Resolution 1992-14
~~..
~- . ",,-'"
.
e
--..-..., '!
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GILROY ESTABLISHING A PROJECT RATING SCALE
FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO
SECTION 50.65 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, section 50.65 of the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Gilroy authorizes the City Council to adopt from time to
time by resolution a Project Rating Scale for use in the
competitive evaluation and ranking of projects under the
Residential Development Ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Residential
Development Ordinance Rating Scale consisting of two pages,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this
reference, should be and hereby is adopted by the city Council
pursuant to Zoning Ordinance section 50.65.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of March, 1992 by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: GILROY, HALE, KLOECKER, NELSON,
ROWLISON, VALDEZ and GAGE.
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
~j,~
Mayor
;;i.TT ST:
2.UJ~ td~'J.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 92 - 14
-].-
$
;
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
RATING SCALE
Revised 3-2-92 Res. #92-14
The city Council shall examine each proposed development and shall rate each
development, in relation to the other projects proposed, by the assignment of
no more than the maximum number of points allowable on each of the following
categories:
I. LOCATIONAL FACTORS (43 points maximum - 28%)
A. City Boundaries
Proximity of the proposed development to existing urban
development within the incorporated City limits. (0-13 points)
B. Public Facilities and utilities
Proximity of the proposed development to existing park and city
facilities, police service areas and fire stations; to existing
development served by City streets, water and sewer lines; and to
telephone, gas and electric lines. (0-15 points)
C. Infilling
Location of the proposed development to provide infill
development in existing neighborhoods.
(0-10 points)
D. Safety Hazards
Location of the proposed development on land free from
safety hazards such as flooding, or soil subsidence,
seismic shaking or slope instability.
(0- 5 points)
II. HOUSING MIX
(36 points maximum - 24%)
A.
Housing Type Variety
provision of housing unit types which would add to
mix of housing types, or provide other residential
alternatives not generally available at present.
the city-wide
housing
(0-11 points)
B.
Density Type
provision of
development.
apartments. )
Variety
a variety of density
(e.g. single family
types within the proposed
lots, duplexes, and
(0-10 points)
C. Housing Cost and Price Reduction Techniques
provision of housing units made affordable to persons in low and
moderate income brackets through reduced construction costs and
selling prices, specially-funded programs or innovative pricing and
financing arrangements.
(0-15 points)
,
~
.
.
.
ROO Rating Scale
(3/2/92)
Page 2
III. DESIGN
(40 points maximum - 26%)
A. Preserving Site Features
Conformance of the Site Design to the natural
topography, maximizing open spaces and preserving
resources such as existing housing units, water recharge
areas, and prime agricultural lands, etc. (0-12 points)
B. Circulation
Efficient design of the proposed circulation to link
existing and planned transportation systems including
streets, bike routes, walkways and trails. (0-15 points)
c. Resource Conservation (including energy and water)
Incorporation of site and Architectural design features which
will maximize the potential for energy conservation, such as
solar orientation, design and landscaping. (0-5 points)
D. Site Design Coordination
Coordination of the proposed development site design,
circulation and other public facilities with adjacent
properties and projects.
(0-8 points)
IV. COMMUNITY BENEFIT FACTORS
(34 points maximum - 22%)
A.
Cultural and Recreational Benefits
provision of new facilities, such as theaters, cultural
and community recreation centers, or other improvements
cultural or community benefit, on the site.
centers
for
(0-5 points)
B. Preservation of Cultural and Historic Features
Preservation of historic sites or structures, or culturally or
archaeologically significant sites, such as prehistoric art or
artifacts, on the site. (0-5 points)
C. School Facility Benefits
Provision of land and/or buildings on the site for school
facilities beyond what is required by law. (0-6 points)
D. Capital Improvement Benefits
provision of public works or capital improvements beyond what is
normally required which will serve the site as public benefits such
as developed public parks and waterways, bikeways, bridges,
public access roads, etc. (0-13 points)
E. Preservation and Dedication of Open Space
provision of land to be kept in permanent open space as a
recreational or aesthetic benefit for the community. (0-5 points)
TOTAL 153 POINTS
... - - ..
.
.
.
.
I, SUSANNE E. STEINMETZ, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do
hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 92-14 is an original
resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the 2nd day of March, 19~,
at which meeting a quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this 14th day of
19 92.
~~~;~~
October
(Seal)