Resolution 2000-33
.
.
,
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GILROY APPROVING A1S 00-06 (PUD), AN APPLICATION
FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL OF A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO ALLOW FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A I7-UNIT APARTMENT
COMPLEX ON A l.1l-ACRE PARCEL ZONED R3-PUD
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT), APN 841-12-053.
WHEREAS, Joe Rocha ("Applicant") submitted AlS 00-06, an application for
architectural and site approval of a planned unit development ("PUD") to allow for the
construction of a l7-unit apartment complex on a I.11-acre parcel zoned R3-PUD on the south
side of East Eight Street, east of Chestnut Street; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Negative
Declaration was adopted on March 15, 1999 for a portion of the project providing eight
residential units; and
WHEREAS, the City Staff finds that this revised project, adding nine more residential
units to the site, is exempted by CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, which
provides a categorical exemption for development that occurs within City limits on a project site
of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed application AlS 00-06 at its duly
noticed public meeting on April 6, 2000, and recommended that the City Council approve
AlS 00-06 with 12 conditions, and
IGMB\477997.2
01-042104706002
-1-
Resolution No. 2000-33
.
.
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public meeting on April 17, 2000, at
which time the City Council considered the public testimony, the Staff Report dated March 24,
2000 (Revised April 11 , 2000) and all other documentation related to application AlS 00-06; and
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which
constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the
City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
A. The City Council hereby adopts the following findings as required by Zoning
Ordinance Section 50.55 based upon substantial evidence in the record:
1. The project is consistent with the site's land use designation on the General
Plan map and with the intent of the General Plan text.
2. The project is consistent with PUD findings A through I, as stated in Zoning
Ordinance Section 50.55, as set forth in the Staff Report attached hereto as
Exhibit A, and facts in the record support said findings.
3. The tentative map for the project, TM 98-11, is inconsistent with this
Architectural and Site application.
4. The project will not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to persons or
property in the vicinity.
5. 5. There is no substantial evidence in the record that this project will cause
any significant environmental impacts.
B. AlS 00-06 should be and hereby is approved subject to:
IGMB\477997.2
01.042104706002
-2-
Resolution No. 2000-33
Resolution No. 2000-33
.
.
1. The twelve conditions set forth in the revised Staff Report dated April I 1,
2000, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference, and three (3) additional conditions which shall read in their
entirety as follows:
Condition 13. The applicant shall immediately abandon the previously
approved Tentative Map (TM 98-Il) due to its inconsistency with this
application. No building permits will be issued unless and until the
tentative map is abandoned.
Condition 14. Access to the trash enclosure must be locked to allow
access only by residents ofthe apartment complex.
Condition 15. There must be a resident manager for the project.
2. The six (6) mitigation measures set forth in the Negative Declaration and
the MitigationIMonitoring Program, adopted hereby, are attached hereto as
Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2000, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
MORALES, SUDOL, VELASCO,
SPRINGER
P. ARELLANO
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
G. ARELLANO, PINHEIRO
APPROVED:
AT~m (/ ,
(:- -/(--e:/w~6ci!/L/LCLK.
Rhonda Pellin, City Clerk
- /" h'fYV'. iJt() c.....I, '7
Thomas W. Springer, Mayor
IGMB\477997.2
01-042104706002
-3-
'Commun~ DevelopmentflepartID1ent
Planning Division
Staff Report-
FILE NUMBER: AlS 00-06
APPLICANT: Joe Rocha
LOCATION: 550 East Eighth Street, east of Chestnut Street
STAFF PLANNER: Bryan Stice
REOUESTED ACTION:
March 23, 2000
Revised: April 11, 2000
The applicant requests Planned Unit Development (PUD) Architectural & Site Review approval in
order construct a I7-unit apartment complex on a 1.1 I-acre parcel zoned R3-PUD (Medium Density
Residential- Planned Unit Development). The oroposal renresents a chanl!e in the site desillIl and unit
type. oreviouslv aoproved under PUD Architectural and Site Review Aoplj,..lltion AlS 98-39 (Martinez
Duplex Deve!ooment).
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY:
Parcel No.:
Parcel Size:
Flood Zone:
841-12-053
1. I h net acres
"X" Panel # 060340 0004 E Date: 8-17-98
LOMR: 11-10-98
STATUS OF PROPERTY:
Existinl! Land Use
Undeveloped Residential Parcel
General Plan DesillIlation
Residential Medium Density
STATUS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY:
Existiml: Land Use
N: Motel
S: Outdoor Pallet Storage Yard
E: Residential Dwelling
Mini Storage Facility
W: Apartments, Fourplex
General Plan DesillIlation
Residential Medium Density
General Services Commercial
Residential Medium Density
General Services Commercial
Residential Medium Density
CONFORMANCE OF REOUEST WITH GENERAL PLAN:
Zoninl!
R3-PUD
Zoning
R3
CM
R3
CM
R3
The proposed project conforms to the land use designation for the property on the General Plan map,
and is consistent with the intent of the text of the General Plan document. In addition, this project
conforms to the policies of Gilroy's General Plan.
. AlS 00-06 (PUD) .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACfS:
.
2
3/23/00
Revised: 4/11100
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides a categorical exemption which applies to
this request: CLASS 32, Section 15332 (b); "The proposed development occurs within City limits on
a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. "
RDO BACKGROUND:
The Residential Development Ordinance (RDO) provides an exemption within section 50.62 (b) (I),
under which the applicant proposes to develop. This exemption allows up to 6 units to be constructed
per year (not exceeding 12 units in 3 years) without competing in the ROO process.
RELA TED APPLICATIONS:
Z 98-08:
An approved Zone Change application, which re-designated the 1.1 I-acre parcel from R3 (Medium
Density Residential) to R3-PUD (Medium Density Residential- Planned Unit Development) and created
the PUD combining district. Approved by City Council on March IS, 1999.
TM 98-11:
An approved Tentative Map application, which tentatively subdivided the I.I1-acre parcel into four (4)
duplex lots. Approved by City Council on March IS, 1999. The orispnal aoolicant (Robert Martinez)
sold this oropertv prior to finalizinl]: the subdivision with a Final Map.
A1S 98-39 (PUD):
Approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Architectural & Site Review application to allow the
construction of a private street and four duplexes totaling eight dwelling units. Approved by City
Council on March IS, 1999.
ANALYSIS OF REOUEST:
The applicant requests Planned Unit Development (PUD) Architectural & Site Review approval in
order to construct a I7-unit apartment complex on a l.I I -acre parcel zoned R3-PUD (Medium
Density ResidentiaI - Planned Unit Development). The prooosaI reoresents a chan{le in the site design
and unit tvoe. oreviouslv aooroved under PUD Architectural and Site Review Application AlS 98-39
(Martinez Duolex Development).
The project site is located within an existing residentiaI neighborhood on the south side of East Eighth
Street, east of Chestnut Street. The project site is bordered by a single family dwelling and mini storage
facility to the east, a fourplex and apartments to the west, a motel to the north, and an outdoor pallet
storage yard to the south. Since the site is zoned R3-PUD, this development project requires Planned
Unit Development approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant is not nrili:n118
the PUD combining district to deviate from any Zoning Ordinance requirements.
AlS 00-06 (PUD)
3
.
.
3/23/00
Revised: 4/11/00
The proposed apartment project involves three phases of development and a total of I 7 units. Since this
project is subject to the City's Residential Development Ordinance (RDO), a maximum of 12 units can
be developed within a three-year period. The applicant proposes to construct the first 12 units during
phases I and IT of the overall project. The last five units will be built during phase ill (following the
three-year waiting period required under the ROO). Build-out of the project site will establish a density
of 15.31 units per net acre, consistent with the R3 zoning district's maximum allowable density of 16
units/net acre. The following table illustrates the proposed build-out schedule and unit configuration:
YEAR PHASE CONFIGURATION UNIT #s TOTAL UNITS
Triplex 1-3 3
2000 1 Triplex 4-6 3
FOllIplex 7-10 4
2001 II Duplex 11-12 2
2002 None None None
Single (attached) 13 I'
2003 ill FOllIplex 14-17 4'
TOTAL 1-17 17'
..
, Subject to avaIlabIlIty of exempt urn! aIlocauons.
Proposed unit clusters will be configured side-by-side along a private driveway, which measures 24 feet
wide (80 feet wide at its southerly terminus). The applicant proposes to construct a decorative
entryway into the apartment development, featuring brick columns, stamped/colored concrete, and
extensive landscaping. A private "common area" will be provided in the central portion of the site,
complete with a brick alcove, brick planter area. 'and park benches. A small lawn area will be installed
immediately north of the common area. In addition, a landscaped, rear private yard will be provided
for each unit. The applicant proposes two-story units for the site, each containing two (2) bedrooms
and a one-car garage. Each unit totals 1,433 square feet with 1,193 square feet of living space. Each
triplex and fourplex features the following architectural elements and building materials:
. Gabledlhipped roof design with composition shingles;
. Stucco siding with foam trim and decorative attic vents;
. Sliding windows with foam sills and trim (and window shutters on unit #1);
. Sectional roll-up garage doors with glass window panels; and
. Covered entry porches.
Proposed street improvements (along the East Eighth Street frontage) involve the construction of a new
sidewalk, curb, and gutter, in accordance with miniinum City standards. A fire apparatus turn-around
will be constructed at the south end of the driveway. The City's Deputy Fire Marshall reviewed the
project plans and determined that there will be adequate fire apparatus access to the site upon its build-
out. Seventeen parking spaces are proposed along the driveway's westerly side and southerly terminus,
in addition to the private garages attached to each unit. A five-foot-wideiandscape strip will serve as
a buffer between the uncovered parking spaces and the residential property located immediately to the
west, as well as the industrial property located immediately to the south.
The proposed Planned Unit Development is substantially consistent with the intent of the City's General
Plan text and Zoning Ordinance. In addition, this development is consistent with the City's
Consolidated Landscaping Policy.
AlS 00-06 (PUD) .
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
.
3123/00
Revised: 4111/00
4
At their meeting of April 6, 2000, the Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (John Ceballos absent) to
recommend City Council approval of AJS 00-06 with 12 conditions.
REOUlRED FINDINGS:
In order to grant Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval, the Planning Commission and City
Council must find that the proposed PUD will:
A. Conform to the Gilroy General Plan in terms of general location and standards of development;
B. Provide the type of development which will fill a specific need of the surrounding area;
C. Not require urban services beyond those which are currently available;
D. Provide a harmonious, integrated plan which justifies exceptions, if such are required, to the normal
requirements of this Ordinance;
E. Reflect an economical and efficient pattern ofland uses;
F. Include greater provisions for landscaping and open space than would generally be required;
G. Utilize aesthetic design principles to create attractive building and open areas which blend with the
character of surrounding areas;
H. Not create traffic congestion, noise, odor, or other adverse effects on surrounding areas; and
1. Provide adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash and storage, as necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council aDnrove this request for the following reasons:
A. The proposed project consistent with the site's land use designation on the General Plan map
and with the intent of the General Plan text;
B. The proposed project meets all of the required findings as required for approval;
C. The proposal will not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to persons or property in the
vicinity; and
D. There will be no significant impacts as a result of this project due to the required mitigation
measures to be applied.
In addition. staff recommends that the followinl! conditions be Dlaced on the aooroval of tbis
reouest:
1. MITIGATION MEASURES #1 THROUGH #6, contained within the Negative Declaration,
dated 12-10-98 shall be applied to the approval of the project in order to reduce and/or mitigate
all potential significant impacts to a level of insignificance, as required under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
AlS 00-06 (PUD)
5
.
.
3/23/00
Revised: 4/11/00
2. Each dwelling unit sha1l be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system for all landscaping,
subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.
3. Landscaping: Landscaping plans for the Eighth Street frontage and the project site shall include
specmcations for an >rrrigation system, and shall be approved by the Planning Division. Such
plans shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the adopted Consolidated Landscaping
Policy, prior to issuance of a building permit. The landscaping shall be continuously maintained
in an orderly, live, healthy, and relatively weed-free condition, in accordance with the adopted
Consolidated Landscaping Policy and the approved specific landscape plan, subject to review
and approval by the Planning Division.
4. The applicant/developer shall provide landscaping within a minimum three-foot-wide planter
area between each unit's driveway, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.
5. All landscaped areas adjacent to parking and/or paved areas shall be separated by a raised
protective curbing to meet minimum City standards, as required under Section 38.22 of the
City's Zoning Ordinance, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.
6. The applicant/developer shall construct rear-yard patios for each dwelling unit. Each rear yard
shall feature adequate security lighting and privacy fencing, subject to review and approval by
the Planning Division.
7. The applicant/developer shall provide City-approved street lights. In addition, the applicant
and/or developer sha1l provide adequate driveway lighting, subject to review and approval by
the Planning Division.
8. The applicant/developer shall construct a minimum six-foot-high masonry or concrete wall along
the entire south property boundary, in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Section 34.21, subject
to review and approval by the Planning Division.
9. Building colors shall be earth tones, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.
10. Trash enclosures shall feature a IO-foot-deep concrete apron the width of the enclosure, as well
as a large recycling system for cardboard, aluminum, glass and plastics. In addition, each
enclosure shall be screened and enhanced with a decorative arbor, which extends over the top
of the enclosure from side to side.
I I. One on-site fire hydrant is required, subject to review and approval by the Deputy Fire MarshaL
12. An approved street tree(s) shall be installed by the developer, subject to review and approval
by the Community Services Department.
amFaus
Planning Division Manager
u.,.u,uu
...u.....
..
,./21!l1!l1!l l5: 1!l4
~
env CF caIYOIolJ
ATTACHMENT ~.
p~ I!lT
41!l88.429
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Negative Declaration City ofGilioy
7351 ROsaDDa St.
Gilroy, CA 95020
(408) 848-0440
City FUll Numben: Z !I~8. TM 98-11
PI'l!jl!d Desrriptloft
Name orProi~
Nature of Project:
Martinez Duplex DevclopmeDt
~ to subdivide the 1.11 &ere site iDt.o four (4) parcels and to c:onstrua fo\ll'
(4) dupJexes. The plOpoSed subdivision would u1timateIy mult in the
construction of eight (8) residential umts with street, sidewalk, utility, and othlll'
subdivision improvemeD1S on the site.
Proiat Lor.9finn
LoCaliOD:
Assessor's Parcel 1;:
600 East E'lgbth S1reet, east of Chestnut Street.
841-12-053
Rnfitv or 'Penanl.\ Undarbakinp Proil!lct
Name:
AddrBss:
Mr. Robart Marlinaz
11550 Centf:r AvI.'ll1Ull, Gilroy, CA 95020
JoitiaI Study
AJ11i1itia1 Study of this project was uruimuken and prepared for the pwpose of ascertaining whether this proj~
might have a si!llli1iCllllt effect on '!he llI1virorunent A copy of this study is on filII at the City ofOilroy pJ_ioB
Divisiatl, 7351 RoHllll8 Street. (iilroy, CA 95020,
lirindinlft &r: 'II_l!ftn..
The Initial Study ilbllified potentially signifiCllllt cf'fcds on the enviromnertt. However. this project has buD
mitigalad (see MitigsDoD Mcasurllll balow which avoid or mitigatlllhe BI'feet5) to a point whmlllO sigDificant
eIlecls will OCCUl'. There is D.O substantial evideace the project may have a signific:aDt cdIilI:t on the mviraDman.
The fOllowing I'llll5DDS wilIlAlpport 1hesefintl;'Igl':
L the proposal is a loaical component of the existing 18I1d use of this lIRa.
2. Idemified advene ilDpll"tS IR proposed II) be mitigarecl tbrougb. preparation of special studies, and
COIl!ItruClion of off-site improvements.
3. 'IlIa proposed projec:t is consistBD.t wUh the adopted goats md policies of the Gilroy Clerult2l Plan.
, 4, na Initial Study was indepcmdllDtly reviewed by City 5l3ff, and 1his Negative Dedaration reflects the
indeplll1dantiud~ oftbe City ofGih-oy.
r,(h ih a- ~
U"f_~fUlJ ...."'.1,1...
~~...w, ~.......
...
. J/2BBB 15: eI4
. <
PAGE 83
488.429
CITY OF 6IL~DMU
-'
-
IJ~ Negative Dcclll1lliClD
Fa...: Z 98-08, TM 98-11, lOll AIS 98-39
2
12110/98
Miti".tinn MelUU~
I A qu8lili~d soils engineer shall prepare a soils investigation fot lhe project. The r~commClldslions of
the sails investigazion sbal1 be incorporated into the IinaJ building pl8llS lIIld shalJ be reviewed and
approved by the Gilroy Engin=ring Division prior 1D approval of 1h~ building pennit
2 The following cotltrol measures shaI1 be incoIporated into lIDY permits issued for the proposed project:
A Water ail active collStruc:tion lII'IlllS lit leaBt twice daily.
B, Cover all trIlw hauling soil, smd, md other loose .mamrials or tequire all trucks to mlli_in at
least two feet of freeboard.
C. Pave, apply water three limes daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers an allllllpaved access
row, parking ore&s and slBging &TellS lit coDStrllcnol'.l sites.
D. Sweep daily (wi1h water sweepers) all paved access roads, parkitlg areas anll ~ areas at
CllllStruclion sius.
Ii, Sweep streetS daily (with Willer sweepers) if'Visible soil material is carried onta adj8Clll1t public
s1ree1>;.
F. Hydroseed or apply (DCn-toxic) soil stabilizers ta inactive construction areas (previogsly gnuled
areas inactive for ten dlt)'$ or more).
O. l'.aclose, cover, waIIlr twice daily or apply (nan-toxic) soil bind.. to exposed stockpiles (dirt, SIIIId,
em.)
R Limit 1raf& speeds an unpaved roads ta 15 mph.
L InstaII sandbags or other erosion coll1rOl meU\lI1I8 to prevent silt runoff to public roadways.
J. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas ... quickly lIS possible.
3 The appliCllllI sbaII modifY lhe proposed cul~e-sac to enable the provision of four required guest PBIkini
spaces, subject to review and approval by 1he Gilroy Plllllllina Division prior ta 'tI!lIltalive map approval
4 The foUowmg IIlllgWljle shall be included on any penni1s issued for the project site, including, but not
Iimi1l:d to, building pennilS for the future deve10pmeat "All noise geneJ'llling construction activities shall
be limited to weekdays betwCllD 7 AM and 6 PM, aud to weekends betweeu 8 AM and 6 PM No
construction is allO'lllled on Sundays. In addition, lbe developer will be required to use tcmporazy berms
or noise attenuation barriet'!.l will be used where feasible. "
5 The developer sbaII have a ~ approved noise lIIl81)m conducted. by a qlllllifillld noise engineer, The noislll
analysis shall be used 1D determine the need for 8IIY noise lIttelnlation stlUctures or spegjaJ building design
considerations. These desip considcraDons shaI1 be incorporated iDlo the overall design of the projeQt:,
and shall be submitted for review and approval by the City PI.anDlng and Building DivisiOllli prior to 1be
issuance of a building permit
6 Due to lbe possibility thst significant buried cu1tw:al resources llIigIIt be found during constrw;tioo. the
fallowing 18Dl\lllP s.bs11 be included in any permits issued for the project site. including, bill not lUxrited
tc building pm:ni1s for me future development, pursuant to the review aud IIpproval of the Gilroy Planning
Division:
"If lII'Clhaoalogicol """"'- or bumao rem";'" _ di~ duri!lll CCIA3tl'uctico. wctX sIud1 be haIhd .. ..
mi.nimum of 200 r. tam lbc fiDd 1lllIiIlt """ be evsluatc:d by a qualifiEd pJ'<lli:smmal 1IrCha=losist If the find
is derenDinod to be lriguitiC8l1l. apprq>riate mitigation_. ",,"U be ","""I"I~ llIlli implemr:ntal."
Date PrePared: O.c:..ml:>er ~O, 199B
End of lkview Period:
Date Approved By City Council;
William Faus,
PIIIIlDinS Division Mansg=r
u~;~a;uu 4U.U~
~
".,nllll! 15: 114
!"AGE
4B8.29
CITY OF GI~DMU
'-......
ATTACHMENT If
Mitigation Monitoring Checlclisl
Prior lD isSU8t\~e of a Building PelDlit. the following mitigation measures shall bO! impl=c1.ted.:
1
A qualified .oils engineer shall P"'"Pare a soils
inv...dgat:ion ror the project. The
~tions of the soils inirl!stigo;tion shall be
in~oIpo"'Wci Into the m.al building plans and $hail
be reviewed and approved. by the Gilroy
Engin....ring Division prior to approval of the
bWldlng p=nit. .
The faJIowing con...oi mellSlll'eS shall be
irlccIporated. into ""'y petmils issuecl for tho!
proposed proj"""
A. Waler aU ac:tiv" construction u.... at least
Iw:it:e daily.
B. Cover all trucks hauling soil. sand, and other
loose mall:rials or require aU tl'Uclcs to malnlain at
!Qs t two feet of &eeboani.
C. Pave. apply wal....lh:ee times dally, or .pply
(non-toxic) soil stabilizers on al1 unpaved access
rOscls, parking .arellS and, staging areas 01
consl:ru.clion sites.
D. Sweep daiiy (with watez sweepe,.,,) all paved
acc""s roacls, puking a..... anci staging areas al
conslructiorl sites..
E. Sw""'p streets daily (with waler sweep""') ti
visible soil material i3 carried. Drtto adjacenl public
streels.
Fl. Hyoi,roseed. or apply (llDIl-toxic) soil stabilizers
to, inactive cOnOlruc:tion are.. (previously graded
areas inactive tOI ten days or mOI1!!).
C. Enclose, covet, water twice daily or .pply
(.non-toxic) soil binQer5 10 ""P~'" .ttXkp'iIes (dirt.
san<t etc.) .' .
H. Limil l:raf!j~. speecls. on Ul\p.ved roads to 1~
mph. .
I. Install sandbags Or other erosion control
measures t'e pre\"e.nt 5ilt runoff to public
roadw4YS.
J. Replant V88'1talion ill clisturb.ocl aNas .. quiclcly
.. possible.
Developer
Gilroy
BWlcling
Divi5ion
2
Developer
Gilmy
PIanninS
0;.;;,.;0..
Marli1on: Duplez DtNelap11lE1!t Mitigrztio1l Morli./Ming PTO~'"
~
'iIlzl"'~~' ...~..
.
il4
U"" ~O), UU
J.~;U~
..
"t!:tU.I...., V.I."
. .d/2ElElEl 15: El4
4ElSe429
CITY OF GI~DIot.J
\. ::
PAGE: as
'.~
--'
.
3 n,e applicant shan lnodify the proposed cul-d.... Developer Gilzoy
.ac to enable the provision at four '~'I'lired guest Plll1l:ling
parJdrog'.pacf!S, subject" to .e\'iew and approvol by DIvision
the Gilroy Planning DiVision prior to tentllttive
ma~ '!.E!E1oval.
4 Th~ tollowlng lan!\,age sha.n be included on any Developer Gilroy
pennit.< issu~d for the project .ite, including. but Building
not limite" to. building pennits for the future Divi5ion
development. "All noise generating construction
adiVitio>s .hall be WNted la w"".~ciay. betw""n 7
AM and 6 PM, and 10 we~loends "etween 8 AM
=d 6 PM. No CCllStruction is allowed tin Sundays.
In addil:ion. the developer wW be "''i''ired ta use
b!mporary be.mu; or noise attenuation barrie... will
b~ useel where f"""ib1e.o,
S The developer shall have a dty appraved noise Deveja?"" Gumy
lIX\aJysi$ cenduc..." by a ~eci noise ""gil'I""r. Planning
The noise IZUIlysis shill be used to del2miirle the Division
need lor any noio.. attenuation structure or
.pedal buIlding design considera.tions. These
design considenltions .ha11 be incorporsted into
the overall design of the project and 5hall be
submiHed lor M\'iew and approval by the City
Planning and J:lull4ing DivisiDrlS ptior to the
issuance of a bUilding permit.
6 Due to the possibility that significant bl.lried Developer Gilzoy
cu!tura.I resources might be found d wing Planning
cDlllltruction. the following I"'SW'll'e shall be Division
incll.lded m any pen:nits issued for the project site,
inc1udi:1g. but not Limi12d to building pe:mits Eor
the future deveJoplZlcnl. pursuant to the review
and approval of the Gilroy PlaMing DIvision:
"If archaeolOgical resources or human remaiN are
discovered during construction, work shall be
ha.lted at a lIIiniJ:nu;n.of 200 fee! &om the lind until
it can b" evaluated by a quallf1ed proie..lanal
Ul:ha...,10gi's1. If U.e lind is dete.n:nined to be
SignifiCllrIl. appropriate mitigatlon mea5Ure.s .hall
be to>mulate" and implemented."
M,,'tme:z D""la DnJeiop",m.t M;';gr<llon Moniloring P"'gmm
4
.
.
I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certifY that the attached
Resolution No. 2000-33 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of
Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of May, 2000, at which meeting a
quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of
the City of Gilroy this 17th day of May, 2000.
C?i2~k ~~.
(Seal)
'.
-"