Resolution 1999-71
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GILROY APPROVING TM 99-06, A TENTATIVE MAP WITH
ELEVEN RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ONE COMMON AREA
LOT ON APPROXIMATELY 1.45 ACRES LOCATED AT 9095
MONTEREY HlGHW A Y, SOUTH OF LAS ANIMAS AVENUE,
APN 790-14-001
WHEREAS, Custom One, Inc. ("Applicant") submitted TM 99-06, requesting a
Tentative Map to subdivide a 1.45-acre lot into eleven (11) single family lots and one (1)
common area lots; and
WHEREAS, the property affected by TM 99-06 is located at 9095 Monterey Highway,
south of Las Animas Avenue, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Negative
Declaration, along with a MitigationIMonitoring program, was adopted by the City Council on
February 13, 1996, which included this project in connection with a general plan amendment
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 29,
1999, at which it considered this project and voted to recommend approval of TM 99-06 to the
City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on August 2, 1999, at
which time the City Council considered the public testimony, the Staff Report dated July 15,
1999, amended on July 21, 1999, and all other documentation related to application TM 99-
06; and
IKHMI453066.01
914.061004706002
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
.
.
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which
constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the
City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT
A. The City Council finds as follows:
I. The project is consistent with the site's land use designation on the
General Plan map, and with the intent of the General Plan text.
2. The project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, the City's
Subdivision and Land Development Code, and the State Subdivision
Map Act.
3. There are no facts to support findings requmng denial of the
proposed tentative map pursuant to California Government Code
section 66474.
4. There is no substantial evidence in the record that this project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
B. Tentative Map TM 99-06 is approved subject to:
I. The twenty (20) conditions identified in the Staff Report dated July
15, 1999, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. The mitigation measures set forth in the Negative Declaration, and
the Mitigation/Monitoring Program, attached hereto as Exhibit C and
incorporated herein by this reference.
3. This approval becomes effective if and only if, and on the same date
that, zoning ordinance Z99-02 becomes effective. Otherwise, this
approval is null and void without any action by the City.
IKHMI453086.01
914-061004706002
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
.
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: ARELLANO, GIFFORD, MORALES, ROWLISON
COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: SUDOL, GILROY
APPROVED:
r,~ ldlGlCb
K.A. Mike Gilroy, Mayor 'I
ATTEST:
(~uuJ~
Rhonda Pellin, City Clerk
\KHM\453086.01
914~1004706002
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 99-71
.
.
/'/
ill / il
r ~,! ~
; I
_~__....t \
'.
.. .. \,
.. .,
II 1/
~ 11:I:0",: "-
I , ~
I .
,
,
:.~
,0,
'...
<I
={I
:
.
.
;" ------- ,
'"
~K~\
:s:'3'.
jJ~:;' ,7
'''If".;':
~
.'
~
,
~
,..--
.- .
..
.'
,
,
..;.~. .{
;:'1
G L R L_1
_OJ y
,
,I
,
.,
,-,
_J i
G9
.~
'No Scale
Source: California State A
utorn.ClbiIe .A.ssociaticn
EXHIBIT A
(
.
.
July 15, 1999
, Community Development Department
Planning Division
Staff Report
TM 99-06 "Las Animas" Subdivision
!
Custom One, Inc. (0/0 Gary Walton)
FILE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
9095 Monterey RoacJ; south of Las Animas Avenue
STAFF PLANNER: MelissaDurkin I
REOUESTED ACTION:
. I
Tentative Map approval to subdivide 1.45 acres into 12 lots, consisting of 11 single family lots and
1 common lot.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
Parcel No.:
Parcel Size:
Flood Zone:
. 790-14-001
1.45 acres (63,313:f: square feet)
"X," Panel # 060 340 00010
Panel Date: 8/17/98
STATUS OF PROPERTY:
Existing Land Use .
Former CET Training Center
General Plan Designation
Low Density Residential
STATUS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY:
Existing Land Use
North: Single Family Residential
East: Monterey Highway
Southern Pacific Railroad
South: Single Family Residential
West: Single Family Residential
General Plan Designation
Low Density Residential
NIA
NiA
Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential
EXHIBIT B
Zoning
Rl
Zoning
RI-PUD
NIA
NIA
R1-PUD'
RI-PUD
.
.
08/10/99
'I'M 99-06 .
2
CONFORMANCE OF REOUEST WITH GENERAL PLAN:
The proposed project conforms to the land use designation for the property on the General Plan map, and is
generally consistent with the intent of the text of the General Plan document. This project also conforms to
the policies of Gilroy's General Plan. The following example demonstrates this compliance:
Urban Development and Community Desim (Section 11):
Policy 3: "Urban Development will only occur within the incorporated portion of the Planning Area.
Land will therefore be annexed to the City before final development approval is given. "
The proposed project is in conformance with this policy, because this land has been within City limits
for many years.
Policy 4: "The City will phase development in an orderly, contiguous manner in order to maintain a
. compact development pattern to avoid premature investment for the extension of public facilities and
services. New urban development will occur in areas where municipal services are available and
capacity exists prior to the approval of development in areas which would require major new facility
expansion. "
The proposed project is in conformance with this policy, because this property IS' surrounded by
developed property to the north, west, and south, and municipal services are available near this site.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
. An Initial Study was prepared for this site in November 1995. The study identified potentially
significant effects on the environment, however the applicant has agreed to individual mitigation
measures that will avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where no significant impacts will occur. A
Negative Declaration with 14 mitigation measures (attached) was adopted on FebruarY 13, 1996. Staff
has subsequently reviewed this Initial Study in conjunction with the proposed project (TM 99-06) and
fmds that the proposed project is substantially consistent with this prior approved environmental
document.
RDO BACKGROUND:
This project consists of the development of 12 homes, which will be constructed in two phases over
a three-year period. Zoning Ordinance section 50.62 (b) (1) allows projects that produce 12 residential
units or fewer within a three-year period to be exempt from the requirements of the Residential
Development Ordinance.
.
.
08/ I 0/99
TM 99-06
3
RELATED APPLICATIONS:
Z 99-02 q This Application Accompanies this Request
A Zone Change request to change the zoning designation of this property fromRI (Single Family
Residential) to RI-PUD (Single Family ResidentiallPlanned Unit Development).
(
(PUD) AlS 99-18 q This Application Accompanies this Request
A Planned Unit Development Architectural and Site Review request for the overall project design and
lot configuration of the "Las Animas" subdivision, and for specific design approval to construct II
detached single family dwellings.
ANALYSIS OF REOUEST:
The applicant (Custom One, Inc.) is requesting Tentative Map approval to subdivide a lAS-acre
project site into 12 lots, consisting of II single family lots and I common lot. This property has a
proposed zoning designation ofRl-PUD (Single Family Residential-Planned Unit Development).
[Note: see accompanying staffreport Z 99-02.] The residential lots in this development are proposed
to range in size from 3,908 square feet to S,309square feet.
r,:,
t
This site haS a proposed zoning designation of RI-PUD. The applicant is proposing to use the
flexibility of the PUD overlay to allow the Tentative Map to deviate from standard Zoning Ordinance
requirements in two ways: I) to allow the lots to be less than the minimum required.6,000 square feet;
and 2) to allow common area within this development. The following analysis clarifie~ this request:
Lot Size Exceotion
The lots in this development range in size from 3,908 square feet to S,309 square feet, with an average
. size of approximately 4,422 square feet. Staffhas two primary concerns with this reduced lot size.
. .
The first concem is the ability of the lots to accommodate houses within the appropriate setbacks. The
applicant has addressed this concern by designing homes specifically to fit on these lots. However,
the homes that are planned for this site do not meet standard setback requirements. Development of
the proposed homes is conditional upon the applicant receiving approval of the accompanying PUD
Architectural and Site Review applicationNS 99-18.
The second concern that staffhas with the reduced lot sizes is that the amount oflot frontage will also
be reduced, which limits the opportunities for on-street parking. This issue has been addressed by the
provision of 8 guest parking stalls in the common area on this site.
Common Area
The center of this project consists of common area that includes a small park, 8 guest parking stalls,
and driveway access to this site. This property will be owned and maintained by a homeownerS
association that is comprised of the home owners in this development
.
.
. TM 99-06
4
08/1 0/99
The applicant will be required to landscape the front yards of all of the homes in this subdivision, as
well as the common park area, in exchange for the exceptions allowed by this Planned Unit
Development. .
SOUNDW ALL ISSUES:
A sound wall will be required to be constructed at this site to reduce the amount of noise that future
residents will be exposed to from Monterey Road. The acoustical analysis that was prepared for this'
project has determined that a 10-foot high sorindwall must be constructed along the eastern boundary
of this site. Staff recommends that this project be conditioned to require a landscape berm to be
placed in front of this soundwall.
Monterey Road (a General Plan arterial) will provide access to this development. The proposed tract
map configuration also shows one new private street that will contribute to the traffic circulation of
this project. The proposed street alignments are consistent with minimum City development
standards.
As submitted, this project is consistent with the intent of the City's General Plan text and Land Use
map, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision and Land Development code, and the Residential Development
Ordinance exemption approved by the City Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of APPROVAL of
this Tentative Map request to the City Councilfor thefo//owing reasons:
A. The project proposal is consistent with the exemption from the Residential Development
Ordinance;
B. The proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City's
General Plan document;
C. The proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision and
Land Development Code; '.
D. Public utilities and infrastructure improvernents needed in order to serve the proposed project
are in close proximity;
E. There will be no significant environmental impacts as a result of this project due to the
mitigation measures to be applied; and
F. The proposed project is consistent with surrounding development.
TM 99-06
S
08/10/99
'.,
.
.
In addition, staff recommends that the following conditions be place on the approval:
I. Approval of this application shall be subject to the .developer receiving approval of Zone
Change application Z 99-02. This shall be subject to.the review and approval of the Planning
Division.
2. Mitigation Measures I through 14 contained within the Negative Declaration for this project
shall be applied to the approval of the project in order to reduce and/or eliminate all potential
significant impacts to a level of insignificance, as required under California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division.
3. Unless this project is exempt from the application of the City's Residential Development
Ordinance ("RDO", City Zoning Ordinance Sections SO.60 et seq.), no building permit shall
be issued in connection with this project if the owner or developer of such development (i) is
not in compliance with the RDO, any conditions of approval issued in connection with such
development or other City requirements applicable to such development; or (ii) is in default
under any agreement entered into with the City in connection with such development pursuant
to the RDO.
4. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, Planning
Commission, agents, officers, aitd employees from any claim, action, or proceeding agaillst
the City or its City Council, Plannitig Commission, agents, officers, or employees to attack,
set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or other
board, advisory agency, or legiskltive body concerning this subdivision. City will promptly
notify_ the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding against it, and will cooperate fully in
the defense. This condition is imposed pursuant to California Government Code section
66474.9.
5. Hydrant locations and water main sizing shall be subject to approval by the Building, Life, and
. Environmental Safety Division, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
6. Street improvements and the design of all storni. drainage, sewer, and water lines, and all street
sections and widths shall be subject to the review and approval of the Engineering Division.
7. All utilities to, through, and on the site shall be constructed underground, in accordance with
Municipal Code Section 21.120, subject to the review and approval of the Engineering
Division.
8. All improvements are to be done per City of Gilroy Standards, subject to the review and
approval of the Engineering Division.
9. All retaining walls must be constructed of permanent materials such as concrete or masonry,
and shall be of a modular design; wood shal1 not be permitted. This shall be subject to review
and approval by the Engineering Division.
TM 99-06
6
. 08/10/99
.
.
10. All grading operations and soil compaction activities shall be per the approved soils report and
shall meet with the approval of the City Engineer. Grading plans shall show grades of all
adjacent properties, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Engineering
Division.
11. All lots shall drain to the street for storm drainage, subject to the review and approval of the
Engineering Division.
12. The developer shall negotiate rights-of-way with Pacific Gas & Electric and other utilities,
subject to review and approval by the Engineering Divisions and the utility compairies.
13. All existing water wells shall be sealed to meet the approval of the City Engineer and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD).
14. All construction activities shall be limited to weekdays between 7 am. and 7 p.m., or
Saturdays and City holidays between 9 am. and 7 p.m. No construction is allowed on
Sundays. .
15.' Prior to Council approval of the Tract Map and Improvement Plans, the following items will
need to be completed, subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division:
a) A signed original composite plan by the electrical design engineer shall be a part of the
improvement plans;
b) A letter from the subdivision design civil engineer shall be }lrepared which states that
. the composite plan agrees with City Codes and Standards and that no underground
utility conflict exists;
c) "Will Serve Letters" from each utility company for the subdivision shall be supplied
to the City; and
d) The plan check and inspection fee for the utility underground work will be collected
by the City.
16. Prior to any construction of the utilities in the field, the following will need to be supplied to the
City:
a) . A signed and PG&E-approved original electric plan; and
b) A letter from the design Civil Engineer that states the electrical plan conforms with City
Codes and Standards, and with the approved subdivision improvement plans.
This shall be subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division.
17. The applicant shall construct a landscape berm along the Monterey frontage of the soundwall
in this development, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division, and the
Community Services Department.
18. The developer shall establish a funding mechanism for the maintenance of the soundwall and
landscaping in this development. This shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Engineering Division. .
.
.
TM 99-06
7
08/10/99
19. The developer shal1 negotiate rights-of-way with Pacific Gas and Electric and other utilities,
subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division and the utility companies.
20. The developer shall provide the following transit improvements:
a. Construct a SO-foot x 10-foot PCC pavement pad consistent withVTA Bus Stop Pavement
Details.
b. Expand the sidewalk to a minimum width of 8 feet for the SO-foot area directly adjacent to
the PCC pavement pad along Monterey Highway, consistent with ADA bus stop access
standards. The sidewalk adjacent to the pad should connect with the sidewalk leading into
the proposed project.
c. . Provide wheelchair curb ramps at all street and driveway intersections within the boundaries
of this project, in compliance with ADA pedestrian access standards.
Respectfully,
William Faus
Planning Division Manager
f
.
.
Plan...--ung Department
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
City of Gilroy
73Sl Rosanna St.
Gilroy, CA 9S020
(408) 848-0440
City File Number: GPA 95-03
Project Description:
Name of Project:
Nature of Project:
Center for Employment Training General Plan Amendment
Request to change the General Plan designation of a 1.4S acre site from
Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, and perform
design review of apartments to be constructed at this site..
Project I,ocation:
Location: 9095 Monterey Road, South of Las Animas Avenue
Assessor's Parcel Number: 790-14-00 I
Entity or Person(s) Undertaking Project:
Name:
Address:
Center for Employment Training
701 Vme Street, San Jose, CA 95110
Initial Study:
An Initial study of this project was undertaken and prepared for the purpose of ascertaining
whether this project might have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of this study is on
:file at the City of Gilroy Planning Department, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 9S020.
Findings & Reasons:
The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects on the environment. However, this
project has been mitigated (see Mitigation Measures below which avoid or mitigate the effects) to
a point where no significant effects will occur. There is no substantial evidence the project may
have a significant effect on the environment. The following reasons will support these findings:
1. The proposal is a logical component of the existing land use of this area.
2. Identified adverse impacts are proposed to be mitigated through preparation of special
studies, and construction of off-site improvements.
EXHIBIT C
.
.
Preliminary Neg. Dec./GP A 9S-03
Page 2
12119/95
3. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the General Plan
of the City of Gilroy.
4. The Initial Study was independently reviewed by City statr: and this Negative Declaration
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Gilroy.
(, Mitigation Measures:
1. The project shall be designed in accordance with earthquake design regulations of the
Uniform Building Code, subject to the review and approval of the City Building Division:
2. A soils investigation shall be prepared for the project by a qualified soils engineer. The
recommendations of the soil investigation sbal1 be incorporated into the final improvement
plans and shall be reviewed and incorporated into the final improvement plans and shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineering Division prior to approval of the final map.
The purposes of the soils investigation are to determine the exact soil characteristics and
limitations on the site, and to recommend appropriate engineering specifications for
development of the site. '
L.':
'...
3. The design and construction of all storm drainage improvements serving the project site
shall be provided by the developer, subject to revieW and approval by the City Engineering
Division. These design plans shall include, but not be limited to:
a Applicable storm water source and treatment-based best management practices, applied
and maintained, as recommended in the California Storm Water Best Management
Practice Handbook
b, Provisions for periodic sweeping for roadways, driveways, and parking areas on the
project site.
c. A design to reflect the City's Storm water Master Plan.
d. Paved areas shall be designed to minimize drainage that is channeled to one location.
Pathway paving shall be kept to a minimum and shall be porous in nature wherever
feasible.
e, Drainage facilities shall be designed and installed to collect and transport the natural
flows in the hillside away from the streets and buildings and into approved drainage
structures.
4. Developers shall pay the appropriate storm drain development fees, subject to review by the
City Engineering Division, prior to building pennit issuance.
.
.
Preliminary Neg. Dec.lGP A 9S-03
Page 3
l2/19/9S
S. Redesign the site plan to eliminate the northern driveway.' Alternatively, the northern
driveway shall be restricted for inbound right turns only. The redesigned site plan shall be
submitted to the city for review and approval by the City Engineering Division and the City
Fire Department, prior to approval of the site plan.
6. For exterior noise contro~ the developer shall construct 10 foot high acoustically-effective
patio fences at the sides of patios that have a direct or side view of Monterey Road and that
are within 83 feet of the centerline of the roadway. Patios between 83 feet and 179 feet of
the centerline of the road, with a direct or side view of the road, require 8 foot high fences.
All other patios that have a direct or side view of the roadway require six foot high
acoustica11y-effective fences. The fence heights are in reference to the nearest patio pad
elevation.
To achieve an acoustically-effective property line barrier or patio fence, it must be made
air-tight, Le., without cracks, gaps, or other openings and must provide for long-term
durability.
The barrier shall be identified on the final map and included in the final improvement plans.
They shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planning Division prior to approval
of the final map"
7. For interior noise contro~ all windows within 315 feet of the centerline of Monterey Road,
and with a direct or side view of the roadway, shiill remain closed at all times. Wmdows
within 113 feet of the centerline of the road shall have windows' rate minimum Sound
Transmission Class (STC) 33. Windows between 113 feet and 179 feet of the centerline of
the road, require windows rated minimum STC 28. All other windows of the project,
including bathroom windows, may have any type "of glass.
Alternatively, the STC 28 windows specified above to be maintained closed may be kept
'. open SO percent of the time for natural ventilation, however, they must be fitted with
windows rated minimum STC 37.
When windows are maintained closed for noise contro~ some type of mechanical ventilation
to assure a habitable environment should be provided. The mechanical ventilation
requirements are specified by the Uniform Building Code.
. The windows specified to be maintained closed are to be operable, as the requirement does
not imply a "fixed" condition. All other windows and all bathroom windows may have any
type of glazing and may be kept opened as desired unless the bathroom is an integral part of
a living space without a closable door, such as is sometimes found in a master bedroom
suite.
8: Prior to development of the site, the developer shall pay required City of Gilroy Public
Safety impact fees.
.
.
Preliminary Neg. Dec./GP A 9S-03
Page 4
12/19/9S
9. The developer sball provide statutory impact fees to the Gilroy Unified School District prior
to issuance of a building permit.
10. Prior to development of the site, the developer sball pay required City of Gilroy Parks and
Recreation impact fees.
(
. 11. All on-site wells sball be permanently capped in compliance with the standards set forth by
the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City Engineering Division prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
12. The design of all sewer line improvements serving the project site shall be provided by the
developer, subject to the review and apilroval of the City Engineeri."lg Division.
13. The design of all storm drainage improvements serving the project site shall be provided by
the developer, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineering Division.
14. If archeological resources or human remains are discovered during construction, work shall
be halted within SO meters (ISO feet) of the find until it can be evaluated by a qualified .
professional archaeologist. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation
measures sball be formulated and implemented. This wording sball be incorporated into any
permits issued for construction of the proposed project.
Date Prepared: December 19, 1995
End of Review Period: February 13, 1996
Date Approved By City Council:
William Faus, Planner ill
!
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
J
1
j
Appendix C
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Center for Employment Training Initial Study
Center for Employment Training Initial Study
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Introduction
]
I
I
I
1
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
1
]
On January 1, 1989, the Califomia State Legislature passed into law Assembly Bill
3180. This bill requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring programs
when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a negative
declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse
environmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to
ensure compliance with conditions of project approval during project implementation
in order to avoid significant adverse environmental effects.
The law was passed in response to historic non-implementation of mitigation
measures presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as
conditions of project approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation
measures are implemented and thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the
effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
A definitive set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and
enforcement procedures to ensure the measure's compliance. This monitoring
program is designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and
. subsequent conditions of project approval are implemented.
Monitoring Program
The basis for this monitoring program is the mitigation measures included in the
initial study. These mitigation measures are designed to eliminate or reduce signifi-
cant adverse environmental effects to levels of insignificance. These mitigation mea-
sures become conditions of project approval which the applicant is required to
complete before, during, and after implementation of the prOposed project.
The attached checklist is proposed for monitoring the implementation of the
mitigatiOn measures. This monitoring checklist contains all appropriate mitigation
measures in the initial study.
Center for Employment Training l1?itial Study
,
.'
Monitoring Program Procedures
It is recommended that the City of Gilroy utilize the attached monitoring checklist for
the proposed project. The monitoring program should be implemented as follows:
1. The City of Gilroy Planning Division should be responsible for coordination of
the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The Planning
Division should be responsible for completing the monitoring checklist and
distributing the checkIistto the responsible individuals or agencies for their
use in monitoring the mitigation measures.
2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsibie for determining
whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have
been complied with. Once all mitigation measures have been complied with,
the responsible individual or agency should submit a copy of the monitoring
checklist to the City of Gilroy Planning Division to be placed in the project file.
If the mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist
should not be retumed to the Planning Division.
3. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the Planning Division should review
the monitoring checklist to ensure that all mitigation measures and additional
conditions of project approval included in the monitoring checklist have been
complied with. An occupancy permit should not be issued until all mitigation
measures and additional conditions of project approval included in the
monitoring checklist have been complied with.
4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non-compliance has
occurred, a written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project
proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Planning Division, describing the
non-compliance and requiring compliance within a specified period of time. If
a non-compliance still exists at the expiration of the specified period of time,
construction may be halted and fines may be imposed at the discretion of the
City of Gilroy.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
.
.
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CHECKUST
Center for Employment Training (GPA95-03 and Z95-Da)
Initial Study
Prior to recordation of the Final Subdivision Map, the following mitigation measures
shall be implemented:
Mitigation Party Responsible Party Responsible for
Number Nature of Mitigation for Implementation Monitorln..
2 Conduct soils investigation Developer City Engineering Division
3 Design storm drain improvements Developer City Engineering Division
5 Redesign sfie plan to eliminate Deveioper City Engineering Division &
northern driveway City Fire Department
6 Design acoustically-effective Developer City Planning Division
barrier as required by the noise
study in accordance, with existing
,7 , ~/l8~%ise control specifications Developer City Planning Division
12 Design sewer line improvements Developer City Engineering Division '
13 Design storm drainage Deveioper City Engineering Division
improvements
i
.
.
MmGAT/ON MONITORING PROGRAM CHECKLIST
Center for Employment Training (GPA95-03 and Z95-o8)
Initial Study
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the following mitigations shall be implemented:
Mitigation Nature of Mitigation Party Responsible Party Responsible for
Number for Implementation Monitorina
1 Development designed in Developer City 8uilding Division
accordance with earthquake
design regulations
4 Pay storm drain development fees Developer City Engineering Division
8 Pay required public safety fees Developer City Planning Division
9 Pay statutory impact fees to Developer City Planning Division
school district
10 Pay required parks and recreation Developer City Planning Division
impact fees
11 Cap on-site well Developer City Engineering Division
14 Include archaeological resources Developer City Planning Division
language on all construction plans
.
.
I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certifY that the attached
Resolution No, 99-71 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy
at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 7th day of September, 1999, at which meeting a
quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of
the City of Gilroy this 22nd day of September, 1999.
(Seal)