Loading...
Resolution 2006-30RESOLUTION NO. 2006 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING AHE 06 -01, AN APPLICATION FOR AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT EXEMPTION FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, APNS 790 -06- 016, 029, 030, 032, AND 033 WHEREAS, South County Housing ( "Applicant ") submitted AHE 06 -01, requesting an Affordable Housing Exemption from the Residential Development Ordinance ( "RDO ") to build the Rancho del Sol residential project of two hundred and sixty (260) units; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the review and approval of an application for an Affordable Housing Exemption from the RDO does not confer any entitlement for residential development and therefore is not a "project" for the purposes of review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the City Council may grant the requested RDO exemption only if it determines that the application meets the criteria set forth in Zoning Ordinance section 50.62(b)(3) and said application was submitted pursuant to 50.62(b)(3), the criteria whereof are set forth and fully discussed in the Staff Report dated January 24, 2006 ( "Staff Report"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council on May 1, 2006 adopted Ordinance No. 2006 -10, amending section 50.62(b)(3) of the Residential Development to allow approval of an Affordable Housing Exemption for projects of more than seventy -five (75) units that are submitted as Master Plans or Specific Plans and are consistent with the Neighborhood District Policy; and \GB0 \689654.2 01 -042506- 04706089 -I- Resolution No. 2006 -30 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed application AHE 06 -01 at a duly noticed public hearing on February 2, 2006, and recommended that the City Council approve the project for the construction of two hundred and sixty (260) units; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed application AHE 06 -01 and all documents relating thereto and took oral and written testimony at its duly noticed public hearings on February 27, 2006, and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the City Clerk. SECTION I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT A. The City Council hereby finds as follows: 1GB01689654.2 01- 042506 - 04706089 1. The project complies with Zoning Ordinance section 50.62(b)(3) in that it would substantially benefit the City, and would not create significant negative impacts to public facilities, to providers of public services in the community, or to the Gilroy Unified School District. The City Council makes these findings based on facts as set forth in the record, including the attached Staff Report. 2. The project is in compliance with Zoning Ordinance section 50.62(b)(3) criteria based on the five- hundred- and -thirty (530) units granted and the seven (7) years remaining in the 2004 -2013 RDO cycle; the project's affordability and the community's need for Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income housing; the number of affordable housing projects in the vicinity; the diversity of unit types -2- Resolution No. 2006 -30 such as single - family homes, condominiums, and live /work units; and the consistency of the project's site design with City standards. B. AHE 06 -01 should be and hereby is approved subject to the conditions in the attached Staff Report, along with three additional conditions, as follows: 1. The Applicant shall be subject to the requirements of the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure" policy. 2. The developer shall sign a contract agreeing to the provisions contained within the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure," prior to approval of an Architectural and Site review for this site. 3. The Applicant shall obtain approvals ( "Approvals ") for a Tentative Map, Final Map, and PUD Architectural & Site Review, and such other approvals as the City considers necessary. 4. The Applicant shall obtain all Approvals within two (2) years from the date of Affordable Housing Exemption approval, otherwise the Affordable Housing Exemption approval shall be deemed automatically revoked. Upon application prior to the expiration of the approval and for good cause shown, the Planning Division Manager may grant an extension of time not to exceed one year. SECTION II This Resolution shall become effective, and approval of AHE 06 -01 granted, if, and only if, and upon the same date that Ordinance No. 2006 -10 approving Z 06 -01 becomes effective. If said Ordinance and Resolution No. 2006 -31 approving M 06 -03 do not 1GB01689654.2 01 -042506- 04706089 -3- Resolution No. 2006 -30 become effective, then AHE 06 -03, without any further action required by the City Council, is denied. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 st day of May, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ARELLANO, BRACCO, CORREA, and VALIQUETTE NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: GARTMAN and VELASCO &IIII (I�K•1iyL•1iilThlTI:��I T.y AT Rhonda Pellin, City Clerk 1GB01689654.2 01 -042506- 04706089 I' 1 I' • APPRO Z. e� z �/� �* � � Rus aliquette, Mayor 46 Tempore Resolution No. 2006 -30 EXHIBIT A February 21, 2006 TO: Jay Baksa, City Administrator FR: Melissa Durkin, Planner U RE: Z 06 -01 and AHE 06 -01, South County Housing, Rancho del Sol Zone Change and Affordable Housing Exemption Request At their February 2, 2006 meeting, the Planning Commission made the following recommendation on the Rancho del Sol Affordable Housing Exemption request: Z 06 -01: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Z 06 -01, by a vote of 7 -0. AHE 05 -02: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve AHE 06 -01, by a vote of 4 -3 (Commissioners Day, Boe, and Spencer voted no). The Planning Commission further recommended that the City Council amend the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure" to allow market -rate housing as part of an RDO affordable housing exemption, as long as the project provides Very Low - income housing. In response to this recommendation, the applicant has proposed revisions to the Procedure, discussed in the attached staff report, M 06 -03. The following materials are attached: ➢ Z 06 -01 Staff Report, dated January 24, 2006 ➢ AHE 06 -01 Staff Report, dated January 24, 2006 ➢ M 06 -03 Staff Report, dated February 21, 2006 ➢ Site plan and elevations V � .., ,e#� }.wy�6" •ise,�".' t "" y�°�R— ,i+t'.t y>� .k�"sa^,T' +s*"1 y - �. 'Hn °t' ` �. w.� M'a'y' � o�el+ 4 �` �-t• February 21, 2006 TO: Jay Baksa, City Administrator FR: Melissa Durkin, Planner U RE: Z 06 -01 and AHE 06 -01, South County Housing, Rancho del Sol Zone Change and Affordable Housing Exemption Request At their February 2, 2006 meeting, the Planning Commission made the following recommendation on the Rancho del Sol Affordable Housing Exemption request: Z 06 -01: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Z 06 -01, by a vote of 7 -0. AHE 05 -02: The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve AHE 06 -01, by a vote of 4 -3 (Commissioners Day, Boe, and Spencer voted no). The Planning Commission further recommended that the City Council amend the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure" to allow market -rate housing as part of an RDO affordable housing exemption, as long as the project provides Very Low - income housing. In response to this recommendation, the applicant has proposed revisions to the Procedure, discussed in the attached staff report, M 06 -03. The following materials are attached: ➢ Z 06 -01 Staff Report, dated January 24, 2006 ➢ AHE 06 -01 Staff Report, dated January 24, 2006 ➢ M 06 -03 Staff Report, dated February 21, 2006 ➢ Site plan and elevations City of Gilroy / Community Development Department Planning Division 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA (408) 846 -0440 ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT January 24, 2006 File Number: Z 06-01 (Encompass #06010025) Applicant: South County Housing (c/o Karen Saunders, 842 -9181) Location: City-wide Staff Planner. Melissa Durkin (mdurkin @bci.gilroy.ca.us) REOUESTED ACTION: Z 06-01 Zone Change request to amend Zoning Ordinance section 50.62 (b) (3) to allow flexibility in project design. Staff recommends approval of this re guest CONFORMANCE OF REQUEST WITH GENERAL PLAN: The proposed text amendment is consistent with the intent of the text and policies of the General Plan Document, particularly the Housing Element portion. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION The California Environmental Quality Act provides an exemption for this project under section 15305, Minor Alterations in Land use Limitations. Z 06-01 2 1/24/2006 BACKGROUND In December 2005, South County Housing processed a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to section 50.62 (b) (3) to allow flexibility in the number of units exempted for non -profit developers [Ref: Z 05 -151. Motions to approve and deny this application failed; therefore, the City Council took no action on this project. During deliberations, the City council expressed the following concerns about the proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment: -0 The Ordinance amendment appears to primarily benefit South County Housing; 4 The Ordinance amendment could potentially allow large clusters of affordable housing units, contrary to Council direction; and The Ordinance amendment could potentially allow for -profit developers to form non -profit corporations and process applications under this exemption. South County Housing has submitted the current Zoning Ordinance text amendment to address the concerns raised by the City Council. Z 06-01 ANALYSIS OF REQUEST 1/24/2006 Deleted wording is indicated by stAkedhfeagh type face; Proposed new wordings are indicated by bold and underlined type face SECTION 50.60, Residential Development Section 50.62 Application of Ordinance (b) The following types of residential projects are exempted from the provisions of this Residential Development Ordinance, except that projects specifically exempted under Subparagraphs (1), (3), (4), and (5) below shall be tabulated in housing goals as described in Section 50.63(a). A project may not qualify for more than one of the following exemptions. (3) A residential dewlepmeM prejeet sponsored by any ageaey that is funded by fedeF&, GkY Of GikeY Pufsaam te- &Eensh .A#*. - XXXA;eegen -I A residential develoument sponsored by an organization funded by federal state, or local government is exempt. For purposes of this provision, such organizations shall consist of any of the following: 1) organizations that receive annual operating grants in excess of $100,000 from government sources, including government chartered intermediaries, 2) organizations operating under the Single Audit Act. as defined by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, or 3) organizations that qualify as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO), as defined by the California Department of Housine and Community Development. eF ( of BeHMM than seventy five (75) units widiio ewh ef the dffee emegefies of heusiRg deseFibed as (a) Si*e Developments receiving this exemption shall consist of no more than seventy five (75) units, unless the development: (1) is submitted as a Master Plan or Specific Plan-, and (2) is consistent with the "Neighborhood District Policy." Projects requesting residential allocation under this exemption shall be specifically approved by the City Council, with such approval or disapproval at the sole discretion of the Council., Such projects may not be immediately adjacent to another project exempted under subsection (3) or (4) of this Section within the previous (3) years except where the City Council approves a specific exemption. Z 06-01 4 1/24/2006 Staff Analysis The City Council originally adopted Zoning Ordinance section 50.62 (b) (3) due to concerns that developers were clustering affordable rental housing in concentrated geographic areas. The Council intended this section of the Zoning Ordinance to allow development of large -scale affordable projects, as long as they consisted of diverse housing types and density. As written, this ordinance section precludes affordable housing developments that do not exactly adhere to its requirements and restricts creativity in project design. The following analysis describes how the applicant has addressed the concerns previously expressed by the City Council: -> Concern: The Ordinance amendment appears to primarily benefit South County Housing Applicant's Response: Any non - profit developer could benefit from this exemption. 4 Concern: The Ordinance amendment could potentially allow large clusters of affordable housing units, contrary to Council direction; Applicant's Response: The applicant proposes changing this exemption to 75 units. The City Council could make exceptions to this unit cap on a case- by-case basis, at their discretion. All developments granted more than 75 units would be submitted as a Master Plan or Specific Plan and would have to be consistent with the "Neighborhood District Policy." Note also that the applicant proposes removing the restriction that limits developments to a maximum of 75 units of each housing type. Concern: The Ordinance amendment could potentially allow for - profit developers to form non- profit corporations and process applications under this exemption. Applicant's Response: The applicant has proposed narrow language that would restrict this exemption to non - profit developers. Specifically, beneficiaries of this exemption must be a organizations funded by federal, state or local government, defined as "1) organizations that receive annual operating grants in excess of $100,000 from government sources, including government chartered intermediaries, 2) organizations operating under the Single Audit Act, as defined by Office of Management and Budget Circular A -133, or 3) organizations that qualify as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO), as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development." The City's Housing and Community Development staff has reviewed this language, and confirms that this definition will restrict this exemption to non -profit developers. The proposed text amendment will facilitate construction of affordable housing by reducing regulatory barriers, and is therefore consistent with the intent of the City's Housing Element. Z 06-01 $ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1/24/2006 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council to Approve Zone Change aualication Z 06 -01 for the following reasons: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance section 60.62 (b) (3); B. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City's General Plan, particularly the Housing Element, C. This text amendment will not create environmental impacts. D. This amendment will facilitate the provision of a variety of housing within the City of Gilroy. Respectfull William Faus Planning Division Manager bfausC ci.gilroy.ca.us City of Gilroy Community Development Department Planning Division 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA (408) 8464440 AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXEMPTION January 24, 2006 File Number: AHE 06-01 (encompass #06010024) Applicant: South County Housing (c/o Karen Saunders, 842 -9181) Location: Property located west of Monterey Road, north and south of the future extension of Cohansey Avenue Staff Planner: Melissa Durkin (mdurkin0ci.gilroy.ca us) REOUESTED ACTION: The applicant, South County Housing, requests a 260 -unit Affordable Housing Exemption for the Rancho del Sol project. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Parcel Number: 790 -06 -016, 029, 030, 032, and 033 Parcel Size: 36 acres Flood Zone: Zone B, Panel # 0603400002D, Panel Date: 8/17/98 STATUS OF PROPERTY: Existing Land Use General Plan Designation Ag., Undev., Residential Neighborhood District/LDR STATUS OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY: Existine Land Use N: Vet. Office, Ag. S: Ag., Undev., Res. E: Res., Indus., Ag. W: Agricultural General Plan Designation Neighborhood District Neigh. Dist./LDR Rural Residential Neighborhood District Zoning Neigh. Dist/ PUD, County Zo- * R 1 -PUD Neigh. Dist./R 1 County Zoning County Zoning AHE 06 -01 2 1/24/06 CONFORMANCE OF REQUEST WITH GENERAL PLAN: The proposed project conforms to the land use designation for the property on the General Plan map, and is consistent with the intent of the text of the General Plan document, particularly the Housing Element portion. ENVIRONMENTAL UVIPACTS• This application examines the proposed project's consistency with the City's Residential Development Ordinance exemption process; it does not result in granting any entitlements for residential development. Therefore, the City's action on this application does not constitute "approval of a Project" for purposes of CEQA review. The City will require CEQA review if the applicant receives approval of this Small Project Exemption, and submits subsequent applications to develop this property. OVERVIEW OF THE RANCHO DEL SOL PROJECT: The Rancho del Sol project, a master - planned residential community, will have the following components: ► 260 Homes ► Commercial Component • 23 live/work units (living portion is included in the residential tally for condominium/loft units) ► Private Open Space Areas ANALYSIS OF REOUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of an Affordable Housing Exemption from the RDO under the provisions of Zoning Ordinance section 50.62 (b) (3), to allow the construction of 260 affordable housing units, as follows (see Exhibit A for details): • 66 Market Rate Homes 61 single-family homes ($750,000 - $825,000) n 5 condominiums lofts ($695,000) • 104 Affordable Homes 104 single-family homes ($250,000- $525,000) • 90 Condominiums or lofts 67 condominiums ($225,000-$400, 000) 23 lofts ($205,000 - $250,000) AHE 06 -01 3 1/24/06 Zoning Ordinance section 50.62 (b) (3) governs affordable housing developments that are constructed by agencies that receive government funding. Under this section, up to 75 units within each of the following categories of housing may be exempted from the City's Residential Development competition process: (a) single family homes, (b) condominiums or townhouse ownership units or (c) rental units. [Note: South County Housing is currently processing a Zoning Ordinance text amendment (see Z 06-01) that will provide flexibility in the number of units an applicant may propose for an exemption. This Affordable Housing Exemption request cannot be approved as proposed unless the City Council approves Z 06-01.] \,s stated in section 50.62 (b) (3), the City Council may grant RDO exemptions for affordable housing projects if the project is determined to meet specific criteria. This Zoning Ordinance section states that the City Council shall consider the following elements in determining whether to grant this exemption: a. The number of exempt units which have already been granted during the current RDO cycle, and the number of years left in the cycle; b. The affordability of the project; C. The need for the types of units which are proposed; d. The number of affordable housing projects constructed or proposed within the project vicinity; e. The diversity of unit type and architectural styles which are proposed in the entire development; and f. The site design and proposed building elevations. Staff s determination of this project's consistency with these exemption criteria follows: A. The number of exempt units which have already been granted during the current RDO cycle, and the number of years left in the cycle The City Council allocated 530 affordable housing units in the 2004 -2013 RDO cycle (see Exhibit B). Applications have been submitted for 436 of these units. If the City Council awards 260 units to South County Housing for the Rancho del Sol project, only ninety-four (94) affordable housing units will be available for the eight years remaining in the RDO cycle. The City Council has not set a policy restricting allocation of affordable housing units. Therefore, Staff believes this project is Consistent with this criterion. B. The affordability of the project The sales prices of the homes in this development are delineated in Exhibit A. As proposed, the development will meet the full spectrum of incomes, from very low to market rate. However, the percentage of units at each income level differs from the percentages listed in the City's "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure." The following chart compares the applicant's proposal with the City's policy: AHE 06 -01 4 1/24/06 Income Levels Percentage of Required in Number of Affordable Units Number of Percentage of the RDO Affordable Units Resulting from Affordable Units Required by the Adherence to RDO Offered by the Units Resulting Exemption p from Applicant's Procedure RDO Exemption Exemption Applicant's Proposal Document Procedure Procedure Proposal Standards 42% to 50% of the median N/A N/A 39 15% income 50% to 60% of the median 104 40% 38 150/0 income 60% to 70% of the median 0 00/0 income 78 30% 70% to 100% of the median 59 23% income 100% to 110% of the median 5 8 22% income 78 30% 110% to 120% of the median 0 0 income Market Rate Income Levels N/A N/A 66 25% Total 260 100% The applicant proposes to sell 25 % of the units at market rate prices, which is not a part of the price range included within the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure." In addition, the applicant proposes far fewer units in the "50 to 60 %" and "60 to 100 %" categories than the policy's standard. The applicant provides the following rationale for proposing prices do not strictly comply with the ranges set forth in the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure ": ► South County Housing needs market -rate units to provide the deep subsidies needed to construct the very low- income units, which is an affordability level the City does not require developers to meet; and ► Providing homes at all levels of affordability will create a mixed- income community that is likely more sustainable than a strictly low- income neighborhood. ► The market -rate units will offset the cost of amenities, such as private parks and a bridge to the future City park. AHE 06-01 5 1/24/06 The City's Housing & Community Development (HCD) staff has reviewed the proposed price structure and determined that the approach to providing affordable ownership units to a wide range of lower income households is appropriate, because fifty -two percent of the units are affordable (defined as being below eighty percent of median income). The City's policy does not address the issue of providing market -rate units in exchange for providing very- low income units. However, because of the large number of affordable units in this geographic area, staff believes that allowing market -rate units in this development will create a more sustainable project (see criterion D for discussion of this issue). Staff believes this project is Marginally Consistent with this criterion. C. The need for the types of units which are proposed The City's Housing Element has documented the need for very low, low, and moderate income housing. Staff believes this project is Consistent with this criterion. D. The number of affordable housing projects constructed or proposed within the project vicinity The following affordable projects have been constructed in the vicinity of this project: ► Sobrato Transitional Center: 140 -bed homeless shelter and 60 transitional apartment units (Monterey Road north of Farrell Avenue; Developer. South County Housing) ► Alderwood: 60 low- income single - family homes [Note: 17 of these homes have been sold, and are now market rate.] (South of Farrell Avenue, between Church Street and Monterey Road; Developer: South County Housing) ► Gilroy Garden Apartments: 74 low- income apartment units (South of Farrell Avenue, east of Wren Avenue; Developer: CBM Group) ► Gilroy Park Apartments: 74 low- income apartment units (East of Wren Avenue, South of Farrell Avenue; Developer: CBM Group) As this list shows, there are 251 affordable housing units and a homeless shelter constructed or proposed near this site. If this exemption request is approved, there will be 445 very low to moderate income housing units and a homeless shelter constructed within an approximate 1/2 mile area Although this could be considered an over - concentration of affordable housing units, there are some factors that may mitigate the impacts of these units: There are four distinct types of units that will be constructed in this area (rental apartment units, owner - occupied single family homes, owner - occupied condominium units, and transitional housing units). Ql' Taken as a whole, the housing projects in this 1/2 mile area are affordable to Very Low, Low, Median, Moderate, and Market -Rate income groups. Because these projects are affordable to a mixture of incomes, people of various incomes and backgrounds are living together. In the long term, this creates more sustainable neighborhoods, and better planned communities. AHE 06-01 6 1/24/06 13" This property is planned for a Neighborhood District development, and will be denser than traditional single - family neighborhoods, regardless of whether the units are targeted toward affordable households. v- There are 66 market rate units proposed for this project. Iv" Seventeen of the units constructed as affordable units in the Alderwood projects have transitioned to market -rate units, and others will likely transition to market rate in the future. Therefore, considering these mitigating factors, Staff believes this project is Marginally Consistent with this criterion. E. The diversity of unit type and architectural styles which are proposed in the entire development There will be several different housing types within the Rancho del Sol project. These are: Single - family market -rate homes Single family median and below - market -rate homes Single family low - income homes Condominiums Uve/Work units In addition, South County Housing has worked to create a wide mix of different architectural designs in this development, which will add architectural interest to the street (see attached elevations). Staff believes this project is Consistent with this criterion. F. The site design and proposed building elevations The applicant has submitted a preliminary site plan. Following is an analysis of the site plan's strengths, and some of the project's issues and concerns. Project Strengths: Staff evaluated this application and determined that the project has the following strengths: ► The project proposes mixed - income, mixed- density development. ► The project appears generally consistent, in terms of design and density, with City standards. ► The developer has proposed to locate the multi- family housing away from established single - family neighborhoods. Issues & Concerns: Staff has the following concerns with this project: ► Staff will need to determine whether the project meets Neighborhood District Standards ► The developer will need to locate the bridge across the channel so that it does not directly abut residential properties. Il• 1 7 1/24/06 ► This project proposes a higher density than anticipated in the City's water, sewer and storm master plans. The developer will need to pay for the City's consultant to prepare supplemental studies, which could require on -site water detention. Prior To Development, The Applicant Will Be Required to: #1. Complete a CEQA environmental review #2. Complete a Tentative Map to subdivide the property #3. Complete a Master Plan and Architectural & Site Review through the PUD process Staff believes this project is Consistent with this criterion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This p%iect is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance criteria for exempting affordable housing units, and recommends that the Plannine Commission forward a recommendation of APPROVAL of this request to the City Council. H this proiect is approved, staff recommends that the following conditions be applied to this approval: Approval of this application is contingent upon City Council approval of Z 06 -01. 2. The developer shall sign a contract agreeing to the provisions contained within the "RDO Affordable Housing Exemption Procedure," prior to approval of an Architectural and Site review for this site. 3. The Applicant shall obtain approval of a Tentative Map, Final Map, and PUD Architectural & Site Review. 4. Time Limits for Approval: If the approvals set forth in condition 3 above have not been obtained within two (2) years from the date of this AHE approval, then this AHE approval shall be automatically revoked without further action by the City. Upon application prior to the expiration of this AHE approval and for good cause shown, the Planning Division Manager may grant an extension of time not to exceed one year. Respectfully, aam Faus Planning Division Manager bfaus@ci.gilroy.ca.us 12- Jan -06 PRELIMINARY RANCHO DEL SOL AFFORDABILITY PROGRAM EXHIBIT A of Units Percent of Project Percent of Affordable Units Estimated First Mortgage + Downpmt Qualifying Incomes Percent of Median Income Market Rate Homes Moderate Income Median Income Low Income Very Low Income _Number 66 58 59 38 39 25% 22% 23% 15% 15% 30% 30% 40% $695,000 - $825,000 $400,000 - $525,000 $350,000 - $395,000 $250,000 - $305,000 $205,000 - $250,000 $157,000 - $185,000 $92,000 - $119,000 $72,000 - $106,000 $52,000 - $64,000 $43,000 - $54,000 148%-175% 87%-110% 70%-100% 51%-60% 42% - 50% Total Units 260 100% 100% Total Market Rate Total Affordable Units 66 194 25% 75% 260 Note: Incomes and prices will change proportional to the change in the Average Median Income Index EXHIBIT A 12- Jan -06 Rancho del Sol, Monterey Road, Gilroy NUMBER OF UNITS LOT SIZE PRODUCT Sq. Ft. PER HOME MORTGAGE + DOWNPMT ALL UNITS PERCENT OF TOTAL PRODUCT TYPE MARKET RATE UNITS: l l 44 6 5 35 x 90 42x110 35 x 75 Carriage A Carriage B Viale Corralitos 1,851 1,620 1,500 1,477 $800,000 $825,000 $750,000 $695,000 4% 17% 2% 2% 25% gle Family Homes - detached [Single gle Family Homes - detached Family Homes - detached ndominimum Homes - Attached TOTAL 66 AFFORDABLE UNIT AFFORDABLE UNITS: PERCENTAGE 30 16 12 35 x 75 40 x 80 Viale La Maestra Corralitos 1, 500 1,478 1, 477 $525,000 $450,000 $400 , 000 12% 6% 5% 21% 30% 120% Single Family Homes - detached 120% Single Family Homes - detached 120% Condominium Homes - attached TOTAL MODERATE INCOME 58 24 15 20 59 7 5 17 9 35 x 75 40 x 80 35 x 75 40 x 80 Condo Viale La Maestra Corralitos Viale La Maestra Corralitos Lofts 1,500 1,478 1,477 1,500 1,500 1,477 1,335 $395,000 $375,000 $350,000 $305,000 $265,000 $250,000 $250,000 9% 6% 8% 3% 2% 7% 3% 13% 15% 30% 100% Single Family Homes -detached 1000/6 Single Family Homes - detached 100% Condominium Homes - attached TOTAL MEDIAN INCOME 60% Single Family Homes - detached 60% Single Family Homes - detached 60% Condominium Homes - attached 0 60 /o Lofts TOTAL LOW INCOME 38 40% 7 18 40 x 80 Condo La Maestra Corralitos Lofts 1,500 1,500 1,335 $250,000 $225,000 $205,000 3% 7% 5% 15% 500/a Single Family Homes - detached 50% Condominium Homes - attached 50% Lofts TOTAL VERY LOW INCOME 39 66 194 25% 75% Total Market Rate Total Affordable PROJECT TOTAL 260 100% 100°/i NO OBJECTIONS TO THIS REOUEST: OBJECTIONS TO THIS REOUEST: 1. D. Sandoval, 9034 Freeman Ct, Gilroy 02/02/2006 14 :25 8317551662 MCLAUGHLIN PAINTING PAGE 01 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS by the CITY OF GILROY PLANNING COMMISSION and the CITY COUNCIL to consider a ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXEMPTION REQUEST THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD in the Council Chambers located at 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California on: Plttming Commissigg fthruary 2.2006 at 6 :00 D_m, City Council February 27.2006 at 7:00 n_m REQUEST: Ametrdnvmt to the City of Gilroy Zoning Ordinatce Section 50 -62 (b) (3), (Application of Ordinance), to allow projects that seek an affordable housing exemption from the RDO (Residential Development Ordinance) to have flw bility in the number of units requested. The applicant is also requesting an Affordable Housing Exemption request to allocate 260 residential housing units. LOCATION: CITYWIDE FOR THE TEXT AMENDMENT AND MONTEREY ROAD, NORTH St SOUTH OF COHANSEY AVENUE FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING EXEMP'T10N APPLICAN": South County Housing jc% Karen Saundc s] 9015 Murray Ave., Ste. 100 Gilroy, CA 95020 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: Exeatpt EIVE FEB 02 2006 ZONING: ND (Neighborhood District) Gilroy Planning Div. FILE NUMBER: Z 06-01 & AHE 06-01 Ifyou have any questions about this request, please call the City of Gilroy Community Develapmcrut Department. Planning Division, at (408) 846 -0440 and ask for Melissa Durkin. Senior Planner. Anyone interested may speak at the public hearings on February 2, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. for the Planning Commission and on February 27, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. for the City Council. If you challcngo the decision to approve or deny the project in court, you may be. limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission and City Council at, or prior to, their respective public hearings. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF GILROY By: 00- _ Kelly Feli , Planning T Wian Dated: January 17, 2006 Planning Division, Community Development Department If you have any questions regarding the proposal, we encourage you to contact the Planning Division prior to the hearing. You have the right to appear at the hearing. You may also send in any comments you have on the proposal CASE NO.: Z 06-01 & AHE 06-Ot _I do not have any objections to this request. *1 do have objections to this request. �•• �i w �� S�ooy� °!� 3�-f �rz��►t� �- Print Name & A dres" / C I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2006 -30 is an original resolution, or true and correct copy of a city resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 1 st day of May, 2006, at which meeting a quorum was present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this Sth day of May, 2006. City Clerk of the City of Gilroy (Seal)