Resolution 596
RESOLUTION NO. 596
RESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
TO CITY OF GILROY OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY DES-
CRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED " FIRST SOUTHERN
ADDITION (1-61) TO THE CITY OF GILROY", AND
GIVING NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF
PROTESTS THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY:
1. That, pursuant to the provisions of the Annexation of
Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939, a petition signed by owners
of all of the land in the hereinafter described territory, by
area and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assess-
ment roll of the County of Santa Clara, was filed with the Council
of the City of Gilroy on January 3, 1961, requesting annexation
of the hereinafter described territory to said City.
2. That the territory which the petitioners request be
annexed to the City of Gilroy and which said City and its Council
propose to annex, is contiguous to the present Southerly City
limits of said city, is situate in the County of Santa Clara,
State of California, is hereby designated "FIRST SOUTHERN
ADDITION (1=61) TO THE CITY OF GILROY," and is descri bed as
follows:
All that certain real property situate in the County of
Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
BEGINNING at the point of intersection cr the center line
of Tenth Street with the center line of Rosanna Street,
running thence Southeasterly along the Southeasterly pro-
longation of said center line of Rosanna Street, 64 feet,
more or less, to the point of intersection thereof with
the Southeasterly City Limits line of the City of Gilroy
and the true point of beginning of the tract to be
described, said true point of beginning being on the
Northeasterly line of that certain 41.722 acre tract of
land described in the Deed from C. N. Smith to Frank
Filice, et ux, dated February 15, 1952, recorded February
15, 1952 in Book 2366 of Official Records, page 302, Santa
Clara County Records; thence from said true point of
beginning Southeasterly along the said Northeasterly line
to the Southeasterly corner thereof in the Southerly line
of Ranch Lot 16, as shown upon Map No. 7 accompanying The
Final Report of the Referees in the Partition Action of
Henry Miller, et aI, vs. Massey Thomas, et al in the
Superior Court of the State of California, in and for
= 1 -
-~-;- 9 Co
the County of Santa Clara, Case No. 5536: thence Easterly
along said last named Southerly line to the point of
intersection thereof with the Southwesterly line of
State Highway U. S. 101, as said Southwesterly line
existed in 1960: thence Northwesterly along said South-
westerly line of State Highway U. S. 101 to the point of
intersection thereof with said Southeasterly City Limits
line: thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly City
Limits line to the true point of beginning.
3. That at the time of filing said petition said territory
proposed to be annexed contained and still contains less than
twelve (12) registered voters and is uninhabited territory
as defined in th~ Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939.
4. That said petition contains the written consent of all
the petitioners to the annexation
5. That the County Boundary Commission of Santa Clara
County, California, did in session duly assembled on January
3, 1961, consider the proposed annexation boundaries of said
"FIRST SOUTHERN ADDITION (1-61) TO THE CITY OF GILROY, II as
described, and as submitted to said Commission by the proponents
of said annexation.
6. That Monday, the 6th day of February, 1961, at the
hour of 8:00 O'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall in the City of Gilroy, County of Santa Clara, California,
is hereby fixed as the time and place when and where any person
owning real property within the uninhabited territory above de=
scribed and proposed to be annexed to the City of Gilroy, and
having any objections to the proposed annexation, may appear
before the Council of the City of Gilroy and show cause why such
uninhabited territory should not be so annexed to the City of
Gilroy. The protest must be in writing, may be filed at any
time before the hour set for hearing objections to the proposed
annexation, and shall state the name or names of the owner or
owners of property affected and the description and area of
such property, in general terms.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Gilroy is hereby authorized
and directed to cause a copy of this resolution to be published
at least twice, but not oftener than once a week, in The Gilroy
= 2 -
Evening Dispatch, a newspaper of general circulation published
in said City of Gilroy, the city to which it is proposed to
annex the aforesaid territory, in the County of Santa, Clara,
California, the county in which is located the territory proposed
to be annexed to the City of Gilroy, said publication to be
complete at least t~enty (20) days prior to the date set for
hearing.
8. The City Clerk is directed to cause written notice to
be given to such other persons as may be legally entitled thereto,
in the manner required by law.
ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 1961, by the following
vote:
AYES: Goodrich,Jordan,Pate,Petersen,Wentworth, and Sanchez.
NOES: None
ABSENT:Rush
)
,.' ..----..
,--' ! ~ JC.t 7t ~Kc_' le- /ei_ '-1/1/1_<'.. ./
City Clerk J
Signed and approved this 3rd day of January, 1961.
,.'/i- "
/./ /
~:::'':, ~_/~':.:./ ~:/i(" .~~';.: ij ~/ //
Mayor/of the City of Gilroy
~ 3 -
I, SUSANNE E. PAYNE
City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that
the attached Resolution No. 596 is an original
resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of
Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the
3rd day of January , 19....Ql, at uhich
meeting a quorum was present.
r ,
IN HITNr,SS lmEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Gilroy, this
4th
day of