Resolution 2001-15
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING A/S
00-54, AN APPLICATION TO AMEND THE MASTER
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL OF A PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO ALLOW FOR VARIED
FRONT-YARD SETBACKS ON APPROXIMATELY
21.4 ACRES, APNS SOS-20-012 AND SOS-20-020.
WHEREAS, Thomas Road Properties ("Applicant") submitted A/S 00-54, an application
to amend the architectural and site approval of a Planned Unit Development ("PUD") to allow
for varied front yard setbacks for the "Villagio" development, involving approximately
21.4 acres located on the northeast comer of Luchessa Avenue and Greenfield Drive; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), a Negative
Declaration was adopted by the City Council on April 20, 1995, with seventeen (17) mitigation
measures, in connection with zone change application Z 96-10, and the City has determined that
this project is included in that CEQA review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public meeting on March 1,
2001, at which time the Planning Commission considered public testimony, the staff report dated
January IS, 2001, and all other documentation related to A/S 00-54 and recommended that the
City Council approve A/S 00-54; and
WHEREAS the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on March 19, 2001, at
which time the City Council considered the public testimony, the Staff Report dated January IS,
2001, and all other documentation related to application A/S 00-54 and determined to approve
AlS 00-54, including three (3) conditions described in the Staff Report and the six (6) conditions
from A/S 00-25; and
ICDS\511390.1
02.Q32B04706002
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-15
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which
constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the
City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
A. The City Council hereby adopts the following findings as required by Zoning
Ordinance section 50.55 based upon substantial evidence in the record:
1. The project conforms to the Gilroy General Plan III terms of general
location and standards of development.
2. The proposed development will consist predominantly of housing and
therefore fulfills a specific need of the surrounding area.
3. Urban services are available at this project site.
4. The project plan is harmonious and integrated.
5. The project land use plan is both an economical and efficient use of this
property.
6. The project includes landscaping provisions which meet the intent of the
Planned Unit Development ordinance.
7. The project as proposed will allow for attractive and harmonious
development of the project site.
8. All impacts from traffic congestion, noise, odor, or other adverse effects
will be mitigated to the extent feasible.
9. The project provides adequate parking, access, landscaping, trash areas,
and storage, in accordance with provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
\CDS\511390.1
02.()32804706002
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-15
B. The City Council hereby finds:
1. The project will not be detrimental to public welfare or lllJUTIOUS to
persons or property in the vicinity.
2. There is no substantial evidence in the record that this proj ect will have a
significant impact on the environment.
C. AlS 00-54 should be and hereby is approved subject to:
1. The three (3) conditions described in the Staff Report and the six (6)
conditions from AlS 00-25, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
by this reference.
2. The seventeen (17) mitigation measures set forth in the Negative
Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
PINHEIRO, G. ARELLANO,
P. ARELLANO, MORALES, SUDOL,
VELASCO AND MAYOR SPRINGER
NOES:
NONE
ABSENT:
NONE
APPROVED:
-----?'A ~6V<:l W
Thomas W. Springer, Mayor
~....~
.... ;/
Rho da Pellin, ~~clerlc
\CDS\511390.1
02.Jl32804706002
-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 20ot-15
AlS 00-54
EXHIBIT A.
January 18, 2001
CONDITIONS
1. All conditions contained in City Council Resolution 2000-65 for ArchitectUral and Site
Review AlS 00-25 (PUD) approval shall remain in effect and apply to any approval of this
PUD amendment request (AS 00-54).
2. The applicant shall meet the following conditions subject to the review and approval of the
Planning Division: ;
a. No front yard setback shall be less than a minimum of 15 feet.
b. No two adjacent front yard setbacks shall be the same.
c. All side and rear yard setbacks shall be the minimum established in Section 11.30 for
the RI zoning district of the City of Gilroy Zoning Ordinance as follows:
Side yard
Street side yard
Rear yard
6 feet
10 feet
I5feet
d. All driveway lengths shall be a minimum of 20 feet.
3. Expiration: This Architectural and Site Review approval is valid for one (I) year from the
date of notification of approval If any development for which this Architectural and Site
Review has been granted is not established within this period, the approval shall expire. The
Planning Division Manager may grant an extension upon an application request received
prior to expiration.
3-1-01
At their meeting of March 1, 2001, the Planning Commission, by a vote of
6-0-1 (Commissioner Tucker absent), forwarded a recommendation of approval
with 3 conditions as set forth in the staff report.
Attachmeats:
\. Vicinity Map
2. Site Plan
3. LelIer from applicant
4. City Council Resolution 2000-65
EXHIBIT A
EX BIT A
ARCHITECTURAL & SITE REVIEW PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (AlS 00-25) CONDITIONS
. 1. Landscaping: Landscaping plllX\S including specifications for an irrigation system shal1
be approved by the Planning Division in accortiance with the adopted Consolidated
Lanciscaping Policy, prior to issuance of a builciing permit. The landscaping shall bc
continuously maintainea in an onierl)', live, healthy, and relatively weed-free condition,
in accordance with the aciopted Consolidaleci Lancisc:aping Policy, ana the approved
specific landscape plan. Street Trees shal1 be planted in accordance with the
Consolidated Landscaping Policy.
2. Expiration: This Architectural and Site Review approval is valid for one (1) year m,m
the dale of adoption by the City Couneil of the resolution approving the Review. If any
dcvelopment for which this Architectural and Site Revicw has been granted is not
established within this period, the approval shall expire. The City Council may grant an
extension for an aciditionai year upon an application request timely received prior to
expiration.
3. Mitigation Measures #1 through #17 contained within theNegative Declaration dated
December17, 1997, and the Mitigation Monitoring Prog=n for Z 96-10 involving the
subjcct project" (attached), sha11 be applied to the approval of this Planned Unit
Dcvelopmc:ot Architectural and Site Revicw application in onier to reduce ancifor
eIiIninate all potential signifieant impacts to a lcvel of insiguificance, as required under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
4. The applicant shall meet the following conditions subject to the revicw and approval of
the Building Life and Environmental Safety Division:
a. All dweUings positioned adjacent to Luchessa Avenue shall be designed to
control interior noise levels of habitable rooms. from exterior sources, with tested
assemblies having STC of 11 C ratings of 45 db or more (UBC Appendix Section
5401(h).
5. The applicant sbaIl meet the following conditions subject to the review and approval of
the Planning Division:
a. All proposed fencing shall meet the requirements "of the City's Zoning Ordinance
Section 34.
b. All fences or walls over six (6) feet high require approval of a builciing permit.
c. The applicant will be required to submit complete elevations with colors and
nWcrials for the proposea residences prior to approval of any fina1 map.
6. The applicant sba1l meet the following conditions subject to the review and approval of
the Co=unity Dcvelopment Department:
EXHIBIT A
" 5;:0/500 ~
A
sr:LT
01 :tI
EXHIBIT A
a. All proposed retaining walls must be constructed of permanent materials such as
concrete or masomy (preferably modular system, i.e. keystone). Wood will not
bep=ined.
b. Details of the design, height, texture and color of the sound wall proposed along
Luchessa Avenue shall be consistent with the sound wall built for the "Creeks"
subdivision on the south side ofLuchcssa Avenue. Complete plans shall be
submitted for review and approval prior to any final map approval.
c. Complete plans of the lanciscaping along thc proposcci souna wall shall be
submitted for review and approval.
d.. All soundwalllocations shall meet the City of Gilroy's sight distance formula on
all streets and intersections. .
e. If archaeological resources or human remains are discovered during constrUction,
work shall be halted at a minimum of200 feet hm the find until it ean be
evaluated by a qualified professional archaeologist. If the find is dctennincci to
be a UDique archeological rcsource pursuant to CEQA section 21083.2,
appropriate mitigation measures in conformance with CEQA Guideline 15064.5
shall be formulated ana implemented.
r.
f.
Hours of construction shall be limited to between 7:00 am and 7:00 pm Monday
thItlugh Friday, 9:00 am to 7:00 pm on Satutday anci City Holidays with no
construction on Sunday
g. The developer, or ~ccessor in interest, shall notify all future homeowners alang
Srn:et ~C' of the potential future extension of that street.
EXHIBIT A
S:0/9001J1
~ 9l:Ll 00/1%/80.
Community Development Department
Plarinin~ Division
'-'
NEGATIVE
DECL..~.<\.TION
ElK1Bn B
Cirv of GilroY
. .
7351 RosGIICa Str=t
Gilroy, CA 95020
(408) ~440
City File Number: Z 96-10
Praiect n""aimjon:
N=e o{Prcje==
Namre c{?rcje:::
Uplands Zone O=ge
Request to r=u= 7"1 7 a=::s fram Al (Agric::Ul:mal) ;mci os (Ope Space)
to Rl-PUD md Op= Spa=. .
Pmiea'LoClrion:
Loc::rrica:
Ncrtll side of the fimlre Lucl1essa. Av=e =e:lSicm, w=so: ofTDC:l2S
.Roa.ci, md south cfUvas Crdc.
. Assessor's Pare::. Numil=: 808-20-011 (partial), md 808-10-012
EJrtiTv or P~"n(5) Und~~ 'PT"OiKt:
N=
A4dr=:
rJl.Cm3.S ~ad PrtJperties (<:/0 rIm Filie::)
7S118 Wrc Avcue. Suite 0-143, Giircy, CA 95020
Iniri:d 5rorrr:
An!IIitW Sl1Jriy cftbis prgje::t wu ~ and I',,,;-_..J fer the ~ose otas.; .;,,;,,! ~
t!Iis proj= c:rig!:lt Il%ve it .;~,..,..". aect 0tI. the =:viro= A ccpy cfthis s:uliy is on fiic ~ the
City cfGiiroy pI"""";..... Dc;lartm........ T.i5l Ro= S=; Gilroy, CA 95020.
. EXHIBIT B
SZOILOOIl!!
j1 OT:/T nn/a~/.n
Ne:zarive ne::lmIion
- .
Z 96-10
2
12117/97
EiruIin~s and Reasons:
The Iniri2l Study iae:nmed potentially sign;';""..,. de:::3 on the eMrc== F...oweve:', this proJ=---
w b= mitiga.ted (see -....;,~d ~tigatiOI1 Me:l.Surcs) to a. point wi:Lc.~ IlC si~;ncam eife:;ts will
0=. TJl= is 110 substa:llliaI C'lidc= the proj= ma.y \uve if. si!",iiicam ra~ on the ~e:It.
'The fonowing reasons will support these fi:c.dings:
1. The proposal is a logical c;ompone:lt of the e:cisting Jmd use oftbis a..~
2. Id...".jfied adve:'"Se impacts arc proposed to be miri~'''! tbrcug:h prepantiOI1 of speciz1 stndic:s,
and con.s=c:tion of on-me improv=e:n:s.
('^,
3. 'The proposed project is ccnsi.stct with the adopted goals and policies of~ Ge::erai Plan of
the City of Gilroy.
4. The I:citial Study was independmtly reviewed by City s:a:tr, and this N~e Declarat1=
retle= the independctjudge:nent of the City ofGiiroy.
DUc Prepared: De=nber- 17,1997
End of1tc:vicw Period: J'anua::y B, 1.!T9B
Dee AflprcVed By CitY Council: .
WiiIiam Fms, pl~....;.,g Divisiol1 Mamge"
~
EXHIBIT B
$ZO/900 III
~ 9T:LT 00/9Z/80
Uplands Zone Change (Z 96-10)
Mitigation Measures
Geology/Soils
1. A soils invc:stig.mon sball be prepar~ fer the proj= by a qualiiied SOIlS engine::,
The rece=enda1ions of the seils investig;cicn sb3ll be incorperaIe co the SIlal
iInprcve:ne:lt plans and shall be revieWed ana awrovcd by the City bgm=.-1:ng
DIvision prior to approval oftl1e final map. The purpeses of me seils inv~oll
are to de>..ermine the. e:act sail c:baract=ristic md lim~:tticns OIl the sit~ and to
rece""",,,"d apprapmte engi:ne:.-ing speci:iicalicns for develcpmellt ~f the site.
Water
2. Prior to preparanon ofa. te:rtztive map, the proj= prcpone::lt shall COm7..ct with an
engiIledIlf film to perfo= a. flood elevaricn stUdy oftbe prOject site to detc:mine
flood hazards. The flood elevation stUdy shaD. include me:isur~ a.c:::ptahle to the
City Engin=:i,.,:;: DiVision, the Federal Em~e::.cy Manage:ne:It A!:e:.cy, and the
Sama. Oan Valley W= District, to r=uce potcttial flooding impactS to a less than
<i:;:miiC3Ilt level. The tem:mve map shall include the fonowing:
a.. Idemmcation and location ofFiood Zone All a.'td Fiood ZOlle D;
b. Identi:fication and localion of the Santa Clara Valley WAter Distri~ e:l.S=ct;
c, Design and additional measures, as pre5e:Iteli in the flood eleva1ion StUdy, to
reduce potc:n:ial flooding impacts to a less than sigDifiC3Ilt level
The flood elevaIion stUdy sball be subj= to review and approval by the City
E:lgine=ring DivisioIl, prior to approval of a temative map.
3. The project praponeDt shalll'''-l'dR a storm dl:a:ina&e p1a:a wIu:reby the project's st=
~ fi:::ds imc the """"":md~ project. Design of the system shzll include measures
to ..r.......,,,,.e, or r=iuce to' a.cc=ptable levels. the amolmt of po111""nt'l in the ==
'iVUer clr3iDage, in accordance with the Naticnal PoRutam Discharge 1=1.......".,.;on
System (NPDES) speO:fic:alions. Prqlamion of thiS plan shall be ~oped in
. consultation with. the biologist Jm=Paring the we-.lmds plm, and wiII be subj= to
review and "f'l"...~'.l:ry the ~ ~,,~...-..i:ng ~n, pricrto the approval offinal
maps. .
Imple:nc=tion of this ~e=ion measure w:ill reduce si~nc:mt impacts related to
W4ter quality to a 1= than siglliJiC3Ilt level. '
EXHIBIT ,8
SZD/6001ll
~ LI:LI OO/9Z/60
Z 96-10
2
Ncg.Deg.
Air Quality
4. Tile fonowing ccmrol me:uures sh2ll be inccrporaIe~ into any p~ issud for the
proposd project:
a.
b.
c.
d.
c.
f
g.
~
b...
L
j.
W = all active cC1lStl'1JCiotl arcs a:t le:ar. twic: daily or more OItl::l as t1e:::id..
Cove:" all ttUc.1a ,.,~"rm~ soil, sand., and othI::' loose ~..als or require all
tIUC.1a to toaim.ain a:t leas:: twO ~ of r. ~board.
Pave, a:pply ~ tbree t:im=s daily, or apply (non-t~c) soil ~ on all
unpavd access reads, parlCog are3S :md ~ aras it c01lStl'l.lc:iotl sites.
Swe:p daily (wtth WUe:" sw=;lC"!) all paved ac::ess roads, parici:1g a~ and
staging areas a:t ccnmuc:ion sites.
Swe:p S'll'=.5 daily (wtth Wl!l:e:" swe:pcrs) if visible soil mnc:ia.! is c.u:ied ontO
alijac:::!t public stre:".!.
Hydros~d or apply (non-toxic) soil s-.zbilizcrs to inactive cons=cion 2IUS
(previously graded arcs inactive for U::l. days or mcre).
Enclose, cove:", W1!:er twice daily or apply (lllJlI-toxic) soil biIi~ to exposed
s::oc:kpiles (dirt, ~ etC.) .
Limit 1J"3ffic speeds on Ul:lpaved reads to 15 mpli
In=l1 sandb~ 'or othe:" erosion comrcl me==s tc pr=v=It silt runofE'to
public roadways-
R<:plam veg<=tion in disturbed Ue3.5 as quickly as possible.
T ranspo rtatio nlCirculation
5. The proposed project sh.a1l include the completiotl of Luchessa. AVemle berwe::::l
Thomas Road and the westerly boundary of the project site. This will require
consnuc::ing the 1ICI'thedy half of LuchCssa.. Avmue, jpcluding 3. Qa.ss II bike lane,
from Thomas Read to the west:rly bou.ndary of the project sit: to complete: the
four-lme c1Mded =ss-s""";"" If the southmy o=-balf ofLuchess& Av= bas 1101:
. be=: ccmpletc:d pricrto oc:c:upmr:y of the proposed project, the southe:I1 baif should
.be ccmpleted by the proposed project, as well
SZOIOTOIlJ
Plans for the uortherly portion ofLw;hessa Averrue sha11 be provided by the proje:::.
prcpon= and included in the final improve:nc:lI plans prior to approval of the final
map, subjca to review ~ ~provai by the City E:lgine=ri:cg Division.
EXK\B\l B
~ Lr:LT 00/8Z/80
Z96-10
3
Neg. Deg.
Biological Resources
6. Prior to initia.i:ion of co==:ion in the oak woodland hamta1, the limits of p?M""~
shall be =ked and surveyed by a. = ..wed arboris'"... Wiler: t!Iinor aci}== in: the
grading!m: could be ma.de to save incliWlu.a1 tr=S, they should be comiCere:i. Tne
arborlst may also make re--..c=cdmcns fer aC.diIional mea.sur~ that could be
considered alCIlg the limit of grading to' prate<:: tr= just outSide of the cc=cion
area.
7. All native t:re:s r=oved tllll1: me:t the ....;m;.;OD. of'Si~~ Tre:" as defined by
the City of Gilroy Consolidated I.3Ildscape Policy, Se::::ion 6.0, sI:a1l be rep1a=i at
a. ratio (not less than three trees rc:piac::d for ~ tree lost) to be dc::enmned in
consultation with City Pl"""";"~ Division aDd a c:.."ti!id arllorist.
8. A c:::Ulied arbcrist a:ad the Ci1:yPl.....,.,;,.,g Division sha1l review the fina1 grading plan
if my =....MTn~ mo the oak/sycamore riparian forest is proposed. Tne biolo~
shall dct......;.w= if the adrWiMnal cC::O....MTn~ would cow.:-.......ise the integrity of the
Uvas Cre:ls: riparian c=idor. If the c:rt:iiicd arborist and the City pI "",.,;.,., 1 Division
de:e:1IIi=; th: :5ml grading pian wculd result in such a compromise, the:! the grading
pIa:1 shall be reviseda.ccordingly.
9. . The projeo::: prcpCI1ClIts shall icientify the limits of ~ on a. !fading plan. All
tr=S, dassiDed as sigIIincaut accordiDg to the ~s cotlSoliciaIed Imdsc:apii:tg policy
(e:tisring IIlIlM: = six inches or more in diameo-.e:', :It a. pom four and one half f=t
above the g:rcund), shan be surveyed and located on the ~ gnding plan.
Where minor adjustmClltS in the grading !me could be made to save indIvidual
siglliiic:mttre=s, they shculd be c:atisidered. A ricd. arllarist.ami the CItY pI""";"'!
DivisiOl1 T1J1rf alsa maJg: r==CIlialicns fer additional m~s tha:t c;ould be
......,.,;rlo:ra:i zlcmgthe limit of grading to prct=:: ir= just outside of ti:.e cotlSl:NClion
__ The!l' "":"'"Y and ba1 gr2ding plans shaD. be subject to review and a:pprova1
by the City Pl..".,.;nlr Division and cirJ Builclmg Division. .
EXHIBIT B
SoO/Holll
~ L!:L! OO/9Z/80
Z 96-10
4
Neg. D~.
, 10. The proj= prcpon= silall bav1= a. biologist pr=;r.n'C a. plan addressing the ~onve:sicn
of the ~,,~ pond aI'l:3. and related. drainage a.r=:s into a So:2.!otm! we".1and..
Compon= oftbe plan =y include, but net be li.mited to:
a. . Removal oftbe e:cisti:og dam;
b. Restonmon md enbmcemem of the c::dsting swale bew= the d= and the
e:cisting outWl to Uvas Cre:k; .
c. Miner reccmouci:c.g and resronmon cfthe ~ behind the dam to allow the ara
to revert back to a. Se:1!onaI wethmd;. and
d. planting of the open spBC1!! are=. to inclucie narive ~caticm,. tr= and shrubs
typical of the oak woodlands on the proj= site. (RepiacClc:tt tr= te:iuired
inMitigaIiOlIS 5 and 6 could also be plamed in this babitaL) .
These e:lhanc~...,t. would l1litigate the loss of approximately 100 fe:! of ~
w~-3Ild wTthin the droinage swale disturbed by the proposed prcje:::.
(-
Owuc=ship and maintcmce of the pond and the 7.5-= ope spac: ar=. are
addressed in Sedion 4.11. Public: Servi=.
The plan shall be subjeet to review and approval by the City pl,.""m~ Division, the
City E:Igin=ing Division. and the City Parks and P.=l:3%ion Division.
11. A~-~ =oval br=di:lg survP:'j (Ma.rcb. 1 through June 30) of the = pla1med
for removal during ccnstIUctiou should be conducted by a qualified. biologist to
cicte:teine if my a.cive b~f-prey nestS occur In the tie:s to be remo....ed. If these
. survP:'js reveal no nesting birds-of-prey nestS in my = to be remo....ed.,.tbc no
further mitig:a:lion shall be required.. If these surveys reveal active birds-of-prey nestS
in tre:s to be removed, the ronowing rrm;~0lI mC3SU1'e shall be required:
a. All adive 1:rird.s-of-prey nestS shall be ~ided while the nest is oc::-.Ipied with
adults mdlortheir~{Mlrch 11:lJr'cu!h.1= 30). Avcidanc: should include
the esWor.~...". of a. site-speci:lic, mm-disturbm= buffer zene a.r1:ltmd the nest
si:e that pttlbibits' "~,,,L..licn z:ad = remcval. as . """"........:nded by a. qualffied
biclogist.. Tr= r=ncvaI can bqin after June 30 or whCl1 a qualified biologist
dete:mines thu the nest is no longer being used fer tha% sesscn.
Wtti1 irnpi==mion of a.n ~on m=ures pres=ed in tbis section, sigl:liD.cant advc:se
Cl'Iircam=l il:I:lp= tc biclogical resources will be redu~ to a less than si~,,;;';cant leveL
EXHIBIT B
SZO/ZTol:ll
JZ iT:LT 00/8Z/80
Z 96-10
5
N~ De;.
Hazards
U. The te:1t3Jive map sh3ll include:: a. xmmmum 30-fbot fire b~C' bc:::we-..:l the:: =
proposed for cpc:::1 spac: zoIling and the proposed devc::lQpm=- The 50-fOot
Cli~ ClII. the:: pr..1;"';"'''''Y site:: plan would samiY this rc::quir==- 111e t=znve
map sball be::. subject to review ami approval by the City Euilrlm::. Li*, and
E.nvirc:m......'"""~1 Saic:::y Di:vision prior to apprcwl. of a. tc::xltZIive InaP. .
Noise
13. The proje::c: proponent sball arrange for a. l1Cise sw:ve.y to be:: =duc:c::d.for the
. proposed. project be=e:: of its 10catiOl1 adjacc::nt to the e:;ctCSiOIl of Luc;bc::ssa
A ve:llle, a four-Jane arterial !be survey wr",.:ma1ion shall be used to dc:e:'llline the
hc::igbt for noise:: atte:matiOl1 fe:ttUTCS or special b>"',;m~ dcsig:n considerations.
The:: ncise survey sha1l be c:ond""''''; priortD tl!:ll3l:ive map apprcvaI. subjd to revic::w
and approv.a1 by the City PI"""";"! Division. .
14. The noise:: survey, as r=l,uired in Mi~.,1;on Measure 14 above, wiil jd=1ify the
rc::quire:i 10Cllion a:rui height of a ncise .......",.,.;ClII. fctture along the liar-ohern side of
the c:::acsicn ofL""';'''':'= AVer!lle. This noise m=ation fe:tlJl:l"e should not amsist
solely of masonry 'lIl%te:ials, but should =:!.te an aesthc:ically-ple3SiIlg efIca for
uavc::len along Luchessa Avenue::.
The project propon=1t sh3ll prep= a noise ane:mation., landscape and ir:i~0l1 plan
to include, but net be limited to the:: foUcwing:
o The I'.&-.....d design would include some =~nn of e:uth b= with wood,
conc:rete, stUCCtl, or mascnry. The:: bamc::r IIl1ISt be made:: air-tigm, without
aacks., gaps, or cthc::l" apellicg:s and am5t praWie fer long-~ dunbility.'
o The ncise --'",.;on feau:e design sbaIl include:: 1.a.ndsc:apmg tb3t wiilllOt only
be ~_h..;.....ny-plc=ing but will also discourage g:rafli1i Elec:ncz1 service and
'\IIUc::I" sc:rvice .sball be provided tD the l_,;.~ed UeL
o A fi....~~ "'-"<lm""" sball be providc::::l for the ~c:: of the sound
-''''';011 fea:turc and 1.a.ndseapmg.
T.nc:: llOise 1-""'-',.,.;on fi:::Uurc:: and la:ldsCl;Je and itrigarion plan sha.Il be designed prior
to fiDaI map ~ subjCl:t to tl:vic::w and approval by the:: City PliI'mn! Division.
EXHIBIT B
s.o/tlo III
~ iT:LT 00/9./80
Z 96-10
6
Neg. Deg.
Parks & Recreation
15. The proj= propen= shall provide a m;,,;""""" 25-foot 1nil and l:laJ::iut cs==
or dedi=:ion from the top of the Uvas ere--!\: bank, along the ~= frcnugc witi1
the cre-..k. TlIis e3.Se:Ilem: and/or dedi=ion shall be indicated on the tcnutive map,
subje::t to ~ew and 'approval by the City Parks and R==ion Division, prior to
approval of a t~e map.
Hi. . ~ long-t= owne:sbip and maint=c: oithe ope space, e.'the:- option a
or b sh.all ocOJI'.
I~'.
i
a.. Tne prejec: proponet shall o:!i'=r the 7.s a.cres of the proje::t site proposed as
opel space in dedic:mion to the city as an =r::ISion of me e.~';'1~ Uvas Cre:.1c
Park Preserve. Dcdicttion of the open space shaIl be negctiaIe:l berw=:l the
city and the proje::t propone:tt, prior to. apprgval.of the fiD3l map. If the city
cheeses to de:::!ine the offer, th= .
b. The prcje::t prcpCI1Cllt sha1l emblish it homeowners assoc:.mOI1 to mamain the.
ope: space. Maimcmc:' provision for the open spac: shall be included in
Cells, which shall be developed, subi= to review and approval by the CItY
Aro.omf:'j, priClI"to approval of the final map.
Cultural Resources
17. Due to the possibility that sig:DE= burid c:u1tural resourc:s mi!!ht be found. during
ccnstIUctien, the fonowing 1l"1!,'''~e shall be included m my pc:mits issued far the
project site, ;..,.!,,';-""g. but IlCi: limited to b,,;JtI;..g pe:mi:ts tar the fi.l=e dc:velopme:lt,
pu:swmt to the review and approval of the eitr PI",.".,;"! Division.:
"If arcilaeologicai reso= or 11-,.","" r-",,;nc are discovered c!uring
~ werle sba1l be baIted at a. ...;";,.,,.... 0{200 f=: from the find.
umil it can be evaluated by a qualified professianal archaeologist. If the
find is ci=:m:i=i to be sigmncmt, appropriate miri~on m=e5 shall
be fcrmulatcd and implemented. .
EXHIBIT B
sZo/tto III
~ 8t:LT OO/9Z/80
i
.
-
11:14
4B8846l
CITY r:F GIL.ROV ~.A.i
Pile B3
Uplands Zcne Change
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Introduction,
On January I. 1989, the Califomia Sate Legisiature passed into law Assembly Bill
3180. This bill.equires publk agencies to adopt reporting Or monitoring programs
when they approve projects subject to an envircmnental impaa repOrt or a negative
declaration that includes mitigalicn InelilSUres to avoid significant adv-e:se
environmental effects. r.ne reporting or monitoring program is to be desig=1ed to
ensure compliance with conditiCZ1S of project apprcva1 dI<ring project
implementaticr1i in order to avoid significant advexse environmental effects.
The law was passed in response to historic: non-implementation of mitigation
.measures presemted in envircmnental documents and subsequently adapted as
conditions of project approval l'rt addition. monitoring ensures that mitigation:
measures are implemented and thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the
effectiveness of the mitigation measures.
A deiin:itive set of project condit:icns would include enough detailed information
and enfcrce:nent procedures to ensure the measure's compllallC:e. This mcnitoring
program is designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures
and subsequent conditions of project approval are implemented..
Monitoring Program
The basis for this monitoring program is the mitigation measures included in the
ertviror.mer.tal impact report (ErR). These mitigation mea5ure:s are designed to
eliminate or redlllce significant .advetlle environmental effects to levels of
insignifiCllrlce. These mitigation measures become conditions or project approval .
which the project proponent is required to complete du.riz1g and after
implementation of the proposed project.
The attached checklist is proposed fer monitoring the implementation of the
mitigation meas-ares. This monitoring checklist contains all llppropriate mitigation
measures in the Em.
EXHIBIT B
S.O/STO Il!!
~ ST:LT 00/8Z/80
8~/26/2e8e 11:14
4eeed61!42
cnv OF G!LROY cor
PAGE 84
Uplmods Zon. Chango britUd St:ld"
Mitill"ti.... Mtmitari1If: Pra!fF1U1l
Mitigation Monitoring Ch.cldi:st A
Prior to applova\.of the Tentative Map, the following mitigation measureS shall be
implemented:
(-
2 Prier tcpNpantian of a tlU\taav. map. the preject P:ajectProp=t City
pTCpcnc:nt :shaI1 eanl:ClC with an engineering fi:m EnPemng
CD pe:faan a fIcocl e!evUicn ~twiy of the pr'Dje<:t Division
site to c!eteml.ine floecl hazama. The flood.
~ticn stUdy shall irU:lude meaAUVS. accllplable
to the City =~g Divisi"", the Pecieral
El:\e:s-:Y Manaprru:nc Agrmr:y, 1M the Santo
Clan. van.y WaCU IXotrict. 1e..1iw:a potllntial
floadinS' impacts to a less than sigItifiant leveL '
The te:'I",tive map shall include the followU\g:.
... Iclen!ification and lecaticn of Flcacl Zcne All
a:u1 Reod Zona D:
b. I~ _;;l;<"ll1icn ancllocat:icn af the S=ta Clan
Valley W_ Oistrkt e~
c:. Dei$!' and .clcliticrlal measures. as presenllld.ln I
'.
tt\e t10ad elevaliarl stUdy, tc recluce potential
floacii:tg ~ to a less than significant level.
1M flaoel elevation study slWl be subject tc
review ....d apprcVlll by the City E:lginoeri:1g
DivisiO%\.. "riox to 1l'D wl of. . tentative ",.....
II The tentative map sha.ll include a miNlnum hoject l'rapcnent Oty P\allClng
3O-foat.liu b..a.k/buffer between the ...... Division
prcp..-l. for open space %crUng and the prcpased
develop::lerlt. rne 5O-foot c:u!-de-sac on the
prelimlnuy site pI.... waulci satisfy this
re~t. '!he tln\tative map shall be subject to
rwview ancl apprtlval by the city lluilQi:\g. Lile. ancl
En virt>rlmC\tal SafEty DIvision prior tc approval af
a .....tativem&c.
M]ItP . 3
L'AC PI..""Ut,. C,tntp IRe.
EXRIBIT B
S~O/9to III
~ OZ:Lt 00/9Z/80
48884684:;'
c:nv r:F GIL.RllV CO'
--PAGlCe5---'----
89/26/2998 11:14
SoO/ LIolll
Min~=tiQft MQrrirDrinlll'rD~'"
UtJlarui.o Z"". Cl"m~ IJlitUJl Stwlrl
Monitoring Program Procedures
It is required that the Gty of Gilroy use the attolc:hed monitcr'.:ng checklist ror the
proposed project. The morjtcrillg prog=='- should be implemented as fcUows:
1.
Tne Oty ci Gilroy Pl=~g Div'.sion should be respo:lSible for coordination
of the monitoring progxam, including the monitoring checklist. The P1=Ung
Division should be resportSible for completing the monitoring c:heckIist and
distnbuting the checklist to the responsible individuals or agertc:ies for their
use in monitoring the mitigation measures.
Each responsible individual or agency will then be respcm.sible for deter-
mining whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring
ched:J.ist have been compl.led with. Once all mitigation measures have been
complied with. the respcm.sible individual or agency should submit a copy of
the monitoring checldist to the Oty of Gilroy Pla=ing Division to be placed
in the project file. If the mitigation measure has net been ccmpliedwith, the
monitoring che<::klist should net be retumed to the PlanniItg Division.
P:ior to issuancc of art occ:upancy pettnit, the Planning Division should
review the checklist to eNure that all mitigation measures and additional
conditions of project approval included in the monitoring checklist ha-ve bee!!.
complied with. An OCCl4partc:y pecnit should I\Ct be issued until all
mitigation- measures ;md additional conditions of project approval included.
in the monitoring c:hed<Jist have been c=plied with. -
If a respoIlsible individual or agertCY detemlines that a non-complianc:e has
occurred, a written notice should be delivered by c:ertiIied mail to the project
proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Plarming Division. describing
the non-c=plian<::e and requiring complianc:e within. a specified period of -
time. If a. non-compli;ma: still exis~ at the e.'(piration of the specified. period
of tiIne, c:onsb:uction may be halted and fines may be imposed at the
discretion of the Gty of Gilroy. .
2.
3.
4.
MMP-z
EM'C Pl<UJJriJlg GrtJvp Uu:.
EXHIBIT B
~ or:LT OO/lr/80
89/26/26!S 11:14
46e846642
CI1Y CF GIlROV CIl:
PIIGE 6ii
I
I
~
~
]
]
1
't-
i
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
SZO/IlTOIll
IbII....ds ZaM Ch1m9;e Initill./ Stwl"
. Mitiptirm Ma";fDm.~ p.,,~
Mitigation Monitoring Checldist B
Prior to approval of the Final Map, the following mitigation measures shall be
implemented:
1
A seils investigaecn shaIll:te pr8panti:!. fer the Projct Propan.:tt
p:ejeet by a qualiiie<i sells enpneer. The
r=endacions of the soUl invlIStigaticn shall ba
incorpcol'llteC into the final imprcovement pIaN ani:!.
shall be %1IViewacl me apprc>vecllly tba city
E:,;jneering Division pri=r to apprcova.l cot dw final
!Up. The pu..-pco,es cof the .coils invesligaticn ..... to
d.etemtine the exact soil c:haracterisl:i.<:s 1%\l11i:ni-
lations en the site. mclto ~d apprc>prialz:
engir!ee:ing speci.ficati= fer develop::u:nt cof the
site..
c..'Y
En;inn:'ing
Division
3
The pirOjec': p""!'an.....t shall pn:Pare a stmm Prcjc: Propcno::tt
d.rai:ulgm plan wh....by the F")e<:t's stamI.
dninap feecls into the wetlands p:eject. Design
cof thesystdl shall include maasures to eliminate.
cor mila Ie =t:able lllV1!ls, tba a:I<lunt co!
ponutu\!S in the;= wallo:' d:ainage. in
aa:=i!ance with the Naticnal p..numnt Discharge
Eliminaticn system (NPOES) specifications.'
P:epanti= oJ this piAn shall be dlOVelcped. in
eCl'lS'llitaticn wi:h the biolalPSt pJ:Cpu:ng 1be
wetlands pIa:n. and will be subjed to review I%\l1
appraval1:ty the Oty Engineering Divisicn, prior Ie
the a val af final mans.
City
Engin8e<ing
Divisio:l
EMC PI"",,;",. Gra"1' I"Co
MMP-$
6\\\B\1 B
~
lZ:Ll 00/8Z/80
B9/26/2BBB 11:14
4BBB46B42~
CITY lJ" G!1.RCV CDl
Miti~tiort MG..rtDrDlR' Pnol"_
13
15
MMP-4
sZa/no~
PAGe: B7
t&laG z.- 0.-".. hrif:W 5nuill
The prcject prop=t shaII amlnge far a noise Pmject Prcpanl!flt
s=ey 10 he c=iud:1!d Un the prapoaecl prajact
bc:ausio of its ~ adjacmt = the utulsian of
Lw:!hessa Av_ .. fouz..lane artmal. The SIl:V"Y
Wam\aI:iQn ~ be use<l tc d&-;,.,. the Jwi&bt
fer t.aise attmuatian iu_ or special bWlcIing
d""isn am5idemticm.
The'n~ SW'V"l' ohall be Cl:lrlducted priar to
tozllali'n map app:cvaL suhjct 10 review a:id
1ll>Di'crval by the' P1amUn Division.
T.ne ptojed: profClNll:lt shall prgvicIa & mi:limum
2S-llDct trail and habitat 4U"'l:l''''tt or dedical:icm
I=!!. the top of the Uva C:eek l>w. alcng the
pn:#ct fr=tllp with the c:eek. nu.-=t
ancl/or cieclicaf:ian shall he ;,.,"I~tood an the
Ilmllitift map. suQject to nrMw =i appzaval by
lite c#.ty Porks and. Raaution Oivisian, pzicr to
lll>Cr:aval of. !ental:i""
City
EnV--:mg
Dmsian
Project P:opanmt City Pulos
IIIU1 .
Rec:uti=
Oivisian
EIKlBn B .
EMC PI........' Grawp 1-.
A
TZ:LT OO/9Z/80
B9/26/2B88 11:14
488B468'-2,
eITV CF GILROV cor
PAS:: BE .
~!.m.u bIt. ClrszII.p b1iti41 Study
-
- MitiptilJ" M~!f Pn..fl'IIm
14. Th~ no~ survey, as re~d in Mitigation Projecthoo=t Ci~PWWng
MelL$Ure 14. will il!entify the requi=:llccaticm and Divisicn
hGght cf a nms. att:nUaticn f~ature alan! the
norlhem sid~ of the extension of Luchessa .... venue.
nus nciH attenuation iu.=a shculd no' ccrW:It
saI~l!, of muamy ,.,._.1., but should <:uta an
aesth:etially-p1easi:rtg elf",,: Jar trav.l"", alang
Lu.c:h=saAven"~.
Th. proj""t proponent shall prepare a noise
.ttencaticn, landscape and irrigaii= pt.n to
inc:lucio, but not b.limi<eci to the fo11awing:
o The pm.::ed Jimgn wauld i:rtclud~ SImIe
- ~ornbinaticn of earth benn with woed, ccnc::ete,
stuccQ, or maoamy. The barrier l:<WSt be ma<i. air. .
tight, without cracks. gaps, or ether epenj:lgs and
must :provide for Iong-tenn durability.
o The<naise attenw.ticn fearure design shall
include lan<!.saping that will net cm.1y be
aesthejially.pJeasing but will.be c!iKourage
graffili. aecmcal serviQl and water service rhall I.
be pro"itied to the Lmdsaped area.
o A fun~ mochuU=. shzll be provided far the
~..,ce of the sound .ltC\uation feature and
~
The ndise al:tl!nw.t:ian feature and lanasap. and
imptign plan shall be designed prior to final map
.ppro.w, subjoet to review and approval by the
citv fu:mjnll Division.
16 Ragatdmg Icng-mm ownership oncltnain-=r:a Pn:Jjac:t Propcmen.t City Pul<s
of tho! qp.... 'Pace.. either aptian a or b shall 0=. md
Reaeaticn
a. The projea proponent shall affRr the 7.s iICR5 of Divisian
the project site proposed as open sp.ce in
cledic:ation to th8 city as U\ extension of the
existing tlvas Creel< Pad: Preserve. Dedll:aticn of
the opm spa"" shaI1 be negoriatRCi betW""" the city
and :he-project pmpcnomt. prior to approYlll of lhe
fi:I:al =1'" Ii the city dleos", to decline the offc:r. .
then:
b. The rroiect proponent shall ..tablish a
heme","""",, usodalicm tD lXlaintai:rt the open
spac.. ~. prDVision tor the open space
shall be Induded 1tI CCRs, whicb shaJ1 be
d""eloped. sW:>jed tD review an4 approval by tba
City Al'lorn..... orier lD a'Ol>r<lval lOt th. mw mao.
EMC Pw...ing Gro",.. IftC.
MMP-7
EXHIBIT B
SZO/OZO IZJ
~ ZZ'LT 00/9./80
89/26/28e8 11:14
4eee45e42~
CITY CF GIl.R:lV em:
PAGE 89
Mft1l(Rtimr MDflitm~ Prort'4m
u"l4a.is ZarrI Or~ hritW Shuiv
S The prcpD.Hd project shall mclude the complctkm P:aject Prcpanenl Ci~
at t.lic:hasn Avenue beNe=! T"no:nu Raad ane! Eng;ne.cng
tN westerly bcund..zy of the praject.ita. 'this..,ill Oivwcm.
requin eanstru!=ting the nazlherly halE of Lw::hassa
A""""", iZIcIucl.ing" C1eo 11 bike le:te, ==
n.azn... ~ to the westerly baunda:y of the
project lite to =pleta the fau:r-lan. dMciI!cl
=-sect:cn. rt 1he sauthllrly one-half of I.w:hesia
AVG\Ull has ""I been =plll!ed priar to
oco:rpancy at th. pmposed. project, the .outhe=
half Ihoulcl. be =ple12d by the F"pased praject,
as ....n.
~ fer the narther.ly pcrticn of Luch_a
AvlltlUe shall be p:ov.icl.ed.lly the prajec:r P"'F-
an<! iftdu<led in the final impro\rUl1l!:\t plam ptier
to eppraval at lhe :mid map. subjl!ct lD ravillw and
_=oval bv 1M City inll:ineerin~ Divisicn.
10 The project prapanenls shall hove . biojap Project Prop=1 City Pl.aming
prepare a ple:t adciresoi:rlg the convemon of <he Divillion
existing pond area ancl relatlld d:aimge :areas izUc
a sasmW wetland. CompClIleNll of the plart.lXIaY
i:u:Iucle. but net be limited to";
~val at the existinS dam; -
a.
b. :Rest=nticn an<l enhana!lnent of !tie =sting
swalll blltWl!Ct the dam and the aisting
oulfalllo t1vas CreelI:;
"- Minor reamlouring and. resloratian at the
area behincl the dam to allow th&! area lC
l!8Vert bad:; to a seasonal wetland.; and.
d. Planting cf tN ap.... 'pace uu to incWde
nativv vegea.tion. trlles an<l shrub. typial of
the aak wooc!b:lcls art the praject site.
(~lac:ementlrHs ~ in Mitigati= 5
and 5 could also be planleci in this habitat.)
These e<lhanccnenlS ",oul.cl mitigate 1M Ia.. of
approximately 100 fHI of existing wetLuui within
the clrainage swala disu.trb.cl by the prop=ecl
prcject
Ownership and mam=u:e of the pa:ui and the
7.5-aCl'll'apen 'Peee un a:w.adclressecl in Secti=
4.11, Puhlli: Servia!s.
The plan shall. be subject to ~w cui approval
by the city !'laming Division. the city Engineering
DIvision. ancllhe city Pules and Racnation
0lvWcn.
I
I
I
MMP-6
EXHIBIT B.
liMe P'-nmK C..... 1m:.
I
sza/tza Il!I
JZ.
zz: Lt aaiiZ/8D
89/26/2BBB 11:14
4B8846842~
CITY CF GILROY CDI
pJ>GE 18
U.,ltnltU ZDM CJm,,~. !",fiAl Stwil/
Mml(4UDfI Mtmitrmnl( Pro'Z1'tmr
9 The project pmpcner.ts shall identity the Ilmits of P:ojec ?:opClMIlt City Pla=ing
grading ell a gndJng plan. All trve5, -I ...;6_d~ Division
sipcmt llCl:ordlng tI: the city's ccnsolidated
landScaping policy (uisting native I:ree5 six inche
Ot men: in <filIzl=lU'. at a pei:>t feur uui ".... half
feet :abave IN gmunci), shall be ~ycd and
located. an the ~ gndingplan. Wh.....
tninar aajustz=nts i:> the gnd.ing line .auld. be
macll! to save inciividual signiliC:at1t trees. they
shouki be <:cn.sidemci. A arliiied. uborist md the
dty PlamIing Division may :a!,s., :Wee
te",,=endaaon> far adc.:ticna1 me3SU%S that
couldI be censiden!d aleng tit. limit oi grading to
protect lneo just outside af the cCNtn,,:tian area.
The prel.imiN%y uui fiN.! gnd.i:tg plans siWl be
",,*cc to review and approval by the city
Plam1lnlZ DiYioion ami citv BuilI:liN: Division.
17 Due tb tho possibility that signiiicant b..Jried Praject Pmpcn-= City Pluming
c:ultwlal Il!5aur:e5 might be foutIa d.u:itlg Division
consm:cticn. the fallowing IMPS" shall b.
mduded in =y pe:miIls ;ssuea far.the pmj<<t site.
including, but not limitea to building pemUl:s fat
the future aevelcpment. p\USWIIIl: to the :eview
md q,proval oi the Gilrcy Pl:uming Dilri:lian:
"If ucbaeelolOical nsa<=Bll arhwnan remaiN an:
dlsce......a aun:.g c~ warX shall be
haltecll at a mitUmum oi 200 feet !rom IN find until
it an be evoluated by a cr,.I;<I... ptof8ssiarial
ardueclagist. U the find is detemli=d to be
signiiitant. appropriate mitigation "",asur'" shall
be fam>ulatcd attd. im,,!emented. "
EMC P!Jvmirrg Gn"", rile.
MMl' -,
EXHIBIT.B
sZo/zzo~
.Q.
CZ: LT oo/aZ/eo
89/26/2B88 11:14
48B646842
CITY OF GILROY Cll1"
Pe.IiE. II
Miti~ MDrribnmg ProI('f"IIm
u"r-a z"". C1um~ briMl SttuI.,
Mitigation Monitoring Checklist C
Prior to issu~ of a Buildi:lg Permit, the following zmtigation measures shall be
implem=nted:
-~
4
The 1'ollcwing contrel measures shall be
iru:e~oraled inte any petmil& isl;ued far the
preposed project:
P:oject Propcnw City BlOilding
DivWcn
a. Water all actiVl! <:ar!Sb'Ud:lcn areas at lllast twice
dall)i or me... ofb:n lIS 1\l!l!dei.
.
b. cinru all b'Uc:ks hauling 3Cil, .and. and other
lcos. mat2riaIs er ~ all trudcs to mzl:ntaiD at
Iaut twe i...t et freebca:d..
l:. Paw. apply water thrI!I! tim... dally. er a!'Ply
(nen-lo:cic) .cil stabili::1!r.l on all unpaved _
reads, parlCng Ul!"" U1d staging .....as at
o:cn&ttudicm sites.
cl. SWeep daily (with WIlt... SWetlpers) allpllVlld
aCJ:I!SI roads, pukirlg lU9S md staging amu at
ccnstz!w:licn sites.
... Sweep streets daily (willi water 1IW1Il!pl!:S) it
visiblol soil mall!rial is =:riali onto adjacmt;nU>Jic
sttl!elll.
i. Hycireseed at apply (non-tOxic) seil staIll1iz=s
to inactive c:onst:ruc::an ueas (ptl!Vieusly graded
areu ihadivo far ll!rt days Dr mare).
g. . E:Idcse. cave, water 1wU:a. daily Cl% apply (non-
lexie) scil bind.... to exposed stcd;;oil... (din. s""cl,
etC.)
h. Limlit tnffic .p@ed5 en unpaved rea" to 15 . .
mph.
1. Insl:lll1 sandbags Cl% other erosicn o:o:Ilrcl
trII!lI5Wll!s Ie prev....t silt =H to public roadways.
.
j. Replarrt veget1tion in d.iJstu:bed .areas a quickly
as ~assible.
MMP-8
EMC pfJumVtg C......" 1=
EXHIBIT B
SZO/CZOIll
~
cz:n 00/9Z/1I0
I
I
I
I
j
.
II.
8'/26/2888 11:14 48884&8425
UrlllDlis Ztnu t:1rlltll(< I1titW. Sbld"
CI1'Y rF GILROY COD>
f'1'G:: 12
.1\ifjti~lIti_ M<mitMD,,1( I'TDJmI<m
i
I
I
j
J
-
I
I
I
I
I
11 A i'-t:ree mnoV2l breedinf surv~ (Matth 1. Project Propanmt Qty Plarlr.i:lf
I:h%I:>ughJune30l of cbe ~plannedlcr:m\01la! Oivioiml
c1urizl.g =t:ucliGn shcuIA be =cNc!l:c1 by a
~ biclapt to dalmNDe if my actiw lrizcIs-
oi.-~ nests 0= in the I:ees '" b. Il!mOVed. II
=- .....,.".. revu.l no ...cing bi:cboof-p"y MSlS
in my l:eeS to be =eved. tbe=n %II> fw1:hu
mil:igaticn shall be IeqWrecL If thae surveys
rev~ adive birds-oi-pny.....15 in trees '" be
ramaved. th8lollowin!, milIgaI:an tNIUU:I! shall
be :~ui:8d:
a. All:ad:ive b~.p",y nuts shall be avaide<!
while the nest is occuplftl with adulcs aM./a: their
ycuag(Much 1 th:oughl\1ne30). Avoidana
shouL:1 include the elltabllshment of a lile-spec:mc.
non-distu:ban= bufl'1lr 2:CllllI arouzu:l the nest site
that jmWbUs veptluon and t:ree removal. aI
. =>nmended by a 'i"aIiflea biologist. T....
.remclva1 can begin after June 30 or when a
quaWicd. biologjst cIetermines that tha nest is "'"
lonftr beinll U3ed Ier that seucn. .
EMC Plamri"K G"....t' IlIC.
MMl'-Il
EXHIBIT. B
sZo/tZoilJ
.0.
tZ: LT 00/9V10
e,/26/2ee8 11:14 488846842'
Mitigtttiarr Moltirari1f~ p",~:zm.
CI1Y IF GII..RlJV COD.
PllGE 13
11~ ZaJI, ChlUl~r l:r.itiJzJ. Stud..,
Mitigation Monitoring Ch"cldist D
Prior to Construction Activities, the following mitigation measures shan be
imple::nented: ..
~--
6 Friar to i:Utiaci01'l of c:cnstrudi01'l. in the oak l'raject Prapcnet G.il:ay .
woadl&nd habitat, the l.im.iu at gnd.inr shall be Pla=Ung
slaked and. surveyed by . Cl!%tUied ulooriat. Wh::e Dr.omcn
min!lr acljustmftUs in lhe grading li:le coulc1 be
.....cl,. to SllVe i:ldividualtnes, th.,. should be
cansidered. The arbamt may alsc.1Zl&ke
-=mendaticns fer aticiitional measures that
c:auld br c:ansiderer::! alan, the limit of ,.,.elmg to
wotec: trees iust outside ot the ccnstnld:icn area. ,
7 All native trees removed thet meet lhe de5nition l'Mject Prcponent CityPla=ing
of "SiptiBant 1t1!e" as defined by the City of DMsicn
Gllrol" ConsolliUter::! L.aM.sc:ape Policy, 5cticn 6.0.
slWl be replaced ar a ratio (not less than thne t.ees
repLaud for every tree lost) to b. dete>::mined in
<='1SUltation "(ith city P1anning Divisicn anc1 a
.certiil.'ed. arbarist.
8 A ce:llfiecl arborist and. tha c:ity PlamUng Divisicn Pn,ject Ptopanent City !'Ianz!inJ
shall teview the fiNl crading plan if any Oivisian
e:=oaclunent into the oU/sy=re riparian
n:.rest is proposeci. The biolopst shall ~ ii
tha ar::!diticnalll%lC"oach:l=t would =promise
the integrity of the Uvas Creek riparian =rrir::!rtt.
Ii the .-tified amarlst an1:l the city PW-.rUng
Divisicn detemlin... the 5rnU gnding plan would
restili In such a =promise. then the grading plan
shall be ...vised. ac<:or.iinJdv.
.
M/dP-I0
EXHIBIT B
EMC P/_ni>rg Gro.." 1-.
S~O/SZOIl!J
J:t
~7. :LT
nnta,./.n
I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached
Resolution No. 2001-15 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of
Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 2nd day of April, 2001, at which meeting a
quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of
the City of Gilroy this 18th day of April, 2001.
J.. //)
~/ ~[t?/^-~FL
City Clerk of the City of Gilroy
(Seal)