04/17/2023 City Council Regular Agenda Packet
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 1 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
7351 ROSANNA STREET, GILROY, CA
95020
REGULAR MEETING | 6:00 PM
MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2023
MAYOR
Marie Blankley
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Rebeca Armendariz
Dion Bracco
Tom Cline
Zach Hilton
Carol Marques
Fred Tovar
CITY COUNCIL PACKET MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.cityofgilroy.org
AGENDA CLOSING TIME IS 5:00 P.M. THE TUESDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING
Due to COVID-19, it is possible that the planned in-person meeting may have to change to a virtual meeting at any
time and possibly on short notice. Please check the City of Gilroy website www.cityofgilroy.org for any updates to
meeting information.
COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. Public testimony is subject to reasonable regulations, including but not limited to time restrictions for
each individual speaker. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. The amount of time allowed per speaker may
vary at the Mayor’s discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda.
Written comments on any agenda item may be emailed to the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org or mailed
to the Gilroy City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. Comments received by the City
Clerk’s Office by 1 p.m. on the day of a Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to or at the
meeting and available for public inspection with the agenda packet located in the lobby of Administration at City
Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street prior to the meeting. Any correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting
record. Items received after the 1 p.m. deadline will be provided to the City Council as soon as practicable. Written
comments are also available on the City’s Public Records Portal at bit.ly/3NuS1IN.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City will make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior
to the meeting at (408) 846-0204 or cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org to help ensure that
reasonable arrangements can be made.
If you challenge any planning or land use decision made at this meeting in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing held at this meeting, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please take notice that the time within which to seek
judicial review of any final administrative determination reached at this meeting is governed by Section 1094.6 of
the California Code of Civil Procedure.
A Closed Session may be called during this meeting pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) if a point
has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the City on the advice of its legal counsel, based
on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City.
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 2 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are
available with the agenda packet on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org subject to the Staff’s ability to post
the documents before the meeting.
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE GILROY OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE
Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public.
Commissions, task forces, councils and other agencies of the City exist to conduct the people's
business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that
City operations are open to the people's review.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE, TO
RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF THE ORDINANCE OR TO REPORT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE,
CONTACT THE OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMISSION STAFF AT (408) 846-0204.
If you need assistance with translation and would like to speak during public comment, please
contact the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the meeting at 408-846-0204 or e-mail the
City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org.
Si necesita un intérprete durante la junta y gustaría dar un comentario público, comuníquese con el Secretario de la
Ciudad un mínimo de 72 horas antes de la junta al 408-846-0204 o envíe un correo electrónico a la Oficina del
Secretario de la Ciudad a cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org.
To access written translation during the meeting, please scan the QR Code or click
this link:
Para acceder a la traducción durante la reunión, por favor escanee el código QR
o haga clic en el enlace:
bit.ly/3FBiGA0
Choose Language and Click Attend | Seleccione su lenguaje y haga clic en asistir
Use a headset on your phone for audio or read the transcript on your device.
Use sus auriculares para escuchar el audio o leer la transcripción en el
dispositivo.
The agenda for this regular meeting is as follows:
1. OPENING
1.1. Call to Order
1.2. Pledge of Allegiance
1.3. Invocation
1.4. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
1.5. Roll Call
1.6. Orders of the Day
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 3 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
1.7. Employee Introductions
2. CEREMONIAL ITEMS - Proclamations and Awards
3. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
3.1. PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council on
matters within the Gilroy City Council’s jurisdiction but not on the agenda. Persons
wishing to address the Council are requested to complete a Speaker’s Card located at the
entrances and handed to the City Clerk. Speakers are limited to 1 to 3 minutes each,
varying at the Mayor’s discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the
agenda. The law does not permit Council action or extended discussion of any item not
on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Council action is requested, the
Council may place the matter on a future agenda.
Written comments to address the Council on matters not on this agenda may be e-mailed
to the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org or mailed to the Gilroy City Clerk’s
Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. Comments received by the City
Clerk’s Office by 1:00pm on the day of a Council meeting will be distributed to the City
Council prior to or at the meeting and available for public inspection with the agenda
packet located in the lobby of Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, prior to
the meeting. Any correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting record.
Items received after the 1:00pm deadline will be provided to the City Council as soon as
practicable. Written material provided by public members under this section of the agenda
will be limited to 10 pages in hard copy. An unlimited amount of material may be provided
electronically.
4. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Bracco – Cities Association Santa Clara County Board of Directors
(alternate), Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority, Santa Clara Valley Water
Commission, Santa Clara Valley Water Joint Water Resources Commission, SCRWA
Council Member Armendariz – Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority, Santa
Clara Valley Habitat Agency Governing Board, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency
Implementation Board, Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board (alternate), South
County United for Health
Council Member Marques – ABAG, Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors, Santa Clara Valley
Habitat Agency Governing Board, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Implementation
Board, SCRWA (alternate)
Council Member Hilton – CalTrain Policy Group (alternate), Silicon Valley Clean Energy
Authority JPA Board, South County United for Health (alternate), VTA Policy Advisory
Committee
Council Member Cline – Gilroy Economic Development Partnership (alternate), Gilroy
Sister Cities Association, Gilroy Youth Task Force, Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability
Authority Board, VTA Policy Advisory Committee (alternate), Visit Gilroy California Welcome
Center Board
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 4 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
Council Member Tovar – Gilroy Youth Task Force (alternate), Santa Clara County
Expressway Plan 2040 Advisory Board, Santa Clara Valley Water Commission, SCRWA,
South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, VTA Mobility Partnership
Mayor Blankley – ABAG (alternate), CalTrain Policy Group, Cities Association Santa Clara
County Board of Directors, Gilroy Economic Development Partnership, Gilroy Sister Cities
Association (alternate), Gilroy Youth Task Force, Santa Clara Valley Water Joint Water
Resources Commission, SCRWA, South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, VTA
Board of Directors, VTA Mobility Partnership
5. COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE
5.1. Adoption of Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023 & Notice of June 7, 2023
LAFCO Public Hearing
6. FUTURE COUNCIL INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will
be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is
made by a member of the City Council or a member of the public. Any person desiring to speak on any
item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed from the consent calendar prior to
the time the Council votes to approve. If removed, the item will be discussed in the order in which it
appears.
7.1. Approval of the Action Minutes of the April 3, 2023 City Council Regular
Meeting
7.2. Memorandum of Understanding Among Local Public Agencies in Santa
Clara County for Food Recovery Program Costs
7.3. Resolution to Accept FEMA Funding for COVID-19 Vaccinator Overtime
Reimbursement
8. BIDS AND PROPOSALS
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.1. Public Hearing to Establish a List of Properties Subject to the Weed
Abatement Program and Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire
Chief to Abate the Nuisance Arising Out of Weeds Growing and Refuse
Accumulating Upon Property in the City of Gilroy Pursuant to Section
12.51 of the Gilroy Code
1. Staff Report: Jim Wyatt, Fire Chief
2. Open Public Hearing
3. Close Public Hearing
4. Possible Action:
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy authorizing the
Fire Chief to abate the nuisance arising out of weeds growing and refuse
accumulating upon property in the City of Gilroy, pursuant to Section 12.51
of the Gilroy City Code.
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 5 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10.1. Approval of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station Alternate Location at
Christmas Hill Park
1. Staff Report: Jim Wyatt, Fire Chief
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
Approve the alternate location of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station which
is proposed to be located on the ranch side of Christmas Hill Park in the
Santa Teresa Fire Response District. 11. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS
11.1. Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing
Agreement with Lenco Industries for the Replacement of a Public Safety
Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
1. Staff Report: Pedro Espinoza, Police Chief
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
a) Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a sole source purchasing
agreement with Lenco Industries for the purchase of a Public Safety
Rescue Vehicle for $360,497.
b) Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving a
Fiscal Year 2023 budget amendment for $150,000 in the Federal Asset
Seizure Fund towards the purchase of the Rescue Vehicle. 11.2. Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk
Vending Rules and Requirements
1. Staff Report: Sharon Goei, Community Development Director
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk
Vending Rules and Requirements.
11.3. Formation of the Downtown Committee
1. Staff Report: Bryce Atkins, Assistant to the City Administrator
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
Council approve the formation of the Downtown Committee. 12. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
13. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
14. ADJOURNMENT
April 17, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 6 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting Agenda
FUTURE MEETING DATES
May 2023
1 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
3 Capital Improvement Plan Workshop – 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
15 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
22 Recommended Operating Budget Workshop – 6:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
June 2023
5 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
19 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
July 2023
3 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. -CANCELED-
10 Special Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
August 2023
7 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
21 Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m.
Meetings are webstreamed on the City of Gilroy’s website at gilroy.city/meetings.
April 6, 2023 TO: County Executive, Santa Clara County City Managers, Cities in Santa Clara County District Managers, Special Districts in Santa Clara County FROM: Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 &
NOTICE OF JUNE 7, 2023 LAFCO PUBLIC HEARING At its public hearing on April 5, 2023, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County (LAFCO) adopted a Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2024, as recommended in the attached staff report. The attached report reviews the status of LAFCO’s current year work plan and budget; and sets forth the proposed work plan and budget for Fiscal Year 2024. LAFCO is scheduled to consider adoption of its Final Budget at a public hearing on Wednesday, June 7, 2022 at 1:15 PM. The County Auditor will apportion LAFCO costs and invoice the cities, independent special districts and the County based on the Final Budget adopted by LAFCO. The meeting agenda, staff reports and related meeting material will be available on the LAFCO website by June 2, 2023. All interested persons may attend the meeting as provided for on the agenda. Written public comments may be submitted by email to LAFCO@ceo.sccgov.org prior to the date of the hearing. Attachment: Staff Report on the Proposed Work Plan and Budget for FY 2024 (April 5, 2023) cc: Board of Supervisors, Santa Clara County City Council Members, Cities in Santa Clara County Board of Directors, Special Districts in Santa Clara County Santa Clara County Cities Association Santa Clara County Special Districts Association
5.1
p. 8 of 130
5.1
p. 9 of 130
PAGE 1 OF 13
ITEM # 7
LAFCO MEETING: April 5, 2023
TO: LAFCO
FROM: Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer
Dunia Noel, Asst. Executive Officer
SUBJECT: PROPOSED WORK PLAN AND BUDGET FOR FY 2024
FINANCE COMMITTEE / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Adopt the Proposed Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. 2. Adopt the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. 3. Find that the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2024 is expected to be adequate to allow the Commission to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. 4. Authorize staff to transmit the Proposed Budget adopted by the Commission including the estimated agency costs as well as the LAFCO public hearing notice for the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2024 Final Budget to the cities, the special districts, the County, the Cities Association of Santa Clara County and the Santa Clara County Special Districts Association.
ANNUAL BUDGET PROCESS REQUIREMENTS The Cortese Knox Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH Act) which became effective on January 1, 2001, requires LAFCO, as an independent agency, to annually adopt a proposed budget by May 1 and a final budget by June 15 at noticed public hearings. Both the proposed and the final budgets are required to be transmitted to the cities, the special districts and the County. Government Code §56381(a) establishes that at a minimum, the budget must be equal to that of the previous year unless the Commission finds that reduced staffing or program costs will nevertheless allow it to fulfill its statutory responsibilities. Any unspent funds at the end of the year may be rolled over into the next fiscal year budget. After adoption of the final budget by LAFCO, the County Auditor is required to apportion the net operating expenses of the Commission to the agencies represented on LAFCO.
5.1
p. 10 of 130
PAGE 2 OF 13
FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 WORKPLAN & BUDGET DEVELOPMENT
TIMELINE
Dates Staff Tasks / LAFCO Action March 13 - April 5 Notice of this public hearing was advertised in a local newspaper, posted on the LAFCO website and distributed to local agencies. The agenda and a link to the posted agenda packet are also distributed to local agencies, interested persons and organizations. The proposed Workplan and Budget are posted on the LAFCO website and available for public review and comment. April 5 LAFCO public hearing on adoption of Proposed Workplan and Budget April 6 Proposed Work Plan and Budget, preliminary apportionments and LAFCO public hearing notice for Final Budget Hearing transmitted to agencies June 7 LAFCO public hearing and adoption of Final Budget June 7 - July 1 Final Budget transmitted to agencies; Auditor requests payment from agencies
LAFCO FINANCE COMMITTEE At its February 1, 2023 LAFCO meeting, the Commission appointed Commissioner Melton, Commissioner Beall and Alternate Commissioner Chapman to serve on the Finance Committee. At its special meeting held on February 27, 2023, the Finance Committee discussed the progress on the current year work plan and the status of the current year budget; and recommended the proposed FY 2024 work plan and budget for consideration and adoption by the full commission.
CURRENT YEAR IN REVIEW
PROGRESS REPORT ON FY 2022-2023 WORK PLAN LAFCO’s current fiscal year workplan was adopted at a noticed public hearing held on April 6, 2022. Attachment A depicts the current status (through the third quarter of the year) of the 2022-2023 Work Program. A major component of the current work program involves the ongoing Countywide Fire Service Review. LAFCO retained a new consultant in June 2022 and relaunched its Countywide Fire Service Review. The new consultant is working with LAFCO staff and the service provider agencies to finalize / validate agency profiles after completing an extensive and challenging data collection process. To date, two Technical Advisory Committee meetings have been held to obtain feedback on key
5.1
p. 11 of 130
PAGE 3 OF 13
aspects including evaluation criteria and preliminary findings. It is anticipated that another Technical Advisory Committee meeting will be held in the next few weeks and a Draft Service Review Report will be published for public review and comment by the end of this fiscal year. LAFCO has received and /or processed major applications such as a special district sphere of influence amendment/annexation and a city urban service area amendment. Staff has held pre-application meetings and has received and responded to many requests for assistance and expertise from local and regional agencies on a variety of matters related to city service extensions, city annexations/island annexations, special district detachments, and housing element updates. Similarly, responding to public inquiries is another significant and growing area of the workplan and staff has seen an increase in the volume and complexity of such inquiries, including requests for information under the Public Records Act, and information requests from local attorneys, appraisers, real estate agents and developers. In accordance with the Commission’s directive, as opportunities arise and time permits, staff continues to conduct targeted outreach to various local entities (special districts, County, cities, civil grand jury, and other community organizations/individuals) through informational presentations on LAFCO and its role in promoting sustainable growth and governance in the county. The Commission has experienced major changes in its membership; in the last two months, 6 new commissioners have come on board and LAFCO will be selecting a new public member and an alternate public member to fill positions due to term expirations in May 2023. Staff conducts onboarding activities and new commissioner orientations for all new appointees. Other notable administrative activities and projects that have been completed or are currently underway include among others, the annual financial audit, the annual report, required staff training, LaserFische and LAFCO database server upgrades/migrations, transition back to in-person and hybrid meetings to allow for remote public participation, and preparations for webcasting LAFCO meetings. Notwithstanding the preceding progress on various work plan items, some important, high priority projects such as the comprehensive review and update of LAFCO policies and scanning of LAFCO records have fallen behind and will not be completed by the end of the fiscal year. The delays are partly due to the application workload, increased demand for LAFCO services and staff’s efforts to prioritize and meet the needs of the local agencies and the public; and staffing issues including a vacant position since January 2021. Completion of the County classification study in July 2022 allows LAFCO staff to implement the Study’s recommendations and work with the County Employee Services Agency on recruitment efforts for a new LAFCO Clerk. It is anticipated that the vacant LAFCO Clerk position will be filled by the end of this fiscal year.
5.1
p. 12 of 130
PAGE 4 OF 13
The projects in the current workplan that will not be completed by the end of the fiscal year have been added to the proposed FY 2024 workplan. The LAFCO Annual Report for FY 2023 will be published at the end of the current fiscal year and will document all the applications reviewed and processed by LAFCO in Fiscal Year 2023; and will summarize the various accomplishments, activities/projects that LAFCO has engaged in or completed during the period.
STATUS OF FY 2022-2023 ADOPTED BUDGET
Attachment D includes the FY 2023 budget adopted by the Commission at a noticed public hearing on June 1, 2022, the status of LAFCO’s expenditures and revenues as of February 21, 2023, and expenditure and revenue projections for end of FY 2023. The adopted LAFCO budget for FY 2023 is $985,974 and reflects a 11% increase compared to the previous fiscal year’s (FY 2022) budgeted operating expenses. It is estimated that the total year-end projected expenditures for FY 2023 would be approximately 13% lower than the adopted budget primarily due to salary savings from the vacant staff position. Staff anticipates that year end revenue for FY 2023 will be slightly lower than the amount budgeted. LAFCO has received the respective FY 2023 funds from the County, the cities and the independent special districts. The actual fund balance rolled over at the end of FY 2022 was significantly higher at $410,027, compared to the amount estimated ($201,006) in the FY 2023 budget. The excess fund balance and the unspent FY 2023 expenditure amounts will carry over into FY 2024 and will be used to reduce net operating expenses that would in turn translate to reduced FY 2024 costs for contributing agencies.
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
Attachment C includes the proposed work plan for FY 2024, as recommended by the Finance Committee, for consideration and adoption by the full commission. The proposed workplan includes ongoing as well as new projects and outlines detailed projects/activities organized under six broad areas: (1.) LAFCO application processing; (2.) island annexations; (3.) outreach, government/community relations and customer service; (4.) service reviews, special studies and sphere of influence updates; (5.) commission support; and (6.) administrative projects. The work plan assigns priority levels (high, moderate, low); and designates whether the work is to be conducted by staff or outside consultants. The proposed work plan includes a broad spectrum of responsibilities that LAFCO, as an independent local agency and as a regulatory body of the state, is expected to fulfil in its role of promoting sustainable growth and good governance in Santa Clara County. It incorporates the Commission’s legislative functions and mandates and also the Commission’s proactive local initiatives and priorities such as its directives for ongoing public outreach and education and its proactive service review and implementation program. The Finance Committee discussed the possible creation of a LAFCO student internship program and recommended that LAFCO staff contact the County to
5.1
p. 13 of 130
PAGE 5 OF 13
further explore such a potential initiative. The Committee also discussed a potential strategic planning workshop in the upcoming year and requested opportunities for ongoing commissioner education. Reduced staffing levels over the last two years have impacted the functioning of the LAFCO office. While the LAFCO Clerk position is expected to be filled in the next several months, actual professional staffing capabilities will be below 4.0 FTE for at least half of the upcoming fiscal year, considering the onboarding and training period for the new staff person. According to the Comprehensive Organizational Assessment report prepared by LAFCO’s consultant, even the 4.0 FTE staffing level is lower than other LAFCOs with comparable operations. However, in August 2020, the Commission voted to maintain the current 4.0 FTE staffing level given uncertain economic conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic but kept open the option to consider the potential addition of 1.0 FTE in the future. Staff actively manages the workload in order to focus on accomplishing essential activities such as processing applications, completing projects currently underway such as the Countywide Fire Service Review, maintaining core administrative functions, tracking on-going projects and studies, supporting the commission and responding to local agency and public requests for assistance. Non-essential activities and other proactive initiatives will need to be deferred until staffing levels/expertise are restored. This is consistent with past practice where LAFCO’s statutorily mandated activities take priority over administrative projects that are not statutorily required, and over proactive commission-initiated projects which are discretionary but support LAFCO’s mission and statutory requirements.
PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
Attachment D includes the proposed Budget for FY 2023-2024 as recommended by the Finance Committee, for consideration and adoption by the full commission. The Finance Committee conducted a thorough review of the work plan and budget and recognized the public benefit of LAFCO’s work and the high demand for LAFCO’s services from local agencies and the public. The Committee maintained its commitment to ensure adequate resources that allow the Commission to fulfill its statutory responsibilities and accomplish its work plan while also limiting costs for LAFCO’s funding agencies The overall expenditure for FY 2024 ($1,296,000) in the proposed budget is approximately 6% higher than the current year budgeted expenses ($1,222,980). Projected current year cost savings (such as from salary savings), and a larger than estimated fund balance from FY 2022 are expected to result in a $366,814 fund balance at the end of the current year – and will be used to reduce net operating expenses in FY 2024. LAFCO’s proposed net operating expense for FY 2024 is 9% lower than the FY 2023 budgeted net operating expense and is similar to the FY 2022 level.
5.1
p. 14 of 130
PAGE 6 OF 13
DESCRIPTION OF FY 2023-2024 BUDGET LINE ITEMS LAFCO and the County of Santa Clara entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (effective since July 2001), under the terms of which, the County provides staffing, facilities, and services to LAFCO. The associated costs are reflected in the proposed LAFCO budget. LAFCO is a stand-alone, separate fund within the County’s accounting and budget system and the LAFCO budget information is formatted using the County’s account descriptions/codes. The following is a detailed itemization of the proposed budget.
EXPENDITURES Expenditures are divided into two main sections: Staff Salary and Benefits (Object 1) which comprise 68% of the total expenditures, and Services and Supplies (Object 2).
OBJECT 1. SALARIES AND BENEFITS $882,121 This line item supports the salary and benefits for the 4.0 FTE positions including the Executive Officer position, a Senior Analyst position, an Associate Analyst position, and a Clerk position. The Clerk position is currently vacant and is anticipated to be filled by the end of the current fiscal year. LAFCO contracts with the County of Santa Clara for staffing and services and in accordance with the MOU between the County and LAFCO, all four positions are staffed through the County Executive’s Office. The proposed amount is based on the best available projections from the County at this time for salary and benefits for the 4 positions. Changes to the projections for the four positions that occur within the next couple of months will be reflected in the Final LAFCO budget.
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Budgeted Net Operating Expenses
5.1
p. 15 of 130
PAGE 7 OF 13
OBJECT 2. SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
5255100 Intra-County Professional $10,000 This includes the costs for services from various County agencies such as the County Surveyor’s Office, the County Assessors’ Office, and the Registrar of Voters. The County Surveyor assists with map review and approval for boundary change proposals. In addition, the Surveyor’s Office also assists with research to resolve boundary discrepancies. The County Assessor’s Office prepares reports for LAFCO and the Registrar of Voters provides data necessary for processing LAFCO applications. This item also allows LAFCO to seek GIS mapping services including maintenance and technical assistance from the County Planning Office, as necessary. This budgeted amount has been maintained at the same level as the current year.
5255800 Legal Counsel $82,780 This item covers the cost for general legal services. In February 2009, the Commission retained the firm of Best Best & Krieger for legal services on a monthly retainer. The contract was amended in 2010 to reduce the number of total hours required to 240 hours per year. The contract sets the hourly rate and allows for an annual automatic adjustment to the rates based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In 2017, the contract was once again amended to increase the monthly retainer cost and limit the CEQA work within the retainer to 24 hours annually. Any additional CEQA work above 24 hours would be charged outside the retainer at the same hourly rate. The monthly retainer for FY 2024 increases to $6,630, based on a 5.6% increase in the Consumer Price Index for the prior calendar year (2022). This item covers the annual retainer fees and includes additional monies to cover approximately 10 hours of work outside the retainer at the current hourly rate of $316.
5255500 Consultant Services $150,000 This item is budgeted for hiring consultants to assist LAFCO with special projects such as for conducting service reviews and special studies, facilitating a strategic planning workshop, scanning LAFCO’s hardcopy records into the existing electronic document management system, meeting broadcast services for LAFCO meetings and for conducting the annual financial audit, among others. The Commission must take action to authorize such special projects prior to expending funds. This item also includes costs associated with ongoing existing contracts such as costs for maintenance and hosting of the LAFCO website by an outside provider. The Finance Committee recommended that an amount of $6,000 be allocated under this item to cover a potential future student internship program cost.
5285700 Meal Claims $750 This item includes cost of food to support Commission events, workshops, meetings.
5220200 Insurance $8,335 This item is for the purpose of purchasing general liability insurance and workers’ compensation coverage for LAFCO. In 2010, LAFCO switched from the County’s
5.1
p. 16 of 130
PAGE 8 OF 13
coverage to the Special District Risk Management Authority (SDRMA), for the provision of general liability insurance. Additionally, LAFCO also obtains workers’ compensation coverage for its commissioners from SDRMA. Workers’ compensation for LAFCO staff is currently covered by the County and is part of the payroll charge. SDRMA has recently provided estimated FY 2024 contribution amounts for use in the budgeting process: Property Liability ($7,225) and Workers’ Compensation ($1,100). SDRMA is in the process of negotiating rates on behalf of its program membership and expects to confirm rates in mid-May. The Final budget will reflect any major revisions to these estimates.
5270100 Rent & Lease $54,766 This item includes FY 2024 monthly rent for LAFCO office space located at 777 North First Street, Suite 420, San Jose. The original lease term expired on May 5, 2022. At its February 2, 2022 meeting, the Commission authorized the extension of the lease for a five-year period through April 30, 2027.
5250100 Office Expenses $5,000 This item includes funds for purchase of books, subscriptions/publications necessary to keep current on laws and trends; small equipment and supplies for office operations, including printer/photocopier lease.
5255650 Data Processing Services $27,520 This item includes estimated costs associated with County Technology Solutions & Services Department (TSS) providing IT services to the LAFCO program. According to TSS, the projected costs cover Telecom services for 5 phones- VOIP/Landline ($3,000), Wireless Carrier Service ($144), MS Adobe special order, Acrobat Pro and MS Visio monthly subscription ($2,480), and other services ($21,896) comprising Enterprise Content Management services and solutions, Kronos support, Architecture and Innovation Services, Claranet services, Data Analytics and Visualizations, digital print and sccLearn. Any further revised cost estimates received from the County will be reflected in the Final LAFCO budget.
5225500 Commissioner’s Fees $10,000 This item covers the $100 per diem amount for LAFCO commissioners and alternate commissioners to attend LAFCO meetings and committee meetings.
5260100 Publications and Legal Notices $1,000 This item is for costs associated with publication of hearing notices for LAFCO applications and other projects/ studies, as required by state law. This budgeted amount has been maintained at the same level as the current year.
5245100 Membership Dues $13,870 This item includes CALAFCO – the California Association of LAFCOs membership dues. At its meeting on February 17, 2023, the CALAFCO Board approved an 8.27% rate adjustment to account for inflation in accordance with the CALAFCO Bylaws. The FY 2024 membership dues for Santa Clara LAFCO is $12,221.
5.1
p. 17 of 130
PAGE 9 OF 13
Additionally, this item includes estimated membership dues for CSDA – the California Special Districts Association. In June 2018, CSDA informed that Santa Clara LAFCO as a customer of SDRMA, must be a member of CSDA pursuant to SDRMA bylaws.
5250750 Printing and Reproduction $1,500 This covers printing expenses for reports such as service reviews or other studies and documents.
5285800 Business Travel $15,900 This item includes funding for staff and commissioners to attend conferences and workshops. It would cover costs of air travel, accommodation, conference registration and other expenses at the conferences. CALAFCO annually holds a Staff Workshop (location TBD, April 2024) and an Annual Conference (Monterey, October 2023) that is attended by commissioners as well as staff.
5285300 Private Automobile Mileage $1,000 This item provides for mileage reimbursement when staff travels by private car to conduct site visits and attend meetings / training sessions. This budgeted amount has been maintained at the same level as the current year.
5285200 Transportation and Travel (for use of County car) $600 This item would cover costs associated with the use of a County vehicle for travel to conferences, workshops, site visits and meetings.
5281600 Overhead $20,358 This overhead charge is established by the County Controller’s Office, for service rendered by various County departments that do not directly bill LAFCO. The overhead includes LAFCO’s share of the County’s FY 2024 Cost Allocation Plan which is based on actual overhead costs from FY 2022 – the most recent year for which actual costs are available. The overhead amount includes the following charges from: County Executive’s Office: $6,653 Controller-Treasurer: $11,003 Employee Services Agency: $6,072 OBA: $357 BHS-MH - Employee: $198 TSS Intragovernmental Service: $958 Technology Services & Solutions: $1,710 Procurement: $57 Equal Opp. (County Counsel): $809 CoB – Harvey Rose Mgt Audit: $22
5.1
p. 18 of 130
PAGE 10 OF 13
Further, a “roll forward” is applied which is calculated by comparing FY 2022 Cost Plan estimates with FY 2022 actuals. The FY 2022 cost estimates were higher than the actuals by $7,480; this amount is deducted from the FY 2024 Cost Plan. This is a state requirement.
5275200 Computer Hardware $3,000 This item is designated for any required hardware upgrades / purchases.
5250800 Computer Software $5,000 This amount is designated for computer software purchases, and annual licenses for GIS software and records management (LaserFische) hardware/software annual maintenance agreement.
5250250 Postage $500 This amount covers postage costs for mailing notices, agendas, agenda packets and general correspondence.
5252100 Training Programs $2,000 This item covers the costs associated with attendance at staff development courses and seminars. CALAFCO conducts University Courses throughout the year on topics of relevance to LAFCO.
REVENUES
4103400 Application Fees $30,000 It is anticipated that LAFCO will receive approximately $30,000 in fees from processing applications. The actual amount earned from fees corresponds to the level of application activity.
4301100 Interest $6,000 It is estimated that LAFCO will receive an amount of approximately $6,000 from interest earned on LAFCO funds.
3400150 Fund Balance from Previous Fiscal Year (i.e, FY 2023) $366,814 It is projected that there will be a savings or fund balance of approximately $366,814 at the end of the current year, which will be carried over to reduce the proposed Fiscal Year 2024 costs for LAFCO’s funding agencies (cities, independent special districts and the County). Projected Year-End [FY 2023] Fund Balance = (Projected Year-End [FY 23] Revenue + Actual Fund Balance from Previous Fiscal Year [FY 22] + Funds Received from Local Agencies in FY 23) - (Projected Year-End [FY 23] Expenses) = ($31,000+ $410,027 + $985,974) - $1,060,187 = $366,814 The fund balance excludes the reserves.
5.1
p. 19 of 130
PAGE 11 OF 13
RESERVES
3400800 Reserves Available $200,000 This item includes reserves for two purposes: litigation reserve – for use if LAFCO is involved with any litigation; and contingency reserve – to be used for unexpected expenses. If used during the year, this account will be replenished in the following year. Since 2012, the reserves have been retained in a separate Reserves account, thus eliminating the need for LAFCO to budget each year for this purpose. The Reserves amount was held at $250,000 since FY 2020 to timely implement potential recommendations from the Comprehensive Organizational Assessment, and as a tentative measure in recognition that LAFCO operates in an increasingly complex and controversial environment. In FY 2022, LAFCO reduced the Reserves from $250,000 to $200,000, in order to further reduce costs to local agencies given the COVID -19 related economic hardships; and maintained the reserve level at $200,000 in FY 2023. The Finance Committee recommends maintaining the current level of reserves for FY 2024. This places the proposed Reserve amount at approximately 15% of the total FY 2024 expenditures. LAFCO has not adopted a Reserves policy, however as an independent agency, LAFCO should maintain sufficient reserves for flexibility and stability in the event of unanticipated needs.
FY 2024 NET OPERATING EXPENSES FY 2024 Net Operating Expenses = (Proposed FY 2024 Expenditures) - (Proposed FY 2024 Fee & Interest Revenues + Projected Fund Balance from FY 2023) = ($1,296,000) – ($36,000 + $366,814) = $893,186 The projected operating expense for FY 2024 is based on projected expenditures and revenues as well as on estimated fund balance for the current year. Further revisions may be needed as we get a better indication of current year expenses/revenues towards the end of this fiscal year. Additionally, a more accurate projection of costs/revenues for the upcoming fiscal year could become available, particularly for employee salary and benefits. This could result in changes to the proposed net operating expenses for FY 2024 which could in turn impact the costs for each of LAFCO’s funding agencies.
COST APPORTIONMENT TO CITIES, INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICTS
AND COUNTY In January 2013, independent special districts were seated on LAFCO. Government Code §56381(b)(1)(A) provides that when independent special districts are represented on LAFCO, the county, cities and independent special districts must each provide a one-third share of LAFCO’s operational budget. The City of San Jose has permanent membership on LAFCO pursuant to Government Code Section 56327. As required by Government Code §56381.6(b), the City of San
5.1
p. 20 of 130
PAGE 12 OF 13
Jose’s share of LAFCO costs must be in the same proportion as its member bears to the total membership on the commission, excluding the public member. The remaining cities’ share must be apportioned in proportion to each city’s total revenues, as reported in the most recent edition of the Cities Annual Report published by the Controller, as a percentage of the combined city revenues within a county. Government Code Section §56381 provides that the independent special districts’ share shall be apportioned in proportion to each district’s total revenues as a percentage of the combined total district revenues within a county. The Santa Clara County Special Districts Association (SDA), at its August 13, 2012 meeting, adopted an alternative formula for distributing the independent special districts’ share to individual districts. The SDA’s agreement requires each district’s cost to be based on a fixed percentage of the total independent special districts’ share. Therefore, in Santa Clara County, the County pays a third of LAFCO’s operational costs, the independent special districts pay a third, the City of San Jose pays one sixth and the remaining cities pay one sixth. Government Code §56381(c) requires the County Auditor to request payment from the cities, independent special districts and the County no later than July 1 of each year for the amount each agency owes based on the net operating expenses of the Commission and the actual administrative costs incurred by the Auditor in apportioning costs and requesting payment. The following is a draft apportionment to the agencies based on the proposed net operating expenses for FY 2024.
Apportionment of the costs among the 14 cities and among the 17 independent special districts will be calculated by the County Controller’s Office after LAFCO adopts the final budget in June. In order to provide each of the cities and districts
$297,729
$297,729
$148,864
$148,864
Proposed FY 2024 LAFCO Cost Apportionments
County Independent Special Districts Other Cities City of San Jose
5.1
p. 21 of 130
PAGE 13 OF 13
with a general indication of their costs in advance, Attachment E includes draft estimated apportionments, based on the proposed FY 2024 net operating expenses and the FY 2020-2021 Cities Annual Report. The final apportionments will be prepared by the County Controller’s Office based on the latest available Cities Annual Report.
ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Status of FY 2023 Work Plan Attachment B: LAFCO Financials 2008-2022 Attachment C: Proposed Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2024 Attachment D: Proposed LAFCO Budget for Fiscal Year 2024 Attachment E: Estimated FY 2024 Costs to Agencies
5.1
p. 22 of 130
5.1
p. 23 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 1 of 7
PRIORITY* H - High Priority (essential activities: state mandate, Commission directive, requirements)
M - Medium Priority (important, provided resources allow or time permits)
L - Low Priority (desirable provided resources allow or time permits , not urgent)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS LAFCO APPLICATIONS Process applicant-initiated LAFCO
proposals
Encourage pre-application meetings
prior to application submittal
Conduct pre-agenda meetings with
County Depts to obtain Assessor &
Surveyor reports, as needed
Process applications per CKH Act
requirements: issue Notice of
Application, Certificate of Filing /
Sufficiency, Public Hearing Notice, staff
report, conduct protest proceedings, as
needed
Staff H Several pre-
application
meetings held
(Monte Sereno,
Sunnyvale/Cuper
tino Sanitary
District, WVSD,
San Jose)
3 city conducted
and a SOI
amendment/
annexation
application
completed, one
USA amendment
in progress
Comment on potential LAFCO applications,
relevant projects & development proposals,
city General Plan updates and/ or related
environmental documents
Ongoing, as needed Staff H Ongoing
County Housing
Element
Review and update LAFCO policies for
context, clarity and consistency with State
law
In progress Staff /
Consultant
H In progress
Prepare flowcharts for LAFCO processes
and update application packets for current
requirements and ease of public use
Upon completion of policies update Staff L Internal
application
processing
checklists
updated
ITEM # 7
Attachment A
5.1
p. 24 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 2 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS ISLAND ANNEXATIONS Conduct outreach to cities with islands,
follow up on responses including
review/research of city limits/ USA
boundaries, provide assistance with
annexations or necessary USA amendments
Prepare and distribute island maps to
cities
Staff L As needed
Facilitate interagency discussions to
support remaining island annexations
Monte Sereno Staff H As needed,
pending city
initiation
Review and finalize city-conducted island
annexations
Ongoing, as needed
Staff H As needed OUTREACH, GOVERNMENT / COMMUNITY RELATIONS & CUSTOMER SERVICE CUSTOMER SERVICE Conduct outreach to increase awareness of
LAFCO’s role
Presentations to cities, other agencies
on LAFCO, as relevant
Distribute LAFCO communications
material to elected officials and staff of
cities, special districts and the County
Seek exhibit opportunities at public
spaces / events
Maintain website as the primary
information resource on LAFCO
Increase social media presence
(Twitter)
Staff L
M
L
H
L
Presentations
provided upon
request (Grand
Jury, Leadership
Sunnyvale, San
Jose Planning)
Website updated
Engage and establish relationships with
local (cities, districts, county), regional
(ABAG/MTC), state (SGC, OPR, DoC,
SWRCB) agencies, organizations such as
SDA, SCCAPO, CALAFCO, other
stakeholder groups
Attend regular meetings of SDA
(quarterly), SCCAPO (monthly), County
Planning Dept.(quarterly)
Small water systems issues / legislation
Collaborate with agencies and entities
with goals common to LAFCO
Staff M
M
M
Ongoing
5.1
p. 25 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 3 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS
Track LAFCO related legislation EO attends CALAFCO Legislative
Committee
Commission takes positions and submit
letters on proposed legislation
Staff L
M
EO served on the
Legislative
Committee until
October 2021
Respond to public enquiries re. LAFCO
policies, procedures and application filing
requirements
Timely response to public inquiries
Update the PRA form for the website
Document research on complex
inquiries
Report to Commission on complex
inquiries
Staff H
L
L
H
Ongoing
High volume of
enquiries SERVICE REVIEWS, SPECIAL STUDIES & SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES Countywide Fire Service Review Manage new consultant’s work and
contract
Coordinate TAC meetings
Attend stakeholder interviews with
consultant
Work with consultant on any data
collection issues
Review and comment on administrative
draft reports
Distribute Public hearing notices and
coordinate community workshops and
public hearings
Prepare and distribute
stakeholder/public outreach material
Coordinate stakeholder / public
engagement process
Prepare staff reports with
implementation recommendations
Staff /
Consultant
H Working with
new consultant
on data collection
and profiles
preparation,
review and
comment
Conducted 2 TAC
meetings
5.1
p. 26 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 4 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS
Follow up with agencies and report back
to the commission
Continue to monitor implementation of
recommendations from previous service
reviews and conduct special studies, as
necessary
RRRPD study – city took action to delay
decision on consolidation
Staff L Pending city
action
Map Mutual Water companies Initial maps complete, further work
through service review
Staff L As needed
Engage in or support grant / partnership
opportunities on issues related to enhancing
viability of agriculture, and climate smart
growth
As needed, and as opportunities arise Staff L As needed
Compile and post JPA filings on the LAFCO
website
Notice provided, gather JPA information
through service review process
Staff L Ongoing COMMISSION SUPPORT Provide ongoing support to the 12
commissioners for regularly-scheduled
Commission meetings, special meetings and
Committee meetings (Finance Committee,
Ad Hoc Committee on Organizational
Assessment and the Fire Service Review
TAC)
Prepare and distribute public hearing
notices and agenda packets, provide
staff support during the meetings,
record minutes, broadcast meetings
Hold pre-agenda review meeting with
Chair
Hold pre-meeting calls with individual
commissioners to address agenda item
questions
Process commissioner per diems for
attendance at LAFCO meetings
Staff H Ongoing
Keep the Commission informed EO report
off-agenda emails, as needed
Staff H Ongoing
5.1
p. 27 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 5 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS
Onboarding new Commissioners Facilitate filing / completion of Form
700, commissioner pledge, ethics
training.
Update LAFCO letterhead, directory, and
website
Set up vendor accounts, provide parking
permits
Conduct new Commissioner orientation
Recognize outgoing commissioners for
service on LAFCO
Staff H Five new
commissioners;
one position
remains vacant at
this time
Onboarding,
orientations
completed for 4;
one in progress
LAFCO past,
present, future:
guest
presentation at
2/1 LAFCO
meeting
Commissioners Selection Process Inform appointing bodies of any
upcoming vacancies and provide
information on appointment criteria
Convene ISDSC committee meeting, as
necessary
Coordinate public member selection
process, as necessary
Staff H Initiated process
for selection of
new public
member and
alternate public
member
Conduct a Strategic Planning Workshop 2018 Workshop re. LAFCO
Communications and Outreach Plan
Staff /
Consultant
L On hold
Commissioner participation in CALAFCO Support commissioner participation in
CALAFCO activities / or election to the
CALAFCO Board
Staff L 2 commissioners
attended
CALAFCO Annual
Conference
5.1
p. 28 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 6 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECTS Prepare LAFCO annual work plan March –June Staff H In progress
Prepare LAFCO annual budget March –June Staff H In progress
Prepare LAFCO Annual Report August 2022 Staff H Completed
Prepare LAFCO Annual Financial Audit October 2022 (Contract with Chavan
Associates extended for FY 2023 and FY
2024)
Consultant /
Staff
H Completed
Office / facility management Coordinate with Building Manager on
facilities issues
Coordinate with County re.
computers/network, phone, printers,
office security, procurement ,
installation & maintenance
Order and manage office supplies
Make travel arrangements and process
expense reimbursements.
Process mileage reimbursements
Office space lease extended (lease
extended through April 30, 2027)
Staff H Ongoing
Transitioning to
in-person /
hybrid meetings
Coordinating with
County for
webcasting
LAFCO meetings
Records management Organize scan of LAFCO records to
Electronic Document Management
System (LaserFische)
Maintain LAFCO’s hard copy records
Maintain and enhance the LAFCO
Website
Maintain LAFCO database
Staff/
Consultant
Staff
H
H
H
H
On hold
Completed
LaserFische and
LAFCO database
server migrations
Website content
updates
completed
5.1
p. 29 of 130
STATUS OF CURRENT YEAR WORK PLAN (FISCAL YEAR 2023)
PAGE 7 of 7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* STATUS
Contracts and payments & receivables Track consultant contracts and approve
invoices
Approve vendor invoices / process
annual payments for various services/
memberships
Coordinate with County Controller’s
Office and track annual collection of
payments from member agencies
Staff H Ongoing
Review and update LAFCO bylaws /
administrative policies and procedures
Ongoing, as needed Staff H
Ongoing
Staff training and development CALAFCO workshops, conferences,
relevant courses
Staff M Staff registered
for CALAFCO
Workshop
Coordinate with County on administrative
issues
Attend monthly meetings with the
Deputy County Executive
Staff H Ongoing
Staff performance evaluation April – October 2022 Staff/
Commission
H Completed in
February 2023
Comprehensive Organizational Assessment
Study – implementation
As needed Staff/
Commission
H LAFCO/County
MOU to be
revised
Recruitment and training of LAFCO staff One LAFCO Analyst position currently
vacant – recruitment pending County
Classification study results
Staff H Begin LAFCO
Clerk
recruitment
Other administrative functions mandated of
a public agency (Form 700 annual filing &
AB 1234 training compliance, Form 806,
maintaining liability/workers comp
insurance, etc.)
Ongoing Staff H Ongoing
ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECTS 5.1
p. 30 of 130
5.1
p. 31 of 130
FY 2008 - FY 2022 LAFCO FINANCIALS
February 2023
ITEM NO. TITLE
ACTUALS
FY 2008
ACTUALS
FY 2009
ACTUALS
FY 2010
ACTUALS
FY 2011
ACTUALS
FY 2012
ACTUALS
FY 2013
ACTUALS
FY 2014
ACTUALS
FY 2015
ACTUALS
FY 2016
ACTUALS
FY 2017
ACTUALS
FY 2018
ACTUALS
FY 2019
ACTUALS
FY 2020
ACTUALS
FY 2021
ACTUALS
FY 2022
EXPENDITURES
Salary and Benefits $356,009 $400,259 $406,650 $413,966 $393,194 $411,929 $450,751 $466,755 $484,216 $514,381 $628,534 $713,900 $744,439 $730,716 $639,099
Object 2: Services and Supplies
5255100 Intra-County Professional $66,085 $57,347 $13,572 $4,532 $6,118 $5,260 $5,663 $4,379 $18,523 $1,292 $703 $3,593 $346 $201 $354
5255800 Legal Counsel $0 $9,158 $67,074 $52,440 $48,741 $56,791 $53,550 $52,854 $57,498 $71,131 $59,400 $72,276 $69,975 $65,791 $78,977
5255500 Consultant Services $19,372 $75,000 $76,101 $58,060 $102,349 $59,563 $35,602 $37,250 $39,625 $0 $45,000 $52,650 $106,709 $41,966 $25,389
5285700 Meal Claims $0 $368 $277 $288 $379 $91 $228 $209 $367 $50 $901 $257 $166 $0 $56
5220100 Insurance $491 $559 $550 $4,582 $4,384 $4,378 $4,231 $4,338 $4,135 $4,679 $4,893 $5,296 $5,893 $10,452 $8,591
1151 Office Expenses $1,056 $354 $716 $639 $1,212 $536 $850 $783 $6,266 $48,632 $15,412 $4,702 $2,544 $1,151 $1,462
5270100 Rent and Lease $41,120 $39,360 $44,478 $46,254 $47,903
5255650 Data Processing Services $8,361 $3,692 $3,505 $1,633 $3,384 $1,663 $3,311 $9,024 $1,519 $6,869 $877 $11,894 $15,500 $21,223 $18,125
5225500 Commissioners' Fee $5,700 $5,400 $3,500 $3,400 $4,000 $4,900 $5,800 $4,900 $6,700 $5,300 $5,400 $5,000 $4,600 $6,100 $4,200
5260100 Publications and Legal Notices $1,151 $563 $1,526 $363 $916 $222 $378 $2,484 $487 $191 $145 $192 $44 $90 $704
5245100 Membership Dues $5,500 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 $14,473 $0 $7,428 $7,577 $8,107 $8,674 $9,615 $11,822 $12,144 $12,316
5250750 Printing and Reproduction $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9 $177 $703 $0 $0 $0 $799 $0 $0
5285800 Business Travel $7,238 $8,415 $4,133 $8,309 $3,095 $4,777 $5,800 $4,042 $5,811 $3,877 $13,091 $4,260 $6,908 $0 $0
5285300 Private Automobile Mileage $1,016 $704 $832 $1,185 $615 $424 $409 $396 $1,009 $1,264 $590 $689 $696 $61 $0
5285200 Transportation&Travel (County Car Usage)$894 $948 $629 $0 $384 $250 $371 $293 $559 $605 $0 $328 $256 $0 $0
5281600 Overhead $42,492 $62,391 $49,077 $46,626 $60,647 $43,133 $42,192 $34,756 $49,452 $0 $28,437 $69,944 $4,505 $30,917 $49,173
5275200 Computer Hardware $0 $451 $0 $83 $2,934 $1,791 $2,492 $0 $106 $0 $0 $773 $0 $0 $0
5250800 Computer Software $0 $0 $626 $314 $579 $3,124 $933 $1,833 $2,079 $754 $4,505 $3,012 $1,200 $4,708 $1,753
5250250 Postage $1,160 $416 $219 $568 $309 $589 $246 $597 $411 $209 $183 $117 $73 $184 $159
5252100 Staff Training Programs $0 $665 $491 $250 $300 $0 $0 $1,431 $0 $0 $0 $350 $525 $70 $70
5701000 Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $516,530 $633,691 $636,478 $604,238 $640,540 $613,895 $612,816 $633,929 $687,043 $667,342 $857,865 $998,208 $1,021,478 $972,028 $888,331
REVENUES
4103400 Application Fees $46,559 $41,680 $35,576 $48,697 $37,426 $45,458 $63,561 $27,386 $146,168 $20,436 $29,864 $33,049 $7,587 $34,622 $41,847
4301100 Interest: Deposits and Investments $24,456 $16,230 $6,688 $4,721 $4,248 $3,416 $2,674 $2,844 $6,073 $10,830 $12,620 $12,141 $18,176 $10,488 $7,831
TOTAL REVENUES $71,015 $57,911 $42,264 $53,418 $41,674 $48,873 $66,235 $30,230 $152,241 $31,266 $42,484 $45,190 $25,763 $45,110 $49,678
3400150
AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE
END OF YEAR $271,033 $368,800 $334,567 $275,605 $209,987 $208,219 $160,052 $226,111 $187,310 $293,489 $331,177 $314,693 $352,123 $312,351 $410,027
3400800 RESERVES AVAILABLE $100,000 $100,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $250,000 $250,000 $200,000
BUDGETED COSTS TO AGENCIES
5440200 County $271,641 $270,896 $267,657 $292,601 $298,597 $281,780 $156,002 $187,521 $220,668 $225,778 $266,298 $277,942 $381,904 $327,928 $295,443
4600100 Cities (San Jose 50% +other cities 50%)$271,641 $270,896 $267,657 $292,601 $298,597 $282,625 $156,002 $187,521 $220,668 $225,778 $266,298 $277,942 $381,904 $327,928 $295,443
4600100 Special Distrcits $296,892 $187,521 $220,668 $225,778 $266,298 $277,942 $381,904 $327,928 $295,443
ITEM # 7
Attachment B
5.1
p. 32 of 130
5.1
p. 33 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 1 OF 6
PRIORITY* H - High Priority (essential activities: state mandate, Commission directive, requirements)
M - Medium Priority (important, provided resources allow or time permits)
L - Low Priority (desirable provided resources allow or time permits , not urgent)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* LAFCO APPLICATIONS Process applicant-initiated LAFCO proposals Encourage pre-application meetings prior to
application submittal
Conduct pre-agenda meetings with County Depts to
obtain Assessor & Surveyor reports, as needed
Process applications per CKH Act requirements: issue
Notice of Application, Certificate of Filing /
Sufficiency, Public Hearing Notice, staff report,
conduct protest proceedings, as needed
Staff H
Comment on potential LAFCO applications,
relevant projects & development proposals,
city General Plan updates and/ or related
environmental documents
Ongoing, as needed Staff H
Review and update LAFCO policies for
context, clarity and consistency with State law
In progress Staff / Consultant H
Prepare flowcharts for LAFCO processes and
update application packets and application
fee schedules for current requirements and
ease of public use
Upon completion of policies update Staff L ISLAND ANNEXATIONS Conduct outreach to cities with islands,
follow up on responses including
review/research of city limits/ USA
boundaries, provide assistance with
annexations or necessary USA amendments
Prepare and distribute island maps to cities Staff L
Review and finalize city-conducted island
annexations
Ongoing, as needed Staff H
ITEM # 7
Attachment C
5.1
p. 34 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 2 OF 6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* OUTREACH, GOVERNMENT / COMMUNITY RELATIONS & CUSTOMER SERVICE Conduct outreach to increase awareness of
LAFCO’s role
Presentations to cities, other agencies on LAFCO, as
relevant
Distribute LAFCO communications material to elected
officials and staff of cities, special districts and the
County
Seek exhibit opportunities at public spaces / events
Maintain website as the primary information resource
on LAFCO
Increase social media presence (Twitter)
Staff L
M
L
H
L
Engage and establish relationships with local
(cities, districts, county), regional
(ABAG/MTC), state (SGC, OPR, DoC,
SWRCB) agencies, organizations such as SDA,
SCCAPO, CALAFCO, other stakeholder
groups
Attend regular meetings of SDA (quarterly), SCCAPO
(monthly), County Planning Dept.(quarterly)
Small water systems issues / legislation
Collaborate with agencies and entities with goals
common to LAFCO
Staff M
M
M
Track LAFCO related legislation EO attends CALAFCO Legislative Committee meetings
Commission takes positions and submits letters on
proposed legislation
Staff L
M
Respond to public enquiries re. LAFCO
policies, procedures and application filing
requirements
Timely response to public inquiries
Update the PRA form for the website
Document research on complex inquiries
Report to Commission on complex inquiries
Staff H
L
L
H
5.1
p. 35 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 3 OF 6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* SERVICE REVIEWS, SPECIAL STUDIES & SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES Countywide Fire Service Review Manage new consultant’s work and contract
Coordinate TAC meetings
Review and comment on administrative draft report
Distribute Public hearing notices and coordinate
community workshops and LAFCO public hearings
Prepare and distribute stakeholder/public outreach
material
Coordinate stakeholder / public engagement process
along with public comment and response process
Prepare staff reports with implementation
recommendations
Follow up with agencies on implementation and
report back to the commission
Staff / Consultant H
Countywide Water and Wastewater Service
Review
Develop water/wastewater service review workplan
and identify method for consultant selection
Staff M
Continue to monitor implementation of
recommendations from previous service
reviews and conduct special studies, as
necessary
RRRPD study – city took action to delay decision on
consolidation
Staff L
Map Mutual Water companies Initial maps complete, further through service review Staff L
Engage in or support grant / partnership
opportunities on issues related to enhancing
viability of agriculture, and climate smart
growth
As needed, and as opportunities arise Staff L
Compile and post JPA filings on the LAFCO
website
Notice provided, gather JPA information through
service review process
Staff L
5.1
p. 36 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 4 OF 6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* COMMISSION SUPPORT Provide ongoing support to the 12
commissioners for regularly-scheduled
Commission meetings, special meetings and
Committee meetings (Finance Committee,
and the Fire Service Review TAC)
Prepare and distribute public hearing notices and
agenda packets, provide staff support during the
meetings, record minutes, broadcast meetings
Hold pre-agenda review meeting with Chair
Hold pre-meeting calls with individual commissioners
to address agenda item questions and prepare
meeting script for Chair
Process commissioner per diems for attendance at
LAFCO meetings
Staff H
Keep the Commission informed EO report
Off-agenda emails, as needed
Provide ongoing educational opportunities/events
Staff H
Onboarding new Commissioners Facilitate filing / completion of Form 700,
commissioner pledge, ethics training
Update LAFCO letterhead, directory, and website
Set up vendor accounts, provide parking permits
Conduct new Commissioner orientation
Recognize outgoing commissioners for LAFCO service
Staff H
Commissioners Selection Process Inform appointing bodies of any upcoming vacancies
and provide information on appointment criteria
Convene ISDSC committee meeting, as necessary
Coordinate public member selection process, as
necessary
Staff H
Conduct a Strategic Planning Workshop Most recent workshop in 2018 re. LAFCO
Communications and Outreach Plan
Staff / Consultant L
Commissioner participation in CALAFCO Support commissioner participation in CALAFCO
activities / or election to the CALAFCO Board
Staff L
5.1
p. 37 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 5 OF 6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY* ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECTS Prepare LAFCO annual work plan March –June Staff H
Prepare LAFCO annual budget March –June Staff H
Prepare LAFCO Annual Report August 2023 Staff H
Prepare LAFCO Annual Financial Audit October 2023 (Contract with Chavan Associates
extended for FY 2023 and FY 2024)
Consultant / Staff H
Office / facility management Coordinate with Building Manager on facilities issues
Coordinate with County re. computers/network,
phone, printers, office security, procurement,
installation & maintenance
Order and manage office supplies
Make travel arrangements and process expense
reimbursements.
Process mileage reimbursements
Office space lease extended (lease extended through
April 30, 2027)
Staff H
Records management Organize scan of LAFCO records to Electronic
Document Management System (LaserFische)
Maintain LAFCO’s hard copy records
Maintain and enhance the LAFCO Website
Maintain LAFCO database
Staff/ Consultant
Staff
H
H
H
H
Contracts and payments & receivables Track consultant contracts and approve invoices
Approve vendor invoices / process annual payments
for various services/ memberships
Coordinate with County Controller’s Office and track
annual collection of payments from member agencies
Staff H
Review and update LAFCO bylaws /
administrative policies and procedures
Ongoing, as needed Staff H
5.1
p. 38 of 130
PROPOSED WORK PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024
PAGE 6 OF 6
PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACTIVITIES / TIMELINE RESOURCES PRIORITY*
Staff training and development CALAFCO workshops, conferences, relevant courses Staff M
Coordinate with County on administrative
issues
Attend monthly meetings with the Deputy County
Executive
Staff H
Staff performance evaluation April - October 2023 Staff/Commission H
Recruitment, hiring, and training of LAFCO
staff
Training of new LAFCO Clerk - recruitment and hiring
expected by end of FY 2023
Staff H
Student internship program Contact the County to explore creation of a paid
student internship program
Staff L
Other administrative functions mandated of a
public agency (Form 806, maintaining
liability/workers comp insurance, etc.)
Ongoing Staff H
ADMINISTRATIVE PROJECTS 5.1
p. 39 of 130
PROPOSED LAFCO BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2023- 2024
ITEM #TITLE
APPROVED
BUDGET
FY 2023
ACTUALS
Year to Date
2/21/2023
PROJECTIONS
Year End
FY 2023
PROPOSED
BUDGET
FY 2024
EXPENDITURES
Object 1: Salary and Benefits $810,419 $403,351 $719,768 $882,121
Object 2: Services and Supplies
5255100 Intra-County Professional $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000
5255800 Legal Counsel $78,326 $42,043 $75,500 $82,780
5255500 Consultant Services $150,000 $22,552 $100,000 $150,000
5285700 Meal Claims $750 $56 $300 $750
5220100 Insurance $9,237 $7,042 $9,237 $8,335
5250100 Office Expenses $5,000 $344 $2,000 $5,000
5270100 Rent & Lease $53,182 $35,272 $53,182 $54,766
5255650 Data Processing Services $28,038 $16,375 $28,038 $27,520
5225500 Commissioners' Fee $10,000 $1,900 $7,000 $10,000
5260100 Publications and Legal Notices $1,000 $308 $1,000 $1,000
5245100 Membership Dues $12,887 $12,921 $12,921 $13,870
5250750 Printing and Reproduction $1,500 $0 $500 $1,500
5285800 Business Travel $10,000 $3,125 $6,000 $15,900
5285300 Private Automobile Mileage $1,000 $7 $200 $1,000
5285200 Transportation&Travel (County Car Usage)$600 $0 $200 $600
5281600 Overhead $30,041 $15,021 $30,041 $20,358
5275200 Computer Hardware $3,000 $0 $1,000 $4,000
5250800 Computer Software $5,000 $853 $2,000 $4,000
5250250 Postage $1,000 $10 $300 $500
5252100 Staff/Commissioner Training Programs $2,000 $0 $1,000 $2,000
5701000 Reserves $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,222,980 $561,180 $1,060,187 $1,296,000
REVENUES
4103400 Application Fees $30,000 $19,603 $25,000 $30,000
4301100 Interest: Deposits and Investments $6,000 $4,657 $6,000 $6,000
TOTAL REVENUE $36,000 $24,260 $31,000 $36,000
3400150 FUND BALANCE FROM PREVIOUS FY $201,006 $410,027 $410,027 $366,814
NET LAFCO OPERATING EXPENSES $985,974 $126,893 $619,160 $893,186
3400800 RESERVES Available $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
COSTS TO AGENCIES
5440200 County $328,658 $328,658 $328,658 $297,729
4600100 Cities (San Jose 50% + Other Cities 50%)$328,658 $328,658 $328,658 $297,729
4600100 Special Districts $328,658 $328,658 $328,658 $297,729
February 23, 2023
ITEM # 7
Attachment D
5.1
p. 40 of 130
5.1
p. 41 of 130
$893,186
JURISDICTION REVENUE PER
2020/2021 REPORT
PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL REVENUE
ALLOCATION
PERCENTAGES
ALLOCATED
COSTS
County N/A N/A 33.3333333%$297,728.67
Cities Total Share 33.3333333%$297,728.67
San Jose N/A N/A 50.0000000%$148,864.34
Other cities share 50.0000000%$148,864.33
Campbell $67,824,629 1.9995536%$2,976.62
Cupertino $125,426,339 3.6977230%$5,504.59
Gilroy $131,638,480 3.8808646%$5,777.22
Los Altos $61,718,303 1.8195316%$2,708.63
Los Altos Hills $19,614,107 0.5782480%$860.81
Los Gatos $51,370,842 1.5144757%$2,254.51
Milpitas $186,509,610 5.4985331%$8,185.35
Monte Sereno $4,845,074 0.1428388%$212.64
Morgan Hill $113,620,439 3.3496705%$4,986.46
Mountain View $373,855,966 11.0217345%$16,407.43
Palo Alto $664,162,959 19.5803423%$29,148.15
Santa Clara $1,000,850,828 29.5063155%$43,924.39
Saratoga $35,690,808 1.0522090%$1,566.36
Sunnyvale $554,860,115 16.3579598%$24,351.17
Total Cities (excluding San Jose)$3,391,988,499 100.0000000%$148,864.33
Total Cities (including San Jose)$297,728.67
Special Districts Total Share (Fixed %)33.3333333%$297,728.66
Aldercroft Heights County Water District 0.06233%$185.57
Burbank Sanitary District 0.15593%$464.25
Cupertino Sanitary District 2.64110%$7,863.31
El Camino Healthcare District 4.90738%$14,610.68
Guadalupe Coyote Resource Conservation District 0.04860%$144.70
Lake Canyon Community Services District 0.02206%$65.68
Lion's Gate Community Services District 0.22053%$656.58
Loma Prieta Resource Conservation District 0.02020%$60.14
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 5.76378%$17,160.42
Purissima Hills Water District 1.35427%$4,032.05
Rancho Rinconada Recreation and Park District 0.15988%$476.01
San Martin County Water District 0.04431%$131.92
Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 1.27051%$3,782.67
Santa Clara Valley Water District 81.44126%$242,473.98
Saratoga Cemetery District 0.32078%$955.05
Saratoga Fire Protection District 1.52956%$4,553.94
South Santa Clara Valley Memorial District 0.03752%$111.71
Total Special Districts 100.00000%$297,728.66
Total Allocated Costs $893,186.00
LAFCO COST APPORTIONMENT: COUNTY, CITIES, SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Estimated Costs to Agencies Based on the Preliminary FY 2024 LAFCO Budget
March 22, 2023
Preliminary Net Operating Expenses for FY 2024
ITEM # 7
Attachment E
5.1
p. 42 of 130
5.1
p. 43 of 130
Page 1 of 7
City of Gilroy
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Monday, April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM
1.OPENING
1.1.Call to Order
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Blankley at 6:00 PM.
1.2.Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1.3.Invocation
Pastor Malcolm MacPhail from New Hope Community Church provided the
Invocation.
1.4.City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
City Clerk Pham reported on the posting of the agenda.
1.5.Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Rebeca Armendariz, Council Member
Dion Bracco, Mayor Pro Tempore
Tom Cline, Council Member
Carol Marques, Council Member
Fred Tovar, Council Member
Marie Blankley, Mayor
Absent Zach Hilton, Council Member
1.6.Orders of the Day
There were none.
1.7.Employee Introductions
Police Chief Espinoza introduced Veronica Najera Ruiz, Police Records
Technician, and Heidi Bates, Public Safety Communicator.
Administrative Services Director McPhillips introduced Armando Zepeda, Senior
Equipment Mechanic.
2.CEREMONIAL ITEMS - Proclamations and Awards
There were none.
3.PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
3.1.Annual Presentation from Visit Gilroy/California Welcome Center
Visit Gilroy Executive Director Frank Johnson provided the annual presentation to
Council and responded to Council Member questions.
7.1
p. 44 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 2 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
3.2.PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment.
The following members spoke on items that were not on the agenda.
Jeff Orth spoke about the upcoming festival and events happening in the
City.
Gregory Felios requested Council to focus on promoting City’s events.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Blankley closed Public Comment.
4.REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Bracco had nothing to report.
Council Member Armendariz reported about last Saturday's Cesar Chavez celebration
event. She also informed the public about the Fair for families with children with autism
occurring on April 22, 2023, at the Civic Plaza.
Council Member Marques reported on Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors and thanked folks
for attending the downtown clean-up on March 25, 2023.
Council Member Cline reported attending the retreats for the Gilroy California Welcome
Center Board and the Chamber of Commerce.
Council Member Tovar reported on Gilroy Unified School District.
Mayor Blankley reported on the State of the City Address. She also reported that she
attended the sneak peek event of the Gilroy Youth Impact Center held by Digital Nest on
March 23, 2023, and met with Dignity Moves on March 22, 2023.
5.COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE
5.1.Letter of Support – California High Speed Rail Authority Application for
Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Program Grant
Mayor Blankley asked Council if they would like to express support for this item.
The item received majority support.
6.FUTURE COUNCIL INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS
There were none.
7.CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Blankley asked Council Members if they wish to pull an item out of the Calendar.
Council Member Armendariz requested that Item No. 7.3 be pulled out of the Consent
Calendar.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor Blankley closed
Public Comment.
7.1
p. 45 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 3 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
Motion:
Approve the Consent Calendar, excluding Item No. 7.3.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Dion Bracco, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER:Carol Marques, Council Member
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco, Council
Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council Member Tovar, Mayor
Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
7.1.Approval of the Action Minutes of the March 20, 2023 City Council Regular
Meeting
A motion was made to approve the minutes.
7.2.Resolution of The City Council of The City of Gilroy Proclaiming April 2023
as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month
A motion was made to adopt the resolution.
Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2023.16
7.3.Approval of the Updated Purchasing Policy Inclusive of Wage Theft Policy
Statement
Item was pulled out of the Consent Calendar.
7.4.Approval of the Gilroy Tourism Business Improvement District (GTBID)
Annual Report as Submitted by Visit Gilroy/California Welcome Center
Gilroy for the Period of January 1, 2022 Through December 31, 2022
A motion was made to approve the Gilroy Tourism Business Improvement District
Annual Report.
7.3.Approval of the Updated Purchasing Policy Inclusive of Wage Theft Policy
Statement
Council Member Armendariz requested Council to have the item be discussed at
a future City Council meeting. Her request did not receive majority support.
Motion:
Approve the updated purchasing policy inclusive of the wage theft policy
statement.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Dion Bracco, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER:Marie Blankley, Mayor
AYES:Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco, Council Member Cline, Council
Member Marques, Mayor Blankley
NAYS:Council Member Armendariz, Council Member Tovar
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
8.BIDS AND PROPOSALS
7.1
p. 46 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 4 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
There were none.
9.PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.1.Adopt the 2022 Sewer System Master Plan
Public Works Director Jordan introduced Tony Akel from Akel Engineering Group,
Inc., who provided presentations for Public Hearing Items 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3.
Finance Director Sangha also provided staff presentation. Director Jordan, Mr.
Akel, and Director Sangha responded to Council Member questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Hearing at 7:04 PM. There being no speakers,
Mayor Blankley closed Public Hearing at 7:04 PM.
Motion:
Adopt a resolution approving the 2022 Sewer System Master Plan.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Tom Cline, Council Member
SECONDER:Carol Marques, Council Member
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco,
Council Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council
Member Tovar, Mayor Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2023-17
9.2.Adopt the 2022 Water Master Plan
Mayor Blankley opened Public Hearing at 7:05 PM. There being no speakers,
Mayor Blankley closed Public Hearing at 7:05 PM.
Motion:
Adopt the resolution approving the 2022 Water System Master Plan.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Dion Bracco, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER:Rebeca Armendariz, Council Member
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco,
Council Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council
Member Tovar, Mayor Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2023-18
9.3.Adopt the 2022 Storm Drainage System Master Plan
Mayor Blankley opened Public Hearing at 7:06 PM. There being no speakers,
Mayor Blankley closed Public Hearing at 7:06 PM.
7.1
p. 47 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 5 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
Motion:
Adopt a Resolution to approve the 2022 Storm Drainage System Master Plan.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Fred Tovar, Council Member
SECONDER:Rebeca Armendariz, Council Member
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco,
Council Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council
Member Tovar, Mayor Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2023-19
10.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10.1.Appointment to City Boards, Commissions, and Committees with Open
Vacancies
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor
Blankley closed Public Comment.
Council appointed Vincent Saso and Terence Fugazzi to the Parks and
Recreation Commission with terms expiring December 31, 2025.
11.INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS
11.1.Enhancing the Access to the Internet and Technology for Gilroy’s Youth
Assistant to the City Administrator Atkins provided staff presentation and
responded to Council Member questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor
Blankley closed Public Comment.
Council provided no further direction to Staff.
11.2.Consideration of Creating a Job Protection Policy
Assistant to the City Administrator Atkins provided staff presentation and
responded to Council Member questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor
Blankley closed Public Comment.
Council provided no further direction to Staff.
11.3.Review and Approve an Extension to the Memorandum of Understanding
and Related Salary Schedules for the Gilroy Police Officers Association for
the Period Ending June 30, 2025
Administrative Services and Human Resources Director McPhillips provided staff
presentation and responded to Council Member questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor
Blankley closed Public Comment.
7.1
p. 48 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 6 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
Motion:
Approve the Extension and Supplemental Agreement to the MOU with the GPOA
for the Period Ending June 30, 2025 and adopt the Salary Schedule Resolution.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Fred Tovar, Council Member
SECONDER:Dion Bracco, Mayor Pro Tempore
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco,
Council Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council
Member Tovar, Mayor Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
Enactment No.: Resolution No. 2023-20
11.4.Updates to Employment Agreement for City Administrator Jimmy Forbis
Mayor Blankley provided a brief presentation and responded to Council Member
questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment. There being no speakers, Mayor
Blankley closed Public Comment.
Motion:
Approve the Employment Agreement for City Administrator Jimmy Forbis.
RESULT:Pass
MOVER:Carol Marques, Council Member
SECONDER:Rebeca Armendariz, Council Member
AYES:Council Member Armendariz, Mayor Pro Tempore Bracco,
Council Member Cline, Council Member Marques, Council
Member Tovar, Mayor Blankley
ABSENT:Council Member Hilton
11.5.Report on Potential Temporary/Emergency Housing at Gilroy Transit Center
City Administrator Forbis provided staff presentation and responded to Council
Member questions.
Mayor Blankley opened Public Comment.
Ron Kirkish complimented City Administrator Forbis’s presentation and
reminisced on his experience in San Francisco. He also expressed that the
City needs help the best it can but need a united front with every elected
official statewide to speak as one voice to Sacramento.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Blankley closed Public Comment.
12.CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
City Administrator Forbis provided a brief report and responded to Council Member
questions.
7.1
p. 49 of 130
April 3, 2023 | 6:00 PM Page 7 of 7 City Council
Regular Meeting Minutes
13.CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
City Attorney Faber provided a brief report and responded to Council Member questions.
14.ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Blankley adjourned the meeting at 8:00 PM.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Gilroy.
/s/Thai Nam Pham, CMC, CPMC
City Clerk
7.1
p. 50 of 130
Page 1 of 2
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Memorandum of Understanding Among Local Public
Agencies in Santa Clara County for Food Recovery
Program Costs
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Public Works
Submitted By:Daryl Jordan, Public Works Director
Prepared By:Michael Lewis, Management Analyst
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
among local public agencies in Santa Clara County for Food Recovery Program costs.
BACKGROUND
Senate Bill 1383 (2016) includes provisions that require that edible food that would
otherwise be sent to landfills instead be recovered and redirected to feed people in
need. The law directs jurisdictions to establish food recovery programs and to
strengthen existing food recovery networks.
To comply with the food recovery provisions of SB 1383, the Santa Clara County Food
Recovery Program was established. The countywide Food Recovery Program is
funded by the cities of Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Milpitas, Monte Sereno,
Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San José, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, and
Saratoga; the towns of Los Altos Hills and Los Gatos; and the County of Santa Clara.
ANALYSIS
For FY 2023/24, the countywide Food Recovery Program will be managed by the
Program Administrator and Contracting Agent to the Technical Advisory Committee
7.2
p. 51 of 130
Memorandum of Understanding Among Local Public Agencies in Santa Clara County for Food
Recovery Program Costs
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 2 April 17, 2023
(TAC) of the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission
(RWRC). The purpose of the MOU is to establish a mechanism by which all agencies
partnering on the countywide Food Recovery Program can pay their respective share of
the program’s implementation costs.
By partnering on a countywide Food Recovery Program, Gilroy benefits from
efficiencies and cost savings related to program outreach and education, improved
coordination with food recovery organizations and businesses which often operate in
multiple jurisdictions, and consistency with the approach of a larger regional program.
ALTERNATIVES
Council could choose to not instruct staff to sign the MOU, in which case the City would
need to establish its own individual Food Recovery Program to stay compliant with the
requirements of SB 1383.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The total share for Gilroy for the implementation of the program is $14,298. In 2022,
Gilroy and Morgan Hill submitted a regional application for the SB 1383 Local
Assistance Grant Program. As part of this grant, the City of Gilroy was awarded
$14,610.57 to cover Gilroy’s share of costs for implementing the countywide Food
Recovery Program in Fiscal Year 2023/24. The City of Gilroy signed a letter of
authorization to allow the City of Morgan Hill to act as the lead agency on behalf of
Gilroy as Morgan Hill has historically been contracted to perform similar duties on
Gilroy‘s behalf. As the lead agency, Morgan Hill will receive the grant funds and
appropriate the funds to pay Gilroy’s share of the Food Recovery Program once Gilroy
signs the MOU. Ongoing costs will be calculated each year for the term of the MOU.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This item was included on the publicly posted agenda for this meeting. Should the
MOU be approved, businesses affected by the program will continue to be informed
through outreach and engagement, an activity included in the countywide Food
Recovery Program.
NEXT STEPS
Authorize the City Administrator to sign the Memorandum of Understanding among local
public agencies in Santa Clara County for Food Recovery Program costs.
Attachments:
1. Attachment A - Memorandum of Understanding Among Local Public Agencies in
Santa Clara County for Food Recovery Program Costs
7.2
p. 52 of 130
1
MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING AMONG LOCAL
PUBLIC AGENCIES IN
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
FOR FOOD RECOVERY PROGRAM COSTS
SECTION 1. OVERVIEW
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is between the cities of Campbell, Cupertino,
Gilroy, Los Altos, Milpitas, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San José,
Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, and Saratoga; the towns of Los Altos Hills and Los Gatos; the County of
Santa Clara; and the West Valley Solid Waste Management Authority; collectively “Parties” or
individually as a "Party."
SECTION 2. RECITALS
WHEREAS, the signatory Parties are also “PARTIES” to the Memorandum of Agreement for the
Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee, which is a
Committee of the County of Santa Clara Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission that
advances the interests of Party jurisdictions by performing technical and policy review to inform
parties and advise the Commission on solid waste management issues, and bring together varied
expertise and viewpoints for planning and implementing the Commission approved annual
workplan and budget.
WHERAS the Parties have previously agreed to jointly fund the cost of a countywide edible food
recovery program to satisfy their respective obligations under SB 1383 (2016) and the
corresponding regulations;
WHEREAS, the County of Santa Clara is the Fiscal Agent for the Technical Advisory Committee
(TAC) to the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission and the City of
Morgan Hill is the Administrator and Contracting Agent for the TAC;
WHEREAS, the City of Morgan Hill, as Program Administrator and Contracting Agent, has
contracted with Joint Venture Silicon Valley to implement and manage the countywide Food
Recovery Program (“Program”) for Fiscal Year 2023/24;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to execute this MOU to provide for their respective share of costs for
the Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
7.2
p. 53 of 130
2
SECTION 3. PURPOSE OF THE MOU
The purpose of this MOU is to establish a means of requiring:
Payment by the Parties for their share of the costs for implementation of the Program.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This MOU shall be effective upon execution of this MOU by all Parties (“Effective Date”).
SECTION 5. PAYMENTS UNDER THIS MOU
For purposes of the Program, the County of Santa Clara is the Fiscal Agent and the City of Morgan Hill
is the TAC Administrator and Contracting Agent, as specified in the Santa Clara County Recycling and
Waste Reduction Technical Advisory Committee MOA.
The Parties agree to share costs for the services as described in Exhibit A of this MOU.
The County of Santa Clara will, within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this MOU, submit to
the other Parties an invoice for the amounts due under the MOU. Each party will make their
payment to the County of Santa Clara based on the invoice amount.
SECTION 6. RECORDS AND ACCOUNTS
The County of Santa Clara will keep complete and accurate financial records related to
accomplishing the purposes of this MOU. Upon reasonable notice to the County of Santa Clara, any
Party to this MOU may inspect the financial records related to this MOU.
SECTION 7. FURTHER ASSURANCES
Each Party will adopt, execute, and make any and all further assurances, instruments and
resolutions as may be reasonably necessary or proper to carry out the intention or to facilitate the
Parties’ performance of their obligations under this MOU.
SECTION 8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Each Party represents and warrants to all other Parties as follows:
Authority: Each Party has the full legal right, power and authority under the laws of the State of
California to enter into this MOU and to carry out all of its obligations herein.
Due Execution: Each Party’s representatives who sign this MOU are duly authorized to sign and bind
their respective agency.
7.2
p. 54 of 130
3
SECTION 9. REMEDIES NOT EXCLUSIVE
No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved in this MOU is exclusive of any other remedy, and
each such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder
or now or hereafter existing in law or in equity or by statute or otherwise, and all such remedies may
be exercised without exhausting and without regard to any other remedy.
SECTION 10. INDEMNIFICATION
In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between
the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities
incurred by a Party shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, the Parties agree that, pursuant to
Government Code Section 895.4, each of the Parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the
other Parties, their officers, board members, employees , and agents, harmless from any claim,
expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section
810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the
indemnifying Party, its officers, employees , or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of
any work , authority, or jurisdiction delegated to such Party under this MOU. No Party, nor any
officer, board member, or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by
reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of any other Party hereto, its officers,
board members, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work authority
or jurisdiction delegated to such other Party under this MOU. The obligations set forth in this
paragraph will survive termination and expiration of this MOU.
SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this MOU shall be severable, and if any clause, sentence, paragraph, provision or
other part shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or
unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this MOU will be valid and binding on the Parties.
SECTION 12. AMENDMENTS
This MOU may only be amended by a written instrument signed by the Parties.
SECTION 13. COUNTERPARTS
This MOU may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all
of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
SECTION 14. USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
Unless otherwise prohibited by law, the Parties agree that an electronic copy of a signed contract, or
an electronically signed contract, has the same force and legal effect as a contract executed with an
original ink signature. The term “electronic copy of a signed contract” refers to a transmission by
facsimile, electronic mail, or other electronic means of a copy of an original signed contract in a portable
7.2
p. 55 of 130
4
document format. The term “electronically signed contract” means a contract that is executed by
applying an electronic signature using technology approved by the City of Morgan Hill. For the
purposes of this agreement, the approved methods of signing shall be via DocuSign or original ink signature
signed in counterpart and scanned over to the CITY via electronic mail.
SECTION 15. INTERPRETATION, PRIOR AGREEMENTS AND AMENDMENTS.
This MOU, including all Exhibits attached hereto, represents the entire understanding of the Parties as
to those matters contained herein. In the event that the terms specified in any of the Exhibits attached
hereto conflict with any of the terms specified in the body of this MOU, the terms specified in the
body of this MOU shall control. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect
with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This MOU may be modified only by a written
amendment duly executed by the Parties to this MOU.
SECTION 16. NO LEGAL RELATIONSHIP
By entering into this MOU, the Parties are neither forming, nor do they intend to form a partnership,
agency, or any other legal entity relationship. No Party is authorized to bind or to act as the agent or
legal representative of the other Party for any purpose, and neither Party is granted any express or
implied right or authority to assume or create any obligation or responsibility on behalf of or in the
name of any other Party.
SECTION 17. GOVERNING LAW, VENUE
This MOU has been executed and delivered in, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance
with, the laws of the State of California. Proper venue for legal action regarding this MOU shall be in
the County of Santa Clara.
IN WITNESS OF, the Parties have executed the MOU as of the last date set forth below:
City of Campbell Approval as to form, Campbell
Date: Date:
City of Cupertino Approval as to form, Cupertino
Date: Date:
7.2
p. 56 of 130
5
City of Gilroy Approval as to form, Gilroy
Date: Date:
City of Los Altos Approval as to form, Los Altos
Date: Date:
Town of Los Altos Hills Approval as to form, Los Altos Hills
Date: Date:
Town of Los Gatos Approval as to form, Los Gatos
Date: Date:
City of Milpitas Approval as to form, Milpitas
Date: Date:
City of Monte Sereno Approval as to form, Monte Sereno
Date: Date:
City of Morgan Hill Approval as to form, Morgan Hill
Date: Date:
City of Mountain View Approval as to form, Mountain View
Date: Date:
7.2
p. 57 of 130
6
City of Palo Alto Approval as to form, Palo Alto
Date: Date:
City of San Jose Approval as to form, San Jose
Date: Date:
City of Santa Clara Approval as to form, Santa Clara (city)
Date: Date:
City of Saratoga Approval as to form, Saratoga
Date: Date:
City of Sunnyvale Approval as to form, Sunnyvale
Date: Date:
County of Santa Clara Approval as to form, Santa Clara County
Date: Date:
West Valley Solid Waste Management
Authority
Approval as to form, West Valley Solid
Waste Management Authority
Date: Date:
7.2
p. 58 of 130
EXHIBIT A
COSTS AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
i
Jurisdictions
Initial Local Asst.
Grant (LAG)
Allocation
Initial program
"pledge" 19%
of LAG
Tier 1
Generators
Tier 2
Generators
Total
Generators
Base Program
Contract Cost ($133
per generator)
Jurisdiction Proposed
amount
Potential
Infrastructure
Enhancements
Jurisdiction
Proposed
amount
Campbell $ 55,495 10,544$ 11 49 60 $ 7,980 $ 7,980 2,564$ -$
Cupertino $ 77,953 14,811$ 10 80 90 $ 11,970 $ 11,970 2,841$ 2,841$
Gilroy $ 75,255 14,298$ 11 48 59 $ 7,847 $ 7,847 6,451$ 6,451$
Los Altos $ 41,038 7,797$ 7 34 41 $ 5,453 $ 5,453 2,344$ 2,344$
Los Altos Hills $ 20,000 3,800$ 0 2 2 $ 266 $ 266 3,534$ 3,534$
Los Gatos $ 41,465 7,878$ 10 45 55 $ 7,315 $ 7,315 563$ -$
Milpitas* $ 100,259 19,049$ 21 92 113 $ 15,029 $ 15,029 4,020$ 4,020$
Monte Sereno $ 20,000 3,800$ 0 1 1 $ 133 $ 133 3,667$ -$
Morgan Hill $ 63,156 12,000$ 15 43 58 $ 7,714 $ 7,714 4,286$ 4,286$
Mountain View $ 109,638 20,831$ 17 114 131 $ 17,423 $ 17,423 3,408$ 3,408$
Palo Alto $ 89,759 17,054$ 7 106 113 $ 15,029 $ 15,029 2,025$ 2,025$
San Jose $ 1,351,654 256,814$ 212 787 999 $ 132,702 $ 132,702 124,112$ 124,112$
Santa Clara $ 172,504 32,776$ 40 162 202 $ 26,866 $ 26,866 5,910$ 5,910$
Saratoga $ 41,085 7,806$ 2 26 28 $ 3,724 $ 3,724 4,082$ -$
Sunnyvale $ 202,777 39,368$ 26 144 170 $ 22,610 $ 22,610 16,758$ 16,758$
Unincorporated SCC $ 113,337 23,000$ 13 35 48 $ 6,384 $ 6,384 16,616$ 16,616$
Totals $ 2,575,374 491,627$ 402 1768 2170 $ 288,445 $ 288,445 203,182$ 192,306$
West Valley Cities 19,152$ No Pledge
Note: Initial program pledge was based on program cost estimate before program establishment and experience with program scope of work.
West Valley cities contributed for the Base Program, but chose not to contribute for infrastructure enhancements
Proposed Jurisdiction contributions for Base Program and Infrastructure - FY 24 Program Costs
7.2
p. 59 of 130
ii
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Base Program – Countywide Food Recovery Program Management
From July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, Joint Venture Silicon Valley will run the Santa Clara County Food
Recovery Program, serving as the food recovery program (Program) on behalf of all jurisdictions
(Jurisdictions) of the Parties, and coordinating with any Party performing their own enforcement.
The Base Program
1. Will develop and coordinate a standardized and uniform method to comply with California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 12, “Short-Lived Climate Pollutants.” The
Program will operate within the Party’s boundaries and replace the need for the Party to create
such a program on its own.
2. Each year by March, the Program will conduct a review of new Tier 1 and Tier 2 Entities, to
ensure that as businesses open in Santa Clara County, the appropriate regulated entities are
added to the Tier 1 and Tier 2 lists. Closing businesses will be identified during the reporting
process, and be eliminated from the lists.
3. Provide Parties with requirements for inclusion in the ‘large event’ list requested from each
Party, as well as provide electronic materials for distribution for large event planners.
4. Shall provide Parties with the information and data necessary for the Parties to make their
required reports to CalRecycle.
5. Shall retain records of inspections for each Party for a minimum of five (5) years.
6. Shall notify the Party promptly about any related issues that require the Party’s assistance or to
request the Party lead in resolving the issue(s) that arise related to non-compliance.
7. Shall fulfill the annual education requirement for the Parties and provide the data needed for the
Parties to complete required CalRecycle reports.
8. Shall conduct generator and Food Recovery Organization/Services requests for reports, compile
the results, and communicate those results to the jurisdictions for inclusion in the
Implementation Record Data Summary, and to Santa Clara County for use in future Capacity
Planning efforts.
9. Shall conduct inspections and monitoring in compliance with CalRecycle expectations for Tier
One businesses, Tier Two entities and Organizations, and Food Recovery Organizations and
Services.
10. The Program shall supply appropriate content for the web site, SCCFoodRecovery.org, as well
as a list of Food Recovery Organizations and Services. The list will be annually updated and
made accessible to Tier 1 and 2 Entities.
11. The Program leadership shall represent the interests of the Program with other entities,
Counties, and CalRecycle.
7.2
p. 60 of 130
iii
12. The Program leadership shall create reports about Program activities at the end of each fiscal
year. These reports shall include monitoring statistics, details on overall compliance,
compliance in certain sectors, total number of pounds of food recovered, and a summary of all
enforcement actions taken.
13. Statistics about food recovery in Santa Clara County will be shared on the Office of
Sustainability website as part of the Sustainability Master Plan Data Dashboard and the Annual
Sustainability Report.
All Parties to this MOU will receive the Base Program services.
Infrastructure Enhancements Program
As shown in Exhibit A of this MOU, some jurisdictions have chosen to contribute to the edible food
recovery Infrastructure Enhancements Program which will direct additional food recovery resources to
participating jurisdictions between July 1, 2023 and June 30, 2024. The Infrastructure Enhancements
Program will include two subprograms, described as follows:
1) Small Capacity Grants. Grants will be issued to increase the food recovery capacity of food
recovery organizations that serve contributing jurisdictions. Applications will be solicited,
awards will be issued, and funds will be distributed. Joint Venture Silicon Valley will provide
information for Annual Reporting that shows how contributions to this subprogram were spent
on behalf of each participating Agency.
2) Food Waste Prevention Classes. A webinar/in‐person series will be advertised for different
sectors regulated under SB 1383 (e.g., restaurants, hospitals, schools, large events). The series
will promote food waste prevention measures specific to each regulated sector, provide food
recovery tips and best practices, and teach businesses and organizations how to comply with SB
1383 and local ordinances. The series will start with Tier 2, and then move into Tier 1 groups
that answered 'zero pounds' in their reports, if funding allows. Joint Venture Silicon Valley will
provide information for Annual Reporting that shows how contributions to this subprogram
were spent on behalf of each participating Party.
7.2
p. 61 of 130
Agenda Item Title:
Meeting Date:
From:
Department:
Submitted By:
Prepared By:
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Resolution to Accept FEMA Funding for COVID-19
Vaccinator Overtime Reimbursement
April 17, 2023
Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Fire
Jim Wyatt, Fire Chief
Jennifer Fortino, Management Analyst
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services
RECOMMENDATION
Council adopt a resolution to accept a FEMA reimbursement grant in the amount of
$69,633.81.
ANALYSIS
In response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, beginning in December 2020
through June 2021, the Gilroy Fire Department assisted the Santa Clara County Public
Health Department with vaccinating Santa Clara County residents using Gilroy Fire
Department Firefighter/Paramedic/EMTs as vaccinators. Staff subsequently submitted a
grant application to FEMA for reimbursement of the overtime costs incurred by Fire
Department staff while working as vaccinators. FEMA approved the grant request and
as part of the payment process, requires that a resolution of the applicant’s governing
board be adopted to authorize the payment. The resolution is in the form that is
provided by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may reject the resolution. If rejected, the City would not meet the requirements
of the reimbursement request and would not be eligible to receive the reimbursement.
Page 1 of 2
7.3
p. 62 of 130
Resolution to Accept FEMA Funding for COVID-19 Vaccinator Overtime Reimbursement
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The Fire Department incurred overtime costs of $69,633.81 in Fiscal Year 2021 while
participating in the Santa Clara County vaccinator program. The reimbursement
revenue is expected to be received in FY23 and will be included in the Fire
Department’s FY23 year-end revenue projections. If Council does not approve the
resolution, the City would not receive reimbursement for the overtime costs incurred
when Gilroy Firefighters worked as COVID-19 vaccinators.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This item was included in the publicly posted agenda for this meeting.
NEXT STEPS
If approved, staff will forward the signed resolution to FEMA to complete the
reimbursement request.
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 2 April 17, 2023
7.3
p. 63 of 130
DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION FOR NON-STATE AGENCIES
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE OF THE
(Governing Body) (Name of Applicant)
THAT , OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
, OR
(Title of Authorized Agent)
(Title of Authorized Agent)
is hereby authorized to execute for and on behalf of the ,
(Name of Applicant)
a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, this application
and to file it with the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for the
purpose of obtaining federal financial assistance for any existing or future grant
program, including, but not limited to any of the following:
-Federally declared Disaster (DR), Fire Mitigation Assistance Grant (FMAG),
California State Only Disaster (CDAA), Immediate Services Program (ISP), Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and
Communities (BRIC), Legislative Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (LPDM), under
-Public Law 93-288 as amended by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, and/or state financial assistance under the
California Disaster Assistance Act.
- Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA), under Section 1366 of the National
Flood Insurance Act of 1968.
- National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b)
((2) (A) (ix) and 42 U.S. Code 7704 (b) (2) (B) National Earthquake Hazards
Reduction Program, and also The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, Div. F,
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-141
- California Early Earthquake Warning (CEEW) under CA Gov Code – Gov, Title 2,
Div. 1, Chapter 7, Article 5, Sections 8587.8, 8587.11, 8587.12
That the , a public entity established under the
(Name of Applicant)
laws of the State of California, hereby authorizes its agent(s) to provide to the
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services for all matters pertaining to such state
disaster assistance the assurances and agreements required.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION
NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)
RECOVERY DIRECTORATE
FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
Cal OES ID No: _____________
OES-FPD-130 Rev. 10-2022 Page 1 of 4
085-29504
City Council
City Administrator
Assistant City Administrator
Fire Chief
City of Gilroy
City of Gilroy
City of Gilroy
7.3
p. 64 of 130
Please check the appropriate box below
This is a universal resolution and is effective for all open and future
disasters/grants declared up to three (3) years following the date of approval.
This is a disaster/grant specific resolution and is effective for only
disaster/grant number(s):
Passed and approved this __day of , 20
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
(Name and Title of Governing Body Representative)
CERTIFICATION
I, , duly appointed and of
(Name) (Title)
, do hereby certify that the above is a true and
(Name of Applicant)
correct copy of a resolution passed and approved by the
(Governing Body)
of the on the day of , 20 .
(Name of Applicant)
(Signature) (Title)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
DESIGNATION OF APPLICANT'S AGENT RESOLUTION
NON-STATE AGENCIES
OES-FPD-130 (Rev. 10-2022)
RECOVERY DIRECTORATE
FINANCIAL PROCESSING DIVISION
OES-FPD-130 Rev. 10-2022 Page 2 of 4
Mayor Marie Blankley
Mayor Pro Tempore Dion Bracco
Council Members Rebeca Armendariz, Tom Cline, Zach Hilton, Carol Marques and Fred Tovar
City Council
City of Gilroy
City of Gilroy
4
City Clerk
City Clerk
DR-4482.
Thai Pham
7.3
p. 65 of 130
Page 1 of 4
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Public Hearing to Establish a List of Properties
Subject to the Weed Abatement Program and
Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire Chief to
Abate the Nuisance Arising Out of Weeds Growing
and Refuse Accumulating Upon Property in the City
of Gilroy Pursuant to Section 12.51 of the Gilroy Code
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Fire
Submitted By:Jim Wyatt, Fire Chief
Prepared By:Jonathan Crick, Deputy Fire Marshal
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy authorizing the Fire Chief to
abate the nuisance arising out of weeds growing and refuse accumulating upon
property in the City of Gilroy, pursuant to Section 12.51 of the Gilroy City Code.
BACKGROUND
On February 27, 2023, the City Council adopted Weed Abatement Resolution 2023-08
declaring weeds and refuse as a public nuisance. This annual process complies with
both the City Code and State Health and Safety Code, which require that, prior to
authorizing the abatement of a lot, the City hold a public hearing regarding the subject
properties. The City of Gilroy, via the annual resolution, identifies those properties and
owners with a history of non-abatement. This list serves as the commencement for the
County’s inspection and abatement program. The abatement program continues to be
implemented under an agreement with the Santa Clara County Agricultural
Commissioner’s Office for the Vegetation Management Program.
9.1
p. 66 of 130
Public Hearing to Establish a List of Properties Subject to the Weed Abatement Program and
Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire Chief to Abate the Nuisance Arising Out of Weeds
Growing and Refuse Accumulating Upon Property in the City of Gilroy Pursuant to Section 12.51
of the Gilroy Code
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 4 April 17, 2023
All subject property owners identified on the commencement list will receive a public
hearing notice, the abatement instructions and the fee costs. The abatement notice is
sent to property owners after the City Council adoption of the Weed Declaration
Resolution. As part of the notification, property owners receive notice that the annual
Abatement Deadline is May 15, 2023. A second notice was sent out approximately 30
days prior to the May 15th deadline. If the property owner fails to complete the
abatement of their lot by May 15, 2023, the owner will be assessed fees for the failed
inspection, in addition to the initial inspection fee, and will receive a notice requiring that
the abatement be completed within two weeks.
Lots in the Wildland Urban Interface Hazardous Fire Areas, primarily homes on the
hillside, pose an immediate concern with potential wildfires. Therefore, these owners will
not receive the additional 2-week grace period. If these lots are not abated by the May
15th deadline, the County will complete a work order to have the lot abated by their
contractor. The County will then assess an abatement administrative fee, in addition to
the cost of the abatement. The abatement administrative fee and cost of abatement will
be in addition to the inspection fee and the failed inspection fee.
At the conclusion of the abatement period, a public hearing (tax lien hearing) will be
held on August 7, 2023, to add the fees as a tax assessment for the following year’s
property taxes. Prior to the City Council tax lien assessment hearing, property owners
with an assessment will be notified of the pending action. They can request an
administrative meeting/review with the County’s Program Manager and the City’s Fire
Marshal should they disagree with the assessment. The administrative meeting/review
can be held in person, virtually, or by phone. The purpose is to eliminate assessments
incorrectly made through an error or incorrectly applied to the wrong property owner.
A listing of the properties and owners that have been noticed is attached and on file with
the City Clerk. It is also posted at the City’s Fire Stations. Lots in which weeds and/or
rubbish have been abated by the May 15th deadline and are maintained in an abated
condition through the fire season will only be assessed the $92 inspection fee.
Following the adoption of the Weed Declaration Resolution by the City Council, this
year’s weed abatement notices went out to property owners in March 2023. This year’s
commencement listing consists of 166 properties identified by assessor parcel number
(APN). As part of the inspection process, which will occur shortly after May 15, 2023,
the County will maintain current photos and documentation of their inspections.
Property owners who missed the deadline will receive subsequent notices and
associated fees. Lots that need immediate abatement (e.g., those located in Wildland
Urban Interface Hazardous Fire Areas) will be abated by the County. A comprehensive
report of abated lots and associated fees will be presented to the City Council at the tax
lien assessment hearing on August 7, 2023.
The agreement with the County requires properties that have failed inspections within
the past three years to remain on the commencement list. A property with no violations
9.1
p. 67 of 130
Public Hearing to Establish a List of Properties Subject to the Weed Abatement Program and
Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire Chief to Abate the Nuisance Arising Out of Weeds
Growing and Refuse Accumulating Upon Property in the City of Gilroy Pursuant to Section 12.51
of the Gilroy Code
City of Gilroy City Council Page 3 of 4 April 17, 2023
within a consecutive three-year period will be removed from the commencement list.
However, the County does provide for some lots to be removed from the
commencement list if the property has been completely redeveloped and there is no
unmanaged weed hazard. The commencement list fluctuates from year to year. The
commencement list changed from 174 lots for 2019 to 146 lots for 2020, 150 for 2021,
146 for 2022 and 166 lots for 2023.
Any owner who objects to their property on the commencement list can object as part of
this public hearing. Such lots can be removed from the commencement list if there is an
adequate reason (i.e., the lot has been redeveloped and there is no weed risk). Any
objections will be evaluated for conformance to the agreement, and an adjustment will
be made if appropriate. Otherwise, the commencement list should be approved by the
City Council so the program can proceed. Owners with concerns that cannot meet the
deadline due to site conditions can contact the County and/or City Fire Marshal’s office.
The County also provides a website for the public to notify them of weed complaints.
Lots reported or identified as out of compliance with weed and refuse requirements that
are not on the commencement list will also be sent a notice to comply. Administrative
citations can be issued by the Fire Marshal’s office, and lots can be added to the
abatement program for the following year. If an unlisted lot has unmitigated weeds and
refuse, that lot can be scheduled for a separate public hearing to allow the County to
abate the lot this year and assess fees for cost recovery.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council could choose not to approve the resolution to establish the commencement
list. The burden of both managing this program and abating the properties would revert
back to the City of Gilroy, requiring additional resources to be needed and no funding
available. THIS ACTION IS NOT RECOMMENDED.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
As long as the County recovers its expenses for the program using the fees assessed,
the County bears the entire program cost. If there is a shortfall in cost recovery, the City
would be requested to provide its proportionate share of the shortfall.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
In March of 2023, the County of Santa Clara mailed abatement notices and instructions
to property owners identified on the commencement list. The City of Gilroy will continue
to include weed abatement as part of annual public outreach for fire prevention and
community risk reduction.
NEXT STEPS
9.1
p. 68 of 130
Public Hearing to Establish a List of Properties Subject to the Weed Abatement Program and
Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Fire Chief to Abate the Nuisance Arising Out of Weeds
Growing and Refuse Accumulating Upon Property in the City of Gilroy Pursuant to Section 12.51
of the Gilroy Code
City of Gilroy City Council Page 4 of 4 April 17, 2023
As part of the inspection process, which will occur shortly after May 15, 2023, the
County will maintain current photos and documentation of their inspections.
Property owners who missed the deadline will receive subsequent notices and
associated fees. Lots that need immediate abatement (e.g., those located in Wildland
Urban Interface Hazardous Fire Areas) will be abated by the County. A comprehensive
report of abated lots and associated fees will be presented to the City Council at the tax
lien assessment hearing on August 7, 2023. Lots reported or identified as out of
compliance with weed and refuse requirements that are not on the commencement list
will also be sent a notice to comply. If an unlisted lot has unmitigated weeds and refuse,
that lot can be scheduled for a separate public hearing to allow the County to abate the
lot this year and assess fees for cost recovery.
Attachments:
1. 2023 Gilroy Commencement Report
2. Draft Resolution Chief authorization
9.1
p. 69 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
MARQUES, ALBERT 2020 ROCKROSE CT GILROY CA 95020-7931
02-0018340WINTERCT783-03-0731
SUNSET HILLS DEVELOPMENT LLC 575 SOUTHSIDE DR STE C GILROY CA 95020
02-0018351WINTERCT783-03-0772
HOEY RANCH COMPANY 2485 HECKER PASS HY GILROY CA 95020-8802
02-004NO SITUS 783-04-0323
SEVILLA, JERRY M AND CUNANAN, 'PO BOX 5175 ARAMCO MC DHAHRAN 31311
02-0041920MANTELLIDR783-45-0164
ENTERPRISE REI 8 LLC 10440 DE ANZA BL S STE D5ACUPERTINO CA 95014
02-0040HOLLYHOCKSLN783-45-0445
AHMADI, AMINREZA 'P O BOX 608 LOS GATOS CA 95030
02-0042320WILDROSECT783-46-0396
LE, ANH & IPX SERVICES INC 682 KAWEAH AVE CLOVIS CA 93619
2004783-46-0797
ENTERPRISE REI 8 LLC 24168 BIG BASIN WY SARATOGA CA 95070
02-0040SUNFLOWERCL783-47-0038
SHEVCHENKO, DENIS AND REBECA 9283 BRIARBERRY LN GILROY CA 95020-8210
02-0019283BRIARBERRYLN783-50-0069
ARDANUY, PAUL AND JACQUELYN M 1383 PHEASANT DR GILROY CA 95020-8203
02-0011383PHEASANTDR783-50-05010
PALMER, MARY L 1463 PHEASANT DR GILROY CA 95020-8219
02-0011463PHEASANTDR783-50-05811
SAULAN, KIMCHAU THI TRUSTEE 4125 HECKER PASS RD GILROY CA 95020
02-0018772FOXGLOVECT783-52-01912
KOLLAREDDY, SRIDHAR 7948 MCCLELLAN RD APT 1 CUPERTINO CA 95014
02-0018775WILD IRIS DR 783-52-02913
ZARGARIAN, HELGA 8755 WILD IRIS DR GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0018755WILD IRIS DR 783-52-03114
VARGAS, ANABEL AND GOMEZ, 1355 ST FRANCIS ST REDWOOD CITY CA 94061
20018745WILD IRIS DR 783-52-03215
SANTO, EDWIN ICHIRO TRUSTEE 1381 PEREGRINE DR GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0011381PEREGRINEDR783-55-01816
KARBALAEINEMATMOEINI, 2121 CRUDEN BAY WY GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0042354BANYANST783-65-02217
WOODWARD, DEBBIE 9261 TEA TREE CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0049261TEA TREE CT 783-72-00618
HY, SANG AND YEH, WEN CHUAN 1841 CAROB CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0041881CAROBCT783-72-01119
IYER, EASHWAR SUBRAMANIAM 1830 CAROB CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0041830CAROBCT783-72-01620
NGUYEN, HENRY H ET AL 6971 SPUMANTE WY GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0041820CAROBCT783-72-01721
OPINSKI, ROSE 2626 FALLBROOK DR MERCED CA 95340
02-0041810CAROBCT783-72-01822
RAMM, ANGELA DAVINA MARTINEZ 574 BLAIRBURRY WY SAN JOSE CA 95123-1303
02-0049145TEA TREE WY 783-72-02023
CHAKAMIAN, SANJAR AND 1940 PEAR DR MORGAN HILL CA 95037-0000
02-0049045TEA TREE WY 783-72-02324
Page 1Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program24 records of 166
9.1
p. 70 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
WORBOYS, TIMOTHY D TRUSTEE 9050 TEA TREE WY GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0049050TEA TREE WY 783-72-02425
ATLLURI SASI K AND SURAPANENI 10800 MAXINE AVE CUPERTINO CA 95014-0120
20049035TEA TREE WY 783-72-02526
DO NGOC BICH THI ET AL 979 STORY RD #7024 SAN JOSE CA 95122
20049030TEA TREE WY 783-72-02627
KOLLAREDDY, USHARANI ET AL 7948 MCCLELLAN RD APT 1 CUPERTINO CA 95014
02-0049025MIMOSACT783-72-02728
THIEN, TRACY 38 PARK FLETCHER PL SAN JOSE CA 95136-2403
02-0048962TEA TREE WY 783-72-03029
UNGER, DAVID AND KHAWAJA, 8981 TEA TREE WY GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0048981TEA TREE WY 783-72-03130
BHATTARAI, ATUL R AND 1660 WHEATLEY PL SAN JOSE CA 95121-0000
02-0048971TEA TREE WY 783-72-03331
PHAM, LAN ET AL 1085 MICHIGAN AV SAN JOSE CA 95125-2417
02-0048950MIMOSACT783-72-03532
INNEH, EMMANUEL AND JENNIFER 1710 VALLEY OAKS DR GILROY CA 95020
02-0048955MIMOSACT783-72-03633
NAYYAR, SAPNA ET AL 2204 BANYAN CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0042204BANYANCT783-72-03934
ROBLES, RONALD E AND MARIA R 1225 VIENNA DR #251 SUNNYVALE CA 94089
02-0042203BANYANCT783-72-04035
NAKANO, NANCY N ET AL 2224 BANYAN CT GILROY CA 95020
02-0042224BANYANCT783-72-04236
NGUYEN, PHU AND DOAN, LILY 3339 VANGORN WY SAN JOSE CA 95121-2555
02-0049210MAHOGANYCT783-72-04537
ZHANG, HONGXIN AND TANG, WEI 2253 BANYAN CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0042253BANYANCT783-72-05038
PREMNATH, FLEMING J AND 2356 PATRICIA DR SANTA CLARA CA 95050-5018
20042273BANYANCT783-72-05139
JEONG JONGHUN AND CHOI YUNHEE 'PO BOX 10652 SAN JOSE CA 95127
20042283BANYANCT783-72-05240
KRUPA, STANISLAW TRUSTEE & ET 901 CALLE SERRA SAN DIMAS CA 91773
02-0042202COLUMBINECT783-72-06141
RAMIREZ, PEDRO AND JOSEFINA 2725 SCOTTSDALE DR SAN JOSE CA 95148-3427
02-0042251MANTELLIDR783-72-06642
DHALIWAL, JASDEEP S ET AL 39224 GUARDINO DR 216 FREMONT CA 94538
02-0011681LONGMEADOCT783-75-08143
LEAL, AMADOR AND PALMINA 75 FARRELL AV GILROY CA 95020-7616
02-00175FARRELLAV790-07-00644
KUANG, WEIWEI 1952 EISENHOWER DR SANTA CLARA CA 95054-1621
02-001NO SITUS 790-07-08545
KUANG, WEIWEI 1952 EISENHOWER DR SANTA CLARA CA 95054-1621
02-001NO SITUS 790-07-08646
KUANG, WEIWEI 1952 EISENHOWER DR SANTA CLARA CA 95054-1621
02-001NO SITUS 790-07-08747
KUANG, WEIWEI 1952 EISENHOWER DR SANTA CLARA CA 95054-1621
02-001NO SITUS 790-07-08848
Page 2Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program48 records of 166
9.1
p. 71 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
MARGARETICH, BOZO AND VANJA 946 STANLEY AV LOS ALTOS CA 94024-5067
02-0018877MONTEREYRD790-15-03649
BROOKS, JULIA M ET AL 9145 JARDIN WY GILROY CA 95020
02-0019145JARDINWY790-16-25750
D R HORTON BAY INC 3000 EXECUTIVE PY STE 100 SAN RAMON CA 94583
02-0019130KERNAV790-17-00251
D R HORTON BAY INC 3000 EXECUTIVE PY STE 100 SAN RAMON CA 94583
02-0019160KERNAV790-17-00352
TORRES, ALBERT 8401 DIANE CT GILROY CA 95020-4213
02-0008401DIANECT790-30-07653
FLORES, ANTHONY R PO BOX 1557 GILROY CA 95021-1557
02-000401BROADWAYST790-33-01954
HOWSON INDUSTRIES LLC 1648 MULBERRY LN SAN JOSE CA 95125-4942
02-0000CHURCHST790-35-00155
MA, WEIMIN TRUSTEE & ET AL 103 CHIPPENDALE CT LOS GATOS CA 95032
02-0008051CHURCHST790-35-00256
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN 11 FIRST ST GILROY CA 95020
02-0000CHURCHST790-35-00857
HOWSON INDUSTRIES LLC 1648 MULBERRY LN SAN JOSE CA 95125-4942
02-0000CHURCHST790-36-00258
INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF THE 8335 CHURCH ST GILROY CA 95020
02-0008335CHURCHST790-36-03959
S A PROPERTIES GROUP LLC 5820 STONERIDGE MALL RD PLEASANTON CA 94588
02-00113751STST790-39-01960
YOUMANS, KRAIG AND FORTINO, 12005 TURLOCK AV SAN MARTIN CA 95046-9432
02-00113551STST790-39-03061
GORAYA, MANU K 860 MAPLE AV SAN MARTIN CA 95046-9538
02-0018771CHURCHST790-53-08762
TEMPLE SAN JOSE LLC 527 SIMAS DR MILPITAS CA 95035-4723
02-001108CHICKADEELN790-66-05763
7711 MONTEREY ROAD, LLC 7711 MONTEREY RD GILROY CA 95020
20007733MONTEREYRD799-03-05464
7711 MONTEREY RD LLC 0 305 SAN JOSE CA 95138
02-0007733MONTEREYRD799-03-05465
7711 MONTEREY RD LLC 7711 MONTEREY RD GILROY CA 95020
20007711MONTEREYRD799-03-05566
KAUR, SANDEEP AND SINGH, 3117 OAKGATE WY SAN JOSE CA 95148-3026
02-0007273EIGLEBERRYST799-09-02867
BAINS, JAGJIT SINGH 3435 HARBOR CT SAN JOSE CA 95127-4311
02-0000EIGLEBERRYST799-10-04268
DIAZ, JUAN A 'PO BOX 193 SAN MARTIN CA 95046
02-0001959THST799-10-05769
DING, ANDREW 7040 CHURCH ST GILROY CA 95020-6410
02-0007040CHURCHST799-11-06870
GOLDEN BRIDGE PROPERTIES LLC 1669 2 HOLLENBECK AV 185 SUNNYVALE CA 94087
02-000NO SITUS 799-11-06971
JEUNG MICHAEL A ET AL 7421 HANNA ST GILROY CA 95020
20007421HANNAST799-18-03172
Page 3Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program72 records of 166
9.1
p. 72 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
MONSEF, CYRUS 6700 CHURCH ST GILROY CA 95020-6508
02-0016700CHURCHST799-33-00173
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010FILBRODR799-44-09374
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010ROYALWY799-44-09475
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010ROYALWY799-44-09576
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010ROYALWY799-44-09677
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010ROYALWY799-44-09778
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010ROYALWY799-44-09879
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-0010THOMASRD799-44-10980
TMP ROYAL WAY LLC 5671 SANTA TERESA BL STE SAN JOSE CA 95123
02-001321LUCHESSAAV799-44-11081
EAGLE GARDEN LLC 21701 STEVENS CRK BLV CUPERTINO CA 95014
02-00114101STST808-01-02182
EAGLE GARDEN LLC 21701 STEVENS CRK BLV CUPERTINO CA 95014
02-0017890SANTA TERESA BL 808-01-02283
EAGLE GARDEN LLC 21701 STEVENS CRK BLV CUPERTINO CA 95014
02-00114901STST808-01-02384
PIROZZOLI, MONICA TRUSTEE & ET 366 5TH ST GILROY CA 95020
02-0010PONDEROSADR808-01-02485
CHRISTOPHER, DONALD C ET AL 305 BLOOMFIELD AV GILROY CA 95020
02-004NO SITUS 808-19-03086
COMMUNITY RESOURCESINC 480 STATE ST E STE 100 EAGLE ID 83616
02-001NO SITUSE 808-19-03187
SUNER CORPORATION 9761 ZUNI LN GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0010THOMASLN808-20-00888
YAHYA, NAAIM A TRUSTEE & ET AL 1835 SULLIVAN CT MORGAN HILL CA 95037
200110WESTAV808-21-00989
THOMAS ROAD PROPERTIES LTD THE 7888 WREN AV D-143 GILROY CA 95020
02-0016201THOMASRD808-38-00190
CORP PRESI BISH CHURCH CHRIST 50 E NORTH TEMPLE FL 22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150-3620
02-0016151THOMASRD808-39-06691
HP AG LAND LLC 23 CORPORATE PL 150 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92625
02-001NO SITUS 810-20-02192
OWENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC 2221 OLYMPIC BL WALNUT CREEK CA 94595
02-0012740HECKER PASS RD 810-20-03393
WILLIAMS JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET AL 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020
02001810-28-02494
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001925WILDFLOWERCT810-28-02695
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001935WILDFLOWERCT810-28-02796
Page 4Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program96 records of 166
9.1
p. 73 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001945WILDFLOWERCT810-28-02897
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001955WILDFLOWERCT810-28-02998
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001950WILDFLOWERCT810-28-03299
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001940WILDFLOWERCT810-28-033100
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001930WILDFLOWERCT810-28-034101
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001920WILDFLOWERCT810-28-035102
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001910WILDFLOWERCT810-28-036103
WILLIAMS, JAKIE C TRUSTEE & ET 1000 MESA RD GILROY CA 95020-6820
02-001900WILDFLOWERCT810-28-037104
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046675EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-60-018105
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046685EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-60-019106
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046695EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-60-020107
VILLAGE AT SANTA TERESA LP 1700 EL CAMINO REAL S 400 SAN MATEO CA 94402
02-0011520HECKER PASSS RD 810-66-012108
RADOSEVICH, ERIC J TRUSTEE 7518 FERNIE CT GILROY CA 95020-0000
02-0047518FERNIECT810-67-041109
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046615EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-029110
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046625EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-030111
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046635EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-031112
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046645EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-032113
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046651EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-033114
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046655EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-034115
DO & PARTNERS LLC 9419 GERANIUM CL FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
02-0046671EAGLE RIDGE CT 810-72-035116
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001MONTEREYNU835-01-034117
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001MONTEREYNU835-01-035118
HIGHLY VISUAL LLC 8840 FOREST ST GILROY CA 95020
2001MURRAYAV835-01-059119
ESPARZA ROBERT TRUSTEE 443 EL CAJON DR SAN JOSE CA 95111-3509
20018585MURRAYAV835-01-065120
Page 5Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program120 records of 166
9.1
p. 74 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
SHELTON, G WILLIAM 1216 PALADIN WY PLEASANTON CA 94566
02-001210LAS ANIMAS AV 835-02-013121
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001MONTEREYNU835-02-014122
CLOMONEY LLC 'PO BOX 60352 SUNNYVALE CA 94088
02-0010LAS ANIMAS AV 835-02-016123
CLOMONEY LLC 'PO BOX 60352 SUNNYVALE CA 94088
02-0010LAS ANIMAS AV 835-02-061124
ZEPEDA ALFREDO ET AL 1420 DUROUX RD LA MARQUE TX 77568
2001402MADISONCT835-03-059125
MONTANO, LYDIA R AND ALFRED 15191 KARL AV MONTE SERENO CA 95030-2229
02-001NO SITUS 835-04-067126
MONTANO, LYDIA R AND ALFRED 15191 KARL AV MONTE SERENO CA 95030-2229
02-001NO SITUS 835-04-068127
LAS ANIMAS DEVEL COLLC 'PO BOX 1772 GILROY CA 95021
02-001315LAS ANIMAS AV 835-05-006128
BALDEV MANN & GURMET MANN 832 BELL ST EAST PALO ALTO CA 94303
2001135LAS ANIMAS AV 835-05-007129
SHELTON G WILLIAM 1216 PALLADIN WAY PLEASANTON CA 94566
200155LAS ANIMAS AV 835-05-008130
GERA NICHOLAS TRUSTEE & ET AL 19341 MONTE VISTA DR SARATOGA CA 95070-6219
2001410COHANSEYAV835-05-016131
TES INVESTMENTS LLC 1754 TECHNOLOGY DR STE SAN JOSE CA 95110
2001405LAS ANIMAS AV 835-05-024132
8805 FORREST QOZB LLC 'PO BOX 787 DIABLO CA 94528
2001FORESTNU835-31-030133
HOLLER DYLAN R TRUSTEE 405 SPRING GROVE RD HOLLISTER CA 95023
2001FORESTNU835-31-031134
SWANSTON LANE LLC 18640 SUTTER BLVD STE 100 MORGAN HILL CA 95037
2000SWANSTONLN841-01-064135
CORIA EFRAIN AND CLAUDIA 7888 MONTEREY RD GILROY CA 95020
20007888MONTEREYRD841-02-009136
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2000NU841-02-046137
DRL PROPERTIES LLC 2545 MUIRFIELD WAY GILROY CA 95020
2000NU841-02-055138
PATEL JITENDRA AND NAYANA 39625 FREMONT BLVD FREMONT CA 94538
2000341LEWISST841-03-063139
RODRIGUEZ QUIRINO V AND 835 GREEN VALLEY RD WATSONVILLE CA 95076
2000311LEWISST841-03-070140
LIU DENG AND CHEN SASHA 400 PALM AVE MILLBRAE CA 94030
2000222MARTINST841-06-040141
SANCHEZ ELOY G AND ANGELICA M 7492 CHESTNUT ST GILROY CA 95020
20007492CHESTNUTST841-07-027142
TORRES-FERNANDEZ ELISA ET AL 7472 CHESTNUT ST GILROY CA 95020-5806
20007472CHESTNUTST841-07-043143
TORRES-FERNANDEZ, ELISA ET AL 7472 CHESTNUT ST GILROY CA 95020-5806
02-0007472CHESTNUTST841-07-043144
Page 6Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program144 records of 166
9.1
p. 75 of 130
Situs APN CITY/STATE
2023 WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
COMMENCEMENT REPORT
CITY OF GILROY
TRA
Exhibit A
ZHENG SHAO LAN AND ZHU 7498 CHESTNUT ST GILROY CA 95020-5806
20007498CHESTNUTST841-07-049145
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CO 111 ALMADEN BLVD SAN JOSE CA 95115
2001SOUTHFY841-10-039146
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001SOUTHFY841-14-058147
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001SOUTHFY841-14-059148
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001841-14-060149
UNION PACIFIC CO 10031 FOOTHILLS BLVD ROSEVILLE CA 95030
2001841-14-072150
GARLIC FARM TRUCK CENTER LLC 5000 E 2ND ST UNIT G BENECIA CA 94510
20015870MONTEREYRD841-14-080151
MCCARTHY GILROY LLC 210 ALMENDRA AVE LOS GATOS CA 95030-7211
20016900CAMERONBL841-17-100152
MCCARTHY GILROY LLC 210 ALMENDRA AVE LOS GATOS CA 95030-7211
20016503CAMERONBL841-17-107153
UNITED NATURAL FOODS WEST INC 100 OLIVER ST FLR 18TH BOSTON MA '02110
2001841-17-121154
MARQUEZ, PRISCILLA A 402 HADLEY CT GILROY CA 95020-5839
02-000402HADLEYCT841-53-032155
NGUYEN THU TAM 2673 MCLAUGHLIN AVE SAN JOSE CA 95121-2752
2000841-53-066156
SOUTHPOINT BUSINESS PARK 'P O BOX 5368 SAN JOSE CA 95150
2001841-69-042157
CAPRARA JANICE TRUSTEE & ET AL 26769 EL CAMINO REAL GONZALES CA 93926
2001PACHECO PASS HY 841-70-014158
GILROY PARTNERS LLC 67 MOUNTAIN BLVD UNIT 201WARREN NJ '07059 2001HOLLOWAYRD841-70-026159
ROCHA JOE A AND VICTORIA M 575 SOUTHSIDE DR GILROY CA 95020
2001555HOLLOWAYRD841-70-037160
TEMPLE GILROY LLC 527 SIMAS DR MILPITAS CA 95035-4723
20016970CAMINO841-70-049161
SIEMPRE SOBRE EL DINERO LLC 190 MONTGOMERY ST N SAN JOSE CA 95110
02-0015885ROSSINLN841-72-001162
PULMUONE FOODS USA INC 2315 MOORE AVE FULLERTON CA 92833
2001560ROSSICT841-72-008163
LONESTAR CALIFORNIA INC 1501 BELVEDERE RD WEST PALM BEACH FL 33406
2001LUCHESSAEAV841-73-005164
HOANG VINCE AN TRI 5240 MONTEVERDE LN LINCOLN CA 95648
20015980TRAVEL PARK CL 841-75-011165
MCCARTHY GILROY LLC 210 ALMENDRA AVE LOS GATOS CA 95030-7211
20016601CAMERONBL841-84-009166
Page 7Santa Clara County Weed Abatement Program166 records of 166
9.1
p. 76 of 130
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GILROY ORDERING THE FIRE CHIEF TO ABATE THE
NUISANCE ARISING OUT OF WEEDS GROWING AND
REFUSE ACCUMULATING UPON PROPERTY IN THE CITY
OF GILROY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 12.51 OF THE
GILROY CITY CODE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article III of Chapter 12 of the Gilroy City Code, on
February 27, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-08 declaring that
weeds growing and refuse accumulating in the City of Gilroy constitute public nuisances;
and
WHEREAS, the Chief of the Fire Department of the City of Gilroy has caused
notice of the adoption of Resolution No. 2023-XX and notice of a public hearing on the
proposed order to abate said nuisances to be given to all of the affected property owners
at their stated mailing addresses on the latest tax assessor’s role, and has also caused
notice to be given by posting and publication in the manner and form provided in Sections
12.48, 12.49 and 12.53 of the Gilroy City Code; and
WHEREAS, said public hearing was duly held on April 17, 2023, pursuant to said
resolution in the time and manner required by law, and any objections raised to the
proposed destruction or removal of said weeds and refuse were duly considered by the
City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Chief of the Fire Department is hereby ordered to abate the nuisances on
the properties described in Attachment “A” hereto, or cause the same to be abated,
by having refuse removed and weeds destroyed and/or removed by cutting,
discing, chemical spraying or any other method as may be determined by the Chief
of the Fire Department or his authorized Contractor. Such abatement shall be
performed before May 15, 2023.
2. That any property owner shall have the right to destroy and/or remove weeds
growing and refuse accumulating on his property or have the same destroyed or
removed at his expense prior to the arrival of the Chief of the Fire Department or
his authorized representatives or contractors to remove them. Any property found
with weeds after May 15, 2023 shall be subject to the costs of further inspection
and /or abatement by the City or the County and its authorized contractor. Sites
found after such date that constitute a fire hazard shall also be subject to
administrative citation.
9.1
p. 77 of 130
Resolution No. 2023-XX
Weed Abatement Program
City Council Regular Meeting | April 17, 2023
Page 2 of 2
3. That the Chief of the Fire Department or his authorized contractors shall keep an
account of the costs of destroying and/or removing said weeds and refuse and
embody such account in a report and assessment list to be presented to the City
Council and filed with the City Clerk. Such report shall refer to and sufficiently
describe each separate lot or parcel of land and, for each, shall state the costs of
destroying or removing weeds, removing refuse, or both, and the costs which are
proposed to be assessed against the lot or parcel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular
meeting duly held on the 17th day of April 2023 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Marie Blankley, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
9.1
p. 78 of 130
Page 1 of 3
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Approval of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station
Alternate Location at Christmas Hill Park
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Fire
Submitted By:Jim Wyatt, Fire Chief
Prepared By:Jennifer Fortino, Management Analyst
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the alternate location of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station which is
proposed to be located on the ranch side of Christmas Hill Park in the Santa Teresa
Fire Response District.
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved the construction of an interim fire station located on the
corner of 10th Street & DeAnza Place on July 5, 2022. At the time, it was anticipated that
PG&E could install electrical infrastructure for the site by late-February/early March
2023 to power the interim fire station modular building. However, over the past several
months, severe weather events have delayed PG&E’s site installation. Despite repeated
requests by the City to have PG&E prioritize the interim fire station over other projects,
PG&E remains unable to commit resources until the end of this year. It is doubtful,
especially after the recent additional statewide flooding disasters, that PG&E will be
able to meet our expectations for installation by late this year. This delays the
completion of other necessary site improvements until the rainy season subsides. This
would extend the time the site would be ready to use until late Summer 2024. In the
meantime, construction of the modular trailer is anticipated to be completed within an
estimated eight (8) weeks from when the modular lease agreement is finalized. We
anticipate completing the agreement within the next 2-3 weeks.
10.1
p. 79 of 130
Approval of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station Alternate Location at Christmas Hill Park
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 3 April 17, 2023
ANALYSIS
The Fire Department initially sought the 10th Street/DeAnza Place site for the interim fire
station because of its more central location in the Santa Teresa Fire Response District.
This location is just a few blocks from the site designated for the permanent Santa
Teresa Fire Station and would provide more evenly distributed responses within this
district. This site is large enough to accommodate a modular building, an apparatus bay
big enough for two apparatuses, and security fencing around the site’s perimeter.
However, this site has not been developed; therefore, it does not have electrical, water,
or sewer infrastructure. The lack of this infrastructure requires PG&E to design,
schedule, and install a new transformer and electrical panel to provide enough
amperage to supply all power needs of the modular building, site lighting, and the
apparatus bay. In addition to the PG&E work, trenching for water and sewer pipes
would need to be completed, along with pouring foundation and asphalt, before the
modular building could be delivered. This would delay the opening of the interim fire
station at this site until Summer 2024.
Due to the extended timeframe for PG&E to complete the electrical work at the 10th
Street/DeAnza Place site, the Fire Department reevaluated the Christmas Hill Park
ranch side location as a possible site for the interim fire station. The Fire Department is
currently responding out of the Temporary Environmental Education Center (TEEC)
building at Christmas Hill Park; however, it does not meet the basic needs for the Fire
Department to operate out of 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The park’s previous
speed bumps also slowed the fire engine’s response out of the park, thereby increasing
the engines response times.
As previously reported to Council in July 2022, the remodeling of the TEEC building to
meet the Fire Department needs is cost prohibitive. However, the adjacent area next to
the TEEC building has enough existing electrical infrastructure to meet the power needs
of the TEEC building as well as the modular building, the site’s lighting, an automatic
gate, and the apparatus bay. The site also has sufficient existing water and sewer
infrastructure to support the modular building. The recent removal of the park’s speed
bumps has also improved response times out of the park.
The existing electrical infrastructure at the TEEC building eliminates the need to wait for
PG&E to install a transformer and electrical panel for the area adjacent to the TEEC.
The electrical, water, and sewer connections can be completed by the City’s Public
Works Department or their designated contractor. Using the Council’s previously
approved funding earmarked for the development of the 10th Street/DeAnza Place site,
improvements to the area adjacent to the TEEC building, and delivery of the modular
building, could be completed as early as Summer 2023. Changing the location of the
modular building to Christmas Hill Park will allow the Fire Department to begin
responding out of the modular building 12 months sooner than the department could
from 10th Street & DeAnza Place.
10.1
p. 80 of 130
Approval of the Santa Teresa Interim Fire Station Alternate Location at Christmas Hill Park
City of Gilroy City Council Page 3 of 3 April 17, 2023
ALTERNATIVES
If this request is not approved, the Fire Department will continue to wait for PG&E to
complete the installation of the electrical infrastructure at the corner of 10th Street &
DeAnza Place. Any additional delay by PG&E would impact and delay future site
preparation and installation of the modular building. Projected delays could extend the
final installation of the interim fire station until the summer of 2024. Additional costs
would be incurred ($500 per month) for storage of the completed modular building until
the installation could be completed. Staff does not recommend this option.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The change in location will not incur any additional costs beyond the $344,000 that was
approved by Council on July 5, 2022, for the development of the 10th Street & DeAnza
Place site.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Public outreach will be conducted through messaging on the City’s Website, Email
Express, Nextdoor, and other social media accounts. The messaging will be issued at
least one week prior to construction activities.
NEXT STEPS
If approved, staff will move forward to begin the required site improvement work and
utility hookups to prepare for the modular building’s delivery.
10.1
p. 81 of 130
Page 1 of 7
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole
Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco Industries
for the Replacement of a Public Safety Rescue
Vehicle for $360,497
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Police
Submitted By:Pedro Espinoza, Police Chief
Prepared By:Luke Powell, Captain
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services
RECOMMENDATION
a) Authorize the City Administrator to enter into a sole source purchasing agreement
with Lenco Industries for the purchase of a Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for
$360,497.
b) Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving a Fiscal Year
2023 budget amendment for $150,000 in the Federal Asset Seizure Fund towards
the purchase of the Rescue Vehicle.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2010, the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office (SCSO), Morgan Hill Police Department
(MHPD), and Gilroy Police Department (GPD), entered into a mutual aid resource
cooperative to share a rescue vehicle (RV) and house the vehicle at the Gilroy Police
Department in a secured garage.
With Assembly Bill 481 (AB481) passing in 2021, the SCSO took possession of
the ARV and has implemented a strict checkout process preventing its use of the ARV
for time-sensitive and high-risk operations.
11.1
p. 82 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 7 April 17, 2023
BACKGROUND
In 2007, the Gilroy Police Department submitted a grant application through the Federal
Emergency Management Association (FEMA) and Homeland Security and Law
Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP) for funding to purchase an ARV
from Lenco Industries for $250,000.
In 2008, the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office submitted a grant application through
the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) program for a Chemical, Biological,
Radiological, Nuclear, and high yield Explosive (CBRNE) ARV for $310,000.
In 2010, UASI agreed to fund the SCSO’s grant application with stipulations that the
acquired armored vehicle would be a mutual aid resource, shared by the SCSO, MHPD,
and GPD and stored in south Santa Clara County to reduce response times during
critical incidents. At the time, all three agencies agreed to these requirements and
agreed to store the ARV at GPD, with SCSO being the grant manager ensuring
compliance with the grant requirements. GPD was selected as the primary storage
facility because of our location in South Santa Clara County, the ARV would be stored
indoors, and GPD is staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The City of Gilroy also
agreed to provide preventative maintenance on the ARV. In 2011, SCSO, MHPD, and
GPD took possession of the CBRNE-equipped Lenco BearCat, and the ARV was
housed at GPD until 2021. The City of Gilroy Fleet Department performed regular
vehicle maintenance on the ARV from 2011 to 2021.
In September 2021, Governor Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to
the use of “military equipment” by law enforcement agencies. AB481 requires a law
enforcement agency to obtain approval from the applicable governing body via the
adoption of a military equipment use policy before funding, acquiring, or using military
equipment. The passage of AB481 mandated more stringent control over the usage of
the ARV and justified the SCSO removal of the ARV from GPD and South Santa Clara
County by relocating it to their facility in San Jose.
In April 2021, SCSO staff removed the ARV from GPD and subsequently implemented
restrictions on its usage until an official checkout process could be established and
monitored by SCSO staff. We have since tried to work with the SCSO to find some
common ground that would be in the best interests of all three impacted agencies, but
these efforts have been unsuccessful due to State mandates imposed by AB481.
Over the proceeding months, SCSO staff established a strict checkout process before
any other agency can use the ARV. The checkout process consists of the following
steps:
1. A telephone call to SCSO administration asking for permission to use the ARV.
This step can take up to an hour because SCSO administration is not always
immediately available to field telephone calls.
11.1
p. 83 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 3 of 7 April 17, 2023
2. After authorization is approved, drive to San Jose, where the ARV is stored. This
step can take up to an hour and a half, depending on the time of day and traffic
conditions.
3. Wait for an SCSO employee to respond and allow staff into the secured garage.
The facility the SCSO chose to store the ARV is not staffed 24 hours a day, and
during those off hours, GPD staff is forced to wait an extended period to be given
access to the secured garage.
4. Physically inspect the ARV prior to leaving the garage. During rapidly evolving
events, the emergency response of vital equipment is crucial to the preservation
of life, and
5. Driving from San Jose to Gilroy to deploy the equipment. Again, this step in the
process can take up to an hour and a half, depending on the time of day and
traffic conditions.
The entire checkout process takes anywhere from 1 to 3 hours, depending on the
response from SCSO administration, the availability of the ARV, SCSO employee
availability to the garage, and traffic conditions to and from San Jose. The relocation of
the ARV from Gilroy to San Jose has drastically increased the response time of a vital
piece of lifesaving equipment. The process to return the ARV is similar to the checkout
process.
In addition to the lengthy checkout process, there have been numerous times over the
past two years when the ARV was not made available. The SCSO staff has provided us
with some of the following reasons:
•The ARV was down for maintenance.
•The ARV was already in use.
•The ARV had been blocked out for use by SCSO.
•The ARV was not authorized for community events.
The community events the SCSO has advised the ARV could not and will not be used
for are, Coffee with a Cop, Ice Cream with a Cop, and National Night Out. In the interest
of transparency, these are optimal opportunities for community members to personally
familiarize themselves with our vehicles and pieces of equipment.
There have been eight documented incidents within a two-year period when the need
for the ARV was critical to minimize the exposure of officer safety, secure proximate
tactical observation, afford time to formulate de-escalation plans, and safe suspect
apprehension. The ARV was not available during the following critical incidents.
2023:
February - During a domestic dispute, a suspect produced and pointed a handgun at
the victim while in a public area of a large apartment complex. The suspect fled into an
unknown area of the apartment complex upon police arrival. Residents were asked to
shelter in place while officers searched the complex for the armed suspect.
11.1
p. 84 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 4 of 7 April 17, 2023
Simultaneously, Gilroy Fire responded to a medical emergency at the complex and
needed escort into and out of the patient’s apartment. This complex and evolving event
required all available staff to maintain public safety and security. We did not have the
staffing available for an officer to leave the event and pick up the ARV using the
checkout process. If the ARV was in Gilroy, we would have used it as a secure platform
to conduct a more expeditious search for an armed suspect and a secure means to
assist Gilroy Fire with the ingress and egress of the patient the medical emergency.
January - A subject inside a residence, brandishing a knife, kicked in a door, and
threatened the reporting party. Upon police arrival, the subject locked himself in an
upstairs bedroom and refused to come out. SCSO advised the ARV was down for
maintenance. Negotiations with the subject were limited by his isolation in the bedroom
and our standoff distance. De-escalation attempts were attempted but had limited
success due to our inability to get close enough to communicate effectively with the
subject. The subject was eventually taken into custody after surrendering.
January - A preplanned service of a search warrant related to convicted felons in
possession of firearms and ammunition. Per the SCSO the ARV was not available. Due
to the severity of the crimes, we reached out to Campbell PD who agreed to assist with
their ARV and two additional police officers. Campbell’s ARV was used to establish
communication with the residents using the vehicle’s integrated two-way intercom
system. De-escalation tactics were employed and the residents’ cooperated with the
service of the search warrant.
2022:
November - The Merced Police Department tracked a homicide suspect to Gilroy and
located him at a local hotel. The subject was wanted for the shooting murder of a 9-
month-old child and the weapon in this crime was still outstanding. By the time our
officer went through the lengthy checkout process with the SCSO and was driving back
to Gilroy, the suspect left the hotel on foot and GPD officers were forced to utilize
unarmored vehicles and take the suspect into custody with an increase to the officers’
and the publics’ safety.
October - An attempted homicide investigation where the suspect in the crime beat his
wife with a hammer and then called 911 stating she was bleeding to death and needed
immediate medical attention. Uniformed patrol officers arrived on scene and the suspect
armed himself with a handgun. The suspect refused to give officers access to his wife,
whom he continued to say was bleeding to death inside the residence. The standoff
distance and the use of a patrol vehicle’s public address (PA) system limited
communication. An ARV would have made de-escalation attempts more effective and
the ARV ballistic protection would have afforded officers the ability to get closer to the
residence, see into the residence and verify if there was an injured party inside who
needed immediate medical aid. This was a rapidly evolving event, and we did not have
the staffing available to allow an officer to leave the City and go through the rigorous
checkout process for the ARV.
11.1
p. 85 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 5 of 7 April 17, 2023
June- During a domestic dispute, the suspect fired several rounds from an AR-15 rifle.
No one was hit by the rounds, however, some of the rounds penetrated the neighbor’s
apartment where a nine and four-year-old resided with their parents. The suspect was
eventually contacted and arrested. An ARV would have been used to initiate verbal
contact with the suspect, however, we did not have the staffing available to go through
the lengthy checkout process for the ARV.
April- A complex domestic violence case where the suspect forced his ex-girlfriend into
his vehicle, assaulted her, and threatened to kill her. He held her hostage overnight until
she was able to escape. Officers located the suspect in his vehicle near a City park and
attempted to employ de-escalation tactics, but communication was limited to using a PA
system on a patrol vehicle. Officers could not hear the suspect’s responses due to the
standoff distance. The ARV would have been used during this event as the vehicle’s
ballistic protection provides a safe environment for our officers to employ de-escalation
techniques and establish clear communication with the suspect using the vehicle’s
integrated two-way intercom system.
2021:
November- An arrest warrant was served at the residence of a homicide suspect. The
homicide involved a firearm, and the firearm was still outstanding. SCSO advised the
ARV was unavailable and due to the severity of the crime, we reached out to Santa
Clara PD who agreed to assist with their ARV and two officers. Santa Clara’s ARV was
used to establish communication with the residents using the vehicle’s integrated two-
way intercom system. De-escalation tactics were employed and the residents’
cooperated with the service of the arrest warrant.
ANALYSIS
City Purchasing Policy 4.9 Purchases Exempt from Competitive Bidding, provides that
competitive bidding shall not apply to (f) “single or sole source goods or services as
defined herein.” Lenco is the sole source provider of the BearCat.
The Lenco BearCat is an ARV specifically designed for public safety with ballistic
protection designed to enhance officer and citizen safety during high-risk search
warrants, hostage situations, armed barricaded subjects, active shooter incidents, and
other dangerous critical incidents. The ARV would be used as a rescue vehicle to save
lives, provide safety for the medical personnel treating victims, safe proximity for crisis
negotiations at the scene, and provide the ability to safely deliver equipment, supplies,
and other necessities during high-risk operations. The vehicle’s ballistic protection
provides an environment for our officers to de-escalate incidents with potentially armed
suspects.
•The term, “armored,” is not to be confused with the term, “armed.” An armored
vehicle is simply a vehicle with ballistic resistance capabilities and has no
weapons mounted or attached to the vehicle.
11.1
p. 86 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 6 of 7 April 17, 2023
•The term “ballistic” has to do with the field of mechanics concerning launch, flight
behavior, and impact effects of projectiles. The ARVs ballistic protection rating is
not the same as the generalized term of being “bulletproof” which is more
commonly used but inaccurate.
The Lenco BearCat is the same brand of armored rescue vehicle utilized by GPD as
well as all surrounding municipalities and agencies. The standardization of this vehicle
allows for additional personnel from neighboring law enforcement agencies to have the
necessary knowledge of the ARVs operation and capabilities. Purchasing the same
brand of ARV eliminates the need for additional training and the associated costs of
maintaining a different type of vehicle. The Lenco BearCat is based on a Ford F-550
Super Duty commercial truck chassis and is the only ARV with a 131-inch wheelbase,
thus allowing the compact vehicle to have a tighter turning radius than larger options.
The smaller turning radius allows the user to navigate through city streets and traffic
with greater maneuverability.
GPD is committed to using best practices and contemporary law enforcement
equipment to enhance our ability to provide the highest level of public safety to our
community. ARVs have been and continue to be employed by the GPD and law
enforcement agencies across the country to enhance the safety of the community and
law enforcement members. These items provide peace officers with the ability to safely
resolve volatile situations and critical incidents that potentially would become lethal
force encounters. Our current policies provide our officers with guidelines for using and
maintaining an ARV and is already listed in our annual equipment inventory report to
City Council.
The use of an ARV is critical to GPD's mission and will continue to be strictly regulated
through internal processes and oversight. GPD’s Policy 708 is our equipment use policy
and outlines each item identified in Government Code section 7070 that the City
currently owns. Policy 708 includes the specifics of each item, its intended use, and its
cost. Policy 708 protects the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. Policy
708 ensures safeguards, including transparency, oversight, and accountability
measures.
ALTERNATIVES
Staff researched and evaluated potential ARV options and found all ARVs currently in
use by law enforcement agencies in Santa Clara County are the Lenco BearCat. Staff is
familiar with this make of ARV, and has twelve years of experience and training with the
Lenco BearCat. If all agencies in the County continue to use the Lenco BearCat, this
would allow for more seamless cross-training between agencies and safer deployments
as personnel are familiar with the operation of this vehicle platform.
It is staff’s belief that there is no reasonable alternative to the Lenco BearCat. Staff has
not discovered alternative products that can achieve the same objectives and or safety.
11.1
p. 87 of 130
Authorize the City Administrator to Enter into a Sole Source Purchasing Agreement with Lenco
Industries for the Replacement of a BearCat Public Safety Rescue Vehicle for $360,497
City of Gilroy City Council Page 7 of 7 April 17, 2023
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The recommended replacement/purchase for $360,497 will be made partly from the
Police Department’s Federal Asset Seizure Fund ($150,000) and the remainder from
Fiscal Year 2023 Police Department Salary Savings ($210,497).
Equitable sharing funds received from federal forfeitures can be expended on various
law enforcement operations, programs, and equipment. To expend the funds of
$150,000 from the Federal Asset Seizure Fund, it is necessary to amend the operations
budget to include appropriations for the Asset Seizure Fund. The FY23 proposed
budget amendments are as follows:
Asset Seizure Fund:
Org Code 2253000 Object Code 53125 Amount $150,000
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution Federal Asset Seizure Fund
2. Quote 100120-B GILCA Gilroy PD CA
3. Lenco Sole Source Letter
4. Lenco Sole Source Specifications 2022
11.1
p. 88 of 130
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GILROY AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF
GILROY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023 IN THE FEDERAL
ASSET SEIZURE FUND AND APPROPRIATING PROPOSED
EXPENDITURE AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Administrator prepared and submitted to the City Council a
budget for the City of Gilroy for Fiscal Years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, and the City
Council carefully examined, considered, and adopted the same on June 7, 2021; and
WHEREAS, City Staff has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed
amendment to said budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the City of Gilroy in the staff
report dated April 17, 2023 for the Federal Asset Seizure Fund, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and considered the same and
is satisfied with said budget amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT appropriations in the Federal
Asset Seizure Fund are hereby increased by $150,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-2023.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April 2023 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Marie Blankley, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
11.1
p. 89 of 130
Quotation 100120-B
Quotation Date:
Lenco Tax ID#:
03/02/23
04-271977710 Betnr Industrial Drive - Pittsfield, MA 01201
PH: (413) 443-7359 - FAX (413) 445-7865
GILCACustomer Code:
Gilroy Police Department
7301 Hanna St.
Gilroy, CA 95020 USA
Bill To
Gilroy Police Department
7301 Hanna St.
Gilroy, CA 95020 USA
Ship To
Net 30 Days FOB: Destination
Payment Terms
Inhouse Contact
Daniel Besemer
Shipping Terms
Estimated Completion
Ship Via
Common Carrier
Inspection & Acceptance
At Lenco's Facility, Pittsfield, MA12 months ARO (Est.)
Unit Price TotalQtyItem:Product #
$200,704.00Lenco BearCat BC55003-BASE 1 $200,704.00
Options:0
California Mandated Solid Burn Red & Blue-Front, Amber & Blue-Rear LED_CALIF 1
Exterior Paint Color: Lusterless Black LUSTERLESS_BLACK 1
$8,859.00Diesel Engine, 6.7L Turbo BCDLEN 1 $8,859.00
$34,958.00BearCat G3 4-Wheel Off-Road Upgrade Pkg w/Run-Flats BC3WOFFRD 1 $34,958.00
$7,858.004-Door Configuration BC4DR 1 $7,858.00
$1,216.00(1) 7" Vertical GunPort Upgrade BCGP7 8 $152.00
$1,508.00Electric Power Mirrors BCMIR 1 $1,508.00
$2,297.00Back up Camera System with Monitor BCBU 1 $2,297.00
$502.00Radio Prep Package, (1) Max (2)BCINSRA 1 $502.00
$7,182.00Rear A/C - Heating Systems: High Capacity Upgrade BCHACUP 1 $7,182.00
$12,479.00Hydraulic Ram Upgrade wFront Mounted Receiver with Ram Post and Plate BCHYDRAM 1 $12,479.00
$14,552.00Gas Injector Unit BCGIU 1 $14,552.00
$1,295.00Gas Injector Storage Basket BCGISB 1 $1,295.00
$1,200.00Break and Rake BCBAR 1 $1,200.00
$2,034.00Integrated Side Area Lights: (8)BCSAL 1 $2,034.00
$2,808.00Roof Mounted Remote Control Spot Light - LED BCSLLED 2 $1,404.00
$1,853.00Take Down Light (Bumper Mounted)BCTDL 1 $1,853.00
$1,392.00Battery Trickle Charger BCTC 1 $1,392.00
$503.00Plasma Rope BCPLAS1 1 $503.00
$1,936.00Armored Oil Pan Guard BCAOPG 1 $1,936.00
$3,872.00Ballistic Skip Round Shield BCBSRS 2 $1,936.00
$1,713.00Front Skid Pan BCFSP 1 $1,713.00
$2,871.00Intercom System Inside to Outside BCINT 1 $2,871.00
$975.005 Pack Mag Kit BCMAGKIT 1 $975.00
$2,498.00Trauma Lighting (6) Overhead Dome White w/Hi/Low/Red BCLTMED 1 $2,498.00
$317,065.00Configuration Subtotal:$317,065.0
$14,500.00FREIGHTVEHICLEVehicle Freight 1 $14,500.00
$331,565.00Total:
11.1
p. 90 of 130
Quotation 100120-B
Quotation Date:
Lenco Tax ID#:
03/02/23
04-271977710 Betnr Industrial Drive - Pittsfield, MA 01201
PH: (413) 443-7359 - FAX (413) 445-7865
GILCACustomer Code:
Notes:
Authorized
WARNING: Information Subject to Export Control Laws
Acceptance of this quotation or entering into a purchase agreement with Lenco, the purchaser agrees to Lenco's full Terms and Conditions of Sale, available upon request. This
quote will be valid for 90 days.
Please sign and return Daniel Besemer
Authorized
Thank you
The written approval of the Directorate of US Defense Trade Controls and Lenco Industries, Inc. must be obtained before reselling, transferring, transshipping or disposing of a
defense article to any end user, end use or destination other than as stated on this Lenco quote or the shipper's export declaration in cases where an exemption is claimed under
this subchapter ITAR 123.9(A).
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
Signature:___________________________________Signature:___________________________________
Gilroy tax (9.125%) of $28,932.18 is NOT collected by Lenco.
11.1
p. 91 of 130
Designer and Manufacturer of Tactical Armored Security Vehicles
10 Betnr Industrial Drive · Pittsfield, MA 01201 · Tel (413) 443-7359 · Fax (413) 445-7865
www.LencoArmor.com · e-mail: Info@LencoArmor.com
SOLE SOURCE LETTER
Lenco Industries, Inc.
10 Betnr Industrial Drive
Pittsfield, MA, 01201
E-mail: Contracting@LencoArmor.com
Phone: 413-443-7359
DATE: August 29, 2022
RE: Sole Source Letter for the Lenco BearCat
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter confirms that Lenco Industries Inc. (d/b/a Lenco Armored Vehicles), as designer and
manufacturer, is the Sole Source provider of the following products in the United States and
internationally:
• Lenco BEAR®
• Lenco BearCat®
• Lenco BombCat®
• Lenco MedCat™
• Lenco FireCat™
Additionally, these Lenco products, their specifications, manufacturing techniques and marketing
materials are proprietary and are protected by copyrights, trademarks, service marks, patents-pending,
nondisclosure agreements, noncompete agreements and exclusive supply agreements; in whole or in part.
There are no other items or products available that offer identical functionality or performance
characteristics, and Lenco determines the prices for the above-named products to be fair and reasonable
because of pre-competed federal and state supply schedules controlled by exclusive distribution.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 6.302-1 – “Only one responsible source and no other supplies
or services will satisfy agency requirements” is the statutory authority permitting this Sole Source
government procurement.
Further, the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards establishes government-wide
requirements for federal grants and cooperative agreements. Under the Uniform Guidance, a
non-Federal entity that receives a federal award must “provide a preference for the purchase,
acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States.” See 2 C.F.R.
§ 200.322. If the non-Federal entity fails to do so, the federal awarding agency or pass-through
entity may sanction a non-compliant recipient of funds.
In summary, Lenco Armored Vehicles, based in the United States, is the only manufacturer or
authorized dealer of the Lenco BearCat, its variants or its equivalent.
11.1
p. 92 of 130
Designer and Manufacturer of Tactical Armored Security Vehicles
10 Betnr Industrial Drive · Pittsfield, MA 01201 · Tel (413) 443-7359 · Fax (413) 445-7865
www.LencoArmor.com · e-mail: Info@LencoArmor.com
SOLE SOURCE SPECIFICATIONS
Lenco Industries, Inc.
10 Betnr Industrial Drive
Pittsfield, MA, 01201
E-mail: Contracting@LencoArmor.com
Phone: 413-443-7359
DATE: September 6, 2022
RE: Sole Source Specifications for the Lenco BearCat
Lenco BearCat Key Features, Testing and Certifications
Armor Protection
• Armor Panels constructed of Certified Mil-Spec Steel
• Vertical Armor Panels are .50 inch thick, one-piece solid construction from the front of the vehicle to
the rear of the vehicle
• Gunports and all surrounding armor protection, including backup armor, is .50 inch thick.
• Proprietary welding technique utilized in sidewall, floor and roof construction
• Armored hood, radiator protection, fuel tank, exterior lighting armor backup, inner fender armor, door
and window pocket armor backup
• Department of the Army, U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center – Ballistic Certification for armor plate
used in every BearCat manufactured
• Independent Third-Party Testing to the following threats / ballistic standards: EN 1063 BR7, NIJ IV,
STANAG 4569 Level 2, .50 CAL M2 Multi-Hit, .50 CAL M33 Multi-Hit, DM51x2 Hand Grenades,
DM31 Anti-Personnel Mine, M67x2 Hand Grenades, 20mm FSP, V50 (BL) P Ballistic Test
Mobility & Automotive Safety
• 126” – 131.5” Wheelbase
• Custom-tuned suspension, including shocks, springs, bump stops, front and rear sway bars, track bar
and radius arms
• Proprietary OEM Frame-to-Body construction
• Department of the Army, U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center, Aberdeen Proving Grounds –
Automotive Performance Testing to the following standards:
o Test Operating Procedures (TOP)
o North Atlantic Treating Organization (NATO) Reference Mobility Model (NRMM)
11.1
p. 93 of 130
Designer and Manufacturer of Tactical Armored Security Vehicles
10 Betnr Industrial Drive · Pittsfield, MA 01201 · Tel (413) 443-7359 · Fax (413) 445-7865
www.LencoArmor.com · e-mail: Info@LencoArmor.com
o NATO Allied Vehicle Testing Publication (AVTP)
o Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
• Human Factors Integration - Safety Assessment Review (SAR)
o Fort Knox, KY
o Fort Belvoir, VA
• National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance (OVSC), Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) Compliance Testing
o Center of Gravity Test
o FMVSS 105 – Hydraulic Brake Test
o FMVSS 206 – Door Locks and Door Retention Test
o FMVSS 207 – Seating Systems
o FMVSS 210 – Seat Belt Anchorages
o FMVSS 302 – Flammability of Interior Components
• National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA), Member Tested and Recommended Certification
o 2003 Certification
o 2020 Re-Certification
• U.S. Air Force Air Transportability Test Loading Activity (ATTLA) – Air Transportation
Certification
o Lockheed C-5 Galaxy
o Boeing C-17 Globemaster III
o Lockheed C-130 Hercules
Tactical Features
• Patented, zero gravity counter balanced & rotating roof hatch system
• Height-adjustable gunner stand with removable / serviceable design
• Automatic Door Lock-Out (side doors) with single tap release
• Welded Running Boards rated to hold 3,000 lbs. at each side & 2,500 lbs. on rear
• Occupant situational awareness
• 390 square feet of interior space
• 2-Piece Bumper-integrated hydraulic entry bars with attachments for Audio / Video, Chemical
Deployment, and Water Deployment
• Roof Mounted Water Nozzle with internal joystick controls
• Bumper Mounted Water Nozzle with internal joystick controls
• Vehicle-Integrated On-Board SCBA System
• Tactical EMS interior layout, workstation, medical cabinet, oxygen storage and trauma lighting
• 68 Gallon Single Fuel Cell
• 40” Water Fording Package with Independent 3rd Party Testing
Service, Reliability & Interoperability
• Commercial Chassis common to government fleet
• Commercial Chassis Warranty and Service history at nearly 130 Authorized Ford Service Centers
across the United States
11.1
p. 94 of 130
Designer and Manufacturer of Tactical Armored Security Vehicles
10 Betnr Industrial Drive · Pittsfield, MA 01201 · Tel (413) 443-7359 · Fax (413) 445-7865
www.LencoArmor.com · e-mail: Info@LencoArmor.com
• Ford OEM Warranty
• 3 Year Lenco Warranty
• Operational and Support Cost: Average cost of $558 USD per 10,000 miles of operation
• Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM): 24,906 mean miles between repair, 1.3 hours
mean time to repair and 98% operational readiness
• Interoperability with hundreds of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies across the United
States; reduces training cost and limits response time in joint operations
• Lenco Refurbishment Program – (4) individual ‘Schedules’ of refurbishment work that address Ford
chassis components, Lenco components, paint and upgrades.
• Lenco Trade-In Program – End-of-Life vehicles can be traded-in to Lenco for value against the
acquisition of a new or used model vehicle.
11.1
p. 95 of 130
Page 1 of 8
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile
Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Community Development
Submitted By:Sharon Goei, Community Development Director
Prepared By:Jon Biggs, Special Assistant to City Administration
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Promote Economic Development Activities
RECOMMENDATION
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules
and Requirements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Legislation adopted at the State level now allows vendors to sell food and merchandise
on public sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and, in certain instances, public parks. Although
the Gilroy City Code includes requirements for mobile vending, those requirements are
not in line with current State legislation for sidewalk vendors.
Staff is providing this report to summarize current regulations and propose new
standards. The City Council is being asked to provide feedback and guidance so
appropriate standards can be developed for sidewalk vending.
Mobile vending, including mobile food trucks, currently has regulations in Gilroy City
Code Chapter 16A. Depending on Council direction, mobile vending can be brought
back separately in order to address concerns or enhancements.
11.2
p. 96 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
POLICY DISCUSSION
State Senate Bill 946 (SB 946), the Safe Sidewalk Vending Act, was signed by the
Governor in 2018 and became effective on January 1, 2019. In response to inquiries,
direction, and State legislation, staff is seeking City Council direction so that an
appropriate set of requirements (either by ordinance or resolution) for sidewalk vending
can be developed and then scheduled for City Council consideration at a future
meeting.
Currently, Gilroy City Code Chapter 16A, Peddlers, Solicitors, Vendors and Other
Transient Businesses, provides mobile vending requirements for the offering or selling
of food, goods, merchandise, or services on private property, streets, parks, or other
public places. Legislation at the State level now limits a City’s ability to regulate vendors
that offer or sell food and merchandise on public sidewalks, paths, and public parks.
Although SB 946 places limits on the City’s ability to regulate sidewalk vendors, this
legislation still provides the City with the authority to adopt requirements regulating the
time, place, and manner of sidewalk vending so long as the requirements are directly
related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns. Note that SB 946 explicitly
states, “... perceived community animus or economic competition does not constitute an
objective health, safety, or welfare concern.”
It is useful to point out that SB 946 applies to vendors, either roaming or stationary, that
offer food and merchandise on public sidewalks or pathways and in parks. These rules
do not apply to mobile vending on other public property or on public streets. Given this,
staff believes it will be appropriate to amend the City’s current mobile vending rules
(Chapter 16A) and develop a new set of rules specific to sidewalk vendors so that there
is compliance with the requirements of SB 946.
BACKGROUND
Existing Regulations
The City’s current regulations governing mobile vendors (including sidewalk vendors)
are found in Chapter 16A, Peddlers, Solicitors, Vendors and Other Transient
Businesses, of the Gilroy City Code.
This Chapter of the City Code provides requirements for mobile vending, including
permits which mobile vendors are required to obtain. A mobile vending facility is any
portable container, pushcart, stand, vehicle, or wagon that is used for displaying or
offering for sale any food, goods, or services. The mobile vending permit and identity
permit are reviewed for issuance by the Police Department. Applications for these
permits are submitted to the Police Department along with the appropriate fee.
In addition to the permit and procedure requirements, Chapter 16A includes locations
where mobile vending is prohibited, such as in the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and
11.2
p. 97 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 3 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
C-3 (Shopping Center Commercial) zone districts, along with prohibiting mobile vending
within three hundred feet (300’) of an elementary or junior high school property. The
regulations also limit the length of time that a mobile vendor may remain in any one
place, which is ten (10) minutes, and provides that a mobile vendor must move at least
100’ before stopping again.
Note that some cities impound vending carts as an option when a vendor refuses to
comply with regulations.
Senate Bill 946, the Safe Sidewalk Vending Act
The Safe Sidewalk Vending Act, signed by the Governor in 2018 and became effective
on January 1, 2019, is a law that decriminalized and legalized sidewalk vending.
This law defines a “sidewalk vendor” as a person who sells food or merchandise from a
pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack, or other non-
motorized conveyance on a sidewalk or pedestrian path. SB 946 defines a sidewalk
vendor as either a “roaming sidewalk vendor”, which is someone who moves around, or
a “stationary vendor”, which is a vendor at a fixed location.
As noted earlier, although SB 946 places limits on the City’s ability to regulate sidewalk
vendors, this legislation still provides the City with the authority to adopt requirements
regulating the time, place, and manner of sidewalk vending so long as the requirements
are directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns. Note that SB 946
explicitly states, “... perceived community animus or economic competition does not
constitute an objective health, safety, or welfare concern.”
Following are some key elements of SB 946 on what a City can and cannot do to
regulate “sidewalk vendors”:
What a City CAN do:
▪Limit hours of operation;
▪Prohibit stationary sidewalk vendors in residential districts (mobile vendors are
allowed to operate in residential zone districts);
▪Prohibit sidewalk vending near farmers’ markets, swap meets, and permitted
special events;
▪Require that sanitary standards be met;
▪Require compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act;
▪Require a permit or license;
▪Request information about business operations.
What a City CANNOT do:
▪Require vendors to operate in a specific area (unless it is necessary to protect
the public’s health, safety, and welfare);
▪Require a vendor to obtain permission to operate from a business, entity, or
person other than a government entity;
11.2
p. 98 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 4 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
▪Prohibit sidewalk vendors from operation in public parks unless there is a
concession agreement for the operation of the park or in order to protect the
public’s health, safety, and welfare;
▪Restrict the number of sidewalk vendors unless necessary to protect the public’s
health, safety, and welfare.
As noted, a City can require a permit or license for sidewalk vendors, and if standards
and permit requirements are adopted by the City, it can enforce these requirements.
SB 946 does not allow any criminal charges, but it may provide for administrative fines.
A violation of the local authority's vending programs is only punishable by the following
fines: $100 for the first violation, $200 for the second violation, and $500 for any
additional violation within one year of the first violation. If the local authority establishes
a permit program, the authorities can impose higher fines for vending without a permit:
$250 for the first violation, $500 for the second violation, and $1000 for any additional
violation within one year of the first violation. On the fourth and any subsequent
violation, the local authority can rescind a permit.
If a local authority seeks to assess administrative fines, SB 946 requires the local
authority to inform the person of his or her right to request an “ability-to-pay
determination” and to provide instructions for requesting such a determination. If the
person establishes that he or she is unable to pay because of the person’s financial
condition, the person will only be required to pay 20 percent of the administrative fine.
SB 946 also provides that a local authority may allow community service in lieu of
paying the total fine or allow an alternative disposition.
Senate Bill 972 Sidewalk Food Vending Update
There is one other piece of State legislation of note that provides requirements for
mobile food vendors, which is SB 972, relating to the California Retail Food Code.
On September 23, 2022, Governor Newsom signed State Senate Bill 972 which
modifies the California Retail Food Code and allows some sidewalk food vendors to
obtain public health permits. The new law established a new retail food facility, among
other changes, and became effective on January 1, 2023.
This legislation provides uniform health and sanitation standards applicable to mobile
food vendors and is administered by the County of Santa Clara Department of
Environmental Health, Consumer Protection Division. This Department
processes/issues the Mobile Food Facility Permits and conducts the health and safety
inspections for these businesses. Given that these permits and regulations are
processed and enforced at the County level, this report will not discuss them further.
11.2
p. 99 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 5 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
ANALYSIS
A set of regulations providing for a sidewalk vending permit and a listing of requirements
and rules for sidewalk vendors is needed so that the City can appropriately protect the
community’s health, safety, and welfare. In addition, an update to the mobile vending
regulations is needed so that its requirements are compliant with SB 946.
A review of SB 946 indicates that the requirements for the permitting and regulation of
sidewalk vendors need to support efforts intended to protect the public’s health, safety,
and welfare. In line with this, staff has drafted the following list of standards that could
be incorporated into an ordinance or resolution that are intended to address health,
safety, and welfare concerns and provide permit and operational standard requirements
for sidewalk vendors:
(1) Vending display devices shall be at least eighteen inches in height. No person engaged
in sidewalk vending may display or sell their wares on the ground, or on a cloth, tarp, or other
similar material on the ground.
(2) No food sidewalk vendor may be accompanied by or in the custody or possession of a
dog or any other animal, except a service animal. Merchandise sidewalk vendors may have
one leashed animal.
(3) To maintain accessibility standards, sidewalk vendors shall not place or allow any
obstruction to be placed on the sidewalk that would reduce the width of the sidewalk to below
a minimum of forty-eight inches excluding curb, except for the brief duration of time for a
roaming sidewalk vendor to conduct a sale. Sidewalk vendors shall maintain their vending
display devices at all times in a manner that provides sufficient access to the sidewalk and
avoids impeding the flow of pedestrian traffic. At no time, may a sidewalk vendor operate in
such a fashion that would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act or state law on
accessibility, or cause the sidewalk to narrow in a fashion that violates the accessible path of
travel for persons with disabilities, including persons who use wheelchairs or other mobility
devices.
(4) Sidewalk vendors may not use easy-ups, tents, or similar shade structures unless their
sidewalk vending permit specifically authorizes such use. Use of these types of structures may
be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application and will be subject to review and
approval by the Community Development Department for fire safety.
(5) Sidewalk vendors shall not vend to occupants of motorized vehicles in operation.
(6) Sidewalk vendors may not engage in vending in such a manner as to cause onlookers,
customers, or others to obstruct the accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities, or
the free flow or view of pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
(7) To maintain the free movement of pedestrians and/or vehicles, sidewalk vendors may not
use signs in connection with the sale, display, or offering for sale of items, except for those
signs affixed to or painted on a vending display device.
11.2
p. 100 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 6 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
(8) Vendors may not use generators unless their sidewalk vending permit explicitly allows for
generator use. Use of generators may be requested in a sidewalk vending permit application
and will be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department.
(9) Sidewalk vendors must provide a trash receptacle for customers and employ good faith
efforts to ensure proper disposal of customer trash. Prior to leaving any vending location, the
sidewalk vendor shall pick up, remove, and dispose of all trash generated by the vending
operations and/or the vendor’s customers within a fifteen-foot radius of the vending location.
Sidewalk vendors are responsible for disposing of the trash associated with their business and
may not use city receptacles for this purpose.
(10) Sidewalk vendors must properly dispose of fats, grease, and oil and comply with
applicable rules regulating such.
(11) At all times while vending, food sidewalk vendors shall possess and display in plain view
on the vending display device a valid permit from the County of Santa Clara Department of
Environmental Health.
(12) At all times while vending, sidewalk vendors shall possess and display in plain view on
their person or on their vending display device a valid sidewalk vending permit and a business
license.
(13) Sidewalk vendors shall be responsible for their own compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, including without limitation state food preparation, handling, and
labeling requirements; fire codes and regulations; noise standards; alcoholic beverages,
tobacco products, cannabis, electronic cigarette, smoking devices and controlled substances
regulations; sanitation and health standards and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
and other state and federal disability access standards.
(14) Vending display devices shall not be chained, fastened, or affixed at any time to any
building or structure, including, but not limited to, lampposts, parking meters, traffic signals, fire
hydrants, benches, bus shelters, trash cans, street signs, trees, or other objects within the
public right-of-way. No vending display device shall become a permanent fixture on the
vending site or be considered an improvement to real property.
(15) Vending display devices shall not be left or stored unattended on public property or
within the public right-of-way.
(16) Sidewalk vendors shall not vend or distribute: (A) live animals, wildlife, fish, fowl, or
insects; or (B) items that are otherwise illegal to sell or distribute under other laws (such as
cannabis, unlawful narcotics, weapons, and counterfeit merchandise). Note that the unlawful
possession or distribution of items is punishable according to the terms of applicable federal,
state, or local law making such possession or distribution illegal.
(17) Sidewalk vendors shall not use sidewalks or public property as storage for extra
inventory, merchandise, or personal belongings, except for: (A) vending display devices, items
placed on or in vending display devices, and associated seating; and (B) personal belongings
wholly contained underneath or inside of a vending display device.
11.2
p. 101 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 7 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
(18) No person shall use any street furniture, including any bench, planter, utility cabinet, or
other street furniture or structure permanently installed on public property, for the display, sale,
or distribution of food, goods, or merchandise.
(19) Sidewalk vendors shall not interfere with access or use of city infrastructure, including
city benches, bike racks, wheelchair access ramps, stairs, parking meters, trash receptacles,
or recycling receptacles.
(20) Sidewalk vendors shall not unreasonably block access to or create unreasonable
congestion at: (A) a corner of any street intersection; (B) any fire hydrant, fire call box,
emergency exit, or other emergency facility; (C) any curb which is designated as white, yellow,
green, blue, or red zone, or a bus zone; (D) any building entrance or stairway access point; (E)
any driveway or driveway apron; (F) upon or within any roadway, median strip, or dividing
section; or (G) at any parking pay station. Vending or operating in a way that violates the
accessible path of travel for persons with disabilities is per se unreasonable.
(21) Trailers are not permitted on the sidewalk pursuant to California Vehicle Code 22500(f).
Violation of this rule is punishable in accordance with the terms of the California Vehicle Code.
(22) Sidewalk vendors shall not operate or vend in a way that violates the terms or
conditions of their sidewalk vending permit or parks vending permit.
It is also worth noting that SB 946 only allows a City to restrict stationary sidewalk
vendors from neighborhoods with a residential zoning designation or where it is
necessary to protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare; thus, any ordinance
brought back to the City Council will need to indicate where stationary sidewalk vendors
are prohibited.
There may be other requirements that need to be addressed, but the above reflect an
effort to keep the sidewalk vendor requirements in line with the State’s directive that
they protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare.
ENFORCEMENT
Like any set of City regulations, enforcement will be a key component in an effective
program. Community Development Department staff will be coordinating with the Police
Department and Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health on
enforcement efforts. Given the range of times that sidewalk vending activities occur, a
multi-level approach will most likely be required to achieve the best compliance with any
adopted rules and permit requirements. It remains to be determined, based on
resources, and competing priorities, if a proactive or complaint driven enforcement
program for sidewalk vending will take place.
QUESTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL
To identify appropriate next steps, staff is seeking the following direction from the City
Council:
11.2
p. 102 of 130
Receive Report and Provide Direction on Mobile Vending and Sidewalk Vending Rules and
Requirements
City of Gilroy City Council Page 8 of 8 April 17, 20231
0
5
5
▪Shall staff draft an ordinance that provides permitting and operational standards
for sidewalk vendors?
▪Shall penalties, in line with SB 946, be a component of an ordinance?
▪Does the list of standards noted above address concerns regarding the
community’s health, safety, and welfare?
▪Are there other standards that should be included or explored?
ALTERNATIVES
Following are some alternatives the City Council might consider:
▪Decline to direct staff to update the City’s current mobile vending regulations and
draft regulations for permits and standards for sidewalk vendors.
▪Identify another method, possibly by resolution or other regulatory document, to
regulate mobile vending and sidewalk vendors.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The fiscal impact is undetermined at this time and will depend to a degree on the
direction that the City Council provides. Budgetary needs of departments will be
examined accordingly.
CONCLUSION
Although recent State legislation has limited the ability of cities to regulate sidewalk
vending in their communities, some requirements can still be adopted at the local level,
by ordinance or resolution, that regulate the time, place, and manner of sidewalk
vending, so long as these requirements are related to objective health, safety or welfare
concerns. As expressed at prior City Council meetings, there are concerns related to
sidewalk vending and it is now an appropriate time to update the City’s regulations so
that they are not only compliant with State legislation, but also address expressed
concerns.
NEXT STEPS
Following City Council direction, staff will finalize the draft of an appropriate set of rules
and requirements to regulate sidewalk vendors and mobile vendors and return with
these drafts to the City Council at a future meeting.
Attachments:
1. Senate Bill 946, Sidewalk Vendors
2. Current Chapter 16A of the Gilroy City Code – Peddlers, Solicitors, Vendors, and
Other Transient Businesses
11.2
p. 103 of 130
Senate Bill No. 946
CHAPTER 459
An act to add Chapter 6.2 (commencing with Section 51036) to Part 1 of
Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, relating to sidewalk vendors.
[Approved by Governor September 17, 2018. Filed with
Secretary of State September 17, 2018.]
legislative counsel
11.2
p. 104 of 130
vending, as specified, to petition for dismissal of the sentence, fine, or
conviction.
Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the
right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public
officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest
protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1) Sidewalk vending provides important entrepreneurship and economic
development opportunities to low-income and immigrant communities.
(2) Sidewalk vending increases access to desired goods, such as culturally
significant food and merchandise.
(3) Sidewalk vending contributes to a safe and dynamic public space.
(4) The safety and welfare of the general public is promoted by
encouraging local authorities to support and properly regulate sidewalk
vending.
(5) The safety and welfare of the general public is promoted by
prohibiting criminal penalties for violations of sidewalk vending ordinances
and regulations.
(6) This act applies to any city, county, or city and county, including a
charter city. The criminalization of small business entrepreneurs, and the
challenges that those entrepreneurs face as a result of a criminal record, are
matters of statewide concern. Further, unnecessary barriers have been erected
blocking aspiring entrepreneurs from accessing the formal economy, harming
California’s economy in the process, and disrupting the regulation of
business, which is a matter of statewide concern. Moreover, California has
an interest in the regulation of traffic, a matter of statewide concern, whether
in ensuring the appropriate flow of traffic or in ensuring the safety of
pedestrians on the road or the sidewalk.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to promote entrepreneurship and
support immigrant and low-income communities.
SEC. 2. Chapter 6.2 (commencing with Section 51036) is added to Part
1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, to read:
Chapter 6.2. Sidewalk Vendors
51036. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:
(a) “Sidewalk vendor” means a person who sells food or merchandise
from a pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack,
or other nonmotorized conveyance, or from one’s person, upon a public
sidewalk or other pedestrian path.
(b) “Roaming sidewalk vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who moves
from place to place and stops only to complete a transaction.
93
— 2 —Ch. 459
11.2
p. 105 of 130
(c) “Stationary sidewalk vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who vends
from a fixed location.
(d) “Local authority” means a chartered or general law city, county, or
city and county.
51037. (a) A local authority shall not regulate sidewalk vendors except
in accordance with Sections 51038 and 51039.
(b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect the applicability
of Part 7 (commencing with Section 113700) of Division 104 of the Health
and Safety Code to a sidewalk vendor who sells food.
(c) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require a local authority
to adopt a new program to regulate sidewalk vendors if the local authority
has established an existing program that substantially complies with the
requirements in this chapter.
51038. (a) A local authority may adopt a program to regulate sidewalk
vendors in compliance with this section.
(b) A local authority’s sidewalk vending program shall comply with all
of the following standards:
(1) A local authority shall not require a sidewalk vendor to operate within
specific parts of the public right-of-way, except when that restriction is
directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns.
(2) (A) A local authority shall not prohibit a sidewalk vendor from selling
food or merchandise in a park owned or operated by the local authority,
except the local authority may prohibit stationary sidewalk vendors from
vending in the park only if the operator of the park has signed an agreement
for concessions that exclusively permits the sale of food or merchandise by
the concessionaire.
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a local authority may adopt
additional requirements regulating the time, place, and manner of sidewalk
vending in a park owned or operated by the local authority if the
requirements are any of the following:
(i) Directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns.
(ii) Necessary to ensure the public’s use and enjoyment of natural
resources and recreational opportunities.
(iii) Necessary to prevent an undue concentration of commercial activity
that unreasonably interferes with the scenic and natural character of the
park.
(3) A local authority shall not require a sidewalk vendor to first obtain
the consent or approval of any nongovernmental entity or individual before
he or she can sell food or merchandise.
(4) (A) A local authority shall not restrict sidewalk vendors to operate
only in a designated neighborhood or area, except when that restriction is
directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare concerns.
(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a local authority may prohibit
stationary sidewalk vendors in areas that are zoned exclusively residential,
but shall not prohibit roaming sidewalk vendors.
(5) A local authority shall not restrict the overall number of sidewalk
vendors permitted to operate within the jurisdiction of the local authority,
93
Ch. 459— 3 — 11.2
p. 106 of 130
unless the restriction is directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare
concerns.
(c) A local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, adopt additional
requirements regulating the time, place, and manner of sidewalk vending
if the requirements are directly related to objective health, safety, or welfare
concerns, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(1) Limitations on hours of operation that are not unduly restrictive. In
nonresidential areas, any limitations on the hours of operation for sidewalk
vending shall not be more restrictive than any limitations on hours of
operation imposed on other businesses or uses on the same street.
(2) Requirements to maintain sanitary conditions.
(3) Requirements necessary to ensure compliance with the federal
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) and other
disability access standards.
(4) Requiring the sidewalk vendor to obtain from the local authority a
permit for sidewalk vending or a valid business license, provided that the
local authority issuing the permit or business license accepts a California
driver’s license or identification number, an individual taxpayer identification
number, or a municipal identification number in lieu of a social security
number if the local authority otherwise requires a social security number
for the issuance of a permit or business license, and that the number collected
shall not be available to the public for inspection, is confidential, and shall
not be disclosed except as required to administer the permit or licensure
program or comply with a state law or state or federal court order.
(5) Requiring the sidewalk vendor to possess a valid California
Department of Tax and Fee Administration seller’s permit.
(6) Requiring additional licenses from other state or local agencies to
the extent required by law.
(7) Requiring compliance with other generally applicable laws.
(8) Requiring a sidewalk vendor to submit information on his or her
operations, including, but not limited to, any of the following:
(A) The name and current mailing address of the sidewalk vendor.
(B) A description of the merchandise offered for sale or exchange.
(C) A certification by the vendor that to his or her knowledge and belief,
the information contained on the form is true.
(D) The California seller’s permit number (California Department of
Tax and Fee Administration sales tax number), if any, of the sidewalk
vendor.
(E) If the sidewalk vendor is an agent of an individual, company,
partnership, or corporation, the name and business address of the principal.
(d) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), a local authority may do both of
the following:
(1) Prohibit sidewalk vendors in areas located within the immediate
vicinity of a permitted certified farmers’ market or a permitted swap meet
during the limited operating hours of that certified farmers’ market or swap
meet. A “certified farmers’ market” means a location operated in accordance
with Chapter 10.5 (commencing with Section 47000) of Division 17 of the
93
— 4 —Ch. 459
11.2
p. 107 of 130
Food and Agricultural Code and any regulations adopted pursuant to that
chapter. A “swap meet” means a location operated in accordance with Article
6 (commencing with Section 21660) of Chapter 9 of Division 8 of the
Business and Professions Code, and any regulations adopted pursuant to
that article.
(2) Restrict or prohibit sidewalk vendors within the immediate vicinity
of an area designated for a temporary special permit issued by the local
authority, provided that any notice, business interruption mitigation, or other
rights provided to affected businesses or property owners under the local
authority’s temporary special permit are also provided to any sidewalk
vendors specifically permitted to operate in the area, if applicable. For
purposes of this paragraph, a temporary special permit is a permit issued
by the local authority for the temporary use of, or encroachment on, the
sidewalk or other public area, including, but not limited to, an encroachment
permit, special event permit, or temporary event permit, for purposes
including, but not limited to, filming, parades, or outdoor concerts. A
prohibition of sidewalk vendors pursuant to this paragraph shall only be
effective for the limited duration of the temporary special permit.
(e) For purposes of this section, perceived community animus or
economic competition does not constitute an objective health, safety, or
welfare concern.
51039. (a) (1) A violation of a local authority’s sidewalk vending
program that complies with Section 51038 is punishable only by the
following:
(A) An administrative fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for
a first violation.
(B) An administrative fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for
a second violation within one year of the first violation.
(C) An administrative fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for
each additional violation within one year of the first violation.
(2) A local authority may rescind a permit issued to a sidewalk vendor
for the term of that permit upon the fourth violation or subsequent violations.
(3) (A) If a local authority requires a sidewalk vendor to obtain a
sidewalk vending permit from the local authority, vending without a sidewalk
vending permit may be punishable by the following in lieu of the
administrative fines set forth in paragraph (1):
(i) An administrative fine not exceeding two hundred fifty dollars ($250)
for a first violation.
(ii) An administrative fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for
a second violation within one year of the first violation.
(iii) An administrative fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000)
for each additional violation within one year of the first violation.
(B) Upon proof of a valid permit issued by the local authority, the
administrative fines set forth in this paragraph shall be reduced to the
administrative fines set forth in paragraph (1), respectively.
(b) The proceeds of an administrative fine assessed pursuant to
subdivision (a) shall be deposited in the treasury of the local authority.
93
Ch. 459— 5 — 11.2
p. 108 of 130
(c) Failure to pay an administrative fine pursuant to subdivision (a) shall
not be punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. Additional fines, fees,
assessments, or any other financial conditions beyond those authorized in
subdivision (a) shall not be assessed.
(d) (1) A violation of a local authority’s sidewalk vending program that
complies with Section 51038, or a violation of any rules or regulations
adopted prior to January 1, 2019, that regulate or prohibit sidewalk vendors
in the jurisdiction of a local authority, shall not be punishable as an infraction
or misdemeanor, and the person alleged to have violated any of those
provisions shall not be subject to arrest except when permitted under law.
(2) Notwithstanding any other law, paragraph (1) shall apply to all
pending criminal prosecutions under any local ordinance or resolution
regulating or prohibiting sidewalk vendors. Any of those criminal
prosecutions that have not reached final judgment shall be dismissed.
(e) A local authority that has not adopted rules or regulations by ordinance
or resolution that comply with Section 51037 shall not cite, fine, or prosecute
a sidewalk vendor for a violation of any rule or regulation that is inconsistent
with the standards described in subdivision (b) Section 51038.
(f) (1) When assessing an administrative fine pursuant to subdivision
(a), the adjudicator shall take into consideration the person’s ability to pay
the fine. The local authority shall provide the person with notice of his or
her right to request an ability-to-pay determination and shall make available
instructions or other materials for requesting an ability-to-pay determination.
The person may request an ability-to-pay determination at adjudication or
while the judgment remains unpaid, including when a case is delinquent or
has been referred to a comprehensive collection program.
(2) If the person meets the criteria described in subdivision (a) or (b) of
Section 68632, the local authority shall accept, in full satisfaction, 20 percent
of the administrative fine imposed pursuant to subdivision (a).
(3) The local authority may allow the person to complete community
service in lieu of paying the total administrative fine, may waive the
administrative fine, or may offer an alternative disposition.
(g) (1) A person who is currently serving, or who completed, a sentence,
or who is subject to a fine, for a conviction of a misdemeanor or infraction
for sidewalk vending, whether by trial or by open or negotiated plea, who
would not have been guilty of that offense under the act that added this
section had that act been in effect at the time of the offense, may petition
for dismissal of the sentence, fine, or conviction before the trial court that
entered the judgment of conviction in his or her case.
(2) Upon receiving a petition under paragraph (1), the court shall presume
the petitioner satisfies the criteria in paragraph (1) unless the party opposing
the petition proves by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner does
not satisfy the criteria. If the petitioner satisfies the criteria in paragraph (1),
the court shall grant the petition to dismiss the sentence or fine, if applicable,
and dismiss and seal the conviction, because the sentence, fine, and
conviction are legally invalid.
93
— 6 —Ch. 459
11.2
p. 109 of 130
(3) Unless requested by the petitioner, no hearing is necessary to grant
or deny a petition filed under paragraph (1).
(4) If the court that originally sentenced or imposed a fine on the
petitioner is not available, the presiding judge shall designate another judge
to rule on the petition.
(5) Nothing in this subdivision is intended to diminish or abrogate any
rights or remedies otherwise available to the petitioner.
(6) Nothing in this subdivision or related provisions is intended to
diminish or abrogate the finality of judgments in any case not falling within
the purview of this chapter.
SEC. 3. The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this act,
which adds Section 51038 to the Government Code, imposes a limitation
on the public’s right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings
of public officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article
I of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional provision,
the Legislature makes the following findings to demonstrate the interest
protected by this limitation and the need for protecting that interest:
The Legislature finds and declares that in order to protect the privacy of
a sidewalk vendor with regard to his or her California driver’s license or
identification number, individual taxpayer identification number, or
municipal identification number, when that number is collected in lieu of
a social security number for purposes of the issuance of a permit or business
license, it is necessary that the sidewalk vendor’s number be confidential,
except as provided in this act.
O
93
Ch. 459— 7 — 11.2
p. 110 of 130
Chapter 16A
PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, VENDORS AND OTHER TRANSIENT BUSINESSES1
Sections:
ARTICLE I. IDENTITY PERMITS
16A.1 Required.
16A.2 Application; application fee; information to be shown.
16A.3 Documents to accompany application.
16A.4 Photographs to accompany application.
16A.5 Cash deposit or bond required; amount.
16A.6 Reserved.
16A.7 Fingerprint records; exemption.
16A.8 Issuance; investigation by police department; denial; approval.
16A.9 Exemptions from payment of fee; compliance with applicable provisions.
16A.10 Identity permit to be carried on person; to be shown upon demand, altercation, etc.
16A.11 Conditions and regulations applicable to licensees and permittees.
16A.12 Contracts in violation voidable.
ARTICLE II. MOBILE VENDING PERMITS
16A.13 Mobile vending permit required.
16A.14 Permit procedure.
16A.15 Prohibited locations; prohibition against loitering.
ARTICLE III. CHARITABLE SOLICITATION
11.2
p. 111 of 130
16A.16 Solicitation of charitable, religious or educational funds or other property; permit
requirements.
ARTICLE IV. REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION
16A.17 Revocation and suspension of license and permits.
16A.18 Administrative hearings and appeals.
ARTICLE V. LIMITS ON SOLICITATION
16A.19.1 Definitions.
16A.19.2 Aggressive solicitation prohibited.
16A.19.3 Solicitation at specified locations prohibited.
16A.19.4 Violation – Penalty.
16A.19.5 Other regulations.
16A.19.6 Severability.
ARTICLE I. IDENTITY PERMITS
16A.1 Required.
All persons except a person having a fixed and permanent place of business in the city and licensed
under the provision of section 13.40 or 13.42 of this Code or licensed and regulated by the state, must
comply with this chapter before offering or selling goods, merchandise or services from place to place or
upon private property, upon streets, parks or other public places of the city, or from any building or other
enclosure or place, or in any vehicle of any nature whatsoever, either for immediate delivery or for
delivery in the future. This Article I shall not require persons holding incidental sales, such as garage
sales or holiday crafts sales, at their permanent place of residence to obtain identity permits for said
sales, nor shall it require those persons to obtain any additional city-issued permits or licenses for said
sales other than those required under other provisions of this Code.
All such persons subject to this article must obtain an identity permit pursuant to this article and are also
subject to the business license provisions of Chapter 13. In addition, a mobile vending permit may be
required under Article II of this chapter.
11.2
p. 112 of 130
No person shall be relieved from the provisions of any section of this chapter by reason of associating
temporarily with, or by conducting a transient business in connection with, any local merchant having a
fixed place of business within the city.
Violation of any section of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.2 Application; application fee; information to be shown.
All applicants for an identity permit must pay an application fee as set out by council resolution and must
make application fee as set by council resolution and must make application therefor to the chief of police
of the city upon forms provided by the city, which forms shall require the following information from the
applicant:
(1) Full name, permanent business address, local business and residence address of the applicant or its
authorized representative; if other than an individual applicant, the nature of the applicant, that is, whether
partnership, firm or corporation; the full name, age, address and occupation of each person who shall
actually vend, solicit or otherwise engage in any act required by this chapter to be licensed on behalf of
the applicant.
(2) A specific description of the article, service or contract proposed to be sold, performed, whether for
immediate or future delivery or performance and the proposed method of delivery and performance,
including information as to whether such sales will be made by quantity, weight, quality, package or
otherwise, and whether delivery or performance will be made personally or by mail or in what other
method. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.3 Documents to accompany application.
In the event any form, contract, order blank, warranty, agreement or other written or printed document is
to be signed by the purchaser or person receiving the property or service a copy of such form shall be
attached to the application. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.4 Photographs to accompany application.
Each application for an identity permit must be accompanied by two (2) prints of a recent photograph of
each individual person who shall actually engage in vending, selling or soliciting, which photographs shall
not exceed one-inch square in size and shall be full front views of the face and head only of such
persons. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.5 Cash deposit or bond required; amount.
11.2
p. 113 of 130
In each case where it appears that the applicant for an identity permit pursuant to this chapter will or may
demand, accept or receive payments or deposits of money or property in advance of final delivery or
performance, the application shall be accompanied by a cash deposit or by a bond to the city in a penal
sum as set by council resolution issued by a surety company authorized to do business within the state.
Such bond shall be conditioned for making final delivery of goods, wares or merchandise or for final
performance of services to be performed in accordance with the order, agreement or contract entered
into, and failing therein the advance payment or deposit on such order shall be refunded or returned.
Such cash deposit or bond, as the case may be, shall remain in full force and effect and be retained for a
period of ninety (90) days after the expiration of any such identity permit or the termination of any action
upon such bond or deposit of which the license collector shall have been notified, unless sooner released
by the license collector. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.6 Reserved.
16A.7 Fingerprint records; exemption.
At the time of making the application for an identity permit, each individual person who shall actually
engage in selling, soliciting or vending shall apply to the office of the chief of police of the city for the
purpose of being fingerprinted and supplying routine information required on the fingerprint forms
provided by the city, including the physical characteristics of each person, identifying marks or scars, age,
name, address and signature, and shall pay all fees connected therewith. Such fingerprint records are to
be taken in triplicate and each individual so presenting himself is hereby advised that the city reserves the
right to retain one of such fingerprint records in its files for permanent safekeeping, and to send one such
fingerprint record to the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the Department of Justice at Washington,
D.C., and to the Criminal Investigation Department of the California State Department of Justice at
Sacramento, California, for the purpose of filing. No fingerprint records will be returned in the event the
identity permit applied for is not issued or is subsequently suspended or revoked.
Every applicant who has established residence within the city for a period of five (5) or more years may
be exempt from this section requiring fingerprinting of such person. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.8 Issuance; investigation by police department; denial; approval.
The character and fitness of every applicant shall first be investigated by the police department before
any license or identity permit shall be issued. After conducting such investigation, if the chief of police
finds that the applicant is not of good business reputation or integrity, or that the granting of the identity
permit or license would be against the public interest, welfare or safety, then the chief of police shall
refuse to issue such identity permit and shall inform the license collector of such action. The license
11.2
p. 114 of 130
collector shall thereupon deny the issuance of a business license to any person denied an identity permit
by the chief of police.
The police chief and his or her authorized agents are authorized to obtain criminal history information for
each applicant for the purpose of determining those who have been arrested or convicted for any crime
involving moral turpitude, including but not limited to larceny, fraud or lewd or indecent conduct; any crime
involving violence, including but not limited to assault or battery or domestic violence or crimes involving
weapons; any crime involving the use, possession, sale or transpiration of drugs or alcohol; or any crime
substantially related to the qualifications or duties proposed by the applicant. The police chief shall refuse
to issue an identity permit as being against the public interest, welfare or safety if it is determined that the
applicant has been arrested for, or convicted of, any of the foregoing specified crimes within the previous
36 months, and may refuse to issue an identity permit if it is determined that the applicant has been
arrested for, or convicted of, any of the foregoing specified crimes within the previous 60 months, in which
event the applicant shall be advised that the criminal history information shall be made available to the
city council upon appeal.
Such identity permit shall have affixed to it one of the pictures filed by the applicant, and shall contain
reference to the issuance of the identity permit, a description of the individual to whom issued, date of
expiration not to exceed one year, and the signature of the individual to whom issued. (Ord. No. 97-10,
§ I, 11-5-97)
16A.9 Exemptions from payment of fee; compliance with applicable provisions.
Individual applicants exempted from the payment of the license fee specified in Chapter 13, Article III,
must comply fully with the requirements of this chapter as to application for identity permits, fingerprinting,
bonds and pictures. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.10 Identity permit to be carried on person; to be shown upon demand,
altercation, etc.
Each person issued an identity permit under section 16A.8 must retain the same in his or her personal
possession at all times while engaged in the business so licensed within the city and must produce and
show the same on the demand of any person solicited or of any police officer or official of the city. No
person issued an identity permit shall alter, remove or obliterate any entry made upon such permit, or
deface such permit in any way. Each identity permit shall be personal and not assignable or transferable,
nor shall any identity permit be used by any person other than the person for whom issued. (Ord. No. 97-
10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.11 Conditions and regulations applicable to licensees and permittees.
11.2
p. 115 of 130
The following conditions and regulations shall apply to the exercises of the privileges granted by licenses
issued under the provisions of Chapter 13 in addition to those set forth in this chapter:
(1) Shouting, Calling Wares, etc. No person shall shout or call his or her wares in a loud boisterous or
unseemly manner, or to the disturbance of citizens or dwellers in the city.
(2) Identification by Comparing Signature with That on Identity Permit. Every licensee or holder of an
identity permit upon the request of any police officer or other officer of the city shall sign his or her name
for comparison with the signature upon the license, identity permit, or upon the license or permit
application.
(3) Orders to Be Written in Duplicate, etc. Any person acting under authority of an identity permit issued
under this chapter who solicits orders for future delivery shall write each order at least in duplicate, plainly
stating the quantity of each article, commodity, contract or service ordered, the price to be paid therefor,
the total amount ordered and the amount to be paid on or after delivery. One copy of such order shall be
given to the customer.
(4) Hours of Door-to-Door Soliciting. No licensee or his or her agent, servant or employee shall solicit,
peddle, or vend goods, wares, merchandise, services, or any other article of any kind from door to door,
except between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and sunset.
(5) “No Peddlers” or “No Solicitation” Signs Posted. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit, peddle or
sell by ringing the doorbell or knocking at the door or otherwise calling attention to his or her presence at
any building, structure or place of business whereon or wherein a sign bearing the words “No Peddlers”
or words of similar import, is painted or affixed so as to be exposed to public view. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I,
11-5-97)
16A.12 Contracts in violation voidable.
Any order, agreement or contract entered into in the city by any person, subject to the provisions of this
chapter, who has failed to comply with or who has violated the provisions of this chapter, shall be
voidable by the other party as contrary to public policy and against the public interest. (Ord. No. 97-10,
§ I, 11-5-97)
ARTICLE II. MOBILE VENDING PERMITS
16A.13 Mobile vending permit required.
11.2
p. 116 of 130
A mobile vending facility, that is, any portable container, pushcart, stand, vehicle or wagon used for
displaying, selling or offering for sale any food, goods or services, shall be prohibited from operating in
commercial zoning districts known as C1 Neighborhood Commercial, C2 Central Commercial and C3
Shopping Center Commercial. No person shall place, maintain conduct, park or allow to stand or remain
any mobile vending facility within the city limits without first obtaining a written mobile vending permit to do
so, as well as any required identity permits under Article I of this chapter, from the chief of police. No
mobile vending facility shall display any sign, flag, banner, whether attached or on a separate structure,
except such signs as may be painted thereon in compliance with the city zoning ordinance.
The following uses shall not be considered as mobile vending facilities, and are thus not required to
obtain a mobile vending permit hereunder:
(1) Vehicles or trucks used for catering or vending prepared foodstuffs and located upon private property
at the invitation of the property owner, solely for the use of the owner or said owner’s tenants or
employees and not for the use of the general public.
(2) Any nonmotorized pushcart or stand selling food on a paved private sidewalk (not a parking lot) in a
commercial zone, provided that permanent restroom facilities (both men’s and women’s) are located on
the same parcel of land, are open for public use for all hours that the pushcart or stand is open, and that
the owner or operator of the pushcart or stand has written permission from the owner of the restrooms for
his customers to use them. Such permission shall be produced and shown on the demand of any person
solicited or of any police officer or official of the city.
(3) Temporary fireworks stands, pumpkin patches, Christmas tree lots, or such other seasonal temporary
vendors as may be defined by the chief of police. No such vendor shall commence operation more than
thirty (30) days in advance of the date of the applicable seasonal holiday.
(4) Temporary vending facilities owned and operated by a nonprofit or charitable organization and
conducting sales for an event or occasion not to exceed three (3) consecutive days within any six-month
time period. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.14 Permit procedure.
(a) Each application for a mobile vending permit shall be on a form provided by the chief of police, shall
be accompanied by an application fee established by the city council, shall be signed by the applicant,
and shall include the following:
11.2
p. 117 of 130
(1) The names and addresses of each person who will occupy or use the mobile vending facility for
purposes of exercising said permit;
(2) A certificate of insurance, stating the insurer’s name, policy terms, and principal amounts, not
less than a combined single limit, established annually by the city council, of a policy of insurance
against public liability, bodily injury, and property damage arising from the permitted activity. Each
such policy shall be amendable only upon thirty (30) days’ advance notice to the city and shall
name the city as an additional insured; and
(3) Such additional information as may be required by the city administrator.
(b) The chief of police shall grant a mobile vending permit, based upon the information contained in the
application, public records, and the recommendations of departmental staff, if he concludes that the
granting of such a permit would be in compliance with all of the provisions of this chapter and the intent of
this article, and it appears that no undue traffic safety, litter, parking, or other health and safety
consequences would result from exercise thereof. Any such permit may be suspended, modified, or
revoked by the chief of police when he finds a violation of or noncompliance with the terms of such
permit, or with other applicable laws or regulations. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.15 Prohibited locations; prohibition against loitering.
No person required to obtain a mobile vending permit hereunder shall place, park or allow to stand the
portable container, pushcart, stand, vehicle or wagon used for displaying, selling or offering for sale any
food, goods or services in any of the following places within the city.
(1) Upon private property, except with the written permission of the owner of the property. Such
permission shall be produced and shown on the demand of any person solicited or of any police officer or
official of the city.
(2) In or upon any street within three hundred (300) feet of the nearest property line of any elementary or
junior high school property.
Regardless of whether on public or private property, no person required to obtain a mobile vending permit
hereunder shall place, park or allow to stand the portable container, pushcart, stand, vehicle or wagon at
any one place except at the request of a bona fide purchaser for a reasonable period of time, not to
exceed ten (10) minutes, provided that when such person thereafter moves any such portable container,
pushcart, stand, vehicle or wagon, it shall be moved a minimum distance of one hundred (100) feet
before again being stopped. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
11.2
p. 118 of 130
ARTICLE III. CHARITABLE SOLICITATION
16A.16 Solicitation of charitable, religious or educational funds or other property;
permit requirements.
It shall be unlawful for any person or organization to solicit within the city for a contribution of funds,
money or other property to be used or expended for any charitable, religious or educational purpose or
object without the person or the organization on whose behalf the person is soliciting first obtaining a
written solicitation permit so to do from the chief of police. In addition, any individual solicitors who solicit
door to door at any businesses or residences shall first obtain an identity permit pursuant to Article I of
this chapter, except for persons having a permanent place of residence in the city who are soliciting for
funds, money or other property or offering for sale incidental merchandise, such as candy, cookies,
magazines and the like, for a charitable, religious or educational purpose and whose organization has
obtained the solicitation permit from the chief of police described above. Notwithstanding any other
provisions of section 16A.8 of Article I, the chief of police shall not have the discretion to deny an identity
permit to any individual solicitor for charitable, religious or educational purpose if such individual has
provided all required information and has paid the applicable fee.
Before the chief of police shall issue a solicitation permit, the person or organization applying therefor
shall file a written statement setting forth the following information:
(1) The object and purpose for which it is desired to solicit funds or other property.
(2) Who shall have charge and control of such funds or property.
(3) If such funds or property are solicited for permanent corporations, organizations or institutions, where
such organizations or institutions are located, and a copy of the organization’s federal tax exemption
certificate, or other proof of bona fide charitable status.
In case of doubt as to the responsibility of any person seeking a permit to solicit for such funds or
property, the permit may be denied subject to the provisions of section 16A.18.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to make it mandatory for the chief of police to grant the permit in
this section where the public peace or safety might be endangered in so doing. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-
97)
ARTICLE IV. REVOCATION AND SUSPENSION
16A.17 Revocation and suspension of license and permits.
11.2
p. 119 of 130
In the event that the chief of police of the city has reasonable cause to believe and does believe that any
licensee or holder of any permit issued under this chapter is violating any provisions of this chapter, of
any permit issued under this chapter, or of any other law or ordinance relating to the business of the
licensee, he shall have the power to and shall be authorized to suspend or revoke such license and all
identity permits so issued, as well as any mobile vending permit. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
16A.18 Administrative hearings and appeals.
In the event that any applicant desires to appeal from any order, denial of exemption, order of
suspension, or any other ruling of the license collector, the chief of police, or any other officer of the city
made under the provisions of this chapter, such applicant or any other person aggrieved thereby shall file
written notice of such appeal with the city clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the date of such action.
The appeal shall be resolved pursuant to the city’s adopted municipal administrative hearing policy, and a
final decision rendered pursuant thereto shall be final. (Ord. No. 97-10, § I, 11-5-97)
ARTICLE V. LIMITS ON SOLICITATION
16A.19.1 Definitions.
Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, whenever used in this article, the following terms shall
respectively be deemed to mean:
“Aggressive manner” means any of the following:
(1) Approaching or speaking to a person, or following a person before, during or after soliciting,
asking or begging, if that conduct is intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear bodily
harm to oneself or to another, damage to or loss of property, or otherwise be intimidated into giving
money or other thing of value;
(2) Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person or an occupied vehicle
without that person’s consent in the course of soliciting, asking or begging;
(3) Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by
any means, including but not limited to intentionally causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take
evasive action to avoid physical contact;
(4) Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited either before, during, or after,
soliciting, asking or begging;
11.2
p. 120 of 130
(5) Persisting in closely following or approaching a person, after the person solicited has informed
the solicitor by words or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited or does not want to
give money or any other thing of value to the solicitor; or
(6) Using profane, offensive or abusive language which is inherently likely to provoke an immediate
violent reaction, either before, during, or after solicitation.
“Automated teller machine (ATM)” means any electronic information processing device which accepts or
dispenses cash in connection with a credit, deposit or convenience account.
“Automated teller machine facility” means the area comprised of one (1) or more automated teller
machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after regular banking
hours.
“Bank” means any member bank of the Federal Reserve System and any bank, banking association, trust
company, savings bank or other banking institution organized or operated under the laws of the United
States, and any bank the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
“Check-cashing business” means any person duly licensed as a check seller, bill payer or prorater
pursuant to Division 3 of the California Financial Code, commencing with Section 12000.
“Credit union” means any federal credit union and any state-chartered credit union the accounts of which
are insured by the Administrator of the National Credit Union Administration.
“Public place” means a place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access and
includes but is not limited to any street, highway, sidewalk, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility,
school, place of amusement, park, playground and any doorway, entrance, hallway, lobby and other
portion of any business establishment, apartment house or hotel not constituting a room or apartment
designed for actual residence.
“Public transportation vehicle” means any vehicle owned by the city or any other public entity, or
contracted for use by the city, and used for the provision of public transportation services.
“Restaurant” means any business establishment which engages in the business of serving food to
customers for immediate consumption, including “fast food” restaurants and traditional “sit-down”
restaurants.
11.2
p. 121 of 130
“Savings and loan association” means any federal savings and loan association and any “insured
institution” as defined in Section 401 of the National Housing Act, as amended, and any federal credit
union as defined in Section 2 of the Federal Credit Union Act.
“Solicit, ask or beg” means the use of the spoken, written or printed word or use of bodily gestures, signs
or other means for the purpose of obtaining an immediate donation of money or other thing of value or for
the purpose of selling or trading goods or services. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-19-10)
16A.19.2 Aggressive solicitation prohibited.
No person shall solicit, ask or beg in an aggressive manner in any public place. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-
19-10)
16A.19.3 Solicitation at specified locations prohibited.
(a) Banks and ATMs. No person shall solicit, ask or beg within twenty-five (25) feet of any entrance or exit
of any bank, savings and loan association, credit union or check-cashing business during its business
hours or within twenty-five (25) feet of any automated teller machine during the time it is available for
customers’ use; provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an
automated teller machine facility, such distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the
automated teller machine facility.
(1) Exemption. The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to any unenclosed
automated teller machine located within any building, structure or space whose primary purpose or
function is unrelated to banking activities, including but not limited to supermarkets and school
buildings; provided, that such automated teller machine shall be available for use only during the
regular hours of operation of the building, structure or space in which such machine is located.
(b) Motor Vehicles and Parking Lots.
(1) Motor Vehicles.
a. No person shall approach an operator or occupant of a motor vehicle for the purpose of
soliciting, asking or begging while such vehicle is being operated in a lane of traffic on a public
street or public right-of-way, in a public parking lot, or in an entrance or exit to a public parking
lot, whether the motor vehicle is moving or not, and whether or not the person is being
solicited by the driver of the vehicle.
11.2
p. 122 of 130
b. No person shall solicit, ask or beg from any traffic median within any public street or public
right-of-way.
c. No person shall solicit, ask, or beg any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle that is being
operated in a lane of traffic on a public street or public right-of-way, whether the motor vehicle
is moving or not, and whether or not the person is being solicited by the driver of the vehicle,
where the motor vehicle is located within one hundred (100) feet of any intersection controlled
by an official traffic signal as defined in Vehicle Code Section 21450, or within fifty (50) feet of
any entrance or exit to a parking lot of any business establishment located within a
commercial district of the city of Gilroy. Persons may otherwise solicit, ask or beg by conduct
that includes but is not limited to the holding of signs on public sidewalks and other public
places at locations that are more than one hundred (100) feet from any intersection controlled
by an official traffic signal and more than fifty (50) feet from any entrance or exit to a parking
lot of any business establishment located within a commercial district.
(2) Parking Lots. No person shall solicit, ask or beg in any public parking lot or structure any time
after dark. “After dark” means any time from one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before
sunrise.
(3) Exemptions. Section 16A.19.2 and this section shall not apply to any of the following:
a. Solicitations related to business which is being conducted on the subject premises by the
owner or lawful tenants;
b. Solicitations related to the lawful towing of a vehicle;
c. Solicitations related to emergency repairs requested by the operator or other occupant of a
vehicle;
d. Solicitations of emergency vehicles; and
e. Hailing a taxicab or public transportation vehicle.
(c) Public Transportation Vehicles and Stops. Other than a person hailing a public transportation vehicle,
no person shall solicit, ask or beg within twenty-five (25) feet of any public transportation vehicle stop,
facility or area designated for the pick-up of passengers.
(d) Restaurants. Any person who solicits, asks, or begs in any outdoor or indoor dining area of a
restaurant or other establishment serving food for immediate consumption is guilty of a violation of this
11.2
p. 123 of 130
section if he or she remains there after being asked to leave by: the owner, manager or supervisor of the
restaurant or other food establishment; the agent of the owner, manager or supervisor of the restaurant;
or a member of a security force employed by the restaurant or by a peace officer as defined in
Chapter 4.5 of Title 3 of the California Penal Code (commencing with Penal Code, 830), acting at the
request of any of the persons specified in this subsection.
(e) Written Material. This Article V shall not prohibit persons from soliciting, asking, or begging, in a
nonaggressive manner, with the use of signs, leaflets or other written material at locations or in a manner
that is not otherwise prohibited by sections 16A.19.2 and this section. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-19-10)
16A.19.4 Violation – Penalty.
Any violation of the provisions of this chapter is punishable in accordance with section 1.7 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-19-10)
16A.19.5 Other regulations.
Nothing in this Article V is intended to supersede or conflict with any requirement or limitation contained in
Articles I through IV of this chapter. (Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-19-10)
16A.19.6 Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Article V is for any reason
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Article V. The city council hereby declares that it would have
passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2010-10, establishing this Article V, and each and all provisions
thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more provisions may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
(Ord. No. 2010-10, § 1, 7-19-10)
11.2
p. 124 of 130
Page 1 of 4
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title:Formation of the Downtown Committee
Meeting Date:April 17, 2023
From:Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator
Department:Administration
Submitted By:Bryce Atkins, Assistant to the City Administrator
Prepared By:Bryce Atkins, Assistant to the City Administrator
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS Promote Economic Development Activities
RECOMMENDATION
Council approve a resolution forming the Downtown Committee.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City’s committees and commissions (”advisory bodies”) are authorized under the
City Charter generally, with a few commissions identified and authorized specifically
within the Charter. The City Council has the authority to create additional advisory
bodies as it so directs. The general provisions contained in the City Charter apply to
newly formed advisory bodies. The Council previously provided direction to form a
Downtown Committee and charged it with dedicating the first year take up the
recommendations that the ad hoc Downtown Committee, which ended its term in
October of 2022, had brought before the City Council for adoption.
BACKGROUND
At the November 1, 2021 City Council meeting, the City Council approved the formation
of an ad hoc committee for Gourmet Alley, which transitioned in focus into an ad hoc
committee for Downtown (Committee). Council Members Armendariz, Marques, and
Tovar volunteered to join the Committee. Council Member Tovar was appointed by the
Committee as Chair, and Council Member Marques as Vice-Chair. The Committee
began identifying challenges and opportunities to spur revitalization throughout the
entire downtown. As a result of early discussions, the Committee developed four policy
11.3
p. 125 of 130
Formation of the Downtown Committee
City of Gilroy City Council Page 2 of 4 April 17, 2023
recommendations that were presented and approved by the full City Council on July 5,
2022.
Subsequently, the Committee presented five additional recommendations approved at
the regular City Council meeting on October 17, 2022. The attached table shows all
nine recommendations and the latest update on those items.
At the January 9, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting, there was a future agenda item
authorized to discuss the formation of a standing downtown committee.
The item was heard at the February 6, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting. The Council
provided direction to pursue all three options that were discussed in as part of the
agenda item recommendation. The action taken by Council directed staff to commence
the following:
1. Continue providing reports to Council to receive information concerning
downtown-related projects and issues.
2. Form a City Council Downtown Committee (subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act).
3. Have the topic discussed at the March 13, 2023 City Council Goal Setting/Priority
workshop.
Staff enhanced the reporting description based on the feedback from the first strategic
planning workshop and will continue providing updates per direction item #1. Direction
item #3 was accomplished by discussing the Downtown Committee at the City Council
Goal Setting/Priority workshop. At that meeting, a discussion was held and identified the
following:
•The Downtown Committee (Committee) would be initially comprised of Mayor
Blankley and four volunteering Council Members, Council Members Armendariz,
Cline, Marques, and Tovar (in alphabetical order).
•The Committee would meet between quarterly and monthly as may be needed
and determined by the Committee.
•The first year of the Committee’s work would be the remaining recommendations
from the earlier ad hoc Downtown Committee, as approved by the City Council.
The second year would be determined towards the end of the first year.
Direction item #2, formation of the Committee, is the resolution which is attached, and
discussed in the Analysis section below.
ANALYSIS
The proposed resolution will establish the Committee and establish a structure based
on the direction issued by Council, as understood by staff. These include the following:
1. Membership – The membership shall consist of the Mayor and the four
Councilmembers identified earlier in this report. The City Council and the
Committee may appoint additional, non-voting members to the Committee which
may include business owners, property owners, or residents living in the
downtown area.
11.3
p. 126 of 130
Formation of the Downtown Committee
City of Gilroy City Council Page 3 of 4 April 17, 2023
2. Term – The resolution establishes a term of two years from formation. Should
Council determine that the Committee is needed longer, then the Council may
amend the term. Otherwise, the Committee will end automatically.
3. Powers and Scope – The Committee will be advisory in nature, similar to the
Downtown Ad Hoc Committee. Any work as may be identified and/or approved
by the Committee in its current term would be performed by and amongst the
members of the Committee and may not engage staff resources without approval
by the City Council. The Committee has similar duties and powers as other
committees, but with the limitation in the first year to focus on the
recommendations of the ad hoc Downtown Committee, as determined by the City
Council discussion in February.
4. Meetings – The regular meetings are proposed to occur quarterly. Should the
Committee determine that special meetings are needed, special meetings may
be called. The City Council may also provide direction to alter the meeting
frequency.
Council Decision Points
Staff is asking Council to determine for the proposed Committee the following decision
points, with some options and points of consideration listed below each decision point:
(a) Determination on the voting membership of the Committee
•Number of Council Members to be appointed and whom
(b) How to appoint non-voting members
•How many non-voting members should be appointed?
•Determined by Council or allow each appointed Council Member to select
their own non-voting member?
(c) Selection of the Committee’s Chair and Vice-Chair
•Who does Council wish to preside over this Committee?
(d) Frequency and length of the Committee meetings
•Should the Committee meet quarterly, monthly, or on another schedule?
•With the number of interested Council Members, should this Committee meet
at the outset of a regular Council meeting?
(e) Date and time of the first meeting to be held
•Should the meetings begin in May?
•If coordinated with City Council meetings, should it be the first meeting of
each month at 6 PM, with regular Council Meetings following, or a different
type of structure?
Based on the decisions by the City Council, the attached resolution may require
amendment as part of the action to adopt.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may accept, modify, or reject the proposed resolution.
11.3
p. 127 of 130
Formation of the Downtown Committee
City of Gilroy City Council Page 4 of 4 April 17, 2023
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
With the restrictions to staff time and support as directed by the action to form the
Committee, there are no anticipated costs aside from some staff time for preparing
agendas, minutes, and room set-up for the Downtown Committee meetings.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This item has been included on the agendas for and discussed at the meetings of the
February 6, 2023 City Council Regular Meeting, March 13, 2023 City Council Goal
Setting and Priority Workshop, and tonight’s meeting agenda. Council’s action tonight
will be posted in the e-newsletter, and future actions and updates from the Committee
will be shared under the guidance of the City’s Social Media Policy.
NEXT STEPS
With approval of the resolution, City staff will poll the membership of the new Downtown
Committee for its first meeting.
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution forming the Downtown Committee.
11.3
p. 128 of 130
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GILROY ESTABLISHING A DOWNTOWN COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gilroy wishes to create an Advisory
Committee of members from the City Council and stakeholders in downtown Gilroy to
provide recommendations and input into the completion of the adopted downtown
recommendations of the City Council in the first year, and other downtown related
activities in the second year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy
does hereby establish the Downtown Committee (Committee), with the duties, powers
and structure as follows:
Membership. The Committee shall consist of a total of five Council Members as
appointed by the City Council. The City Council and Committee may appoint additional,
non-voting members from the community, businesses, or property owners from downtown
Gilroy.
Term. The Committee shall have a term of two years from the formation. Upon reaching
two years, the Committee shall automatically close unless the term is otherwise amended
by the City Council.
Meetings. The Committee may hold meetings once per quarter, on a schedule of its
selection. The Committee may hold special meetings on an as-needed basis at the
determination of the Committee or as otherwise determined by the City Council from time
to time.
Powers and Scope. The Committee will have the duty to:
(a) Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and City
Administrator in matters pertaining to downtown Gilroy, with a
limiting focus on the existing downtown recommendations – as
adopted by the City Council in October 2022 – during the first
year of the Committee’s existence, and then other downtown
Gilroy subject matters during the second year, subject to approval
of the second year workplan by the City Council;
(b) Identify problems and, with Council approval, study such
problems, activities and concerns regarding the downtown, hold
forums on such problems, and recommend programs, policies
and procedures to the City Administrator and City Council which
the Committee finds necessary and/or desirable;
(c) No less than annually report to the City Council on the goals and
objectives of the Committee’s work; and,
(d) Perform such other duties related to downtown Gilroy as may be
directed by the City Council.
11.3
p. 129 of 130
Resolution No. 2023-XX
Establishing Downtown Committee
City Council Regular Meeting | April 17, 2023
5
0
2
(e) Work of the Committee shall be performed by the members of the
Committee. The City Council is authorizing staff time just to
perform administrative functions to support the Committee,
limited to agenda preparation and posting, meeting attendance,
and meeting minutes preparation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April 2023 by the following vote:
AYES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:COUNCIL MEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Marie Blankley, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Thai Nam Pham, City Clerk
11.3
p. 130 of 130