Resolution 2002-41
Resolution No. 2002-41
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY OF GILROY GENERAL PLAN GPA 99-01 FOR
WHICH AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED, AND
ADOPTING MITIGATION MEASURES AND APPROVING A MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to approve a project to update the City of Gilroy's
General Plan, GPA 99-01, referred herein as the "the General Plan"; and
WHEREAS, such General Plan was the subject of a final environmental impact report
(Final EIR) entitled Final Environmental Impact Report for the 1999-2020, prepared by the City
of Gilroy as the lead agency in compliance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held on October 14, and October 28, 1999, and said
Draft General Plan and Draft EIR were recommended for approval by the City of Gilroy
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held before the City Council on January 24 and 31,
2000, March 13 and 27, 2000, April 10, 2000, and April; 9, 2001, wherein the City Council
recommended a revised Draft General Plan, which triggered the recirculation of the Draft EIR;
and
WHEREAS, public hearings on the revised General Plan and Final EIR were held on
December 13, 2001, January 10 and 23, 2002, and February 7, 2002, and said revised General
Plan and Final EIR were recommended for approval by the City of Gilroy Planning Commission,
per Resolution 2002-02; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held before the City Council on the General Plan and
Final EIR were held on February 19, 2002, March 11,2002, and public meetings on Aprill and
8, 2002, and June 13, 2002, that included public input; and
WHEREAS, CEQA requires that in the approval of a project for which a Final EIR has
been prepared, the decision-making body shall review said Final EIR and make certain findings
regarding the significant effects on the environment identified in said Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gilroy is the decision-making body for the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which
constitute the record of proceedings upon the City Council's decision is based is the office of the
City Clerk; and
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-1-
2. Mitil!ation.
WHEREAS, the City Council has certified that as the decision-making body, it has
reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR, which is comprised of the
Draft EIR dated September 2001, the Amendment to the Draft EIR, dated December 6,2001, as
amended by the General Plan EIR Addendum, dated May 30, 2002, and other information in the
record, prior to acting upon or approving the General Plan, and found that the Final EIR has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the
City of Gilroy as lead agency for the General Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY make the following
findings with respect to the significant effects on the enviromnent of such General Plan as
identified in the Final EIR.
I. FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
A. LAND USE: CONSISTENCY WITH PLANS.
1. Impact.
4.1-1. Substantial inconsistencies with local, regional, state and federal plans, policies and
regulations regarding agriculturalland preservation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of substantial inconsistencies with local, regional,
state and federal plans, policies and regulations regarding agricultural land preservation.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.1-1:
Policies
1.01 This policy ensures orderly. contiguous development that avoids land use conflicts including those
related to preserving agricultural lands.
1.03 This policy mitigates impact 4.1-1 by restricting the land use east of 101 to industrial or
agricultural uses. The 660 acres of agricultural land being converted by the General Plan are
being converted to Industrial Use, and commercial use that would bring a clear majority of
customers from outside Gilroy such as nearby the outlets.
2.01 This policy mitigates impact 4.1-1 by guiding growth into areas in or adjacent to Gilroy's existing
urban service area, which the 660 acres are adjacent to.
2.03 This policy requires that land to be used for urban development be incorporated prior to
development approval. The annexation of the 660 acres is consistent with this policy.
2.04 This policy suggests that Urban Service Area boundaries and service and resource availability be
used as a guide to growth. As the 660 acres are adjacent to the Urban Service Area and adjacent
to services and resources, the annexation of 660 acres of agricultural land is consistent with this
policy.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-2-
Resolution No. 2002-41
4.03 This policy promotes urban containment, thus preserving outlying agricultural lands.
2.05 This policy provides for regular review of growth management tools, thus ensuring adequate
review of policies relating to agricultural lands.
2.06 This policy requires that new developments pay all of the incremental public service costs that
they generate. Successful implementation of this policy insures that the costs of developing the
660 acres will not impact the financial status of the city. This helps mitigate the annexation of the
660 acres.
2.07 This policy requires that properties to be developed for urban uses be inside the urban service
area. The annexation of the 660 acres into the City of Gilroy and its inclusion into the Urban
Service Area is consistent with this policy.
2.08 This policy directs the establishment of a 20-year boundary with the objectives of directing growth
and location of urbanization, minimizing public services and infrastructure costs, and promoting
compact development. The annexation of the 660 acres and its addition to the 20-year growth
boundary is consistent with this policy.
2.09 This policy dictates that modification to the 20-year planning boundary take place only in the
event of a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan. The annexation of the 660 acres and
its addition to the 2V-year growth boundary is consistent with this policy.
2.10 This policy sets forth circumstances under which 20-year planning boundaries can be altered
without a General Plan review or a General Plan update. A project or projects which will
provide a significant number of jobs or contribute substantially to the City's tax revenues qualifY.
The annexation of 660 acres is consistent with this policy.
2.11 This policy recognizes that long-term development may require expansion of the 20-year planning
boundary. The annexation of 660 acres is consistent with this policy.
3.0 This policy advocates attracting industrial, high-tech, and commercial office employers to Gilroy.
The annexation of the 660 acres is consistent with this policy_
3.12 This policy advocates agriculture as an interim and long-tenn use in areas designated for
industrial development. The annexation of the 660 acres of agricultural land for the purpose of
allowing industrial development is consistent with this policy.
4.02 This policy encourages the preservation of agricultural lands through collaboration between
public and private entities.
4.04 This policy recommends opposing urban development in County lands until such lands are
annexed by the City of Gilroy. The annexation of the 660 acres of agricultural land for the
purpose of allowing industrial development is consistent with this policy.
4.05 This policy promotes agricultural uses in the Planning Area, thus ensuring the viability of
agriculture-based industries.
4.06 This policy promotes agricultural uses in hazard areas, thus preserving agricultural lands.
20.05 This policy encourages the use of greenbelts and open space to retain the community's rural
atmosphere.
20.09 This policy encourages preservation in perpetuity of open space, thus enhancing the rural quality
of Gilroy.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-3-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2.D This action encourages interagency coordination for grol'cth management, thus reducing
inconsistencies among jurisdictions.
20.10 This policy encourages regional preservation of agricultural lands.
Actions
I.A This action requires consistency between the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other
planning and land use tools, thus reducing inconsistencies.
I.E This action encourages the development of a specific plan for Hecker Pass to maintain
consistency with the General Plan.
2.A This action requires annual review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
ensuring consistency between planning tools and documents.
2.B This action encourages the maintenance of a 20-Year Boundary to guide long-term development,
thus reducing plan inconsistencies.
4.A This action encourages interagency coordination for growth management, thus reducing
inconsistencies among jurisdictions.
4.B This action encourages interagency coordination for agricultural protection, thus reducing
inconsistencies between planning documents and strategies.
20.A This action encourages an open space review process for all development proposals in open space
areas, thus reducing inconsistencies between development and growth management plans.
20.E This action encourages greenbelt definition and protection among multiple jurisdictions. thus
reducing planning inconsistencies.
20.F This action encourages the use of a greenbelt or other buffer between Gilroy and San Martin, thus
encouraging interagency coordination to reduce planning incons~stencies.
20.H This action would maintain and improve practices for the City's open space management, thus
reducing planning inconsistencies.
20.1 This action would ensure the use of open space preservation tools to be consistent with the
General Plan.
20.J This action encourages interagency coordination between the City and the Santa Clara County
Open Space District, thus reducing inconsistencies in growth management practices.
Additional Mitigation Measures: 4.4-A, 4.4-C See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by
this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a significant unavoidable impact. The General Plan includes mitigation measures that
will lessen the significant inconsistencies with local, regional, state and federal plans, policies
and regulations regarding agricultural land preservation. Despite implementation of these
mitigation measures, the General Plan will result in significant unavoidable agricultural land
preservation impacts that cannot feasibly be reduced to a non-significant level. This impact,
UHI553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-4-
Resolution No. 2002-41
therefore, is considered significant and unavoidable.
Considerations.
See Statement of Overriding
B. LAND USE: PLANNING AND COMPATIBILITY ISSUES.
1. Imuact.
4.2-1. The General Plan would result in alteration of physical development of the City
compared to existing plan and creation of potential land use incompatibilities.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of alteration of physical development of the City
compared to existing plan and creation of potential land use incompatibilities due to
development under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.2-1:
Policies
1.01 This policy encourages the orderly development of land, and the avoidance of land use
incompatibility. Iffollowed this policy helps mitigate impact 4.2-1.
1.02 This policy encourages a diverse mix of land uses to achieve a balance between jobs and housing
and to insure the community's long-term viability. The proposed land use changes in the General
Plan are consistent with this policy.
1.03 This policy dictates what uses can be made of land east of 101. If followed, this policy will
mitigate land use conflict.
1.04 This policy promotes safe and attractive design for new neighborhoods that would limit land use
conflicts.
1.05 This policy sets forth goals for ensuring and maintaining the quality of neighborhoods. If followed
this policy will help to mitigate impact 4.2-1.
1.06 This policy sets goals for the development of the downtown area. If followed, this policy will help
mitigate land use policy inconsistencies.
1.07 This policy sets goals for the development of the Hecker pass area. Iffollowed, this policy will
help mitigate land use policy inconsistencies.
1.08 This policy encourages development in area with fragmented property ownership. thus reducing
land use conflicts.
1.09 This policy promotes clustered development. Iffollowed, this policy will help mitigate land use
policy inconsistencies.
2.01 This policy promotes growth that maximizes existing infrastructure and service investments, and
growth that takes place adjacent to existing urban development areas. If followed this policy will
help mitigate impact 4.2-1.
IJH1553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-5-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2.09 This policy dictates that modification to the 20-year planning boundary take place only in the
event of a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan. This policy will help to mitigate
potential land use inconsistencies in the General Plan.
2.02 This policy encourages growth to be controlled by existing infrastructure availability, thus
reducing land use conflicts.
2.03 This policy states that urban development will only be allowed within incorporated portions of the
Planning Area. This policy, if followed, will help to mitigate impact 4.2-1.
2.04 This policy suggests that Urban Service Area boundaries and service and resource availability be
used as a guide to growth. This policy will foster planned, responsible growth. its implementation
will help mitigate impact 4.2-1.
2.05 This policy advocates regular review and evaluation of growth management goals, tools, and
results as part of the periodic General Plan review process. If followed, this policy will help to
foster planned, necessary growth. This will help mitigate impact 4.2-1.
2.06 This policy requires development impactfees to pay for new infrastructure, thus reducing land use
conflicts.
2.07 This policy requires that properties to be developed for urban uses be inside the urban service
area. This policy will help to insure land use consistency.
2.08 This policy directs the establishment of a 20-year boundary with the objectives of directing growth
and location of urbanization, minimizing public services and infi-astructure costs, and promoting
compact development. This policy will help to mitigate potential/and use inconsistencies in the
General Pion.
2.10 This policy sets forth circumstances under which 20-year planning boundaries can be altered
without a General Plan review or a General Plan update. A project or projects which will
provide a significant number of jobs or contribute substantially to the City's tax revenues qualifY.
This policy will help to mitigate potentia/land use inconsistencies in the General Plan.
2.11 This policy recognizes that long-term development may require expansion of the 20-year planning
boundary.
3.04 This policy eneourages industrial development if it provides jobs for Gilroy residents, and
recommends placing the development near housing and where there are available public facilities.
Following this policy will help mitigate potential land use incompatibilities.
3.05 This policy encourages concentration of heavy industrial activities in the City's southeast
industrial area, to avoid incompatible land uses. Following this policy will help avoid or mitigate
potential land use incompatibilities.
3.06 This policy encourages the development of well-designed park areas to attract new light industrial
development in the Gilroy area.
3.07 This policy encourages the development of well-designed park areas to attract high-tech
businesses and related industries to Gilroy.
3.08 This policy allows industrial park uses in areas other than those designated on the Land Use Plan
map if the use is shown to meet the City's Industrial Design Guidelines for environmental
compatibility with existing or planned uses. Following this policy will help to mitigate and avoid
land use compatibility impacts.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-6-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3.12 This policy advocates agriculture as an interim and long-term use in areas designated for
industrial development. Following this policy will help to mitigate and avoid land use
compatibility impacts.
3.13 This policy encourages new commercial uses to group into clustered areas or centers containing
professional offices, retails sales and service. Following this policy will help to mitigate and
avoid land use compatibility impacts.
3.14 This policy promotes the use of rigorous design review procedure to protect residential uses from
potential adverse effects from adjacent commercial centers.
3.25 This policy encourages a wide mix of uses in close proximity to each other in the Downtown area
and encourages mixed use developments that integrate housing and commercial uses.
4.02 This policy advocates working with the county, LAFCO, and other relevant agencies to protect
agricultural and grazing lands fi"om encroachment by urban uses, and advocates implementing the
strategies and actions recommended by the South County Agricultural Study.
4.03 This policy advocates containing urbanization within an area large enough to meet foreseeable
need, but which will not intrude unnecessarily on, or cause premature conversion oj, agricultural
lands.
4.04 This policy recommends opposing urban development in County lands until such lands are
annexed by the City of Gilroy.
4.05 This policy advocates recognizing agriculture as a compatible land use in undeveloped portions of
the planning area.
4.06 This policy encourages area subject to natural hazards such as major flooding or soils u'ith a high
water table to remain in long term agricultural production.
5.06 This policy allows non-conforming uses in designated Historic Structures.
10.12 This policy advocates using the following criteria to identifY Housing Infill Opportunity Sites or
areas:
a) adequate vehicle and pedestrian access
b) convenient access to transit
c) convenient access to neighborhood services and facilities needed by the prospective resident
d) convenient access to neighborhood recreation facilities
ej cost-effective mitigation of physical site constraints
f) cost-effective provision of adequate services and utilities to the site
g) ability to meet applicable noise requirements
hj adequate site size to provide parking
11.04 This policy encourages senior housing, including residential care facilities, to locate in or near
residential neighborhoods that are convenient to public transit and within walking distance of
shopping and restaurants.
11.05 This policy supports the provision of emergency shelter facilities and transitional housing for
families and individuals who are homeless or who require special care services.
11.06 This policy sets the following criteria to identify potential sites for a new permanent shelter
facility:
aj sites should be in c/ose proximity to public transportation, and professional services
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-7-
Resolution No. 2002-41
b) site should preferably be located a reasonable distance from schools, existing residential
neighborhoods, industrial areas, and areas with a high concentration of bars and liquor
stores
12.10 This policy promotes land use planning that helps to reduce automobile trips, thereby educing
congestion and helping to achieve air quality goals. In particular strive for a balance of jobs and
housing n future development.
26.01 This policy recommends establishing a physical development pattern that is compatible with the
noise environment afGilroy.
26.02 This policy recommends that outdoor and indoor noise levels are within the maximum permitted
levels.
26.03 The policy recommends enforcing stringent buffering standards to protect residents from freeway,
e.:tpresswaYJ highway and industrial areas wherever possible.
26.04 This policy recommends considering the acoustical design afprojects in the development review
process to reduce noise levels to acceptable levels.
26.05 This policy recommends requiring landscaped earth berms as an alternative to soundwalls where
feasible to buffer noise along major thoroughfares adjacent to residential areas.
27.04 This policy recommends evaluating new development on sites that may have involved hazardous
materials, to ensure there is no public health danger prior to granting development approvals.
28.1 This policy recommends that the City take an active leadership role to assure the use and
implementation of the General Plan.
28.2 This policy recommends that the City conduct periodic reviews of the General Plan to evaluate its
performance and effectiveness in light of changing conditions and trends.
28.3 This policy recommends that the City amend the General Plan as necessary in response to
changes in local conditions and needs, and evaluate proposed amendments in regard to
environmental impact and consistency with the other goals and policies contained in the plan
document.
28.4 This policy recommends that the City promote the ongoing participation of community residents,
businesses, and property owners in the planning and development process.
28.5 This policy recommends that the City encourage the participation of young people in the planning
process.
28.6 This policy recommends that the City work with other local, regional. and state agencies to
address planning issues that cut across jurisdictional boundaries.
Actions
1.A This action encourages updating all planning documents to ensure that all growth management
plans are compatible.
1.B This action encourages the maintenance of hillside development guidelines to reduce land use
conflicts,
1.C This action requires the creation of a task force to implement neighborhood district strategies
designed to reduce land use conflicts.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-8-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3.A This action would create "pelformance standards" for use in reviewing industrial development
proposals to reduce land use conflicts with industrial developments.
I.D This action encourages the development of a Downtown Specific Plan to reduce land use
incompatibilities in the Downtown area.
I.E This action encourages the development of a Hecker Pass Specific Plan to reduce land use
conflicts in the Hecker Pass corridor.
1.1 This action encourages community beautification efforts to enhance the attractiveness of the City
and to reduce visual land use conflicts.
2.A This action encourages a review process for application for inclusion in the Urban Service Area,
thus reducing land use conflicts.
2.B This action encourages the development of a 20-Year Boundary to reduce long-term land use
conflicts.
2. C This action encourages the regular evaluation of the Residential Development Ordinance to
ensure compatibility with the General Plan.
2.D This action encourages interagency coordination for growth management to reduce regional/and
use conflicts.
3.B This action would ensure the use of industrial design guidelines to reduce land use conflicts with
industrial developments.
3.n This action establishes commercial design and development standards to reduce land use conflicts
with commercial developments.
3.E This action ensures the use of design guidelines and use controls for neighborhood commercial
development, thus reducing land use conflicts.
3.G This action encourages the creation ofa neighborhood revitalization strategy area to reduce land
use conflicts relating to neighborhood uses.
4.A This action encourages interagency coordination to address agricultural land uses and reduce
land use conflicts.
4.B This action encourages interagency coordination for agricultural protection, thus reducing
possible land use conflicts relating to agriculture.
9.A This action requires a study to determine housing infill opportunity sites, thus reducing land use
conflicts through zoning recommendations.
11.A This action encourages working with representatives from homeless service providers to select
sites for homeless shelters, thus reducing land use conflicts through long-term planning.
26.A This action encourages the adoption of a noise ordinance to regulate noise in the City and help to
prevent land use conflicts relating to noise generation.
26.B This action encourages the revision of the Zoning Ordinance noise standards, thus reducing land
use conflicts relating to noise generation.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-9-
Resolution No. 2002-41
28.B This action would allow citizen requests to the City Council to amend the General Plan, thus
reducing land use conflicts.
26. C This action encourages the use of noise standards as part of development review, thus reducing
land use conflicts.
26.D This action encourages compliance with the State's noise insulation standards, thus reducing land
use conflicts relating to noise.
27.B This action encourages regular inspection of hazardous materials storage, thus reducing land use
conflicts.
28.A This action encourages the review and updating of the Implementation Priorities to reduce land
use conflicts in long-term planning.
28.C This action would ensure regular General Plan review and updating, thus reducing land use
conflicts in long-term planning.
28.D This action ensures the review and updating of the Housing Element to reduce potential land use
conflicts with housing.
Mitigation Measures: 4.4-A, 4.4-C, 4.4-D. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference.
3. Findinl!:s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
C. AGRICULTURE.
1. Impact.
4.4-1. Conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses from implementation of the General
Plan will cause loss of productive agricultural land, including prime farmland and
farmland of statewide importance.
2. Mitil!:ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of loss of productive agricultural land, including
prime farmland and farmland of statewide importance as a result of the conversion of agricultural
uses to urban uses from implementation ofthe General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.4-1:
Policies
1.01 This policy encourages inflll development and the preservation of agricultural resources, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-10-
Resolution No. 2002-41
1.03 This policy restricts lands east af Highway 101 to only industrial and agricultural uses, thus
protecting productive agricultural/and.
1.07 This policy encourages the protection and enhancement of Hecker Pass as a scenic gateway, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
1.09 This policy encourages clustered development for increased densities, thus protecting productive
agricultural land.
2.01 This policy promotes growth controls and a compact development pat/ern, thus protecting
productive agricultural land.
2.03 This policy requires annexation to the City prior to development of new areas, thus protecting
productive agricultural land.
2.04 This policy encourages the use of planning tools to control grOlvth rats and locations, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
2.05 This policy encourages growth monitoring and evaluation as part of the periodic General Plan
review process, thus protecting productive agricultural land.
2.06 This policy requires development impact fees to cover increased costs of providing public
services.
2.07 This policy promotes the establishment of an Urban Service Area to identify land that could be
potentially developed, thus protecting productive agricultural/and.
2.08 This policy promotes the establishment of a 20-Year Boundary to identify potential development
sites, thus protecting productive agricultural/and.
2.09 This policy promotes the establishment of a 20- Year Boundary to identify potential development
sites, thus protecting productive agricultural land.
2.10 This policy provides for "rare and exceptional circumstances" for amendments to the 20- Year
Boundary.
3.01 This policy promotes the development of agricultural businesses, thus protecting productive
agricultural land.
3.11 This policy advocates the recognition of agricultural industries as vital to Gilroy's economy, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
3.12 This policy promotes agriculture uses in areas designated for industrial development, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
4.01 This policy ensures that agriculture is viewed as economically viable, thus protecting productive
agricultural land.
4.02 This policy encourages agricultural land preservatian, thus protecting productive agricultural
land.
4.03 This policy encourages urban containment and compact development, thus protecting productive
agricultural land.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-11-
Resolution No. 2002-41
4.05 This policy encourages agricultural uses within the Planning Area, thus protecting productive
agricultural land.
4.04 This policy supports County land use regulations that promote agriculture, thus protecting
productive agricultural land.
4.06 This policy encourages agricultural uses in hazard areas, thus protecting productive agricultural
land.
20.09 This policy encourages preservation in perpetuity for agricultural lands, thus protecting
productive agricultural land.
20.10 This policy encourages regional preservation efforts in preserving agricultural lands, thus
protecting productive agricultural land.
Actions
l.A This action encourages collaboration between local agencies on growth management tools and
practices, thus ensuring the protection of agricultural land.
J.E This action encourages the development of a Hecker Pass Specific Plan to ensure protection of
nearby agricultural resources.
2.A This action requires review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
protecting agricultural/and.
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20- Year Boundary to guide long-term growth and protect
farm land.
2. C This action encourages evaluation of the Residential Development Ordinance to ensure protection
offarm land.
2.D This action encourages interagency coordination for growth management, thus protecting
regionally important farm land.
4.A This action encourages implementation of "Strategies to Balance Planned Growth and
Agricultural Viability" to ensure the protection of farm land.
4.B This action encourages interagency coordination for agricultural land protection
II.C This action encourages providing farm worker housing to protect the agriculture industry.
20.A This action encourages open space revifl1.l processes to ensure the protection of fann land.
20.E This action would establish greenbelt definition and protecting and protection of agricultural
land.
20P This action would ensure the establishment of a greenbelt between Gilroy and San Martin to
provide a buffer and further protect farm land.
20.H This action encourages effective open space management to protect agricultural lands.
20.1 This action ensures review of current open space preservation tools for achieving preservation of
agricultural lands.
UH\553B22.2
01-052902-04706052
-12-
Resolution No. 2002-41
20J This action encourages collaboration with the Santa Clara County Open Space District to
preserve fann land.
Mitigation Measnres: 4.4-A, 4.4-C. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a significant unavoidable impact. The General Plan includes mitigation measures that will
lessen the significant impact on the conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses will cause loss
of productive agricultural land, including some prime farmland. Despite implementation of these
mitigation measures, the General Plan will result in significant unavoidable agriculture impacts
that cannot feasibly be reduced to a non-significant level. This impact, therefore, is considered
significant and unavoidable. See Statement of Overriding Considerations.
D. AGRICULTURE.
1. Impact.
4.4-2. Conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses will cause increases in land use
compatibility problems and nuisance complaints due to urban uses being sited adjacent to
agricultural uses.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contains many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased land use compatibility problems and
nuisance complaints due to urban uses being sited adjacent to agricultural uses as a result of the
conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.4-2:
Policies
3.1 J This policy encourages the recognition of agriculture as an important industry and encourages
efforts to promote adequate land use compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
3.12 This policy encourages agricultural uses in industrial areas to promote adequate land use
compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
4.01 This policy supports the economic viability of agriculture to promote adequate land use
compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
4.03 This policy encourages urban containment to promote adequate land use compatibility between
agriculture and other uses.
4.04 This policy supports County regulations regarding agricultural lands to promote adequate land
use compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
4.05 This policy promotes agricultural uses in the Planning Area to promote adequate land use
compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
1JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-13-
Resolution No. 2002-41
4.06 This policy encourages agricultural uses in hazardous areas to promote adequate land use
compatibility between agriculture and other uses.
Actions
1.A This action encourages consistency amongst local and regional planning tools and documents to
reduce land use incompatibilities.
4.A This action encourages implementation of "Strategies to Balance Planned Growth and
Agricultural Viability" to reduce land use conflicts relating to agriculture.
4.B This action requires interagency coordination for agricultural protection and for addressing land
use compatibility issues.
Mitigation Measure: 4.4-C See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
E. AGRICULTURE.
1. Impact.
4.4-3. Conversion of agricultural land to urban uses may potentially impact remaining
farm operations.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the potential impact on remaining farm operations as a result of
the conversion of agricultural land to urban uses.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.4-3:
Policies
3.01 This policy encourages agricultural businesses, thus discouraging conversion of agricultural
lands to urban uses.
3.02 This policy encourages economic development of agricultural businesses, thus discouraging
conversion of agricultural lands to urban uses.
3.11 This policy encourages the recognition of agricultural uses, thus discouraging conversion of
agricultural lands to urban uses.
3.12 This policy encourages agricultural uses in industrial areas, thus discouraging conversion of
agricultural lands to urban uses.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-14-
Resolution No. 2002-41
4.01 This policy promotes the economic viability of agriculture, thus discouraging conversion of
agricultural lands to urban uses.
Actions
4.A This action encourages implementation of "Strategies to Balance Planned Growth and
Agricultural Viability" to preserve operating farm land.
1 I.C This action encourages providing farm worker housing to help preserve operating agricultural
industries.
3. Findings.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
F. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION.
1. Impact.
4.5-1. Build-out under the General Plan would increase vehicular traffic in the planning
area, resulting in level of service deficiencies within the roadway network.
2. Mitigation
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased vehicular traffic in the planning area,
resulting in level of service deficiencies within the roadway network as a result of build-out
under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.5-1:
Policies
12.01 This policy would ensure long-term planning decisions would be based on the proposed street
map designed to accommodate the traffic anticipated by build-out of the General Plan, thereby
reducing congestive conditions in the future.
12.02 This policy would ensure that existing and proposed transportation facilities are used as intended
under the General Plan, thereby avoiding temporary congestion and reducing safety concerns.
12.03 This policy encourages bicycling and walking. thereby reducing vehicular traffic and associated
congestion.
12.05 This policy ensures that there would be no new development southwest of Uvas Creek until
adequate bridge service exists.
12.06 This policy would increase traffic capacity, reduce congestion, and maximize general safety on
expressways by reducing intersections on Santa Teresa Boulevard and Hecker Pass Highway.
Resolution No. 2002-41
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-15-
12.07 This policy would reduce the number of commercial driveways to prevent traffic conflicts and
safety problems and improve traffic flow.
12.08 This policy states that traffic conditions in the city remain at a Level of Service C or belieI' and. in
some cases, maintain a Level of Service D or better. Therefore new projects would e required to
mitigate if they would trigger new impacts (i.e., LOS deficiencies).
12.09 This policy encourages maintaining the city's Standard Level of Service to minimize traffic
congestion.
/2.10 This policy would ensure that a reasonablejobs-housing balance is maintained in order to reduce
automobile trips and associated congestion.
13.01 This policy encourages new development to be designed to include public transit facilities and
accessibility thus reducing vehicle trips.
13.02 This policy encourages the constrnction of Park and Ride lots to reduce the number of vehicles on
the road.
13.03 This policy encourages high-density development and mixed-use facilities, especially near the
Caltrain station, to encourage use aftransit and reduce traffic.
14.01 This policy encourages emphasis on non-auto modes of travel through safer public facilities,
thereby reducing traffic.
14.02 This policy encourages emphasis on walking and biking through compact, mLT.ed-use development
and increased in fill construction, thereby reducing traffic.
14.03 This policy would ensure that bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities are improved and
expanded to encourage greater usage and reduced vehicular trips.
14.04 This policy encourages improved crossing design on both streets and bridges to encourage
greater usage.
14.05 This policy ensures that private development would be involved in providing bikeways, pedestrian
paths, and related facilities within development sites, to reduce new vehicle trips.
14.06 This policy ensures that the comprehensive traffic impactfee would finance General Plan bikeway
improvements to increase usage.
19.12 This policy encourages new telecommunications technologies to reduce vehicle trips by
telecommuting.
21.03 This policy aims to reduce automobile trips and traffic congestion by promoting infill
development, reducing sprawl, and encouraging high-density and mixed-use development.
21.04 This policy encourages coordination with other regional transportation and air quality authorities
to address transportation issues.
27.03 This policy ensures that transportation of hazardous materials would be strictly monitored and
proper notification would take place in the event of a leak or spill.
UH\553B22.2
01-052902-04706052
-16-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Policies (to a lesser extent)
1.0U.02, 1.04, /.05, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 1.12,2.09,3.05,3.13,3.16,3.18,3.19,3.24,3.25,3.26, 3.27, 3.28,
3.29,9.01,9.02,9.03,10.12,11.02,11.04,17.06,17.07,18.07
These policies encourage use of alternative transportation thus reducing the amount and length of vehicle
trips and thereby reduce traffic congestion.
Actions
12.C This action encourages street design that is traffic-calming and includes pedestrian access to
encourage walking versus driving.
12.D This action encourages street design that distributes traffic evenly and maintains the city's
Standard Level of Service.
12.E This action requires dual access on streets serving 26 or more dwelling units to accommodate
public safety vehicles without blocking other through traffic.
13.A This action encourages the setting aside of land for Park and Ride lots to support ride-sharing, in
order to reduce vehicle trips.
13.B This action encourages the identification ofland/arpotential Transit Oriented DLrvelopment near
the Caltrain station and to design strategies that encourage this type of development that would
encourage increased transit use as an alternative to vehicle use.
14.A This action encourages collaboration with Santa Clara County in implementing and planning tails
and pathways to encourage alternative transportation.
14.B This action encourages the implementation of the City Bicycle Tramportation Plan, including the
responsibility of developers to build these facilities on their property.
14.C This action encourages designing bike and pedestrian bridges over Highway 101 and various
drainage channels to encourage walking and biking.
14.D This action encourages installing bike racks and lockers at all types of development.
14.E This action encourages using easements to ensure that streets are designed with adequate
facilities for walking and biking.
14.F This action would maintain and improve road surface conditions for improved bicycle and vehicle
travel.
14. G This action would ensure that all future roads will accommodate bicycle and pedestrian travel.
14.H This action discourages on-street parking in order to facilitate bike lanes and improved traffic
flow.
14.J This action ensures that the California Department of Transportation's "Planning and Design
Criteria or Bikeways in California" be used, that encourages safety and efficiency for this
alternative to vehicle use.
21.A This action encourages designing pedestrian and bicycle amenities and building transit facilities.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-17-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Mitigation Measnres: 4.5-A, 4.5-B, 4.5-C, 4.5-D, 4.5-E, 4.5-F, 4.5-G. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR may reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level. However, some of the proposed roadway
improvements are regional in nature and within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency, and such changes have been or should be adopted by such other agency.
G. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION.
1. Impact.
4.5-3. Build-out under the General Plan may lead to increased parking demand and
parking deficiencies in the City.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased parking demand and parking deficiencies
in the City as a result of the build-out under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.5-3:
Policies
3.28 This policy encourages the development of a Downtown Traffic Circulation plan discussing
parking and street configuration in an effort to correct parking deficiencies.
3.29 This policy encourages the provision of off-street parking in the downtown area, thereby meeting
the increased demandfor parking.
12.11 This policy encourages the development of on-site parking in new developments and compliance
with the city's Downtown Parking Ordinance in older areas to address existing and potential
parking deficiencies.
12.12 This policy encourages the sharing of parking facilities between adjoining sites to properly meet
parking demand.
13.02 This policy encourages the designation of specific areas as Park and Ride lots with related
facilities in order to reduce parking demand.
13.03 This policy encourages the development of high-density development and mixed-use to reduce
parking needs.
14.01 This policy encourages alternative transportation as a strategy for air quality goals and as a tool
for reducing parking demand.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-18-
Resolution No. 2002-41
14.02 This policy encourages the use of land use planning as a tool to promote walking and biking,
thereby reducing parking demand.
14.03 This policy encourages the development of safe, convenient, and attractive facilities to promote
walking and biking and, in, /urn, reduce the need for parking. in conjunction with the city's
Bicycle Transportation Plan.
14.04 This policy encourages the development of pedestrian and bicycle crossing to encourage
alternative transportation, thereby reducing parking demand.
14.05 This policy encourages the private development of pedestrian and bicycle facilities to encourage
alternative transportation and reduce parking demand.
14.06 This policy encourages usage of the comprehensive traffic impact fee for bikeway improvements to
promote bicycle transportation and reduce parking demand.
Actions
/2.A This action ensures that all improvements for parking outlined in the General Plan are
implemented in order to reduce parking demand and correct parking deficiencies.
12.B This action ensures that new development be designed with adequate space for parking and traffic
circulation to prevent parking shortage problems.
f2. C This action encourages residential street designs that allow for pedestrian and bicycle usage,
thereby reducing parking demand.
f2.D This action encourages collector street design that maintains the city's Standard Level of Service
and corrects parking deficiencies.
f2.E This action ensures proper access/or public safety vehicles on streets serving 26 or more dwelling
units.
f2.F This action ensures that adequate on-site parking is provided in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, thereby preventing parking shortages.
12.G This action ensures that adequate parking facilities are provided in the downtown area to avoid
parking deficiencies.
13.A This action ensures land is reserved at key intersections for Park and Ride lots and related transit
services, thereby reducing parking demand.
Resolution No. 2002-41
13.B This action ensures that land is set aside in the downtown area for transit oriented development,
thereby reducing parking demand.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
IJH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-19-
H. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION.
1. Impact.
4.5-4. Build-out under the General Plan may increase hazards to bicyclist and pedestrian
safety.
2. Mitil!:ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased hazards to bicyclist and pedestrian safety
as a result of the build-out under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.5-4:
Policies
3.27 This policy ensures the development of a safe and convenient downtown environment for
pedestrians and bicyclists.
3.28 This policy ensures the provision of downtown street design that lvill create a safe and pleasant
environment for pedestrians and bicyclists.
12.03 This policy encourages the design of residential street systems that allow for safe biking and
walking and a reduction in hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
/4.01 This policy encourages non-auto modes aftransportation including safe pedestrian and bicycle
facilities that will reduce hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
14.02 This policy encourages land use planning that promotes biking and walking and the development
of safe pedestrian and bicycle facilities to reduce hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
14.03 This policy encourages the improvement of existing pedestrian and biking facilities and the design
of new related facilities in a safe and convenient manner in order to reduce hazards to bicyclists
and pedestrians.
J 4.04 This policy encourages the design of safe pedestrian and bicycle crossings in accordance with the
Bicycle Transportation Plan that will reduce hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
14.05 This policy encourages the private development of bicycle and pedestrian pathways and related
support facilities including safe facilities that will reduce hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
14.06 This policy ensures the usage of the comprehensive traffic impact fee to finance bikeway
improvements to increase safety and reduce hazards for bicyclists.
16.04 This policy encourages the development of a Parks and Recreation System Master Plan to guide
the design and maintenance of safe pedestrian and bicycle facilities to reduce hazards to bicyclists
and pedestrians.
16.12 This policy encourages the creation of pedestrian and bikeway links to connect the City's park and
community facilities in accordance with the County Trails Master Plan that will reduce hazards to
bicyclists and pedestrians.
Resolution No. 2002-41
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-20-
12.C This action encourages residential street design that allows for safe passage of pedestrians and
bicyclists and a reduction of hazards to them.
Actions
12.D This action ensures that col/ector streets in residential areas are designed to promote pedestrian
and bicycle use through increased safety measures designed to reduce hazards to bicyclists and
pedestrians.
14.A This action encourages the design of safe trails and bikeways as part of a countywide network and
requires that and from new development be dedicated for these uses.
14.B This action ensures the implementation of a City Bicycle Transportation plan to ensure the safety
of bicycle facilities and reduce hazards to bicyclists.
14.C This action ensures coordination with Caltrans and the Santa Clara Valley Water District to
provide safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings that will reduce hazards to bicyclists and
pedestrians.
14.D This action ensures that adequate bicycle parking and storage be provided at key locations in the
city.
/4.E This action encourages street design that provides safe and adequate access for pedestrians and
bicyclists, thereby reducing hazards to bicyclists and pedestrians.
14.F This action ensures that roads will be properly surfaced for safe bicycle usage, thereby reducing
hazards to bicyclists.
14.1 This action ensures that bike paths are wide enough for the passage of emergency vehicles, ....t,here
necessary.
14.J This action ensures that bikeway planning and design follow the Ca/trans standards in ensuring a
reduction of hazards to bicyclists.
16.A This action ensures the implementation of the Parks and Recreation System Master Plan to
provide safe pedestrian and bicycle facilities, thereby reducing hazards to bicyclists and
pedestrians.
21.A This action encourages the development of on-site pedestrian and bicycle facilities to improve air
quality.
Mitigation Measure: 4.5-H. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findines.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
\JH\553622.2
01-052902-04706052
-21-
Resolution No. 2002-41
I. AIR QUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.6-1. Construction, earthmoving and clearing activities due to build-out of the General
Plan would result in temporary, short-term increases in particulate matter emissions.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of temporary, short-term increases in particulate
matter emissions as a result of the construction, earthmoving and clearing activities due to build-
out of the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.6-1:
Policies
12.09 This policy would ensure maintenance of the city's Standard Level a/Service to ensure better air
quality and a reduction in particulate matter emissions.
12.10 This policy would ensure land use planning that reduces automobile trips to help achieve air
quality goals and provide a reduction in particulate matter emissions.
21.0 I This policy encourages land use planning that separates air pollution sources from residences and
"sensitive receptors, " thereby reducing particulate matter emissions.
21.02 This policy encourages landscaping to reduce pollutants and to provide a reduction in particulate
matter emissions.
Actions
21.A This action encourages development that encourages alternative transportation and therefore
improves air quality and provides a reduction in particulate matter emissions.
Mitigation Measure: 4.6-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
J. AIR QUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.6-2. Construction activities during development under the General Plan would result in
short-term exhaust emissions from construction equipment.
UH\553B22.2
01-052902-04706052
-22-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2. Mitil!ation:
The Final EIR contains a mitigation measure, which when implemented will lessen the impact of
short-term exhaust emissions from construction equipment as a result of construction activities
during development under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following mitigation measure will help to mitigate impact 4.6-2:
Mitigation Measure: 4.6-B. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
K. AIR QUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.6-3. Build-out of the General Plan would result in increases in criteria pollutant
emissions due to increased vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and may result in
regional impacts on air quality, particularly in downwind areas (i.e., south Gilroy).
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implementcd, will lessen the impact of increased criteria pollutant emissions due to
increased vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and may result in regional impacts on air
quality, particularly in downwind areas (i.e., south Gilroy) as a result of the build-out of the
General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.6-3:
Policies
3.04 This policy would ensure phasing of housing and jobs according to the availability of local
housing and public facilities in order to reduce vehicle trips, thereby reducing emissions.
3.05 This policy would ensure that industrial uses are located in one area to avoid possible pollution
problems with residences and public facilities.
3.10 This policy encourages the removal of abandoned or defunct industrial structures to ensure public
safety and avoid any possible release of emissions.
3.18 This policy encourages the incorporation of commercial areas into residential neighborhoods to
decrease vehicle trips, thereby reducing emissions.
Resolution No. 2002-41
3.25 This policy would encourage a mix of uses downtown to include housing and transit facilities in
order to reduce vehicle trips, thereby reducing emissions.
\JH\553B22.2
01-052902-04706052
-23-
3.27 This policy would ensure that design improvements take place to make a safe and convenient
pedestrian environment in the downtown area, resulting in reduced vehicle trips and reduced
emissions.
3.28 This policy encourages the use of the Downtown Specific Plan to reduce vehicle trips by designing
a pedestrian-oriented environment, thereby reducing emissions.
9.01 This policy encourages maintaining an adequate jobs-housing balance to reduce vehicle trips
resu/tingfrom commuting out of the area, thereby reducing emissions.
9.02 This policy would ensure that a mix of housing types is available in terms of style and price to
provide more choices for Gilroy residents and workers, therefore reducing commutes to and from
other areas and reducing emissions.
/2.09 This policy encourages maintaining the city's Standard Level of Service to minimize traffic
congestion, thereby reducing emissions.
12.10 This policy encourages the use of land use planning to reduce automobile trips, thereby reducing
emissions.
13.01
This policy encourages new developments to promote the use of transit and alternative
transportation through design, thereby reducing vehicle trips and vehicle emissions.
13.02 This policy ensures that land lvill be dedicated for use as Park and Ride lots in order to reduce
vehicle trips and educe vehicle emissions.
13.03 This policy encourages emphasis on walking and biking through compact, mixed-use development
and increased in fill construction, thereby reducing vehicle trips and emissions.
14.01 This policy encourages non-auto modes o/travel to reduce vehicle trips, thereby reducing vehicle
emissions.
14.02 This policy encourages land use planning that promotes pedestrian and bicycle travel in order to
reduce vehicle trips and emissions.
14.03 This policy would ensure that bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities are improved and
expanded to encourage greater usage and reduced vehicular trips, thereby reducing emissions.
14.04 This policy encourages improved crossing design on both streets and bridges to encourage
greater pedestrian usage, thereby reducing vehicle trips and emissions.
14.05 This policy ensures that private development would be involved in providing bikeways, pedestrian
paths, and related facilities within development sites to reduce automobile trips and vehicle
emissions.
14.06 This policy ensures that the comprehensive traffic impactfee wouldfinance General Plan bikeway
improvements to increase usage and reduce vehicle trips, thereby reducing emissions.
21.01 This policy encourages land planning that separates air pollution sources from "sensitive
receptors. ..
21.02 This policy encourages landscaping to reduce pollutants and emissions.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-24-
2].03 This policy aims to reduce automobile trips and traffic congestion by promoting infill
development, reducing sprawl, and encouraging high-density and mixed-use development, thereby
reducing vehicle emissions.
2].04 This policy encourages coordination with other regional transportation and air quality authorities
to address transportation issues including regional air quality concerns relating to automotive
emissions.
25.0] This policy permits development only in areas where the potential dangers to safety, health, and
welfare can be properly mitigated.
25.02 This policy encourages the use of zoning and land use to regulate development in hazardous
areas.
25.03 This policy encourages appropriate review to minimize hazards resulting from development.
26.03 This policy encourages the use of buffering standards to protect residences from noise-producing
developments.
Actions
l.A This action ensures consistency benveen the Gilroy Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Afap and the
Land Use Plan Map.
/. C This action encourages the creation of task forces to implement strategies for improving
neighborhood districts.
I.D This action requires development of a Downtown Specific Plan.
11 This action encourages community beautification through landscaping.
2.D This action encourages interagency coordination for growth management and a regional
approach to solving problems such as air pollution and traffic congestion.
3.A This action encourages development of "performance standards" for use in reviewing industrial
development proposals to ensure safety for residents. especially in terms of air emissions.
3. C This action encourages the development of design standards for high-impact uses to beautifY
visually unattractive uses.
3. G This action supports the goals of the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area to benefit the
welfare of all residents.
9.B This action encourages providing incentive for infill development to reduce sprawl and its related
traffic problems, thereby reducing vehicle emissions.
Resolution No. 2002-41
9. C This action encourages development of accessory units in residential areas.
9.D This action would provide incentives for mixed-use development to reduce vehicle trips, thereby
reducing emissions.
] 2.A This action would ensure that all improvements outlined in the General Plan to maintain the city's
Standard Level of Service are adopted.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-25-
12.H This action establishes a comprehensive traffic impact fee for new developments to finance
roadway improvements.
13.A This action encourages dedicating land for use as Park and Ride lots in order to reduce vehicle
trips and related emissions.
13.B This action ensures that the Downtown Specific Plan is used to promote transit-oriented
development to reduce vehicle trips and automotive emissions.
13. C This action encourages interagency coordination to improve transit service and to reduce
automotive emissions.
14.A This action ensures coordination with Santa Clara County to implement trails and paths as part of
a countywide network to promote alternative transportation, thereby reducing vehicle emissions.
14.B This action encourages the implementation oj a citywide bicycle plan that includes private
development of bike paths and lanes to reduce vehicle trips and related emissions.
14.C This action requires improved bridge crossings for safer pedestrian and bicycle usage to reduce
vehicle trips and related emissions.
/4.D This action encourages the provision of bike racks and lockers at key locations based on city
standards Jor bicycle storage.
/4.E This action encourages street design that provides easements for pedestrian and bicyclists.
14.F This action encourages proper road surface maintenance for safer driving conditions.
/4.0 This action encourages the inclusion of pedestrian and bicycle facilities on all future road
development, thereby reducing vehicle trips and related emissions.
14.H This action supports restrictions on on-street parking to create safer travel environments.
14.1 This action encourages bike paths to be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles, where
necessary.
J 4.J This action requires that all bikeway planning and design be in accordance with Caltrans'
standards.
21.A This action ensures that projects are evaluated in terms of their polluting potential and proper
mitigation is required.
25.B This action would ensure that all building codes relating to hazards and saJety are updated
regularly.
Mitigation Measnres: 4.6-C, 4.6-D. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a significant and unavoidable impact. The General Plan includes mitigation measures that
will lessen the General Plan's impact of increased criteria pollutant emissions due to increased
vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and may result in regional impacts on air quality,
particularly in downwind areas (i.e., south Gilroy). Despite implementation of these mitigation
measures, the General Plan will result in significant unavoidable air quality impacts that cannot
Resolution No. 2002-41
I./H\553B22.2
01-052902-04708052
-26-
feasibly be reduced to a non-significant level. This impact, therefore, is considered significant
and unavoidable. See Statement of Overriding Considerations.
L. NOISE.
1. Impact.
4.7-1. Development consistent with the General Plan will increase noise levels above the
maximum permissible noise levels at existing, previously developed uses including sensitive
receptors due to iucreased levels of traffic and use of rail lines.
2. Mitigation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased noise levels above the maximum
permissible noise levels at existing, previously developed uses including sensitive receptors due
to increased levels of traffic and use of rail lines as a result of development consistent with the
General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.7-1:
Policies
26. Of This policy would ensure quiet neighborhoods and public facilities through physical development.
26.02 This policy 'vvauld ensure that all noise levels are "t'ithin the maximum permitted levels.
26.03 This policy would enforce noise buffering standards to protect residents from excessive noise,
especially from noise related to traffic and rail.
26.04 This policy encourages project design that considers acoustics in an effort to reduce noise from
vehicles and trains.
26.05 This policy would require landscaped earth berms to be integrated into developments as physical
noise buffers.
26.06 This policy would ensure coordination with other regional agencies on noise issues that stem from
transportation.
Resolution No. 2002-41
26.07 This policy would encourage public input on noise issues stemming from traffic and rail lines.
Actions
26.A This action ensures the adoption of a noise ordinance to regulate noise generated by traffic and
rail lines.
26.B This action encourages the revision of the city's zoning ordinance to include noise standards,
particularly for noise from traffic and trains.
26. C This action requires development review to include review of compliance with local noise
standards.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-27-
26.D This action encourages adopted Noise Element guidelines to be in compliance with State noise
criteria.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a significant and unavoidable impact. There is no feasible mitigation that could
reasonably be imposed on the General Plan to mitigate the General Plan's impact of increased
noise levels above the maximum permissible noise levels at existing, previously developed uses
including sensitive receptors due to increased levels of traffic and use of rail lines. Despite
implementation of these measures, the General Plan will result in significant unavoidable noise
impacts that cannot feasibly be reduced to a non-significant level. This impact, therefore, is
considered significant and unavoidable. See Statement of Overriding Considerations.
M. NOISE.
1. Impact.
4.7-2. The General Plan would allow new development adjacent to high volume roads and
railroad tracks, which would potentially expose people to noise above maximum
permissible noise levels.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of exposing people to noise above maximum
permissible noise levels as a result of new development adjacent to high volume roads and
railroad tracks under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.7-2:
Policies
26.01 This policy would ensure quiet neighborhoods and public facilities through physical development
that would consider the relationship between noise and development.
26.02 This policy would ensure that all noise levels are within the maximum permitted levels.
26.03 This policy would enforce noise buffering standards to protect residents from excessive noise
generated by railroad tracks and high-volume roads.
26.04 This policy encourages project design that considers acoustics in an effort to reduce noise
generated by railroad tracks and heavy traffic.
26.05 This policy would require landscaped earth berms to be integrated into developments as physical
noise buffers.
Resolution No. 2002-41
26.06 Thispolicy would ensure coordination with other regional agencies on noise issues.
26.07 This policy would encourage public input on noise issues.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04708052
-28-
Actions
26.A This action ensures the adoption of a noise ordinance to regulate noise generation, particularly
noise generated by trains and high-volume roads.
26.B This action encourages the revision of the city's zoning ordinance to include noise standards.
26. C This action requires development review to include review of compliance with local noise
standards.
26.D This action encourages adopted Noise Element guidelines to be in compliance with State noise
criteria.
Mitigation Measure: 4.7-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!.s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
N. NOISE.
1. Impact.
4.7-3. Development consistent with the General Plan would cause temporary increases in
noise levels on and nearby project sites during periods of construction.
2. Mitil!.ation:
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of temporary increases in noise levels on and nearby
project sites during periods of construction as a result of development consistent with the
General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.7-3:
Policies
26.02 This policy would ensure that all raised noise levels resultingfrom construction activity are within
the maximum permitted levels.
26.06 This policy would ensure coordination with other regional agencies on noise issues.
26.07 This policy would encourage public input on noise issues arising from construction-related noise.
Actions
26.A This action ensures the adoption of a noise ordinance to regulate noise generation.
UH\5538222
01-052902-04706052
-29-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Mitigation Measure: 4.7-B. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
O. PUBLIC SERVICES. UTILITIES. PARKS AND RECREATION.
1. Impact.
4.8-1. Development consistent with the General Plan could substantially increase the
demand for fire protection beyond existing capacity of the City of Gilroy Fire Department.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased demand for fire protection beyond
existing capacity of the City of Gilroy Fire Department as a result of development consistent
with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-1:
Policies
2.01 This policy would ensure that existing infrastructure is at maximum usage levels before investing
in new infrastnJcture to ensure that demand/or fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
2.02 This policy would ensure that the growth rate does not exceed existing capacity afpublic services
to ensure that demand for fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
2.03 This policy would encourage development only on incorporated portions of the planning area that
have adequate fire protection infrastructure to ensure that demand for fire protection does not
exceed existing capacity.
2.04 This policy would ensure that existing infrastructure for public safety is a guideline for future
development to ensure that demand for fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
2.06 This policy would ensure that new developments pay fees for the new need for public services that
they generate to ensure that demand for fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
2.08 This policy would encourage using the "20-Year Boundary" to guide potential development to
minimize public service costs.
10.12 This policy would establish criteria for developing infilllots for residential uses to minimize the
need for more public safety infrastructure to ensure that demand for fire protection does not
exceed existing capacity.
15.01 This policy would ensure the development of an adequate system of public facilities to ensure that
demand for fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
1JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-30-
Resolution No. 2002-41
15.06 This policy would ensure proper staffing for community facilities to ensure that demand for fire
protection does not exceed existing capacity.
18.01 This policy would ensure that police and fire services remain adequate in terms of manpower,
equipment, and resources so that demand for fire protection does not exceed existing capacity.
18.02 This policy would encourage community education about crime and fire prevention.
18.03 This policy would ensure that facilities designated as command control centers in case of an
emergency are designed to withstand a "maximum probable seismic event" and remain
operational, thus ensuring that local emergency needs can be met with existingjacilities.
18.05 This policy would ensure that essential emergency public serv'ices will be provided during natural
catastrophes, thereby ensuring that community needs will be met by e.xisting/acilities.
25.12 This policy would encourage the restriction of development in Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zones, thereby ensuring that local demand for fire protection services can be met by existing
facilities.
25.13 This policy would ensure that new and existing construction complies with all local and state
regulations regarding fire safety, thus ensuring that adequate fire services will be available to the
community.
25.15 This policy 'would ensure that adequate water flow exists for fire prevention services in order to
supply adequate fire protection with existing facilities.
25.16 This policy would require developments in hillside areas to comply with specific Fire Department
policies for hillside construction, thus ensuring that adequate fire protection can be provided by
existing fire facilities.
Actions
2.A This action encourages review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
monitoring the demandforfire services
18.A This action encourages monitoring the levels of service of fire protection services, thus ensuring
that demands are met.
18.B This action requires updating the Impact Fee Schedule for new development, thus ensuring that
demandsfor fire service are met.
18. C This action encourages giving priority to capital improvements required to maintain adequate
levels of fire services.
18.D This action encourages maintaining the City's mutual aid agreements with the surrounding
jurisdiction, thus ensuring that fire demands Gre met.
25.0
This action encourages providing plan checks for new construction to ensure that fire service
demands are met.
25.H
This action encourages adopting an ordinance to regulate hazardous fire conditions, thus
ensuring that demands for fire services are met.
25./ This action encourages providing fire and life safety inspections to ensure that demands for fire
services are being met.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-31-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.J This action encourages the enforcement of prompt abatement of fire hazards, thus reducing
demands for fire services.
25.K This action encourages providing fire and safety training to encourage preventive measures and
thus reduce demands for fire services.
25.L This action would enforce the City's weed abatement ordinance, thus reducing demand for fire
services by preventing fires.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
P. PUBLIC SERVICES, UTILITIES, PARKS AND RECREATJON.
1. Impact.
4.8-2. Development consistent with the General Plan could substantially increase the
demand for police protection beyond existing capacity of the City of Gilroy Police
Department.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased demand for police protection beyond
existing capacity of the City of Gilroy Police Department as a result of development consistent
with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-2:
Policies
2.01 This policy would ensure that new growth is directed to lands already in the Urban Service Area,
thereby ensuring that demand for police services does not exceed existing capacity.
2.02 This policy would ensure that the rate of growth is controlled so that public services such as
police protection will remain adequate.
2.03 This policy would encourage development only in the incorporated portion of the Planning area,
thereby ensuring that existing police facilities can adequately serve the community.
2.04 This policy would ensure that rate, location, and extent of growth are determined by local planning
taols and available resources, thus ensuring that demand for public services does not exceed
existing capacity.
2.06 This policy would ensure that new development pay for all increases in public service costs that
their development creates, thus ensuring that public facilities can meet increased demands.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-32-
2.08 This policy would encourage the use of a "20-Year Boundary" as a planning tool, thus minimizing
public service expansion costs.
1 0.12 This policy would establish criteria for selection infill sites for housing, thus ensuring that new
infill development can be served by existing police protection facilities.
15.0 I This policy would ensure the development of a system of public facilities provides adequate police
protection at a consistent level of service.
15.06 This policy would ensure adequate staffing and program support at all community facilities,
including those related to police services.
18.01 This policy would ensure that a consistent level of service exists throughout the City for police
services.
18.02 This policy would encourage a pro-active approach to crime and fire prevention through
community education and awareness.
18.03 This policy would ensure that facilities designated as local command centers for
emergency/disaster services are designed to 1vithstand a "ma.yimum probable seismic event: and
remain operational, thus ensuring the availability afpolice services during such an event.
18.05 This policy would ensure essential emergency public services would be available during natural
catastrophes through training and preparedness.
Actions
2.A This action encourages review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
monitoring the demand for police services
18.A This action encourages monitoring the levels of service of police protection services, thus
ensuring that demands are met.
18.B This action requires updating the Impact Fee Schedule for new development, thus ensuring that
demands for police services are met.
18. C This action encourages giving priority to capital improvements required to maintain adequate
levels of police services.
18.D This action encourages maintaining the City's mutual aid agreements with the surrounding
jurisdiction, thus ensuring that police demands are met.
3. Findinl!:s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
\JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-33-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Q. PUBLIC SERVICES. UTILITIES. PARKS AND RECREATION.
1. Impact.
4-8.3. Development consistent with the General Plan will increase the number of students
in the Gilroy Unified School District, therefore exceeding the current capacity of the
District.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of an increased number of students in the Gilroy
Unified School District, therefore exceeding the current capacity of the District, as a result of
development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-3:
Policies
1.05 This policy would ensure the maintenance and enhancement of existing neighborhoods to
encourage injill development and the use of existing public facilities, such as schools.
2.01 This policy would encourage new growth to be directed to lands lvi/hin the Urban SClfJice Area,
thereby utilizing schools and other public facilities that are existing.
2.02 This policy would encourage the rate of growth to be controlled by the availability of public
facilities such as schools.
2.03 This policy would ensure the development only occurs within the incorporated portion of the
Planning Area, thus utilizing etisting schools and other public facilities.
2.04 This policy would ensure the use of planning tools as a method for controlling and directing
growth, thus ensuring that existing schools and public facilities will not exceed their capacity.
2.06 This policy would require that new development pay the service costs associated with increased
demand for schools and public services.
2.07 This policy would establish and maintain an Urban Service Area that indicates land potentially
suitable for development, thereby ensuring that schools and other public facilities do not exceed
their capacity
2.08 This policy would establish a "20-Year Boundary" to direct the location of growth and maintain a
suitable proportion between schools and new growth.
15.01 This policy would ensure the development of a system of public facilities, including schools, that
meets an adequate level of service in serving the demands of the community.
15.06 This policy would ensure adequate staffing and program support for schools.
16.18 This policy would encourage partnerships with community groups to assist with outreach to youth
in conjunction with local schools.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-34-
Resolution No. 2002-41
16.19 This policy would ensure the continuation and enhancement oj the partnership between the City
and the Gilroy Unified School District to ensure adequate development oj school Jacilities.
16.20 This policy would encourage expansion oj the partnership between the City and Gavilan College.
17.01 This policy would ensure that policies and actions oj the City in terms oj educational Jacilities
reflect the educational values oj the Gilroy Unified School District Mission Statement.
17.02 This policy would ensure the control oj the growth oj new residential development in an effort to
allow schools to develop new Jacilities to match the growth.
17.03 This policy would encourage the verification oj the capacity oj local schools as part oj the review
process for residential subdivisions, thereby ensuring that schools can adequately re5pond to
growth.
17.04 This policy would require developers of new residential subdivisions to dedicate land and/or pay
fees to offset increased costs for educationalfacilities.
17.05 This policy would ensure cooperation between the City, the Gilroy Unified School District,
Gavilan College, and Santa Clara County in an effort to adequately plan for long-range grmvth.
17.06 This policy would encourage the development of educational facilities on land best suited for
optimizing educational goals and ensuring that appropriate capacity is available.
17.07 This policy would encourage the siting of new educational facilities to be done in a way that
promotes pedestrian and bicyclist safety, access to transit, and routes for school buses.
17.08 This policy would encourage the shard use of school facilities and community facilities and
programs, thus increasing capacity of educational facilities.
17.09 This policy would ensure that educational facilities practice conservation efforts such as solar
Jeatures and landscaping.
Actions
2.A This action encourages review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
monitoring the demand for schools.
17.A This action encourages interagency coordination to address the needs of the school district and
the citizens.
17.B This action requires that the development review process consider the impacts oj development on
schools.
17. C This action encourages working with the school district to find appropriate school sites when
considering new development.
17.D This action encourages including neighborhood representatives in addressing school decisions.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-35-
R. PUBLIC SERVICES. UTILITIES. PARKS AND RECREATION.
1. Impact.
4.8-4. Development consistent with the General Plan will increase waste generation.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented will lessen the impact of an increase in waste generation as a result of
Development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-4:
Policies
1.05 This policy would ensure the growth is managed in a way that allows public services related to
waste to adequately maintain an appropriate capacity and level of service.
2.01 This policy would ensure the ma:timization of existing infrastructure, thereby allmving waste
management facilities to maintain adequate capacity.
2.02 This policy would ensure that the rate of growth is controlled so as not to exceed existing waste
management capacity.
2.03 This policy lvould ensure that development only occur in the incorporated portion afthe Planning
Area, thus allowing waste management services to maintain adequate capacity.
2.04 This policy would ensure that planning tools are utilized to ensure that waste management
services remain adequate.
2. 06 This policy would require that new development pay for increases in public services such as waste
management.
2.07 This policy would establish and maintain an Urban Service Area to indicate lands that are
appropriate for development.
2.08 This policy would establish a "20-Year Boundary" to control growth to ensure that adequate
public services such as waste management exists.
10.02 This policy would establish incentives for affordable housing to encourage injill development,
thereby utilizing existing waste management services.
15.01 This policy would ensure the development of a system of public facilities that will meet the needs
of the community.
15.06 This policy would ensure adequate staffing and program support for all community facilities.
24.01 This policy would ensure the reduction of the volume sent to solid waste sites through source
reduction and recycling. thus reducing demand for waste services.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-36-
Resolution No. 2002-41
24.02 This policy would ensure the reduction of the volume of disposed waste by encouraging efforts to
decrease consumption and recycling, thus reducing demand for waste services.
24.03 This policy would ensure that a new landfill site is designated to meet new waste disposal needs.
Actions
l.A This action encourages review of applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
monitoring the increased waste generation.
/5.A This action encourages using Capital Improvement Program funds for public facility
improvements, such as waste treatment facilities.
24.A This action requires the continuation of the City'5 Source Reduction and Recycling Program to
reduce waste generation.
24.B This action encourages \vorking vdtll South Valley Disposal and Recycling to identify possible
land fill sites for increased lvaste generation.
3. Findin!!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
S. PUBLIC SERVICES, UTILITIES, PARKS AND RECREATION.
1. Impact.
4.8-5. Development consistent with the General Plan will increase demand for parks and
recreational facilities, including the pedestrian and bicycle trails system.
2. Miti!!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased demand for parks and recreational
facilities, including the pedestrian and bicycle trails system, as a result of development consistent
with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-5:
Policies
1.05 This policy would ensure the maintenance and enhancement of existing neighborhoods to utilize
existing parks and recreationfacilities.
1.06 This policy would ensure the promotion of the Downtown area as the focal point for the City
including the construction of a park area in the Downtown.
3.22 This policy would prohibit commercial development in the areas west of Santa Teresa Boulevard
except for parks and recreational services.
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-37-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3.31 This policy would encourage the exploration of possible park development in the Downtown area.
3.32 This policy would encourage the exploration of possible recreational facilities in the Downtown
area.
8.07 This policy would encourage including play areas and tot lots in new residential construction
marketed to families, thus reducing demand for neighborhood parks.
14.01 This policy would emphasize non-auto modes of travel through the creation of safer bikeways and
providing bike racks and/or lockers.
14.02 This policy would ensure the promotion of walking and biking through land planning that
emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle travel.
14.03 This policy would ensure the correction of deficiencies, expansion offaeilities, and improvement
of bicycle and pedestrian facilities to meet increased demand for these services and facilities.
14.04 This policy would ensure the proper design afstreet crossing to promote increased pedestrian
usage.
14.05 This policy would encourage private development afbike and pedestrian facilities to encourage
non-auto modes of transportation.
14.06 This policy 'fvould ensure the use of the comprehensive traffic impact fee for financing General
Plan bikeway improvements.
16.01 This policy would ensure the maintenance of the City's established of 5 acres of developed park
land per thousand population, thereby enuring that demandfor parks and recreation is met.
16.02 This policy would ensure the developers pay fees or dedicate land for park and recreational
purposes, thus ensuring that demand for park services is met.
! 6.03 This policy would ensure the inclusion of cultural facilities as part of the parks and recreation
5ystem.
16.04 77lis policy would ensure the development of a Parks and Recreation System Master Plan to guide
future development, thus ensuring that demand for park services is met.
16.05 This policy would ensure the development of a Trails Master Plan to ensure that demand for trails
is met.
16.06 This policy would encourage the distribution of parks and recreation facilities throughout the
City, thus ensuring that demand for parks is met.
16.07 This policy would ensure that parks and recreational facilities are planned. designed and
implemented along with City standards, ensuring that demand for parks services is met.
16.08 This policy would ensure that adequate staffwill existfor all parks and recreationalfacilities.
16.09 This policy would encourage that all park facilities comply with all standards set forth to establish
accessibility for disabled persons.
16.10 This policy would provide parks and recreational services that are responsive to diverse cultures
and ages, thus ensuring broad usage of these facilities.
Resolution No. 2002-41
\JH\553B22.2
01-052902-04706052
-38-
16.11 This policy would ensure partial subsidies of some recreational programs and reasonable fees,
thus ensuring that all community members will have access to these facilities.
16.12 This policy would ensure the creation of a network of bicycle and pedestrian pathways to connect
the City's park and recreational facilities, thus ensuring adequate access to all facilities.
16./3 This policy would ensure the location of park facilities near gated residential developments to
ensure adequate access.
16./4 This policy would encourage the construction of several new facilities by the year 2020 to
accommodate the growing population.
16.15 This policy would ensure the continuation of support to programs and facilities related to the
Gilroy Youth Center, thus ensuring the utilization of existing recreationalfacilities.
16.16 This policy would ensure the continuation of support to programs and facilities related to the
Gilro.v Senior Center, thus ensuring the utilization of existing recreational facilities.
16./7 This policy would ensure that the City considers the renting or leasing of space if existing
facilities cannot accommodate specific programs or services.
16.18 This policy l.vould ensure partnerships between community groups that focus on youth activities.
16./9 This policy would ensure the continuation of a partnership between the City and the Gilroy
Unified School District.
16.20 This policy would ensure an increase partnership between Gavilnn College and the City.
16.21 This policy would encourage partnerships between the City and other local and regional public
agencies.
16.22 This policy would encourage partnerships between the City and nonprofit organizations.
16.23 This policy would ensure partnerships between the City and the private sector.
17.09 This policy would encourage the use of energy conservation measures in the constnJction and
maintenance of school facilities.
20.01 This policy would preserve and protect various open space areas, thus reducing the demand for
open space and recreational areas.
20.05 This policy would ensure the designation of open space areas as greenbelts to be used as public
parks, thus meeting new demand for park facilities.
20.06 This policy would ensure the management and maintenance of public open space areas to meet
demand for recreational facilities.
Resolution No. 2002-41
Actions
1.A This action encourages consistency between local and regional growth management tools and
documents. thus reducing discrepancies regarding parks, open space. pedestrian facilities, and
bike trails.
1J This action encourages design review for all development prior to the issuance of a development
permit, thus ensuring that adequate recreational facilities are included.
1JH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-39-
14.A This action requires coordination with Santa Clara County on implementing trails and bike paths
to ensure that demand for recreational facilities is met.
14.B This action encourages the development of a bicycle transportation plan to ensure that demands
for bike trials and facilities are met.
l4.C This action encourages providing bike and pedestrian bridge crossing across the South Valley
Freeway, thus ensuring that demands for recreational facilities are met.
14.D This action encourages providing bike parking and storage at key sites in the City, thus meeting
demand for bicycle facilities.
14.E This action encourages easements for pedestrian and bicycle access to meet increased need for
recreational facilities.
14.F This action requires improved road surfacing to create safe passages for vehicles and bicycles.
14. G This action encourages all future roadway design to include pedestrian and bicycle facilities, thus
meeting demands for these recreational services.
14.H This action encourages restricting on~street parking to better accommodate traffic flow and
bicycle lanes.
J 4.1 This action encourages bike paths that are designed to accommodate emergenc.v access.
14.1 This action encourages following the State's criteria for safe bikeway design, thus meeting the
recreational needs of the city.
15.A This action requires using the Capital Improvements Program funds for improving recreational
facilities.
15.B This action encourages updating the Civic Center }v[aster Plan to reflect the new recreational
needs of the City.
16.A This action encourages using the implementation and action of the Parks and Recreation System
Master Plan to ensure that new recreational needs are being met.
/6.B This action encourages establishing specific trail alignment based on growth management
documents, thus meeting increased demands for recreational services.
16. C This action encourages coordination between the private and public sectors to develop and
support parks and recreational services.
16.D This action encourages exploring alternative financing methods, such as grants, bonds, and
sponsorships, for funding parks and recreational services.
Resolution No. 2002-41
16.E This action encourages reviewing and updating the Master Plan to evaluate the current and future
demandsfor recreational sen>ices.
20.G
This action encourages using regulatory mechanisms to require easements and dedications to
provide open space for recreational use.
20B
This action encourages examining and improving open space management practices, thus
ensuring the availability of land for recreational uses
UH\553822.2
01-052902-04706052
-40-
20.1 This action encourages the use of open space preservation tools, thus setting aside areas for
recreational uses.
20J This action requires exploring regional methods of preserving open space for recreational uses.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
T. PUBLIC SERVICES. UTILITIES. PARKS AND RECREATION.
1. Impact.
4.8-6. Development consistent with the General Plan wiII increase demand for gas and
electric utilities as well telecommunication capabilities.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased demand for gas and electric utilities as
well telecommunication capabilities, as a result of development consistent with the General Plan
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.8-6:
Policies
1.08 This policy would ensure coordinated development of areas lvithfragmented property oHmership,
thus ensuring coordination in providing utilities.
1.l3 This policy would ensure the removal of overhead utility lines and require underground utilities in
new developments.
2.01 This policy would encourage the maximum utilization of existing utilities by directing growth to
areas within the Urban Service Area.
2.02 This policy would ensure that the rate of growth is controlled by the availability of utilities.
2.04 This policy would ensure that planning tools are used as methods for determining appropriate
growth rates and location, thus ensuring that demand for utilities does not exceed existing
capacity.
2.06 This policy would require that new developments pay fees for increases needed in the utility
system.
2.07 This policy would establish and maintain an Urban Service Area to limit growth to areas that can
be served my existing utilities.
2.08 This policy would establish a "20-Year Boundary" to limit growth to areas that can be served by
existing utilities.
UH\553622.2
01.Q52902-04706052
-41-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2.09 This policy would encourage citywide reviews of land availability to be peiformed with every
amendment to the 20-Year Boundary
10.02 This policy would ensure incentives for affordable housing development, thereby ensuring the
maximum use of existing utilities.
17.09 This policy would ensure that energy conservation measures are implemented to reduce demand
for utilities.
19.10 This policy would encourage working with public, quasi-public, and private utility providers to
ensure adequate levels of service.
/9.l1 This policy would encourage the undergrounding of utilities in older areas, as "t'ell as in ne'.v
developments.
19.12 This policy would ensure the support of new telecommunication technologies.
19.14 This policy would encourage the promotion of energy-efficient outdoor lighting, thus reducing
demandfor utilities.
23.05 This policy would reduce energy consumption through building technologies, thereby reducing
demandfor utilities.
25.01 This policy would ensure that developrnent is only pennitted in area lvcll-served by public
services.
Actions
2..11 This action encourages review of all applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
monitoring demand for utilities.
8.J This action encourages resource conservation to reduce demand for utilities.
19.F This action requires undergrounding of all utilities.
19. G This action encourages reviewing and updating the City's lighting standards to improve safety
and reduce demand for utilities.
23.C This action requires new development to be energy-efficient, thus reducing demandfor utilities.
23.D This action encourages providing the public with energy conservation information to reduce
demand for utilities.
23.E This action encourages the enacting of an Alternative Energy Ordinance to reduce demand for
utilities.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduee this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-42-
u. GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY.
1. Impact.
4.9-1. Seismic shaking in the City during an expected earthquake on one of the nearby
regional faults could cause structural and nonstructural damage to development allowed
within the projected area.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of structural and nonstructural damage to development
allowed within the projected area caused by seismic shaking in the City during an expected
earthquake on one of the nearby regional faults.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.9- I:
Policies
2.08 One of the objectives of this policy is to discourage development in areas subject to public safety
hazards such as seismic shaking.
2.09 Amendments to 20-Year Boundary must be evaluated in terms of public safety hazards.
4.06 This policy would encourage areas subject to seismic shaking hazards to remain in agricultural
production, thereby decreasing the potential for structural and non-structural damage.
10.12 When selecting sites for infill development, the criterion includes whether mitigation for geologic
and soils hazards is cost effective.
/8.01 This policy provides and maintains police and fire services that are adequate to respond to
emergencies and potentially prevent harm to people and property caused by seismic shaking and
related hazards.
18.03 This policy ensures that command centers for emergency/disaster services are designed to remain
operational during a "maximum probable seismic event" and able to continue to provide services
that may potentially prevent further seismic shaking related damage.
18.04 This policy promotes hazard awareness and prevention, including seismic hazards, through
community education, to ensure citizens are aware of how to protect themselves from risk of
structural and bodily hazards.
18.05 This policy promotes emergency preparedness and continuing provisions for essential public
services during natural disasters, potentially preventing harm to people and property caused by
seismic shaking and related hazards.
18.06 This policy ensures that high-occupancy structures and critical emergency facilities are not
located in areas of high seismic risk. This policy also decreases the potential for damage to be
caused by seismic shaking by ensuring that all such structures are designed to protect human life
to the highest degree possible during a "maximum probable event" of seismic activity.
UH\553622.2
01-052902-04706052
-43-
Resolution No. 2002-41
18.07 This policy ensures adequate access for emergency vehicles and equipment, facilitating the
potential prevention of harm to people and property caused by seismic shaking hazards.
20.01 This policy preserves areas subject to strong groundshaking during earthquakes as open space,
greatly reducing the potential for damage to development due to seismic shaking to occur in these
areas.
25.01 This policy restricts development to areas where potential danger to residents caused by seismic
shaking can be adequately mitigated to an "acceptable level of risk" and prohibits development in
areas where emergency services cannot be provided.
25.02 This policy requires the use of zoning and other land use controls to regulate development in
areas subject to seismic shaking hazards based 011 the potential degree of hazard and potential
public cost incurred in the event of an emergency.
25.03 This policy requires appropriate studies as part oj the development review process to assess
potential seismic shaking hazards and assure that impacts arc properly mitigated.
25.04 This policy aims to ensure that only urban uses with relatively high Risk Tolerances to seismic
hazards 'would be placed in areas that have a potential for strong seismic shaking.
25.05 This policy ensures that all potential seismic shaking hazards are anticipated by considering all
faults in the area to be active until evidence shmving otherwise is developed.
25.06 This policy facilitates identification of areas of potential seismic risk, ensuring that potential
seismic shaking hazards at various sites are anticipated and mitigated.
25.07 This policy decreases the potential for damage due to seismic shaking to occur by allowing only
low intensity, low occupancy development in areas subject to high seismic risk.
25.08 This policy decreases the potential for damage due to seismic shaking to occur by assuring that
structures arc designed and constructed in accordance lvith the Uniform Building Code of the
State of California.
25.09 This policy ensures proper site investigation and appropriate mitigation for development
proposals and that site and construction design and engineering minimize potential damage from
seismic shaking to an "acceptable level of risk. "
25.10 This policy ensures that roads, bridges, utility lines, and water storage tanks are designed and
constructed to prevent damage during strong seismic shaking.
25.11 By restricting development on steep slopes, this policy would reduce the potential for earthquake-
induced landslides to cause damage to structures.
Resolution No. 2002-41
Actions
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20- Year Boundary to help control growth that may be
affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes.
18.A This action encourages moniton'ng the levels of service of the emergency response agencies to
ensure safety during a natural disaster.
l8.B This action requires updating of the Impact Pee Schedule to ensure that public safety facilities are
improved to keep up with new developments, thus ensuring maximum safety in the event of a
natural disaster.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-44-
18. C This action encourages using Capital Improvement Programs funds to support emergency
response services, thus ensuring adequate responses in times of emergency.
18.D This action requires maintaining the City's mutual aid agreements with surrounding jurisdictions
to ensure adequate emergency response in the event of a natural disaster.
25.A This action encourages maintaining detailed hazard maps for adequate responses in emergency
situations.
25.B This action encourages updating the building codes to help prevent damage in the event of a
natural disaster.
25.C This action encourages building inJpection programs to mitigate existing possible hazards.
25.D This action encourages addressing safety issues related to unreinforced masonry which may prove
to be hazardous in the event of a natural disaster.
25.E This action requires soils reports for all new developments to assess their hazard potential in the
event of a natural disaster.
25.F This action encourages new development to submit erosion and deposition control plans to ensure
safety in the event of a natural disaster.
25.lv' This action requires providing public information regarding potential natural hazards.
Mitigation Measure: 4.9-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's polieies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final ETR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant levcl.
V. GEOLOGY. SOILS AND SEISMICITY.
1. Impact.
4.9-2. Liquefaction of unconsolidated sediments caused by seismic shaking during an
expected earthquake could result in damage to development allowed within the project
area.
2. Mitigation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of liquefaction of unconsolidated sediments caused by
seismic shaking during an expected earthquake could result in damage to development allowed
within the project area.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.9-2:
UH\553622.2
01.052902-04706052
-45-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Policies
2.08 One of the objectives of this policy is to discourage development in areas subject to public safety
hazards such as liquefaction caused by seismic shaking.
2.09 This policy encourages amendments to the General Plan when public safety hazards, such as
earthquakes, become planning issues.
4.06 This policy would encourage areas subject to liquefaction during seismic shaking, such as those
having soils with a high water table, to remain in agricultural production, thereby decreasing the
potential for structural and non-structural damage.
10.12 This polic.v only allOl'vs infill development on sites 1vithout public safety hazards, such as
earthquake risks.
18.01 This policy provides and maintains police and fire services that are adequate to respond to
emergencies and potentially prevent harm to people and property caused by liquefaction during
seismic shaking.
J 8. 03 This policy ensures that command centers for emergency/disaster services are designed to remain
operational during a "maximum probable seismic event" and able to continue to provide services
that may potentially prevent further damage.
18.04 This policy promotes hazard mvareness and prevention, including seismic hazards, through
community education.
/8.05 This policy promotes emergency preparedness and continuing provisions for essential public
services during natural disasters, potentially preventing harm to people and property caused by
liquefaction during seismic shaking.
/8.06 This polic~v ensures that high-occupancy structures and critical emergency facilities are not
located in areas of high seismic risk. This policy also decreascs the potcntial for damage to be
caused by liquefaction during seismic shaking by ensuring that all such structures are designed to
protect human life to the highest degree possible during a "ma.rimum probable event" of seismic
activity.
18.07 This policy ensures adequate access for emergency vehicles and equipment, facilitating the
potential prevention of harm to people and property caused by liquefaction during seismic
shaking.
20.01 This policy preserves areas subject to strong groundshaking during earthquakes as open space,
reducing the potential for damage to development due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking to
occur in these areas.
25.01 This policy restricts development to areas where potential danger to residents caused by
liquefaction during seismic shaking can be adequately mitigated to an "acceptable level of risk"
and prohibits development in areas where emergency services cannot be provided.
25.02 This policy requires the use of zoning and other land use controls to regulate development in
areas subject to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking based on the potential degree of hazard
and potential public cost incurred in the event of an emergency.
25.03 This policy requires appropriate studies as part of the development review process to assess
potential hazards due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking and assure that impacts are
properly mitigated.
UH\5536222
01.0s2902.04706052
-46-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.04 This policy aims to ensure that only urban uses with relatively high Risk Tolerances to seismic and
geologic hazards would be placed in areas that have a potential for liquefaction during seismic
shaking.
25.05 This policy ensures that all potential seismic hazards, including liquefaction, are anticipated by
considering all faults in the area to be active until evidence showing otherwise is developed.
25.06 This policy facilitates identification of areas of potential seismic risk, ensuring that potential
hazards due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking are anticipated and mitigated to the
furthest extent possible.
25.07 This policy decreases the potential for damage due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking to
occur by allowing only low intensity, low occupancy development in areas subject to high seismic
risk.
25.08 This policy decreases the potential for damage due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking to
occur by assuring that structures are designed and constnlcted in accordance 1vilh the Uniform
Building Code of the State of California.
25.09 This policy ensures proper site investigation and appropriate mitigation for development
proposals and that site and construction design and engineering minimize potential damage fi'om
liquefaction caused by seismic shaking to an "acceptable level of risk. "
25.10 This policy ensures that roads, bridges, utility lines, and 1vater storage tanks are designed and
constnlcted to prevent damage due to liquefaction caused by seismic shaking.
25.11 This policy restricts development on steep slopes, thus reducing risks associated with seismic
shaking.
27.04 This policy evaluates new developments in terms of potential of public danger, thus reducing the
possibility oj seismic shaking.
Actions
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20-Year Boundmy to help control growth that may be
affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes.
18.A This action encourages monitoring the levels of service of the emergency response agencies to
ensure safety during a natural disaster.
18.B This action requires updating of the Impact Fee Schedule to ensure that public safety facilities are
improved to keep up with new developments, thus ensuring maximum safety in the event of a
natural disaster.
18. C This action encourages using Capital Improvement Programs funds to support emergency
response services, thus ensuring adequate responses in times of emergency.
18.D This action requires maintaining the City's mutual aid agreements with surrounding jurisdictions
to ensure adequate emergency response in the event of a natural disaster.
25.A This action encourages maintaining detailed hazard maps for adequate responses in emergency
situations.
25.B This action encourages updating the building codes to help prevent damage in the event of a
natural disaster.
UHI553622.2
01.()52902.04706052
-47-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.C This action encourages building inspection programs to mitigate existing possible hazards.
25.D This action encourages addressing safety issues related to unreinforced masonry which may prove
to be hazardous in the event of a natural disaster.
25.E This action requires soils reports for all new developments to assess their hazard potential in the
event of a natural disaster.
25.F This action encourages new development to submit erosion and deposition control plans to ensure
safety in the event of a natural disaster.
25.N This action requires providing public information regarding potential natural hazards.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's polieies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
W. GEOLOGY. SOILS AND SEISMICITY.
1. Impact.
4.9-3. Development allowed within the project area may be exposed to differential
settlement, causing architectural and/or structural damage.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implcmented, will lessen the impact of exposure to differential scttlcmcnt, causing
architectural and/or structnral damage as a result of development allowed within thc project arca.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.9-3:
Policies
2.08 One of the objectives of this policy is to discourage development in areas subject to public safety
hazards such as differential settlement due to expansive soils.
2.09 This policy requires review of the 20-Year Boundary area only when public hazards are identified,
such as differential settlement.
4.06 This policy would encourage areas subject to natural hazards, such as differential settlement
caused by expansive soils, to remain in agricultural production, thereby decreasing the potential
for structural and non-structural damage.
10.12 This policy states that infill housing not occur on sites identified as having potential public safety
hazards, such as differential settlement.
18.01 This policy requires that adequate standards of service are maintained to ensure proper
emergency responses.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-48-
18.03 This policy ensures that all emergency facilities can withstand a "maximum probable seismic
event" and remain operational.
18.04 This policy promotes hazard awareness and prevention through community education programs.
18.05 This policy promotes emergency preparedness and continuing provisions for essential public
services during natural disasters, potentially preventing harm to people and property due to
differential settlement caused by expansive soils.
18.06 This policy ensures that high-occupancy stnlctures and emergency facilities are not located in
areas that have high risk for differential settlemcnt.
18.07 This policy requires adequate access for emergency vehicles in all development.
20.01 This policy preserves hazardous areas, such as those having expansive soils, as open space,
reducing the potential for damage to development due to differential settlement to occur in these
areas.
25.01 This policy restricts development to areas where potential danger to residents caused by
differential settlement due to expansive soils can be adequately mitigated to an "acceptable level
of risk" and prohibits development in arcas 'rvhere enzergency services cannot be provided.
25.02 This policy requires the use of zoning and other land use controls to regulate development in
areas subject to differential settlement due to expansive soils based on the potential degree of
hazard and potential public cost incurred in the event of an emergency.
25.03 This policy requires appropriate studies as part of the development revinv process to assess
potential hazards of differential settlement due to expansive soils and assure that impacts are
properly mitigated.
25.04 This policy aims to ensure that only urban lIses with relatively high Risk Tolerances to seismic and
geologic hazards would be placed in areas that have a potential for differential settlement due to
the presence of expansive soils.
25.05 This policy requires that all faults in the area be considered to be active faults, thus reducing risk
of differential settlement occurring on developed land.
25.06 This policy encourages use of maps to identify areas subject to high seismic risk and high
probability of differential settlement.
25.07 This policy allows only low intensity, low occupancy development in areas subject to high seismic
risk and high probability of differential settlement.
25.08 This policy ensures that structural standards are used in all development, reducing the risk for
differential settlement.
25.09 This policy ensures proper site investigation and appropriate mitigation for development
proposals and that site and constrnctfon design and engineering minimize potential damage from
differential settlement due to the presence of expansive soils to an "acceptable level of risk. "
25.10 This policy ensures adequate design of all roads, bridges and utility lines to reduce risks
associated with differential settlement.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-ll4706052
-49-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.11 This policy designates areas with highly expansive soils on slopes greater than 10 percent as not
suitable for development, thereby eliminating hazards associated with differential settlement of
these areas.
27.04 This policy restricts development on steep slopes, thus reducing risks of differential settlement.
Actions
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20-Year Boundary to help control growth that may be
affected by natural disasters such as differential settlement.
18.A This action encourages monitoring the levels of service of the emergency response agencies to
ensure safety during a natural disaster.
18.B This action requires updating of the Impact Fee Schedule to ensure that public safety facilities are
improved to keep up with new developments, thus ensuring maximum safety in the event of a
natural disaster.
18. C This action encourages using Capital Improvement Programs funds to support emergency
response services, thus ensuring adequate responses in times of emergencJ'.
18.D This action requires maintaining the City's mutual aid agreements 'rvith surrounding jurisdictions
to ensure adequate emergency response in the event of a natural disaster.
25.A This action encourages maintaining detailed hazard maps for adequate responses in emergency
situations.
25.B This action encourages updating the building codes to help prevent damage in the event of a
natural disaster.
25.C This action encourages building inspection programs to mitigate existing possible hazards.
25.D This action encourages addressing safety issues related to unreinfiJrced masonry which may prove
to be hazardous in the event of a natural disaster.
25.E This action requires soils reports for all new developments to assess their hazard potential in the
event of a natural disaster.
25.F This action encourages new development to submit erosion and deposition control plans to ensure
safety in the event of a natural disaster.
25.N This action requires providing public information regarding potential natural hazards.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-50-
Resolution No. 2002-41
X. GEOLOGY. SOILS AND SEISMICITY.
1. Impact.
4.9-4. Future grading, construction, and concentrated discharge of collected runoff could
result in erosion and increased sedimentation, if not properly controlled.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of erosion and increased sedimentation as a result of
future grading, construetion, and concentrated discharge of collected runoff.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.9-3:
Policies
1.16 This policy minimizes the amount of grading for hillside development, decreasing the potential for
erosion and increased sedbnentation of nearby water resources.
25.11 This policy restricts development on steep slopes, thus reducing risk oJerosion and sedimentation.
25.23 This policy requires new development to include green areas to reduce runojf; erosion, and
sedimentation.
Actions
15.A This action encourages using the Capital improvement ProgralllfulldsJor IJ/"cvcllling erosioll alld
sedilnentation.
20.S This action encourages monitoring creeks to help prevent erosion and sedimentation.
22.S This action requires interagency cooperation in preventing erosion and sedimentation through
water quality control.
25.F This action requires all new development to submit plans regarding crosion and deposition
control.
Mitigation Measnres: 4.9-B, 4.9-C, 4.9-D. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
UHI553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-51-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Y. FLOOD CONTROL. DRAINAGE AND WATER OUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.10-1. Future development consistent with the General Plan will place urban uses within
areas designated as 1 % flood zones.
2. Mitil!ation:
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of placing urban uses within areas designated as 1 %
flood zones as a result of future development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation mcasures will help to
mitigate impact 4,10-1:
Policies
2.08 This policy discourages development, and therefore, placement of urban uses within arca
designated as 1% Flood Zones.
4.06 This policy will decrease urban uses placed within 1% Flood Zones by encouraging agricultural
land in those zones to remain in agricultural production.
19.09 This policy protects urban development placed within 1 % Flood Zones ji'om localized jlooding.
20.01 This policy decreases urban uses placed within 1% Flood Zones by preserving and protecting
riparian areas andfloodways within these zones.
20.02 This policy decreases urban uses placed within 1% Flood Zones by preserving easements and
setbacks adjacent to rIatural drainage, including small canyons alld creeks..
25.04 This policy aims to ensure that only urban uses with relatively high Flood Risk Tolerances lvould
be placed within 1% Flood Zones.
25.17 This policy requires coordination to alleviate flooding and drainage problems in the Planning
Area, including area within 1% Flood Zones.
25.18 This policy will restrict urban developments within 1% Flood Zones, to those including measures
to reduce jlood hazards to an acceptable level of risk.
25.19 This policy decreases urban uses placed within 1% Flood Zones by leaving jloodways in
agricultural or recreational use where these uses exist.
25.20 This policy ensures the development of jlood control measures to reduce jlood damage.
25.21 This policy decreases urban uses placed within 1% Flood Zones by designing jloodways with
provisions for multiple uses.
25.22 This policy encourages new drainage channel design to reduce risks associated withjlooding.
25.23 This policy encourages green areas designed to reduce runoff and reducejlooding risks.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-52-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.24 This policy requires new development to retain and protect native vegetation to reduce erosion
and flood risks.
Actions
l.A This action encourages updating the City's current growth management documents to ensure
consistency and to protect residents from flooding and other hazards.
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20-Year Boundary to guide long-term planning and restrict
development from areas prone to flooding and other hazards.
19.E This action requires the creation of a storm drain master plan to prevent flooding and other
hazards.
25.A This action encourages the creation of hazard maps to guide development away from areas prone
to flooding and other hazards.
25.B This action requires updating of the building codes to prevent damage from flooding and other
hazards.
25.F This action requires new developments to submit erosion and deposition plans to help prevellt
flooding and other hazards.
25.kf This action encourages maintenance of the City's Flood Control Ordinance to prC'l--'cntflooding
and other related hazards.
Mitigation Measure: Sce Appendix B.
3. Findin!!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementalion of the General Plan's polieies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
Z. FLOOD CONTROL. DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.10-2. An increase in impervious surfaces from build-out of the General Plan could
increase the volume and flow rate of runoff generated in the City, potentially causing
localized flooding, erosion or siltation, alteration of drainage patterns or exceeding
capacities of drainage systems.
2. Mitil!ation:
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased volume and flow rate of runoff generated
in the City, potentially causing localized flooding, erosion or siltation, alteration of drainage
patterns or exceeding capacities of drainage systems as a result of an increase in impervious
surfaces from build-out ofthe General Plan.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-53-
Resolution No. 2002-41
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4,10-2:
Policies
2.08 This policy discourages development in areas subject to natural hazards, thus reducing the risks
of flooding, erosion, and siltation.
4.06 This policy encourages agricultural uses in areas subject to flooding to reduce erosion and
siltation.
/9.09 This policy protects development fi'om localized flooding by providing a drainage system designed
to handle increased runoff/rom impervious swfaces.
20.01 This policy will preserve vegetation in open space areas lvhich protects hillsides, habitat areas,
and riparian communities from erosion and alteration of drainage patterns caused by increased
nmoj!
20.02 This policy ensures the preservation of the natural pattern and erosion control function of
drainage and riparian areas.
5.04 This policy requires development controls that would reduce the risk of erosion, siltation, and
flooding.
25.17 This policy requires agency coordination ensuring that flood control measures are designed to
alleviate flooding and drainage problems caused b.v increased runoff.
25.18 This policy will restrict urban development in areas that are most prone to the effects of increased
runoff, such as localized flooding and erosion.
25.19 This policy encourages agricultural and recreatiOlwl llses in high-risk floodway areas thus
reducing damage to developments.
25.20 This policy ensures that measures to reducejlood damage are implemented.
25.21 This policy will decrease siltation of drainage channels due to erosion caused by increased runoff
by providing and protecting vegetation to capture eroded sediment.
25.22 This policy will decrease siltation of drainage channels due to erosion caused by increased runoff
by providing and protecting vegetation to capture eroded sediment.
25.23 This policy will decrease the percentage of impermeable area included in new development and
increase absorption of runoff from paved areas, thereby reducing the negative effects of increased
runoff
25.24 This policy will reduce runoff velocity on hillsides, resulting in decreased erosion and alteration
of drainage pal/ems due to increased runoff
Actions
I.A This action encourages updating the City's current growth management documents to ensure
consistency and to protect residents from flooding and other hazards.
2.B This action encourages maintaining a 20- Year Boundary to guide long-term planning and restrict
development from areas prone to flooding and other hazards.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-54-
Resolution No. 2002-41
J 9.E This action requires the creation of a storm drain master plan to prevent flooding and other
hazards.
25.A This action encourages the creation of hazard maps to guide development away from areas prone
to flooding and other hazards.
25.B This action requires updating of the building codes to prevent damage from flooding and other
hazards.
25.F This action requires new developments to submit erosion and deposition plans to help prevent
flooding and other hazards.
25.i\;f This action encourages maintenance of the City's Flood Control Ordinance to preventjlooding
and other related hazards.
l\1itigation l\Ieasure: 4.10-B. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
AA. FLOOD CONTROL. DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY.
1. Impact.
4.10-3. Future construction activities and post-construction uses in the City could result in
degradation of water quality in nearby surface water bodies by adding pollutants to storm
water runoff.
2. Mitil!ation:
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of degradation of water quality in nearby surface
water bodies by adding pollutants to storm water runoff as a result of future construction
activities and post-construction uses in the City,
The implementation of the following polieies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4,10-3:
Policies
22.01 This policy ensures agency cooperation in enforcing water quality controls on construction and
development sites.
22.02 This policy encourages interagency coordination in addressing water quality issues.
22.03 This policy prohibits development of waste facilities, septic systems, and industries using toxic
chemicals in areas where polluting substances may come in contact with surface waters.
22.04 This policy ensures that City drinking water exceeds required state standards.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-55-
Resolution No. 2002-41
22.05 This policy requires continued monitoring to ensure that suiface water quality standards are
maintained.
22.06 This policy requires continued monitoring of private wells and expands the scope of testing to
include tests of more wells, tests on constituents not yet tested in private wells (i.e., volatile
organics, bacteriological, radiological, etc.), and periodic retesting of selected private wells.
Policies 22.06 through 22.10 do not mitigate for Impact 4.10-3. These policies mitigate for
impacts to groundwater. Impact 4.10-3 refers to water quality of suiface water bodies affected by
pollutants carried by storm water runoff. However, some of the policies identified as mitigating
for 4.10-2 would also mitigate for Impact 4.10-3, but are notlisted(20.0l, 20.02, 25.2 J, 25. 22 for
example). Policies lvhich protect, preserve, or establish riparian and other vegetation mitigate for
Impact 4.10-2 because this vegetation slows runoff and filters eroded sediment from runoff before
it reaches surface waters. These policies would also mitigate for Impact 4.10-3 because the same
vegetation would slow and filter pollutants from storm water nmofj before it enters surface water
bodies.
22.07 This policy continues programs to identifY and seal abandoned and unused lvells, as such lvells
may be prime sources for transferring contaminants from the upper to the lower aquifer.
See note following Policy 22.06.
22.08 This policy continues land use policies that limit the number ofilldividual septic systems in areas
vulnerable to groundwater contamination because of the potential for cumulative degradation of
water quality.
See note following Policy 22.06.
22.09 This policy restricts development on properties that have soils l-vith 11 rapid water percolation to
protect water quality. Cornmcrcial and industrial developments in sllch areas shall only be
permitted under the strict safety limitations required by the City's and/or County's Hazardous
Materials Specialists.
See note following Policy 22.06.
22.1 U This policy provides greater protection of the aquifers that supply drinking lvater to South County,
give specht! consideration to the nU/l/ogclIlcnt uf contaminants (c. g., !w:'.ardous material.)', Sanilal)!
effluents) in groundwater recharge areas lvhere no protective aquitard layer exists.
See note following Policy 22.06.
Actious
22.A This action encourages developing a comprehensive water quality tracking program to prevent
pollutants in storm water runoff
22.B This action encourages working with surrounding jurisdictions to address water quality issues,
including pollutants in stonn water runoff
22. C This action requires a water quality monitoring program to monitor groundwater and stonn water
runofffor evidence of pollutants.
22.D This action encourages identification and sealing of abandoned or unused wells to prevent
pollutants in the storm water runoff.
Mitigation Measure: 4.1O-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
UH\553622.2
01.052902-04706052
-56-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
BB. WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER.
1. Impact.
4.11-1. Development consistent with the General Plan could increase the demand for water
in the planning area when compared with water demand projections in the Water Master
Plan (1993).
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of increased demand for water in the planning area
when compared with water demand projections in the Water Master Plan (1993) as a result of
development consistent with the General Plan,
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.11-1:
Policies
1.05 This policy aims to ensure the existing population has adequate water throughout the 20-year life
of the General Plan.
2.01 This policy "vill Ii/nit the amount of lvater line Im;s (i.e., inevitable leaks from "valet supply
pipelines lvhich increase with distance fi'om source to user) that lvould occur in the water system
because it limits leapfrog or non-compact development patterns.
2.02 This policy would, if implemented properly, prevent the creation of a new water user, if a H.-'ater
constraint exists (i.e., the water supply system was unable to adequately serve them or an existing
user after the new users are added to the system).
2.04 This policy would use water resources availability as a tool for managing the rate, location and
extent of growth such that new growth would be restricted if adequate water supplies are not
available.
2.05 This policy would allow for updating the growth management goals and tools to make it more able
to respond to any potential water supply constraints in the fUture.
2.06 This policy requires that new developments pay all of the incremental public service costs that
they generate.
This would require that if a new development triggered a requirement for new water supply
facilities or sources, that the development would be required to pay for their incremental share of
the costs.
2.07 This policy establishes and maintains an Urban Service Area that indicates the area of land that
could potentially be developed in the next 5 years and to which the City is committed to providing
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-57-
Resolution No. 2002-41
basic infrastructure and services. Urban zoning, development approvals, and building permits will
only be granted to properties within the Urban Service Area. The City will not accept development
proposals on land outside the Urban Service Area, and will coordinate with the County to
discourage premature subdivision of such land. Applications for inclusion in the Urban Service
Area will be accepted annually and evaluated in light of General Plan policies promoting infill
development and efficiency in the provision of urban services.
The evaluation of requests for additions to the City's Urban Service Area shall include
consideration of the availability of adequate water supply for the new area.
2.08 This policy maintains a semi-static lO-year horizon for potential maximum development that will
ensure that water supplies are developed in a timely way for the anticipated buildout (within 20-
years) of that area.
2.09 This policy elaborates upon Policy 2.08 by providing a mechanism that would allow amendments
to the 20-Year Boundary Line if criteria or certain situations exist. The consideration of the
Boundary Line amendment would be required to consider urban services availability/provision
(such as 1vater).
10.12 This policy requires consideration of adequacy of water supply systems prior to selecting sites for
housing.
19.01 This policy would, if implemented, ensure that the grolllldlvater supply is maintained sustainable,
and by itself may be considered complete mitigation for the potential impact of the General Plan
on adequate water supply.
19.02 This policy encourages water system efficiency and will limit the amount of water line loss (i.e.,
inevitable leaks from '.vater supply pipe/ines lvhich increase with distance from source to user)
that would occur in the water system because it limits leap-frog or non-compact development
patterns.
22.01 This policy maintains close coordination lvi!1l the agencies and organizations that share
jurisdicLion and interest relative to South County's lvater supply and 1vater quality, including: the
Regio!lal rVatcr Quali(1/ Control Board; Sai//a Clara Vulley IVmer District; COllllly !fealth
Department; County Executive's Office; County Planning Office; Morgan Hill Planning
Department; and the San A1artin Planning Committee.
Inter-agency coordination will ensure that water supply issues that cross jurisdiction lines are
resolved cooperatively. In addition to local planning and conservation, use of and compliance
with the SCVWD 's information, policies and programs will be the key ingredient in ensuring long-
term reliability of water for Gilroy.
22.02 This policy ensures compatible ordinances, standards, and enforcement procedures regarding
water quality in all South County jurisdictions so that there is no advantage for a company to
locate in an area with lower standards. Also, encourage the &0 Regional Water Quality Control
Boards that have jurisdiction in South County to agree on compatible water quality standards for
South County and consistent approaches to implementing the State Board's non-degradation
policy.
Protecting water quality in existing sources will ensure that the sources will remain viable and is
necessary to prevent adverse health effects and maintain adequate water supply.
22.03 This policy prohibits development of waste facilities, septic systems, and industries using toxic
chemicals in areas where polluting substances may come in contact with groundwater,
floodwaters, creeks, or reservoir waters. Within the Gilroy Planning Area, identify land uses that
may contribute to the degradation of groundwater quality and ensure adequate monitoring,
controls and enforcement to protect groundwater quality.
Protecting water quality in existing sources will ensure that the sources will remain viable and is
necessary to prevent adverse health effects and maintain adequate water supply.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-58-
Resolution No. 2002-41
22.04 This policy ensures that City drinking water exceeds the required and recommended standards set
forth by the State of California Department of Environmental Protection.
Protecting water quality in existing sources will ensure that the sources will remain viable and is
necessary to prevent adverse health effects and maintain adequate water supply.
22.10 This policy provides greater protection of the aquifers that supply drinking water to South County,
give special consideration to the management of contaminants (e.g., hazardous materials, sanitary
efJluents) in groundwater recharge areas where no protective aquitard layer exists.
Protecting water quality in existing sources will ensure that the sources will remain viable and is
necessary to prevent adverse health effects and maintain adequate water supply.
23.01 This policy promotes water conservation and encourage the use ofrcclaimed or recycled water to
reduce the overall demand on water resources. Ensure that recycled wastnvater is treated in
accordance with state and federal standards.
Water conservation and reclamation is a key element to the City's and the SCVWD's long-term
u'aler supply programs by reducing the potable l-vater demands of City users.
23.02 This policy encourages development of lvater reclamation facilities, where feasible, in order to
make reclaimed water available to help meet the growing water needs of the South County region.
Reclamation (or water recycling) has been identified as a key long-term 11/Gter source by the City
and the SCVWD for appropriate irrigation and industrial uses. The ability to use reclaimed 1vater
optimally benefits the potable l'vater supply availability for urban uses and reduces the amount of
effluent that the South County Regional lYastewater Authority must dispose to
percolation/evaporation ponds.
23.03 This policy encourages the use of drought-resistant landscaping and low-flow irrigation systems
to help reduce overall demand.
This additional conservation measures will reduce long-term demand on the water supply system.
23.04 This policy uses reclaimed water for landscape irrigation, especially for large water users such as
golf courses.
Water conservation and reclamation is a key element to the City's and the SCVI-l'D's long-term
I\"aler supply jJruj},rulllS by reducing the polahlc II'ulel" tlc!I,'(,'iids of City USCT:;.
Actions
l.A This action encourages reviewing applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
reviewing the demand for water in the planning area.
4.A This action encourages implementation of "Strategies to Balance Planned Growth and
Agricultural Viability" to monitor and reduce demand for water in the planning area.
8.J This action requires resource conservation as a means to reducing water demand in the planning
area.
15.A This action encourages using funds from the Capital Improvement Program to improve public
service and therefore better address demand for water in the planning area
19.A This action requires developer to pay fees to offset the increased demand for water generated by
their new development.
19.B
This action encourages interagency coordination to address demand for water in the regional
planning area.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902.04706052
-59-
Resolution No. 2002-41
19.C This action encourages regular updating of the Water master Plan to monitor and address
demand for water in the planning area.
22.A This action requires a comprehensive groundwater management program to monitor and address
demand for water in the planning area.
23.A This action encourages the recycling of treated wastewater for use in landscape irrigation, thus
reducing water demand in the planning area.
23.B This action encourages educating residents on water conservation, thus reducing demand for
water in the planning area.
3. Findings.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Pinal EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
cc. WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER.
1. Impact.
4.11-2. Development under the General Plan would cause an exceedance of the sewer
collectiou system aud sewer treatment plant capacities due to an increase in flows over that
estimated in the Sewer Master Plan. The capacity of the existing pcrcolation ponds uscd by
the SCR\VA would also be exceeded without acquisition of adequate land and suhsequent
construction of ponds, to accommodate increased flows.
2. Mitigation.
The General Plan and Final EIR containlllany policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of an exceedance of the sewer collcction system and
sewer treatment plant capacities due to an increase in flows over that estimated in the Sewer
Master Plan as a rcsult of development under the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.11-2:
Policies
2.01 This policy will ensure that development can only take place where existing infrastructure can
accommodate new development. thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.02 This policy would ensure that growth rates are controlled by infrastructure capacity, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.03 This policy would allow urban development only in the incorporated portion of the Planning Area
that has appropriate infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.04 This policy would utilize planning tools for managing growth rates based on available
infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902.04706052
-60-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2.05 This would provide for review and evaluation of growth management tools based on available
infrastructure. thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.06 This would require new developments pay impact fees for infrastructure improvements, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.07 This policy would establish and maintain an Urban Service Area based on available
infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.08 This policy maintains a semi-static 20-year horizon for potential ma."'Kimum development, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
2.09 This policy elaborates upon Policy 2.08 by providing a mechanism, that lvould allow amendments
to the 20-Year Boundary Line based on available infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing SCl-ver
capacity is not exceeded.
2.10 This policy elaborates upon Policy 2.08 by providing a mechanisul that would allOlv amcndrncnts
to the 20-Year Boundary Line based on available infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing selva
capacity is not exceeded.
10.12 This policy establishes selection criteria for infill dn-'elopment based on Gl-Ylilability of
infrastructure, thus ensuring that existing server capacity is not exceeded.
19.03 This policy would ensure the maintenance of adequate sewers, thus ensuring that existing scvver
capacity is not exceeded.
19.04 This policy encourages that developnwlIt be controlled by availability of infrastructure, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
19.05 This policy encourages the use of state-oft he-art treatment and disposal facilities for wastev.mter,
thus ensuring that e..;risting selver capacity is not exceeded.
19.06 1'111.'" fJolic.v requires thai flC\V devclolJ/llellt be cOJ1llected to the ellY'S prlllci/wl '.1'(lSIC'.I-'(I(cr
treatment plant, thus ensuring that existing seH-'er capacity is not exceeded.
19.07 This policy discourages the use of lift stations, thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not
exceedcd.
19.08 This policy encourages the consideration of available infi'astructure in new development, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
22.01 Inter-agency coordination will ensure that sewer issues are resolved, thus ensuring that existing
sewer capacity is not exceeded.
22.02 This policy ensures compatibility between ordinances, standards, and enforcement procedures
regarding sewer services, thus ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
22.03 This policy ensures that sewer service will be constructed without polluting local waterways, thus
ensuring that existing sewer capacity is not exceeded.
22.04 This policy ensures that City drinking water exceeds State standards.
22.05
This policy ensures water quality monitoring for pollutants, thus ensuring that existing sewer
capacity is not exceeded.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-61-
Resolution No. 2002-41
22.06 This policy ensures the monitoring ofpnvate wells.
22.07 This policy ensures the identification and sealing of abandoned and unused wells which may
contain pollutants.
22.08 This policy ensures that land use policies will limit the number of individual septic systems in
areas vulnerable to groundwater contamination.
22.09 This policy restricts development on soils with "rapid water percolation)J in order to protect
water quality.
Actions
2.A This action encourages reviewing applications for inclusion in the Urban Service Area, thus
reviewing the demandfor Selver services in the planning arca.
4.A This action encourages implementation of "Strategies to Balance Planned Growth and
Agricultural Viability" to monitor and reduce demand for sewer services in the planning area.
1 j.A This action encourages using funds from the Capital Improvement Program to improve public
service and therefore better address demand for sewer services in the planning area
J 9.A This action requires developer to pay fees to offset the increased demand for sewer services
generated b,v their new development.
19.D This action encourages a long-term wastewater management plan to address demand for se~ver
services in the regional plallning area.
22.A This action encourages regular updating of the Water master Plan to monitor and address
demand for selver services in the planning area.
22.B This action requires interagency coordination to monitor alId address demandfor selver services
ill the plollning orco.
22. C This action requires a comprehensive lvater quality monitoring program to monitor and address
demandfor sewer services in the planning area.
23.A This action encourages the recycling of treated wastewater for use in landscape irrigation, thus
reducing sewer services demand in the planning area.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
DD. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
1. Impact.
4.12-1. Development consistent with the General Plan would replace existing wildlife
habitat with new structures and landscaping.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-62-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, whieh
when implemented, will lessen the impact of replacement of existing wildlife habitat with new
structures and landscaping as a result of development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.12-1:
Policies
1.09 This policy aims to protect wildlife habitat by encouraging clustered development.
1.16 This policy aims to protect wildlife habitat by encouraging clustered development in hill~ide areas
and design of roadways such that the ecological character of the hillsides is preserved
2.01 This policy directs new development to areas within or adjacent to the Urban Service Area,
ensuring a compact development pattern, and avoiding expansion of development into wildlife
habitat areas outside of the Urban Service Area.
2.04 This policy encourages the use of grm-vth management tools to reduce conflicts bellveen ~vildlife
and development.
2.08 This policy encourages the establishments of a 20-Year Boundary to reduce conflicts bef1.veen
lvildlife and development.
12.04 This policy aims to protect wildlife habitat by prescn'ing the ecology of the hillsides to the west of
the City lvhen designing circulation facilities and roadlvays.
20.0J This policy preserves and protects open space natural resource and wildlf(e habitat areas.
]O.(J2 This policy aims to protect lvildlife f/(/biiat /;.1' protectillt; the ecological value of creeks and
natural areas in the Gilroy Planning Area.
20.03 This policy preserves important plant and wildlife habitat types and requires provisions for
compensation for loss of them.
20.04 This policy preserves areas that support rare or endangered species and requires provisions for
compensation for loss of them.
20.05 This policy designates protected open !Jpace areas to create natural buffers between Gilroy and
surrounding communities, potentially decreasing the amount of wildlife habitat replaced by
development.
20.06 Provides for the management and maintenance of public and private open space areas in a
manner that ensures habitat protection.
20.07 This policy recommends the development and application of a variety of preservation tools to
protect open space in and around the city, potentially decreasing the amount of wildlife habitat
replaced by development.
20.08 This policy requires preservation of open space and recreational areas to reduce conflicts
between wildlife and development.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-63-
Resolution No. 2002-41
20.09 This policy ensures that when land preservation measures are required as a condition of project
approval, the land is preserved in perpetuity, potentially decreasing the amount of wildlife habitat
replaced by development.
20.10 This policy aims to support regional open space preservation programs, potentially decreasing the
amount of wildlife habitat replaced by development.
Actions
20.A This action encourages an open space review process to help ensure that existing wildlife habitats
are preserved.
20.B This action encourages protection of the local creeks to ensure that wildlife habitats are
preserved.
20.C This action requires the implementation ofa Habitat Protection Ordinance to ensure protection of
wildlife habitats.
20.D This action encourages consultation with state officials on fish and wildlife impacts to ensure
preservation of habitats.
20.E This action requires greenbelt definition and protection in the regional area, thus preserving
wildlife habitats.
20.F This action encourages a greenbelt or other buffer hetween Gilroy and San lvfartin to help
preserve wildlife habitat.
20.H This action encourages improving open ~pace managenwnt practices to ensure preservation of
wildhfe habitats.
20./ This action requires review the current open space preservation tools to ensure the protection of
wildlife habitat.
20J This action encourages interagenc)/ coordination in preserving lvildlife habitats.
l\tIitigation i\-Ieasure: 4.12-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
EE. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
1. Impact.
4.12-2. Development consistent with the General Plan could affect potential habitat of
special-status species.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-64-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of affecting potential habitat of special-status species
as a result of development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4,12-1:
Policies
20.0/ This policy preserves and protects open space natural resource and lvildlife habitat areas,
including potential special-status species habitat.
20.02 This polic.v aims to protect potential special-status species habitat by protecting the ecological
value of creeks and natural areas in the Gilroy Planning Area.
20.03 This policy preserves important plant and wildlife habitat types, including potential special~status
species habitat and requires provisions for compensation for loss of them.
20.04 This policy preserves areas that support rare or endangered species and requires pro-visions for
cornpensationfor loss of them.
20.05 This policy designates protected open space areas to create natural buffers bellveen Gilroy and
surrounding communities, potentially decreasing effects on potential special-status species
habitat.
20.06 Provides for the management and maintenance of public and private open space areas in a
manner that ensures habitat protection, including potential special-status 5pccies habitat.
20.07 This policy recommends the dC'.-'elopment and application of a variety of preservation tools to
protect open space in and around the ci(v. potentially decreasing a.lIee!s 011 potential 5jJccial-
status species habitat.
20.09 This policy ensures that lvhen land preservation measures are required as a condition of project
approval, the land is preserved in popetuity, potentially decreasing affects on potential special-
status species habitat.
20.10 This policy aims to support regional open space preservation programs, potentially decreasing
affects on potential special-status species habitat.
Actions
20.A This action encourages an open space review process to help ensure that existing wildlife habitats
of special-status species are preserved.
20.B This action encourages protection of the local creeks to ensure that wildlife habitats of special-
status species are preserved.
20.C This action requires the implementation of a Habitat Protection Ordinance to ensure protection of
wildlife habitats of special-status species.
20.D This action encourages consultation with state officials on fish and wildlife impacts to ensure
preservation of habitats of special-status species.
UH\553822.2
01.()52902-04706052
-65-
Resolution No. 2002-41
20.H This action encourages improving open space management practices to ensure preservation of
wildlife habitats of special-status species.
20.1 This action requires review the current open space preservation tools to ensure the protection of
wildlife habitats of special-status species.
20J This action encourages interagency coordination in preserving wildlife habitats of special-status
species.
Mitigation Measure: 4.12-8. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the final ErR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
FF. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
1. Impact.
4.12-3. Development consistent with the General Plan could affect potential jurisdictional
wetland habitat and riparian habitat.
2. Miti!!:ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of affecting potential jurisdietional wetland habitat
and riparian habitat as a result of dcvclopmcnt consistent with the Gcneral Plan.
Thc implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.12-3:
Policies
20.01 This policy preserves and protects open space natural resource and wildlife habitat areas,
including potential jurisdictional wetland habitat and riparian habitat.
20.02 This policy aims to protect potential jurisdictional wetland habitat and riparian habitat by
protecting the ecological value of creeks and natural areas in the Gilroy Planning Area.
20.03 This policy preserves important plant and wildlife habitat types, including potential jurisdictional
wetland habitat and riparian habitat and requires provisions for compensation for loss of them.
20.04 This policy preserves areas thaI support rare or endangered species. including jurisdictional
wetland habitat and riparian habitat and requires provisions for compensation for loss of them.
Actions
20.A This action encourages an open space review process to help ensure that existing jurisdictional
wetland habitats and riparian areas are preserved.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902.04706052
-66-
Resolutiou No. 2002-41
20.B This action encourages protection of the local creeks to ensure that jurisdictional wetland habitats
and riparian areas are preserved.
20. C This action requires the implementation of a Habitat Protection Ordinance to ensure protection of
jurisdictional wetland habitats and riparian areas.
20.D This action encourages consultation with state officials on fish and jurisdictional wetland impacts
to ensure preservation of habitats and riparian areas.
Mitigation Measnre: 4.l2-C See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incOIporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the final ErR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
GG. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
1. Impact.
4.12-4. The cumulative effects of the General Plan combined with other development in the
region could adversely impact biological resourccs.
2. Miti!!:ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of adversely impact biological resourees as a rcsult of
the cUlllulativc effccts of the General Plan eombined with other dcvelopl11ent in thc region_
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation mcasures will help to
mitigate impact 4.12-4:
Policies
20.01 This policy preserves and protects open space natural resource and wildlife habitat areas,
potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological resources.
20.02 This policy aims to protect the ecological value of creeks and natural areas in the Gilroy Planning
Area, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological resources.
20.03 This policy preserves important plant and wildlife habitat types and requires provisions for
compensation for loss of them, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological resources.
20.04 This policy preserves areas that support rare or endangered species and requires provisions for
compensation for loss of them, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological resources.
20_05 This policy designates protected open space areas to create natural buffers between Gilroy and
surrounding communities, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological resources.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-67-
Resolution No. 2002-41
20.06 Provides for the management and maintenance of public and private open space areas in a
manner that ensures habitat protection, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological
resources.
20.07 This policy recommends the development and application of a variety of preservation tools to
protect open space in and around the city, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological
resources.
20.09 This policy ensures that when land preservation measures are required as a condition of project
approval, the land is preserved in perpetuity, potentially decreasing adverse impacts to biological
resources.
20./0 This policy aims to support regional open Jpnce preservation programs, potentially decreasing
adverse impacts to biological resources.
Actions
20A This action encourages an open space review process to help ensure that biological resources are
preserved.
20.B This action encourages protection of the local creeks to ensure that biological resources are
preserved.
20. C This action requires the implementation of a Habitat Protection Ordinance to ensure protection of
biological resources.
20.D This action encourages consultation with state officials on fish and wildlife impacts to ensure
preservation of biological resources.
20.H This action enco1lrages improving open space management practices to ensure preservation of
biological resources.
20./ This action requires review the current open space preservatio!1 tools to ensure the protection of
biological resources.
20J This action encourages interagency coordination in preserving biological resources.
Mitigation Measnre: 4.12-D. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findings.
This is a significant unavoidable impact. The General Plan includes mitigation measures that
will lessen the impaet of adversely impact biological resources as a result of the cumulative
effects of the General Plan combined with other development in the region, Despite
implementation of these mitigation measures, the General Plan will result in significant
unavoidable biological impacts that cannot feasibly be reduced to a non-significant leveL This
impact, therefore, is considered significant and unavoidable. See Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
UH\553822.2
01.()52902-04706052
-68-
Resolution No. 2002-41
HH. VISUAL QUALITY AND AESTHETICS.
1. Impact.
4.13-1. Development consistent with the General Plan could conflict with adjoining
development relative to height, mass and scale, and could create additional solar shading
on adjacent properties.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of conflicts with adjoining development relative to
height, mass and scale, and could create additional solar shading on adjacent properties as a
result of development consistent with the General Plan,
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.13-1:
Policies
3.03 This policy aims to ensure that new commercial and industrial developments contribute to an
overall attractiveness of the community and reduce possible solar shading occurring through
structural conflicts.
3.()5 This policy aims to ensure that heavy industrial uses are grouped together, thereby reducing
possible structural conflicts and the resulting solar shading.
3.14 This policy ensures the use uf standards and reviClV procedures ill architectural review of
commercial buildings, tlIlIS reducing structural conflict.,;.
3.18 This poli<-)I encourages neighborhood commercial uses that are built using design stwulards that
will reduce structural conflicts and the resultant solar shading
3.21 This policy encourages new commercial development along First Street to use a Planned Unit
Development approach and architectural standards that will reduce structural conflicts and solar
shading problems.
3.26 This policy aims to ensure that the Downtown area is architecturally appealing in an effort to
make the area attractive to businesses.
3.30 This policy preserves and protects historical or architecturally significant buildings in the
Downtown area, including limiting possible structural conflicts.
5.03 This policy aims to encourage preservation of historic structures and limit possible structural
conflicts involving the significant buildings.
5.04 This policy encourages the designation of a Downtown Historic District and ensures the
preservation of it through design standards that will reduce structural conflicts.
8.01 This policy promotes maintenance and rehabilitation of existing housing and implement design
standards that reduce structural conflicts with these housing units.
UH\553622.2
o 1'()52902 -04 706052
-69-
Resolution No. 2002-41
8.06 This policy aims to protect the character of existing neighborhoods through design standards that
limit structural conflicts and reduce solar shading.
Actions
1.B This action encourages hillside development guidelines to reduce structural conflicts and solar
shading
IJ This action encourages design review of all new development to reduce structural conflicts and
solar shading.
3.A This action requires developing "performance standards" for use in reviewing industrial
developments to reduce structural conflicts and solar shading.
J.B This action encourages applying industrial design guidelines to reduce structural conflicts and
solar shading.
3.e This action encourages design standards for high-impact uses to reduce structural conflicts and
solar shading.
3.D This action requires commercial design and development standards to reduce structural conflicts
and solar shading.
3.E This action encourages use controls and design guidelines for neighborhood commercial
developments to reduce structural conflicts and solar shading.
5.D This action encourages design reviel-v in historic preservation districts to reduce structural
conflicts and solar shading.
6.B This action encourages scenic higlnvay development standards to reduce structural conflicts and
solar shading.
8.B This action requires strict code enforcement in an effort to reduce slmcium! COJ!{licls {{lid sola/"
shading.
8.C This action encourages rehabilitation loan programs to encourage mixed-se development while
reducing structural conflicts and solar shading.
Mitigation Measure: 4. 13-A. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
II. VISUAL QUALITY AND AESTHETICS.
1. Impact.
4.13-3. Development consistent with the General Plan will potentially result in a reduction
of Gilroy's current "small-town" rural character.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-70-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of a reduction of Gilroy's current "small-town", rural
character as a result of development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures wiII help to
mitigate impact 4,13-3:
Policies
1.01 This policy ensures orderl}', compact development in an effort to retain Gilroy '5 rural character.
1.04 This policy aims to guide the construction of new neighborhoods so as to retain the rural
character of Gilroy.
1.05 This policy preserves existing neighborhoods to ensure the maintenance of the compact, rural
character of Gilroy
1.07 This policy preserves the unique qualities of Hecker Pass, thus enhancing the rural character of
Gilroy.
1.09 This policy encourages clustered development in order to maintain the compact, ruml qualitJ' of
Gilroy.
1.10 This policy aims to provide clear gatewa)/s to be entlY points to the City, thus enhancing the rural,
small-town quality of Gilroy.
1./1 This policy promotes city beautification ill order to preserve the rural, small-tOlvn quality of
Gilroy.
J. J 2 This po/i(-'Y promotes tree planting along city streets ill order to cnlUlllcc the ruml quality of
Gilroy.
1.13 This policy promotes the undergrounding of utilities to enhance the small-town. I1Iral quality of
Gilroy.
1./4 This policy aims to regulate signage and billboards to ensure the maintenance of a small-town,
n~ral quality.
1.15 This policy prohibits signs within 1,000 feet of Santa Teresa Boulevard to enhance the rural
quality of Gilroy.
1.16 This policy minimizes the constl1lction of hillside development in an effort to preserve the I1Iral
quality of Gilroy.
3.03 Thispolicy ensures that new commercial and industrial development maintain attractive scale and
design, thus preserving the rural quality of Gilroy.
3.05 This policy aims to consolidate heavy industrial uses into one area, thus enhancing the small-town
quality of Gilroy.
3.06 This policy consolidates industrial uses into industrial districts, thus enhancing the compact
quality of Gilroy.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04]06052
-71-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3.08 This policy allows industrial park uses around the city ifit enhances the small-town character of
Gilroy.
3.09 This policy requires landscaping to screen industrial areas and uses, thus preserving the rural
quality of Gilroy.
3.10 This policy requires that abandoned industrial structures be removed, thus removing unsightly
structures from the city.
3.13 This policy encourages the clustering of commercial uses, thus enhancing the compact quality of
Gilroy.
3.14 This policy ensures the use oj design Slandards and revie}v ill any new conunercial design, thus
enhancing the architectural quality afGilroy.
3.15 This policy requires landscaping in commercial areas that will enhance the small-tmvn quality of
Gilroy.
3./6 This policy requires auto-oriented uses to have high-quality architectural design to enhance the
small-town character of Gilroy.
3./8 This policy encourages commercial uses in neighborhoods to enhance the small-tOlvn quality of
Gilroy.
3.21 This policy encourages new commercial development on First Street to use {l Planned Unit
Development approach in an effort to maintain Gilroy's small-town qualify.
3.26 This policy encourages business development in the Downtolvn area, thus enhancing Gilroy's
small-town character.
3.27 171 is poliq-' encourages a pedestrian environment in the DOlvntolvn area that enhances the slllall-
tmvn quality of Gilroy.
3.28 This policy would improve the trafjic circulation in the DOl-vntOl.vn area, thus enhancing the small~
town quality of the Downtown.
3.29 This policy would improve the traffic circulation and parking in the Downtown area, thereby
enhancing the small-town quality of Gilroy.
3.30 This policy preserves and protects historic structures in the Downtmt'n area, thus enhancing the
small-town quality of Gilroy.
3.31 This policy aims to explore the possible construction of a park or plaza in the Downtown area
which would enhance the small-town atmosphere of Gilroy.
6.01 This policy supports the designation of scenic highways to maintain the rural character of the
Gilroy area.
6.02 This policy preserves the scenic features of roadways in the Gilroy area, thus enhancing the rural
character of Gilroy.
6.03 This policy encourages landscaping along Highway J01that would match the rural character of
Gilroy.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-72-
Resolution No. 2002-41
8.01 This policy aims to maintain and rehabilitate existing housing, thus enhancing Gilroy's compact
design.
8.04 This policy preserves houses and neighborhoods of historical significance, thus enhancing the
small-town quality of Gilroy.
8.05 This policy ensures that the goals of affordable housing and historic preservation are compatible.
8. 06 This policy preserves and protects the character of existing residential neighborhoods, thus
enhancing the compact, small-town nature of Gilroy.
8.08 This policy aims to conserve e:r:isting mobile homes in Gilroy, thus enhancing the compact quality
of the City.
12.02 This policy ensures the protection of the character of existing residential neighborhoods.
12.04 This policy preserves scenic routes in the area, thus enhancing the rural quality 0/ Gilroy.
20.01 This policy preserves and protects open space areas, thus enhancing the rural quality of Gilroy.
20.02 This policy aims to protect local creeks, thus enhancing the rural quality a/Gilroy.
20.05 This policy preserves and protects greenbelt areas, thus enhancing the rural quality of Gilroy.
20.06 This policy promotes management and maintenance oj public upen ~pace, thereby enhancing the
nJral, small-town quality of Gilroy.
20.07 This policy preserves and protects open space area, thus enhancing the rural quality of Gilroy.
20.08 This polic}! aims to protect open space areas and also to prescn'e and expand recreational arcas,
thus enhancing the rural quality o/Gilroy.
20.09 This policy ellsures that open space and dedicated lands arc preserved ill pClpetuity, thus ensuring
the enhancement of the rural quality of Gilroy.
20.10 This policy supports regional presen'ation efforts, thus ensuring the rural, compact qualify of
Gilroy.
21.02 171is policy promotes the use of landscaping as a tool to reduce air pollution and as an
enhancement to Gilroy's small-town atmosphere.
26.05 This policy promotes the use of earth berms to act as soundwalls and contribute to the rural
character of Gilroy.
Actions
1.A This action encourages consistency among all growth management tools and documents to
maintain Gilroy's rural atmosphere.
1.B This action encourages the use of hillside development guidelines to maintain Gilroy's rural
atmosphere.
1.E This action requires the development of a Hecker Pass Specific Plan to maintain Gilroy's rural
atmosphere.
UHI553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-73-
Resolution No. 2002-41
1.F This action encourages development of campus industrial specific plans to cluster industrial
development and maintain Gilroy's small-town atmosphere.
1. G This action encourages deep-rooted tree planting to beautify Gilroy and enhance its small-town
character.
1.H This action encourages developer to include gateway landscaping in their development plans to
enhance the rural quality of Gilroy.
1./ This action encourages community beautification efforts to enhance Gilroy's small-tOlvn
atmosphere.
IJ This action encourages design review of all new c/evelopnwnts to ensure the maintenance of
Gilroy's rural atmosphere.
1.K This action encourages strict enforcement of Gilroy's sign ordinances to maintain Gilroy's small-
tOlvn atmosphere.
3.A This action encourages developing "peJformance standards" for use in industrial development
review to maintain Gilroy's small-town quality.
3.B This action l.vould apply industrial design guidelines to new industrial developments to ensure the
maintenance of Gilroy's small-town atmosphere.
3. C This action lvould ensure the development of design standards for high-impact uses, thus
enhancing the small-town quality of Gilroy.
3.D This action encourages implementing commercial design and development standards to enhance
Gilroy's small-town character.
3.E 7his aclion enS1Ircs dcvclopmcnl of use cOll!rols ([lid dcsigll gllidelincs fill' nciglil)()/'hood
commercial development, thus maintaining Gilroy's small-tmvn atmosphere.
3.G This action encourages supporting the neighborhood revitalization strategy area in an effort to
enhance Gilroy's small-town atmosphere.
S.B This action encourages reviclv of structural modifications and use changes in Gilroy's historic
areas to enhance Gilroy's small-town character.
S.D This action encourages design reviel1' in historic preservation districts to ensure the maintenance
of Gilroy's small-town character.
6.A This action encourages scenic highway designations to enhance Gilroy's rural quality.
6.B This action encourages scenic highway development standards to ensure the maintenance of
Gilroy's rural atmosphere.
8.G This action encourages property maintenance regulations to enhance the small-town character of
Gilroy.
12. C This action encourages residential street designs that include sidewalks and street trees, thus
enhancing Gilroy's small-town atmosphere.
12.D
This action encourages collector streets to be designed to enhance the small-town quality of
Gilroy's residential areas.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-74-
Resolution No. 2002-41
19.F This action encourages undergrounding of utilities to enhance Gilroy's rural, small-town
atmosphere.
19.G This action encourages establishing lighting standards to enhance Gilroy's small-town quality.
20.A This action encourages an open space review process for all proposed developments in open
space areas, thus enhancing the rural character of Gilroy.
20.E This action would provide greenbelt definition and protection, thus enhancing Gilroy's rural
character.
20.P This action would ensure a greenbelt or buffer between Gilroy and San Alartin to enhance the
rural quality of the area.
20. G This action encourages using planning tools to ensure the availability of open ~pace access, thus
maintaining Gilroy'5 nu'al character.
20.H This action ensures improvement of open space management practices to ensure the maintenance
ofCilroy's rural quality.
20.1 This action encourages using open space preservation tools to enhance Cilroy's rural
atffl05phere.
20.J This action encourages interagency coordination in addressing open space issues and enhancing
CilrD)} 's rural character.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identilied in thc Final ETR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
JJ. VISUAL QUALITY AND AESTHETICS.
1. Impact.
4.13-4. Development consistent with the General Plan will potentially result in an increase
in lighting.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impaet of a potential increase in lighting as a result of
development consistent with the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.13-4:
Policies
19.13 This policy promotes the use of appropriate outdoor lighting as an aid to public safety.
VH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-75-
Resolution No. 2002-41
19.14 This policy aims to promote outdoor lighting that is energy efficient.
19.15 This policy promotes the use of lights that reduce glare and "light pollution."
Actions
19.G This action encourages developing lighting standards to regulate "light pollution" and glare
sources.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the final ErR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
KK. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
1. Impact.
4.14-1. Development consistent with the General Plan could result in adverse impacts on
cultural resources, including on historical, archaeological, paleontological, or human
remains.
2. Mitigation.
The General Plan and final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
whcn implcmcnted will lessen the adverse impaets on eultural resourees, including on historical,
archaeological, palcontological, or human remains as a result of development consistent with the
General Plan.
The implementation of the following policics, aetions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.14-1:
Policies
1.06 This policy aims to promote the use of the DOl,vntou'n area as a historic area preserving the
historic feeling of Gilroy.
3.24 This policy aims to establish a Downtown Historic District to presenJe the historic resources of
Gilroy.
3.30 This policy encourages historic preservation, restoration, and re-use in the Downtown area,
preserving the historical resources of Gilroy.
5.01 This policy encourages public and private efforts to preserve historic and archaeological
resources in Gilroy.
5.02 This policy encourages the use of state and federal funding to provide incentives for public and
private efforts in preserving historical resources of Gilroy.
5.03 This policy aims to ensure the preservation of historic or architecturally significant homes in
Gilroy, particularly in the historic city center.
UHI5536222
01.()S2902-04706052
-76-
Resolution No. 2002-41
5.04 This policy aims to establish a Downtown Historic District and provide incentive for preserving
Gilroy's historic resources.
5.05 This policy ensures the promotion of adaptive reuse of older buildings, particularly in the
Downtown Historic District.
5.06 This policy allows non-conforming uses in designated Historic Structures, taking into
consideration neighboring uses.
5.07 This policy ensures that if archaeological resources or human remains arc discovered, the proper
evaluative processes will be implemented, thus ensuring the preservation of archaeological and
historic resources.
8.04 This policy aims to protect homes or neighborhoods of historic significance, thus ensuring the
preservation of historical resources.
8.05 This policy aims to ensure that the goals of affordable housing and historic preservation are
compatible, thus ensuring the protection of historic resources without conflicting lvith the prescnt-
da)/ goals of Gilroy.
16.02 This policy ensures that developers of new subdivisions dedicate land for recreational facilities,
including cul/ura/facilities, thus preserving the cultural quality of Gilroy_
16.03 This policy encourages the inclusion of cultural facilities as part of the Park and Recreation
Systelll, thus ensuring the preservatio/l of the cultural qrHllitJ' of Gilroy.
Actions
5.A This action encourages using historic preservation designations to help preserve cultural and
historical resources.
S.B This action encourages review of structural 111odificatioll and Ilse changes in historic areas to
preserve Gilroy's historic resources.
5.e This action requires Environmental Impact Reports for historic structures to help preserve the
community's historic resources.
5.D This action encourages design review in historic preservation districts to preserve Gilroy's
historic resources.
5.E This action encourages periodic updating of the City's Survey of Historic Structures, thus
preserving historic resources.
5.F This action requires a public infonnation program on historic preservation to involve the
community in preserving historic resources.
5. G This action encourages supporting development of Mills Act Agreements to help preserve historic
resources.
5.H This action encourages adopting an historic preservation ordinance to help preserve historic
resources.
5.1
This action encourages archaeological assessments for all CEQA projects, thus preserving
cultural and archaeological resources.
UHI5536222
01.()52902-04706052
-77-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Mitigation Measnre: 4. 14-A. See Exhibit "A " attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Pinal EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
LL. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
1. Impact.
4.15-1. People in the City of Gilroy could be exposed to hcalth risks due to exposure to
cxisting contaminated propertics.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of exposure to health risks due to exposure to existing
contaminated properties on people in the City of Gilroy.
The implcmcntation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.15-1:
Policies
25.01 This policy aims to permit development only in areas ....vhere potenthtl danger to residents can me
miligated to an acceptable level 0/ risk and adequaie emergency services C({II be provided, thlls
protecting Gilroy residents from existing contaminmion.
25.02 This policy encourages using zoning and development controls to regulate development in
hazardous areas, thus protecting Gilroy residents from existing contamination.
25.03 This policy requires appropriate studies afpotential hazardous as part of the development review
process, thus protecting Gilroy residents from existing contamination.
27.04 This policy encourages the evaluation of new development on sites that may have hazardous
materials, thus protecting Gilroy residentsfrom existing contamination.
Actions
25.A This action encourages the creation of detailed hazard maps to reduce risk on contamination.
25.B This action encourages regular updating of building codes to reduce risk of contamination.
25.C This action requires building inspection programs to reduce risk of contamination.
25.E This action requires soils reports for all new developments to identifY possible causes of
contamination.
25.1 This action encourages fire and life safety inspections to identifY and eliminate possible sources of
contamination.
UH\553822.2
01.()52902-04706052
-78-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Mitigation Measure: 4.15-A. See Exhibit "A " attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
MM. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
1. Impact.
4.15-2. Development under the General Plan will result in potential exposure to health and
safety risks related to the storage, transportation and use of hazardous materials.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Final EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of exposure to health risks duc to exposure to existing
contaminated properties on people in the City of Gilroy.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation meaSLll'CS will help to
mitigate impact 4,15-2:
Policies
3.04 This policy aims to discourage industrial uses that would create noxiolls or l11dsonce conditions,
thus reducing health and safety risks.
3.05 This policy aims to concentrate heavy industrial uses close to InajaI' transportation routes and
emergency services, thus reducing health and safety risks.
10.12 This policy encourages infill housing only on sites without significant hazards, thus reducing
health and safety risks.
22.03 This policy prohibits development that may result in polluting substances coming in contact with
water sources, thus reducing health and safety risks.
22.04 This policy ensures that City drinking water exceeds the required and recommended standards set
forth by the State of California, thus reducing health and safety risks.
22.05 This policy aims to ensure that all water sources are monitored, thus reducing health and safety
risks.
22.06 This policy aims to ensure that all private wells are tested and monitored, thus reducing health
and safety risks.
22.09 This policy restricts development that would negatively impact water quality, thus reducing health
and safety risks.
22.10 This policy provides greater protection of drinking water from contaminates, thus reducing health
and safety risks.
UH\553822.2
01.()52902-04706052
-79-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.01 This policy ensures that development only occurs in areas where danger to the health, safety, and
welfare of residents is reduced.
25.02 This policy aims to regulate development on potentially hazardous areas by using zoning and
development controls, thus reducing health and safety risks.
25.03 This policy requires appropriate studies as part of the development review process to identifY
possible hazards, thus reducing health and safety risks.
27.01 This policy ensures inspection and monitoring of hazardous materials, thus reducing health and
safety risks.
27.02 This policy encourages source reduction, waste minimization, and on-site pretreatment of
hazardous materials and \vaste, thus reducing health and safety risks.
27.03 This policy ensures that the City will work \vith the necessalY jurisdictions to monitor the
transportation of hazardous materials and waste, thus reducing health and safety risks.
27.04 This policy ensures the new development l.vill be evaluated to ensure that there will be no public
health danger.
27.05 This policy encourages coordination and implementation of public education programs regarding
hazardous materials and waste management.
Actions
S.B This action encourages strict code enforcement to help reduce risk of exposure to hazardous
materials.
22.3 This action encourage.,,' ;'Iteragcncy coordillation to address \-l'ater quality iss1Ies and to reduce
possible exposure to hazardous l!Iuleria/s.
25.A This action requires using detailed hazard maps to idcntijj; and eliminate possible exposure to
hazardous materials.
25.1 This action encourages fire and life safety inspections to identify and eliminate possible exposure
to hazardous materials.
27.A This action encourages interagency coordination in addressing hazardous materials issues.
27.8 This action requires a hazardous materials storage ordinance to identifY and eliminate possible
sources of hazardous materials.
27.C This action encourages implementing a household hazardous waste element to handle household
hazardous waste issues.
27.D This action encourages constructing a collection facility for household hazardous wastes, thus
reducing exposure to hazardous materials.
27.E This action encourages implementing a hazardous waste education program to involve the public
in hazardous waste reduction.
UH\553622.2
01.Q52902-04706052
-80-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Pinal EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
NN. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
1. Impact.
4.15-3. Development under the General Plan wiII result in potential exposure to health and
safety risks related to agricultural chemicals in the groundwater.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Pinal ErR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented will1csscn the impact of potential cxposure to health and safety risks related
to agricultural chemicals in thc groundwatcr as a rcsult of dcvelopment undcr the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.15-3:
Policics
4.06 This policy aims to encourage long-term agricultural production where high water tables exist
and natural hazards such as flooding occur, thus reducing agricultural chemicals in the
grolllUhvater.
8.06 This polfc,v aims to protect the characier of existing neighborhoods, thus reducing development in
agricultural areas and preventing agricultural chemicals in the ground-Ivatcr.
22.10 This policy encourages protection of the aquifers in groundwater recharge areas, thus reducing
agricultural chemicals in the groundwater.
25.01 This policy permits development only in areas lvhere risks of hazards are low, thus reducing
agricultural chemicals in the groundwater.
25.02 This policy ensures that development will be limited in hazardous areas by using zoning and
development controls, thus reducing agricultural chemicals in groundwater.
25.03 This policy requires development review to involve potential hazards evaluation, thus reducing
agricultural chemicals in groundwater.
27.01 This policy ensures the monitoring and inspection of local, state, and federal standards regarding
hazardous materials and waste, thus reducing agricultural chemicals in groundwater.
27. 04 This policy encourages evaluation of new developments that involve screening for hazardous
conditions, thus reducing the risk of agricultural chemicals in groundwater.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-81-
Resolution No. 2002-41
Actions
B.B This action encourages strict code enforcement to reduce risk of agricultural chemicals in the
groundwater.
25. This action encourages creating detailed hazard maps to be used in reducing the risk of
agricultural chemicals being present in the groundwater.
25.B This action requires regular updating of the building codes to prevent agriculture chemicals in the
groundwater.
25.E This action requires soils rcpots for all new development to reduce the risk of agricultural
chemicals in the groundwater.
27.B This action encourages a hazardous materials storage ordinance to prevent agricultural
chemicalsfrom beingprcscnt in the groundwater.
Mitigation Measures: 4.15-B, 4.15-C, 4.15-D, 4.15-E. See Exhibit "A" at/ached hereto and incorporated
by this reference.
3. Findings.
This is a potentially significant impact The implementation of the General Plan's policies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
00. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
1. Impacl.
4.15-4. Dcvclopmcnt under the Generall'lan will result in potential cxposure to hcalth and
safety risks relatcd to thc usc of pesticides on ncighboring llgricnltural properties.
2. Mitil!ation.
The General Plan and Pinal EIR contain many policies, actions and mitigation measures, which
when implemented, will lessen the impact of potential exposure to health and safety risks related
to the use of pesticides on neighboring agricultural properties as a result of development under
the General Plan.
The implementation of the following policies, actions and mitigation measures will help to
mitigate impact 4.15-4:
Policies
4.06 This policy aims to encourage long-term agricultural production where high water tables exist
and natural hazards such as flooding occur, thus reducing exposure to pesticides.
8.06 This policy aims to protect the character of existing neighborhoods, thus reducing development in
agricultural areas and preventing exposure to pesticides.
UHI5536222
01.Q52902-04706052
-82-
Resolution No. 2002-41
25.01 This policy permits development only in areas where risks of hazards are low, thus reducing
exposure to pesticides.
25.02 This policy ensures that development will be limited in hazardous areas by using zoning and
development controls, thus reducing exposure to pesticides.
25.03 This policy requires development review to involve potential hazards evaluation, thus reducing
exposure to pesticides.
27.01 This policy ensures the monitoring and inspection of local, state, and federal standards regarding
hazardous materials and waste, thus reducing exposure to pesticides.
27.04 This policy encourages evaluation of new development that involves screening for hazardous
conditions, thus reducing c--rposure to pesticides.
Actions
8.B This action encourages strict code enforcement to reduce risk oj pesticides on neighboring
properties.
25.A This action encourages creating detailed hazard maps to be used in reducing the risk of pesticides
on neighboring properties.
25.3 This action requires regular updating of the building codes to prevent pesticides on neighboring
pruperties.
25.E This action requires soils repots for all new development to reduce the risk of pesticides on
neighboring properties.
27.B This action encourages a hazardous material,,' storage ordirwflcc to prevent pesticidc5' on
neighboring properties.
1\litigation 1\1 easures: 4.15-F, 4.15-G, 4./5-H. See E'dll"bit "A" attached hereto ond incorporated by this
reference.
3. Findinl!s.
This is a potentially significant impact. The implementation of the General Plan's polieies,
actions and mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will reduce this potentially
significant impact to less than significant level.
II. FINDINGS CONCERNING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Seetion 15126.6(d), the Final EIR identifies and evaluates the
comparative merits of alternatives to the General Plan, which could eliminate any significant
adverse environmental impacts of the General Plan or reduee them to a level of insignificance.
These alternatives are evaluated in the Final EIR even if they would impede to some degree the
attainment of project objectives or would be more costly.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-83-
Resolution No. 2002-41
A. PROJECT ALTERNATIVE NO.1
1. Description: The "No Proiect" Alternative.
This alternative is required by CEQA, and assumes that the General Plan would not be adopted,
new uses proposed in the General Plan area would not occur, and new policies would not be
implemented, This alternative assumes that development would occur within the City's planning
area, consistent with that allowed under the existing General Plan.
2. Comparison to General Plan.
Potential impacts to agriculture, air quality, noise, traffic, water demand, visual quality and
aesthetics, and biological resources resulting from the General Plan would be avoided or reduced
under this alternative. Therefore, overall environmental impacts and demands on serviccs would
be reduced under the No Project Altcrnative and it is therefore considered to be environnlcntally
superior to the General Plan. The No Project Alternative would also meet some of the General
Plan's objectives, however, not to the extent of any ofthe other alternatives or the General Plan.
3. Findinl!.
Whilc the Final EIR identifies thc No Project Alternative as environmentally superior to the
Gcncral Plan, speci fic, economic, social or othcr conditions make this altcrnativc infcasible as
that term is defined in CEQA (CEQA Guidelines l5091(a)(3)) bccause it would fail to
accomplish the following City objeetives to the extent that the Gcneral Plan would:
. It would not manage growth as much as the General Plan
. It lvould not millimize C05tS as much (IS the Ceneral Plall
. Ir lvould not focus growth inward as much as the Genera! Plan
. It would not strengthen the downtoHm as much as the General Plan
. It would not promote jobs and business development as much as the General Plan
. It would not create quality, diverse neighborhoods as much as the General Plan
. It would not support affordable housing as much as the General Plan
. It would not protect resources as much as the General Plan
. It would not ensure public safety as much as the General Plan
B. PROJECT ALTERNATIVE NO.2
1. Description: The Concentrated Growth Alternative.
The Concentrated Growth Alternative removes speeific areas from the General Plan 20-year
planning area, and adds stronger policies to encourage Downtown infiIl projects through the
Residential Development Ordinance (RDO) process and firmer language in support of mixed
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-84-
Resolution No. 2002-41
uses Downtown. This alternative also allows for an increase in building heights to six stories
(except within the historic core), while maintaining the same approximate Downtown
boundaries.
2. Comparison to General Plan.
This alternative reduces planned development, thus decreasing water demand requirements,
drainage and water quality impacts, traffic volumes in some areas in and around the City, traffic-
related noise, air pollutant emissions, impacts related to opcn space, agricultural land conversion
to urban uses, geotechnical hazards, biotics, and public services. Accordingly, the increased
density in the Downtown District under this alternative would increase potential impacts to
viewsheds due to the increased height of buildings. Potential impacts associated with the
implementation of infrastructure facilities identified in the General Plan would remain, although
they would be slightly reduced in the areas of wastewater, water, public services and stonnwater.
Despite the reduction in traffic-related noise and air pollutant emissions, contributions to
regional air emissions may still exceed the significance thresholds, and increased development
would expose people to noise levels above maximum permissible noise levels. As with the
proposed project, development under the Concentrated Growth Alternative could result in some
removal of sensitive habitats, Also, impacts related to loss of agrieulturalland would be reduced
substantially under this alternative, but the impact would still be considered significant and
unavoidable (due to the I O-acrc standard).
The Conccntrated Growth Alternative would result in fewer overall environmental impacts and
would lessen the severity of almost all impacts, with the exception of viewshed, associated with
the proposed project or any other alternative discussed in the Final EIR and is therefore
considered to bc the cnvironmcntally superior alternative. Thc Concentrated Growth Alternative
would also mect many of the General Plan's olJjcclives.
3. Finding
While the Final EIR identifies the Concentrated Growth Alternative as the environmentally
superior alternative, specific economic, social or other considerations (specifically, provision of
employment opportunities for highly trained workers) make this alternative infeasible as that
term is defined in CEQA because this alternative would fail to accomplish the following City
objectives to the extent that the General Plan would:
. It would not promote jobs and business development as much as the General Plan
Resolution No. 2002-41
. It would not provide a substantial enough link between growth and resources as much as the General Plan
. It would not promote jobs and business development as much as the General Plan
. It would not provide a substantial enough level of diverse economic opportunities as much as the General Plan
In particular, the large Campus Industrial area east of Highway 101 included in the General Plan
and not in the Concentrated Growth Alternative provides better economic opportunities for the
City to find high technology companies interested in future large-scale, campus development in
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04]06052
-85-
Gilroy because the area contains contiguous, large, undeveloped parcels. Specifically, the
Guiding Principles for the General Plan (see page 3-6) states:
"Gilroy's economic health and vitality is of utmost importance, providing jobs for residents and
revenues to support City services. The General Plan promotes a strong local economy by
supporting the growth and expansion of existing local businesses; ensuring adequate land to
attract new commercial and industrial businesses, including small- and medium-size businesses;
creating a new 'campus industrial' land use to specifically attract high-tech businesses; and
establishing policies in support of economic development activities."
The addition of the new Campus Industrial section, recommended under the General Plan east of
Highway 101, is immcdiately adjacent to vital city services, including but not limited to water
and scwcr. Other city services, necessary for continued planned growth, are in close proximity
and are readily available, from the 660 aere site, only 430 acrcs will be dcsignatcd Campus
Industrial. This net acreage will provide a strong link bctwecn industrial growth and planned
resources within the city.
In addition, the inclusion of the 660 site will add approximately 234 acres of open space land,
located along Uagas Creek. This land will contribute directly to the existing nctwork of parks,
paths, and trails within the community. This inclusion will contribute significantly to the overall
diversity of rccreation facilities available to the citizens of Gilroy and the local community.
Overall, this alternativc fails to provide the necessary level of industrial growth nceded in order
to sustain a vibrant economic community and a thriving job base within the city, The
Concentrated Growth Alternative is not superior to the General Plan.
C. PROJECT ALTERNATIVE NO.3
1. Description: The Oril!inal Proposal Alternative.
This alternative consists of the original version of the General Plan proposed by the General Plan
Update Committee and documented in the General Plan Update 1999 - 2020 (dated June 1999),
and evaluated in the Draft EIR (dated August 1999) and final EIR (dated October 1999).
2. Comparison to proposed project.
Due to reduction in planned development, this alternative would reduee water demand
requirements, traffic volumes, traffic related noise, air pollutant emissions, impacts related to
open space, loss of agricultural land, geotechnical hazards, biotics, public services, and drainage
and water quality impacts from stormwater runoff. This alternative would increase noise levels
above the maximum permissible noise levels at sensitive receptors; however, it would not have
as severe of an impact on noise sensitive receptors as would the General Plan. Development of
this alternative could cause an increase in stormwater contaminant loading; however, this impact
would not be significant with implementation of "best management practices" and maintenance
of facilities. Potential impacts associated with the implementation of infrastructure facilities
would remain, but would be slightly reduced in the areas of wastewater, water, public serviees
and utilities (including energy), and stormwater. This alternative could also result in some
removal of sensitive habitats. Mitigation measures also applicable to the proposed project would
UH\553822.2
01.()52902-04706052
-86-
Resolution No. 2002-41
mitigate these potential impacts to a less-than-significant level; although the mitigation necessary
to reduce traffic impacts to a less-than-significant level would be reduced due to reduction in trip
generation in the areas east of Highway 101. Although the impacts related to loss of agricultural
land would be reduced substantially under this alternative, this impact would still be considered
significant and unavoidable (due to the lO-acre standard). Likewise, contribution to regional air
emissions caused by this alternative would still exceed the significance thresholds, thus
persisting as an unavoidable impact.
The Original Proposal Altemative would result in fewer overall environmental impacts and
would lessen the severity of almost all impacts associated with the proposed project, and is
therefore considered to be environmentally superior to the Gencral Plan. The Original Proposal
Alternative would also mect many ofthc Gcncral Plan's objcctivcs.
3. FindiIll!.
While the FElR identifies the Original Proposal Altcmative as environmcntally supcrior to the
General Plan, specific economic, social or other conditions (specifically, provision of
employment opportunities for highly trained workers) make this alternative infeasible as that
term is dcfined in CEQA because this alternative would fail to accomplish the following City
objectives to the extent that the General Plan would:
. It H-'ould not promotejobs and business development liS much as the General Plan
. It V\/Quld not provide a substantial enough link bellveen grmvth and resources as much as the General Plan
. It would not promote jobs and business development as much as the General Plan
. it "vollld Ilot provide a substalllial enough level oIdiverse cco/wlllie oppol"lIIllitics n'; IIlUel: as the Gel/C/"a! Plan
In particular, the largc Campus Industrial arca cast of Highway 101 inclllded in thc Gcncral Plan
and not in thc Original Proposal Altcmative provides better economic opportunities for the City
to find high technology companies interested in future large-scale, campus development in
Gilroy because the area contains eontiguous, large, undeveloped parcels. Speeifically, the
Guiding Principles for the General Plan (see page 3-6) states:
"Gilroy's economic health and vitality is of utmost importance, providing jobs for residents and
revenues to support City services. The General Plan promotes a strong local economy by
supporting the growth and expansion of existing local businesses; ensuring adequate land to
attract new eommercial and industrial businesses, including small- and medium-size businesses;
creating a new 'campus industrial' land use to specifically attract high-tech businesses; and
establishing policies in support of economic development activities."
The addition of the new Campus Industrial section, recommended under the General Plan east of
Highway 101, is immediately adjacent to vital city services, including but not limited to water
and sewer. Other city services, necessary for continued planned growth, are in close proximity
and are readily available. From the 660 acre site, only 430 acres will be designated Campus
Industrial. This net acreage will provide a strong link between industrial growth and planned
resources within the city.
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-87-
Resolution No. 2002-41
In addition, the inclusion of the 660 site will add approximately 234 acres of open space land,
located along LIagas Creek. This land wiII contribute directly to the existing network of parks,
paths, and trails within the community. This inclusion will contribute significantly to the overall
diversity of recreation facilities available to the citizens of Gilroy and the loeal community.
Overall, this alternative fails to provide the necessary level of industrial growth needed in order
to sustain a vibrant economic community and a thriving job base within the city, The Original
Proposal Alternative is not superior to the General Plan.
III. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
A. There are significant effects and cumulative significant cffects of the General Plan, since
substantial inconsistcncics with local, regional, statc and federal plans, policies and regulations
rcgarding agricultural land preservation that havc bceh identified in the Final ErR but may not bc
avoided or substantially lessened.
1. Impact.
4.1-1: Substantial inconsistencies with local, regional, state and fedcral plans, policics and
regulations regarding agricultural land preservation.
. This is a signijlcallt and unavoidable impact.
2. Discussion.
The Final ErR found that the Gencral Plml would be potentially inconsistcnt with regional
policies to prcscrvc agricultural land, by expanding thc 20-year planning area and re-dcsignating
arcas fi'om agricultural to urban uses within tbe expanded Planning Area. Thc intent of thc
General Plan process was to focus growth in areas of least impact on agriculture, and to stay
largely within the plmming area defined in the previous gcneral plan. The existing General Plan
area contains sufficient land to provide growth opportunities projected to be necessary by this
Gcneral Plan. By adding 664 acres ofland to the 20-year General Plan area in addition to almost
300 net acres in other areas, future development consistent with thc General Plan will cause a
substantial loss of agricultural land. This will result in substantial inconsistencies with local,
rcgional, state and federal plans, policics and regulations calling for agricultural land
preservation.
3. Mitil!ation.
Many policies and implementing actions proposed in the General Plan are included that would
reduce this impact; these policies and actions are listed in the Pinal EIR following the impact. In
addition, the City is proposing mitigation measures to reduce this impact to the extent possible.
Even with the policies, actions, and mitigation measures being adopted, the Final EIR found that
this is a significant and unavoidable impact.
B. There are significant effects and cumulative significant effects of the General Plan, since
the conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses from implementation of the General Plan will
cause loss of productive agricultural land, including prime fannland and fannland of statewide
UH\553622.2
01.()52902.04706052
-88-
Resolution No. 2002-41
importance, that have been identified in the Final EIR but may not be avoided or substantially
lessened.
1. Impact.
4.4-1: Conversion of agricultural uses to urban uses from implementation of the General
Plan will cause loss of productive agricultural land, including prime farmland and
farmland of statewide importance.
. This is a significant and unavoidable impact.
2. Discussion.
The net acreage of Farmland to be added to the Gencral Plan area for urban development is
approximately 952 acres of which approximately 70% is the 664 acres proposed for campus
industrial and open space east of the outlets. Thc total amount of prime fannland to be converted
from an open space designation to an urban designation is 381 acres. This excccds the CEQA
threshold of 10 acres. This total loss of agricultural land is considered a significant and
unavoidable impaet.
3. Mitigation.
Many policics and implementing actions proposcd in the General Plan are included that would
reduce the scvcrity of this impact; these policies and actions are listed in the Final EIR following
the impact. In addition, the City is proposing mitigation measures to reduce this impact to the
extent possible. Even with the pollcics, actions, and mitigation mcasures being adopted, the
Flnal ElR found that this is a significant and unavoidable impact.
C. There arc significant effects and cumulativc siguificant effects of the General Plan, since
the build-out under the General Plan would increase vehicular traffic in the planning area,
resulting in level of service deficiencies within the roadway network that have been identified in
the Final ErR but may not be avoided or substantially lessened.
1. Impact.
4.5-1: Build-out under the General Plan would increase vehicular traffic in the planning
area, resulting in level of service deficiencies within the roadway network.
. This is a significant impact and potentially unavoidable
2. Discussion.
Build-out of the General Plan, without new transportation improvements, would result in
substantial increases in traffic volume on many of the roadways throughout the planning area.
The most significant projected traffic increases are on the roadway facilities that provide
connections to job centers located along the Highway 101 corridor. Other than the freeway,
these roadways include Highway 152, Monterey Road, Santa Teresa Expressway, Buena Vista
Avenue and Luchessa Avenue. The projected level of service on virtually all the major
UH\553622.2
01.052902-04706052
-89-
Resolution No. 2002-41
roadways serving Gilroy is projected to fall below the City's standard for roadway level of
service. The existing roadway network would be very inadequate due to capacity deficieneies
within and around the General Plan boundary limits. Levels of service (LOS) would decline
below LOS C (or LOS D in areas designated by General Plan policy 12,08) on many road
segments. The City has historically consulted with, and in the future plans to consult with, the
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority on a projeet-by-project basis regarding
improvements to bus stops and related facilities on any new road or upgrade of existing roads.
3. Mitil!ation.
In addition to the implementation of the policies and actions in the Gcneral Plan, thc
improvcmcnts required to mitigate the increased traffic volnmes forecasted for the General Plan
alternative to satisfactory levels of service are included in mitigation mcasurcs in the Final EIR.
Roadway improvements (widening) recommended would ease the magnitude of projected traffic
volumes and increase the capacity of existing arterial streets. In particular, many ramps would
have to be added or widened to accommodate the industrial and commercial development along
the freeway and east of the outlets. New east-west arterials in the north (Cohansey, Buena Vista)
and south (Tenth Street extension, Luehessa) parts of the City llild north-south arterials in thc
arca east of Highway 101 will also ease access to thc freeway for the fnture new residents and
employees of Gilroy, If these mitigation measures are not implemented, due to lack of funding
or any other rcason, Impact 4.5-1 would be signi ficant and unavoidable.
D. There arc significant effects and cumulative significant effects of thc Gcneral Plan, since
the build-out of the Gcncral Plan would result in increases in critcria pollutant cmissions duc to
incrcased vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, and may result in regional impacts on air
quality, particularly in downwind areas (i.e., south of Gilroy) that have becn identificd in the
Final ElR bCltmay not be avoided or substantia11)' Iessellcl1.
1. Impact.
4.6-3: Build-out ofthe General Plan would result in increases in criteria pollutant emissions
due to increased vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and may result in regional impacts
on air quality, particularly in downwind areas (i.e., south of Gilroy).
. This is a significant and unavoidable impact.
2. Discussion.
Growth associated with build-out of the General Plan would result in direct and indirect impacts
on regional air quality. This growth could introduee new stationary sources of pollutants
associated with industry (direct air quality impacts), but this is not expected to be significant due
to the predominance of new industrial lands being designated as campus industrial. Campus
Industrial uses include office, high technology, research uses, and some light industry, which are
not associated with significant pollutant emissions. The majority of additional pollutants would
be related to transportation (indirect air quality impacts).
Impacts due to increased vehicle emissions were determined to be significant due to the potential
inconsistency of the General Plan with the 2000 Clean Air Plan (CAP) of the BAAQMD (based
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-90-
Resolution No. 2002-41
on greater population projections in the General Plan than were used for the CAP), The 2000
CAP uses ABAG's Projections '98 as the basis for the emission inventory. The population
estimates of the General Plan for 2020 are more than ABAG's '98 Projections for 2020 that were
used to prepare the 2000 CAP. Therefore, the population-based emission estimates in the CAP
do not accurately reflect the emissions expected due to build-out of the General Plan, and the
estimated population growth in Gilroy is not consistent with the CAP. This is a significant
impact on regional air quality.
3. Mitigation.
The policies and implementing actions in the General Plan would reduce this impact due to the
extensive provisions for reducing vehicle trips. Tn addition, mitigation measures are proposed
that would further reduce the level of severity of the impact. The impact, however, would not be
rcduced to a lcss-than-significant level, and therefore, would rcmain significant and unavoidable.
E. There are significant effeets and cumulative significant effects of the General Plan, sincc
the devclopmcnt consistent with the General Plan will increasc noisc levels above the maximum
pemlissible noise levels at existing, previously developed uses ineluding sensitive reccptors due
to increased levels of traffic and use of rail lines that have been identified in the Final ErR but
may not be avoided or substantially lessened.
1. Impact.
4.7-1: Developmcnt consistcnt with the Gcneral Plan will increasc noise lcvels above the
maximum permissible noise levels at existing, previously developed uses ineluding scnsitive
receptors due to increased levels of traffic and use of rail lines.
. This is a signijicant and unavoidable impact.
2. Discussion.
Development under the General Plan will significantly increase traffic on the roadways within
the City. This will increase the noise levels expcricnced by City residents and visitors. This is a
particular concem for sensitive receptors that are located near major roadways. Not only will the
noise level increase at discrete locations, but the distance to noise contour lines along roadways
will increase significantly, For example, with General Plan build-out, the 70 Ldn contour will
move 70 feet further from Santa Teresa Boulevard north of Gavilan Road compared to existing
conditions, Under existing conditions, the contour is 50 feet from the centerline of Santa Teresa
Boulevard; under General Plan conditions, the contour is 120 feet from the centerline.
Railroad noise is not expected to increase significantly due to implementation of the General
Plan; however, it will increase in the future due to cumulative development and the expected
increase in the use of railroads. In addition, development consistent with the General Plan will
increase the density of land use in the proximity of railroad tracks and, therefore, will increase
the exposure of people to railroad noise,
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-91-
Resolution No. 2002-41
3. Mitil!ation.
Policies and implementing actions in the General Plan will reduce the noise impacts somewhat,
however, many land uses are proposed that wiII place sensitive receptors close to major
roadways. People using parks and open space or outside areas adjacent to most major roadways
will be exposed to noise levels above the maximum permissible outdoor noise level standards
shown in the Final EIR despite buffering, landscaping, and/or walls. In some cases, indoor noise
levels within existing structures may exceed indoor noise standards. Sites where
incompatibilities could occur includc existing uscs along Santa Tercsa Boulevard, Wren Avenue,
Hecker Pass Road, First Street, Monterey Street, Tenth Street, Highway 101 and other locations
where receptors arc located in close proximity to heavily-traveled roadways. Mitigation
measures proposed would reduce the impacts, however, not to a less-than-significant level;
therefore, this impact is considered significant and unavoidable.
F. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: LAND USE AND AGRICULTURAL
1. Discussion.
The General Plan will contribute to the cumulative conversion of open spacc to urban
dcvelopment in the region, General Plan development will result jn the pemlanent loss of opcn
space on sites that are presently vacant and thc cxpansion of urban uscs into cxisting agricultural
and opcn space lands. The General Plan Update committee sought to limit expansion of the City
to the east of 101 in order to prescrvc the area cited as the most important agricultural land in the
area; however, the Gencral Plan results in substantial cxpansion to the cast. Currently, 2, I 45
acres of open space and agricultural land are available for potential development within the City
limits. Build-out ofthc entire area within the General Plan 20-year bouJ1cLlry would resuit [nthe
loss of over 5,000 acres of agricultmal bnc1 by allowing mban uses 0'1 property used f",'
agriculture. This would result in a loss of 1,333 more acres of Prime and Statewide -Important
Farmland over the existing Gcneral Plan. A portion of the farmland to be lost is classified as
prime agricultural land by the Califomia Department of Conservation. The amount of open
space lost would vary depending on the scale and dcsign of future development. The addition of
new land available for development eontribulcs to thc cumulative loss of agricultural land and its
related impacts, and weakens the incentives for in-fill development.
2. Miti!!ation.
Many policies and actions proposed in the General Plan are included that would reduce the
severity of this impact; these policies and actions are listed in the Final ErR following the
impact. In addition, the City is proposing mitigation measures to reduce this impact to the extent
possible. Even with the policies, actions, and mitigation measures being adopted, the Final EIR
found that the loss of agricultural land resulting from build-out of the General Plan would be
considered a significant unavoidable cumulative impact.
UHI553622.2
01.052902-04706052
-92-
Resolution No. 2002-41
G. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
1. Discussion.
Cumulative development in the region could adversely affect biological resources in the region,
including creeks and associated aquatic and riparian habitat, coastal oak woodlands and
serpentine-associated plant communities. Of particular concern is the potential for cumulative
impacts to adversely affect Uvas Creek and its associated aquatic and riparian habitat The Uvas
Creek corridor is the most significant biological habitat in this area, and it could degrade further
due to continued development in the region.
2. Mitigation.
Future projects will be required to conduct biological studies and propose mitigation for impacts
to the riparian habitat. The implementation of this policy/mitigation, in addition to other policies
and actions in the General Plan and additional mitigation proposed by the City in the Final EIR,
would offset many of the impacts, However, the proposed development al10wcd in thc Gcncral
Plan, when combined with other regional development affccting the creek, would result in
dcgradation of the riparian habitat complex, rcsulting in a significant and unavoidable
cumulative biological impact.
II. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: VISUAL RESOURCI;:S
1. Discussion.
The geographic scope for thc analysis of visual resources is gcnerally confincd to South S811ta
Clara County, which is visually connected by similar terrain and smaller development intensities.
Future cumulative development wOltld result in visual impacts as undeveloped visually sensitive
lands are converted to mban uses. The cumulative visual impacts would be most notable in areas
where new development occurs outside existing urban areas. Infil1 dcvclopment occurring
within or adjacent to existing urbanized areas would result in minor visual impacts, although it
could affect adjacent parcels by increasing dcnsity, creating glare, and decreasing open space.
Cumulative development in South Santa Clara County would result in potentially significant
visual impacts associated with the cumulative loss of open space, increase in development, and
alteration of the rural character of the area over time. While the visual design quality and site-
specific impacts of proposed projects can be controlled though the policies and programs
accompanying the Plan, modifications outside the City are not the City's jurisdiction. Without a
detailed analysis of each jurisdiction's guidelines, and without specific project designs, it is not
feasible to accurately assess the significance ofthis impact on a regional cumulative level.
2. Mitil!ation.
Regulations governing design, density, and preservation of open space are the responsibility of
each jurisdiction. The City has included gnidelines for these areas in the General Plan that
reduce the visual impacts of development within the existing limits to a less-than-significant
level. In addition, the Final EIR also includes a mitigation measure to allow the City the
opportunity to require that applicants conduct sun-shade analyses for projects in the downtown
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-93-
Resolution No. 2002-41
area. Because the effectiveness of the policies, actions, and mitigation measures in areas outside
the City is uncertain, this is considered to be a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact.
I. CUMULATIVE IMPACT: TRAFFIC
1. Discussion.
The geographic scope for the traffic analysis includes those areas outside the City, generally to
the north, that would be affected by additional commuter traffic generated by the General Plan.
This cumulative traffic analysis is based on the traffic report prepared by Higgins & Associates
and projections of regional traffic growth and trends. The proposed plan will substantially
increase traffic at the freeway interchanges and roads leading to these interchanges. Cumulative
traffic impacts are considered to be significant and unavoidable based on the rapid population
growth and vehicle use within and in the vicinity of Santa Clara County. Existing frccway
defieiencies are addressed in Regional Transportation Plans; however, unless regional
transit/transportation solutions are found to reduce cumulative regional traffic impacts to a less-
than-significant level, the project would contribute to significant traffic impacts on freeways (i,e.,
D.S, 101),
2. Mitigation.
Mitigation measures for this impact ineludc existing transportation planning conducted by the
City, policies and implementing actions in the Gcneral Plan, mitigation measures in the final
ErR, and the programs, plans, regulations, etc. of state and rcgional transpOliatiol1 and transit
agencies. Even with implementation of all of these mitigation measures, the project would
contribute to sigllific~lnt llllavoicbb1c C111~1l1l:1tivc tLlffic impacts 011 freeways (including U.S.
101), bCClllSC necessary regional tr<lllsport:ltion improvements nlay pot be implcnlcntcd prior to
deficient level of service conditions.
J. CLMULATIVE IMPACT: AIR QUALITY
1. Discussion.
The geographic seope for the cumulative air quality analysis includes those areas located within
the Bay Area Air Basin, which extends north to Napa County, as well as northem portions of the
North Central Coast Air Basin which receives downwind emissions, The air pollution emissions
resulting from implcmentation of the General Plan will contribute to cumulative increases in
regional emissions. Based on expected regional growth due to the General Plan and other areas'
growth exceeding recent ABAG projections (and therefore assumptions in the 2000 Clean Air
Plan), development under the General Plan will contribute to cumulative impacts on regional air
quality. Due to the tendency of pollutants to travel with the wind to downwind areas, increased
emissions in the Gilroy area and Santa Clara Valley are expected to contribute to air quality
concerns in San Benito and Monterey Counties.
2. Mitil!ation.
Mitigation measures for this impact include existing City programs, policies and implementing
actions in the General Plan, mitigation measures in the Final EIR, and the programs, plans,
\.JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-94-
Resolution No. 2002-41
regulations, etc. of federal, state and regional air quality agencies (V.S, EP A, California Air
Resources Board, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and the Monterey Bay Unified
Air Pollution Control District). Even with implementation of all of these mitigation measures,
the project would contribute to significant unavoidable air quality impacts, because exceedances
of ambient air quality standards or safe concentrations of toxic contaminants may occur. The
project would contribute to significant unavoidable cumulative air quality impacts from
vehicular emissions,
K. ST A TEMENT
After review of the entire administrative record, including the Final EIR, the staff report, and the
oral and written testimony and evidence prescnted at public hearings, the City Council finds,
pursuant to CEQA Section 21081 (b) and CEQA Guidelines Scction 15093, that specific
economic, legal, social, tcchnological and other benefits of thc General Plan outweigh the
General Plan's unavoidable adverse environmental impacts and the City Council finds that the
significant and unavoidable adverse impacts arc acceptable in light of thc Gencral Plan's
benefits.
The City Council further finds that, in the event it is determincd that the mitigation measures
identified in the Final ErR above do not reduce the significant environmental impacts identified
and analyzcd in thc Final ErR to a less-than-signi ficant level, the bcnefits described below
outweigh any and all potential adverse impacts of thc Gcneral Plan,
The City Council adopts and makcs this Statement of Ovcrriding Considerations regarding the
significant unavoidable impacts of thc General Plan and the anticipated benefits of the General
Plan. The City Council finds that each of tllC b-~'I:cfits set forth below. in this SUlt2:r:iC:l1t or
O""lTic'inn Co"si'lcr'lJ;oIlS constitutc<:: '1 eeI1'1'":!"; Tvl ;'l,l"'"'In'lcl.n"t (~'-Opl1(1 ro'. fi';I-li,'l~ 111'1+ t1,"
,,--- , <:? . "" '- . c,,_. . ~ '0 "<,~, 1,,- I, ",-,{,,---, ''--'' ,:;;l. ". ~ it ,,-I...,.;:;; I. _, <. "_'
bcncfits of the General Plan outweigh the risks of its potential significant advcrse environmcntal
impacts. The benefits of the General Plan, which constitute the specifie economic, legal, social,
technological and other considerations that justify the approval of the Gcneral Plan, are as
follows:
1) It would promote economic development within the City. The 430 acres of Campus
Industrial to be designated east of Highway 101 provides needed economic opportunities
for the City to find high technology companies interested in future large-scale, campus
development in Gilroy because the area contains contiguous, large, undeveloped parcels,
Attracting this private investment to the City would increase tax revenues and encourage
further investment, meeting the City's economic development goals. As described in the
General Plan, Gilroy's eeonomic health and vitality is of utmost importance, providing
jobs for residents and revenues to support City services. The General Plan promotes a
strong local economy by supporting the growth and expansion of existing local
businesses; ensuring adequate land to attract new commercial and industrial businesses,
including small- and medium-size businesses; creating a new 'campus industrial' land
use to specifically attract high-tech businesses; and establishing policies in support of
economic development activities.
\JH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-95-
Resolution No. 2002-41
2) It would provide for development of a balanced community in terms of type and
distribution of jobs and housing, economic development. As described on page 4.3-9
of the Final EIR, many Gilroy residents are not working in the City even when the
number of jobs matehes the number of housing units in the area, Commuting patterns
identified by the traffic analysis in the Final EIR indieate that Gilroy residents are
commuting north to the San Jose area to work, while many people who work in Gilroy
are commuting from Hollister and other areas south of Gilroy, The main reason for this
commute is the imbalance between cost of housing and the prevailing wage within the
communities, In order to decrease the amount of long-distance commuting necessitated
by this imbalance, a region-wide effort to standardize wages and home prices throughout
the Valley would be necessary. To the extcnt possible at the local level, the Gencral Plan
seeks to addrcss this problem by bringing highcr wage jobs to Gilroy and adding morc
affordable housing than would be built under the current General Plan.
3) It would strengthen the Downtown m-ea. As described in the Gcneral Plan, Downtown
is the historic center of Gilroy, and the communlty desires to retain its historie charaeter
and strengthen its role as the City's eenter. Thc General Plan places a high priority on
Downtown and sets forth a variety of policies to support that position, ineluding
development of a Downtown Specific Plan to coordinate and guide devclopmcnt efforts
thcre.
4) It would crcatc quality, diverse neighborhoods. The General Plan supports
development of quality, divcrsc ncighborhoods thatll1cct the nceds of all Gilroyans, and
establishes a new land use dcsignation titled "01 eighborhood District" to help achieve this
goal.
5) it would support affordable housing. Thc GCJlcral Plan cncourages a mix of housing
lypcs in new rcsiJcntial areas, ensures aucquatc land fur medium and high (L:ns~Lj.
houslng, and sets forth a numher of policies and supporting programs to specifically
address housing affordability.
6) It would enhance quality of life for the residents of Gilroy and the region. Through
its policies and actions, it would promote the planning and design of development that
would enhance the character of the City, protect natural resources, ensure public safety
services are maintained at adequate levels, minimize costs, and manage growth.
Resolution No. 2002-41
UH\553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-96-
IV. ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATIONfMONITORlNG PROGRAM
The City Council hereby adopts the mitigation measures set forth in the Final EIR, the
Additional Mitigation Measures attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and the Mitigation Monitoring
Program attached hereto as Exhibit "B," both exhibits incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day ofJune, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
DILLON, GARTMAN, .
. PINHEIRO, VELASCO and SPRINGER
NOES:
ARELLANO, MORALES
ABSENT:
NONE
APPROVED:
~~(A~
Thomas W. Spnnger,
I
(,-..
'/~d~'
Rhonda PelIin, City-Clerk
UHI553622.2
01.()52902-04706052
-97-
Resolution No. 2002-41
\JH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
-1-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
EXHIBIT A
Additional Mitigation Measures
for the City of Gilroy General Plan
(as approved by the City Council on June 13, 2002)
AGRICULTURE
4.4-A
Prior to any land use approval that would result in the conversion of land that
is dcsignated as prime farmland or farmland of statcwide importance to an
urban use (i.e., zoning changcs, annexation to the City, urban scrvice
amendments, etc.) the City shall:
1. Implement a conservation and open space easement program,
Guidance for this program may be found, in part, in "A Proposal to
Establish and Agricultural Conservation Easement Program in Santa Clara
County"(Appendix F-3 of the Draft Environmentallmpaet for the City of
Gilroy Revised General Plan dated September 2001)
As this implementation is of signifieanee countywide, this program should
be established as a joint effort of the City, the County, the Farm Bureau,
the Open Space authority and other agencies.
This program shall offer the following options as an aceeptablc mitigation
for said land use approval:
a. Purehase of an equal amount of prime agricultural land within the area
of the Open Spacc Authority and the transfer of the owncrship of this land
to the Open Space authority or other City-approved agency,
b, Purchase of development rights on agricultural land within the area of
the Open Space Authority and the transfer of the ownership of this land to
the Open Space authority or other City-approved agency. The purehase
value shall be equivalent in value to that required under (a) above,
c. Payment, in lieu of purchase, of fee to the Open Space Authority or
other City-approved agency, equal to the amount required to comply with
either of the above elements. The amount of this fee shall be equivalent in
value to that required under (a) above,
2. Require all future projects that involve the conversion of agricultural land
to urban uses to use generally accepted methodologies to identify the
potentially significant impacts of changes in agricultural land use (Appendix F
of the Draft Environmental Impact for the City of Gilroy Revised General
Plan dated September 2001).
4.4-B
4.4-C
TRAFFIC
4.5-A
4.5-B
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
One example is the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment (LESA Model) developed by the California Department of
Conservation to help establish standards of significance for CEQA evaluations
of agricultural land eonversions,
Additional programs to protect prime farmland and farmland of statewide
importanee comparable to those used by other counties or cities described in
the Draft EIR may be considered by the City from time to time for adoption as
meeting the requirements of this mitigation.
In addition, the City shall consider joining the Open Space Authority to help
conserve remaining viable agricultural land within the City's sphere of
influence.
Encourage active farming without further development on the remaining
agricultural land within the South County area by implementing and
reaffirming the policies outlincd in this section related to agricultural
resources.
Where use compatibility impacts exist, the City shall require open spacc
buffers be established between future residential uses and existing agricultural
operations.
The City shall work with the County of Santa Clara, the City of Morgan Hill
and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency (as the designated
Congestion Management Agency for Santa Clara County), to develop and
implement the South County Regional Transportation Plan and identify the
mitigation measures required by the City under this plan for roadways outside
the Gilroy City limits, Once adopted, Mitigation 4.5-D though 4.5-F may be
revised to conform to this regional plan.
For roadways within Gilroy's General Plan area, the City shall develop a
comprehensive Traffic Circulation Master Plan, supported by a City Traffic
Impact Mitigation Fee, that shall be imposed on all projects identified under
CEQA as having a significant impact to the City's circulation element.
Periodically, the City shall review and update its Traffic Circulation Master
-2-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
4.5-C
4.5-D
4.5-E
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
Plan and adjust the Traffic Circulation Master Plan and adjust the Traffic
Impact Mitigation Fee appropriately.
The City shall maintain a Level of Service (LOS) of"C" or better within the
City for the roadway system with the exception of the following which shall
be LOS of"D" or better: 1) Leavesley Road west of Highway 101 up to and
including the Highway 101 south bound ramps/Leavesley intersection; 2)
Tenth Street west of Highway 101 up to and including the Tenth
Street/J\1onterey Road intersection; 3) Monterey Road north/west of Highway
101 up to and including the Monterey Road/Luchessa Avenue intersection; 4)
Luchessa west of Highway 101 up to and including the Luchessa
Avenue/J\1onterey Road interseetion; 5) the entire City roadway system east of
Highway 101; and 6) roadways designated as County Expressways that
primarily serve regional needs.
Widen the following roads:
. Masten/Fitzgerald Avenues
. Buena Vista Avenue
. Hecker Pass Highway
. Tenth Street/Pacheco Pass Highway/ Highway 152
. Luchessa Avenue
. Santa Teresa Expressway
. Wren Avenue
. Monterey Highway
. San Ysidro/No Name Uno Avenue
. Highway 101 NB on- and SB off-ramps at Leavesley interchange
. Highway 101 SB and NB off-ramps at 10th Street
. Highway 101 NB off-ramp at Monterey
. "Eastside Boulevard" 1','13 and SB approaches to Highway 152, including
one additional through lane each way and a second SB left-turn lane
. Highway 152 eastbound from Camino Arroyo to Highway 101 NB on-
ramp
Extend the following roads:
.
Rucker, west to Santa Teresa
Golden Gate from the railroad (no crossing) to Murray
Buena Vista, west to Santa Teresa (align with Day Road)
Cohansey, west to Santa Teresa (align with Sunrise)
Mantelli, west to Santa Teresa and west to Burchell Road
Uvas Creek Drive, east to Wren
Tenth Street, west to Santa Teresa
.
.
.
.
.
.
-3-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
-4-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
. Luchessa, east to Eastside and west to Santa Teresa
. Holloway, west to Brem Lane
. Southside Drive west to Bolsa Road (realign at Camino Arroyo)
. Mesa Road east to Farman Lane
. Santa Teresa southeast to Highway 25 (freeway interchange)
. Burchell, north to ManteIIi extension
. Rancho Hills, north to Day Road
. Hirasaki, north to Cohansey
. Wren, north to Fitzgerald
. Church, north to Buena Vista
. Murray, north to Masten (align with 6th Street)
. Chestnut, south of Lewis
. Camino Arroyo, south to Southside Drive
. Rossi, north to Holloway
4,5-F Construct the following roads:
. Collector east of Club Drive
. Collector east of Ballybunion Avenue
. Collector from the above road south to Luchessa extension
. Collector along Princevalle Drain, from Camino Arroyo to Eastside
Boulevard;
. Eastside Blvd" from Southside to the Leavesley Road (including an
extension spur to Marcella)
. Buena Vista interchange (including weigh station fly-over)
. SB loop on-ramp and off-ramp at the 10th SI. interchange (or dircct
connection to avoid weaving areas}
. Northbound loop on-ramp at the Masten interchange
. Railroad fly-over and expressway interchange at Buena Vista and
Monterey
. Railroad fly-over on Southside Drive
4.5-G
Upgrade Marcella, Las Animas and portions of Buena Vista Roads to
collectors and upgrade Gilman Road west of Camino Arroyo to an arterial.
4.5-H
The City shall prepare and implement a comprehensive traffic calming plan
for the road network along 6th and Chestnut Streets from Camino Arroyo to
10th Street that includes strategies to reduee speeds and protect non-vehicular
roadway uses such as turn prohibitions, bulb-outs, etc. due to the proximity of
Eliot School.
UH\554093.3
02-070204706002
-5-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
AIR QUALITY
4,6-A
Implement the following control measures as appropriate, depending on the
size of the construction site, the proximity to sensitive receptors, and other
factors that warrant additional emissions reductions:
Basic Control Measures - The following controls should be
implemented at all construetion sites:
. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily.
. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose matcrials or require all
trucks to maintain at least tow feet of freeboard.
. Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on
all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at eonstruction
sites.
. Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas
and staging areas at construction sites.
. Sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) ifvisible soil material is carried
onto adj acent public streets.
Enhanced Control Measures - The following measures should be implemented
at construction sites greater than four acres in area:
. All "Basic" control measures listed above.
. Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction
areas (prcviously graded areas inactive for ten days or more).
. Enclose, cover, water twicc daily or apply (non-to xi e) soil binders to
exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc,)
. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph,
. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevcnt silt runoffto
public roadways.
. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.
Optional Control Measures - The following control measures are strongly
eneouraged at construction sites that are large in area, located near sensitive
receptors or which for any other reason may warrant additional emissions
reductions:
.
Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off the tires or tracks
of all trucks and equipment leaving the site.
Install wind breaks, or plant trees/vegetative wind breaks at windward
side( s) of construction areas.
Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantaneous gusts)
exceed 25 mph or visible dust clouds affect sensitive receptors.
.
.
4,6-B
4,6-C
4.6-D
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
. Limit the area subject to excavation, grading and other construction
activity at anyone time,
Include a policy or program in the General Plan to implement the following
mitigation measures to reduce exhaust emissions from construction-related
equipment to a less-than- significant impact
. The idling time of all construction equipment shall not exceed five
minutes,
. Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and / or the amount
of equipment in use,
. All equipment shall be properly llmcd and maintaincd in accordance with
the manufacturer's specifications.
. When feasible, alternative fueled or electrical construction equipment
shall be used at the project site.
. Use the minimum practical engine size for construction equipment.
. Gasoline-powered equipment shall be equipped with catalytic converters,
where feasible,
The following Transportation Control Measures rccommcnded by BAAQMD
in the 2000 CAP should bc implemcntcd to ensure consistcncy with that plan
and to reduce pollutant emissions.
. Establish and maintain bicycle advisory committees
. Designate a staff person as a Bicycle Program Manager
. Study signal preemption for buses on arterial streets with high volume of
bus traffic
. Continue and expand local signal timing programs
. Designate a staff person as a Pedestrian Program Managcr
. Study or consider traffic calming strategies in capital improvements
programs
. Provide bicycle safety education
. In coordination with the BAAQMD, Mctropolitan Transportation
Commission, Caltrans, and FHW A, construct demonstration projects for
low emissions and alternative fuel vehicles (including incorporating low-
emission vehicle refueling infrastructure in projects), reductions in lawn
and garden equipment emissions, recognition and promotion of Spare the
Air Days, and others as described in the Bay Area 2000 Clean Air Plan.
Projects proposed within one mile of sensitive reeeptors with the potential to
generate odors or toxic pollutants should be required to conduct an odor or
health risk assessment to evaluate the project's compatibility with the sensitive
receptor. A sufficient buffer zone shall be provided when necessary.
-6-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
NOISE
4.7-A
4.7-B
As part of normal City review and approval procedures, the City shall require
that developers reduce noise levels to which people will be exposed at new
developments by using frontage roads, topography, buffering, landscaping or
siting of uses, whenever possible, such that noise levels are consistent with the
maximum permissible noise levels of the City, Ifnoise levels at a future
project site cannot be rcduced to be consistent with standards using thcsc
measures, noise walls shall be used,
As part ofnonllal City review and approval proccdurcs for futurc projects the
following measures should be incorporated to mitigate construction noise:
. Limit construction activity to weekdays between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM
and Saturdays and holidays between 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM, with no
construction on Sundays;
. Require that all internal combustion engine-driven equipment are
equipped with mufflers which are in good condition and appropriate for
the equipment;
. Locate stationary noise-generating cquipmcnt as far as possible from
sensitive receptors when scnsitive receptors adjoin or arc ncar a
eonstruction project area; and
. Construct sound walls or other noise reduction measures prior to
dcveloping the project site.
GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
4.9-A
4.9-B
\JH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
In order to provide information to the public about earthquake hazards, faults
and soil conditions, maps and explanations of thcse conditions shall be
included in the Draft General Plan.
Grading plans for subdivisions and large scale commercial and industrial
developments shall include an approved drainage and erosion control plan to
minimize the impacts from erosion and sedimentation during grading, This
plan should conform to all standards adopted by the City of Gilroy. This plan
should include measures such as (a) restricting grading to the dry season; (b)
protecting all finished graded slopes from erosion; (c) protecting downstream
storm drainage inlets from sedimentation; and (d) use of silt fencing to retain
sediment in the project site. Site-specific erosion and sediment control
measures shall be based on recommendations of the Central Coast Regional
Water Quality Control Board (CCRWQCB) and measures contained in the
'Start at the Source, Design guidance Manual for Storm Water Quality
Protection.
-7-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
4.9-C
4,9-D
After construction is completed for subdivisions and large-scale
developments, all active drainage channels and culverts should be inspected
for accumulated sediment. If sediment accumulation has occurred, these
drainage structures should be cleared of debris and sediment.
As soon as grading is complete, all exposed soils shall be seeded or vegetated
with a City- approved seed mix and native vegetation to ensure that soils are
stabilized,
FLOOD CONTROL, DRAINAGE, AND WATER QUALITY
4,10-A
4,1O-B
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
Upon submittal of an application for any speeific plan, subdivision, tentative
map, or other diseretionary approval for development of the 664 acres ofland
proposed for inclusion in the 20-year growth boundary, the project applicant
shall prepare, and submit, to the SCVWD and the City of Gilroy a detailed
Flood Management and Mitigation Plan (PMMP) that includes, at a minimum,
the recommendations in the Schaaf & Wheeler PMP (Febmary 12, 2001),
The PMMP shall be approved by the SCVWD and the City prior to filing of
the Pinal Map. The FMMP shall include the following, at a minimum:
. Relocation or elimination of the floodway to enable development to occur
outside of any designated floodway;
. Constmction of a detention facility will provide storage for the project's
surface mnoff. The project shall be constructed to drain to the detention
basin via an underground stonn drain system, and the nmoff shall be
stored in the detention basin to be released at a rate that would not change
the peak discharge in Llagas Creek; and
. The slope of the floodway channel shall be flattened, to mitigate the
increase in peak discharge to Llagas Creek and reduce overbank velocity.
Two 3- foot drop stmctures shall be constructed which will make up for the
reduction in fall associated with the flatter slope of the channel. The
mitigation plan for the project shall also include local erosion protection
for the Ronan Channel to protect the banks and channel bottom against the
high velocities of the floodway flows in the areas where they enter the
channel.
Any future development that increases runoff should be evaluated by a site-
specific or area-wide hydraulie analysis to ensure that the capacity
requirements of drainage improvements are adequate and that post-
development flow rates do not exceed pre- development levels. Any
development creating runoff beyond the capacity of planned drainage
improvements should be required to upgrade those improvements as a
requirement or a condition of approval, subject to the review and approval of
the City.
-8-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
-9-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
4,lO-C
To reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level, one ofthe following
measures shall be implemented:
. The City shall obtain a municipal storm water National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and prepare a Municipal
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as part ofthat permit approval.
- or-
. On a project-specific basis, post-construction water quality mitigation
shall be implemented to prevent significant impacts of sedimentation and
urban runoff based on recommendations by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board. Guidance for appropriate mcasurcs is contained in thc
"Start at the Source, Dcsign Guidancc Manual for Stoml Watcr Quality
Protection, prepared for the Bay Area Stonnwater Management Agencies
Association, "
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
4.12-A
Implementing Actions in the General Plan should be expanded to provide
lllorc spccific guidelincs for crcck cascmcnts or sctbacks, to elarlfy protccted
habitats, and to require or encourage exotic invasive plant removal and use of
drought resistant, native and non-invasive exotic omamental species on City
property and for proposed new developments. To strengthen existing policies
and implementing actions, the following additions or changes are
recommended so that impacts due to habitat loss arc rcduccd to a less-than-
significant level:
. Action 20.B Habitat and Urban Streams/Creek Protection - Reqnire
development along creeks to be set back from the entire floodwayl of the
ereek. Require development along Uvas Creek and the main branch of
Llagas Creek to be set back either the entire area of the floodway or 250
feet on either side of the creek centerline, whichever is greater. Note: This
action could also use a buffer idcntificd as 50 - lOO fcet from the top of the
bank or edge of the riparian corridor, stretching outward, whichever is
greater. Alternatively, setbacks for individual developments can be
established through conditions developed during the regulatory permitting
1 A FEMA designated floodway is the portion of the floodptain that is to be reserved for the passage of flood flows.
The floodway is where the flood waters are likely to be the deepest and fastest. The floodway should be kept free from
obstruction to allow the floodwaters to move downstream. Devetoping (e.g., placing fiU or buildings) within the
floodway requires approval from the community that has jurisdiction over land use decisions in the floodplain. For
clarification purposes, the floodplain is the area inundated during a tOO-year flood (a flood that has a I-percent chance
of being equaled or exceeded in any given year), and therefore, is sometimes referred to as the ..tOO-year floodplain."
For example, within the Llagas Creek Overflow floodplain, there exists the Llagas Creek Overflow floodway (as shown
on the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) for Santa Clara County, dated August 2, 1982). which is a 650
foot-wide swath of land extending from Leavesley Road to the Ronan Channel.
\JH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
-10-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
process with the trustee or resource agencies, Development of the buffer
policy shall also create an exception or variance process for those
situations where strict imposition ofthe standard would be reasonably
infeasible,
. Require development along tributary creeks to be set back from the entire
designated floodway of the creek. Setbacks required should allow
adequate room for trails and access on both sides of the creek. The Santa
Clara Valley Water District shall be consulted regarding the determination
of creek setbacks and buffers to ensure that they will accommodate the
restoration of riparian habitat, trails, flood control aceess, and the
protection of riparian habitat. Determination of actual layout and size of
these creekside linear parks is recommended [or further study which could
be addressed in the City's Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
. Setback land could be dedicated to thc City by the subdivider/developer or
the City could purchase an easement over the setback area.
. Action 20,C Habitat Protection Ordinance - rcvise to include ereeks,
nativc grasslands, oak woodlands and nativc riparian communities.
. Rcvisc thc City Street Tree Ordinance and Landscape Policy to includc
specific lists and landscape guidelines emphasizing native species for use
in special habitat areas; i.e., riparian corridors and hillside areas,
. When dcveloping ncw projccts, eliminatc exotic invasive pest plants to thc
cxtcnt fcasiblc and practical. Promote use of native plants and non-
invasivc exotics in landseape plans for ncw dcvelopment.
4.12-B
To strengthen existing policies and implementing aetions and further reduce
the potcntial impact to special status species to a lcss-than-signi [icant level,
the following additions or changes are recommended:
.
Action 20.D - Revise to include consultation with National Marine
Fisheries Service and the U.S, Fish & Wildlife Service for developments
that may impact listed species, and include appropriate mitigation
measures for other special status plant and wildlife species regulated by
California Department ofFish & Game that are known to or may
potentially occur within the Gilroy Planning Area. Standardized or
general mitigation measures for specific special status species can be
accessed through the appropriate agencies,
Prior to construction of a proposed project within the planning area where
special status species may be impacted, the appropriate jurisdiction shall
require preparation of a biological assessment to determine the
presence/absence of any special-status plant or wildlife species. If special-
status species are known to occur or have the potential to occur,
.
4.l2-C
4.12-D
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
appropriate resource agency contacts shall be made and mitigation
developed in consultation with a qualified biologist and the resource
agencies.
. If initial biological assessments for a proposed proj ect determine the
presence or potential presence of a state or federally listed species on the
site, the project applicant shall consult with the CDFG or USFWS,
respectively, for guidance on whether or not the project can avoid impacts
to the species. The project shall avoid impacts through re-design wherever
possible. If impacts cannot be avoided, the project shall incorporate
mitigation to reduce impacts to the extent possible based on consultation
with a qualified biologist and the resource agencies,
To strengthen existing policies and implementing actions and further reduee
the potential impact to wetlands and riparian habitat to a less-than-sigrificant
level, the following additions or changes are recommended:
. Require wetland delineation studies of proposed proj ects, including City-
initiated projects, that may affect potential jurisdictional wetlands.
. Fnture development should avoid substantial adverse impacts on emergent
wetland habitats. Unavoidable impacts to these habitats should bc
mitigated at a 3: I ratio or as determined in consultation with the
appropriate resource agencies. Any developmcnts along Uvas and Llagas
Creeks should inelude an appropriate setback or buffer from the top of the
ereek bank and planting of native riparian species within disturbed or non-
native areas of this buffer. In addition, project-specific biological surveys
shall be undcrtakcn along natural tributaries to Uvas and Llagas Creeks to
determine if sctbacks or buffers are walTantcd for proj ccts along othcr
natural creeks.
To strengthen existing policies and implementing actions and further reduce
the potential cumulative impaet to wetlands and riparian habitat to a less-than-
significant level, the following additions or changcs arc rccommendcd:
.
The City of Gilroy should continue to work with Santa Clara County and
the Santa Clara V alley Water District to enhance the Uvas Creek riparian
corridor for fish and wildlife including the removal of arundo, or giant
reed, and other invasive exotics and replacement with native riparian
species and enhancement efforts to help protect and recover native
steelhead populations, In addition, based on the comments received from
the Santa Clara V alley Water District, Uagas Creek and the tributaries of
Uvas and Uagas Creeks shall be afforded similar protections.
-11-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
The City may require a solar shade analysis for the proposed development
projects involving more than two stories in the Downtown area.
VISUAL QUALITY AND AESTHETICS
4,13-A
CULTURAL RESOURCES
4.14-A
In areas identified as archaeologically sensitive: A comprehensivc cultural
rcsourcc evaluation would be required at thc time specific development
projects are proposed. Unsurveyed arcas would require a thorough field
inspeetion to identify potential historic and prehistoric resources. After
specific eultural surveys have been conducted, appropriate plans for
evaluation and mitigation of impacted resources would be completed as
necessary, The City shall exercise discretion in requiring project applicants to
perform one or all of the following:
. Planning constmction to avoid archaeological sites,
. "Capping" or covering the arehaeological site with a layer of soil prior to
constmction. Capping may be used where serious soil compaction will
not occur; the covering materials are not chemically activc; and the site
has been recorded.
. Deeding the archaeological sites into permanent conservation easements.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
4,15-A
4,15-B
UH\554093.3
02.()70204706002
The City, in conjunction with the California Department of Conscrvation,
shall initiate the preparation of a map generally showing thc locations within
the City that possess soils or rock material with the potcntial to contain
naturally-occurring asbestos for use by the Community Development
Department in their review of proposed projects. A rcgistcrcd soils engineer
shall evaluate proposed projects within areas on this map for impacts due to
naturally-occurring asbestos, and develop and implement appropriate
mitigation, if necessary.
Conduct well and ditch tailwater tests to determine the presence of "Category
1" (highly bioaccumulative or toxic) herbicides and pesticides and triazide
herbicides as well as other chemicals that have the potential to pollute the
groundwater and pose health risks. The list of suspected and confirmed
chemieals that could leach into and pollute groundwater is provided by Title
3, Division 6, Section 6800(b) of the State Code of Regulations.
-12-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
4.15-C
4,15-D
4.15-E
4,15-F
4.15-G
4,]5-H
\lHI554093.3
02.()70204706002
If any "Category 1" or other chemicals that can pollute the groundwater as
defined in Mitigation 4.15-A are found, conduct a health risk assessment to
determine if people will be exposed to hazardous levels of contaminants,
If the health risk indicates that additional mitigation measures are needed to
prevent continued groundwater contamination, bioremediation with the use of
appropriate bacteria, or other appropriate technology as approved by the
relevant resource agency, should be carried out.
Provide a densely landscaped fence around the perimeter of the property to
prevent residents and domestic pets from trespassing on adjoining fanns, and
to reduee some of the potential for chcmical wind drift.
Provide a 100-300 feet buffer strip between the agricultural farmlands (unless
they are organic opcrations) and the residentially zoned land,
Project sponsors should provide a densely landscaped fence around the
perimeter of the property to prevent residents and domestic pets from
trespassing on adjoining farms, and to reduce some of the potential for
chemieal wind drift.
Potcntial home buyers shall be infonned ofthe agricultural-related hazards
that may arise. Thc county shall enforce this ordinance and should ensure that
proper farming operations are occurring to minimize these problems. These
include, for instance, prohibition of spraying on windy days, and posting
notices on fields that have been sprayed indicating whcn the field can be
safely re-entered,
-13-
Exhibit A to Resolution 2002-41
0':
~:I:
6-
~~
o~
~~
~!
~;..,
~
o
m
o
~
~
4.2 Land Use: Planning 4.1 Land Use: Consistency with Plans ...,
and Compatibility Issues 0
'"
1j'
... !> 3'
"
'" , '"
"
a
en en (I)
- c ;;: -,
r - a: :r>f2.
en en <g = O':::!
c e.~dl~
g - ~
"
~~NNN~--~~WWWNNNN--- N~.J:o.WI\:)I\)N-" "
~E666~6~~~~~~~~~S~~~ 00' . . . . . !1.
. . 0....0000
.....O-llo-l\JtOOlW.....
" .f>..f>.NOOlN- . . . . - - - - - - . 001" . . . - - 1j'
I'\)N- - - - . .f>......WWWNNNJ\)...............
~~~~~~~~8~g8~~8~g8S - .J!t...J!t..I\)Nt>.)..... ;;'
t-.)' . . . . . ~
000....000
- - 00000' . . . . . . - . - - - . UlI\JO.......J!t..(.o.l
NNOlW.....~.....Ol.....WWWNNNN............... O. - ~ . - -
!X'~- . . . . OON:"O:""'OOOOOO CO.....,..WI\)NI\.:I
~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ - oaoaoo
.0>~.""'p:.5J1."'"
C')
1\)l\.)1\)1\).....""'WI'\.:IN.......... NNN.f:lo.N-" ~ ~
?>!>>?'>?>:-"")>bb:x:.ol> 000' . .
()):> 0 lIl)>- . - - - . c...:cinS:C.!ll}> 0' 0
. - . - - .J!t..WWN.......... - . NN.....
I\:)N 1\)1\) 1\)' . . . m' NNobm ~ ...
CDCO......o>o>.tD.m'}>s:o. SD ~
btDtDOl><OWWN:-'"..... e~)>- ~ (j)
. - - - }>.(;).oo51'-p - - f'>
}>, a
'<
... ... ... ... CD ~ 8 8 0'()g.!'J~ -tc6.S:~ ~rm:-,,~ ~ ~ (j)
l> l> l> l> -... :::Jc.....~Dl;;o(bffi:rC\l(J)"'C~-::l,Jlo CD
<> ID j. <> " . ~ ~
mill ~.::l oa':::::I (D::I'O (j)W:::J rom 3 5.~
rn en rn ..., o.m a.~m....,rc.a n c: (il Q.3 3"Eco 0' CD
m m m =0- -~ !!: m 02. m 5.':< 0 g 00 m CD CD CD 0 :J. ~ D!
m m m " ~8 ~.o>~~;!~~a. ia~iQ !!.
:P :P :P 0 <0 <= -.... CD > Q) I: Q) (Q -; "O:J:J...... ;;:
OJ OJ OJ q' ~'iil :J 0 < co Q) -lU (/I :J.5=::r =:;t;... ......co 0 "
~ ~ 0 ~ 0<0 ~.~~~.g~=:gCD~ggQ)~~ ~ Di
< ~(tJ _ (/I Q) I: 0 - 0 Q) ;:::;= 0'0 _. @ a. '<
=0- ::r -;:::;=1:1::;:-1:-0...(1) lU-
m m m ~ <= " CDg-O.I:;:::;=; aiD}ctlo03::::1::::1Q) ~
elg ::::1"'1: ctI _::::1(0__(1)::::1::::1 0'
iil <i O~ (I) Q!..@~ Q) ~Dl(/')@ ~.::::I-CD ctI a. ~ m
.0 iil ~~a~~~.3~:J-03~~i~~ ;;: z ~
<= ~
~. 0 iil' ::::I CD Q):::I ctI 0 - a.lU (/I -. =:;t; =:;t; ('\l " ~ ~.
<= 3 en a.(O a. 5.. Q. 5 g !;. @ :;r Q S- 0 g Q) "
g ~'-':Jm(ll--Q) :::1-0 ~ a
0 e !'!'
'0 S' lU ::::I g' < ~ 5=; CD 2: ~ =::::1 () Q) 0-0 iil
ro ~<O @ ~;:::;=Q!..CD ~.o.g::::l s:~@: Dl5..5=a (I) ~
~ :E ~
~ )> ~~~:r5.<.s=0!!:a@0('\lQ3 11 3
'0 9' I:O_d: <;~CD::::I.s: 0"80- (I)
ro 0 g:@_O'OOa.CDDl,z 50 ,z9= <Q' CD
@ S o=~::::ICD<-a;Dl(tlfc::::I~ lU ~
::!.ma.lU5..('\lO-.lU::::IO' ::::1(/11:- ~
0' 2' '" -
~~ ::::I-.-a::::loa.- ~-o...::e !!!..
e '" 0;lJaa.xffi3<-s:oo.:_@[il0 [
il' =0- 3:::1 en" ~ s= CD ::e sn)> :J 5..
,~ ~ ::rQ) (i5 s=o 8"2.c: ('\l _:r:r-o ('\l (II a. ;!. 3
0. ctI,< -::::1'< CD @(O _.'0 Dl ctI'" 0
'" " ~i~.t~(i5~ffi~~;!~?~ ~"O
" <i "D)
~ 5' ::::Ia~~o~, S:::::I~g:ax.~@:::. 2.0
0. '0 (11::::1' !:l@g!&!!eno::::l~II::::1[1)::::I ~-
e 3 (tltIJ)>3= ::r...-o_<n[l) 1-3_
~ <_. OCD('\l [I)_Q) 3 (,.)-0 ctI::r ~ ~:;::tI
" ro CDa.8:(tlm-...'Oo~<n oa:::lCD
8 ;!. !!: -. a:::l lU 0 5. CD CD Q) (II -co a. 8 ~CD
0 ~ ~g~~.g.~~~~ ~ g~~ ~ ~ <Q' (;,"0
3 ~ !!.
'0 5' ~.~ Q!.. (/') 3 $:: 5 ~ ~ 0 a: o. ::::I CD 0' ~o
!!. " ~.--o)>CD I: o-a.... (il@: C-@ G)yr~. ~ ;!,::I.
g iil ~i~~::::Ii~!!:,z~i:=5.~g ;;: =>
q' 3 <0'" 0 ![_CD_[I)-oo-<nma.p0 " g;s:
ro _._.[I)a. [I) Dl:::lO-S":::I[I)-_ " ~ -.
3' S' W~3CD3::::1<tl-a.-('\l <::::1......_ ~ - -
0- -.:;;; a.(D[I)_-3c-a'@:::rQ) ~ ;'cC'
'0 S' (j)g<n~'O_30-::r::r = (1):::1
" <0 Q) oa.~oCDoctlijj.a;~30'()a. "
& ~ (l)D)
ro ~3-o~-C::::J<-Ql(Q(1) ...-g. 11 -
<0 ::::I. d:'" (1) 0' iT S' !'D iiJ ::::I ~ a. ~ -~ III o'
" ~. g3 s.o'" III 0 O~Q.OIllS"2:CI')- r
". g -CD (11'0 S=::::I -;-__::::1 <n.-(II fifiij' " ~
,!!l. E'"oQ.~<D c: :;r~!!: ~0'1ll3"Q;:;:a. ~
E' ~
iiJ -0 ()(II<tI,<o::r--.~- 0 <tI .... ;s:
0' ~ -3::::1.~-.~ Q) 3 _<tI (II Q.~co ~. =0-
" ~CD3_~-3(11S=0~aQ.@ ~ " 0
~ " 5._~ia~ g ~aCD~ ~CD 0'3 !! ~ ~
~ ill
" 0. ~Q~oG>ma=r~::::I~2r"'3 ~ <Q' ;:;:
~ S' ..+m Ill= _::::I (l.)a.;::I.S:1ll 0
" ~Q.iii=a(O s'(ii'(t)-o c: 0 CD'< tll ~
~ 5' :::I ~ ::::l Q''< ~ s: c (il tll ~ :: () g .; ::; :!.
'"' " n ~
2' ro S:=:;t;a.:::I::UCDiij'02:~ ffi,z-::::I. ~~(Q
2' iil <tIg~~'~i<b'';-oQ)~()og 3
iil ro Q.m a.oCii.-<('\l c s's.'O -._::l CD (I) "
0' ~<n_<tI<tIw<nn-~a.zG)a. ~
iil . [I) '0 a. :;r 0 . . C ..
'"' ~~3Q)G>~~iCii-~~S:aS. 3 11 0
~ 3
c: ~CD-i<tl'O-mDr ..CD'<'O Dr ~lC
ro '0 ::r _ Q) ::l...... 0". :::I 0 Dl ();;u tll :::I <Q' D!
" " CDS.a.<tICDCD('\lOa.--.-OCD;::I. a.
3 ;co 3.@a.CD-_S."'tII:<~. 0 ~
PI " _00-3.oi$'0~1:::::I-':::I ... '" 3
e ~ s'ffi;;;'-:QCD 5. CD :r!!: n~m:x:: ~ ii'
~ '" -. -()m-< Ci) ::r a. ..
ro ~ ::::I...lU ::J"1ll0 Om- 3 ~
~ <0 ::!I CD _0:::1 0 - 0-.(11 ::rG)"'U - 0
" " c.o~~a.a.~S='O~CD<D<tIa iiJ e ~
~ ~ ~5._.Ci)9tQ.-Ci)CDQ)OTl::::l-o ::l ~ 0.
0. 0. @;a.<CDOS'O:::l'O_W(1l0 a. " 0
" iil 3m a.(C -om3@Ul 0 ~ 'a
. -'~(I.)(ii.<-o (I.) a ::::I _tll _
X " ~30.CDtIJ~~~<CDlD"'tI= <n 0: "
![ 0.
3l S'"8:'"9.ffffi(/')@:~.g~iilO i " '-
S' 3 cr
<0 o6}-O<tl-.--o. m[l)CD:::Im <tI m e
~
" S' ::::::I::r3g.::w~(Q;~a.s- ~. ~
<0 <0 2:@~g3.:r@~~3........!t2: g. ~
~. 5' (II -0 "'~~)>o~ 0 ~a.U;' .'"
0 3'
s. " 3 a <tl I'\) _... c 3:. I: Ci) en:r '"
a; 3 &- g ffi.2 s:'< 0- 3. 0 m W '0
2' ~ 0 0
~ CC-o ...... coo_o'O-o::::l iil' 0
5: III W 2:_'0 ::;.:J.... lJ-Ci) (ba. '"
0 ro e....U;.. O<tl~oc'O:J3)> ~ ~
g@}::rOroa.. s:'" ::::1.(1.)0-(0 @
'" ~ . (j)(I):::J:Jc5:<tIg.3-om::::l.
" so
iil 0 or<tl~::::I "'mCDIll...O 0'
a :JO:JCDQ!.g.S.O(lllU@l'\)5.. "
_. "
0 S' m _a.~-<--. ::r~<tI(O III gE'" 9-
~ ro 2:5~ 3 ~.ro!!: w s'1'5'c......iiJ ~
~ 0. :::;:CI') g.'O~-Q.'O a.5..S:":-'(; ~ -<':
S' -'(1) -_.Dl '0 ('\l-O 0' 2-
g c a~.@o-'?a < ~ :J.tg "
5' :..m~.<n ~~<~_.:t_Ul ~ g
0;' ffia.(O S=3.~-o~.g iil~ 2:Ci) e
~ ~
~ o-~.<tI-. aQ)3:::1a.(II< ro
" ()<<:::!I 3 < (0 CD a. ~ -.
0
'" ,zg.@ ~ ~~a~.~ o' j' <>
0 ~
~ <n::r:J n ~ g.CD :::I
i!!: ~ (I) . S.... <>
= s, 0
c
~
%
:PO 0 III -''0 () ~~ 0 W -''0 () -"'"
:g~ q' [.3 ro - q' -0 3 <tI -. 3 " ro
'" ,,'" '0 -0 =4..z '2.~~
=m =00_ =00_
g ~ 3 0 -." g 8l 3 0 " 0
g ~ g ~ 3 ~
"A. ::l O. 0 ,,0. 3.0. q " ~
:-:::IlU; . ::llll <D ~ -.
~ ro ~ " _0'
a.~CD a..CD 5' tD'
<0_
g
00 00 00 00 00 00 i:0'"tJ
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~,z ~,z o ~ ro
~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~O ~ ~
00 00 00 ~ 0 00 00 0 ~
"'3 '03 "'3 33 '03 '03 ~
33 3 3 33 " 3 33 3 3 ,r ~
"e " e ro e " c ro c <0 '"
,,~ ,,~ ,,~ ~ e ,,~ ,,~ 0
~~ ~
~,z ~,z 0::0.: oq' f?q ~,z ~
ro'"' ~ i5'
;:>. ;:>. ;:>. ;:>. ;:>. iD
'" iJi' ~~~g. e 4' @~ (11"8 ~r8 Dr I'\) "'Um())>o<n ~S'C " 0-""
i3 0 :J5:aQ)0~Ci)i3<m ~. " 3 -
ro Q' ~~S: Q '" 3
'" '0 bg~.~' ro "Q"g a.CD(Q ~ ~ g.tIJ =_Q. tD'5"
o ~ ro-3 ~ 3':::1 iiJ 3 CD or.. III :s;.~ 0'
Ul .9. '0 0' ~ .Q. 3'"
"" 0_Gl '0 !e.CD tll -o~3 <D < E!2:.:=;a.tB"g
i3 " 0" " " 2-
o.U ~~ "0 Ill::l = w_ a~@Cii.()~ 0 ~
~ < ~ ~U 0.-'< Olu o'-::J"-.() < ~
" j," !!!. 0. " ~ c' J.if3 ::::l Q)-<:q Q!.. 0. g
0.
iil .. ~ ~
m
><
::T
C'
;+
CD
o
;IJ
CD .
"' ~
o .
s:
o'
::l
'"
o
o
'"
./..
~
0<:::
-:<:
~g:
o~
~~
'1<;..,
~
o
m
o
~
N
4.4 Agriculture 4.3 ....
Population, 0
..,
Housing and 0'
Job
... ... ... ... 3"
:". :". ! '"
I" " .:. ..,
=
!l.
U> U> U> r '"
- - c U> i:: -,
r r - - a:):o f2.
U> U> U> I ~ = O'::!
C ~!!:ji;~
g - ~
~
"'''' ......'" f\:I,J::..f:o,W"->NI'\.].......... Z "0
:""0 00:"'" O' . . . . . . . 0 2.
. 00..........0000
.l\:Iw..... 9'!'V ...... .....O)(JJl\:lO......,f>.CO..... ~ (;.
o. . . . . ~
...'" ......'" f\)~~WNf\)N..... ;0 ,,'
bo goe. O' . . . . . . ..
. 0000000 ~
-.'" !-'J.f-..> Q,f:l...........COOl.....W .c
<D . . . ~
'" ...... . .J:>..l>-WNtvN..... 0;.
e. 00 00:"'0000
~.J:>. ~..... 9'_I\:)~""'SOg>5'J.""" 0.
.
(")
... - I\:)f\)N.J:>.N....... ;OZ ~ ~
)> )> ~99):.b:l}> ~ 0
.-"T1)>- - - .c~ 0'
::: ... r:5t..JN:P-!"':""'" ~ ~ 0
1- @. " ....
0 Looscp.m ..
. Im.....Ntv 0. Cil
...
i:o . - =-'"bl>
p- - a
'<
z ... ... ... z )> Cil
0 :". .. .. 0 0. CD
" " ,;, :i> " g: ::l
~ ~ CD
U> U> U> ;0 0' ..
m m m ~ " !!!.
m m m ~ !!.
.c
)> )> )> ~ i:: "ll
OJ OJ OJ @. '"
~ ~ ~ 0. cO' Ai
m m m !!. ::l
0' m
"
i:: z ::l
~ 0 :S.
= ....
.. ..
~ ~ 0
;
.. '" ::l
" 3
~CD
" ::l
-. ...
"'Ill
~-
" -
;;3
~"ll
"0 III
ao
g...
~ i;:tJ
cO' ~CD
= ",00
~ ~. 0
0'
" ~;l.
i:: ~r s::
~
= " -.
.. ~~ =::::t.
~
; rlC
.. "'Ill
u=:::t.
rO
:Ji ::l
..
...s::
;0
~ ::l
'" -.
-. ...
'g 0
-. ..
:::!t _0
~ ::l
il,lC
o,"ll
C:"
" 0
..lC
~. ..
" III
=3
~-
" =
~ ..
~ =
" 0.
~ 0
0;<
-. ~
0.0.
= '-
!!: ~
~ "
~
-
.w
...
0
0
...
C'
'<
:T
~
(')
~
!l.
e
a
'<
(')
~
(')
0
~
"
~
0 )>0 0 !ll ---0 () Z -;0"0
.z :g~ ~ t3 ~-. )> 3 ~ =
.., "''' '2.~~
=[1) =00_
@ " @ 3: 3 0 ~ 0
3 "
ao. ::::I 0 _ n ~ ..
~:::JQ)ro " -
"i!'. _C'
0. .~ :;'iii
"'~
0
~
00 00 00 00 z 3:0'''
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ )> o ~ =
~o ~o ~o ~o g, ~
00 00 00 00 Q ;0
.., 3 '03 '03 '03 ~
3 3 33 33 33 3' ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ '" '0
a" a" a" a~ 0
:?~ :?~ a?~ a?q: "
..
0'
;l- ;l- ;l- ;l- iD
C/I-g ~r8 '0)> "'0 ~j' 8 ~ "0 Z 0-....
a" 0 .. ". )> :::l 3 -.
=-0 :::l ="0 :::::l ~ g .., 3
Q. (D l:t. '0'0 Q. CD~ w ii S'
~ 3 " g 02. ~ 3 " '0 6' 3'"
~<1l IS ~ ~ ~(1)~ '0
OJ:::l= 0.0 a or ~ 0
g. -'< 0; g;;t-< < ~ " ~
o' w o' e!. 0. ~
" ; "
m
x
:0-
ff
""
OJ
o
;0
CD ,
en",
o ,
c:
-
o'
::J
'"
o
o
'"
./.
~
0<::
-"
60;
d~
~I:
~'"
~
o
~
o
~
~
.......................(.0.)
!'"l~:f:o-~J'>N
.....oooO--...J
f\.:IOl,flo.f\.)(.o,)"
~ v v . CJJ
0~~~~
0000'
.~.IJ1_w."'"
~~~~N
_Ljnt)}>p
~~:t~N
}>.'-nbroa
N......- - -
~..
J>:'-
m
X
:J'
0'
'"
::i" :fl-
n",
[:i:
m;!
~"
@Q
ii1'"
<9. Ul
" '"
~!!.
0';
ro @
0.'0
C ~
@ ro
~ ~
166-
~ 3'
~'O
~ii>
5.~
'0 ~
9.;;
~8
~ 3
0.'0
T Cil
< '"
" "
"'~
0' ~.
c <
ill"
~ ,,-
~ ~
o.n
~ @
~~
~ ~
,,<0
~'O
~nr
n~
~Q
~ -
_'"
c "
3 a
'O~
ao.
:r.ffi
gO'
o. 0
ill ~
- ~
[g
er<o
g~
lh~
- ~
,,0.
5"0
c,,'"
c "
,,~
-~
0. ~
9'en
" ,,-
~ g:
~ ct
~r a
.z3
0. 0
-~
[!J3
o'S'
-0.
en;!>
~a
~(5
S'
OJ
o
;0
'" .
"'w
o .
s:
0'
:J
'"
o
o
'"
.j,.
~
g~~~
~:ffi Q'
fto~o
(\)~
~o.
~ ~
00.
--
...
'"
J,.
en
r
en
o
~
00
ro::+
<'<
!E.o
0. 0.
'0 3
3 3
" c
a~
~..z
il-
............................w
7'-f>-f'-~!'JN
oooo.....co
0'1 w..... f'V......
- . - - - 0)
~~~~~~
0000.....-
m_~_I\J5-'J_1'\,)
..........................
Wf'VNJ\.>tv
to 5i>fn.O}>-
.....................
wNJ\.)f\.)
;"71 b.to
~
'1,
!II
ro
!E.
9'
!!.
00
CD:=.:
<'<
!E.o
0. 0
'03
3 3
" c
a~
~..z
il-
en -g 3' 8
fr~~
ro.3 ~
!e.(t!Ql
tll:J=
0......'<
o'
~
...
'"
w
en
-
r
en
z
o
~
"
o
.z
...
'"
"
r
en
z
o
~
"
;0
"
.0
C
~.
0.
;oz
$!!g
;C! "
ai"
0.
z
o
~
"
;0
"
.0
C
@.
0.
z
;!>
z
;!>
z
;!>
4.5 Traffic and Circulation
~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w~~~~~
bb~~~~~gog~~~' ~bbbb~bbbb
....,J..j::r."'->"....... ('D- ~f\.)O'Iw"",f\.)ocoO)w"'"
. . . (0 W W (.:l C,,)................, cr- . . . - . . . . . -
............. . . . . . . . (\)Cf\.)I'.)...........................................
CO....,J....Of\.)I\.)..............OO~-....,J....~~~wwJ\.)J\.)f\.)f\.)
bbb~~~~~~?~(\)5bbb. bbbbbbb
-...to)f'V (owWwN..........aWwwm~Nw....w....,J1J11\.)
- - bN~~bbb.. .. - - - - - - - - . .
.......-..j.+>-.Ol~~_~
...
'"
Cl
i
@
0.
"
s:
~
&
!i>
r
~
~
;!>
~
~j"
~
m
~
~
0.
'8
"
o'
~
~
Q,
OJ
c
~
~
~
<
".
or
;0
o
~
0.
~
S'
~
ii>
U
Q
~
~
~
0.
g$!!t:l:t- zg~~c;l():I:t-
:', s-.~."Cf' o~ Cil""3 CiJ g. Cf'
Ill...... -I::T:J Ul III m
~::r"1la !1:IS~~.~~m
III !:fs.g ":cg.{;r~ s-
::g.~!e. Q~~~~~5.
~~~~ 2':=:oucp(\)_
:s::<g ~ :: E" IU " en ~ ~ ffi
~-:':O~ Cil'< F:t~.1ll 00'
_:] !!t CS2 WCll en=
~Q.~.Q: _ 'u III III 0
::.~?o ~ @-IUl:]~
:] !:: -:E :] c:: ~ :: fir 5'
1$":]05. !!a.. "CPO-110
i1lO3lO :;::. a~mClla
?"~O~o. !Jl ~UlgJCilIll
... <U ...., 0 _ Ul a.
~cg:~.~ ;l ~9:5:~~
.. Ul :::::I" 0 :J CP Cll !!t......
;:u ill 0 () 3 0 III III -. l::
~g~g, gJ 5:~a.~ 2-
. - ....,., _ o.c::=:...,
o:](3'u ..... 0 <_..
~~~S 0 to;;!;!Jls=:e
b ..., ~ c r.c - en CP
1<8"Cll :T ~~S5::
b CD m gJ gJ IU III C/):::!. 0
< ~ gJ c; 0- $~ ~ .~. ~
~(f.)tit- CD fir-'"
IllCDa:Q m @-(J'I '3:::l
5.om8- :J --=r-lllllii
~~~o ~ ~~ffi[~
go=.::!. ~ @3~?-Ul
(D 7 m (ii '< ,.. III
en:"l Di.. ~ . _.:c:=:..
enUl a :]3.omG)
~3a.0 0 0~5'!e.0
~~~~ !; 3:g.~Sff
a5.~S g. s~,<en::l
~ 0 tit ..., m :s:~ ~ ~ g>
g.7la:m g: ~~g: or $'
~ @~!e. ~ ~~S~o'"
2''03 <s, <" ."
'" a. wg.gJttl 3
~!!a..~ g' :J =comOJ-
CD-=:-= ~ ~.=3 ~ i6
15 ffi~g III ~.g {;a.(a
:J..... :J ::l S=:1:J~~
OJ'1Fg'c)"- a. cn?;_CI!g:g
<enl:::J 0 !f0(J)-a.
?!r--S-l> c: 92s::20-::;-
III _.~. < -I ,- ..... -
1ll3.a.~ :T (D~S=g'o
::lCDCDC 0 m_Ul...,q
a.~ SCD 3 ~~a:g.o
s::~='o' ~ aa;.m ~g:
0:]- :T....O-_.
:] r.c CD Q.. ;:u m!it:::!.;:ut5
$'CDlj;"m g 9-~ctig,;:;:
~otl)n. c. c-':ea.o
:'-: ..., < 0 (D ,:-+ g m" s::
;o9:3l~ < Ul..UlCl::
~~~~ g. ~i??s~ ~
a 8-;05= s- :T~ co()':<i
~:]gCD -----' S,:T2.(DCD
.=33 :] a. I.'l)er "'0---' r 0 ID CP l::
'"i-([) CD:c....,.,""~
b 0-:':0 3 ~.~6'OI.'l)
cti 5-5-.cti III J!. tI) :::!.<
...,~~...,o en a:::! a.cti Cii.
o ~..... ::0 m 0 '=1" fir
::lOs.~ 0 3_.5:!p.m.
enl.'l)r.c Ul m ...:=:
o (5 III 0 ~ 60r5!e.m
s.c:~s. l>o:]S!e.
;r:e""~ ~.9!2a.<o
a:Cllm-o 0 <::
" I.'l) ::l .... '< ;:u a (D en
< I 00 m :] III
os.~.c ~9:!~.-:..:.~
:::!.r.cgg. o~:](Dw
ctilll(flCD l:::co:]-1
(D-g g: ~~r~S=a
Ill...m OUloenen
~o~ (J)~~:::tm
zs::1$" g.-.::-:,m~
g. ~ :J_~. ....:J S::.-lO.
o ;r~m:e:]
fr~g -':rUl(\)
gE.o' g-ol.'l)!e.i
:] 0 ;:u.....:::!"
a.o:,g, :::!.ag~o
o~ ~ cti g.a.I.'l)~
o :J ;..:,. .. I.'l) ell :J
"OI>>Q ;:uffi~ill6'
Ocp- m
~.':<i 8" ~
~
@
0.
"
"'
3"
~
~
;0
o
~
0.
~
"
~
Q,
o
~
3
S'
o
;!>
~
~
S'
~
~
~
il-
~.
!l'
~~;st~~:I:t-
:=.a.g<g.~b
RUI :5:ro ~ l:: :;:
o ::TI>> Cp
..., ,<.'
gcg Dr ..... en a:
I.'l):]ffi~~~
p..~menfirS=
w-o to-l CD
;l~::T~~0'
~ a.~ a.!Jl 0=
I:::!. :f'< Z III :e
~ ([) OJ to m S'
en5..o~r.c
~I>> OJ ~(D 0
_:J ..., III
8 ill en Il) ~ a.
~o83~~
~.sr:J-g,<s:
g.(aa.2a.<gJ
...,<en.....<-
l~ ~ OJ oro ~
~. ~ (D en:7~ :n
0,<= ....-.
ffi ~2-~cti~
-I.'l)"" CD::l 'u
8:J ::l.~C (a
I~ {g or:c~ 0::
~.offi~.S:l>
:J iiJ.. :::!"o <
m.....:c:E3.CD
a. g'~'~ ~ E
o ):> ~ o~ m
s.r.c m.....:c..
S,~":.zlO'~
s=.Q O1CJ~([)
([)_t<Jol>>:J
<CD =1:,< m
tll-jl>> :',w. <
(D l>~ w enCii'
f1l'm' 8" -5 ~ ill
::;;(D51>>-<~
:r-.c.-~'<D
Ul 2. =:- s: ~:J
~~ogQ..~
S. e: 3 $' z..
~<5 0 (D 0 I
. _I.'l),< zg!:
:f::T3w, I>> *
(I)<D s-ni3 CD
=- m 0 (I) Cp :0
8 '.....)>!e. C I.'l)
=~=1 ~.:J Ul
g=.Oa.OUl
< en '< CD l> :c
g3~g'Cfi~'
I.'l) ([) 0 l:: :J :T
a.:JIm!::~
3 c;<<:i" <.CT! '<
a;~a.~~
:T OJ 3r.c m
;- cn,< z:T :J
...,g.....CD~s=
8 s=~m'< sa
~az6..0(D
CPgCDen.....~
(D:JOCDZ"1l
:=.~ T I>> OJ tll
~.;:u@:gog.
g co 3 ... T m
en CQ."!=I gO) 8
sg-lg.a."1l
(fl!!t:TCDen~
o -j m en CD ttl
~~QOO;;!;
o Ul C :c ~lO
="8 :]cg:@ ~
:::!";::+~.c:31>>
CDDjO<"'C,<
3 c;-~ en--
_.0 C/) I>> I
rE:J~~-IO'
&::Qw!':l{;~
g'~ OS'~~
(fl 0 Dr Q. g: .....
~cti..DJa(Dr-3
~(il_S''<..
o CD ::TlO S. r
;::+ CD CD 0 .....!::
::T:Jo:JCPo
1>>002:CDOffi
0-,< ([) IU :T Ul
~m(t.lO-~Ul
CP "'C sa. 9:r.c I.'l)
. Q. G) 5- 51!
('5"=:J
'<o~
'<
........................................
+>-+>-~~~wt<Jt<J
!-I~bi:oi:omo
rv~:...~:...:...:...~
:-"+>-~+>-+>-+>-C,o.)t<J
l>:-.Gl.m.o}-}>9
a. r -. 0-'"
m l:: :J CD .
enoQ.~OI
fl' '" C " '"
::l (\) 9: :1
m ~ ,a: .....-l
(ii"1.'l)....-:::!"
a.:E:frCP
mcpmm()
enUl-l<~
Qc;~!Jl(fl
C is=~~
jj.,-' en =
~cg.@~3
~ ~ CD ~~.
~ '< c::..c: Iii
CD .....:s::::si _.
(floO~::l
~""';3.-m
cCDOr
~"'C (D-ell
en _'< :c <
s=0 ;:U1O' ~
I>>mO:To
=5.I>>:e-
~ a.men
:::!. S' -.'< m
30;3......<
Il) cg: ~n'
~ a. (fl m
~~.~iir
~s=~~fS~
CD<D..m_
(DJ;~a.S,
t9.g.:s::S' 0
o ([) 0 Q. 3
~g:@-a.Q
~ ~~~. g
~~;os=iif
Ul :J 0 ([) ...,
, ~ ~:c~.
-- -'s-
s: "0 <g. -.
o S ~
:J5:tI1;st
ii1 ~'< "
(il<D.....a
'< UI 0_.
;0--'"
00(fl.,..,
I.'l) -0 0
a.IS.""
-.,o':T s:
;a.::TO-CD
CP :E 0 a
Cil m l:: I.'l)
~":.5.c.
g~@~
~=! !:: 3 ~
~~~'zij
-lor$'
ffi~m3
m a. cti :e
::l -'Ul ..
c;~Cb:T
(D E'< s=
Q~a~
-<:lOmX
o;st~@
O)mo"O
~s:gg
m o.? :]
~$-~s'
'<ii(i3-1:T
.....'< CD CD
"3 ;:u 3. 0'
o::T=
([)I.'l)(f)o
~ e: S"~.
_r'u :J
ol::([)r.c
ig.;~
10' 3l 3l ~
::Ten-::T
::e m 0 en
I>>):>-:T
~~~~
o::l::To-
.-:"ffi::e CD
I.'l) -.1>> r
::l ;a. '< 0
a.~oen
O')en.....o
':;"~l::~
o c;"'C 0
III 0 - =
a..? 0 0
~ ~ ~
~ ... ~
",_0.
-;."...
(aC'lltn
31" .
0:"03
'"
O~."
-. - 0
~ (fl ...,
c: :::!" a
sr~m
gg~
~ ~
S:3'"
W. -g ~.
g:~2:
"o.~
-0 -
~:J~
~~g
0.'0-
I>> a a
~<5'~'
~a-G>
~a:~
"""
~ ~
-Ic;~
@~3!
~O-I>>
n C ~
o~~
-. a....,
n ([) CD
C ~ ~
ora.......
c;mffi"
g~o
;:: -.
~~'"
~ ~ ~
$'::T:::!"
...,~~
,,_.
Cilt5 g.
::l I.'l) cti
~ ~ -
:J -. 0
a.~"'C
1ll3jQ)
~@ 8
~ ~ 3
;="'C
CD 3 (D
'0'"
-;~"
(a n. ~
31 S :;::.
n _"
~1i-;
'" 0 @
~~~
s:en.Q
~~.~
2a.~~
5'm c;
::l c; 0
o ~
~:J:s::
m ~I>>
,,~
~3<D
o,,~
~~-
Q--"
v' ~
~. "'O.:J
-,,~
~5.C:
~ 9::g
@o
-"
-"
"'0.
~~
o~
-. 0
'" --
~'"
"'-;
~@
ro 31
< n
(ii'3"
~'O
~ ~
~ U
o.s:
{5a:
0.<0
~ ~
$'g
~:J
~;!>!"
~ <0",
:.~>
Q.Q -l
aO':::!"
~ ~ "
~g'Q
~::l~
lei) nig}
oo!!t
~~i"
_.I.'l) 0
g.()~
s= g ~.
"~9'
g~ g:
~S~
ag-o
~cti 5
=.o~
3'00
~~C;;
. 0. ~
~3'~
@%Q
~3~
0." @
tQ ~ -
I~::S=
([) :::!"CD
.?-CDa
s: en--
_.O~
~~Q,
~'"
"'oS:
gg~
...~~
(.n~:J
6;o~
9'8 =
0-.(1)
~g5.
:J'"~S=
...-;~
(.n@ en
, ~ ~
.,,~~
3 -g fir
~ ij-Q
gg@
(D~<
< - ~
g;.~ ~
o.~'<
- ~ -;
o a. (a
8 a: ~
~"'O
O'a:g.
3~1l,
sffig
2:3c6"
en 2'; CD
~.a ~
5'0.'<
:J:Jw
~3Ul
-E:m~
~ ~
~co.
. (D 3l
Ul to.
2~
C ii1
~. 0-
~o
ero.
'<.5
9'''
~ ~
Q g'
"'s:
5 ~
o.~
~~
2:3
~ "
"
_ ,,"'0" ;!>
):> [lj a~. Ul
B: ~"8 ~~
g&mt5~
..... CD a. 05
!'>"'C :J .... m
:ca ~ ~
-r.c< :::::I
@ ~
3 ~
. '<
~~ g.g~
55' Ii m ~
_,:J 0 a. CD
c5~"00a.
~ ~ "
0. 0.
~
~
0.
...
~
en
r
en
00
~~
~~
~}>
~
~
0.
en
;r: -.
~>fe~.
cg = 0' ="
=~cC
g -- g
..
"
!2.
~.
~.
~
;!>
a
o'
~
~
1::
~
0'
~
!!.
;r:
;;
0;
!!!.
o'
~
;r:
..
~
~
c
;
~
-;0"0
3 " ~
"E.~~
.. 0
3 ~
~ ~
~ -.
_er
5' iD
"'-
0.
~
::0'"1:1
0. ~ ~
3. ~
c; "
~. C1l
~ ~
'" "0
0.
~
~
a
;;
0.--;
::J 3 -.
"03
iD 5'
3<0
~ 0.
~-
g
-;
0.
"0
~.
3'
'0
~
a
;r:
;;
0;
~
~
0'
~
;r:
"
~
~
c
;
~
(")
~
o
....
G)
a
'<
G)
(I)
::I
(I)
iil
-0
iii
::I
m
z::l
0<
-; -.
f!lo
en::l
II 3
g!(I)
~ ::I
3iS"
@-
"
0. 3
~-o
"Ill
!2.n
g-
g;u
;;'(1)
;;'-0
9' 0
~::I.
if s:
a:::;:
~lC'
en III
II~
1;0
~ ::I
~s:
lo
~ ::I
!!!;:;:
<go
~ ::!.
@ ::I
;alQ
(;,-0
c::-'
II 0
~lQ
,i' -.
~ III
"'3
~. -
~ ~
~m
c ~
~ 0.
~ 0.
< '0
0. ;;
Q;a.
~...
iDS
"
~
.'"
'"
o
o
'"
er
'<
~
'"
"
o
~
0.
-
g
~
o
~
n
0.
C
~
g
0<::
~:I:
~~
o~
~!
~" .... .... ....
~ '" '" '"
0 ./.. W ,(,
~
0
~
N
r rJ) rJ)
rJ) C -
- - r
I rJ) rJ)
C
m
x
:r
[
aJ
8'
AI
CD ,
~t'
~
C'
::I
'"
o
o
'"
J,.
~
f',)f\J1'.) 1\.)""""''''''''''''''''''''' WWW
O'1Ul...........f:o..,...,..WWN. . .
. . . . . . . . . . "'.....0
OOOOOOOOOO(XlCO.J>.
W.... (.oJ.....01 c..>..... W..... 0;0" ~
. . ... . COt.:/W
I\Jt..:lNI\:).................................. . .
mOl...........J:>..a:>..".WWNONO
. . . . . . . . . . .....c.n(1J
8lG~S~~~~~ow~(.,
. . . . . . . . . oi-.:!:'"
.f',).-.Jp
z
o
"
"
1'\)"''''''''''''''''''''''' co w.........
;;~:;~~~pp;::;)-
. . . . . . . cow. .....
~~~~~w<:)bGlPo
ro::: .'n.o.l:c .n}> ~ ~ ~~
:f>.:;;:: >.CD' p
~. -
-9
z
o
"
"
z
o
~
"
~
s.
w
p.
" ....
"'a.
m c
'"
3 :\'
" 0
aro.
o~
"'0
~a
c-g
!!<'"
""
_0.
l ~.
'09'
i3 S'
(D' 0
~$
8 g,
3 "
'00
" -
@m
=:::::l
.z~
~~
"w
9'~
~"9.
" 0
~ en
"'~
~. s:
Cil s=
~ "
-s.-g
~ ~
):>6r
'" ;:
~ 0
;;;<0
o "
(D.:J
""
-il
g-li
WO
~o.
~~
~g
",-
~ ~t
=0
0''0
,,0
-oe:
00;
< ~
c:vr
l1;
~g
!!l 0:
,,0'
,,"
~w
~5.
~~
. 6
8
~
0.
~
fl-
"
"
o
0.
Q
Q
"
"
"
5'
".
'"
"
z
)>
z
)>
DC)
~~
~C)
00
'03
3 3
" ~
;?~
0;::;:
,,'"
?<
z
)>
Ql "0 Q) ""U
:g .9.:g 6'
a CD =....
<O-@o
" 0'
- iD
C) 3- C) 8 "'8 '"
('D=t'o::::lffi"=(n
ro Q) 3 CIl ... t: .L.
:::::I (I) 3 is: firm n
):>2 a;-ro -:J -l
:::;-n~.:'~;:; ffi
:]~gwCD3-
OJ ([). 3lffi-(i5' g
?-'()O VlO
~2!.@~_cr~.
....:::t-:T::l:J
.2.~ 2.::r!h cc
(l) (I) :::::I -......-l
("). r.c to_ W
.gQ)cn~m:J
. :J _ < (II CIl
Cilo..w2.(ii"O
c. "THil" c: 0- 0
l: Ice 3::: ar
n:E(ti'(l) ~~
!~r.!> ~. Q, ~ g
"'8:J0"0..(")
5':J@~3g
-(Il'TJ iii"oo-
~ gg 315. 2-
:J 0. -. n m: ~
Dl 3":J C1l
5. g."Q ~ g: ffi
co 3 ~ oQ c:
~g(bgQ.Cil
Q.Ul3!::!;(I)CIl
('D!:t<tl:J Q) (il
~,,~~ffi~oo
o _.
~:J~~~3
.:c."Q 2 0...:2 ~
~,*'@~8~
:J n 3 -g 3 (D
-[(.IY!~30.
~O'.....o.~cr
_.-'--(D'<
IJl -""Co (D to
~.~a~-CI!~
~ (D 5:~'~O
. ~.(Dcg o:!:
@~g:E!1..310
85'.Q~<i5'3'
1O~03~_
~~ro-5.!affi
Cr:::l rn co (D I\)
:::l 0. ~'O W 0
~ ~~S S- g
o.~(D@:::I::a
~~g-~a:~
3~~~Cil",
o (D :=._O:T
52'gO:::lg
:J!lo;mffia:
s'(i5'::<E.wg
(J):T:J ;2 !P._.
"C,rQ~n3
~ CP 0 (D (5"2-
(D IJl -. tu ro (D
__o.lJl 3
:T5" 5' Iii ""IJ (D
(D n ll) :::1::3 :::I
>c~ cc-
=i'9:g~@~
~~ :;. ~ 3 0
~ 5'9=:J ~ ~
w89=~~~
:::I:a (D Q) co -.
:; Q ~ ""C~ (D8
_tu >(D.'
ffig:og-~~
en~S:~fa~
ffi ~ 9ii5.a ~
o.cb~:::I'<Q
3l ~.~ ~r.5':e
Q '" 0 2 :J ;:;;:
g5'"8nl~::
o.:J~3-g&
_.<W~(D_
;:~:JOJ(D"2-
:T -. -I::J 3 OJ
(DQ.@OJ"2.:J
CD (D :J co o'll)
ll) -.{Il (D:J:J
'< e."8:'! _ 0.
)>f66f~Qo
m~~sag@
f\Jcc g aKl g-
o '< en @
g Qg
)>
'0
'2.
g
"
DC)
~q:
~C)
00
'03
33
,,~
;?~
~~
?<
1Jl'O -'0'0 G)-
0300 (b-:J
~"2. a.: g:;::J ~
-. (D :J -. (D 0.
m 3 [: m @ (D
_(D tu -_.
~ ;a.~~];!:J
~ 0. OJ
o ~
~
Z~Q..9=~
c:;(D(Dtuail
u's:.g~m
~ gu-<E'5"
0.-32.S2
::e8(D~[:
;:;;::J:::Igo.
:T {Il :::J (D
g 2" ~ ::~
Iii 0. en 3 0
~cr!U~Q
c5"~~~o
8 -g ~.=:~
~u'(D -IS
!1 ~ -g i
CD ::; -c' -. @
en -3 ~3
~ ~~rS S'
ffi~;;~9=
-.0-:::r3(D
CDCDOJ(DG)
CD'~~s,~
ffi CD(D OJ (D
~ ~a 8 Pl
. _'O:::l];!
:T([IenOJ
~~2;:
a E"~~.
ro.:J 0 3
nll~"2.
~~-g ~
~ o.u' CD
0133;a.
c~. ~ :f
'" 3.-CD
~ 5. ~ Q:
:T([I9:!.o
CD 0.;-:;.
~.s'a~
~. ~ ~ ~
3 a.CD'g
'0 III c.:=.
@ :J ~ 0
~QCi5~
@ ~ 2 m
ro:T~en
cE :fc;r=;
S' (D !13 m
CD3I\Jo
~. ~r....
~ 5.3. ~
_DJ..c:
Q E-:f@
n .... CD CD
g ~a~
IJl en I:: OJ
2"~ Cil @
n(DO-
g: o. - CD
:::l ;;;!lO 3
(D f3~ (ii'
-g g 2l~'
-.::J -':J
"3!13glJl
~!";Q..a
,..-::;:,,3
~ffim 8
G)::J.::z :J
OJcto.~
l3 OJ I:: 2
=1Jl~n
ii 2:.oCD o'
," ~
-g ~ 5..!,
::e -" (D
(D(D3m
....3(Dc;r
ll(ll3.o.
(D ~~Z
-g([lQ.5.
-. 2'-'''
"0([103
3--.CD
~ll9=;a.
;;Q:o
~ 5 ~
;;: 3m
CD _~
C)
<i'
8'0 S'I:: -.G>5"
ao.'03(DO
:J,-.-.0'O:::l-
en CD < :J CD' c:
2" Sl g: :3 J! g-
~ E!1.. ~ ~ S'
g .....~
4.6 Air Quality
z
o
~
"
"'~
~'"
bo
.....~
"'~
~'"
b~
"'9
z
o
~
"
g~~02SIm85l3a:J~~
~!b'<~g g~s.~'O.== 9:~
~_o 0 ::!t,!..O Ql -~ IJl c;':=,)>
=-:::l9=:::l_o[(.l:::l2(!)DJ 0_
~&-(DDlo~.(!)~Slo.:Jn~3
@ =:: n-g.2..~o.o'(1).o.g c;j
(D<(Docrenon:::lOtu=t33
o.:5.OJ:::l=o-'OIJl@:Jo_.
:::I [(.I_o=tu -.",o._IJl<1l
~~g a a 2::g ~i]'" !l3:~.;a.
~3 @ 3 !:~a-<~cng ffim:::l ~
tutuCD<<1I_'<o.-.enlJl
:::r;::o:'"'< ~ n3 Cil :J =- < '" 8- c -. 0'
o!l'::eu.,<_olRg:~ ;ll=
-. 0 ~ c ~ 0 T rn 'O~ IJl en c 0
:s.-.~r;;u<1l0Cen~<1I, Sl~.
!::2."2.:J en <11~ ~.r; 9"_.3 -10.~
CTQ)_'"Conrn\"p:Jtu:::r:::l
ro-;a.tu -ImlJl-. ~(O c;r<1l ~ 8
0._ c.::J";:) <11 l3 -I UJ (1) :3.-
1::@9:a>-o.=:::ro.([l(llQ.. 3.
Ul<1l!:!:_<IJlIJl<1l(lllllcnO a
- C/I 0 Q. <11 6' S" _~ Ul o:E -
u.<-~o~oO'Q.._DJ-'S' 3
g(!)-::e!i)-6=.o~:::l@CO ([I
g.<g ~~.g~~ :;.s=~-g 8 ~
(ll 9t (ii' 8;:) Ul Cil cE :e Iii::;' 3. Ei
::!t-'1Jl -.-_ (ll (C \"P -. ([I
(DCi50':J:J9:o3-5-(llQ.. (Il
o<:::Il::to.;::+s'<1I~cc=1Jl ll)
;; s.1Jl Q. ~~ Q) gJlJl tu !::t (/I IJl
"~~3cOJnc::e-.I:::T Q)
:Jo.~ ~:J:=''''''<1I<1IOO '0
[(.10- <1ItJo.<<1I<1IDJ;)I"C ~
...... I:: tu (!). <11 IJl ~ IJl C/I a: a
<'m~~~!2.8~~S.00" ~
<1I;::o:'"g@-,P:::I0.e83([1 0;-
@IJlUlIJl<1l-enc:_. (ll-. -
@ !a:":" DJ ffi c:: 2' c:::;- ~ 5.-5 .<11
fa.:;.!!@ ffi ~~g~:2"~CD3 g-
0:JQ)1Jl _0_'0"0..:J ~
en 0.= l::t-g iil:3 3 m-'(ll (!) (!)
. ::e:Eo_._(ll~{Ilo-:J :::l
rlll:::r:::ln=-'-O:::lCDc;r 9:
3.a.(!)$~~ m ~ =~OJ 0. <5
..~.~<1Itu'OC/I(!)3m~s. 0
9=o.~:::lenm:o;a.s.-'oQ) :J
<1I..!.g18'Ooo.@~~cn~= ::T
OJ fh c: en < (ll.:e -8 "
-.-g-:"l ~ 0 o'(ll __<11 ([I
<1IO....w-.:JI::-_.<1I<1I;:) '"
tu-{Il~S:!cIJl8en~-~ ~.
~80'o.!b:J-<:Jgo."s'2 '"
rr:J-'Q) 'O(C{Il3 _0 a
<11' ~!!!. - ~ iiJ 2" CD-~ iD g: ~
0. c: <D 8 ell a. 0 0.- ~ ;:) <11
.....g)(::J 0.<11 C:o :;.0 VI
o o' 2: IJl a a. g 3.9= ~ i
~~~2' ~*~.0:E~~
g-.-g 1Jl11)c;r~s.""Cc:::
< <11 2 0 _ VI (Jj ,-.(1) 11) <:
Q) DJ 0;:) 0 --(0 11) .... < DJ
C":.!13 ,... (Il .... ~ ...., @ ~ ~(!) c;r
OC/J.Ul.. t.1l0(!):J<t1)-'
?[:Qm 3~*".;m'O~
~~::e 9= -g.~:5.-g~tu
0.:J(ll1ll . O?"=en::e~
-.0."'- 5"-.....0-~<
:5 :T(ll 1JlH):J[(.II1)_<1I
Ill~g~ ![:J0'~=~8
:J g _OJ -a.=; <11~ 9=:J
Q.<:Tca ~I1)DJct<....,~
OQl(!)<1I :::I~nHa><1I2
-!:!:!:!: c.... 0.<11
ffigiDs' O'~m (1)3~
....ClIJl~ ~3S' Q<1Ig
8 :::l ~ <11 IJl 0 Cl ro IJl tu
~~~~ g~@ ~ ar@
2'@og !lm~ a~ffi
Sl9:~et ffi:J)> ~o (ll
o-:::l 0 (!) -. S2 = [(.I -.-
;:)(0_0. <110 = - ClCP
III (ll e!.:J a ~!?? ~ '0 (ll
o Sl-(!) 1Jl. IJl ~'O ~
!:!: <. 2' 11) 0.8 c5" -.-< i"
~~ n;;; :J < 8' cE s -.
~~~~ 8~:::I tug@
-,,:Ttu!::2. ;a.~- ro,!..o.
11) .... :::l:=' -. a Cl 0 Q)
3-'0.< 0 - 1Jl)(=
:: ::e <11 CD 3- c;r 3 Ql 0'-:::;
oS'.o-' ""'<11 :::I-a
:J 0. c: ~ <11" ll) a. (II 0
<11 IJl -0' <11 tu 3. (II IJl Q. <
_ ~ IJl 0 I:: ..,.-(!)
3'~3- [:<11-. W{Il-'
<11~~~ @a.m CQ.mOJ
. Iii_en (Jj~.= cE2:::
:::l m Q 0-< ~ tu Fr 2
~~~ ~Q~ @~~
(D S. ~ (!) III Q) Cl {Il en
oco9- Ci5~cr 1Jl0:::r
~9=_ ;a.~~ s.;~
(!)Q~.!b =g:
'" <0
"C)
:gq:
~~
,,0.
DC)
<11;:;:
<'"
~C)
00
'03
33
" ~
;?~
~~
?<
G)s8;a.8C
~0.::J03"'8
(!)~~.;'3:::l
~:f2a<1l
""C (!) g'(6' ~
m g 0.3
? "
....
~
rJ)
r
rJ)
~
"
8
~
'"
g
@.
o
~
'"
j
9'
"
'0
a
x
~.
.:c
6
'"
"
"
~
~.
w
~
'0
6
jiI
"
~
0.
o
9'
~
iiJ'
~
'"
9'
a
~
"
iil
;?
~
'2.
g'
"
DC)
~~
~C)
00
'03
3 3
" ~
;?~
~~
?<
'"
:: CD c'
"'_' ~ (1):!.
-C)'::b
a!tr;~
g' - ~
"
"
2-
n'
ii'
In
~
6
~
In
l::
~
o'
~
!!.
!!;
~
a
0'
~
;:
"
"
In
~
W
'"
-;Ill"
3 " "
'0 In::l.
ii' -g -<
3 ~
" In
~ -.
_0"
S' CD
<0_
o
~
3:0'''
o ~ "
;? ~
S' ;Ill
::l. "
~ In
<0 '0
o
~
In
0'
iD
0-3 :!
~" 3
iD S'
3<0
" 0
~-
Iil'
'"
r}
."
n'
3"
."
~
fl-
o
~
o
....
Gl
~
.c
!!.
0'
~
;:
"
"
In
~
~
In
...
o
'<
Gl
CD
::::s
CD
...
!!!..
"tl
Dr
::::s
m
z::::S
0<
-; -.
~a
"'::::S
II 3
~CD
;; ::::s
3icr
g-
~
;;3
~"tl
" III
~n
~ ...
;:;;;0
;;'CD
;;,,,
g' 0
3. ;:l.
'"
@s::
~~ ~
rlC
"'Ill
II!:!.
rO
~ ::::s
In
".s::
iro
" ::::s
en -.
gS'
:5 :!.
o ::::s
ale
o,"tl
c::'"
II 0
InlC
cg;J
;;;3
g-
a:
~ ~
~ 0.
~ 0
2. ;-
0.0.
" c..
!1:~
" ~
"
~
!"
"
o
o
"
~
so
"
("')
~
So
~
"
~
("')
~
("')
o
~
~
~
0<:
-:I:
6"
~~
o~
~~
~"
~
o
m
o
~
N
...
'"
..
'"
r
'"
I\JI\)....NN.....
:./:o.;flof."ooo
OOD--..JC>:101
(.0)............
'''' '"
~~~~~
00- -
Nm......J\)1\)
Peo
om",
W
.....................................NN.....
:'l:--J:--l:--l:--l!"f.tIooo
OOOOO.....O-..,jW01
0:0...... O1W'" (0 0)- -
................................t'l!\l!'J
~:-4:--J:--l?>~:$~~
~~~~~~:...~~
?loa
~_'3l_N
'"''
f'-);>.
l>-
~~
~)>
(J)-
~~"
=":--J);.
OPJ~
-~
:--J);>.
p-
z
o
"
"
m
x
::T
g
[[l
o
;0
<1>,
"'on
0,
~
o'
::>
'"
o
o
'"
.
..
~
()
.z
D()
~.z
!!.()
00
"'3
33
" c
3-"
~~
,.
D()
~~
!!.()
00
"'3
33
" c
3-"
~~
,.
1Jl-g 3' 8
~~2:
(0" 3 e
~C1lQ)
CU:J=
g,-'<
o'
"
en -g ;r 8
W"* a
(j)'32
le..COQ.l
Q)::I=
U-'<
o'
"
...
'"
w
'"
r
'"
.....................1\)1\)
~!=O?1Poo
OOO.......J>.......
O1I"\)(f)N- -
:":",,:,,,!"!'J
~~f.tIgB
000'
.CN..............!':I!'.:J
00
!>>S>>
~~"
~fXli>
O.lIl-.....
-co
!>>}>.
p-
z
o
"
"
()
.z
D()
~~
!!.()
00
"'3
33
" c
3-"
o:=.:
",'<
,.
(j) -g 3'8
,r~2:
Cii" 3 e
~([)Q)
Q):J=
U-'<
o'
"
4.8 Public
Services,
Utilities, Parks
and Recreation
...
'"
'"
'"
r
'"
1\)1\).....................1\)1\)
f.tIf.tI!=O~f.tIPoo
............000......".......
mW()ll\)mN-
. - . . . NN
1\)1\)................. .
f.tIf.tI!=O~f.tI!$B
..........000.
01 I'\) (,)........I\)N
. . . . - co
_cn~
1\)1\.)1\)............1\.)
?1$11?1?l?='):.
r:-.:I:.OSD:...
NrvN.....OO
?1U1OlCO):..
r.=-- .(;)p.
z
o
"
"
()
.z
fII -g 3' 8
o~2:
ffi'32
f:!?.CDCU
0):::1=
a......'<
o'
"
...
~
'"
-
r
'"
""
0l0l
bo
...._N
"
Ol
o
'l'
z
o
"
'"
~~8~e;
Q) it 3 <' .
UI..,o-:=,:aJ
~ cu c: '< )::>
(l)CI.I~S'(IJ
~15 g ~~
l~. r.n CD m ;4-
o !:2.:J ;:0:- 0
:. 2:'9.0.-
o ('Jl :J Q) ::J
a. _ CD '(is 0
~aa.0"3
CD 3 :Jo([l m
~~~?0
I"::".:J tiS-.
L~'r.Jl (\) CD~
~ a:,€ :J <t1
~ Cii -6'~:S.
~ Cil ~ o~
~.@ ~~Ql
~"2.~Qla.
-Q(1):JQl
~. tIl (1) 0."0
~~.g ~a
(1) -S' 0 <
:J"O oQl
tIl (1) ""C";
(1)0.:5:....,
~ ~.~ g
~seo.~
(1) 3 U>=;
Cil t:: 001 <D
@ ::!l e- tIl
.....~aO'
~(I)Oo1....,
o ~~ S
;j3 ::'001 t::
~g.a(il
_. '"
~. a ~.Q.
o -. a: <D
....,:JOo1Q.
Dl (Q '< t.if
Cil8~se
:J a. <D <D
~8~Q:
""':J <D-
Dl g; ~ ~.
8 0' co :J
:J :J 0(0
~Dl03
~5.)>m
~Dl:5:(I)
O"ODlt::
:J-o:J Cil
"Cao.tJl
.Q.~ ~g}
~ ji).g 0
~CD t::
Dl_""CO:
Cil Q ~ 0""
W -
Q; 1f ~_::i"
:J (1) :T 8
a..c:J .,
~ 5:;. 0 15
0"08 @
03:J-
~~~~
2Z~S-
U-~3
r 0 -.
tJlO:J!:!':
g@o~
aCD~@
~ ~ t:: 8
Dl Dl:J:J
=~a.en
tJlOQ).....
0:J~ 2
...., Dl.. n
0<< I\) ~
5' _0
<D5:::o:J
...., (ii.(1) g
:J (1).n _.
Q.c6 5:;. $
en CD iD"
"" -
""'CDS'-
~@~c:
~ g~;!.
.....CO --
~r CD :i" 8
.c (j)::l
c 3 ~
'0' w 2"
3 - 0
CD ~
" 0
~ "
()
.z
l>()
'" -.
"'"'
=Dl
&l "
3-0.
D()
~q:
!!.()
00
"'3
33
'" c
3-"
0::+
",'<
,.
D()
~q:
!!.()
00
"'3
33
" c
3-"
~~
,.
...
:..,
'"
'"
-
r
'"
J\.)J\.)J\)J\.)
mQ'lO'lO'l
bbbb
""!JI~w...J.
"""
0l0l0l
000
9l.~.J\.)
"
0>
'l>
""
Ol Ol
j:'Jj>
""
0l0l
DwCc
~~.~
oca oj,.
~aG"
~S-~
"", '"
Q. <D 0
$a-
<D~iS
rti Yl 3
iDS-e!.
!('8 Q
w'" "'
2'@iD
e--g. :s.
(i!'< "
"Oc.~
~ C w
~'ia.
g.:J'Dl
~.ca :g
(j):-a
bJ ~ ~
:J fF.:o
s.bJa
O""E.@
","0.
~ '" c
~QiD
t::tJlYl
K~ 1f
SOC)
o-~~
'" ~ ~
8 ~ ID
iil~~
![ ffi ~
" " c
3. ~ ;'
~~St
,,-'" w
engQ.
~~.<D
0.0'<
~?~
o.~'"
~ c "
~ g. OJ
:i" se Cil
",wo.
__c
g-g@
$ (ii.iS
3 !<ii'
",""
~(6<D
t:: iD <
iD~*"
~(I) <D .....
"80
~.:J ~
<D ~. cr
~~::r
w"'"
~a~
(I) ~.'2..
~se<D
= 5'~.
C""<D :::;
(D3C""
c w "
$ ~. ~
?-3-g
3 $
",0.
" w
3 ;
2i. ~
{fa.
ro~
" '"
Q.5'
~'"
~3
" '"
< "
~$"
~ 0'
9,'<
l>()
:g~
=Dl
&l "
3-0.
D()
~~
!!.()
00
"'3
33
'" c
3-"
~~
,.
58~~g.ae:
:J:JQ.:J:::!.uu
::+!!t ....,caoa
02 CD (I) '-.
:::!. n < (I) (D (D
::l ~ ro.::+ a. Q.
COo ~CDDl(j)
" "w
o.(i!
4.7 Noise
...
:..,
'"
'"
-
r
'"
J\.)J\.)!\)J\.)
?1!'"l?>0'l
000'
-....Ic.nwo
- - -
J\.)/'.)i-.J
!'"l?>m
~~b
. . 1':1
cn-g ~r8
g:~ a:
ro'3 E
i& (D e!.
9:3.-<
o
"
...
~
'"
C
'"
C
""
0l0l
p)>
"N
Olm
DwCc
z
o
"
"
()
.z
D()
~~
!!.()
00
"'3
33
" c
3-"
~~
,.
'"
;:: -.
tr.>~~.
ce =d':::!'I
~~Cilg
o _"
~ lil
...
9,
o'
..'
..
~
o'
"
..
1:
0.
'"
o'
"
!!!.
~
.c'
!!!.
o'
"
;::
'"
w
..
c
iil
..
-"...
3 '" w
"'''''-
-."",
'" 0
3 "
'" ..
" -.
g.~
CD~
o
~
3:0'"t1
o ~ w
" '"
::0: '<
o "
~. CD
" ..
CD ."
o
"
..
C'
..
0--1
:J 3 -,
." 3
i' 5'
3'"
~ 0
" -
g
-I
o
."
o'
3'
."
W
!l
o
~
o
...
9-
...
o
'<
Cil
CD
::::l
CD
...
!..
"'ll
iii"
::::l
m
z::::l
0<
-I -.
m'"
.. 0
::::l
3
CD
::::l
-
!..
~
.c'
!!!.
o'
"
;::
'"
w
..
c
iil
..
'"
II
'"
.c'
"
3i
lil
3-
03
~"Cl
"'11I
~n
,,-
fi:::u
~CD
","Cl
ci5'O
3-;::l.
'"
lilS::
;a.;:;:
~ii.
"'Ill
11=
rO
~ ::::l
:c.s::
5"0
" ::::l
!!!;:;:
<go
::;;..,
cr :i"
~cc
-
c;,"'ll
c:'"
II 0
..cc
/g' iil
~3
w-
;a.l}:
c w
" 0.
W 0
tj'S.
iill
w '-
!2: 0
'" "
'"
-
~
'"
o
o
'"
0'
'"
;;:
'"
o
~
o
~
~
..
o
'"
o
~
o
o
c
~
g
....
0
'"
1r
... ... 3"
CD CD
<l, 0, '"
m
~
en en '"
- - ;;: -,
r r a:)lo f~.
en en ~ =O'~
e:~a~
g - ~
~
0<:
-:I:
b",
~~
~~
5<"-
~
o
m
o
~
N
M..................J\JJ\J.....
!J.>~~~OOO
0""'''''' O-...JN CO
c.nNOf\r - -
. . . - NN.....
~~~~~~~
0..........0. . -
......../>......<DNNN
. . . 000
!.o9"~
f\.)1'J....J\J
~~~i>
m ()-n-
M;oE
",. -
'G)
9-
m
><
::T
0'
""
to
8'
;0
'" ,
"'m
o ,
s:
0'
::J
N
o
o
N
J,..
~
CIl -g ;r 8
~s- a:
a;'3 ~
~CDQl
(1)::1=
[1-'<
o
~
1\)1\).............................................................................w.....
~~~~~~~~~~0~~~~~~wo
OONJ\J..........................oooooooo......c.n
m.....w.....<D-...J()lw......<D-...J()lw....c.nw...... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w......
~~0~~000~0~00~~t~~
OONN............................Ooooooo. .
()l<DJ\Jocom../>.J\Jocom../>.J\Jm../>.J\Jcow
. . . . . . . . . - - - - - - . oi--J
.-....1.'"
Nf\.).............................................
~!=l!'"l9'>$11~~~~~)>
~9.0.m!D~ .I.T1.D.ro:",.
~~~mm~~t~~!-
t.... ~.m.h}>;PO.:"".G) .m.o ~
}>
z
o
~
~
o
~
00
~~
~o
00
"'3
33
~ ~
3~
a?q
?'
CJ)"8 ;3" 8
g:"* a:
(6' 3 e
~C1le!..
$.13.<<
o'
~
z
o
~
~
o
~
00
~~
~o
00
'C 3
3 3
~ ~
3~
0;::;:
~'<
?'
"
!!.
ii'
1;'
~
~
0'
~
~
~
!!;
o'
~
!!.
;;:
;;
.r
!!.
0'
~
;;:
~
m
~
~
~
~
-"'"
3 ~ m
"'~:l.
ii"-g-<
3 ~
~ ~
~ -.
_C'
5'CD'
"'~
o
~
3:0'"tJ
o ~ m
3 .t
S' '"
::::!. CD
~ ~
'" '"
o
~
~
;:r
..
0-....
::1-53'
iDS'
3'"
~ 0
~ ~
g
(')
~
o
....
G')
...
o
'<
G')
lD
::::I
lD
...
!!!..
"1:1
iii
::::I
m
z::::l
0<
.... -.
m'"
.. 0
::::I
3
lD
::::I
-
!!!..
;;:
;;
0;'
!!.
o'
~
;;:
~
m
~
~
~
~
~
'"
"
'"
.r
~
"
~'
3
03
~-c
"11I
an
~-
i'::a
~lD
"'-c
r!!' 0
2. ::I.
'"
~s:
a:::;:
~~.
"'Ill
II ~
rO
~ ::::I
~s:
io
z,:.
.g'o
==it'"
(j'S'
ate
;;'"1:1
c:'"
" 0
~IC
.g' ill
"3
ii'
m-
a~
~ m
~ 0.
~ 0
Q. ;.
0.0.
m c..
5!:~
~ ~
~
-
S"
'"
o
o
'"
C'
'<
9'
~
Cl
~
!l.
[!
';"
~
9-
.:<
Cl
o
~
~
~
0.0
~:I:
~~
o~
~~
'i<~
~
o
o
o
o
~
4.9 Geology, SoUs, and Seismicity ~
"
(;.
.. .. .. .. 3"
'" '" '" ~
j,. w ,:" "
~
~
U> U> U> U> '"
- - - - I: -
r r r r a: > &'2.
U> U> U> U> cg;fg~
~""'lfD~
o _ ~
~ ~
,,~ NNNNNN........................N NNNNNN......................N NNNMNN......................N "
<.n' ~~!J191P'?1~:=:O~9o 9"?19'19191P'!=O:=:O!=O96 919'191?1P'P'!J:I!=O!J:I90 !2.
. -
"0 .....00000000......(:0 .....00000000......03 ......oooooooo......co
w- ....fD.--..I.01W~.--...JOiWN" ......CO-...J01W......--J01WI\J. .....CO......01W.........(}1WN. (;.
. . ~ - - - - - - - - - - N - -. -. -.... I'\)
" ~~~~~~~~~~i5 ~~~~~~~p;~~g ~~~~~~~~~i>>g ii'
?' ~
0.....00000000. 0....00000000. 0....00000000.
~ .f>.OCOCll.J>.N......CIl.J>......f>. .f>.CCOOl.J>.N.....Ol./>o.......... .f>.OOJO>.J>.N.....Cll.J>......J>.
. - - - - - . - - - 0 - . - - - - . . . (::, . - - . - - - - - "
."' 9' -"'
(')
,,- ~1\.)f'V""""N NNN....I\,) NNN.....N ~ ;::;:
"<.n ?1?1?1~!>>to 91P'!J1?'i:D 919191!=Om '<
.Co }> "OOJOOJ- .fT1J))> .0:.. !T1P.t> .0:.. o' 0
- . - - - ..... NNtv.....CO I\)N "'.... OJ
"" 1'.)1\Jr--JI'.J....OO 9191P'?'~ 9191 ?1 ?')> ~ ....
<.no ?1?"!JI?'!>>~ ~
"j:D 71.0.OJ 5=':" 71p.CtI.o:.. ~
Z.!TIp)>p- tl '" " '"
jD <.n i"
z z a
'<
.. '" .. 0"""'" -.. z z G>~ 6: Cil
'" ". c:~m~u, 0 0 CD
c.... "...
" 3'(, ~g.:i~ m ~ ~ ~ :l> 0. :l
" " " '" CD
l> " l> -?cc~(jjGJ PIs- o'
'" 3.g b> ora =r OJ :Qg ~ ill
'" " , 3.C1l~ 3 ~ !!!.
0 0 8 ~ 0. !:
0 0 Q.![~(D<O ? ~ "tJ
~ c
~ c; ~ Di
" 3 '" to:::l S' a '2..
'" c " o(fl(Q(IlQ) " ~ :l
'" ~o. Q) ('b ....o.:J ~
~ ....C.O:::lCll o' m
0-' a.3'G;QlO' ~
0. ~ 0 c:
3' ~ O<1l<1l:l'" m I: z :l
'" ". -. oa.a.o.~ m :So
" '" 3' 0
,.. '" 8 ;:0 :3"0.< $ g: is' m ....
~ ..
8 0 ~_ rn a._. 3 c [!I 0
g 3 offi ~ ~3"~' ;
3 c>1. o rn <11-. ~ ~ '" :l
" , m ~~ gag 0- " 3
ii' ; -
% o.il. ...... ~. I>> rn ~ ,[CD
"""'0' ~~c:g-~ c; ~ :l
1!, ffi~ o.-_:l 5'
3 ~.-c a.:: -. -
" $ fr (1)COaC:1>> m ~I>>
x Q)' -~.ra " g-
" 0.0. ~ ~~r.5 (1) c ;a -
0 Ql <- 2: 3
'"
m S'(ij- m %(~f@ [ (;. 0
0. " o' " ~"tJ
'" '" ~ 8~ ~~<11 0" "1\)
2. m '" 0 !ao
v; "''' :l 0 :::!1(O 8 So m _
'" ,,~ (if 3:i ~ . m ;a
c 0. -.0 w.-I3 I: ;;0
". f<- " ;.
1!, ~(1)::r::r3 " '"
c " o.a~(jj'~ ~CD
cara ". OS'
0" :r~.(O -c ~. D
" '" '1' c ~ ","
'" '" '" :Tg@~; " 5' <e' 0
" i5g '"
" (1)Q)g.rn::l " ~ 3. ;:l.
0. E.(i) ci55.0.5~ ". I: '"
" " gs:
0. 0.0. (if (I) ~c: 5- !;j m
0"" ~ ~ -.
Q "Ii ~~.g a: c: a ~ - -
~ ~3" rn 8 ~ ~ ~lC"
Ii 0- !" ;
'" (i).g :T(1).....::I 63' or ~ ",I\)
" ~ 3 (1) aa 0';;:: S, " -
or rom g>833~ 0'
0; o.~ '" :;
aF c:::]<1I.....<1I " :l
0. .., ..... a 0 - ~ ~
~. c." @ 2.~.~.g 0. ~ s:
m = ..
5' 0"" c,3g;3 ~ ".
g ~ 0
" iii'Sl (1)(1).' (if <11 ~
rIlQ)-::I::I :l
() " ~. t9;'(I) ~ a. (t 8 en
q ~ :lSi-cl>>rn ~ os' ;::;:
0.0. ~<1I"'a.:::r g; 0
" "'~ c:(I)$trne!. ~ ..
" m -. o' 5
'0 o.~ c:~lll>>= ~ n :;"
-."
a 3", ~e!.s.g.5. .'" ~~(Q
Ii " " @ -(0"0 c: 3
0. ?'g. ga.roo. " '" "tJ
'" " :s::: 00.<11 '0 C:"
" ~ Q) !if:E CT ~ '" " 0
" ~ ::]rn:l'< "
0. m C:<1I!e.:r1>> ~ ~lQ
3 v; !!?.o..(ll(1):g 0. iii' ..
". " O'gQloa " ~ I\)
x
~ .., 3 -. < '0 '" 3
" c. cncarn.:ct(1) or ii'
~
c. 0 Q8oS.~ ~ ~
~ !!( ~
~ ,,- 333G>~ - ~
!!( m o' ~ m
<' iF :2: ~ a. a 5. ~ ~ 0.
" llJ::I Ol,< Q) '" ~ 0
< '" -0.-..10 !2. < "
". 0 ..
m 0 ~ ~ ~ -I (1) 5' 0:
'" ~ OO-~ 2:~ 0.
" 0: m m '-
!I C:::I rIlo. m 0"
0" !!?. rn 5'''0 (1) m iD ~
o' m .za[roa 8 ~
~ 3' m
c; "tl =r rn ;; f!? ~ ~
~ a <1I3'::rg ~ !"
m "
m lfQ3~8 o' to
~ 1i- 0
'" ~
C !::!;:l(l) 0.::1 '" 0
; c. 0..... (1) -...... '" to
Q' ::IQl9:~a ". 0"
5' . c;~E'; 1!, '"
~ " -
fl g:lg.~ 0" ".
'" " "
2. !e.a3..... 3' n
v; 3 ;:00' <11 0 0 :fi
" c &~~~~. E
; or _. Q) c: ::] c. a
0; g 5. ca 3' "
'" 0. C. 9-
or '" Q) rn F::r 3'
-Ci:rn <11 a
g " ~-f5 s= 5'
N' 0. '"
" 3' ~~::r <11 " n
P- " m" " 0 :fi
?' ' 0 '" ~
-- '"
~~ n
'" 0
c
~
1=
l> l> l> () () () -""
" " '0 ~ ~ ~ 3 m m
>1. >1. >1. "~,,
@ @ @ is't:I '<
3 0
3- 3- 3- m ~
~ -.
_0"
S. CD
"'-
Q
o() o() o() o() o() o() 3:0'"lJ
~~ ~~ <11;;;;: <11;::;: ~~ ~~ o ~ ~
<'< <'< ~ ~
~() ~() ~() ~() ~() ~()
~o 00 00 00 o 0 00 0 "
33 " 3 " 3 "3 '03 "3 ~ m
3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 3' ~
m 3 " ~ " c " c ~5 me '" "
~ c 3-~ 3-~ 3-~ 3-~ 0
-~ ~
O~ ~~ ~~ ~.z ~~ ~~ ~
~ 0'
?l- ?l- ?l- ?l- ?l- iD
8 0. ~e!.~ 8 ~ " " rn"8 3' 8 '" '8 3' 8 rn -g 3' 8 0-....
c a'" ~ 3 -
~ , ..,::::I~3-c n~~ ="0 ::I o~~ " 3
rn 5. ,,'0 Q. (i)!::!; iDS"
"'" mrn-<~a ~ .2. ro.3 ~ " 3 ~ (D. 3 ~
c" ~m"O !lCii' " m !e.<1IQ) i!?.(1)6l *"~~ 3'"
f<, ~ ~ 5'~ 0. o.f< 1>>::]= Q)::I= " 0
-'0 m 0.-'< 0......'< n -'< ~ -
o~. ~ ~ '" g
~ " -" " " o' o' o'
f< o ~ , ; ~ ~ ~
c."
m
x
::T
0'
""
CD
o
;U
CD ,
"'....
0,
s:
o'
:J
'"
o
o
'"
./>.
~
4.11 Water Supply and Wastewater
4.10 Flood Control, Drainage, and Water Quality
0<::
-"
~~
o~
~~
'i<'" f- f- ... ~
~ ~ :..
g 0 '"
0 ,(, ~ w ,(,
~
~
r.n r.n r.n r.n
- - - -
r r r r
r.n r.n r.n r.n
J\)J\)J\)J\)J\)...............J\)J\)J\)J\)
~~~~~~~~~~~~
(O-...J(,Ilw.....-...J(,Ilw. . . .
- . . . . . . J\)NJ\)J\)
~~~~~~~~~~~
0000000'
COCl).f>.J\)COCl).f>......J\)J\)N
. . . . . . . 9600
.....comw
'"
"''''......f'0
!'.J!'.J~);.
O::t>::t>.
. . ~ .J>o.
"''''.......
(,oJr-,)(O)>
i>bJb......
. . ~
}>
m
x
::T
C'
'"
OJ
~
o
;0
CD ,
IIlClO
o .
C
~
1'i'
::J
'"
o
o
'"
,
....
~
(I) ~ -5 ~r 8
= _-0 ::3
Q.'< CDg
m ~.3 c:
m::f~~
Sl. ",'<
g' 8
J\)J\)J\)J\)J\).....J\)J\)J\).....
~~!'V!'V!'V~6060
oo.....ooocom(.o)t.n
.f>.J\)ow........... . . .
~ . . . . . ..... J\) J\) J\)
~~~~~~~~~~
.....00000J\). ~ .
(,Ilw......f>.J\)J\). J\)J\)J\)
. . . .. 000
?lS'l.J\)
r-,)r-,)............r-,)
~!'.J~~i>
lD::t>lD::t>-
. . ...
~co"""i>
. . c.o.
}>~()i>~
. .L
z
o
~
"
()
~
O()
(D ;::;:
<'<
~()
00
'" 3
3 3
" ~
;!.~
~~
;a
(I) ~ 8 3' 8
[-5~~
(D<<3~
~:Eme!.
~S:~<<
o
~
r-,)r-,)"'r-,)'"
r-,)r-,)Nr-,)N
00000
~c.o~""".!JI y.> ~
r-,)N"'r-,)!\J
NNNNN
:""0000
O~O'J,?l~~!'J
~"'~
"'''''''
~9)>
"''''
"''''
p~bJ
z
o
~
ro
~~16ga~S"~~.~
::l:W !:!!.....'O~s:::cc
~~~:.!lgs.s::!:!!.>
::T5-iii'O (I)~~~3!g C
<'0 g.O"(I) g -::f_.-o
~CDr:umc: ::fw::lO
oOcaCila-QCD~::f::l
~::CDCDO~Tl::3CD~
Cll ::I'"_Q) Cll -'5'U.J\)1J
(I)(1)O(l)2~.wa?3
9.g.S:~5 ~ ~m(l g
::fWcc a~C:tl). (l)_
Cll 5 gJ (l) . g"? a~ 9..
5'~o@;!9.;!Ql3~
8.-1Cil fi)Cll::fCD ;!.:s.tl)
:E::TCll _'0 CD Tl:!.::T'O
L~ (1) "'~.Q.:::!lS:3 O""'Q.
~3Ql......CDOS:C:0-.
~a:a~o.8.-u35e
:E cg Cil 5.. 3-:E (I) 5t g- 1:5"
~. -0-.!2- 0.. ~~ ~ (D -< ~
::I ...::I-_=--.~ 0
_::I@oerOerCDS:--'
::1'"'0 -CD Cll CD 0 (I) Q)
(DDr008~ 0 ~
w::ICi5iG" r:u~3-g,<
Cil O'a-::I ~ 2:-0 3.Q.{g
W--. Q)cc......(II 3(D (I) (I)
(II:f::lCD20..<ao.o
::E (II '" ::fn.~ ~w w ~
~~Ci5(D~!!.c-g-:g.g
Cil.Q.g~S".g~~rrni"
- (D _. Ql 3::T _.l.U ::3
~ ll-:t '" o.iil (D CD ::I ~"en
~ (II 9: __::l Cf.I::f (I) c:
CD::I'"-1~::I:::OCD::rO"
::I el..::E::T50 <;",el..9:
~9L0 ~ _g ~o~~.
:T(II~~lOO~(D6'
m ~.g _.o.~ ~ ~~~::I
o::l_::I(1)oo..Qo--'_
::I'"Q.o..cg~_ !D~
~a3~a~.ffi:EQ)6r
::I (D -0 Q) O' g. ...... ~ is. ~
(I) - Ch (11::1 ~'(I) <
;- g 2" () c- Q.~ CD ~ (D
~o.--.3'lQ),o--.0"3
(1) c: $ -'::1 ::I. Tl3 Q)
a(D?f~~Qs:r:!J
Ch Ch m ""(D _,,!:!" 0
-'(1)::1'" (I) O_v--'
g ::TO'~r.'r~~:Ts.
~ ~.!:!c: ~ S. C-f.D ffi
00" ::1_(02",--.
gf.D;!g-~9..r:u()9:
Sl. 8 f.D --. :::!:I-<< ~~o
-. <C 0 "'-
O::l~ao(D'" Cil
::I!2..0c:o.Tl~ o~
0'2'O::I:E 5'Nm g
...., n.~ o..~ ~8~tl)
stro_(II..s:...... -<
roO"stQ~w':-"~tl)
6'~f.D30"P-I :g
::I _.~a. 0 -1::TQ....,
(l)g.gQl:J::T(D~S!
::I:E o.S'~f.D ~Q.~
9=~(f/2'T1s:G>0'
r:u 3'<'<l9:S:-u=--.
~OJo(tg~(IIa~
- '" '" 3 v::l'"'< '"
~(D OJ w 0 (I) OJlU tl5
-c:::I -~= -
O'O::ImOJlU(To.O
~ O'~ag-=(D!t"3
0--. Ch_......::IlU=(I)
g_iG"::T(IIQ.-o(l):J
n.~_f.D::Ic:-oo.......
_~;;:2gg.~::nQ.
~~~5:':T~gse
IJC:OJ;:t::~f.D 0.(1)
~~!i3-=:0'.!ls::~
~o::lW~=-l.U.J>.
(II ::. (D =:E ~ ffi ~ r:u
m::lP-er=:5.. (00
::I__(1)-::I"'(I)Cil
o.~o ~-g~ ()3 (I)
o 30om<;<ll0
~Q)_.""'<-~::I-
~~r5~g:mO;fij
::I 0 Ql -. 3 Ol ::l ::I
m.g.(t::l as.::I 0.0..
erg_seo 3' 0. s:"'O
&o.i6ro~c:sea:a
o :E 5' g- f.D 3 f.D cc-g
3S:Qfi)0'~Q~~
OJ......(D::I ....,_~g 0..
ro ::Ttl) ~ g. "0 _
~.f.D$g(l) ::t];!Q
~ S' Q ~
()
~
O()
f.D;::1:
<'<
~()
00
"'3
3 3
ro ~
;!.~
~~
;a
~Q..g-~~~~Q..g
CilS:<Ol-o-.-oWO
(Jl f.D ~fi)a (II =::1::1
cnoo..<:Eg (I)
cn~8"~~g: g.
.J>o.(II 0.::1 3
:J ~-.
- [
r-,)NNNN......N
~?1~~~~0
r-,)N............OO();)
(,oJ......(O -...J N c.ow
~w~.~~~
~~~~~~g
NI\.)N......OO~
~.f\.)9S:O~.f;o.~
"''''-
?1~i>
~'T1~~
"''''.
0'l0'l~(D
~m......
. '"
-'"
0. -. Ilo.
Ql3:....".
S'a ~
III < ..
~(I)::t>
3 ~
3' (I) '<
-os-2'
~r:uE"
(I) Cil Cil
~OJg-
~ C. <
E;l]g ~
~m.g
o ro 3
=-OJ<ll
o.::l~
crc."
(I) :Tm
CDa~
~.-g Q
CD (I) (D
0.6:3'l
8"~m
.g !!. 2
~.g5
ro3",
C.lll ~
ro ~ '"
se;g
00_
~:Eo.
~r?l g
",roro
~ ~ <
o 0. III
~oc
3::1s'
rooro
~-c.
ft~O"
2lM~
Qlo.~
~~%
5. %. 16
; ~ Q.
~m.5'
a.g Q
o 3 ro
~~CD
~ro
8 ro ~
atl5i5.:
a:1F~
o' -
::I 1> 'a
Q.~ @
.go.~
",roo
3 tl5 OJ
a:; 6" ~
-"'~
~ ~ -.
5-::I~
'-. - 0
a@~
_ro~
o ~ c:
:Tea Cil
~2S:
m::l S,
<0_
ib-;:t::::I'"
~ ro
(l)gg
5.~ ~
~a.&
-g ::f~
Orolll
ti5@~
o~ ai"
S; Q. 3
Cll-<~
OQ..fh
-?%Q.
~c.
a: ~.
c.jil
<C
ro
)>
'"
'2.
~.
;!.
O()
~~
~()
00
"'3
33
ro ~
;!.~
~~
;a
r-,)NNr-,)N......I\.)
~~~~~~o
I\.)N............OO();)
W......C'O......NC'O.
. - . ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~g
r-,)NN......OO.
~wN9?~~~
"''''~
"'~.
=n~}>
. . '"
"''''.
0'l0'l~(D
~m"""
. '"
In
)>
'"
'2.
o'
III
;!.
O()
~~
~()
00
'" 3
3 3
ro ~
;!.~
~~
;a
Ch -g 3' 8
='0 ::I
Q. (D ~
ro 3 ~
m- (D ~
0.3.<<
o'
~
f-
2:
r.n
r
r.n
r.n
ro
ro
)>
'"
16
~
c.
x'
'"
()
~
O()
~~
~()
00
'" 3
3 3
ro ~
;!.~
~~
;a
'"
i: -.
~>f~.
cg = 0' =
=~iiC
o _~
~ g
-0
!2.
0'
iii'
o
~
0'
~
o
1::
~
o'
~
!!.
lii
iC
i!l.
0'
~
i:
ro
ro
o
~
~
ro
o
-",-0
3 ro III
"'~::l
ii" -g '<
3 ~
ro 0
~ -,
_cr
:;CD
<C_
Q
:!:O'"'a
o ~ ..
;!. ~
8' '"
::!. lD
~ 0
<C ..,
o
~
o
0'
iii'
0--<
::I 3 -.
'" 3
CD:i'
3'"
~ 0
~ -
Iil'
'"
-<
o
..,
0'
3"
..,
ro
~
(')
~
o
...
~
.,
o
'<
C)
m
:::I
m
.,
!!!.
J!
III
:::I
m
z:::l
0<
-<_.
m""
.. 0
:::I
3
m
:::I
-
!!!.
i:
,.
cD'
i!l.
6'
~
i:
~
ro
o
~
;
o
'"
"
'"
iC
~
:;;
~
;!.
03
~-c
-0 III
ao
~ -
~::c
~CD
"'-c
@'O
~~
g3:
~~
-;':'cC"
"'Ill
II~
..-0
m :::I
03:
to
~ :::I
In -.
-. -
<gO
::;;,""'1:
o' :;'
acc
o,"tI
c.,
" 0
0lC
cgDJ
:;;3
~-
~=
~ ..
~ 0.
ro 0
<..,
2. ;-
0.0.
ro '-
!1: ~
m ~
ro
~
~
'"
o
o
~
cr
'<
-
".
ro
"
~
o
-
~
~
"
~
"
o
~
~
~
0<:
-:r:
b,;;
~~
~~
5<"
~
o
m
o
~
N
m
X
:T
C'
'"
Ol
6'
;0
CD ,
en<t>
o ,
Ii
O'
:>
N
o
o
N
.J,.
~
"'~'"
000
000
c.'a.
~~ ~
'<~fi)
~"'~
~g~>-
en c.. 0 II
:::1"_3 m
~ D) 0 s:
:J ~ C6 )>
000.a.
::J a. 0 (\)
:T:T::E~.
ro~~cg
11::r==tQl
oooct>(t
oC/)D)a.
a. Q) 3 _
OJ...... 5"
0100
c~ t1) ~
:J.... < Q)
g.@~,<
-< ;a..g en'
D) C') 5......
:::::J ::rtC :::r
Q.m_Cll
II::JCD"C
o@r?3.
8. a:C g'
:!:crOlO
~ ~.Q.-+.
:J:J -
S:::CO co :::r
Q:lCD~CD
"C.c=~
_coo
"D) .., 0
OJ(i)c-O-
"TIc.. !:.~
$ Q 9; S'
-(I):J .....
Qxcg~
cnn--
Q) g:::E 00'
:Ie..;::;:
5tC1)~8"
()~::c-
ji)::J:::rCD
@~~~
()'< 5" <D
OCCO<!
5 <'% ~
-<~Q)~
- -<'< 0
0-(0.......
Q) Q) CD :T
m~-g CD
a. w ::;:'"0
)>D)CDQ)
C 5. Cf) (II
co ~Q) ~
c :::r"C co
(/l CD"C Cl)
t:;a; a 0
- .",..< -
.....Q ~:::!:!
<:0<0_0
~~, a 8-
~(Il 3:::::!:l
:E[g:fo
~3 (1) ~
n (l) (") .
:::re:o-l
0;' ~ 33 ::T
Ol en '"
0)....515
CJ1m.,_. 0
o (l),:< a.
cr=1:f:E
g,lle~
:iE 0:1"00'
o.:D)~:E
([l I:h_.:::r
VI _c: CD
:E :::r::3.....
D:l CD=~~
s: ..... c:S- :::r
g,gg~
--.<: :J 0
C) ct> 00
:JQ)<Q.
c......(l):E
"''''~Ol
~o-
$"oQ)fD
:J0-5-.;
a. '0
-. ill C Q)
<5 5'~ ro
-'= a. =
a CD '"
3 -n (") ~
o Cif '<
~;; o' 6"
Ol X :J 0'
< Q) CIl (l)
~ 3::i".....
(ti"12. :T ~
'<!DroQ.
f]~. ~ g:
~~8.-g
.....:J"O VI
~:T~;
:::rro:J :J
Cl) r' c.
::oOi"'TID!'
o (Q 0 CIl
:J m .... CD
OJ (Il Q..~.
::I () ~
().... --
::rg:~-1
Q);:o;;-Q) ~
~og::::::!:l
(l) < ;J 0
:-CD-CO
3,c a.
o -a :E
:Eo~
:::!:lCll CIl
0"'::T
0_00 0
%s=s.
or CD a.
_5'& g
S:8.@
~"9.."E.
CD 9:!._
CD:J CD
~. Cir ctl
Cir::fa
:T CD 3
Cl) ~ 0
r'" 0'
arm ~
cg 3.2
CIl 5 g
Qg.g
<DiD"'"
~a.O
oa.~
< c 5"
co S' ~
3,,,, -
OD)ffi
:;;
NNNN
0000
bbbo
~P)~~
NNNN
0000
:"'bbb
o:-J.';",!')
NNNN
0000
c... ~.h)>
NNN
000
:- ~b ~i:D
O(1.J(D-~
-.-0 5- ~ ~
~~D.l~m.~
~n:~. fJ ..... C
rQ) ffi-l
&a~Q:~
~!!lc~~
o:::r ti5 S' ~
a;~(1.J(Q<s.
(D~()Q)ffi
^3a;8::~
Q) (D -. (D
5.!!l ~ g~.
St;i;".g. ~ ~
(D~~O~
5:::l.~' ~-o
0- fJl :::r 0
s-08~~
ffi. ffi 3.cg m
(I)'5"g-CIlI1)
o .., tll ~
--gO'ro~
cg."'..,3
ti5~~~12.
fJl .....:::r 0 (D
()~11)33
~a.a~!!l
~a;::E::::I g:
~ 8 i:i g-co
a.<=c.tll
r ~ (t.. g
-::::I -.-to
~~a.~~
~Cii'9:Q~
Q!e.~~a.
(D (D to 0 -
(D(D....._c
~s:ffiG)5=
CIl (D..,:':(D
CIl 03 (D a ..,
ffi a. 3'< (D
;;-0 0 (1.J 0.
o-.g ti5 Erc
(Dr:::-r:::S
~![!:a,a:St
o o. ~ g (D
a.::Jl::~~
~S"ag.g.
CIl 5" 9 ffi g:
~:~Qo~
~~~'::E g
"Oo'aQ3
a.~ .., ~ c
CD g ~ ~.![
gCllFL:f~'
g~03cn_.
~oa~~
:.s. 6) 11)
:::r:::ron.
(D~Q)0
8 s.w::E
3 ~ () (D
3 ~ 0 e.
(D <' l:: ~
~(Daa.
fit (D '< en
a; ~ ~ ~
@g-c.a.
<. CIl :f :::::!.
(D11)(tl'8
a. ~ (J):::::!.
=to-QlI1)
o .... :::J ~
3.g Qj :::r
StQ)()~
(tl @ m-.
C1l3m![
O3CD<O
@-ae!.m
Q~~m
~:::r ~C{'
Pl~mg.
~~~~
m= ~ Q 4.
'< -0' $. <g
:2:03 :::!.~
m :::::I. C'l -
(j)~s@
~ ,.
8~~8g3
ae.St3::J3
S. g -0 -0 ;::;: (tl
CC/lo=oo.
03 =~ :::!'w.
~ g~.g 1[
m '<
.. ..
,.
N
j,.
rn
c
rn
c
NN
00
bb
5-'J......
N'"
00
00
"'.'"
N'"
00
p)>
",N
00
b9J
11).....0.. . -~
0-8 ~~ ;:uf?::...
t6g,~cZ~l\)
::::I..... 3 ro ~. S' 0
11) ffi S' a. (D co -I
~C'l~~::E~~
@..~s'~~9:g
~;o;-g.g~gc5
s.g~~~~St
D.l ::::I C ::l CD 0 (tl
:::J.~s=..... _....:::J
~~e.~~'g.~
..... 0- 00 D.l m -.
0~:::J C e.:::J ~
~Q)~.c:g~~
O3:::! Still en (1.J
(1.J ~StC5 c~-g
~ro(DC:9:(D('5'
a. a. Ol (I) ~ ro <6.
r:::J~5-08m
.9fS!t"Q C/I - Ol
~ -.0 !if-o 3 ::::I
"'''<~:::J''''03C.
(1.J ::::I. ...... -0 CD ~r
Q-e. $- e: ~ a-o
(D Q).., 03 (tl CD en
~S1'm ~ a.!; 3
(1.J ::::I 0 (tl -0 (D
..... CIl C Ul a a
o~ t=l (tl '(D' S.
0. CD CD -. 0 ro
~ lJ. Ol 3 ur Ol
~~ro,,-g-=-. a
3 ~-.
s'~.fia-Q. g
(D g. -. c C/I
_.s.~g9: Q)
- . ~ ::::I
fJl a.;t>(Dro 0.
!B.!:l::::l3() 2'
0" c '< (D;;; ::l.
Q) a- o.cO '1
~(tl CD CD S. ~
Ulo.<a;::;: .
QQ~::E![ tb
g53~~ g.
:::I::::J CIl::J ~ @
(D ~ ::::I a. a St
Ul ~ 1t :::rro. (tI
;a ~. ~ 2: a- "8
:EOle5!if....... (j)
Ill'" Ui:::r :::I
=d8 c' S!t c;
ro Ul < c 3 e!.
ag,3l ~ III 3'
~.....m<'< -0
O'~a~~ Ii
.: O"rQ) CD
:::::cQj!2:a 0
.g.~cg ~.-g ~
~:",,(1.J3(b e.
Ui5"Q'8 a ~
03 0l(D !:tw' a.
Oc.(DCIf.= 0)
~~Go5. ~
-'0) ..... (1.J a.
~gErffi9: ...
(tl:p 5..~ g -6'
..,..,0. 0 ~
~~.s'ffi ~ ~.
~!f~g;i" :::r
e!.~ g-~ ~ ~
qCDQ)(1.JOl ~
(D lJ'::::I :::r 5. ~
~ frQ) g ~ 0
~Q::ga: Q)
Q.acr m
o~ (D (1.J
ce.:::::!.3 0/
o Q) -. St
e!.$"g D.l
0) (1.J Ol T
~ @:[ cS'
(tl 03 Ol :::I
~~...... 3i
~Q~ @
e!.. 0-:'.;'. ;a.
o:~w ~
~~g: ~
5. a Q St
(D 3 Q) (tl
6rSt(1.J
@"
~
o
~
:r>o
" -.
,,-<
=Q)
@ ~
,.c.
00
(D;:::;:
<'<
!!.o
00
"3
33
" c
,.~
a?,z
?'-
00
~,z
!!.O
00
"3
33
" c
,.~
~~
?'-
8~~-8~3"
ao.:f3o.3
~.~"8~5 ~
@..g:o~ =.~
-<~ m'~ g:~
~
<0
'"
:..
N
I"
rn
-
r
rn
NNf'\.)N
0000
bbbb
~sn.w~"'"
NNNN
0000
:"'bbb
o.-../f'-~
NNNf'\.)
0000
c... .Ipj>
NN'"
000
.~P.i:D
,.
N
,:"
rn
r
rn
4.12 Biological Resources
NNf'\.)Nf'\.).....N.....
OOOOON' .
. . . . . . 00
o:$g~2~f>-~U)
. . . . ~ N.....
Nf'\.)NNN' .
000000.....
. . . . . CD en
000 0 o~
U).....O'lw..... N
. . ~ . ~ ~
NNf'\.)NN
00000
L ~jn~h)>
NJ\)NN
0000
;- ." ~b 9J
~'8 00" 0-..11).....
....::;-::::I~gQ.~Q~)>a.~
a.~(1.J::::ICO-~E'g.g.l\)
St CD C ;;;;'" co Q ... a. 0 '
(tl < ;;;;: W 03 cr.....:E (tl :::I 0 tD
(D ~ ~.;;::g @..o s:.g N ijl -I
~ -g St Q: a ~ ~ S.~ b Q ~
c CIl ..... 0 -0 Ul 0) ...... an....
.., en ffiro:::l (D.....:::r-o I :::r(D
o rr -.0,1' (I) 2 (D::!.;:u lU ::::I
(D-()@.....(I)C'lQOl(D::::ItO
.9! ~ o;~ 3 g:~(bs.~ ~
(D:::;:;T1(1)mg:::J03~(1.J::::I
::J _.G)(1.J 0 ::::0'< ;;;.....03 CD
Q.3 0 m c 0 - "0<<5" 0 tb ><
(D -0 .... (1.J'" m Q) m -. C;;'
~ ~ c 3 g S:"Q 5 g: a. c;; g.
Uien(tlOlCllO-'::::Icgco
@~~~3"'8c53g.3-g
:::Jsna'~ s'~ ~g: 8 ~ =
:::I .., '< CD 0. CIl (1.J ::::I lJ.
S. m 03 g St-o fIl ~ ~ a. m
0"-0 -0 ~ (tl a (D 5. ~ Q)
(tl CD a Qi'-O 'ii' 92 0) 6) .. ::::I
~!1-gac;;n.~g'g a.
Q. C6 (1.J Ul ~ ::E a. 0::::1 3'
g.~~~~ s:a.g.~. ffi-
fLO'"Q~s:tS.N'~St 3
:r"'.Q.cr03g.(tl(l)z (D
(Dcg(D(Dg(D:;--g~ a
~ -. n 3 (tl -0 .... Q. o' S'
ag.o.Q)~Drco~::J (0
'(D'::J$2.g-(tlSg:CIle!. Ol
n.@~Q)g,s.(tl~S: g
O)o3::JmcoCJc~ ::J
:::r::J S' 0.:::J 03 - fJl . (I)
~::E (D 3'< C;; ~.12. ffi Ol
-.:::r St a;{g 03 c; 03 TI ::::I
~8!!t(Dro(D:E<gac;;. a.
:::r"'O~Q.:::r~03:::r C'
il (D .... cr Ol CD 0 ::::I (tl ::l.
0;; ~ :::J;];" C;; ~ 0. ffi.' :::r
QJ-.(D0.!if(1.J3::E(fI ~
CD5~~c111g:5:(J) (il
3 _(D CD Ul 0 0) =:(D a.
;;;Sto 0-0 w'~ (t~. c
cO.CD-'-oDr-(D'J'J@ @
~"Q S. 8. a s- ~111 Q) g.
o.Q(Ds'oe-QlJ.::::I (\)
::::I (D' &. 8 ~ 0) fJl m a. "8
0s.Q) --O)~tb:T
tb @ .; ~ g;-g ~.cc (\) ~
0.:::::1 C;; 5.(tQ.~5.~ c;
COlfJl!if (DOOlen ~
@C5!!lg{gO){g (j) ~ 3-'
_._.0:::J(D3(D0._. -0
-5 ~ CD ::E g.~ g.~ ~ lU
O33s';;;(I)cr- po a
!:t~ O3::J'"' (D CI) Q 0
CIf ~ (1.J m :::;:; 3. !if =::;:
oC;;!if.g{g~ ~Q~ ~
St 0 (b e!.. CD ~ CI) 2. =.; ~
(tl..... 0 3ilJ.......~ 03 (D 55_'
:::r....-D.lCDCD r.n
(tl(D_(Dc.,c.Q0" ."
~ (tl (1.J ~ . CD .."
(tl~ g.g:6):f~-g S. Qi'
a~CJQ..e-(D@::l.@ ~
-gffi.~g:~::I~O' (1.J
(1.J!fl = C;;.-o~ O'"::J'" 1il
!:!!. (1.J..... (tl a (tl ...... a. 0
cr;:}mQ)lJ.~03O(\) ffi.
@(tlc.5.mffi'o::;;Cii (1.J
cr~O)"""03(b@ii).O 0
Ol....~:::r.... (1.J......-O
0) ..2.(D (D (tl 'E. (1.J .... 3 Ol
~~g'tb ~::!.~po(tl @
o O)Ul5~.....G)a 0)
::::I g}o g::E o.:::r D.l (1.J C{'
8tll::::l....:::Ie.a3St :f
::J~Stgogr.E~!a ~
CIl<CDIll0(1.J:::r:::r3 0)
5. Q.!!!. ro C'l :::r St S!t Ol US'
g:c.m~g~(D~,< ::::I
0.3....... lJ..... (D Ol (tl 3' ~
::1-0 ~m Q.c:g ~~ @
::E Ol ':::r c .., ::::I Ol a
;;;g.-g Ol:::;..Q~n
:::rwo <(tl~:3- m
Q)St'ii' ~~ni.......!! <
.Dan. :::r(tl$"0(D ~~
C C Q) CD -0 Ol 0 0- ~
e!.(O ~ "'0 ~ ro .... (1.J -
3i:::r~ s.~ CD 3-0 (D
CD=,= (D=:::JmCD 0'_
a. (P ~ ~ 0 C'l,< lJ.
0'"0.:::J e.::J ffi'~ (\) 0
o.(tl..... @..a.~s.~C/I ;-
o!:!!.~ OM (D~~'
ce.~~ ~a.
~ e!..
-<
~ ~.g.;u ~ in '8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g- ~ ~
::::I:::r~(tln.(D~~@!g:g:~m3l~~Cii~.l\)
(1.JCD~S.~ff(1.J3~~!:!!~~~OQ'0C;;~
0'::J::::I$::I~V,i'3 ..,O'"(D ~ ""d~ _
~C.8.....N~"'og(tlm(l)~~(DN~3Q3
:::::I~ :::ro-(tlo. 0.' O~:~OlDT~(tl12.
~(D3(Dh~gQ)g(tl "=--(1",,, (1.J:::\.::::I(tl
<o~O 0'3S.....Cii <CI)~5I6~83
o.~O~I 3.....:::r- CIlCDOa.Q)::::I c(D
~S'Ul ~8(tl:::r~..g off::Jr:::tcr3i-l....::J
(tlCOO3~~5.:::J~a.3 -oQ)gffi~@o~g
Q::::I5.(D......o.g.m~CD 3~c -:::J~(DCO
3~~$2.~go.og,a ~Ula:3~~(D(tl~
(tl~~~s.o.~CJ:fe!.. .....O'Ol~.o.~~~n.
?..Q a: (D ~ ~:. g (D g s, =. Ui 0- C (D :f e: o.
~(tl(\)a-c::::lq(Q ~5.0CJa-~CD~~
g~Qgi~~(D,,5: (tl<'5~1ll ::::I~~
~'~ ~(D~ cr ~-(DO::::l CIlOl
~m~Qo.~:::I.~c C~Ol:::rC1l ~.O)St
=~~~s;'8-1Qj ~@..O"g,g ~iCD
3 C'l::::l..... 0.. :::I. :::r-.< ... a. c r 03 ::J Q
~ (DQ):::r,<03(Dq -g~~~3 ~i~
03 Q)::::I(tl::E:::JW(D =:CD....tO~ O:::lCD
(b ::J@Q:::rffi~(tl ~o~~() o~w
~ ~:..-<g:g:6)G O)-og:()@ (j).CD=t;
g ~l~g~QS ffi~~~~ :~Q)
o 0'(1.J..... O3cr =::::I(D~~ :::J<::::I
-. (1.JCD:::rCq"'(D ~Uio.~..,o o.@..(I)
:::I @.....(tl~~.030) O)oQ)O..... _Q):::r
~ O(1.Jcr~<ro OO3Ulo-(tl 3:::10
!:!!. 111~~(D~~; C'l::::l~(Da -oa.5..
<" ~~~<."'c.00~9! (ilO'"o(1.Jo. mca.
o ~ ~"Ol (tl , CD::::I 3 Ul cr
-0 =a.~Q-o.:E;O;- (j)(tl.........., ro(tl(D
~ ~Q~m8!aa OlS-gg;:u ;a.a.~
-0 0(tlo.ma(tl3 ;:]0"$'~2 S.o.~
~ ~~~~~~St ~~~CD~. ~~~
~ 12S'Jm.::::IOlV,i'CD @ffi=tS:(il acog.
Cc.;:]-8~85:CD ~o.oroo. 6'~o.
o (tl~~mCDa~ g:St3~~ ~a;o
g. ~CiiQQJ!~ :::IaSt~~ .......~-o
: (tlCO.....~Ole!..O' Qr.E~~.g ffi~~
x lJ...,:::r(1.J::::I-~ c:::ro.....3 _:::J-'
(j) ::::!lOl(D~o.cr~. Q) -o:::;.(\) o.....a.
~~()03.....(tltO :::::!.8 0 (D::::I =~ (tl
a ii)'~,z~ffi8~ ~~=~; ~i3
(t ur::::l8(1.J~::J(b C'lo.:::rCD_ -._0
~ O3~ O3a~o. ~g~D.lg ~Ciitb
rr :::Ic..o~a~~~o ..,::::Im!:a,CO 0lO3(1.J
.. (I),,, OCl):::J.....q o.~-O
~ m~-o~~~R @o.~:::r(\) o.a.(tl
'" :Jc.~~~Q~~ (I)(DOCll(D ~::::IQ
::J '~_'''< (I)<....~~ oo::::!l
0. 0) C'l(tlotO~ m.(tlOUl ::J:::IO
~ ooiQ)_~'< 0'00.0..... O)~.CO
.... Olo.CI)e...,o.O "'-Ocoo.o O:::J~.
Q) ~m(DO~~= StCD(D:Ecr "'<c.
n. (D::::ID.l:::Jlllro:::r ~~a~(D ~~.~
I.' cgi::::l~iSt(tl CD~~QI ~<,,~
c:: Q) CD ~ ::::I CD q .....,......
m.:::J3l......,,:::rc.~ ~~(DNcr (Q(tl0)
-O'CIl....03CD~ e-(Q~mQ) mxO'
~:::I3~g:~. ~~-g~~ Q)&~
fJl~m~I~(J) 0(D~(tl_ ....C'l..,
.... - ~~" ::::I.., Ol (tl....o "0'"
CD <.....::::1' -. (1.J<o"~-03 ~,,~a
3(Do' o:::Jff -"....
-o~< (tl~Ol ::E~g:::l..... gOl(\)
ii~ (bd~ ffi![~m.ffi 3~~
~iSt ~~= tb.~~:f(tl 3::::1(D
~::::I(tl s.-(tl $.~;"'~&. g:i~
~g(1.J ~q.g :::::!'CDO)~.(D o.fJl::J
~3& ~.!C;;c.-. ~~~g-~ &i~
~3- 0 3~ffo8 (I)~Q
~ci _~O) "8~~=0. O~CI)
(1.JS:0l ~S:5 O)coc5:::r::E Stos.
"" ffi'~ c9! cc.- ~~ 0 (D~ S!t::J g
(1.J- Ol" oo~q..... -'00
i" ~~~ ~@i~g, ~,z~
(1.J ~::IO -(1.JI1)~:f O3~'
Q ca.:E ~~~@(D ~as
..... 0" Ol -'::E ::J C'l -012
5 OlC~ ~St:::rroc;; 0.(D03
C1l 5.~.c ~ Sto'2:~ ffi.z~
S' !:!!. Ul fii 0. (D ::r ::J . ..... D.l
N,,-Oro !!:!q~.(D;::o o::::l~
~ a. c: (tl ::E (D ffi a. 0
(tl 0 (tl (3 :E 0) "':::r..c 0" 0' (b
lJ. -::Jo o(j)ii)'ff~ ~..,~
e!. :f~3 c(Dco:::r(il ......-o(tl
:::r m(D~ ~Qtb~o. oaa.
Ol (D....., cr..,!aCDCD ~-gffi
g: :::r...... (D(D(tl~< 0)0)0"
..... qmw CIlO~(I)~ Ol(tl-.
~ ~;~ (Dc roO a;a.!if
Ol ....~........~::::I~
(D ~(D D.l 0 @ (tl 3 ro (tl.
~ c:~ a S1 *" ~ ~::E ~
~:;: 0- =-'; ~ C.
S. -< oo.s
~ ~ 0
-5 ro g:"8 Q
g "5. Q ~~
~tbOCDO
.., 3 (tl (1.J m
.9.(tl III a.
(D:::J :::10.
0_ c.
?i(1.J
00
~,z
!!.o
00
" 3
3 3
" c
,.~
~~
?'-
8 ~ ~.g ~ 3"
aa.~3a.3
~'~-g-g~ ~
e?.go~ 2.~
-<~ffi.@om.
fJl :::::!.'<
~
<0
'T;)
a
3
o
!if
c
m
"
g
~
i!i.
".
"
"
or
,.
m
'"
~
C.
~
o
i'
S'
OJ
m
".
'"
"
~
~.
S'
lil'
~
c.
m
@
"
"
?
C1)"8~ 3.8
=_-0 ::J
Q.'< mg
~ ~.3 c:
_.....CIlQ)
Ol:::r::::l=
n. <::!:'<
~r 8
...
:..
~
rn
r
rn
-6'Q
,,-<
=03
@ ~
,.c.
00
~~
!!.o
00
"3
33
" c
,.~
~,z
?'-
en
3: -
2:~~2.
rg~~~
!:!:~tDlII
o _ ~
~ ~
""
g
o'
".
en
~
5'
~
en
~
fS:
o'
~
!!1.
!!;
~
a
o'
~
3:
"
"
m
~
~
m
-;0""
3 ~ "
'Cm:L
CD '& -<
3 ~
" m
~ -.
_CT
S'ii'
lC_
!l
~~~
2. ~
~ ;tI
:;. a
<0 "
o
~
en
iT
ii'
0--;
~ 3 -.
'C 3
CD :;.
3lC
" 0
:J ~
g
-;
o
'C
o'
3"
"
"
!l
3:
'"
cO'
a
o'
~
s:
"
"
m
~
;;:
en
(")
;:;:
'<
o
...
Q
"'l
o
'<
Q
CD
::::l
CD
Dl
"'ll
Di
::::l
m
z::::l
0<
-i -.
~a
",::::l
" 3
:&CD
2.3.
~D)
g-
~ -
;;3
~"
""D!
ao
~ ...
g:;::a
~CD
en"
~O
2. ::l.
-
~. s::
~a;
rlC
enD!
II~
rO
~ ::::l
en
...s::
~O
~ ::::l
II> -.
-. ...
og 0
3i :::::!.
o ::::l
aCC
c;,"'ll
C:"'l
" 0
mlC
fgDl
"3
o'
,,-
a ~
c "
~ c.
" 0
<"
2. It
c.c.
" '-
!!:c
~ ~
~
~
!"
to
o
o
to
CT
'<
-
or
"
o
~
g,
gJ
o
'<
o
~
o
o
~
~
~
g~
~~
~~
"'A
~A
);"
~
'"
m
'"
~
~
4,14 Cultural
Resources
....<.n0101....
0'). . . .
b~2~g
"'. .
~ <:o<.nOlW
mOOON
. .J>.011'\.).J>.
O. .
W<:OO1<.nW
000(,.)
s.n.m~wp
~~'"
0.0j>
"'''''''
~~mjlJ
",,,,,,,
:...~~p
m
x
::;
0'
'"
O~c)::Q;L~C~
~ellQ)~ell"O~:::
Q, 6:g :J () a r:: .
~~ .....:5"=r~~:2 ~
~g.co.~ Ul![~:J
ffielloo:J"ellell~
3.....:J~"O a. ell
~@'8~mQ)~~
:J" - < l:: >< :J ell _.
1ll-<~g.~~3lft
ell Dl :5" o. o. 0 :J
2.aCO:JUl.....~~
~2<.__ellell :::!l
~.ell~o9:D3~~
"..... Dl Ul-
~DlQ)<Qlii@Q)
Ul an oa.-.Cb!:!:.c ~
;::;: :J" ~Ol::'"
([I :T III Dl 0 :J ::;. n
Ulell (l).....:J III Cb:J"
s- CI) Q. g.. 5':J Dl Dl
-;::;:ODl a._ell
~ellre.CD@35~
1(6 :J" g Q..c a;..... co
'3 3l ;-2 ~'(Q' 2 cr
0'" -.cr:J' 9a,.co ~
~ellro~coo':J"-<
(1)ell::ECI)"O:J::!lCl)
;a.:J;::;:;::;:ao!!!.CD
8 @ :J"(1)__._a.:J
8D.l?l~;r5.~
~a.ii) ;~~~.
(1)(1)'(6 "O"ell"
~!=L"'" -grog)>
g s. @~g8
:J ~ amo3
(1) = CI) 0 _."0
~""O s~g-m
([I Q' "0 ~ :J :J"
~ g,Ul~~
:J 0 o~"U~.
~ 8 322.(%
~ g c:~ g
2" ell ~~e
g ~8;:~
? ~3![m
s.$-g.~
() __"l::
~ :J"(l) Q) n
""0 ~~a(1)
S' Q.. Ul-o (1)
co O-:J @ Q3
3 ::ECb:J"-
Ql S' ~ Uj.lii
ri If=! ~ Q B-
CD Q) -.:J
l:: o.<"::E
(JJ . m 0
~ mo C
C c:
@ ~
!'J m
l>.g
i~-
'a.
.g!a
..-
0"
5(1)
o~
03
~ro
c m
!il~
~~
~ 0
..a.
'Oi ~
,,!!.
.. 0
<'0
.. 3
0'''
.. ~
.. -
~'O
8.fl.
~ ..
g-~
Q...
~Cb
'0
<3
'0
o
m
..
p.
OJ
0'
;U
<D'
"'~
00
- ,
5-
0'
:J
'"
o
o
'"
,
.,.
~
~
"
<ii
'"
"
~.
o
c
m
m
g
o
o
3
'0
..
Q.
o'
~
~
~
sa
o
o
o
~
9'
"
8
~
S'
<0
3
..
m
~.
..
"'
".
!:
rn
-
r
rn
C)l>
~~
ii'
"
..
~
a.
DC)
~~
!!.C)
o 0
'03
3 3
" c
,,~
~~
?<
'Ol>
<3 m
'0'0
0'
CI).Q.
.. "
a.Q.
m
..
<ii
(JJ"883'8
~-5 $- 2:
m-<3e
QJ::E([I~
fJ:~a:,<
o
~
4,13 Visual Quality and Aesthetics
".
'"
.I.
rn
-
r
rn
~~
~~
"'!"
~~~~~~~~mwwwwww~~~~
~~~gg~~~~~~~~g8~~~~
O1ocom~.....' - . . . - . . - - - - -
. --- - co~mwwwwww~~~~
~~~~~~~S~~~~gg~~g~
00000'
~m~01~~~mwwwwww~~~~
. . . . . ~OOWNN~~O~~~O
001W~CO~0100>mwo01
.".
~
~
".
~
'"
Gl
NI\.:IJ\J........OlU1WW............
!='!='!='~~OJOJO~~:...,,~
~-G)mG)O. . ~ . ...." .
J\J~ ~ ~ ~ COO1WW. ........
!=' 1\.:1 ~ 1'\.).... (;) 0 m i:o~c- (;) OJ
(... o. 0 (0. . ~ _ ...." .
I_'i1)>~" ~ ~ ~ ~;,:;:-":-"
. !")>(j)()~:rm
". .. ..
2
o
~
"
C)
.z
DC)
~~
!!.C)
o 0
'03
3 3
" c
,,~
a?~
?<
DC)
~~
!!.C)
00
"'3
33
" c
,,~
a?~
?<
m'88~:r8
=3"0 :J
0_"0 CD d;
m-<3e
--c(1)Ql
~ ~:J~
!:!::J"~
o
~
".
~
'"
w
rn
r
rn
"'2
Ii!! g
tC"
~.
a.
2
o
~
"
C)
.z
".
~
't'
'"
rn
r
rn
z
o
~
"
'"
"
.a
c
a'
a.
COWWW
0(,.):""0
.....PSX'5-'"
COOtWW
00;"'0
Ol_W~""5J'1
"'''''''
bi-.J:""
~""".al !'-
COWW....
jlJ.m~i:ojlJ
CO 01 w....
hOO5-
"m'"w!N
.OJ ~b}>
2
o
~
..
2
l>
2
l>
2
l>
(l):f~ 1>
aJ ro 0 !il
fU 0"0"0
00 a
::E $ 76'
;a.a.g.
~ 5'~
~ <ii
".
~
rn
r
rn
...
:..
'"
).
-<
"
"
C)
.z
3
..
'<
<ii
.a
c
~.
..
m
o
~
m
"
..
a.
"
..
~
..
~
(ji.
g'
'"
<3
'"
o
m
"
a.
a.
"
<
"
0'
'0
3
"
"
'0
02.
"
$l.
m
S'
<
o
"
5'
<C
3
o
<ii
9'
..
~
~
o
'"
0'
~.
"
m
S'
9'
"
D
o
~
~
~
~
..
<ii
~
l>
'0
'E.
ii
"
DC)
" 0
< 3
!!.3
o c
~ ~.
,,'"
"
'"
;: -.
a: >f~.
~ =0'=
~~(i;fJ
g - ~
..
"'0
2-
1r
<ii'
'"
~
0'
~
'"
~
a.
'"
0'
~
!!.
;:
'"
.c'
i!i.
0'
~
;:
..
~
'"
c
~
..
'"
-"'"'0
3 .. ~
'0",:>.
iD '& '<
3 ~
~ '"
~ -.
-0'
:iii'
"'-
o
~
3:0'''
o ~ ~
~ :>.
::+ '<
o ;0
::!. CD
~ '"
'" '0
o
~
'"
6'
"
0-....
~ -5 3'
CP 5'
3'"
.. 0
~-
g
-<
o
'0
"
3"
'0
~
!l.
(')
;:;:
'<
o
....
C)
...
o
'<
C)
lD
::::l
lD
...
2!.
"
jjj"
::::l
m
z::::l
0<
.... -.
m'"
..0
::::l
3
lD
::::l
-
2!.
~
.c'
i!i.
o'
~
;:
..
~
'"
c
~
..
'"
'"
"
'"
.c'
~
'"
~.
"
03
~"tl
"'OD!
2.0
~ -
i::a
;f.lD
","tl
~' 0
2. ;:I.
'"
@s:
;a::;
~cC.
UlD!
II =
.-0
i1 ::::l
"'s:
io
i' ::::l
'" -.
g' 0'
5 :3.
n ::::l
a(Q
;;,,,
C:'"
" 0
..(0
g'ill
"'3
~. -
a=
c ~
~ a.
~ 0
(i'g
0:8-
~ ...
!!:c
.. ~
..
~
!"
'"
o
o
'"
0'
'<
9'
..
n
.z
o
-
~
o
'<
n
~
n
o
c
~
,g;
"'c;
-"
~~
2~
":I::
ii:'"
~
5l
'"
~
N
m
x
::r
6'
..
-. 0 .Ilo
5." :..a.
-.([1 C1l
@ @ ,
_d:~
5- 0 -0
"'=>0
~~-
:T~~
([)(J)d:
:)o~
:rg :T
"',,0
~3.~
-=>
0.", 0'
g _ e
=>~~
C'" _. en
tl) =. (/)
~ ;!. ffi
_N =
~CDcr
~ ~~.
%m~
=> '0 3
::DaeD
~O'o.
C.Wo
. 3-
~5'
. '"
....0>
"''''
'" =>.
rig
:i" e:
Iljil
a1;
'" '"
:...nr
~. [
~ ~
o;N
=> 0>
w!6 g.
QSt
o 0>
",-
0=3
;:::;:w
0''<
=> 0>
Q" ~.
~ ~
'0
ro :;!
'S.",
=> 0
'" 0
o "
=> =>
~<:
::i"g}
~~
0."
0> =>
950-
~ @
~~
o~
~g
=>0.
<0 S.
=> 0>
o =>
~@
@O>
~ =>
00.
=> ~
0'"
'" 0
C:~
~ 0.
::f~
~~
",,,
0> ~
~St
0'0>
"'-
",'0
=> 3
~'O
'0'"
CJ :..
U
S'
'"
OJ
6'
;lJ
C1l '
"'~
o~
,,'
~
0'
:J
'"
o
o
'"
,
.I>
~
""Q~~Q.C
,Q"O.....o"'8
ro=3o;:l
;4. g ~g -.
-'0- "0 Ul
m-O'm~
([I ..... ::J W
.Q=>
@
or~
3~
!"c,
g: ~
0.0
S' (D'
o
ro ;-
0.'0
" 0
@ ~
~ 0
o ~
3 ~
'" "J.
00
-"
::fa:
"''0
g ~
tit -.
;ag.
ii).Q)
a;g.
~ =>
o~
",,,,
"''<
3 -
_.0>
g 5-
-~
~. g
5-16
Q-o.
::iiCD'
. =>
@
0>
3
e
=>
0.
5'
'"
'0
~
3
!l-
~
!l.
5'
'"
'0
3
'0
'"
~
0)>
0'0
e'O
~g
3
0>
=>
0.
00
~q:
!l-o
00
'03
3 3
'" e
3=>
~..z
i<
00
~..z
!l-o
00
'03
3 3
'" e
3=>
..z
rggJ
.gQ
00
~_.
'" '"
0.5l,
~
0>
~
o
'0
~
<
'"
3
~
~
a:
'"
3
~
0>
=>
0.
0.
o
3
'"
i!'.
o'
'0
!l-
~
a-
3
~
~
'0
0>
~
~
S'
'"
o
=>
0>
0.
o'
S'
S'
'"
)>
'0
'!2.
ii
3
N....,N~
-..J0IU'1'
. . . 0
0000'>
.j:>.c..J.....
. . oo
''',' .
~"'o
. . '"
00.
~..... .!'J
"''''oo
...",.
. . OJ
OJ OJ.
. '"
"''''
",.
jn}>
,.
:..
'"
'n
"
3
<
a:
'"
0>
s.~
--
"''''
~In
0"
roa
=> <
~g:
3'0>
~ 0.
o '"
"'=>
'" ~
3 !l-
0"::'
~O>
~ 5-
-. ~
5-g
0.'0
=>. '"
=0.
'w
=>
@
0>
3
e
=>
0.
5'
'"
'0
~
3
'"
m-
!l.
5'
'"
'0
3
'0
'"
~
-
o
o
I"
o
o
W
!l-
0'
e
~
~
s:
'0
0'
'"
~
'"
=>
5'
'"
0>
'"
=>.
o
5.
0;
~
ill'
3
0;
=>
0.
~
'2
=>
"
~
~
5'
'"
'<
0>
~
o
.a
0>
=>
o'
o
'0
'"
~
,r
=>
~
0>
=>
0.
5'
'"
~
~
a:
'"
3
f[
'<
N
o
=>
'"
0.
0;
=>
".
:;;Q
0<:
;<-"
~ "
2:
o'
00
~.z
!l-o
@o
33
'" 3
=> "
-=>
~
"<i:l
@'O
03
~_.
"''''
0.5l,
~
0>
~
~
-
'"
J,.
'"
-
r
'"
o
'0
~
<!
3
~
~
a:
'"
=>
or
0>
=>
0.
0.
o
3
'"
i!'.
o'
'0
!l-
~
-
3
3
:if
~
'0
0>
~
~
S'
'"
o
=>
0>
0.
o'
S'
S'
'"
ill'
3
!"
0>
=>
0.
o
~
0.
"
@
~
o
3
'"
0'''
!i~
'" .
::::!.c
.Ill ::;;
05'
;:;'"
::fi6
~ fE..
1'l~
~ ~
~:.
53' a
lOii'
cnct
o ~
"'-
=> '"
o 0>
~i
~ g.
~~
3 3
< -
2.cg'
~g
-=>
163
~ '"
'" 0>
(i~
ai ro
=> ~
~ 0>
llro
o=>
" '"
~ '"
@g-
~o.
~o
~]
<
~'"
"'=>
0-
5.8
c.=>
C"d:
'" =>
g ffi
~ 0.
ffi'CQ
0.0
~~
. ~
0>
m-
o
o
=>
0;
3
S'
0>
~
o
.=>
0'
,r
~
3
'"
0.
![
o'
=>
~
s:
5'
'"
e
~
'"
!l.
0>
'0
'0
3
'0
=>.
0>
10
~
'!2.
ii'
3
:;;Q
0<:
;<-"
~ "
2:
o'
00
~.z
!l-o
00
'03
33
'" "
3=>
~
00
~..z
!l-O
~ 0
33
'" 3
=> "
-=>
fil..z
i<
00.
-"
Gp.
'" =>
=>'"
1Jm
-<
0> -.
=> ~
00.
-"
G) =>.
'" =>
=>'"
1J<D
-<
0> -.
=> ~
~ i"
=....
;;:'"
'" n
'" -
:s;
o =>
~'<
'" ,
0.0
o~
ffi~
bi~
0.-
o .
" 0
~ ~
ro~
!i~
~ 0
0'"
-'"
8 3.
=> g
0;_
3 ~
:i" s=
0> 0>
=>-
org
. =>
'0
Q.
C
10
5'
'"
'"
3
"
=>
0.
~
m-
0>
~
0.
'"
o
=>
'"
0.
S'
;::
a:
'"
~
o'
=>
~
'"
:!>
0>
~
0'
"
=>
.0.
8
=>
0.
e
5l,
0>
'"
'"
~
5'
~
0;'
'"
0>
~
~
'"
~
~
3
'"
3
o
0.
'"
10
3
S'
'"
:;;Q
0<:
;<-"
~ e
2:
o'
00
~..z
!l-o
00
'03
33
'" "
3=>
~..z
i<
,,0.
-"
0> ~
::I S'
~'"
S. G)
'" '"
~ ?
NJ\)J\.).p.
-.J 0'1 tv.
. . . 0
00.....0:1
.....NO.
. . oo
NNI\)'
:...qll?J@
000.
,J::>.}.>Jw.....
"''''oo
...",.
. . OJ
OJ OJ.
. '"
"''''
?'Ii>
jT1.
:;;
"'0>"
aUJ:'"
" 0 '"
5.~a.
~~O
~g.g
~('Jla.
-.3 c:
Ul -. 0-
-g Ql :IE
o ~ '"
:S.....=
g-5f~
a.; a.
0'0> 0.
~(6ff
;:::;:_::J"
roffi6i
."''8 t
0_0>
~:~ ~
5-~ro
=>-~
0')0 Ch
u;g s
~~g-
g!~
~ g-~.
~<fl ;
.Qg:f
o"=>'"
'O'~~
-0> '"
~ffi"~
.. ~ =>
"'O>@
![s.o
"''0 -
b'go
0."'0>
",,,,10
amrg
::u~-<
~ ::!_~
~~9
!a~6-
,5" -I ==
~ g-ci-
=0'
~O>
;;g
-"
~ 3
~s.
'00>
CD :;;t;
o <
10'"
0.0
0> ~
=> 0
c.x
8~
=> '"
0'"
3 2:
'" 0
0.0.:
o '"
"'~
'" 0>
~. a
g'O
inrn
~~
-0.
8 ~
5.0>
c.=>
_ 0.
'" -
0> =>.
o 0>
"'N
-. a:
3",
0",
0>'"
ag
"U Q.
gg-
,,~
ffi"5l
~
!1,
'0
'"
o
'0
"
(Jl-g~ ~r8
=_"0 ::::I
Q.'< CD Q;
m~. 3 ~
--CDQ)
Q)::T::::I=
0. <::;!:'<
~~r 8
~
-
'"
I"
'"
-
r
'"
:;;Q
0<:
;<-"
~ "
2:
o'
00
~~
!l-O
00
'03
33
"'"
3=>
0::1=
",'<
i<
4.15 Hazardous Materials
J\.)J\.)J\)J\.)J\.)J\.)J\.)W
:-J:--I~?1!'J!'J!'Jo
~28~gg8f>-
'~~~'~~w
~~~~~~~8
g8~~~~~:"
~~~.~ 9
r;;
NNI\)NCl:)
:'l:'l~~bJ
m(1)>}:>-
~ . . N
NJ\.)NN
--.J --.J 01 .
. . . CD
.0 ~lD~-'
~"'8 -53.8
= _'0 ::::I
Q.'< (j) Q;
~ ~. 3 E
--CDQ)
Q)::T::::I=
g, <::;'<
~i' 8
~
-
'"
,:,
'"
r
'"
"''''
"''''
00
.W~...A
"''''
...'"
~.i:s
"'''''''
"'''''''
:... ~O}>
"''''
",,,,
tn.CD
z
o
=>
'"
~.CD ~ ~
~~'iF c::;
~~Q>
OCD....-I
? a. g ::T
:::;;~~CD
::::I =3 Q
CD(Jlm-<
@ ~ ffi":'.
C/.I to ::!. ::::I
Kl :5" ~ 8
~ m ~_2.
.... :f 5
~:fO
~CDg
-'0 =>
~2.~
~~ ~
e_
ll) -.-
_0> '"
'" -'"
-coo
.g8~
03.0'
~ ~. 3
0. ::::I ii5"
'0 => 0
a~CD
Cii'~~
0_"
Ch-< 3
~ 6 '"
'" Q =>
"'1::-
:so a
Dl ~. (1
(il (Q 0
5l ~ ~
00''''
=> '" <
S:ff~
iij. C/.I g
3 S'""cn
O>~'"
'0 " 0>
-C/.I=
Q CD :so
3.~~
'0 9' 0>
0>",10
&05'
o '"
g-3~
'" 3 '"
s!::"O
=> 0>
~~~
coo
OJ '" =>
_<0
'?!!.;
g.g 3
030>
~~'O
-. _co
cE o~
0>"''''
~ '0 OJ
O"~ _
m 3<<
g"~ ~
Cu ~ ~
::::I ::::I :i"
a. :T (Q
0. '" -
CD -.::T
< ::: CD
!e..~o
.g (5- g
(l)~Q;
ag,g
~
3'"3 ~.
"'E.'O :f-
CD 0 -.
3 ~ =>
","'5'
=> 0. '"
-'0
0> ~ 0
:g~'~
3&5'
'0. 0>
~ -
iij.)>"O
(t g
~
'"
~
~
o
~
00
~~
!l-o
00
'03
33
'" "
3=>
fi'~
i<
'8 Ii' ~ 3
=::::1 ::::.3
n. CD CD
(6' -o:e 0-
C/.I nr ~ iij.
::::Ig:OC
'<
..
...
:..
~
'"
-
r
'"
:;;Q
Q<:
"'''
~ "
2:
o'
00
~~
!l-o
00
'03
3 3
'" e
3=>
~~
i<
U>
;r: -.
_. D1tg
'" ~ ~ -.
cgCD~~
=""CDm
g -~
~
"
2.
n
iD
~
~
o'
=>
en
~
~
0'
=>
!!!.
~
~
i!i.
o'
=>
;::
~
0>
~
"
;
~
-"'"
3 ~ 0>
"2.~~
~ 0
3 ~
'" ~
=> -,
_0'
5'Ci"
"'-
o
~
3:0'''
o ~ 0>
:l, ~
o '"
:::::!. CD
=> ~
'" "
o
=>
~
0'
iD
0-3 :!
~'O3
iP :i"
3'"
~ 0
=> -
g
....
o
."
0'
3"
."
"
5l,
o
;:;:
'<
o
...
C)
a
'<
C)
CD
::l
CD
..
!!!.
-c
Dr
::l
m
z::l
0<
.... -.
m"
" 0
::l
3
CD
::l
-
!!!.
~
.c'
0>
-
0'
=>
;r:
'"
0>
en
"
;
en
U>
"
U>
.c'
=>
:;;
if
=>-
;;3
~"C
"Ill
an
!!:-
i:t1
~,CD
~-g
s;;::l
[3:
a;::;
;'cC'
",Ill
II ::!:.
.-0
m ::l
~3:
~o
=> ::l
!!!;:;:
'go
3i :::::!.
o ::l
acc
U,-c
C:"
" 0
~CC
ii' ..
~ III
:;;3
o
0>_
a~
" 0>
=> 0.
" 0
~"S
-. ~
c'c.
0> '-
5!:e
'" =>
~
-
.'"
'"
o
o
'"
C"
'<
so
~
"
~
o
-
9
"
~
"
~
"
o
"
=>
%
0'::
-0:
~~
o~
2~
~'"
~
o
'"
o
~
~
m
X
::T
C'
'"
I:J1
a
;u
CD '
lJl~
0'"
s'
0'
::!
'"
o
o
'"
./.
~
cn1583'8
[~~~
m,<3~
W~C1l~
9:S:~'<
o
~
:I>
".
o
~
!!1.
~
'"
c
'"
c
z
o
~
m
(')
~
0(')
~~
!!.(')
00
"3
33
m"
;?~
a?~
1'-
~ '883' 8
~3"E.. a
>..::.-0 (tI S'
C1l<<3c
~~CD~
~S:~-<
o
~
g
3l
n
'"
c
'"
c
z
o
~
m
(')
~
0(')
~~
!!.(')
00
"3
33
" ~
;?~
0;:;:
,,'<
~
cn-g~ ~r8
:;;::_"0 ;:)
Q.'< cr g
l!!~fi3
Q;I::T:::I=
~ ~'<
g 0
< " Z
iii' c: 0
c Q: iii'
~ o. <D
;u '"
" "
~ <
~ ~.
o
'"
c
r-
oo
-
r-
oo
'"
c
z z z
000
~ ~ ~
" " "
;u ;u
Il1 ~
~ ~
or ~.
0. 0.
(')
~
z
:I>
0(')
~~
!!.(')
00
"3
33
" "
;?~
~~
1'-
z
:I>
z
:I>
0:1:
n.
~Q.
o
<0
~
"
~
r-
'"
-
r-
'"
Z
:I>
Z
:I>
0(')
~~
!!.(')
00
"3
33
" ~
;?~
~~
1'-
z
:I>
0'883'8
=3"0 ::::l
Q.-u CD ~
m-<"32
iir~C1l~
g s: ~'<
o
~
;uw
5l2:
00
,,<0
il~
o
'"
'"
c
r-
'"
'"
c
~~4'~Q,3
(l) ==t...Q.:::l 't>"E..
(I) (0 (D C1l"t:l CD
g~Slra-g3
m g :u @ ~
ii)!;!6r
:;:I([IQ';
'" g
if~90~~3
Q) _.""U;:)_"'O
cn'9.actl)>CD
c ~..... Dl "b 3
@ 0 a -"0 C1l
cn:::l "lJ=:::J
iil@![
:J ~ ci"
z
o
~
"
z z
o 0
~ ~
" "
;u
"
.c
~
;'
0.
(')
~
(')
~
0(')
~.z
!!.(')
00
"3
33
" ~
;?~
~~
i<-
(,II -g 8 3.8
S2-5S-a
Cll-<:"3e
!ie.:eCDQ)
~ _.;:)~
~9''''
o
~
r-
"
~
0.
C
o
"
r-
'"
r-
'"
z
:I>
z
:I>
z
:I>
'"
N
o
l:
3
l:
iil
-
<'
CD
~
D) I: ~
a - OJ'g
fI) ~ ~!. =i;
~ CD ~ cr
-"CIlD)
o _~
~ g
."
5!.
0'
iD
o
-
~
0'
~
o
-
~
~
o'
~
!!1.
5:
g
a
o'
~
5:
"
"
..
<:
iii
..
-;u"
3 " "
"""
CD -g -<
3 ~
" ..
~ _.
_C'
:i"ii
<0_
o
~
3:0'''
o ~ "
~ ~
o '"
:!. CD
~ ..
<0 "
o
~
..
0'
iD
0-....
::I 3 -.
'03
i" 5'
3<0
~ 0
~ -
g
~
'0
n'
3"
'0
"
a
!i!i
oQ
a
0'
~
5:
m
"
o
<:
iii
o
o
;:;:
'<
o
....
~
a
'<
(j)
Cll
::I
Cll
..
III
:!:!
III
::I
m
z::l
0<
.... -.
~a
",::I
II 3
~Cll
2. a
"'Ill
g-
~
~3
~-C
"Ill
ao
~ ...
g::::c
.:!'Cll
",-C
.eo
~~
~j' :s::
a::+
~rQ.
"'Ill
II!:!.
....0
~ ::I
0:s::
io
~ ::I
!!!;:;:
<go
:::;0-'
ii' :;j'
;?CC
cn-C
c:"
" 0
0CC
eg' OJ
~3
,,-
am
~ "
~ "
" 0
<"
!let
0."
" c..
5!:"
~ ~
m
-
$"
'"
o
o
'"
~
!T
m
"
~
a
9
I
"
~
"
o
~
~
~
I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached
Resolution No. 2002-41 is an original resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of
Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 13th day of June, 2002, at which meeting a
quorum was present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of
the City of Gilroy this 3rd day of July, 2002.
~Q
/ / .--
. . (~_Lc?-- .
City Clerk of the City of Gilroy
(Seal)