Loading...
Resolution 2007-01 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING GP A 06-02, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN ON APPROXIMATELY 423 ACRES IN THE AREA NORTH AND SOUTH OF HECKER P ASS HIGHWAY AND WEST OF SANTA TERESA BOULEVARD, APNs 810-20-015, 004-009, 011-013; 810-21-001, 003-005,007; 783-04-011, 018; 783-03-002, 003, 070; 783-02-004, 009,010,020,026,030-033 WHEREAS, the applicants, referred to collectively as the Hecker Pass Property Owners, submitted application GP A 06-02 requesting certain amendments to the Hecker Pass Specific Plan which was adopted by the City Council on January 18, 2005 by Resolution No. 2005-03, for approximately 423 acres in the area north and south of Hecker Pass Highway and west of Santa Teresa Boulevard, APNs 810-20-015, 004-009, 011-013; 810-21-001, 003-005, 007; 783-04- 011,018; 783-03-002,003,070;783-02-004,009,010,020,026,030-033;and WHEREAS, the requested amendments are referred to herein as "the Project," and are specifically set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on December 7, 2006, at which time the Planning Commission considered the public testimony, the staff report dated November 28, 2006 ("Staff Report"), and all other documentation related to application GP A 06-02, and recommended that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration for the Project and approve said application; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on December 18,2006, at which time the City Council considered the public testimony, the Staff Report, a supplemental IMD01714543.2 01-011507-04706089 -1- Resolution No. 2007-01 staff report dated December 12, 2006, and all other documentation related to application GPA 06-02; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council, following its public hearing on December 18, 2006, considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and adopted the Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," finding that the Negative Declaration was completed in compliance with CEQA, that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City, and that there is no substantial evidence in the entire record that the Project as mitigated will have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this project approval is based is the office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT: A. The City Council hereby finds as follows: 1. The proposed amendments are generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City's General Plan document, in particular Policies 1.07 (Hecker Pass), 1.10 (Gateways), and 6.01 (Scenic Highways), as more fully discussed in the Staff Report. 2. The proposed amendments are generally consistent with the intent of the goals and policies ofthe Hecker Pass Specific Plan. 3. The proposed amendments are in the public interest because they will limit the removal of deodar cedar trees along the Hecker Pass corridor and improve the IMDOI714543.2 01-011507-04706089 -2- Resolution No. 2007-01 chance that the State will designate Highway 152 as a Scenic Highway. B. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for this Project, attached hereto as Exhibit "c." C. Based on the findings in subsection A above, the City Council hereby approves application GP A 06-02 requesting certain amendments to the Hecker Pass Specific Plan as set forth in Exhibit "A," subject to the mitigation measures set forth in the Negative Declaration (Exhibit "B") and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (Exhibit "C"). D. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2007 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ARELLANO, BRACCO, CORREA, GARTMAN, VALIQUETTE, VELASCO, and PINHEIRO NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE APPROVED: ~-> rt inheiro, Mayor IMDOI714543.2 01-011507-04706089 -3- Resolution No. 2007-01 PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (GP A06-02) PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy October 25,2006 Exhibit A HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA06-02) Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy Community Development Department Melissa Durkin 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy CA 95020 Tel 408.846.0252 PREPARED BY EMC Planning Group Inc 301 Lighthouse Avenue Suite C Monterey CA 93940 Tel 831.649.1799 Fax 831.649.8399 contactus@emcplanning.com www.emcplanning.com October 25,2006 REQUEST TO AMEND THE HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN (Prepared in response to City of Gilrov Hil!hwav 152 03/22/06 Workshop) The applicants request the following changes to the text and figures of the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. Changes are intended to eliminate wording regarding the east intersection or mention of two new intersections, and clarify wording regarding unit transfers. [Proposed inserts are marked like this. Proposed deletions are ShOWTI.tl._______________________________________________:::-.'{ Deleted: like this Chane:e No.1 --- Deleted: ~ Page 3-18. Amend second paragraph as follows: The Residential Cluster land use designation is designed to allow for a diverse mix of residential unit types, similar to the City of Gilroy's Neighborhood District land use designation. By establishing a "target mix" ofIot types, the Specific Plan ensures that numerous housing types are provided. Lot types have been generally described as falling into three lot type or typical lot size categories: Typically 2500-3500 SF Lots, Typically 3500-6000 SF Lots, and Typically greater than 6000 SF Lots. Individual lot sizes within each category may vary according to Policy 3-18. By providing a bulk of the residential units in the mid-range ofIot types (typically 3500-6000 SF Lots) and requiring a certain percentage of smaller lot types (typically 2500-3500 SF Lots), the Specific Plan provides greater affordability than would occur if the site were developed with only large lot residential units such as typically found in rural development. The Specific Plan also allows for units to be transferred among Residential Clusters. so long as the total in any cluster does not increase bv more than 25 units as a result of the transfers. and as long as the,p_~~~,~!l.t_"!&~_____,..... ofIot types in each cluster is consistent with Figure 3-6. Allowing a transfer of units between development clusters provides greater flexibility to provide innovative and creative residential neighborhood designs that incorporate "livable community" design concepts. Deleted: a transfer of up to 25 units to or from any cluster provided that the Page 3-19. Amend Policy 3-19 as follows: Policy 3-19;,J!..'!!!~_'!}_(FY.._~~!!..c!!!s(f!!.':~4J!..'!'_9..'!gJJf!~j!!~'!!!f!.~,q!!~!~':~~-~9.J?!!~!l.~,!l.!fUq_t_a.U'!_<!..'!v.m____// Deleted: Up to 25 units may be cluster does not increase hv more than 25 units as a result of the transfers. and as long as the transferred to or from any Residential - - -. Cluster percentage of lot types in each cluster is consistent with the charts in Figure 3-6. .A Deleted: B EXHIBIT A / --'t___________________________________________________________...' GP A 06-02 Exhibit B 2 11/28/06 Chane:e No.2 Page 4-3. Amend Figure 4-1 as attached to delete the east intersection. Chane:e No.3 Page 4-4. Amend section "STREET B" as follows: A new roadway, shown as Street B on the Circulation Plan, will be constructed in the easterly portion of the Specific Plan Area~J.h~,~)(_,,!~~_~IJ~~~~,~tt.~!~_~~~.4~~Y_:'Y.iJJ_~~_.4~!~~!~~.4_~!.!l1_~m.// time of development. .;.r:hi.~_~~,"!<l':\:~),_':\:!!!,~~_~~,"!~_~<::~_~~~_!~_~~Y_~!~l'~~!l.!.i!!_!l1,~_~~!~~}X P.~~!~_~_~L___ the Specific Plan Area and as access for South Valley Community Church. -". Chan2e No.4 Page 4-5. Amend section 4.4.1 as follows: In order to accommodate new traffic generated by development, maintain acceptable levels of service along Highway 152, and help reduce the need for full widening of Hecker Pass Highway, the Specific Plan requires intersection improvements at..~!!~_~~:'Y..i!!!~~~~!i_,?!\'p!,,?p.'?~~.4_~Y-.!l1~mm._"-'" Conceptual Circulation Plan: the intersection of Hecker Pass, Third Street and Street A~"m_mmm_.~'--" Chane:e No.5 Amend Policy 4-1 as follows: Policy 4- J: A l':~tfz.c. :~!&'!~~. _~l!':!! _ ~'!!!~-'- !':.'!4. f!.~~!!.,:, !,!!!!.,:~!!.qHf!. ,!, !'!!l! ~o.y.e.'!!!!.'!!~ ~ ~!':.!! J?!!. _ _,.,.. _" _ _ _ _ _ _....'. constructed at .!:L/},~,~~! ,~'!!~!.~~c.!!q-,!r.~!!!z. fif!~~~r.,f.'!~~ ,lj!g~_'Y..'!y.:___________,_"_,,, _ _ "_.~~.._- ''.::::~~ Chane:e No.6 Amend Policy 4-2 as follows: Deleted: that will connect Third Street to Hecker Pass Highway. Deleted: This roadway will serve as a secondary access for the Specific Plan Area and will primarily serve development in the easterly portion of the Specific Plan Area. This new roadway may also serve as the main access for the Goldsmith Seeds Agriculture Commercial area and as a second access for South Valley Community Church. Deleted: two Deleted: s Deleted: and the intersection of Street B and Hecker Pass Highway. Deleted: Traffic Deleted: s Deleted: two (2) Deleted: ellS! and Deleted: s /..{ Deleted: B EXHIBIT A ./ --"_____________________________________________________------.1 ,.:A Deleted: B EXHIBIT A ,.: -"'I. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.' GPA 06-02 Exhibit B 3 11/28/06 Policy 4-2: Limit new future access along Hecker Pass Highway by directing internal roadways to the._ f!~~s.~~,!g_~'!!~..r.~~.E!!9..'!_ ()l1J!!r.r!:_$!!.e.f!!.~f}_c!_$..q1}.H1:_ T f}!.~_q _ q_'!r!:,q_!!~,_,__. ..... west intersection with Hecker Pass Hir!llwav. Chane:e No.7 Page 4-6. Delete section entitled Hecker Pass Highway and Street B Intersection. _mnnnnnnnmmmnnmnnnnnnmnnnmnmnnnnmmnnnmnmmnnnnm\ Chane:e No. 8 r.~, ~~\:, ~~~\ ~~\~ ~~~l \\ t~\\ \" \\\"\\ ~~;\ \ 1t\\ ~\~ \\ ~\\ ~ ~r ~\\ ~ \~ \ Page 4-9. Delete Figure 4-3. Chane:e No.9 Page 4-27. Amend Policy 4-13 as follows: Policy 4-13: Primary access to all new agricultural commercial and agri-tourist commercial u", ,hould be di","ed to the l"",tint""""tio'''O!_?1!!r~_St,:""t'nmn_nm_____ _ _ _ _mm\\ \'. " " \ Chane:e No. 10 Page 4-31. Amend Figure 4-22 as attached to delete the sidewalk at the east intersection. Chane:e No. 11 Page 8-5. Amend first paragraph to read as follows: New distribution lines will be sized to comply with the current City of Gilroy Water Master Plan. The distribution system will utilize existing domestic water facilities that are available at several points along the Specific Plan Area boundary. The basic water infrastructure may consist of a 12" Zone 1 line in Third Street, connecting to an existing 24" Zone 1 line in Santa Teresa Boulevard and an existing 24" Zone 1 line in Hecker Pass Highway (State Route 152); a 12" Zone 1 line that extends from the proposed Third Street line to the existing Hecker Pass Highway line along future Street B and maintenance road ; and a new 8" Zone 1 line that extends from the Third Street line through the South Valley National BanklRaley's Property and loops back to Third Street, along the existing east-west portion of Two Oaks Lane. Additional lines will be installed as part of Deleted: Iwo new streels intersecling wilh Highway 152. Deleted: The Street B and Hecker Pass Highway intersection (east intersection) consist of a four-legged signalized intersection. The leg on the north side of Highway 152 will serve only as a driveway access for the existing Lutheran Church and limited existing residences. Figure 4-3 illustrates the future intersection improvements.' , Once the east intersection improvements have been completed, the Goldsmith, Vanni and " Deleted: , Deleted: Filice properly accesses from ,\ Hecker Pass Highway may be eliminaled. \; This includes the existing " \ Deleted: " ,\ Deleted: entrance 10 Goldsmith Seeds. \\ Ihe Highway 152 access on Soulh Valley \: Community \ \ Deleted: ,,' \~l Deleted: Church's properly and access \\ to the Vanni and Filice properties. All \: properties may then \ Deleted: Deleted: lake access from Streel B. \' Deleted: easland Deleted: s GPA 06-02 Exhibit B 4 11/28/06 individual development project, including Zone 2 lines to serve future developments in the hillsides north of Hecker Pass Highway. Chane:e No. 12 l,~g~,~:: 7:" _ _ __ _ _ _""_",,, _" _ _ _ _ _ _"_"_""",,,, _""""", _ _ _, _ _ _ _ .._ _ _, _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___,,__________ ____ _"" ..""""" _ _ _ __ _ _...... ,{ Deleted: ~ Amend Figure 9-1 as attached to delete east intersection. .A Deleted: B EXHIBIT A ./ -1_~__________________________________________________________, NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION In compliance with the California Enyironmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Gilroy has undertaken environmental review for the proposed Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment, and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City of Gilroy invites all interested persons and agencies to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. Lead Agency: Project Location: Project Description: Public Review Period: Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is Available for Public Review at these Locations: Address Where Written Comments May be Sent: Public Hearing: City of Gilroy The Hecker Pass Specific Plan area is located within the western portion of the Gilroy city limits. The area is west of Santa Teresa Bouleyard and bisected by State Route 152, locally referred to as Hecker Pass Highway. It is approximately three miles west of U.S. Highway 101. The proposed project is an amendment to the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. The main change and purpose for this enyironmental reyiew process is the remoyal of the "east intersection" on Hecker Pass Highway. Other proposed changes to the specific plan include slight alterations to the trail system plan, some changes to details regarding transfer of residential units among residential clusters, and seyeral textual changes for clarification. Begins - November 1, 2006 Ends - December 1, 2006 City of Gilroy Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020 408-846-0440 Gilroy Public Library Contact: Reference Librarian 7387 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020 408-842-8208 Melissa Durkin, Senior Planner City of Gilroy Community Deyelopment Department 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 Fax (408) 846-0429 Planning Commission Date: December 7, 2006 Time: 6 PM City Council Date: December 18, 2006 Time: 7 PM Location: 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy CA 95020 EXHIBIT B Community Development Department Planning Division (408) 846-0440 NEGATIVE DECLARATION City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA 95020 City File Number: GPA 06-02 Proiect Description: Name of Project: Nature of Project: Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment The proposed project is an amendment to the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. The main change and purpose for this environmental review process is the removal of the approved "east intersection" on Hecker Pass Highway. Other proposed changes to the specific plan include slight alterations to the trail system plan, some changes to details regarding transfer of residential units among residential clusters, and several textual changes for clarification. Proiect Location: Location: The Hecker Pass Specific Plan area is located within the western portion of the Gilroy city limits. The area is west of Santa Teresa Boulevard and essentially bisected by State Route 152, locally referred to as Hecker Pass Highway. It is approximately three miles west of U.S. Highway 101. Assessor's Parcel Number:810-20-003, 004-009, 011-013; 810-21-001, 002-005; 783-04-001, 018; 783-03-002,003,070; 783-02-004,009,010,020,026,030-033 Entity or Person(s) Undertakine: Proiect: Name: Jim Hoey, Hecker Pass Property Owners Address: 2480 Hecker Pass Highway, Gilroy, CA 95020 Staff Planner: Melissa Durkin, mdurkin@cLgilroy.ca.us Initial Studv: Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment Negative Declaration 2 October 25,2006 An initial study of this project was undertaken and prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether this project might have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of this study is attached. The initial study was prepared to supplement the EIR prepared for the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. Findines & Reasons: The initial study identified potentially significant effects on the environment. However, this project has been mitigated (see Mitigation Measures below which avoid or mitigate the effects) to a point where no significant effects will occur. On the basis ofthe whole record, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The following reasons will support these findings: ~ The elimination ofthe eastern access from the specific plan reduces construction impacts. ~ The only mitigations required are revisions to measures existing and previously adopted in the specific plan. ~ A mitigation monitoring and reporting program have been prepared. ~ The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the General Plan ofthe City of Gilroy, as well as the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. ~ City staff independently reviewed the Initial Study, and this Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of Gilroy. ~ With the application of the following Mitigation Measures the proposed project will not have any significant impacts on the environment. ~ The Gilroy Planning Division is the custodian of the documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based. Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment Negative Declaration 3 October 25, 2006 Transportation T -1 (Specific plan mitigation measure 18) Applicants for projects within the specific plan area shall be responsible for improving Hecker Pass Highway immediately west of Santa Teresa Boulevard to include a second westbound travel lane. The second westbound travel lane on Hecker Pass Highway, and the appropriate lane-drop taper consistent with Caltrans' Standards, should extend as far as possible beyond (west of) Santa Teresa Boulevard as can be accommodated within the existing public right-of-way, with the design subject to approval by the City Engineer in his/her reasonable discretion. Applicants shall coordinate with the City of Gilroy Engineering Division to design and implement the widening project. Removal of deodar cedar trees along the highway must be avoided wherever possible and improvements must be consistent with State scenic highway guidelines. Traffic signal modifications should be made to the intersection of Santa Teresa Boulevard and First Street/Hecker Pass Highway to add vehicle detection for the second eastbound through lane. T -2 (Specific plan mitigation measure 19) Applicants for projects within the specific plan area shall be responsible for shoulder improvements to Hecker Pass Highway, per Caltrans' standards, between Santa Teresa Boulevard and the easterly limits of the planned Caltrans Uvas Creek Bridge Improvement project. Applicants shall coordinate with the City of Gilroy Engineering Division to design and implement the shoulder improvements. Removal of deodar cedar trees along the highway must be avoided wherever possible and improvements must be consistent with State scenic highway guidelines. Date Prepared: October 25,2006 End of Review Period: December 1,2006 Date Adopted by City Council: William Faus Planning Division Manager B ill.Faus@cLgilroy.ca.us EXHIBIT C APPENDIX C MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment Mitigation Monitoring Program Introduction CEQA Guidelines section 15097 requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring programs when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a negative declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse enyironmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to ensure compliance with conditions of project approyal during project implementation in order to avoid significant adverse environmental effects. The law was passed in response to historic non-implementation of mitigation measures presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as conditions of project approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation measures are implemented and thereby proyides a mechanism to eyaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. A definitiye set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and enforcement procedures to ensure the measure's compliance. This monitoring program is designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and subsequent conditions of project approyal are implemented. Monitoring Program The basis for this monitoring program is the mItigation measures included in the project mitigated negatiye declaration. These mitigation measures are designed to eliminate or reduce significant adverse environmental effects to less than significant levels. These mitigation measures become conditions of project approyal, which the project proponent is required to complete during and after implementation of the proposed project. The attached checklist is proposed for monitoring the implementation of the mItigation measures. This monitoring checklist contains all appropriate mitigation measures in the environmental impact report. Monitoring Program Procedures The City of Gilroy shall use the attached monitoring checklist for the proposed project. The monitoring program should be implemented as follows: 1. The Gilroy Community Development Department should be responsible for coordination of the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The Community Deyelopment Department should be responsible for completing the monitoring checklist and distributing the checklist to the responsible individuals or agencies for their use in monitoring the mitigation measures. 2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsible for determining whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have been complied with. Once all mitigation measures have been complied with, the responsible indiyidual or City of Gilroy Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment Mitigation Monitoring Program agency should submit a copy of the monitoring checklist to the Community Development Department to be placed in the project ftle. If the mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist should not be returned to the Community Deyelopment Department. 3. The Gilroy Community Deyelopment Department will reyiew the checklist to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures and additional conditions of project approval included in the monitoring checklist have been complied with at the appropriate time, e.g. prior to issuance of a use permit, etc. Compliance with mitigation measures is required for project approyals. 4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non-compliance has occurred, a written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Community Development Department, describing the non- compliance and requiring compliance within a specified period of time. If non- compliance still exists at the expiration of the specified period of time, construction may be halted and fines may be imposed at the discretion of the City of Gilroy. City of Gilroy 2 Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment Mitigation Monitoring Checklist Prior to approval of the Amendment, the following mitigation measures shall be included in the specific plan: Mitigation Measure T -1 (Specific Plan EIR mitigation measure 18) Applicants for projects within the specific plan area shall be responsible for improving Hecker Pass Highway immediately west of Santa Teresa Boulevard to include a second westbound trayellane. The second westbound travel lane on Hecker Pass Highway, and the appropriate lane-drop taper consistent with Caltrans' Standards, should extend as far as possible beyond (west of) Santa Teresa Boulevard as can be accommodated within the existing public right-of- way, with the design subject to approval by the City Engineer in his/her reasonable discretion. Applicants shall coordinate with the City of Gilroy Engineering Division to design and implement the widening project. Removal of deodar cedar trees along the highway must be avoided wherever possible and improvements must be consistent with State scenic highway guidelines. Traffic signal modifications should be made to the intersection of Santa Teresa Bouleyard and First Street/Hecker Pass Highway to add vehicle detection for the second eastbound through lane.. Mitigation Measure T -2 (Specific Plan EIR mitigation measure 19) Applicants for projects within the specific plan area shall be responsible for shoulder improvements to Hecker Pass Highway, per Caltrans' standards, between Santa Teresa Boulevard and the easterly limits of the planned Caltrans Uvas Creek Bridge Improvement project. Applicants shall coordinate with the City of Gilroy Engineering Diyision to design and implement the shoulder improyements. Remoyal of deodar cedar trees along the highway must be avoided wherever possible and improvements must be consistent with State scenic highway guidelines. Party Responsible Jor Implementation: Applicant Party Responsible Jor Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division City of Gilroy 1 I, RHONDA PELLIN, City Clerk ofthe City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2007-01 is an original resolution, or true and correct copy of a city resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 22nd day of January, 2007, at which meeting a quorum was present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this 8th day of February, 2007. '~~; (Seal)