HomeMy WebLinkAbout00 COMPLETE January 5, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda PacketJanuary 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 1 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
CITY CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
7351 ROSANNA STREET, GILROY, CA
95020
MONDAY, JANUARY 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM
MAYOR
Greg Bozzo
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Dion Bracco
Tom Cline
Terence Fugazzi
Zach Hilton
Carol Marques
Kelly Ramirez
CITY COUNCIL PACKET MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.cityofgilroy.org
AGENDA CLOSING TIME IS 5:00 P.M. THE TUESDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING
COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. Public testimony is subject to reasonable regulations, including but not limited to time restrictions
for each individual speaker. **Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.** The amount of time allowed per
speaker may vary at the Mayor’s discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda.
Written comments on any agenda item may be emailed to the City Clerk’s Office at
publiccomment@cityofgilroy.org or mailed to the Gilroy City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street,
Gilroy, CA 95020. Comments received by the City Clerk’s Office by 1 p.m. on the day of a Council meeting will
be distributed to the City Council prior to or at the meeting and available for public inspection with the agenda
packet located in the lobby of Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street prior to the meeting. Any
correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting record. Items received after the 1 p.m. deadline
will be provided to the City Council as soon as practicable. Written comments are also available on the City’s
Public Records Portal at bit.ly/3NuS1IN.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City will make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to the
meeting at (408) 846-0204 or cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org to help ensure that reasonable
arrangements can be made.
If you challenge any planning or land use decision made at this meeting in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing held at this meeting, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please take notice that the time
within which to seek judicial review of any final administrative determination reached at this meeting is governed
by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
A Closed Session may be called during this meeting pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) if a
point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the City on the advice of its legal counsel,
based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet
are available with the agenda packet on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org subject to the Staff’s ability to
Page 1 of 165
January 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 2 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
post the documents before the meeting.
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE GILROY OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE
Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public.
Commissions, task forces, councils and other agencies of the City exist to conduct the
people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the
people and that City operations are open to the people's review.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE OPEN GOVERNMENT
ORDINANCE, TO RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF THE ORDINANCE OR TO REPORT A
VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE, CONTACT THE OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMISSION
STAFF AT (408) 846-0204.
If you need assistance with translation and would like to speak during public comment,
please contact the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the meeting at 408-846-0204 or
e-mail the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org.
Si necesita un intérprete durante la junta y gustaría dar un comentario público,
comuníquese con el Secretario de la Ciudad un mínimo de 72 horas antes de la junta al 408-
846-0204 o envíe un correo electrónico a la Oficina del Secretario de la Ciudad
a cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org.
To access written translation during the meeting, please scan the QR
Code or click this link:
Para acceder a la traducción durante la reunión, por favor escanee el
código QR o haga clic en el enlace:
bit.ly/3FBiGA0
Choose Language and Click Attend | Seleccione su lenguaje y haga clic
en asistir
Use a headset on your phone for audio or read the transcript on your
device.
Use sus auriculares para escuchar el audio o leer la transcripción en el
dispositivo.
The agenda for this regular meeting is outlined as follows:
1. OPENING
1.1. Call to Order
1.2. Roll Call
1.3. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
1.4. Pledge of Allegiance
Page 2 of 165
January 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 3 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
1.5. Invocation
1.6. Orders of the Day
1.7. Employee Introductions
2. COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE (Informational Only)
3. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
3.1. PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the
Council on matters within the Gilroy City Council’s jurisdiction but not on the
agenda. Persons wishing to address the Council are requested to complete a
Speaker’s Card located at the entrances and handed to the City Clerk. Speakers
are limited to 1 to 3 minutes each, varying at the Mayor’s discretion depending
on the number of speakers and length of the agenda. The law does not permit
Council action or extended discussion of any item not on the agenda except
under special circumstances. If Council action is requested, the Council may
place the matter on a future agenda.
Written comments to address the Council on matters not on this agenda may be
e-mailed to the City Clerk’s Office at publiccomment@cityofgilroy.org or mailed
to the Gilroy City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA
95020. Comments received by the City Clerk’s Office by 1:00 pm on the day of a
Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to or at the meeting
and available for public inspection with the agenda packet located in the lobby
of Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, prior to the meeting. Any
correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting record. Items
received after the 1:00pm deadline will be provided to the City Council as soon
as practicable. Written material provided by public members under this section
of the agenda will be limited to 10 pages in hard copy. An unlimited amount of
material may be provided electronically.
4. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Bracco – Downtown Committee, Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers
Authority, Santa Clara Water Commission, Santa Clara Valley Water Joint Water Resources
Committee, SCRWA
Council Member Fugazzi – Santa Clara Water Commission (alternate), Silicon Valley
Regional Interoperability Authority Board (alternate), SCRWA, Visit Gilroy California Welcome
Center, VTA Mobility Partnership Committee
Council Member Marques – ABAG, Downtown Committee, Santa Clara County Library Joint
Powers Authority (alternate), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Governing Board, Santa
Clara Valley Habitat Agency Implementation Board, SCRWA (alternate)
Page 3 of 165
January 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 4 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
Council Member Hilton – CalTrain Policy Group, Santa Clara County Expressway Plan
2040 Advisory Board (alternate), Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board, South
County Youth Task Force Policy Team, VTA Policy Advisory Committee
Council Member Ramirez – ABAG (alternate), Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors (alternate),
Gilroy Sister Cities, Gilroy Youth Task Force (alternate), SCRWA, Santa Clara Housing and
Community Development Advisory Committee
Council Member Cline – CalTrain Policy Group (alternate), Gilroy Sister Cities (alternate),
Gilroy Youth Task Force, Santa Clara County Expressway Plan 2040 Advisory Board, Silicon
Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board (alternate), Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability
Authority Board, Visit Gilroy California Welcome Center (alternate), VTA Mobility Partnership
Committee, VTA Policy Advisory Committee (alternate)
Mayor Bozzo – Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors, Santa Clara Valley Water Joint Water
Resources Committee, South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, VTA Board of Directors
(alternate), Santa Clara Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee
(alternate)
5. BOARD AND COMMISSION INTERVIEWS
5.1. Interviews for Open Seats on Boards, Commissions, and Committees with
Future Appointment on January 26, 2026
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless
a request is made by a member of the City Council or a member of the public. Any person
desiring to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed
from the consent calendar prior to the time the City Council votes to approve. If removed, the
item will be discussed in the order in which it appears.
6.1. Approve the minutes of the December 8, 2025 City Council Special Meeting,
December 8, 2025 Regular Meeting, and the December 15, 2025 City Council
Special Meeting.
6.2. Adopt the City Seal and Logo Use Policy
6.3. Acceptance of a State of California Department of Justice, Tobacco Grant
Program Award in the Amount of $291,546 and Adoption of a Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Gilroy Approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 and 2026-2027
Budget Amendments
6.4. Council Concurrence with the Issuance of the Recreation Assessment Request
for Proposals
1. Staff Report:
Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Page 4 of 165
January 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 5 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
Council concur with the issuance of the Recreation Assessment Request for
Proposals
7. BIDS AND PROPOSALS
7.1. For the Love of Gilroy Public Art Campaign - Selection of 14 Designs and Award
of Intellectual Property Rights Agreements for $500 Each
1. Staff Report:
Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
Council approval of the Arts and Culture Commission’s recommended award
order of designs for purchase.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8.1. Consider Adopting an Urgency Interim Ordinance Prohibiting the Issuance of
Tobacco Retailer Permits for a Period Not to Exceed Forty-Five (45) Days
Citywide
1. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications
2. Staff Report:
Sharon Goei, Community Development Director
3. Open Public Hearing
4. Close Public Hearing
5. Possible Action:
1. Determine this action is exempt from environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines;
2. Adopt an Urgency Interim Ordinance establishing a temporary
prohibition on the issuance or approval of any new Tobacco Retailer
Permits citywide within the City of Gilroy pursuant to California
Government Code Section 65858; and
3. Make findings, as incorporated in the ordinance, that adoption of the
ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of public
health, safety, and welfare, particularly regarding the protection of
minors throughout the City.
9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Page 5 of 165
January 5, 2026 | 6:00 PM Page 6 of 6 City Council
Regular Meeting
11. ADJOURNMENT
Page 6 of 165
5.1.
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Interviews for Open Seats on Boards, Commissions, and
Committees with Future Appointment on January 26, 2026
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Kim Mancera, City Clerk
Prepared by: Kim Mancera, City Clerk
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
RECOMMENDATION
Interview candidates for open seats on City of Gilroy boards, commissions, and
committees.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
The City Council opened the annual recruitment period ending December 19, 2025, to
fill seats on nine Boards, Commissions, and Committees with member terms vacant or
expiring as of December 31, 2025:
Arts and Culture Commission – Two (2) seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Open Government Commission – One (1) seat with a term expiring 12/31/2029
Parks and Recreation Commission – Three (3) seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Planning Commission – Two (2) seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Page 7 of 165
5.1.
In addition, the following seats are vacant due to resignations or terminations:
Arts & Culture Commission:
One (1) vacant seat with a term expiring 12/31/2027
Two (2) vacant seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Building Board of Appeals:
One (1) vacant seat with a term expiring 12/31/2027
Two (2) vacant seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Library Bond Oversight Committee:
Three (3) vacant seats with terms expiring when funds are fully allocated (2027-2028)
Library Commission:
Two (2) vacant seats with terms expiring 12/31/2027
Parks and Recreation Commission:
One (1) vacant seat with a term expiring 12/31/2027
Personnel Commission:
Two (2) vacant seats with terms expiring 12/31/2029
Physically Challenged Board of Appeals:
One (1) vacant seat with a term expiring 12/31/2029
Three (3) vacant seats with terms expiring 12/31/2027
ANALYSIS
At the close of the application period, the following applications were received:
Arts & Culture Commission Applicant
1. Jacqueline Cianci
2. Camille McCormack
Building Board of Appeals Applicant
N/A
Library Bond Oversight Committee
N/A
Library Commission Applicant
Page 8 of 165
5.1.
1. Jan Guffey
2. Christina Tovar
Open Government Commission Applicant
1. Blanca McMurray
Parks and Recreation Commission Applicants
1. Andrew Brinton
2. Jesse Jimenez
3. Emily Miller
Personnel Commission Applicants
1. Danny Edde-Mitchell
2. Martha Martinez
Physically Challenged Board of Appeals Applicants
N/A
Planning Commission Applicants
1. Makhan Gupta
2. Martha Martinez
Interviews have been scheduled with the City Council at this evening’s meeting, and
appointments are scheduled to take place at the regular meeting on January 26, 2026.
For those seats without sufficient applications, the recruitment efforts will remain open.
Moving forward, staff will present candidates for interviews and appointments to the City
Council only in cases where a board, commission, or committee lacks the minimum
number of members required to meet quorum requirements as per the Brown Act.
ALTERNATIVES
Not Applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Page 9 of 165
5.1.
There are no costs incurred from conducting the interviews for, nor appointing
individuals to, the City’s boards, committees and commissions.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This item was included on the publicly posted agenda for this meeting.
NEXT STEPS
With the completion of interviews, staff will return to Council on January 26, 2026 to
request Council appointments of members of the public to the various open seats on the
City’s boards, committees and commissions.
Attachments:
1. Cianci, Jacqueline - Arts and Culture Commission_Redacted
2. McCormack, Camille Arts and Culture Commission_Redacted
3. Guffey, Jan - Library Commission_Redacted
4. Tovar, Christina - Library Commission_Redacted
5. McMurray, Blanca - Open Government Commission_Redacted
6. Brinton, Andrew - Parks and Recreation Commission_Redacted
7. Jimenez, Jesse - Parks and Recreation Commission_Redacted
8. Miller, Emily - Parks & Recreation Commission_Redacted
9. Edde-Mitchell, Danny - Personnel Commission_Redacted
10. Martinez, Martha - Planning Commission and Personnel Commission_Redacted
11. Gupta, Makhan - Planning Commission_Redacted
Page 10 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/24/2025 6:17 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Arts and Culture Commission
Jacqueline
Sophia
Cianci
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
-15+ years experience partnering with community organizations and local
businesses to promote community growth and inclusion
-15+ years experience event organizing for community events thru non profit
organization including : YMCA, Tulip Kids, Great Mall management group, First 5
California, Santa Clara Food Banks, San Jose Fire Department Toy Drive,
Christmas in the Park and Fanimecon
-10+ years experience in budgeting and forecasting for community events and
programs
Though I am new to the Gilroy community, having just moved here January of this
year, these are past community service experiences from my time living in San
Jose:
-YMCA Early Learning Readiness Director - collaborated with Libraries in the
South Bay Area to provide a Milestone Enrichment Program for Families with
children 6weeks- 5years old
-YMCA AfrerSchool Director- collaborated with schools, districts and local
organizations to not only enhance education for students in low income areas but
also provide a point of contact for community organizations to bring resources to
Submission ID: 4ebc3690-4012-44dc-bafd-c62dd28bfa0b Page 1/2Page 11 of 165
students and their families.
- East Valley event planning committee- appointed to be part of a group with other
director in various departments to create community events that took place at the
YMCA facility
- FanimeCon Extravaganza Division Director- appointed lead of the cosplay
community focus division with 7 departments under my lead, our focus was on
creating events for the cosplay and anime community. I would also be in charge
of forecasting the budget for each department, create the media information to be
sent out , and build new experience based on community feedback.
My goals for serving on the art and culture board is to immerse myself in the
community and utilize my skills and prior experiences to further expand
community involvement and experiences in community events.
My past experience in collaborating with local businesses and organizations to
bring resources and community engagement in the past can prove to be useful in
expanding the community involvement in cultivating a diverse and rich city culture.
I agree.
11/24/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 4ebc3690-4012-44dc-bafd-c62dd28bfa0b Page 2/2Page 12 of 165
Page 13 of 165
Page 14 of 165
Page 15 of 165
Page 16 of 165
Page 17 of 165
Page 18 of 165
Page 19 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
12/16/2025 10:25 AM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Library Commission
Jan
T
Guffey
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Hi! I am a former librarian and have always loved books since I entered the cool
sanctuary of my small town library in hot Visalia, California, as a kid. Books have
taken me across continents and across the millenia to experience the lives of
others, enriching my life and my understanding of my world. I started a book club
about 25 years ago when we were living in San Jose, and I still meet regularly
with those old friends as we read and discuss books together each month. I am a
consistent and appreciative patron of our beautiful Gilroy Public Library.
I have not served in any official capacity in the City of Gilroy, though through our
Environmental Action Committee of our local Gilroy AAUW chapter, we helped put
on the first Earth Day celebration in Gilroy in some years in 2025, and hope to do
so again this year in April 2026.
To enhance the public library services to all the population of Gilroy.
As stated above, I am an avid reader, current consistent user of our wonderful
Submission ID: 3bbd597c-3654-4407-aa66-072e52393094 Page 1/2Page 20 of 165
Gilroy Public Library, and I am a former librarian with the City of San Jose.
I agree.
12/16/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 3bbd597c-3654-4407-aa66-072e52393094 Page 2/2Page 21 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/24/2025 3:45 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Library Commission
Christina
Ruth
Tovar
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Business
Active community volunteer Gilroy Business Owner (10 years in business)
Bachelor's degree in finance Previous Community Board Member
Master's degree in accountancy
Certified Public Accountant
AAUW Membership Co-Chair (2020) - Still current member
Gilroy Downtown Business Association - Treasurer (2023) & Current Volunteer
YMCA House of Toys Committee Chair (2024) & Current Volunteer
Gilroy After Hours Rotary Treasurer (2022)
Gilroy Rodeo Volunteer
Gilroy Downtown Business Owner (2017 to Present)
My goal is to help continue the good work that the library and commission are
currently doing. I would use my skills and resources to support and take on any
Submission ID: 44cad77b-7331-4b96-8b34-e839b83ffdd5 Page 1/2Page 22 of 165
areas that the commission may need assistance with. I see all the valuable
programs and services it brings to the community and would like to be a part of
making sure they are continued in the future.
I believe what most qualifies me for this appointment is my high respect for the
value that the library brings to the community. I have been a member of the Gilroy
Library since I was in elementary school. I value the resources that it offers the
community. I also have experience as a community member, business owner and
past board chair, which has helped me gain skills in organization, accounting,
leadership and teamwork. I have prided myself on having a reputation for being
able to be given a task and see it through to its successful completion.
I agree.
11/24/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 44cad77b-7331-4b96-8b34-e839b83ffdd5 Page 2/2Page 23 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/21/2025 4:08 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Open Government Commission
Blanca
E
McMurray
gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Open Government Commission
I have no prior appointments. My community service has been associated with my
husband's business, South Valley Oral and Facial Surgery. We have donated to
the community in different ways, for example, collecting Christmas gifts for
Rebekah Children's Services, also collecting backpacks for local elementary
schools. I was also part of the first-ever food Truck Flying event in San Martin
Airport, which has been a success since 2020.
I would like to help the Government Commission achieve its goals for a better
community and get citizens engaged in matters important to them.
Serving on the board requires collaboration with diverse members. My ability to
listen to and understand diverse perspectives and to build consensus will be
invaluable in advancing the board's goals.
Submission ID: d064fc87-0c88-4852-8659-804a0e4b6413 Page 1/2Page 24 of 165
I agree.
11/21/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: d064fc87-0c88-4852-8659-804a0e4b6413 Page 2/2Page 25 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/30/2025 7:30 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Parks and Recreation Commission
Andrew
Brinton
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
I have strong communications skills both in public speaking as well as
collaboration in involving stakeholders and building consensus. I have the ability
to be impartial in judgement and commit to put the public interest above individual
interests.
This is my first try at an advisory board. I have volunteered in the community since
we moved here in 2009 in the schools as well as a coach and director in Gilroy
Little League.
I am interested in improving the experience of using parks, trails, open spaces,
and community facilities for all members of the community.
I and most qualified to serve on this board because I am invested in the health
and happiness of our community and know personally how the parks and open
spaces the City provide contribute to that goal. I am dedicated, reliable, and
prepared to contribute the time, effort, and thoughtful judgment that effective
board service requires.
I agree.
Submission ID: 0628a192-bac2-4087-ba3c-c7e444d92c99 Page 1/2Page 26 of 165
11/30/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 0628a192-bac2-4087-ba3c-c7e444d92c99 Page 2/2Page 27 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/24/2025 11:15 AM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Parks and Recreation Commission
Jesse
Jimenez
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
I am currently a commissioner for the Parks and Recreation in the city of Jo Ann
would like to extend my time for park improvement
I volunteer my time at the Gary festival, the Gilroy rodeo, city Park cleanups, park
and recreation pop-up events, etc.
To ensure that our parks are safe, clean and enjoyable to our community
members. Also exploring new ideas for park improvement.
I have been a Gilroy resident all my life in my heart and desire is to see Gilroy
improved and continue to be the safest community we can be. I have a handful of
volunteers with my current organization and position and together we can
collaborate and be an asset to our parks and rec department.
I agree.
Submission ID: 10dd7cf0-e0ce-487b-92e9-c2b5f88b2ad0 Page 1/2Page 28 of 165
11/24/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 10dd7cf0-e0ce-487b-92e9-c2b5f88b2ad0 Page 2/2Page 29 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
12/03/2025 11:36 AM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Parks and Recreation Commission
Emily
Constance
Miller
Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Over the past year, I have gained direct experience serving as a Parks &
Recreation Commissioner for the City of Gilroy, giving me a deep understanding
of our city’s parks system, priorities, and long-term capital needs. I have actively
participated in commission meetings, public outreach, and policy discussions,
helping shape recommendations to City Council and staff. In addition to my P&R
role, I also serve as the City of Gilroy’s representative to the VTA Bicycle &
Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), where I advocate for Gilroy’s interests in
regional mobility planning, multimodal safety improvements, and Complete
Streets policy development.
Professionally, I bring strengths in strategic planning, data-driven analysis, and
collaborative decision-making. My background enables me to evaluate capital
improvement proposals, understand budget and funding structures, and contribute
meaningfully to long-term resource planning. Over the past year, I have
strengthened relationships with City staff, council members, nonprofit
organizations, and community partners, including engaging with the Santa Clara
County Public Health Department to better understand regional health priorities
and how parks and recreation planning can support community wellness, equity,
and access. These collaborations have broadened my perspective on how local
park investments align with broader public health outcomes and mobility needs.
As an active user of Gilroy’s parks - walking and running regularly at the Sports
Park, biking our trail system, and playing pickleball and tennis at Sunrise and Las
Animas - I bring firsthand insight into daily park usage, community needs, and
Submission ID: 1c616b40-90d4-41cb-94aa-a4a5ef585ce1 Page 1/3Page 30 of 165
program demand. My lived experience as both a resident and commissioner helps
ensure that my contributions reflect the real needs of Gilroy families, seniors,
youth, and recreational groups, while also aligning with regional partners who
share goals around health, safety, and active lifestyles.
I have served as a Parks & Recreation Commissioner for the City of Gilroy,
participating actively in meetings, discussions, and recommendations presented
to City Council. I also currently serve as Gilroy’s representative to the VTA Bicycle
& Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), where I ensure Gilroy’s local needs are
represented in countywide transportation planning.
Beyond formal appointments, I remain involved in the community through active
participation in local park events, public workshops, and outreach efforts
supporting parks, mobility safety, and recreation initiatives. Over the past year, I
have taken part in several major community park events, including Cinco de Mile,
the Miller Red Barn Plant Sale, the Earth Day Resource Fair, and the Breakfast
with Santa celebration. These events have provided meaningful opportunities to
engage directly with residents, learn from community partners, and better
understand how our parks can continue to support connection, cultural
celebration, and family-oriented programming. Prior to moving to Gilroy, I also
volunteered with the Eugene Mission, Mount Pisgah Arboretum, Fort Mason Park,
and the Edward and Anita Lee Newcomer School.
My goals while serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission are to continue
advancing community-driven, high-impact improvements to Gilroy’s parks, trails,
and recreation programs. This includes continuing to advocate for dedicated
pickleball courts, responding to strong and growing resident demand for this
inclusive and multigenerational sport. I also aim to support long-term parks
planning through the CIP process, ensuring that proposed projects reflect
community priorities, maintenance realities, and future population needs.
Through my role on VTA BPAC, I will continue bringing countywide updates, best
practices, and safety insights back to staff and the Commission, helping align
Gilroy’s efforts with regional mobility, trail connectivity, and active transportation
initiatives. I also plan to advance improvements to trails, mobility access, and safe
walking and biking routes, leveraging both my BPAC experience and community
feedback.
Another area of interest is exploring joint-use opportunities between the City and
interested parties, to expand recreational access and maximize the use of existing
spaces without requiring large capital investments.
I will continue strengthening community engagement, encouraging residents to
participate in shaping park projects, and promoting equitable access to recreation
programs for all ages and neighborhoods.
Above all, my goal is to help ensure that Gilroy’s parks remain safe, vibrant, and
welcoming spaces that support health, connection, and a high quality of life for the
entire community.
I am uniquely qualified due to my combination of current commission experience,
regional commission appointment, professional background, and active
involvement in the community.
Serving as a Parks & Recreation Commissioner this past year has given me
firsthand understanding of city processes, council expectations, parks
maintenance needs, and how recreational demand is evolving. My role on VTA
BPAC further supports Gilroy’s interests at the county level and strengthens my
ability to advocate for trail connectivity, safe crossings, and multimodal access to
parks.
My professional background in operations, analysis, and strategic planning equips
me to evaluate complex proposals, understand budget tradeoffs, and make
informed recommendations that balance equity, sustainability, and fiscal
responsibility. I have demonstrated strong communication and collaboration skills,
consistently working with staff, Council, and the public to ensure decisions reflect
the community’s voice.
Most importantly, I approach this role with passion, consistency, and reliability. I
regularly use our parks, listen to residents, attend meetings fully prepared, and
follow through on commitments. My lived experience, professional skill set, and
Submission ID: 1c616b40-90d4-41cb-94aa-a4a5ef585ce1 Page 2/3Page 31 of 165
dedication to public service make me qualified to continue serving effectively and
constructively on the Parks & Recreation Commission.
I agree.
12/03/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 1c616b40-90d4-41cb-94aa-a4a5ef585ce1 Page 3/3Page 32 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
10/31/2025 10:06 AM (PDT)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Personnel Commission
Danny
Edde-Mitchell
Mitchell
CA - Gilroy
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Administrative VP, CFO /CPA of a local manufacturing co. for 25 years. Was in
charge of the HR department. I developed the department as our company grew
over the years. Participated in developing all aspects of HR including policies,
procedures and employee handbooks. Developed different levels of management
as we grew larger. Oversaw development training, job descriptions, performance
reviews, harassment training, interviews, and employee hiring and firing.
Past Chamber of Commerce board member (6 years). Served as interim
President/CFO. 2024.
Served on the General Plan Advisory Committee for 2040 plan development.
Board Trustee, Gilroy Elks Lodge. Served as Chairman for 4 years.
Offer my background and experience in supporting the City of Gilroy's Personal
Department. Provide input with the rest of the Personal Commission in assisting
the HR group and the City Council in decision making.
25 Years growing a company's revenue from $3M a year to $30M a year and all
the growth challenges that come with managing personal. We have a successful
Submission ID: d229fcab-9368-430e-87d7-a6491a905fe3 Page 1/2Page 33 of 165
history of employee retention, with many of our 120+ employees having been with
us for 20 to 30 years or more. This speaks to the treatment of maintaining good
employee relations with management and staff and continuing to address the
challenges of a growing company.
I agree.
10/31/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: d229fcab-9368-430e-87d7-a6491a905fe3 Page 2/2Page 34 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
12/17/2025 12:56 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Planning Commission
Personnel Commission
Martha
Linda
Martinez
GILROY
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Over 25 years of senior executive leadership in public-sector governance,
planning, and systems oversight
Retired School Superintendent with responsibility for strategic planning and fiscal
oversight of budgets exceeding $115 million for fourteen schools
Proven experience analyzing policy, data, and regulatory requirements to inform
sound, equitable decision-making
Strong understanding of public accountability, open-meeting laws, and ethical
governance
Skilled communicator experienced in public hearings, stakeholder engagement,
and consensus-building
Demonstrated systems-thinking approach to long-term planning and sustainable
community outcomes
Submission ID: 1a522b7f-bc69-4329-b309-976c6ef6bd04 Page 1/3Page 35 of 165
Co-Executive Director, California Association of Latino Superintendents &
Administrators (CALSA) (retired 03-2025)
Superintendent, Salinas City Elementary School District (retired 2020)
Parks & Recreation Commissioner, City of Gilroy (1996–2000)
Former Board Member, Community Alliance for Safety & Peace
Board Member, Monterey Bay Aquarium
Advisory Board Member, California State University at Monterey Bay, San Jose
State and National University (Dept. of Ed.)
Founding Member and Advisor to Board, Latino Family Fund of Gilroy
Steering Partner, Monterey County Bright Futures
Former Board Member, Gilroy Visitors Bureau and Gilroy Hispanic Chamber of
Commerce (President)
Former President, Gilroy Gang Task Force (1996–2000)
Sunrise Rotary International, Past President
Area 8 World Community Service Chair, District 5170, Rotary International
California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (2016 - 2020)
To support thoughtful, transparent planning decisions that balance community
character, housing needs, economic vitality, and environmental sustainability
To elevate community voice and ensure diverse perspectives are reflected in
planning recommendations
To apply a long-term, systems-focused lens that promotes equitable growth and
quality of life for all residents
To collaborate respectfully with fellow commissioners, staff, and elected officials in
service of the public good
I bring extensive executive leadership experience, a strong proven record of
public accountability, and a deep commitment to community service
My background in overseeing complex public systems, large budgets, and policy
implementation prepares me to evaluate planning matters with care and rigor
Having previously served on a city commission, I understand the responsibilities,
ethics, and commitment required
As a longtime community leader, I am well-positioned to listen, build trust, and
contribute balanced, informed recommendations that reflect both immediate
needs and long-term community goals
I agree.
Submission ID: 1a522b7f-bc69-4329-b309-976c6ef6bd04 Page 2/3Page 36 of 165
12/17/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 1a522b7f-bc69-4329-b309-976c6ef6bd04 Page 3/3Page 37 of 165
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application
11/17/2025 12:43 PM (PST)
Boards/Committees/Commissions Application Form
Planning Commission
MAKHAN (MAK)
L
GUPTA
GILROY
CA
95020
Yes
Mobile
Mobile
I am a citizen of USA and a resident of Gilroy for 25 years . I am retired and very
active in community. I wan born in India and came to USA over 50 yeard ago and
have lived in many states of USA. I am colage graguate with major in Chemistry,
Botany and Zoology. Love to teach and guide chirdern toward science and
technology. I have worked in many large manufacturing companies the
experence in metal finishing, waste water system, waste disposal sites, water
purification and potable water. i have worked with OSHA, NSF, and EPA.
Volunteer at Gilroy Garden for six years
Worked with commission for city of Gilroy for one year. Our commission worked
with homless in Gilroy with other inputs.
Worked with FEMA in NM for three months during peek time of Covid.
Working with seniors in Gilroy and Morgan hill teaching way of life and changes
Helping a group to provide food for homeless in Gilroy.
Submission ID: 5b5955db-97e5-486e-b207-aa9841af1f72 Page 1/2Page 38 of 165
Build a better place to live , being safe and help other.
Educate childer and permote college education.
Educate and find a way to skill learning.
Stop drug abuse
Learn how to handle day to day issues
Proper use of city facilities.
Waste reduction and recycleing
House keeping out side the home
I have real life experience with handling these matters
Education and desire to do it.
Have worked with many cultures and many countries.
I agree.
11/17/2025
*All Commission, Board and Committee applications are a public record.
Submission ID: 5b5955db-97e5-486e-b207-aa9841af1f72 Page 2/2Page 39 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 5:00 PM Page 1 of 2 City Council
Minutes
1. OPENING
1. Call to Order
City of Gilroy
DRAFT
City Council
Minutes
Monday, December 8, 2025 | 5:00 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bozzo at 5:00 PM.
2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Council Member Dion Bracco
Council Member Tom Cline
Council Member Terence Fugazzi
Council Member Zach Hilton
Council Member Carol Marques
Council Member Kelly Ramirez
Mayor Greg Bozzo
2. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Andy Faber announced the closed session item.
City Attorney Andy Faber opened public comment at 5:01 P.M.
With no speakers, City Attorney Andy Faber closed public comment.
1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT/ EMPLOYMENT.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 and Gilroy City Code Section
17A.11(2)
Name/Title: City Administrator
3. ADJOURN TO OPEN SESSION
City Attorney Andy Faber announced that the only reportable action was a vote to remain in
closed session.
Motion
Remain in closed session.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: None
SECONDER: None
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council Member
Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
4. ADJOURNMENT
Page 40 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 5:00 PM Page 2 of 2 City Council
Minutes
With no additional business before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 5:40 P.M
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Gilroy on XXXXXXX, 20XX.
Kim Mancera
City Clerk
Page 41 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 1 of 11 City Council
Minutes
1. OPENING
1. Call to Order
City of Gilroy
DRAFT
City Council
Minutes
Monday, December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bozzo at 6:00 PM.
2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Council Member Dion Bracco
Council Member Tom Cline
Council Member Terence Fugazzi
Council Member Zach Hilton
Council Member Carol Marques
Council Member Kelly Ramirez
Mayor Greg Bozzo
3. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
City Clerk Kim Mancera reported on the Posting of the Agenda.
4. Pledge of Allegiance
5. Invocation
Pastor Trevor Van Laar with Gilroy Presbyterian Church led the invocation.
6. Orders of the Day
None.
7. Employee Introductions
Community Development Director Sharon Goei introduced Code Enforcement
Officer Juan Becerra.
Human Resources Director/Risk Manager LeeAnn McPhillips introduced Human
Resources and Risk Management Technician Alyssa Remily, Equipment Mechanic
Diego Amador-Zepeda, and Senior Facilities Maintenance Specialist Luis Silveira.
2. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
1. Presentation of the 2025 City of Gilroy Highlights Video
Communications and Engagement Manager Rachelle Bedell provided a
presentation.
2. Children's Advocacy Center (CAC) For South County Presentation
Page 42 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 2 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Assistant District Attorney James Gibbons-Shapiro provided a presentation.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 6:23 P.M
Keana Gandarilla - commented that she is part of the Santa Clara Family Health
Plan Resident Advisory Group and mentioned the opening of the South County
Community Resource Center. She thanked the City Council and the City of Gilroy for
their vision.
Patty Pena - commented that she is happy to be a part of the Resident Advisory
Group and thanked the City Council and the City of Gilroy for their support and
partnership. She invited the City Council to the ribbon-cutting.
Araceli De La Cruz - commented on the South County Community Resource Center
and Santa Clara Family Health Plan.
Lucy Navarro - commented on the South County Community Resource Center and
Santa Clara Family Health Plan.
Terry Hernandez - commented that she would like to thank the City Council. She
mentioned that the South County Community Resource Center will also offer some
youth enrichment programs, which is an important resource for our community in
Gilroy, San Martin and Morgan Hill.
Greg Felios - commented on the Christmas Parade in Gilroy and Morgan Hill being
on the same day. He mentioned that he liked the highlight video and asked everyone
to thank city workers throughout the year. He reminded everyone that there is one
more election for the County Assessor.
Ron Kirkish - commented on overdose deaths throughout the Country, specifically
California.
Amos - commented on an incident and tragedy that happened to his family and a
seven-year curse that he believes is on the Gilroy Garlic Festival.
With no further speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
3. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
1. Council Member Bracco – Downtown Committee, Santa Clara County Library
Joint Powers Authority, Santa Clara Water Commission, Santa Clara Valley
Water Joint Water Resources Committee, SCRWA
Council Member Fugazzi – Santa Clara Water Commission (alternate), Silicon
Valley Regional Interoperability Authority Board (alternate), SCRWA, Visit
Page 43 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 3 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Gilroy California Welcome Center, VTA Mobility Partnership Committee
Council Member Marques – ABAG, Downtown Committee, Santa Clara County
Library Joint Powers Authority (alternate), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency
Governing Board, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Implementation Board,
SCRWA (alternate)
Council Member Hilton – CalTrain Policy Group, Santa Clara County
Expressway Plan 2040 Advisory Board (alternate), Silicon Valley Clean Energy
Authority JPA Board, South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, VTA
Policy Advisory Committee
Council Member Ramirez – ABAG (alternate), Gilroy Gardens Board of
Directors (alternate), Gilroy Sister Cities, Gilroy Youth Task Force (alternate),
SCRWA, Santa Clara Housing and Community Development Advisory
Committee
Council Member Cline – CalTrain Policy Group (alternate), Gilroy Sister Cities
(alternate), Gilroy Youth Task Force, Santa Clara County Expressway Plan
2040 Advisory Board, Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board
(alternate), Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority Board, Visit
Gilroy California Welcome Center (alternate), VTA Mobility Partnership
Committee, VTA Policy Advisory Committee (alternate)
Mayor Bozzo – Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors, Santa Clara Valley Water
Joint Water Resources Committee, South County Youth Task Force Policy
Team, VTA Board of Directors (alternate), Santa Clara Housing and
Community Development Advisory Committee (alternate)
Council Member Bracco - No report.
Council Member Fugazzi - Reported from Visit Gilroy that they have a successful
new website and well-received branding. They have added tourism-related
marketing pieces and are in the process of replacing the City kiosk map. They also
have a new online calendar. He personally thanked every staff member for their hard
work this year. He thanked the City Council members and the Mayor for making his
first year enjoyable. He thanked the residents and encouraged them to stay involved
and wished everyone a Merry Christmas.
Council Member Marques - Reported that at the Habitat meeting in November, they
discussed the agency's ad hoc proposal for the annual Executive Officer's
compensation package and review. She thanked the holiday parade committee for
their hard work on the parade. She mentioned the window decorating contest and
judged based on how much hard work and time they spent on their windows. She
wished everyone a Happy Holiday.
Council Member Hilton - Reported from the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
Policy Advisory Committee that they recommended adoption of the 2025 Congestion
Management Program. At the last South County Task Force (SCYTF) Policy Team
Page 44 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 4 of 11 City Council
Minutes
meeting, he provided updates on the joint use agreements between the City of
Gilroy and Gilroy Unified School District, with a focus on free, safe spaces for youth
to have after school and on the weekends. He wished everyone a Happy Holiday.
Council Member Ramirez - Reported that she attended the Gilroy Gardens Board of
Directors retreat.
Council Member Cline - Thanked the holiday parade committee and the volunteers
for making the parade happen. He wished the community and everyone a Merry
Christmas.
Mayor Bozzo - Thanked the holiday parade committee and staff for the parade work.
Gilroy Gardens had a day-long retreat. Thanked Kelly Ramirez for her involvement
in the League of California Cities and congratulated her for being appointed to the
Housing Community and Economic Development Policy Committee for 2026. He
also thanked and acknowledged our Supervisor of District 1, Sylvia Arenas. He has
been able to collaborate on many items, including funding grants for South County.
In total, Gilroy has received over $750,000 and South County over $1 million.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 6:47 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Approve the consent calendar.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Tom Cline
SECONDER: Council Member Kelly Ramirez
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council Member
Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
1. Approve the minutes of the November 17, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting
2. Approve Notice of Acceptance of Completion, and Reduction of the Faithful
Performance and Payment Security Bonds for Property Improvement
Agreement No. 2020-01, Town Center Multifamily Tract 10472
3. Approve Notice of Acceptance of Completion, and Reduction of the Faithful
Performance and Payment Security Bonds for Property Improvement
Agreement No. 2020-02, Nebbiolo Malvasia The Glen Tract 10520
4. Acceptance of the Annual Development Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year
2024-2025 as Required under Government Code 66000
Page 45 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 5 of 11 City Council
Minutes
5. Approval of a Contract Amendment to the Tree Maintenance Contract with
West Coast Arborists, Inc in the Amount of $69,319 for Hecker Pass Tree
Pruning
6. Adopt a FY26 and FY27 Budget Amendment Resolution to the Police
Department BSCC Title II Grant Fund for $290,225 and Approve a First
Amendment To Agreement for Services of $116,617.50 with Youth Alliance for
the South County Restorative Justice Youth Diversion Program from January
1, 2026 through September 30, 2026
7. Award a Contract to Youth Alliance for $130,105.14 for South County Youth
Task Force (SCYTF) School-Based Youth Services
8. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Cal-West Lighting &
Signal Maintenance, Inc. for Streetlight and Traffic Signal Maintenance
Services, and Adopt a Resolution Approving a Budget Amendment for the
Signal/ Street Light Maintenance Project (Project No. 800340)
9. Receive Report Regarding Upcoming 2026 Commission Vacancies per Maddy
Act
10. Authorization for Council Member Travel to the League of California Cities
2026 Mayors and Council Members Academy
11. Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Board and Commission Terms and
Appointment Process
12. Authorize the Surplus of Sixteen Vehicles/Equipment and Authorize the
Disposal of the Surplus by Auction
13. Claim of Antonio Garcia (The City Administrator recommends a "yes" vote
under the Consent Calendar shall constitute denial of the claim)
14. Claim of Stephanie Moretto (The City Administrator recommends a "yes" vote
under the Consent Calendar shall constitute denial of the claim)
15. Claim of Jeff Scherck (The City Administrator recommends a "yes" vote under
the Consent Calendar shall constitute denial of the claim)
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Consider Extending the Urgency Interim Ordinance Prohibiting the Issuance of
Tobacco Retailer Permits for a Period of Ten (10) Months and Fifteen (15) Days
within the Downtown Specific Plan Area
Mayor Bozzo opened the public hearing at 7:00 P.M.
Ann Marie McCauley - commented on the ordinance and thanked the City Council
for taking action.
Gary Walton - commented on the ordinance and agrees that it should be city-wide.
Page 46 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 6 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Ron Kirkish - commented on smoke shops selling drugs and cigarettes.
With no further speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
City Council directed staff to come back with a City-Wide ordinance on January 5,
2026.
Motion
Determine the action is exempt from environmental review under California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15262, Section 15060(c)(2),
15060(c)(3), and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, adopt an extension of the
Urgency Interim Ordinance established to prohibit the issuance or approval of an
new Tobacco Retailer Permit for an additional ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days
within the Gilroy Downtown Specific Plan Area and review, approve and issue the
10-day report as required by Government Code Section 65858(d) for the extension
of the temporary moratorium.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Carol Marques
SECONDER: Council Member Terence Fugazzi
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
6. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS
1. Commemorative Flag Application Review for Calendar Year 2026
Deputy Director for Community Development Bryce Atkins provided a report.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 7:21 P.M.
Jan Guffey - commented on the statistics of how adults identify and her support of
the Pride Flag being flown every year.
Alicia - commented by asking City Council to raise the Pride Flag in Gilroy.
Edwin Salazar - commented as a student of Gilroy High School and the results of a
school survey that he sent out regarding raising the Pride Flag.
Ann Marie McCauley - commented on the flag-raising policy and her support of
raising the Pride Flag.
Gisel - commented on her experience as a new resident to California, Gilroy in
specific, and the fear of not being accepted.
Page 47 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 7 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Terry Hernandez - commented that her non-profit helped to organize the Pride Flag
to be raised last year and asked the City Council to raise the flag this year.
Augustine Alvarez - commented on the LGBTQ+ youth that have lost their lives and
asked the City Council to raise the Pride Flag in Gilroy.
Ron Kirkish - commented on his opinion to not fly the Pride Flag on the same
flagpole as the American Flag.
With no further speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Approve the Commemorative Flag Flying Application for the Progressive Pride Flag.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Zach Hilton
SECONDER: Council Member Carol Marques
AYES: Council Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton,
Council Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez,
Mayor Greg Bozzo
NAYS: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline
ABSENT: None
2. Consideration of options and recommendations for meeting State-mandated
stormwater trash capture requirements.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:16 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Prepare and advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the fabrication and
installation of 73 connector pipe screens (a type of certified full trash capture
system) to meet the City's December 2026. 30-percent MS4 trash capture mandate
and in conjunction with the bid award, return to City Council with a budget
amendment to add the Connector Pipe Screen Project into the FY 26 Capital
Budget with funding from Stormwater Management Fund (422).
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Dion Bracco
SECONDER: Council Member Zach Hilton
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
City Council directed staff that they would like a parallel path. As staff is looking into
the Hydro Separators, they would also like to concurrently begin pursing track two.
Page 48 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 8 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Council recessed at 8:20 P.M. and reconvened at 8:30 P.M.
3. Mayoral Appointments of Council Members to Serve in Regional
Representative Seats and Seats on Local Boards and Committees
City Clerk Kim Mancera provided a report
.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:33 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Approve representative seat assignments as determined by Mayor Bozzo per
California Government Code Section 40605.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Terence Fugazzi
SECONDER: Council Member Carol Marques
AYES: None
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
4. Appointment of Council Member Zach Hilton to the position of Mayor Pro
Tempore for 2026
City Clerk Kim Mancera provided a report.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:35 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Appoint Council Member Zach Hilton to the position of Mayor Pro Tempore for 2026.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Tom Cline
SECONDER: Council Member Dion Bracco
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
5. Consent the Appointment of Scot Smithee (CalPERS Retired Annuitant) as the
Interim Police Chief Following Successful Completion of all Peace Officer
Standards & Training (POST) Hiring Requirements and Adoption of a
Resolution Approving the Appointment and Employment Agreement
Interim City Administrator Brad Kilger provided a report.
Page 49 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 9 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:38 P.M.
Ron Kirkish - commented on his support for Scot Smithee as Interim Police Chief.
With no further speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Consent the City Administrator's recommendation to appoint Scot Smithee
(CalPERS Retired Annuitant) as Interim Police Chief effective upon successful
completion of all Peace Officer Standards & Training (POST) Hiring Requirements
and adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving the
appointment of Scot Smithee (CalPERS Retired Annuitant) as Interim Police Chief
pursuant to Government Code Section 21221(h) and authorizing the City
Administrator to execute the employment agreement to include setting the
employment start date following successful completion of all POST hiring
requirements.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Dion Bracco
SECONDER: Council Member Carol Marques
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
6. Consent the Appointment of Karl Bjarke (CalPERS Retired Annuitant) as the
Interim Utilities Director Effective December 23, 2025 and Adoption of a
Resolution Approving the Appointment and Employment Agreement
Interim City Administrator Brad Kilger provided a report.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:40 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Consent the City Administrator's recommendation to appoint Karl Bjarke (CalPERS
Retired Annuitant) as Interim Utilities Director effective December 23, 2025 and
adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving the appointment
of Karl Bjarke (CalPERS Retired Annuitant) as Interim Utilities Director effective
December 23, 2025 pursuant to Government Code Section 21221(h) and
authorizing the City Administrator to execute the employment agreement.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Kelly Ramirez
SECONDER: Council Member Tom Cline
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Page 50 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 10 of 11 City Council
Minutes
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
7. Consent the Appointment of LeeAnn McPhillips (CalPERS Retired Annuitant
as of December 31, 2025) as the Interim Administrative Services & Human
Resources Director/Risk Manager Effective December 31, 2025 and Adoption
of a Resolution Approving the Appointment and Employment Agreement and
Waiving the 180-Day Wait Period for Post-Retirement Employment
interim City Administrator Brad Kilger provided a report.
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 8:43 P.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
Motion
Consent the City Administrator's recommendation to appoint LeeAnn McPhillips
(CalPERS Retired Annuitant as of December 31, 2025) as Interim Administrative
Services & Human Resources Director/Risk Manager effective December 31, 2025
and adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving the
appointment of LeeAnn McPhillips (CalPERS Retired Annuitant as of December 31,
2025) as Interim Administrative Services & Human Resources Director/Risk
Manager effective December 31, 2025 and waiving the 180-day wait period for post-
retirement employment pursuant to Government Code Section 21221(h) and
Section 7522.56 authorizing the City Administrator to execute the employment
agreement.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: Council Member Dion Bracco
SECONDER: Council Member Kelly Ramirez
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council
Member Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor
Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
7. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
Interim City Administrator Brad Kilger mentioned that the Youth Commission has put on two
events in the last couple of weeks. One was the Intergenerational Dance, and the other
was the Youth Commission helping the seniors with their technology issues. He thanked
the Youth Commission, Recreation, the YMCA, and several other groups that helped
collaborate on these events.
8. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
Page 51 of 165
December 8, 2025 | 6:00 PM Page 11 of 11 City Council
Minutes
City Attorney Andy Faber commended the City Clerk on her work on SB 707.
9. CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Andy Faber announced the closed session item.
City Attorney Andy Faber opened public comment at 8:46 P.M.
With no speakers, City Attorney Andy Faber closed public comment.
1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 and Gilroy City Code Section
17A.8
Property: APN 808-58-004
Negotiators: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator, John Doughty, Director
Public Works
Other Party to Negotiations: John Filice, Glen Loma
Negotiations: Price and Term of Payment for Sale and/or Lease
10. ADJOURN TO OPEN SESSION
City Attorney Andy Faber announced that the only reportable action was a vote to remain in
closed session.
Motion
Remain in closed session.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: None
SECONDER: None
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council Member
Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
11. ADJOURNMENT
With no additional business before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 8:59 P.M
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Gilroy on XXXXXXX, 20XX.
Kim Mancera
City Clerk
Page 52 of 165
December 15, 2025 | 9:00 AM Page 1 of 2 City Council
Minutes
1. OPENING
1. Call to Order
City of Gilroy
DRAFT
City Council
Minutes
Monday, December 15, 2025 | 9:00 AM
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bozzo at 9:00 AM.
2. Roll Call
Attendance Attendee Name
Present Council Member Dion Bracco
Council Member Tom Cline
Council Member Terence Fugazzi
Council Member Zach Hilton
Council Member Carol Marques
Council Member Kelly Ramirez
Mayor Greg Bozzo
2. CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Bozzo opened public comment at 9:01 A.M.
With no speakers, Mayor Bozzo closed public comment.
The meeting adjourned to closed session at 9:01 A.M.
1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT/ EMPLOYMENT.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 and Gilroy City Code Section
17A.11(2)
Name/Title: City Administrator
3. ADJOURN TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Bozzo announced that the only reportable action was a vote to remain in closed
session.
Motion
Remain in closed session.
RESULT: Passed
MOVER: None
SECONDER: None
AYES: Council Member Dion Bracco, Council Member Tom Cline, Council
Member Terence Fugazzi, Council Member Zach Hilton, Council Member
Carol Marques, Council Member Kelly Ramirez, Mayor Greg Bozzo
NAYS: None
Page 53 of 165
December 15, 2025 | 9:00 AM Page 2 of 2 City Council
Minutes
ABSENT: None
4. ADJOURNMENT
With no additional business before the Council, the meeting was adjourned at 1:30 P.M
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Gilroy on XXXXXXX, 20XX.
Kim Mancera
City Clerk
Page 54 of 165
6.2.
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Adopt the City Seal and Logo Use Policy
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Rachelle Bedell, Communication and Engagement Manager
Prepared by: Rachelle Bedell, Communication and Engagement Manager
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the City Seal and Logo Use Policy with approval authority for external use of the
City Logo delegated to the City Administrator.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Seal and City Logo(s), including the City Logo, Arts Logo, Police Department
Logo, and Fire Department Logo, are proprietary symbols of the City of Gilroy that
reflect the City’s identity, authority, and professionalism.
The proposed City Seal and Logo Use Policy establishes standards for the appropriate
use of the City Seal and City Logo(s), with particular emphasis on a formal application
and approval process for use of City Logo by outside organizations, as directed by City
Council. The draft policy proposes to delegate approval authority for external logo use
to the City Administrator, while preserving the ability for any individual City Council
Member to call up a decision for Council review. The policy also provides an appeal
process allowing applicants to request City Council review of a City Administrator
decision.
Council is asked to consider whether to adopt the policy as drafted, including the
proposed delegation of authority, or to retain sole approval authority over future
requests for City Logo use by outside entities.
Page 55 of 165
6.2.
BACKGROUND
The City’s official Seal and logos are important identifiers that represent the authority,
credibility, and brand of the City of Gilroy. Federal law prohibits private entities from
trademarking government seals, and California law restricts misleading or unauthorized
use of governmental insignia. However, without a City-adopted policy governing how
and when these marks may be used, the City’s ability to manage and protect its official
marks is limited.
At the April 21, 2025 Council Meeting, the City Council provided direction specifically
related to use of the City Logo by outside organizations, including the development of a
formal application process and eligibility criteria. The proposed City Seal and Logo Use
Policy implements this direction by establishing a structured process for reviewing and
approving external logo-use requests.
The draft policy further proposes that approval authority for external logo use be
delegated to the City Administrator, with safeguards to ensure transparency and
oversight.
These safeguards include:
• The ability for any City Council Member to call up a City Administrator decision
for Council review; and
• A defined process allowing applicants to appeal or request review by City
Council.
In addition to addressing external use, the policy establishes internal standards for use
of the City Seal, City Logo, Arts Logo, Police Department Logo, and Fire Department
Logo to ensure consistency, prevent misuse, and support clear brand management.
ANALYSIS
Purpose of the Policy
The purpose of the City Seal and Logo Use Policy is to establish clear standards for the
appropriate use of the City’s official marks, with a particular focus on managing requests
for use of City Logo by outside organizations, as directed by City Council. The policy
provides a consistent framework to protect the City’s identity, prevent unauthorized or
misleading use, and ensure transparency and fairness in how external requests are
evaluated and approved.
In addition, the policy establishes internal guidelines for the use of the City Seal, City
Logo, Arts Logo, Police Department Logo, and Fire Department Logo to support
consistent branding, reinforce professionalism, and ensure compliance with City Code
and Charter requirements.
Page 56 of 165
6.2.
Legal and Operational Considerations
Federal law prohibits private entities from trademarking government seals, and
California law restricts misleading or unauthorized use of government insignia. While
these laws provide baseline protections, they do not establish City-specific standards or
procedures for authorizing or denying use of the City Logo by outside organizations.
Operationally, the City has historically allowed limited external use of the City Logo
without a formal application or review process. This ad hoc approach creates risks
related to inconsistent decision-making, unintended implications of City endorsement,
brand dilution, and limited enforcement capability.
The proposed policy addresses these gaps by formalizing eligibility criteria, approval
standards, and review procedures.
Delegation of Authority and Oversight
The draft policy proposes delegating approval authority for external City Logo use to the
City Administrator. This delegation allows applications to be reviewed and processed in
a timely and administratively efficient manner, consistent with the policy’s eligibility
criteria and standards.
To preserve City Council oversight and accountability, the policy includes multiple
safeguards:
• Council Call-Up Authority: Any individual City Council Member may request
that a City Administrator's decision be reviewed by the City Council.
• Applicant Review Procedures: Applicants may request City Council review of a
City Administrator's decision in accordance with procedures outlined in the policy.
These mechanisms ensure that while day-to-day decisions are handled administratively,
ultimate authority and policy oversight remain with the City Council.
Internal Use Standards
Although Council direction focused on external City Logo use, staff included internal use
standards to ensure consistency across City departments, reinforce City Code
limitations on use of the City Seal, and support effective implementation of the external
approval process. These provisions do not expand Council’s prior direction but provide
necessary clarity and operational consistency.
Risk Assessment
If the City does not adopt a formal City Seal and Logo Use Policy, the City remains
exposed to several operational and reputational risks. Without clearly defined standards
and approval procedures, the City Seal and City Logo(s) may continue to be used
inconsistently by departments and outside organizations, increasing the likelihood of
unauthorized use, brand dilution, or public confusion regarding City endorsement or
Page 57 of 165
6.2.
affiliation.
The absence of a formal application and review process for external use of the City
Logo also limits the City’s ability to apply decisions consistently and transparently, which
may result in perceived inequities, disputes, or challenges from applicants. Additionally,
without documented procedures and delegated authority, the City’s ability to efficiently
manage requests and address misuse may be constrained.
Adopting the policy, with delegated approval authority to the City Administrator, Council
call-up authority, and applicant review procedures, mitigates these risks by establishing
clear standards, defined decision-making roles, and oversight mechanisms. This
framework balances administrative efficiency with accountability, reduces the potential
for misuse or misrepresentation of City marks, and strengthens the City’s ability to
protect its identity, credibility, and public trust.
ALTERNATIVES
Adopt the City Seal and Logo Use Policy (Recommended)
Under this option, Council would adopt the City Seal and Logo Use Policy with approval
authority for external use of the City Logo delegated to the City Administrator.
• Any Council Member may call up a decision for Council review.
• Applicants may request City Council review of a decision.
This option balances administrative efficiency with transparency and Council oversight
and establishes clear standards, strengthens legal protections, formalizes approval
processes, and ensures consistent and appropriate use of City marks.
Provide Direction to Staff for Modifications
Council may direct staff to revise the policy’s approval authority, review procedures, or
eligibility criteria and return with a modified policy for consideration.
Do Not Adopt a Policy
This option maintains the current practice of ad hoc, informal use.
Not adopting a policy would:
• Continue the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate use of City marks.
• Allow inconsistent branding across departments and external partners.
• Limit the City’s ability to enforce proper use or protect its identity.
• Leave unclear expectations for community organizations and partner agencies.
Page 58 of 165
6.2.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The scope of drafting the policy was accommodated within the Administration
Department's existing workplan, and budgeted appropriations and resources. Adoption
of the Policy has no additional fiscal impacts.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
None.
NEXT STEPS
Once adopted, staff will work with organizations currently using the City Logo to submit
an official application for use of the City Logo, ensuring compliance with the policy.
Attachments:
1. City Seal and Logo Use Policy FINAL DRAFT
Page 59 of 165
1
City of Gilroy
CITY SEAL AND LOGO USE POLICY
Adopted: XXXX
Page 60 of 165
2
Table of Contents
1. Purpose of Policy
2. City Seal and City Logos
3. Permitted Use of City Seal and City Logos
4. Restrictions on Uses of City Seal and City Logos
5. Additional City Seals and Logos
6. Process for Applying for Use of City Logo(s) by Outside Organizations
7. Penalty for Use of City Seal or Logo(s) in Violation of the Policy
8. Interpretation
Page 61 of 165
3
1. Purpose of Policy
The City of Gilroy takes the integrity and proper representation of its City Seal and City Logo(s) seriously.
The City is required to have a seal. (Cal. Gov’t Code § 34501.) The City Logo was designed in 2007 and
formally adopted in 2008 as a means by which the City of Gilroy can express its values and viewpoint.
Both the Seal and Logo reflect the City’s identity, values, and commitment to its residents.
This policy establishes standards for the appropriate use of the City Seal and City Logo to maintain the
integrity of Gilroy’s identity and ensure consistency across communications. This policy also establishes
a process and standards for the use of the City Logo by external entities in limited circumstances
pursuant to City of Gilroy Code § 1.20(a).
2. City Seal and City Logos
2.1. City Seal
The City Seal is the property of the City and may only be used for official business of the City of
Gilroy (City of Gilroy Code § 1.20). The Seal of the City is the same as that heretofore used and
depicted below:
2.2. City Logo
The City Logo expresses the values and viewpoints of the City in alignment with its culture and
goals. The Logo of the City is the same as that heretofore used and depicted below and as may
also be depicted in the City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines:
2.3. City Arts Logo
The Logo of the City for Gilroy Arts is the same as that heretofore used and depicted below:
Page 62 of 165
4
2.4. City of Gilroy Police Department Logo
The Logo of the City for the Gilroy Police Department is the same as that heretofore used and
depicted below:
2.5. City Gilroy Fire Department Logo
The Logo of the City for the Gilroy Fire Department is the same as that heretofore used and
depicted below:
3. Permitted City Use of City Seals and City Logos
The City Seal and City Logos are used for different purposes.
3.1. Seal. The City may use the City Seal to certify official City records and instruments and for
formal and official business of the City. Examples when the City may use the Seal for formal
and official business include legal documents, official proclamations, official meeting
agendas and minutes, official press releases, resolutions, ordinances, approved contracts,
permit applications and approvals, City policy documents, and City-issued business cards.
3.1.2 The City Clerk shall be the official custodian of the City Seal. (City Code § 1.19).
3.1.3 The City Seal is alterable at the pleasure of City Council. (Cal. Gov’t Code § 34501.)
Page 63 of 165
5
3.1.4 Use of the City Seal must comply with the City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines, including
colors, clear space, and size requirements.
3.2. Logo. The City Logo expresses the City’s values and viewpoint that Gilroy is a community
with a spice for life. The City may use the Logo as a form of City expression on department-
approved materials and City communications.
3.1.5 Use of the City Logo must comply with the City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines, including
colors, clear space, and size requirements.
3.1.6 The Communication and Engagement Manager shall be the official custodian of the City
Logos, as well as any other Logos adopted by the City Council. The City Communication
and Engagement Manager may propose for approval by the City Administrator
guidelines pertaining to the use of the Logo not in conflict with this document as it may
deem necessary to assure the proper administration of this Policy.
3.1.7 Individual departments may request additional department Logos made in accordance
with the City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines.
4. Restrictions on Uses of City Seal and City Logos
Elements of the City Seal or City Logo(s) may not be isolated or used alone or in combination with any
other art, symbols, or words.
4.1. Seal. No person shall use the Seal in personal correspondence, campaign or election
materials, endorsements, general or routine communications, promotional purposes,
informal documents such as newsletters or event signage, or routine email communications.
4.2. Logo. City employees and City of Gilroy elected officials shall use the City Logos in
compliance with the City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines. Use for political campaigns, ballot
measures, endorsements, private advertising, third-party merchandise, or third-party
websites is strictly prohibited. No person other than City employees and City of Gilroy
elected officials shall use the City Logos, or any imitation thereof, in any manner that implies
City endorsement, authorship, or affiliation except upon approval by the City Administrator.
(City Code § 1.20(a).)
5. Additional City Seals and City Logos
The City Council retains the right to create variations of the City Seal and City Logo and to adopt and
establish other official City seals and City Logos. Such variations may include but are not limited to,
centennial seals or other seals that mark anniversaries, events, apparel, and any other City occasion the
City Council wishes to commemorate.
6. Process for Applying for Use of the City Logo(s) by Outside Organizations
Page 64 of 165
6
The City has historically allowed certain organizations to use elements of the City’s Logo in adherence
with Brand Guidelines when an organization’s mission is in alignment with the values of the City,
typically when there has also been a close working relationship between the organization and the City.
The City may choose to make the City Logo available for limited purposes by certain organizations
(Gilroy City Code § 1.20(a)). In such circumstances, the City requires outside organizations to use
variations of the City Logo to avoid confusion with the City Logo.
6.1. Application Process. Any eligible organization that wishes to use the City Logo(s) may make
an application for such use to the City Administrator through the Communication and
Engagement Manager. Within 30 days of receiving a complete application submitted
pursuant to this section, the City Administrator, through the Communication and
Engagement Manager, shall review the application. The City Administrator may select only
organizations that convey values deemed in their sole discretion to be in accordance with
the City’s interests.
6.2. Eligible Organizations. Organizations may only apply for Logo use if they meet the following
criteria: (1) are a registered 501(c)(3) or public benefit nonprofit OR a government/public
agency, (2) provide programs that directly benefit the Gilroy community, (3) are actively
partnering with the City or operating under a City-endorsed agreement, and (4) are not
engaged in political advocacy, religious activity, or commercial sales unless approved
through a sponsorship agreement.
6.3. Application contents. The organization’s application for use of the City Logo(s) shall contain
at a minimum, the following:
6.3.1. The name of the organization that wishes to use the City Logo(s).
6.3.2. The complete address, email address, and telephone number of the contact person
submitting the application on behalf of the organization.
6.3.3. The purpose and scope of the City Logo use.
6.3.4. The event or advertising materials for which the City Logo(s) will be used.
6.3.5. The location(s) in which the organization will use the City Logo(s), including any online
platforms.
6.3.6. The starting and ending dates, if known, for which the organization will use the City
Logo(s).
6.3.7. Whether any promotional materials or items using City Logo(s) will be sold.
6.3.8. Subject to staff approval, a clear disclaimer in specified place, font size, and style that is
legible and easy-to-find, which may read: “This organization is an independent entity
operating in collaboration with the City of Gilroy. Use of any version of the City Logo does
not imply official City endorsement.” The City reserves the right to require enhanced
Page 65 of 165
7
wording and visibility of the disclaimer (such as placement on the homepage or relevant
project pages) when there is a reasonable risk of public confusion about the City’s
involvement. Planned disclaimer language should also clarify the nature of the relationship
(e.g., “not an official City program”).
6.3.9. Subject to staff approval, a design with elements of the City’s Logo in compliance with the
City of Gilroy Brand Guidelines.
6.4. Decision. The City Council explicitly delegates authority to approve or deny an application to
the City Administrator, subject to the following limitations.
The City Administrator may approve or deny a Logo application at their sole discretion. The
City Administrator shall notify City Council of their decision and shall mail written notice to
the applicant. If no review of the City Administrator decision is sought within 15 days of the
mailing of written notice, the decision shall become final and effective.
6.4.1 Review by City Council. A decision made by the City Administrator shall be reviewed
by City Council if the applicant requests review of the decision in writing to the
Communication and Engagement Manager within 15 days of the mailing of the written
notice. Any Council Member may also bring the decision to City Council for review,
without having been deemed to have taken a position in any way that would otherwise
disqualify them from voting on the matter. Upon review, City Council may uphold, modify,
or deny the decision in whole or in part by resolution. The City Council’s decision on
review shall be effective immediately and shall be final.
6.5 Additional Restrictions. Approval is not assignable or transferable. Additional terms
contained in the approval or resolution may also apply. Pursuant to Gilroy City Code § 1.20, a
Logo may not be placed on any written, printed or electronic material in favor of or against any
ballot measure, or in favor of or against any candidate for public office. The City reserves the
right to revoke the approval of use at any time.
7. Revisions.
Minor revisions may be approved by the Communication and Engagement Manager.
8. Penalty for Use of City Seal or Logo in Violation of the Policy. Unauthorized use of the City Seal or
City Logo(s) is a misdemeanor pursuant to Gilroy City Code § 1.21. Violation may also result in civil
and administrative remedies through legal and administrative actions. Failure to adhere to the
terms contained in the approval or resolution may result in revocation of the approval.
9. Interpretation
The City Communication and Engagement Manager may establish additional administrative procedures
not in conflict with this document as they deem necessary to assure the proper administration of this
Policy.
Page 66 of 165
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Acceptance of a State of California Department of Justice,
Tobacco Grant Program Award in the Amount of $291,546
and Adoption of a Resolution of the City Council of the City
of Gilroy Approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 and 2026-2027
Budget Amendments
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Luke Powell, Acting Chief of Police
Department: Police Department
Submitted by: Luke Powell, Acting Chief of Police
Prepared by: Luke Powell, Acting Chief of Police
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: Develop a Financially Resilient Organization
RECOMMENDATION
1. Accept the State of California Department of Justice Tobacco Grant Program
Award for $291,546;
2. Authorize the Interim City Administrator to execute the grant agreement and any
related documents necessary to implement the grant; and
3. Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy amending the budget
for FY26 and FY27 and appropriating proposed revenue and expenditure
amendments.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Gilroy Police Department has been awarded a three-year, $291,546 grant from the
California Department of Justice (DOJ) Tobacco Grant Program funded by Proposition
56. The purpose of the grant is to reduce youth access to tobacco products and
improve retailer compliance with State tobacco laws through proactive enforcement,
education, and training.
The project will fund personnel costs for a sergeant, a corporal, three officers, and a
dispatcher to conduct tobacco enforcement activities and retailer education.
Page 67 of 165
City Council approval is required to formally accept the award, authorize execution of
the grant agreements, and establish the necessary budget appropriations.
BACKGROUND
Local tobacco retailers in Gilroy effectively serve a market area of approximately 67,945
people, including both residents and customers who travel from outside the city to
purchase tobacco products—with about 31.4% of this population under the age of 21.
Within the city limits, there are 52 tobacco retailers, 11 of which (approximately 21.6%)
are located within 1,000 feet of a school. This combination of a large youth population
and retailer proximity to schools increases the risk of youth exposure to tobacco
products, including e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco.
Gilroy is approximately 57% Hispanic/Latino, a demographic that has historically been
targeted by flavored tobacco marketing. Additionally, about 8.4% of households receive
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, indicating economic
vulnerability that is often correlated with higher tobacco-related health risks.
The DOJ Tobacco Grant Program provides funding to local law enforcement agencies
to conduct education, enforcement, and prosecution efforts aimed at reducing illegal
tobacco sales to minors and addressing illegal or non-compliant tobacco retail
practices. The Gilroy Police Department applied to DOJ for the 2025/26 funding cycle
and has been awarded $291,546 for the project beginning November 21, 2025 and
ending June 30, 2029.
ANALYSIS
The grant will support a comprehensive, multi-year approach that includes:
Project Scope and Activities
• Retailer Inspections
o Approximately 17 retailers inspected per year.
o Focus on businesses near schools, with prior violations, or with
community complaints.
o Inspections will verify compliance with age-verification requirements,
flavored tobacco restrictions, and licensing laws.
• Minor Decoy Operations (Approx. 6 per year)
o Target retailers at higher risk for underage sales.
o DOJ-compliant decoys (age and appearance) will be always supervised
by trained officers.
o Violations will result in citations, education, and potential referral for
administrative or legal action.
• Shoulder-Tap Operations (Approx. 6 per year)
Page 68 of 165
o Identify adults who purchase tobacco for minors outside retail locations.
o Emphasis on enforcement and on-the-spot education regarding the
seriousness of providing tobacco to minors.
• Undercover Buy Operations (Approx. 3 per year)
o Officer-only operations focused on single-sale (“loosie”) violations,
flavored in-store product sales, and unlicensed retailers.
o No youth participation: all buys conducted by trained officers.
• Retailer Education
o On-site education and distribution of DOJ-approved materials to all
targeted retailers each year.
o Immediate educational intervention for minor violations, emphasizing
corrective actions and future compliance.
• Prosecution Coordination
o First-time or low-level violations may be addressed through administrative
citations and education.
o Serious or repeat violations will be referred to the City Attorney’s Office for
civil or criminal action and/or license-related consequences, where
applicable.
• Tobacco Enforcement Education for Officers
o Training for approximately 15 enforcement officers on state tobacco laws,
local ordinances, DOJ grant requirements, and operational protocols
(minor decoy, shoulder-tap, and undercover operations).
o Ongoing updates as laws and best practices evolve.
Staffing and Capacity
The grant funds a portion of personnel time for:
• One Sergeant – project supervisor and grant coordinator.
• One Corporal – field supervisor for enforcement operations and decoy
management.
• Three Police Officers – primary field enforcement and retailer education.
• One Dispatcher – operational communications and records checks.
The Gilroy Police Department has extensive experience managing similar state and
federal grants (e.g., Office of Traffic Safety, DOJ grants) and administering
enforcement-focused projects with detailed reporting and accountability requirements.
Established internal controls and cross-training will ensure continuity in the event of
personnel changes.
The grant is structured to supplement, not replace, existing resources by funding
targeted operations and outreach that would not be feasible under the current budget.
ALTERNATIVES
Page 69 of 165
Council may amend or reject the budget amendment resolution. This is not
recommended as these funds will be placed into use for the public’s benefit and are
offset by the grant revenue received that would otherwise not be available to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
$291,546 in expenditures are proposed with offsetting revenue. The expenditures and
grant revenue will be appropriated to the Police Department’s, Department of Justice
Tobacco Inspection Grant program expenses, and accounted for in a separately
established Tobacco Inspection Grant Fund.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
The Police Department will engage in public outreach and education efforts with local
retailers, schools, youth programs, and community partners regarding tobacco laws and
youth access prevention.
NEXT STEPS
If the City Council approves the recommended actions, staff will:
1. Execute the grant agreement and any required DOJ documents.
2. Coordinate with the California Department of Justice to finalize the project
schedule and reporting requirements.
3. Establish grant accounts and internal tracking procedures for enforcement
activity and training.
4. Implement the planned enforcement, education, and training operations in
alignment with the approved grant work plan and timeline.
Attachments:
1. California DOJ Tobacco Grant Summary of Award
2. Memorandum of Understanding DOJ-PROP56-2025-26-1-016
3. Resolution Accepting and Appropriating DOJ TGP Award
4. Government Agency Taxpayer ID Form
5. Letter of Intent
Page 70 of 165
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE
CITY OF GILROY TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT
OF $291,546 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, TOBACCO GRANT PROGRAM, AND AMENDING THE
BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF GILROY FOR FISCAL YEARS 2025-
2026 AND 2026-2027 IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE TOBACCO INSPECTION GRANTS FUND AND
APPROPRIATING PROPOSED EXPENDITURE AMENDEMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Administrator prepared and submitted to the City Council a budget
for the City of Gilroy for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027, and the City Council carefully
examined, considered and adopted the same on June 2, 2025, and
WHEREAS, The City is interested in participating in the Tobacco Grant Program, which
is made available through the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act
of 2016 (Prop 56) and administered by the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to support
local efforts to reduce the illegal sale of tobacco products to minors in the city, and
WHEREAS, Following the City’s submittal of a proposal to the Program, the State of
California DOJ offered to award $291,546 for the program beginning November 21, 2025, and
ending June 30, 2029, and
WHEREAS, Grant funds will be used for City of Gilroy personnel costs related to
tobacco enforcement operations and local retailer inspection operations, and
WHEREAS, In order to be considered eligible to receive grant funding, the City must
submit a completed Grant Award Memorandum of Understanding to the State of California DOJ,
and
WHEREAS, City Staff has prepared and submitted to the City Council a proposed amendment
to said budget for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 for the City of Gilroy in the staff report
dated January 5, 2026, for the Police Department Department of Justice Tobacco Inspection
Grants Fund, appropriating funding received from the California Department of Justice and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and considered the same and is
satisfied with said budget amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
1. The City Administrator is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to accept funding
in the amount of $291,546 from the California Department of Justice, and
Page 71 of 165
Resolution No. 2026-XX
Acceptance $291,546 CA DOJ Tobacco Inspection Grant
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 2 of 3
2. The City Administrator, or designated representative, is hereby authorized, on behalf
of the City, to execute all grant related documents, including, without limitation,
contracts, amendments, extensions, and payment requests as appropriate to accept the
funds under and comply with the conditions of the grant, and
3. That revenue and expenditure appropriations in the Police Department, Department of
Justice Tobacco Inspection Grants Fund, is hereby increased by $97,182 for Fiscal
Year 2025-2026 and $97,182 in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and $97,182 will be
appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2027-2028 budget development.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January 2026 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
APPROVED:
______________________________
Greg Bozzo, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kim Mancera, City Clerk
Page 72 of 165
Resolution No. 2026-XX
Acceptance $291,546 CA DOJ Tobacco Inspection Grant
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK
I, KIM MANCERA, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the
attached Resolution No. 2026-XX is an original resolution, or true and correct copy of a
City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a Regular Meeting of
said held on Council held Monday, January 5, 2026 with a quorum present.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official
Seal of the City of Gilroy this Date.
____________________________________
Kim Mancera
City Clerk of the City of Gilroy
(Seal)
Page 73 of 165
Tobacco Grant Program
GRANT SERVICES BRANCH – LOCAL
ASSISTANCE
DIVISION OF OPERATIONS
11/19/2025 Page 1 of 4
TOBACCO GRANT SUMMARY OF AWARD
DOJ-PROP56-2025-26-1-016
GILROY POLICE DEPARTMENT
This Summary of Award document will be used by the Tobacco Grant Program when determining
whether an activity or expense claimed was approved for funding and is reimbursable. Activities other
than those presented here may not be reimbursable. A Grant Modification may be necessary for
material deviations. Please consult with your Grant Program Officer before engaging in any activity
beyond this scope or if you have questions about the scope of the activities and budget allowability.
By signing the Memorandum of Understanding, your agency agrees to the commitments outlined
below and this document becomes part of the Grant Agreement.
AWARD SUMMARY
Award Amount: $291,546 Requested Amount: $291,546
Removed from Award: None
Reduced Line Items: None
Other Changes or Stipulations:
IMPORTANT PROVISIONS FOR ALL GRANTEES
I. Enforcement Activities
a. Authorized - If enforcement activities were proposed, only activities that target retailers
for illegal sales/marketing of tobacco products were approved. It is expected that the
flavor ban will be enforced within one or more enforcement activities.
b. Unauthorized - Community or school patrols, or other enforcement actions related to
tobacco use and possession, are not permitted.
II. Educational Activities
a. Authorized – Retailer and/or officer educational activities on tobacco laws and
ordinances, if included, are authorized as noted below.
b. Unauthorized – School or community education efforts, including media campaigns, are
not permitted as part of this award. All educational efforts should be directed to
retailers and/or officers.
III. Removed Personnel or Other Items
Page 74 of 165
11/19/2025 Page 2 of 4
a. If specific personnel or other items were removed and not funded, they cannot be
reinstated during the grant term.
IV. Reduced Line Items
a. If a specific line item was reduced, the intention was to not fully fund it or the activities
it represents.
V. Mileage/Fuel
a. Budgets that include mileage or fuel were amended to include both together in one line
item for flexibility and the type of backup documentation available. Mileage is limited to
the state rate in effect at the time of travel.
VI. Equipment
a. All equipment items must be purchased during the first year of the project as noted on
the Budget Detail. Their awarding is intended to support project goals and be used to
support grant activities throughout the grant term.
Please reference the Tobacco Grant Program Grantee Handbook for more information regarding
allowable costs.
GOALS AND ACTIVITIES
Retail Inspections
• Per year, 17 retailers will be inspected.
• Additional details regarding these inspections:
o Retailers will be selected based on proximity to schools, prior violations, and community
complaints. The Gilroy Police Department will focus inspections on illegal sales to
minors, flavored tobacco products, and license compliance. Operations will be
conducted by trained officers from the Special Operations Division and Anti-Crime
Team, using minor decoy and shoulder tap tactics where permitted. Each inspection will
be documented, with citations issued as needed. Retailers with minor violations will
receive education materials, while repeat or serious violators may face referral for
prosecution. All activity will be logged and reported in accordance with DOJ grant
requirements.
Minor Decoy Operations
• Per year, 6 minor decoy operations will be conducted.
• Per year, 17 retailers will be targeted through these operations.
• Additional details regarding these operations:
o Operations will target retailers near schools, with prior violations, or community
complaints. Minor decoys will be recruited per DOJ guidelines, ensuring they meet age
and appearance requirements. All decoys will receive training and supervision by sworn
officers. Operations will be staffed by trained personnel from the Anti-Crime Team and
Special Operations Division. Safety protocols include pre-operation briefings, constant
officer oversight, and no direct possession of tobacco by decoys. Follow-up actions
Page 75 of 165
11/19/2025 Page 3 of 4
include citations, retailer education, and referral of repeat offenders for administrative
or legal action. All activities will be documented and reported in compliance with DOJ
requirements.
Shoulder Tap Operations
• Per year, 6 shoulder tap operations will be conducted.
• Per year, 17 retailers will be targeted through these operations.
• Additional details regarding these operations:
o Operations will focus on retailers near schools, those with a history of violations, or
those identified through community complaints. Minor decoys will be carefully selected
to meet DOJ age and appearance guidelines and will be trained on procedures and
safety protocols. Each operation will be staffed by trained officers who supervise decoys
at all times to ensure compliance with legal standards and maintain safety. Prior to
operations, officers will conduct briefings and ensure all safety measures are in place.
Violations will result in citations and educational outreach, with repeat offenders
referred for administrative action or prosecution. All activities will be documented and
reported to DOJ.
Undercover Buys
• Per year, 3 undercover buy operations will be conducted (other than minor decoy or shoulder
tap).
• Per year, 17 retailers will be targeted through these operations.
• Additional details regarding these undercover operations: None
Retailer Education
• Per year, 17 retailers will receive educational materials.
• Per year, 17 retailers will receive on-site education.
• Classes ARE NOT part of a diversion program.
• Additional details regarding these retailer education activities:
o The Gilroy Police Department will provide education to retailers through in-person
visits, informational materials, and outreach events. Officers will distribute DOJ-
approved brochures outlining tobacco laws, age verification requirements, and
prohibited products, including flavored tobacco. Retailers found in minor violation
during inspections will receive immediate education and guidance to correct behavior.
All education efforts will focus on preventing future violations and promoting
responsible retail practices.
Enforcement Officer Education
• Per year, 15 enforcement officers will receive education about tobacco laws and ordinances.
• Additional details regarding these officer education activities:
o The Gilroy Police Department will provide specialized training to all enforcement officers
assigned to the tobacco grant project. Training will cover state tobacco laws, local
ordinances, DOJ grant requirements, and enforcement protocols, including minor decoy
and shoulder tap operations. Officers will also receive instruction on proper
Page 76 of 165
11/19/2025 Page 4 of 4
documentation, citation procedures, and retailer education techniques. Training will be
delivered through a combination of in-house briefings, DOJ-sponsored sessions, and
approved external courses as needed. Ongoing updates will be provided to ensure
officers remain informed of legal changes and best practices throughout the grant
period.
Prosecution
• The Gilroy Police Department will document all violations thoroughly and coordinate with
the City Attorney's Office for prosecution of serious or repeat offenses. First-time violations
may result in administrative citations and mandatory retailer education. For repeat or
egregious violations, cases will be referred for civil or criminal prosecution under state or
local tobacco laws. Officers will ensure that evidence, reports, and witness statements are
properly prepared to support legal action. The department will also work with licensing
authorities to pursue license suspension or revocation when appropriate.
Task Force – Not Applicable
Other Activities – Not Applicable
PARTNERING AGENCIES – Section Is Not Applicable
[Please notify your Grant Program Officer of any proposed changes to partnering agencies,
particularly if they are included within your budget.
Page 77 of 165
Tobacco Grant Program
Grant Services Branch – Local Assistance
Division of Operations
Gilroy Police Department DOJ-PROP56-2025-26-1-016
Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
PURPOSE
This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
and the Gilroy Police Department (“Grantee”), for the purpose of disbursing grant funds to Grantee for
reimbursement of expenditures in compliance with the California Code of Regulations and the Fiscal
Year 2025-26 Grantee Handbook.
Commencing January 1, 2023, the California Code of Regulations, Title 11, Division 1, Chapter 5:
Department of Justice Tobacco Grant Program (“TGP Regulations”) shall govern the policies and
procedures of the Tobacco Grant Program.
The TGP Regulations, Request for Proposals, Grantee Handbook (dated April 2025), and Summary of
Award document are hereby incorporated by reference into this MOU. Grantee will expend funds for
the purposes identified in the approved Summary of Award document. Reimbursements are to be
funded under the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016, approved
by the voters as Proposition 56.
COST REIMBURSEMENT
DOJ agrees to reimburse Grantee in arrears, for Grantee’s actual expenditures in performing the
project or scope of work included in the approved Summary of Award document. Reimbursements for
line items in the approved Budget Detail will be made upon receipt of invoices from Grantee and
approval of the invoices by DOJ, in accordance with the reimbursement procedures set forth in the TGP
Regulations and Grantee Handbook.
BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
It is mutually agreed, if the Budget Act of the current fiscal year and/or any subsequent years covered
under the MOU does not appropriate sufficient funds, the MOU shall be of no further force and effect.
In the event this situation occurs, DOJ shall have no liability to reimburse/pay any funds to Grantee, or
to furnish any other considerations under this MOU. As well, Grantee shall not be obligated to
continue performing the provisions of this MOU, for which the Grantee would have been reimbursed.
If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted in the Budget Act for purposes of this MOU, DOJ
shall have the option to either cancel this MOU with no liability occurring to DOJ or offer an addendum
to the Grantee to reflect the reduced amount.
Page 78 of 165
Gilroy Police Department DOJ-PROP56-2025-26-1-016
Page 2 of 3
PROJECT BREACH-TERMINATION
Failure of a Grantee to comply with this MOU or the TGP Regulations shall be treated by DOJ as a
breach of contract. If an act of noncompliance occurs, DOJ may take actions described within the TGP
Regulations, including termination. DOJ may terminate this MOU and be relieved of any obligation to
disburse grant funds to Grantee should Grantee fail to perform the scope of work at the time and in
the manner provided in this MOU.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Addendum – No addendum or variation of the terms of this MOU is valid unless made in writing and
signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.
Assignment – This MOU is not assignable by Grantee in whole or in part.
Indemnification – Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless DOJ, its officers, agents and
employees from all claims, liabilities, or losses in connection with the performance of this MOU.
Certifications – Grantee certifies that it does not receive funding from a manufacturer, distributor, or
advertiser of Cigarettes or Tobacco Products. Grantee further certifies that grant funds will not
supplant existing state or local funds dedicated for the same purpose.
TERMS
Grant Duration: 11/21/2025 – 6/30/2029
Award Amount
Category of Expenditure Budget
FY 2025-2026
Budget
FY 2026-2027
Budget
FY 2027-2028
Budget
FY 2028-2029
Personal Services $92,555 $92,555 $92,555 $
Operating Expenses and
Equipment $0 $0 $0 $
Administrative Costs (Not to
Exceed 5%) $4,627 $4,627 $4,627 $
TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT $291,546
The time limit for reimbursements against this award ends 6/30/2029. Requests for reimbursement
received after 7/15/2029 cannot be considered by DOJ.
GRANTEE CONTACT INFORMATION
[NAME, TITLE]
Gilroy Police Department
[MAILING ADDRESS]
[PHONE NUMBER]
[EMAIL ADDRESS]
AUTHORIZATION
DOJ and Grantee, by their duly authorized officials, have executed this MOU on the respective dates
indicated below. This MOU and any future addendums shall be e-mailed to
Page 79 of 165
Gilroy Police Department DOJ-PROP56-2025-26-1-016
Page 3 of 3
TobaccoGrants@doj.ca.gov, care of the Division of Operations, Local Assistance Unit, Tobacco Grant
Program, and will become fully executed upon completion of signatures from all parties.
GRANTEE AUTHORIZATIONS
___________________________________ ___________________
NAME: Date
Title:
Agency:
___________________________________ ___________________
NAME: Date
Title:
Agency:
___________________________________ ___________________
NAME: Date
Title:
Agency:
DOJ AUTHORIZATIONS
______________________________ ___________________
DOJ GRANT MANAGER Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
___________________________________ ___________________
DOJ FISCAL DIRECTOR Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
__________________________________ ___________________
DOJ CHIEF OF OPERATIONS Date
Division of Operations
California Department of Justice
Page 80 of 165
Page 81 of 165
State of California
Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal)
GOVERNMENT AGENCY TAXPAYER ID FORM
2000 Evergreen Street, Suite 215
Sacramento, CA 95815
www.fiscal.ca.gov
1-855-347-2250
The principal purpose of the information provided is to establish the unique identification of the government entity.
Instructions: You may submit one form for the principal government agency and all subsidiaries sharing the same TIN. Subsidiaries with a
different TIN must submit a separate form. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required. Hover over fields to view help information. Please
print the form to sign prior to submittal. You may email the form to: vendors@fiscal.ca.gov, or fax it to (916) 576-5200, or mail it to the
address above.
Principal
Government
Agency Name*
Remit-To
Address (Street
or PO Box)*
City* State *Zip Code*+4
Government Type: City County
Special District Federal
Other (Specify)
Federal
Employer
Identification
Number
(FEIN)*
List other subsidiary Departments, Divisions or Units under your principal agency's jurisdiction who share the same
FEIN and receives payment from the State of California.
Dept/Division/Unit Complete
Name Address
Dept/Division/Unit
Name
Complete
Address
Dept/Division/Unit
Name
Complete
Address
Dept/Division/Unit
Name
Complete
Address
Title
E-mail address
Contact Person*
Phone number*
Signature*Date
Page 82 of 165
6.4.
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Council Concurrence with the Issuance of the Recreation
Assessment Request for Proposals
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Prepared by: Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
Council concur with the issuance of the Recreation Assessment Request for Proposals
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
During the budget and strategic planning process, a legislative agenda item was
created to do a complete assessment of the Recreation program. These items included
reviewing the $1.5M General Fund contribution to Recreation, the claim of high cost for
youth to participate in recreation activities, and an assessment of the Division to review
the staff-requested position additions during the budget process.
At the September 15, 2025, regular meeting of the Gilroy City Council, the Council
provided direction to staff to pursue an outside consultant to conduct the assessment of
the Recreation Division.
Staff developed and sent the draft scope of work to the Council via email for review on
November 6, 2025.
Page 83 of 165
6.4.
ANALYSIS
Staff received three responses to the draft scope of work from Council. The responses
included adding the library as a potential partnership site for recreation activities,
questions about the funding source, and a statement thanking staff for their work on
developing the scope of work.
With the responses received, the desire to have the assessment completed as soon as
possible to bring to the Council to initiate implementation of any improvements, and the
looming effective date of AB 339, which would add a 45-day notification period for any
RFPs released after January 1, 2026, staff chose to release the RFP on December 18,
2025. The next available meeting, which would have been this meeting, would have
been after AB 339 took effect, delaying the project by 1.5 months.
This consent calendar agenda item provides an additional opportunity for Council to
review and request changes to the RFP and scope of work, should it so desire. Any
changes would be applied as an addendum to the RFP, issued on the City's website,
and incorporated into the requirements of the proposals to be received.
The RFP requires proposals to be presented like other professional service consultant
RFPs. The cost proposal is to be broken out by scope-of-work section to allow
modification of the contract award based on the cost proposals received, at the
Council's discretion.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may pull the item from Consent and direct changes to the RFP at its discretion.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Not Applicable: any proposed changes would not have a fiscal impact. The budgetary
impact of the overall assessment project will be analyzed as part of the contract award,
based on the proposals received.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
This project has been discussed twice before with the City Council, and the RFP was
advertised in the newspaper and online. The project itself proposes public outreach and
public input into the assessment.
NEXT STEPS
If the Council concurs, then the procurement process would continue as-is. Should the
Page 84 of 165
6.4.
Council desire to make any changes, an addendum will be released. The next phase of
the project will happen when proposals are received, and staff returns to Council for
award of the contract.
Attachments:
1. 26-RFP-AD-531 - Recreation Assessment RFP
Page 85 of 165
-1-
City of Gilroy
Administration Department
Request for Proposals
Recreation Division Assessment
No. 26-RFP-AD-531
ATTN: KATTY ALVAREZ
CITY OF GILROY
7351 ROSANNA STREET
GILROY, CA 95020-6197
Proposals Due by: 4:00 pm, Friday, February 6, 2026
Page 86 of 165
-2-
Request for Proposal
No. 26-RFP-AD-531
Notice is hereby given that the Purchasing Coordinator of the City of Gilroy at 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy,
CA 95020-6197 will receive proposal submittals via e-mail. The City of Gilroy is soliciting proposals from
firms to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the Recreation Division and provide recommendations
to enhance its operational effectiveness and service offerings, as described in the attached Request for
Proposals (RFP). Submittals will be accepted up until 4:00 PM, PST, Friday, February 6, 2026, via e-mail
to the address specified in this RFP. Proposals received after that time and date will not be considered.
The City of Gilroy accepts no responsibility if delivery is made to another e-mail address other than those
specified within this RFP. An evaluation team will review submitted proposals and select the best-
qualified firm based on the evaluation criteria and selection process outlined in the RFP. The chosen
consultant will then be recommended to the City Council for the awarding of an agreement to conduct
the work.
A free electronic copy of the RFP can be obtained by going to the City of Gilroy website and selecting bid
opportunities under the Business and Development Services Tab, or directly at the following link:
http://www.cityofgilroy.org/Bids.aspx.
Respectfully Requested,
Katty Alvarez
Purchasing Coordinator
Page 87 of 165
-3-
RFP No. 26-RFP-AD-531
Request for Proposals for a Recreation Division Assessment
Table of Contents
Request for Proposal .......................................................................................................................... 2
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4
Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 4
Issuing Office ..................................................................................................................................... 5
Anticipated RFP Schedule ................................................................................................................... 5
Submission Date and Location ............................................................................................................ 6
Protests ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Rejection of Proposals ........................................................................................................................ 6
Partial Funding or Award .................................................................................................................... 6
Modification / Withdrawal ................................................................................................................. 7
Cancellation ....................................................................................................................................... 7
Duration of Proposals ........................................................................................................................ 7
Public Record ..................................................................................................................................... 7
Incurring Costs ................................................................................................................................... 7
Selection Process ............................................................................................................................... 7
Eligible Applicants .............................................................................................................................. 7
Scope of Work Requirements ............................................................................................................. 7
Proposal Contents ............................................................................................................................ 11
Proposal Evaluation Criteria and Scoring ........................................................................................... 14
Page 88 of 165
-4-
Introduction
The City of Gilroy (City) is seeking proposals from qualified firms (Consultants) to assess the City’s
Recreation Division within the Administration Department and to provide recommendations to enhance
its operational effectiveness, the services it offers to residents, and to plan for the future growth of the
recreation functions of the City.
The City of Gilroy is a charter city located in southern Santa Clara County with a population of
approximately 60,000. The City is a council-administrator form of government, with the mayor elected
at large for a four-year term and six City Councilmembers elected at large for four-year terms.
However, it is transitioning to district-based elections for the six councilmember seats.
Information regarding the City and its organization, such as governmental structure, services provided,
the Current Operating and Capital Budgets, Annual Financial Reports, and the most recent
Comprehensive Fee Schedule, is available on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org
The Recreation Division offers a wide array of services to meet residents' recreational needs. The
Recreation Division provides the following community services:
• Offers free and fee-based programs to residents of all ages and all interests.
• Connects seniors with free, vital services such as tax preparation, free bimonthly groceries, daily
lunch, transportation, and social services.
• Supports disadvantaged and low-income families by partnering with other governmental
agencies and local community organizations.
• Provides logistical support during a local emergency.
The Recreation Division also publishes a seasonal recreation guide in English and Spanish, three times a
year, and sends it to all Gilroy households. Recreation communicates with the community through a
monthly e-newsletter, social media, school flyers, and tabling at special events.
The Recreation Division has a staff of four full-time positions (Recreation Manager, Recreation
Supervisor, Recreation Coordinator, and Office Assistant). Additionally, there are 10 ongoing part-time
positions and 10 seasonal part-time positions that provide direct service and programming. Recreation
also relies on contract activity and class providers to deliver many of the programs the community
desires.
The City commissioned a Recration and Facility Needs Assessment, which commenced before the COVID
Pandemic and was completed in 2020 during the Pandemic. The report can be found at this link.
Project Description
The City seeks qualified consulting services to conduct a comprehensive, data-driven assessment of its
Recreation Division to inform future policy, operational, financial, and capital decisions. This project
intends to evaluate current recreation programs, staffing, facilities, finances, governance, and service
delivery models; identify gaps between community needs and existing services; and develop clear,
actionable recommendations that enhance effectiveness, equity, sustainability, and alignment with
industry best practices.
Page 89 of 165
-5-
The selected Consultant will engage City leadership, staff, and the community to assess recreational
needs, participation patterns, and barriers to access; benchmark performance against comparable
agencies and National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) standards, including CAPRA accreditation
criteria; and evaluate staffing structures, cost recovery practices, program portfolios, facilities, and
operational systems.
The final outcome will be a prioritized implementation roadmap, supported by data, benchmarks, and
community input, that provides City staff and the City Council with clear policy options, investment
strategies, and near- and long-term actions. Deliverables will include financial and organizational
analyses, program and facility assessments, performance metrics, policy frameworks, and a
comprehensive final report and presentation suitable for City Council consideration, enabling informed
decision-making and sustainable delivery of recreation services over the next several years to decades.
Issuing Office
The Finance Department is the Issuing Office, and the City Administrator’s Office is the Project Manager
for this Request for Proposal (RFP). Contact the Finance Department for all process questions and
protests. Contact the City Administrator’s Office for contract questions.
Issuing Office Project Manager
Finance Department City Administrator’s Office
Katty Alvarez Kylie Katsuyoshi
Finance Analyst Management Analyst
7351 Rosanna Street 7351 Rosanna Street
Gilroy, CA 95020 Gilroy, CA 95020
katty.alvarez@cityofgilroy.org kylie.katsuyoshi@cityofgilroy.org
Anticipated RFP Schedule
The Administration Department anticipates the following general timeline for this RFP,
and the schedule may change as necessary.
Issuance of RFP documents December 18, 2025
Deadline for RFP questions and comments,
submitted by e-mail to
kylie.katsuyoshi@cityofgilroy.org, with a copy to
katty.alvarez@cityofgilroy.org.
5:00 p.m. PST, January 23, 2026
Response to questions available on the website 5:00 p.m. PST, January 26, 2026
Deadline for proposal submission 4:00 p.m., PST, February 6, 2026
Completion of submission review and issuance of
Notice of Intent to Award
February 12, 2026
Consultants to sign the contract and provide all required
attachments by
February 20, 2026
Page 90 of 165
-6-
Council award contract at the regular City Council meeting, if
required
February 23, 2026
Submission Date and Location
Each responding Consultant must provide one electronic copy of their proposal in PDF format to
katty.alvarez@cityofgilroy.org and kylie.katsuyoshi@cityofgilroy.org. The e-mail shall be entitled with
the Consultant’s name and “Recreation Assessment”. The proposals must be received by the City issuing
office via e-mail by the Deadline for Proposal Submission, as defined above.
Solicitation Documents and Changes (Addenda)
All solicitation documents may be viewed or printed online from the City’s website at
https://www.cityofgilroy.org/Bids.aspx or may be viewed onsite at the Issuing Office at the address
listed above.
Proposals received from other sources will not be considered valid documents. Please contact the
Issuing Office listed above if you have any problems viewing the solicitation documents.
All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via e-mail. The questions will be
researched, and the answers will be communicated to all known interested Consultants and posted on
the City’s website after the deadline for question submissions.
Prospective Consultants shall not contact City officers or employees with questions or suggestions
regarding this solicitation except through the primary contact person listed above. Any unauthorized
contact may be considered undue pressure and cause for the disqualification of the Consultant.
Consultants are responsible for checking the City’s website for the issuance of any addenda prior to
submitting a proposal. The Consultant is held responsible for all addenda/changes to the documents and
may be considered non-responsive if their proposal does not reflect those addenda/changes.
Protests
Any complaints or perceived inequities related to this RFP shall be made in writing and directed to the
Issuing Office at the address listed above and in accordance with the City's purchasing policy. This policy
may be found on the City’s website, located here:
https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/10774/Gilroy-Purchasing-Policy-.
Rejection of Proposals
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted. The City also reserves the right to
waive or not waive any informalities or irregularities in proposal responses.
Partial Funding or Award
The City reserves the right to fund only a portion of the total funding identified in its sole discretion. The
City may make a partial award of an amount it determines to be appropriate, based on the financial
resources available and operational considerations.
Page 91 of 165
-7-
Modification / Withdrawal
Unless otherwise specified, modification of the Proposal will not be permitted; however, a Consultant
may withdraw their Proposal at any time before the scheduled closing time for receipt of Proposals;
any Consultant may withdraw their Proposal, either personally or by written request to the Issuing
Office. Withdrawal of the Proposal shall not disqualify the Consultant from submitting another
Proposal, provided the time for receipt of Proposals has not expired.
Cancellation
The City reserves the right to cancel the award of this contract at any time before execution of the
contract by both parties if cancellation is deemed to be in the C ity’s best interest. In no event shall
the City have any liability for the cancellation of the award.
Duration of Proposals
Proposals must remain valid for at least 120 days. Proposals must be signed by an official
authorized to bind the Consultant.
Public Record
All submitted proposals are the property of the City and constitute public records. All documents
received by the City are subject to public disclosure after the City selects a Consultant.
Incurring Costs
The City is not liable for any cost incurred by Consultants prior to execution of a contract.
Selection Process
The City reserves the right to select the Consultant based on the proposals, or to conduct interviews
with the highest-qualified Consultant(s) following the evaluation and scoring of the proposals,
whichever is determined to best serve the needs of the City. The City reserves the right to seek
clarifications on any or all proposals.
Eligible Applicants
The City is requesting proposals from experienced consulting firms to complete the assessment. To
ensure the highest quality of the Consultant’s responses and to facilitate the fair and objective
evaluation of those responses, this document provides guidance to all potential Consultants regarding
the scope/requirements and the format and content requirements for vendor proposal submissions. A
detailed Scope of Work is below.
Scope of Work Requirements
The Consultant shall conduct a comprehensive and exhaustive analysis of the Division’s existing
operations, service levels, offerings, staffing levels, and all other aspects of the Division's operations and
services. The Scope of Work tasks and deliverables are provided below:
1. Project Initiation, Background Review, & Governance
a. Meet with City leadership, Recreation staff, and other stakeholders to understand goals
and expectations. Confirm goals, success metrics, project schedule, and communication
plan.
Page 92 of 165
-8-
b. Collect and review existing documents, including budgets, fee schedules, staffing
structures, organization charts, prior plans and studies, participation data, facility
condition information, and policies.
c. Map current policies against the National Recreation and Park Association’s (NRPA’s)
Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA) standards to
identify gaps and quick wins (governance, planning, finance, human resources, risk,
operations).
d. Deliverables:
i. Project work plan and schedule.
ii. Stakeholder map.
iii. Communications and engagement plan.
iv. CAPRA gap summary, noting which standards are fully/partially met and priority
fixes.
2. Community Engagement and Needs Assessment
a. Design and administer a mixed-methods engagement: resident survey, intercept/on-site
surveys, focus groups (youth, seniors, underserved areas, etc.), partner interviews.
b. Follow NRPA’s survey guidance (sampling, admin modes, actionable question design).
c. Collect input on satisfaction, unmet needs, and desired future services.
d. Ensure representation from diverse community groups.
e. Deliverables:
i. Engagement plan and instruments (survey tool, discussion guides).
ii. Engagement finding report: Satisfaction, unmet needs, barriers (cost, location,
time, language), priorities by demographic and geography.
iii. Updated needs assessment report.
3. Staffing and Organization Assessment
a. Analyze structure, spans/layers, role clarity, workload, scheduling, and training.
b. Benchmark staffing ratios with NRPA/California Park & Recreation Society (CPRS)
national/state municipal peers (per capita, per facility/acre where applicable).
c. Assess alignment between staffing and service delivery needs.
d. Identify workforce development and succession planning needs.
e. Provide recommendations on staffing efficiencies, training needs, and future workforce
planning.
f. Deliverables:
i. Organization assessment memo with options (no-cost, low-cost, investment
scenarios), updated organizational chart, role definitions, and training plan.
ii. Peer benchmark table (City vs NRPA medians/quartiles).
4. Financial Analysis, Cost Recovery, and Fee Policy
a. 3–5 year trend analysis: revenues, expenditures, subsidies, and cost recovery by
program/facility.
b. Develop a Cost Recovery & Resource Allocation Policy (e.g., Pyramid Method: who
benefits/who pays), and align fee schedule and scholarship strategy.
c. Benchmark fees and cost-recovery targets (e.g., San José PRNS examples of fee/cost-
recovery governance).
d. Identify opportunities for increasing revenues (fees, partnerships, sponsorships, grants).
e. Assess financial sustainability of significant programs (referring to program size) and
facilities.
f. Deliverables:
Page 93 of 165
-9-
i. Financial analysis with revenue/expenditure trends and recommendations for
cost recovery.
ii. Financial dashboard (trends, margins by line of business, subsidy per
participant).
iii. Draft Cost Recovery Policy with category targets, methodology, and annual
update process.
iv. Draft fee schedule adjustments and equity supports.
5. Program and Service Portfolio Review (Lifecycle and Alignment)
a. Analyze participation levels, demographics served, and program utilization.
b. Identify gaps in programming relative to community needs.
c. Assess program quality and alignment to values (equity, access, youth development,
senior services, etc.).
d. Conduct a program lifecycle analysis (introduce/grow/mature/decline) to right-size the
portfolio; evaluate alignment with mission, equity, demand, and margins.
e. Compare offerings to peer agencies; identify gaps (e.g., adults, teens, seniors, adaptive
rec, etc.), schedule balance, and access (time/location).
f. Recommend adds, retires, partnerships, and pricing strategies.
g. Deliverables:
i. Program and services evaluation summary.
ii. Program portfolio matrix (demand, equity, cost recovery, lifecycle stage) with
action recommendations and 12–24-month pilot plan.
6. Facilities, Asset Management, and Capital Needs
a. Indoor and Outdoor Facility inventory and condition assessment: age, systems
condition, accessibility, capacity/utilization, lifecycle, and replacement values.
b. LOS (level-of-service) and access analysis (catchment, coverage, underserved areas);
align with NRPA master-planning best practices.
c. Identify ADA/Title II and safety issues; evaluate operating model efficiency for major
venues (e.g., aquatics, community centers).
d. Identify capacity constraints and deferred maintenance.
e. Assess alignment of facilities with community needs and future growth.
f. Recommend priorities for capital improvements and potential new facilities.
g. Deliverable: Facility needs assessment report.
h. Deliverables:
i. Facility needs assessment report.
ii. Facility assessment book with inventory tables, condition scores, utilization
analysis, and repair/replace priorities.
iii. Capital improvement plan (CIP) roadmap (0–5, 6–10, 10+ years) with order-of-
magnitude costs and funding options.
7. Technology, Data, and Business Processes
a. Audit registration/POS, scheduling, reporting, and data governance; identify pain points
(refunds, waitlists, utilization reporting).
b. Recommend improvements (KPIs, dashboards, data hygiene, privacy practices), and
integrations with finance/human resources.
c. Deliverables:
i. Systems improvement plan with priority fixes, training modules, and key
performance indicator(s) (KPI) dashboards wired to NRPA benchmark
categories.
8. Equity, Access and Inclusion
Page 94 of 165
-10-
a. Map participation vs. community demographics; analyze barriers (cost, transit,
language, digital access).
b. Align pricing/scholarships with the cost-recovery policy to protect access for socio-
economically challenged populations.
c. Deliverables:
i. Equity action plan: sliding-scale/fee assistance model, outreach strategies,
language access, mobile/ pop-up programs, and targeted pilots.
9. Partnerships, Sponsorships, and Volunteers
a. Inventory existing MOUs/agreements (schools, library, nonprofits, leagues); evaluate
performance and risk.
b. Identify new partnership models, shared-use agreements, and a potential
sponsorship/naming framework consistent with public ethics.
c. Assess volunteer program structure and compliance.
d. Deliverables:
i. Partnership framework (criteria, templates, performance KPIs) and sponsorship
policy outline with approval workflow.
10. Risk Management, Safety, and Operations Standards
a. Review policies for incident reporting, background checks, aquatic and youth safety,
emergency plans, and insurance.
b. Recommend standard operating procedures (SOPs) and training cadence; note relevant
CAPRA standards.
c. Deliverables:
i. Operations & safety compliance report with priority SOP updates and training
calendar.
11. Performance Measurement and Benchmarking
a. Build a KPI scorecard aligned with NRPA/CPRS Agency Performance Review metrics
(participation per capita, cost per participant, cost recovery, expenditures per
capita/acre, maintenance metrics).
b. Define data collection cadence and public-facing reporting.
c. Deliverables:
i. KPI dashboard & definitions; 12-month measurement plan and template
quarterly report.
12. Programmatic Mini-Studies
a. Review and assess the following programming clusters:
i. Adaptive Recreation.
ii. Adult Sports/Activities.
iii. Aquatics.
iv. Contract Classes.
v. Senior Services.
vi. Youth Sports.
vii. Summer Day Camps.
viii. Volunteers.
ix. Reservations/Parks.
x. Special Events (breakfast with Santa, bike to wherever day, cleanups, etc.).
xi. Targeted Community Recreation Services (SCYTF/NSU).
xii. Early Childhood Education (potentially).
xiii. Fitness/Health (potentially).
xiv. After School (potentially).
Page 95 of 165
-11-
b. Evaluate the following aspects of these program clusters:
i. Staffing models (internally provided service).
ii. Alternative service delivery models (outside provided service).
iii. Programming mix.
iv. Risk.
v. Fee strategy/cost recovery models vs. affordability.
vi. Industry best practices for effective marketing techniques/strategies.
c. Deliverables:
i. Program report.
13. SWOT Analysis
a. Identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for the Recreation Division.
b. Incorporate findings from staffing, financial, program, and facility analyses.
c. Deliverable:
i. SWOT analysis document.
14. Growth and Opportunity Identification
a. Identify short- and long-term opportunities for expanded or improved recreation
services.
b. Explore partnership models (schools, nonprofits, private sector, regional collaboration).
c. Recommend strategies for sustainable growth.
d. Deliverable:
i. Growth opportunities report.
15. Implementation Roadmap and Council Presentation
a. Provide a comprehensive report that synthesizes findings from all tasks.
b. Include clear, prioritized recommendations (impact/feasibility), timeline, cost, funding
sources, and owners.
c. Provide an implementation roadmap.
d. Present findings to City Council and community stakeholders.
e. Draft policy updates (cost recovery, partnerships, sponsorships, fee schedule).
f. Prepare briefing materials and presentation to City Council.
g. Deliverables:
i. Draft Report for staff review.
ii. Final report (executive summary and detailed appendices: benchmarks,
inventories, engagement findings).
iii. Phased implementation roadmap (0–6, 6–18, 18–36 months) with budget
ranges and decision gates.
iv. Slide deck and talking points for Council.
Proposal Contents
The Proposal package shall be organized to include the following sections. Each proposal shall have the
sections identified below as separate sections in the proposal document. The contents for each section
are listed below and must be presented in the same order. Potential Consultants shall be responsible for
preparing an effective and clear proposal. Concise proposals without needless duplication are
encouraged.
Proposals must be structured, presented, and labeled in the following manner:
Page 96 of 165
-12-
• Cover Letter.
o The firms’ proposal must provide a written transmittal of the proposal in the form of a
cover letter. A company officer must sign the cover letter, empowered to bind the
proposer to the provisions of this RFP and any contract awarded pursuant to it. The
cover letter will reference and respond to each of the following bulleted items:
Consultant’s legal name and corporate structure.
A high-level statement of the credentials to deliver the services sought under
the RFP.
Briefly state the Consultant’s understanding of the work to be performed and
why the consultant believes it is best qualified to perform the duties and tasks
outlined and described in the scope of work contained in this request.
Primary contact name, mailing address, e-mail address, and telephone number.
Identification of use of subcontractor(s), if any, and scope of work to be
performed by subcontractor(s).
A statement that the Consultant or any individual who will perform work for the
Consultant is free of any conflict of interest (e.g., employment by the City).
Statement of acknowledgement that the City’s standard agreement has been
reviewed and accepted without modification.
Signature of a company officer empowered to bind the Consultant to the
provisions of this RFP and any contract awarded pursuant to it.
• Table of Contents.
• Executive Summary.
• Section 1. – Company Background.
o Provide a history of the individual or firm’s experience, which specifically addresses the
individual or firm’s experience in conducting and producing an assessment similar in
complexity and scope to that which is listed in the Scope of Work section above.
o The proposal shall include an organizational chart and describe the organizational
structure that is proposed to handle the assessment.
o Describe the specific types of services that your organization provides.
o Number of years your organization has been in business.
o Describe your agency’s basic organization and management structure. Be sure to
include the number of personnel involved in your organization.
• Section 2. – Company and Project Team Qualifications.
o Qualifications and Related Experience of Personnel Who Will Perform Work. Résumés of
all personnel who are proposed to provide professional services to the City within the
Scope of Work outlined and described in this request shall be included. Résumés shall
include all relevant experience, education, and other qualifications.
o Prior Relevant Experience. A description of prior work experience and projects of the
company relevant to the Scope of Work outlined and described in this request shall be
included.
Page 97 of 165
-13-
o At a minimum, this should include the project manager/principal agent, associates in
charge when the project manager/principal agent is unavailable, key personnel, firm
size, and an organization chart identifying only those who will perform work for the
proposed project and the percentage of each individual’s time devoted to this project.
The project manager/principal agent shall be the primary point of contact for your firm.
• Section 3. – References.
o References of Local Government Clients. Please include a list of at least three (3) current
and/or previous local government clients, with a preference for those located in
California, for which a consultant assigned to the project has rendered professional
services similar to the scope of work outlined and described in this request.
o Describe the project, client name, and the name, title, and telephone number of the
primary contact person.
o References may not be older than 5 years from the deadline of proposal submission.
o Additionally, provide a list of all local government clients that your firm has completed
similar projects for.
• Section 4. – Proposed Methodology.
o Consultant shall provide a work plan identifying the major tasks and subtasks
anticipated by the Consultant associated with the completion of the assessment,
including the proposed approach and projected timeline to conduct and complete each
item in the Scope of Work.
o Provide a staffing plan for the assessment project.
o Provide an outline that demonstrates the firm’s understanding of the scope of work.
This outline should include the anticipated approach, the tasks necessary for successful
completion, the deliverables, and any suggestions or special concerns that the City
should be made aware of. Identify any assumptions and/or exclusions used in
preparation of the scope of work and associated fee estimate.
• Section 5. – Proposed Timeline
o Prepare an overall proposed timeline to conduct the assessment. The proposal shall
include a timeline to complete the project, based on the Scope of Work and the
availability of a skilled labor force. The proposed timeline shall be based on experience
with similar engagements and the best available information.
• Section 6. – Prior Work Samples
o Consultant shall provide at least one prior work sample of an assessment on a
Recreation Department or Division. This shall include all components of the assessment,
including the final report, any presentation material developed, workpapers used, and
other such documents developed for the assessment, which show the experience,
quality, and thoroughness of your firm’s work in conducting such assessments.
• Section 7. – Pricing
o Proposal shall have a project cost estimate with justification.
o Proposal shall include hourly rates for all personnel on the project, and estimated hours
and subtotals for each enumerated section of the Scope of Work.
Page 98 of 165
-14-
o Proposal should include options for reducing or adding services.
• Section 8. – Additional Information
o Attachment A – Contract Requirements Acknowledgement Form and Standard Contract
Template:
The proposal shall include a completed and signed copy of the Contract Requirements
Acknowledgement Form included with this RFP as Attachment A.
o Attachment B - Special Policies – Wage Theft Form
The proposal shall include a completed and signed copy of the Wage Theft Form
included with this RFP as Attachment B.
Failure to follow the specified format, to label the responses correctly, or to address all of the
subsections may, at the City’s sole discretion, result in the rejection of the Proposal.
Proposal Evaluation Criteria and Scoring
Proposal packages will be reviewed and scored according to the criteria below. Based on the number
and quality of responses, Consultants may be asked to continue to the interview/presentation step in
the process. Each package may receive a maximum of 100 points, as summarized below:
CRITERIA POINTS
Consultant’s experience and qualifications as they relate to the scope of services of the
RFP
25
Project methodology and understanding of the assessment needs 25
Staffing plan and team’s individual qualifications 20
Prior work example 15
Cost proposal 10
Project Schedule 5
TOTAL 100
Page 99 of 165
A-1
ATTACHMENT A – CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I, __________________________________, declare as follows:
That I am the _________________________, of ________________________________,
(Title) (Company)
the Consultant making the attached proposal; and that I have read the sample Agreement for
Services (Attachment B), including the insurance & indemnification requirements contained
therein, and hereby state that I understand and am willing to abide by, and can meet the
requirements of the contract, including insurance and indemnification requirements, without
modification thereto, should my firm be selected for a project or projects based on my
qualifications and proposal, assuming a mutually agreeable scope, fee, and schedule can be
established.
I understand that the attached sample agreement is the current version used by the City of Gilroy.
The standard agreement for Professional Services is currently being updated, and a new version
may be used by the time the agreement resulting from this RFP is executed.
Signed this _______ day of __________________, 2026
By _______________________________
Title: _____________________________
Page 100 of 165
-1- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
(For contracts over $5,000 - CONSULTANT)
This AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , between:
CITY: City of Gilroy, having a principal place of business at
7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California
and CONSULTANT: , having a principal place of business at .
ARTICLE 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement will become effective on and will continue in effect through unless
terminated in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of this Agreement.
Any lapse in insurance coverage as required by Article 5, Section D of this Agreement shall
terminate this Agreement regardless of any other provision stated herein. ______
Initial
ARTICLE 2. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
It is the express intention of the parties that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not
an employee, agent, joint venturer or partner of CITY. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee
between CITY and CONSULTANT or any employee or agent of CONSULTANT. Both parties
acknowledge that CONSULTANT is not an employee for state or federal tax purposes.
CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to any of the rights or benefits afforded to CITY’S
employees, including, without limitation, disability or unemployment insurance, workers’
compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, retirement benefits or any other employment
benefits. CONSULTANT shall retain the right to perform services for others during the term of
this Agreement.
ARTICLE 3. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT
A.Specific Services
CONSULTANT agrees to: Perform the services as outlined in Exhibit “A” (“Specific
Provisions”) and Exhibit “B” (“Scope of Services”), within the time periods described in
Exhibit “C” (“Milestone Schedule”).
B.Method of Performing Services
CONSULTANT shall determine the method, details and means of performing the above-
described services. CITY shall have no right to, and shall not, control the manner or determine
the method of accomplishing CONSULTANT’S services.
Page 101 of 165
-2- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
C. Employment of Assistants
CONSULTANT may, at the CONSULTANT’S own expense, employ such assistants as
CONSULTANT deems necessary to perform the services required of CONSULTANT by this
Agreement, subject to the prohibition against assignment and subcontracting contained in
Article 5 below. CITY may not control, direct, or supervise CONSULTANT’S assistants in the
performance of those services. CONSULTANT assumes full and sole responsibility for the
payment of all compensation and expenses of these assistants and for all state and federal income
tax, unemployment insurance, Social Security, disability insurance and other applicable
withholding.
D. Place of Work
CONSULTANT shall perform the services required by this Agreement at any place or location
and at such times as CONSULTANT shall determine is necessary to properly and timely perform
CONSULTANT’S services.
ARTICLE 4. COMPENSATION
A. Consideration
In consideration for the services to be performed by CONSULTANT, CITY agrees to pay
CONSULTANT the amounts set forth in Exhibit “D” (“Payment Schedule”). In no event
however shall the total compensation paid to CONSULTANT exceed .
B. Invoices
CONSULTANT shall submit invoices for all services rendered.
C. Payment
Payment shall be due according to the payment schedule set forth in Exhibit “D”. No payment
will be made unless CONSULTANT has first provided City with a written receipt of invoice
describing the work performed and any approved direct expenses (as provided for in
Exhibit “A”, Section IV) incurred during the preceding period. If CITY objects to all or any
portion of any invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT of the objection within thirty (30)
days from receipt of the invoice, give reasons for the objection, and pay that portion of the
invoice not in dispute. It shall not constitute a default or breach of this Agreement for CITY not
to pay any invoiced amounts to which it has objected until the objection has been resolved by
mutual agreement of the parties.
D. Expenses
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all costs and expenses incident to the performance of
services for CITY, including but not limited to, all costs of equipment used or provided by
CONSULTANT, all fees, fines, licenses, bonds or taxes required of or imposed against
CONSULTANT and all other of CONSULTANT’S costs of doing business. CITY shall not be
Page 102 of 165
-3- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
responsible for any expenses incurred by CONSULTANT in performing services for CITY,
except for those expenses constituting “direct expenses” referenced on Exhibit “A.”
ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT
A. Tools and Instrumentalities
CONSULTANT shall supply all tools and instrumentalities required to perform the services
under this Agreement at its sole cost and expense. CONSULTANT is not required to purchase
or rent any tools, equipment or services from CITY.
B. Workers’ Compensation
CONSULTANT agrees to provide workers’ compensation insurance for CONSULTANT’S
employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless, defend with counsel acceptable to CITY and
indemnify CITY, its officers, representatives, agents and employees from and against any and all
claims, suits, damages, costs, fees, demands, causes of action, losses, liabilities and expenses,
including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of any injury, disability, or
death of any of CONSULTANT’S employees.
C. Indemnification of Liability, Duty to Defend
1. As to professional liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law,
CONSULTANT shall defend, through counsel approved by CITY (which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld), indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, representatives, agents
and employees against any and all suits, damages, costs, fees, claims, demands, causes of action,
losses, liabilities and expenses, including without limitation attorneys’ fees, to the extent arising
or resulting directly or indirectly from any willful or negligent acts, errors or omissions of
CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’S assistants, employees or agents, including all claims
relating to the injury or death of any person or damage to any property.
2. As to other liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall
defend, through counsel approved by CITY (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld),
indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, representatives, agents and employees against
any and all suits, damages, costs, fees, claims, demands, causes of action, losses, liabilities and
expenses, including without limitation attorneys’ fees, arising or resulting directly or indirectly
from any act or omission of CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’S assistants, employees or
agents, including all claims relating to the injury or death of any person or damage to any
property.
D. Insurance
In addition to any other obligations under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall, at no cost to
CITY, obtain and maintain throughout the term of this Agreement: (a) Commercial Liability
Insurance on a per occurrence basis, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles,
with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence for all damages
due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person, and damage to property,
Page 103 of 165
-4- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
including the loss of use thereof; and (b) Professional Liability Insurance (Errors & Omissions)
with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate;
provided however, Professional Liability Insurance written on a claims made basis must comply
with the requirements set forth below. Professional Liability Insurance written on a claims made
basis (including without limitation the initial policy obtained and all subsequent policies
purchased as renewals or replacements) must show the retroactive date, and the retroactive date
must be before the earlier of the effective date of the contract or the beginning of the contract
work. Claims made Professional Liability Insurance must be maintained, and written evidence
of insurance must be provided, for at least five (5) years after the completion of the contract
work. If claims made coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another
claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the earlier of the effec tive date of the
contract or the beginning of the contract work, CONSULTANT must purchase so called
“extended reporting” or “tail” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of
work, which must also show a retroactive date that is before the earlier of the effective date of
the contract or the beginning of the contract work. As a condition precedent to CITY’S
obligations under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish written evidence of such
coverage (naming CITY, its officers and employees as additional insureds on the Comprehensive
Liability insurance policy referred to in (a) immediately above via a specific endorsement) and
requiring thirty (30) days written notice of policy lapse or cancellation, or of a material change in
policy terms.
E. Assignment
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, neither this Agreement nor any duties or
obligations of CONSULTANT under this Agreement may be assigned or subcontracted by
CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY, which CITY may withhold in its
sole and absolute discretion.
F. State and Federal Taxes
As CONSULTANT is not CITY’S employee, CONSULTANT shall be responsible for paying
all required state and federal taxes. Without limiting the foregoing, CONSULTANT
acknowledges and agrees that:
CITY will not withhold FICA (Social Security) from CONSULTANT’S
payments;
CITY will not make state or federal unemployment insurance contributions on
CONSULTANT’S behalf;
CITY will not withhold state or federal income tax from payment to
CONSULTANT;
CITY will not make disability insurance contributions on behalf of
CONSULTANT;
CITY will not obtain workers’ compensation insurance on behalf of
CONSULTANT.
Page 104 of 165
-5- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
ARTICLE 6. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY
A. Cooperation of City
CITY agrees to respond to all reasonable requests of CONSULTANT and provide access, at
reasonable times following receipt by CITY of reasonable notice, to all documents reasonably
necessary to the performance of CONSULTANT’S duties under this Agreement.
B. Assignment
CITY may assign this Agreement or any duties or obligations thereunder to a successor
governmental entity without the consent of CONSULTANT. Such assignment shall not release
CONSULTANT from any of CONSULTANT’S duties or obligations under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. Sale of Consultant’s Business/ Death of Consultant.
CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of the proposed sale of CONSULTANT’s business no later
than thirty (30) days prior to any such sale. CITY shall have the option of terminating this
Agreement within thirty (30) days after receiving such notice of sale. Any such CITY
termination pursuant to this Article 7.A shall be in writing and sent to the address for notices to
CONSULTANT set forth in Exhibit A, Subsection V.H., no later than thirty (30) days after
CITY’ receipt of such notice of sale.
If CONSULTANT is an individual, this Agreement shall be deemed automatically terminated
upon death of CONSULTANT.
B. Termination by City for Default of Consultant
Should CONSULTANT default in the performance of this Agreement or materially breach any
of its provisions, CITY, at CITY’S option, may terminate this Agreement by giving written
notification to CONSULTANT. For the purposes of this section, material breach of this
Agreement shall include, but not be limited to the following:
1. CONSULTANT’S failure to professionally and/or timely perform any of the
services contemplated by this Agreement.
2. CONSULTANT’S breach of any of its representations, warranties or covenants
contained in this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall be entitled to payment only for work completed in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement through the date of the termination notice, as reasonably determined by
CITY, provided that such payment shall not exceed the amounts set forth in this Agreement for
the tasks described on Exhibit C” which have been fully, competently and timely rendered by
CONSULTANT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if CITY terminates this Agreement due to
CONSULTANT’S default in the performance of this Agreement or material breach by
CONSULTANT of any of its provisions, then in addition to any other rights and remedies CITY
Page 105 of 165
-6- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
may have, CONSULTANT shall reimburse CITY, within ten (10) days after demand, for any
and all costs and expenses incurred by CITY in order to complete the tasks constituting the scope
of work as described in this Agreement, to the extent such costs and expenses exceed the
amounts CITY would have been obligated to pay CONSULTANT for the performance of that
task pursuant to this Agreement.
C. Termination for Failure to Make Agreed-Upon Payments
Should CITY fail to pay CONSULTANT all or any part of the compensation set forth in Article
4 of this Agreement on the date due, then if and only if such nonpayment constitutes a default
under this Agreement, CONSULTANT, at the CONSULTANT’S option, may termina te this
Agreement if such default is not remedied by CITY within thirty (30) days after demand for such
payment is given by CONSULTANT to CITY.
D. Transition after Termination
Upon termination, CONSULTANT shall immediately stop work, unless cessation could
potentially cause any damage or harm to person or property, in which case CONSULTANT shall
cease such work as soon as it is safe to do so. CONSULTANT shall incur no further expenses in
connection with this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall promptly deliver to CITY all work done
toward completion of the services required hereunder, and shall act in such a manner as to
facilitate any the assumption of CONSULTANT’s duties by any new consultant hired by the
CITY to complete such services.
ARTICLE 8. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Amendment & Modification
No amendments, modifications, alterations or changes to the terms of this Agreement shall be
effective unless and until made in a writing signed by both parties hereto.
B. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Throughout the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall comply fully with all
applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“the Act”) in its current
form and as it may be amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall also require such
compliance of all subcontractors performing work under this Agreement, subject to the
prohibition against assignment and subcontracting contained in Article 5 above. The
CONSULTANT shall defend with counsel acceptable to CITY, indemnify and hold harmless the
CITY OF GILROY, its officers, employees, agents and representatives from and against all suits,
claims, demands, damages, costs, causes of action, losses, liabilities, expenses and fees,
including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees, that may arise out of any violations of
the Act by the CONSULTANT, its subcontractors, or the officers, employees, agents or
representatives of either.
Page 106 of 165
-7- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
C. Attorneys’ Fees
If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce
or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable
attorneys’ fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought
for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.
D. Captions
The captions and headings of the various sections, paragraphs and subparagraphs of the
Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered nor referred to for resolving
questions of interpretation.
E. Compliance with Laws
The CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of all State and National laws and all municipal
ordinances and regulations of the CITY which in any manner affect those engaged or employed
in the work, or the materials used in the work, or which in any way affect the conduct of the
work, and of all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or
authority over the same. Without limiting the foregoing, CONSULTANT agrees to observe the
provisions of the Municipal Code of the CITY OF GILROY, obligating every contractor or
subcontractor under a contract or subcontract to the CITY OF GILROY for public works or for
goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or subcontracting practices on the
basis of the race, color, sex, religious creed, national origin, ancestry of any employee, applicant
for employment, or any potential subcontractor.
F. Conflict of Interest
CONSULTANT certifies that to the best of its knowledge, no CITY employee or office of any
public agency interested in this Agreement has any pecuniary interest in the business of
CONSULTANT and that no person associated with CONSULTANT has any interest that would
constitute a conflict of interest in any manner or degree as to the execution or performance of
this Agreement.
G. Entire Agreement
This Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements, whether oral or written, between the
parties hereto with respect to the rendering of services by CONSULTANT for CITY and
contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of
such services in any manner whatsoever. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by
any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no
other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding.
No other agreements or conversation with any officer, agent or employee of CITY prior to
execution of this Agreement shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in
any documents comprising this Agreement. Such other agreements or conversations shall be
considered as unofficial information and in no way binding upon CITY.
Page 107 of 165
-8- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
H. Governing Law and Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California without regard to the conflict of laws provisions of any jurisdiction. The exclusive
jurisdiction and venue with respect to any and all disputes arising hereunder shall be in state and
federal courts located in Santa Clara County, California.
I. Notices
Any notice to be given hereunder by either party to the other may be effected either by personal
delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt
requested. Mailed notices shall be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing in
Exhibit “A”, Section V.H. but each party may change the address by written notice in
accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed delivered as of
actual receipt; mailed notices will be deemed delivered as of three (3) days after mailing.
J. Partial Invalidity
If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void
or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being
impaired or invalidated in any way.
K. Time of the Essence
All dates and times referred to in this Agreement are of the essence.
L. Waiver
CONSULTANT agrees that waiver by CITY of any one or more of the conditions of
performance under this Agreement shall not be construed as waiver(s) of any other condition of
performance under this Agreement.
Executed at Gilroy, California, on the date and year first above written.
CONSULTANT: CITY:
CITY OF GILROY
By: By:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Social Security or Taxpayer
Identification Number
Page 108 of 165
-9- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
Approved as to Form ATTEST:
City Attorney City Clerk
Page 109 of 165
-1- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
EXHIBIT “A”
SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
I. PROJECT MANAGER
CONSULTANT shall provide the services indicated on the attached Exhibit “B”, Scope of
Services (“Services”). (All exhibits referenced are incorporated herein by reference.) To
accomplish that end, CONSULTANT agrees to assign , who will act in the capacity of
Project Manager, and who will personally direct such Services.
Except as may be specified elsewhere in this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish all
technical and professional services including labor, material, equipment, transportation,
supervision and expertise to perform all operations necessary and required to complete the
Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
II. NOTICE TO PROCEED/COMPLETION OF SERVICE
A. NOTICE TO PROCEED
CONSULTANT shall commence the Services upon delivery to CONSULTANT of a written
“Notice to Proceed”, which Notice to Proceed shall be in the form of a written communication
from designated City contact person(s). Notice to Proceed may be in the form of e-mail, fax or
letter authorizing commencement of the Services. For purposes of this Agreement, shall
be the designated City contact person(s). Notice to Proceed shall be deemed to have been
delivered upon actual receipt by CONSULTANT or if otherwise delivered as provided in the
Section V.H. (“Notices”) of this Exhibit “A”.
B. COMPLETION OF SERVICES
When CITY determines that CONSULTANT has completed all of the Services in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall give CONSULTANT written Notice of Final
Acceptance, and CONSULTANT shall not incur any further costs hereunder. CONSULTANT
may request this determination of completion when, in its opinion, it has completed all of the
Services as required by the terms of this Agreement and, if so requested, CITY shall make this
determination within two (2) weeks of such request, or if CITY determines that CONSULTANT
has not completed all of such Services as required by this Agreement, CITY shall so inform
CONSULTANT within this two (2) week period.
III. PROGRESS SCHEDULE
The schedule for performance and completion of the Services will be as set forth in the attached
Exhibit “C”.
IV. PAYMENT OF FEES AND DIRECT EXPENSES
Payments shall be made to CONSULTANT as provided for in Article 4 of this Agreement.
Page 110 of 165
-2- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
Direct expenses are charges and fees not included in Exhibit “B”. CITY shall be obligated to
pay only for those direct expenses which have been previously approved in writing by CITY.
CONSULTANT shall obtain written approval from CITY prior to incurring or billing of direct
expenses.
Copies of pertinent financial records, including invoices, will be included with the submission of
billing(s) for all direct expenses.
V. OTHER PROVISIONS
A. STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP
CONSULTANT represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, skills and licenses
necessary to perform the Services, and its duties and obligations, ex pressed and implied,
contained herein, and CITY expressly relies upon CONSULTANT’S representations and
warranties regarding its skills, qualifications and licenses. CONSULTANT shall perform such
Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as
being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California.
Any plans, designs, specifications, estimates, calculations, reports and other documents furnished
under this Agreement shall be of a quality acceptable to CITY. The minimum criteria for
acceptance shall be a product of neat appearance, well-organized, technically and grammatically
correct, checked and having the maker and checker identified. The minimum standard of
appearance, organization and content of the drawings shall be that used by CITY for similar
purposes.
B. RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy, and the
coordination of the Services furnished by it under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not be
responsible for the accuracy of any project or technical information provided by the CITY. The
CITY’S review, acceptance or payment for any of the Services shall not be construed to operate
as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the
performance of this Agreement, and CONSULTANT shall be and remain liable to CITY in
accordance with applicable law for all damages to CITY caused by CONSULTANT’S negligent
performance of any of the services furnished under this Agreement.
C. RIGHT OF CITY TO INSPECT RECORDS OF CONSULTANT
CITY, through its authorized employees, representatives or agents, shall have the right, at any
and all reasonable times, to audit the books and records (including, but not limited to, invoices,
vouchers, canceled checks, time cards, etc.) of CONSULTANT for the purpose of verifying any
and all charges made by CONSULTANT in connection with this Agreement. CONSULTANT
shall maintain for a minimum period of three (3) years (from the date of final payment to
CONSULTANT), or for any longer period required by law, sufficient books and records in
accordance with standard California accounting practices to establish the correctness of all
charges submitted to CITY by CONSULTANT, all of which shall be made available to CITY at
the CITY’s offices within five (5) business days after CITY’s request.
Page 111 of 165
-3- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
D. CONFIDENTIALITY OF MATERIAL
All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, manufacturing procedures, data (including, but not
limited to, computer data and source code), drawings, descriptions, documents, discussions or
other information developed or received by or for CONSULTANT and all other written and oral
information developed or received by or for CONSULTANT and all other written and oral
information submitted to CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this Agreement
shall be held confidential by CONSULTANT and shall not, without the prior written consent of
CITY, be used for any purposes other than the performance of the S ervices, nor be disclosed to
an entity not connected with the performance of the such Services. Nothing furnished to
CONSULTANT which is otherwise known to CONSULTANT or is or becomes generally
known to the related industry (other than that which becomes generally known as the result of
CONSULTANT’S disclosure thereof) shall be deemed confidential. CONSULTANT shall not
use CITY’S name or insignia, or distribute publicity pertaining to the services rendered under
this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper or other medium without the express
written consent of CITY.
E. NO PLEDGING OF CITY’S CREDIT.
Under no circumstances shall CONSULTANT have the authority or power to pledge the credit
of CITY or incur any obligation in the name of CITY.
F. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIAL.
All material including, but not limited to, computer information, data and source code, sketches,
tracings, drawings, plans, diagrams, quantities, estimates, specifications, proposals, tests, maps,
calculations, photographs, reports and other material developed, collected, prepared (or caused to
be prepared) under this Agreement shall be the property of CITY, but CONSULTANT may
retain and use copies thereof subject to Section V.D of this Exhibit “A”.
CITY shall not be limited in any way in its use of said material at any time for any work,
whether or not associated with the City project for which the Services are performed. However,
CONSULTANT shall not be responsible for, and City shall indemnify CONSULTANT from,
damages resulting from the use of said material for work other than PROJECT, including, but
not limited to, the release of this material to third parties for work other than on PROJECT.
G. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY.
This Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third
party or parties, and no third party or parties shall have any claim or right of action hereunder for
any cause whatsoever.
Page 112 of 165
-4- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
H. NOTICES.
Notices are to be sent as follows:
CITY:
City of Gilroy
7351 Rosanna Street
Gilroy, CA 95020
CONSULTANT:
I. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS.
If the box to the left of this sentence is checked, this Agreement involves federal
funding and the requirements of this Section V.I. apply.
If the box to the left of this sentence is checked, this Agreement does not involve
federal funding and the requirements of this Section V.I. do not apply.
1. DBE Program
CONSULTANT shall comply with the requirements of Title 49, Part 26, Code of Federal
Regulations (49 CFR 26) and the City-adopted Disadvantaged Business Enterprise programs.
2. Cost Principles
Federal Acquisition Regulations in Title 48, CFR 31, shall be used to determine the allowable
cost for individual items.
3. Covenant against Contingent Fees
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person,
other than a bona fide employee working for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this
Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a
bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other
consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this Agreement. For
breach or violation of this warranty, the Local Agency shall have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability or, at its discretion, to deduct from the agreement price or
consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.
Page 113 of 165
-1- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
EXHIBIT “B”
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Page 114 of 165
-1- 4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
EXHIBIT “C”
MILESTONE SCHEDULE
Page 115 of 165
4835-2267-0361v1
LAC\04706083
EXHIBIT “D”
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Page 116 of 165
Wage Theft Prevention Policy Statement
It is the policy of the City that all parties contracting with the City must comply with all applicable
federal, state and local wage and hour laws including but not limited to the Federal Fair Labor Standards
Act (“FLSA”) and the California Labor Code. Suitable language regarding this requirement should be in all
contracts.
1.Disclosure. As a part of any City solicitation for goods and/or services, including public works
projects, contractor shall complete a “Bid Certification” (“Certification”) that requires each
potential contractor to disclose whether the contractor has been found by a court or final
administrative action of an investigatory government agency to have violated federal, state, or
local wage and hour laws within the past five (5) years from the date of the submitted bid or
proposal.
2.Disqualification. The City MAY disqualify a potential contractor based on the disclosed violation.
3.Contract Termination. A current contractor found by a court or by final administrative action of
an investigatory government agency to have violated applicable wage and hour laws, in the five
(5) years prior to or during the term of the contract with the City, may be in material breach of
its contract with the City if the violation is not fully disclosed and/or satisfied per City contract
requirements. Such breach may serve as a basis for contract termination and/or any other
remedies available under law, including a stipulated remediation plan.
I, _________________________, certify that (Business Name) _________________________________
☐Has
☐Has Not
been found by a court or by final administrative action of an investigatory government agency to have
violated applicable wage and hour laws on more than one (1) occasion or has one (1) unpaid wage
judgment.
For each disclosed violation, please provide a copy of (i) the court order and judgment and/or final
administrative decision; and (ii) documents demonstrating either that the order/judgment has been
satisfied, or if the order/judgment has not been fully satisfied, a written and signed description of
potential contractor’s efforts to date to satisfy the order/judgment. The completed Certification shall be
submitted by the potential contractor to the City as a part of its bid or proposal.
Signature and Date: _________________________________________________________________
Attachment B - Wage Theft Form
Page 117 of 165
7.1.
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: For the Love of Gilroy Public Art Campaign - Selection of 14
Designs and Award of Intellectual Property Rights
Agreements for $500 Each
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator
Department: Administration
Submitted by: Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
Prepared by: Bryce Atkins, Deputy Director of Community Development
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
Council approval of the Arts and Culture Commission’s recommended award order of
designs for purchase.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
N/A
BACKGROUND
The Arts and Culture Commission (ACC), with Council approval, put together a public
art campaign entitled “For the Love of Gilroy” to solicit two-dimensional art designs from
local artists to be printed on banners and posted on streetlight poles along Monterey
Road in Downtown Gilroy. The second round of this campaign began with the release of
the Call for Artists (CFA) to solicit design submissions from local artists.
The CFA (26-CFA-AD-102) was released on October 1, 2025, and had a closing period
of December 1, 2025, at 4:00 PM. The CFA provided details, templates, and other
information regarding the solicitation and processing of proposed designs. The process
involves the ACC recommending to the City Council the designs for a potential award to
Page 118 of 165
7.1.
purchase the intellectual property and produce the banners for public display.
ANALYSIS
The City received 52 design submissions from 32 artists during the Call for Artists
submission window for this program. Six artists submitted multiple designs, though only
one would be selected from any particular artist.
The majority of the artwork was submitted electronically, while others were submitted in
hard copy. Nine of the 32 artists were minors (identified in the attached
recommendation packet lists). The ACC did not inquire about their specific ages. 28 of
the 32 artists are known to live in Gilroy; One who lives in San Jose but has sufficient
connections with Gilroy that the ACC considered them eligible; and three others who
are not eligible, and are identified below.
Attached to this staff report is the ACC’s recommendation package, containing a cover
letter with the recommended award order for eligible designs, followed by the designs
deemed eligible in order of recommended order. Below is a discussion about the nature
of the ACC recommendation.
Ineligible Artist Determinations
The ACC identified the following artists as ineligible because they are not residents of,
do not work in, attend school in, or are not associated with the arts in Gilroy:
• Jose Trejo Maya - one submission (Baldwin Park, CA)
• Yuraima Antonio - 10 submissions (Milpitas, CA)
• Magaly Fernandez - three submissions (San Jose, CA)
Ineligible Designs
The ACC designated five designs as ineligible because they contained photographs of
minors, with no waivers or releases provided for their use. An additional (sixth) design
was deemed ineligible because it was submitted a day past the deadline.
Recommendation and Council Determination
Staff’s recommendation is for Council to adopt the ACC’s recommended award order,
attached to this staff report. Should any of the first 14 ranked designs not complete the
design purchase and rights transfer documentation or meet any of the conditions placed
for selection, then the award would progress to the next ranked design that completes
the process, and staff would not need to return to Council for an amended award
selection. Due to production timelines, the banners must be selected at this meeting,
held on January 5, 2026, as the next meeting would likely delay production and prevent
them from being produced in time for the February 20th reveal.
Page 119 of 165
7.1.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may approve or modify the proposed order of awards, or reject one, more than
one, or all designs.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The purchase of 14 designs will total $7,000 from the Public Art Fund, at $500 per
design. Funding for this public art installation comes from the Public Art Fund.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
The ACC conducted outreach for this campaign, including website and social media
posts, direct outreach via flyers to social and arts-related community groups and the
Gilroy Arts Roundtable, and tabling at a community event.
The ACC has discussed this item at each of its regular meetings since the January 14,
2025, meeting. This item was included on the publicly posted agenda for this meeting
and on each Arts and Culture Commission meeting agenda since January 2025.
Staff will conduct outreach to announce the selected designs and provide information
about the unveiling event planned for February 20, 2026.
NEXT STEPS
Once a priority award order has been adopted, staff will then complete the intellectual
property rights agreements and send the banner designs for production. The ACC is
continuing to develop the unveiling event for February 20, 2026, during which the
banners will be displayed.
Attachments:
1. ACC Recommendation Letter 2025
2. #1 - Natasha Sagouspe
3. #2 - Mathew Weski
4. #3 - Orlando Salcedo
5. #4 - Adriel-Guillermo Jimenez
6. #5 - Kristina Noland
7. #6 - Athena Flores
8. #7 - Rob McClelland
9. #8 - Quetzalli Jimenez
10. #9 - Andrea Silva
11. #10 - Santiago Moreno
Page 120 of 165
7.1.
12. #11 - Alfredo Yuriar
13. #12 - Andrea Ramos
14. #13 - Josue D. Rubio
15. #14 - Richard Ontiveros
16. #15 - Florencia Santiago & Ren Florez
17. #16 - Anabella Velasquez
18. #17 - Joey Choko Castañeda
19. #18 - Emy Edok
20. #19 - Kayla Bostock
21. #20 - Abigail Himan
22. #21 - Tristan Calzetta (redacted)
23. #22 - Vera Rodriguez
24. #23 - Vickie Kaufman - After Harvest
25. #24 - Vickie Kaufman - The Harvest
26. #25 - Allana Calzetta
27. #26 - Allyssa Gil-Ojeda
28. #27 - Angelina Loyola
29. #28 - Mia Rodriguez
30. #29 - Josue D. Rubio
31. #30 - Kayla Dube
32. #31 - Angelina Loyola
33. #32 - Kayla Dube
Page 121 of 165
Arts and Culture
Commission
Council Correspondence
7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-6197
Telephone: (408) 846-0202
http://www.cityofgilroy.org
Commission Chair
Melanie Reynisson
Commissioners
Ruben Dario Villa
Camille McCormack
Steven Porter
Steven Taylor
Wendy Zamora
December 19, 2025
To: Gilroy City Council and City Administrator
Re: For the Love of Gilroy Public Art Banner Campaign – Award Recommendation Packet
The Arts and Culture Commission (Commission) has completed the evaluation of design
submittals for the 2026 “For the Love of Gilroy” public art campaign. The Commission received
52 designs in total and is presenting its recommendations in this packet for Council members to
review, ahead of the January 5, 2026, meeting, when the Council will be asked to approve the
designs to be publicly displayed for the community to enjoy.
There were 52 designs submitted by 32 artists. Six artists submitted multiple designs, though the
Commission recommends selecting at most one from each artist. This year’s campaign was to
produce 14 designs as banners. The Commission recommends that the Council adopt an order of
award rather than selecting only 14 designs. Until the purchase agreements for the rights to the
designs are completed, there is a chance that an artist may choose not to sign over their design to
the City. By approving an order of award, the Commission can proceed to the next in the order of
award as needed, rather than returning to Council for new or replacement awards and delaying
the production and unveiling event to later in the year.
Recommended Award Order
The Commission has identified 32 of the designs as eligible and is recommending the award
order listed in the table below. The list is in the Commission’s recommended order and includes
the artist's name and a column indicating if the artist is a minor. Attached to this correspondence
are the designs in the recommended order.
ACC
Recommended
Ranking
Artist Name Minor
1 Natasha Sagouspe No
2 Matthew Weski No
3 Orlando Salcedo No
4 Adriel-Guillermo Jimenez No
5 Kristina Noland No
6 Athena Flores No
7 Robert McClelland No
8 Quetzalli Jimenez No
Docusign Envelope ID: D19838D3-027E-493B-9590-75DE296E774F
Page 122 of 165
2
ACC
Recommended
Ranking
Artist Name Minor
9 Andrea Silva-Quiroz No
10 Santiago Moreno No
11 Alfredo Yuriar No
12 Andrea Ramos Yes
13 Josue D. Rubio* No
14 Richard Ontiveros No
15 Florencia Santiago TBD
16 Anabella Velasquez No
17 Joey Choko Castaneda No
18 Emy Edok Yes
19 Kayla Bostock Yes
20 Abigail Himan Yes
21 Tristan Calzetta Yes
22 Vera Rodriguez Yes
23 Vickie Kaufman* No
24 Vickie Kaufman* No
25 Allana Calzetta Yes
26 Allyssa Gil-Ojeda No
27 Angelina Loyola* No
28 Mia Rodriguez Yes
29 Josue D. Rubio* No
30 Kayla Dube* No
31 Angelina Loyola* No
32 Kayla Dube* No
* This artist has multiple design entries. Once one is awarded to this artist, the other entries
would then be passed over when awarding available banners/contracts.
Designs Deemed Ineligible by the Commission
Of the 52 designs, there are 20 that the Commission has determined to be ineligible due to either
the artist being ineligible to be in the event (14 designs), design content (five designs), or a late
submission (1 design).
Ineligible Artist Determinations
The ACC identified the following artists as ineligible because they are not residents of, do not
work in, attend school in, or are not associated with the arts in Gilroy:
• Jose Trejo Maya - one submission (Baldwin Park, CA)
• Yuraima Antonio - 10 submissions (Milpitas, CA)
• Magaly Fernandez - three submissions (San Jose, CA)
Docusign Envelope ID: D19838D3-027E-493B-9590-75DE296E774F
Page 123 of 165
3
Ineligible Designs
The ACC designated five designs as ineligible because they contained photographs of minors,
with no waivers or releases provided for their use. An additional (sixth) design was deemed
ineligible because it was submitted a day past the deadline.
Conclusion
The Commission would like to thank the City Council for the opportunity to pursue this public
art campaign and recommend these designs for your approval.
Sincerely,
Melanie Reynisson, Chair
Arts and Culture Commission
Docusign Envelope ID: D19838D3-027E-493B-9590-75DE296E774F
Page 124 of 165
Page 125 of 165
Page 126 of 165
Page 127 of 165
Page 128 of 165
Page 129 of 165
Page 130 of 165
Page 131 of 165
Page 132 of 165
Page 133 of 165
Page 134 of 165
Page 135 of 165
Page 136 of 165
Page 137 of 165
Page 138 of 165
Page 139 of 165
Page 140 of 165
Page 141 of 165
Page 142 of 165
Page 143 of 165
Page 144 of 165
Page 145 of 165
Page 146 of 165
Page 147 of 165
Page 148 of 165
Page 149 of 165
Page 150 of 165
Page 151 of 165
Page 152 of 165
Page 153 of 165
Page 154 of 165
Page 155 of 165
Page 156 of 165
8.1.
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Consider Adopting an Urgency Interim Ordinance Prohibiting
the Issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits for a Period Not to
Exceed Forty-Five (45) Days Citywide
Meeting Date: January 5, 2026
From: Brad Kilger, Interim City Administrator
Department: Community Development
Submitted by: Sharon Goei, Community Development Director
Prepared by: Michael Fossati, Planning Manager
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
1. Determine this action is exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA
Guidelines;
2. Adopt an Urgency Interim Ordinance establishing a temporary prohibition on the
issuance or approval of any new Tobacco Retailer Permits citywide within the
City of Gilroy pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858; and
3. Make findings, as incorporated in the ordinance, that adoption of the ordinance is
necessary for the immediate preservation of public health, safety, and welfare,
particularly regarding the protection of minors throughout the City.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Gilroy has seen a significant rise in tobacco retail establishments in recent
years. Gilroy now has 52 businesses selling tobacco products, equating to
approximately 1.0 retailers per 1,000 residents, which is much higher than in many
neighboring cities. Staff has confirmed that three new smoke shops have opened in
Gilroy since 2024, indicating a growing trend.
Page 157 of 165
8.1.
While the City Code does not define 'smoke shop,' the term generally refers to retail
outlets selling smoking and vaping products and accessories. The rise in smoke shops
is expected to negatively impact the Gilroy community by increasing access to tobacco
products, raising public health risks, fostering associations with illicit sales, and
contributing to the visual decline of commercial areas.
In response, the City Council approved an urgency ordinance on November 3 and an
extension on December 8, 2025, temporarily prohibiting new tobacco retailer permits
within the downtown area. After reviewing the data within the 10-day Report and
considering public input, the City Council directed staff to draft an urgency interim
ordinance to prohibit new tobacco retailer permits citywide for consideration at the next
available City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND
On November 3, 2025, the City Council voted unanimously to adopt Ordinance No.
2025-08, an urgency interim ordinance of the City of Gilroy prohibiting the issuance of
tobacco retailer permits for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) days within the
downtown area.
On December 8, 2025, the City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2025-11,
which extended the urgency interim ordinance prohibiting new tobacco retailer permits
for an additional 10 months and 15 days within the downtown area. Based on
information from the 10-day Report and public input, the City Council directed staff to
draft an urgency interim ordinance prohibiting new tobacco retailer permits citywide for
consideration at the next available City Council meeting.
ANALYSIS
The growing number of tobacco retailers, especially stand-alone smoke shops, has led
to several documented public health concerns for the City of Gilroy. Per the California
Tobacco Health Assessment Tool developed by the Stanford Prevention Research
Center and GreenInfo Network, Gilroy has a greater density of tobacco retailers (1.0
retailers per 1,000 residents vs. 0.7 retailers in Morgan Hill and Hollister) than our
neighboring jurisdictions. Additional concerns are as follows:
Enforcement Capacity and Age Restriction Compliance: Studies show that stand-alone
smoke shops sell to minors illegally more often than other types of stores, like grocery,
convenience, or liquor stores, even though age checks are required by law. The fast
growth of new smoke shops has made it harder for the City of Gilroy to enforce these
rules. With 52 retailers now, adding more shops without a strong regulatory system
makes it difficult for City staff and law enforcement to monitor compliance.
Increased Youth Accessibility and Use: Gilroy has 12,435 residents ages 5-17 (21.2%
Page 158 of 165
8.1.
of the population) and 19,119 residents under 21 (32.6%) per the American Community
Survey 2019-2023 five-year estimates. Studies show that when tobacco retailers are
more available and accessible, youth tobacco use rates go up. When many retailers are
located close together in certain areas, it becomes easier and more normal for young
people to get tobacco products.
Marketing Practices Targeting Youth: Marketing strategies aimed at youth, such as
displaying flavored products, using eye-catching packaging, flashy signs, and prominent
advertisements near the checkout counter, have a strong influence on minors. Even
though Senate Bill 793 (effective January 1, 2024) limits flavored tobacco products
across the state, the way smoke shops market and display their products still
encourages and normalizes tobacco uses.
Regulatory Framework: The City’s current tobacco regulations are limited to requiring a
Tobacco Retailer Permit and enforcing general business licensing requirements. The
City does not define or differentiate between categories of tobacco retailers, such as
stand-alone smoke shops and businesses with co-located tobacco sales. Furthermore,
there are no local restrictions on flavored tobacco, vaping products, or e-cigarette sales,
nor are there standards addressing cumulative retailer density or operational
expectations for stand-alone smoke shops. The City also needs to develop a
comprehensive strategy to guide tobacco retail regulation.
In response to the increase in smoke shops, the Gilroy Police Department, Gilroy
Community Development Department Code Enforcement Division, and the California
Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) inspected several locations for
compliance with City and State regulations. Violations included selling prohibited
products, lacking required permits, and operating without business licenses. Authorities
seized items and issued violations at each site.
Immediate action is necessary to prevent the issuance of additional tobacco retailer
permits prior to adoption of comprehensive, permanent regulatory standards by the City.
Without immediate restrictions, additional permit applications may be submitted, which
may lead to irreversible commercial occupancy of our commercial and mixed-use areas.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City of Gilroy is authorized to adopt
an urgency interim ordinance as an immediate measure to protect public health, safety,
or welfare. The evidence and initial findings presented, including demographic
vulnerability, current tobacco retailer concentration within the entire city exceeding
regional comparables, recent compliance violations, lack of definitions that include
“smoke shop,” and lack of appropriate land use controls establishes the necessity for
immediate action.
An urgency ordinance requires passage by a four-fifths (4/5) vote. If at least six (6)
Councilmembers vote to pass the urgency ordinance, it will take effect immediately
upon adoption and will remain in effect for forty-five (45) days, expiring automatically on
Page 159 of 165
8.1.
February 19, 2026.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Direct staff to return with a non-urgency ordinance to prohibit the issuance of new
tobacco retailers permits citywide. This alternative will delay the City’s ability to
restrict new permits until the time it takes to legally provide adequate public
notice in the local newspaper. This will allow new tobacco retailers the ability to
apply for the required permits.
2. Take no action on tobacco retailer regulation at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Implementation and development of permanent regulations will utilize staff time and
resources, which will be accommodated within existing budgeted appropriations.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
California Government Code Section 36937 states that urgency ordinances adopted by
cities are exempt from advance public notice and waiting period required for standard
ordinances. Urgency ordinances can be adopted immediately, with a four-fifths vote, at
either a regular or special meeting, if the City Council determines that there is an urgent
need to act to protect public peace, health, or safety.
NEXT STEPS
If approved, the proposed ordinance will take effect immediately and will remain in effect
for 45 days. On or before February 19, 2026, staff will either present a permanent
ordinance or request an extension to conduct further study on the issue. An initial
extension may last up to 10 months and 15 days.
Attachments:
1. Proposed Urgency Interim Ordinance
Page 160 of 165
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XX
AN URGENCY INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GILROY PROHIBITING THE
ISSUANCE OF TOBACCO RETAILER PERMITS FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED
FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS CITYWIDE
WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy (“City”) is a municipal corporation duly organized
as a Charter City under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has broad discretion pursuant the California
Constitution Article XI, Section 5; and the general laws of the state, including, but not
limited to, the California Planning and Zoning Law (Gov. Code section 65000 et seq.) to
legislate for public purposes and for the general welfare, including, but not limited to,
matters of public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65858 sets forth procedures
for the adoption of an urgency interim ordinance to prohibit the approval of applications
for additional subdivisions, use permits, variances, building permits, and other
applicable entitlements for uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated specific plan
or zoning proposal that the legislative body, planning commission or the planning
department is considering or studying or intends to study; and
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, the City adopted an Ordinance requiring all
tobacco retailers to obtain a “Tobacco Retailer Permit” to ensure that retailers comply
with tobacco control laws and City business standards (Ord. No. 2014-14; Gilroy Code
Section 13.66 et seq); and
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2025-08,
prohibiting the issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits within the Gilroy Downtown
Specific Plan Area for a period not to exceed 45 days, as permitted per California
Government Code Section 65858; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 2025, the City adopted Ordinance 2025-11,
extending the urgency interim Ordinance prohibiting issuance of any Tobacco Retailer
Permits within the Gilroy Downtown Specific Plan Area, as set forth by Chapter 13,
Article VIII (Tobacco Retailer Permit) of the Gilroy Municipal Code in the City of Gilroy;
and
WHEREAS, in California, individuals under the age of 21 are prohibited from
purchasing or using tobacco or cannabis products. This regulation is based on evidence
that smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and mortality worldwide.
Smokeless tobacco is also associated with increased risk for several cancers, including
those of the mouth, esophagus, and pancreas. Additionally, marijuana smoke contains
many of the same toxins, irritants, and carcinogens found in tobacco smoke; and
Page 161 of 165
Ordinance No. 2026-XX
Prohibition on Issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits Citywide
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 2 of 5
-2-
WHEREAS, while the majority of tobacco retailers in the City operate in
conjunction with another land use activity (i.e., part of a grocery store, liquor store, gas
station, convenience store), in the past year-and-a-half the City has seen an increase in
the number of stand-alone “Smoke Shop” tobacco retail stores; and
WHEREAS, the prevalence of tobacco retail establishments citywide may
contribute to various adverse effects because of the associated health risks. In addition,
the City of Gilroy has a greater density of tobacco retailers compared to neighboring
jurisdictions increasing the likelihood that both youth and adults start using tobacco
products as they are more available and accessible; and
WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy’s current tobacco regulations are limited. For
instance, a tobacco retailer must only obtain a State retailer license, a Tobacco Retailer
Permit, and a City business license to operate within a mixed-use or commercial area
that allows retail. The City does not define or differentiate between categories of
tobacco retailers, such as stand-alone smoke shops and businesses with co-located
tobacco sales. Furthermore, there are no local restrictions on flavored tobacco, retail
vaping products, or e-cigarette sales, nor are there standards addressing cumulative
retailer density or operational expectations for stand-alone smoke shops; and
WHEREAS, stand-alone smoke shops throughout the City have been a source of
unlawful activities in the City, including April 2025, where the California Department of
Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) and the City of Gilroy confiscated flavored
tobacco products and hallucinogenic psilocybin that are illegal to sell from certain local
tobacco retail businesses; and
WHEREAS, considering the foregoing findings, the City Council finds that there
is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety, and welfare, and that approval
of additional tobacco retailer permits would result in and exacerbate that threat to public
health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, within a reasonable time, the City Council or staff is considering
studying or intending to study a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning
proposal to address the foregoing concerns, with which the uses currently authorized by
tobacco retailer permits may be in conflict; and
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2026, in accordance with State law, the City Council
provided due consideration of all evidence presented and provided in the entire
administrative record and held a duly noticed public hearing and took testimony
regarding this urgency interim ordinance.
Page 162 of 165
Ordinance No. 2026-XX
Prohibition on Issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits Citywide
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 3 of 5
-3-
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Recitals.
The above recitals are true and correct and hereby adopted as the City Council’s
findings.
SECTION II. Purpose and Authority.
In the interest of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the residents in the City of
Gilroy, it is the purpose and intent of this urgency interim Ordinance to place a
temporary moratorium on the issuance of any new permit, license, or other entitlement
for any tobacco retailer business citywide. This includes any new permit, license, or
other entitlement for the relocation or physical expansion of existing business falling
under the definition of a tobacco retailer business as defined in Gilroy Municipal Code
Section 13.66. The City Council has authority to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to
California Government Code Section 65858 as an urgency measure prohibiting any use
that may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning
proposal that the City is considering or studying.
SECTION III. Findings.
The City Council hereby finds and determines that tobacco retailer businesses in
general constitute an immediate threat to public health, safety, and welfare. The
approval of additional entitlements for Tobacco Retailer Permits and approval of the
relocation or physical expansion of existing tobacco retailer business under the City’s
current regulations will further threaten the public health, safety, and welfare. The
adoption of this urgency interim Ordinance is therefore necessary for the immediate
protection of public health, safety, and welfare. The above recitals are incorporated
herein by reference as true and correct as the Council’s findings.
SECTION IV. Moratorium Imposed.
This Ordinance imposes a moratorium on the issuance of any Tobacco Retailer Permit,
as set forth by Chapter 13 Article VIII (Tobacco Retailer Permit) of the Gilroy Municipal
Code. This moratorium shall not apply to the renewal of an existing tobacco retailer’s
permit previously issued by the City of Gilroy.
SECTION V. Violation.
Except as otherwise permitted under this urgency interim Ordinance, the establishment,
relocation, or physical expansion of a Tobacco Retailer Business is declared to be a
public nuisance. Violations of this urgency interim Ordinance may be enforced by any
Page 163 of 165
Ordinance No. 2026-XX
Prohibition on Issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits Citywide
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 4 of 5
-4-
applicable laws or ordinances, including, but not limited to, injunctions or administrative
or criminal penalties under the Gilroy Municipal Code.
SECTION VI. Term of Ordinance.
This urgency interim Ordinance shall be in effect from the date of adoption for a period
of forty-five (45) days, unless it is extended pursuant to California Government Code
Section 65858 or other applicable law, as approved by the City Council.
SECTION VII. Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this urgency
interim Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise void or
invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this urgency interim Ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this urgency interim Ordinance and each section,
subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases
may be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
SECTION VIII. CEQA Determination
This urgency interim Ordinance is exempt from environmental analysis under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that this Ordinance has no
possibility of having a significant effect on the environment, as it merely preserves the
status quo in accordance with Government Code Section 65858 in the interest of
evaluating and preventing potential harms related to tobacco sales.
SECTION IX. Effective Date.
This urgency interim Ordinance, passed by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council,
is declared to be an interim urgency Ordinance for preserving the public health, safety,
and welfare and shall take effect and be enforced immediately upon adoption pursuant
to Government Code Section 36937(b).
SECTION X. Publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published and shall be published, or
summary thereof, one time within fifteen (15) days upon passage and adoption in a
newspaper of general circulation, such as the Gilroy Dispatch.
Page 164 of 165
Ordinance No. 2026-XX
Prohibition on Issuance of Tobacco Retailer Permits Citywide
City Council Regular Meeting | January 5, 2026
Page 5 of 5
-5-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gilroy this 5th day of
January 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Greg Bozzo, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Kim Mancera, City Clerk
Page 165 of 165