Loading...
Resolution 2020-46RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY MAKING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE GILROY SPORTS PARK MASTER PLAN PHASE III AMENDMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL RECREATIONAL BUILDING AT THE GILROY SPORTS PARK AT 5925 MONTEREY FRONTAGE ROAD WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy City Council ce11ified the Gilroy Spo11s Park and Urban Service Area Amendment (USA 98-03) Enviromnental Impact Repo11 (EIR) on June 7, 1999 and adopted the Gilroy Spo11s Park Master Plan on that same date; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy City Council ce11ified the Gilroy Urban Service Area Amendment (USA 98-03) Subsequent EIR on March 18 , 2002, in anticipation of adoption of the Gilroy 2020 General Plan, which proposed new General Plan land use designations on prope11ies outside the City-owned Spo11s Park but within the proposed urban service area amendment; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy City Council ce11ified the Barberi Urban Service Area Amendment (USA 04-02) Subsequent EIR on December 19, 2005, for a smaller urban service area amendment and conceptual review of a residential development south of West Luchessa Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy City Council , at these prior hearings, adopted findings pursuant to the California Enviromnental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15091, and has adopted Statements of Oven-iding Considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, associated with the Sp011s Park project, for the conversion of prime fam1land within the proposed urban service area amendment, including the land within the Gilroy Sp011s Park; for noise from sp011s activities and project traffic ; and for regional air quality degradation from project-generated traffic; and WHEREAS, The City of Gilroy applied to the Santa Clara County Local Agency Fmmation Commission two separate times for inclusion of the Gilroy Spo11s Park and adjacent parcels within the City 's urban service area (USA 98-03), and was denied on the first application, and was not able to meet the required timing of conditions placed upon approval of the second application ; and WHEREAS, the Santa Clara County Local Agency Fonnation Commission approved the smaller urban services area amendment (USA 04-02) and the proposed residential development was constrncted in 2014; and WHEREAS, the Gilroy Spo11s Park Master Plan establishes a nine-phase development plan for the Gilroy Sports Park, and constrnction of Phase I (utility improvements , entry road, and rough grading) and Phase II (premier little league fields , parking lot, and a trail connection to West Luchessa A venue) have been completed; and 4822-3845-5487v.2 ALF/04706-083 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 2 WHEREAS, Phase III of the Gilroy Spo1ts Park Master Plan includes a cmmnercial recreation, tent-shaped building ( estimated size of 41,000 square feet) and a dual use soccer/baseball field and parking lot; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy has determined that amendments to the Gilroy Spo1ts Park Master Plan are necessary to accommodate a specific type of cmmnercial recreational use in Phase III, focused on ice spmts; and WHEREAS, the City is interested in constrncting and leasing an approximately 100,000 square-foot building at the Gilroy Spo1ts Park designed to accommodate ice spmts and other commercial recreational uses; and WHEREAS, the City detennined that the appropriate level of review for the Gilroy Spo1ts Park Master Plan Phase III amendments and constrnction of the cmmnercial recreation building would be an EIR supplemental to the three prior ce1tified EIRs pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15163; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation was circulated from September 20, 2019 to October 20, 2019 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, and comment letters were received from the Native American Heritage Commission, the Gilroy Unified School District, the South County Regional Wastewater Authority, and the Santa Clara County Local Agency Fmmation Commission; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15087(d) and (f), the City posted a Notice of Availability with the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder on January 3, 2020, and posted said notice to its website on December 23 , 2019, published the Notice of Availability in the San Jose Mercury News on December 28, 2019, submitted a Notice of Completion to the State Clearinghouse on December 23, 2019, and mailed the Notice of Availability to those agencies and organizations on the City's distribution list believed to potentially have an interest in the proposed Master Plan amendments and constrnction of the conunercial recreation building; and WHEREAS, the City prepared the Gilroy Spmts Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments Supplemental Draft EIR and posted it to the City 's website on December 23, 2019, and made it available for public review at the Gilroy Planning Division counter and the Santa Clara County Public Library -Gilroy Branch, and circulated it for public review with direct mailing and through the State Clearinghouse from December 23, 2019 to Febrnary 12, 2020 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15087 and 15105; and WHEREAS, the City received seven (7) cmmnent letters from individuals, organizations, and agencies, and responded to those cmmnents in a final enviromnental impact report dated March 25, 2020, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15089 and 15132, and provided a copy of the responses to commenters pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section l 5088(b ); and RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Gilroy Spmts Park Phase III Amendments Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Repmt, inclusive of the draft and final volumes, and prior cettified EIRs, on May 21, 2020 and voted to recotmnend certification of the Supplemental EIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Gilroy Spotts Park Phase III Amendments Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Repott, inclusive of the draft and final volumes, and prior cettified EIRs on June 15, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF GILROY CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY: adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Repotting Program for the Gilroy Spotts Park Phase III Amendments and makes the following findings with respect to the significant effects on the environment of the Gilroy Spmts Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of a commercial recreational building at the Gilroy Spmts Park pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, and statements of overriding considerations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093: 1. The findings provide the written analysis and conclusions of the City Council in regard to environmental impacts and mitigation measures related to the Gilroy Spotts Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of a cmmnercial recreational building at the Gilroy Spmts Park, and incorporate the draft and final environmental impact repott, appendices, and prior cettified EIRs by reference. The findings represent the independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Gilroy. 2. The City Clerk's office of the City of Gilroy, at 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020 shall be the custodian of documents and record of proceedings on which the decision is based; 3. The City makes the following findings, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(l), regarding significant impacts that are mitigated to a less-than-significant level; i.e. that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. The following findings relate specifically to the Gilroy Spotts Park Phase III Amendments Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Repott: a) Air Quality: Constrnction of the commercial recreation building would result in reactive organic gas emissions that would exceed the standards of significance established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the City of Gilroy . The primary source of the reactive organic gasses would be exhaust from constrnction equipment. Mitigation Measure A.Q- I would reduce reactive organic gas emissions by establishing idling limitations on constrnction equipment; requiring equipment be well-tuned and maintained, and requiring alternative fuel equipment or emissions filters, or late model equipment with lower emissions levels. These measures are feasible and recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District as appropriate for reducing reactive organic gas emissions from constrnction equipment, and would reduce this impact to a less-then-significant level. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 4 b) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Operations of the commercial recreation building would result in greenhouse gas emissions that would be inconsistent with the emission reduction targets of SB 32, based on achieving a 5.2 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the projected 2020 emission inventory that are attributable to land use. The required reduction for the commercial recreation building is detennined based on its service population as a share of the state 's service population (population plus employment). Modeling performed for the commercial recreation building indicates that the building would be directly or indirectly responsible for an increase in annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 1,498 .38 metric tons, or about 11.27 metric tons per service population each year. This emission level exceeds the threshold of 4.27 metric tons per year, and the total required annual reduction would be 93 lmetric tons. Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would require one or more of four potential mitigation approaches be implemented: 1) greenhouse gas emissions reductions measures to suppmi achieving proposed LEED Silver certification; 2) incorporate non-LEED related greenhouse gas reduction measures into the project design; 3) pmiicipate in greenhouse gas reduction programs being implemented off-site by public or special agencies to obtain credit for greenhouse gas emissions reductions; and/or 4) purchase carbon offsets that have been certified through a qualified body to off-set greenhouse gas emissions generated by the project. These are feasible measures , and would reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a less-than-significant level. c) Biological Resources: Subsequent to the City 's ce11ification of the three prior EIRs that are incorporated by reference , the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan was adopted by Santa Clara County; the cities of San Jose, Morgan Hill, and Gilroy; the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Santa Clara Valley Transpo1iation Authority in August 2012. The Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan provides United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Depmiment of Fish and Wildlife authorization for incidental take of several covered species under the Endangered Species Act and the Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, and obviates the need for several mitigation measures presented in the earlier environmental review and adopted by the City. The City specifically finds that removal of mitigation measures specified below and the substitution of the applicable mitigation measures from the Habitat Plan will provide equivalent or greater mitigation. Accordingly, the following biological resources mitigation measures previously adopted by the City were removed from the EIR in recognition that implementation of similar provisions in the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan will equally mitigate impacts: 1) Spotts Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measure 7 , specific to habitat protection at a future trail crossing of Uvas Creek, was removed in favor of Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan stream crossing and buffer provisions . 2) Spo1is Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measure 10, specific to erosion controls at a future trail crossing of Uvas Creek, was removed in favor of Santa• Clara Valley Habitat Plan stream crossing and buffer provisions . 3) Spo1is Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measure 11 and USA Amendment Subsequent EIR Mitigation Measure 5, providing protections for bmrnwing owl , were removed in favor of Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan special status species provisions . RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 5 4) Spo11s Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measures 14 and 15, and USA Amendment Subsequent EIR Mitigation Measures 6 and 7, providing protection to several special status amphibian species were removed in favor of Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan special status species provisions. Two prior biological resources mitigation measures adopted by the City, Sp011s Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measure 4, providing a stream buffer and native plantings, and USA Amendment Subsequent EIR Mitigation Measure 3, requiring adherence to the City's fmmer Consolidated Landscape Policy, were combined and consolidated to reflect provisions of the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan, and increasing the stream buffer from 50 feet to 150 feet. d) Hydrology and Flooding : The project site and the smrnunding area are pai1ially within a 100-year flood zone as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and pa11ially within a flood flowage easement held by the Santa Clara Valley Water District. The Gilroy Spmis Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of the commercial recreation building would place a building on a pe1manent foundation within flood areas, replacing a previously planned tent strncture that would have allowed flood waters to flow through with little impedance. A flood study was prepared to analyze the effects of the strncture on flood levels, flow patterns, and velocity, and the study concluded that the commercial recreation building would dive11 flood flows in such a manner that elevations would rise to a limited extent to the west and no11h of the building and would be reduced directly to the east of the building, but the changes would be considered less than significant under criteria established in the Code of Federal Regulations and by Santa Clara County. The Gilroy Sp011s Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of the commercial recreation building would increase the amount of impervious surface area compared with the adopted Gilroy Spo11s Park Master Plan, and as a result, increase the potential for pollutants to be canied in stonn water. Two previously adopted mitigation measures, Sp011s Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measures 2 and 3, will address surface water quality and reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. e) Transp011ation: The Gilroy Sp011s Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of the commercial recreation building would increase traffic volumes compared with the adopted Gilroy Sp011s Park Master Plan. A traffic impact analysis was prepared to determine the volumes of traffic and extent of improvements necessary to maintain the City 's service standards for intersections near the Gilroy Sp011s Park. The study detennined that effects on traffic congestion would be similar to those already identified in the prior ce11ified EIRs, but that some improvements may need to be implemented sooner. Sp011s Park and USA Amendment EIR Mitigation Measure 20 and USA Amendment Subsequent EIR Mitigation Measure 22 both require improvements to the Monterey Street I Monterey Frontage Road intersection. Each mitigation measure's specific improvements at this intersection are similar but the improvements at Monterey Road/Monterey Frontage Road will be required to be completed p1ior to buildout of Phase III. The Gilroy Spo11s Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and constrnction of the cmmnercial recreation building would also result in a reduced level of service at the Church RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 6 Street / West Luchessa Avenue intersection. USA Amendment Subsequent EIR Mitigation Measure 21, previously adopted by the City, would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. 4. The City finds that in p1ior actions, findings were made pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(l) regarding other significant impacts that were mitigated to a less-than- significant level, relating to aesthetics; construction dust; archeological and historic resources; biological resources (raptors, protected trees, nighttime lighting, and accidental habitat disturbance during construction); noise; and transpo1tation (Monterey Street / West Luchessa Avenue, Monterey Street/Tenth Street, commercial site access, bicycle and pedestrian access and safety, and parking supply); and for which the Gilroy Spmis Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and construction of a commercial recreation building were not found to have new or more severe environmental effects. The following are the specific impact findings for the prior EIRs germane to the proposed project. Some environmental topics or mitigation measures are not addressed below because they do not pe1tain to the subject project under this Phase III amendment. (f) Air Quality -Construction Emissions: Sensitive receptors could be exposed to construction emissions , including diesel , during construction. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measures are feasible and will, when implemented, effectively mitigate the potentially significant health impacts associated with construction equipment emissions, when implemented . The mitigation measures are fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Planning Division will require compliance with the measure prior to issuance of grading or building pennits. During construction, all diesel-powered engines shall be required to have pa11icle trapping filters to reduce the amount of polluting emissions. Construction delivery trucks shall not idle for longer than two minutes . Dust control measures shall be incorporated into all pe1mits, subject to the review of the City of Gilroy Engineering Division. (g) Air Quality -Construction Dust: Sensitive receptors could be exposed to dust (PMl 0) from grading operations and other soil disturbance during construction. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measure is feasible and will, when implemented, effectively mitigate the potentially significant health impacts associated with construction dust, when implemented. The mitigation measures are fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Engineering Division will require compliance with the measure prior to issuance of grading or building pennits. Dust control measures shall be incorporated into all permits for the proposed project, subject to the review and approval of the City of Gilroy Engineering Division. (h) Archaeological and Historical Resources -Discovery of Unknown Archaeological Resources and Human Remains: It is possible that that construction of the proposed project could disturb unknown archaeological resources. This would be a potentially significant impact. A mitigation measure is required that ensures that in the event of the discovery of buried cultural resources or human remain, project work would be temporarily stopped until a qualified professional archaeologist can inspect the find. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be fonnulated and in1plemented. If human remains are RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 7 found the Gilroy Police Depai1ment will contact the coroner of Santa Clara County to dete1mine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission, and the most likely descendent shall be consulted. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measure is feasible and, when implemented, will effectively mitigate for the potential disturbance of unknown archaeological resources . The mitigation measure will be included on constrnction drawings and is fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Planning Division will require compliance with the measure prior to approval of grading or building pe1mits . (i) Biological Resources -Invasive Species: A number of invasive species listed on the California Exotic Plant Council's Exotic Pest Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in California are present within the prope1iy boundaries. Grading and disturbance associated with the proposed project would remove any native plants and create the disturbed environment prefen-ed by invasive species. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that mitigation measure is . feasible and, when implemented, will effectively mitigate the potential for the project to remove native plants and create an environment prefen-ed by invasive species . The mitigation measure is fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Planning Division will require compliance with the measure prior to issuance of grading or building pern1its . The project proponent shall prepare a landscaping and re-vegetation plan with requirements in order to prevent the spread of invasive non-native species. (j) Biological Resources -Raptors: Cottonwood and sycamore trees present near the project site have the potential to provide suitable nesting habitat for raptors . If there were active nest(s) of protected bird species present, constrnction and site preparation activities , if conducted during the nesting season, could result in the direct loss of nests, including eggs and young, or the abandonment of an active nest by the adults. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measure is feasible and, when implemented, will effectively mitigate the potential impacts to nesting raptors. The mitigation measure is fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Planning Division will require compliance with the measure prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Pre-constrnction surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted by a qualified biologist if construction is to occur during the nesting season (April 15 -August 1) to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. If raptor nests are located during pre-constrnction surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish a 300-foot buffer around each nest for the duration of the breeding season to prevent nest harassment and brood mo1iality. Work may proceed prior to August 1 only if a qualified biologist conducts nest checks and establishes that the young are fully fledged. (k) Biological Resources -Protected Trees: Some of the trees along the north side of Thomas Road -Luchessa A venue, along the nm1h side of Mesa Road, and through riparian habitat leading to and from the proposed pedestrian bridge may be considered "significant" trees that might be removed or injured during construction activities. The City of Gilroy City Council find that implementation of mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation includes a field survey conducted by a ce11ified arborist and a written repo11 of the findings of the survey. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 8 (1) Biological Resources -Habitat Disturbance : Accidental spills of contaminants or other hannful materials, such as diesel fuel or oil, from construction vehicles could spread into the sensitive riparian woodland habitat and Uvas Creek and hann or kill wildlife. During use of the spo11s park, contamination of Uvas Creek could potentially occur from pesticides, fe11ilizers, and similar substances . The City of Gilroy City Council find that implementation of mitigation measures will reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation involves requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Station pe1mit and a Santa Clara Valley Water District pennit in addition to a plan and guidelines established for the response to and prevention of accidental spill and contamination of the Uvas Creek. (m) Biological Resources -Nighttime Lighting: Nighttime lighting of the spo11s park play fields could spill over into the riparian woodland habitat and disturb wildlife, restrict the movement or activity of wildlife, or facilitate increased predation of wildlife. The City of Gilroy City Council find that mitigation, involving preparation of a lighting plan, will reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. (n) Transp011ation -Monterey Street I West Luchessa A venue: The intersection of Monterey Street and Luchessa Avenue is projected to degrade from LOS C to LOS F during the PM peak hour with the addition of Sp011s Park and Barberi residential project-generated traffic. The City of Gilroy City Council find that implementation of the mitigation measure will reduce this potentially significant impact to a less-than-significant level. Street improvements at Monterey Street/West Luchessa Avenue must be required as a condition of approval and implemented at such time as to prevent the deterioration of traffic operations below acceptable levels. The Barberi residential project completed most of the improvements and the remaining improvements are not required for Phase III development. (o) Transpo11ation -Monterey Street/Tenth Street: This intersection would operate at an overall acceptable level of service during project conditions. However, the pe1mitted phasing for the eastbound and westbound left-tum movements causes excessive delays for left-turning vehicles. The Sp011s Park Barberi residential project would add traffic volume to the westbound left-tum movement during both peak hours , which could exacerbate this condition and result in a potentially significant impact. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measure is feasible and, when implemented, will effectively mitigate the unacceptable left turn delays at the Monterey Street/Tenth Street intersection. The mitigation measure is fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Engineering Division will require compliance with the measure prior to approval of project entitlements . The developer of the first project on the project site shall install a full eight-phase signal operation at the Monterey Street/Tenth Street intersection to provide protected left turns on the eastbound and westbound approaches and increase the capacity of the left-tum movement. The signal shall be installed prior to issuance of the first residential or commercial occupancy permit, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Division. The Barberi residential project completed most of the improvements and the remaining improvements are not required for Phase III development. (p) Transportation -Bicycle and pedestrian access and safety: Continuous sidewalks are not provided on the west side of Monterey Road, restricting pedestrian access in and around the Sp011s Park. The City of Gilroy City Council hereby finds that the mitigation measure is feasible RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 9 and, when implemented, will effectively mitigate the potentially significant safety impacts for pedestrians and bicyclists on Monterey Road. The mitigation measure is fully enforceable by the City of Gilroy, and the City Engineering Division will require complianc e with the measure prior to approval of grading or building permits for adjacent conunercial uses or the final phase of the Sp01is Park. The Barberi developer has constructed sidewalk improvements along Luchessa A venue. Additionally, the Uvas Creek bicycle and pedestrian trail has been constructed as pati of the first two phases of the Spo1is Park. Monterey Road frontage improvements will benefit Phase III development, but are not required until the final phase of the Spo1is Park development. (q) Transpo1iation -Parking supply: The proposed spo1is park would have a sho1iage of parking spaces at the completion of Phase V , resulting in a significant impact related to parking supply. The City of Gilroy City Council finds that with implementation of mitigation, this impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. The Master Plan amendment reduces the parking deficit by 183 spaces tlu·ough completion of Phase III development. 5. The City, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), incorporates by reference and hereby remakes prior findings that specific economic, legal , social , technological , and other benefits of the proposed use outweigh significant environmental effects that may not be mitigated to a less-than-significant level , relating to the conversion of prime fannland within the proposed urban service area amendment, including the land within the Gilroy Spo1is Park; for noise from spo1is activities and project traffic; for which the Gilroy Spo1is Park Master Plan Phase III Amendments and construction of a conunercial recreation building were not found to have specific new or more severe envirorunental effects. A prior finding of significant and unavoidable effects due to inconsistency with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District 's Clean Air Plan is no longer applicable, since adoption of new Clean Air Plans in 2010 and 2017 , and a change in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's methodology for determining consistency with the Clean Air Plan. The City has adopted a fa1mland mitigation program, and in March 2020 the City secured an easement on fmmland that will be used to mitigate fa1mland conversion impacts within the City. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: BLANKLEY, LEROE-MUNOZ, MARQUES , TOY AR, TUCKER and VELASCO COUNCILMEMBERS: NO NE COUNCILMEMBERS: BRACCO ~ Roland Velasco, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2020-46 I, SHAWNA FREELS , City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2020-46 is an original resolution, or true and correct copy of a city Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a regular meeting of said held on Council held on the 15 th day of June , 2020 , at which meeting a quorum was present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of ~ty of June , 2020. City Clerk of the City of Gilroy (Seal)