Loading...
Resolution 1998-02 . . RESOLUTION NO. 98-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING A/S 97-59, AN APPLICATION FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL, APN 810-30-037 (pARTIAL) WHEREAS, Albert Fortino ("Applicant") submitted A/S 97-59, an application for architectural and site approval in order to construct eight (8) single family dwellings on property totaling 1.19 acres zoned Rl (Low Density Residential), located at the east side of Mesa Road and backing the west side of Santa Teresa Boulevard, between Nicole Way and Dawn Way; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") the City Council on October 9, 1997 certified a Negative Declaration with 9 mitigation measures, and a mitigation monitoring program has been prepared; and WHEREAS, as a condition of Tentative Map (TM 97-02) approval, the Architectural and Site Review Application, is subject to review by the Planning Commission and review and approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed application A/S 97-59 at its duly noticed meeting on December 4, 1997 and recommended that the City Council approve A/S 97-59 with nine (9) conditions as set forth in the staffreport dated November 25, 1997, which staff report is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and IKBA1360375.01 72-121804706002 -1- RESOLUTION NO. 98-2 . . WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed Application 97-59 and all documents relating thereto and took oral and written testimony at its duly noticed meeting of December 15, 1997; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the City Clerk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT A. The City Council hereby finds: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City's General Plan document; 2. The proposed Architectural and Site Review Application is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance; 3. The proposed Architectural and site Review Application is consistent with the Guidelines for Sound Attenuation and Visual Preservation of the Santa Teresa Boulevard Corridor; and 4. There is no substantial evidence that the project as mitigated may have a significant effect on the environment. B. A/S 97-59 should be and hereby is approved subject to the nine (9) conditions set forth in the staff report attached hereto as Exhibit A. IKBA1360375.01 72-121804706002 -2 - RESOLUTION NO. 98-2 . . PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1998 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ARELLANO, GIFFORD, MORALES, ROWLISON, SPRINGER, SUDOL, GILROY NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE APPROVED: ATTEST: ~~, Rhonda Pellin, City Clerk IKBA1360375.01 72-121804706002 -3- RESOLUTION NO. 98-2 .J._:_.....o;)l .Ll...LJ..I.I.J.ur~ De~L~~e~ ~ ~UnL~ '6!:J UUll . '. EXHI. A ., ,:";'~"'., ,.;;. - , Comriiunity DevelopmentD'epartfueht Planning Division Staff Report ~ , .~. . : ...i" '.'. November 25. 1997 FILE NUMBER.: APPUCANr: LOCATION: AlS 97-59 .,- Albert Fortino Property fronting the east side of Mesa Road and bacJd~ the west side of Santa . Teresa Boulevard, between Nicole Way and Dawn Way. STAFF PLANNER: Bryan Stice' REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests ArchitectuIil1 md Site Review approval in order to construct eight (8) single- family dwellings ,on a 1.19=1:: acre parcel zoned Rl Single Family Residential. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Parcel No.: . Parcel Size: Flood Zone: 810-30-037, -038 (partial) 1.15H: net acres . "0" Panel;;' 060340 0003D Date: 9..04-87 rev. 4-18-91 STATUS OF PR.OPERTY: Existing l.and Use Undeveloped Land Ctenera.l. Plan Desiena.tipD Resideutia1 Low Density Zoning R1 STATUS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: 'Fbrimni Land Use N: Undeveloped Land S: Single Family Residence E: Agriculture (row crops) W: Single Family Residenc:es General Plan DesimllrtioD Residential Low Density Residemial Low Density ResidCDtial Low Deu.sity Residential Low Density Zon;ni Rl Rl County RI ~ l........ ...... "'" v J. .:),._ L;I:.A..oJ.'\..Loo.......~l\. ~ ,,"VLu:...\ ~\.JlJl AlS 97-59 . 2 . 11125/97 CONFORMANCE OF REOUE~T WITH GENERAL PLAN: ~ The proposed project conforms.to the,1and use deSignation for the property on the Gena Plan map, and is consistent with the intent of the teXt of 1he General Plan DocumeDt. This project also conforms with the policies of Gilroy's General Plan. 1be following examples dCCIl1011SU'3le this compliance: Urban DevelOJ'merq: aqd Cnmmtmitv Design (Section ll): Policy 3: "Urban Development will only oC&:Ur' within the Incorpgrated portion of the Pltmning .A.ret:l. lAnd will therefore be anne:ud 101M City before JiMZ development approWlI is given. to '7ire City wiU phtJse developmmt in an orderly. contiguous manner in order 10 mtzinrDm Q compact deve/opmsnr pattsm 10 avoid premature investment far the B%le1lSion of public facilities t112d 1BrrJtcU. New urhan development will occur in areas where municipal 3erviCe3 are awziklble fl1IIi capacity e:dsts prior to the appralltll of developmlllll in areca which worJd require 11itzjor new factliry upaMion. The proposed project is in c:oDfomumc15 with these policies, beca11Se this property is close to developed residential property, and municipal services are currently available near this site. Policy 4: ENVIRONMENTAl. TMPAC'Ui: ~o BACKGROUND: The Residemial Development OrdiDanc:c (ROO) contains an exemption within Section 50.62 (b) (1), under which the appJicaat proposes to develop. This exmnption allows up to 6 uaits to be constructed per year (not exceeding 12 units in 3 years) without c:ompeting in me RDO process. RELATED APPLICA nONS: TM 97-02 Teotaiive map approv;u to subdivide a 3.22-aae si1e into eight (8) single family lots and one remainder p~ totallina 2.03 acres. Subject to 13 conditions of approval and nine (9) mitigariOD measures and awed residential lots ranging from 6.248 to 6.918 square feet ...l......... ..................., .l."~ DL:"l\.J......a..'L:..l'. ~ \""v.D.L.\ ~ lJuu AlS 97-59 . 3 . 11/25/97 " ANAL VSIS OF REOUEST: The applicant is ~uesting Architec:tural & Site Review approval in order to I;Qnstrud: eight (8) single-family dVidlinjS en property totalling 1.19:1: acres 2'DI1ed Rl (Low Density Residential). The projec:t site is locaied m 1he soutnem portion of the ~, along the east side of Mesa Read between Nicole Way ,and Dawn W~. The Santa Teresa. Boulevard camelor is directly adjacent to the projec~s east property boundary. Existing single fiunily residential UDits are located to the west. across from Mesa Road, as well as to the south. Agricultural uses are lol;8Eed further to the east. As a condition of Tentative Map (TM 97-02) approval. the Architectural and Site Review Application i$: _ subject to review by the Plarming Commission and review and approval by the City Council. The intent of ~ condition is to e:oable Planning Commission and City Council review oflbis project for its continuity with the existing Mesa Ranch neighborhood. 'lbe proPOSe4 single family dwellings will be developed on lots ranging from 6,248= to 6,918:l: square feet Pr.oposed lots arc configured sidc-by-side, all along the east side of Mesa Road., and will follow the p8ttem established with the four previously-constructeci lots to the south. The applicant proposes to wid&:ll and improve Mesa Road along 1be entire project frontage (including remainder area). Off-site improvernen~ will be,provided by the applicant, in accordance with City standards, and include the construction of street, curb, gutter, sidewalk (with landscaped strip), and elearoliers. - This request is part of a larger proposed development which will ultimately consist of 22 dwelling units on the 3.22-acre project site. The Rl zoning district allows a maximum density of 7.25 units per net acre. Buildout of the 22 units will establish a density of 6. 83:1:: units per net acre. Therefar~ developme:nt of the project site will not exceed the maximum allowable density for the R1 zamng district HOME DESIGN The applicant intands to develop the 8 individual lots utilizing six distinct plans (see the attached elevation plans). As submitted, all six plans are designed with two-car garages, stuccoed siding and chimney columns, and composition roof shingles. These homes will be detailed along the front elevation with decorative windows, wood or protruding stucco trim, decorative attic vents, and wooden sectional garage doors. Privacy fences and landscaping are also proposed. The' six proposed plans are further described as fonows: Elml.: A single-story, three-bedroom home with 1,495 square feet and an l1ltacbed two-car garage. This plan features a gabled roof design with hipped accents. A vaulted front-room ceiling aDd facade is a.c:cented with ta.ll,. elevared windows and. stucco stone trim. EliI::L.2.: A .siD~. tbree- to four-bedroom home with 1,630 square feet and an :1lT;IC1P.t1 two-car garase. Plan 2 is distinguished with a side-f'aciDg ~e, arclu:d window bays and entJyway. and decorative stul:CO columns. This plan will fearure a. gabled roof design. flml: A singJe-story, three-bedroom home with 1.51S square feet and an a.nached two-car garage. Featured in this plan is a combination gabled and hipped roof design. The staggered from facade is detailed with a recessed doublc-door entry, stucco stone wainscotting with brick trim, window shutters, and decorative gange-door window panels. ~: , A siDgle-st.oI)'. 1hree-bed.room home with 1,529 square feet and an attached tWo<ar garage. As proposed, this plan will feature a gabled roof dc:s.ign, a front-room alcove. decomive garage-door window panels, and stucco stone wainscotting. .I.~i~,Ji~1 ~LJe .1.0;.1.0 t"d..l.. ~e~L~~e~ ~ ~une~ ~uu;, A/S 97-59 . 4 ~_.- 11125/97 f!mj,: A sinsie-stDlY. 1hree-bedroom home with 1,602 square feet and an attached two-car garage. The proposed garage features t\TiO single-car sedion&l doom. oJfset 1iaD1 cme~. A from courLy8l'd area with double frmcb. doors distinguishes 1bis plan from all five oftbe Other pm. '1bjs plan will also feature a gabled roof design and a stucco band wrapping around the base of the front elev8%ion. ~; , A single-stolY. three-bedroom home with 1.541 square feet and an altached two-car garage. This plan features a gabl~ roof design, a decorative main entryway with french windows and a fanlight Window, arched window bays. and protruding stUcco bands at base- and mid-levels. NOISE ATI'ENUAnON: A noise analy!is was perfonned as a part of the Initial Study. No mitigation measures are required for Daise; attenuation along 'the project's east boundary since a six..foot-high decorative stUCco wall is proposed as a part oftb.e project A noise aaawation 5'l:rUdure was originally IeCt'l'TTmPI'Idrod and proposeci to be seven feet in total height (four-footwall on top efa 1bree-foot bmn). However. at1hei:rmcetiDg ofScptember IS. 1997. the City Council directed staff to research altemarlve berm heights when used in conj1mcUon with soundwalls. As 'a re5Ult, the Santa. Teresa Corridor Task Force (STCTF) 8Dd Pbaming staffreviewed problems assoc:iated with high berms and researched alternatives. The STCTF and Planning staff subsequemly recommended the following two actions: . 1. Tlw the proposed project soundwall be reduced to six reet without a berm but with increased landscaping; ~d 2. That the City Council approve a Zoning Ordinance text change during 1he City's annual "spring cleanup" to include the following language: When a berm /3 ~ted adjacent to a soundwall, the top of the berm shmJd be no closer tJum stx (6) jeet from the top of the soundwalL Proposed noise attenuation banier desigas are ana.ched. As submitted.. the reqUl!Stli:d Arcbitedural& Site Review is consistent with tbe ima1t of the City's Gt:neral Plan text and Zoning Ordinance. In additiOD, this proj~ is consistent with the GuidelilJes fa" Sorqui AneTJUIltton and VZs&ltlJ Preservation afthe Sal'l.la Teresa Botdevard Corridor. STAFF RECOMMENDA TTON: Staff recommends lba% the PiamUng Commission forward a recomrm:ndation of atJnroval for this request to the City Council for the following reasons: A The proposed development is consist=t with the intc:Dt of the goals and policies of the City's General Plan document; B. The proposed Architectural and Site Review Application is CODSistent wi'th the Zoning Ordinsm~; C. Public utilitil:S 8Dd inft3strw:ture improvements needed in order to serve the proposed project are located lmmll!diately adjaam to The project site; D. The proposed Architec:tulal and Site Review Appliea1ion is amsistent With tbe GuJdBlinBS for Sound Attenuatton and YUJlQI Pre.sl!f'1lQttOf'l of the St:tnta Teresa. Bou/ewud Ca"ido,.: and E. There will be no signitic:aDt impadS as a result oftbis project due to me requir~ mitigation-measures to be applied. ' ~.' .v' v, ..L,-,L .LU..l..... r.~ D.l:.AL~.\e~ C;. ~VnL.\ ~U.lU AlS 97-59 ... 5 . 11125/97 In addition.. Slaffrecommends the fonowin~ ~nditions be ~12C'.JI!d on the prantine nfthi! request: 1. MITIGATION MEASURES #1 THRnIJGH #9, contained wiibin the adopted Negative Declaration (datecl1-2S-97. revised 9..09-91) shall be applied to the approval of the project in order to reduc:e and/or mitigme all potential significant impacts to a level of insignificance. as required under the California Envircmmeotal Quality Act (CEQA). 2. The developer sba111smrfc:~ aDd irrigsIe the from yards of each unit Such landscaping f9r each umt shall be controned by an aurcmatic sprinkler systeIm iDstalled by the developer. subject to review and approval by the plarmin& Division.. ' 3. This development shall comply with the provisions of Zoning Ordinance SectiDn S .SO. entitled "Si. , Design RequiremeDts, It pertaining 10 proposed individualdwelliDg unit desigDS. subject to review and apprDval by 1he Plmming Di~ioD. 4. No chain-link fimcing ~1vzll be constructed along any portion of the project sits, sUbject to review and appt'Owzl by rhe'Pkmning Division. S. 1he developer shJ:zJJ imraD a m-foot-high deCOl'mtve 1IIQSonry or Slllcco wG/I along the ellSt ponion of the property. Specific de~igns for the ,",us atttmlltltiQlI barrlel' shtlll be submitted by the developer prior to fi1ltll pennit usuance, subject ro ,eview and appruval by the Pltznning Division. 6. Materials for the proposed front patio railing (model jive) shall be submitted prior to final permit is&'lllZ1lCe, subject to review and approval by the Pkmning Division. 7. All impIovemmts are to be done per City of Gilroy standards, subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division. 8. All proposed retamiDg walls shall be constructed. with permaneat materials such as concrete ( masomy. subjec:tto review and approval by the Community Development Departmea.t 'Wood shau not be penni.tted. 9. Unless this project is exempt from the application of City's Residential Development Ordinance ("ROO-) (City Zoning Ordinan~e Sections SO.60et seq.). no building pennit shall be issued in connection with this project if the owner or developer of such development (i) is not in (iompliance with the RDO. any conditions of approval iSsued in connection with. such development or other City requirements applicable to such development; or ("ti) is in default under my agrec:ment entered into with the City in connection with such development pwmant to the ROO. ~~ William FlUS Plam!ing Division Manager Attachments De~L~~e~ ~ ~UDL~ . , 'iU U........ . , ------- i T.HE ',ITE ~ N GAVILAN COLLEGE ,./\\\ Site Map fo r A/S. 97-59 l~" ;:~,. ~-/ .H1:.RLHd:;k~ '" ' cOttBJS--- , , ' ATTACHMENT A 'Communi~Development;ilpartment J;11anning Division Negative Declaration .City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St GilroY. CA 95020 , (408) 848-0440 llib .lb;17 toll '6!:J U.l.": City FUe Number: TM '7-0% Pro iect Descriution Name of Project Nature of Project Fortino Subdivision The proposed project consists of a ten1:a!:ive subdivision map application for 8 single-family residem:ia11ats. The 8 lots are part of a larger subdivision which would 1~~ subdivide 1b.e entire 3.22-acre parcel into 22 lots. ,The proposed subdivision would ultimately result in the conStruction of 22 single-family residences with street, sidewalk, utility, and other typical subdivision impr~vements on the site. Proiec:t Loc=ation Assessors Parcel #: Along the East side of Mesa Road adjacent to Santa Teresa BouIev<U'Q. betWeen Dawn Way and Nicole Way. .' 810-30-031. 038 Location: .;. Entity or Penon(s) Undertnkin: Proiect Name: Address: Mr. Albert Fortino P.C;>. Box V GilrOy, CA 95020 Initial Study AD. Initial Study of this project was UI1dertaken and prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether this project might bve a sigIrificant effect aD the environment A copy of this study is on file aJ: the City of Gilroy Planning Division, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. Findinfl.'!! & R~~nm The Initial ~tudy id.entified potentially sigcilic:Jnt effects on the environment. However, this project ba5 been mitigated. (see Mitigmion Measures below' whiCh avoid or mitipze the effects) to a point where no significant c::ffi:cts will DCCUI'. There is no substantial evidence the projec:t may have a significant effect on ~e environment. The following reasons will support these findings: 1. The proposal is a logical component of the existing land use of this area. 2. Identified. adver!e impacts are proposed to be mitigated through preparation of special studies, and construction of off-site improvements. 5) 6. OJ j . '-...... .. \,0 . .. j ~ ...... DL.n......L..".c..n 0.. \".UnL..' I.f!:.J U.J,....l Draft Negative D=laratian TM.,97~2 . .' 2 7-25-97 (Reviled 919/'97) 3. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals and policies oftbe Gilroy General Plan. 4. The Initial Study was independently reviewed by City statI: and this Negative Declarnrion re.t1eClS the independent judgement oftbe City of Gilroy, Mitil:9~on M@9..~ns 1) The developer shall have a soils investigation prepared for the project by a qualified soils engineer. The recomznetldatioJJS of the soils investigation shall be inccrporaied into the final improvement plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the ~ E.ngi.net:ricg Division prior to approval of me Final Subciivi!ion Map. The design and coIlStr'uction of all storm dramage improvements serving the proposed project site shaIl be provided by the developer, and will be subject to review and approval by the Gilroy Engineering Division prior to issuance of a building permit These design plans shall include, bu.t not be limited to: A Paved areas shall be designed to minimize drainage that is channeled to one loca:rion. Pa%hway paving shall be potous'in nature, whenver feasible. B. Drainage facilities shall be designed and installed to collect and transport flows away from the streets and buildinSS and into approved drainage strUctures. C. Provisions for periodic sweeping for driveways and parking areas on the proposed project site shall be addressed. 2) 3) Due to the possibility of adverse short-term noise impacts from construction, the following language shall be included in any permits issued for the project site, including. but not limited to building permits for the future development "Noise generating construction activities are limited to weekdays between 7 AM and 6' 7 PM. Limit noise generating construction .u::tivities to weekends and bulidays betwe:n 8' 9 AM and "67 PM." ~, 4) I The developer sball construct a 4-[oot high barrier along the property line contigucus with Santa Teresa Boulevard at Lot 22. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest building pad elevation. The design of the barrier shall be submitted. for the review and approval of the Gilroy Building Division and the Gilroy Planning Division prior to the approval of the Final Subdivision Map. To reduce flanking noise, the developer shall construa a minimum 3-foot high acoustically-effective barrier along the south property line of Lot 1. This barrier may also be the north property barrier recommended in a previous acoustic:a1 study for the four existing residential lots to 1he south of the proJect site. The barrier height is in reference to the nearest building pad elevation. The design of the barrier shall be submitted for the review and approval' of the Gilroy Building Division and the Gilroy Planning Division prior to the approval of the Final Subdivision Map. Note: To achieve an ~oustica1ly-etfective barrier, it must be made air-tight, i.e., without cracks, gaps, or ather openings, and provide far long-term dunbillty. The barrier can be constructed of earthen benn, wood., masomy, stuccc or a combination thereof and must have a minimwn surface weight of2Ibslsq.fl Ifwood is used, homogenous sheet materials ate preferable to conventional wood fcoc:ing bewwse oftbe tendenc;y of the latter to warp and form openings with age, However, high quality, air-tight tongue-and-groove, shiplap or board and batten construction can be used if it meets the minimum surface weight requirement and is constructed air-tight The noise control barriers must be constructed 50 that all joints, including connections with posts, pilasters or building facades are sealed air-light. and no openings are permitted between the upper barrier components and the ground. Restrict the height of the dwellings to smgle-.slory. The developer shall submit elevation drawings for review and approval by the Planning Division. prior to the issuance of the Final Subdivision Map. .l";.. ..; oj' ~ I ~ we ..l. 0 ; ..l. I r d.l. De~L..l.~b~ ~ ~Utie~ ~UH Dn1lNcptivc~. . 1'M 97-02 3 7-25-97 ~ 919197) . , . . . . . . 7) The developersbaIl Dic:1Ude almdsc:ape plan wiih the Fu\;d S~bdimioD Map. the bmdscape plan shall be prepared witH the intent of shielding the beimlfse. Landscape irrigation ~ be provided to the landscaped area. This'vegetation plan sbaI1 be subject to review and approval by the Gilroy Plam1ing Division. prior to the approval of the Final Subdivision Map. 8) The developer sball eid1er fimd or provide a funding mechanism for the rnstintenance of the souad banier and IMltlc!caping. The proposal for the funding m~M"i!:m shall be subject to review and approval by the Gilroy Plmning Divisia~ prior to the approval of1he FiDal Subdivision Map. . 9) Due to the possibility that signitiant buried cultural resources might be found during constrUc:rion. the following 1angu.qe sball be inclucied in all permits issued for the proj~ site. including, but not ~ed If building permits for the future development, pursuant ta the review and approval of the City Planning Division: . "If archaeologicDlre.saurces Dr humon remm1lS are discovered durlng construction, work sJu:zll be MIred within 200 jeet of 1M find until it can be evlllUQreti by a qualified proftssioni:zl archaeologist. If the find ;s determined fO be significant. appropriare mitigation measures shall be formukJ.ted and implemented. " " .. New language is indicaIed in bold. gu.ii~w. teXt indicates old" text Date Prepared: July 25, 1997 (r.v:1.aecl 9/9/97) EndaER.evicwPeriod: AugtJs1:. 20, 1997 Date Appreved ByCty CounciI: October 6, 1997 //// .~ K~ fCsP4 Planning Oivisicn Manager .L,-,.L,. .............\,,011 .L.~ DL.l'.&..IJ..,"\Cl\. 0.;. ......VQL." '6!:J U..L.... B IFrwt-inD SrJ,J;..;.;o. 1....,./ S,MJ. ~ ~tigation McmitoriDg Cheddist A Prior to apprCMJ. of the Final Su:bdrriaion Map, the following mitigation mea.suns shall be implemented: 1 A.~ iD-tiQl.ti.oA .haD. 1. ~ k the pa:rjcn:t l,y D~ City B~g a. ~.l.CliJ. .peer. Th. ~of Diviaian tL.e Iloils iA~at:icm .1aaIl J. m~ bite the Emal imF<<"'CDBDt piau ~ tD'~ cJ the FiD&l SubdiwiDll .M&p. 2 Th" dll8ign aad C:OIlI==ClD of all ~ drama,,, D-kpc City imF-tlZlIlI .lull iIIc:lw!e. Lut Dat b. limit:ecll:.a: EqiDeezm, A. P....l ~ .hJl1e J..iQllecl to -;......;'e Di1li8iCIII. dnmag. tIw: is abma.J.d to crae Joeafiou.. Puh_y,....me ,ball be ~ ill DANze, W'hftIM: feuilJc. B. , Daina.e fac:iliki.. .l:aall1e dc.iSIi.J ~ mstalU to CGlllld: acl !zm.part Go- .._y &am !:he .tmeta aad lnuUmt. uul iIlta ..ppr_d dnmqe ,tzuatun.. C. PmviJliaas for pciaclic: l'lII8eping from cbr-ayw and parlang ar-.. an the propctNd project IIiI:s .h.ll1. ~ 4 TL.e d..,...JwlJ c;l~t iL 4-foot: lailills km. D-Iop.r City Building ab. tlie p~ ha.e ClClDtiQ1lG\U with SiUlt:a. T ft.... DMfton BCI~ "t lPt: 22 TL..l.m..lseight u ia nfennel. City PLuuamg I:D t:be D-.zftt lmi.ldiag paJ .I-ti-. The daill1 of DivilliQll the bacia' .Iwll be nbit:ted bz tbll ~_ azr.d. app=wl of the Giby Buildm. DiYWc= NlJ the Gilmy p~ DiYUiclII pzigr tatbll ~ cJ tbe Fuaal suLchvi.iaa Map. E-2 EMe pf."..ing Gru.." Inc. .l.':/;':J/tlI ~L'e .l.tl:J.O rAA ~&KL1~bK & ~U~ Lll.I Ulb F"rtirro S,,},,};';";"'" Ina;... Ma4Mcwa;u,,i,,g p~ fJ c:J..JJi.i . ~.. . .~ ..... .5 To nd.. Bmkma ncriII., the ~.ball ~ D.wkp.r City Buildm; , & mmimwu 3~~ Li.h acauncall,....lf-~. L.=.r. . DM.icm alcm. tb ~tb pmpedy lm.. of Lot 1. T1b.l.zzi.. City.p~ may.1.o L.1:b.. north 'pNpofty b.mc ~_.J.J. in DiviaiQU a pmvi.au. ac:ouRc.J .t;udy f= tb. _ a.:iItiAl nilidc:a.aJ k.. to th.1Ot.dIa of tis. pmject Jit... n. Lame h~pt is ill ~. tIo ~ DUI'&!Ift ~ pad .I-ti.QD. TIs. d.iI2D of tIr.. Lam. .Is..ll J,. nluaitt.l k tb. nvi- md ~ of the Oikr Buildm.e 0M.icm usd the Gilzoy P!.zimnl Dm.ioa. pam: tg t1. app=vJ of l:he.FiDal S~ Map. Naie: To adu- an aaDUIti~ },.m., it" mwt: 1. awIe "'Hgh~ i..:, ~tb._ aruL., e.. QE other cpciDg., ~ paMcL;' fm. laD'-'-= cbJ.ility. The 1am= 1liID.1. caDStmc:W af -nIa.l-m. ygaJ, m.uamy, .tw:co .. & --mbu,.tiOll th..,f azul m.w't have Ii mUaimum luzEaae ..a.bt cd 2D.Jsq.ft:. If.oacl ill W1eJ. hOdlogeaCN8 .heel: ma*-ial. __ preEaJJ. to GOuv.oticmal 'IIIlOCI bcizl.1 heoaullll of the _deu:,. of the W-I:c wup a.ad b:m ~. with al" H_, hi.,h ~ty, air-tight 1:c:a..~J-g-, .luplap QE ~ uul batbm-.tnaftiOllllaA 1. UIIed if il: meeb th. mizW:D1.lUl nafa.:e ....ht ~eai: !lAc! ill c:oamw:tecl aiz'-tipt. n. Dl:IiI. GODtzol .ba=.. m\llt Le ~ 10 tLat all joiZlb, malucha,1 ~ witb posta, piluta. IJC InailJmI2 bcada aZ. .ea.I.l m-Iigkt:. &Dr! DO opeuiDlil' iIZ8 pamitted k.Cwec:a. the uppc hamar c:ompcmmb &Dd the itcUDd. 6 R-b:ic:t the beight of the cl-lhag. to .uaal.....tazy. D~ City PI.-ms Th. cLwelapft .hall sul.it .l.vatioa dn..mgs fer DivilJiaIl ZW9i_ ~ &~ by tli. PIumia. DiviJiOll, pear \;g tl:r.e UIII1UDce of the FiDal SulJiMoa Map. 7 The ~.hall include a 1auJ.~ plm with tb. D-!apc City Plam:w:i12 Fiaal SuLJm.iOll ~ n.laad.a.pe ,lm .Lall J,. DivisUm ~ with !:b. m~ oE .bieldu.. tJa bcalfllDCII. Electzic.l..ma. .el .. kwo-iJlalt __leL'Yin .h.Jl be pnwicU to tIw 1.~J...... Tbi. ~ piau .1aal1 be .,J,;ect: to t8Vi- agd ..ppmva1 Lr the Gib, p~ DmRoa. pior to tb. ap~ of the Fual S~Map. EMC Pion,,;"!! c;,.;,up Inc. .: :E~ ---- - - - ;4..1 --';'u1--U- I .1 uL J.-o-; J: ~ r~ - ~i::.!(L1J'l.l:.K &. (.Utu:.J'I lltJ U17 . . . . Fom.. S8J ~" bnli41 Sludy Mil:H".,;;'" ~f1ifrjri..4 1/ a....JJr..I ~ . 8 The d-1op.r .baIl.rtla. fuad << pEDVid. a ~ ~ City Pk=. - 1Il.d.uainD. _ tit. ""Iu.uaCtt of tb. IOUDd buac DM.iaa aad Imd.aaping. Th. pmpal Iw tlie bdiag 17'I-1...,j"Dl .bJl L.1V1jec:t to mwinr aad .ppmvaI.by the 0iIrc,y PLmma, DivWcm, pzim: f;g tla. .ppmval.l tla. Fizaal SuLdivia= ~p. ) , .. E4 EMC pJ....;ng GoD.." llle. .Lao.' ao.ut ~, ""'-,.&:, ~U...LV r..."1....Jt. D.cZ\J..,.J..."1.c,.l\. ~ \..UJ:1.L.i.' '6!:J U~-:> ," ~ Foriino S.J,J;gjriJ" I...~ M~Morio,i..g~_ ~~ . . 1 ~ .' :. ' ... ." ......', ... Mitig-ition M~~'Cheddist B .: - ,. .',' ',0 ", '(.:; ,.j:". ' " ., Frio: to isswmce of a Bui1ling Permit, the' following mitisatian mea.rares shall be 'implemCl~: Mit:igatiOZl Nabu8 al MitigatiOZl Puty R.e~le PIIfty M..uua: tar R.-r-..~l. Nu:mber t-pbantatian . tar ~It 3 Ow, ta tb poIIiLillt:y of adwae ,hcm:..1:8ml Daise D-dapc ~B~ impacri:ll ham. ~ th. ~.laquqe 0M.iaa JuJl L. iBdwY =lIZlY peamb ia-J Em th. pBljllCll: City Plaaausg site, ialc:ludmc. l,w; Aoi: limited tcr lnaLliag t-mib for DMsiaa the ~ ~1IQt. .A. l.imi.1: QQi.. glBlm:almg GoaJIt:Nc:t:iClll. aatMtu:. to .......lrJ..)'II1:a.rt.-a 7 .AM _d 6 7 PM. Ladi: .' am.cr gmczal:iDf GClII..ItzwzI:i.cm lI&lt.iviti.. I:a -J.ad. aml :baJida,.. ~ e 9 AM uJ 6 7 PM. B. U I. tem~ 1cm. CIt uoU. UbmU&ficm 1.=.. -arb_ f....nI,l.. 9 Due I:a th. poIIubility t:h&t 1Ii.~t; lnm.l c:ultunl ~ Cil:y P!.ummg ~ might ~ fCNDd duda. ~CID., the DWi.iCl1l. EoBawia. laquqe .l:aall1e iDclwl.d in my pemaib iaNed Em the pjllCll: libt, iudwluag, ltut DOt limited to bui.JJmg pm:m.ib for the futun ~lIIlt, pusua:t to tis. nvi_ _d. .~: . If ~ cwou=.. ~ hQlDAll amam.. Ull di.c--l ~ IIOzutzuGtiGa, ...k .ball be halt..J witbm 200 bi: of the fmd 1mtil it Cl&a 1M ..,Juated ky &~.,J ~ ~logiat.. If tho fmd ill , .j,..._i...,J I:a 1. 1Ii1Di!inut. ~ mil:i8s.ticn1 meuuzw .hall L. faau~ md implcmmt.l EMC JIIG"",-s Go.. 1..c.. 9..5 , '. . . I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 98-2 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council ofthe City of Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th day of January, 1998, at which meeting a quorum was present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this 9th day of January, 1998. ~ City Clerk of the City of Gilroy (Seal)