Minutes 1983/04/04
r
I
!
Roll Call
Consent
Calendar
Minutes
Pub.Hear. re:
Appe a l-,J .
Castle
Dev. Agree.-
Las Animas
Tech Pk.
Budget
Amendments
Vendors'
Wagons, etc.
4851
April 4, 1983
Gi 1 roy, Cal iforni a
The Regular Meeting of the Gilroy City Council was called to order
by His Honor Mayor Norman B. Goodrich at 8:01 p.m.
Present: Council Members: Sharon A. Albert, Donald F. Gaae, Roberta
H. Hughan, Marion T. Link, Robert E. Taylor, Pete Valdez, Jr. and Norman
B. Goodrich.
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilman Gage
that the following items under the Consent Calenrlar be aoproved by the
following Roll Call Vote: (excluding Item "C" adootion of proposed ordi-
nance amending Section 15.61 and 15.62 of the Gilroy City Code pertaining
to vendors wagons, etc.) Ayes: Council Members: Albert, Gaqe, Hughan,
Link, Taylor, Valdez and Goodrich:
Approved the Minutes of the Reqular Council Meetina of March 21,
1983;
Set April 18, 1983, as a Public Hearing date on an anpeal of Jamie
Castle on the Planning Commission's 1-6-83 denial of a variance request
for reduction of setbacks at 7491 Cra\'iford Drive, north of Clark !~ay;
Approved a Development Agreement with Las Animas Technoloqy Park
as 'recommended; and
Approved Budget Amendments to the 1982-83 Bud0et as reauested (Accts.
3700, 1400, 2100, 2013 and 4439).
Discussion was had regarding the orooosed ordinance amending Sections
15.61 and 15.62 of the Gilroy City Code pertaining to vendors wagons, etc.
Police Chief Cowart's report regarding said issue was noted and further
explained by Chief Cowart.
Motion was made by Councilman Gage seconded by Councilman Link Rnd
carried that a proposed ordinance be introduced to amend Section 15.62 to
provide requirements for permits to be issued by the City Administrator
which shall designate the specific location in which such waqon shall stand
on any street, parking lot or other location open to the public.
The City Attorney noted that under the wording of the 15.62 amend-
ment, a permit could be issued by the City Administrator for mobile lunch
wagons to park for a maximum of thirty (30) minutes to vend. It was noted
that Section 15.61 would not be amended which provides for ten (10) minute
parking of ice cream vendors, etc.
4852
Bids. re:
E. 9th St.
et al,
Assess. Dist.
Pub. Hear. re:
Street
Abandonment
Res. #83-26
Pub.Hear. re:
Tent. t1ap-
\~oolworth
Res. #83-27
Pub. Hear. re:
E. 9th St.
Assess. Dist.
The Mayor noted that bids received for East Ninth Street, et
al Assessment District 1983-1 would be renorted under the Public
Hearing for same.
The Mayor stated that it was the tirile" and pl ate schedul ed for
a Public Hearing on Intention to vacate a 351 one-half street riaht-
of-way and a portion of the public easement.
Director of Public Works-City Engineer Hansen oresented and
explained the Staff Reoort.
The Mayor asked if,there was anyone present in the audience
wishing to speak for or against the matter. There was no comment
from anyone in the audience.
....."......,
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilwoman
Hughan and carried that the Public Hearing be closed.
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilman Gage
that the reading of Resolution No. 83-26 be waived and that it be
adopted vacating a 351 one-half street right-of-way and portion of
public easement as recommended.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-26
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY ORDERING VACATION OF
A THIRTY-FIVE FOOT ONE-HALF STREET RIGHT-OF-~JAY AND PORTION OF PUBLIC
SERVICE EASEMENT ON BREM LANE.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ
and GOODRICH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
The Mayor stated that it was the time and place scheduled for
a Public Hearing on a Tentative Map request of Al Woolworth, appli-
cant, for ten (10) Industrial Condominium Lots, located east of the
South Va 11 ey Freeway, south of Tenth Street on Brem Lane in an M2
(General Industrial) District.
Planning Director Dorn presented and explained the Staff Report.
The Mayor asked if there was anyone present in the audience
wishing to speak on the proposal. There was no comment from anyone in
the audience.
Motion was made by Councilman Taylor seconded by Councilman
Link and carried that the Public Hearinq be closed.
Motion was made by Councilwoman Hughan seconded by Councilwoman
Albert that the reading of Resolution No. 33-27 be waived and that it
be adopted granting approval of the Tentative Map request of Al Wool-
worth as recommended.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-27
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING A TENTATIVE
MAP FOR A 10 INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM UNIT SUBDIVISION ON 0.91 ACRES ON
BREM LANE.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MH1BERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ
and GOODRICH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
~,~
-
The Mayor stated that it was the time and place scheduled for a
Public Hearing on proposed East Ninth Street, et al, Assessment Dis-
tri ct 1983-1.
Director of Public Works-City En9ineer Hansen presented a report
on bids received for award at the M~y 16, 1983, Regular Council Meeting.
Mr. Arnold J. Brunetti, Project Engineer, presented the following
report:
4853
"Gentlemen:
I, Arnold Brunetti, am a Registered Engineer with the firm of w. J. Hanna
& Son, Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors of Gilroy, California, which has
been named as Engineer of Work for the East Ninth Street et al Assessment
District by Resolution Number 80-72. I have been assigned as the Project
Engineer for and on behalf of W. J. Hanna & Son. I have directed the
engineering design and have been directly involved with the assessment
district proceedings.
....'
The East Ninth Street et al Assessment District is approximately 84 acres
in size. The proposed improvements will be installed on Ninth Street
from Alexander easterly to the westerly R.O.W. line of the U.S. 101 Free-
way, on Tenth Street from the Southern Pacific Railroad track easterly
to the U. S. 101 Freeway off ramps, on Alexander Street from Banes Lane
northerly to Ninth Street, on Banes Lane from Alexander easterly 175 feet,
more or less, on Chestnut Street between Ninth Street and Tenth Street.
I
....
The proposed improvements include clearing and grubbing, excavation,
grading, removal of existing trees, shrubs and structures and the construc-
tion therein of base, pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, where required,
street monuments, street signs, handicap ramps, surface and subsurface
storm drainage facilities, where required, sanitary sewer mains, manholes
with manhole frames and covers, laterals and cleanouts, where required,
water mains, valves, tees, hydrants and services, where required, under-
ground serviced street lighting facilities, and the relocation and/or
reconstruction of existing facilities, where required, together with any
and all appurtenances to any of the above necessary to meet the require-
ments of the City of Gilroy.
The construction of landscaped median islands, including sprinkler and
irrigation systems, in 2'enth Street from Alexander Street to a point of
600 feet, more or less, easterly of Chestnut Street.
The acquisition of a right of service and use in existing traffic signal
facilities and in intersection improvements at the intersection of Tenth
Street and Chestnut Street on behalf of the properties benefitting there-
from.
--
The acquisition of all rights, lands and easements and the performing of
all work auxiliary to any of the above and necessary to comp~~te same.
These improvements are completely detailed on the plans prepared by W. J.
Hanna & Son for this project.
The costs of the improvements for this district have been spread to each
parcel to properly reflect benefits received according to the criteria
established for this project. The proposed method of assessments uses the
adjusted front footage and parcel area to distribute costs in proper
proportion to benefits received. The total assessment for each parcel was
determined by the sum of the construction costs, the costs of acquisition
of traffic signals and intersection improvement, the cost of land acquisi-
tion, construction costs for landscape median, and incidental expenses.
The construction costs for handicap ramp, a~justment to grade of valve
boxes and manholes, relocation of street signs and installation of City
monument boxes have been prorated on a front basis for the footage to
all parcels facing Ninth, Tenth and Alexander Streets except that this
footage on Tenth in front of Parcels 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 is spread
to Parcels 21 thru 26 based on their net area.
---
The construction costs for clearing, grading, curb and gutter asphalt
dike, pavement, aggregate base, street lighting, storm sewers, catch
basins, asphalt overlay, petromat, fog seal, water main, relocation and
installation fo fire hydrants have been prorated on a front foot basis
to parcels fronting said improvements.
....
The construction costs for water services, sanitary sewer services, P.C.C.
sidewalks, fire services, driveway aprons, asphalt driveway conforms have
been allocated to the properties served.
The construction costs for the Tenth Street median curbs, landscaping,
irrigation system have been prorated to the par~els on both sides of Tenth
Street from the RR tracks to Chestnut Street on the front foot basis. From
Chestnut Street easterly the costs have been prorated to the parcels on the
south side of Tenth Street only on the net acreage basis.
4854
The construction costs for the traffic signals at Tenth and Chestnut
Streets and the costs of existing intersection improvements have
been spread to the parcels in the traffic signal zone as shoUJn on
the assessment diagram on a net acreage basis. The Traffic Signal
Zone shaU be, aU of the South VaUey Plaza Shopping Center area
plus aU that area lying within 400 feefof the ;vesterly line of
Chestnut Street be-tween Banes Lane and Ninth Street.
The costs of incidental expenses including City Administration and
inspection costs~ legal~ engineering~ bond discount~ printing and
construction contingencies shall be distributed to all parcels pro-
portional to all the costs.
The .cost of Land Acquisition for required additional B. O. W. has been
spread to the parcels affected by the front door method.
~
.....
On the basis of my past experience and my knowledge of this proposed
assessment district~ it is my opinion that the proposed assessments
properly reflect the benefits to be derived by each parcel. The
method of assessment is reasonable~ fair~ and equitable and the assess-
ments are distributed in proportion to the amount properties benefit.
On March 29~ 1983~ a total of five (5) bids Were received by the City
of Gilroy for the construction of these improvements. These bids
ranged from a low of $4?3~563.25 to high of $5?3~805.35. The Engineer's
Estimate was $463~?49.35. The low bid of $4?3~563.25 was incomplete
and therefor rejected and the next lowest bid of $498~990.00 from
Piazza Construction Company of San Jose was used. Based on the bid of
$498~990.00 and a construction contingency of approximately 6.88%~ the
total project cost of this assessment district will remain the same
as previously submitted~ $1~12?~022.81.
This completes my report for and on behalf of W. J. Hanna & Son~ Engi-
neer of Work.
Respectfully submi tted~
.....
/s/ ARNOLD BRUNETTI
R.C.E. 1?~186
....-
A?/FB"
The Mayor presented the following Opening Statement:
"This is the time and Dlace set for hearing on the project known
as East Ninth Street Et Al Assessment District 83-1. Notices have been
posted~ published and mailed pursuant to law and the certificates and
affidavits of posting~ publishing and mailing are on file in the office
of the City Clerk. There are two separate and distinct legal hearings
duly noticed for tonight which will be combined and heard at the same
time because of the fact that they deal with the same basic subject
matter. These hearings are as follows:
1. Hearing under Article XVI~ Section 19 of the Constitution
of the State of California.
The subject of this hearing is whether the public convenience
and necessity require the proposed acquisitions and improve-
.ments. Any Council determination on this subject~ in order
to be legally effective~ must be made by a 4/5th vote of the
Ci ty Co unci l.
~
2. Hearing on the Engineer's Report under the Gilroy City Code.
I
-
The Engineer's Report prepared by the Engineer consists of plans
and specifications of the proposed improvements~ maps and descriptions
of the lands and easements to be acquired~ the Engi~eer's statement of
the itemized and total estimated cost and expenses of the acquisitions
and improvements~ including the incidental expenses in connection there-
with~ a diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and
dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within the district
and an assessment in accordance uith benefits. Anyone of these items
may be the subject of protests or endorsements.
4855
All written protests to be computed in the protests percentage
should have been filed with the City Clerk on or before 8:00 o'clock p.m.
Protests or endorsements may be made by any person interested~ but only
written protests filed by the owners of the property may be considered
in determining the percentage of protests.
You are asked to clearly identify yourself and the property owned
by you so that your statements may be correctly recorded.
The hearings are declared open and I will ask the City Clerk to
report on the various notices given in connection with the hearings."
-"
The City Clerk made the following report as to notices:
....
"Notices have been posted~ published and mailed as required by the
Gilroy City Code. Affidavits and certificates of posting~ publishing
and mailing are on file in my office. A copy of the Engineer's Report
prepared by the Engineer was filed in my office on February 22~ 1983~
and has been open to public inspection since that time."
The City Clerk presented and read the followinq written protests
against the project:
1) Mike Conrotto, Val Filice, and Gilroy Weighing and Receiving
Station Inc. (Franklin J. Ditto);
2) National Fiberglass Corp., (Charles Enlow, V.P.) and James F.
Cl i fford;
3) Michael J. Filice, Trustee;
4) Garden Valley Foods, Fred Avali, President.
The City Clerk noted that no written endorsements had been received.
-"~
The Mayor asked if there was anyone present in the audience wishing
to speak for or against the proposed assessment district.
The following persons addressed the Council:
Mr. Doug Newell, representing Orchard Supply, noting that the
estimated assessment for their property was more than they wished to
assume.
Mr. Paul Simpson, attorn~y representing Star Excavation, requesting
Council to waive irregularities of their bid.
Mr. Mike Conrotto objecting to the proposed Improvement District.
Mr. Don Luva, representing Operators' Enqineers, Local Union #3,
reporting that Star Excavation is not a responsible contractor.
Mr. Jose Vasquez, San Jose, on behalf of minorities concerning
apprenticeship requesting that any contractor selected be required to obey
the law.
Mr. Dennis Finnegan, Chief Estimator for Piazza Construction, re-
questing Council to award the contract to Piazza.
......
Mr. Paul Simpson, representing Star Excavation, requesting Council
to discard derogatory innuendos presented towards Star Excavation.
....
Mr. Ernest S. Filice, property owner, in favor of the project with
smaller islands than proposed and reduction in traffic lanes.
Mr. Val Filice, property owner, in favor of the project with reduc-
tion in traffic lanes.
Mr. Frank Ditto, representing Gilroy Weighing & Receiving, Inc. noting
need for the project at a future date; proposed project too extensive
traffic lanes for the present.
Mr. Don Luva, noting that he has documentation in regard to Star
Excavation not being a responsible contractor.
4856
Res. #83-28
Pub. Hear. re:
RDO Numerical
Limits
The Mayor inquired of the nercentage of protests received. Dir-
ector of Public Works-City Engineer Hansen renorted that written pro-
tests received were 32.815% Drotests of the district area. He further
explained the reasoning for the size of the prooosed district.
Heard from Mr. Mike Conrotto inquiring about the total orotest
percentage.
Heard from Mr. Tom Carmichael, Third Street and Santa Barbara
Drive, recommending that the City consider selectinq a different street
other than Tenth Street as a major traffic carrier.
The Mayor asked if there was anyone further in the audience
wishing to soeak on the matter. There was no further comment from
anyone in the audience.
:~
i
,
.......
Motion was made by Councilwoman HUQhan seconded by Councilman
Gage and carried that the Public Hearing be closed.
Council considered and discussed the proposed project.
Mr. Philip D. Assaf, Bond Attorney, presented a Resolution
Overruling Protests on Resolution No. 80-71 of Preliminary Determina-
tion and of Intention, as amended, notinq that said resolution requires
a simple majority since protests received were less than 50%.
Motion was made by Councilwoman Huohan seconded by Councilwoman
Albert that the reading of Resolution No. 83-28 be waived and that
it be adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-28
A RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS ON RESOLUTION NO. 80-71 OF PRELIMI-
NARY DETERMINATION AND OF INTENTION, AS AMENDED.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the followinq vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, and GOODRICH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: LINK, TAYLOR and VALDEZ
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
..,....,
A resolution finding and determining that the nublic convenience
and necessity require proposed acquisition,s and improvements was nre-
sented requiring 4/5ths majority.
....
Motion was made by Councilwoman Hughan seconded by Councilwoman
Albert that the reading of a resolution finding and determining that
the public convenience and necessity require proDosed acquisitions
and improvements be adopted.
Motion failed by the following Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Council
Members: Albert, Gage, Hughan and Goodrich. Noes: Council Members:
Link, Taylor and Valdez.
Motion was made by Councilman Gage seconded by Councilman Taylor
that the resolution finding and determininq that the public convenience
and necessity require proposed acquisitions and imorovements be re-
considered at a future date to allow Staff to oresent a revised oro-
ject proposal, by the following RollCall Vote: Ayes: Council Members:
Albert, Gage, HUQhan, Link, Taylor, Valdez and Goodrich. Noes: Council
Members: None.
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilman Taylor
and carried that Staff be requested to Dresent Council with a reduction
in the proposed street to an ei~hty-six foot (861) width, noting that
Council would consider all variations recommenrled by Staff.
----
...,'~
The Mayor stated that it was the time and place scheduled for
the Public Hearing to establish numerical limits of dwelling units oer-
mitted under the Residential Development Ordinance for 1984, 1985 and
1986.
Planning Director Dorn nresented and explained the Staff Reoort.
The Mayor asked if there was anyone present in the audience
wishing to speak on the matter. There was no comment from anyone in
the audience.
Res. #83-29
-,
...
Las Animas
Tech Pk.
Pub. Hks.
Week
The Food
Bank
...
-
t10nthly
Reports
Gen. Plan
Fees
Res. #83-30
""....
....
Ind. Dev.
Authori ty
Res. #83-31
4857
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by COllncilman Taylor
and carried that the Public Hearing be closed.
Motion was made by Councilman Gage seconded by Councilman Valdez
that the reading of Resolution No. 83-29 be waived and that it be adopted
establishing numerical limits of dwelling units permitted under the ROO
as recommended by the Planning Department (407 - 1984; 400 - 1985; and
450 - 1986).
RESOLUTION NO. 83-29
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY ADOPTING NUMERICAL LIMITS
FOR RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS TO BE ISSUED BUILDING PERMITS FOR EACH OF
THE YEARS, 1984, 1985 AND 1986.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of Aoril, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ
and GOODRI CH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUCNIL MEMBERS: NONE
Mr. John Brennan, renresenting Las Animas Technology Park Develop-
ment, addressed the Council regarding a progress report on the Las Animas
Technology Park proposed construction and landscapina.
The Mayor asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to
speak on any matter not on the agenda. There was no comment from anyone
in the audience.
A letter from Mayor William Gissler (City of Santa Clara) was noted
in regard to Public Works' Week, May 22-28, 1983, and same was referred
to the Director of Public Works.
A letter from The Food Bank requesting a Budget Allocation was
noted and referred to the Council Budget Study Sessions as recommended.
The following informational items were noted with no seoarate dis-
cussion on same:
Department of Transportation in re: to signalization at Leavesley
Road and Murray Avenue; and
Mr. R. Williams in re: to Tenth Street Bridge.
The Summary of Monthly Reports of February 1983 was noted.
A report of the Planning Department regarding adjustment of General
Plan fees was noted and discussed.
Motion was made by Councilwoman Hughan seconded by Councilman Gage
that the reading of Resolution No. 83-30 be waived and that it be adopted
approving Alternate #2 to include the three (3) recommendations proposed.
Councilman Link voted "no" on the motion.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-30
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY ESTABLISHING GENERAL PLAN
FEES FOR THE CITY OF GILROY.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, TAYLOR, VALDEZ and
GOODRI CH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER: LINK
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
City Administrator Wood presented a report on Charter City Industrial
Development Bond Resolutions and Guide.
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilwoman Hughan
that the reading of Resolution No. 83-31 be waived and that it be adopted
re: Application and Fees.
4858
Res. #83-22
Guide
Parking-
Nicole Way
Res. #83-33
Uvas Pk.
Preserve
Pub. Hear.
re: Hl~O
Concession
Stands
RESOLUTION NO. 83-31
A RESOLUTION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF POLICIES RELATING TO APPLICA-
TIONS AND FEES.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the followinq
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE,
and GOODRI CH
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilwoman
Hughan that the reading of Resolution No. 83-32 be waived and that
it be adopted approving the application of Silacci Enterprises, Inc.
~---
.......
RESOLUTION NO. 83-32
A RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION OF SILACCI ENTERPRISES, INC.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT, GAGE, HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ
and GOODRICH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCI L ~1n1BERS: NONE
Motion was made by Councilman Link seconded by Councilman Taylor
and carried that the Guide to Prosnective Applicants be approved as
presented.
City Administrator Wood presented a Report on One (1) Hour
Parking Restriction on Nicole Way including a oetition from some
residents in ooposition to same.
Councilman Valdez further reoorted on same and recommended an
amendment to the previous resolutio~ regarding one (1) hour narking
on Nicole vJay.
Motion was made by Councilman Valdez seconded by Councilman
Link that the reading of Resolution No. 83-33 be waived and that it
be adopted eliminating one (1) hour oarking on Nicole ,.Jay except for
the residential lots on the south side and one (1) residential lot
on the north side of Nicole Way. Council Members Albert and Gage voted
"no" on the motion.
~
-
RESOLUTION NO. 83-33
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 83-24 DESIGNATING ONE-HOUR PARKING TIME LIMITS ON THE WEST SIDE
OF MESA ROAD AND PORTIONS OF NICOLE WAY.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983, by the followin0 vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: HUGHAN, LINK, TAYLOR, VALDEZ and GOODRICH
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ALBERT anr GAGE
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE
(Prior to voting on the above resolution, Mr. Carlos Davis, 5435 Nicole
Way, addressed the Council objecting to anyone (1) hour narkinq re-
striction in a residential area.)
City Administrator Wood presented a recommendation to hire a
consultant for Uvas Park Preserve. Motion was made by Councilwoman
Hughan seconded by Councilwoman Albert and carried that Royston,
Hanomoto & Abbey be hired as consultants for the Uvas Park Preserve
Project in the amount of $24,700.00 as recommended.
......
--....
Motion was made by Councilwoman Albert seconded by Councilman
Gage and carried that a Public Hearinq date of April 18, 1983, be set
regarding the proposed Hazardous Waste (Materials) Ordinance as recom-
mended.
City Administrator Wood presented a report and recommendation on
concession stand agreements. Motion was made by Councilman Link second-
ed by Councilman Gage and carried that authorization be given to extend
the concession stand agreements with the present operators as recommended.
Street Tree
Ord.
",....
...
E. 9th St.
et al Assess-
ment Di st.
J. Strono
Circus
Permit
Golf Course
Storm Damage
,,*,,~""~
-
Gen. Plan
Amendments
LAFCO
Vacancies
Reel amati on
Project
Pub. Hear. re:
Rev. Shari ng
ICC Meeting
....
Adjournment
--
4859
Mr. William McIntosh, President of the Gilroy South Little League,
addressed the Council requesting Council to consider his Little League
to operate said concession stands. Council recommended that the Parks
and Recreation Director take same under advisement.
A recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission was noted
requesting an amendment to the Street Tree Ordinance, further explained
by Parks and Recreation Director Ayer.
Discussion was had on the matter. The City Attorney auestioned
the verbage of the proposed amenrlment. Council instructed the City
Attorney to prepare the proposed amendment for their consilderation.
Director of Public Works-City Engineer Hansen recommended continuing
the East Ninth Street et al Assessment District 1983-1 to the April 18,
1983 Regular Council Meeting to allow Staff to present revised prooosals
and noted that it may be necessary for Council to set a change and modifi-
cation hearing which would require public notification of same. He further
invited Council Members Link, Taylor and Valdez to meet with Staff for
their input on same. It was noted that the Public Hearing on the East
Ninth Street et al Assessment District 1983-1 was closed to the public
and no further discussion from the audience would be oermitted unless
requested by Council.
City Administrator Wood presented a request of John Strong for a
circus permit April 29, 1983.
Moti on was made by Council man Link seconded by Council man Taylor
and carried that John Strong be granted permission to conduct a circus
on April 29, 1983, subject to retaining an acce~table sponsor.
City Administrator'Wood oresented a report of the Department of
Public Works regarding the storm damage at the golf course. Council
accepted same and referred the recommendation to the Board of Directors
of the Golf & Country Club, noting that the estimated $3,990 repairs to
be paid for by the Operator under the Maintenance Agreement.
A letter from Mr. William A. Gissler (W. J. Hanna & Son) was noted
requesting to file applications of two (2) small parcels of land for
General Plan Amendments in addition to those two (2) larger oarcels ore-
viously filed. Council indicated that they would not concur with proces-
sing applications on two (2) smaller parcels prior to those already filed.
City Administrator Wood presented a letter regarding vacancies on
the Local Agency Formation Commission and invitation to apoly for same.
City Administrator Wood noted a letter from the Water District
regarding cost of operation regarding the Reclamation Project. Council
requested that the District be advised in writing to submit their oroposal
which would be considered. '
The Mayor noted a Public Hearing scheduled for April 8, 1983, at
9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers rega~dinq 1983-84 ~evenue Sharing funds.
The Mayor noted the Inter-City Council Meeting of April 14, 1983,
hosted by the City of Sunnyvale.
At 10: 35 p. m., the Mayor adjourned the meeti ng.
Respectfully submitted,
/d~~~~k4~