Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 2026-40 | Resolution Modifying Hearing Officer's Decision | Adopted 06/15/2026 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER'S DECISION REGARDING BUSINESS LICENSE NO. 16606725 AND TOBACCO RETAILER'S PERMIT ISSUED TO THE ROCK ZONE, LOCATED AT 1323 FIRST STREET, GILROY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINDINGS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER, AND MODIFYING THE HEARING OFFICER’S DECISION TO INCREASE THE PERIOD OF TOBACCO PRODUCT RETAILING PROHIBITION AND SUSPENSION OF THE TOBACCO RETAILER'S PERMIT FROM SIX (6) MONTHS TO TWELVE (12) MONTHS WHEREAS, Gilroy Municipal Code Section 13.45 authorizes the City to initiate proceedings to suspend, revoke, or modify a business license where the Chief of Police determines that violations of the Gilroy City Code or any other law have occurred in connection with the operation of the business; and WHEREAS, Chapter 13, Article VIII of the Gilroy Municipal Code regulates Tobacco Retailer Permits and authorizes suspension, revocation, and enforcement actions to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City initiated administrative proceedings against The Rock Zone (the “Licensee/Permittee”), located at 1323 First Street, Gilroy, California, concerning Business License No. 16606725 and related Tobacco Retailer's Permit issued to Account No. 16606725; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 97-17, Administrative Hearing Officer Alan Seltzer conducted evidentiary hearings on April 3, 2026, and April 17, 2026, received testimony under oath, admitted documentary evidence, considered post-hearing submissions, and thereafter issued a written Administrative Decision dated April 28, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Administrative Hearing Officer found that substantial evidence existed demonstrating violations involving tobacco products and business operations occurring at the premises and further determined that administrative sanctions were warranted; and WHEREAS, the Administrative Hearing Officer carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented by both the City and the Licensee/Permittee, including arguments regarding the legality of products, applicability of state law exemptions, evidentiary objections, and the appropriate scope of administrative remedies; and WHEREAS, the Administrative Hearing Officer determined that revocation of the business license was not warranted and instead imposed a penalty as follows: “The Rock Zone’s business license shall be modified so that it may not sell any “tobacco product” as that term is defined in GMC Sec. 13.66 for six months from the effective date of this Decision. The Rock Zone’s current Regulatory Permit similarly shall be modified to prohibit the sale of tobacco products for the same period.”; and Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364 Resolution No. 2026-40 Appeal Hearing Decision – The Rock Zone City Council Regular Meeting | June 15, 2026 Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the Licensee/Permittee timely appealed the Administrative Hearing Officer's decision to the City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 97-17; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2026, the City Council conducted an appeal hearing pursuant to Resolution No. 97-17, reviewed the administrative record, considered the Hearing Officer's decision, considered the written appeal and arguments of the parties, and received oral argument; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section VII of Resolution No. 97-17, the City Council may adopt, reject, or modify the Hearing Officer's decision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. FINDINGS REGARDING THE APPEAL. The City Council finds that: A. The administrative proceedings were conducted in accordance with Resolution No. 97-17 and afforded appellant due process, including notice, opportunity to present oral and written testimony and evidence, representation by legal counsel, and the opportunity to submit written and oral arguments. B. The Administrative Hearing Officer thoroughly evaluated the evidence presented by both parties and exercised independent judgment in rendering the Administrative Decision. C. Substantial evidence exists within the administrative record supporting the findings and conclusions reached by the Administrative Hearing Officer. D. The Administrative Hearing Officer appropriately considered the appellant's defenses and objections, including arguments regarding product classifications, alleged exemptions under state law, evidentiary issues, and the propriety of administrative penalties. SECTION 3. FINDINGS SUPPORTING MODIFICATION OF THE DECISION. The City Council further finds that modification of the Administrative Hearing Officer's decision is warranted as follows: A. The administrative record reflects multiple enforcement actions occurring over an extended period of time involving unlawful tobacco-related products and other violations identified by law enforcement and regulatory agencies. B. The evidence presented during the administrative proceedings demonstrated repeated compliance concerns rather than an isolated incident. Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364 Resolution No. 2026-40 Appeal Hearing Decision – The Rock Zone City Council Regular Meeting | June 15, 2026 Page 3 of 6 C. The sale or offering for sale of prohibited items, including controlled substances, for an extended period of time and the offering for sale of flavored tobacco products in violation of requirements of State law reflect a significant level of noncompliance with applicable tobacco regulations. D. Protection of the public health, safety, and welfare is a fundamental purpose of the City's Tobacco Retailer Permit program, and a longer suspension period is necessary to promote future compliance and deter similar conduct. E. A twelve (12) month suspension more appropriately reflects the seriousness and duration of the violations established in the administrative record while remaining proportionate to the facts of this case. F. The City Council recognizes that the Administrative Hearing Officer declined to revoke the business license and instead fashioned a remedy allowing the business to continue operating as a lawful non-tobacco retailer. The Council agrees with that determination and finds that complete revocation of the business license is not necessary at this time. G. However, with respect to the length of the modifications of the Business License and the Tobacco Retailer's Permit, the City Council, after weighing all of the relevant factors concludes that the modifications of the Business License and the Tobacco Retailer’s Permit for a period of twelve (12) months more appropriately balances the City's interest in protecting public health and enforcing tobacco regulations with the business's continued ability to operate lawfully as a non-tobacco retail establishment. SECTION 4. DENIAL OF APPEAL. The appeal filed by The Rock Zone and Adel Ammari is hereby DENIED. SECTION 5. ADOPTION OF HEARING OFFICER'S FINDINGS. Except as expressly modified herein, the City Council adopts and incorporates the findings, conclusions, and determinations contained in the Administrative Hearing Officer's April 28, 2026, Administrative Decision as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 6. MODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION. The Administrative Hearing Officer's decision is modified solely as follows: A. The Business License No. 16606725 (Account No. 16606725) is modified to prohibit selling any “tobacco product” as that term is defined in Gilroy City Code 13.66, at the premises located at 1323 First Street, Gilroy, California, for a period of twelve (12) months from the effective date of this resolution. B. The Tobacco Retailer’s Permit (Regulatory Permit) issued to The Rock Zone ATML Inc for Account No. 16606725 is hereby modified to be suspended for the same twelve (12) month period from the effective date of this resolution. During the suspension period, said Permit shall confer no authority to sell any tobacco product as defined in GMC § 13.66, Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364 Resolution No. 2026-40 Appeal Hearing Decision – The Rock Zone City Council Regular Meeting | June 15, 2026 Page 4 of 6 and The Rock Zone ATML Inc shall not sell or offer for sale any such tobacco product at the above-referenced premises. C. During the aforementioned 12-month suspension period, The Rock Zone shall not engage in the retail sale, offer for sale, display for sale, distribution, or furnishing of any tobacco product, tobacco paraphernalia, electronic smoking device, nicotine product, or any other product requiring a Tobacco Retailer's Permit under the Gilroy Municipal Code. D. Nothing in this Resolution shall prohibit the continued operation of the business as a lawful non-tobacco retailer, provided the business remains in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. E. Upon the expiration of the twelve (12) months, and provided that no further violations have occurred, Business License No. 16606725 and the Tobacco Retailer’s Permit (Regulatory Permit) shall automatically revert to their unmodified terms (if they are still in effect, and have not expired or otherwise been canceled), authorizing the retail sale of tobacco products in accordance with applicable law, provided the Licensee/Permittee has renewed the Business License and the Tobacco Retailer’s Permit as required by Gilroy City Code. F. The Licensee/Permittee shall, within five (5) business days of the effective date of this resolution, remove or conspicuously cover all tobacco product displays, signage, and advertising at the premises that may indicate the availability of tobacco products for purchase. Failure to comply with the terms of this Order may result in further enforcement action, including but not limited to revocation of Business License No. 16606725 and/or the Tobacco Retailer's Permit. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. SECTION 8. IMPLEMENTATION The City Administrator, City Attorney, Finance Director, Police Chief, and all other appropriate City officials are authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2026, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: BRACCO, CLINE, FUGAZZI, MARQUES, RAMIREZ, BOZZO NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: HILTON Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364 Resolution No. 2026-40 Appeal Hearing Decision – The Rock Zone City Council Regular Meeting | June 15, 2026 Page 5 of 6 APPROVED: ________________________________ Greg Bozzo, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Mancera, City Clerk Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364 Resolution No. 2026-40 Appeal Hearing Decision – The Rock Zone City Council Regular Meeting | June 15, 2026 Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK I, KIM MANCERA, City Clerk of the City of Gilroy, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution No. 2026-40 is an original resolution, or true and correct copy of a City Resolution, duly adopted by the Council of the City of Gilroy at a Regular Meeting held Monday, June 15, 2026, with a quorum present. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of the City of Gilroy this Wednesday, June 17, 2026. ____________________________________ Kim Mancera City Clerk of the City of Gilroy Docusign Envelope ID: 6F1C9F3B-B9B5-8489-827B-13D2F143F364