Resolution 1993-05
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 93- 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GILROY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND REVISING
RATES FOR A CITYWIDE TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ON ALL
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY OF GILROY
WHEREAS, on November 2, 1992 the city Council adopted
Ordinance No. 92-17 establishing a citywide traffic impact fee on
development projects, as the ordinance defines that term, to
finance certain street and highway improvements; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 92-71 authorizes the City Council
to revise the rates for the fee from time to time by resolution;
and
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 6600l
requires that certain findings be made upon the imposition of such
fees; and
WHEREAS, the city Council has duly received, reviewed,
and considered documents entitled "Citywide Traffic Impact Fee
Study" (December 1991) ("Study") and "citywide Transportation Study
Technical Report" (January 1992) ("Report"), prepared by TJKM
Transportation Consultants, and additional studies prepared by City
staff entitled "Alternatives to Existing Traffic Impact Fee"
(January 1993) and "Additional Alternatives to Traffic Impact Fee"
(January 1993) (collectively, "Alternatives"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public
hearing on this resolution on February 16, 1993, and this resolu-
tion, the Study, the Report, and the Alternatives were available
to the public for at least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, a Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) analyzing the improvements to be build by the traffic impact
fee were prepared under the City's direction and control, and the
Final EIR was duly certified, and a mitigation monitoring program
adopted, by the city Council on August 3, 1992, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 5
-1-
.
.
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the rates
adopted herein are for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital
projects necessary to maintain service within the city's planning
area, and therefore the adoption of these rates is exempt from cEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section l5273(a)(4); and
WHEREAS, the city Council has considered the effect of
the following fee rates with respect to the housing needs of the
region;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT
A. The initial rates for the citywide traffic impact
fee on development projects shall be as follows:
1. Single family residential: $2727 per dwelling
unit;
2. High-density residential: $2209 per dwelling
unit;
3. Low-traffic commercial: $3.00 per gross square
foot;
4.
High-traffic commercial:
square foot;
$6.083 per gross
5. General Industrial: $1.175 per gross square
foot; and
6. Warehouse Industrial: $0.866 per gross square
foot.
B. Based upon facts in the record of the public hearing
and in the Study Report, and Alternatives, the city council hereby
finds that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount
of the fees, as set forth above, and the cost of the improvements
attributable to the development projects on which the fee is
imposed, in that:
1. A direct relationship exists between the number
of dwelling units of residential development projects and the
number of automobile trips generated by them;
2. A direct relationship exists between the square
footage of non-residential development projects in the above
categories and the number of automobile trips generated by them;
and
RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 5
-2-
.
.
3. The cost estimates for the improvements
currently planned (as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto) and the
quantity estimates for new development in each fee rate category
are reasonable, and the fees expected to be generated by develop-
ment projects are therefore not expected to exceed the total costs
of the improvements.
C. The City Council further finds that it has duly
taken all actions required by CEQA.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February, 1993 by
the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:GILROY, HALE, ROWLISON and GAGE.
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:KLOECKER, NELSON and VALDEZ.
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Don Gage,
Susanne
RESOLUTION NO. 93 - 5
-3-
CCST OF IMPGOVEMENTS WlTHCliT RIW
Rrw COSTS (11.10, J.I~1)
GRANO rOTAllNCLUOINQ RJw
W-4.. 1,18. l.5J
. TAlIUiVl.. .
COSTS 01' GTRiIiT 1I.CPROVElolEHTS TO BE FUNOeo
BY TRAFFiC ''''PACT Ai Ii
NO FtAJUlOAO G"AO~ SEPARATiON
njlll'~CP!'PT'k'1N J:Q:iI np-qC~fPTl("';lN l;.Q;il
~~'~on :'StJ8TCTAl. :2.147'.21$3 Roactway WkSen&r1g. ~ SUJJTOTA.L .:21.7'8A.,:24S
:J8O - Wren A..../Sonfts. 0'. $21.-46:1 - $.2.1,".~2
-411 - U.S. 101 N6 OM.lt~ Rd. =.O:U Santa T....... $13.~.080
-41~-U.S. 10' sa~ Ad. $77._ - \i1$Q $1.~,0S7<
-417. M<lmly AV4A.11_1oy Ad. $16.0<0 lA_IOY saog,4'"
~. Mon_ St1t.Av.tstey Ad. S6Q<.S88 Ten'" $l,071l2n
~. . CIlun:rz SUW.-., A..... f4J.432 s..v;." S8s.<,:).!Q
~ - CfIur<n SUManu,;I Or. S20.01~ O'Y $'.71$,<OB
441 .. w...., Aw./Mantem Cr. =,617 Wron $1,440.582
-4$7. Santo T...... IlIVllJMantatll Or. ~.:I02 Cl\Wd1 S2.J l'.~>a
561 . Chur<l1 Str.S1>ln St $11,443 Thomas Sl.802.253
oS7'3 - Mornoroy St/SIXl1l St $18~,Q90 Fa..,.~ S 1&l,2S<;
$23. VA 101 NBOttit".d1.." Pus $$J,gs2
~ - U.s. 101 58 0llIT""11l St $46.2.s:l N1wtnterchanogu.. SJJBTO~Al $18~.OOO
' S3G - cn.....ut St./Tamtl at $$~.:I02 Buana VC4ta ss.ooo,OOO
s.u . Mon""'Y sur 4n'" St $6Q2.M8 ~Q TQ(~ $9.500.000
65A . ClIurdl SlIT""," St s:lll.9O$
704 . u.s. 10, N8 ~tlll1ly H>>y $Z:.7:1 lmpcond Intwch_tlQ:" .. 8USTOT Al $1.000.000
Loa_Joy $3.000,000
Ov4tOtOaln.:o . SUaTOT AL $:l,~.224 T""., $<.000.000
SP ~t.tll'.r'\"o."f(':~"II'l:tnc"t'9
(No A~ Cto&sJnQa) T",ffle SIgnal.. SUBTOTAL ss'OOO.OOO
f'illy lnteBoaiOno $5.000,000
tl~ 101~O!"'I:jf'!(,..;
C<>hanaey $l.93<.e 12 alld~...$UBTCTA.L $7.980.480
Mou. $1.93<.612 T4'r1lt1-at Uva:I Park $2.412.000
1homuat~ 31.268.300
Roadway Ex1"'.{or\4 .. QUOTO.,. A L ~1:1,i7$,4P' '-'otde nonh at Thoma $130.llOo
T_ :2.2411,188 ~4 ..11"".,; GlL-=n SSU.200
Uvu PWI< - $337,250 CMoIwJt llOftb 01 SllCIh S118.&oo
-Road E.>.<'cl101 $4-'"0.1<0 For_( aouO'l: 01 to.C.P. S118,800
Wn>n $546.040 lO.OF, e"4lcl ~ 3118,800
,~ $1.300.1160 Woll>om ...~ 1256,500
-VIota 31.011.780 Chutcn nc:w-m ot F'"..-:e,t $:ZS6,SOQ
Mon_ $1.7:J.<,48Q C-on.an~ ~t 01 K4m $411:l.400
'Thoma. $1.T.l-4,-<&J C~-'ey Wtit 01 ChlJl"Cf1 S3;8.89O
Chutct'l S 113,6.32 Heonl\Q"y lIi...:t of W,~ 32S~.1:'O
ScJ~na Vis.u ~(WrfM'l ~7S,aao
S.-nca T9rg~ at O~y ~2.~oa
.:! '1 .::.~ '\':::.
::S~7.:84.l ~J
RESOLUTION NO.
SUMM.AA.~..xL.S
7na,,;2
93 - 5
EXHIBIT A
.. .
.
.
~ .. ..
I, SUSANNE E. STEINMETZ, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do
hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 93-5 is an original
resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the l6th day of February 1993
, at which meeting a quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this l8th day of February ,l993.
(Seal)