Resolution 344
~OLUTI01T NO. ~4i
RSSOLUTIOI" OF THE Cm,7Irm~ COUl~CIL 01;' T?:E CITY OFUILROY DDECTTI:rG THE
SALE OF CE:rtTAIK :ctEAL PROPEHTY n~ THE crTY OF GILROY BELONGJ:NGTD~ SAID
CITY OF GILROY.
vVHEREAS; the City of Gilroy is the owner of the following described
premises located in the ;said City of Gilroy, to-wit:
Beginning at a point in the Southerly line
of Sixth Street that is distant thereon
Easterly 120.00 feet from the point of -,
intersection of said Southerly line of
Sixth Street with the Easterly line of
Monterey street;thence along said South-
erly line of Sixth Street Easterly 73.00
feet to the point of intersection thereof
with the Westerly line of an Alley as said
Alley is shown upon the Map hereinafter re-
ferred to;thence along the Westerly line of
said Alley Southerly 90.71 feet to the North-
easterly corner of that certain parcel of
land conveYl::d by l:-Iarriet t Slli s to G.A.
Chappell,by Deen recoraed .May 12,1905 in Book
295: of Deeds,page 232,Santa Clara County Records; ~
thence Westerly along the lTorthwesterly line of
lands so conveyed to Chappell, said line also
being the Southerly line of Lot 1 Black 1 South)
Range 1 East as shoVJn upon the Map hereinafter
referred to 50.00 feet to the Southwesterly
co rner of said Lot 1; thence Northwestlerly along
the Westerly line of said Lot 1 3 feet 4 inches
thence along the lJorthwesterly line of said
lands so conveyed to Chappell Westerly 23.00
feet more or less to the Southwesterly corner
of t hat certain parcel of land conveyed by Louis /
S.Osbourne to Gustav IT.Brodersen and Lillian O.
Bro(:lersen,his wife, by Deed recorded May 16,1944
in Book 1204 of Official Records,pRge 203,Santa
Clara County Hecords;thence Northerly along the
Easterly line of lands so conveyed to Brodersen
86.07 feet more or less to the point of begin-
ning,being Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2 in
Block 1 South, Hange 1 East, as shovvn on I:lap No.
6 accompanying report of the Commissioners in
Henry Miller, et al ,.Plaintiff s vs .Lassey Thomas
et al,Defendants,in the Superior Court of the
State of California,in and for the County of
Santa Clara, Case No'. 5536; and
'VVB:r<':HEitS,the said property is not devoted to a public use and
has never been so devoted but has been used as a storage yard for
vehicles,equipment ~1drersonal property belonging to said Ci~r;and
ViII.E:HEAS, the said City has other premises which can be used Glore
advantageously for the said storage of said vehicles, equipment, and
f6 rsonal property, and the premi se shere inbefore described are not
necessary to the said City,and it will be i.n the public interest
to .sell the same.
NON ,THEa:GF'OHE,BE IT fL2.:SCLVED: .
That the said real proJ."'erty hereinbefore described be sold and
that Doti ce of the sale of said real property invi ti ng bids tllerefor
be c;iven by the City Clerk by publication thereof,at least once a
iveek for two weeks in the GILHOY EVS]TnTG DISPATCH, said publication
to be at seven-day intervals, and the time on or after which the said
sale will be made as stated in the notice to be at least fifteen. (15)
days froul and after the firct 1/u.b1ication of the notice, the sale to
be subject to tIle ri8ht of the said City to retain possession and
use of the propert.y for a period not in excess of 120 days from and
after the execution of the deed of conveyance,without payment of
rent. Each bid shall be accompanied by a deposit of at least 'ten per
cent (10%) of the amolmt of bid. Title insurance and revenue stamns
are to be furnished at the expense of the purchaser. ..
ADOPTSD and P/\SSED the 21st day of Tt:arch ,1955, by the follovving
vote:
i\TIS: COUTIC illnen I'at e, Gal.1 0, Kenrlsdy, li.u sh ,Petersen, ~3a11c}1e z
.NOES: Councilmen l;one
An:.bT!~I~T : COllllcilme.D. lTone \\
AttesQ, .
-City: ~le~-
/t ("7' iff h
(/ ., rlavo
"