Resolution 1994-02
.
'1,
.
.
.If
o ~
RESOLUTION NO. 94-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GILROY GRANTING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S DECISION AND THEREBY UPHOLDING A
DECISION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR TO DENY AN
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CITY'S RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, Section 50.62(b) of the city of Gilroy Resi-
dential Development Ordinance ("RDO") provides for exemptions from
the development restrictions of that ordinance, one of which such
exemptions is for projects containing four or fewer single family
residential lots; and,
WHEREAS, Section 50.62(b) (1) provides that such exemp-
tions shall not apply to projects which, within any three year
period, are combined with other projects otherwise exempt, where
the parcels for the projects are contiguous and will result in
development of greater than four dwelling units; and,
WHEREAS, Albert Fortino applied for and obtained a lot
line adjustment approval for the purpose of creating three conti-
guous developable parcels; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Fortino subsequently applied for approval
to subdivide each of these three parcels into five new parcels,
such subdivision scheme as is indicated on the plan attached hereto
as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Fortino's proposal was such that, of the
five new parcels that would be created on each of the three parcels
created by the lot line adjustment, four of the new parcels would
be developed with single family residences (for a total of twelve
single family residences), the other left as a designated remainder
parcel and comprising an undeveloped separation between each group
of four parcels; and,
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 2
-1-
"
~
.
.
WHEREAS, the Planning Director of the city of Gilroy
determined that the remainder parcels that Mr. Fortino proposed be
located between each group of four new parcels did not extinguish
the contiguous character of the three original parcels, that Mr.
Fortino's proposal was in fact a proposal to subdivide three
contiguous parcels resulting in greater than four dwelling units,
thus disqualifying the proposal from an exemption under section
50.62(b) (1) of the RDO; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Fortino appealed the Planning Director's
determination to the Planning Commission and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at their duly noticed
regular meeting of November 4, 1993, voted to grant Mr. Fortino's
appeal; and,
WHEREAS, thereafter the Planning Commission's decision
was appealed to the city Council; and,
WHEREAS, this City Council has held a duly noticed public
hearing on the matter on December 20, 1993, at which hearing it
accepted and considered oral and written testimony and staff
reports.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
This City Council hereby grants the appeal of the
Planning Commission's decision and upholds the determination of the
Planning Director that the remainder parcels proposed to be located
between each group of four new parcels did not extinguish the
contiguous character of the three original parcels, that Mr.
Fortino's proposal is to subdivide three contiguous parcels
resulting in greater than four dwelling units and that the proposal
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 2
-2-
~"'-..
- .
'.
.
.
thus does not qualify for an exemption under section 50.62(b) (1)
of the RDO.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 1994 by the
following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: KLOECKER, ~10RALES, ROGERS, RO\{LISON,
VALDEZ and GILROY.
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: GAGE
ATTEST:
_ ,.AU4~ .
~ne E4 Steinmetz,
RESOLUTION NO. 94 - 2
-3-
.. ____.___..__._..___..__.______-_ OP'"._____. -~_._._-,._._.
.
I:.:D C\J
~ ;2:
1.01 .. 0 .
III II ..... .
,0 -
11- D Z ..
0 .
0: ..
11- U. - (!) ..
- .
1.01 ~ ~ en z
-
0: D 0: >- 0
III <( c:: N w ..
w vi 1.01
U p ..i u W W >
~ <( p <( 000 ;::: a:: e
0 0: ... ~ II Ii) 10 W :> i
p 0: <( ... r/) ..
... P III 0' c( u. rJ en ~ Z 0
U III <( Z 0: .00 ~
<( .1.01 III <( 1.01 '" N .----, ::C ~
0: W ... :C' D. == (.!) l- e
l- X III ... ~ en xc{ z '0
"T >- W
cD ~ u >- z ..: 0 en E-l OU Z w ..
.... z 0 0 0: II w :1 0
~ 0 0: g H ~ (D": l1. ..
'" ~ ~ ... <( ~ D. ~ 0 ~
... VI <( .... III III 0 c;
,.. I U .... 0: 1.01 \.&J H ..J
III 1.01 a VI l:i w X c:: . Q: w
oJ a ... '" 11. Z :) ~ III UJ ~= ..J > .=
.... " ... Ol fl 0 z )0')1 tv .
::> w
... 7- 0: Ol III N 0 2 ::5 > c ..
co .... U X ~ ~ ~ ..
. III <( 0 1.01 ~ ... .., CD C) c
.... ..... ... ;. .... 1.01 .. III c( - C ..
co N VI 0 U :. " .... U Z l-
N .... ... a 0: Z X ..J -< '"
... a 11- 0: 0: .... '1.01 .J 1:.:1 ..J 0
7- a r. 1.01 0 :.: 0 D. ex :a
III ::> ... .... 11. 0: III I:C: -
oJ ... III <( 1.01 W -
w ... ... ... U ~ 11. .... a: ...
u z w :z .... ... c:s::: ..
0: ::> III .1.01 ... .... ti ... <(
<( W 0: ~ P ~
11- P >- N ... ~ 1.01 ... Q. , 11::II
w ... .... III U ... p: !:; 1
...1 III ... III III ::> ... W
<( 11- III ~ P al III
... 0 7- ... oJ 3 '" ...1 a:
0 0: 1.01 0 ~ 0 ~ ---0.---- ~- - ---~-~
..... I a. A ... .. --- - ----------------------- .--
W
...
0 .,;
"L. N M ... '" .... I- co
.
ru ~
... ~
RJ,
..
o
a
>
-1
(lJ
.s ~ i c!
... U
fI) i~
.... u
~~ ~1
~ ~ ...
t.!l
wm~~~ONm~~~~.~~~-
U~~~NmN~~"~~m~N-O
Z . . . . . . . " . . . . . . , .
c~~.mm~~N~O.~.ONm
~~N~NN-~--~~-.om-
III (\I ~
....
C
~wxxxxwwxxxxxwxxw
~. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
~oo~mmwom~NN~O~~D
~N~O~~N~M-OOO~OMN
UJ. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
~N_O~~N~~_~~~mO_N
NO_OOO_OVll"1PlVlt\l-VlN
~m~OO~~OMmm~~~~~
,....NNl"1P"tMt\lPlPlrlM.PlN.,....
ZZZZZlIllllZZZZZIIlZlIlZ
w
Z O-NM~~~
H_NP'\.~~~mm-------
~j~~~~~J~J~~~JJJJ
.)tv ...
, Vtv$
IlJ/:;,J
N 0 .- MOM 0'1 Q) to 01 ... r1 en ... .... too C'? N N PI
OO~N~om~.'~N~O~~N~O~N
MON~m~N~~~~~.NO~~NN~
~~~~~~I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<(
Cf)
w
a:
w
r-
a
<(
o
a:
~
C\A
:r:
(,)
<:
~
a:::
Q
~
o
a:::
~
CI)
lU
=e
M ., ." y] ... Q) Ol 0 .... N M .. In to ,.... GO eft 0 ~ N
NNNNNNNMMMMMM~MMM...
...
1.01
1.01
'"
1.01
0:
<(
;;.
()
III
~~I-m~N~~NMN~omm~~~~~~~
~Nw~~n~~~I-M"'~O~NW.OON~
mN"NNM"'N~~~.."MMNNNM~M
.-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~
~
~M~.~~'~~~~:==:==:==~~~
.
.lIr
<(
Cf)
W
~
<(
r-
z
<t
en
.
CO
...
.
...
.Ii)
t:l
:2:
=j: \~bl
~'", ~~1_r.,
!' -f-!!iL!!.t_._
o
J
---.
.
to
(11
. --'- .
~ ~ .:;~~ri--.- "
m ~ . ~i .
m Ir~tm'-".- ~
en ~
."',,, :"/
Jr .
..
z
ro
(1') ;;
l:(
.
....
..
N
)& 0; 0
:l "l 8
. n
.... ,""o',m--
a II
In .... 0
II 'It 0
. . ... i
..
.. ~
X
.......
...
. . __.<>. . .~. ..L
-
.
.
. .
.
I, SUSANNE E. STEINMETZ, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do
hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 94-2
is an original
resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the
3rd
day of
Januarv
, 19--2.L,
at which meeting a quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this 18th day of
January
,1994.
(Seal)