death in 1908. The brothers specialized in private homes, including the Carson House in Eureka, commercial offices, and city government buildings. The Gilroy City Hall building was one of the last projects Samuel Newsom worked on during their partnership (PCAD 2019e). A sample of Newsom’s work is included below:  Napa County Superior Court of California Courthouse, Napa (1878)  City of Berkeley City Hall #1, Berkeley (1884)  T.H. Boyd House, Eureka (1885)  William McKendrie Carson House, Eureka (1886)  Glendale hotel, Glendale (1887)  Pinney House Hotel, Sierra Madre (1887)  Charles and Katherine Sessions House, Echo Park, Los Angeles (1888)  1407 Carroll Avenue House, Angelino Heights, Los Angeles, CA (1889)  Carson Office Building, Eureka (1892)  J. Milton Carson, Eureka (1897)  Fraternal Hall Building, Palo Alto (1898)  City Hall, Gilroy (1905-1907) 6.2 Builders 6.2.1 Orrin F. Hanson (1840-1921) Orrin Footman Hanson was born in Maine in 1839. In 1863, at 24, Hanson had already moved to Sonoma County, California, and registered for the Civil War draft as a “mechanic.” Little is known about Hanson, other than his listed occupation as “carpenter” on census forms and San José area directories from 1870 until 1910. In one 1893 directory, he was listed as a carpenter who worked at the Whitehurst and Hodges lumber mill. In the last census of his lifetime, in 1920, he listed his occupation as “inspector” (Ancestry 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011). A list of his extant work includes:  Residence, 7425 Church Street circa (1870)  Sydney Johnson Residence, 170 West Ninth Street (1909)  Residence, 7431 Church Street (circa1870)  Chesbro House, 7541 Church Street (1888) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 122 July 2020 6.2.2 Holmes Brothers (circa 1918-1926) The Holmes Brothers were prolific local contractors consisting of two bothers: Charles S. Holmes and Harry B Holmes. The Holmes Brothers were known for their modest Craftsman style cottages and built variations of just a few versions of this style. At the time of Gilroy’s expanding population between 1915 and 1925, the Holmes Brothers were young contractors who constructed efficient, tract-style small residences. They would construct homes that were very similar in design and style, with only small variations in entrance and window placement. The buildings were consistently five rooms in size and sold from $2,500 to $3,500. It is not known when the Holmes Brothers stopped working in Gilroy, but the majority of their work can be dated between 1918 and 1926. A list of their extant work includes:  7861 Rosanna Street (1918)  Curse House, 144 Martin Street (1923)  J.A. Peters House, 414 E 6th Street (1921)  W.B. Sanders House, 424 E. 6th Street (1921)  W.B. Sanders House, 444 E. 6th Street (1921)  J. Lasserot House, 464 E. 6th Street (1921)  J.C. Dowell House, 474 E Sixth Street (1921)  Claud Peters House, 484 E Sixth Street (1921)  S.W. Downhour House, 494 E. Sixth Street (1921)  John Lasserot rental house, 7387 Chestnut (1921)  John Lasserot rental house, 7391 Chestnut (1921)  John Lasserot rental house, 7399 Chestnut Street (1921)  7851 Rosanna Street (1923) 6.2.3 George Renz (1893-1988) George Renz was a prominent, local builder who was born in Tres Pinos in 1893, and moved to Gilroy in 1913. Renz worked for prominent building contractor William Radtke Sr. during the 1920s, before forming his own construction company in 1938. Renz worked on several major road and building construction projects throughout Gilroy. A list of their extant work includes:  555 5th Street, personal residence (1924) with William Radtke Sr.  575 5th Street, residence (1922) with William Radtke Sr.  595 5th Street residence (1922) with William Radtke Sr.  Wheeler Civic Auditorium, 7351 Rosanna Street/250 W 6th Street, Gilroy (1940), with Binder & Curtis CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 123 July 2020 6.2.4 J. Howard Carl (1871-1944) J. Howard Carl was born in 1871 in Illinois and had moved to the Rucker area of Santa Clara County, some 6 miles north of Gilroy, in 1896 to work on his prune farm. The Carl family moved to Church Street in Gilroy in 1923, where Carl had worked as a builder of several homes on the block. Carl’s Church Street residence included his workshop. Carl was a profitable local builder, coming to prominence in the 1920s, designing and building Craftsman-style residences. He was also an inventor and held several patents for pistol parts. In the 1930s, Howard left the building industry to resume being a prune orchardist outside of Gilroy. A list of his extant work includes:  7631 Hanna Street, residence (1922)  7830 Church Street, residence (1923)  7851 Church Street, personal residence (1923)  7860 Church Street, residence (1925)  7870 Church Street, residence (1923)  Chesbro House 665 5th Street (1929)  495 5th Street, residence (1937) [personal communication with Connie Rogers] 6.2.5 William Radtke Sr (1888-1969) William Radtke Sr was born in San Francisco March 11, 1888. At age 14, he went to work at the Enterprise Foundry in Santa Clara, then quickly moved on to work for Robert Hall, a machinist. Radtke then entered the carpentry trade apprenticing three years to Charles Stockholm in Santa Clara. At age 18, Radtke formed his first contracting firm in San José in 1906. Radtke’s first contracts were for the Los Altos Grammar School, a private residence at Los Altos; the Ed Seifert Garage at San José, and the bridge across Guadalupe Creek at West Santa Clara Street in San José. In 1911, Radtke took his first contract in Gilroy, hired by Henry Miller to construct reinforced concrete silos at Bloomfield Ranch, at a time when the technology was new. In 1912 Radtke moved to Gilroy and married Clare Loewen, and immediately began taking contracts such as Llagas Creek Bridge and the First National Bank building on Monterey in 1912, and 8.5 million gallon concrete reservoirs in 1913. Radtke has been involved in many high profile contracts throughout the city between 1913 and 1969, including the Louis Hotel, the Strand Theater, the new Masonic building, and Wheeler Hospital, in addition to several private residences. Though not an architect, Radtke designed and built some residences, including his home at 515 5th Street. Nevertheless, he regularly partnered with the prominent architects in Gilroy such as William Weeks and William Binder. Radtke had become such a prominent member of the Gilroy community that he was elected to Gilroy City Council from 1927 to 1931. Radtke partnered with his son later in life and they continued as Radtke & Son until Radtke’s death in 1969.351 351 Bonnie Bamberg. 1986. City of Gilroy Historic Preservation Survey 1985-1986. A comprehensive Study of the History and Architecture of the City of Gilroy within the 1945 City Limits. (San Jose, California: Firm of Bonnie L. Bamberg); Barratt 2003; Conrotto 1951; Salewske 2003; Sprain 2018; Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. “Commercial Building Survey.” 1985. Gilroy Historical Museum; Ancestry.com. 2006. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. (Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc.)https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=7884&h=1788197&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=isb1987637&_phstart=successSource; Ancestry.com. 2010. 1920 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. (Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 124 July 2020 A sample of the work for Radtke’s contracting firm includes:  Llagas Creek Bridge (1912)  San Benito College (Gavilan College) (1919)  IOOF/Rebekah Children’s Home clock and chimes tower (1921)  Gilroy Fire House, 55 5th Street (1916), with William Binder  Habing Funeral Home, 129 4th Street (1928), with William Weeks  Wheeler Hospital, 651 W 6th Street (1929) with William Weeks  Byers Ford Dealership, 7747 Monterey Street (1930) with Binder & Curtis  Gilroy Advocate Building, 55 W 6th Street (1910)  Gilroy Post Office, 50-60 W 6th Street (1920)  Radtke Construction, 42-46 Martin Street (1920)  Salinas Valley Savings Bank, Monterey and Fourth Street (demolished) (1960) Residences  Radtke (Drake) apartments, 85 5th Street (demolished) (1919)  515 5th Street, personal residence (1920)  595 5th Street residence (1922)  494 5th Street residence (1922)  545 5th Street residence (1923)  555 5th Street residence (Renz house) (1924)  575 5th Street residence (1922)  595 5th Street residence (1922)  7551 Hanna Street residence (1921)  7445 Forest street residence (1920)  701 Fourth Street, personal residence (1939)  7821 Princevalle Street (Radtke Jr. residence) (1951) Downtown Monterey Street properties  Cherry Blossom Hotel, 7261/7257 Monterey Street (1921)  7360 Monterey Street (1920)  Louis Hotel (Gilroy Hotel and café), 7363-7371 Monterey Street (1921) with Binder & Curtis bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=6061&h=812203&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=isb1382825&_phstart=successSource; Connie Rogers. Email message to Kate G. Kaiser. July 8, 2020. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 125 July 2020  Pitzer Auto Parts, 7380 Monterey Street (circa 1920)  Firestone Tires/Ellis Garage Building, 7390 Monterey Street (1920) with William Weeks  Perelli Building, 7419 Monterey Street (1914)  Harris Building, 7423 Monterey Street (1912)  Coast Counties Building, 7436 Monterey Street (1920)  Cimino Building, 7441 Monterey Street (1920)  Second Chesbro Building, 7445 Monterey Street (1912)  Hollister’s Feed Store 7460 Monterey Street (1912)  Gilroy Dispatch Building, 7466 Monterey Street (1917)  Storefront, 7482-7478 Monterey Street (c. 1920)  Gilroy Stationers, 7483 Monterey Street (1940)  Storefront, 7486 Monterey Street (c. 1920)  First National Bank, 20 Martin Street, 7490/7488 Monterey Street (1912)  Storefront, 7507 Monterey Street (1929)  Woolworth Building, 7511 Monterey Street (1928)  Gilroy Telephone Building, 7525 Monterey Street (1920)  Robinson Hardware Company Building, 7541-43 Monterey Street (1915) with William Weeks  Storefront, 7550 Monterey Street (1919)  Four storefronts, 7557, 7561, 7565, 7573 Monterey Street (1920)  Elks Building, 7560 Monterey Street (1930) with Albert Roller  Storefront, 7568 Monterey Street (1922)  Storefront, 7579-7581 Monterey Street (1920)  Strand Theater, 7588-7578 Monterey Street (1921) with the Reid & Reid  Masonic Building, 7598 Monterey Street (1921) with William Weeks (demolished and replaced) Radtke’s Residential Signature CDFs:  Broad, low pitched roofs, usually as simple as possible; front gable or hip plan  Contemporaneous styles for the time: strong focus on Craftsman bungalows, Spanish Colonial Revival  Stucco cladding  Arch detailing, observed in both Craftsman and Spanish Colonial Revival, in porch openings and primary elevation focal windows; if porch opening, can be multiple and will usually be a full porch; if windows this will usually be a large single pane or tripartite window on the main elevation CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 126 July 2020 6.2.6 Howson Brothers Construction Company (1928-1962) The Howson Brothers Construction Company were prolific, local, building contractors in Gilroy between 1928 and approximately 1962, and consisted of two local brothers, John (Jack) M. Howson (1904-1980) and William Robert Howson (1907-1976). The brothers were born in Nelson, Lancashire, England, but immigrated to the California with their parents Frank and Dora Howson in 1920.352 The brothers briefly worked in Alameda as shipwrights, before moving to Gilroy between 1926 and 1928. At the time of the brothers’ naturalization in 1928, they were already self-employed as building contractors.353 By 1962, they had changed their name to Howson’s Inc. and operated as a building supply company, offering lumber, building materials, rather than labor, and moved to an office on Monterey at the intersection of Howson Street.354 The Howson Brothers built custom homes in Gilroy, as well as churches, public and commercial buildings, and military buildings in the 1940s. One of William Howson’s daughters, Roberta Howson Hughan (1932-present), carried on her family’s tradition by becoming an architect. Mrs. Hughan gained her architecture degree from University of California, Berkeley in 1955. She and her husband became the firm Hughan & Hughan and are responsible for, among other projects, the restoration of the Caroline Hoxett house. Hughan continued to practice until elected to Gilroy City Council in 1977 and later became Gilroy’s first woman mayor.355 While few of the Howson Brothers Construction Company works are known, their extant works includes356:  Christian Science Church, 283 5th Street (1930)  7571 Carmel Street, residence, William Robert Howson first personal residence (1928)  7561 Carmel Street, John “Jack” Howson’s first personal residence (1930)  701 5th Street, William Robert Howson’s second personal residence (1948)  711 5th Street, multi-family residence (1928)  7515 Princevalle Street, residence (1941)  7525 Princevalle Street, John “Jack” Howson’s second personal residence (1948)  7535-7545 Princevalle Street, duplex (1939)  7555 Princevalle Street, residence (1940)  7554 Princevalle Street, residence (1932)  7730 Princevalle Street, residence (1948) 352 Ancestry.com. 2002. 1930 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2002. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?dbid=6224&h=93088689&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=2238 353 Ancestry.com. 2014. California, State Court Naturalization Records, 1850-1986 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?dbid=8839&h=59033&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=5180 354 The Monitor. “Howson’s Inc.” Advertisement. The Monitor, Volume CIII, No. 37. December 16, 1960 355 Reid Lerner. Email message to Samantha Murray. July 10, 2020. 356 Howson Family. Email message to Julie Wyrick. May 19, 2020. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 127 July 2020 6.2.7 Robert Grant (1844-1919) Robert Grant was born in Canada in 1844 and immigrated to San José, California in 1877. Grant moved south to just outside the city of Gilroy to raise stock, but eventually turned to land development. Grant became an early land speculator and housing developer for rental houses in Gilroy and is responsible for the Grant Tract houses on Forest Street. Little else is known about Grant, except that he moved with his wife to San Francisco some time before 1919 and remained there until his death. A list of their extant work includes:  7211 Forest Street, residence (pre-1937) (altered beyond recognition)  7221 Forest Street, residence (pre-1937)  7241 Forest Street, residence (pre-1937)  7251 Forest Street, residence (pre-1937) 6.2.8 Other Builders In addition to many professional builders, multiple residential and commercial buildings were built by non- professionals such as David Dryden a furniture maker, or the initial homeowners, such as James M. Browne or George Eustice. These houses ranged in skill and execution from simplistic Pioneer, to popular Folk National styles or Craftsman styles, to ornate Queen Anne cottages or Italianate homes. A list of known local builders and their buildings is listed below:  James M. Browne, 7360 Railroad Street (1870)  William Cullen, 7456 Church Street (1920)  Ed Denman, 111 Martin Street (1906), 7530 Railroad (1907)  James J. Dorland, 7360 Eigleberry Street (1872), 7528 Eigleberry Street (1886), 365 5th Street (1890)  David Dryden, 394 E 6th Street (no date)  William Charles Ehrich, 7521 Hanna Street (1923)  George Eustice, 213 5th Street (1869)  Wo Fife, 174 Martin Street (1885)  William Furlong, United Presbyterian Church, 214 5th Street (1869)  Val Grodhaus, 7527 Eigleberry Street (1896)  John Harrison, 7581 Rosanna (c. 1871)  William Hanna, 7321 Eigleberry Street  Pleasant C. Hodges, 7406 Church (1891)  Milton Holsclaw, 7531 Rosanna Street (1874)  H.D. Koch, 7341 Alexander Street (1900)  A. Martin, 7571 Hanna Street (1921) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 128 July 2020  Palmer & Gurries, 7451 Monterey (1924)  James Patterson, Milias Hotel, 7397 Monterey Road (1921)  Charles W. Pedlar, 7417 Church Street (no date)  John Rhineheart, 7540 Church Street (pre-1870)  Perry W. Robinson, 99 8th Street – Perry W. Robinson (c.1866)  John E. White, 7520 Railroad Street (1903) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 129 July 2020 7 Guidance for Assessing Significance 7.1 Designation Criteria and Integrity Requirements The following presents an overview of the national, state, and local guidelines for evaluating properties in Gilroy for historical significance and integrity. 7.1.1 National Register of Historic Places The NRHP is the United States’ official list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects worthy of preservation. Overseen by the NPS under the U.S. Department of the Interior, the NRHP was authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended. Its listings encompass all National Historic Landmarks and historic areas administered by the NPS. NRHP guidelines for the evaluation of historic significance were developed to be flexible and to recognize the accomplishments of all who have made significant contributions to the nation’s history and heritage. Its criteria are designed to guide state and local governments, federal agencies, and others in evaluating potential entries in the NRHP. For a property to be listed in or determined eligible for listing, it must be demonstrated to possess integrity and to meet at least one of the following criteria: The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association; and A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. NRHP Criteria Considerations There are certain types of properties that shall not be considered eligible for the NRHP. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: a. A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 130 July 2020 b. A building or structure removed from its original location but which is primarily significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or c. A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or d. A cemetery which derives its primary importance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or e. A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or f. A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance; or g. A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. NRHP Integrity To be listed in the NRHP, a property must not only be shown to be significant under at least one of the NRHP criteria, but it also must have integrity. The evaluation of integrity is sometimes a subjective judgment, but is must always be grounded in an understanding of a property’s physical features and how they relate to its significance. Historic properties either retain integrity (that is, convey their significance) or they do not. Within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognize seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. These are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of the aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance. Determining which of these aspects are most important to a particular property requires knowing why, where, and when the property is significant. 357 7.1.2 California Register of Historical Resources In California, the term “historical resource” includes but is not limited to “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California” (California Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(j)). In 1992, the California legislature established the CRHR “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change” (California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(a)). The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR were expressly 357 OHP (California Office of Historic Preservation). 2011. California Register and National Register Criteria: A Comparison (for the purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register). OHP Technical Assistance Series #6, Sacramento, CA: Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 131 July 2020 developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP, enumerated below. According to California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity,” and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria: (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In order to understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2)). The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are the state landmarks and points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys. CRHR Integrity Historical resources eligible for listing in the CRHR must meet one of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing. Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. It must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which a resource is proposed for eligibility. Alterations over time to a resource or historic changes in its use may themselves have historical, cultural, or architectural significance.358 7.1.3 Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Under local municipal code 30.27.30, properties may be eligible for the Gilroy HRI either as a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district. The establishment of a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district may be in combination with any residential, commercial, industrial or other base district as defined in this chapter. The establishment or removal of either a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district shall be processed as a zone change. The historic heritage committee shall review all applications for historical designation or removal of historical designation and pass its recommendations on to the planning commission and city council. The zone 358 Ibid CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 132 July 2020 change fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the establishment of, but not the removal of, either a historic site or neighborhood combining district. (a) Any area or combination of sites within the city may be designated as a historic neighborhood combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following criteria: (1) The neighborhood possesses a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects unified by past events or physical development; or (2) The neighborhood represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community; or (3) The collective historic value of the neighborhood taken together is of greater value than each individual structure. (b) Any site within the city may be designated as a historic site combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following criteria: (1) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or (2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or (3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or methods of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer or architect. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 7.2 Property Types and Registration Requirements 7.2.1 Initial Development Period (1868-1904) The dominant themes of the Initial Development period (1868-1904) are the development of Gilroy’s early infrastructure, local government, downtown commercial buildings along Monterey Road, transportation expansion, the formalization of civic and institutional buildings, and agricultural expansion. Development during this period was primarily located around the central core of Monterey Road and 6th Street near the SPRR railroad depot. Residential growth during the Initial Development period was minimal and bordered the emerging commercial corridor of Monterey Road. The majority of the commercial and civic properties associated with these significant themes have been replaced overtime. Additionally, the majority of the residential properties built between 1868 and 1904 have either been altered beyond recognition or replaced with new construction. Property types associated with these significant themes include residential properties, commercial properties, and civic and institutional properties. During this Initial Development period, specifically in 1886, the western extent of town was at Hanna Street, the southern extent was 7th Street, the northern extent was roughly at 3rd Street (although some sparse residences CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 133 July 2020 were located as far north as 1st Street), and the eastern boundary of settlement is Railroad Street. In the late 1880s, the downtown core was centered along Monterey Road between 4th Street and 7th Street, with residential buildings on large lots on the surrounding streets. Off Monterey Road, a few large-scale businesses dominated the side streets. By the 1892 map, residential settlement had expanded north to Broadway Street, South to 9th Street, and east to Chestnut Street. The population reached 1,820 in 1900 and the city again began to experience sustained growth. Residential Properties Residential buildings constructed between 1868 and 1904 primarily consisted of single-family homes, typically represented by wood frame 1 and 2-story dwellings and associated outbuildings (e.g., outhouses, sheds, stables). The residential development patterns that emerged during this period laid the foundation for architectural styles and trends that continued into future development periods in Gilroy’s history. The dates of construction prior to the Initial Development Period (1868-1904) were often missing from Santa Clara County Assessor property records. Given this data gap, late nineteenth and early twentieth century buildings in the city are listed with an assumed date of construction of pre-1937 if their locations could be confirmed from a 1937 aerial image. While and the exact dates of construction proved difficult to confirm, the architectural styles present in the City indicate that many of the homes were likely constructed during the Initial Development. Popular styles seen in Gilroy from this early time period are Carpenter Gothic, Italianate, Folk National, Folk Victorian , Queen Anne, and Colonial Revival. Residential buildings from this time period generally fall in one of the following two typologies:  Modest dwellings and cottages largely following the stylistic traditions of Folk National, Folk Victorian, and Queen Anne, incorporating basic floor plans such as Hall and Parlor, no more than 2-stories in height, and minimal ornamentation. Roof forms under this typology included gabled, hipped, and pyramidal.  Larger dwellings and mansions designed in specific styles such as Italianate, Queen Anne, Shingle, and Carpenter Gothic feature elaborate detailing and irregular floor plans. Roof forms were designed to be more elaborate and oftentimes featured steeply pitched gables, multi-level eaves, towers, and extensive cornice line or porch detailing. Associated Architectural Styles Residential architectural styles associated with the Initial Development period (1868-1904) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  Carpenter Gothic (1840-1880s)  Italianate (1840-1885)  Stick/Eastlake (1860-1895)  Folk National (1860-1940)  Folk Victorian (c. 1870-1910)  Shingle (1880-1900)  Queen Anne (1880-1910)  Colonial Revival (1880-1955) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 134 July 2020 Significance Requirements Table 6 discusses the significance of residential buildings from Gilroy’s Initial Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order for a residential property built during the Initial Development Period (1868-1904) to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must 1) be located within the original city grid, and 2) be constructed within the Residential Development period of significance (1870-1948). Many of the surviving residential buildings from this period are already listed in the City HRI. Table 6. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Residential Development, specifically, Gilroy’s pattern of early residential development in the original city grid during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. This period was characterized by expansion into the previously undeveloped sections of the initial Gilroy city grid. Many private residences were constructed during this period, aided by the prospect of piped utilities like natural gas, water, and electricity. B/2 2 Association with People Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants, artists, or city officials. However, under this Criterion the residence should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder, such as William Weeks, Orrin Hanson, or Robert Grant. Resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. Architectural significance should be considered for different property typologies including simple residences (e.g., bungalows/cottages) and larger mansions. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 135 July 2020 Table 6. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance D/4 — Information Potential Residential buildings or ruins of residential buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, residential properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from the Initial Development period:  Good representation of a style of architecture from the time period  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration.  Retains the majority of its original windows and doors on the main elevation or exhibits compatible replacements. Window replacements are acceptable if the collective value of the property’s character- defining features is sufficient to convey its architectural style despite having replaced windows and doors. For example: a Queen Anne mansion may have window replacements while still retaining much of its original features that continue to convey its architectural significance such as original cladding, half- timbering, second story overhang, roof pitch, scale and massing, etc.; whereas a cottage or bungalow with numerous window replacements and fewer character-defining features may struggle to convey architectural significance without its original windows and doors.  Retains the majority of its original ornamentation (e.g., scalloped trim, decorative verge boards, stonework, bracketed eaves, spindle posts and railings)  Retention of the original cladding is important, however, replacement cladding is acceptable when it does not detract from the historic character of the building. For example: the aesthetic of a Shingle building is not completely lost if the original wood cladding is replaced in kind with replacement wood shingles, provided that the replacement wood cladding is in keeping with the other character-defining features such as original woodwork, porch, fenestration, and windows remain intact.  Retains original porch configuration and materials. Compatible porch railing replacements are acceptable, however, replacement columns, partial/full porch enclosures, or changes in the approach to the porch are not acceptable. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 136 July 2020  Does not have later additions that are visible from the public right-of-way and impact integrity. Examples of such additions include incompatible garages, second story additions, dormers, and breezeways that are visible from the public right-of-way. This also includes any inappropriately scaled ADUs.  Does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door and porch details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style).  Relocation of a residential building is acceptable provided that it can still convey its historic significance.  Residential buildings that have been converted to commercial uses may still be eligible for local designation provided the conversion did not compromise important character-defining features. Commercial Properties Just before and after the official incorporation of Gilroy, the downtown core established along Monterey Road, concentrated between 4th and 7th Streets. Based on Sanborn maps, many of the early commercial buildings constructed during the Initial Development period were predominately wood frame or brick construction. The majority of the commercial buildings constructed during the Initial Development period were located in the downtown commercial core on Monterey Road. Off Monterey Road, a few large-scale businesses dominated the side streets. Along 6th Street, between Monterey and Church Streets, there were a few mills, a wheelwright, a blacksmith shop, and several carpenters, all occupying stone buildings. As was the case with residential buildings constructed during the Initial Development period (1868-1904), the dates of construction for commercial buildings built during this period were also missing from property records. Given this data gap, late 19th and early 20th century buildings in the city have an assumed date of construction of pre-1937. Previous historic district information prepared in the 1980s indicates that a few early commercial buildings remain from this development period. The remaining buildings are modest in scale and massing, simplistic in design, and lacked excessive ornamentation. Given this fact, these buildings fall within the style categories of False Front Commercial buildings and Brick Commercial buildings. Associated Architectural Styles Commercial architectural styles associated with the Initial Development period (1868-1904) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  False Front (1860-1905)  Brick Commercial (c. 1880-1940) Significance Requirements Table 7 discusses the significance of commercial buildings from Gilroy’s Initial Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must 1) be located within the original city grid, and 2) be constructed within the Monterey Road Downtown Commercial Development period of significance (1870-1940). While many of the commercial buildings from this time period no longer exist, most of the surviving buildings from this period are already listed in the City HRI. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 137 July 2020 Table 7. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Commercial Development which is best captured in the period of significance identified for the Monterey Road Downtown Commercial Development period (1870-1940) . A large number of commercial buildings and storefronts were erected during this period, aided by the advent of city sidewalks, paved streets and new municipal buildings, and drawing increased pedestrian traffic to the commercial core of the city. Commercial buildings from this period were typically simple brick and wood frame buildings with no discernable architectural styles. Commercial buildings from this time period serve as important representations of early commercial architectural development patterns in Gilroy. B/2 2 Association with People Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants. However, under this Criterion the commercial building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder. Individual resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. With regard to historic districts, contributing properties need not meet the integrity threshold required for individually eligible properties. Provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole within its historic context, individual properties may lack individual distinction. This is particularly true of properties located within the downtown commercial core, nearly all of which exhibit altered storefronts. D/4 — Information Potential Commercial buildings or ruins of commercial buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 138 July 2020 Table 7. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, commercial properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change the property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for commercial properties from this time period:  Good representation of a style of architecture or construction methodology from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains overall scale and massing that is consistent to the time period.  Additions made to the building must be made to the rear of the building and not serve as a detraction from the main elevation.  Retains elements of the original fenestration pattern. Storefronts can be altered, but their alterations should not compete with the rest of the building or detract from other historic elements still in place on the street facing elevation. Original fenestration may be covered, but the building retains adequate integrity if the treatment used to cover the fenestration is removable. For example, if a building’s original transoms have been painted over or boarded up, but are still in place the building retains the requisite historic integrity.  Retains some of the original ornamentation including original awnings, signage, cornice line and stringcourse detailing.  Replacement cladding is acceptable as long as character-defining features remain intact. For instance, a brick commercial building may be reclad in stucco in the event that the cornice line detailing remains intact.  The addition of security elements like bars and fencing that is not permanently affixed to the building does not negatively impact the integrity of the building.  The building does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style).  With regard to commercial historic districts, contributing properties need not meet the integrity threshold required for individually eligible properties. Provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 139 July 2020 within its historic context, individual properties may lack individual distinction. This is particularly true of properties located within the downtown commercial core, nearly all of which exhibit altered storefronts, but together can still convey the essential elements of the downtown commercial core. Civic and Institutional Properties The Initial Development period was a period of growth for civic and institutional buildings after Gilroy established its government in 1868. The bulk of the buildings that developed out of this period were schools and churches concentrated on Church Street or just north of the City’s central core on Broadway. Three utilities services were also established to serve residents and according to Sanborn maps, these utility buildings were located outside of the commercial and residential areas, typically on Railroad Street east of the railroad tracks. Many fraternal organizations founded their Gilroy chapters during the Initial Development Period. While the majority of these buildings were utilized by fraternal organizations, benevolent societies, and clubs, they either were replaced with larger structures or sold for a different use. The fraternal organization buildings were located either in residential areas or within the established commercial corridor on Monterey Road. As Gilroy grew and developed in the 20th century, many of the temporary civic and institutional buildings were replaced by more elaborate and permanent structures. There are very few extant buildings from this time period. Associated Architectural Styles Institutional architectural styles associated with the Initial Development period (1868-1904) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  Italianate (1840-1885)  Greek Revival (c. 1850-1900)  False Front (1860-1905) Significance Requirements Table 8 discusses the significance of institutional buildings from Gilroy’s Initial Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order for an institutional property to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be located within the original city grid and be constructed during Initial Development period (1868-1904). While most of the buildings from this period no longer extant, those that remain from this period are already listed in the City HRI. Table 8. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with multiple themes in Gilroy’s Initial Development period including schools, churches, and civic development. Institutional buildings from this period serve as CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 140 July 2020 Table 8. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1868-1904 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance important representations of early institutional architectural development patterns in Gilroy. B/2 2 Association with People Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent religious figures or civic figures. However, under this Criterion the institutional building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder. Resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. D/4 — Information Potential Institutional buildings or ruins of institutional buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, institutional properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration. While replacement windows and doors are acceptable, the original fenestration pattern should be intact. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 141 July 2020  Retains some of the original ornamentation (particularly ornamentation around entry points, windows, and roofline detailing)  Replacement cladding is acceptable in rare cases when cladding is replaced in kind and there is no change in the material type. For example, wood cladding needs to be replaced with wood cladding not stucco.  Additions to the building must be in keeping with scale and must not detract from the building’s principal elevation.  Does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style). Transportation Infrastructure No transportation infrastructure properties from this period are still extant in Gilroy, all having been replaced or materially altered in the years since. The most important change in the Initial Development Period (1868-1904) was the coming of the SC&PRR completed to Gilroy in 1869, and its purchase by SPRR in 1870. The train, as opposed to the Monterey Road became the primary means for travelers to visit Gilroy and for Gilroy-area farmers to ship their goods to San José and Monterey. Transportation infrastructure constructed during this period include the SPRR line to Gilroy, its extension south of Gilroy, a one-story, wood-frame depot (no longer extant), turntable, spurs and rail sidings along the line in Gilroy. Roads in and around Gilroy also generally improved and formalized by the city during this period. El Camino Real, now simply the Monterey Road, transitioned from a toll road to a free highway in 1874.359 Additionally, the 1868 charter opened the existing city roads beyond their 1868 distances: e.g., Eigleberry Street was extended from Farman to Martha Street. As expected, transportation infrastructure in Gilroy during this period was in its infancy, prior to the automobile boom that occurred in the next major period of development. As such, no extant transportation properties were identified in Gilroy during this period, beyond existing roads and rail lines, which have been improved upon over time. Agriculture, Industry, and Manufacturing As Gilroy converted from a rural village to a formally established and planned town in the late nineteenth century, many agricultural practices were relegated to the areas outside of Gilroy. Gilroy’s 1870 SPRR depot (no longer extant) became the shipping center for the region’s agricultural products, so instead of bringing goods directly to ship, many goods were stored in warehouses along the rail line at established rail sidings. Agricultural goods were processed or stored instead of grown directly within city borders. Culp’s tobacco farm, far outside the city, had a warehouse and processing plant in Gilroy as well, and Gilroy was a large producer of tobacco products in the 1870s. By 1892, Gilroy’s cheese production was up to 1,800,000 pounds, one-fifth of the of the entire cheese product for California.360 In addition to already established industries, fruit orchards and dried fruit production rose to prominence in the 1870s. As was the situation with residential and commercial properties, the date of construction many of the agricultural, industrial, or manufacturing properties constructed during the Initial Development Period were missing from the Santa Clara County Assessor property records. Based on the available data, only one agricultural, industrial, or manufacturing building was identified from the Initial Development period: the Miller Red 359 Foot 1888: 119-120. 360 Pacific Rural Press 1892: 516. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 142 July 2020 Barn located in Christmas Hill Park. However, it is possible there are other extant agricultural, industry, and manufacturing properties from the Initial Development period. While many industrial properties were identified during the survey, more research is required to determine if individual industrial and manufacturing properties are from the Initial Development Period. Additionally, this citywide survey was conducted from the public right of way, so there may be more extant resources from this period that were not visible during the survey. There is high potential for the identification of additional resources from this period in the future. 7.2.2 Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development (1904-1941) Residential Properties The dominant themes of the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904-1941) are the expansion of Gilroy’s infrastructure, establishment of zoning districts, formalization and expansion of transportation, development of new areas of the City, agricultural expansion and large-scale civic development projects. Development during this period expanded into the previously undeveloped sections of the initial Gilroy city grid. Residential growth during this period included decades of expansion and slowdowns due to nationwide events such as the entrance of the United States into World War I and the Great Depression. These periods of slow development and expansion were mirrored by the City’s population, which gradually continued to rise. Despite these development slowdowns, the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period was one of Gilroy’s most productive periods in terms of residential, commercial, and civic and institutional growth expanding into undeveloped parts of the City. During this Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period, the City’s development expanded north as far as Hot Springs Road (Leavesley Road) and west out to Carmel Street. The majority of the north development was residential while the western development was primarily commercial and agricultural. The majority of the residences constructed during this period remain today and make up the core of the City’s early-residential area between 1st and 10th Streets, and Carmel and Eigleberry Streets. Additional small scale residences, mostly worker housing, were located east on Railroad Street, south of Lewis Street, west of Chestnut Street, and north of Pacheco Pass Road. Residential development during the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period was characterized by expansion into the previously undeveloped sections of the initial city grid. Buildings constructed between 1904 and 1941 primarily consisted of single-family homes, bungalow courts, and duplexes typically represented by wood- frame 1- and 2-story dwellings and associated outbuildings (automotive garages). In 1936, the City of Gilroy zoned the city into five distinctive districts: Single Family Residences; Multiple Family Residences; Business Districts; Industrial Districts; and Residential-Agricultural. The single-family district was located between Hanna, Princevalle, First and Seventh Streets. The Multiple Family residence district constituted an area approximately double the size of that designated for single family residences between Eigleberry and Hanna Streets, and 1st and 10th Streets as well as a swath to the east of Monterey Street between Old Gilroy and Lewis Street. Residential development patterns during this period served as a continuation of earlier architectural development patterns and introduced new styles that were not present in the previous development period. The dates of construction for buildings constructed during the early years of the Initial Development Period (1904-1941) were often missing from Santa Clara County Assessor property records. Given this data gap, late 19 th and early 20th century buildings in the city are listed with an assumed date of construction of pre-1937 if their locations could be confirmed from a 1937 aerial image. While the exact dates of construction proved difficult to confirm without assessor data, there were some styles that were present indicating that buildings within the City were most likely CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 143 July 2020 constructed prior to 1904, such as Shingle (1880-1900), Carpenter Gothic (1840-1880s), and Stick/Eastlake (1860-1895). Whereas other popular residential styles seen in the Initial Development period extend into the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development Period such as Queen Anne (1880-1910), Folk National (1850-1930), Folk Victorian (c. 1870-1910), and Colonial Revival (1880-1955). Gilroy also saw the emergence of new styles during this period of development that included the following: Tudor Revival (1890-1940), Prairie (1900-1920), Craftsman (1905-1930), Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940), Monterey (1925-1955), Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965), Ranch (c. 1935-1975, and Minimal Traditional (c. 1935-1950). Residential buildings from this time period fall into multiple typologies:  Modest and mid-size dwellings continue during this period with the most popular style being Craftsman. There are many variations of Craftsman homes from this period, but it is one of the most dominant residential styles in Gilroy during this time period. The last decade of development period includes the emergence of two housing styles that would dominate the second half of the twentieth century throughout California and the United States, the Ranch and Minimal Traditional style homes.  Cottages continue during this period, especially in the first two decades of the development period. These cottages are similar to those seen in the Initial Development Period including Folk National, Folk Victorian, and Queen Anne designs and ornamentation.  Larger dwellings and mansions designed in specific styles such as Queen Anne, Tudor Revival, Spanish Colonial Revival, and Prairie that feature elaborate detailing and irregular floor plans. Roof forms were designed to be more elaborate and oftentimes featured steeply pitched gables, multi-level eaves, towers, extensive cornice line detailing.  Multi-family dwellings that include duplexes, Bungalow Courts, and apartment buildings also emerge in Gilroy during this period of development. They were typically 1-2 stories in height, simplistically designed, and the styles used for these buildings were typically Craftsman or Spanish Colonial Revival. Associated Architectural Styles Residential architectural styles associated with the Initial Development period (1868-1904) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  Folk National (1850-1930)  Folk Victorian (c. 1870-1910)  Queen Anne (1880-1910)  Colonial Revival (1880-1955)  Tudor Revival (1890-1940)  Prairie (1900-1920)  Craftsman (1905-1930)  Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940)  Monterey (1925-1955) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 144 July 2020  Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965)  Ranch (c. 1935-1975)  Minimal Traditional (c. 1935-1950). Significance Requirements Table 9 discusses the significance of residential buildings from Gilroy’s Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904-1941) in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order for a residential building constructed during the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century period (1904-1941) to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must 1) be located within the original city grid, and 2) be constructed within the Residential Development period of significance (1870-1948). A large portion of the residential buildings from this period are already listed on the City of Gilroy HRI, but there are later buildings constructed in the 1940s that were not of historic age at the time of the last HRI in the 1980s. Table 9. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Residential Development, specifically, Gilroy’s pattern of early residential development in the original city grid during the early twentieth century. This period was characterized by expansion into the previously undeveloped sections of the initial Gilroy city grid. Many private residences were constructed during this period, aided by the prospect of piped utilities like natural gas, water, and electricity. B/2 2 Association with People Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants, artists, or city officials. However, under this Criterion the residence should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder, such as William Weeks, Binder and Curtis, Reid Brothers, Samuel Newsom, George Renz, J. Howard Carl, Willam Radtke Sr., and Holmes Brothers. Resources qualified under these criteria CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 145 July 2020 Table 9. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. Architectural significance should be considered for different property typologies including simple residences (e.g., bungalows/cottages) and larger mansions. D/4 — Information Potential Residential buildings or ruins of residential buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, residential properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture from the time period  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration.  Retains the majority of its original windows and doors on the main elevation or exhibits compatible replacements. Window replacements are acceptable if the collective value of the property’s character- defining features is sufficient to convey its architectural style despite having replaced windows and doors. For example: a Tudor Revival mansion may have window replacements while still retaining much of its original features that continue to convey its architectural significance such as original cladding, half- timbering, second story overhang, roof pitch, scale and massing, etc.; whereas a cottage or bungalow with numerous window replacements and fewer character-defining features may struggle to convey architectural significance without its original windows and doors.  Retains the majority of its original ornamentation (e.g., scalloped trim, decorative verge boards, stonework, bracketed eaves, spindle posts and railings)  Retention of the original cladding is important however, replacement cladding is acceptable when it does not detract from the historic character of the building. For example: the aesthetic of a Craftsman building is not completely lost if the original wood cladding is replaced with stucco, provided that other character- defining features such as original woodwork, porch, fenestration, and windows remain intact. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 146 July 2020  Retains original porch configuration and materials. Compatible porch railing replacements are acceptable, however, replacement columns, partial/full porch enclosures, or changes in the approach to the porch are not acceptable.  Does not have later additions that are visible from the public right-of-way and impact integrity. Examples of such additions include incompatible garages, second story additions, dormers, and breezeways that are visible from the public right-of-way. This also includes any inappropriately scaled ADU.  Does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door and porch details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style).  Relocation of a residential building is acceptable provided that it can still convey its historic significance.  Residential buildings that have been converted to commercial uses may still be eligible for local designation provided the conversion did not compromise important character-defining features. Commercial Properties Commercial development during the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period was characterized by rapid expansion and growth of commercial businesses related to the everyday needs of Gilroy’s citizens. A large number of storefronts were erected during this period, aided by the advent of city sidewalks, paved streets and new municipal buildings drawing increased pedestrian traffic to the commercial areas of the city. Due to the 1936 zoning law, commercial properties were limited to certain parts of the City. According to Sanborn maps, Monterey Road continued to be the primary commercial corridor in the City and reinforced concrete buildings replaced many of the earlier built impermanent or small wood frame structures. In response to the increased traffic brought to town by the completion of State Route 101 through Gilroy, and the relatively inexpensive cost of mass produced automobiles like Ford’s Model T, a sizeable number of businesses associated with the automobile clustered along Monterey Road. The economization of the automobile offered other commercial opportunities to people living in Gilroy. These establishments included service stations, repair garages, auto-dealers, and several Auto Courts (motels). Associated Architectural Styles Commercial architectural styles associated with the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904- 1941) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  False Front (1860-1905)  Stucco Commercial (c. 1870-1960)  Brick Commercial (c. 1880-1940)  Mission Revival (1890-1920)  Mediterranean Revival (1890-1940)  Neoclassical (1895-1955)  Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 147 July 2020  Art Deco (1920-1940)  Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965) Significance Requirements Table 10 discusses the significance of commercial buildings from Gilroy’s Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904-1941) in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be 1) located within the original city grid, and 2) constructed within the Monterey Road Downtown Commercial Development period of significance (1870-1940). Most of the surviving commercial buildings from this period are already listed on the City of Gilroy HRI. Table 10. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Commercial Development. Gilroy’s pattern of early commercial development in the downtown core predominately took place in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. A large number of commercial buildings and storefronts were erected during this period, aided by the advent of city sidewalks, paved streets and new municipal buildings drawing increased pedestrian traffic to the commercial core of the city. Commercial buildings from this period ranged from simple brick and wood frame buildings with no discernable architectural styles. Commercial buildings from this time period serve as important representations of early commercial architectural development patterns in Gilroy. B/2 2 Association with People Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants. However, under this Criterion the commercial building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder, CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 148 July 2020 Table 10. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance such as William Weeks, Binder and Curtis, Reid Brothers, Albert Roller, Samuel Newsom, or William Radtke Sr. Individual resources should be good examples of their types and/or styles, and retain most of their original features. With regard to historic districts, contributing properties need not meet the integrity threshold required for individually eligible properties. Provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole within its historic context, individual properties may lack individual distinction. This is particularly true of properties located within the downtown commercial core, nearly all of which exhibit altered storefronts. D/4 — Information Potential Commercial buildings or ruins of commercial buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist.. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, commercial properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture or construction methodology from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains overall scale and massing that is consistent to the time period.  Additions made to the building must be made to the rear of the building and not serve as a detraction from the main elevation.  Retains elements of the original fenestration pattern. Storefronts can be altered, but their alterations should not compete with the rest of the building or detract from other historic elements still in place on the street facing elevation. Original fenestration may be covered, but the building retains adequate integrity if the treatment used to cover the fenestration is removable. For example, if a building’s original transoms have been painted over or boarded up, but are still in place, the building retains requisite historic integrity. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 149 July 2020  Retains some of the original ornamentation including original awnings, signage, parapet details, plasterwork, and decorative cornices or stringcourses.  Replacement cladding is acceptable as long as character defining features remain intact. For instance, a brick commercial building may be re-clad in stucco in the event that the cornice line detailing remains intact.  The addition of security elements like bars and fencing that is not permanently affixed to the building does not negatively impact the integrity of the building.  The building does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style).  With regard to commercial historic districts, contributing properties need not meet the integrity threshold required for individually eligible properties. Provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole within its historic context, individual properties may lack individual distinction. This is particularly true of properties located within the downtown commercial core, nearly all of which exhibit altered storefronts, but together can still convey the essential elements of the downtown commercial core. Civic and Institutional Properties The Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period was a period of growth for civic and institutional buildings and the establishment of monumental permanent structures. These building include a new City Hall Building located at the intersection of Monterey and Sixth Streets (1907), the Carnegie Library located at the corner of Fifth Street and Church (1910), Gilroy High School constructed on I.O.O.F. Avenue (1913), and Wheeler Hospital located at the intersection of 5th Street and Princevalle Street (1929). Despite the economic downturn effecting the U.S. during the Great Depression, city-backed development projects persisted throughout the remainder of the 1930s with financial assistance from prominent Gilroy families like the Wheelers. The majority of these civic and institutional projects are located within the core residential blocks of the City and were intended to be accessible in order to serve the community. They were built using substantial materials such as brick, concrete, and stone in a variety of architectural styles that would later influence future commercial and civic projects. Many of these buildings were constructed by well-known architects like William Weeks and serve as important representations of the formalization of Gilroy that took place during this period of development. Associated Architectural Styles Institutional architectural styles associated with the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904- 1941) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features of each style):  Richardson Romanesque (ca. 1870-1910)  Brick Commercial (ca. 1880-1940)  Mission Revival (1890-1920)  Neoclassical (1895-1955)  Spanish Colonial Revival (1915-1940)  Mediterranean Revival (1920-1930s) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 150 July 2020  Art Deco (1920-1940)  Stripped Classicism (1930-1945)  Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965)  Contemporary (1945-1990) Significance Requirements Table 11 discusses the significance of institutional buildings from Gilroy’s Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be 1) located within the original city grid, and 2) constructed during this development period (1904-1941). Most of the surviving buildings from this period are already listed on the City of Gilroy HRI. Table 11. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with multiple themes in Gilroy’s Initial Development period including schools, churches, and civic development. Institutional buildings from this time period serve as important representations of early institutional architectural development patterns in Gilroy. B/2 2 Association with People Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent religious figures or civic figures. However, under this Criterion the institutional building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builders like William Weeks, Binder and Curtis, George Renz, or William Radtke Sr. Individual resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles, and retain most of their original features. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 151 July 2020 Table 11. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1904-1941 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance D/4 — Information Potential Institutional buildings or ruins of institutional buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, institutional properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration. While replacement windows and doors are acceptable, the original fenestration pattern should be intact.  Retains some of the original ornamentation (particularly ornamentation around entry points, windows, and roofline detailing)  Replacement cladding is acceptable in rare cases when cladding is replaced in kind and there is no change in the material type. For example, wood cladding should be replaced with wood cladding, not stucco.  Additions to the building must be in keeping with scale and must not detract from the building’s principal elevation.  The building does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door and window details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style). Transportation Infrastructure Like many cities throughout California, Gilroy’s development pattern was influenced by the advancements in automobile and road construction technology in the first half of the 20th century. During the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development Period (1904-1941), Gilroy’s transportation became more focused on roads than in the previous development period, marked by the rise of the railroad industry. Numerous important transportation events took place during this period of development including the passage of the State Highways Act in 1909. In an effort to capitalize on the development of the State Highway program, Gilroy chose to pave their main CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 152 July 2020 thoroughfare to capture the emerging tourism market brought about by the automobile industry and the State Highway program. Gilroy continued to pave roads during this period including Old Gilroy Road and 1st Street in 1922. In addition to paving the main thoroughfares throughout the City, Highway 152 was also paved and improved during this period of development. One of the last road projects undertaken during this period of development was the construction of the road between Gilroy and Watsonville, known as Hecker Pass, that was dedicated in 1928. Shortly after the dedication, a now historic tree row was planted along the pass and remains to this day. While these road projects were an important factor in the development of Gilroy and helped to create more avenues for travel in and around the city, they did not produce significant buildings that are part of the architectural fabric of Gilroy today. However, there is one building from this period of development that is reflective of the importance of transportation: the existing Southern Pacific depot. In 1918, the original 1870s railroad depot was replaced by the current depot at 7250 Monterey Road. The depot’s construction reflected Gilroy’s movement towards more permanent structures which came with the growth and development of the City during this period. The depot also stands as an important example of Mission Revival style of architecture in the City. Agriculture, Industry, and Manufacturing Agricultural, industrial and manufacturing development during the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period continue to grow throughout the city. This period of development saw the emergence of agricultural manufacturing businesses and services, which led to the industrialization of agriculture and agricultural products, which persists in Gilroy today. Examples of these agricultural goods manufacturers included: Live Oak Creamery, the Pieters-Wheeler Seed Company, the Filice & Perrelli Cannery, and C. B. Gentry Chili Powder Company. Other companies, such as BeGe Manufacturing & Welding Company, manufactured tools and vehicles for agricultural use. This period also saw the establishment of smaller farms closer to the downtown core. While much of the agricultural-related resources have been lost throughout Gilroy’s history, there are some examples that remain from this period. One important remaining resource is the Live Oak Creamery located on Railroad Avenue. This building is simplistic in design and located near the railroad tracks, which was likely for the ease of transporting goods and supplies. Unlike the Live Oak Creamery, which is located on a small parcel within the downtown core on Railroad Avenue, larger agricultural properties from this period may contain buildings and structures that were not fully visible from the public right-of-way. One of the most visible representations of agricultural properties is located at 7040 Church Street. This property is an intact, early-twentieth century farm with multiple agricultural buildings that were partially visible from the public right of way including a water storage building, multiple sheds, and animal enclosures. Another extant example is a barn located at 420 Lewis Street, however, this barn is no longer tied to a farmstead and exhibits a very utilitarian and unremarkable design. The remaining agricultural properties identified during the survey were not visible from the public right of way or were unremarkable in design. Given the rich history of agriculture in Gilroy, it is likely that there are additional agricultural resources of significance that were not identified by the citywide survey. These resources should be evaluated on a case by case basis for significance and integrity. There are numerous examples of manufacturing and industrial buildings throughout the city. However, the bulk of these buildings are ubiquitous and unremarkable in design, and devoid of workmanship as they are often prefabricated using standard materials. The few examples that were identified as potentially significant from this time period were flagged for additional research in order to adequately assess historic significance. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 153 July 2020 7.2.3 World War II and Post-War Development (1941-1975) The dominant themes of the World War II and Post-War Development period (1941-1975) are population growth, expansion of City territory, enlarged manufacturing, food production and processing capabilities. Like many other cities in California, Gilroy’s population continued to grow in the decade following the close of World War II, and the need for residential development required more space than the remaining undeveloped areas within the City could accommodate. In order to house Gilroy’s many incoming residents, annexation of new territory by the mid-1950s was essential to keep pace with the steadily rising demand for housing. The influx of people to the City required even more newly annexed areas devoted to residential developments as well as supporting infrastructure like schools, parks, churches and commercial centers. These newly annexed areas were primarily located to the west of Princevalle Street extending as far north as Mantelli Drive and as south as West Luchessa Avenue. Property types associated with these significant themes include residential, commercial, and civic and institutional properties. Residential Properties The population of Gilroy grew substantially between in the first half of the 1940s. This growth was spurred by a combination of service members returning from the war to establish families and people who were attracted to the area in search of job opportunities created by the war effort. The City was not prepared for the increased housing needs and as a result, private companies such as BeGe Manufacturing created their own worker housing. Albert Gurries designated a portion of the land north of First Street between Hanna and Church Streets as an employee housing subdivision, the Gurries Tract in April 1945. In 1946, Gurries announced development of 50 additional houses for employees and returning soldiers. A few of these modest, Minimal Traditional-style houses in the Gurries Tract still stand on Gurries Drive, while many others have been demolished or heavily modified. After annexation of land west of the original downtown core, modern residential subdivisions like Sherwood Park, Eschenberg Park, and Castlewood Park formed using the Gurries Tract model. The earliest examples of Ranch and Minimal Traditional residences in Gilroy during this period were typically not constructed as large-scale tracts, but rather, were intermixed among other earlier architectural styles in non-tract neighborhoods. Examples of these early Ranch and Minimal Traditional house forms can be seen along 5th Street between Princevalle Street and Miller Avenue and on Carmel between 3rd and 5th Streets. These individually designed residences embody the construction techniques and design aesthetic most often associated with the Ranch and Minimal Traditional style homes found throughout tracts, however, their placement within existing neighborhoods makes these individual houses more likely to be significant than their counterparts in large housing tracts, which were constructed by the hundreds outside of the original downtown core. Given the commonality of Ranch and Minimal Traditional style homes throughout the United States and California, the standards for significance and integrity is generally quite high. While the earlier house forms from the 1940s and 1950s are present in Gilroy, most of the properties from this period of development consist of ubiquitous tract housing and fail to rise to the level of significance required for designation at the local, state and national level. Newly annexed sections of the City were typically subdivided by the same developer or development company and laid out in its own grid system. The most common architectural styles for these developments were Ranch (c. 1935-1975), Minimal Traditional (c. 1935-1950), and Contemporary (1945-1990). These styles were repeated in various models throughout tract housing developments using low-cost building materials and limited architectural details to reduce labor costs. The majority of the residences from this period of development are extant; however, many have been subject to window and door replacements and other CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 154 July 2020 alterations including second-story additions. These modifications disrupt the visual continuity that is required to make a tract housing development significant. There are also instances in which large portions of early housing tracts were demolished. Significant alterations to visual cohesion in the tract neighborhoods to the north and west of Gilroy’s downtown core combined with the uniformity in architectural style, materials, lot size, and arrangement placed all of the tract neighborhoods outside of the realm of significance at the local, state and national level. Associated Architectural Styles Residential architectural styles associated with the World War II and Post-War Development period (1941-1975) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features of each style):  Ranch (c. 1935-1975)  Minimal Traditional (c. 1935-1950)  Contemporary (1945-1990) Significance Requirements Table 12 discusses the significance of residential buildings from Gilroy’s World War II and Post-War Development period (1941-1975) in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order for a residential property from the World War II and Post-War Development Period (1941-1975) to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be constructed within this development period (1941-1975) and adhere to the following requirements: Table 12. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Gilroy followed the same pattern of much of the U.S. in the post- war years with regard to residential development, which is characterized as expansion to accommodate population growth. Post-war residential development in Gilroy primarily consisted of large housing tracts in the newly annexed western portions of the city. Residences within these post-1948 annexation areas are not likely to be associated with any important patterns of post-war residential development. Post-1948 development marked Gilroy’s deviation from the formal city grid. Examples of this change in city planning and development includes the angling of Miller Avenue (as opposed to having it run parallel to Princevalle Street), and the introduction of curvilinear streets such as Monte Vista Way. This less rigid form of planning resulted in lots that are not uniform in size. Setback requirements also increased slightly in these areas, resulting in an overall lack of uniformity, as seen in the original city grid. Like most of the U.S. in the post-war years, CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 155 July 2020 Table 12. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance there is also evidence of the Small House Movement, with the frequent use of Minimal Traditional homes and early Ranch style homes, versus the larger homes seen on streets within the original city grid. Buildings most likely to be eligible for their associations with events and patterns of development will have been built in 1948 or earlier and be located within the original downtown grid. These buildings may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Residential Development, specifically, Gilroy’s pattern of early residential development in the original city grid during the early twentieth century. B/2 2 Association with People Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants, artists, or city officials. However, under this Criterion the residence should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Residential buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder. Given the commonality of the architectural styles from this period of development, buildings must retain a high level of materials integrity to be considered for significance and must be proven to be the work of a master architect or builder that is noted for his/her work in Gilroy. Resources qualified under these criteria should be excellent examples of types and/or styles and retain almost all of their original features. Architectural significance should also be considered in the event of a tract housing development that retains a high level of visual cohesion, as it has the potential to be representative of architectural planning and methodology employed in this development period, although none were observed during the citywide survey. D/4 — Information Potential Residential buildings or ruins of residential buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 156 July 2020 Table 12. Significance Requirements for Residential Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, residential properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Excellent representation of a style of architecture from the time period  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration.  Retains original windows and doors on the main elevation. Replacement windows on the main elevation of the building have the potential to compromise the building’s integrity, given the commonality of the house form.  Retains the original ornamentation.  Retains the original cladding.  Retains original porch configuration and materials.  Does not have later additions that are visible from the public right-of-way and impact integrity. Examples of such additions include incompatible garages, second story additions, dormers, and breezeways that are visible from the public right-of-way. This also includes any inappropriately scaled ADUs.  Does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door and porch details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style).  Relocation of a residential building is acceptable provided that it can still convey its historic significance. Commercial Properties During World War II commercial development slowed and little new construction was completed during these years, as most business that began during the war years were established in existing commercial buildings. In 1949, following a recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council passed an ordinance allowing CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 157 July 2020 businesses to operate for the first time on a section of Eigleberry Street between First and Seventh Streets. This resulted in an expansion of the commercial corridor from Monterey Road only to Eigleberry Street, which became a combination of residences and businesses, as well as homes that were converted to a commercial use. Later, in the 1960s and 1970s, commercial development took place in the newly developed areas of the City to the north and west of the original downtown core. These areas required the installation of new facilities like shopping centers to service the outlying residential developments which had been established in the 1950s and 1960s. There were few new commercial developments along Monterey Road in the downtown district, again relegated to the area outside the main development corridor from 1st Street to 8th Street. Associated Architectural Styles Commercial architectural styles associated with the Early and Mid-Twentieth Century Development period (1904- 1941) of Gilroy became more streamlined and less ornate than the previous development period, and include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features and a representative example of each style):  Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965)  Mansard (1940-1980)  Contemporary (1945-1990)  Googie (c. 1940-1960s) Significance Requirements Table 13 discusses the significance of commercial buildings from Gilroy’s World War II and Postwar Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order for a commercial property from the World War II and Post-War Development Period (1941-1975) to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be constructed within this period (1941-1975) and consider the following: Table 13. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with the theme of Commercial Development. Commercial buildings from this period serve as important representations of architectural development patterns in Gilroy in the years surrounding World War II. After 1949, commercial buildings were allowed outside of the Monterey Road corridor and begin to appear on formerly residential-only street such as Eigleberry Street. As this period progresses, and Gilroy citizens rely more heavily on automobiles, the city government allowed commercial buildings to expand further outward from the original, Monterey Road commercial district. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 158 July 2020 Table 13. Significance Requirements for Commercial Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance B/2 2 Association with People Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent merchants. However, under this Criterion the commercial building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Commercial buildings from this period may be significant for their architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Popular styles for commercial buildings from this period include Mid-Century Modern, Contemporary, and Googie. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builder. Individual resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. With regard to historic districts, contributing properties need not meet the integrity threshold required for individually eligible properties. Provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole within its historic context, individual properties may lack individual distinction. This is particularly true of properties located within the downtown commercial core, nearly all of which exhibit altered storefronts. D/4 — Information Potential Commercial buildings or ruins of commercial buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation in the City’s HRI, commercial properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 159 July 2020 time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for commercial properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture or construction methodology from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains overall scale and massing that is consistent to the time period.  Additions made to the building must be made to the rear of the building and not serve as a detraction from the main elevation.  Retains elements of the original fenestration pattern. Storefronts can be altered, but their alterations should not compete with the rest of the building or detract from other historic elements still in place on the street facing elevation. Original fenestration may be covered, but the building retains adequate integrity if the treatment used to cover the fenestration is removable. For example, if a building’s original transoms have been painted over or boarded-up but are still in place, the building retains the requisite historic integrity.  Retains some of the original ornamentation including original awnings or signage.  Replacement cladding is acceptable as long as character defining features remain intact. For instance, a brick commercial building may be re-clad in stucco in the event that the cornice line detailing remains intact.  The addition of security elements like bars and fencing that is not permanently affixed to the building does not negatively impact the integrity of the building.  The building does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style). Civic and Institutional Properties Similar to the development of commercial properties during the World War II and Post-War Development period, civic and institutional properties continued at a moderate rate in Gilroy. The properties built during this period were mostly built as replacements to earlier structures. The newly annexed areas of the City predominantly devoted to residential development required the construction of supporting infrastructure like schools, parks, and churches. These buildings were constructed north and west of the original City core and typically utilized simple, modern architectural styles including Stripped Classicism (1930-1945), Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965), and Contemporary (1945-1990). Associated Architectural Styles Institutional architectural styles associated with the World War II and Post War Development period (1941-1975) of Gilroy include the following (see Section 5 for the character-defining features of each style):  Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965)  Contemporary (1945-1990) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 160 July 2020 Significance Requirements Table 14 discusses the significance of institutional buildings from Gilroy’s World War II and Post-War Development period in consideration of NRHP, CRHR and City designation criteria. In order to be eligible for designation as an individual property on the City’s HRI, the property must be constructed within the World War II and Post War Development period (1941-1975) and consider the following: Table 14. Significance Requirements for Institutional Properties Built from 1941-1975 NRHP/CRHR Criteria Gilroy Criteria (MC 30.27.30) Type of Significance Description of Significance A/1 1 and 2 Association with Events, Patterns of Development; Special Elements of the City Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their clear associations with multiple themes in Gilroy’s World War II and Post-War Development period including schools, churches, and civic development. Institutional buildings from this time period serve as important representations of institutional architectural development patterns in Gilroy. B/2 2 Association with People Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for their association with persons important to the history of Gilroy. Such persons may include prominent religious figures or civic figures. However, under this Criterion the institutional building should: 1) be clearly associated with the person during the period of time in which they gained importance within their profession or group; 2) be compared to other properties associated with the person(s) in question in order to identify which property(s) best represent that person’s achievements or reasons for being significant. C/3 3 and 4 Architecture; Design; Notable Work Institutional buildings from this period may be significant for thei r architecture, as expressed by intact character-defining features, forms or construction methods. Buildings may also qualify as the work of a master architect or prominent builders. Individual resources qualified under these criteria should be good examples of types and/or styles and retain most of their original features. D/4 — Information Potential Institutional buildings or ruins of institutional buildings that have the potential to yield important information about construction methods and materials, or patterns of local residential development may be significant for their potential to provide information important to history; but it is unlikely such examples exist. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 161 July 2020 Integrity Requirements In order to be eligible for designation on the City’s HRI, institutional properties must meet at least one of the City’s designation criteria and retain integrity from their period of construction. While most buildings undergo change over time, alterations should not significantly change a property’s essential historic character. The following integrity requirements have been identified for residential properties from this period:  Good representation of a style of architecture from the time period.  Retains the original roofline and roof form. Replacement of roofing material is acceptable, but the roofline and form must be intact.  Retains original fenestration. While replacement windows and doors are acceptable, the original fenestration pattern should be intact.  Retains some of the original ornamentation (particularly ornamentation around entry points, windows, and roofline detailing).  Replacement cladding is acceptable in rare cases when cladding is replaced in kind and there is no change in the material type. For example, wood cladding needs to be replaced with wood cladding not stucco.  Additions to the building must be in keeping with scale and must not detract from the building’s principal elevation.  The building does not feature conjectural elements (e.g., the addition of stone veneer to a building that was historically clad in wood, or elaborate door and porch details that are not consistent with the original period of construction or architectural style). Transportation Infrastructure The single greatest change to transportation infrastructure during this period of development consisted of and related to moving Highway 101 off Monterey Road and around downtown Gilroy, constructing a large freeway through town. The City of Gilroy appealed to the State Highway Commission to route Highway 101 around the City instead of along Monterey Road in order to alleviate traffic congestion beginning in 1965. When the Highway 101 bypass was completed in 1973, the population of Gilroy had grown to over 12,600. While there are no additional transportation buildings identified during this period of development, the Highway 101 bypass influenced the future growth and development of Gilroy into the next development period (1975 to present), as businesses and residences began to develop in relation to established on/off ramps from the highway. Agriculture, Industry, and Manufacturing As a direct result the demand created by World War II and the need for processed food and military equipment, industry and manufacturing began to turn into more of an agribusiness enterprise with large plants being developed by established companies such as C.B. Gentry Company and BeGe Manufacturing. With a shift towards shipping using automobiles, rather than solely relying on rail, new agribusiness companies like Gilroy Foods and Christopher Ranch also began to develop their warehouses and packing plants on the edges of town. In the 1950s, the City also made an effort to attract non-agricultural based industries. By 1961, a Standard Industrial Survey Summary of Gilroy found that Gilroy’s six largest manufacturing plants included BeGe Manufacturing Co. (300 employees), Gentry (60 to 400 seasonal employees), Filice & Perrelli Canning Co. (80 to 800 seasonal employees), National Fiberglass Corporation (25 employees), Air-O-Fan Corporation (12 employees), and Sandoe Hanna Welding Co. (10 CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 7. Guidance for Assessing Significance 162 July 2020 employees). The number of manufacturing plants rose to 37 by 1972, with companies like Dukor Industries, Crown Zellerbach Co. and Pacific Central Co. Industrial development during this period resulted in the emergence of more ubiquitous industrial and manufacturing facilities to maximize efficient processing of goods and materials. Industrial and manufacturing buildings constructed during this period tended to be made from mass produced materials and in most cases, consist of large, prefabricated metal or concrete warehouses with no architectural detail. While there is always potential to uncover additional industrial and manufacturing resources from this time period that were not visible from the public right-of-way, it is somewhat unlikely that they would rise to the level required for significance at the National, State or local level without a significant level of research. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 163 July 2020 8 Findings and Recommendations 8.1 Citywide Survey Findings 8.1.1 Summary of Findings Dudek completed pedestrian survey of 3,374 properties within the City of Gilroy built in 1974 or earlier. The historical significance and integrity of properties within the survey area was evaluated in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and City designation criteria, as well as the seven aspects of integrity established for the NRHP and incorporated into the CRHR. All evaluated resources were assigned a California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC), as appropriate. These codes indicate if a resource is listed in, or appears eligible for listing in, the NRHP, CRHR, or City HRI. The complete spreadsheet of all citywide survey findings is provided in Appendix B. A summary of these findings is provided below:  City HRI Properties: 360 currently designated; 224 recommended to stay on HRI; 136 recommended for removal from the HRI; and 55 recommended for addition to the HRI (see Appendix C, Table 1a, 1b, 1c).  City HRI Districts: 10 currently designated and 7 are recommended for removal; 3 districts will remain and have been updated as part of this study (see district DPR forms in Appendix D)  CRHR and NRHP Eligible/Listed Properties: 32 properties listed in/eligible for the NRHP and/or CRHR. Of these, 7 are listed in the NRHP/CRHR; 3 determined eligible for the NRHP/CRHR through the Section 106 process; 12 appear eligible for listing in the NRHP/CRHR; and 10 appear eligible for listing in the CRHR only (see Appendix C, Table 2).  Ineligible Properties: 1,560 properties appear not eligible for inclusion in the HRI, CRHR, or NRHP due to a lack of significance/integrity.  Unevaluated Properties: Certain properties were excluded from the citywide survey because they served as a ubiquitous example of tract housing or an unremarkable, prefabricated industrial property (n=1,520); require additional study/research before they can be evaluated (n=11); or they were not visible from the public right-of-way (n=25) and could not be evaluated. A complete list of properties requiring additional study/not visible is provided in Appendix C, Table 3a and 3b.  All State of California DPR Forms completed as part of the citywide survey are located in Appendix D. 8.1.2 City HRI Eligible/Listed Properties According to City data, 360 properties are designated on the City’s HRI. Many of these properties were identified as part of the 1985-1986 citywide survey, which inventoried much of the original downtown grid, roughly equivalent to the 1945 city limits. Of the 360 designated HRI properties, 136 are recommended for removal from the HRI due to either demolition of the resource entirely, extensive alteration of character-defining elements, or lack of identified CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 164 July 2020 significance. Additionally, 55 newly identified properties are recommended for designation on the HRI. Appendix C, Table 1a, 1b, and 1c provides a complete list of all existing HRI properties by address, historic name (if applicable), recommendation for retention or removal from the HRI, as well as any properties recommended for inclusion in the HRI, and any applicable comments concerning these recommendations. Figure 40 provides an overview of existing and recommended HRI properties as a result of the current study. Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_HRI_Properties.mxd101 152 Holloway R dHoo ver Ct2nd St RogersLnDe l Ma r St A l e x a n d e r S t S i x t h S t Alt a St M u rr a y A v e Old Gilroy StTaft CtSilvia St5th S tPolk CtIOOF AveCarr PlStuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt E 9th S tFowler StBlake Ct S toneyC t SequoiaDr Dor i s Ct Casey LnOak CtW aln u t L n BremLnGa r d e n Ct L e x i n g t o n P lSyrahCtClubDrEl Rancho St Willard Ct Automall Dr B irch Pl White Oak Pl Ma p l e S t 11th StHadley C tGl e n wo o d DrE St Tennyson Dr H o w so n S tBenassi DrF o r e s t StLa Co c he Wa y Automall CtParish WayHoesch Way Violet Way B u t t e r cup Ln Cas a De l S o lS tA d o b e PlzCulpDr L a Sierra W a y Hoxett StPetersen Dr Aspen WayChesbro Way La AlondraW ay Mo nteV istaWayGe tty s b urgW ay JuniperDr Carla Way Gl e n v i e wDr Sarf in aW aySanta Barbara DrPappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St W illiam sburgW ay C lark Way Hersman Dr C u m b erlan d D r E 8th S tPlym ou t h D r HowardAve Fillippelli D r Perrelli S t La Paloma Wa yKipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St F airview D rHacienda Dr Me s a S t4th S tE 7 th S tS p rin g d ale C t DriftwoodTerLawrence Dr Ro s a n n a StWentzDrReaSt VentureW a yCra wfordDr Ch e s t n u t S t Broadway St W 7th S tW 9th S tCypress Ct E schen b u rg D rGaunt AveLindsteadt WayGrenacheWay Arnold Dr Sherwood Dr Monte Bello Dr Ortega Cir Silacci W ay Ayer Dr Y orktownDrSantaPaulaDrLaurelDr C a mile A veAu t o mallPkwyS w a n sto nLnSan Miguel St El Cerrito Way L ew is S tFilice DrOrchardDrWestwood DrK elto n DrHa n n a StWaylandL n SantaTheresaDrDo wd y St Gilman RdCa r me l St Ei g l e b e r r y StW8thSt Arroyo C i rPri n c e v a ll e St 3rd S t W 6th St E 6th S tUvas Park Dr C a min o Arro yo Church S t UvasPkwy RenzLnKern AveWrenAveMiller AveW 10th S tWelburn Ave M a n telliDrS a n t a T e r e s a B l v d P ach eco P a s s H w yLeavesleyRd E 10th S t 1st St Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 40A 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area Existing HRI Properties Recommended Eligible for HRI/Property Should Remain Listed Recommended for Removal from HRI City of Gilroy Parcels Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_HRI_Properties.mxd101 Las Anim as AveNoNameUno C hurchSt Mu rr a y A v eKern AveSaddlerDrM a rt iri Ct Jaguar Pl Cooper PlP u eblo Ct OrindaWayOkeef e Ct Finch Ln M o ro C t Yam aneD r M oroDrBenbow DrKe ll y L n M artiriDr Peregrine Dr RodeoDrHogan WayMelchoir CtAvezan WayWagonWayOkeefeLn Sage H illDrJicarilla Pl Koshare St F r e e manC tLariatDrBennett StL e r m a W a yHopiLnComancheStZuniLnTapestry DrDelRi oCirT e rri C t L e r m a L n Ra d t k e Av e V i c k e r y L n Mu r a o k a Dr Le pa Ct K ishim ura D rSolanaDrLa Primavera Way F e s ta AgilioDrWoodcreek Way Taos WayBobcat CtSturla W ayMonticelliDr Li man Ave V a l b u s a D r LoganberryDrF o r e s t StElCaminito Johnson W ayE d en St Pad ovaDrArapaho Dr Z a mz o w C t EagleHillsWayGeronimo St Pueblo St CalledelReyB ria rb e r r y Ln Pheasant DrEagle View WaySprig Way Cheyenne DrCougar CtS a n Y sid r o A v e Wilf o rdW ayTatum Ave FarrellA veC ohansey A veRona n Ave D en io A veM a r c ella A v e D a y R d B u en a V ista A veWren AveHirasakiAveSunrise Dr Longmeadow Dr S a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 40B 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area Existing HRI Properties Recommended Eligible for HRI/Property Should Remain Listed Recommended for Removal from HRI City of Gilroy Parcels Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_HRI_Properties.mxd152 Solis D r Silvia StC l u b Dr StuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt Blake Ct Birkdale Ct SequoiaDrGallowayCtColonyWay SyrahCtWillard Ct B irch Pl White Oak Pl LahinchCtVerbendDrWildIrisDrAlister CtTennyson Dr Benassi DrHacket DrTarynLnParish WayBraid CtHoesch Way TurnberryWayEdinburghWayViolet Way B u t t e r cup Ln Perrelli S tPeriwinkleDrLaPalomaWa yHoxett StCulp D r Petersen Dr W a y l a ndLnAspen WayChesbro WayLar k s p u rLnC alabres e Way La AlondraW ay CrudenBayWayJuniperDr Carla Way Santa Barbara DrBerwickAv ePappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St Wentz Dr C lark Way Hersman Dr R anch o Vista Ct VistadelSur HowardAve Fillippelli D r Eld o ra do Dr Kipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St Hacienda Dr UvasParkDr DriftwoodTerUvasPkwyPonderosaDrLawrence Dr LahinchDr Portmarno ckWayCra wfordDrRanchoRealStrathPl PitlochryDr Gaunt AveGrenacheWay ElCerrito Way IsabellaWayMonte Bello Dr MossroseWay Ousley Dr R oundstone Dr Ortega Cir S u n flo w e r CirCypress Ct Ayer Dr Co u ntryDrSantaPaulaDrLaur el DrTr o on Way San Miguel St Muirfield W a y Delta DrHollyh ockLnEagleRidgeDr Westwood DrKelto n DrLone OakRanchoVistaDr Saint Andrew's Cir BurchellRd W 6th St Miller Ave3rd St M a n t e l l i Dr Kern AveWrenAveS a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Welburn Ave Heck e r P a s s H w y 1st St City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 40C 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area Existing HRI Properties Recommended Eligible for HRI/Property Should Remain Listed Recommended for Removal from HRI City of Gilroy Parcels Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_HRI_Properties.mxd101 Arizo n a CirCiminoStCharlesLuxDrHydeParkDrKoror L n Sussex PlBarron PlCajon Way Wisteria Dr T e c a t e L n De Anza Plz MasoniP lVin c a C t BoninoWay Gage CtTannatLn El Rancho St RasberryCt Thames DrFilbroDrEngel W a y Vill agePl Po p p yfieldSt Ro s a n n a St B r ookWayBogialaWayOlympicCtLusitano St Pal omi noPl C hurchill Pl RubyWay Shire St Alder St London Dr N ic ol eWay VlognierWay Carig nan e DrDawnW a yRiverviewCreek Trave l P a r kCi rLopezWayBultustro l DrBallybunionDr BabbsC re e k D r Wild f l o w erCtOakBrookWay Caspian W a y Greenfield DrMayock RdSanJ u s toRdObata Way Portrush C tS o u th sid e D rA uto m all P k w yV ictoria Dr W i nged F o otDr Eag l eRidgeDr M e s a R d Luchessa Ave UvasPkwy PrincevalleSt Ch u r c h St W LuchessaAveM i l l e r A v e W10thStB o ls a R d Santa Teresa Blvd Mont e r e y RdS Valley FwyCity of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 40D 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area Existing HRI Properties Recommended Eligible for HRI/Property Should Remain Listed Recommended for Removal from HRI City of Gilroy Parcels CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 166 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 167 July 2020 HRI Historic Districts According to City data, there are currently 10 historic districts designated on the HRI, most of which were identified as part of the 1985-1986 survey (Figure 41). As a result of the updated citywide survey, 7 of these existing districts are recommended for removal from the HRI due to a lack of integrity. However, many of the once-district contributing properties will remain listed on the HRI as individually significant properties. Table 15 provides a list of all existing HRI historic districts and associated recommendations for retention or removal from the HRI. Table 15. Summary of Existing and Recommended HRI Historic Districts District Name Currently on HRI? Recommendation Comments Bungalow Residential District Yes Remove from HRI Many district contributors exhibit significant alterations; boundary justification unclear; no defined period of significance Craftsman Bungalow District Yes Remove from HRI Lacks a cohesive Craftsman style, no defined period of significance Tudor/Period Revival District Yes Remove from HRI Omission of some properties without justification; unclear incorporation of the Wheeler Hospital; no defined period of significance and unclear why “Period Revival” is included in the district title Fifth Street Historic Residential District Yes Remove from HRI Statement of significance is very broad leaves room for the addition of many more properties to this district without establishing a clear period of significance; the district boundaries are not clearly justified and there are large pockets of non-contributors within the district. Eigleberry Early Settlers District Yes Remove from HRI Eastern-half of the district demolished Alexander Street Residential District Yes Remove from HRI Lacks visual cohesion; contributors exhibit numerous alterations Forest Street Bungalow District Yes Remove from HRI District justification unclear; no defined period of significance California Bungalow Residential District Yes Keep, but revise Now called the Holmes Brothers Craftsman District to more appropriately reflect the builder and correct architectural style Pioneer Row Historic District Yes Keep District to remain as-is Monterey Street Downtown Commercial Historic District Yes Keep, but revise Now called the Monterey Road Downtown Commercial Historic District. Revisions include changes to the original boundary and contributors/non-contributors CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 168 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_HRI_Districts.mxdPioneer RowDistrict Holmes BrothersCraftsmanDistrict MontereyDistrict AlexanderStreet District BungalowDistrict CraftsmanBungalowDistrict EigleberryEarly SettlersDistrict Fifth StreetDistrict Forest StreetBungalowDistrict Tudor-PeriodRevivalDistrict 101 152 2nd St Hoov er Ct RogersLnCl a r a Wa y 7th StMu r r a y Av eOakCt Sydney Ct S i x t h S tSargentStFontana W ayOld Gilroy St M artin S t5th S tGe n n a r o Wa y P e rre lli S tOr char dDrS a n Y sid ro P a rk R enzLnStoneyCtRa ilr o a d St W aln u t L n Al e x a n d e r St Ma p l e S tRo s a n n a St F o r e s t S t E St H a d le y C t L a Sierra W a y IO O FA veMont eV istaW ayS arfinaW ayWa y l a n d L nHa n n a St E 8th S tE 9th S t4th St E 7 th S tRe a St W 7th S tC h e s t n utSt Broadway St E s c h en b u rg D rL e w is S tFiliceDrDo wd y St SantaTheresaDrCa r me l St Ei g l e b e r r y St ArroyoCir W 8th S t3rd St W 6th S tE 6th S tCh u r c h St Miller AvePri n c e v a ll e St Mo n t e r e y R d 1st St S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Existing and Recommended HRI Districts City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 500250Feet FIGURE 41 101 152 City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels City HRI District Contributor Recommended City HRI District Boundaries Districts Recommended for Removal from the HRI CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 170 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 171 July 2020 Historic Districts Recommended for Removal from HRI The following districts are recommended for removal from the HRI as a result of the survey:  Bungalow Residential District: the original justification for this district states that “the district is significant as a neighborhood that reflects the growth of Gilroy during the height of the canning industry and the popular styles of bungalow architecture so appropriate in Gilroy.”361 A review of the district and its contributors indicates that the district has significant integrity issues, particularly on the east side of Church Street between 1st and 2nd Streets. Further, the boundary justifications are not visually distinctive and it is not clear how they were determined. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although many of its contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Alexander Street Residential District: the original justification for this district states that “this district is distinct from other areas by its limited alterations and cohesive design” and pinpoints the district’s significance in its ability to function of a “micro display of Gilroy history, this area contains homes of early settlers, those who came from lumbering, cattle and farm industries, as well as those who were attracted by the booming economy of the food processing era”362. A review of the district and its contributors indicates that none of the aforementioned associations are conveyed by the district. Further, several of the contributors have been subject to extensive alterations, including 7350, 7360, 7391, and 7429 Alexander Street. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although many of its contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Craftsman Bungalow District: the original justification for this district states “The 7700 Block of Rosanna contains a grouping of Craftsman bungalows that are a complete set on the street.”363 However, updated survey found that the 7700 block of Rosanna Street is not comprised solely of Craftsman bungalows, it also includes Queen Ann (7721 and 7711 Rosanna) and Folk National (7751 Rosanna) style properties. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although many of its contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Tudor/Period Revival District: it is unclear why “Period Revival” is used in the district title, when the contributing properties are only Tudor Revival style. If it was meant to be a Period Revival style district, then it should have included the Colonial Revival (7580 Princevalle Street) and Spanish Colonial Revival (7548 Princevalle) properties as contributors. Of further confusion is why one Tudor Revival residence (7554 Princevalle Street) was not included as a contributor. Finally, it is unclear why the Wheeler Hospital is included as a contributor to this district, when the district’s justification of significance is primarily focused on how the “Tudor Revival style marked a distinctive change in Gilroy from the unassuming bungalows to these elegant and formal homes that portray a change in attitudes.”364 There is a vague connection to these residences as being owned by “people who were important in the development, business and medical history of the community.”365 However, the connection to Wheeler Hospital is not clearly established. For 361 Bamburg, Bonnie. 1986. City of Gilroy Historic Preservation Survey 1985-1986. A comprehensive Study of the History and Architecture of the City of Gilroy within the 1945 City Limits. The Firm of Bonnie L. Bamburg, San Jose, California. On file with the City of Gilroy. 362 Ibid. 363 Ibid 364 Ibid 365 Ibid CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 172 July 2020 these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although many of its contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Fifth Street Historic Residential District: the original justification for the significance of this district is that it is a representative sample of Gilroy residential architecture, important architects and builders, and associations with important individuals. “The collective history of Gilroy is represented in this grouping of structures.”366. The result is a large number of properties with varying levels of significance and historical associations incorporated into a district boundary that is not clearly justified. There is also a significant gap between Hanna Street and Carmel Street. While there is clearly a high density of HRI properties within the boundary defined, it seems to exclude many other HRI properties that also contribute to the “collective history of Gilroy.” Simply put, the parameters of this district are too broad and not clearly defined. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although the vast majority of its contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Eigleberry Early Settlers District: the original justification for this district was that “In less than one block, this area retains the sense and feeling of early development on the west side of Monterey Street.” The significance statement goes on to state that “The importance is due to the sense of time and place, these mid 1870-1880 structures present”367. Updated survey of this district revealed that the entire eastern side of the 7300 block of Eigleberry Street has been demolished, including four district contributors (67 Seventh Street and 7320, 7350, and 7360 Eigleberry Street). As such, the loss of the entire eastern half of the district has significantly compromised the setting and feeling of the district as a whole. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although nearly all of the contributors on the west side of Eigleberry Street will remain on the HRI as individual properties.  Forest Street Bungalow District: the original justification for this district is that “This simple block of Forest has a well defined representation of bungalow styles.” The significance statement goes on to say that “the significance of this district is directly enhanced by the large grouping of bungalows that represent variations of design within the style.”368 But it is unclear how this grouping of bungalows on Forest Street is differentiated from those in the Craftsman Bungalow District or Bungalow Residential District (see discussions above), or why this particular pocket of residences on Forest Street is worthy of its own district. For these reasons, the district is recommended for removal from the HRI, although nearly all of the contributors will remain on the HRI as individual properties. Historic Districts Recommended to Stay on HRI The following districts continue to be recommended as HRI districts, with some modifications to account for changes in integrity and setting since they were first recorded and evaluated. A complete record of each district, including contributors and non-contributors, can be found in the district DPR forms provided in Appendix D  Holmes Brothers Craftsman District. Formerly called the California Bungalow Residential District, this district comprises 10 buildings constructed in 1921. Contributing buildings within the district are visually united by the Craftsman style of architecture, as well as, their small lots, rectangular plans, 1-story height, uniform set back, low, broad-design, and a wide front porch with stucco sheathing. All contributing buildings 366 Ibid 367 Ibid 368 Ibid CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 173 July 2020 are historically united by their shared associations with the growth and development of Gilroy’s residences within the original grid, and represent a concentration of small, Craftsman style homes dating from 1921 constructed by the Holmes Brothers. The district’s period of significance is 1921 when all of the contributing buildings were constructed on Chestnut Street and 6th Street. As a result, this district remains an undisturbed grouping of Holmes Brothers’ buildings that are historically distinct from other buildings within the neighborhood.  Pioneer Row Historic District. This district comprises four buildings constructed circa 1870. Contributing buildings within the district are Folk National in style and visually united by their almost identical appearance with hall and parlor design, one-story height, cross gable roof, horizontal board siding, full front porch supported by posts with ornamental braces, equal set-backs from Forest Street, and a center entry flanked by multi-lite windows. All contributing buildings are historically united by their shared associations with the growth and development of early Gilroy’s residences within the original grid, and represent a concentration of small, Folk National style homes dating from the 1870s. The district’s period of significance begins in 1870, the approximate date of construction for all four contributing buildings and ends the same year when the Robert Grant developed housing tract was completed. This group of four residences represents the best example of early 1870’s mass constructed housing left in Gilroy.  Monterey Road Downtown Commercial Historic District. Formerly called the Monterey Street Downtown District, this district comprises 60 buildings (45 contributors and 15 non-contributors) constructed between approximately 1870 and 1940. Contributing buildings within the district are visually united by their long, narrow, rectangular plans, 1-2 story height, 1-2 part commercial block, glass storefronts, standardized set- backs from Monterey Road, adjacent positioning/shared party-wall, and use of simple brick commercial, stucco commercial, and more ornately elaborately designed buildings in Art Deco, Neoclassical, Spanish- Colonial Revival, and Italianate styles. The district also contains a number of simple, unadorned storefronts devoid of architectural style that only contribute to the district through their simple rectangular plan, scale and massing, and shared walls. Other features seen throughout the district include raised parapets, cornice line detailing, and brick/molded stringcourses. The district also includes several monumental buildings that serve as major anchor-points for the district, including the NRHP-listed Old City Hall building (7400 Monterey Road), The Milias Hotel (7387 Monterey Road), the bank building at 7490 Monterey Road (22 Martin Street), and the Louis Hotel and Café (7365-7367 Monterey Road). All contributing buildings are historically united by their shared associations with the growth and development of Gilroy’s commercial core, and represent a concentration of simple, traditional brick commercial (one-part and two-part block) and revival style storefronts, dating from 1870 to 1940, with the vast majority of buildings within the district dating to the 1920s. The district’s period of significance begins in 1870 when the original SPRR Depot was constructed and new hotels and businesses began to establish along Monterey Road; and ends in 1940 when commercial development along Monterey Road slowed and new commercial development departed from the size, scale, and massing of the districts traditional storefronts; and commercial development on other streets was newly allowed (i.e., along Eigleberry Street between First and Seventh Streets). Very little new development has occurred in the Monterey Road downtown core since the mid-century. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 174 July 2020 8.1.3 CRHR and NRHP Eligible/Listed Properties In consideration of the CHRIS records search results (Confidential Appendix A), which included a review of the State HRI, 32 properties listed on/eligible for the NRHP and/or CRHR. Of these 7 properties within Gilroy city-limits are listed in the NRHP, and by default, are also listed in the CRHR; an additional 3 properties have been determined eligible for the NRHP/CRHR through the Section 106 process; 12 properties appear eligible for inclusion in the NRHP (CHRSC 3S); and 10 additional properties appear eligible for inclusion in the CRHR only (CHRSC 3CS). All CRHR and NRHP eligible/listed properties are also listed in or eligible for the City HRI. Appendix C, Table 2 provides a complete list of all identified CRHR and NRHP eligible/listed properties by address, historic name (if applicable), current CHRSC, recommended CHRSC, and any applicable comments concerning these recommendations. Figure 42 shows the locations of all NRHP and CRHR listed/eligible properties. 8.1.4 Ineligible Properties Of the properties evaluated for historical significance, 1,560 properties were found ineligible for the NRHP, CRHR, and City HRI due to a lack of requisite integrity and/or architectural merit. These are represented by a CHRSC of 6Z in Appendix B. Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Eligible_Properties.mxd101 152 Holloway R dHoo ver Ct2nd St RogersLnDe l Ma r St A l e x a n d e r S t S i x t h S t Alt a St M u rr a y A v e Old Gilroy St M artin S tTaft CtSilvia St5th S tPolk CtIOOF AveCarr PlStuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt E 9th S tFowler StBlake Ct S toneyC t SequoiaDr Dor i s Ct Casey LnRa ilr o a d St Oak CtW aln u t L n BremLnGa r d e n Ct L e x i n g t o n P lSyrahCtClubDrEl Rancho St Willard Ct Automall Dr B irch Pl White Oak Pl Ma p l e S t 11th StHadley C tGl e n wo o d DrE St Tennyson Dr H o w so n S tBenassi DrF o r e s t S tLa Co c he Wa y Automall CtParish WayHoesch Way Violet Way B u t t e r cup Ln Cas a De l S o lS tA d o b e PlzCulpDr L a Sierra W a y Hoxett StPetersen Dr Aspen WayChesbro Way La AlondraW ay Mo nteV istaWayGe tty s b urgW ay JuniperDr Carla Way Gl e n v i e wDr Sarf in aW aySanta Barbara DrPappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St W illiam sburgW ay C lark Way Hersman Dr C u m b erlan d D r E 8th S tPlym ou t h D r HowardAve Fillippelli D r Perrelli S t La Paloma Wa yKipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St F airview D rHacienda Dr Me s a S t4th S tE 7 th S tS p rin g d ale C t DriftwoodTerLawrence Dr Ro s a n n a St Wentz Dr Re a S t VentureW a yCra wfordDr Ch e s t n u t S t Broadway St W 7th S tW 9th S tCypress Ct E schen b u rg D rGaunt AveLindsteadt WayGrenacheWay Arnold Dr Sherwood Dr Monte Bello Dr Ortega Cir Silacci W ay Ayer Dr Y orktownDrSantaPaulaDrLaurelDr C a mile A veAu t o mallPkwyS w a n sto nLnSan Miguel St El Cerrito Way L ew is S tFilice DrOrchardDrWestwood DrK elto n DrHa n n a StWaylandL n SantaTheresaDrDo wd y St Gilman RdCa r me l St Ei g l e b e r r y St W 8thSt Arroyo C i rPri n c e v a ll e St 3rd S t W 6th St E 6th S tUvas Park Dr C a min o Arro yo Church S t UvasPkwy RenzLnKern AveWrenAveMiller AveW 10th S tWelburn Ave M a n telliDrS a n t a T e r e s a B l v d P ach eco P a s s H w yLeavesleyRd E 10th S t 1st St Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy NRHP and CRHR Eligible/Listed Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 42A 101 152 A B C A B C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Currently Listed on the NRHP/CRHR Properties Previously Determined Eligible for NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the CRHR Only Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Eligible_Properties.mxd101 Las Anim as AveNoNameUno C hurchSt Mu rr a y A v eKern AveSaddlerDrM a rt iri Ct Jaguar Pl Cooper PlP u eblo Ct Li l l y AveOrindaWayOkeef e Ct Finch Ln M o ro C t Yam aneD r M oroDrBenbow DrKe ll y L n M artiriDr Peregrine Dr RodeoDrHogan WayMelchoir CtAvezan WayWagonWayOkeefeLn Sage H illDrJicarilla Pl Koshare St F r e e manC tLariatDrBennett StL e r m a W a yHopiLnComancheStZuniLnTapestry DrDelRi oCirT e rri C t L e r m a L n Ra d t k e Av e V i c k e r y L n Mu r a o k a Dr Le pa Ct K ishim ura D rSolanaDrLa Primavera Way F e s ta AgilioDrWoodcreek Way Taos WayBobcat CtSturla W ayMonticelliDr Li man Ave V a l b u s a D r LoganberryDrF o r e s t StElCaminito Johnson W ayE d en St Pad ovaDrArapaho Dr Z a mz o w C t EagleHillsWayGeronimo St Pueblo St CalledelReyB ria rb e r r y Ln Pheasant DrEagle View WaySprig Way Cheyenne DrCougar CtS a n Y sid r o A v e Wilf o rdW ayTatum Ave FarrellA veC ohansey A veRona n Ave D en io A veM a r c ella A v e D a y R d B u en a V ista A veWren AveHirasakiAveSunrise Dr Longmeadow Dr S a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy NRHP and CRHR Eligible/Listed Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 42B 101 152 A B C A B C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Currently Listed on the NRHP/CRHR Properties Previously Determined Eligible for NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the CRHR Only Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Eligible_Properties.mxd152SolisDrSilvia StC l u b Dr StuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt Blake Ct Birkdale Ct SequoiaDrGallowayCtColonyWay SyrahCtWillard Ct B irch Pl White Oak Pl LahinchCtVerbendDrWildIrisDrAlister CtTennyson Dr Benassi DrHacket DrTarynLnParish WayBraid CtHoesch Way TurnberryWayEdinburghWayViolet Way B u t t e r cup Ln Perrelli S tPeriwinkleDrLaPalomaWa yHoxett StCulp D r Petersen Dr W a y l a ndLnAspen WayChesbro WayLar k s p u rLnC alabres e Way La AlondraW ay CrudenBayWayJuniperDr Carla Way Santa Barbara DrBerwickAv ePappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St Wentz Dr C lark Way Hersman Dr R anch o Vista Ct VistadelSur HowardAve Fillippelli D r Eld o ra do Dr Kipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St Hacienda Dr UvasParkDr DriftwoodTerUvasPkwyPonderosaDrLawrence Dr LahinchDr Portmarno ckWayCra wfordDrRanchoRealStrathPl PitlochryDr Gaunt AveGrenacheWay ElCerrito Way IsabellaWayMonte Bello Dr MossroseWay Ousley Dr R oundstone Dr Ortega Cir S u n flo w e r CirCypress Ct Ayer Dr Co u ntryDrSantaPaulaDrLaur el DrTr o on Way San Miguel St Muirfield W a y Delta DrHollyh ockLnEagleRidgeDr Westwood DrKelto n DrLone OakRanchoVistaDr Saint Andrew's Cir BurchellRd W 6th St Miller Ave3rd St M a n t e l l i Dr Kern AveWrenAveS a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Welburn Ave Hecker Pass Hwy 1st St Hecker Pass Tree Row City of Gilroy NRHP and CRHR Eligible/Listed Properties City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 42C 101 152 A B C A B C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Currently Listed on the NRHP/CRHR Properties Previously Determined Eligible for NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the NRHP and CRHR Properties that Appear Eligible for the CRHR Only CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 176 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 177 July 2020 8.1.5 Unevaluated Properties Certain properties were excluded from the citywide survey because they served as a ubiquitous example of tract housing or an unremarkable, prefabricated industrial property (n=1,520); require additional study/research before they can be evaluated n=11); or they were not visible from the public right-of-way (n=25) and could not be evaluated. Properties falling into one of these three categories have no accompanying DPR form set. A complete list of properties requiring additional study/not visible is provided in Appendix C, Table 3a and 3b. A discussion of all properties not evaluated as part of the citywide survey is provided below. Properties Excluded from Evaluation In consideration of the large quantity of properties that are included in a citywide survey, Dudek excluded certain properties that represent ubiquitous resource types throughout the United States and California (n=1,520), such as postwar tract housing and prefabricated industrial properties. Starting in the 1930s, housing shortages throughout the United States resulted in mass-produced housing forms. These new housing forms lead to the popularity of multiple styles from the 1930s to the 1970s including Minimal Traditional, Ranch, and Contemporary. While a large percentage of homes during this time were constructed as single family residences, as populations continued to boom in the second half of the twentieth century, multi-family complexes and duplexes also increased in popularity as a way to increase density in both suburban and urban areas. These popular building forms were designed to be quickly constructed with the use of mass produced materials, standardized floor plans, and were not typically designed by a master architect or with a high level of artistic value. Given the commonality of these house types, most do not rise to the level of significance required for local, state, or national designation. More than 40 million tract housing units were constructed in the United States during the 30-year period that followed the end of World War II. In California, nearly six million housing units were constructed during this period with more than 3.5 million of these being single-family residences. Generally speaking, a tract Ranch, Minimal Traditional, or Contemporary house will rarely be found individually eligible for designation. Rather, it is the larger tract that is more likely to be eligible as a district369. However, no distinctive postwar housing tracts were identified in Gilroy as a result of the citywide survey. All housing tracts west of Miller Avenue, south of 1st Street and west of Wayland Lane, north of 1st Street were found to be ubiquitous examples of Ranch and Minimal Traditional style tracts lacking distinctive/unique architectural features and exhibiting a low level of integrity of design, materials (particularly with regard to window placements), and feeling (Figure 43). Industrial development in Gilroy predominantly took place adjacent to the downtown commercial core/business district and developed in close relation to the railroad, reflective of Gilroy’s role as a major agricultural shipping center in the region. As the mid-twentieth century approached, and shipping became less reliant on the railroad and more reliant on overland trucking, industrial development began to expand on the outskirts of Gilroy. Buildings from this mid-century period were oftentimes mass produced, prefabricated metal, utilitarian building forms that can be found throughout the United States and California, with few design elements that reflect architectural styles. This is true of the industrial properties on Monterey Road near Leavesley Road; all industrial properties south of 10th Street; and industrial development along the 101 between 6th and 10th Streets (Figure 43). 369 Caltrans. 2011. Tract Housing in California, 1945-1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation. Sacramento, California. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 178 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Ineligible_Properties.mxd101 152 Holloway R dHoo ver CtRogersLnA l e x a n d e r S t S i x t h S t M u rr a y A v e W illy C tOld Gilroy St M artin S tTaft Ct5th S tPolk CtIO OFAveCarr PlE 9th S tS toneyC t BremLnDor i s Ct Me s a StCasey LnRa ilr o a d St Oak Ct2n d S tW aln u t L n Automall CtL e x i n g t o n P lMa p l e S t Ro s a n n a St L illy Ave Hadley C tGl e n wo o d DrE St H o w so n S tF o r e s t S tLa Co c he Wa y Ven tu reW ayA d obe P lzE lC errito W a y L a Sierra W a y Yorktow n D r Mo nteV istaWayPierce St Sarf in aW ayW illiam sburg Wa yC u m b erlan d D r E 8th S tPlym ou t h D r F airview D rArnold Dr 4th S tE 7 th S tS p rin g d ale C t Sherwood Dr Re a S t Ch e s t n u t S t Broadway St W 7th S tW 9th S tE schen b u rg D rLindsteadt WayWa y l a n d L n Au t o mallPkwySilacci W ay Ca m ile A ve S w a n sto nLnOrchardDrLew is S tFilice DrHa n n a St D unlap A veDo wd y St F u rl o n g Av e Gilman RdCa r me l St Ei g l e b e r r y St HolsclawRd Arroyo C i rW 8thStPri n c e v a ll e St Church S t C a min o Arro yo3rd St W 6th S tE 6th S tRenzLnMiller AveW 10th S tW e lburn Ave Mantelli Dr Pacheco Pass HwyLeavesley RdE 10th S t 1st St Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Properties Recommended Ineligible City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 43A 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Found Not Eligible for the HRI, CRHR or NRHP Properties Found to Represent a Common or Ubiquitous Resource Type that Lacks Potential for Eligibility Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Ineligible_Properties.mxd101 152Las Anim as AveNoNameUno C hurchSt Mu rr a y A v eKern AveC a s a b lancaCirSaddlerDrW illy C tB urke D rM a rt iri C t S a n Y sid r o A v e Jaguar Pl Cooper PlP u eblo Ct ArborStOrindaWayOkeefe Ct M o ro C t Yam aneD r Mo r oDrBenbow DrM a rtiriDrRodeoDrHogan WayMelchoir CtFl or a l StAvezan WayWagonWay Sage H illDrJicarilla Pl Koshare St F r e e manC tLariatDr Sp en ce rCtL illy Ave Del Oro W ayB ennett StL e r m a W a y Sorren to C tHopi LnComancheStZuniLnTapestry DrDelRio C irT e rri C t L e r m a L n Ra d t k e Av e Birdsong StV i c k e r y L n S o r r e ntoDrP a r t r i d g e D r Le pa Ct K ishim ura D rSolanaDrLa Primavera Way F e s ta AgilioDrWoodcreek Way Taos WayBobcat CtWilford W ayMu r a o k a D rSturla W ayMonticelliDr Li man Ave V a l b u s a D rElCaminito Johnson W ayLoganberryDr Arapaho Dr Z a mz o w C t B ria rb e r r y Ln Pheasant Dr Pad ovaDrEagle Hills WayGeronimo St Pueblo St Ede n St Siena D rEagle View WaySprig Way Cheyenne DrCougar CtF o r e s t S t Tatum Ave FarrellA veCalledelReyC ohansey A veD en io A veRona n Ave M a r c ella A v e Hi r asaki AveD a y R d B u en a V ista A veWren AveSunrise Dr L o n gmeadowDr S a n t a T e r e s a B l v d MantelliDr Leavesley RdMo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Properties Recommended Ineligible City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 43B 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Found Not Eligible for the HRI, CRHR or NRHP Properties Found to Represent a Common or Ubiquitous Resource Type that Lacks Potential for Eligibility Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Ineligible_Properties.mxd152 2nd StJanDrSolisDrSilvia StC l u b Dr Carr PlStuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt Fowler StBlake Ct Birkdale Ct SequoiaDr Dor i s Ct 4th St GallowayCtColon y W aySyrahCtWillard Ct Carriage DrB irch Pl White Oak Pl LahinchCtVerbendDrAlister CtArnold Dr Tennyson Dr Benassi DrPoplar DrHacket DrFineDr TarynLnParish WayBraid CtHoesch WayAcorn Way TurnberryWayEdinburghWayViolet Way B u t t e r cup Ln AmandaAvePeriwink l e DrCulp D r Hoxett StPetersen Dr Aspen WayChesbro WayLar k s p u rLnC alabres e Way La AlondraW ay Yorktown DrCrudenBayWayLavendarWay JuniperDr Carla Way Maria Way Santa Barbara DrLionsCreekDrBerwickAv ePappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St P a r t r i d g e D r C lark Way Hersman Dr R anch o Vista Ct WildIrisDrCalledelReyVistadelSur HowardAve Fillippelli D r Perrelli S t Eld o rad o Dr La Paloma Wa yKipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St Hacienda Dr UvasParkDr DriftwoodTerUvasPkwyPonderosaDrLawrence Dr Co lu mbineCt LahinchDr Wentz Dr Siena D rCrawford DrRanchoRealStrathPl PitlochryDr Gaunt AveGrenacheWayIsabellaWay Ramona WayBayTreeDrDaffodilPl Monte Bello Dr MossroseWay Ousley Dr R oundstone Dr Ortega Cir CypressCt Ayer Dr SantaPaulaDrS u n flo w e r CirLaur el DrEagleRidgeDr El Cerrito Way Troon W a y San Miguel St Muirfield W a y Delta DrWayl andL n Hollyh ockLnFilice DrWestwood DrK elto n DrSantaTheresaDrLone OakRanchoVistaDrCountryDr Saint Andrew's Cir BurchellRd WrenAveW 6th StKern AveMillerAveRanchoH ills D r 3rd St M a n t e l li Dr S a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Welburn Ave Hecker P a s s H wy 1st St City of Gilroy Properties Recommended Ineligible City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 43C 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Found Not Eligible for the HRI, CRHR or NRHP Properties Found to Represent a Common or Ubiquitous Resource Type that Lacks Potential for Eligibility Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Ineligible_Properties.mxd101CiminoStCharlesLuxDrHydeParkDrAlt a St De l Ma r S t K o ro r L n Arizo n a CirSussex PlBarron PlCajon Way Wisteria Dr De Anza Plz MasoniP lTe c a t e L n V i n ca C t BoninoWay Gage CtTannatLnRasberryCt Automall Dr Thames DrFilbroDrEngel W a y11th StGa r d e n CtOrch a r d Dr Vil l agePl A d o b e Plz Popp y fieldSt B r ookWayCa sa D el So lS tBogialaWayOlympicCtLusitano St Pal omi noPl G e tty s burgW ay C hurchill Pl RubyWay Gl e n v i e wDr Shire StMe s a S t Y orktownDr Alder St London Dr N ic ol eWay VlognierWay Carig nan e DrDawnW a yRiverviewCreek Trave l P a r kCi rVentureW a yLopezWayBultustro l Dr Ro s a n n a St Babbs C r e e k D r Wild f l o w erCtOakBrookWay Caspian W a y Greenfield DrMayock RdPortrushCtSanJ u s toRdObata Way V ictoria Dr W i nged F o otDr A uto m all P k w yS o u th s id e D rM e s a R d Luchessa Ave C a m in o Arroy oPri n c e v a ll e St UvasPkwy Ch u r c h St WLuchessaAveM i l l e r A v e Bolsa RdW10thStSanta Teresa Blvd Mo nt e r e y Rd S Valley FwyCity of Gilroy Properties Recommended Ineligible City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 43D 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Properties Found Not Eligible for the HRI, CRHR or NRHP Properties Found to Represent a Common or Ubiquitous Resource Type that Lacks Potential for Eligibility CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 180 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 181 July 2020 Properties Requiring Additional Study As a result of the survey, 11 properties were flagged as requiring additional survey/research to facilitate evaluation (Figure 44). This includes large, complex properties where the full extent of the resource could not be viewed; resources exhibiting unique characteristics that should be further researched for potential significance; public parks; cemeteries; and other properties that may have important historical associations and research beyond the scope of a citywide survey. Properties requiring additional research have been assigned a CHRSC of 7R (Identified in Reconnaissance Level Survey: Not evaluated). These properties were not evaluated for historical significance and therefore have no accompanying DPR form set in Appendix D. Properties Not Visible from Public Right-of-Way A total of 25 properties were not visible from the public right-of-way and therefore could not be surveyed or evaluated as part of the citywide survey (Figure 44).These properties were not evaluated for historical significance and therefore have no accompanying DPR form set in Appendix D. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 182 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Additional_Surveys_Needed.mxd101 152 Holloway R dHoo ver CtRogersLnA l e x a n d e r S t S i x t h S t M u rr a y A v e W illy C tOld Gilroy St M artin S tTaft Ct5th S tPolk CtIO OFAveCarr PlE 9th S tS toneyC t BremLnDor i s Ct Me s a StCasey LnRa ilr o a d St Oak Ct2n d S tW aln u t L n Automall CtL e x i n g t o n P lMa p l e S t Ro s a n n a St L illy Ave Hadley C tGl e n wo o d DrE St H o w so n S tF o r e s t S tLa Co c he Wa y Ven tu reW ayA d obe P lzE lC errito W a y L a Sierra W a y Yorktow n D r Mo nteV istaWayPierce St Sarf in aW ayW illiam sburg Wa yC u m b erlan d D r E 8th S tPlym ou t h D r F airview D rArnold Dr 4th S tE 7 th S tS p rin g d ale C t Sherwood Dr Re a S t Ch e s t n u t S t Broadway St W 7th S tW 9th S tE schen b u rg D rLindsteadt WayWa y l a n d L n Au t o mallPkwySilacci W ay Ca m ile A ve S w a n sto nLnOrchardDrLew is S tFilice DrHa n n a St D unlap A veDo wd y St F u rl o n g Av e Gilman RdCa r me l St Ei g l e b e r r y St HolsclawRd Arroyo C i rW 8thStPri n c e v a ll e St Church S t C a min o Arro yo3rd St W 6th S tE 6th S tRenzLnMiller AveW 10th S tW e lburn Ave Mantelli Dr Pacheco Pass HwyLeavesley RdE 10th S t 1st St Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Properties Requiring Additional Study City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 44A 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Property Requires Additional Research Property Not Visible from Public ROW Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Additional_Surveys_Needed.mxd101 LasAnim asAveNoNameUno C hurchSt Mu rr a y A v eKern AveC a s a b lancaCirSaddlerDrW illy C tLinetCtLoganberryDr Fine DrB urke D rPomo Pl M a rt i ri C t S a n Y sid r o A v e Jaguar Pl Cooper PlP u eblo Ct ArborStOrindaWayOkeefe Ct M o ro C t Mimos a CtYam aneD r Mo r oDrBenbow DrFinch Ln M a rtiriDrRodeoDrHogan WayMelchoir CtFl or a l StS wa l l o w Ln Avezan WayDoral Ct WagonWayOkeefeLn Sage H illDrJicarilla Pl Koshare St F r e e manC tLariatDr Sp en ce rCtL illy Ave Del Oro W aySaffr onCtB ennett StL e r m a W a y Sorren to C tHopi LnSalem Ave ComancheStZuniLnTapestry DrDelRio C irT e rri C t L e r m a L n Ra d t k e Av e Birdsong StV i c k e r y L n EagleNestWay S o r r e ntoDrAcornWayLe pa Ct K ishim ura D rSolanaDrLa Primavera Way F e s ta AgilioDrWoodcreek Way Taos WayBobcat CtP a r t r i d g e D rCarobCt Mu r a o k a D rSturla W ayMonticelliDr Lane B Li man Ave Laven da r W ay V a l b u s a D r C ol um b i neCt ElCaminitoBa n yanCt Arapaho Dr Z a mz o w C t Pad ovaDrEagleHillsWayGeronimo St Pueblo StOhlone DrEde n St Siena D rQuailWalk Dr Eagle View WaySprig Way Cheyenne DrCougar CtPheasa n t D rP eregrine Dr F o r e s t S t C r e s t HillWay B r ia rb e rr y L n TeaTreeWayTatum Ave FarrellA veCalledelReyValleyOaksDr C ohansey A veD en io A veRona n Ave Geri Ln Hi r asaki AveB u en a V ista A veWren AveRanchoHillsDr CoyoteM o o n LnS u n s e tD r Cielo Vista Ln Sunrise Dr Longmead o w D rD a y R d Leavesley RdS a n t a T e r e s a B l v d MantelliDr Mo n t e r e y R d S V a lle y F wy City of Gilroy Properties Requiring Additional Study City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 44B 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Property Requires Additional Research Property Not Visible from Public ROW Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Additional_Surveys_Needed.mxd152 2nd StJanDrSolisDrSilvia StC l u b Dr Carr PlStuartDrDaisy L n CedarCt Fowler StBlake Ct Birkdale Ct SequoiaDr Dor i s Ct 4th St GallowayCtColon y W aySyrahCtWillard Ct Carriage DrB irch Pl White Oak Pl LahinchCtVerbendDrAlister CtArnold Dr Tennyson Dr Benassi DrPoplar DrHacket DrFineDr TarynLnParish WayBraid CtHoesch WayAcorn Way TurnberryWayEdinburghWayViolet Way B u t t e r cup Ln AmandaAvePeriwink l e DrCulp D r Hoxett StPetersen Dr Aspen WayChesbro WayLar k s p u rLnC alabres e Way La AlondraW ay Yorktown DrCrudenBayWayLavendarWay JuniperDr Carla Way Maria Way Santa Barbara DrLionsCreekDrBerwickAv ePappani Dr Swaner Dr Byers St P a r t r i d g e D r C lark Way Hersman Dr R anch o Vista Ct WildIrisDrCalledelReyVistadelSur HowardAve Fillippelli D r Perrelli S t Eld o rad o Dr La Paloma Wa yKipling C irKentwoodCt Gary St Hacienda Dr UvasParkDr DriftwoodTerUvasPkwyPonderosaDrLawrence Dr Co lu mbineCt LahinchDr Wentz Dr Siena D rCrawford DrRanchoRealStrathPl PitlochryDr Gaunt AveGrenacheWayIsabellaWay Ramona WayBayTreeDrDaffodilPl Monte Bello Dr MossroseWay Ousley Dr R oundstone Dr Ortega Cir CypressCt Ayer Dr SantaPaulaDrS u n flo w e r CirLaur el DrEagleRidgeDr El Cerrito Way Troon W a y San Miguel St Muirfield W a y Delta DrWayl andL n Hollyh ockLnFilice DrWestwood DrK elto n DrSantaTheresaDrLone OakRanchoVistaDrCountryDr Saint Andrew's Cir BurchellRd WrenAveW 6th StKern AveMillerAveRanchoH ills D r 3rd St M a n t e l li Dr S a n t a T e r e s a B l v d Welburn Ave Hecker P a s s H wy 1st St City of Gilroy Properties Requiring Additional Study City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 44C 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Property Requires Additional Research Property Not Visible from Public ROW Date: 7/7/2020 - Last saved by: cstarbird - Path: Z:\Projects\j1116500\MAPDOC\HistoricResourceReport\Fig_Additional_Surveys_Needed.mxd101CiminoStCharlesLuxDrHydeParkDrAlt a St De l Ma r S t K o ro r L n Arizo n a CirSussex PlBarron PlCajon Way Wisteria Dr De Anza Plz MasoniP lTe c a t e L n V i n ca C t BoninoWay Gage CtTannatLnRasberryCt Automall Dr Thames DrFilbroDrEngel W a y11th StGa r d e n CtOrch a r d Dr Vil l agePl A d o b e Plz Popp y fieldSt B r ookWayCa sa D el So lS tBogialaWayOlympicCtLusitano St Pal omi noPl G e tty s burgW ay C hurchill Pl RubyWay Gl e n v i e wDr Shire StMe s a S t Y orktownDr Alder St London Dr N ic ol eWay VlognierWay Carig nan e DrDawnW a yRiverviewCreek Trave l P a r kCi rVentureW a yLopezWayBultustro l Dr Ro s a n n a St Babbs C r e e k D r Wild f l o w erCtOakBrookWay Caspian W a y Greenfield DrMayock RdPortrushCtSanJ u s toRdObata Way V ictoria Dr W i nged F o otDr A uto m all P k w yS o u th s id e D rM e s a R d Luchessa Ave C a m in o Arroy oPri n c e v a ll e St UvasPkwy Ch u r c h St WLuchessaAveM i l l e r A v e Bolsa RdW10thStSanta Teresa Blvd Mo nt e r e y Rd S Valley FwyCity of Gilroy Properties Requiring Additional Study City of Gilroy Historic Resources Inventory Update SOURCE: City of Gilroy, OpenStreetMap 0 1,0 00500Feet FIGURE 44D 101 152 A B D C A B D C City of Gilroy Limits and Citywide Survey Study Area City of Gilroy Parcels Property Requires Additional Research Property Not Visible from Public ROW CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 8. Findings and Recommendations 184 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 185 July 2020 8.2 Recommendations Although this document aims to be as thorough as possible, it is acknowledged that the scope of a citywide survey is not conducive to in-depth research on specific properties. Therefore, recommendations for additional study have been provided below. 8.2.1 Additional Study Howson Brothers Construction Company and the Wheeler Hospital Area Public comments and additional primary and secondary source research indicate that the Howson family significantly contributed to the built environment in Gilroy. While archival research revealed information about the Howson Brothers as builders, their level of significance remains largely unconfirmed due to a lack of primary source documentation. Additional information about the Howson Brothers was provided by local community stakeholders and Howson family members. Based on this information, additional archival research was conducted to determine their potential significance. The Howson Brothers were found to be notable builders in Gilroy with many examples of their work located on Princevalle Street, Carmel Street, and 5th Street. While a discussion of their history and a confirmed works list is included in this document, there are significant research gaps that would require in-person interviews with Howson family members, as well as permit research to confirm builder and architect information for many residences. It is recommended that residences thought to be designed and built by the Howson Brothers, and later by Roberta Howson Hughan, be studied further to assess potential historical significance. It is also recommended that the neighborhood surrounding the Wheeler Hospital also be studied further to determine if there is a broader pattern of development present in the area that resulted in the Howson Brothers designing such a significant concentration of homes in this part of Gilroy. It also appears that the Howson family resided in this part of Gilroy and their history in the area may have bearing on their potential significance. Based on information received throughout the course of the public comment period, additional research should be conducted on the following properties to assess their potential for association with the Howson family, Howson Brothers Construction Company, or Roberta Howson Hughan:  283 5th Street, Christian Science Church (1930)  7571 Carmel Street, residence, William Robert Howson first personal residence (1928)  7561 Carmel Street, John “Jack” Howson’s first personal residence (1930)  701 5th Street, William Robert Howson’s second personal residence (1948)  711 5th Street, multi-family residence (1928)  7515 Princevalle Street, residence (1941)  7525 Princevalle Street, John “Jack” Howson’s second personal residence (1948)  7535-7545 Princevalle Street, duplex (1939)  7555 Princevalle Street (1940)  7554 Princevalle Street (1932) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 186 July 2020  7730 Princevalle Street (1948)  7551 Carmel St (1930)  7511 Carmel St. (1928)  7581 Carmel St. (1930)  7501 Carmel St. (1928)  7595 Princevalle St. (1939)  7548 Princevalle St (1932) In addition to the Howson Brothers, there are other important local builders, such as William Radtke Sr, who also had prolific building careers in Gilroy and shaped the history of its built environment. Deeper permit research into these local builders and architects would greatly enhance the understanding of the footprint, level of influence, and significance of these local builders and architects (see Section 6). CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 187 July 2020 9 Bibliography Adema, Pauline. 2009. Garlic Capital of the World. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press. “Alien Enemies--Japanese.” Proc. No. 2525, Dec. 7, 1941, 6 F.R. 6321, 55 Stat. Pt. 2, 1700. Ancestry.com. 2002. 1930 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2002. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?dbid=6224&h=93088689&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=2238 Ancestry.com. 2006. 1910 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=7884&h=1788197&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=isb1987637&_phstart=s uccessSource Ancestry.com. 2009. 1870 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2009. Images reproduced by FamilySearch. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?dbid=7163&h=13720217&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=60525 Ancestry.com. 2010. 1920 United States Federal Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010. Images reproduced by FamilySearch. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=6061&h=812203&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=isb1382825&_phstart= successSource Ancestry.com. 2011. San Jose, California, City Directory, 1893. U.S. City Directories, 1822-1995 [database on- line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=2469&h=1385791188&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=isb1382825&_phs tart=successSource Ancestry.com. 2014. California, State Court Naturalization Records, 1850-1986 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?dbid=8839&h=59033&indiv=try&o_vc=Record:OtherRecord&rhSource=5180 Arbuckle, Clyde. 1970. Gilroy’s First Century of Incorporation, 1870-1970. A History of the City. Gilroy, CA: Gilroy, CA: City of Gilroy. Architect & Engineer. 1929. “Who’s Who in this Issue.” Architect & Engineer. Volume 99. No. 2. November 1929. https://www.usmodernist.org/AECA/AECA-1929-10-12.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2020. “Area of the City of Gilroy.” No Date. Gilroy Historical Museum. Bamburg, Bonnie. 1986. City of Gilroy Historic Preservation Survey 1985-1986. A comprehensive Study of the History and Architecture of the City of Gilroy within the 1945 City Limits. The Firm of Bonnie L. Bamburg, San Jose, California. On file with the City of Gilroy. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 188 July 2020 Bancroft, Hubert Howe. 1890. History of California Vol VII 1860-1890. San Francisco, CA: The History Company. Barratt, Elizabeth. 2003. “Gilroy Gets its First Hotels.” The Pinnacle: Yesterday & Today. Gilroy, CA: Elizabeth R. Barratt. Barratt, Elizabeth. 2005. “Early Fraternal and Benevolent Societies Played Large Role.” The Pinnacle: Yesterday & Today. Gilroy, CA: Elizabeth R. Barratt. Barratt, Elizabeth. No Date. “Be-Ge-Manufacturing Co. Notes.” Gilroy Historical Museum. Barretta, Richard. N.D. Fifty Years of Beer: the Gilroy Brewery. Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Historical Society. Basgall, M.E. 1987. Resource Intensification Among Hunter-Gatherers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric California. Research in Economic Anthropology 9:21–52. Bay City News. 2020. “Gilroy Strong Resiliency Center To Open Tuesday With Ceremony.” Accessed via Patch: https://patch.com/california/gilroy/gilroy-strong-resiliency-center-open-tuesday-ceremony Bertrando, E. 2004. Evidence and Models for Late Pleistocene Chronology and Settlement along California’s Central Coast. In Emerging from the Ice Age: Early Holocene Occupations on the California Central Coast, edited by Ethan Bertrando and V.A. Levulett, pp. 93–105. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society Occasional Papers no. 17. Bowker, R. R. ed. 1962. American Architects Directory, Second edition. New York City, NY: R. R. Bowker Company. http://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/Bowker_1962_R.pdf. Bowker, R. R. ed. 1970. American Architects Directory, Third edition. New York City, NY: R. R. Bowker Company. http://content.aia.org/sites/default/files/2018-09/Bowker_1970_R.pdf. Brady, R., J. Farquhar, T. Garlinghouse, and C. Peterson. 2009. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-143 for the Asilomar Boardwalk Replacement Project, Asilomar State Beach, Pacific Grove, California . Albion Environmental, Inc., Santa Cruz. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Bracero History Archive. 2019. “About” Webpage. http://braceroarchive.org/about. Accessed March 26, 2019. Breschini, G.S., T. Harvest, and R.P. Sampson. 1983. A Cultural Resources Overview of the Coast and Coast-Valley Study Areas[California]. Salinas, CA: Coyote Press. Breschini, G. and T. Haversat. 1992a. Preliminary Excavations at CA-MNT-108, Fisherman’s Wharf, Monterey County, California. In Archaeological Investigations of Some Significant Sites on the Central Coast of California, edited by H. Dallas, Jr. and G.S. Breschini, pp. 39–47. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 37, Salinas. Breschini, G. and T. Haversat. 1992b. Baseline Archaeological Studies at Rancho San Carlos, Carmel Valley, Monterey County, California. Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory No. 36, Salinas. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 189 July 2020 Brown, Warren. 1988. “Ah, The Sweet Smell of Success.” The Washington Post. June 13, 1988. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1988/06/13/ah-the-sweet-smell-of- success/943da8cf-5ca9-432a-bb4b-a6c5cc0d4b12/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3aa851095843. Accessed March 26, 2019. Bryne, S. 2002. Archaeological Monitoring of the Wilder Ranch Bike Path Construction and Mitigation Related to Archaeological Site CA-SCR-38/123/H. Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo. Copies available from Northwest Archaeological Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California. The California Farmer. 1869. “Opening of the Southern Pacific Railroad to Gilroy.” The California Farmer and Journal of Useful Sciences, volume 31, No. 13, April 15, 1869. California High-Speed Rail Authority. 2018. Draft 2018 Business Plan. http://www.hsr.ca.gov/docs/about/business_plans/Draft_2018_Business_Plan.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2019. California High-Speed Rail Authority. 2018. “Gilroy Station.” https://www.hsr.ca.gov/programs/station_communities/gilroy_station.html. Accessed December 21, 2018. California State Legislature. 1870. “Chapter 180: An Act To Incorporate the City of Gilroy.” The Statutes of California Passed at the Eighteenth Session of the Legislature 1869-1870 . Sacramento, CA: D.W. Gelwicks, state printer. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2007. “National Register of Historic Places Registration Form: Highway 152 Tree Row, Santa Clara County, California.” Gilroy Historical Museum. Caltrans. 2011. Tract Housing in California, 1945-1973: A Context for National Register Evaluation . Sacramento, California. Caltrans. 2018. “Important Events in Caltrans History.” http://www.dot.ca.gov/paffairs/timeline.html. Accessed December 4, 2018. Cartier, R. 1993. The Scotts Valley Site: CA-SCR-177. The Santa Cruz Archaeological Society, Santa Cruz. Cemetery History in Gilroy. No Date. Cemetery Subject File. Gilroy Historical Museum. CIRCA. 2006. Historic Context Statement for the City of Morgan Hill. Prepared for the City of Morgan Hill. San Francisco: CA: CIRCA Historic Property Development. City of Gilroy. 2018. “Your Voice: Gilroy High Speed Rail Alignment.” https://yourvoice.cityofgilroy.org/high-speed- rail-alignment. Accessed January 4, 2019. Clausen Jr., George E. 2007. “History of Gentry and Gilroy Foods.” Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 190 July 2020 Cockcroft, Eva Sperling and Holly Barnet-Sanchez. 1990a. “Signs from the Heart: California Chicano Murals.” In Humanities Network. Fall 1990: Vol. 12/Num. 4,: pg. 2. Gilroy Historical Museum. Cockcroft, Eva Sperling and Holly Barnet-Sanchez. 1990b. Signs from the Heart: California Chicano Murals. University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque, NM. Coffin, H. 1873. Gilroy as a Home: Its Geography, Climate, Location, Soil, Productions, and Institutions. Gilroy, CA: Advocate Book and Job Printing Office. ConAgra Foods, Inc. 2009. “Garlic: the root of it all.” Gilroy Foods and Flavors. Gilroy Historical Museum. Conkling, Roscoe P. and Margaret B. Conkling. 1947. The Butterfield Overland Mail 1857-1869. Volume 1. Glendale, CA: Arthur H. Clark Company. Conrotto, Eugene Lewis. 1951. “The Urbanization of the Southern Santa Clara Valley: Gilroy.” Term paper. Stanford University. Gilroy Historical Museum. Cox, Phil. N.D. Notes “Compiled from Gilroy City Council Minutes. Gilroy, CA: City of Gilroy City Clerk’s Office. Culleton, B. J., R. H. Gargett and T. L. Jackson. 2005. Data Recovery Excavations at CA-SCR-60/130 for the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency Local Water Supply and Distribution Project. Pacific Legacy, Santa Cruz, California. Densho Encyclopedia. 2015. “Kiyoshi Hirasaki.” http://encyclopedia.densho.org/Kiyoshi_Hirasaki/. Accessed March 31, 2019. DeSantis, Carol A. 2016. “Miller Red Barn.” National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination Form. Gilroy, CA: Miller Red Barn Committee, draft, April 5, 2016. Dietz, S.A., W.R. Hildebrandt, and T. Jones 1988. Archaeological Investigations at Elkhorn Slough: CA-MNT-229 A Middle Period Site on the Central California Coast. Papers in Northern California Anthropology, Number 3. Dill, Leslie A. G., Kara Oosterhous, Charlene Duval. 2003. Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory Update. South County Survey Report. Los Gatos, CA: Dill Design Group. Duncan, Mark. 2005. The San Francisco Peninsula Railroad Passenger Service – Past Present Future. (Mark Duncan, 2005): 93. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2017. “Smith Act.” https://www.britannica.com/event/Smith-Act. Accessed December 8, 2018. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2018. “Model T Automobile.” https://www.britannica.com/technology/Model-T. Accessed December 4, 2018. Erlandson, J.M., M.H. Graham, B.J. Bourque, D. Corbett, J.A. Estes, and R.S. Steneck. 2007. The Kelp Highway Hypothesis: Marine Ecology, the Coastal Migration Theory, and the Peopling of the Americas. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2(2): 161–174. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 191 July 2020 Fitzgerald, R.T., J.L. Edwards, J.M. Farquhar, and K. Loefler. 1995. Archaeological Test Excavation at CA-MNT- 1765, for the Moro Cojo Standard Subdivision Project (SH93001), Monterey County, California . Biosystems Analysis, Inc., Santa Cruz. Report on file Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Fitzgerald, R.T. and T.L. Jones. 1999. The Milling Stone Horizon Revisited: New Perspectives from Northern and Central California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 21:65-93. Fitzgerald, R.T. and A. Ruby. 1997. Archaeological Test Excavations at CA-SCR-117, the Davenport Landing Site . Garcia and Associates, San Anselmo. Report on file Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Foote, Horace S. 1888. Pen Pictures from the Garden of the World or Santa Clara County, California. Chicago, IL: Lewis Publishing, 1888. Forsyth, Ruth. 1969. “Gilroy Ladies Benevolent Society: 1872-1967.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, May 26, 1969. Gibson, R.O. 1996. Results of Archaeological Monitoring for Unocal Soil Testing Program along Pipelines near Santa Margarita, San Luis Obispo County, California. Gibson’s Archaeological Consulting, Paso Robles. Report submitted to UNOCAL CERT, San Luis Obispo. Copies available from the Central Coast Information Center, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California. Gilroy Advocate. 1904. “Big Winery Coming: California Wine Association Will Erect Plant in Gilroy.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, July 23, 1904. Gilroy Advocate. 1916. “Gilroy’s Latest Addition to Fire Department Equipment.” March 25, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. “Building Boom Goes Merrily On.” March 25, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. “Gilroy’s Latest Addition to Fire Department Equipment.” March 25, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. “The New Fire House.” June 10, 1916. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Advocate. 1918. “New Depot Formally Opened.” May 4, 1918. Gilroy Historical Museum. “Old Depot Being Torn Down.” December 28, 1918. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Cannery Timeline. 2006. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. 1969. “Standard Industrial Survey Report: Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” March 1969. Gilroy Historical Museum. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 192 July 2020 Gilroy Chamber of Commerce. 1985. ““Commercial Building Survey: Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” On file at Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Councilmember Sharon Albert. 1984. As quoted in the San José Mercury-News. 1984a. Gilroy Dispatch. 1944. December 5, 1944. As quoted in Barratt. No Date. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Dispatch. 1949. “Eigleberry Street Rezoning Ordinance Adopted.” January 25, 1949. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Dispatch. 1970. “San Ysidro Settled First.” Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. On file at the Gilroy Historical Museum. “Early Settlers Turn to Agriculture.” Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. On file at the Gilroy Historical Museum. “Dairy Industry Once a Major Gilroy Business.” Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. On file at the Gilroy Historical Museum. “Railroad Opens Up New Era.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. “Schools Grow From Modest Start into Unified District.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. “Miller Plays Role in Town’s Development.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. “Japanese Immigrants Were First Big Garlic Growers.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. “Early Settlers Turn to Agriculture.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Dispatch. December 21, 1970. Gilroy Dispatch. 1973. “Pieters-Wheeler Seed Plant Sold.” September 7, 1973. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Dispatch. 2004. “Plaque Honors Chinese Cemetery.” The Gilroy Dispatch. April 5, 2004. https://gilroydispatch.com/2004/04/05/plaque-honors-chinese-cemetery/. Accessed March 26, 2019. Gilroy Dispatch. 2006a. “Campus Name Game.” April 12, 2006. http://gilroydispatch.com/2006/04/12/campus- name-game/. Accessed December 5, 2018. Gilroy Dispatch. 2006b. “The Story Behind Christmas Hill Park.” http://gilroydispatch.com/2006/01/23/the-story- behind-christmas-hill-park/. Accessed December 20, 2018. Gilroy Evening Dispatch. 1954. “First Big Project on Eigleberry: Work to Start on New IOOF Building.” January 1954. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Evening Dispatch. 1969. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 193 July 2020 “Gilroy Celebrates Arrival of the Railroad in 1869.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Evening Dispatch. January 10, 1969, pg. 7A. “Religion Plays Prominent Role in Early Gilroy.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Evening Dispatch. January 10, 1969, pg. 11A. Gilroy Gardens. No Date. “Michael Kiosk Booklet.” Gilroy Historical Museum Gilroy Gardens. 2018. “About Us.” https://www.gilroygardens.org/explore/about-us. Accessed December 21, 2018. Gilroy Garlic Festival. 2018. “History.” https://gilroygarlicfestival.com/about/history/. Accessed December 21, 2018. Gilroy High School. 1923. Photograph. Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Historical Museum Subject Files. N.Da. “Tobacco Culture in Gilroy and the Consolidated Tobacco Company.” From the Tobacco Subject File at the Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Historical Museum Subject Files. N.Db. “Fifteen Weeks in Gilroy: The Works of Architect William Henry Weeks.” From a Pamphlet on file with the Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Historical Museum Subject Files. 1985. “Commercial Building Survey.” From the Commercial Subject File at the Gilroy Historical Museum. Gilroy Premium Outlets. 2018. “About Gilroy Premium Outlets.” https://www.premiumoutlets.com/outlet/gilroy/about. Accessed December 21, 2018. Ginn, Phil. 1947. “About Albert Gurries: From ‘Perfectionist’s’ Dream Cam More Efficient Machine.” San José Mercury-News. October 26. 1947. Gilroy Historical Museum. GofundMe. 2018. “Aztec Calendar Restoration Project.” https://www.gofundme.com/aztec-calendar-restoration- project. Accessed March 31, 2019. Gurries, Ron. 2017. “An Old Time Gilroyan Speaks Out.” As quoted in Gilroy Dispatch. October 10, 2017. http://gilroydispatch.com/2017/10/06/guest-column-an-old-time-gilroyan-speaks-out/. Accessed December 6, 2018. Gwinn, Vernon C. 1982. “History of Hospitals in Gilroy.” Gilroy Historical Museum. Harrison, E.S. 1888. Gilroy: The Most Favored Section of Santa Clara Valley. Gilroy, CA: Gilroy Board of Trade. Hildebrandt, W.R. 2006. Archaeological Evaluation of the Priest Valley Knoll Sites (CA-MNT-745), Eastern Monterey County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 194 July 2020 Hildebrandt, W. and P. Mikkelsen. 1993. Archaeological Test Excavations at Fourteen Sites along Highways 101 and 152, Santa Clara and San Benito Counties, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Davis, California. Hirasaki, Manabi and Naomi Hirahara. 2003. A Taste for Strawberries: The Independent Journey of Nisei Farmer Manabi Hirasaki. Japanese American National Museum: Los Angeles, California. Historic American Buildings Survey. Post-1933. “Lilly's Auto Camp, 8877 Monterey Highway, Gilroy, Santa Clara County, CA.” Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/ca0920/. Accessed December 2018. Historic American Building Survey. Post-1933. “Live Oak Creamery.” Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/hhh.ca0928.sheet/?sp=1&st=single. Accessed December 11, 2018. Hollister Free Lance. 2006. “Be-Ge Manufacturing Co. Played Major WWII Role.” November 24, 2006. https://sanbenito.com/2006/11/24/yesterday-today/. Accessed December 9, 2018. Hylkema, M.G. 1991. Prehistoric Native American Adaptations along the Central California Coast of San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, San José State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor. Hylkema, M.G. 2007. Santa Clara Valley Prehistory: Archaeological Investigations at CA-SCL-690, The Tamien Station Site, San José, California. Center for Archaeological Research, Davis, California. “Italian Influence Brings a Change to Agriculture.” No Date. Newspaper Article. Gilroy Historical Museum. Jones, T.L. 1993. Big Sur: A Keystone in Central California Culture History. Pacific Coast Archaeological Quarterly. Jones, T.L. 1995. Transitions in Prehistoric Diet, Mobility, Exchange, and Social Organization Along California’s Big Sur Coast. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, California. Jones, T.L. 2003. Prehistoric Human Ecology of the Big Sur Coast, California. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley. Jones, T.L., G. M. Brown, L.M. Raab, J.L. McVickar, W.G. Spaulding , D.J. Kennett, A. York, and P.L. Walker. 1999. Environmental Imperatives Reconsidered: Demographic Crises in Western North America During the Medieval Climatic Anomaly. Current Anthropology 40:137-170. Jones, T.L. and J.A. Ferneau. 2002a. Prehistory at San Simeon Reef: Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-SLO-179 and -267, San Luis Obispo, California. San Luis Obispo Archaeological Society Occasional Paper No. 16. Jones, T.L., and J.A. Ferneau. 2002b. Deintensification along the Central Coast. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by J.M. Erlandson and T.L. Jones, pp. 205-232. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Vol. 6. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 195 July 2020 Jones, T.L. and J. Haney. 2005. Archaeological Evaluation of CA-MNT-910, -1748/H, -1919, and -2182, Fort Hunter Liggett Military Installation, Monterey County, California. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Jones, D., and W.R. Hildebrandt. 1990. Archaeological Investigation at Sand Hill Bluff: Portions of Prehistoric Site CA-SCr-7, Santa Cruz County, California. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Jones, D., and W.R. Hildebrandt. 1994. Archaeological Investigations at Sites CA-SCR-10, CA-SCR-17, CA-SCR- 304, and CA-SCR-38/123 for the North Coast Treated Water Main Project, Santa Cruz County, California . Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Copies available from Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Jones, T.L., and D. Jones. 1992. Elkhorn Slough Revisited: Reassessing the Chronology of CA-MNT-229. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 14:159-179. Jones, T.L., J.F. Porcasi, J.W. Gaeta, and B.F. Codding. 2008. The Diablo Canyon Fauna: A Coarse-grained Record of Trans-Holocene Foraging from the Central California Mainland Coast. American Antiquity 73:289–316. Jones, T. L., N. E. Stevens, D. A. Jones, R. T. Fitzgerald, and M. G. Hylkema. 2007. The Central Coast: A Midlatitude Milieu. In California Prehistory Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by Terry L. Jones and Kathryn A. Klar, pp: 125-146. Altamira Press, Lanham. Jones, T.L. and G. Waugh. 1995. Central California Coastal Prehistory: A View from Little Pico Creek. Perspectives in California Archaeology No. 3, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Jones, T.L. and G. Waugh. 1997. Climatic Consequences or Population Pragmatism? A Middle Holocene Prehistory of the Central California Coast. In Archaeology of the California Coast During the Middle Holocene, edited by J.M. Erlandson and M.A. Glassow, pp. 111-128. Perspectives in California Archaeology 4. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles. Levy, R. 1978. Costanoan. Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 8. Edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. Lewis, Betty. 1985. “W.H. Weeks: Architect.” Fresno, CA: Panorama West Books. Held at the SCPL Local History Collection. Loomis, Patricia. 1971. “Signposts: Old Indian Pass.” San José News, October 29, 1971. Copy held by the Gilroy Historical Museum. Loomis, Patricia. 1974. “Signposts Gilroy’s Pioneer Tom Rea: Short on Words—Long On Deeds.” San José News. March 29, 1974, pg. 31. Loomis, Patricia. 1977. “Hanna’s a Name Always Important in Gilroy.” San José, CA: The San José Mercury, December 7, 1977, pg. 30. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 196 July 2020 Madera Daily News-Tribune. 1953. “Oliver Corporation Buys Be-Ge Manufacturing Co.” November 17, 1953. P. 5. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=MT19531117&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------1. Accessed December 7, 2018. Maggi, Franklin. 2014. San Jose Central Fire Station: National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. Prepared by Archives and Architecture LLC, San Jose, CA https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1067/files/nr_10-900_sjfirestationone1060614.pdf. Melone, Michael E. 1991. “Gilroy’s First Newspaper: The Advocate.” The Californian. Volume 12, No. 3. Santa Clara, CA: California History Center Foundation, De Anza College. Miller Lux v. Dunlap, 152 P. 309. 1915. (California Court of Appeal, 1915). https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3280481/miller-lux-v-dunlap/. Accessed December 3, 2018, Mikkelsen, P., W.R. Hildebrandt and D.A. Jones. 2000. Prehistoric Adaptations on the Shores of Morro Bay Estuary: Excavations at Site CA-SLO-165, Morro Bay, California. Occasional Paper No. 14, San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California. Milliken, R., J. Nelson, W.R. Hildebrandt, and P. Mikkelsen. 1999. The Moss Landing Hill Site: A Technical Report on Archaeological Studies at CA-MNT-234 in 1991 and 1997-1998. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis. Copies available from the Northwest Information Center, Department of Anthropology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Mills, W.W., M.F. Rondeau, and T.L. Jones. 2005. A Fluted Point from Nipomo, San Luis Obispo County, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 25:214-220. The Monitor. “Howson’s Inc.” Advertisement. The Monitor, Volume CIII, No. 37. December 16, 1960. Morser, Michael. 1989. “A Historical Reconstruction Study of Highway 152 (Pacheco Pass).” Gilroy Historical Museum. Munro-Fraser, J.P. 1881. History of Santa Clara County, California. San Francisco CA: Alley, Bowen & Co. https://archive.org/download/historyofsantacl00munr/historyofsantacl00munr.pdf. Accessed November 2, 2018. Myer, Chuck. 1992. “Pacheco Past: A History of the Gateway to Santa Clara Valley.” Article prepared for the California Pioneers of Santa Clara County. Gilroy Historical Museum. Myer, Chuck. 1993. “Hecker Pass…A Historical Adventure: A History of the Southwestern Gateway to Santa Clara County.” Article prepared for the California Pioneers of Santa Clara County. Gilroy Historical Museum. Nelson, Truda Cooling. 1981. John Gilroy: a Biography. Master’s Thesis presented to the Department of Social Science at San Jose University. San Jose, CA: San Jose University. Held at Gilroy Historical Museum. New York Times, The. 1941. “Alien Total So Far is Put at 4,741,971.” January 13, 1941. https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1941/01/13/88097082.html. Accessed December 8, 2018. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 197 July 2020 NPS (National Park Service). 1990. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior. NPS. 2018. “Early History.” Santa Clara County: California’s Historic Silicon Valley: A NRHP Travel Itinerary. https://www.nps.gov/nr/travel/santaclara/history.htm. Accessed November 6, 2018. National Register Nomination for Wheeler Hospital. 1990. Gilroy Historical Museum. Newsome, S.D., D.L. Phillips, B.J. Culleton, T.P. Guilderson, P. Koch. 2004. Dietary Reconstruction of an Early to Middle Holocene Human Population from the Central California Coast: Insights from Advanced Stable Isotope Mixing Models. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:1101-1115. OHP (California Office of Historic Preservation). 2011. California Register and National Register Criteria: A Comparison (for the purposes of determining eligibility for the California Register). OHP Technical Assistance Series #6, Sacramento, CA: Office of Historic Preservation, Department of Parks and Recreation. PCAD (Pacific Coast Architecture Database). 2018a. “City of Gilroy, Wheeler Municipal Auditorium, Gilroy CA.” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/building/7909/. Accessed December 6, 2018. PCAD. 2018b. “Wheeler Hospital, Gilroy CA.” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/building/7911/. Accessed December 5, 2018. PCAD. 2019a. “William H. Weeks (Architect).” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/person/1345/. Accessed December 17, 2019. PCAD. 2019b. “Binder and Curtis, Architects (Partnership).” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/firm/1296/. Accessed December 17, 2019. PCAD. 2019c. “Albert F. Roller (Architect).” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/person/1785/. Accessed December 17, 2019. PCAD. 2019d. “Reid Brothers, Architects (Partners).” http://pcad.lib.washington.edu/firm/284/. Accessed December 17, 2019. Pacific Rural Press. 1882. “Green Cheese.” Volume 23, No 18. San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. May 6, 1882, pg. 346. Pacific Rural Press. 1885. “The Dairy: Gilroy Cheese Dairies.” Volume 29, No 26. San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. June 27, 1885, pgs. 594-595. Pacific Rural Press. 1892a. “Miscellaneous.” Volume 44, No 13. San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. September 24, 1892, pg. 252. Pacific Rural Press. 1892b. “Santa Clara: The Dairy.” Volume 44, No. 25. San Francisco, CA: The Pacific Rural Press. December 17, 1892, pg. 516. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 198 July 2020 Page & Turnbull, Inc. 2009. Raised Streets & Hollow Sidewalks: Survey Report. Prepared for City of Sacramento. July 2009. https://www.cityofsacramento.org/~/media/Corporate/Files/CDD/Planning/Environmental%20Impact% 20Reports/Arena_ESC/Admin%20Records/GHistoricalResourcesReportAdminRecord16of37.pdf. Paulson, LL. 1875. Handbook and Directory of Santa Clara, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Monterey and San Mateo Counties. San Francisco, CA: L. L. Paulson. People for Open Space as quoted in San José Mercury-News. 1984. “Cover-up Led to Resignations…” January 4, 1984a. San José Public Library. Personal Communication Howson Family. Email message to Julie Wyrick. May 19, 2020. Connie Rogers. Email message to Kate G. Kaiser. July 8, 2020. Reid Lerner. Email message to Samantha Murray. July 10, 2020. Pohorecky, Z.S. 1976. Archaeology of the South Coast Ranges of California. University of Archaeological Research Facility 34, Berkeley. Population of the City of Gilroy, 1870-1997. Gilroy Historical Museum. Rebekah Children’s Services. 2019. “Our History.” http://www.rcskids.org/about/history. Accessed March 26, 2019. Rogers, Connie. 2012. “Local Women in History: Caroline Amelia Brooks Osborne Hoxett.” In Gilroy Patch. https://patch.com/california/gilroy/local-women-in-history-caroline-amelia-brooks-osborne-hoxett. Accessed December 18, 2018. Rogers, D.B. 1929. Prehistoric Man of the Santa Barbara Coast. Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara. Rosenthal, J and J. Meyer. 2004. Landscape Evolution and the Archaeological Record: A Geological Study of the Southern Santa Clara Valley and Surrounding Region. Center for Archaeological Research at Davis Publication Number 14. Regents of the University of California, Davis. Sacramento Daily Union. 1874. “City Intelligence: Incorporation.” UCR California Digital Newspaper Collection: The Sacramento Daily Union. April 7, 1874, pg. 3. Salewske, Claudia. 2003. Images of America: Gilroy. Chicago, IL: Arcadia Publishing. San Francisco Call. 1897. “Plans for the New Orphanage.” San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call, January 16, 1897, pg. 9. San Francisco Call. 1898. “Gilroy’s New High School.” San Francisco, CA: San Francisco Call, April 9, 1898. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 199 July 2020 San Francisco Call. 1900. “Join the Fruit Association.” San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call, March 14, 1900, pg. 9. San Francisco Call. 1902. “Packing Plant for Gilroy.” San Francisco, CA: The San Francisco Call, April 26, 1902, pg. 9. San Francisco Chronicle. 1986. “Gilroy is Going in for More Than Garlic These Days.” July 24, 1986. Gilroy Historical Museum. San José Mercury. 1935. “When San José Was Young: October 21 to 27, 1865.” San José: The San José Mercury, October 28, 1935. San José Mercury Herald. 1940. “Ancient Gilroy Armory, Music Hall Goes Into Limbo After 70 Years of Service.” San José, CA: The San José Mercury-Herald, November 17, 1940, pg. 16. San José Mercury-News. 1941. “Gilroy’s Fame Comes from Ranches.” June 20, 1941. San José Public Library. San José Mercury-News. 1949. “City of Gilroy 79 years Old: 1870 Charter Still in Effect.” March 13, 1949. Gilroy Historical Museum. San José Mercury-News. 1954. “Gilroy Building For Future.” August 15, 1954. Gilroy Historical Museum. San José Mercury-News. 1966. “Gilroy’s Top Problems Attacked During 1965.” January 30, 1966. San José Public Library. San José Mercury News. 1984a. “Cover-up Led to Resignations...” January 4, 1984. San José Public Library. San José Mercury News. 1984b. Sweepstakes for Builders.” January 5, 1984. San José Public Library. San José Mercury News. 2005. “Gilroy Timeline.” November 12, 2005. https://www.mercurynews.com/2007/02/05/gilroy-timeline/. Accessed December 21, 2018. San José Mercury-News. No Date. “New Plant Never Really Did its Job.” San José Public Library. Sanborn Map Company. 1886. “Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” Map. 5 sheets. Sanborn Map Company, August 1886. https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn00566_001/. Accessed August 14, 2018. Sanborn Map Company. 1892. “Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” Map. 11 sheets. Sanborn Map Company, May 1892. https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn00566_002/. Accessed August 14, 2018. Sanborn Map Company. 1943. “Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Gilroy, Santa Clara County, California.” Map. Santa Cruz Public Library. Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission. 1979. “Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory.” San José, CA: SCC Historical Heritage Commission. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 200 July 2020 Santa Clara County Parks. 2019. “Chesbro Reservoir County Park.” https://www.sccgov.org/sites/parks/parkfinder/Pages/ChesbroReservoir.aspx. Accessed March 14, 2019. Sawyer, Eugene T. 1922. History of Santa Clara County, California. Los Angeles, CA: Historic Record Company. Severance, Sarah. 1879. “The Harrison Bequest.” Gilroy, CA: The Gilroy Advocate, June 28, 1879. On File at the Gilroy Historical Museum. Shortridge, Charles. 1895. Santa Clara County and Its Resources, Historical, Descriptive Statistical: a Souvenir of the San José Mercury. San José, CA: San José Mercury Publishing and Print. Co. Shueh, Sam. 2008. Images of America: South Santa Clara County. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing. Sprain, Rick. 2018. Postcard History Series: Santa Clara County. Arcadia Publishing: Charleston, South Carolina. Stine, S. 1994. Extreme and Persistent Drought in California and Patagonia during Medieval Time. Nature 369:546-549. Strand Theatre Program. 1921. Vol. 1, No. 1, December 3, 1921. As featured in Salewske. 2003. Texas State Historical Association. 2010. "BRACERO PROGRAM," Handbook of Texas Online, Fred L. Koestler. http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/omb01. Accessed March 31, 2019. “Through the Decades: 1950 – 1960.” Gilroy Historical Museum. “Through the Decades: 1960s.” Gilroy Historical Museum. Thompson & West. 1876. “City of Gilroy.” Map published in Historical Atlas Map of Santa Clara County. San Francisco, CA: Thompson & West. http://www.davidrumsey.com/maps33.html. Accessed December 1, 2018. Unknown Author. “Italian Influence Brings a Change to Agriculture.” No Date. Newspaper Article. Gilroy Historical Museum. Unknown Author. 1914. “Gilroy Ready for Her Guests.” Article. Gilroy Historical Museum. Unknown Author. 2014. “Frank Delos Wolfe: San José’s Most Enduring Architect.” http://www.frankdeloswolfe.com/fdw.html. Accessed November 21, 2018. USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2018. “The Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake.” https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/events/1906calif/18april/. Accessed November 28, 2018. United States Copyright Office. 2018. Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17) / Chapter 1, 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use. United States Patent Office. 1876. “Patent No 6779” Specifications and Drawings of Patents Issued from the United States Patent Office for December 1875. Washington D.C: Government Printing OfficeVarious CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 201 July 2020 Newspapers. “Highlights from Gilroy Newspapers by Year.” November 11, 1904. Gilroy Historical Museum. WRP (Watsonville Register-Pajaronian). 1995. “That Was Watsonville: William H. Weeks A Master Architect.” Watsonville, CA: Watsonville Register-Pajaronian. Held in the Local News Index Collection at SCPL Local History. https://history.santacruzpl.org/omeka/items/show/127938. Accessed December 17, 2019. White, Armand. No Date. “Timeline.” Gilroy Historical Museum. Woolacott, Angela, Carroll Pursell and Chuck Myer. 1991. Gilroy’s Old City Hall: 1906-1989… Cupertino, California: California History Center and Foundation, De Anza College. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE 11165 Chapter 9. Bibliography 202 July 2020 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Appendix A Confidential Records Search Results Appendix B Master Spreadsheet of Findings Appendix C Tables of Findings APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79037016 11 1ST ST 1965 Yes Yes 5S1 79901032 111 2ND ST 1910 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79901015 159 2ND ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79901049 215 2ND ST 1914 Yes Yes 5S1 79904031 129 4TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79906022 164 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906039 194 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79904043 265 4TH ST 1901 Yes Yes 5S1 79919054 328 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79950007 55 5TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79907045 60 5TH ST 1900 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79907042 92 5TH ST 1922 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79906026 111 5TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79907023 140 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907082 160 5TH ST 1857 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79906031 195 5TH ST 1910 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79907083 200 5TH ST 1869 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79906010 213 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906012 263 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907021 268 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79906013 283 5TH ST 1930 Yes Yes 5S1 79907020 286 5TH ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79918045 314 5TH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79919062 323 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79918044 338 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79919063 365 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79918043 366 5TH ST 1905 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79919064 391 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79918042 494 5TH ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79919024 515 5TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79918002 546 5TH ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79919026 555 5TH ST 1924 Yes Yes 5S1 79919027 575 5TH ST 1924 Yes Yes 5S1 79919028 595 5TH ST 1924 Yes Yes 5S1 79919010 665 5TH ST 1929 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79924005 701 5TH ST 1948 Yes Yes 5S1 79907070 55 6TH ST 1910 Yes Yes 5S1 79908059 60 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79908011 110 6TH ST 1936 Yes Yes 5S1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79908058 250 6TH 1940 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 84106048 307 6TH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84106047 337 6TH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84109020 414 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109021 424 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109022 444 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109023 464 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109024 474 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109025 484 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84109026 494 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 79918001 651 6TH ST 1929 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79909024 288 7TH ST 1910 Yes Yes 5S1 79915025 338 7TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79909063 99 8TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84108016 7311 ALEXANDER ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84108013 7341 ALEXANDER ST 1904 Yes Yes 5S1 84108011 7361 ALEXANDER ST 1926 Yes Yes 5S1 84105026 7530 ALEXANDER ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84105037 7561 ALEXANDER ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84105036 7571 ALEXANDER ST 1908 Yes Yes 5S1 79919009 7501 CARMEL ST 1928 Yes Yes 5S1 84109038 7340 CHESTNUT ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 84109004 7387 CHESTNUT ST 1926 Yes Yes 5D1 84109003 7391 CHESTNUT ST 1926 Yes Yes 5D1 84109002 7399 CHESTNUT ST 1926 Yes Yes 5D1 84106065 7493 CHESTNUT ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84107064 7522 CHESTNUT ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79911008 7011 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79911063 7040 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79911062 7090 CHURCH ST 1910 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79910028 7160 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79910032 7190 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79909079 7201 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79909045 7248 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79909048 7272 CHURCH ST 1915 Yes Yes 5S1 79909050 7288 CHURCH ST 2003 Yes Yes 5S1 79909003 7297 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79908024 7310 CHURCH ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79907009 7405 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79907033 7406 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79907008 7417 CHURCH ST 1906 Yes Yes 5S1 79907034 7424 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907007 7425 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907006 7431 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907036 7440 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907004 7449 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907038 7456 CHURCH ST 1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907003 7463 CHURCH ST 1938 Yes Yes 5S1 79907039 7468 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907040 7474 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906009 7521 CHURCH ST 1924 Yes Yes 5S1 79906008 7531 CHURCH ST 1917 Yes Yes 5S1 79906064 7540 CHURCH ST 1999 Yes Yes 5S1 79906007 7541 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79906034 7550 CHURCH ST 1952 Yes Yes 5S1 79906005 7561 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906004 7571 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906038 7590 CHURCH ST 1914 Yes Yes 5S1 79904042 7601 CHURCH ST 1917 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79904035 7650 CHURCH ST 1938 Yes Yes 5S1 79904037 7680 CHURCH ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79904038 7690 CHURCH ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79903039 7704 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79903006 7751 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79901047 7831 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79901046 7841 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79901045 7851 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79901044 7861 CHURCH ST 1912 Yes Yes 5S1 79909031 7257 EIGLEBERRY ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79908020 7321 EIGLEBERRY ST 1990 Yes Yes 5S1 79908018 7341 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79908016 7361 EIGLEBERRY ST 1912 Yes Yes 5S1 79908013 7391 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907031 7405 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907027 7439 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79907080 7477 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79906025 7527 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79950009 7528 EIGLEBERRY ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79906024 7539 EIGLEBERRY ST 1903 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79904025 7671 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79903032 7707 EIGLEBERRY ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79903078 7737 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79903059 7740 EIGLEBERRY ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79903029 7751 EIGLEBERRY ST 1914 Yes Yes 5S1 79903070 7760 EIGLEBERRY ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79903071 7765 EIGLEBERRY ST 1915 Yes Yes 5S1 79903025 7797 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79901002 7832 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79901059 7841 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84111014 7221 FOREST ST Circa 1870 Yes Yes 5D1 84111013 7231 FOREST ST Circa 1870 Yes Yes 5D1 84111012 7241 FOREST ST Circa 1870 Yes Yes 5D1 84111011 7251 FOREST ST Circa 1870 Yes Yes 5D1 84109014 7320 FOREST ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 84106049 7430 FOREST ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 84106033 7433 FOREST ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84106031 7445 FOREST ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 84106051 7450 FOREST ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 84106052 7460 FOREST ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 84106030 7469 FOREST ST 1912 Yes Yes 5S1 79918031 7421 HANNA ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79918026 7471 HANNA ST 1926 Yes Yes 5S1 79919042 7521 HANNA ST 1921 Yes Yes 5S1 79919040 7551 HANNA ST 1921 Yes Yes 5S1 79919068 7560 HANNA ST 2008 Yes Yes 5S1 79919071 7590 HANNA ST 1905 Yes Yes 5S1 79905031 7621 HANNA ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79905016 7630 HANNA ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79902031 7700 HANNA ST 1908 Yes Yes 5S1 79902033 7730 HANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79902038 7790 HANNA ST 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79920009 7811 HANNA ST 1923 Yes Yes 5S1 79920008 7821 HANNA ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 79920004 7861 HANNA ST 1923 Yes Yes 5S1 78304022 2485 HECKER PASS HY Pre-1937 Yes Yes 2S2, 5S1, 7J 84104024 290 IOOF AV 1920 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 84106015 20 MARTIN ST 1912 Yes Yes 5D1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 84106016 44 MARTIN ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84106018 144 MARTIN ST 1922 Yes Yes 5S1 84106067 174 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84105086 209 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84106029 264 MARTIN ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84113017 7250 MONTEREY ST 1918 Yes Yes 2S2, 5S1 84108042 7350 MONTEREY ST 1912 Yes Yes 5D1 79908038 7357 MONTEREY RD Circa 1870 Yes Yes 5D1 79908036 7373 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 79908034 7387 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 2S2, 5D1 84108007 7390 MONTEREY ST 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84106061 7400 MONTEREY ST 1905 Yes Yes 1S, 5D1 79907067 7401 MONTEREY RD Circa 1906 Yes Yes 5D1 79907064 7419 MONTEREY RD 1914 Yes Yes 5D1 79907062 7423 MONTEREY RD 1912 Yes Yes 5D1 84106007 7430 MONTEREY ST 1914 Yes Yes 5D1 79907058 7435 MONTEREY RD 1925 Yes Yes 5D1 84106009 7440 MONTEREY ST 1919 Yes Yes 5D1 79907057 7441 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 79907056 7445 MONTEREY RD 1912 Yes Yes 5D1 84106010 7450 MONTEREY ST Circa 1896 Yes Yes 5D1 79907055 7451 MONTEREY RD Circa 1924 Yes Yes 5D1 79907053 7455 MONTEREY RD Circa 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84106011 7460 MONTEREY ST 1912 Yes Yes 5D1 84106063 7466 MONTEREY ST Circa 1917 Yes Yes 5D1 79907050 7477 MONTEREY RD circa 1885 Yes Yes 5D1 79907049 7483 MONTEREY RD 1940 Yes Yes 5D1 79907048 7485 MONTEREY RD 1940 Yes Yes 5D1 79906054 7511 MONTEREY RD Circa 1928 Yes Yes 5D1 79906053 7515 MONTEREY RD Circa 1900 Yes Yes 5D1 79906050 7529 MONTEREY RD Circa 1910 Yes Yes 5D1 79906049 7533 MONTEREY RD Circa 1890 Yes Yes 5D1 79906048 7541 MONTEREY RD 1915 Yes Yes 5D1 84105058 7550 MONTEREY RD 1918 Yes Yes 5D1 79906046 7557 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84105060 7560 MONTEREY RD 1931 Yes Yes 5D1 79906045 7561 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 79906044 7565 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84105061 7568 MONTEREY RD 1922 Yes Yes 5D1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1A PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED TO STAY ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79906043 7573 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 79906042 7579 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 5D1 84105064 7588 MONTEREY RD 1918 Yes Yes 5D1 84104010 7638 MONTEREY RD 1925 Yes Yes 5S1 79903053 7747 MONTEREY RD 1930 Yes Yes 5S1 79903052 7757 MONTEREY RD 1906 Yes Yes 5S1 79903047 7797 MONTEREY ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 83505015 9480 MURRAY AV Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 84111065 362 OLD GILROY ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79919011 7544 PRINCEVALLE ST 1932 Yes Yes 5S1 79919015 7590 PRINCEVALLE ST 1938 Yes Yes 5S1 84106027 7450 RAILROAD ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84106028 7470 RAILROAD ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79911018 7090 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79918050 7427 ROSANNA ST 1906 Yes Yes 5S1 79907015 7438 ROSANNA ST 1916 Yes Yes 5S1 79907016 7446 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79919061 7531 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79905011 7601 ROSANNA ST 1910 Yes Yes 5S1 79905007 7641 ROSANNA ST 1906 Yes Yes 5S1 79905005 7657 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79902028 7711 ROSANNA ST 1911 Yes Yes 5S1 79902027 7721 ROSANNA ST 1907 Yes Yes 5S1 79902026 7731 ROSANNA ST 1914 Yes Yes 5S1 79902024 7751 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 79903019 7760 ROSANNA ST 1908 Yes Yes 5S1 79902020 7791 ROSANNA ST 1920 Yes Yes 5S1 79902019 7801 ROSANNA ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 5S1 84102003 8191 SWANSTON LN Circa 1929 Yes Yes 5S1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1B PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79037008 11 1ST ST Circa 1953 Yes No 6Z 79901016 165 2ND ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79902039 358 2ND ST 1916 Yes No 6Z 79906021 290 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905013 361 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905014 393 4TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79904029 4TH ST Yes No 6Z 79907043 80 5TH ST 1941 Yes No 6Z 79906011 237 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79919025 545 5TH ST 1924 Yes No 6Z 84106046 367 6TH ST 1916 Yes No 6Z 84106058 395 6TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79908045 67 7TH ST Yes No 6Z 79909002 254 7TH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84111043 7200 ALEXANDER ST 1956 Yes No 6Z 84108046 7350 ALEXANDER ST 1928 Yes No 6Z 84106022 7429 ALEXANDER ST 1918 Yes No 6Z 84106021 7439 ALEXANDER ST 1910 Yes No 6Z 84105038 7551 ALEXANDER ST 1910 Yes No 6Z 84105029 7554 ALEXANDER ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 84106043 7461 CHESTNUT ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79911005 7041 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79910030 7180 CHURCH ST 1908 Yes No 6Z 79909006 7249 CHURCH ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 79909005 7265 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79909049 7280 CHURCH ST 1995 Yes No 6Z 79908025 7320 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79908028 7360 CHURCH ST 1961 Yes No 6Z 79908031 7390 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79907005 7439 CHURCH ST 1904 Yes No 6Z 79906032 7530 CHURCH ST 1914 Yes No 6Z 79906006 7551 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79906003 7581 CHURCH ST 1916 Yes No 6Z 79904041 7621 CHURCH ST 1916 Yes No 6Z 79904040 7631 CHURCH ST 1916 Yes No 6Z 79903010 7711 CHURCH ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79903041 7728 CHURCH ST 1926 Yes No 6Z 79903042 7738 CHURCH ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 79903007 7741 CHURCH ST 1920 Yes No 6Z APPENDIX C, TABLE 1B PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79903043 7746 CHURCH ST 1914 Yes No 6Z 79903073 7766 CHURCH ST Circa 1952 Yes No 6Z 79903004 7771 CHURCH ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79903003 7781 CHURCH ST 1910 Yes No 6Z 79901017 7810 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79901018 7820 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79901048 7821 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79901019 7830 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79901020 7840 CHURCH ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79901022 7860 CHURCH ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 79901023 7870 CHURCH ST 1926 Yes No 6Z 79901024 7880 CHURCH ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79910019 7141 EIGLEBERRY ST 1908 Yes No 6Z 79909070 7264 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79909030 7265 EIGLEBERRY ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 79908047 7310 EIGLEBERRY ST Yes No 6Z 79908048 7320 EIGLEBERRY ST Yes No 6Z 79908050 7350 EIGLEBERRY ST Yes No 6Z 79908051 7360 EIGLEBERRY ST Yes No 6Z 79908012 7393 EIGLEBERRY ST Circa 1937- 1956 Yes No 6Z 79906062 7562 EIGLEBERRY ST circa 1953- 1956 Yes No 6Z 79903033 7705 EIGLEBERRY ST 1919 Yes No 6Z 79903079 7725 EIGLEBERRY ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79903069 7750 EIGLEBERRY ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79903027 7773 EIGLEBERRY ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79903076 7780 EIGLEBERRY ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79903026 7785 EIGLEBERRY ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79903077 7790 EIGLEBERRY ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 84106050 7440 FOREST ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 84106054 7498 FOREST ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 84105014 7536 FOREST ST pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84105073 7541 FOREST AV 1928 Yes No 6Z 84105067 7549 FOREST ST 1901 Yes No 6Z 84105016 7554 FOREST ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79915051 7256 HANNA ST 2008 Yes No 6Z 79915045 7264 HANNA ST 1910 Yes No 6Z 79919065 7520 HANNA ST 2009 Yes No 6Z 79919039 7571 HANNA ST 1923 Yes No 6Z 79919070 7580 HANNA ST 1916 Yes No 6Z APPENDIX C, TABLE 1B PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79919038 7581 HANNA ST 1927 Yes No 6Z 79905030 7631 HANNA ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79905029 7641 HANNA ST 1925 Yes No 6Z 79905019 7660 HANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905020 7670 HANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905024 7691 HANNA ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79902035 7750 HANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79902004 7820 HANNA ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79920007 7831 HANNA ST 1923 Yes No 6Z 79920006 7841 HANNA ST 1923 Yes No 6Z 84105045 111 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84106017 124 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84105043 165 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84106040 222 MARTIN ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79908041 7347 MONTEREY RD 1914 Yes No 6Z 79908039 7355 MONTEREY RD 1925 Yes No 6Z 84108006 7380 MONTEREY ST 1907 Yes No 6Z 79907084 7433 MONTEREY RD 2009 Yes No 6Z 84106008 7436 MONTEREY ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79907054 7453 MONTEREY RD Yes No 6Z 79907052 7461 MONTEREY RD circa 1918 Yes No 6Z 79906069 7525 MONTEREY RD circa 1910 Yes No 6Z 84105056 7526 MONTEREY RD 1950 Yes No 6Z 84105057 7542 MONTEREY RD 1936 Yes No 6Z 84104012 7648 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes No 6Z 79015036 8877 MONTEREY RD Yes No 6Z 79924055 7545 PRINCEVALLE ST 1939 Yes No 6Z 84105046 7520 RAILROAD ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 84105047 7530 RAILROAD ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79910069 7100 ROSANNA ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79910072 7150 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79910063 7170 ROSANNA ST 1993 Yes No 6Z 79910066 7180 ROSANNA ST 1995 Yes No 6Z 79907014 7428 ROSANNA ST 1906 Yes No 6Z 79918049 7443 ROSANNA ST 1906 Yes No 6Z 79907017 7456 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79918047 7463 ROSANNA ST 1965 Yes No 6Z 79906014 7530 ROSANNA ST 1915 Yes No 6Z 79906015 7540 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z APPENDIX C, TABLE 1B PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79919060 7541 ROSANNA ST 1918 Yes No 6Z 79919059 7551 ROSANNA ST 1901 Yes No 6Z 79906020 7580 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79919056 7581 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79919055 7591 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905010 7611 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79904045 7620 ROSANNA ST 1922 Yes No 6Z 79905008 7631 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905006 7651 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79905004 7661 ROSANNA ST 1918 Yes No 6Z 79903016 7730 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z 79902025 7741 ROSANNA ST 1918 Yes No 6Z 79902023 7761 ROSANNA ST 1905 Yes No 6Z 79903020 7770 ROSANNA ST 1920 Yes No 6Z 79902016 7831 ROSANNA ST 1915 Yes No 6Z 79902014 7851 ROSANNA ST 1910 Yes No 6Z 79901056 7860 ROSANNA ST 1998 Yes No 6Z 79902013 7861 ROSANNA ST 1918 Yes No 6Z 79902012 7881 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes No 6Z APPENDIX C, TABLE 1C PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommende d CHRSC 79901014 139 2ND ST 1912 No Yes 5S3 79907044 64 5TH ST 1940 No Yes 5S3 79918022 590 5TH ST 1930 No Yes 5S3 79908033 64 6TH ST 1947 No Yes 5S3 79908053 74 6TH ST 1951 No Yes 5S3 84108026 262 6TH ST 1916 No Yes 5S3 79918053 321 6TH ST 1926 No Yes 5S3 84111025 7290 ALEXANDER ST Pre-1937 No Yes 5S3 84108039 7340 ALEXANDER ST 1922 No Yes 5S3 79031053 641 BROADWAY ST Circa 1968 No Yes 5S3 79031054 651 BROADWAY ST Circa 1968 No Yes 5S3 79919008 7511 CARMEL ST 1928 No Yes 5S3 79905055 7600 CARMEL ST 1934 No Yes 5S3 79920015 7800 CARMEL ST Circa 1952 No Yes 5S3 79921004 7931 CARMEL ST 1949 No Yes 5S3 84105008 7531 CHESTNUT ST 1927 No Yes 5S3 79908029 7370 CHURCH ST 1908 No Yes 5S3 79906037 7580 CHURCH ST 1941 No Yes 5S3 79905045 7681 DOWDY ST 1940 No Yes 5S3 79909027 7281 EIGLEBERRY 1919 No Yes 5S3 79908019 7331 EIGLEBERRY ST 1914 No Yes 5S3 79907025 7451 EIGLEBERRY ST 1954 No Yes 5S3 79904028 7641 EIGLEBERRY ST 1915 No Yes 5S3 79923033 711 FOURTH ST 1940 No Yes 5S3 79918057 7430 HANNA ST 1923 No Yes 5S3 79902007 7850 HANNA ST pre-1937 No Yes 5S3 79920005 7851 HANNA ST 1937 No Yes 5S3 78302004 1795 HECKER PASS HY 1948 No Yes 5S3 78302020 1795 HECKER PASS HY 1948 No Yes 5S3 81023010 6395 MILLER AV 1936 No Yes 5S3 80818022 7049 MILLER AV 1891 No Yes 1S, 5S3 80813011 7841 MILLER AV 1920 No Yes 5S3 84114031 6110 MONTEREY RD 1966 No Yes 5S3 79909059 7259 MONTEREY RD 1926 No Yes 5S3 79908037 7367 MONTEREY RD 1920 No Yes 5D1 79908035 7377 MONTEREY RD 1920 No Yes 5D1 79907066 7411 MONTEREY RD 1910 No Yes 5D1 79907065 7415 MONTEREY RD 1910 No Yes 5D1 84106014 7484 MONTEREY ST 1920 No Yes 5D1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 1C PROPERTIES RECOMMENDED FOR INCLUSION ON THE HRI APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommende d CHRSC 79906055 7501 MONTEREY RD 1929 No Yes 5D1 79906047 7547 MONTEREY RD 1920 No Yes 5D1 79901012 7845 MONTEREY RD 1915 No Yes 5S1 78318017 10545 MONTEREY RD Pre-1941 No Yes 5S3 79919012 7548 PRINCEVALL E ST 1932 No Yes 5S3 79919013 7554 PRINCEVALL E ST 1932 No Yes 5S3 79919014 7580 PRINCEVALL E ST 1936 No Yes 5S3 84108022 7360 RAILROAD ST Circa 1862 No Yes 3CS, 5S3 84106025 7400 RAILROAD ST 1930 No Yes 5S3 84106001 7491 RAILROAD ST 1908 No Yes 1S, 5S3 79923004 7671 REA ST 1947 No Yes 5S3 79911012 7000 ROSANNA ST 1904 No Yes 5S3 79901039 7840 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 No Yes 5S3 84102001 8091 SWANSTON LN Pre-1937 No Yes 5S3 78329025 8444 TARYN LN 1921 No Yes 5S3 80838001 6201 THOMAS RD Pre-1952 No Yes 5S3 APPENDIX C, TABLE 2 PROPERTIES LISTED IN/ELIGIBLE FOR THE NRHP AND/OR CRHR APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 79901032 111 2ND ST 1910 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79907045 60 5TH ST 1900 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79907042 92 5TH ST 1922 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79907082 160 5TH ST 1857 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79906031 195 5TH ST 1910 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79907083 200 5TH ST 1869 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79907021 268 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79918045 314 5TH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79918044 338 5TH ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79918043 366 5TH ST 1905 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79919010 665 5TH ST 1929 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79908059 60 6TH ST 1920 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79908058 250 6TH 1940 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79918001 651 6TH ST 1929 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 79911063 7040 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79911062 7090 CHURCH ST 1910 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79907033 7406 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79906007 7541 CHURCH ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 79904042 7601 CHURCH ST 1917 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79950009 7528 EIGLEBERRY ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 79906024 7539 EIGLEBERRY ST 1903 Yes Yes 1S, 5S1 84109014 7320 FOREST ST pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 78304022 2485 HECKER PASS HY Pre-1937 Yes Yes 2S2, 5S1, 7J 84104024 290 IOOF AV 1920 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 80818022 7049 MILLER AV 1891 No Yes 1S, 5S3 84113017 7250 MONTEREY ST 1918 Yes Yes 2S2, 5S1 79908034 7387 MONTEREY RD 1920 Yes Yes 2S2, 5D1 84106061 7400 MONTEREY ST 1905 Yes Yes 1S, 5D1 83505015 9480 MURRAY AV Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 5S1 84108022 7360 RAILROAD ST Circa 1862 No Yes 3CS, 5S3 84106001 7491 RAILROAD ST 1908 No Yes 1S, 5S3 79919061 7531 ROSANNA ST Pre-1937 Yes Yes 3CS, 3S, 5S1 APPENDIX C, TABLE 3A PROPERTIES THAT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RESEARCH PRIOR TO EVALUATION APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? Recommended for HRI? Recommended CHRSC 80811007 900 1ST ST No No 7R 79921005 2ND ST No No 7R 84166012 9TH ST No No 7R 79906023 7559 EIGLEBERRY ST No No 7R 79001022 MANTELLI DR No No 7R 84117098 1350 PACHECO PASS HY No No 7R 84106003 7411 RAILROAD ST 1925 No No 7R 84105072 7565 RAILROAD ST 1940 No No 7R 79020076 8455 WREN AV No No 7R 79026047 WREN AV No No 7R 84103081 No No 7R APPENDIX C, TABLE 3B PROPERTIES NOT VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY APN House # Street Name Street Type Year Built Currently on HRI? 79038054 226 CARLYLE CT 1972 No 83506043 455 COHANSEY AV No 81029002 766 DAWN WY 1968 No 81028018 770 DAWN WY 1965 No 79006043 330 DAY RD No 78316016 1060 DAY RD 1935 No 78315085 1180 DAY RD 1960 No 80815023 7621 FILICE DR 1958 No 84101126 FOREST ST No 78301033 1705 HECKER PASS HY 1957 No 79020077 8710 KERN AV 1949 No 79018015 9060 KERN AV 1965 No 79018017 9070 KERN AV 1950 No 83505023 535 LAS ANIMAS AV 1905 No 79015046 8887 LILLY AV 1961 No 81033092 5589 MESA RD Circa 1922 No 81033089 5595 MESA RD 1922 No 81028038 5875 MILLER AV No 81028002 5885 MILLER AV 1967 No 80813028 7830 SANTA THERESA DR 1967 No 80813029 7840 SANTA THERESA DR No 78323038 1410 WELBURN AV 1958 No 78326031 1550 WELBURN AV No 84131003 No 79017001 No Appendix D State of California DPR Forms Appendix E Applicable Local Codes and Regulations CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 1 March 2020 1 Applicable Codes and Regulations 1.1 Gilroy City Code: Chapter 30 Zoning Ordinance The following presents key sections of City Code concerning the establishment of historic site and neighborhood combining districts, and required procedures for design review within these established areas. Article XXVII. Historic Site and Neighborhood Combining Districts 30.27.10 Statement of intent. The intent of this article is: (a) To preserve historic sites and neighborhoods that represent important elements of Gilroy’s pa st or contribute to the community’s identity or educational resources; (b) To enhance the visual character of Gilroy by encouraging and regulating the compatibility of architectural styles within historic sites and neighborhoods; (c) To identify and designate areas that have a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings or objects unified by past events or physical development; (d) To encourage restoration of historic buildings and neighborhoods throughout the city. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.27.30 Establishment of historic site and neighborhood combining districts. The establishment of a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district may be in combination with any residential, commercial, industrial or other base district as defined in this chapter. The establishment or removal of either a historic site or historic neighborhood combining district shall be processed as a zone change. The historic heritage committee shall review all applications for historical desig nation or removal of historical designation and pass its recommendations on to the planning commission and city council. The zone change fees, which are established from time to time by the city council, shall be waived for the establishment of, but not the removal of, either a historic site or neighborhood combining district. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 2 March 2020 (a) Any area or combination of sites within the city may be designated as a historic neighborhood combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following criteria: (1) The neighborhood possesses a significant concentration or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects unified by past events or physical development; or (2) The neighborhood represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community; or (3) The collective historic value of the neighborhood taken together is of greater value than each individual structure. (b) Any site within the city may be designated as a historic site combining district if it meets any one (1) of the following criteria: (1) It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history; or (2) It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or (3) It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period or methods of construction, or is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or (4) It is representative of the work of a notable builder, designer or architect. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.27.40 Design review procedures. Applications to construct new structures, alter, change, modify, remove or significantly alter the exterior of any structure within a historic site or neighborhood combining district shall require architectural and site approval according to the provisions of section 30.50.40. An application shall be denied if the changes would jeopardize the building’s or neighborhood’s architectural or historical value. Interior remodeling or routine maintenance or repair of the exterior features of a structure in a histo ric site or historic neighborhood combining district shall not require architectural and site review. (a) In a historic neighborhood combining district, the design of the following proposed structures or remodeling shall be reviewed according to the provisions of section 30.50.40: (1) Construction of any type of a building that will affect the exterior appearance of the site, neighborhood, or any structure on the site or in the neighborhood; (2) New construction; (3) Relocation of any structure in or removal from a historic neighborhood combining district; (4) Remodeling of fifty percent (50%) or more of the facade of any structure. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 3 March 2020 (b) In a historic site combining district, but not in a historic neighborhood combining district, the design of the following proposed structures or remodeling shall be reviewed according to the provisions of section 30.50.40: (1) Exterior alterations to any building; (2) Interior alterations that would affect the exterior of a building; (3) Construction of any type on a building that will affect the exterior appearance of the site, or any structure on the site; (4) New construction; (5) Relocation of any structure into or removal from a historic site combining district. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) Article XIV. Downtown Specific Plan Districts Subarticle 1. Downtown Historic District (DHD) 30.14.10 Statement of intent. This district is suitable for the improvement and maintenance of existing commercial structures or the conversion or construction to new mixed use development. Residential mixed use projects are encouraged. The intent of the downtown historic district (DHD) is to foster the city’s historic downtown as a unique and prosperous commercial resource. Buildings in the downtown historic district (DHD) are mixed use with premium local and regional boutique retail uses and entertainment establishments, fostering a multicultural environment. Residential or office use above the ground floor is encouraged. Architecture should reflect historic forms and materials and adaptive reuse of historic architecture is encouraged. Wide sidewalks with strong pedestrian connections to adjacent districts are encouraged. Establishment of paseos and plazas and unique outdoor spaces of any size with fountains and public art is a priority. Parking is not allowed at street front retail locations. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.14.11 Permitted uses and conditional uses. Land in the downtown historic district (DHD) may be used as provided in the commercial use table, section 30.19.10. Conditional uses may be permitted with a conditional use permit, which may be issued by the planning commission in accordance with the regulations in section 30.50.30. (Ord. No. 2013 -08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.14.12 Site and building requirements. The lot, yard, height and additional requirements in the DHD downtown historic district shall be as established in the commercial site and building requirement table, section 30.19.20. (Ord. No. 2013 -08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 4 March 2020 30.14.13 Density. The downtown historic district (DHD) allows commercial and mixed use projects. Commercial and mixed use projects have a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.5. The minimum density for the residential component of mixed use projects is twenty (20) dwelling units per acre. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8- 5-13) 30.14.14 Railroad corridor. Properties between Lewis Street and Seventh Street that abut the west side of the railroad corridor must provide a fifty-one (51) foot rear setback from the property line to accommodate on-site parking, an access drive, and a landscaped buffer. Additional articulation should be provided on building facades that face this corridor to promote an aesthetically pleasing view of the downtown for rail patrons. A “standard” fencing design that will be commercial grade, six (6) foot tall, black powder coated metal, with vertical slats and top and bottom rail as well as a five (5) foot minimum landscape planter area adjacent to the railroad corridor. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13 Subarticle 2. Downtown Expansion District (DED) 30.14.20 Statement of intent. This district is suitable for the improvement and maintenance of existing commercial structures or the conversion or construction to new mixed use development. Residential mixed use projects are encouraged. The intent of the downtown expansion district (DED) is to recognize an area suitable for the expansion of downtown retail and mixed use developments which expands the synergy of the downtown historic district and which caters primarily to the Gilroy community. Buildings in the downtown expansion district (DED) are mixed use developments, housing street front retail and restaurant services with residential and office use above the ground floor. Architecture of a historic natu re should be used in conjunction with contemporary designs. Beautification and building upkeep are encouraged, utilizing signage, awnings and greenery for an aesthetically pleasing environment. Architecture should reflect historic forms and materials and a daptive reuse of historic architecture is encouraged. Strong pedestrian access to neighboring districts is encouraged through the establishment of paseos. The establishment of unique outdoor spaces of any size with fountains and public art is recommended. Parking lots and structures are to be discreetly screened from street view. The following regulations, except to the extent that they may be modified by a combining district, shall apply to every lot and building in a downtown expansion district (DED). (Or d. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.14.21 Permitted uses and conditional uses. Land in the downtown expansion district (DED) may be used as provided in the commercial use table, section 30.19.10. Conditional uses may be permitted with a conditional us e permit, which may be issued by the planning commission in accordance with the regulations in section 30.50.30. (Ord. No. 2013 -08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 5 March 2020 30.14.22 Site and building requirements. The lot, yard, height and additional requirements in the down town expansion district (DED) shall be as established in the commercial site and building requirement table, section 30.19.20. (Ord. No. 2013 -08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 30.14.23 Density. The downtown expansion district (DED) allows commercial and mixed use projects. Commercial and mixed use projects have a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.5. The minimum density for the residential component of mixed use projects is twenty (20) dwelling units per acre. (Ord. No. 2013 -08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8- 5-13) 30.14.24 Railroad corridor. Properties that abut the railroad corridor must provide “standard” fencing design that will be commercial grade, six (6) foot tall, black powder coated metal, with vertical slats and top and bottom rail as well as a five (5) foot minimum landscape planter area adjacent to the railroad corridor. The intent of the city and public utilities commission is to create a pedestrian pathway along the east side of the railroad corridor between Tenth Street and Leavesley Road. Additional articulation sh ould be provided on building facades that face this corridor to promote an aesthetically pleasing view of the downtown for rail patrons. (Ord. No. 2013-08, § 2 (Exh. A), 8-5-13) 1.2 2020 General Plan The Gilroy 2020 General Plan (Adopted June 2002) identifies historic preservation goals and policies, primarily for the Downtown Historic District. These discussions can be found throughout Chapters 3 (Strategic Direction) and 4 (Community Design and Development). A summary of these sections is provided below. 1.2.1 Chapter 3. Strategic Direction Urban Design and Historic Preservation The design of buildings and public spaces in the Downtown area can contribute to the economic success of Downtown, making it an attractive, pleasant and unique place to visit. Basic pedestr ian amenities such as lighting and seating help make the area feel inviting and safe. Other improvements can support specific types of activities. For example, widening the sidewalk in selected areas can create opportunities for outdoor cafes and restaurants, making the street into a more active, friendly place. Similar sidewalk extensions can be used at pedestrian crossings to reduce the distance pedestrians must cross and enhance pedestrian safety. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 6 March 2020 1.2.2 Chapter 4. Community Design and Development Section 5. Historic Preservation GOAL: A strong sense of connection to Gilroy’s past through historical, archeological, and paleontological resources that are preserved, protected, enhanced, and commemorated for the benefit of current and future generations. Policy 5.01 Historic Preservation. Encourage public and private efforts for the preservation of historic and architecturally significant buildings, archeological sites, and other landmarks that give residents a tie with the past. Policy 5.02 Preservation Funding and Incentives. Seek state and federal funding for the preservation of buildings of historical merit and consider public/private partnerships for capital and program improvements. Support the use of Mills Act contracts to reduce property taxes on historic properties and thereby provide a monetary incentive for their acquisition, maintenance, and restoration. Policy 5.03 Historic Character. Encourage preservation of older homes, other structures, and neighborhood districts to maintain and enhance the historic character of the city. In particular, encourage the retention and rehabilitation of older homes in and near the historic city center (r oughly bound by First Street on the north, Princevalle on the west, Tenth Street on the south, and Chestnut/Murray on the east) and ensure that rehabilitation activities (especially if funded by low-interest rehabilitation loans from the City) are sensitive to the historic character of the building and/or site. Policy 5.04 Downtown Historic District. Designate a Downtown Historic District and promote the preservation of historic buildings within the district area to reinforce Downtown’s historic character a nd scale. Provide incentives for the retention and rehabilitation of buildings with historic merit. Policy 5.05 Adaptive Reuse. Promote adaptive reuse of old buildings, especially in the Downtown Historic District, to preserve the buildings’ historic character while encouraging development of an economically vital Downtown. Policy 5.06 Non-Conforming Uses in Historic Structures. Allow non-conforming uses in designated Historic Structures. In some situations, a historic building can be retained only if it ca n be used for an activity that would not CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 7 March 2020 normally be permitted under the zoning classification. The City may consider conditional use permits where the proposed use will not have a detrimental effect on the neighborhood and will be in keeping with the historic nature of the building, taking into consideration parking needs and compatibility of the use to neighboring uses. Policy 5.07 Archeological Resources. If archeological resources or human remains are discovered during construction, work shall be halted within 50 meters (150 feet) of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified professional archeologist. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be formulated and implemented. 1.3 Downtown Specific Plan Purpose. The purpose of the Downtown Gilroy Specific Plan is to create a unique and identifiable downtown for Gilroy that is economically vibrant, pedestrian-oriented and a local and visitor destination. This specific plan will be a regulatory tool used by the City of Gilroy to guide development in the downtown for approximately the next 20 years. While the city's general plan is the primary guide for growth and development within Gilroy, this Specific Plan focuses on the downtown area in more detail, organizing land use and zoning regulations by districts. Goals. The specific plan seeks to establish a direct connection between the City of Gilroy's General Plan and revitalization and enhancement opportunities within downtown Gilroy. An overall goal is the orderly development of downtown Gilroy in a method consistent with the city's general plan and, more specifically, with the community's vision as developed through the community outreach process. 1.4 CEQA As described further below, the following CEQA statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:  California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.”  California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) define “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource.” It also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of an historical resource.  California Public Resources Code Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 8 March 2020  California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) set forth standards and steps to be employed following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony.  California Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b)-(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 provide information regarding the mitigation framework for archaeological and historic resources, including examples of preservation -in-place mitigation measures; preservation-in-place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s). More specifically, under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b).) If a site is either listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historic resources or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(q)), it is a “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource even if it does not fall within this presumption (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(1); California Public Resourc es Code Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(b)(2) states the significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project: 1. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; or 2. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical char acteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or 3. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 9 March 2020 Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resourc e’s historical significance is materially impaired. If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserv ed in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2[a], [b], and [c]). California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g) defin es a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criter ia: 1. Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information. 2. Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. 3. Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. Impacts to non-unique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (California Public Resources Code section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(4)). However, if a non-unique archaeological resource qualifies as tribal cultural resource (California Public Resources Code Section 21074(c), 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described below, these procedures are detailed in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. CITY OF GILROY HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY UPDATE Appendix E 10 March 2020