The URL can be used to link to this page

Resolution 1995-41 . . . RESOLUTION NO. 95-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING A/S 95-03, AN APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL OF 131 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS ON APPROXI- MATELY 33 ACRES (PARCELS NO. 783-48-001 AND 783-49-001) ON PROPERTY ZONED R1-PUD (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) WHEREAS, Arcadia Development Company submitted A/S 95- 03, an application for Architectural and site approval of 131 single family detached dwellings on approximately 33 acres of property zoned R1-PUD (single family residential, planned unit development), said property located on west of Santa Teresa Bouelvard and north of Longmeadow Drive; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted on July 20, 1992, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Negative Declaration including 20 mitigation measures and a mitigation/monitoring plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference, for tentative map TM 91- 01, which project included the property associated with A/S 95- 03; and WHEREAS, the Planning commission held a duly noticed public hearing on A/S 95-03 on May 4, 1995 and after that hearing recommended that the City Council approve the project, subject to fifteen conditions set forth in that certain staff report dated April 26, 1995, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed application A/S 95- 03 and all documents relating thereto and took oral testimony at its duly noticed meeting of May 15, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: SECTION I. The City Council hereby finds that A/S 95-03 complies with the findings set forth in subsections (a) through (i) of section 50.55 of the Gilroy Zoning Ordinance as required to grant planned RESOLUTION 95-41 -1- . . . unit development (PUD) architectural and site approval. SECTION II. The City Council hereby finds, pursuant to the requirements of the Public Resources Code, that: 1. This project is consistent with the Gilroy General Plan. 2. The City Council previously adopted a Negative Declara- tion with 20 mitigation measures and the mitigation/monitoring plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" which included this property. 3. There are no off-site or on-site environmental effects of this project which were not addressed in the Negative Declara- tion. 4. There is no new information showing environmental ef- fects to be more significant than described in the Negative Decla- ration. SECTION III. A/S 95-03 should be and hereby is approved, subject to the fifteen conditions set forth in the staff report attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the mitigation measures and mitiga- tion/monitoring program attached hereto as Exhibit "B". PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of May, 1995 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GILROY, KLOECKER, MORALES, ROGERS, ROWLISON, VALDEZ, GAGE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE. ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE. APPROVED: oo4!t.l y \077\ 190502.1 52-051704706002 RESOLUTION 95-41 -2- . . Planning Department STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT "A" April 26, 1995 File Number: NS 95-03 Applicant: Arcadia Development Company Location: Ncrth ofLongme2dow Drive, west of Santa Teresa Boulev~rd Staff Planner: Melissa Durkin REOUESTED ACTION: Planned Unit Development review of a 131 lot single family subdivision, DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Parcel Number: Parcel Size: Flood Zone 783-48-001 and 783-49-001 33 acres Zone "A" and "B", Panel # 060340000lC Panel Date: 10/06/81 STATUS OF PROPERTY: Existin~ Land Use Vacant Land General Plan Desi~nation Low Densitv Residential Zonin~ RI-PUD STATUS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Existing Land Use N: Vacant Land S: Single Family Homes E: Vacant Land W: Single Family Homes General Plan Desi~nation Low Density Residential Low,Density Residential PPFILDR LDR, Residential Hillside Zoning RI RI R 1, County Ag RI-PUD CONFORMANCE OF REOUEST WITH GENERAL PLAN: The proposed project cOflforms to the land use designation for the property on the General Plan map, and is consistent with the intent of the text of the general Plan Document. . . Staff Report NS 95-03 Page 2 4/26/95 This project conforms with the policies of Gilroy's General Plan. The following example demonstrates this compliance: Urban Development and Community Design (Section II): Policy 3: "Urban Development will only occur within the incorporated portion of the Planning Area. Land will therefore be annexed to the City before final development approval is given. " The proposed project is in conformance with this policy, because this land has been within City limits for many years, Policy 4: "The City will phase development in an orderly, contiguous manner in order to maintain a compact development pattern to avoid premature investment for the extension of public facilities and services. New urban development will occur in areas where municipal services are available and capacity exists prior to the approval of development in areas which would require major new facility expansion. The proposed project is in conformance with this policy, because this property is surrounded by developed residential property on two sides, and municipal services are currently available at this site. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: NEGATIVE DECLARATION An expanded initial study was prepared for this project under TM 91-0 I. The study identified potentially significant effects on the environment, however, the applicant has agreed to individual mitigation measures which will avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where no significant impacts will occur. A Negative Declaration was adopted for this project with 20 mitigation measures on July 20, 1992, BACKGROUND: A ROO allotment of 195 units was given to this site during the 1981 and 1983 ROO processes A Tentative Map application (TM 91-01) was approved for this site on July 20, 1992, This map subdivided 48.7 acres into 198 lots, 195 of these lots were intended for single family homes, and three remainder lots were planned to be subdivided at a future time. An Architectural and Site Review (NS 93-12) was approved in June of 1993, which gave development approval to 64 of the 195 residential lots, The remaining 131 lots are requesting development approval in this application, . . Staff Report AlS 95-03 Page 3 4/26/95 ANALYSIS OF REOUEST: The applicant is requesting design review for the proposed construction of 131 detached single family homes on land which totals approximately 33 acres. The Tentative Map which was approved for this site divided the lots into two different types. The first type consists of 65 lots ranging from approximately 6,000 to 7,000 square feet. The second type consists of 66 lots averaging approximately 4,000 square feet, The overall density of this PUD, which includes a portion of the Hillcrest development, remains well below the maximum allowed density of 7,25 dwelling units per net acre, PUD Issues The Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning overlay is necessary for this project to go forward for two reasons. The first is that several of the lots in this subdivision will be under the 6,000 square foot minimum lot size required for Rllots, The PUD designation allows lots which are less than 6,000 square feet, as long as the total density of the PUD does not exceed 7,25 dwelling units per net acre. The second reason a PUD is necessary for this project is because the homes which the applicant is requesting to construct on these lots are too large to be built within the six foot side yard setbacks required in the Rl zoning district; instead, the applicant plans to construct some of the proposed homes with a five foot side yard setback. In addition, some of the single story homes on the 4,000 square foot lots are too large to be constructed within the envelope of the twenty foot required front yard setback and fifteen foot required rear yard setback. The applicant would like these homes to be allowed to have an eighteen foot front yard setback. Staff feels that this option is preferable to reducing the rear yard setback for the following reasons: I) Allowing some ofthe homes to have an eighteen foot setback, while requiring the others to retain the standard twenty foot setback allows variety which creates an interesting streetscape. 2) The reduced front yard setback option allows homeowners to maximize their rear yard area, while still enabling adequate room to park a car in their front driveway, With the eighteen foot front yard setback, most of the lots will meet the fifteen foot rear yard setback requirement, however, a few lots will be slightly below the fifteen foot requirement, with approximately a ]4,5 foot setback. Staff believes that this meets the intent of the PUD district The Zoning Ordinance requires that extra amenities be provided in exchange for the flexibility that the Planned Unit Development allows, This development is providing two amenities which staff feels are adequate to meet this requirement: ]) The smaller lots will allow more affordable homes to be constructed in this area, which has been almost .exclusively moderate and high end homes up until this point, This is a benefit to the City, because it essentially creates a mixed density development in this area, 2) The applicant is proposing to landscape the front yards of the smaller lots in this development The applicant has asked not to be required to landscape the front yards ofthe larger lots, because these are "move-up" homes, and the buyers tend to have more particular ideas about the design of their landscaping, No portion of the proposed homes will be permitted to be set back less than five feet from the side yard property lines, Ten foot side yard setbacks will still be required to be maintained on side yards which are adjacent to a street, in order to maintain visibility for cars travelling on the street . . Staff Report AfS 95-03 Page 4 4/26/95 Home Design Type One Type one homes will be located on the 6,000-7,000 square foot lots (65 homes total). The applicant has proposed four different models for this type. Each model has three different elevations to add variety to the development. Following is an analysis of these models. Plan 2185: This model is proposed to be 2,185 square feet in area with two story ranch style construction, and a three car garage located in front. Architectural elements of this home include an elevated front entrance, enhanced by vertical columns, multi-level gable and shed roofs, and detailed window and door framing, The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, windows and garage doors, and by varying the roof line, Plan 2340: This model is proposed to be 2,340 square feet in area with two story ranch style construction, and a three car garage located in front, Architectural elements of this home include first floor and second floor bay windows, a detailed front entrance, multi-level hip, gable and shed roofs, and detailed window and door framing. The three elevations ofthis model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, windows, and garage doors, Plan 2611: This model is proposed to be 2,6 I I square feet in area with two story ranch style construction, and a three car garage located in front. Architectural elements of this home include a second floor bay window and a bay window on the rear of the first story, a detailed front.entrance, multi-level shed and gable roofs, and detailed window and door framing. The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, windows, garage doors and rooflines, Plan 2785: This model is proposed to be 2,785 square feet in area with two story ranch style construction, and a three car garage located in front. Architectural elements of this home include a second floor bay window and a bay window on the rear of the first story, a detailed front entrance, multi-level hip, shed and gable roofs, detailed window and door framing, and a variety of projections of the second story elevation, The three elevations of this model are differentiated by usiflg alternative exterior materials, windows, garage doors and rooflines, . . Staff Report AlS 95-03 Page 5 4/26/95 Type Two Type two homes will be located on the 4,000 square foot lots (66 homes total). The applicant has proposed six different models for this type, but only intends to construct three or four of them, depending on the market. Staff recommends that, because these homes have somewhat limited variety, the applicant shall be required to construct at least one single story model. In addition, to the greatest extent possible, the applicant shall be required to place single story models adjacent to two story models. Each of the models which has been proposed for these lots has three different elevations to add variety to the development, Following is an analysis of these models, Plan 902: This model is proposed to be 902 square feet in area with single story construction, The two car garage dominates the front of this structure. Architectural elements of this home include a two-level gable roof, and detailed window adjacent to the garage, which has been recessed to provide a greater level of depth to the structure. The entrance to this dwelling is located on the side. The garage which is shown on this plan illustrates a ribbed steel door as the standard, with more decorative doors available at the option of the buyer. Staff feels that because the garage door dominates the front of this structure, the steel door would not be appropriate, and recommends that a more decorative door be provided on these units, The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roof line, Plan 1228: This model is proposed to be 1,228 square feet in area with single story construction, with the two car garage dominating the front of this structure, The architectural elements of this home are almost identical to that of Plan 902, with the exception of different door and window framing, the addition of a garden window in the front, some variation on the roof design, and the addition of a gable on the side of the structure, As with Plan 902, the entrance of this dwelling is located on the side of the building, and the garage which is shown on this plan illustrates a ribbed steel door as the standard, with more decorative doors available at the option of the buyer. Staff feels that because the garage door dominates the front of this structure, the steel door would ,not be appropriate, and recommends that a more decorative door be provided on these units, The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roofline, . . Staff Report AlS 95-03 Page 6 4/26/95 Plan 1397: This model is proposed to be 1,397 square feet in area with two story construction, and a two car garage in front. Although this structure is narrow, and the garage is a dominate feature, it is softened by the existence varying gable and shed roofs, detailed window and door framing, an enhanced entrance with vertical columns and a second story bay window. The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roofline, Plan 1424: This model is proposed to be 1,424 square feet in area with two story construction, and a two car garage in front, Architectural features of this home include second story extension over the garage, gable, hip and shed roofing, detailed second story windows, and an enhanced entrance way. The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roof line, Plan 1598: This model is proposed to be 1,598 square feet in area with two story construction, and a two car garage in front. Architectural features ofthis home include a multi-faceted second story elevation, with detailed window framing, gable and shed roofing, and an enhanced entrance way. The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roofline, Plan 1773: This model is proposed to be 1,773 square feet in area with two story construction, and a two car garage in front. This is the most decorative of the Type Two homes, with architectural features which include two second story dormers, varying roof elevations, detailed window framing, gable and shed roofing, and an enhanced entrance way, The three elevations of this model are differentiated by using alternative exterior materials, window and garage framing, and by varying the roofline Primary access to this development will be provided by Longmeadow Drive, which is a General Plan collector street. The applicant will be required to construct a sound wall adjacent to Santa Teresa Boulevard and for approximately 100 feet along Longmeadow Drive, in compliance with the Mitigation Measures which were approved for this project. The proposed tract map configuration has been designed to provide the most efficient traffic circulation, and is cOflsistent with minimum City development standards, . . Staff Report NS 95-03 Page 7 4/26/95 FINDINGS: In order to grant Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval, the Planning Commission and City council must find that the proposed Planned Unit Development will: A Conform to the Gilroy General Plan in terms of general location and stll.ndards of development; B. Provide the type of development which will fill a specific need of the surrounding area; C. 1'-:ot require urban services beyond those which are currently available; D, Provide a harmonious, integrated plan which justifies exceptions, if such are required, to the normal requirements of this ordinance; E. Reflect an economical and efficient pattern ofland uses; F. Include greater provisions for landscaping and open space than would generally be required, G, Utilize aesthetic design principles to create attractive buildings and open space areas which blend with the character of surrounding areas; H Not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects on surrounding areas; and L Provide adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage, as necessary, STAFF RECOMMENDA nON. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve this request for the following reasofls. A The proposed project conforms to the land use designation for the property on the Gefleral Plan map. and is consistent with the intent of the text of the General Plan document; B. Public utilities and infrastructure improvements needed in order to serve the proposed project are ifl close proximity along Longmeadow Drive, C. There will be no significant environmental impacts as a result of this project due to the required mitigation measures to be applied at the development stage; and D, As submitted, the proposed development is consistent with the necessary PUD findings A through I, as stated under ZOfling Ordinaflce section 50,55, . . Staff Report AfS 95-03 Page 8 4/26/95 If this project is approved, staff recommends that the following conditions be attached to the approval of the project: I, Exterior Lighting: No unobstructed beam of exterior lighting shall be directed outward from the site toward any residential use or public right-of-way. 2, Mechanical Appurtenances: Mechanical equipment to be located on the roof of a building shall be screened by an architectural feature of the building, such that it cannot be seen from ground level at the far side of the adjacent public right-of-way, whenever possible, 3, Building colors shall be earth tones subject to Planning Department review and approval. 4. All utilities constructed to, through and on the site shall be constructed underground. 5, The overall project shall comply with the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 5,50, "Site Design Requirements", pertaining to proposed individual dwelling unit designs. 6, Street addresses shall be assigned by the City Public Works Department. 7, All proposed fencing must meet the requirements of the City Planning Department, 8, Side yard setbacks may be reduced to five feet, but should remain at six feet wherever feasible, All dwelling units shall maintain ten foot side yard setbacks when adjacent to a street on a corner lot 9, Location of hydrants must be approved by the Fire Department for this project 10, An approved fife apparatus access road and water supply, capable of delivering the required fire flow, shall be installed and made serviceable before and during construction, II, Street trees will be required for the above project per the Consolidated Landscaping Policy, A Street Tree Pennit must be obtained, ] 2, For the 4,000 square foot lots, at least one single story model shall be constructed, As much as possible, single story homes shall be.ronstructed adjaceflt to two story homes, Reversed floor plans shall be used Ofl these lots, ) 3, Due to the fact that plans 902 and 1228 have their front entraflces Ofl the side of the, home, the applicant shall set these homes back from the side yard lot lifle adjaceflt to the entrances as much as possible, while still maintaining the required side yard setback on the other side of the house, . . Staff Report NS 95-03 Page 9 4/26/95 14. No steel ribbed doors shall be allowed in this development. The applicant shall provide an option of three or four different styles of decorative garage doors for all of the models, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department, prior to building 'Permit Issuance, J 5, In addition, the applicant shall comply with all 20 mitigation measures contained within the Negative Declaration which was prepared for this project. /) J1 ~esp~tfull2' f~jJCr'- Michael Dom Director of Planning 5-4-95 At their meeting of May 4, 1995, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of NS 95-03, subject to 15 conditions as set forth in the staff report. AYES: NAYES: ABSENT: Arellano, Collier, Gage, Lai, Pinheiro, Puente, Suyeyasu None None (-. Planning Department NEGATIVE DECLARATION EXHIBIT "B't eA/S 95-03 City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA 95020 (408) 848-0440 city File:NUmbers: '1M 91-001, Z 91-10 P1lOJECl' DESCRIPl'ION: Name of Project: Nature of Project: Rancho Hills Tentative Map Request to subdivide a 48.7 acr-e lot into 265 lots, 198 lots of which are under this application, Rezone the lot from R1 to R1 PUD, and perform a design review of m:d.el haDes. \ P1lOJECl' IDCM'ION: I.=ation: Northwest corner of Santa Teresa Boulevard and I.ongmeadow Drive Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 783-20-027, 028, 029, 783-40-005, 006 Entitv or PersOn(s) undertakina Pro;ect: Name: The William Lyon Co. & Arcadia Developnent Co. Address: The William Lyon Co. 1631 N. First St., #100, San Jose, CA 95112 Arcadia Develop. Co. 1500 E. Hamilton Ave., r:.mphell, CA 95008 INITDIL STCDY: An Expanded Initial study of this project was undertaken and prepared f= the purpose of ascertaining whether this project might have a significant effect on the envirornnent. A =py of this study is on file at the City of Gilroy Planning DepartIIV:mt, 7351 Rosanna street, Gilroy, CA 95020. FINDDlGS & RE1lSONS: The Initial study identified potentially significant effects on the environment. However, the project has been mitigated (see Mitigation Measures below which avoid or mitigate the effects) to a point where no significant effects will =. There is no substantial evidence the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 'Ihe followin; reasons will support these findings: 1. The proposal is a logical extension of the ex:istin:l urllan, land use, and zoning patterns of this area. 2. Identified adverse .i1lq:lacts such as the effect on school .i1lq:lacts and increase in traffic generated from this project are proposed to be mitigated through school .i1lq:laction fees, and construction of off-site improvements . . . Negative Declaration 'IM 91-01, Z 91-10 2 03/31/92 3. 'The l-'.Lupased project is =nsistent with the adopted goals and policies of the General Plan of the City of Gilroy. 4. The Initial study was i.ndeperxiently reviewed by City staff, and this Negative Declaration reflects the in:ieperrlent judgement of the City of Gilroy . MITIGATION MEl\S1JRES: 1. The developer shall, as soon as possible, and before issuance of arrj' building pennits for the project, negotiate with the Gilroy Unified School District to detennine the level of additional ilIlpacts on the District. In the case of an ~eee, the City of Gilroy shall mediate the negotiation. Following campletion of the negotiations, the developer shall prcIlide mitigation of the ilIlpacts to the School District which may include~) inlpact fees, 2) dedication of land, 3) facilities arrl/= 4) equi~. 2. A water well destruction peImit shall be obtained frcm the Santa Clara valley Water District, and the well shall be sealed in a=rdance_with _ District staIidards. 3. Special fOl.ll'XJation systems =nsi.st.in:3' of 1) drilled, poured-in-piace " concrete, friction piers and grade beams = 2) conventional strip foundation footings with isolated interi= friction piers; prenx:>ist:uri.zation p:t'-Y.LcuIIS; the soil subgrade of the foondation trenches; and =crete slabs-oIMJrade, as J"<""<"l..-'l, shall be provided t:hrougha1t the highly expansive clay soil area as detel:mi.ned by the lPI'PmhP..r, 1986 soil and geologic investigation by Applied Soil Mechanics, Inc. 4. Drainage shall be \..UHw.ulled away frcm all strucb.1res and pavements. 5. A portj.on of the cc:mpressible silts shall be :reDDITed, and the remai.nin3' underlying silts shall be densified with grading canpactors throughout the campressible silt soil area as deteJ::mined by the December, 1986 soil and geologic investigation by Applied Soil Mechanics, Inc. 6. The project shall be designed and =nst:nlcted to incmporate wall bracing, mudsil anchors, tie downs, arrl/or hinge =nnectors to ensure structural stability as required by the earthquake design regulations of the Unifonu alllding Ccx:ie. 7. street trees shall be planted t:hrougha1t the project. 8. I.an::lscaping shall be planted by future hameawners. 9. I.an::lscaping shall be installed to enhance the sound walls along Santa Teresa Boulevard and IDrr,;rneadow Drive in a=rdance with the requirements of the City's Consolidated Landscaping :E\:)licy. 10. B.lilding pads and homes shall be designed and =nst:nlcted so that the finished floor is elevated or flood-proofed to= above the projected flood level. . . Negative Declaration 'IN 91-01, Z 91-10 3 03/31/92 11. 'The Santa Teresa Boulevard fee shall be paid for maj= roadway iltprovements alon] Santa Teresa Boulevard. 12. A 7. foot high noise attenuation barrier shall be =nstructed along Santa Teresa Boulevard, with a 75 foot segment =nstructed along the north property line am. along the rear yard property lines of houses along ~ Drive to control flanking. 13. A 6 foot high noise attenuation barrier shall be =nstructed for a distance of 100 feet fran the end of the 7 foot high barrier along the north property line, am. along the rear = side yard pIqJerty lines of lots directly adjacent to I.o\'Y;lIneadcw Drive. 14. windows am. sliding glass doors shall be maintained closed at secorrl floor living spaces within 170 feet of the Santa Teresa Boulevard right-of-way, am. having a direct or side view of the roadway. Mechanical ventilatiori shall be providoo in a=rdance with UnifODll arilding Code requ:iIemertts when WindOVlS are to be closed for noise ......uuul. = src 26 or higher rated windows am. sliding glass doors shall be installoo at second floor living spaces within 170 feet of the Santa Teres?- Boulevard right-of-way, am. having a dixect = side view of the roadway. 15. Noisy operations shall be sc:heduloo f= the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. so as to avoid the more sensitive evening am. nighttime how::s. 16. r:ust problems shall be controlled during construction by requiring and enfo=ing measures such as the use of watering trucks in the grading =ntract provisions. 17. A stom drainage line shall be constructed within the project that will drain to the existing box culvert at the intersection of I.c:l1'YJlnF'",tiow Drive am. &inta Teresa Boulevard. 18. 'lhe onsite storm drainage system shall be constructed to ao, .",lLldate stonnwater runoff frcnn the existing drainage ditch at the northwesterly =rner of the site. 19. Required public safety impact fees shall be paid in a=rdance with established City policy. 20. A cnntr:ibuti.on shall be made ta-Iard the cost of a fire station location study. ,.-" Date Prepared: March 31, 1992 End of Review Perio:i: May 5, 1992 Date Approved By City Council: 7/20/92 ~/f}~ Michael Oem, Director of Planning . EXHIBIT C . !'" :- gg:;;;g:> ~g~gJ~~~~gJgJ~~~~gJ ~~l=0~ ~t"'l'l~o-J ~gQ~5;S~~~!;;~l!l~~g o-Jg:-<~!il ('l;s::'" l'l l'lo-J< o-Jp ~ .... > > '" o-J l'l- z:! l'l '" - .!" ",,,,:::E :::E ~o-J>('ll'l-o-Jo-J t"'('lZO t'" o-Jl'l> .l30-<o-J:>O~:t:t('l0:tl'lZ~0 Z('l >>o-JO!!l ZZ"'''' l'll'lo-J"IlOOOO'" > > "X1 e!;;!il~t'" ij o-J~OZ('l' 00 l'l o-Jo-J OPO "Ill'l::iz~t"'o-J;gll:l:>O e:> 0 ~og~g ;~agJt"':i!g-<o-J~~~~~~ ~g :::0 Z'" '" 0:>0 0-3 o-Jo-Jo-J ~~l'l ;::ll'lo-J~gj_o-Jl'l::i~ !">z:! :>0 "Il-< ::r: ('l('lgje: . O.:::~O~~O('l~z:!~",_!'" ;S::O ('lo-J",Q - -:t<O-p> ('lo-J"Il'" ::i"rl t:r.l 0- ~;S::0800::ol",~o-J:t0"'~ >- ~~~~ "'Ol'lo-JZ tz1 o-J ::ole: aE: i2~t"';s::>' ~OE:OgJo-J~~ >'" :::0 ~O>'" ('l O-o-J"Tl "Il",O gj 0 o-J> (1 _o-J_o-J'_O"'~>l'l ('lZ -('l ('lo-J('ll'l t"'''Tl'''-0t'''~ o-JO l'l Oo-J >- l'lgjt"'~ gEg~p5t'" ~~~ ~~ Z- 0 ~~~::i .... '" - ('l - o-J:::E 0 0 ~~ :tt'" '" ,:-iOgJZ ZZ-< t'" 52 Z 0 l'l l'.... 0 -<:j t'" "Il t'" 00 N Z>- \0 N:j ...... 00(1 I , OE:~ 0 ZZ.... ......t:r.l~0-3 0 0 "Il"'''' 0(1 -< t"'." l'l l'l ;S::l'l0." >-::r:00 ~ < -;S::Z~ Z>-~"X1 l'l :jtr1C1:l t'" t'" O~liio-J OZ0-30 0 0 '" '" ~>t"'-< 0-300.... l'l l'l _ tr1 :>0 ::ol O:j~ ~t:r.l~l' ZOO >-Z:::o Z':>O \0 ZOO ...... I 0"'0-< 0 0 0-3:::0 ...... t:r.l0 ZO ('l ;; ~, '" 0 :t 0 0-3~ > fT1 c:: .... :::EZ 1" '" ~ < "Il 0 >o-J 0 ll:I ;s::;s::'" t:r.l o-J> "Il e: '" c:: -0'" ~ l'l('l '" P "d o-J~O." :>ot'" e: 0 lT1 - Z> >- 0> ll:I z:! Oo-J'" Ui~ t'" Z >0-:>0 "'0 z tno-J - 0 ::lz:!t"'-< Gi o-J< ('l o-J z:!> :::E 0 lT1 o Z l'l ' "Il e ZO"'" ('It''' 0 .." 0 I:) o-Jt'" ~ (i lT1 :>0 C lT1 s: Z -< '" o-J t:r.l t'" V) 0-3 . . " ?' ~ ~ ...., Oo-l~~tDno-l >~Oo-l:E<=gj> "J:lO "'iZOo-lz> "'E::?j"J:ltDno '" ~g;:<l ~~g; :gp~g;::j~>~ ~~ ~ t%lXt%lz<=o Ot%lO"J:liil Xt%l<=-n",,,,, C>t%lnXt%lr::c Oo-lt%lt%lo:g-t%l<=~z-n t%l>nozo-l:<l t%l ~OO~ro-l ;~~g@8~~s~"'~o;; o-l:<l ::Co O~_E::~ tD8 >> <=::1<=x'O<=.... rO (lO-X- zOi::!::c~Oo-l~r 2lx!;:ZE::~::l '" Z"" ;:St%lz rt%l X5~r"'nt%lN"J:l-::ct%lrC3 OOt%l1:loz1:l "'''' iZoo-<s:1:lo~i::!~~:"t%l<= Zn C3'2ro<=mo-l P13o",zoE::~ o-lX ~>"'t%lOO'" ~f: _- t%lro-l"J:l_(l ni::!OZ >> E::rtD",O!!lOo-l (ln~>-:rmo-loo-l"J:lo - 0 o-l..., &1~n!!lo-lX t%lo-<63(lr<x (lr "'- "" xz_Oz(l",,> <=> tD tI:lorof: Q8;j1;;0;;lmm - Zo-l>tD'" 00""0 1:l0 o-ltD z~g;zt%lrm""Zo-l<-<=::! <=op~iZzr >nt%l",~",5'8 ~~ ",,,,,>"J:l::C -m01:lo o~ Pl::l::Jmnntl:l zzoP>~>E:: P"'o<:<l!;looiil~~z z "J:l-< O--<(lXOt%l "'0 gmm~6~~::C"'8iil9~ -0 o-l ~o n~mo-ln z"" E::o ~z~~~ol::l '" n"'C5r01:l >z >Qnazo :?':Ez::cz'" -"J:l "'t%lo zo-l o-l_ n 1:l1:l '" -'" !;: 0 Zo-lE::p:<ltD;j", o::C ::!E::!;:t%l6~~""::jf:"'-i-,;;l oE:: nOtD VJtIj tr.) ",,0 o tI:l -< 0 ~ - -. 1:': X > r E:: 00 o-lo-l z . >t%l>o-lot%l63 >r >"" o<=.oOtiio-l Zt%l",o-l ~o-lIVi~~>'" o-l> 1'1 <= mt%l ""::C1:liiim1:lr <1;; tD::COXO X n -n . !;:_t%lO:EO - - z. t%1 -<:"p::CjTlo-lt%l ~!iiom8 Oo-l ~:O>O!!lE::", 1'10 g~~~f::Z E::> ~~>g>1:':~ ~ ~ z z- tI:lg:~aiil~~ t%l:E "'1:lo"'zp 1'1 '" ZtD1:':zrO -< 50z'" ~> ~'" X (l 0 1'1 Vi en to( _VJ !"-< tii8>0 g; g <= 0 ..., or~;j !-'.' 0 0g:1:': 0 0 0 0 "J:l""'" 1'1 t%l t%l 1'1 r"" < < < <: E::t%l0"" 1'1 t%l 1'1 t%l ::jE::Z~ r 5 r r _t%l'" 0 0 0 O~63o-l "" "" "" "" ~>~-< t%l t%l 1'1 1'1 :<l :<l ::c ::c O:::!torj zoo z::c n 0 0 - ~ n X 1:': m X n n - "J:l 1'1 o-l o-l .." ~ tI:l 0 0 <= :<l :<l tI:l E::E::'" P 0 0 c:: -0"" 0 "J:l "J:l P o-lZO"" z "" "" 0 o-Z> z >o-ll!l:<l 0 c:: c:: o-lOtl:lo-l 0 tIl tD 0 _i::!r-< r r 0 Ozt%l .." n n .." .." ZO"" n ~ :E .." 0 ;; 0 0 n ;;0 r ;;0 ~ ;; '" ;<: r '" '" -. ~ e- ~ .. . - ;:; !'-' ~ ?" :-' '<Il"""""""''''=> :::=--i '>"'" ttlttl:I: 5l:l~gJc o.o!2~z> 0> ~1:1 >zoo:::z~''" ~p: ttl '" ~ In ttlO Ottl ~:::ttlttlttl>ttlo ",-> 0'" C--i ttl~~z--ildSl >oz !;;gjo~~ t""1:1s:>oo ~o o--i o>o<o<--i~"'::c t""'<I--i 8::: =ttl> z~ 81:1 . 0 t"" l"" (') ::c_ 00> <Clf!>"" >ttl~g""2 ttl- Zn 0__0",>0 z::O..., ttl oz> --iZOt"":I: ldZ Cttl ~ ZZ'Z> t"" ::c O,::::ttl. r,o-o 0 ~ ttl...,o ttl,ttl 0 !"O --i", >> --i--i ttl,'ttl '" .. Z "'i':; 1:1 " ::0'::0 O."'~.< '" '" '" ...,In c> 0"" --i = o~ l""0 >O:I: ::c :I:::C !20>ldO=0 >0'" >-0 1:10 zc?ttl- ~::o> ="'z >'Tj>~c> > ttl> <'<IOn (')'" z...,z zt"" t"" ""t"" 0 ttl::c>...,ttlottl >ld= Ottl", O::c(') > ot"" l"" ldl"" Old ...,00 <t""--i:I: 0= '<10< --iOl""ttl<z~ t!1ttlldO ~ttlttlz:=;:tll = ocoo>'" ttl>C --i<CE:: >g~o>~ t!1 tTlttl E::o ogj~>~;;Jttl 1:10l"" gj>Ottl "" n"" -' . > z>..., :=;:(')C >>> ""00'" OIll--iZ>> Z Z >"" --il""::CZ ...,> tll~~ ld :I: --i> OO"'?; (3 gj~51= --i ..., ldot!1O::jt!1--i m m -(') 0:::'<1 .....ldO 0..., ~z1:1--i::Coo C""m m'<l--it"" l"" mzm 0 0 z- o ::C>?;Z t""ldt!1 (')t""!;tll n >00 = >t!1 ~o'" --io m 0< O",--i 0< ldZ<;;O ><::c mO--i . ~~o ' 00 C >ldOO 't"" ,--i --i :I: ~...,o . l"" t!1 > C ::c..., 'Tj C 0E::1:1 --i C 0 0 0 0 1:1 0 --r.I."'C/J t"""" m m m m m :::mo"" < < ~ < :I: < m m m 0 m ::jE::z> t"" t"" t"" l"" ::: t"" _tI1(1J~ 0 0 0 0 0 o~li3--i "" "" "" "" m "" ~>t""o< m m tr1 m 0 m _ m ld ld ld ld :=;: - O:3"1j ~ .z zoo m Zld ld '" 0 0 0 0 - ~ (') ~ ~ 1:1 ::c 0 iTi 0 ~ n 0 (') ..., --i 1:1 --i ..., ' "" 0 "" "" "" - > > >--i~ld C C Z 'Tj --i0=--i tt:l = 0 ~ "" ~ -!2r-'-<: t"" r-' '0 r-' ozm n - '" > '" ,() ' Z > ZO'Tj 'Tj 0 ~ :=;: 0 Z Z Z ld 0, 0 ;;: 0 s: 0 ~ ld 1:1 0 1:1 ;><: r-' ,Ill en 0 (') '.- , .. .\...; '#0' ~::'2lZ z8~8 23:-cr~~ ::!:s:::x:O <. tTl "" tTl"'OtTl tTlo>~ <>-<> tTl ",..."..." oz - -- _...,:s::o ZOtTlz 0> '" > <:x: '" ZOO:x: __c:> vo~r- z...,"'r- -:x:Oto OtTl"I1tTl :x: -:0 :l :s:: .. ~ _08:x: :S::~>tTl tTll%l. 0 :x: ;:::c: o ...,r- ~ o~ !" - '^ . ;0: . w " . zn >> ...,..., ~~ o o~ "I1-< :S::O ::J"I1 o~ ~~ 0- n ..., z- , o~ ~ 0 0 0 "I1"" '" :s::t;; "" tTl tTl tTl 0 < < < -:S::z "" lt1 lt1 tTl ::::!tTJtfJ > r r- r o~- ~ 0 0 0 > I:l:I ..., "" "" "" ...,>r- -< lt1 lt1 lt1 _ lt1 ~ ~ ~ o:j'"Ij ZOO z~ ~~~~z~ OOtTlnOn tTl:x:...,ooo <""ozr-- iii6~o>- ~"I1...,"I1~:E 0~[iib05J "I1>",00lt1 ...,-<>~o~ :x: - '~ lt1>~!:"'~ ~S>2g:irl >:x:irlof:o o>~"'r-~ ~;5"'~l:l:Iz -<Z>ntTlo . 0 1:l:Ilt1 Z 0 >o~"'~ 0C:<:...,,,, ~~g~~ n>zlt1v ",,~_o'" oO-:o>C ~ 0...,0 I n~><f:!l~Ofl~~ r-lt1nlt1oo"I1 ...- o.onzlt1:x:...,8f:s ~S~::!;57[ii~r-o 0~0r->lt10 r-1:l:I"'" "I1~>...,~"I1~<tTl;:; Z~ 3 R ~ ~ ~ ~ *,J ~ . ~ ",...,-< ' Zv '8 '" ~:x::x: - ..., '" ..., '" "'~::i>l%l>lt1~>r- lt1:x::x:r-~~1:Jnza nlt1c:r-ov",lYllt1- oozzl:l:l>:X:>"'oi5 ~~~::;;~O~I:l:I~no ~zo~~-g...,r-r- ~8~~:<i5t;;~~~ ~l:l:Ia:s::><-oo "'>S~tTl9?;;Cl>0 r-vn~o"I1""o 1:Jgz:x:tI:l lt1"'~ L< >n lt1lt1'" ""0 ."...., ...,n o ""0 0 :g8 ~~ s o r- Or-~z""Ottl> C!o>tI:lo:x:;;:;> 0- <..., ~tI:l...,~ tI:l"'~""-:O> 2l . oo:X: "I1 Z 0 ~~""on~..., ;:;",~0lt1",_ n ",0..., o:x:= ...,"'''''-''I1>0 r-l%1!:l=_r-:x: '-< -< ...,,0 8 r- Z >>-<:x: l:l:Io O~_I:l:I:;ltrl- __ t:l ~ > ,., (') tr.I F;""z~!:lotrl l%1~J"Ic:"I1z> z~>!:l~~:l ...,trlz Q~trl ...,:jo>:S::c:z o-<>b""~;; bCbi5[iitI:l::! zzz trlOO Otrlo""z"I1Z :S::"'...,:X:oo lt1o:x:tI:lo~ ~"%jtI:l "I1> o ~ n n 0 :E :x: ~ m m n 1:J .." .." ..., to to 0 :s:::S:: en c: c: :>0 "" P P 0 -0 0"" ::!z 0 0 "I1 0- z> Z Z ." >..., f:!l:>o c: ...,0 to"" Cl Cl to -C! r-< 0 0 r- Oz m .." "I1 0 Zo .." :::l "I1 0 (') 0 ~ :>0 >- s: 0 r- r- ~ en ~>-i> c::iiin OnO -<OZ . >-i "'~ >-itD Oc:: '-,j>-i >0 '-,jZ ~~ "'> >-it'" >t'" >-itD otTI ZE:: t"'> 00 ntTI >>-i ::lo o~ z> El -. '" !=' tTI"':<> "':I:tT1 >-i>.o >t"'c:: tDt"'- CtD1:; "'tTlo :I: tTI"'", o~c:: nOtD __t""' >-iz(') -<>'" "'n> On'-,j t"'otTI (');;c>-i -<0-< >- zE:: n'" tTI> ~Q -'-,j >-itTI :I:tT1 '" - ~ no~tD>-i o;;c>tTI:I: ~~>-inl11 lI1z!iJ~~ :<>>:<>"'''' oOc:>-i::l '-,jtTIz~tTI >-i80n", :I:>-i'-,j>-i>-i lI1n '-,jlI1 0 ",:I:'-,jO~ ::l>:<>>-iE:: lI1>-iOOO >-iE::><", :I:>-in~ tTI:I:nz ZtTIO> o lI1E:: 0 :<>XE::lI1 -icnOtfl :I:-lO-< ~z>'" lI1O-l-l '" tTllI1 ;;j ",E:: f: -l'" -< ~~ - ?' 'ft - -.l n~tTloo O>~c:c: ~;;jo~~ s:~~o;g nZOzno >-i OOtD "'>-i".ZC :<>:<> "" '" ,.. OC:tTI:jE:: -<n>~'" -;.::"'C:", !!;",C:Q:I: ~z~O~ !">-i~Zt'" -:I: c::'tIl tEl lI1n-<tTI O:I:1:;n S:>.o~ 8~S;;J Z:I:~O OtYlzt'" c::ot'" gj~gj ~o - ?' ..... Zn >> -l>-i c:> G;o o 0:<> '-,j-< E::o -'-,j >-i_ oE:: >'" -l> -n O-l z- , oE::G; 0 0 0 0 0 '-,j""'" E::t"''''' tTI tTI lI1 tTI tTI lI10 -< -< -< -< tii -E::z "" tTI lI1 lI1 lI1 ~trlC/) ~ t'" t'" t'" 5 t'" o~- 0 0 0 0 > tD "" "" "" "" "" -l>t""' -< tTI lI1 lI1 lI1 tTI _ tTI ;;c :<> :>:l :>:l :<> O~"'r1 zoo z:<> '-,j ~ n ::r: m .." "" o t""' (') tTI n :I: m .." .." ~ n :I: m .." O>:s:n> ~-l;::'0", tii5ll=~d ~;~~~ O>-l-no ",mZ>-i;;c ~:>:l-lm> gjOOz >n>-i~> -l:I:::lO -l5lI1:I:lI1 ~z~z~ ~~~5lm t"'<=tTI'" lX1 0 """,,:I: OzO:<>> fJol3sl= lI1f;lXtTllX1 ~>nQlI1 El8fJ-l . ~ -< 1,:: m-l :>:l -l o ~ n -l o :<> o .." "" c:: lX1 t""' (') ~ o :<> ;.:: '" o ~ n -l o :<> o '-,j "" c:: lX1 t'" (') ~ o ~ '" o ~ n -l o :>:l o .." ." c:: tD C n ~ o :<> ;>:: '" .- - n :I: m '-,j tD c:: t""' o Z o o .." .." (i ;; t""' :<> tTI E::E::'" -0'" ::lzO"" o-z> >....,~:::a :jg~:1 OztTI zo"" o ;:0 . . I, SUSANNE E. STEINMETZ, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 95 41 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the city of Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 22nd day of at which meeting a quorum was present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the M~ , 19...,2L, Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this 23rd day of M~ ,1995. City Clerk of the City of Gilroy (Seal)