Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-11-15 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Packet November 10, 2021 2:46 PM City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page1 MAYOR Marie Blankley COUNCIL MEMBERS Rebeca Armendariz Dion Bracco Zach Hilton Peter Leroe-Muñoz Carol Marques Fred Tovar CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF GILROY CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 7351 ROSANNA STREET GILROY, CA 95020 REGULAR MEETING 6:00 P.M. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2021 CITY COUNCIL PACKET MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.cityofgilroy.org AGENDA CLOSING TIME IS 5:00 P.M. THE TUESDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING Due to COVID-19, it is possible that the planned in-person meeting may have to change to a virtual meeting at any time and possibly on short notice. Please check the City of Gilroy website at http://gilroyca.iqm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx for any updates to meeting information. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL. Persons wishing to address the Council are requested, but not required, to complete a Speaker’s Card located at the entrances. Public testimony is subject to reasonable regulations, including but not limited to time restrictions for each individual speaker. A minimum of 12 copies of materials should be provided to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council and Staff. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. The amount of time allowed per speaker may vary at the Mayor’s discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda. Written comments on any agenda item may be emailed to the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org or mailed to the Gilroy City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. Comments received by the City Clerk’s Office by 1 p.m. on the day of a Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to or at the meeting and avail able for public inspection with the agenda packet located in the lobby of Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street prior to the meeting. Any correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting record. Items received after the 1 p.m. deadline will be provided to the City Council as soon as practicable. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Governors Order N -29-20, the City will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need specia l assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the meeting at (408) 846-0204. If you challenge any planning or land use decision made at this meeting in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing held at this meeting, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please take notice that the time within which to seek judicial review of a ny final administrative determination reached at this meeting is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. A Closed Session may be called during this meeting pursuant to Government Code Section City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page2 54956.9 (d)(2) if a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the City on the advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation against the City. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available with the agenda packet on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org subject to Staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE GILROY OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public. Commissions, task forces, councils and other agencies of the City exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE, TO RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF THE ORDINANCE OR TO REPORT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE, CONTACT THE OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMISSION STAFF AT (408) 846-0204 I. OPENING A. Call to Order 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Invocation 3. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda 4. Roll Call B. Orders of the Day C. Employee Introductions II. CEREMONIAL ITEMS A. Proclamations, Awards, and Presentations 1. Proclamation Naming October 29, 2021 as Arbor Day 2. Proclamation Naming November 27, 2021 as Small Business Saturday III. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page3 PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council on matters within the Gilroy City Council’s jurisdiction but not on the agenda. Persons wishing to address the Council are requested to complete a Speaker’s Card located at the entrances and handed to the City Clerk. Speakers are limited to 1 minute each. The amount of time allowed per speaker may vary at the Mayor’s discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda. The law does not permit Council action or extended discussion of any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Council action is requested, the Council may place the matter on a future agenda. Written comments to address the Council on matters not on this agenda may be e -mailed to the City Clerk’s Office at cityclerk@cityofgilroy.org or mailed to the Gilroy City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, CA 95020. Comments received by the City Clerk’s Office by 1:00pm on the day of a Council meeting will be distributed to the City Council prior to or at the meeting and available for public inspection with the agenda packet located in the lobby of Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street, prior to the meeting. Any correspondence received will be incorporated into the meeting record. Items received after the 1:00pm deadline will be provided to the City Council as soon as practicable. Written material provided by public members under this section of the agenda will be limited to 10 pages in hard copy. An unlimited amount of material may be provided electronically. City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page4 IV. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Council Member Bracco – Gilroy Sister Cities Association (alternate), Santa Clara Co. Library JPA, SCVWD Joint Council-SCRWA-Board Water Resources Committee, South County Regional Wastewater Authority Board, South County Youth Task Force Policy Team, Street Naming Committee, URM Task Force Sub-committee Council Member Armendariz – ABAG (Alternate), CalTrain Policy Group, Gilroy Downtown Business Association Board (alternate), Historic Heritage Committee, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Implementation Board, Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board (Alternate), Street Naming Committee, VTA Committee for Transit Accessibility (Alternate) Council Member Marques - Gilroy Downtown Business Association Board, Gilroy Gardens Board of Directors, Historic Heritage Committee (Alternate), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Governing Board (alternate), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Implementation Board (alternate), South County Regional Wastewater Authority (Alternate), URM Task Force Sub-Committee Council Member Hilton – Gilroy Economic Development Partnership, Silicon Valley Clean Energy Authority JPA Board, South County United for Health, Visit Gilroy California Welcome Center Board Council Member Tovar – Economic Development Corporation Board, Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission, Santa Clara Co. Expressway Plan 2040 Policy Advisory Board, Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission, Santa Clara Co. Library JPA (alternate), SCVWD Water Commission (alternate), South County Regional Wastewater Authority Board, Street Naming Committee, VTA Committee for Transit Accessibility Council Member Leroe-Muñoz - ABAG, CalTrain Policy Group (alternate), Cities Association of Santa Clara County Board of Directors (alternate), Economic Development Corporation Board, Gilroy Youth Task Force, SCVWD Water Commission, Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority Board, South County Youth Task Force Policy Team (alternate), VTA Mobility Partnership, VTA South County City Group, VTA Policy Advisory Committee Mayor Blankley - Cities Association of Santa Clara Co. Board of Directors, Gilroy Economic Development Partnership, Gilroy Sister Cities Association, Gilroy Youth Task Force (alternate), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Governing Board, SCVWD Joint Council-SCRWA-Board Water Resources Committee, South County Regional Wastewater Authority Board, VTA Board of Directors Alternate, VTA Mobility Partnership, VTA Policy Advisory Committee, VTA South County City Group V. FUTURE COUNCIL INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE) All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a request is made by a member of the City Council or a member of the public. Any person desiring to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed from the consent calendar prior to the time the Council votes to approve. If removed, the item will be discussed in the order in which it appears. City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page5 A. Change of Date for First Council Meeting in January from January 3, 2022 to January 10, 2022 VII. BIDS AND PROPOSALS VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Introduction of An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy Amending Gilroy City Code Chapter 12 to Add a New Article VI, Entitled Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, to Chapter 12 of the Gilroy City Code to Implement the Requirements of SB 1383 1. Staff Report: Bryce Atkins, Senior Management Analyst 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Possible Action: a) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading. b) Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy amending Gilroy City Code Chapter 12 to add a new Article VI, entitled Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, to Chapter 12 of the Gilroy City Code to implement the requirements of SB 1383. B. Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27 of the Gilroy City Code, Article VI "Water Supply Shortage Regulations" Authorizing the Public Works Director to Make Changes to the City of Gilroy Watering Schedule as Needed 1. Staff Report: Daryl Jordan, PE, Public Works Director 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Possible Action: a) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading. b) Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 27 of the Gilroy City Code, Article VI "Water Supply Shortage Regulations" authorizing the Public Works Director to make changes to the City of Gilroy Watering Schedule as needed. C. Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision (Panattoni Development) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Request for Industrial Planned Development Approval for Warehouse, Distribution Facility and Commercial Use of Property at the Northeast Corner of Pacheco Pass Highway and Camino Arroyo (File No.s Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07, CUP 20-02 and GPA 20-01) City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page6 1. Staff Report: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner 2. Disclosure of Ex-Parte Communications 3. Open Public Hearing 4. Close Public Hearing 5. Possible Action: Staff and the Planning Commission analyzed the proposed project and recommend the City Council: a) Adopt, by resolution, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the project with findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); b) Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment GPA 20-01 amending the Mobility Element Figures M-1 and M2 for the project; c) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading; d) Introduce an ordinance to approve Z 20-07 Commercial/Industrial Planned Unit Development Zoning Amendment; e) Adopt a resolution to approve Architectural and Site Review AS 20 -21 for the site planned unit development plan and buildings, with findings and conditions; and f) Adopt a resolution to approve Tentative Parcel Map TM 20-07, with findings and conditions. IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Appointments to Fill Vacancies on Boards & Commissions 1. Staff Report: LeeAnn McPhillips, Administrative Services/HR Director/Risk Manager 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Appoint members to the vacant seats on the Housing & Neighborhood Revitalization Committee and Open Government Commission. B. Status Update and Council Direction on the Evaluation of the Boards and Commissions Structure for Efficiency 1. Staff Report: Bryce Atkins, Senior Management Analyst 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Council receive report and provide direction. X. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS A. Approve a School Resource Officer Memorandum of Understanding for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page7 1. Staff Report: Pedro Espinoza, Police Chief 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: a) Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy authorizing the City Administrator to participate in a Memorandum of Understanding with the Gilroy Unified School District for two School Resource Officers, and b) Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with the Gilroy Unified School District sharing the cost of two School Resource Officers for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. B. Councilmember Zachary Hilton Travel Request 1. Staff Report: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator 2. Public Comment 3. Possible Action: Approve or deny the request from Councilmember Hilton to approve City -funded travel to the Local Government Commission and the CalBike Conference in compliance with Government Code Section 53232.2 and AB 1234. XI. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS A. Fentanyl in the Gilroy Community 1. Public Comment XII. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS XIII. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT MEETING DATES FUTURE MEETING DATES DECEMBER 2021 6* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 13* Special Meeting - 6:00 p.m. JANUARY 2022 10** Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 24* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. FEBRUARY 2022 7* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 28* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. MARCH 2022 7* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. 21* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m. * meeting is webstreamed and televised City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 11/15/2021 Page8 **Tentative rescheduled regular meeting from January 3, 2022 OFFICIAL PROCLAMATION WHEREAS in 1872, the Nebraska Board of Agriculture established a special day to be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS trees can be a solution to combating climate change by reducing the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cutting heating and cooling costs, moderating the temperature, cleaning the air, producing life-giving oxygen, and providing habitat for wildlife, and WHEREAS trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires, and countless other wood products, and WHEREAS trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community, and WHEREAS trees — wherever they are planted — are a source of joy and spiritual renewal. NOW, THEREFORE, I, , Mayor of the City of , do hereby proclaim as ARBOR DAY In the City of , and I urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and to support efforts to protect our trees and woodlands, and FURTHER, I urge all citizens to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations. DATED THIS day of , Mayor 2.A.1 Packet Pg. 9 Communication: Proclamation Naming October 29, 2021 as Arbor Day (Proclamations, Awards, and Presentations) Proclamation of the City of Gilroy WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy celebrates our local small businesses and the contributions they make to our local economy and community; and WHEREAS, according to the United States Small Business Administration, there are 31.7 million small businesses in the United States, which represent 99.7% of firms with paid employees and are responsible for 65.1% of net new jobs created from 2000 to 2019; and WHEREAS, small businesses employ 47.1% of the employees in the private sector in the United States, 88% of U.S. consumers feel a personal commitment to support small businesses in the wake of the pandemic, and 92% of small business owners have pivoted the way they do business to stay open during the pandemic; and WHEREAS, 97% of Small Business Saturday® shoppers recognize the impact they can make by shopping small, 85% of them also encouraged friends and family to do so, too; and WHEREAS, 56% of shoppers reported they shopped online with a small business on Small Business Saturday in 2020; and more than 50% of consumers who reported shopping small endorsed a local business on social media or shopped at a local business because of a social media recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy supports our local businesses that create jobs, boost our local economy, and preserve our communities; and WHERAS, advocacy groups, as well as public and private organizations, across the country have endorsed the Saturday after Thanksgiving as Small Business Saturday. NOW, THEREFORE I, Marie Blankley, Mayor of the City of Gilroy on this 15th day of November, 2021, along with my colleagues on the City Council as Mayor, do hereby proclaim November 27, 2021 as Small Business Saturday And urge the residents of Gilroy, and communities across the country, to support small businesses and merchants on Small Business Saturday and throughout the year. Marie Blankley, Mayor 2.A.2 Packet Pg. 10 Communication: Proclamation Naming November 27, 2021 as Small Business Saturday (Proclamations, Awards, and Presentations) City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Change of Date for First Council Meeting in January from January 3, 2022 to January 10, 2022 Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: City Clerk Submitted By: LeeAnn McPhillips Prepared By: LeeAnn McPhillips Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION Change first Council meeting in January from January 3, 2022 to January 10, 2022. BACKGROUND As Council is aware, City offices will be closed during the holidays from December 23, 2021 – January 2, 2022. Offices will reopen on Monday, January 3, 2022. Currently the City Council meeting calendar notes the first Council meeting of the 2022 year on January 3, 2022. This would require staff to prepare and issue an agenda packet the week prior while offices are closed. Therefore, staff is recommending that the first meeting in January be changed to January 10, 2022 which allows the packet to be issued the week prior when City offices are open after the holidays. 6.A Packet Pg. 11 RECOMMENDATION Change the January 2, 2022 Council meeting to January 10, 2022. 6.A Packet Pg. 12 City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Introduction of An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy Amending Gilroy City Code Chapter 12 to Add a New Article VI, Entitled Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, to Chapter 12 of the Gilroy City Code to Implement the Requirements of SB 1383 Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Administration Submitted By: Jimmy Forbis Prepared By: Bryce Atkins Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization  Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION a) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading. b) Introduce an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy amending Gilroy City Code Chapter 12 to add a new Article VI, entitled Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, to Chapter 12 of the Gilroy City Code to implement the requirements of SB 1383. BACKGROUND Senate Bill No. 1383 (SB 1383) was signed into law on September 19, 2016 to reduce organic waste disposal by 75% and increase edible food recovery by 20% by 2025. SB 8.A Packet Pg. 13 1383 established methane emission reduction targets in a statewide effort to address the impacts of climate change on human health and the environment. A major source of methane is from organic waste decomposing in landfills. Organic waste includes green waste, wood waste, food waste, and fibers such as paper and cardboard. Organic waste is the largest waste stream in California and comprises two-thirds of the total waste stream. To reduce methane gasses generated by organic waste in landfills, SB 1383 contains provisions for organic waste recycling and edible food recovery, including a requirement that jurisdictions adopt ordinances and implement programs to ensure compliance by January 1, 2022. This legislation requires all businesses, residents, and multi-family apartments to have access to recycling programs that capture food scraps, landscaping waste, among other organic waste materials. As a result of SB 1383, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), which is the state department tasked with administering California’s waste and recycling programs, developed prescriptive regulations to achieve the State’s outlined organic waste disposal goals by 2025. Over the last two years, CalRecycle conducted informal hearings with local go vernments and stakeholders to develop regulations to achieve the State’s organic waste reduction mandates. In November 2020, CalRecycle released the final regulations for SB 1383. City staff, including both internal staff and contracted shared staffing with Morgan Hill’s Environmental Services Division, have been working in concert with Santa Clara County and our exclusive franchise solid waste hauler to prepare for and implement SB 1383. The City is currently in negotiations with Recology South Valley, the exclusive franchisee, to update the franchise agreement including preparations to implement this legislation and its imposed requirements on the City. The purpose of this agenda item is to introduce an ordinance (Attachment A) updating Chapter 12, Garbage Refuse and Weeds, of the City of Gilroy Municipal Code to bring the City’s code into compliance with SB 1383. The proposed ordinance is based largely on the Model Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (Model Ordinance) released by CalRecycle in January 2021. The proposed ordinance language is also based on a coordinated countywide effort that adjusted relevant sections of the Model Ordinance to accommodate a regional edible food recovery program. ANALYSIS SB 1383 is an unfunded state mandate from Sacramento. SB 1383 regulations provide CalRecycle the ability to engage enforcement actions of its own against the City if their designated level of compliance is not attained. Essentially, it requires the City to be the enforcer for the State, and issue citations and other enforcement measures in the City’s own name on behalf of the State. If the City fails to meet the goals in CalRecycle’s perspective, the City may be fined. 8.A Packet Pg. 14 Requirements of SB 1383 As a result of SB 1383 and the regulations established by CalRecycle, the City will have to implement the following practices to be considered compliant: • Provide organic waste recycling services to all residents and businesses. • Inspect and enforce compliance with SB 1383 by adopting an enforcement ordinance (the ordinance being introduced this evening). • Implement an edible food recovery program that recovers edible food from the waste stream. • Conduct outreach and education to all affected parties, including generators, haulers, facilities, and edible food recovery organizations. • Procure recycled organic waste products like compost, mulch, and renewable natural gas. • Maintain accurate and timely records of SB 1383 compliance for annual reporting requirements. On January 1, 2022, CalRecycle’s regulations will become enforceable, and will require each jurisdiction to adopt a mandatory recycling ordinance. SB 1383 allows cities to take an educational and non-punitive approach to enforcement for the first two years of the ordinance being in effect (2022 and 2023). Taking an educational approach will allow the City and its franchise waste hauler to work with residents and businesses to inform them of the requirements. The ordinance requirements can generally be described within the context of two main programs: the Organic Waste Recycling Program and the Edible Food Recovery Program. Organic Waste Recycling Program SB 1383 requires that each jurisdiction in California provide containers to organic waste generators for organic waste recycling. Organic waste generators include single-family residential properties and commercial businesses (including multi-family residential with > 5 units). The basic SB 1383 requirements for organic waste recycling, as written into the ordinance, are summarized below. 1. Materials shall be properly sorted by the organic waste generator. 2. City or designated representative has the right to review the number and size of containers to verify appropriate service levels. 3. The organic waste generator shall adjust service levels for collection services upon City or designated representative’s request. 8.A Packet Pg. 15 4. Generators have the right to manage their organic waste through prevention and reduction. In addition to the items listed above, the following requirements apply to commercial businesses only (not applicable to single-family residential generators). 5. Access to containers with specified labels and colors shall be supplied by businesses for use by employees, contractors, tenants, and customers. 6. Education information shall be provided by businesses before or within fourteen (14) days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes requirements to keep green container organic waste and recyclable materials separate from gray container waste, and the location of containers and the rules governing their use at each property. 7. Excluding multi-family residential dwellings, containers shall be provided for the collection of green container organic waste and recyclable materials in all outdoor and indoor areas where disposal containers are provided for cus tomers, for materials generated by that business. 8. Businesses shall annually provide information to employees, contractors, tenants, and customers about organic waste recovery requirements and proper sorting. City Compliance Strategy for Organic Waste Recycling For compliance with SB 1383 requirements related to organic waste recycling, the City intends to assign the bulk of implementation, inspection, and recording/reporting responsibilities to its solid waste hauler through its Franchise Agreement. Enforcement activities will be completed through coordination with the City or designated representative(s). Edible Food Recovery Program SB 1383 requires each jurisdiction in California to implement an edible food recovery program that will feed hungry people. Edible food generators will be required to arrange food recovery through a contract or written agreement with food recovery organizations or services, who will collect or accept self-hauled edible food for redistribution to hungry Californians. Businesses that generate edible food scraps which are regulated under SB 1383 and the proposed ordinance are as follows: Tier 1 commercial edible food generators will be required to donate their edible food starting January 1, 2022. Tier 1 generators include: • Wholesale food vendors. • Food service providers and distributors. • Grocery stores over 10,000 square feet. 8.A Packet Pg. 16 • Supermarkets. Tier 2 commercial edible food generators will be required to donate their edible food starting January 1, 2024. Tier 2 generators include: • Restaurants over 5,000 square feet. • Hotels with on-site food facilities and 200 or more rooms. • Local education agencies with on-site food facilities. • Large venues/events. • Health facilities with at least 100 beds and on-site food facilities. City Compliance Strategy for Edible Food Waste Recovery For compliance with SB 1383 requirements related to edible food recovery, the City will participate in a centrally managed countywide edible food recovery program organized through the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission (RWRC) in partnership with Joint Venture Silicon Valley (JVSL). A countywide food recovery program will benefit the City and the region in a variety of ways. There is consensus that uniform requirements throughout the county for edible food waste recovery will make it easier for businesses with facilities in multiple cities to comply. Food recovery organizations prefer standardized requirements because they do not normally operate or report on a city-by-city basis. Uniform record keeping and reporting through a countywide centrally managed program will also support countywide capacity planning that is required by SB 1383. The proposed ordinance has been developed with flexible language that will enable future decisions to be made on items that are not fully fleshed out for the countywide food recovery program at this time (e.g., enforcement, funding, MOU, etc.). To date, JVSL has coordinated a Food Recovery Steering Committee to strategize implementation procedures, create education and outreach, develop a countywide ordinance, and make recommendations on future inspection and enforcement processes. Other Regulated Entities There are several entities that will support the Organic Waste Recycling Program and the Edible Food Recovery Program to ensure proper pickup, hauling, recycling and/or redistribution of organic waste and food scraps. SB 1383 and the proposed city ordinance regulate these program support entities, as summarized below, and described in detail in the ordinance (Attachment A). Food Recovery Organizations and Services. Food recovery organizations and services receiving or coordinating the collection of Edible Food directly from Tier 1 or Tier 2 8.A Packet Pg. 17 commercial edible food generators via a contract or written agreement, will have their own set of record keeping and reporting requirements. Haulers including Self-Haulers. Haulers, including self-haulers, must follow requirements related to sorting, selection of facility for material drop-off, education, equipment, signage, container labeling, container color, contamination monitoring, and recording and reporting. Facility Operators and Community Composting Operations. Facility Operators must provide information on capacity and operations upon City request for planning purposes. Inspection and Enforcement The ordinance gives the City or designated representative(s) the authority to inspect and enforce as needed. Inspections may include confirmation of proper placement of materials in containers through route reviews, in-person or electronic review of edible food recovery arrangements and activities, review of records, annual compliance reviews, complaint investigations, or any other inspection to ensure compliance with the requirements of the ordinance. Enforcement may start with a warning and may escalate to issuance of a Notice of Violation with specified penalties and fines. Note, the State’s requirements in this area will require the City to enforce this ordinance with more rigor and force than the City normally enforces other provisions in the Municipal Code. The City will be required to document and report on enforcement activities annually and will be fined itself if ongoing noncompliance by waste generators or others continues without tangible and progressive enforcement activities. The City intends to incorporate a mechanism into the solid waste franchise to fund SB 1383 enforcement efforts completed by the City or designated representative(s). Non-Compliance While the City expects to gain compliance from residents and businesses, SB 1383 regulations allow CalRecycle the ability to enforce against the City if designated levels of compliance are not met. These actions may include any or all the following: • Conducting more frequent inspections. • Taking over direct enforcement on non-compliant businesses within the City. • Establishing a schedule for City compliance and a probationary period, requiring a work plan and that the jurisdiction demonstrates it has sufficient staffing to implement the requirements of the law. • Seeking administrative penalties against the City of up to $10,000 per day . 8.A Packet Pg. 18 Adoption of this ordinance will aid the City in meeting its compliance requirements, and thereby avoid penalties that may be imposed for failure to adopt an enforcement ordinance by January 1, 2022. Implementation Efforts and Organic Waste Recycling Efforts Already in Place Some elements of the SB 1383 requirements are in place, namely the three-cart system including organics for residential customers. This was implemented previously to aid in meeting organic waste diversion goals. Further efforts are currently underway. These efforts include: • A virtual business meeting to discuss the proposed ordinance and requirements of SB 1383 on local businesses was held as a first of what promises to be a long public education campaign to help meet SB 1383 requirements over the next two years. • The exclusive franchise hauler agreement with Recology South Valley is currently in negotiations. A portion of the negotiations involve working to resolve the SB 1383 requirements on refuse haulers to meet the organic waste recycling compliance. Staff will continue to work with our residents, businesses, local associations and other cities and contractors implementing the provisions of the ordinance and SB 1383. Ordinance Provisions The City used the model ordinance from CalRecycle for the creation of the ordinance presented tonight. The draft ordinance was further modified from the model ordinance by sections from Santa Clara County for consistency in language with jurisdictions for better coordination with food rescue and other organics recycling industries in the County. Additionally, further editing was completed by shared staff between the cities of Gilroy and Morgan Hill. Below are high-level descriptions of the contents of the draft ordinance, though residents and businesses are encouraged to read the ordinance to obtain the fine level detail of the requirements. 12.74 – Definitions A large portion of the ordinance is establishing definitions. Many of these definitions help to define other definitions used in the operative portions of the ordinance. As part of the SB 1383 rulemaking process, CalRecycle developed a large series of defined terms with specific meanings tied back to other codes of regulations for the State. To comply with specific state recycling requirements on businesses, the City included the defined terms in the definitions section. 12.75 – Requirements for Single-Family Generators Requires single family residential organic waste generators to 8.A Packet Pg. 19 • Subscribe to organic waste collection services. • Participate in organic waste collection services by placing appropriate material in the designated container, and not cross contaminating the containers. 12.76 – Requirements for Commercial Businesses Requires commercial businesses to: • Subscribe to the three-container collection service. • Place the correct materials into their designated containers. • Provide sufficient containers for employees, contractors, tenants, and customers to comply. • Excluding multi-family residential dwellings, provide source separated green and recyclable containers in all indoor and outdoor areas where disposal containers are provided to customers. The ordinance provides requirements regarding the color and labeling of these containers. • To the extent practical, prohibit employees from cross contaminating the containers. • Annually provide information to employees, customers, etc. about organic waste recovery requirements. • Provide training to new occupants/tenants to a building about the requirements to keep separated organic waste and recyclable material containers. • Provide or arrange access for City, CalRecycle or designee to properties during all inspections in accordance with the ordinance. 12.77 – Waivers for Generators Allows the City to grant waivers to the SB 1383 requirements. Waivers are only granted for businesses that generate a low enough amount of organic waste, or when the physical space is too small to comply. The ordinance has requirements that must be met to be eligible for these waivers. 12.78 – Requirements for Commercial Edible Food Generators Tier 1 and Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators, and large venue and/or event operators must comply with requirements to: • arrange for recovery of the maximum amount of edible food that would otherwise be disposed. • Contract with Food recovery organizations or Food Recovery Services for collection of edible food for recovery. 8.A Packet Pg. 20 • Shall not intentionally spoil edible food capable of being recovered. • Allow the City, CalRecycle or designee access to premises to conduct inspections. • Keep records for required reporting as defined in the ordinance . 12.79 – Requirements for Food Recovery Organizations and Services Food Recovery Organizations and Services are required to maintain significant records regarding the edible food recovered and distributed, and provide consultation to the City, CalRecycle or designee regarding their capacity. 12.80 – Requirements for Haulers and Facility Operators Haulers are required to: • Each year provide to City the facilities to which they will transport organic waste. • Transport recyclable materials. • Obtain approvals from City to haul organic waste. Facilities and Community Composting Operations are required to provide information regarding available or future capacity and information to assist in capacity planning in the City. 12.81 – Self Hauler Requirements Self-Haulers are required to source separate all recyclable and organic waste materials generated on-site, haul to a facility that recovers those materials, and record and report the amounts of waste recovered as outlined in the ordinance. 12.82 – Inspections and Investigations by City Provides for access requirements for all inspections of records and facilities, provision for remote monitoring, and investigating complaints. 12.83 – Enforcement Provides for issuing notices of violations, administrative citations and fines, factors considered in determining penalty amounts, appeals, other remedies, the education period, process for enforcement and civil penalties. Outreach Conducted: Virtual Business Meeting On October 27, 2021, a virtual meeting was held for our business community, the sector of the community that will experience the most administrative and financial impacts from SB 1383. The presentation was conducted by the cities of Gilroy and Morgan Hill. There were over 35 participants on the virtual meeting. Attendees were not required to state which City they were from. Outreach about the virtual meeting was conducted by the 8.A Packet Pg. 21 City’s Communications and Engagement Office. No comments about the ordinance or requirements were raised as part of that meeting. There was a question raised about if a tenant who rents property were to violate, would the tenant be cited or the property owner. The response was that it depends upon the respective city’s municipal code. In the case of the Gilroy City Code, enforcement via administrative citations, contained in Chapter 6A.13 (a) identifies that an enforcement officer has the authority to issue an administrative citation to any person responsible for the violation. Typically, this would be against the tenant if the tenant was the cause of the violation. However, there may be situations where a property owner – either through the lease agreement, their action, or their inaction regarding a circumstance impacting the ability of a tenant to comply – where the property owner may be responsible, and therefore may be cited for the violation. The enforcement officer is granted discretion to make the determination regarding who may be the cause of the violation. A hearing can be scheduled before a hearing officer for administrative citations should the determination of the enforcement officer be contested (Gilroy City Code Section 6A.16). ALTERNATIVES 1. Council may choose not to introduce the ordinance. Not recommended. Per California’s SB 1383, the City is required to adopt an ordinance regarding enforcement of the mandatory reduction of organic waste disposal in the community. The requirement is to adopt an ordinance by January 1, 2022. 2. Direct staff to return with a revised ordinance to be presented at a future City Council meeting. Not recommended. Due to the requirement to adopt an enforcement ordinance before January 1, 2022, a delay in adoption would potentially place the City in a status of non-compliance and subject to enforcement action by CalRecycle. The proposed ordinance was drafted based on CalRecycle’s model ordinance. If there are provisions that Council desires to be changed, a future Council item could be directed to revisit the ordinance language for future amendment to the Gilroy City Code. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE The adoption of the proposed ordinance does not carry any fiscal impact in and of itself. Enforcement of the ordinance’s requirements will come from current appropriations in the adopted budget for code enforcement and environmental services, and coordination of efforts with the City’s exclusive franchise waste hauler. This ordinance is strictly about enforcement. The nature of any recycling programs th rough the refuse hauler will be subject to future Council review and actions. When those approvals are brought to Council for consideration, their fiscal impacts will be presented. Fiscal impacts will be felt by all residents and businesses subscribing to waste collection services since compliance costs for implementation of the Organic Waste Recycling Program will be incorporated into trash hauler franchise fees. Direct costs to the City 8.A Packet Pg. 22 related to participation in the countywide Edible Food Recovery Program are currently unknown, pending further coordination with the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Reduction Commission (RWRC) in partnership with Joint Venture Silicon Valley (JVSL). Refuse haulers and RWRC/JVSL will complete the bulk of the work for City compliance with SB 1383 including general program implementation, inspection, and recording/reporting. General oversite of the programs will be completed by Morgan Hill Environmental Services Division (MH ESD) staff through the Gilroy/Morgan Hill con tract for MH ESD management of Gilroy solid waste compliance programs. On Gilroy’s behalf, MH ESD will oversee preparation of the annual report to the State, coordination with and management of the trash haulers, waivers, active engagement with regional partners in the countywide Edible Food Recovery Program, etc. At this time, it is anticipated that MH ESD will be able to incorporate these activities within their existing work program. CONCLUSION The City of Gilroy’s goal in implementing SB 1383 will be vo luntary compliance. It is the ideal approach to work with the residents and businesses of the City to comply voluntarily, so that no fines or fees are required to be assessed and limit the amount of City resources required to carry out the requirements of SB 1383 and meet the organic waste recycling levels. NEXT STEPS Schedule the second reading and adoption of the ordinance for the December 6, 2021, regular meeting of the Gilroy City Council. PUBLIC OUTREACH Staff sent a flyer out to all businesses that briefly described the ordinance being proposed. The flyer had a QR Code and a webpage URL where recipients of the flyer could go to view the draft ordinance. A Business Community Meeting was organized and advertised on the flyer. The Business Community Meeting and webpage details were advertised in the City’s newsletter, as well as in the Chamber of Commerce Newsletter. The flyer was mailed out in both English and Spanish languages, and the Business Community Meeting held on October 27, 2021, included Spa nish translation. Information about the requirements of this ordinance and the upcoming recycling requirements were presented at this meeting. Additionally, in 2021 outreach was conducted by JVSL to all Tier 1 edible food generators in the County of Santa Clara notifying them of their food recovery responsibilities starting in January of 2022. This introduction and public hearing of the proposed ordinance was advertised in the Gilroy Dispatch on November 5, 2021. The advertisement also included the potential 8.A Packet Pg. 23 adoption at the next regular City Council meeting on December 6, 2021, and provided a high-level summary of the ordinance. Once an ordinance is adopted, the conditions within it as well as other SB 1383 information will be shared as the education and awareness campaign for the next two years commences. Attachments: 1. DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) 8.A Packet Pg. 24 -1- ORDINANCE NO. 2021-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY AMENDING GILROY CITY CODE CHAPTER 12 TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION, TO CHAPTER 12 OF THE GILROY CITY CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SB 1383 WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy (City) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1383 (SB 1383), the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act of 2016, requires the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop regulations to reduce organics in landfills as a source of methane. As adopted by CalRecycle, these SB 1383 regulations (SB 1383 Regulations) place requirements on multiple entities, including the City, residential households, commercial businesses and business owners, commercial edible food generators, haulers, self-haulers, food recovery organizations, and food recovery services to support achievement of statewide organic waste disposal reduction targets; and WHEREAS, the SB 1383 Regulations require the City to adopt and enforce an ordinance or other enforceable mechanism to implement relevant provisions of the SB 1383 Regulations; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance implements the requirements of the SB 1383 Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I Article VI entitled Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction, is hereby added to Chapter 12, to read as follows: ARTICLE VI. MANDATORY ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION 12.74 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations have the meaning given in this section: “Blue Container” has the same meaning as in 14 CCR Section 18982.2(a)(5) and shall be used for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Recyclable Materials or Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -2- “CalRecycle” means California's Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, which is the Department designated with responsibility for developing, implementing, and enforcing SB 1383 Regulations on cities (and others). “California Code of Regulations” or “CCR” means the State of California Code of Regulations. CCR references in this ordinance are preceded with a number that refers to the relevant Title of the CCR (e.g., “14 CCR” refers to Title 14 of CCR). “Commercial Business” or “Commercial” means a firm, partnership, proprietorship, joint-stock company, corporation, or association, whether for-profit or nonprofit, strip mall, industrial facility, or a multifamily residential dwelling, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(6). A Multi-Family Residential Dwelling that consists of fewer than five (5) units is not a Commercial Business for purposes of implementing this ordinance. “Commercial Edible Food Generator” includes a Tier One or a Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator as defined in Section 12.74 of this ordinance or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(73) and (a)(74). For the purposes of this definition, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services are not Commercial Edible Food Generators pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(7). “Compliance Review” means a review of records by the City, Department, or Designee to determine compliance with this ordinance. “Community Composting” means any activity that composts green material, agricultural material, food material, and vegetative food material, alone or in combination, and the total amount of feedstock and Compost on-site at any one time does not exceed 100 cubic yards and 750 square feet, as specified in 14 CCR Section 17855(a)(4); or, as otherwise defined by 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(8). “Compost” has the same meaning as in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4), which stated, as of the effective date of this ordinance, that “Compost” means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic solid Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -3- “Compostable Plastics” or “Compostable Plastic” means plastic materials that meet the ASTM D6400 standard for compostability, or as otherwise described in 14 CCR Section 18984.1(a)(1)(A) or 18984.2(a)(1)(C). “Container Contamination” or “Contaminated Container” means a container, regardless of color, that contains Prohibited Container Contaminants, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(55). “C&D” means construction and demolition debris. “Department” or “authorized Department” means any department of the County of Santa Clara, or any other public agency authorized by the City to enforce or administer this chapter, as authorized in 14 C.C.R. Section 18981.2. “Designee” means any private entity that the City or authorized Department contracts with or otherwise designates to carry out any of the City’s responsibilities of this chapter as authorized in 14 CCR Section 18981.2. A Designee may be a hauler, a private entity, or a combination of private entities. “Edible Food” means food intended for human consumption, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(18). For the purposes of this chapter, “Edible Food” is not Solid Waste if it is recovered and not discarded. Nothing in this ordinance or in 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12 requires or authorizes the recovery of edible food that does not meet the food safety requirements of the California Retail Food Code. “Enforcement Action" means an action of the City or authorized Department to address non- compliance with this ordinance including, but not limited to, issuing administrative citations, fines, penalties, or using other remedies. “Excluded Waste” means hazardous substance, hazardous waste, infectious waste, designated waste, volatile, corrosive, medical waste, infectious, regulated radioactive waste, and toxic substances or material that facility operator(s), which receive materials from the City and its generators, reasonably believe(s) would, as a result of or upon acceptance, transfer, processing, or disposal, be a violation of local, State, or Federal law, regulation, or ordinance, including: land 8.A.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -4- use restrictions or conditions, waste that cannot be disposed of in Class III landfills or accepted at the facility by permit conditions, waste that in the City, or its Designee’s reasonable opinion would present a significant risk to human health or the environment, cause a nuisance or otherwise create or expose City, or its Designee, to potential liability; but not including de minimis volumes or concentrations of waste of a type and amount normally found in Single- Family or Multi-Family Solid Waste after implementation of programs for the safe collection, processing, recycling, treatment, and disposal of batteries and paint in compliance with sections 41500 and 41802 of the California Public Resources Code. Excluded Waste does not include used motor oil and filters and/or household batteries when the generator or customer has properly placed the materials for collection pursuant to instructions provided by City or its Designee for collection services. “Food Distributor” means a company that distributes food to entities including, but not limited to, Supermarkets and Grocery Stores, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(22). “Food Facility” means an operation that stores, prepares, packages, serves, vends, or otherwise provides food for human consumption at the retail level, including, but not limited to facilities listed in Section 113789 of the Health and Safety Code. “Food Recovery” means actions to collect and distribute food for human consumption that otherwise would be disposed, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(24). “Food Recovery Organization” means an entity that engages in the collection or receipt of edible food from commercial edible food generators and distributes that edible food to the public for food recovery either directly or through other entities. “Food Recovery Organization” includes, but is not limited to: (1) A food bank as defined in Section 113783 of the Health and Safety Code; (2) A nonprofit charitable organization as defined in Section 113841 of the Health and Safety code; and (3) A nonprofit charitable temporary food facility as defined in Section 113842 of the Health and Safety Code. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -5- A Food Recovery Organization is not a commercial edible food generator for the purposes of this chapter and implementation of 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12 pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(7). If the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(25) for Food Recovery Organization differs from this definition, the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(25) shall apply to this chapter. “Food Recovery Service” means a person or entity that collects and transports Edible Food from a commercial edible food generator to a Food Recovery Organization or other entities for Food Recovery, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(26). A Food Recovery Service is not a Commercial Edible Food Generator. “Food Scraps” means all food such as, but not limited to, fruits, vegetables, meat, poultry, seafood, shellfish, bones, rice, beans, pasta, bread, cheese, and eggshells. Food Scraps excludes fats, oils, and grease when such materials are Source Separated from other Food Scraps. “Food Service Provider” means an entity primarily engaged in providing food services to institutional, governmental, commercial, or industrial locations of others based on contractual arrangements with these types of organizations, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(27). “Food-Soiled Paper” is compostable paper material that has come in contact with food or liquid, such as, but not limited to, compostable paper plates, paper coffee cups, napkins, pizza boxes, and milk cartons. “Food Waste” means Food Scraps, Food-Soiled Paper, and Compostable Plastics. “Gray Container” has the same meaning as in 14 CCR Section 18982.2(a)(28) and shall be used for the purpose of storage and collection of Gray Container Waste. “Gray Container Waste” means Solid Waste that is collected in a Gray Container that is part of a three-container Organic Waste collection service that prohibits the placement of Organic Waste in the Gray Container as specified in 14 CCR Sections 18984.1(a) and (b), or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17402(a)(6.5). 8.A.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -6- “Green Container” has the same meaning as in 14 CCR Section 18982.2(a)(29) and shall be used for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste. “Grocery Store” means a store primarily engaged in the retail sale of canned food; dry goods; fresh fruits and vegetables; fresh meats, fish, and poultry; and any area that is not separately owned within the store where the food is prepared and served, including a bakery, deli, and meat and seafood departments, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(30). “Hauler Route” means the designated itinerary or sequence of stops for each segment of the city’s collection service area, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(31.5). “Health Facility” has the same meaning as in Section 1250 of the Health and Safety Code. “High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility” means a facility that is in compliance with the reporting requirements of 14 CCR Section 18815.5(d) and meets or exceeds an annual average Mixed Waste organic content Recovery rate of 50 percent between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2024, and 75 percent after January 1, 2025, as calculated pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18815.5(e) for Organic Waste received from the “Mixed waste organic collection stream” as defined in 14 CCR Section 17402(a)(11.5); or, as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(33). “Hotel” has the same meaning as in Section 17210 of the Business and Professions code. “Inspection” means the City, an authorized Department, or their Designee’s electronic or onsite review of records, containers, and an entity’s collection, handling, recycling, or landfill disposal of organic waste or edible food handling to determine if the entity is complying with requirements set forth in this chapter, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(35). “City Enforcement Official” means the director of public works or designated city department, or the authorized Department who is/are partially or wholly responsible for enforcing the ordinance. See also “Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official”. “Large Event” means an event, including, but not limited to, a sporting event or a flea market, that charges an admission price, or is operated by a local agency, and serves an average of more than 2,000 individuals per day of operation of the event, at a location that includes, but is not 8.A.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -7- limited to, a public, nonprofit, or privately owned park, parking lot, golf course, street system, or other open space when being used for an event. If the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(38) differs from this definition, the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(38) shall apply to this Chapter. “Large Venue” means a permanent venue facility that annually seats or serves an average of more than 2,000 individuals within the grounds of the facility per day of operation of the venue facility. A venue facility includes, but is not limited to, a public, nonprofit, or privately owned or operated stadium, amphitheater, arena, hall, amusement park, conference or civic center, zoo, aquarium, airport, racetrack, horse track, performing arts center, fairground, museum, theater, or other public attraction facility. A site under common ownership or control that includes more than one Large Venue that is contiguous with other Large Venues in the site, is a single Large Venue. If the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(39) differs from this definition, the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(39) shall apply to this chapter. “Local Education Agency” means a school district, charter school, or county office of education that is not subject to the control of city or county regulations related to Solid Waste, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(40). “Multi-Family Residential Dwelling” or “Multi-Family” means of, from, or pertaining to residential premises with five (5) or more dwelling units. Multi-Family premises do not include hotels, motels, or other transient occupancy facilities, which are considered Commercial Businesses. Under the SB 1383 Regulations and for the purpose of this ordinance, Multi-Family Residential Dwellings with five (5) or more units are included under the definition of a Commercial Business per 14 CCR “Non-Compostable Paper” includes but is not limited to paper that is coated in a plastic material that will not breakdown in the composting process, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(41). “Non-Local Entity” means an entity that is an organic waste generator but is not subject to the control of a jurisdiction’s regulations related to solid waste. These entities may include, but are not limited to, special districts, federal facilities, prisons, facilities operated by the state parks 8.A.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -8- system, public universities, including community colleges, county fairgrounds, and state agencies. “Non-Organic Recyclables” means non-putrescible and non-hazardous recyclable wastes including but not limited to bottles, cans, metals, plastics and glass, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(43). “Notice of Violation (NOV)” means a notice that a violation has occurred that includes a compliance date to avoid an action to seek penalties, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(45) or further explained in 14 CCR Section 18995.4. “Organic Waste” means Solid Wastes containing material originated from living organisms and their metabolic waste products, including but not limited to food, green material, landscape and pruning waste, organic textiles and carpets, lumber, wood, Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, manure, biosolids, digestate, and sludges or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(46). Biosolids and digestate are as defined by 14 CCR Section 18982(a). “Organic Waste Generator” means a person or entity that is responsible for the initial creation of Organic Waste, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(48). “Paper Products” include, but are not limited to, paper janitorial supplies, cartons, wrapping, packaging, file folders, hanging files, corrugated boxes, tissue, and toweling, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(51). “Printing and Writing Papers” include, but are not limited to, copy, xerographic, watermark, cotton fiber, offset, forms, computer printout paper, white wove envelopes, manila envelopes, book paper, note pads, writing tablets, newsprint, and other uncoated writing papers, posters, index cards, calendars, brochures, reports, magazines, and publications, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(54). “Prohibited Container Contaminants” means the following: (i) discarded materials placed in the Blue Container that are not identified as acceptable Source Separated Recyclable Materials for the City’s Blue Container; (ii) discarded materials placed in the Green Container that are not identified as acceptable Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste for the City’s Green 8.A.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -9- Container; (iii) discarded materials placed in the Gray Container that are acceptable Source Separated Recyclable Materials and/or Source Separated Green Container Organic Wastes to be placed in City’s Green Container and/or Blue Container; and, (iv) Excluded Waste placed in any container. “Recovered Organic Waste Products” means products made from California, landfill-diverted recovered Organic Waste processed in a permitted or otherwise authorized facility, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(60). “Recovery” means any activity or process described in 14 CCR Section 18983.1(b), or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(49). “Recycled-Content Paper” means Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least 30 percent, by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(61). “Regional Agency” means regional agency as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40181. “Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official” means a regional or county agency enforcement official, authorized by the City with responsibility for enforcing the ordinance in conjunction or consultation with City Enforcement Official. “Remote Monitoring” means the use of the internet of things (IoT) and/or wireless electronic devices to visualize the contents of Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers for purposes of identifying the quantity of materials in containers (level of fill) and/or presence of Prohibited Container Contaminants. “Renewable Gas” means gas derived from Organic Waste that has been diverted from a California landfill and processed at an in-vessel digestion facility that is permitted or otherwise authorized by 14 CCR to recycle Organic Waste, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(62). “Restaurant” means an establishment primarily engaged in the retail sale of food and drinks for on-premises or immediate consumption, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(64). 8.A.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -10- “Route Review” means a visual Inspection of containers along a Hauler Route for the purpose of determining Container Contamination, and may include mechanical Inspection methods such as the use of cameras, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(65). “SB 1383” means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on September 19, 2016, which added Sections 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 to the Health and Safety Code, and added Chapter 13.1 (commencing with Section 42652) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a Statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time. “SB 1383 Regulations” or “SB 1383 Regulatory” means or refers to, for the purposes of this ordinance, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Reduction regulations developed by CalRecycle and adopted in 2020 that created 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12 and amended portions of regulations of 14 CCR and 27 CCR. “Self-Hauler” means a person, who hauls Solid Waste, Organic Waste or recyclable material he or she has generated to another person. Self-hauler also includes a person who back-hauls waste, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(66). Back-haul means generating and transporting Organic Waste to a destination owned and operated by the generator using the generator’s own employees and equipment, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(66)(A). “Share Table” has the same meaning as in Section 114079 of the Health and Safety Code. “Single-Family” for the purpose of this ordinance means of, from, or pertaining to any residential premises with fewer than five (5) units. “Solid Waste” or “Solid Waste Matter” has the same meaning as defined in State Public Resources Code Section 40191, which defines Solid Waste as all putrescible and non-putrescible solid, semisolid, and liquid wastes, including garbage, trash, refuse, paper, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles and parts thereof, discarded home and industrial appliances, dewatered, treated, or chemically fixed sewage sludge which is not hazardous waste, manure, vegetable or animal solid and semi-solid wastes, and 8.A.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -11- other discarded solid and semisolid wastes, with the exception that Solid Waste does not include any of the following wastes: (1) Hazardous waste, as defined in the State Public Resources Code Section 40141. (2) Radioactive waste regulated pursuant to the State Radiation Control Law (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 114960) of Part 9 of Division 104 of the State Health and Safety Code). (3) Medical waste regulated pursuant to the State Medical Waste Management Act (Part 14 (commencing with Section 117600) of Division 104 of the State Health and Safety Code). Untreated medical waste shall not be disposed of in a Solid Waste landfill, as defined in State Public Resources Code Section 40195.1. Medical waste that has been treated and deemed to be Solid Waste shall be regulated pursuant to Division 30 of the State Public Resources Code. "Solid waste collector" means any person with whom the City has duly contracted under the terms set out in this chapter, to collect and transport solid waste matter through the streets, alleys or public ways of the city. “Source Separated” means materials, including commingled recyclable materials, that have been separated or kept separate from the Solid Waste stream, at the point of generation, for the purpose of additional sorting or processing those materials for recycling or reuse in order to return them to the economic mainstream in the form of raw material for new, reused, or reconstituted products, which meet the quality standards necessary to be used in the marketplace, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17402.5(b)(4). For the purposes of this chapter, Source Separated shall include separation of materials by the generator, property owner, property owner’s employee, property manager, or property manager’s employee into different containers for the purpose of collection such that Source Separated materials are separated from Gray Container Waste or other Solid Waste for the purposes of collection and processing. “Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste” means Source Separated Organic Wastes that can be placed in a Blue Container that is limited to the collection of those Organic Wastes and 8.A.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -12- Non-Organic Recyclables as defined in Section 18982(a)(43), or as otherwise defined by Section 17402(a)(18.7) such as Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper. “Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste” means Source Separated Organic Waste that can be placed in a Green Container that is specifically intended for the separate collection of Organic Waste by the generator, excluding Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste, carpets, Non-Compostable Paper, and textiles. “Source Separated Recyclable Materials” means Source Separated Non-Organic Recyclables and Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste. “State” means the State of California. “Supermarket” means a full-line, self-service retail store with gross annual sales of two million dollars ($2,000,000), or more, and which sells a line of dry grocery, canned goods, or nonfood items and some perishable items, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(71). “Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator” means the following: (1) Supermarket, as defined above. (2) Grocery Store with a total facility size equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet. (3) Food Service Provider, as defined above. (4) Food Distributor, as defined above. (5) Wholesale Food Vendor, as defined above. (i) If the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(73) of Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator differs from this definition, the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(73) shall apply to this ordinance. (ii) For the purposes of this chapter, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services are not commercial edible food generators. “Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator” means the following: 8.A.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -13- (1) Restaurant with 250 or more seats, or a total facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. (2) Hotel with an on-site Food Facility and 200 or more rooms. (3) Health facility with an on-site Food Facility and 100 or more beds. (4) Large Venues, as defined above. (5) Large Event, as defined above. (6) A State agency with a cafeteria with 250 or more seats or total cafeteria facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. (7) Local Education Agency facilities, as defined above, with on-site Food Facilities, as defined above. (i) If the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(74) of Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator differs from this definition, the definition in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(74) shall apply to this ordinance. (ii) Non-local entities that operate a facility that meets this definition are Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators. (iii) For the purposes of this chapter, food recovery organizations and food recovery services are not commercial edible food generators. “Wholesale Food Vendor” means a business or establishment engaged in the merchant wholesale distribution of food, where food (including fruits and vegetables) is received, shipped, stored, prepared for distribution to a retailer, warehouse, distributor, or other destination, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 189852(a)(76). 12.75 Requirements for Single-Family Generators. Single-Family Organic Waste Generators shall comply with the following requirements: 8.A.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -14- (a) Shall subscribe to City’s Organic Waste collection services for all Organic Waste generated as described below in Section 12.75(b). City, authorized Department and/or Designee shall have the right to review the number and size of a generator’s containers to evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each type of collection service for proper separation of materials and containment of materials; and, Single-Family generators shall adjust its service level for its collection services as requested by the City, authorized Department or Designee. Generators may additionally manage their Organic Waste by preventing or reducing their Organic Waste, managing Organic Waste on site, and/or using a Community Composting site pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.9(c). (b) Shall participate in the City’s Organic Waste collection service(s) by placing designated materials in designated containers as described below, and shall not place Prohibited Container Contaminants in collection containers. Generator shall place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including Food Waste, in the Green Container; Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue Container; and Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container. Generators shall not place materials designated for the Gray Container into the Green Container or Blue Container. 12.76 Requirements for Commercial Businesses. Generators that are Commercial Businesses, including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings, shall: (a) Subscribe to City’s three-container collection services and comply with requirements of those services as described below in Section 12.76(b), except Commercial Businesses that meet the Self-Hauler requirements in Section 12.81 of this ordinance. City shall have the right to review the number and size of a generator’s containers and frequency of collection to evaluate adequacy of capacity provided for each type of collection service for proper separation of materials and containment of materials; and Commercial Businesses shall adjust their service level for their collection services as requested by the City. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -15- (b) Except Commercial Businesses that meet the Self-Hauler requirements in Section 12.81 of this ordinance, participate in the City’s Organic Waste collection service(s) by placing designated materials in designated containers as described below. (1) Generator shall place Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, including Food Waste, in the Green Container; Source Separated Recyclable Materials in the Blue Container; and Gray Container Waste in the Gray Container. Generator shall not place materials designated for the Gray Container into the Green Container or Blue Container. (c) Supply and allow access to adequate number, size and location of collection containers with sufficient labels or colors (conforming with sections 12.76(d)(1) and 12.76(d)(2) below) for employees, contractors, tenants, and customers, consistent with the City’s Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container collection service or, if self-hauling, per the Commercial Businesses’ instructions to support its compliance with its self-haul program, in accordance with Section 12.81. (d) Excluding Multi-Family Residential Dwellings, provide containers for the collection of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials in all indoor and outdoor areas where disposal containers are provided for customers, for materials generated by that business. Such containers do not need to be provided in restrooms. If a Commercial Business does not generate any of the materials that would be collected in one type of container, then the business does not have to provide that particular container in all areas where disposal containers are provided for customers. Pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.9(b), the containers provided by the business shall have either: (1) A body or lid that conforms with the container colors provided through the collection service provided by the City, with either lids conforming to the color requirements or bodies conforming to the color requirements or both lids and bodies conforming to color requirements. A Commercial Business is not required to replace functional containers, including containers purchased prior to January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the requirements of the subsection prior to the end of the useful life of those containers, or prior to January 1, 2036, whichever comes first. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -16- (2) Container labels that include language or graphic images, or both, indicating the primary material accepted and the primary materials prohibited in that container, or containers with imprinted text or graphic images that indicate the primary materials accepted and primary materials prohibited in the container. Pursuant 14 CCR Section 18984.8, the container labeling requirements are required on new containers commencing January 1, 2022. (e) Multi-Family Residential Dwellings are not required to comply with container placement requirements or labeling requirement in Section 12.76(d) pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.9(b). (f) To the extent practical through education, training, Inspection, and/or other measures, excluding Multi-Family Residential Dwellings, prohibit employees from placing materials in a container not designated for those materials per the City’s Blue Container, Green Container, and Gray Container collection service or, if self-hauling, per the Commercial Businesses’ instructions to support its compliance with its self-haul program, in accordance with Section 12.81. (g) Excluding Multi-Family Residential Dwellings, periodically inspect Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers for contamination and inform employees if containers are contaminated and of the requirements to keep contaminants out of those containers pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.9(b)(3). (h) Annually provide information to employees, contractors, tenants, and customers about Organic Waste Recovery requirements and about proper sorting of Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials. (i) Provide education information before or within fourteen (14) days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes requirements to keep Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials separate from Gray Container Waste (when applicable) and the location of containers and the rules governing their use at each property. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -17- (j) Provide or arrange access for City, Department and/or Designee to properties during all Inspections conducted in accordance with Section 12.82 of this ordinance to confirm compliance with the requirements of this ordinance. (k) If applicable, accommodate and cooperate with City’s Remote Monitoring program for Inspection of the contents of containers for Prohibited Container Contaminants, which may be implemented at a later date, to evaluate generator’s compliance with Section 12.76(b). If implemented, the Remote Monitoring program shall involve installation of Remote Monitoring equipment on or in the Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers. (l) At Commercial Business’s option and subject to approval required from the City, implement a Remote Monitoring program for Inspection of the contents of its Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers for the purpose of monitoring the contents of containers to determine appropriate levels of service and to identify Prohibited Container Contaminants. Generators may install Remote Monitoring devices on or in the Blue Containers, Green Containers, and Gray Containers subject to written notification to and approval by the City, authorized Department, or its Designee. (m) If a Commercial Business wants to self-haul, meet the Self-Hauler requirements in Section 12.81 of this ordinance. (n) Nothing in this section prohibits a generator from preventing or reducing waste generation, managing Organic Waste on site, or using a Community Composting site pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.9(c). (o) Commercial Businesses that are Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators shall comply with Food Recovery requirements, pursuant to Section 12.78. 12.77 Waivers for Generators. (a) De Minimis Waivers: A city may waive a Commercial Business’ obligation (including Multi- Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the Organic Waste requirements of this ordinance if the Commercial Business provides documentation that the business generates 8.A.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -18- below a certain amount of Organic Waste material as described in Section 12.77(a)(2) below. Commercial Businesses requesting a de minimis waiver shall: (1) Submit an application specifying the services that they are requesting a waiver from and provide documentation as noted in Section 12.77(a)(2) below. (2) Provide documentation that either: (i) The Commercial Business’ total Solid Waste collection service is two cubic yards or more per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 20 gallons per week per applicable container of the business’ total waste; or, (ii) The Commercial Business’ total Solid Waste collection service is less than two cubic yards per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 10 gallons per week per applicable container of the business’ total waste. (3) Notify City if circumstances change such that Commercial Business’s Organic Waste exceeds threshold required for waiver, in which case waiver will be rescinded. (4) Provide written verification of eligibility for de minimis waiver every 5 years, if City has approved de minimis waiver. (b) Physical Space Waivers: City may waive a Commercial Business’ or property owner’s obligations (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the recyclable materials and/or Organic Waste collection service requirements if the City has evidence from its own staff, a hauler, licensed architect, or licensed engineer demonstrating that the premises lacks adequate space for the collection containers required for compliance with the Organic Waste collection requirements of Section 12.76. A Commercial Business or property owner may request a physical space waiver through the following process: (1) Submit an application form specifying the type(s) of collection services for which they are requesting a compliance waiver. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -19- (2) Provide documentation that the premises lacks adequate space for Blue /Brown Containers and/or Green Containers including documentation from its hauler, licensed architect, or licensed engineer. (3) Provide written verification to City that it is still eligible for physical space waiver every five years, if City has approved application for a physical space waiver. 12.78 Requirements for Commercial Edible Food Generators. (a) Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply with the requirements of this section commencing January 1, 2022, and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply commencing January 1, 2024, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.3. (b) Large Venue or Large Event operators not providing food services, but allowing for food to be provided by others, shall require Food Facilities operating at the Large Venue or Large Event to comply with the requirements of this section, commencing January 1, 2024. (c) Tier One and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Arrange to recover the maximum amount of Edible Food that would otherwise be disposed. (2) Contract with, or enter into a written agreement with Food Recovery Organizations or Food Recovery Services for: (i) the collection of Edible Food for Food Recovery; or, (ii) acceptance of the Edible Food that the Commercial Edible Food Generator self- hauls to the Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery. (3) Shall not intentionally spoil Edible Food that is capable of being recovered by a Food Recovery Organization or a Food Recovery Service. (4) Allow the City, authorized Department and/or Designee to access the premises, conduct Inspections, and review electronic and hard copy records pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.4. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -20- (5) Keep records that include the following information, or as otherwise specified in 14 CCR Section 18991.4: (i) A list of each Food Recovery Service or Organization that collects or receives its Edible Food pursuant to a contract or written agreement established under 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b). (ii) A copy of all contracts or written agreements established under 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b). A copy of all contracts or written agreements established under 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b). (iii) A record of the following information for each of those Food Recovery Services or Food Recovery Organizations: • The name, address and contact information of the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization. • The types of food that will be collected by or self-hauled to the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization. • The established frequency that food will be collected or self-hauled. • The quantity of food, measured in pounds recovered per month, collected or self-hauled to a Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery. (d) Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators shall submit Food Recovery Reports, as defined below, to the City, authorized Department or Designee according to the following schedule: (1) On or before August 1, 2022, Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators shall submit a Food Recovery Report for the period of January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022. (2) On or before May 1, 2023, and on or before May 1st each year thereafter, Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators shall submit a Food Recovery Report for the period covering the entire previous calendar year. (e) Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators shall submit Food Recovery Reports, as defined below, to the City, authorized Department or Designee according to the following schedule: 8.A.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -21- (1) On or before May 1, 2025, and on or before May 1st each year thereafter, Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators shall submit a Food Recovery Report for the period covering the entire previous calendar year. (f) Food Recovery Reports submitted by Tier One and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators shall include the following information: (1) The name and address of the Commercial Edible Food Generator; (2) The name of the person responsible for the Commercial Edible Food Generator’s edible food recovery program; (3) A list of all contracted Food Recovery Services or Food Recovery Organizations that collect Edible Food from the Commercial Edible Food Generator; (4) The total number of pounds of Edible Food, per year, donated through a contracted Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service. (g) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit or conflict with the protections provided by the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 2017, the Federal Good Samaritan Act, or share table and school food donation guidance issued by the California Department of Education pursuant to Senate Bill 557 (2017). 12.79 Requirements for Food Recovery Organizations and Services. (a) Food Recovery Services collecting, receiving, or coordinating the collection of Edible Food directly from Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators, via a contract or written agreement established under 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b), shall maintain the following records, or as otherwise specified by 14 CCR Section 18991.5(a)(1): (1) The name, address, and contact information for each Commercial Edible Food Generator from which the Service collects Edible Food. (2) The quantity in pounds of Edible Food collected from each Commercial Edible Food Generator per month. (3) The quantity in pounds of Edible Food transported to each Food Recovery Organization per month. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -22- (4) The name, address, and contact information for each Food Recovery Organization that the Food Recovery Service transports Edible Food to for Food Recovery. (b) Food Recovery Organizations collecting, receiving, or coordinating the collection of Edible Food directly from Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators, via a contract or written agreement established under 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b), shall maintain the following records, or as otherwise specified by 14 CCR Section 18991.5(a)(2): (1) The name, address, and contact information for each Commercial Edible Food Generator from which the Organization receives Edible Food. (2) The quantity in pounds of Edible Food received from each Commercial Edible Food Generator per month. (3) The name, address, and contact information for each Food Recovery Service that the organization receives Edible Food from for Food Recovery. (c) Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services that have their primary address physically located in the city and contract with or have written agreements with one or more Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b) shall submit Food Recovery Reports, as defined below, to the City, authorized Department and/or Designee according to the following schedule: (1) On or before August 1, 2022, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services shall submit a Food Recovery Report for the period of January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022; (2) On or before May 1, 2023, and on or before May 1st each year thereafter, Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services shall submit a Food Recovery Report for the period covering the entire previous calendar year. (d) Food Recovery reports submitted by Food Recovery Services or Organizations shall include the following information: (1) Total pounds of Edible Food recovered in the previous calendar year from Tier One and Tier Two Edible Food Generators with whom the reporting entity has a contract or written agreement pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b). 8.A.a Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -23- (2) Total pounds of Edible Food recovered in the previous calendar year from Tier One and Tier Two Edible Food Generators within Santa Clara County with whom the reporting entity has a contract or written agreement pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b). (e) In order to support Edible Food Recovery capacity planning assessments or other studies conducted by the City, the County of Santa Clara or other authorized Department or their Designees, Food Recovery Services and Food Recovery Organizations operating in the city shall provide information and consultation to the City, Department, or Designee upon request, regarding existing, or proposed new or expanded, Food Recovery capacity that could be accessed by the City and its Tier One and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators. A Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization contacted by the City, authorized Department, or a Designee shall respond to such request for information within 60 days, unless a shorter timeframe is specified. 12.80 Requirements for Haulers and Facility Operators. (a) Requirements for Haulers are as follows: (1) All haulers including exclusive franchised haulers, non-exclusive franchised haulers, permitted haulers, and licensed haulers providing residential, Commercial, or industrial Organic Waste collection services to generators within city boundaries shall meet the following requirements and standards as a condition of approval of a contract, agreement, or other authorization with the City to collect Organic Waste: (i) Through written notice to the City annually on or before February 1 of each year, identify the facilities to which they will transport Organic Waste including facilities for Source Separated Recyclable Materials and Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, and Mixed Waste. (ii) Transport Source Separated Recyclable Materials and Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste to a facility, operation, activity, or property that recovers Organic Waste as defined in 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 2. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -24- (iii)Obtain approval from the City to haul Organic Waste, unless it is transporting Source Separated Organic Waste to a Community Composting site or lawfully transporting C&D in a manner that complies with 14 CCR Section 18989.1. (2) All haulers including exclusive franchised haulers, non-exclusive franchised haulers, permitted haulers, and licensed haulers with authorization to collect Organic Waste shall comply with education, equipment, signage, container labeling, container color, contamination monitoring, reporting, and other requirements contained within its franchise agreement, permit, license, or other agreement entered into with the city. (b) Requirements for Facility Operators and Community Composting Operations (1) Owners of facilities, operations, and activities that recover Organic Waste, including, but not limited to, Compost facilities, in-vessel digestion facilities, and publicly-owned treatment works shall, upon City’s request, provide information regarding available and potential new or expanded capacity at their facilities, operations, and activities, including information about throughput and permitted capacity necessary for planning purposes. Entities contacted by the City shall respond within 60 days. (2) Community Composting operators, upon City request, shall provide information to the City to support Organic Waste capacity planning, including, but not limited to, an estimate of the amount of Organic Waste anticipated to be handled at the Community Composting operation. Entities contacted by the City shall respond within 60 days. 12.81 Self-Hauler Requirements. (a) Self-Haulers shall source separate all recyclable materials and Organic Waste (materials that City otherwise requires generators to separate for collection in the City’s organics and recycling collection program) generated on-site from Solid Waste in a manner consistent with 14 CCR sections 18984.1 and 18984.2, or shall haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility as specified in 14 CCR Section 18984.3. (b) Self-Haulers shall haul their Source Separated Recyclable Materials to a facility that recovers those materials; and haul their Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste to a Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Source Separated Organic 8.A.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -25- Waste. Alternatively, Self-Haulers may haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility. (c) Self-Haulers that are Commercial Businesses (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings) shall keep a record of the amount of Organic Waste delivered to each Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Organic Waste; this record shall be subject to Inspection by the City. The records shall include the following information: (1) Delivery receipts and weight tickets from the entity accepting the waste. (2) The amount of material in cubic yards or tons transported by the generator to each entity. (3) If the material is transported to an entity that does not have scales on-site, or employs scales incapable of weighing the Self-Hauler’s vehicle in a manner that allows it to determine the weight of materials received, the Self-Hauler is not required to record the weight of material but shall keep a record of the entities that received the Organic Waste. (d) Self-Haulers that are Commercial Businesses (including Multi-Family Self-Haulers) shall provide information collected in Section 12.81(c) to City if requested. (e) A residential Organic Waste Generator that self-hauls Organic Waste is not required to record or report information in Section 12.81(c) and (d). 12.82 Inspections and Investigations by City. (a) The City, authorized Department(s) and/or Designee(s) are authorized to conduct Inspections and investigations, at random or otherwise, of any collection container, collection vehicle loads, or transfer, processing, or disposal facility for materials collected from generators, or Source Separated materials to confirm compliance with this chapter by Organic Waste Generators, Commercial Businesses (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings), property owners, Tier One and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators, haulers, Self-Haulers, Food Recovery Services, and Food Recovery Organizations, subject to applicable laws. This section does not allow the City or its designated representative to enter the interior of a private residential property for Inspection. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -26- (b) Regulated entities shall provide or arrange for access during all inspections (with the exception of residential property interiors) and shall cooperate with the City and/or its designated inspection representative(s) during such Inspections and investigations. Such Inspections and investigations may include confirmation of proper placement of materials in containers, in- person or electronic review of Edible Food Recovery activities, records, or any other requirement of this chapter described herein. Failure to provide or arrange for access to an entity’s premises or access to records for any Inspection or investigation is a violation of this chapter and may result in penalties described. (c) Any records obtained by the City or their designated representative during Inspections, Remote Monitoring, and other reviews shall be subject to the requirements and applicable disclosure exemptions of the Public Records Act as set forth in Government Code Section 6250 et seq. (d) The City, authorized Department(s) and/or their Designee(s) are authorized to conduct any Inspections, Remote Monitoring, or other investigations as reasonably necessary to further the goals of this chapter, subject to applicable laws. (e) The City or its designated representative shall receive written complaints, including anonymous complaints, regarding entities that may be in violation of this chapter. Complaints shall include the name and contact information of the complainant, if the complainant is not anonymous; the identity of the alleged violator, if known; a description of the alleged violation including location(s) and all other relevant facts known to the complainant; any relevant photographic or documentary evidence to support the allegations in the complaint; and the identity of any witnesses, if known. 12.83 Enforcement. (a) Responsible Entity for Enforcement. Enforcement pursuant to this section may be undertaken by the following: (1) City Enforcement Official, which is the director of public works or his/her designated city department(s), legal counsel, or combination thereof. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -27- (2) Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official and/or other authorized Department(s), as designated by the City and in consultation with the City Enforcement Official or his/her designated city department(s), when needed. (i) Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official and/or other authorized Department(s) when applicable, will interpret ordinance; determine the applicability of waivers, if violation(s) have occurred; implement Enforcement Actions; and, determine if compliance standards are met. The authorized enforcement representative will consult with the City Enforcement Official(s) or his/her designated City department(s) as needed. (ii) Enforcement Official(s), including Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official or other authorized Department, may issue Notices of Violation(s). (b) Notice of Violation. Violation of any provision of this ordinance shall constitute grounds for issuance of a Notice of Violation. Before assessing an administrative citation and fine, the City or designated representative shall issue a Notice of Violation requiring compliance within sixty days of issuance of the Notice. The Notice shall include: (1) the name(s) of each person or entity to whom it is directed, (2) a factual description of the violations, including the regulatory section(s) being violated, (3) a compliance date by which the respondent is to take specified action(s), and (4) the penalty for not complying before the specified deadline. (c) Extensions to Notice of Violation Compliance Deadlines. The City or designated enforcement representative may extend the compliance deadlines set forth in a Notice of Violation if it finds that there are extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the respondent that make compliance within the deadlines impracticable, including the following: (1) Acts of God such as earthquakes, wildfires, flooding, and other emergencies or natural disasters; (2) Delays in obtaining discretionary permits or other government agency approvals; (3) Deficiencies in Organic Waste recycling infrastructure or Edible Food Recovery capacity and the existence of a corrective action plan imposed by CalRecycle pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18996.2 due to those deficiencies; or 8.A.a Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -28- (4) Any other circumstance in which the City, in their sole discretion, finds good cause to extend the compliance deadlines. (d) Administrative Citations and Fines. Absent compliance by the respondent within the deadline set forth in the Notice of Violation, City or designated representative shall commence an action to impose penalties, via an administrative citation and fine. The City’s procedures on imposition of administrative fines, or the procedures of the City’s designated enforcement representative as applicable, are hereby incorporated in their entirety, as modified from time to time, and shall govern the imposition, enforcement, collection, and review of administrative citations issued to enforce this ordinance and any rule or regulation adopted pursuant to this ordinance, except as otherwise indicated in this ordinance. (e) Amount of Fine. The amount of the administrative fine for each violation of this chapter shall be as follows: (1) For a first violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $50 to $100 per violation. (2) For a second violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $100 to $200 per violation. (3) For a third or subsequent violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $250 to $500 per violation. (f) Factors Considered in Determining Penalty Amount. The following factors shall be used to determine the amount of the penalty for each violation within the appropriate penalty range: (1) The nature, circumstances, and severity of the violation(s). (2) The violator’s ability to pay. (3) The willfulness of the violator's misconduct. (4) Whether the violator took measures to avoid or mitigate violations of this chapter. (5) Evidence of any economic benefit resulting from the violation(s). (6) The deterrent effect of the penalty on the violator. (7) Whether the violation(s) were due to conditions outside the control of the violator. (g) Appeals. Persons receiving an administrative citation for an uncorrected violation may request a hearing to appeal the citation. The City will appoint a hearing officer who shall conduct 8.A.a Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -29- the hearing and issue a final written order. The hearing officer may be a City official or another public agency designated by the City. The hearing officer shall be identified in the administrative citation. A hearing will be held only if it is requested within the time prescribed and consistent with City and/or authorized Department, procedures in the applicable codes for appeals of administrative citations. (h) Other Remedies. Other remedies allowed by law may be used to enforce this ordinance, including civil action or prosecution as misdemeanor or infraction. The City and/or authorized Department may pursue civil actions in the California courts to seek recovery of unpaid administrative citations. The City and/or designated representative may choose to delay court action until such time as court action is a reasonable use of staff and resources. (i) Education Period for Non-Compliance. Beginning January 1, 2022 and through December 31, 2023, the City, authorized Department, and/or Designee will conduct Inspections, Remote Monitoring (if program is active), Route Reviews or waste evaluations, and Compliance Reviews, depending upon the type of regulated entity, to determine compliance. If the City or its designated representative determines that an Organic Waste Generator, Self-Hauler, hauler, Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not in compliance, it shall provide educational materials to the entity describing its obligations under this ordinance and a notice that compliance is required. It shall also provide notice that violations may be subject to administrative civil penalties starting on January 1, 2024. (j) Process for Enforcement (1) The City Enforcement Official or designated city department(s), Regional or County Enforcement Officials or other authorized Department(s) and/or Designee(s) will monitor compliance with the ordinance randomly and through Compliance Reviews, Route Reviews, investigation of complaints, and an Inspection program (that may include Remote Monitoring). Section 12.82 establishes the City’s right to conduct inspections and investigations. (2) Contamination Processing Fees/Penalties. For incidences of Prohibited Container Contaminants found in containers, City or authorized Department may issue a Notice of Violation to any generator found to have Prohibited Container Contaminants in a container. Such notice may be provided via a cart tag or other communication 8.A.a Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -30- immediately upon identification of the Prohibited Container Contaminants and no later than within one week after determining that a violation has occurred. If the City, authorized Department or Designee observes Prohibited Container Contaminants in a generator’s containers on more than three consecutive occasion(s), the City may assess contamination processing fees or contamination penalties on the generator. (k) Civil Penalties for Non-Compliance. Beginning January 1, 2024, if the City, authorized Department, or Designee determines that an Organic Waste Generator, Self-Hauler, hauler, Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not in compliance with this ordinance, it shall document the noncompliance or violation, and the City or authorized Department will issue a Notice of Violation, and take Enforcement Action pursuant to Section 12.83, as needed. (l) Enforcement Table. Table 1 below is a list of most common likely violations related to this ordinance. Possible violations related to this ordinance are not limited to those listed in the table. Table 1. List of Violations Requirement Description of Violation Commercial Business and Commercial Business Owner Responsibility Requirements, Section 12.76 Commercial Business fails to provide or arrange for Organic Waste collection services consistent with city requirements and as outlined in this ordinance, for employees, contractors, tenants, and customers, including supplying and allowing access to adequate numbers, size, and location of containers and sufficient signage and container color. Organic Waste Generator Requirements, Section 12.75 and 12.76 Organic Waste Generator fails to comply with requirements adopted pursuant to this ordinance for the collection and Recovery of Organic Waste. Hauler Requirements, Section 12.80 A hauler providing residential, Commercial or industrial Organic Waste collection service fails to transport Organic Waste to a facility, operation, activity, or 8.A.a Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -31- property that recovers Organic Waste, as prescribed by this ordinance. Hauler Requirements, Section 12.80 A hauler providing residential, Commercial, or industrial Organic Waste collection service fails to obtain applicable approval issued by the City to haul Organic Waste as prescribed by this ordinance. Hauler Requirements, Section 12.80 A hauler fails to keep a record of the applicable documentation of its approval by the City, as prescribed by this ordinance. Self-Hauler Requirements, Section 12.81 A generator who is a Self-Hauler fails to comply with the requirements of 14 CCR Section 18988.3(b). Commercial Edible Food Generator Requirements, Section 12.78 Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator fails to arrange to recover the maximum amount of its Edible Food that would otherwise be disposed by establishing a contract or written agreement with a Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service and comply with this section commencing Jan. 1, 2022. Commercial Edible Food Generator Requirements, Section 12.78 Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator fails to arrange to recover the maximum amount of its Edible Food that would otherwise be disposed by establishing a contract or written agreement with a Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service and comply with this section commencing Jan. 1, 2024. Commercial Edible Food Generator Requirements, Section 12.78 Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator intentionally spoils Edible Food that is capable of being recovered by a Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -32- Organic Waste Generator, Commercial Business Owner, Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service, sections 12.76 and 12.78 Failure to provide or arrange for access to an entity’s premises for any Inspection or investigation. Recordkeeping Requirements for Commercial Edible Food Generators, Section 12.78 Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator fails to keep records, as prescribed by Section 12.78. Recordkeeping Requirements for Food Recovery Services and Food Recovery Organizations, Section 12.79 A Food Recovery Organization or Food Recovery Service that has established a contract or written agreement to collect or receive Edible Food directly from a Commercial Edible Food Generator pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18991.3(b) fails to keep records, as prescribed by Section 12.79. 12.84 Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective commencing on January 1, 2022. SECTION II If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION III This Ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2022. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance or a summary thereof pursuant to Government Code Section 36933. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY this 6th day of December, 2021 by the following vote: 8.A.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) -33- AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: APPROVED: _______________________________ Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, City Clerk 8.A.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: DRAFT Mandatory Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance (SB 1383) (3487 : SB 1383 Organics Ordinance First Reading) City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 27 of the Gilroy City Code, Article VI "Water Supply Shortage Regulations" Authorizing the Public Works Director to Make Changes to the City of Gilroy Watering Schedule as Needed Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Public Works Department Submitted By: Daryl Jordan Prepared By: Daryl Jordan Daryl Jordan Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION a) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading. b) Introduce an Ordinance amending Chapter 27 of the Gilroy City Code, Article VI "Water Supply Shortage Regulations" authorizing the Public Works Director to make changes to the City of Gilroy Watering Schedule as needed. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8.B Packet Pg. 58 California is currently in another year of drought and will most likely continue to be in a drought next year. In response to the ongoing drought, the Governor of California proclaimed a drought emergency on July 8, 2021 which calls for state drought actions and a 15% reduction in water use compared to the base year of 2019. With exceptionally dry conditions expected again this year, we are constantly having to adjust our water conservation efforts. This proposed ordinance would grant the Public Works Director to determine which days of the week the watering schedule will consist of, instead of the set days as contained currently in the Gilroy City Code. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2016, an emergency ordinance, Ordinance No. 2016-15 was approved by City Council amending the Gilroy City Code Chapter 27, Article VI, entitled “Water Supply Shortage Regulations.” On July 8, 2021, the Governor of the State of California issued Executive Order No. N - 10-21 for state drought actions and called for a 15% reduction in water use compared to the base year of 2019. On July 9, 2021, the State Water Resources Control Board approved continued and new prohibitions on potable water use state-wide. They recommended that retail water agencies within Santa Clara County implement mandatory measures to achieve a 33% water use reduction compared to 2013 water use levels. On August 2, 2021 a resolution was approved by City Council to declare a Level 2 Water Supply Shortage and approve the provisions of Ordinance No. 2016-15, Section III, D “Level 2 Water Supply Shortage (21% - 35% reduction). ANALYSIS Staff is requesting changes to the Gilroy City Code to allow staff to be more responsive to water conservation declarations from the State. The ordinance, if adopted, would change the verbiage in the existing City Code. Below are the changes that are proposed. Gilroy City Code Chapter 27, Article VI, Section 27.98(c)(3) (Level 1 Water Supply Shortage) would be amended as follows: (3) Limits on Watering Days: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to three (3) days per week from April through October. The watering days are designated depending upon house address (odd house and no house address— Monday, Thursday, and Saturday, even house address—Tuesday, Friday, and Sunday) to be determined by the Public Works Director. During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no 8.B Packet Pg. 59 more than one (1) day per week (odd house and no house address— Monday, even house address—Tuesday) to be determined by the Public Works Director. Gilroy City Code Chapter 27, Article VI, Section 27.98(d)(1)(Level 2 Water Supply Shortage) would be amended as follows: (1) Limits on Watering Days: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to two (2) days per week from April through October. The watering days are designated depending upon house address (odd house and no house address—Monday and Thursday, even house address—Tuesday and Friday) and are to be determined by the Public Works Director. During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no more than one (1) day per week (odd house and no house address—Monday, even house address—Tuesday) to be determined by the Public Works Director. The City will continue to implement water saving measures already in place as well as implement additional measures to achieve our water conservation goals. The City’s Landscape Ordinance will be revised in accordance with changes to regulations governing outdoor irrigation that will be made by the State Water Board, the California Building Standards Commission, and the Department of Housing and Community Development when such updates are available. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE There are no financial impacts to the General Fund with this amendment of the City Code. NEXT STEPS City staff will be bringing forward the ordinance to amend the City Code to the next City Council meeting, for the second reading and adoption. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2021-XX Amending Chp 27 Article VI DRAFT_01 8.B Packet Pg. 60 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-X ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY AMENDING CHAPTER 27, ARTICLE VI, ENTITLED "WATER SUPPLY SHORTAGE REGULATIONS." WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a drought emergency on July 8, 2021 based on the State's water supply storage and outlook; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2021 the Governor of the State of California issued executive order N-10- 21 calling for mandatory water conservation measures; and WHEREAS, on October 19, 2021 the Governor of the State of California proclaimed a Continued State of Emergency to exist throughout the State of California due to the ongoing drought; and WHEREAS, to promote water conservation and to impose permanent mandatory water conservation measures and make more efficient use of water; and WHEREAS, the underground water aquifers that the City relies on for 100% of its water supply are recharged by the District using water supplies imported into the District; and WHEREAS, historical evidence indicates that the State of California has experienced prolonged periods of drought in the past; and WHEREAS, wasteful use of water is detrimental to the long-term water supplies of the City of Gilroy; and WHEREAS, the long-term health, safety, and prosperity of the community depends upon having a reliable long-term supply of potable water; and WHEREAS, the District's imported water supply allocations have been significantly reduced for 2021 by the state and federal government water systems; and WHEREAS, such landscape watering schedule changes are essential to ensure a reliable and sustainable minimum supply of water for the public health, safety and welfare of the City of Gilroy; and WHEREAS, authorizing the Public Works Director to modify specific watering days allows the City to adapt to the ever-changing drought restrictions; and WHEREAS, The California Water Code, §10632 requires that stages of action to be undertaken by the urban water supplier in response to water supply shortages, including up to a 50 percent reduction in water supply; and WHEREAS, the City finds that this Ordinance and actions taken hereafter pursuant to it are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act as specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(4) and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15269(c). 8.B.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Ordinance 2021-XX Amending Chp 27 Article VI DRAFT_01 [Revision 4] (3495 : Introduction of an Ordinance Authorizing PW NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Gilroy City Code Chapter 27, Article VI, Section 27.98 c(3) is hereby amended to read as follows: "(3) Limits on Watering Days: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to three (3) days per week from April through October. The watering days are designated depending upon house address and are to be determined by the Public Works Director. During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no more than one (1) day per week to be determined by the Public Works Director.” Gilroy City Code Chapter 27, Article VI, Section 27.98 d(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: "(1) Limits on Watering Days: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to two (2) days per week from April through October. The watering days are designated depending upon house address and are to be determined by the Public Works Director. During the months of November through March, watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is limited to no more than one (1) day per week to be determined by the Public Works Director.” Effective Date. Pursuant to Gilroy City Charter Section 608 this Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after the date of its adoption. Publication. Within ten (10) days of its adoption, this Ordinance shall be published pursuant to Water Code Section 376. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The people hereby declare that they would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of the Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 8.B.a Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Ordinance 2021-XX Amending Chp 27 Article VI DRAFT_01 [Revision 4] (3495 : Introduction of an Ordinance Authorizing PW APPROVED: ______________________________ Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.B.a Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Ordinance 2021-XX Amending Chp 27 Article VI DRAFT_01 [Revision 4] (3495 : Introduction of an Ordinance Authorizing PW City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision (Panattoni Development) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Request for Industrial Planned Development Approval for Warehouse, Distribution Facility and Commercial Use of Property at the Northeast Corner of Pacheco Pass Highway and Camino Arroyo (File No.s Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07, CUP 20-02 and GPA 20-01) Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Planning Division (Planning Commission Meetings) Submitted By: Karen Garner Prepared By: Kraig Tambornini Kraig Tambornini Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services  Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission analyzed the proposed project and recommend the City Council: a) Adopt, by resolution, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the project with findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); b) Adopt a resolution to approve General Plan Amendment GPA 20-01 amending the Mobility Element Figures M-1 and M2 for the project; 8.C Packet Pg. 64 c) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading; d) Introduce an ordinance to approve Z 20-07 Commercial/Industrial Planned Unit Development Zoning Amendment; e) Adopt a resolution to approve Architectural and Site Review AS 20-21 for the site planned unit development plan and buildings, with findings and conditions; and f) Adopt a resolution to approve Tentative Parcel Map TM 20-07, with findings and conditions. BACKGROUND Project Description. Panattoni Development Company submitted zoning applications GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 and CUP 20-02 for the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Project located on Renz Lane and Pacheco Pass Highway at the northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Highway 152 and Camino Arroyo. APN: 841-18-082 2 Property Owner: John Machado. The site is zoned PUD and is not covered by a current development plan approval. The project includes a general plan amendment to modify the circulation plan a nd remove future planned Cameron Boulevard roadway through the site, subdivision of the 59.7-acre property into three parcels, architectural and site approval, tentative map and a conditional use permit for development in three phases. Phase 1 includes con struction of a 143,153 square foot delivery station, on proposed Lot 2 (34.1 acres), which includes a request for a Conditional Use Permit approval as a distribution facility use in the M2 zone. Phase 2 includes construction of a 266,220 -square foot industrial warehouse building on proposed Lot 3 (20.4 acres). Phase 3 would be for future commercial uses on proposed Lot 1 (5.2 acres). On and offsite improvements would include raising and replacement of PG&E overhead utility lines on the property to match new site grade elevations, a bicycle and pedestrian trail from Renz Lane to West Branch Llagas Creek, and roadway circulation and frontage improvements. The project includes required PUD amenities consisting of 1) an entry feature and future art sculpture at the northeast corner of Camino Arroyo and Highway 152, 2) frontage landscaping and fencing that would be in keeping with the McCarthy Business Park located across Highway 152, 3) Improvement of the bicycle trail on the property, and 4) improvement of the Highway 152 median. No deviations from the base C3/M2 zoning standards are proposed and the existing C3 commercial zoning for property located at the corner of Highway 152 and Camino Arroyo would remain. 8.C Packet Pg. 65 Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses. The site is presently vacant and used for crop production. The site is part of a larger C3/M2 PUD that includes Lowes, Costco and Walmart developments, originally established under Ordinance 94 -12 for the Kimball Small Properties (approx. 97 acres). The Newman Cen ter developed with separate tentative map and architectural and site review planned development permits. The site is subject to agricultural mitigation pursuant to the City’s agricultural mitigation policy. A drainage channel flows across the site which drains into Llagas Creek (aka Miller Slough). Environmental Assessment. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an initial study was prepared to evaluate any potentially significant adverse effects of the proposed project on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15063(c)(3)(D), the General Plan EIR adequately addresses many of the proposed project environmental effects. Environmental effects are fully analyzed, and mitigation measures have been included as necessary to address Agriculture, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Geology, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality and Transportation/Traffic. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was circulated and made available for on the Planning Division webpage (www.cityofgilroy.org/planning) for the requisite comment period, from July 30, 2021 through August 30, 2021. Additionally, notices were published in the Gilroy Dispatch, posted on the state website CEQAnet (ca.gov) and county CEQA Postings - Office of the County Clerk-Recorder - County of Santa Clara (sccgov.org), and posted at the Gilroy Public Library. Comments on the draft environmental document were received, including comments from responsible and trustee agencies Santa Clara Cou nty Valley Water District, Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority, and Caltrans. Letters received on the environmental document are included with the attached response to comments document prepared by the City’s environmental consultant, EMC Planning Group (EMC). EMC has provided minor clarifications to the environmental document and Mitigation Measures as shown the Draft Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration. A detailed discussion of the environmental review is included in the attachments to this report which includes the October 21, 2021 Planning Commission staff report, project Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, comments on the MND and responses provided form EMC as well as the project applicants legal counsel. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Project plans were routed to Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire, Santa Clara Regional Waste Management Authority and Valley Water representatives for review and comment. Recommendations of the TAC members have been incorporated into the project plans and/or are included as recommended conditions in attached resolution(s). 8.C Packet Pg. 66 Planning Commission Review. At its October 21, 2021 hearing the Planning Commission unanimously voted to adopt resolutions to support the project. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution to adopt the project Mitigated Negative Declaration and a resolution to approve the Conditional Use Permit request, as required by the Municipal Code. As the approving authority for CUP’s no further action is necessary. The Planning Commission also unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council approve the related General Plan Amendment, PUD Rezoning, Architectural and Site Review and Tentative Map for the project. The Planning Commission received and considered public testimony on the project, including the comments and responses to comments on the CEQA environmental document. The Commission specifically asked for further clarification regarding the requested amendment to the Circulation Maste r Plan and were provided with clarification from the City Engineer that the revision was supported given reductions in the planned buildout of the City in the area. ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency (GP 20-01). The City's General Plan designates the subject site for General Industrial uses, which supports the proposed project request. As such, the proposal conforms to the key goals and policies that pertain to the proposed project, which are listed and discussed in the attached General Plan Compliance Table. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed amendment to Mobility Element Figure M1 and M2, for planned extension of Cameron Blvd. Removal of this planned extension has been analyzed in the June 16, 2021 Project Traffic Analysis (TA), p. 24-58. The modification would not materially affect the planned circulation system and is supported based on the fact the properties that this road was intended to serve are no longer within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary. Zoning Code Conformance (Z 20-07). Though the site is located in the C3/M2 PUD zone district, a PUD development plan zone change is required to establish the site specific plan and standards. The PUD development plan is approved with the Architectural and Site Review permit. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required to permit the distribution facility use, consistent with the base M2 zoning table. The CUP and AS permit entitlements along with a concurrent Tentative Map application request are discussed in detail in the attached Planning Commission report. The project does not request any deviations from the zoning district development standards and future development of the commercial parcel would require a separate administrative Architectural and Site Plan approval. As proposed and conditioned, the Planning Commission and City Staff have determined project zoning entitlements can be approved. ALTERNATIVES The City Council may approve the project with revisions, continue the project for further review or deny the project. Staff does not recommend these actions. 8.C Packet Pg. 67 FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE The costs associated with review of the project and development of the site are borne by the applicant. The project will pay development impact fees at time of building permit for citywide improvements. In addition, the applicant has agreed to fund future roadway widening and land restriping improvements on Tenth Street. NEXT STEPS The rezoning ordinance requires a second reading at the next City Council Hearing. A Final Map would also be required subject to City Council action at a future date. The project may proceed with construction within two years from date of approval. PUBLIC OUTREACH Property owner information (i.e. list, labels, and map) within 500 feet of the subject site were generated by Chicago Title Company using current ownership data. Notices of this Planning Commission and City Council meetings were sent via mail to the property owners and by mail or email to other interested parties and agencies. In addition, notice was published in the Gilroy Dispatch a minimum of 10 days prior to the public hearings, the property has been posted with on-site signage notifying passersby of pending development, and the public hearing packets are available through the City's webpage. If any additional comments are received, they will be either provided with the agenda packet or at the meeting. Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Project Description 3. Site and Architectural Plans 4. Tentative Map and Civil Plans 5. Landscaping and Lighting Plans 6. Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos 7. General Plan Compliance Table 8. CEQA MND Links 9. Response to PGE Comments 10. Response to Teamsters 2 11. Applicant Response Letter 12. MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 13. Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 14. PC Resolution 2021-13 MND 15. PC Resolution 2021-18 CUP 20-02 16. CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 17. CC Resolution GPA 18. CC Resolution Z PUD Approval 19. CC Resolution AS 20-21 8.C Packet Pg. 68 20. CC Resolution TM 8.C Packet Pg. 69 Vicinity Map 26,816 City of Gilroy, GIS Services 4,469.3 1:NAD_1983_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Feet 2,234.64 Feet4,469.30 Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision 8.C.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Vicinity Map (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DXC1 – Project Garlic – Deivery Station Confidential 1 LOGISTICS At DXC1, we focus on being the most customer-centric company in the world. DXC1 Logistics specializes in delivery of customer orders from delivery stations, which power the last mile of our customer order process and help speed-up deliveries for customers. Our growth in Gilroy, CA is the result of an outstanding workforce, strong local support, and incredible customers. Our associates and customers in this region are also your residents, and we want to ensure we are being good neighbors. Employment Delivery stations create hundreds of mostly full time and part time jobs. DXC1 provides all associates at least $15.00 per hour in wages, and a variety of benefits packages from day one. Full time associates receive benefits including medical, dental and vision insurance, 401k match, and life and disability insurance – the same benefits as our senior executives. Part time opportunities are great for parents seeking flexibility in schedule, college students, those seeking second jobs, and retirees. For the proposed delivery station in Gilroy, CA we are planning 197 full time jobs. Three types of jobs are available in delivery stations: 1. Sortation – These associates are directly employed by DXC1. They help with sorting packages inside the delivery station. 2. Delivery Service Partners (DSP) – DSPs are entrepreneurs who have launched their own small business delivering packages on behalf of DXC1. DSPs operate out of DXC1’s delivery stations and employ delivery van drivers who deliver DXC1 packages. They adhere to the $15.00 per hour wage requirement for their employees. 3. Managers – Managers are employed by DXC1 for managing the sortation process, and by DSP owners for managing the delivery process. DSP drivers and DXC1 Flex drivers generally handle delivery to customers from delivery stations. DXC1 Flex is an innovative service where independent contractors can be their own boss and create their own schedules delivering packages on behalf of DXC1. Delivery Service Partner (DSP) Program The DSP program helps entrepreneurs build their own businesses delivering DXC1 packages in their local communities. DXC1 takes an active role helping interested entrepreneurs start and manage their delivery business. DSPs get delivery volume from DXC1, access to the company’s sophisticated delivery technology and discounts on a suite of assets and services including discounted vehicle leases and comprehensive insurance to keep startup costs low. 8.C.b Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DXC1 – Project Garlic – Deivery Station Confidential 2 DXC1 Flex Program Launched in 2015, DXC1 Flex is an innovative program that gives independent contractors the opportunity to be their own boss while delivering for DXC1. Flex partners use their own vehicles and set their own schedule via the DXC1 Flex app (available on Android and iOS devices), freeing up time to pursue their goals and dreams, such as finishing school, building a business or spending time with their family. On average, DXC1 Flex drivers earn more than $22 per hour. DXC1 Operations Delivery stations power the last mile of our order fulfillment process and help speed up deliveries for customers. Packages are transported to delivery stations via trailer trucks (18 wheelers) from neighboring DXC1 fulfillment and sortation centers and are sorted, picked and loaded into delivery vehicles. Delivery stations operate 24/7 to support delivery of packages to at customer locations between 10:30 AM and 9:00 PM. At our proposed Gilroy, CA facility, DXC1 anticipates approximately 21 line haul trucks delivering packages to the delivery station each day, primarily between the hours of 10:00 PM to 8:00 AM. The customer packages are sorted, picked to the delivery routes, placed onto movable racks and staged for dispatch. Approximately 81 DXC1 associates and 21 managers support this operation and the shift structure is designed between 1:00 AM and 12:00 PM that mitigates traffic impact during rush hour periods. Additionally, there will be approximately 32 managers and dispatchers supervising the delivery operations, arriving at 9:30 AM and departing at 10:00 PM followed by another shift of dispatchers arriving at 1:30 PM and departing at 10:00 PM. The DSP delivery associates arrive at a delivery station at 9:20 AM. Starting at 9:50 AM and ending at 11:10 AM], 223 delivery vans will load and depart from the delivery station at a rate of 60 vans every 20 minutes to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. Meaning, the 1st wave of delivery vans leave the station at 9:50am. The departure window is designed to mitigate impact on rush hour periods. Approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, delivery routes are completed and the vans return to the station between 7:10 PM and 9:10 PM. The drivers park the delivery van onsite and leave using a personal vehicle or public transport. DXC1 will also use Flex drivers to deliver packages from this location. DXC1 Flex works in concert with an advanced logistics systems and technology that DXC1 has been building since day one. DXC1 anticipates approximately 60 traditional passenger vehicles entering the facility staggered between 4:30 PM and 6:00 PM. Flex vehicles will load and depart every 15 minutes. Approximately 31 DXC1 associates will work in the delivery station between 12:00 PM and 10:30 PM to support the Flex and DSP drivers as they return to the station. After the check out and release of all delivery vehicles by 9:40 PM, delivery station associates prepare the delivery station for the next day’s packages. 8.C.b Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Time In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 00:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 00:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 01:30 102 0 102 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 1 104 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 02:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 03:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 04:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 05:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 05:30 32 0 32 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 1 33 06:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 06:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 07:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 09:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 21 09:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 80 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 81 10:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 94 0 94 0 60 60 0 0 0 94 61 155 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 0 120 120 0 0 0 29 120 149 11:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 43 43 0 0 0 1 43 44 11:30 5 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 6 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 102 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 102 13:00 32 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 32 13:30 26 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 26 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 32 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 60 60 0 60 16:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 1 30 31 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 30 0 31 31 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 26 26 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 27 18:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 19:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 15 15 15 0 15 0 0 0 16 15 31 19:30 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 30 30 75 0 75 0 0 0 76 31 107 20:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 101 101 56 0 56 0 0 0 56 102 158 20:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 41 41 67 0 67 0 0 0 68 41 109 21:00 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 36 36 10 0 10 0 0 0 11 37 48 21:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 22:00 0 32 32 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 33 22:30 0 5 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 7 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23:30 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 197 197 394 21 21 42 223 223 446 223 223 446 60 60 120 724 724 1,448 DXC1 in Gilroy, CA ‐ Site Specific Associates Trucks DSP Vans Flex TotalDSP Drivers 8.C.b Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) kimley-horn.com 555 Capital Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814 916-858-5800 To: City of Gilroy – Community Development Department From: Sheetal Bhatt, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: 10/16/2020 Subject: Project Garlic Comparison of Required and Proposed developments Site and Building Requirements per the City of Gilroy Zoning Ordinance Industrial District Requirements M-2 (General Industrial Requirements) Delivery Station Provided Industrial Spec Bldg Provided Building Coverage (Maximum), Article XXIII 60% 9% 34% Yard Requirements (Min Setbacks), Article XXIII Front (from face of curb) Side Side (adjacent to street – from face of curb) Rear 26’ None 31’ None Varies (139.7’ - 16.2’) Varies (60.7’ - 25.5’) N/A Varies (106.2’ - 62.4’) Varies (210.7’ -100.4’) Varies (127.5’ – 62.5’) N/A Varies (96.5’ - 0’) Height Requirements (Maximum), Article XXIII Building Height Number of Stories 75 6 45’-6” 1 42’-0” 1 Off-Street Parking, Article XXXI (Warehouse over 10,000 gross square feet) (Office) Delivery Station 1 stall / 5,000 sf = 25 1 stall / 300 sf = 56 Total = 81 Stalls Industrial Bldg 1 stall/5,000 sf = 52 1 stall / 300 sf = 34 Total = 86 stalls 231 Associate stalls (1.63/1000 sf) 934 Delivery Van stalls N.A 137 Standard Stalls 56 Truck Stalls 8.C.b Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Page 2 kimley-horn.com 555 Capital Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814 916-858-5800 Industrial District Requirements M-2 (General Industrial Requirements) Delivery Station Provided Industrial Spec Bldg Provided Landscaping (Min Setbacks), Article XXXVIII Adjacent to street (from face of curb) Adjacent to commercial or residential uses Perimeter (entire site) Maximum paved area in landscape setbacks 21’ 8’ 5’ 50% Varies (49.7’ – 21’) Varies (60.7’ – 9.8’’) 96.4’- 5.0’ 12% Varies (40’ – 23.6’) Varies (62.5’ – 8.5’) Varies (96.5’ - 0’) 32% 8.C.b Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 1 Memorandum Date: 10/19/2020 Project Name: Project Garlic To: City of Gilroy – Community Development Department Project No.: DAL20-0001-00 From: Nony Rivera Subject: PROJECT OBJECTIVES, AMENITIES AND BENEFITS Copies To: PROJECT OBJECTIVES Develop low-intensity industrial development with a minimum of environmental conflict consisting of two buildings on a 59.7 acre agricultural parcel located at the northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Hwy (Hwy 152) & Camino Arroyo in the City of Gilroy, California. The primary project will be a shipping and delivery station consisting of a one-story 141,360 sf concrete tilt-up building with loading docks, van staging areas, paved parking areas, underground utility infrastructure, stormwater management basins, and landscaping. A second project would seek planning entitlement for future 266,220 sf warehouse, also one-story concrete tilt-up with associated parking, truck docks, stormwater management basins, and landscaping. - an aesthetically pleasing and appropriate site design, architectural design through building articulation and high quality exterior finishes, and landscaping (LU 5.1); - screened loading areas and open storage areas so that they are not visible from major roads (LU 5.3); - encourages greater automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connections through traffic improvement studies, adjacent trail improvements, on-site ride share and pedestrian shelters and bicycle parking (LU 5.4); - beautification of Gilroy by providing easements for open space, planting street trees, and landscaping public right-of- ways (LU 8.1); - undergrounding of new utilities (LU 8.6); - sign locations will respect the surrounding context to minimize any negative impact on the visual environment (LU 8.7); - outdoor lighting fixtures will utilize LED to provide maximum energy efficiency as well as effective lighting (LU 8.12); - Light shielding will be utilized to limit light pollution and direct outdoor lighting downward and away from sensitive receptors (LU 8.13) The proposed project meets the City’s Land Use Goals and Zoning ordinances with the following features and amenities that benefit the built environment and protect environmental resources to improve the overall quality of life of residents: 8.C.b Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Project Description (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) >>>>>>><<<<<<<>>>>>><<<<<<<PROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENTBASINDO NOT ENTER R50'PACHECO PASS HWYRENZ LNCAMI N O A R R O Y OFUTURE COMMERCIAL5.15 ACRESOH ELECTRICAL EASEMENT72 UTR/ VAN LOADING72 UTR/ VAN STAGING401 VAN PARKING SPACES10 TRAILER SPACES>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<><><>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<>><><30 VAN BUFFER21 VAN PERSONALVEHICLE SPACES96'98'30'42'620'228'140'30'TYP.30'30'PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDGFOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PROPOSEDOFFICE258 VAN PARKINGSPACES<<<<<30'TYP.PROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENTBASIN40'PROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENTPROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED TRAIL EASEMENT23'PROPOSED 12' WIDE PAVED TRAILFUTURE TRAIL BY OTHERS25'TYP.26'30'DRAINAGE SETBACKS65 VAN PERSONALVEHICLE SPACES235 ASSOCIATE PARKING26'26'COVERED TRASH ENCLOSUREAGRICULTURAL DITCH 3' WIDEAGRICULTURALDITCH 1.5' WIDEHIGHWAY ROAD CULVERTROADSIDE DITCH 3' WIDEROADSIDE DITCH 1.5' WIDEFARM ROAD CROSSING CULVERTRIPARIAN SETBACK35'<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<>>>STRIPED WALKWAY, TYP.FUTURE ACCESS TO OUT-PARCEL70'155'-4"43'-4"155'-4"43'-4"155'-4"48'98'109'-4"40'-4"109'-4"40'-4"109'-4"70'30'75'28'21' LANDSCAPESETBACK35'35'290'54' TYP.60'50'TYP.WAREHO U S E B L D G FOOTPR I N T : 2 6 6 , 2 2 0 S F CLR. HG T : 3 6' 918'PROP.OFFICEPROP.OFFICE60'55'PROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENTBASIN30'PROPOSEDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENTBASINThis conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review ofentitlement requirements and on unverified and possiblyincomplete site and/or building information, and is intendedmerely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed.NORTHSHEET01.06.2021DAL20-0001-00Conceptual Site PlanCamino Arroyo & Renzscheme: SSA SITE CONCEPT 13.7cGilroy, CA10501005001" =100200TRUCK TRAFFIC>FLEX TRAFFIC>ASSOCIATE TRAFFIC>PARKING BREAKDOWN - GEN3.0 M 2W4F V1.01LEGENDSPARKINGAUTO PARKING STALLS (18' X 9')ASSOCIATE PARKING SPACESSUPPORT SPACESDSP MANAGER SPACESVAN DRIVER PERSONAL SPACESTOTAL AUTO PARKING STALLSACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLSACCESSIBLE AUTOACCESSIBLE VANTOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLSVAN PARKING STALLS (27' X 11')STANDARD VAN PARKING SPACESVAN PERSONAL VEHICLE SPACESVAN BUFFER SPACESTOTAL VAN PARKING STALLSLOADING & STAGING AREAVAN LOADING SPACESVAN STAGING SPACESTRUCK YARDTRAILER / BOX TRUCK LOADINGTRAILER PARKING SPACESREQUIRED1721532722917295111443068567721513PROPOSED17315328631282105151443068972721510GAP+100+14+15+10+1+400+4000-3SITE DEVIATION TABLEPROTOTYPETRUCK YARDFENCENO SECURITY FENCEVAN ACCESS DRIVEINTERSECTS DOCKACCESSBAPROTOTYPETRAILERPARKINGREDUCED TRAILER PARKINGBY THREE STALLSSITE GEOMETRYCONSTRAINS STALLLAYOUTABCPROTOTYPEASSOCIATEPARKING ENTRYINDIRECT ACCESS FROMSTREETCALTRANS COMMENTCDPROTOTYPEASSOCIATEPARKING DRIVEAISLE WIDTH25' WIDE DRIVE AISLESCITY PLANNINGCOMMENTD8.C.cPacket Pg. 77Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTJBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTWVLTEVLTWVLT12"SSCC400DC400AC400BC400OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD SILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'MILLER SLOUGHEC400CAMINO ARROYOKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Tue, 12 Jan 2021 DATE:PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC300 LEGENDGENERAL NOTESNORTHPRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES8.C.cPacket Pg. 78Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET W/ FIRE EXTINGUISHERWALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHERFEFECC1PL1P1XALIGNROOM NAMEDOOR NUMBERROOM NUMBERDETAIL REFERENCESHEET NUMBERSHEET NUMBERDETAIL SECTION REFERENCE0000OFFICEXXXXXX101SHEET NUMBERSECTION REFERENCEKEYNOTE INDICATORXXXXXXREVISION CLOUD & DELTA NUMBERXXXFINISH INDICATORSHEET NUMBERINTERIOR ELEVATION REFERENCESHEET NUMBEREXT. ELEVATION REFERENCEFLOOR MATERIAL TYPEFLOOR NOTEWALL MATERIAL TYPEWALL NOTEMISC. MATERIAL TYPETYPE NUMBEREXISTING DOORWALL TAGXXXABCDXXXNNOT TO SCALE101152HOLSCLAW RD.E 6TH ST.W 10 ST.W LUCHESSA AVE.M O N T E R R E Y R D .GILMAN RD.PROJECT SITEarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT4/21/2021 10:09:28 AMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00TITLE SHEET A0.0 PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSOWNER / DEVELOPERSHEET INDEXARCHITECTOWNER'S CONSULTANTSARCHITECT'S CONSULTANTSVICINITY MAPP 425.670.67063015 112TH AVE NE #205BELLEVUE, WA 98004NONY RIVERAnrivera@waremalcomb.comPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020EMILY BROWNPH: (916) 772-7688Emily.Brown@kpff.comKPFFSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERDAN ALWARDT2250 DOUGLAS BLVD., SUITE 200ROSEVILLE, CA 95661PH: (916) 772-7688Dan.Allwardt@kpff.comKIMLEY HORNCIVIL ENGINEERRICHARD MOLES6671 LAS VEGAS BOULEVARD SOUTH, SUITE 320LAS VEGAS, NV 89119PH: (702) 731-2779IES COMMUNICATIONSLOW VOLTAGEDAN SEVERSONDan.Severson@iescomm.comLANDSCAPE VISIONSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTERIC DEARINGeric@landscapevisionsinc.comPANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.8775 FOLSOM BLVD, SUITE 200SACRAMENTO, CA 95826PH: (916) 479-1109CELL: (916) 926-2984ABBREVIATIONSPROJECT TEAMSYMBOLSREVISION LOGINCORP. DESIGN BULLETIN LOGGHDFIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERERIC OKUROWSKI3075 BRECKINRIDGE BOULEVARD, SUITE 470DULUTH, GA 3009PH: (407) 162-5290TERRA ASSOCIATESGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERTED SCHEPPER12220 113TH AVENUE NE, SUITE 130KIRKLAND, WA 98024PH: (206) 396-5783Tschepper@terra-associates.comDESIGN STANDARDSNAMEVERSION DATEBUILDING:ERIC MODVAYPH: (916) 772-7688Eric.moldvay@kpff.comJORDAN & SKALA ENGINEERSMECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERSTEPHEN DEMERS17885 NORTH DALLAS PKWY., STE 320DALLAS, TX 75287PH: (214) 673-0949sdemers@jordanskala.comDUSTYN WOMACKPH: (469) 385-1616 x13133dwomack@jordansckala.comYOGESH KALANTREPH: (407) 162-5290Yogesh.kalantre@ghd.comDESIGN BULLETIN:ISSUEDATE:REMARKS:JON WAKENHUTPH: (702) 731-2779jon.wakenhut@kimley-horn.comHUFFMAN-BROADWAY GROUP,INC.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTTERRY HUFFMAN828 MISSION AVENUESAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, 94901CELL: (415) 385-1045thuffman@h-bgroup.comKPFFSURVEYOR/UTILITIESRYAN CARTER2250 DOUGLAS BLVD, SUITE 200ROSEVILLE, CA 95661PH: (916) 772-7688Ryan.Carter@kpff.comR.C.P. REFLECTED CEILING PLANR.D. ROOF DRAINR.O. ROUGH OPENINGR.O.W. RIGHT OF WAYR.T.U. ROOF TOP UNITR.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADERRAD. RADIUSREF. REFERENCEREFR. REFRIGERATORREINF. REINFORCE(D)REQ. REQUIREDRESIL. RESILIENTRGTR. REGISTERRM. ROOMRWD. REDWOODS. SOUTHS.A.F. SELF-ADHERED FLASHINGS.C. SOLID CORES.C.D. SEAT COVER DISPENSERS.D. SOAP DISPENSERS.F. SQUARE FOOTS.I. SQUARE INCHS.N.D. SANITARY NAPKINDISPENSERS.N.R. SANITARY NAPKINRECEPTACLES.S. STAINLESS STEELS.SK. SERVICE SINKS.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSIONCOEFFICIENTSCHED. SCHEDULESCWD. SOLID CORE WOODSECT. SECTIONSH. SHELFSHR. SHOWERSHT. SHEETSIM. SIMILARSPEC. SPECIFIED orSPECIFICATIONSQ. SQUARESTA. STATIONSTD. STANDARDSTL. STEELSTOR. STORAGESTRL. STRUCTURE orSTRUCTURALSUPP. SUPPLEMENT orSUPPLEMENTARYSUSP. SUSPENDEDSYMM. SYMMETRICALT&G TONGUE AND GROOVET. TREADT.B. TOWEL BART.C. TOP OF CURBT.D. TRENCH DRAINT.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETET.O.M. TOP OF MULLIONT.O.P. TOP OF PARAPETT.O.R. TOP OF REVEALT.O.REC. TOP OF DEEP RECESST.O.S. TOP OF STEELT.O.W. TOP OF WALLT.P. TOP OF PAVEMENTT.P.D. TOILET PAPER DISPENSERT.V. TELEVISIONTEL. TELEPHONETER. TERRAZZOTHK. THICKTOL. TOLERANCETYP. TYPICALU.C. UNDERCUTU.H. UNIT HEATERU.L. UNDERWRITERS'LABORATORIESU.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDUNF. UNFINISHEDUR. URINALV.C.T. VINYL COMPOSITE TILEV.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELDV.P. VISION PANELV.R. VAPOR RETARDERVAC. VACUUMVERT. VERTICALVEST. VESTIBULEVIT. VITREOUSW. WESTW.C. WATER CLOSETW.I. WROUGHT IRONW.P. WORKING POINTW.S. WEATHER STOP orSTRIPPINGW.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRICW/ WITHW/O WITHOUTWD. WOODWPM WATERPROOFINGMEMBRANEWRB WEATHER / WATERRESISTIVE BARRIERWSCT. WAINSCOTWT. WEIGHTG.C. GENERAL CONTRACTORG.F.I. GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTGA. GAUGEGALV. GALVANIZEDGL. GLASSGND. GROUNDGR. GRADEGYP. GYPSUMH.B. HOSE BIBBH.C. HOLLOW COREH.M. HOLLOW METALH.P. HIGH POINTH.V. HIGH VOLTAGEHDWD. HARDWOODHDWE. HARDWAREHORIZ. HORIZONTALHR. HOURHT. HEIGHTI.D. INSIDE DIMENSIONI.H.P. INTERMEDIATE HIGH POINTINSUL. INSULATION or INSULATEDINT. INTERIORJ.B. JUNCTION BOXJAN. JANITORJST. JOISTJT. JOINTK.O. KNOCK-OUTK.P. KICK PLATEK.W.H. KILOWATT HOURKIT. KITCHENL.P. LOW POINTL.S. LIMESTONEL.V. LOW VOLTAGEL.W.C. LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETELAB. LABORATORYLAM. LAMINATE(D)LAV. LAVATORYLIN. LINEARLIQ. LIQUIDLKR. LOCKERLT. LIGHTLTL. LINTELLVR. LOUVERM.B. MOP BASINM.C. MEDICINE CABINETM.O. MASONRY OPENINGMAINT. MAINTENANCEMAN. MANUALMAS. MASONRYMAX. MAXIMUMMECH. MECHANICALMEMB. MEMBRANEMET. METALMEZZ. MEZZANINEMFR. MANUFACTURERMH. MANHOLEMIN. MINIMUMMIR. MIRRORMISC. MISCELLANEOUSMTD. MOUNTEDMUL. MULLIONN. NORTHN.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACTN.R.C. NOISE REDUCTIONCOEFFICIENTN.T.S. NOT TO SCALENO. NUMBERNOM. NOMINALO.A. OVERALLO.C. ON CENTERO.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETERO.F. OUTSIDE FACEO.H. OVERHEAD or OPPOSITEHANDOBS. OBSCUREOFF. OFFICEOPNG. OPENINGOPP. OPPOSITEP.C. PRECASTP.J. PANEL JOINTP.LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATEP.S.F. POUNDS PER SQUAREFOOTP.T.D. PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERP.T.R. PAPER TOWERRECEPTACLEPL. PLATEPLAS. PLASTERPLYWD. PLYWOODPOL. POLISH(ED)PR. PAIRPT. POINTQ.T. QUARRY TILEQUAL. QUALITYQUAN. QUANTITYR. RISERR.B. RUBBER / RESILIENT BASEANGLECENTERLINE# POUND or NUMBER& AND(E) EXISTING@ AT~ DIAMETER or ROUNDØ DIAMETERA.D. AREA DRAINACOUS. ACOUSTICALADJ. ADJUST, ADJUSTABLE orADJACENTAGGR. AGGREGATEAL. ALUMINUMAPPROX. APPROXIMATE(LY)ARCH. ARCHITECTURALASB. ASBESTOSASPH. ASPHALTB.O.C. BOTTOM OF CONCRETEB.O.M. BOTTOM OF MULLIONB.O.P. BOTTOM OF PANELB.O.R. BOTTOM OF REVEALBD. BOARDBITUM. BITUMINOUSBLDG. BUILDINGBLK. BLOCKBLKG. BLOCKINGBM. BEAMBOT. BOTTOMC.B. CATCH BASINC.G. CORNER GUARDC.I. CAST IRONC.O. CASED OPENINGC.O.M. CENTER OF MULLIONC.O.R. CENTER OF REVEALCAB. CABINETCEM. CEMENT(ITIOUS)CER. CERAMICCLG. CEILINGCLKG. CAULKINGCLO. CLOSETCLR. CLEARCNTR. COUNTERCOL. COLUMNCONC. CONCRETECONN. CONNECTIONCONSTR. CONSTRUCTIONCONT. CONTINUOUSCORR. CORRIDORCTR. CENTERCTSK. COUNTER-SUNKD.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIND.O. DOOR OPENINGD.S. DOWNSPOUTD.S.P. DRY STANDPIPEDBL. DOUBLEDEPT. DEPARTMENTDET. DETAILDIA. DIAMETERDIM. DIMENSIONDISP. DISPENSERDN. DOWNDR. DOORDWG. DRAWINGDWR. DRAWERE. EASTE.J. EXPANSION JOINTE.P. ELECTRIC PANELBOARDE.W.C. ELECTRIC WATER COOLEREA. EACHEL. ELEVATIONELEC. ELECTRIC(AL)ELEV. ELEVATOREMER. EMERGENCYENCL. ENCLOSED or ENCLOSUREEQ. EQUALEQPT. EQUIPMENTEXP. EXPANSIONEXPO. EXPOSEDEXST. EXISTINGEXT. EXTERIORF.A. FIRE ALARMF.A.R. FLOOR AREA RATIOF.B. FLAT BARF.D. FLOOR DRAINF.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHERF.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHERCABINETF.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINETF.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETEF.O.F. FACE OF FINISHF.O.M. FACE OF MULLIONF.O.SH. FACE OF SHEATHINGF.P. FIREPROOFF.S. FULL SIZEFDN. FOUNDATIONFIN. FINISH(ED)FL. FLOORFLASH. FLASHINGFLUOR. FLUORESCENTFT. FOOT or FEETFTG. FOOTINGFURR. FURRINGFUT. FUTUREG.B. GRAB BARCLARCHITECTURAL A0.0 TITLE SHEET A0.5 OVERALL SITE PLAN A0.5a PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5b PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5c PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5d PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5e PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5f PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.6 SIGNAGE AND STRIPING DETAILSA0.7 SITE DETAILS A1.11 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A1.11a PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN A1.11b PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN A1.13 OVERALL ROOF PLAN A2.14 CANOPY PLANS A3.10 BUILDING SECTIONS A2.2 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN MAIN OFFICE A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A6.1 WALL SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL SHEET COUNT: 20ARCHITECTURAL - CONCEPT SITE PLAN1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANARCHITECTURAL SHEET COUNT: 18.C.cPacket Pg. 79Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) A TTEM P A T T E M P A TTEM P A T T E M P A T T E M P A TTEM P 18'-0"6'-6"32'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"26'-0"18'-0" 6'-6"6'-0" 18'-0"30'-0"27'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6" 8'-6"30'-0"12'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"23'-6"40'-0"30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"30'-0" 9'-2"132'-0"8'-0"66'-0"16'-0" 30'-0" 12'-0" 66'-0" 27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0"4'-0"8'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"38'-10"23'-0"30'-0"16'-10"25'-8"30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 6'-6"27'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 30'-8" 4'-0" 27'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"11'-0" TYP.27'-0"TYP.27'-0" 30'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0"27'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 165'-0" 11'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 120'-0"R50'-0"60'-0"80'-0"55'-0"26'-0"10'-6"99'-0"10'-6"26'-0"18'-0"9'-0"TYP.27'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0"18'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"5'-0"30'-0"18'-0" 98'-4"55'-3"95'-6" 25'-6" 30'-0" 15'-0" 16'-3"180'-0" 42'-0"108'-3"30'-0"30'-0" 3 5 '-0 " 3 5 '-0 "35'-0"30'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0"30'-0"8'-6"6'-0"27'-0" 30'-0"DO NOT ENTERA TTEM P A T T E M P A TTEM P A T T E M P A T T E M P A TTEM P 18'-0"6'-6"32'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"26'-0"18'-0" 6'-6"6'-0" 18'-0"30'-0"27'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6" 8'-6"30'-0"12'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"23'-6"40'-0"30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"30'-0" 9'-2"132'-0"8'-0"66'-0"16'-0" 30'-0" 12'-0" 66'-0" 27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0"4'-0"8'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"38'-10"23'-0"30'-0"16'-10"25'-8"30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 6'-6"27'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0" 30'-8" 4'-0" 27'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"11'-0" TYP.27'-0"TYP.27'-0" 30'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0"27'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 165'-0" 11'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 120'-0"R50'-0"60'-0"80'-0"55'-0"26'-0"10'-6"99'-0"10'-6"26'-0"18'-0"9'-0"TYP.27'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0"18'-0" 30'-0" 27'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"5'-0"30'-0"18'-0" 98'-4"55'-3"95'-6" 25'-6" 30'-0" 15'-0" 16'-3"180'-0" 42'-0"108'-3"30'-0"30'-0" 3 5 '-0 " 3 5 '-0 "35'-0"30'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0"30'-0"8'-6"6'-0"27'-0" 30'-0"DO NOT ENTERFEFEFEFEFE FEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFE FEFEFEFEFEA0.5a A0.5b PROPOSED BUILDING ±143,153 S.F. 1-STORY RENZ LN POWER SUBSTATION CAMINO ARROYOPACHECO PASS HWY PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN OH ELECTRICAL EASEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PYLON SIGN xA0.5e 1 DROP OFF SHELTER 8' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 8' LANDSCAPE BUFFER BIKE TRAIL CONNECTION TO RENZ LANE (BY OTHERS) DECORATIVE FENCING PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT COVERED TRASH ENCLOSURE PROPOSED 12' WIDE PAVED TRAIL PROPOSED TRAIL EASEMENT FUTURE TRAIL BY OTHERS RIPARIAN SETBACK FUTURE ACCESS TO OUT-PARCEL AGRICULTURAL DITCH, 3' WIDE DRAINAGE SETBACKS AGRICULTURAL DITCH, 1'-6" WIDE ROADSIDE DITCH, 3' WIDEFARM ROAD CROSSING CULVERT ROADSIDE DITCH, 1'-6" WIDE TYP. 30'-0" 9'-0" U.O.N.20'-0"20'-0"CLR.6'-6"9'-0"25'-0"20'-0"20'-0"CLR.6'-6"9'-0"9'-0"architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:05 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00OVERALL SITE PLANA0.5PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020N SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"1OVERALL SITE PLAN SIGNAGE NOTES: 1. REFER TO SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. 2. ALL SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). 3. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY RESIN AND 4" WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PAVEMENT GRAPHICS SHALL BE HOT-APPLIED THERMOPLASTIC (REFLECTIVE). 4. COLOR SHALL BE WHITE ON ASPHALT AND YELLOW ON CONCRETE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ASPHALT SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS SHALL BE USED IN COLDER CLIMATES WHERE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT IS INTENDED TO BE USED. RUBBER SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS MAY BE USED IN WARMER CLIMATES OR REGIONS WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IS PREVALENT. 6. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TENANT FULFILMENT WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE STANDARDS REVISION 16 DATED QUARTER 2, 2019. 7. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED IN FIELD. 8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE NOT SHOWN ON GRAPHICS PLAN (E.G. FIRE LANES) MAY BE REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE AND/OR AHJ. SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL AHJ AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. 9. MOUNT SIGNAGE ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODES. 10. TYPICAL SIGN FONT IS SET IN AERIAL. PARKING LEGEND APPLICABLE TO ALL SITE PARTIAL SHEETS, U.O.N. TRUE NORTH PROJECT NORTH N DATEREMARKSPROJECT DATA PARKING BREAKDOWN - GEN3.0 M 2W4F V1.01: AUTO PARKING STALLS (18' X 9') ASSOCIATE PARKING SPACES 172 174 +2 SUPPORT SPACES 15 15 0 DSP MANAGER SPACES 32 32 0 VAN DRIVER PERSONAL SPACES 72 91 +19 TOTAL AUTO PARKING STALLS 291 312 +21 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS ACCESSIBLE AUTO 7 8 +1 ACCESSIBLE VAN 2 2 0 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS 9 10 +1 VAN PARKING STALLS (27' X 11') STANDARD VAN PARKING SPACES 511 514 +3 VAN PERSONAL VEHICLE SPACES 144 144 0 TOTAL VAN PARKING STALLS 655 658 +3 LOADING & STAGING AREA VAN LOADING SPACES 67 72 0 VAN STATING SPACES 72 72 0 TRUCK YARD TRAILER / BOX TRUCK LOADING 15 15 0 TRAILER PARKING SPACES 13 10 -3 PARKING SUMMARY PROPOSED GAPPARKINGREQUIRED NOTES: SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 0 40'80'160'320' 1"=80' SITE AREA:1,380,872 (31.70 ACRES) BUILDING AREA 141,360 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE (F.A.R.)X % FRONT (25 FT MIN) TO BOONE DRIVE STREET FRONTAGE XXX FT MIN SIDE XXX FT MIN SITE DATA PROPOSED USE:INDUSTRIAL FRONT: (25 FT MIN, 40 FT AVERAGE)XXX FT MIN BUILDING SETBACKS: SIDE (10 FT MIN)XXX FT MIN REAR (10 FT MIN)XXX FT MIN LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: REAR (10 FT MIN)XXX FT MIN LANDSCAPE AREA XXX,XXX SF LANDSCAPE COVERAGE (15% MIN)XX % 180'-0" 42'-0" 3 5 '-0 " 3 5 '-0 " 3 0 '-0 " 5 3 '-6 " 3 6 '-0 " 6 '-0 " 9 '-0 " T Y P . 9 0 '-0 "6 '-0 " 9 0 '-0 "6 '-0 " 2 7 '-0 " 9 9 '-0 " 3 0 '-0 "49'-0"6'-0"90'-0"6'-0"63'-0"21'-0"LANDSCAPESETBACK6 0 '-0 " 7 5 '-0 " 5 5 '-0 "5'-6"6'-6"18'-0"30'-0"18'-0"6 0 '-0 " 7 5 '-0 " 5 5 '-0 "12'-0"TYP.12'-0"TYP.30'-0"9 '-0 " T Y P .18'-0"30'-0"18'-0"6'-6"5'-6"2 8 '-6 " 5c 0.5d PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN DRAINAGE SETBACKS PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN FUTUREWAREHOUSE BLDG FOOTPRINT:266,220 SFCLR.HGT:36' A0.5e A0.5f PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN 3 5 '-0 "3 5 '-0 " 8.C.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) A TTEM P 40'-0"27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0"4'-0"8'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"38'-10"23'-0"30'-0"16'-10"25'-8"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-8"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"11'-0" TYP.27'-0"TYP.27'-0"30'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"165'-0" 11'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 120'-0"R50'-0"60'-0"80'-0"55'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"3 5 '-0 " 3 5 '-0 "35'-0"30'-0"8'-6"6'-0"27'-0"30'-0"FEFEFE FEFEFEFEFEFE FEFEFEFOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5d RENZ LN 11'-0"039 TYP. 006 11'-0"TYP. 032 20 4 31 34 36 22 27 21 FOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5d 15 14 14 15 16 16 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 10 OH ELECTRICAL EASEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. PROPERTY LINE. FIRE LANE (HATCHED) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPER TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T 5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING F.H. TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTOR 1 PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. A5.10 25 INDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT INDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREAS INDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREAS INDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDS INDICATES LANDSCAPE AREA AND IRRIGATION AREA INDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURB architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:06 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL SITE PLANA0.5aPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"1PARTIAL SITE PLAN 0 25' 50'100' 250' 1"=50' SITE LEGEND KEY PLAN N NOT TO SCALE A0.5a A0.5bBUILDING N TRUE NORTH N PROJECT NORTH DATEREMARKS006 PROPERTY LINE. 032 EACH DOCK SHALL HAVE A DOCK IDENTIFICATION SIGN MOUNTED DIRECTLY TO THE BUILDING FACADE, CENTERED ABOVE DOCK DOOR. COORDINATE WITH TENANT FOR DOCK NUMBER. SEE SIGNAGE PLAN FOR DOCK NUMBERS 039 LANDSCAPE ISLAND. NOTES: SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO CIVIL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS THROUGHOUT SITE. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) A T T E M P A TTEM P A T T E M P A T T E M P A TTEM P 18'-0" 6'-6" 32'-0"18'-0" 8'-0" 18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"8'-0"18'-0"18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0"18'-0" 8'-0" 18'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"26'-0"18'-0" 6'-6"6'-0" 18'-0"30'-0"27'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6" 8'-6"30'-0"12'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"23'-6"40'-0"30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"30'-0"9'-2"132'-0"8'-0"66'-0"16'-0"30'-0"12'-0"66'-0"27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0"4'-0"8'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"26'-0"10'-6"99'-0"10'-6"26'-0"18'-0"9'-0"TYP.27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"18'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"8'-0"18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"5'-0"30'-0"18'-0" 98'-4"55'-3"95'-6" 25'-6"30'-0" 15'-0" 16'-3"180'-0" 42'-0"108'-3"30'-0"30'-0" 30'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0"30'-0"8'-6"DO NOT ENTERFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5b PACHECO PASS HWY PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN OH ELECTRICAL EASEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN16 18 18 20 22 2330'-0"58'-0"30'-0"44'-0"24'-0"15 12121212121212121212 005005 TYP. 041 018 055 014 TYP. 007 TYP. 043 DROP OFF SHELTER xA0.5e 1 FOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5b 6 13 16 19 22 22 22 22 22 22 36 36 36 36 36 36 22 222222 36 POWER SUBSTATION PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PYLON SIGN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. PROPERTY LINE. FIRE LANE (HATCHED) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPER TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T 5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING F.H. TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTOR 1 PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. A5.10 25 INDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT INDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREAS INDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREAS INDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDS INDICATES LANDSCAPE AREA AND IRRIGATION AREA INDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURB architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:07 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL SITE PLANA0.5bPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020SCALE: 1" = 50'-0"1ENLARGED SITE PLAN N TRUE NORTH N PROJECT NORTH DATEREMARKSSITE LEGEND KEY PLAN N NOT TO SCALE A0.5a A0.5bBUILDING005 LANDSCAPED AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 007 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB TYP. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 014 PAINTED PARKING STRIPING PER CITY STANDARDS. 018 KNOX BOX, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT. 041 4' WIDE CROSSWALK, 4' WIDE WHITE STRIPING AT 36" ON CENTER MAX. 043 PAINTED TRAFFIC MARKINGS. 055 MONUMENT SIGN, UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. NOTES: SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES 0 25' 50' 100' 250' 1"=50' SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO CIVIL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS THROUGHOUT SITE. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-8"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"11'-0" TYP.27'-0"TYP.27'-0"30'-0"4'-0"27'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"165'-0" 11'-0" 30'-0"27'-0" 4'-0" 120'-0"R50'-0"60'-0"80'-0"55'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"3 5 '-0 " 3 5 '-0 "35'-0"6'-0"27'-0"30'-0"FEFEFE FEFEFE FOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5cFOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5aDRAINAGE SETBACKS OH ELECTRICAL EASEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN15 14 14 15 16 16 11'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 6 11'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"005005 TYP. 007 TYP. 047 TYP. 041 014 xA0.5f 1 xA0.5f 2 10 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. PROPERTY LINE. FIRE LANE (HATCHED) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPER TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T 5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING F.H. TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTOR 1 PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. A5.10 25 INDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT INDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREAS INDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREAS INDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDS INDICATES LANDSCAPE AREA AND IRRIGATION AREA INDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURB architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:24:25 AMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00ENLARGED SITE PLANxA0.5bPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"1ENLARGED SITE PLAN 0 15' 30'60'150' 1"=30' SITE LEGEND KEY PLAN N TRUE NORTH N PROJECT NORTH A0.5a A0.5bBUILDING N NOT TO SCALE DATEREMARKS005 LANDSCAPED AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. 007 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB TYP. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 014 PAINTED PARKING STRIPING PER CITY STANDARDS. 041 4' WIDE CROSSWALK, 4' WIDE WHITE STRIPING AT 36" ON CENTER MAX. 047 BIO-RETENTION ZONE, SEE CIVIL DWGS. NOTES: SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES A0.5c 8.C.c Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) A T T E M P A T T E M P A TTEM P 4'-0" 18'-0"18'-0" 8'-0" 18'-0"25'-0"25'-0"18'-0"18'-0"25'-0"26'-0"18'-0" 6'-6"6'-0" 18'-0"30'-0"27'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6" 8'-6"30'-0"12'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0"6'-6"23'-6"40'-0"30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"30'-0"9'-2"132'-0"8'-0"66'-0"16'-0"30'-0"12'-0"66'-0"27'-0" TYP.11'-0"TYP.30'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 30'-0"4'-0"4'-0"8'-0"19'-0"27'-0"30'-0"27'-0"4'-0" 30'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0"30'-0"8'-6"FEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFOR CONDINATION SEE SHEET 1/A0.5a FOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5cP A C H E C O P A S S H W Y POWER SUBSTATION PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN PYLON SIGN 6 13 16 19 22 22 22 22 22 22 36 36 36 36 36 36 58'-0"30'-0"73'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0"58'-0"30'-0" 30'-0"73'-0"30'-0"58'-0" 018 001 TYP. 014 TYP. 041 22 222222 36 xA0.5f 4 xA0.5f 5 ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. PROPERTY LINE. FIRE LANE (HATCHED) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPER TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T 5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING F.H. TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTOR 1 PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL DOCK HIGH TRUCK DOOR GRADE LEVEL TRUCK DOOR FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. A5.10 25 INDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT INDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREAS INDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREAS INDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDS INDICATES LANDSCAPE AREA AND IRRIGATION AREA INDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURB architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:24:28 AMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00ENLARGED SITE PLANxA0.5dPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 950200 15' 30' 60' 150' 1"=30' SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"1ENLARGED SITE PLAN SITE LEGEND KEY PLAN N TRUE NORTH N PROJECT NORTH A0.5a A0.5bBUILDING N NOT TO SCALE DATEREMARKS001 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH SIGNAGE AND SYMBOL AS PER COUNTY STANDARDS. 014 PAINTED PARKING STRIPING PER CITY STANDARDS. 018 KNOX BOX, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT. 041 4' WIDE CROSSWALK, 4' WIDE WHITE STRIPING AT 36" ON CENTER MAX. NOTES: SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES A0.5d 8.C.c Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 60'-0"75'-0"55'-0"1 2 '-0 " T Y P .30'-0"9'-0"TYP.1 8 '-0 " 3 0 '-0 " 1 8 '-0 " 6 '-6 " 5 '-6 "ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE.PROPERTY LINE.FIRE LANE (HATCHED)PARKING LIGHTING. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGSFIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPERTRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCEFIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1.ACCESSIBLE PARKINGF.H. POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTORINDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTINDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREASINDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREASINDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETEINDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDSINDICATES LANDSCAPE AREAINDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURBFOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5cTYP.006FOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5farchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT1/11/2021 4:59:00 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5ePROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:006 PROPERTY LINE.SITE LEGENDKEY PLANNNOT TO SCALESCALE: 1" = 30'-0"1PARTIAL SITE PLANNTRUE NORTHNPROJECT NORTHAEBDBUILDINGFC8.C.cPacket Pg. 85Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 30'-0"53'-6"36'-0"6'-0"9'-0"TYP.90'-0"6'-0"90'-0"6'-0"27'-0"99'-0"30'-0"4 9 '-0 " 6 '-0 "9 0 '-0 " 6 '-0 "6 3 '-0 " 2 1'-0 " LANDS CAPE S ETBAC K60'-0"75'-0"55'-0"5 '-6 "6 '-6 "1 8 '-0 "3 0 '-0 "1 8 '-0 " 1 2 '-0 " T Y P .28'-6"ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE.PROPERTY LINE.FIRE LANE (HATCHED)PARKING LIGHTING. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGSFIRE HYDRANT P.I.V. WITH TAMPERTRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS)T5' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCEFIRE LANE, DASHED LINE INDICATES EXTENT OF CURB TO BE PAINTED RED OR FIRE LANE STRIPING WHERE NO CURB PRESENT PER DETAIL 20/A12.1.ACCESSIBLE PARKINGF.H. POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE, SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS.TRASH OR RECYCLING COMPACTORINDICATES LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENTINDICATES LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PADS AND WALK AREASINDICATES STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE AT VAN LOADING AREASINDICATES HEAVY DUTY CONCRETEINDICATES CONCRETE PAD, EV CHARGER & BOLLARDSINDICATES LANDSCAPE AREAINDICATES HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT & CAST-IN-PLACE CURBFOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5dFOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1/A0.5e18'-0"PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT1/11/2021 4:59:04 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL SITE PLAN A0.5fPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:SITE LEGENDKEY PLANNNOT TO SCALENTRUE NORTHNPROJECT NORTHSCALE: 1" = 30'-0"1PARTIAL SITE PLANAEBDBUILDINGFC8.C.cPacket Pg. 86Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) POST AND PANEL SIGNSMOUNTING U-1E, U-1C, U-2SPECIFICATIONSALSO SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.DESCRIPTION:1. POST AND PANEL SIGNS WITH STANDARD SIZED "MUTCD" AND CUSTOM SIGN FACES.2. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION3. SIGNS TO CONSIST OF ALUMINUM SIGN PANEL ON 2" SQUARE STEEL POST.4. PANEL TO CONFORM TO "MUTCD" SPECIFICATIONS. SOLID ALUMINUM PANEL, 0.08" THICK. COMPOSITE MATERIALS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.5. POSTS ARE TO BE 2" SQUARE STEEL, 12 GA. 7/16" PERFORATION ON 1" CENTERS. FOUR SIDES TO BEAPPROXIMATELY 12' LONG.6. SUPPORTS ARE TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR SECURE MOUNTING OF SIGN.7. ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE NON-CORROSIVE. IF ADDITIONAL THICKNESS OF MATERIAL OR ADDITIONAL INTERNALBRACING IS REQUIRED FOR SECURE INSTALLATION OR TO PROVIDE STABILITY, ALTERATIONS SHALL BEREFLECTED IN SHOP DRAWINGS. WIND LOADING AND DURABILITY SHALL BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THEENGINEERING OF THE SIGN.8. GRAPHICS AND TYPOGRAPHY SIGN GRAPHICS ARE TO BE HEAVY DUTY '3M' REFLECTIVE VINYL.9. CUSTOM GRAPHICS AND TYPOGRAPHY SIGNS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OWNER AS ELECTRONIC FILES10. COLORS ARE INDICATED ON THE DESIGN INTENT DRAWINGS. ADDITIONAL COLOR AND FINISH SPECIFICATIONS ARE FOUND IN THE GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS.11. ALL SIGNS INDICATED "DOT" SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES12. FROM THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.INSTALLATION:1. LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY NOTED ON THE ATTACHED LOCATION PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR FILED VERIFYING ALL INSTALLATION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.2. MOUNTING U-1e SHALL BE USED FOR SIGNS IN COMPACTED EARTH. MOUNTING U-1c SHALL BE USED FOR SIGNS ONCONCRETE OR ASPHALTIC PAVING.3. MOUNTING U-1e PROVIDES A 36" MOUNTING TUBE (2 1/4" SQUARE STEEL POST DRIVE TO 1" TO 2" ABOVE GRADE.THE MOUNTING TUBE IS PAIRED WITH AN 18" BREAKAWAY SUPPORT TUBE (2 1/4" SQUARE STEEL POST). THE SIGN POST SINKS TO THE BASE OF THE ANCHOR TUBE AND FASTENS TO THE ANCHOR TUBE AND BREAKAWAY SUPPORT WITH AN ANGLE BOLT.4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.5. TYPICAL SIGN PANEL INSTALLS BOTTOM OF SIGN AT 7'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. THE POST EXTENDS TO WITHIN 2" OF THE TOP OF THE SIGN PANEL. INSTALLATION SHALL BE PLUMB, LEVEL, AND STRAIGHT.6. MOUNTING U-2 PROVIDES TWO POLE SUPPORT SIMILAR TO THE MOUNTING U-1e. ADDITIONALLY, U-2 REQUIRESCROSS BRACING OF STRUCTURAL ANGLE ON THE BACK OF THE SIGN FACE.7. TOP OF U-2 MOUNTED SIGN SHALL BE AT 8'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. INSTALLATION SHALL BE PLUMB, LEVEL,AND STRAIGHT.8. THE INSTALLATION METHODS AND DETAILS FOR EACH LOCATION SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE SUBMITTED SHOP DRAWINGS. FINAL LOCATION WILL BE APPROVED ON THE SITE BY THE TENANT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.9. SIGN POSTS INSTALLED IN COMPACTED EARTH OR SIDEWALK SHALL BE 18" MIN. FROM FACE OF CURB.SUBMITTALS:THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION - (3) SETS OF SHOP DRAWINGSAND (3) 6"X6" VINYL SAMPLES OF EACH SIGN FACE COLOR. SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATIONSPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SUBMITTALS.SIGNAGE NOTES:1. REFER TO SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.2. ALL SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).3. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY RESIN AND 4" WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PAVEMENT GRAPHICS SHALL BE HOT-APPLIED THERMOPLASTIC (REFLECTIVE).4. COLOR SHALL BE WHITE ON ASPHALT AND YELLOW ON CONCRETE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. ASPHALT SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS SHALL BE USED IN COLDER CLIMATES WHERE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT IS INTENDED TO BE USED. RUBBER SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS MAY BE USED IN WARMER CLIMATES OR REGIONS WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IS PREVALENT.6. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TENANT FULFILLMENT WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE STANDARDS REVISION 16 DATED QUARTER 2, 2019.7. 7. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED IN FIELD.8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE NOT SHOWN ON GRAPHICS PLAN (E.G. FIRE LANES) MAY BE REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE AND/OR AHJ. SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL AHJ AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED.9. MOUNT SIGNAGE ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODES.10. TYPICAL SIGN FONT IS SET IN AERIAL.LIGHT POLESIGN AS SCHEDULEDSHIM AS REQUIRED FOR PLUMB INSTALLATION*FRONT/REARELEVATIONSIDEELEVATIONLIGHT POLE SIGNS*ALL POLE MOUNTED SIGNS SHALL BE ATTACHED USING "LOCK BOLTS" TO PREVENT LOOSENING FROM WIND OR OTHER VIBRATON.7'-0"3'-6"4"7'-0"3'-6"4"2'-0"5'-0"18" DIA. CONC. BASE (3,000 PSI)SIGN INLANDSCAPE ISLANDU-1eSIGN INPAINTED ISLAND U-1cBREAKAWAYSIGN AS SCHEDULEDGALV. STEEL CHANNELMIN. EMBEDEMENT 2-FT6" DIA. X 8'-6" LONG STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. PAINT "SAFETY YELLOW"18" DIA. CONC. BASE (3,000 PSI)SIGN AS SCHEDULEDGALV. STEEL CHANNEL8'-0"FRONTBACKPROVIDE 1 1/2" STEEL ANGLE CROSS BRACESBREAKAWAY MOUNT4'-0" SIGN PANEL6'-0" SIGN PANELTENANTSee Placard DetailSee Placard DetailBuilding Adress1'-4"9"6'-0"TOP OF SIGN3"2 1/2"1'-5 1/2"3"5'-6"3"3 1/2"3"3 1/2"5 1/2"4"ALUMINUM SIGN CONSTRUCTION BY SIGN MANUF. CONNECTION TO CONCRETE STEM WALL BY SIGN MANUF.DIRECTIONAL ARROWS -1/2" THICK, SURFACE APPLIED OPAQUE BLACK ACRYLICDIRECTION TEXT -REFLECTIVE BLACK VINYLFRONT ELEVATION4"4"2" X 2" ALUM. SQUARE TUBES PTD WHITEALUMINUM FACES PTD. SATIN WHITE WITH DIGITALLY PRINTED GRAPHICS4" X 4" WOODEN POSTS PAINTED WHITE1/2" THICK SURFACE APPLIED, OPAQUE BLACK ACRYLICREFLECTIVE BLACK VINYLPLANAll TrucksFACING PLAN SOUTHCustomersFACING PLAN SOUTHVisitors and AssociatesAll TrucksFACING PLAN NORTHCustomersFACING PLAN NORTHVisitors and AssociatesDelivery Service Provider ParkingAll TrucksVisitors and AssociatesDelivery Service Provider ParkingPYLON SIGN 1PYLON SIGN 2NOTES:PLACARD LAYOUT SHALL BE SITE SPECIFIC. DETAIL SHOWN IS FOR DELIVERY STATION BUILDING 2W4F LARGE DS PROTOTYPE. ORIENTATION OF ARROWS SHALL BE BASED ON PYLON SIGN LOCATION.architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT12/23/2020 4:07:48 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00SIGNAGE AND STRIPPING DETAILS A0.6PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"5LIGHT POLE SIGNSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"6DETAIL U-1c & U-1eSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"7DETAIL U-2SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"9TYPICAL PYLON SIGNSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"10PLACARD DETAIL8.C.cPacket Pg. 87Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) CJCJPIPE SLEEVEPIPE SLEEVEPIPE SLEEVE,BOLLARDBOLLARDGATE, SEE DETAIL 8/A5.12ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGEAT TRANSITION FROM CONCRETE TO ASPHALT6" CURB AS OCCURS(2) #4 REBAR AT GATE END OF PANELSTEP AS OCCURSMAN GATE, SEEDETAILCONCRETE FOOTING, BELOWFUTURE CONTAINERPRE-CAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP (2 SIDES)W/ REBAR DRIVEN THRU PREDRILLED HOLES.TYP.4BOLLARD AS APPLICABLE3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-6" 5'-0" 2'-6" 5'-0" 3'-6"26'-0" 2'-6" 6'-0" 4'-0" 12'-6"1'-6 ""NO PARKING" PAINTED ONCONCRETE 12" LETTERS4" WIDE STRIPING13A0.714A0.715A0.715'-0"25'-0" CONCRETE PADCONTINUOUS CONCRETE FOOTING, BELOWCONTINUOUSCONCRETEFOOTINGPANEL JOINT4'-0"3'-0"1'-0"1'-0".7'-0"T/FTGB/FTGTILT WALL, TYP. PER FINISH GRADE 1'-0" +/- ABOVE SLABFF26'-0"6'-0"1'-0"1'-0" 1'-0"7'-0"PAINTED TS 3" X 3" FRAME (BLACK)GALCANIZED "B DECK" DO NOT PAINTCANE BOLT PER DETAILS X/X.XXCONTINUOUSCONCRETEFOOTINGCONCRETESLABPAINTED CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL BEYOND PER"NO PARKING" SIGN, TYP EACH GATE1'-0" ±7'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" 3'-0" 4'-0"CONTINUOUS CONCRETEFOOTING BELOW6" CONCRETETILT WALL, TYP.PER 7/A5.123' WIDE GATE W/LATCHPAINTED GATETS 3" x 3"FRAME (BLACK)6" CONCRETE TILT WALLBEYOND, TYP.PER 7/A5.12FFT/FTG1'-6"6"3"3" 1"2" 6'-0" GATE1'-0"3/4" CANE BOLT FOR EACH LEAFPIPE SLEEVE-EMBED 4" DEEPGALVANIZED 3X3X3/16 ANGLE WITH 1/2" DIA. X4 HEADED WELD STUDS AT 2'-0" OC. 1'-0"ASPHALT PAVINGGALVANIZED "B" DECK ATTACHWITH 1/4" 304 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTSCONT. SEALANT AND FLASHINGTYPTOP AND BOTTOM 1 3/4"TS3x3x1/4 TUBE FRAMEROD TURNBUCKLE BRACING1/4" x 2" x CONT.#4 AT X'-X" O.C. EACH WAY6" CONCRETESLAB, SEE 1/A5.126"3'-0" 4'-0"7'-0"1'-0"1'-0"T/FOOTINGEXTERIORINTERIOR6"3'-0"6" CONCRETE TILT WALLB/REVEAL "A"CLR. 3"1/2" CHAMFER, TYPICAL(2) #4 AT TOP AND BOTTOM OFPANEL, TYPICAL#4 REBAR AT X'-X"O.C. EACH WAY#4 W/STD. HOOK @ X'-X" O.C.LAPSPLICE W/WALL REINF.PRE-CAST CONCRETE CURB (3 SIDES) W/ REBAR DRIVENTHRU PREDRILLED HOLES6" CONCRETE SLAB W/#4 AT X'-X" O.C. EACH WAY OVER 6" BASE PER GEOTECH(X) #4 REBAR LONGITUDINALTOP AND BOTTOM#4 REBAR ATX'-X" O.C. TOP AND BOTTOMarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering3911 Sorrento Valley Blvd, Suite #120San Diego, CA 92121P 858.638.7277F 858.638.7506JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINTBIM 360://DAL20-0001-00_AMZL Gilroy DXC1-M/X0001_ARCH.rvt12/23/2020 4:07:20 PMN. RIVERAA.R./S.N.DAL20-0001-00SITE DETAILSA0.7PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"7TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"14TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"13TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"15TRASHENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATIONSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"17GATE SECTIONSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"21TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL8.C.cPacket Pg. 88Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) B17-22A13-24H13-24F9-24D1-24C1-24J1-24G1-24K1-24B1-16A1 -12B23-24F1-8H1-122014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014811'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR20148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148PARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKDISTPANEL 30A TWIST LOCKPCC CCCCPCCCCCCPPCCPRCPPCCPRCCCCCGGGGPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPCCCCCCPCCCCCP CPCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCPCCCCCCPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPCCCCCCPCCCCCCPCCCCPCCCCPCCPCCPCCPCCCPCCCCCCPCCPCCCCCCCPCPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKP18'17'-8"18'16'-4"11'11'67'17'-7"4'10'-2"5'12'5'5'-1"1700GEMBA BOARDTRASHB17-22A13-24H13-24F9-24D1-24C1-24J1-24G1-24K1-24B1-16A1 -12B23-24F1-8H1-122014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014811'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR20148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148201482014820148PARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKDISTPANEL 30A TWIST LOCKPCC CCCCPCCCCCCPPCCPRCPPCCPRCCCCCGGGGPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPCCCCCCPCCCCCP CPCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCPCCCCCCPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPCCCCCCPCCCCCCPCCCCPCCCCPCCPCCPCCPCCCPCCCCCCPCCPCCCCCCCPCPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKPARENT30ATWISTLOCKP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPP-FLEXCONV30ATWISTLOCKPTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHTRASHGo CartReturn4A 1 6A1FILE CABINET MERCURY DISPLAYGEMBA BOARD ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MATTEAM LIFTCONE2207CONESKEEP THIS SIDECLEARKEEP THIS SIDECLEAR6AAPALET JACKHAND TRUCK STEP STOOLSINGLE OVERFLOWVAN WHITE BOARDCARTCARTTABLEAMBASSADOR BOARD G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 "FILE CABINET TRASHG o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " 4A ERGO MATWHITE BOARDGEMBA BOARD TRASH 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT TRASH DSP STAND UP AREA DSPSTAND UPAREADSP STAND UPAREAPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFF TRASH VRI CART4A4AHOURLY HUDDLE CARTASSIGNMENT BOARDA AA INDUCT LABEL PRINTERS A AAA AAFASTSTARTFASTSTARTNO HEAT OR SPARK SOURCE WITHIN THIS 25' RADIUS PLACE AGAINST WALL TRASH6AEYE WASH STATION CART PARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKPARENTCONV30ATWISTLOCKTRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT PROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVEPROBLEM SOLVE3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT ERGO MATDOCK PLATEDOCK PLATE TEAM LIFT FILE CABINET TRASHCART ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT4AWINTER SUPPLIESDO NOT SIT OR LEANDO NOT SIT OR LEANDO NOT SIT OR LEAN1111EXCESS SIGNAGE5S TAPESORT BAGSMISC MISC MISCSTORAGE CABINET PPE VENDING MACHINETRASH PPE VENDING MACHINETRASHTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFUNISTRUT 12' AFFTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH 4A-GFI WATER 17"x24" FLOOR MAT TRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24 " FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASHCART 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT TRASH 4A VOD BOARDGEMBA BOARD CONECONECONE ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT GEMBA BOARDGEMBA BOARDTRASH4A-GFI20A-GFI24 "x36" DRA IN MATWATER17"x24" FLOOR MAT4ACARTSTRASH 6A 4A VIDMAR-KEEPSTOCK SHOP VACSTORAGE CABINET STORAGE CABINET EYE WASH STATIONCART LIQ FLAM CABINET LADDERTOOL CART DROP ZONEWORKBENCH 10'-0"10'-0"7'-6" 7'- 6 " 4'- 6 " ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT10'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"TRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATDD DEVICE CHARGING STATION D D DEVICE CHARGING STATION DD DEVICE CHARGING STATION D DDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDDDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDD DEVICE CHARGING STATION DD DEVICE CHARGING STATION D D DEVICE CHARGING STATION D DDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDDDEVICE CHARGING STATION4ACARTSFILE CABINET 6A TRASH 6A GEMBA BOARD FILE CABINET D D DEVICE CHARGING STATIONDDDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDD DEVICE CHARGING STATION DD DEVICE CHARGING STATION DD DEVICE CHARGING STATION DDDEVICE CHARGING STATIONPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACK G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o C a r t 3 2 . 5 " x 5 4 " G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54" G o Cart3 2.5 " x 54"3A MERCURY DISPLAY3A MERCURY D ISPLAYSORTABLE NON SORT RETURN TO SORT CENTER4A2PHONE BOOTHFILE CABINET 6A TRASH FILE CABINET 6A TRASH UPUPUPUP UP UP TRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24 " FLOOR MAT NO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONE NO STAND ZONETRASHTRASHSCISSOR LIFT STORAGE12AFEFEFE FE FEFE FE FE FE FE FE FE FE FEFE FE FE FE FE FE TRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH 6A 4A VIDMAR-KEEPSTOCK SHOP VACSTORAGE CABINET STORAGE CABINET EYE WASH STATIONCART LIQ FLAM CABINET LADDERTOOL CART DROP ZONEWORKBENCH 10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"7'-6"4'-6" ERGO MAT3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT10'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"10'-0" FE 1 1 3 3 E E G G 3 A2.12 1 A2.11 2 A2.11 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 D D C C 75'-0"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9" 49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"47'-6"100'-5"228'-0"81'-1"15'-9"58'-0"56'-0"56'-0"58'-0"2 A3.10 2 A3.10 1 A3.10 1 A3.10 A1.11b A1.11a A2.14 1 WAREHOUSE ZONE "B" B100 REMOTE BREAKROOM 129 MEN'S RESTROOM 131 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 130 ELECTRICAL 101 FIRE PUMP 102 DEMARC 103 AEN 132 TRAINING 104 STORAGE 105 MEN'S RESTROOM 106 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 107 STORAGE 108 JANITOR 109 LOCKERS 110 BREAKROOM 111 ASSOCIATE ENTRY/SCREENING 113 EXIT 114 CIRCULATION 120 LOCKERS 115 MEN'S RESTROOM 118 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 117 STORAGE 116 HUB 122 HUB STAGING 123 MOTHER'S ROOM 122 LOBBY 125 MULTI-FAITH 128 OFFICE 121STORAGE 119 WAREHOUSE ZONE "A" A100 ENTRY 112 ABLUTION 126 ABLUTION 127 F F 12 12 13 13 620'-0" A1.11 2 A2.15 1 A2.16 1 B B A A GATE / STORAGE 141 G 30'-2"15'-1"5'-6"4'-7"GATE / STORAGE 141 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:20 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00OVERALL FLOOR PLANA1.11PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020N 0 4'8'16'32' 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 1. SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES. 2. FOR METAL STUD SIZES AND SPACING SEE LIMITING WALL HEIGHT TABLE L/240. 3. ALL WALL STUDS TO BE 3-5/8", U.O.N. 4. ALL RESTROOM WALL STUDS TO BE 6" AND FULLY INSULATED, U.O.N. 5. SEE KEYNOTE INFORMATION FOR ANY REQUIRED INSULATION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE SAID DOCUMENTATION TO TENANT CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR OR ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION. 7. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS (IF ANY) AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 8. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE ALL FLOOR PREPARATIONS IN BASE BID. 9. ALL DRYWALL CORNERS AND COLUMN EDGES TO BE FINISHED WITH CORNER "L" BEAD. 10. DIMENSIONS OF COLUMN FURRING IN A COMMON AREA ARE TO BE EQUAL DIMENSIONS WITH EDGE ALIGNED, U.O.N. 11. INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD WALL SHALL CONFORM TO ICC REPORT ESR-1338. 12. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE TILT-UP CONCRETE PANEL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 13. DETAIL REFERENCES SHOULD BE APPLIED TO ALL INSTANCES WHERE THE SAME CONDITIONS OCCUR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 14. DIMENSIONS ARE GIVEN TO THE COLUMN GRID, FACE OF STUD, CENTERLINE OF OPENING, OR ROUGH OPENING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALIGN FINISHES WHERE INDICATED. 15. REFER TO DESIGN CRITERIA DOCUMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 16. EXECUTION OF THIS DESIGN, THE OWNER AND TENANT ARE THE SAME ENTITY. GENERAL NOTES DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2ENLARGED CHAIN LINK PLAN 0 10'20'40'100' 1"=20' SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES NOTES: 8.C.c Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FEFE FE FE FE FE FE FE E G 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 D CSEE SHEET 1/A1.11b49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"97'-3" 1'-8"SEE SHEET 1/A1.11b58'-0"56'-0"56'-0"58'-0"I4.11 1 F.O.C. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J.F.O.C.F.O.C.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.F.O.C.228'-0"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 19'-5" 19'-5" 28'-8"12'-10"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"28'-8"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 46'-5" 19'-5" 28'-8" TYP. 203TYP. 1'-0" TYP. 201 TYP. 210 TYP. 202 TYP. 202 A100e A100fA100c A100h A100aA100b 122 A100d A100g A100j 114b 112a 104 101102A100k I4.31 1 K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 3'-0" K.O. 12'-0" 5'-8" 3'-4" 3'-0" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 3'-0"3'-4" 10'-6" 7'-2" 7'-0" 11'-5" 4'-0" 4'-0" 11'-5" 4'-0" 28'-8"4'-0"3'-4"15'-8"4'-0"4'-0"19'-0"4'-0"4'-0"11'-5"3'-5"4'-2"4'-0"4'-0"19'-0"4'-0"4'-0"2'-8"3'-4"13'-0"4'-0"4'-0"19'-0"4'-0"4'-0"6'-4"6'-4"6'-4"5'-8"6'-4" 9'-6" 3'-4" 6'-6"12'-0" 11'-0" 4'-0" K.O. 12'-0" 4'-8" 3'-4" 3'-0" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 11'-0" 12'-0" 4'-0" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 11'-0" 12'-0" 4'-0"4'-0"3'-4" 4'-5" K.O. 12'-0" 3'-3" 19'-5" BREAKROOM 111 ASSOCIATE ENTRY/SCREENING 113 ENTRY 112 EXIT 114 LOCKERS 110 MEN'S RESTROOM 106 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 107 STORAGE 108 JANITOR 109 TRAINING 104 ELECTRICAL 101FIRE PUMP 102 DEMARC 103 WAREHOUSE ZONE "A" A100 LOCKERS 115 CIRCULATION 120 OFFICE 121 MEN'S RESTROOM 118 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 117 HUB STAGING 123 HUB 122 MOTHER'S ROOM 122 ABLUTION 126 ABLUTION 127 LOBBY 125 MULTI-FAITH 128 AEN 132 F 12 12 13 13 1'-0"1'-0"FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTURE PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING PARTITION TO UNDERSIDE OF CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL WITH FURRING PLUMBING CHASE WALL TO 6" ABOVE CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALLCON 1HR RATED CONSTRUCTION NOTE: PROVIDE VERTICAL DRYWALL EXPANSION JOINT AT 30' O.C. MAXIMUM A5.17 8 A5.17 13 A5.17 9 A5.17 5 A5.17 11 A5.17 17 A5.17 10 A5.17 6 A5.17 7 A5.17 14 A5.17 15 A5.17 16 CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CARD READER LOCATED-BY SECURITY VENDOR. G.C. TO PROVIDE POWER TO ALL LOCATIONS AND CONDUIT PULL STRING AT HARD WALL LOCATIONS FOR SECURITY VENDOR DATA LINES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND SECURITY DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO. CR W NEW CHILLED WATER COOLER FOR WAREHOUSE. PROVIDE POWER, AND PLUMBING LINE WITH VALVE AS REQUIRED. SEE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION TBD. EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER - SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. #EQUIPMENT TAG - SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET DOOR TAG - SEE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEETS A11 SERIES ### FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEC PROVIDE SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. CABINET TO BE ARCHITECTURAL SERIES VERTICAL DUO, STEEL WITH BAKED WHITE FINISH. EXTINGUISHER TO BE "MP10" 4A:80B:C. U.N.O. SEE NOTE:SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR METAL WALL STUD TABLE TO SELECT APPROPRIATE WALL STUD SIZE GAUGE & SPACING FOR WALL HEIGHT. WINDOW TAG - SEE WINDOW ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A11.2? X WALL TAG - SEE PARTITION TYPE LEGEND ON DETAIL 5/A12.5 A5.22 6 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:25 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN -ZONE AA1.11aPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN - ZONE A N NOT TO SCALE N WALL LEGEND LEGEND KEY PLAN 201 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT 12' A.F.F. 202 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. 203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS. 1 7 13 A C E AB 0 8'16'32'64' 1/16"=1'-0"DATEREMARKSNOTES: 8.C.c Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FE FE FEFE FE FE FE FEFE FE FE FE 1 1 3 3 E G 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 D C SEE SHEET 1/A1.11aSEE SHEET 1/A1.11a75'-0"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"58'-0"56'-0"56'-0"58'-0"TYP. 209 F.O.C.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J. P.J.F.O.C.228'-0"P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.P.J.F.O.C.F.O.C. P.J.28'-8"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"27'-0"12'-10"WAREHOUSE ZONE "B" B100 21'-4" 20'-0" 53'-9"27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 28'-9" 27'-0" 27'-0" 21'-1" 20'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 27'-0" 28'-9" 27'-0" 27'-0"P.J.206 TYP. 207 TYP. 201 202202 TYP. 203 208 I4.11 2 B100aB100b B100c B100d B100e B100f B100g B100h B100j B100k B100m B100l B100n B100o B100p B100q B100r B100s B100w B100v B100x A100d A100c B100u B100t 14'-0" 3'-4" 4'-0" 4'-0" K.O. 12'-0" 4'-0" 7'-5" K.O. 12'-0" 14'-11" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 4'-0" 3'-4" 4'-8" K.O. 12'-0" 3'-0" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 8'-5" K.O. 12'-0" 8'-5" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0"3'-11"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"2'-3"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"2'-3"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"2'-3"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"6'-6"3'-4"5'-11"9'-0"2'-3"2'-3"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"2'-3"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-4"2'-2"9'-0"4'-6"9'-0"2'-3"5'-1" K.O. 12'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" K.O. 12'-0" 4'-0" 27'-0"4'-0" 12'-0" 11'-0" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 4'-0" 12'-0" 11'-0" 3'-0"3'-4" 5'-2" K.O. 12'-0" 3'-6" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 11'-6" 12'-0" 11'-0" 11'-0" K.O. 12'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 12'-6" 12'-3" 7'-6" K.O. 12'-0" 7'-6" 4'-0" 12'-0" REMOTE BREAKROOM 129 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 130 MEN'S RESTROOM 131 B100y B100z F CARD READER LOCATED-BY SECURITY VENDOR. G.C. TO PROVIDE POWER TO ALL LOCATIONS AND CONDUIT PULL STRING AT HARD WALL LOCATIONS FOR SECURITY VENDOR DATA LINES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND SECURITY DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO. CR W NEW CHILLED WATER COOLER FOR WAREHOUSE. PROVIDE POWER, AND PLUMBING LINE WITH VALVE AS REQUIRED. SEE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION TBD. EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER - SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. #EQUIPMENT TAG - SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET DOOR TAG - SEE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEETS A11 SERIES ### FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEC PROVIDE SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. CABINET TO BE ARCHITECTURAL SERIES VERTICAL DUO, STEEL WITH BAKED WHITE FINISH. EXTINGUISHER TO BE "MP10" 4A:80B:C. U.N.O. SEE NOTE:SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR METAL WALL STUD TABLE TO SELECT APPROPRIATE WALL STUD SIZE GAUGE & SPACING FOR WALL HEIGHT. WINDOW TAG - SEE WINDOW ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A11.2? X WALL TAG - SEE PARTITION TYPE LEGEND ON DETAIL 5/A12.5 A5.22 6 FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTURE PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING PARTITION TO UNDERSIDE OF CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL WITH FURRING PLUMBING CHASE WALL TO 6" ABOVE CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALLCON 1HR RATED CONSTRUCTION NOTE: PROVIDE VERTICAL DRYWALL EXPANSION JOINT AT 30' O.C. MAXIMUM A5.17 8 A5.17 13 A5.17 9 A5.17 5 A5.17 11 A5.17 17 A5.17 10 A5.17 6 A5.17 7 A5.17 14 A5.17 15 A5.17 16 CONCRETE MASONRY WALL architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:28 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN -ZONE BA1.11bPROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020WALL LEGEND LEGEND KEY PLAN NN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN - ZONE B 201 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT 12' A.F.F. 202 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. 203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS. 206 6'X8' HYDRAULIC DOCK LEVELER. 207 DOCK PIT. 208 EXTERIOR STEEL STAIR, ALL COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED. 209 STEEL BOLLARD, CONCRETE-FILLED PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW. 1 7 13 A C E AB 0 8' 16' 32' 64' 1/16"=1'-0" NOT TO SCALE DATEREMARKSNOTES: 8.C.c Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 1 3 3 E E G G 1 A2.11 2 A2.11 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 D D C C 75'-0"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"49'-9"47'-6"58'-0"56'-0"56'-0"58'-0"228'-0"SLOPE1/4" PER FOOT MIN.RIDGE LINE RIDGE LINE 2 A3.10 2 A3.10 1 A3.10 1 A3.10SLOPE 3/8" PER FOOT MIN.SLOPE1/4" PER FOOT MIN.SLOPE3/8" PER FOOT MIN.A2.14 3 SLOPE1" PER FOOT MIN.301301 303 TYP. 304 F F 12 12 13 13 620'-0" A2.16 3 A2.15 3 39'-5" 38'-3" 38'-3" B B A A 37'-1 1/2" 38'-3" 36'-7 1/2" 36'-7 1/2" 37'-3" FLOW LINE TO DRAIN. SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MIN. STRUCTURAL FRAMINGS BELOW ROOF DECK. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:33 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00ROOF PLANA1.13PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020301 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING OVER RIGID INSULATION OVER WOOD DECK. 303 ROOF HATCH. VERIFY ROOF JOIST LOCATIONS WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 304 LINE OF WALL BELOW. N LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES B.O.D. = BOTTOM OF DECK T.O.P. = TOP OF PARAPET H.P. = TOP OF ROOFING -HIGH POINT M.P. = TOP OF ROOFING -MID POINT L.P. = TOP OF ROOFING -LOW POINT SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES 0 10' 20' 40' 100' 1"=20'DATEREMARKSA. MAINTAIN ¼”PER FOOT MINIMUM SLOPE THROUGHOUT ROOF. B. WALKWAY PADS TO BE PROVIDED AT AREAS SHOWN AND TO INCLUDE ALL EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS, DOORWAYS, STAIR/LADDER LANDINGS, AND OTHER AREAS REQUIRING REGULAR MAINTENANCE. C. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE COVERS, ENCLOSURES, AND/OR SEALANTS AT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS, PIPES, CURBS, DUCTS, AND CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE AND REFER TO MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL DISCIPLINES FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D. PROVIDE TAPERED INSULATION ROOF CRICKETS AT MECHANICAL UNITS AS REQUIRED. MIN SLOPE TO BE 1/4" / 1' 0". PROVIDE VALLEY SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY AHJ AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS E. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FOR GENERAL ARRANGEMENT AND LOCATION ONLY. ACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED AND COORDINATED WITH EQUIPMENT, SHOP DRAWINGS, AND STRUCTURAL FRAMING. F. SEE STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLAN FOR ROOF DECK HEIGHTS TO ESTABLISH ROOF SLOPES AND ROOF MEMBER LOCATIONS. G. NO CONDUIT ON ROOF. H. ALL COMPONENTS FOR THE ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED BASED ON A STORM OF 60 MINUTES DURATION AND 100 YEAR RETURN PERIOD PER LOCAL BUILDING CODE. I. ALL ROOF MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY W/ THE STANDARDS AS SPECIFIED BY LOCAL CODE AND SHALL HAVE A FIRE CLASSIFICATION AS REQUIRED J. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODE. ALL STORM DRAINS SHALL PROVIDE CLEAN OUTS AND OVERFLOWS AS REQUIRED BY CODE. K. ALL ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES REQUIRING MAINTENANCE SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 20 FEET FROM THE PARAPET WALL. NOTES: 8.C.c Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) K1-24K1-2411TRASH WATER17"x24" FLOOR MAT TRASH 4A VOD BOARDGEMBA BOARD CONECONECONE ERGO MAT 3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT GEMBA BOARDGEMBA BOARDTRASH4A-GFI20A-GFI24"x36" DRAIN MATWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDD DEVICE CHARGING STATION D D DEVICE CHARGING STATION D DDEVICE CHARGING STATIONDDDEVICE CHARGING STATIONFE GEMBA BOARDCLEAR11 PPE VENDING MACHINETRASHTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MAT4A2PHONE BOOTH6A TRASH FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTURE PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING PARTITION TO UNDERSIDE OF CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL WITH FURRING PLUMBING CHASE WALL TO 6" ABOVE CEILING TILT-UP CONCRETE WALLCON 1HR RATED CONSTRUCTION NOTE: PROVIDE VERTICAL DRYWALL EXPANSION JOINT AT 30' O.C. MAXIMUM A5.17 8 A5.17 13 A5.17 9 A5.17 5 A5.17 11 A5.17 17 A5.17 10 A5.17 6 A5.17 7 A5.17 14 A5.17 15 A5.17 16 CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CARD READER LOCATED-BY SECURITY VENDOR. G.C. TO PROVIDE POWER TO ALL LOCATIONS AND CONDUIT PULL STRING AT HARD WALL LOCATIONS FOR SECURITY VENDOR DATA LINES. SEE SPECIFICATIONS AND SECURITY DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO. CR W NEW CHILLED WATER COOLER FOR WAREHOUSE. PROVIDE POWER, AND PLUMBING LINE WITH VALVE AS REQUIRED. SEE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION TBD. EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER - SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. #EQUIPMENT TAG - SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THIS SHEET DOOR TAG - SEE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEETS A11 SERIES ### FEH PROVIDE 15.5LB HALOTRON WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER 2A:10B:C WITH BRACKET & SIGN. FE PROVIDE WALL-MOUNTED FIRE EXTINGUISHER, "MP10" BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. 4A:80B:C, WITH WALL HANGING BRACKET & SIGN. FEC PROVIDE SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER BY LARSEN'S MANUFACTURING CO. CABINET TO BE ARCHITECTURAL SERIES VERTICAL DUO, STEEL WITH BAKED WHITE FINISH. EXTINGUISHER TO BE "MP10" 4A:80B:C. U.N.O. SEE NOTE:SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR METAL WALL STUD TABLE TO SELECT APPROPRIATE WALL STUD SIZE GAUGE & SPACING FOR WALL HEIGHT. WINDOW TAG - SEE WINDOW ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A11.2? X WALL TAG - SEE PARTITION TYPE LEGEND ON DETAIL 5/A12.5 A5.22 6 E D C102101 3 26 256 289 I4.41 1C 2 2 P1A P3A P12A P12B P12CP12C P12C P12C P12CP12C P1A P1AP1A P5 P1AP1A P1A P1A P1A P5 P5 P1AP5 P3A P3A P12CP12C P3A P3A CMU P11P11 P3A P13 277 11 3 64 8 3 3 251 208 JANITOR 109 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 107 MEN'S RESTROOM 106 TRAINING 104 WAREHOUSE ZONE "A" A100 AEN 132 DEMARC 103 FIRE PUMP 102 ELECTRICAL 101 LOCKERS 110 BREAKROOM 111 ASSOCIATE ENTRY/SCREENING 113 262 264 265 25'-11"8'-7" 10'-11" 17'-1" 4'-10" 6'-7" 4'-8" 24'-9" 4'-9" 7'-3" 15'-2"4'-10"11'-11"13'-2"10'-6" 1'-3" 4'-0" 18'-8" 4'-0" 1'-4" 8" 4'-0" 18'-10" 6'-0" 8" 9'-9" 10'-6" 4'-7" 17'-3" 104 103 104a 139 105 109 110 108 111a 112a112 112b STORAGE 105 STORAGE 108 CENTER ON MULLION CENTER ON MULLION ENTRY 112 36'-5"11'-11"4'-9"3'-4"13'-6"11'-11"I4.41 1E 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 5'-6" 5'-1" 3'-9" 5'-1" 7'-3"4'-10"5'-5" I4.31 1 4'-7"10'-5"I4.42 3C 3A 3B 266 12 I4.43 1 I4.43 2 I4.43 3 13 I4.44 1I4.45 1 B B E E D D C C 14 15 B B 12 13 E G 122 D FF I4.411A P3A P1A P12CP12C P12CP12C P1A P3A B3 P12A P12CP12C P12B P12A P12CP12C P1A P2 P12B P1A P12B P1AP1A P2 P2 P2P2 P3A P3A P1A P2 U3U3 P1AP1A P1A P1A P5 P5 P1A P1A U3 P1AP1AP5 P5 P1A P1A P1A P1AP1A P1A P3A P3A P1A P1A P1AB3 P3A P3A P3A P3A P29'-11"10'-8"10'-4"10'-9"10'-4"4'-7"5'-0"12'-0"4'-1"4'-1"2'-9"9'-3"4'-0"7'-10"7'-0"12'-0"10'-7" 4'-6" 8'-10" 9'-5"36'-8"9'-9"10'-3"16'-10"27'-6"8"10'-3" 4'-10" 7'-0" 4'-4"36'-9" CENTER ON MULLION CENTER ON MULLION CENTER ON MULLION 17'-1" 1'-9" 4'-0" 7" 19'-0" 6" 4'-0" 1'-5" 11" 4'-0" 7" 9'-4" 8'-7" 7" 4'-0"3'-8"6'-3"5'-7"8"2'-9"2'-7"4'-10"7"10'-11"8'-1"8"6" 6'-5"8" 4'-10" 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 3'-5" 4'-4" 4'-11" 4'-11" 4'-0"6'-11"277 274 272 268 253 256 257 268 276 251 259 280 279279 281 2'-2"3'-8"12 13 26 1 164 8 3 3 265 12 3 26 13 26 3 2 2 2 2 BREAKROOM 111 ASSOCIATE ENTRY/SCREENING 113 EXIT 114 LOCKERS 115 CIRCULATION 120 OFFICE 121 MEN'S RESTROOM 118 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 117 LOBBY 125 MULTI-FAITH 128 ABLUTION 127 ABLUTION 126 MOTHER'S ROOM 122 HUB STAGING 123 HUB 122 STORAGE 116 266 267 290 I4.43 4 128 125 128a 126 127 124 123a 123 116 121 119 STORAGE 119 120 114 114a 114b 113 112b 112 112a 111 I4.422C 2B 2A 266 ENTRY 112 I4.33 2 36'-8" 4'-10"6'-7"3'-8"A6.10 8 F 12 12 I4.41 1D I4.41 1B I4.43 1 I4.43 3 I4.435 I4.436 13 13 I4.45 1I4.46 1 E E G G F F 12 12 13 13 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:24:40 AMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN -MAIN OFFICExA2.2PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020GENERAL NOTES 0 4' 8' 16' 32' 1/8"=1'-0" FLOOR PLAN 1. SEE SHEET A0.2 & A0.2a FOR ADDITIONAL GENERAL NOTES. 2. FOR METAL STUD SIZES AND SPACING SEE LIMITING WALL HEIGHT TABLE L/240. 3. ALL WALL STUDS TO BE 3-5/8", U.O.N. 4. ALL RESTROOM WALL STUDS TO BE 6" AND FULLY INSULATED, U.O.N. 5. SEE KEYNOTE INFORMATION FOR ANY REQUIRED INSULATION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE SAID DOCUMENTATION TO TENANT CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR OR ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION. 7. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS (IF ANY) AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 8. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE ALL FLOOR PREPARATIONS IN BASE BID. 9. ALL DRYWALL CORNERS AND COLUMN EDGES TO BE FINISHED WITH CORNER "L" BEAD. 10. DIMENSIONS OF COLUMN FURRING IN A COMMON AREA ARE TO BE EQUAL DIMENSIONS WITH EDGE ALIGNED, U.O.N. 11. INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD WALL SHALL CONFORM TO ICC REPORT ESR-1338 12. PLANS HOLDER, G.C. RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, PRINTS OF FINAL AS-BUILT DRAWINGS AND LABELING. FINAL PLACEMENT TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER/TENANT. EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WALL LEGEND LEGEND KEY PLANNOTESWALL TYPES * ALL WALLS TO BE OF TYPE < A3 > U.O.N. * SEE SHEET A12.5 FOR WALL TYPES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - MAIN OFFICE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - MAIN OFFICE N N 1 7 13 A C E AB 12 NOT TO SCALE ITEM:SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLED BY: TENANT GC TENANT GC 36 37 REFER TO DESIGN DETAILS ON A4.0 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR DIGITAL CONTENT. CLIENT TO CONFIRM & PROVIDE SPECIFICATION. 48 49 95 ITEM:SUPPLIED BY: INSTALLED BY: TENANT GC TENANT GC 1 LUNCH STORAGE COOLER YES YES 2 REFRIGERATOR/TOP FREEZER ELEC. BY G.C. YES YES 3 MICROWAVE ELEC. BY G.C. YES YES 4 ICE MACHINE W FLOOR DRAIN ELEC. & WATER LINE BY G.C. YES YES 5 6 VENDING MACHINE SMALL - SNACK ELEC. BY G.C. YES YES 7 COFFEE VENDOR, ELEC. & WATER LINE BY G.C. YES YES 8 WATER COOLER ELEC. & WATERLINE BY G.C. YES YES 11 SOAP DISPENSER 12 13 TV-WALL MOUNTED ELEC. & DATA BY G.C. 16 TRASH BIN YES YES 23 26 PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER - SURFACE MOUNTED YES YES 29 30 UNDER COUNTER REFRIGERATOR 289 PATH FOR PORTABLE GENERATOR CABLE LOCATED OUTSIDE TO CONNECT WITH SWITCH LOCATED IN EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL ROOM. 12X12 OPENING IN BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS, WITH FIRE RATED, SECURITY ACCESS DOOR, +-36" AFF. 290 SHOE RACK (FOIO/FTIT). 208 EXTERIOR STEEL STAIR, ALL COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED. 251 EXTERIOR CONCRETE WALLS/EXTERIOR METAL PANELS TO BE FURRED TO 6" ABOVE CEILING AND CONTINUE INSULATION (IF APPLICABLE) TO DECK ABOVE. AT OPEN CEILING AREAS, FURRING TO BE PROVIDED TO DECK ABOVE, FURRING TO CONTINUE ABOVE AND BELOW WINDOWS WHICH ARE NOT FULL HEIGHT. GYPSUM BOARD TO WRAP WINDOW FRAME AT SILL, JAMB AND HEAD. 253 NICHE WALL FOR FLATSCREEN TV INSTALLATION. PROVIDE 3" AIR CLEARANCE AROUND TOP, BOTTOM AND SIDES OF SCREEN. VERIFY WITH TENANT TV SIZES PRIOR CREATING NICHE. 256 UPPER & LOWER CABINETRY NO DRAWERS, WITH BACK-SPLASH AND DOUBLE-BASIN STAINLESS STEEL SINK WITH FAUCET. 257 UPPER & LOWER CABINETRY NO DRAWERS, WITH BACK-SPLASH. 259 LOWER CABINETRY NO DRAWERS, WITH BACK-SPLASH AND SINGLE-BASIN STAINLESS STEEL SINK WITH FAUCET. 262 MOP SINK. SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 264 ELECTRIC WATER HEATER. 265 HI-LO DRINKING FOUNTAIN WITH CANE APRON. 266 FLOOR DRAIN. SEE PLUMBING DRAWINGS. 267 LOCKER BENCH: FREESTANDING, ACCESSIBLE 42"W X 20"D X 17 14"H GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL (MODEL #T9F2698859). 268 GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT/HEADER ABOVE. 272 TIME CLOCK (FOIO/FTIT). G.C. TO PROVIDE DATA WIRING (P.O.E) FOR EACH CLOCK. COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION W/ OWNER/TENANT. 274 BULLETIN BOARD. 276 PHONE BOOTH. TO BE PROVIDED BY ROOM ONE. DOOR/FRAME: WHITE, INTERIOR: LIGHT GRAY, EXTERIOR: OAK. 277 SEMI-RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET AND FIRE EXTINGUISHER BY POTTER-ROEMER. CABINET TO BE ALTA SERIES #7013-DV, STEEL WITH RECOATABLE WHITE FINISH - PAINT (SEMI-GLOSS) TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL. EXTINGUISHER TO BE #3005, 2A:10B:C. 279 CUSTOMER KIOSKS (2 TOTAL). (FOIO/FTIT). 280 CUSTOMER PICK-UP LOCKERS. (FOIO/FTIT). 281 RETURN SLOT MILLWORK.DATEREMARKS8.C.c Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLR11'CLRTRASH NO HEAT OR SPARK SOURCE WITHIN THIS 25' RADIUS PLACE AGAINST WALL CARTDO NOT SIT OR LEANDO NOT SIT OR LEANDO NOT SIT OR LEANTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24 " FLOOR MATTRASH4A-GFIWATER17"x24" FLOOR MATVOD BOARDGEMBA BOARD CONE3'x5' W/DBL. STCK. TAPE ERGO MAT GEMBA BOARDGEMBA BOARDPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACKPALLET JACK NO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONENO STAND ZONEFEFEFEFEFEFEFEFE1324567891011 C REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CANOPY COLUMNS FRAMING AND ROOFING 2 A2.13 1 A2.13 6'-0" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 43'-0" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 43'-0" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 38'-6" 5'-11" 46'-4 1/2" TYP. 201 210 12 13 B B A A 1 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 C 13'-8 1/2"559'-11" 12 13 620'-0" B B A A 1 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 C REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CANOPY COLUMNS FRAMING AND ROOFING 2 A2.13 1 A2.13 SLOPE1" PER FOOT MIN.12 13 B B A A MANEUVERING CLEAR AREAS LOAD OUT CLEAR ZONE BIRD NETTING architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:23:56 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00CANOPY PLANSA2.14PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 950200 10' 20' 40' 100' 1"=20' KEY PLAN N N 1 7 13 A C E AB SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1CANOPY FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"2CANOPY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"3CANOPY ROOF PLAN 201 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT 12' A.F.F. 210 OUTLINE OF CANOPY ABOVE. GENERAL NOTESLEGEND NOT TO SCALE DATEREMARKSNOTES: 1. THIS REFLECTED CEILING PLAN IS PROVIDED TO DOCUMENT CEILING DESIGN INTENT. SEE ALSO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DOCUMENTATION FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION INCLUDING SWITCH LOCATION, CIRCUITING AND WIRING LAYOUT. ALL MEP-FP DEVICE LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS, OR IN CONFLICT WITH MEP/FP DRAWINGS, ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE ARCHITECT'S REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AND THE ENGINEERS' PLANS, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING BEFORE ORDERING MATERIALS OR PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 2. AT AREAS OPEN TO STRUCTURE, PAINT METAL DECK, STRUCTURE, EXPOSED CONDUIT, MECHANICAL DUCT WORK, AND FIRE SPRINKLER COMPONENTS (EXCEPT HEADS) PT-2, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR FRAMING INFORMATION. 4. COORDINATE PERIMETER CONDITIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AND SITE ELEMENTS LIGHTING, SPRINKLERS, SIGNAGES AND OTHER MEPF ELEMENTS ARE NOT SHOWN. COORDINATE AS REQUIRED WITH EACH DISCIPLINE. 5. CRITICAL DIMENSIONS ARE DELINEATED AS "CLEAR". 6. REGIONAL WEATHER CONDITION CONSIDERATIONS - REGIONAL DESIGN TEAM TO VERIFY WITH CODES AND ADJUST DESIGN ACCORDINGLY TO ACCOUNT FOR REGIONAL WEATHER REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STORMWATER, WIND SPEED, UV EXPOSURE, HOT/COLD TEMPERATURE, HUMIDITY, SNOW LOAD, SNOW DRIFT, AND ICE BUILDUP. CANOPY OVERHANG AS REQUIRED BY SITE SPECIFIC CLIMATIC REQUIREMENTS, TO KEEP LAUNCH AREA CLEAR OF EXCESSIVE RAIN, SNOW AND SUN EXPOSURE. 7. SEE PARKING LEGEND FOR REQUIRED SIZE OF STAGING AND LOADING STALLS. THE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL REVIT/AUTOCAD MODELS MAY NOT REFLECT THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED. SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS SHALL ADHERE TO REQUIRED DIMENSIONS INDICATED IN PARKING LEGEND. VAN LOADING CANOPY ROOF MATERIAL BASIS OF DESIGN A. 45 MIL SINGLE PLY TPO OVER 1.5" RIGID INSULATION OVER METAL DECK. B. FASCIA PANEL COLOR TO BE PANTONE 2995C. ROOF MATERIAL BASIS OF DESING A. SINGLE COMPONENT RAISED SEAM METAL PANEL ROOF CLADDING SYSTEM. FORMED WITH INTEGRAL RIBS AT PANEL EDGES AND A FLAT PAN BETWEEN RIBS. DESIGNED FOR SEQUENTIAL INSTALLATION BY MECHANICALLY ATTACHING PANELS TO SUPPORTS USING SCREW FASTENERS LOCATED UNDER CONCEALED SIDE OF PANELS AND LAPPING AND INTERCONNECTING SIDE EDGES OF ADJACENT PANELS. BASIS OF DESIGN AEPSPAN SPAN-LOK OR SIMILIAR. COLOR TO BE PT-4, PROVIDE FINISH ON BOTH SIDES. B. ALTERNATE, PROVIDE INSULATED METAL PANEL, KINGSPAN KINGSEAM. PANELS TO BE DESIGNED FOR SEQUENTIAL INSTALLATION BY MECHANICALLY ATTACHING PANELS TO SUPPORTS USING SCREW FASTENERS LOCATED UNDER CONCEALED SIDE OF PANELS AND LAPPING AND INTERCONNECTING SIDE EDGES OF ADJACENT PANELS. COLOR TO BE PT-4. PROVIDED FINISH ON BOTH SIDES. THIS ALTERNATE SELECTION WILL RESULT IN A DIFFERENT JOIST LAYOUT REFER STRUCTURAL C. FASCIA PANEL COLOR TO BE PT-3 OR AS REQUIRED BY SPECIFIC PROJECT'S SIGNAGE AND BRANDING REQUIREMENTS SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES 8.C.c Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" EG D C CLEAR HEIGHT32'-0"TYP. 201 301 T.O.P. 45'-6" TYP. 202 CLEAR HEIGHT15'-0"WAREHOUSE ZONE "B" B100 401 TYP. 602 F B A F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 T.O.P. 45'-6" SEE ELEVATION 1BSEE ELEVATION 1A 12 13 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1 32 4 5 6 7 TYP. 202 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1B/A5.0WAREHOUSE ZONE "B" B100 CLEAR HEIGHT32'-0"TYP. 603 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 7 8 9 10 11 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONDINATIONSEE SHEET 1A/A5.0CLEAR HEIGHT32'-0"WAREHOUSE ZONE "A" A100 TRAINING 104 12 13 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 4/20/2021 11:24:10 AMN. RIVERA A.R./S.N. DAL20-0001-00BUILDING SECTIONSA3.10PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020201 STRUCTURAL STEEL COLUMN PAINT SAFETY YELLOW AT 12' A.F.F. 202 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICE AREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE FLOOR AREA IN WAREHOUSE. 301 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING OVER RIGID INSULATION OVER WOOD DECK. 401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE AND FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL. 602 STRUCTURAL STEEL JOIST. SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. 603 CONCRETE FOOTING. SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. 0 16' 32' 64' 128' 1/32"=1'-0" 8' 0 8' 16' 32' 64' 1/16"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2OVERALL BUILDING SECTION B-B SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"1OVERALL BUILDING SECTION A-A SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1APARTIAL BUILDING SECTION A-A SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1BPARTIAL BUILDING SECTION A-A GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN 1 7 13 A E 2 A5.0 2 A5.0 1 A5.0 1 A5.0 AB N NOT TO SCALE DATEREMARKSSEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES A. ELEVATION 0'-0" = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION INDICATED IN CIVIL DRAWINGS B. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS C. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS WHERE INDICATED FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ENLARGED PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANS OF SMALLER SCALE NOTES: 8.C.c Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASSSPANDREL GLASSTEMPERED GLASSALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE:U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITGLASS:BASE COLOR - PT-1MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITEPROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW.COLORS:SECONDARY COLOR - PT-2MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: SW 7066 GRAY MATTERSACCENT COLOR - PT-3MANUFACTURER: PANTONECOLOR/NO: 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUEACCENT COLOR - PT-4MANUFACTURER: STANDARDCOLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITEF.F.E.0"1324567891011T.O.P.45'-6"SEE ELEVATION 1BSEE ELEVATION 1A1213F.F.E.0"1324567T.O.P.45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.2TYP.402TYP.403TYP.401TYP.2034114061'-0"1'-0"F.F.E.0"7891011T.O.P.45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.2TYP.415411TYP.401TYP.404412TYP.403TYP.402TYP.1'-0"TYP.203406TYP.3'-3"TYP.3'-3"2 A6.11 A6.1A3.131121'-0"13F.F.E.0"CEBA0.AT.O.P.45'-6"405TYP.414411TYP.209208TYP.410TYP.408TYP.409TYP.401TYP.402412TYP.4031" 12"Darchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT12/14/2020 5:40:18 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.1PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKS203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS.208 EXTERIOR STEEL STAIR, ALL COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED.209 STEEL BOLLARD, CONCRETE-FILLED PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT.404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.406 OVERFLOW SCUPPER.408 DOCK BUMPER.409 DOCK SHELTER.410 TRAILER RESTRAINT.411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES.412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUDFRAMING.LEGEND016'32'64'128'1/32"=1'-0"8'08' 16'32'64'1/16"=1'-0"GENERAL NOTESSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"1OVERALL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1APARTIAL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1BPARTIAL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2OVERALL NORTH ELEVATIONSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:1. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX. U-FACTOR OF & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED ON SHEET CS.2. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE "KNOXBOX: LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL. 8.C.cPacket Pg. 96Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASSSPANDREL GLASSTEMPERED GLASSALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE:U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITGLASS:BASE COLOR - PT-1MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITEPROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW.COLORS:SECONDARY COLOR - PT-2MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: SW 7066 GRAY MATTERSACCENT COLOR - PT-3MANUFACTURER: PANTONECOLOR/NO: 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUEACCENT COLOR - PT-4MANUFACTURER: STANDARDCOLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITEF.F.E.0"1324567891011T.O.P.45'-6"SEE ELEVATION 3BSEE ELEVATION 3A1213F.F.E.0"7891011T.O.P.45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.1TYP.414TYP.402412TYP.403405TYP.203TYP.1'-0"406121'-0"13F.F.E.0"1324567T.O.P.45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.1TYP.403TYP.402412TYP.401TYP.414405TYP.203TYP.404411406TYP.4241'-0"1'-0"F.F.E.0"CEBAT.O.P.45'-6"405TYP.414TYP.403412TYP.402TYP.401TYP.404TYP.4151'-0"2'-0"4111" 12"4 A6.13 A6.1Darchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT12/14/2020 5:40:30 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.2PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKS203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT.404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.406 OVERFLOW SCUPPER.411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES.412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUDFRAMING.424 COILING OVERHEAD LOAD OUT DOOR (INSULATED), PRIMED AND FIELDPAINTED.016' 32'64'128'1/32"=1'-0"8'LEGEND08' 16' 32' 64'1/16"=1'-0"GENERAL NOTESSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"3OVERALL EAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3APARTIAL EAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3BPARTIAL EAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"4OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATIONSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:1. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX. U-FACTOR OF & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED ON SHEET CS.2. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE "KNOXBOX: LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL. XXXX8.C.cPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"E5'-5"14'-6"6'-5"6'-3"2'-0"2'-11"4'-1"3'-0"44'-6"B.O.C.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.C.O.M.B.O.M.301608609F.F.E.0"ET.O.P.45'-6"6'-5"14'-6"6'-0"6'-8"8'-11"3'-2"45'-6"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.B.O.CA.T.O.CA.301608609FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTUREPARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILINGPARTITION TO UNDERSIDE OF CEILINGTILT-UP CONCRETE WALL WITH FURRINGPLUMBING CHASE WALL TO 6" ABOVE CEILINGTILT-UP CONCRETE WALLCON1HR RATED CONSTRUCTIONNOTE: PROVIDE VERTICAL DRYWALL EXPANSION JOINT AT 30' O.C. MAXIMUMF.F.E.0"T.O.P.45'-6"12'-0"6'-3"6'-5"14'-5"6'-5"45'-6"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CA.301202606603TYP.40240140541413F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"5'-5"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.B.O.M.C.O.M.C.O.M.3'-0"4'-1"2'-11"2'-0"6'-3"6'-5"14'-5"2024026036061344'-6"4 A6.11310"1'-0"TRAINING1043 A6.1D1310"3'-10"BREAKROOM111LOCKERS1151'-0"E1 A6.1HUB STAGING1233'-9"E2 A6.1MULTI-FAITH128LOBBY125ABLUTION12710"1'-0"architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT12/23/2020 4:10:32 PMN. RIVERAL.T.V.DAL20-0001-00WALL SECTIONS A6.1PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1WALL SECTION02' 4'8'16'1/4"=1'-0"WALL TYPES* ALL WALLS TO BE OF TYPE < A3 > U.O.N.* SEE SHEET A12.5 FOR WALL TYPESWALL LEGEND202 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICEAREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE FLOOR AREAIN WAREHOUSE.301 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING OVER RIGID INSULATION OVER WOOD DECK.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.603 CONCRETE FOOTING. SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.606 STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.608 2X WOOD NAILER, PER STRUCTURAL.609 METAL COPING, PER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.GENERAL NOTESSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"8ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"7ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"6ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN8.C.cPacket Pg. 98Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASSSPANDREL GLASSTEMPERED GLASSALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE:U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITGLASS:OBSCURE GLAZINGSECONDARY COLOR - PT-1MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: NEBULOUS WHITE / SW 7063PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW.COLORS:ACCENT COLOR - PT-2MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: GRAY MATTERS / SW7066ACCENT COLOR - PT-3MANUFACTURED: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: TENANT BLUE. PANTONE /2995 CBASE COLOR PT-4MANUFACTURER: STANDARDCOLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITEANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMPT-1PT-2PT-3PT-4OSHA CAUTION YELLOW/ COLUMN BASE ANDBLACK DIAGONAL STRIPES COLUMN PROTECTIONPT-5NOTE: SEPARATE EXTERIOR PAINT SCHEDULE AND INTERIOR PAINTSCHEDULE IS PROVIDED. REFER TO A4.21 FOR EACH SCHEDULE.REFER TO CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION.EXTERIOR PAINT COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN IS SHERWIN WILLIAMS. ACCEPTABLEMANUFACTURERS ARE SHERWIN WILLIAMS, BENJAMIN MOORE, OR PPG.MATERIALS:METAL CANOPY, PAINTEDF.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"1324567891011SEE ELEVATION 1BSEE ELEVATION 1AT.O.P.45'-6"1213F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"1324567FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.2T.O.P.45'-6"TYP.402TYP.403TYP.401TYP.203411406TYP.3'-3"TYP.3'-3"TYP.418TYP.419TYP.426F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"7891011FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.2T.O.P.45'-6"TYP.415411TYP.401TYP.404412TYP.403TYP.402TYP.1'-0"TYP.203406TYP.3'-3"TYP.3'-3"A3.1311213F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"EGDCT.O.P.45'-6"405TYP.414411TYP.209208TYP.410TYP.408TYP.409TYP.401TYP.402412TYP.403TYP.425A2.133FBAarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT4/20/2021 1:56:03 PMN. RIVERAA.R./S.N.DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA2.11PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020LEGENDSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"1OVERALL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1APARTIAL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1BPARTIAL WEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2OVERALL NORTH ELEVATION016'32'64'128'1/32"=1'-0"8'08'16'32' 64'1/16"=1'-0"GENERAL NOTESDATEREMARKSA. ELEVATION 0'-0" = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION INDICATED IN CIVIL DRAWINGSB. SEE PLANS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR ROUGH OPENING LOCATIONS AND WINDOW TYPES.C. SEE A6.10 AND A6.11 FOR WINDOW TYPES.D. ALL STOREFRONT GLAZING TO BE INSULATED GLAZING TYPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.E. VERIFY WITH AHJ FOR SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPERED INSULATED GLAZING BEFORE IMPLEMENTING.F. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX U-FACTOR & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA.G. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE KNOXBOX LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL.H. ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FINISHED FLOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.I. CHANGE IN PAINT COLOR OCCURS AT BACK OF REVEAL, TYP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.J. ALUMINUM DOOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE.K. PAINT ALL SIDES OF SOFFIT PT-3.SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS.208 EXTERIOR STEEL STAIR, ALL COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED.209 STEEL BOLLARD, CONCRETE-FILLED PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT.404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.406 OVERFLOW SCUPPER.408 DOCK BUMPER.409 DOCK SHELTER.410 TRAILER RESTRAINT.411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES.412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUDFRAMING.418 PANEL REVEAL.419 TILT UP CONCRETE PANEL.425 SECTIONAL OVERHEAD TRUCK DOCK DOOR (INSULATED) WITH BUMPERSAND DOCK SEAL, PRE-PRIMED, PAINT PER LEGEND, TYP.426 HM DOOR AND FRAME, PAINT.NOTES:8.C.cPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) SECONDARY COLOR - PT-1MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: NEBULOUS WHITE / SW 7063PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW.COLORS:ACCENT COLOR - PT-2MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: GRAY MATTERS / SW7066ACCENT COLOR - PT-3MANUFACTURED: SHERWIN WILLIAMSCOLOR/NO: TENANT BLUE. PANTONE /2995 CBASE COLOR PT-4MANUFACTURER: STANDARDCOLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITEANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMPT-1PT-2PT-3PT-4OSHA CAUTION YELLOW/ COLUMN BASE ANDBLACK DIAGONAL STRIPES COLUMN PROTECTIONPT-5NOTE: SEPARATE EXTERIOR PAINT SCHEDULE AND INTERIOR PAINTSCHEDULE IS PROVIDED. REFER TO A4.21 FOR EACH SCHEDULE.REFER TO CRITERIA FOR MORE INFORMATION.EXTERIOR PAINT COLOR BASIS OF DESIGN IS SHERWIN WILLIAMS. ACCEPTABLEMANUFACTURERS ARE SHERWIN WILLIAMS, BENJAMIN MOORE, OR PPG.VISION GLASSSPANDREL GLASSTEMPERED GLASSALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE:U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITGLASS:OBSCURE GLAZINGMATERIALS:METAL CANOPY, PAINTEDF.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"1324567891011SEE ELEVATION 3BSEE ELEVATION 3AT.O.P.45'-6"1213F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"7891011FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.1T.O.P.45'-6"TYP.414TYP.402412TYP.403405TYP.203TYP.1'-0"4062A3.141A3.15TYP.424TYP.426TYP.419TYP.4181A3.161213F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"1324567FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.1T.O.P.45'-6"TYP.403TYP.402412TYP.401TYP.414405TYP.203TYP.404411406TYP.424F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"EGDCT.O.P.45'-6"T.O.P.46'-6"405TYP.414TYP.403412TYP.402TYP.401TYP.404TYP.4151'-0"2'-0"4113/4" 12"5'-7 1/4"TYP.2'-0"TYP.2'-0"1'-9"1'-9"7'-2"7'-1"4'-3"4'-3"4'-3"4'-3"3A3.114A3.113A3.124A3.125A3.114A3.13A2.132A3.121A3.111FBAarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT4/20/2021 1:56:07 PMN. RIVERAA.R./S.N.DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA2.12PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT.404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.406 OVERFLOW SCUPPER.411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES.412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUDFRAMING.418 PANEL REVEAL.419 TILT UP CONCRETE PANEL.424 COILING OVERHEAD LOAD OUT DOOR (INSULATED), PRIMED AND FIELDPAINTED.426 HM DOOR AND FRAME, PAINT.016' 32' 64' 128'1/32"=1'-0"8'LEGENDSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"3OVERALL EAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3APARTIAL EAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3BPARTIAL EAST ELEVATION08'16' 32' 64'1/16"=1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"4OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATIONGENERAL NOTESDATEREMARKSA. ELEVATION 0'-0" = FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION INDICATED IN CIVIL DRAWINGSB. SEE PLANS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR ROUGH OPENING LOCATIONS AND WINDOW TYPES.C. SEE A6.10 AND A6.11 FOR WINDOW TYPES.D. ALL STOREFRONT GLAZING TO BE INSULATED GLAZING TYPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.E. VERIFY WITH AHJ FOR SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPERED INSULATED GLAZING BEFORE IMPLEMENTING.F. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX U-FACTOR & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA.G. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE KNOXBOX LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL.H. ALL VERTICAL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FINISHED FLOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.I. CHANGE IN PAINT COLOR OCCURS AT BACK OF REVEAL, TYP, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.J. ALUMINUM DOOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE.K. PAINT ALL SIDES OF SOFFIT PT-3.NOTES:SEE SHEET G0.2 & G0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES8.C.cPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"E5'-5"14'-6"6'-5"6'-3"2'-0"2'-11"4'-1"3'-0"44'-6"B.O.C.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.C.O.M.B.O.M.301608609F.F.E.0"ET.O.P.45'-6"6'-5"14'-6"6'-0"6'-8"8'-11"3'-2"45'-6"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.B.O.CA.T.O.CA.301608609FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTUREPARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILINGPARTITION TO UNDERSIDE OF CEILINGTILT-UP CONCRETE WALL WITH FURRINGPLUMBING CHASE WALL TO 6" ABOVE CEILINGTILT-UP CONCRETE WALLCON1HR RATED CONSTRUCTIONNOTE: PROVIDE VERTICAL DRYWALL EXPANSION JOINT AT 30' O.C. MAXIMUMF.F.E.0"T.O.P.45'-6"12'-0"6'-3"6'-5"14'-5"6'-5"45'-6"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CA.301202606603TYP.40240140541413F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"5'-5"T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.T.O.CH.B.O.M.C.O.M.C.O.M.3'-0"4'-1"2'-11"2'-0"6'-3"6'-5"14'-5"2024026036061344'-6"4 A6.11310"1'-0"TRAINING1043 A6.1D1310"3'-10"BREAKROOM111LOCKERS1151'-0"E1 A6.1HUB STAGING1233'-9"E2 A6.1MULTI-FAITH128LOBBY125ABLUTION12710"1'-0"architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT12/23/2020 4:10:32 PMN. RIVERAL.T.V.DAL20-0001-00WALL SECTIONS A6.1PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1WALL SECTION02' 4'8'16'1/4"=1'-0"WALL TYPES* ALL WALLS TO BE OF TYPE < A3 > U.O.N.* SEE SHEET A12.5 FOR WALL TYPESWALL LEGEND202 CONCRETE SLAB. PROVIDE VAPOR RETARDER OVER SAND BASE AT OFFICEAREA PER SOILS REPORT. PROVIDE SEALER FOR CONCRETE FLOOR AREAIN WAREHOUSE.301 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING OVER RIGID INSULATION OVER WOOD DECK.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.603 CONCRETE FOOTING. SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.606 STRUCTURAL FILL PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND STRUCTURALDRAWINGS.608 2X WOOD NAILER, PER STRUCTURAL.609 METAL COPING, PER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS.GENERAL NOTESSEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"8ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"7ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"5ENLARGED FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"6ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN8.C.cPacket Pg. 101Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 PAINTED CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL WITH JOINTS AND REVEALS AS INDICATED-TYP. (U.N.O.) 2 PAINTED FORM-LINED OR RIBBED CONCRETE-TYP. 3 METAL COPING 4 FENESTRATION TO BE COMPRISED OF BLACK ANODIZED VERTICALLY BUTT GLAZED MULLIONS WITH TINTED INSULATED GLAZING-MULLION CAPS AT ENTRY-TYP. 5 OPEN METAL CANOPY AT ENTRY-WITH SUBSTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT STOREFRONT GLASS SYSTEM AT ENTRY 6 ALUMINUM INFILL PANELS AT ENTRY 7 CLERESTORY GLAZING TO WAREHOUSE TO MATCH FENESTRATION-TYP. 8 ALUMINUM PANEL WITH ACCENT COLOR AT PANEL RETURN AND SOFFIT ABOVE KEYNOTES 6 5 8 1 4 2 3 7 PAGE 210.12.2020GILROY INDUSTRIAL GILROY, CALIFORNIA - SEA20-5001-00 PERSPECTIVE VIEW AT ENTRYThis conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) GROUND FLOOR 0’-0” GROUND FLOOR 0’-0” POTENTIAL 2ND FLOOR 15’-0” POTENTIAL 2ND FLOOR 15’-0” South Elevation at Pacheco Pass West Entry Elevation Partial West Entry Elevation at Primary Office Partial West Entry Elevation at Secondary Office CLEAR HEIGHT 36’-0” CLEAR HEIGHT 36’-0” PARAPET 42’-0” PARAPET 42’-0” ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 0 10m5m 25m 50m 8’0 16’32’ 16’0 32’64’ 32’0 64’128’ 2’4’0 8’12’ 1’2’0 4’6’ 4’8’0 16’24’ 4’0 8’16’ 2’0 4’8’ 1’0 2’4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 100 20 40 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:400 1:200 1/16" = 1'-0” 1/32" = 1'-0” 1/64" = 1'-0” 3/16" = 1'-0” 3/8" = 1'-0” 3/32" = 1'-0” 1/8" = 1'-0” 1/4" = 1'-0” 1/2" = 1'-0” 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 8’0 16’32’ 16’0 32’64’ 2’4’0 8’12’ 1’2’0 4’6’ 4’8’0 16’24’ 4’0 8’16’ 2’0 4’8’ 1’0 2’4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:400 1:200 1/16" = 1'-0” 1/32" = 1'-0” 1/64" = 1'-0” 3/16" = 1'-0” 3/8" = 1'-0” 3/32" = 1'-0” 1/8" = 1'-0” 1/4" = 1'-0” 1/2" = 1'-0” 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 0 10m5m 25m 50m 0 15m5m 30m 60m 0 15m5m 35m 75m 0 25m10m 50m 100m 0 40m20m 75m 150m 0 50m20m 100m 200m 0 100m50m 150m 250m 0 100m50m 150m 300m 0 100m50m 200m 400m 0 100m50m 250m 500m 0 200m100m 300m 600m 0 200m100m 400m 800m 0 250m100m 500m 1000m 8’0 16’32’ 16’0 32’64’ 32’0 64’128’ 64’0 128’256’ 2’4’0 8’12’ 1’2’0 4’6’ 4’8’0 16’24’ 4’0 8’16’ 2’0 4’8’ 1’0 2’4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 100 20 40 50 10 20 1:600 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:2000 1:4000 1:750 1:400 1:200 1:1000 1:1500 1:3000 1:5000 1:6000 1:8000 1:10000 1:2500 1/16" = 1'-0” 1/32" = 1'-0” 1/64" = 1'-0” 1/128" = 1'-0” 3/16" = 1'-0” 3/8" = 1'-0” 3/32" = 1'-0” 1/8" = 1'-0” 1/4" = 1'-0” 1/2" = 1'-0” 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' 1" = 10' ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 0 10m5m 25m 50m 0 15m5m 30m 60m 0 15m5m 35m 75m 0 25m10m 50m 100m 0 40m20m 75m 150m 0 50m20m 100m 200m 0 100m50m 150m 250m 0 100m50m 150m 300m 0 100m50m 200m 400m 0 100m50m 250m 500m 0 200m100m 300m 600m 0 200m100m 400m 800m 0 250m100m 500m 1000m 12’ 6’ 24’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 100 20 40 50 10 20 1:600 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:2000 1:4000 1:750 1:400 1:200 1:1000 1:1500 1:3000 1:5000 1:6000 1:8000 1:10000 1:2500 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' 1" = 10' PAGE 310.12.2020GILROY INDUSTRIAL GILROY, CALIFORNIA - SEA20-5001-00 ELEVATIONSThis conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) North Elevation East Elevation at Service Yard Enlarged East Elevation at Service Yard GROUND FLOOR 0’-0” GROUND FLOOR 0’-0” POTENTIAL 2ND FLOOR 15’-0” POTENTIAL 2ND FLOOR 15’-0” CLEAR HEIGHT 36’-0” CLEAR HEIGHT 36’-0” PARAPET 42’-0” PARAPET 42’-0” ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 8’0 16’32’ 16’0 32’64’ 2’4’0 8’12’ 1’2’0 4’6’ 4’8’0 16’24’ 4’0 8’16’ 2’0 4’8’ 1’0 2’4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:400 1:200 1/16" = 1'-0” 1/32" = 1'-0” 3/16" = 1'-0” 3/8" = 1'-0” 3/32" = 1'-0” 1/8" = 1'-0” 1/4" = 1'-0” 1/2" = 1'-0” 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 0 10m5m 25m 50m 0 15m5m 30m 60m 0 15m5m 35m 75m 0 25m10m 50m 100m 0 40m20m 75m 150m 0 50m20m 100m 200m 0 100m50m 150m 250m 0 100m50m 150m 300m 0 100m50m 200m 400m 0 100m50m 250m 500m 0 200m100m 300m 600m 0 200m100m 400m 800m 0 250m100m 500m 1000m 8’0 16’32’ 16’0 32’64’ 32’0 64’128’ 64’0 128’256’ 2’4’0 8’12’ 1’2’0 4’6’ 4’8’0 16’24’ 4’0 8’16’ 2’0 4’8’ 1’0 2’4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 100 20 40 50 10 20 1:600 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:2000 1:4000 1:750 1:400 1:200 1:1000 1:1500 1:3000 1:5000 1:6000 1:8000 1:10000 1:2500 1/16" = 1'-0” 1/32" = 1'-0” 1/64" = 1'-0” 1/128" = 1'-0” 3/16" = 1'-0” 3/8" = 1'-0” 3/32" = 1'-0” 1/8" = 1'-0” 1/4" = 1'-0” 1/2" = 1'-0” 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' 1" = 10' ENGINEERING METRIC 0 .25m .5m 0 .5m.25m 1m 0 1m.5m 2.5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 0 2.5m1m 5m 10m 0 5m2m 10m 20m 0 10m5m 15m 30m 0 10m5m 20m 40m 0 10m5m 25m 50m 0 15m5m 30m 60m 0 15m5m 35m 75m 0 25m10m 50m 100m 0 40m20m 75m 150m 0 50m20m 100m 200m 0 100m50m 150m 250m 0 100m50m 150m 300m 0 100m50m 200m 400m 0 100m50m 250m 500m 0 200m100m 300m 600m 0 200m100m 400m 800m 0 250m100m 500m 1000m 32’ 64’ 28’ 56’ 12’ 6’ 24’ 16’ 8’ 4’ 500 100 200 0 200100 400 0 250125 500 0 500250 1000 300 60 120 250 50 100 200 40 80 150 30 60 100 20 40 50 10 20 1:600 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:100 1:300 1:100 1:500 1:2000 1:4000 1:750 1:400 1:200 1:1000 1:1500 1:3000 1:5000 1:6000 1:8000 1:10000 1:2500 1" = 100' 1" = 200' 1" = 250' 1" = 500' 1" = 60' 1" = 50' 1" = 40' 1" = 30' 1" = 20' 1" = 10' PAGE 410.12.2020GILROY INDUSTRIAL GILROY, CALIFORNIA - SEA20-5001-00 ELEVATIONSThis conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Signage shown is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect municipal code compliance. All colors shown are for representative purposes only. Refer to material samples for actual color verification. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 18 A B C D 2 5 3 5 4 5 4'-0"10" 22'-4"2'-6" 2'-6"18'-7"2'-6" 2'-6"18'-7"2'-6"25'-0"10'-0" 2'-6"19'-8"2'-6"10"50'-0"50'-0"30'-0"10"10"10"10"10"10"F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 15'-0" 18 T.O.P. 44'-4"29'-4"15'-0"2'-4"12'-0"5'-0"5'-0"10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"4'-6"1'-0"2'-0"7'-4"2'-8"501 502 504 503 506 507 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 15'-0" T.O.P. 42'-0" 18 27'-0"15'-0"12'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"7'-6"2'-6"7'-6"2'-6"503 506 506 507 507 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 15'-0" 18 T.O.P. 44'-4"29'-4"15'-0"2'-4"12'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"5'-0"10'-0"505 503 1 1 18 18 G G A A PROJECT NORTH FIRST FLOOR 5 1 N 0 2'4'8' 1/4"=1'-0" PAGESEA20-5001-00 01/04/21 WALL SECTIONS GILROY INDUSTRIAL GILROY, CALIFORNIA - SEA20-5001-00 5 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"3WALL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"4WALL SECTION 501 OPEN METAL CANOPY AT ENTRY WITH SUBSTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT STOREFRONT GLASS SYSTEM ENTRY 502 ALUMINUM PANEL WITH ACCENT COLOR AT PANEL RETURN AND SOFFIT 503 PAINTED CONCRETE TILT-UP PANEL, TYP. 504 METAL COPING 505 CLERETORY GLAZING TO WAREHOUSE TO MATCH FENESTRATION, TYP. 506 PAINTED FORM-LINED OR RIBBED CONCRETE, TYP. 507 GLAZING SYSTEM KEYNOTES: KEY PLAN N 8.C.c Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Site and Architectural Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4418" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'DETECTOREVLTEVLTDETECTORDETECTOREVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTDETECTORWVLTEVLTDETECTOR24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'DETECTORWVLTSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBDETECTORDETECTORCAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:TITLE SHEETTM01 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP XX-XXFORPROJECT GARLICCITY OF GILROY, CALIFORNIA152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHSHEET INDEXNORTHPROJECT INFORMATIONGENERAL NOTESAPPLICANTCIVIL ENGINEERCIVIL ENGINEERGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERSURVEYOR“”8.C.dPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE BRUSH182.4181.7182.2181.7181.7180.8181.2180.8181.1181.2181.9182.1182.6182.8183.4184.2184.6185.7186.2188.6188.4188.4188.4188.4188.2170.4169.4170.1169.6169.3169.4187.6187.9187.9187.6187.8188.2188.2187.6184.9185.2184.7185.4185.4185.4184.3184.3184.8185.6185.4185.3184.7184.4184.1184.1184.1183.7184.6184.3183.7183.7183.4183.2183.3183.7182.8183.0183.5183.2182.8182.8182.0182.6182.7182.5182.1181.9181.7182.9182.7183.3182.3181.7183.2182.3181.4182.9183.8182.9182.8182.2181.1FIELD178.9179.2179.6179.1179.5179.2179.8179.8180.8180.8180.3179.8180.8180.1180.8180.7180.3180.6179.7180.3180.4179.3179.9180.7179.9181.1181.3182.0180.7183.8181.2180.7181.6181.8181.6182.1180.8181.8181.1181.3180.9182.6182.7183.7184.3183.8182.9184.3184.7184.7183.8183.8185.4185.8186.3185.9185.2186.4185.9183.9183.8184.4182.3184.7184.2185.2185.5184.8184.9185.3186.4186.3187.3185.7184.9186.8187.3185.3185.2183.2183.6184.1184.7183.7186.2184.9183.1186.3185.8185.1185.1186.7183.6183.4184.1182.5183.6184.4183.8184.2184.7184.7184.9183.7185.6184.2185.8185.2185.6186.2185.8185.8186.2185.7185.4183.7184.8184.7184.4184.7183.3184.1182.7182.3179.5180.4180.4183.6181.8175.9178.8178.5179.2179.6179.6178.7179.2179.5179.8179.9180.0179.4178.7179.8178.8179.4178.7178.8179.4180.2180.2180.5180.4180.1180.4180.7179.9180.4179.8180.0180.3180.5180.6180.9181.1180.9180.5181.0181.1181.0181.2181.3181.4181.3181.1181.2182.0181.6181.1180.9180.9180.5179.6179.3179.9180.3180.6180.6180.3179.4180.3179.9180.9181.1181.8181.7181.6181.3181.7181.8181.7181.9182.2182.1182.2181.6181.1181.0181.3181.5182.4182.6182.6182.2182.7182.7182.5182.3181.6181.6181.6181.9181.8181.9182.1183.2181.9182.8182.3182.3182.8182.6183.2183.1183.6183.9183.3183.4182.9183.0182.2181.9181.7181.1180.9181.0180.9180.6179.8180.1179.8180.7180.9180.9181.3181.5181.6181.9182.5182.0181.6181.7181.7181.1180.6180.3181.1181.2181.4180.6180.2180.8181.2181.6181.6181.8181.6181.9181.6182.1182.1181.7182.1181.9181.9182.1182.0182.2182.4182.2182.4182.1182.3182.1182.7182.6182.9183.5183.8183.7183.8183.4183.7182.9182.7182.9183.6183.4182.9182.7182.8183.3183.7183.9183.7183.4183.9184.0183.8183.9183.6183.3183.3182.8182.7182.5182.5182.4182.4182.4182.1183.2182.9181.4FIELD182.4182.9182.8182.4182.9182.7182.8182.7182.8183.4182.8182.7182.7182.5183.1182.9182.9182.8183.8184.4183.3185.2184.2185.3185.2185.3184.2184.5185.7184.1183.5184.6185.4184.5184.8184.8185.2185.6186.2185.1184.6185.4186.5185.7185.4185.4185.4185.3184.8185.4184.9184.6184.3184.6185.2185.3185.4184.2183.1184.8183.6183.3183.3183.7183.8183.8183.9184.2184.1184.4184.4184.1184.1184.2184.4183.9183.4183.3183.1183.4183.9184.1183.6183.6183.7183.8184.5184.6184.8185.0184.8184.6185.3185.6185.1184.8184.5185.1185.2185.1184.6184.1184.5183.7184.7184.5184.6181.3182.7182.5181.8183.1183.1183.3183.7DENSE TREESDENSE TREES177.7177.9178.7179.4179.3178.6179.3179.9179.8179.2179.6179.9180.3180.7180.7181.4182.1182.9182.8183.1183.8184.4183.1182.1182.3182.1181.7181.3180.2180.3179.9178.7179.8179.6179.4179.3179.3179.4179.4179.2178.6179.7179.2178.8178.8178.8178.2178.7178.1178.2177.7178.3178.7182.2EDGE OBSCUREDDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESFOVLTGVW (2X)D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)18''SDDETECTORDETECTORTELVLTDETECTORWVLTDETECTORDETECTORSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBDETECTORDETECTOREX #11: P.U.E.PER 16172646 O.R.EX #11: P.U.E.PER 16172646 O.R.EX #12: DRAINAGE EASEMENTPER 16172653 O.R.EX #13: PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTPER 17424882 O.R.EX #9: 40' PG&E EASEMENTPER BOOK L313, PAGE 664 O.R.OWNER: DEFRANCESCO DOLORES TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-083OWNER: CANCIAMILLA ANTHONY TRUSTEECANCIAMILLA MARIA TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-079OWNER: DENICE CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES LLC ET BENNY TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-081PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 152)MILLER SLOUGHRENZ LANECAMINO ARROYOOHUOHUOHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUN 58 °30 '07 " E 1521 .08 'S 69°54'18" E 979.76'Δ=6°53'05"R=900.00'L=108.14'S 04°18'38" E 1161.82'Δ=1°01'05"R=2559.38'L=45.48'S 82°57'56" E 129.91'N 79°02'55" W 200.98'N 80°02'14" W 714.13'N 81°55'16" W 397.03'N 84°35'46" W 944.00'N 74°39'18" W 44.96'Δ=9°56'28"R=149.03'L=25.86'N 84°35'46" W 184.91'Δ=79°11'16"R=40.00'L=55.28'Δ=21°28'25"R=1072.00'L=401.77'S 84°40'38" E 405.91'ACCESSDIR T ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROAD179'182'183'185'184'185'184'179'180'184'180'1 8 0 ' 175'185'180'185'186'184'185'180'182'180'182' 180'184'184'184'184'185'185'184'183'182'184'185'186'187'186'186'185'184'184'185'183'182'181'180'180'185'184'185'170'169'170'179'178'179'179'178'178'177'178'181'182'183'183'184'182'185'184'183'183'184'185'185'168'168'180'185'182' 18 3 '184'185'185'168'168'180'[3] FENCE INTERSECTION 11.4' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[2] FENCE ANGLE POINT 11.2' WESTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[5] FENCE ANGLE POINT 84.8' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[1] FENCE INTERSECTION 5.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[4] BACK OF WALK 1.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINESTAND PIPE WITHUG PIPE TO SWGVW (2X)JBJBJBJBT36''SD36''SD36''SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.7718''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 178.68'EVLTEVLTDETECTOREVLTEVLTEVLTWVLTVERIZONEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'WVLTSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB36''SDSD SD SD SD SD 54" SD54" SD54" SDVEGETATION LINEPARKING STRIPESWASH / WATERGUARD RAILCATCH BASINXXINDEX CONTOUR / TEXTROAD / PAVEMENTINTER CONTOURRETAINING WALLSWIMMING POOLFENCEXTRAFFIC LANE PAINTCANOPYCONCRETECURB / GUTTERDIRT ROAD / TRAILTRAFFIC PAINTBUILDINGBRIDGETV DISHTRAFFIC SIGNALSTRAIGHT ARROWSDIRECTIONAL ARROWSHANDICAPBIKE LANEGATEVALVESTREET SIGNMETER / UTILITYUTILITY POLESIGNSLIGHT POLEMANHOLEFIRE HYDRANTSTREET LIGHT2980.5PALM TREEPEDESTRIAN SIGNALSPOT ELEVATIONBILLBOARDTRANSMISSIONOVERHEAD SIGNSSINGLE TREEPOST / BOLLARDCULVERTFLAGAERIAL PANELSTRAFFIC PAINTXINDEX DEPRESSION / TEXTINTER DEPRESSION31303130FIELD / GRASSROCKSLEGEND: FOUND 3/4" IP STAMPED "LS 4526"NOTES:1.) VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK: USCGS BRASS DISK "S148 1933"; AT NORTHEASTERLY SIDE OF HOLSCLAW ROAD ATADDRESS 6650; ABOUT 500 FEET NORTH FROM INTERSECTION OF HOLSCLAW AND HIGHWAY152; 13 FEET NORTHEAST FROM EDGE OF PAVING; 9 FEET NORTHWEST FROM POWER POLE.UNINCORPORATED SANTA CLARA COUNTY.BENCHMARK NO. BM1077 ELEVATION = 185.42'2.) BOUNDARY AND EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON TITLE REPORT NO.NCS-997735-DC BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE JANUARY 22, 2020.3.) UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE PER OBSERVED FIELD EVIDENCE [AND FIELD LOCATEDUTILITY PAINT MARKS & REFERENCE MAPS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE VARIOUS UTILITYPROVIDERS]. UNLESS INDICATED, DEPTHS OF UTILITY LINES ARE NOT AVAILABLE. ALL UTILITYLOCATIONS SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED (POTHOLED) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.4.) THE PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN ADDRESS.5.) THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN "OTHER FLOOD AREAS - ZONE X"-AREAS DETERMINED TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE OR GREATERFLOOD HAZARD BY A LEVEE SYSTEM. OVERTOPPING OR FAILURE OF ANY LEVEE SYSTEM ISPOSSIBLE.- ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 06085C0643H, MAP EFFECTIVE DATE MAY18, 2009.6.) GROSS LAND AREA = 2,600,327 SQ. FT. (59.695 ACRES)7.) A ZONING REPORT WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY.8.) NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDINGADDITIONS OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING FIELDWORK.9.) ALL POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS ARE GRAPHICALLY SHOWN HEREON. FOR CONVENIENCE, ASUMMARY OF POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS ARE LISTED BELOW, BUT SHOULD BE USED INCONJUNCTION WITH THE SURVEY:[1] FENCE INTERSECTION 5.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[2] FENCE ANGLE POINT 11.2' WESTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[3] FENCE INTERSECTION 11.4' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[4] BACK OF WALK 1.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[5] FENCE ANGLE POINT 84.8' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINENORTH2001005001001 INCH = 100 FEETSCALEVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALESITEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Tue, 13 Oct 2020 2250 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 O: 916.772.7688 F: 916.772.7699 www.kpff.comC100TM02EXISTING BOUNDARIES AND EASEMENTS WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:AG.AG. FIELDAG. FIELDEDGE OFTRAVEL WAYSILACCI WAY CAMER O N B L V D EX. AGRICULTURAL DITCH8.C.dPacket Pg. 107Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB2DEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3EXISTINGCOMMERCIALDEVELOPMENTEXISTINGAG LANDREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PRELIMINARY SITE PLANTM03 LEGENDPROPERTY INFORMATIONNORTHSITE AREAPHASE 1PHASE 2BUILDING AREACOVERAGEAUTO PARKING REQUIREDAUTO PARKING PROVIDEDTRAILER PARKING PROVIDEDVAN PARKING PROVIDED8.C.dPacket Pg. 108Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 2TELVLT(±5.2 AC)(±34.1 AC)(±20.4 AC)APN: 841-18-079APN: 841-18-081APN:841-18-083CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEWEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKMILLER SLOUGHPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PARCEL MAPTM04 LEGENDNORTHLOT SUMMARYLOTAREA (AC ±)USE15.2COMMERCIAL (FUTURE)234.1DELIVERY STATION320.4WAREHOUSELOTTING NOTES8.C.dPacket Pg. 109Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTJBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTWVLTEVLTWVLT12"SSCTM06DTM06ATM06BTM06OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD SILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'MILLER SLOUGHETM06CAMINO ARROYOREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PRELIMINARY GRADING PLANTM05 LEGENDGENERAL NOTESNORTHPRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES8.C.dPacket Pg. 110Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PRELIMINARY GRADING SECTIONSTM06 CDBAE8.C.dPacket Pg. 111Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)APPROX. FL = 170.4418''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'12"SSFF=188.50OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHU OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUO H U O H UOHU S D S D S D S D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)APPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDFF=188.50PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEWEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANTM07 LEGENDNORTHDETAIL 1DETAIL 2DETAIL 3UTILITY NOTESOHU8.C.dPacket Pg. 112Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210W (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4418" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'S D SDSDS D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'12"SSDMA-711.76 ACDMA-17.05 ACDMA-22.43 ACDMA-413.39 ACDMA-56.27 ACDMA-63.58 ACDMA-31.00 ACDMA-92.56 ACDMA-86.48 ACREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLANTM08 LEGENDNORTHBIORETENTION AREA SYSTEMGENERAL NOTES8.C.dPacket Pg. 113Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 12"SS#202#205#206#207#209#210W (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4418" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'S D SDSDS D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDDMA-711.76 ACDMA-17.05 ACDMA-22.43 ACDMA-413.39 ACDMA-56.27 ACDMA-63.58 ACDMA-31.00 ACDMA-92.56 ACDMA-86.48 ACREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDNORTHDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:ALTERNATE PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLANTM08 LEGENDNORTHBIORETENTION AREA SYSTEMGENERAL NOTES8.C.dPacket Pg. 114Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:COVER SHEETC000 ABBREVIATIONSPROJECT TEAMGEOTECHNICAL REPORTFEMA FLOOD ZONEBENCHMARK NOTEPRELIMINARY EARTHWORKSITE INFORMATIONCIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANSFORPROJECT GARLICADDRESS:NEC CAMINO ARROYO AND PACHECO PASS HWYGILROY, CA 95054152HIGHWAY 101W 10TH STW 6TH STMONTEREYRD1ST STWREN AVEGILMAN RDCAMINOARROYOSANTA BLVDTERESAMANTELLIDRBOLSARDCIVIL & LANDSCAPE SHEET LISTNORTHLEGENDOHU8.C.dPacket Pg. 115Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE BRUSH182.4181.7182.2181.7181.7180.8181.2180.8181.1181.2181.9182.1182.6182.8183.4184.2184.6185.7186.2188.6188.4188.4188.4188.4188.2170.4169.4170.1169.6169.3169.4187.6187.9187.9187.6187.8188.2188.2187.6184.9185.2184.7185.4185.4185.4184.3184.3184.8185.6185.4185.3184.7184.4184.1184.1184.1183.7184.6184.3183.7183.7183.4183.2183.3183.7182.8183.0183.5183.2182.8182.8182.0182.6182.7182.5182.1181.9181.7182.9182.7183.3182.3181.7183.2182.3181.4182.9183.8182.9182.8182.2181.1FIELD178.9179.2179.6179.1179.5179.2179.8179.8180.8180.8180.3179.8180.8180.1180.8180.7180.3180.6179.7180.3180.4179.3179.9180.7179.9181.1181.3182.0180.7183.8181.2180.7181.6181.8181.6182.1180.8181.8181.1181.3180.9182.6182.7183.7184.3183.8182.9184.3184.7184.7183.8183.8185.4185.8186.3185.9185.2186.4185.9183.9183.8184.4182.3184.7184.2185.2185.5184.8184.9185.3186.4186.3187.3185.7184.9186.8187.3185.3185.2183.2183.6184.1184.7183.7186.2184.9183.1186.3185.8185.1185.1186.7183.6183.4184.1182.5183.6184.4183.8184.2184.7184.7184.9183.7185.6184.2185.8185.2185.6186.2185.8185.8186.2185.7185.4183.7184.8184.7184.4184.7183.3184.1182.7182.3179.5180.4180.4183.6181.8175.9178.8178.5179.2179.6179.6178.7179.2179.5179.8179.9180.0179.4178.7179.8178.8179.4178.7178.8179.4180.2180.2180.5180.4180.1180.4180.7179.9180.4179.8180.0180.3180.5180.6180.9181.1180.9180.5181.0181.1181.0181.2181.3181.4181.3181.1181.2182.0181.6181.1180.9180.9180.5179.6179.3179.9180.3180.6180.6180.3179.4180.3179.9180.9181.1181.8181.7181.6181.3181.7181.8181.7181.9182.2182.1182.2181.6181.1181.0181.3181.5182.4182.6182.6182.2182.7182.7182.5182.3181.6181.6181.6181.9181.8181.9182.1183.2181.9182.8182.3182.3182.8182.6183.2183.1183.6183.9183.3183.4182.9183.0182.2181.9181.7181.1180.9181.0180.9180.6179.8180.1179.8180.7180.9180.9181.3181.5181.6181.9182.5182.0181.6181.7181.7181.1180.6180.3181.1181.2181.4180.6180.2180.8181.2181.6181.6181.8181.6181.9181.6182.1182.1181.7182.1181.9181.9182.1182.0182.2182.4182.2182.4182.1182.3182.1182.7182.6182.9183.5183.8183.7183.8183.4183.7182.9182.7182.9183.6183.4182.9182.7182.8183.3183.7183.9183.7183.4183.9184.0183.8183.9183.6183.3183.3182.8182.7182.5182.5182.4182.4182.4182.1183.2182.9181.4FIELD182.4182.9182.8182.4182.9182.7182.8182.7182.8183.4182.8182.7182.7182.5183.1182.9182.9182.8183.8184.4183.3185.2184.2185.3185.2185.3184.2184.5185.7184.1183.5184.6185.4184.5184.8184.8185.2185.6186.2185.1184.6185.4186.5185.7185.4185.4185.4185.3184.8185.4184.9184.6184.3184.6185.2185.3185.4184.2183.1184.8183.6183.3183.3183.7183.8183.8183.9184.2184.1184.4184.4184.1184.1184.2184.4183.9183.4183.3183.1183.4183.9184.1183.6183.6183.7183.8184.5184.6184.8185.0184.8184.6185.3185.6185.1184.8184.5185.1185.2185.1184.6184.1184.5183.7184.7184.5184.6181.3182.7182.5181.8183.1183.1183.3183.7DENSE TREESDENSE TREES177.7177.9178.7179.4179.3178.6179.3179.9179.8179.2179.6179.9180.3180.7180.7181.4182.1182.9182.8183.1183.8184.4183.1182.1182.3182.1181.7181.3180.2180.3179.9178.7179.8179.6179.4179.3179.3179.4179.4179.2178.6179.7179.2178.8178.8178.8178.2178.7178.1178.2177.7178.3178.7182.2EDGE OBSCUREDDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREESFOVLTGVW (2X)D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)18''SDDETECTORDETECTORTELVLTDETECTORWVLTDETECTORDETECTORSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBDETECTORDETECTOREX #11: P.U.E.PER 16172646 O.R.EX #11: P.U.E.PER 16172646 O.R.EX #12: DRAINAGE EASEMENTPER 16172653 O.R.EX #13: PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTPER 17424882 O.R.EX #9: 40' PG&E EASEMENTPER BOOK L313, PAGE 664 O.R.OWNER: DEFRANCESCO DOLORES TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-083OWNER: CANCIAMILLA ANTHONY TRUSTEECANCIAMILLA MARIA TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-079OWNER: DENICE CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES LLC ET BENNY TRUSTEEAPN: 841-18-081PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY (ROUTE 152)MILLER SLOUGHRENZ LANECAMINO ARROYOOHUOHUOHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHU OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUN 58 °30 '07 " E 1521 .08 'S 69°54'18" E 979.76'Δ=6°53'05"R=900.00'L=108.14'S 04°18'38" E 1161.82'Δ=1°01'05"R=2559.38'L=45.48'S 82°57'56" E 129.91'N 79°02'55" W 200.98'N 80°02'14" W 714.13'N 81°55'16" W 397.03'N 84°35'46" W 944.00'N 74°39'18" W 44.96'Δ=9°56'28"R=149.03'L=25.86'N 84°35'46" W 184.91'Δ=79°11'16"R=40.00'L=55.28'Δ=21°28'25"R=1072.00'L=401.77'S 84°40'38" E 405.91'ACCESSDIR T ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROADDIRT ROAD179'182'183'185'184'185'184'179'180'184'180'1 8 0 ' 175'185'180'185'186'184'185'180'182'180'182' 180'184'184'184'184'185'185'184'183'182'184'185'186'187'186'186'185'184'184'185'183'182'181'180'180'185'184'185'170'169'170'179'178'179'179'178'178'177'178'181'182'183'183'184'182'185'184'183'183'184'185'185'168'168'180'185'182' 18 3 '184'185'185'168'168'180'[3] FENCE INTERSECTION 11.4' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[2] FENCE ANGLE POINT 11.2' WESTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[5] FENCE ANGLE POINT 84.8' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[1] FENCE INTERSECTION 5.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[4] BACK OF WALK 1.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINESTAND PIPE WITHUG PIPE TO SWGVW (2X)JBJBJBJBT36''SD36''SD36''SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.7718''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 178.68'EVLTEVLTDETECTOREVLTEVLTEVLTWVLTVERIZONEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'WVLTSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB36''SDSD SD SD SD SD 54" SD54" SD54" SDVEGETATION LINEPARKING STRIPESWASH / WATERGUARD RAILCATCH BASINXXINDEX CONTOUR / TEXTROAD / PAVEMENTINTER CONTOURRETAINING WALLSWIMMING POOLFENCEXTRAFFIC LANE PAINTCANOPYCONCRETECURB / GUTTERDIRT ROAD / TRAILTRAFFIC PAINTBUILDINGBRIDGETV DISHTRAFFIC SIGNALSTRAIGHT ARROWSDIRECTIONAL ARROWSHANDICAPBIKE LANEGATEVALVESTREET SIGNMETER / UTILITYUTILITY POLESIGNSLIGHT POLEMANHOLEFIRE HYDRANTSTREET LIGHT2980.5PALM TREEPEDESTRIAN SIGNALSPOT ELEVATIONBILLBOARDTRANSMISSIONOVERHEAD SIGNSSINGLE TREEPOST / BOLLARDCULVERTFLAGAERIAL PANELSTRAFFIC PAINTXINDEX DEPRESSION / TEXTINTER DEPRESSION31303130FIELD / GRASSROCKSLEGEND: FOUND 3/4" IP STAMPED "LS 4526"NOTES:1.) VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88BENCHMARK: USCGS BRASS DISK "S148 1933"; AT NORTHEASTERLY SIDE OF HOLSCLAW ROAD ATADDRESS 6650; ABOUT 500 FEET NORTH FROM INTERSECTION OF HOLSCLAW AND HIGHWAY152; 13 FEET NORTHEAST FROM EDGE OF PAVING; 9 FEET NORTHWEST FROM POWER POLE.UNINCORPORATED SANTA CLARA COUNTY.BENCHMARK NO. BM1077 ELEVATION = 185.42'2.) BOUNDARY AND EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON TITLE REPORT NO.NCS-997735-DC BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE JANUARY 22, 2020.3.) UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE PER OBSERVED FIELD EVIDENCE [AND FIELD LOCATEDUTILITY PAINT MARKS & REFERENCE MAPS MADE AVAILABLE BY THE VARIOUS UTILITYPROVIDERS]. UNLESS INDICATED, DEPTHS OF UTILITY LINES ARE NOT AVAILABLE. ALL UTILITYLOCATIONS SHOULD BE FIELD VERIFIED (POTHOLED) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.4.) THE PROPERTY DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN ADDRESS.5.) THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN "OTHER FLOOD AREAS - ZONE X"-AREAS DETERMINED TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE 1-PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE OR GREATERFLOOD HAZARD BY A LEVEE SYSTEM. OVERTOPPING OR FAILURE OF ANY LEVEE SYSTEM ISPOSSIBLE.- ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 06085C0643H, MAP EFFECTIVE DATE MAY18, 2009.6.) GROSS LAND AREA = 2,600,327 SQ. FT. (59.695 ACRES)7.) A ZONING REPORT WAS NOT PROVIDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY.8.) NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, OR BUILDINGADDITIONS OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING FIELDWORK.9.) ALL POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS ARE GRAPHICALLY SHOWN HEREON. FOR CONVENIENCE, ASUMMARY OF POTENTIAL ENCROACHMENTS ARE LISTED BELOW, BUT SHOULD BE USED INCONJUNCTION WITH THE SURVEY:[1] FENCE INTERSECTION 5.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[2] FENCE ANGLE POINT 11.2' WESTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[3] FENCE INTERSECTION 11.4' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[4] BACK OF WALK 1.0' NORTHEASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINE[5] FENCE ANGLE POINT 84.8' EASTERLY OF PROPERTY LINENORTH2001005001001 INCH = 100 FEETSCALEVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALESITEKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRREMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Tue, 13 Oct 2020 2250 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 O: 916.772.7688 F: 916.772.7699 www.kpff.comC100C10013EXISTING CONDITIONS WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKAG.AG. FIELDAG. FIELDSILACCI WAY CAMER O N B L V D EX. AGRICULTURAL DITCHEDGE OFTRAVEL WAYC10013EXISTING CONDITIONS WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKAG.AG. FIELDAG. FIELDSILACCI WAY CAMER O N B L V D EX. AGRICULTURAL DITCHEDGE OFTRAVEL WAYDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:DATE:8.C.dPacket Pg. 116Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB2DEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV PHASE 1PHASE 3PHASE 2Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:PHASING PLANC101 LEGENDNORTH8.C.dPacket Pg. 117Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB2DEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3EXISTINGCOMMERCIALDEVELOPMENTEXISTINGAG LANDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CIVIL SITE PLANC200 LEGENDPROPERTY INFORMATIONNORTHSITE AREAPHASE 1PHASE 2BUILDING AREACOVERAGEAUTO PARKING REQUIREDAUTO PARKING PROVIDEDTRAILER PARKING PROVIDEDVAN PARKING PROVIDED8.C.dPacket Pg. 118Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTJBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTWVLTEVLTWVLT12"SSCC400DC400AC400BC400OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD SILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'MILLER SLOUGHEC400CAMINO ARROYOKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC300 LEGENDGENERAL NOTESNORTHPRELIMINARY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES8.C.dPacket Pg. 119Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:GRADING SECTIONSC400 CDBAE8.C.dPacket Pg. 120Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)APPROX. FL = 170.4418''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'12"SSFF=188.50OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHU OHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUOHUO H U O H UOHU S D S D S D S D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)APPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18''SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS 12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS12''SS18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDFF=188.50PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEWEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANC500 LEGENDNORTHDETAIL 1DETAIL 2DETAIL 3UTILITY NOTESOHU8.C.dPacket Pg. 121Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210W (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4418" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'S D SDSDS D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'12"SSDMA-711.76 ACDMA-17.05 ACDMA-22.43 ACDMA-413.39 ACDMA-56.27 ACDMA-63.58 ACDMA-31.00 ACDMA-92.56 ACDMA-86.48 ACKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER CONTROL PLANC600 LEGENDNORTHBIORETENTION AREA SYSTEM8.C.dPacket Pg. 122Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 12"SS#202#205#206#207#209#210W (2X)JBJBJBJB218" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'D54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4418" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'EVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLT24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'PROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'S D SDSDS D 15''SD 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D 4 8 ' ' S D18''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD36''SD18" SD18" CMP CULVERTFL = 179.25'24" CULVERTFL = 178.44'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 173.9'54" CMP CULVERTFL = 174.63'CULVERT(BURIED)CULVERT(BURIED)54" CMP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 170.4454" SD54" SD18" CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 176.74'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 179.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'24" CPP CULVERTFL = 178.90'36''SDDMA-711.76 ACDMA-17.05 ACDMA-22.43 ACDMA-413.39 ACDMA-56.27 ACDMA-63.58 ACDMA-31.00 ACDMA-92.56 ACDMA-86.48 ACPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD SILACCI WAY RENZ LANEFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESZONE: C-3CAMINO ARROYOKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:ALTERNATE CONCEPTUAL STORMWATER CONTROL PLANC600 LEGENDNORTHBIORETENTION AREA SYSTEM8.C.dPacket Pg. 123Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) W (2X)JBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EVFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:FIRE TRUCK CIRCULATION PLANC700LEGENDDESIGN TRUCKNORTH8.C.dPacket Pg. 124Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) W (2X)JBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EVFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:ALTERNATE FIRE TRUCK CIRCULATION PLANC700LEGENDDESIGN TRUCKNORTH8.C.dPacket Pg. 125Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) W (2X)JBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:SITE DESIGN VEHICLE CIRCULATION PLANC701NORTHLEGEND 8.C.dPacket Pg. 126Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJBEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTWVLTEVLTWVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3INDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV CLEAN AIR VANPOOL EV Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:SOLID WASTE HANDLING PLANC800NORTH LEGENDDESIGN TRUCK8.C.dPacket Pg. 127Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) #202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB2DEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLTFUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.58 ACRESPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDG - 1FOOTPRINT: +/- 141,360 SFGEN 3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEDO NOT ENTERZONE: C-3WEST BRANCH LLAGAS CREEKINDUSTRIAL BLDG - 2FOOTPRINT: 266,220 SFCLR. HGT: 36'PHASE 1PHASE 3PHASE 2Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Mon, 19 Oct 2020 PHASING PLANC101 LEGENDNORTH8.C.dPacket Pg. 128Attachment: Tentative Map and Civil Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 12"SSSHADE TREE278CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA / CAMPHOR TREE24" BOXFRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA `RAYWOOD` / NARROW-LEAVED ASH24" BOXLAURUS X `SARATOGA` / SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL24" BOXOLEA EUROPAEA `FRUITLESS` / FRUITLESS OLIVE24" BOXPODOCARPUS GRACILIOR / FERN PINE24" BOX24" BOX24" BOX24" BOXCONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE#202#205#206#207#209#210FOVLTW (2X)JBJBJBJB2DEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTEVLTTELVLTEVLTSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINEXISTING AGRICULTURAL DITCH(TO REMAIN AS IS)LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3EXISTINGCOMMERCIALDEVELOPMENTEXISTINGAG LANDSTORMWATERMANAGEMENTBASINP4A4P4A4P5A5P4A4P4A4P4A4P4A4P3A3P3A3P3A3P4A4P4A4P5A5P5A5P4A4P4A4P4A4P4 A4 P4 A4 P3A3P5A5P4A4P5A5P4A4P5A5P4A4P5A5P 5 P5A 5 A5 P2A2P 3 P 3 A 3 A 3 P5A5P5A5P5A5P5A5P3A3P5A5P4A4P5A5P4A4P3A3P3A3P5A5P4A4P5A5P5A5P4A4P4A4P4A4P4A4P4A4LVSBLVSBPMT PMTPMTP5A5 LVSBPMTLVSB SWGRMPMTMMHMHMHMHMHMHMHMHMHMHLVSBPMT SWSWSWSW SW LVSBPMTSWMHMHMHMHMHLVSBPMTSWLVSBPMTSWLVSBPMTSWLVSBPMTSW L V S B P M T SW P4A4P3A3P3A3P3A356 SPACES54 SPACES 59 SPACESP4 A4 56 SPACESP4A4A4P4P4A4A4P459 SPACESLVSBPMTSW46 SPACES53 SPACES 50 S P A C E S 24 SPACES45 SPACES40 SPACES54 SPACESSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINTYPICAL BIKE TRAIL SECTIONSEE SHEET L103FUTURE COMMERCIAL OUTPARCEL±5.18 ACRESPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152CAMERON BLVD CAMINO ARROYOSILACCI WAY RENZ LANEZONE: C-3DO NOT ENTERCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIRVANPOOLEVCLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV CLEAN AIR VANPOOLEV 12' PROPOSED CLASS I BIKE TRAIL35'28'TYP.40' PROPOSED ACCESS ESMT.62.5'40'23' PROPOSED BIKE TRAIL ESMT.11' EX MEDIAN 21' LS ESMT 11'11'27'5'7'8'10'30' 25' 24'7'5'40' O.C. TYP.30' O.C. TYP.30' O.C. TYP.40' O.C. TYP.40' O.C. TYP.40' O.C. TYP.15'ENTRY ASEE SHEET L101 FORENLARGEMENTENTRY CSEE SHEET L101 FORENLARGEMENTPROPOSED LOT LINE(TYP)VAN PARKINGSPACES (TYP.)ASSOCIATEPARKINGSPACES (TYP.)VAN PARKINGSPACES (TYP.)TRAILERSPACES (TYP.)UTR/VANSTAGING(TYP.)PROPOSEDDRIVEWAYOH ELECTRICALESMT.PROPOSEDCUL-DE-SACPROPOSED LOT LINEUTR/VANLOADING(TYP.)PROPOSEDBIKE TRAILPROPOSEDSIDEWALKEX DIRT ROADEX DIRT ROADEX DIRT ROADPROPOSED SIDEWALK(MATCH EXISTING)PROPOSEDWALLLIGHTPOLE (TYP)LIGHTPOLE (TYP)TRASHENCLOSURETRANSFORMERTRASHENCLOSUREENTRY BSEE SHEET L101 FORENLARGEMENTENTRY ESEE SHEET L101 FORENLARGEMENTENTRY DSEE SHEET L101 FORENLARGEMENTWATER UTILITIESWATER UTILITIES42" HT POST AND RAILFENCING, COLOR WHITE, TOMATCH EXISTING FENCINGACROSS HIGHWAY 152EV CHARGINGUTILITIES (TYP)SCREENING SHRUBS (TYP)SCREENING SHRUBS (TYP)SCREENING SHRUBS (TYP)ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS(TYP)ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS(TYP)SCREENING SHRUBS (TYP)START 42" HTPOST AND RAILFENCINGSTOP 42" HT POSTAND RAIL FENCINGBIORETENTION AREAPLANTING (TYP)BIORETENTION AREAPLANTING (TYP)BIORETENTION AREAPLANTING (TYP)BIORETENTION AREAPLANTING (TYP)HYDROSEED (TYP)HYDROSEED(TYP)HYDROSEED(TYP)HYDROSEED(TYP)GROUNDCOVERPLANTING(TYP)GROUNDCOVERPLANTING(TYP)GROUNDCOVERPLANTING(TYP)SCREENING SHRUBS (TYP)GROUNDCOVERPLANTING(TYP)GROUNDCOVERPLANTING(TYP)PG&E EASEMENTLIGHT POLE(TYP)LIGHT POLE(TYP)LIGHT POLE(TYP)LIGHT POLE(TYP)6'PACHECO PASS HIGHWAYCORNER MONUMENTFEATURE, SEE RENDERINGON SHEET L1033 0 ' O .C . T YP .PROPOSED RETAINING WALLSEE TYPICAL ENHANCEDSTREET FRONTAGE RENDERINGON SHEET L103LANDSCAPE DITCHPLANTING (TYP)6' HT ORNAMENTALFENCING, SEE DETAILSON SHEET L102(TYP)PG&E EASEMENTEXISTING PG&EPOLE (TYP)EXISTING PG&EPOLE (TYP)EXISTING PG&EPOLE (TYP)EXISTING PG&EPOLE (TYP)EXISTING PG&EPOLE (TYP)EASEMENT (TYP)SHADE TREE278CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA / CAMPHOR TREE24" BOXFRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA `RAYWOOD` / NARROW-LEAVED ASH24" BOXLAURUS X `SARATOGA` / SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL24" BOXOLEA EUROPAEA `FRUITLESS` / FRUITLESS OLIVE24" BOXPODOCARPUS GRACILIOR / FERN PINE24" BOXQUERCUS RUBRA / RED OAK24" BOXRHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMAC24" BOXSCHINUS MOLLE / CALIFORNIA PEPPER24" BOXFRONTAGE TREE A68ALONG PACHECO PASS HIGHWAYPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA / LONDON PLANE TREE24" BOXFRONTAGE TREE B9ALONG CAMINO ARROYOLIQUIDAMBAR ROTUNDILOBA / SWEET GUM24" BOXSCREENING SHRUBS727LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM `TEXANUM` / WAX LEAF PRIVET5 GAL., 48" O.C.MYRTUS COMMUNIS / COMMON MYRTLE5 GAL., 48" O.C.OLEA EUROPAEA `LITTLE OLLIE` TM / LITTLE OLLIE OLIVE5 GAL., 48" O.C.PHOTINIA X FRASERI / RED TIP PHOTINIA5 GAL., 48" O.C.PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS / ENGLISH LAUREL5 GAL., 48" O.C.ORNAMENTAL SHRUBS1,450DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY5 GAL., 48" O.C.EUONYMUS JAPONICUS `MICROPHYLLUS VARIEGATUS` / VARIEGATED BOXLEAF EUNONYMUS5 GAL., 48" O.C.PHORMIUM TENAX `AMAZING RED` / DWARF RED FLAX5 GAL., 48" O.C.PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA `CREAM DE MINT` / MOCK ORANGE5 GAL., 48" O.C.RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA `PINKIE` / PINKIE INDIAN HAWTHORN5 GAL., 48" O.C.WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA `MORNING LIGHT` / MORNING LIGHT COAST ROSEMARY5 GAL., 48" O.C.BIORETENTION MIX235,628 SFSEE SHEET L101 FOR FULL LISTBOUTELOUA GRACILIS `BLONDE AMBITION` / BLONDE AMBITION BLUE GRAMA15,671,7895 GAL., 1.5` O.C., LOWCAREX BARBERAE / SANTA BARBARA SEDGE61,2185 GAL., 2` O.C., LOW24" ocNON IRRIGATED HYDROSEED242,293 SFNATURE`S SEED PACIFIC SOUTHWEST WILDFIRE RESISTANT BLEND-GROUNDCOVERS117,827 SFARCTOSTAPHYLOS X `PACIFIC MIST` / PACIFIC MIST MANZANITA9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocBACCHARIS PILULARIS `PIGEON POINT` / COYOTE BRUSH9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocCARISSA MACROCARPA `GREEN CARPET` / GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUM9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocCEANOTHUS GRISEUS HORIZONTALIS `YANKEE POINT` / YANKEE POINT CALIFORNIA LILAC9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C., LOW42" ocCISTUS SALVIIFOLIUS `PROSTRATUS` / SAGELEAF ROCKROSE9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocJUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS / CREEPING JUNIPER9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocLANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS / TRAILING LANTANA9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocMYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM `PUTAH CREEK` / PUTAH CREEK MYOPORUM9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS `PROSTRATUS` / DWARF ROSEMARY9,9961 GAL., 42" O.C.42" ocLANDSCAPE FRONTAGE DITCH57,022 SFSEE SHEET L101 FOR FULL LISTBACCHARIS PILULARIS / COYOTE BRUSH5 GAL.CAREX DENSA / DENSE SEDGESEEDFESTUCA IDAHOENSIS / IDAHO FESCUESEEDMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASSSEEDKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANL100NORTH CONCEPTUAL PLANTING SCHEDULEI HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AB-1881 AND APPLIEDTHEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLAN.________________MATHEW J. MORGAN, LLA 6256LANDSCAPE NOTE:THE SELECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS BASED ON CULTURAL, AESTHETIC, ANDMAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE PREPARED WITHAPPROPRIATE SOIL AMENDMENTS, FERTILIZERS AND APPROPRIATE SUPPLEMENTSBASED UPON A SOILS REPORT FROM AN AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOIL SAMPLETAKEN FROM THE SITE. DECOMPOSED GRANITE SHALL FILL IN BETWEEN SHRUBS TOSHIELD THE SOIL FROM THE SUN, EVAPOTRANSPIRATION, AND RUN-OFF. ALL SHRUBBEDS SHALL BE MULCHED TO A 3" DEPTH TO HELP CONSERVE WATER, LOWER SOILTEMPERATURE, AND REDUCE WEED GROWTH. THE SHRUBS SHALL BE ALLOWED TOGROW IN THEIR NATURAL FORMS. AFTER ROUGH GRADING HAS OCCURRED,CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT AND SUBMIT TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO AMENDMENTS AND/OR PLANTING.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THEGUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF GILROY MUNICIPAL CODE.IRRIGATION NOTE:AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE 100% COVERAGEFOR ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE WATER SUPPLY FOR THIS SITE ISA POTABLE WATER CONNECTION AND A DEDICATED IRRIGATION METER WILL BEPROVIDED. LOW VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLANTGROWTH WITH NO WATER LOSS DUE TO WATER CONTROLLERS, AND OTHERNECESSARY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL POINT SOURCE SYSTEM SHALL BEADEQUATELY FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDEDDESIGN PARAMETERS. ALL IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THEGUIDELINES SET FORTH BY THE CITY OF GILROY MUNICIPAL CODE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ESTIMATED WATER USE TOTAL WATER USE IS CALCULATED BY SUMMING THE AMOUNT OF WATER ESTIMATED FOR EACHHYDROZONE. WATER USE FOR EACH HYDROZONE IS ESTIMATED WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) = GAL / YEAR PER HYDROZONE ET ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (ETAF) =0.55 ETAF FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE0.45 ETAF FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE0.8 ETAF FOR EXISTING NON-REHABILITATED LANDSCAPESPECIAL LANDSCAPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 ETAF PLANT FACTOR (PF) = WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES HYDROZONE AREA (HA) = (SF OF LANDSCAPE) OR (32 SF / TREE) CONVERSION FACTOR (CONVERTS ACRE-INCHES PER ACRE PER YEAR TO GALLONS PER SQUARE FOOTPER YEAR = 0.62 IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY (IE) = 0.75 (OVERHEAD SPRAY) 0.81 (DRIP) SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA (SLA) = SF OF EDIBLE PLANTS, RECREATIONAL AREAS, AREAS IRRIGATEDWITH RECYCLED WATER, OR WATER FEATURS USING RECYCLED WATER EVAPOTRANSPIRATION RATE (ETo) = QUANTITY OF WATER EVAPORATED FROM ADJ. SOIL ANDTRANSPIRED BY PLANTS OVER A SPECIFIED TIME ETWU = [(ETo) * (PF) * (HA) * (0.62)] / (IE) MAWA = (ETo) * (0.62) [ETAF) * (SUM OF SLA & HA)] + [(1-ETAF) * (SLA)] HYDROZONE "A" (MOD WATER BUBBLER) ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR) 43.60 0.40 12,544 0.62 0.81 - 167,451.56 HYDROZONE "B" (LOW WATER ROTARY) ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR) 43.60 0.20 193,751 0.62 0.81 - 1,293,204.21 HYDROZONE "C" (BIORETENTION LOW WATER ROTORS) ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR) 43.60 0.20 235,628 0.62 0.81 - 1,572,715.09 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (GAL/YEAR) 3,033,370.85 MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) ETO SUM OF HA CONVERSION FACTOR ETAF SUM OF SLA MAWA(GAL/YEAR) 43.60 441,923.00 0.62 0.45 - 5,375,728.14 MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (GAL/YEAR) 5,375,728.14 MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE PERCENT OF ESTIMATED TOTAL WATERUSE56.43%*NOTE: ALL TREES WITHIN 5' OFHARDSCAPE OR UTILITIES TORECEIVE ROOT BARRIER, SEEDETAIL ON SHEET L1028.C.ePacket Pg. 129Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P 5 P 5 A 5 A 5 P 3 P 3 A 3 A 3 P3A3L V S B PM T SW 5 0 S P A C E S 18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'18" CPP CULVERTAPPROX. FL = 180.12'PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152SHADE TREECINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA / CAMPHOR TREEFRAXINUS ANGUSTIFOLIA `RAYWOOD` / NARROW-LEAVED ASHLAURUS X `SARATOGA` / SARATOGA HYBRID LAURELOLEA EUROPAEA `FRUITLESS` / FRUITLESS OLIVEPODOCARPUS GRACILIOR / FERN PINEQUERCUS RUBRA / RED OAKRHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMACSCHINUS MOLLE / CALIFORNIA PEPPERFRONTAGE TREE AALONG PACHECO PASS HIGHWAYPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA / LONDON PLANE TREEFRONTAGE TREE BALONG CAMINO ARROYOLIQUIDAMBAR ROTUNDILOBA / SWEET GUMNON IRRIGATED HYDROSEEDNATURE`S SEED PACIFIC SOUTHWEST WILDFIRE RESISTANT BLEND-GROUNDCOVERSARCTOSTAPHYLOS X `PACIFIC MIST` / PACIFIC MIST MANZANITABACCHARIS PILULARIS `PIGEON POINT` / COYOTE BRUSHCARISSA MACROCARPA `GREEN CARPET` / GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUMCEANOTHUS GRISEUS HORIZONTALIS `YANKEE POINT` / YANKEE POINT CALIFORNIA LILACCISTUS SALVIIFOLIUS `PROSTRATUS` / SAGELEAF ROCKROSEJUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS / CREEPING JUNIPERLANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS / TRAILING LANTANAMYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM `PUTAH CREEK` / PUTAH CREEK MYOPORUMROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS `PROSTRATUS` / DWARF ROSEMARYDIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILYEUONYMUS JAPONICUS `MICROPHYLLUS VARIEGATUS` / VARIEGATED BOXLEAF EUNONYMUSPHORMIUM TENAX `AMAZING RED` / DWARF RED FLAXPITTOSPORUM TOBIRA `CREAM DE MINT` / MOCK ORANGERHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA `PINKIE` / PINKIE INDIAN HAWTHORNWESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA `MORNING LIGHT` / MORNING LIGHT COAST ROSEMARYSCREENING SHRUBSLIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM `TEXANUM` / WAX LEAF PRIVETMYRTUS COMMUNIS / COMMON MYRTLEOLEA EUROPAEA `LITTLE OLLIE` TM / LITTLE OLLIE OLIVEPHOTINIA X FRASERI / RED TIP PHOTINIAPRUNUS LAUROCERASUS / ENGLISH LAURELKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PALETTE AND ENLARGEMENTSL101 TREESENTRY A ENLARGEMENT1" = 30'NORTHENTRY B ENLARGEMENT1" = 30'NORTHENTRY C ENLARGEMENT1" = 30'NORTHSEEDED OPEN AREASGROUNDCOVERSORNAMENTAL SHRUBSSCREENING SHRUBSMATURE HEIGHTS: 30' - 50'MATURE HEIGHT: 60'MATURE HEIGHT: 60'MATURE HEIGHTS: 12" - 30"MATURE HEIGHTS: 36" - 48"MATURE HEIGHTS: 48" - 96"STREET TREEENHANCED SHRUBS FOR ENTRYLOW GROWINGGROUNDCOVERSRENZ LANEPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA PERGILROY COMMUNITY SERVICESDEPARTMENT MASTER STREETPLANTING PLANSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA PERGILROY COMMUNITY SERVICESDEPARTMENT MASTER STREETPLANTING PLANENHANCED PLANTING FOR ENTRYFRONTAGE DITCHLANDSCAPE FRONTAGE DITCHLANDSCAPE FRONTAGE DITCH MIX MAY INCLUDE:BANKSMATURE HEIGHT: 24" - 36"SELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE:BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BRUSHROSA CALIFORNICA - CALIFORNIA WILD ROSEROSA GYMNOCARPA - DWARF ROSECHANNELMATURE HEIGHT: 24" - 48"SELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE:CAREX DENSA - DENSE SEDGECAREX PRAEGRACILIS - SLENDER SEDGEFESTUCA IDAHOENSIS - IDAHOE FESCUEFESTUCA RUBRA - RED FESCUEJUNCUS PATENS - CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSHLEYMUS CONDENSATUS - GIANT WILD RYELEYMUS TRITICOIDES - WILD RYEMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS - DEER GRASSENTRY D ENLARGEMENT1" = 30'ENTRY E ENLARGEMENT1" = 30'FRONTAGE DITCHSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINENHANCED PLANTING FOR ENTRYPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA PERGILROY COMMUNITY SERVICESDEPARTMENT MASTER STREETPLANTING PLANFRONTAGE DITCHSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA PERGILROY COMMUNITY SERVICESDEPARTMENT MASTER STREETPLANTING PLANFRONTAGE DITCHSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY 152BIORETENTION AREASBIORETENTION MIX SHALL INCLUDE:BIORETENTION BASINSELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE:CAREX DIVULSA / BERKELEY SEDGECAREX PANSA / DUNE SEDGECHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM / SMALL CAPE RUSHLEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' / CANYON WILD RYEJUNCUS PATENS / CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSHSCIRPUS CERNUS / LOW BULRUSHBIORETENTION BANKSSELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE:CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM / SMALL CAPE RUSHJUNCUS PATENS / CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSHMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASSSALVIA ULIGINOSA / BOG SAGESISYRINCHIUM BELLUM / BLUE EYED GRASSBIORETENTION UPLANDSELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE:BACCHARIS PILULARIS / COYOTE BRUSHCHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM / SMALL CAPE RUSHLEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' / CANYON WILD RYEMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASSSALVIA ULIGINOSA / BOG SAGESISYRINCHIUM BELLUM / BLUE EYED GRASSZAUSCHNERIA CALIFORNICA 'CATALINA' / ISLAND CALIFORNIA FUCHSIANOTE: FOR BIORETENTION PLANTINGS, THE PROJECT PROPOSES A COMBINATION OF SEED, AND 1-GALLONCONTAINER STOCK. BASINS, BANKS, AND UPLAND AREAS WILL BE SEEDED. ADDITIONALLY, BANKS AND UPLANDAREAS WILL RECEIVE CONTAINER STOCK PLANTINGS SPACED BROADLY FOR IMMEDIATE IMPACT ANDNATURALISTIC AESTHETIC. ALL PLANTS PROPOSED FOR BIORETENTION AREAS SHALL COMPLY WITHCENTRAL COAST LIDI PLANT LIST.MATURE HEIGHT: 24" - 48"MATURE HEIGHT: 24" - 48"MATURE HEIGHT: 24" - 60"*4' HT POLE IN RAIL FENCING4' HT POLE IN RAIL FENCING4' HT POLE IN RAIL FENCING4' HT POLE IN RAIL FENCINGMEDIAN PLANTINGMEDIAN PLANTINGMEDIAN PLANTING8.C.ePacket Pg. 130Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE DETAILSL102 TYPICAL SHRUB PLANTINGBNTS9-12"3 XROOTBALL WIDTH6"3" MULCH LAYER AS SPECIFIED4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED3" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH FROM TRUNKFINISHED GRADE.UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILSCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PITSET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED STABLESUBSOIL SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS 1"ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.PREPARED BACKFILLPLANT TO BE INSTALLED CENTEREDAND PLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PITTYPICAL GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGCNTS2-3" MULCH LAYER4" HIGH BERM FIRMLY COMPACTEDFINISHED GRADE.UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILPREPARED PLANTING SOIL. AMENDENTIRE BED FOR GROUNDCOVER BEDS.SHRUB PLANTING AT CURBHNTS2'-0"MIN. CLEARMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTH2'-0"MIN. CLEARMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTHSHRUB PLANTING AT SIDEWALKINTSMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTHBACK OF CURBBACK OF CURBSIDEWALKBACK OF CURBSHRUB PLANTING AT BUILDINGFNTSMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTHBUILDING2'-0"MIN. CLEARSHRUB PLANTING AT FIRE HYDRANTENTSMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTHFIRE HYDRANT5'-0"MIN. CLEARMIN. 1/2 MATURESHRUB WIDTHMIN. 10' CLEARFERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3" DEEP)NOTES:1.REFERENCE PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS/SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION.2.WHEN SHRUBS MASSED WITHGROUNDCOVER BEDS, ENTIRE BED TO BEAMENDED.3.WHEN SHRUBS ARE USED IN MASSES,PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TO ACHIEVEUNIFORM MASS/HEIGHTSECTIONSECTIONSCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING PITBEST FACE OF SHRUB TO FACEFRONT OF PLANTING BEDREFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE ANDPLANS FOR SPACING/LAYOUTPLANBEST FACE OF PLANT TO FACEFRONT OF PLANTING BEDREFER TO PLANT SCHEDULE ANDPLANS FOR SPACING/LAYOUTPLANNOTES:1.REFERENCE PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS/ SPECIAL PROVISIONSFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.4"FRONT OF BEDFRONT OF BED4"6"NOTES:1.REFERENCE PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS/ SPECIAL PROVISIONSFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.2.TRIPLE STAKE ALL TREES #36" BOX SIZEAND LARGER.3.LOCATE ALL STAKES OUTSIDE OFROOTBALL. DO NOT DRIVE STAKES INTOROOTBALL. STAKE MUST BE DRIVENMIN. 24" INTO NATIVE SOIL AT BOTTOMOF PLANTING PIT.4.REMOVE ANYTHING (IE. BURLAP, WIRES,STRAPS, ETC.) THAT COULD GIRDLETREE OR RESTRICT TREE GROWTH.3 X ROOTBALL WIDTH3" MULCH LAYER4" HIGH BERM, FIRMLY COMPACTED6" DIA. CLEAR OF MULCH AT TRUNK FLAREFINISHED GRADE.FERTILIZER TABLETS (MAX 3" DEEP)SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTINGPITSET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED STABLESUBSOIL SO THAT TOP OF ROOTBALL IS 1"ABOVE FINISHED GRADEAND TO PREVENT SETTLING.PREPARED BACKFILLHIGH WIND TREE PLANTINGTRUNK/ROOTBALL TO BE CENTERED ANDPLUMB/LEVEL IN PLANTING PITUNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILMINIMUMPLANSECTION24"2" DIA. LODGEPOLE STAKES AND 6 RUBBERTIES. TOP TREE TIES SHALL BE 6" ABOVEBENDING MOMENT OF TREE. TIES SHOULDPROVIDE FLEXIBILITY OF TRUNK BUT NOTALLOW RUBBING OF TRUNK AGAINST STAKE.CUT STAKE OFF 6" ABOVE TIES.6"4"4" PERFORATED PVC STANDPIPE WITHGRATE CAP AT MULCH LEVEL, WRAPPED INFILTER FABRIC, EXTEND TO BOTTOM OFPLANTER PITTREE TRUNKRUBBER TREE TIES LOOPED AROUND TREETRUNK AND STAKE2" DIA. LODGEPILE STAKEEACH TREE TIE SHALL BE NAILED TO STAKEUSING GALVANIZED NAILSPREVAILING WINDANTSCONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION:NOTES:MATERIALS:ANTI-LIFT GROUND LOCKZIPPER JOINING SYSTEMDOUBLE TOP EDGEZIPPER JOINING SYSTEM.085".085"1/2"1/4"7/16".085".085"2 1/4".085"3/8"SPECIFIED TREE ROOT BARRIERS ARE A MECHANICAL BARRIER AND ROOT DEFLECTOR TO PREVENT TREE ROOTS FROM DAMAGING ADJACENT PAVING /HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS. ASSEMBLED IN 2' LONG MODULES OR FOR LINEAR APPLICATIONS DIRECTLY BESIDE AN ADJACENT HARDSCAPE AREA TO ONE SIDEOF THE TREES (LINEAR PLANTING STYLE).1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL TREE ROOT BARRIERS AS SPECIFIED. THE TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE PRODUCT # UB 24-2 ASMANUFACTURED BY DEEP ROOT PARTNERS, L.P. 530 WASHINGTON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 (800-458-7668), OR APPROVED EQUAL. THEBARRIER SHALL BE BLACK, INJECTION MOLDED PANELS, OF 0.085" WALL THICKNESS IN MODULES 24" LONG BY 24" DEEP; MANUFACTURED WITH AMINIMUM 50% POST CONSUMER RECYCLED POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC WITH ADDED ULTRAVIOLET INHIBITORS; RECYCLABLE.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE TREE ROOT BARRIERS WITH THE NUMBER OF PANELS AND IN THE MANNER SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THEVERTICAL ROOT DEFLECTING RIBS SHALL BE FACING INWARDS TO THE ROOT BALL AND THE TOP OF THE DOUBLE EDGE SHALL BE 1/2" ABOVEGRADE. EACH OF THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PANELS SHALL BE CONNECTED EITHER TO FORM A CIRCLE AROUND THE ROOT BALL OR BE JOINED INA LINEAR FASHION AND PLACED ALONG THE ADJACENT HARDSCAPE.2. EXCAVATION AND SOIL PREPARATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGSDOUBLE TOP EDGE FORPREVENTION OF ROOTOVER GROWTH90° ROOT DEFLECTING RIBSINTEGRAL PART OF PANELPANEL 0.085" (2.16MM)THICK POLYPROPYLENEPATENTED MOLDEDGROUND LOCKINGANTI-LIFT PADS (SEEDETAIL "B")ROUNDED EDGES FORSAFETY AND STRENGTHROOT CONTROL BARRIERGNTS10' MIN.10' MIN.ROOT BARRIER REQUIRED WITHIN10' OF TREE TRUNKTREE TRUNKROOT BARRIERTREE TRUNK24" DEPTH ROOT BARRIERFINISHED GRADETOP OF ROOT BARRIER 1/2"ABOVE FINISHED GRADEBUT NOT HIGHER THANADJACENT HARDSCAPEROOT BARRIER REQUIRED WITHIN10' OF TREE TRUNKHARDSCAPE, WALLS,BUILDINGS, BROWDITCHES, OR OTHERIMPROVEMENTSSECTIONPLANNOTES:1.ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE IMPROVEMENT AND NOT AROUND THE ROOTBALL.2.ROOT BARRIER REQUIRED WHEN TREE TRUNK IS WITHIN 10' OF HARDSCAPE, WALLS, BUILDINGS, BROWDITCHES, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTSCTREEL1/2"WOOD BARK MULCH WITH WEED BARRIERENTSBIOFILTRATION BASIN MULCHDNTSKNTSUTILITY SCREENING ELEVATIONPLANFINISHED SURFACE5' SCREENING SHRUBUTILITY (VARIED HEIGHTAND WIDTH)WATERUTILITIES5' SCREENING SHRUBUTILITY (VARIED HEIGHT AND WIDTH)COMPANY VEHICLE SCREENINGJNTS36" MIN. HEIGHTSCREENING SHRUB, ATPARKING LOTPERIMETERWATERUTILITIESFIRE ACCESSSIDEWALKSCALE:KMcDR:CK:SH . 1of 1Date04/17/2015AMERISTARRREV: AEGIS II MAJESTIC 2/3-RAILDO NOT SCALEDTitle:Uniform Zinc Coating(Hot Dip Galvanized)Base MaterialUniform Zinc Coating(Hot Dip Galvanized)Zinc Phosphate &Conversion CoatingEpoxy base coat134" [44.5mm]134" [44.5mm]OPTIONAL 45° SWIVEL BRACKETPANEL BRACKETSpecially designed two-point connection ensuresfixity of rail ends forincreased strength.INTERNAL RETAINING RODVariable pitch connection system forease of installation, high anglebias ability and elimination ofunsightly external fasteners.FORERUNNER RAILDouble-walled "U"-ChannelSpecially formed high strengtharchitectural shape.TMFORERUNNER RAILTM"No-Mar" PolyesterPowder finish coat2MISO8' [2438.4mm] O.C. Nom.VarieswithHeightStandard Heights4' [1219.2mm], 5' [1524.0mm], 6'[1828.8mm], 7' [2133.6mm], 8' [2438.4mm], 9' [2743.2mm], 10' [3048.0mm]36" [914.4mm] Min.Footing depth2" [50.8mm] Nom334" [95.2mm] Typ.118" [28.6mm]9316" [233.4mm]Bracket Options134" [44.5mm] FORERUNNER Rail (See Cross- Section Below)1" [25.4mm] x 14ga. PicketTM234Post size varies with Height(See AEGIS II Post-Sizing chart)TM11555 N. MingoTulsa, OK 741161-888-333-3422www.ameristarfence.comINDUSTRIAL STRENGTH STEELNOTES:1.) Post size depends on fence height and wind loads. See AEGIS II post sizing chart.2.) Panels also available for 6' on center post spacing3.) Additional heights available on request4.) Third rail optional.TMValues shown are nominal and not to be used forinstallation purposes. See product specificationfor installation requirements.SCALE:KMcDR:CK:SH . 1of 1Date04/17/2015AMERISTARRREV: 1555 N. MingoTulsa, OK 741161-888-333-3422AEGIS II MAJESTIC 2/3-RAIL SGL & DBL GATEDO NOT SCALEETitle:334" [95.25mm]TYPICAL2MISOG134" [44.5mm] FORERUNNER Rail(See Cross- Section on Panel Drawing)TM1" [25.4mm] x 14ga. Picket1Gate Upright2" [50.8mm] x 11 ga.Weld on Box Hinge39316" [233.47mm]118" [28.58mm]4VarieswithHeightStandard Heights4' [1219.2mm], 5' [1524.0mm], 6' [1828.8mm], 7' [2133.6mm], 8' [2438.4mm], 9' [2743.2mm], 10' [3048.0mm]36" [914.38mm] Min.Footing depth23" [76.2mm] (Latch Clearance)Ameristar StandardLeaf Widths2" [50.8mm] (Hinge Clearance)134" [44.5mm] FORERUNNERRail (See Cross- Section onPanel Drawing)TM1" [25.4mm] x 14ga. PicketGate Upright2" [50.8mm] x 11 ga.Weld on Box Hinge232" [50.8mm](Hinge Clearance)Ameristar StandardLeaf Widths2" [50.8mm] (Hinge Clearance)3" [76.2mm](Latch Clearance)Over all Out to Out .2Single gate ArrangementDouble gate ArrangementPost size varies with Height(See AEGIS II Post-Sizing chart)TM1Post size varies with Height(See AEGIS II Post-Sizing chart)Ring334" [95.25mm]TYPICAL9316" [233.47mm]118" [28.58mm]4VarieswithHeight36" [914.38mm]Min.Footing depth134" [44.5mm]134" [44.5mm]www.ameristarfence.comINDUSTRIAL STRENGTH STEELNOTES:1.) Post size depends on fence height, weight and wind loads. See AEGIS II post sizing chart.2.) See Ameristar gate table for standard out to outs. Custom gate openings available for special out to out/leaf widths.3.) Additional styles of gate hardware are available on request This could change the Latch & Hinge Clearance.4.) Third rail optional.Pickets welded toFORERUNNER Railprior to coatingTMTMAdornment Options(See ring panel for rail spacing)2" [50.85mm]Nom.2" [50.85mm]Nom.Values shown are nominal and not to be used forinstallation purposes. See product specificationfor installation requirements.Standard Heights4' [1219.2mm], 5' [1524.0mm], 6' [1828.8mm], 7' [2133.6mm], 8' [2438.4mm], 9' [2743.2mm], 10' [3048.0mm]TYPICAL ORNAMENTAL FENCING AND SWING GATE LNTS8.C.ePacket Pg. 131Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRDRAWN BY:JOB NO.:PA / PM:REMARKSDATE PROJECT GILROY CAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152 GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020 Wed, 21 Apr 2021 DATE:CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE DETAILS & RENDERSL103 TYPICAL SITE ENTRY RENDERING 2PACHECO PASS HIGHWAY CORNER MONUMENT FEATURE RENDERING 1TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL SECTION38.C.ePacket Pg. 132Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 133Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 134Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 135Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 136Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 137Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.ePacket Pg. 138Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 1 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR D-Series Size 1 LED Area Luminaire Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long-life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. It is ideal for replacing up to 750W metal halide in pedestrian and area lighting applications with typical energy savings of 65% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. L H L H1 WW HH2 Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSX1 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD DSX1 LED Series LEDs Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting DSX1 LED Forward optics P1 P4 1 P7 1 P2 P5 1 P8 P3 P6 1 P9 1 Rotated optics P10 2 P12 2 P11 2 P13 1,2 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K T1S Type I short (Automotive) T2S Type II short T2M Type II medium T3S Type III short T3M Type III medium T4M Type IV medium TFTM Forward throw medium T5VS Type V very short 3 T5S Type V short 3 T5M Type V medium 3 T5W Type V wide 3 BLC Backlight control 4 LCCO Left corner cutoff 4 RCCO Right corner cutoff 4 MVOLT 5 XVOLT (277V-480V) 6,7,8 120 9 208 9 240 9 277 9 347 9 480 9 Shipped included SPA Square pole mounting RPA Round pole mounting 10 WBA Wall bracket 3 SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor 11 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 9 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 12 Specifications EPA:1.01 ft2 (0.09 m2) Length:33” (83.8 cm) Width:13” (33.0 cm) Height H1:7-1/2” (19.0 cm) Height H2:3-1/2” Weight (max):27 lbs (12.2 kg) Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled 13 PIRHN Network, high/low motion/ambient sensor 14 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15 PER5 Five-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15,16 PER7 Seven-pin receptacle only (controls ordered separate) 15,16 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately) 17 DS Dual switching 18,19,20 PIR High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 20,21 PIRH High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 5fc 20,21 PIR1FC3V High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 20,21 PIRH1FC3V Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 20,21 FAO Field adjustable output 20,21 Shipped installed HS House-side shield 23 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 9 DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 9 L90 Left rotated optics 2 R90 Right rotated optics 2 HA 50°C ambient operations 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes 24 EGS External glare shield DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white 8.C.e Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 2 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Tenon O.D. Mounting Single Unit 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @ 90 3 @120 4 @ 90 2-3/8"RPA AS3-5 190 AS3-5 280 AS3-5 290 AS3-5 390 AS3-5 320 AS3-5 490 2-7/8"RPA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-390 AST25-320 AST25-490 4"RPA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-390 AST35-320 AST35-490 Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Drilling Top of Pole 0.563” 2.650” 1.325”0.400”(2 PLCS) Template #8 Ordering Information NOTES 1 HA not available with P4, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 2 P10, P11, P12 or P13 and rotated optics (L90, R90) only available together. 3 Any Type 5 distribution with photocell, is not available with WBA. 4 Not available with HS. 5 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 6 XVOLT only suitable for use with P3, P5, P6, P7, P9 and P13. 7 XVOLT works with any voltage between 277V and 480V. 8 XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF) and not available with PIR, PIRH, PIR1FC3V, PIRH1FC3V. 9 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V. Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V. XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF. 10 Suitable for mounting to round poles between 3.5” and 12” diameter. 11 Universal mounting brackets intended for retrofit on existing, pre-drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. Only usable when pole’s drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8 12 Must order fixture with SPA option. Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. For use with 2-3/8” diameter mast arm (not included). 13 Must be ordered with PIRHN. Sensor cover available only in dark bronze, black, white and natural aluminum colors. 14 Must be ordered with NLTAIR2. For more information on nLight Air 2 visit this link. 15 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Shorting cap included. 16 If ROAM® node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node with integral dimming. 17 DMG not available with PIRHN, PER5, PER7, PIR, PIRH, PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V, FAO. 18 Provides 50/50fixture operation via (2) independent drivers. Not available with PER, PER5, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available P1, P2, P3, P4 or P5. 19 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutrol. 20 Reference Controls Option Default settings table on page 4. 21 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 4 to see functionality. 22 Not available with other dimming controls options. 23 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 24 Must be ordered with fixture for factory pre-drilling. 25 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PER5 or PER7 option. See Control Option Table on page 4. 26 For retrofit use only. Only usable when pole’s drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8. Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (120-277V) 25 DLL347F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (347V) 25 DLL480F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (480V) 25 DSHORT SBK U Shorting cap 25 DSX1HS 30C U House-side shield for P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 23 DSX1HS 40C U House-side shield for P6 and P7 23 DSX1HS 60C U House-side shield for P8, P9, P10, P11 and P12 23 PUMBA DDBXD U*Square and round pole universal mounting bracket (specify finish) 26 KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 12 DSX1EGS (FINISH) U External glare shield For more control options, visit DTL and ROAM online. Options .50 73˚ 12.05 12.476 .50 73˚ 12.05 12.48 HANDHOLE ORIENTATION A Handhole B C D EGS - External Glare Shield Drilling Template Minimum Acceptable Outside Pole Dimension SPA #8 2-7/8” 2-7/8” 3.5”3.5”3”3.5” RPA #8 2-7/8” 2-7/8” 3.5”3.5”3”3.5” SPUMBA #5 2-7/8” 3”4”4”3.5”4” RPUMBA #5 2-7/8” 3.5”5” 5” 3.5”5” Mounting Option Drilling Template Single 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @ 90 3 @ 120 4 @ 90 Head Location Side B Side B & D Side B & C Side B, C & D Round Pole Only Side A, B, C & D Drill Nomenclature #8 DM19AS DM28AS DM29AS DM39AS DM32AS DM49AS 1.75” for aluminum poles 2.75” for other pole types Fixture Quantity & Mounting Configuration Single DM19 2 @ 180 DM28 2 @ 90 DM29 3 @ 90 DM39 3 @ 120 DM32 4 @ 90 DM49 Mounting Type DSX1 LED 1.013 2.025 1.945 3.038 2.850 3.749 DSX1 Area Luminaire - EPA *Includes luminaire and integral mounting arm. Other tenons, arms, brackets or other accessories are not included in this EPA data. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 3 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting’s D-Series Area Size 1 homepage. Photometric Diagrams Isofootcandle plots for the DSX1 LED 60C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25’). LEGEND 0.1 fc 0.5 fc 1.0 fc Test No. LTL23211 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T1S Test No. LTL23164B tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T2M Test No. LTL23222 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T2S Test No. LTL23271 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3M Test No. LTL23211 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3S Test No. LTL23164B tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T4M Test No. LTL23222 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 TFTM Test No. LTL23271 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5VS Test No. LTL23211 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5S Test No. LTL23164B tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5M Test No. LTL23222 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5W Test No. LTL23271 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 BLC Test No. LTL23211 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 LCCO Test No. LTL23164B tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 RCCO 8.C.e Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 4 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.04 5°C 41°F 1.04 10°C 50°F 1.03 15°C 50°F 1.02 20°C 68°F 1.01 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 35°C 95°F 0.98 40°C 104°F 0.97 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM-80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Motion Sensor Default Settings Option Dimmed State High Level (when triggered) Phototcell Operation Dwell Time Ramp-up Time Ramp-down Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 1FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *for use when motion sensor is used as dusk to dawn control. Current (A) Performance Package LED Count Drive Current Wattage 120 208 240 277 347 480 Forward Optics (Non-Rotated) P1 30 530 54 0.45 0.26 0.23 0.19 0.10 0.12 P2 30 700 70 0.59 0.34 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.16 P3 30 1050 102 0.86 0.50 0.44 0.38 0.30 0.22 P4 30 1250 125 1.06 0.60 0.52 0.46 0.37 0.27 P5 30 1400 138 1.16 0.67 0.58 0.51 0.40 0.29 P6 40 1250 163 1.36 0.78 0.68 0.59 0.47 0.34 P7 40 1400 183 1.53 0.88 0.76 0.66 0.53 0.38 P8 60 1050 207 1.74 0.98 0.87 0.76 0.64 0.49 P9 60 1250 241 2.01 1.16 1.01 0.89 0.70 0.51 Rotated Optics (Requires L90 or R90) P10 60 530 106 0.90 0.52 0.47 0.43 0.33 0.27 P11 60 700 137 1.15 0.67 0.60 0.53 0.42 0.32 P12 60 1050 207 1.74 0.99 0.87 0.76 0.60 0.46 P13 60 1250 231 1.93 1.12 0.97 0.86 0.67 0.49 Electrical Load Controls Options Nomenclature Description Functionality Primary control device Notes FAO Field adjustable output device installed inside the luminaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. Allows the luminaire to be manually dimmed, effectively trimming the light output.FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that need the 0-10V leads DS Drivers wired independently for 50/50 luminaire operation The luminaire is wired to two separate circuits, allowing for 50/50 operation.Independently wired drivers Requires two separately switched circuits. Consider nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PER5 or PER7 Twist-lock photocell recepticle Compatible with standard twist-lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes that provide 0-10V dimming signals. Twist-lock photocells such as DLL Elite or advanced control nodes such as ROAM. Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected.Acuity Controls SBGR Also available with PIRH1FC3V when the sensor photocell is used for dusk-to-dawn operation. NLTAIR2 PIRHN nLight AIR enabled luminaire for motion sensing, photocell and wireless communication. Motion and ambient light sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride when wirelessly connected to the nLight Eclypse.nLight Air rSDGR nLight AIR sensors can be programmed and commissioned from the ground using the ClAIRity Pro app. Operating Hours Lumen Maintenance Factor 0 1.00 25,000 0.96 50,000 0.92 100,000 0.85 8.C.e Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Performance Data Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Lumen Output Forward Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 30 530 P1 54W T1S 6,457 2 0 2 120 6,956 2 0 2 129 7,044 2 0 2 130 T2S 6,450 2 0 2 119 6,949 2 0 2 129 7,037 2 0 2 130 T2M 6,483 1 0 1 120 6,984 2 0 2 129 7,073 2 0 2 131 T3S 6,279 2 0 2 116 6,764 2 0 2 125 6,850 2 0 2 127 T3M 6,468 1 0 2 120 6,967 1 0 2 129 7,056 1 0 2 131 T4M 6,327 1 0 2 117 6,816 1 0 2 126 6,902 1 0 2 128 TFTM 6,464 1 0 2 120 6,963 1 0 2 129 7,051 1 0 2 131 T5VS 6,722 2 0 0 124 7,242 3 0 0 134 7,334 3 0 0 136 T5S 6,728 2 0 1 125 7,248 2 0 1 134 7,340 2 0 1 136 T5M 6,711 3 0 1 124 7,229 3 0 1 134 7,321 3 0 2 136 T5W 6,667 3 0 2 123 7,182 3 0 2 133 7,273 3 0 2 135 BLC 5,299 1 0 1 98 5,709 1 0 2 106 5,781 1 0 2 107 LCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 RCCO 3,943 1 0 2 73 4,248 1 0 2 79 4,302 1 0 2 80 30 700 P2 70W T1S 8,249 2 0 2 118 8,886 2 0 2 127 8,999 2 0 2 129 T2S 8,240 2 0 2 118 8,877 2 0 2 127 8,989 2 0 2 128 T2M 8,283 2 0 2 118 8,923 2 0 2 127 9,036 2 0 2 129 T3S 8,021 2 0 2 115 8,641 2 0 2 123 8,751 2 0 2 125 T3M 8,263 2 0 2 118 8,901 2 0 2 127 9,014 2 0 2 129 T4M 8,083 2 0 2 115 8,708 2 0 2 124 8,818 2 0 2 126 TFTM 8,257 2 0 2 118 8,896 2 0 2 127 9,008 2 0 2 129 T5VS 8,588 3 0 0 123 9,252 3 0 0 132 9,369 3 0 0 134 T5S 8,595 3 0 1 123 9,259 3 0 1 132 9,376 3 0 1 134 T5M 8,573 3 0 2 122 9,236 3 0 2 132 9,353 3 0 2 134 T5W 8,517 3 0 2 122 9,175 4 0 2 131 9,291 4 0 2 133 BLC 6,770 1 0 2 97 7,293 1 0 2 104 7,386 1 0 2 106 LCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 RCCO 5,038 1 0 2 72 5,427 1 0 2 78 5,496 1 0 2 79 30 1050 P3 102W T1S 11,661 2 0 2 114 12,562 3 0 3 123 12,721 3 0 3 125 T2S 11,648 2 0 2 114 12,548 3 0 3 123 12,707 3 0 3 125 T2M 11,708 2 0 2 115 12,613 2 0 2 124 12,773 2 0 2 125 T3S 11,339 2 0 2 111 12,215 3 0 3 120 12,370 3 0 3 121 T3M 11,680 2 0 2 115 12,582 2 0 2 123 12,742 2 0 2 125 T4M 11,426 2 0 3 112 12,309 2 0 3 121 12,465 2 0 3 122 TFTM 11,673 2 0 2 114 12,575 2 0 3 123 12,734 2 0 3 125 T5VS 12,140 3 0 1 119 13,078 3 0 1 128 13,244 3 0 1 130 T5S 12,150 3 0 1 119 13,089 3 0 1 128 13,254 3 0 1 130 T5M 12,119 4 0 2 119 13,056 4 0 2 128 13,221 4 0 2 130 T5W 12,040 4 0 3 118 12,970 4 0 3 127 13,134 4 0 3 129 BLC 9,570 1 0 2 94 10,310 1 0 2 101 10,440 1 0 2 102 LCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 RCCO 7,121 1 0 3 70 7,671 1 0 3 75 7,768 1 0 3 76 30 1250 P4 125W T1S 13,435 3 0 3 107 14,473 3 0 3 116 14,657 3 0 3 117 T2S 13,421 3 0 3 107 14,458 3 0 3 116 14,641 3 0 3 117 T2M 13,490 2 0 2 108 14,532 3 0 3 116 14,716 3 0 3 118 T3S 13,064 3 0 3 105 14,074 3 0 3 113 14,252 3 0 3 114 T3M 13,457 2 0 2 108 14,497 2 0 2 116 14,681 2 0 2 117 T4M 13,165 2 0 3 105 14,182 2 0 3 113 14,362 2 0 3 115 TFTM 13,449 2 0 3 108 14,488 2 0 3 116 14,672 2 0 3 117 T5VS 13,987 4 0 1 112 15,068 4 0 1 121 15,259 4 0 1 122 T5S 13,999 3 0 1 112 15,080 3 0 1 121 15,271 3 0 1 122 T5M 13,963 4 0 2 112 15,042 4 0 2 120 15,233 4 0 2 122 T5W 13,872 4 0 3 111 14,944 4 0 3 120 15,133 4 0 3 121 BLC 11,027 1 0 2 88 11,879 1 0 2 95 12,029 1 0 2 96 LCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 RCCO 8,205 1 0 3 66 8,839 1 0 3 71 8,951 1 0 3 72 30 1400 P5 138W T1S 14,679 3 0 3 106 15,814 3 0 3 115 16,014 3 0 3 116 T2S 14,664 3 0 3 106 15,797 3 0 3 114 15,997 3 0 3 116 T2M 14,739 3 0 3 107 15,878 3 0 3 115 16,079 3 0 3 117 T3S 14,274 3 0 3 103 15,377 3 0 3 111 15,572 3 0 3 113 T3M 14,704 2 0 3 107 15,840 3 0 3 115 16,040 3 0 3 116 T4M 14,384 2 0 3 104 15,496 3 0 3 112 15,692 3 0 3 114 TFTM 14,695 2 0 3 106 15,830 3 0 3 115 16,030 3 0 3 116 T5VS 15,283 4 0 1 111 16,464 4 0 1 119 16,672 4 0 1 121 T5S 15,295 3 0 1 111 16,477 4 0 1 119 16,686 4 0 1 121 T5M 15,257 4 0 2 111 16,435 4 0 2 119 16,644 4 0 2 121 T5W 15,157 4 0 3 110 16,328 4 0 3 118 16,534 4 0 3 120 BLC 12,048 1 0 2 87 12,979 1 0 2 94 13,143 1 0 2 95 LCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 RCCO 8,965 1 0 3 65 9,657 1 0 3 70 9,780 1 0 3 71 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 5 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR 8.C.e Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Forward Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 40 1250 P6 163W T1S 17,654 3 0 3 108 19,018 3 0 3 117 19,259 3 0 3 118 T2S 17,635 3 0 3 108 18,998 3 0 3 117 19,238 3 0 3 118 T2M 17,726 3 0 3 109 19,096 3 0 3 117 19,337 3 0 3 119 T3S 17,167 3 0 3 105 18,493 3 0 3 113 18,727 3 0 3 115 T3M 17,683 3 0 3 108 19,049 3 0 3 117 19,290 3 0 3 118 T4M 17,299 3 0 3 106 18,635 3 0 4 114 18,871 3 0 4 116 TFTM 17,672 3 0 3 108 19,038 3 0 4 117 19,279 3 0 4 118 T5VS 18,379 4 0 1 113 19,800 4 0 1 121 20,050 4 0 1 123 T5S 18,394 4 0 2 113 19,816 4 0 2 122 20,066 4 0 2 123 T5M 18,348 4 0 2 113 19,766 4 0 2 121 20,016 4 0 2 123 T5W 18,228 5 0 3 112 19,636 5 0 3 120 19,885 5 0 3 122 BLC 14,489 2 0 2 89 15,609 2 0 3 96 15,806 2 0 3 97 LCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 RCCO 10,781 1 0 3 66 11,614 1 0 3 71 11,761 2 0 3 72 40 1400 P7 183W T1S 19,227 3 0 3 105 20,712 3 0 3 113 20,975 3 0 3 115 T2S 19,206 3 0 3 105 20,690 3 0 3 113 20,952 3 0 3 114 T2M 19,305 3 0 3 105 20,797 3 0 3 114 21,060 3 0 3 115 T3S 18,696 3 0 3 102 20,141 3 0 3 110 20,396 3 0 4 111 T3M 19,258 3 0 3 105 20,746 3 0 3 113 21,009 3 0 3 115 T4M 18,840 3 0 4 103 20,296 3 0 4 111 20,553 3 0 4 112 TFTM 19,246 3 0 4 105 20,734 3 0 4 113 20,996 3 0 4 115 T5VS 20,017 4 0 1 109 21,564 4 0 1 118 21,837 4 0 1 119 T5S 20,033 4 0 2 109 21,581 4 0 2 118 21,854 4 0 2 119 T5M 19,983 4 0 2 109 21,527 5 0 3 118 21,799 5 0 3 119 T5W 19,852 5 0 3 108 21,386 5 0 3 117 21,656 5 0 3 118 BLC 15,780 2 0 3 86 16,999 2 0 3 93 17,214 2 0 3 94 LCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 RCCO 11,742 2 0 3 64 12,649 2 0 3 69 12,809 2 0 3 70 60 1050 P8 207W T1S 22,490 3 0 3 109 24,228 3 0 3 117 24,535 3 0 3 119 T2S 22,466 3 0 4 109 24,202 3 0 4 117 24,509 3 0 4 118 T2M 22,582 3 0 3 109 24,327 3 0 3 118 24,635 3 0 3 119 T3S 21,870 3 0 4 106 23,560 3 0 4 114 23,858 3 0 4 115 T3M 22,527 3 0 4 109 24,268 3 0 4 117 24,575 3 0 4 119 T4M 22,038 3 0 4 106 23,741 3 0 4 115 24,041 3 0 4 116 TFTM 22,513 3 0 4 109 24,253 3 0 4 117 24,560 3 0 4 119 T5VS 23,415 5 0 1 113 25,224 5 0 1 122 25,543 5 0 1 123 T5S 23,434 4 0 2 113 25,244 4 0 2 122 25,564 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,221 5 0 4 112 25,016 5 0 4 121 25,332 5 0 4 122 BLC 18,458 2 0 3 89 19,885 2 0 3 96 20,136 2 0 3 97 LCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,735 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 60 1250 P9 241W T1S 25,575 3 0 3 106 27,551 3 0 3 114 27,900 3 0 3 116 T2S 25,548 3 0 4 106 27,522 3 0 4 114 27,871 3 0 4 116 T2M 25,680 3 0 3 107 27,664 3 0 3 115 28,014 3 0 3 116 T3S 24,870 3 0 4 103 26,791 3 0 4 111 27,130 3 0 4 113 T3M 25,617 3 0 4 106 27,597 3 0 4 115 27,946 3 0 4 116 T4M 25,061 3 0 4 104 26,997 3 0 4 112 27,339 3 0 4 113 TFTM 25,602 3 0 4 106 27,580 3 0 4 114 27,929 3 0 4 116 T5VS 26,626 5 0 1 110 28,684 5 0 1 119 29,047 5 0 1 121 T5S 26,648 4 0 2 111 28,707 5 0 2 119 29,070 5 0 2 121 T5M 26,581 5 0 3 110 28,635 5 0 3 119 28,997 5 0 3 120 T5W 26,406 5 0 4 110 28,447 5 0 4 118 28,807 5 0 4 120 BLC 20,990 2 0 3 87 22,612 2 0 3 94 22,898 2 0 3 95 LCCO 15,619 2 0 4 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 RCCO 15,619 2 0 4 65 16,825 2 0 4 70 17,038 2 0 4 71 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 6 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Lumen Output 8.C.e Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 7 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Performance Data Lumen Output Rotated Optics LED Count Drive Current Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 60 530 P10 106W T1S 13,042 3 0 3 123 14,050 3 0 3 133 14,228 3 0 3 134 T2S 12,967 4 0 4 122 13,969 4 0 4 132 14,146 4 0 4 133 T2M 13,201 3 0 3 125 14,221 3 0 3 134 14,401 3 0 3 136 T3S 12,766 4 0 4 120 13,752 4 0 4 130 13,926 4 0 4 131 T3M 13,193 4 0 4 124 14,213 4 0 4 134 14,393 4 0 4 136 T4M 12,944 4 0 4 122 13,945 4 0 4 132 14,121 4 0 4 133 TFTM 13,279 4 0 4 125 14,305 4 0 4 135 14,486 4 0 4 137 T5VS 13,372 3 0 1 126 14,405 4 0 1 136 14,588 4 0 1 138 T5S 13,260 3 0 1 125 14,284 3 0 1 135 14,465 3 0 1 136 T5M 13,256 4 0 2 125 14,281 4 0 2 135 14,462 4 0 2 136 T5W 13,137 4 0 3 124 14,153 4 0 3 134 14,332 4 0 3 135 BLC 10,906 3 0 3 103 11,749 3 0 3 111 11,898 3 0 3 112 LCCO 7,789 1 0 3 73 8,391 1 0 3 79 8,497 1 0 3 80 RCCO 7,779 4 0 4 73 8,380 4 0 4 79 8,486 4 0 4 80 60 700 P11 137W T1S 16,556 3 0 3 121 17,835 3 0 3 130 18,061 4 0 4 132 T2S 16,461 4 0 4 120 17,733 4 0 4 129 17,957 4 0 4 131 T2M 16,758 4 0 4 122 18,053 4 0 4 132 18,281 4 0 4 133 T3S 16,205 4 0 4 118 17,457 4 0 4 127 17,678 4 0 4 129 T3M 16,748 4 0 4 122 18,042 4 0 4 132 18,271 4 0 4 133 T4M 16,432 4 0 4 120 17,702 4 0 4 129 17,926 4 0 4 131 TFTM 16,857 4 0 4 123 18,159 4 0 4 133 18,389 4 0 4 134 T5VS 16,975 4 0 1 124 18,287 4 0 1 133 18,518 4 0 1 135 T5S 16,832 4 0 1 123 18,133 4 0 2 132 18,362 4 0 2 134 T5M 16,828 4 0 2 123 18,128 4 0 2 132 18,358 4 0 2 134 T5W 16,677 4 0 3 122 17,966 5 0 3 131 18,193 5 0 3 133 BLC 13,845 3 0 3 101 14,915 3 0 3 109 15,103 3 0 3 110 LCCO 9,888 1 0 3 72 10,652 2 0 3 78 10,787 2 0 3 79 RCCO 9,875 4 0 4 72 10,638 4 0 4 78 10,773 4 0 4 79 60 1050 P12 207W T1S 22,996 4 0 4 111 24,773 4 0 4 120 25,087 4 0 4 121 T2S 22,864 4 0 4 110 24,631 5 0 5 119 24,943 5 0 5 120 T2M 23,277 4 0 4 112 25,075 4 0 4 121 25,393 4 0 4 123 T3S 22,509 4 0 4 109 24,248 5 0 5 117 24,555 5 0 5 119 T3M 23,263 4 0 4 112 25,061 4 0 4 121 25,378 4 0 4 123 T4M 22,824 5 0 5 110 24,588 5 0 5 119 24,899 5 0 5 120 TFTM 23,414 5 0 5 113 25,223 5 0 5 122 25,543 5 0 5 123 T5VS 23,579 5 0 1 114 25,401 5 0 1 123 25,722 5 0 1 124 T5S 23,380 4 0 2 113 25,187 4 0 2 122 25,506 4 0 2 123 T5M 23,374 5 0 3 113 25,181 5 0 3 122 25,499 5 0 3 123 T5W 23,165 5 0 4 112 24,955 5 0 4 121 25,271 5 0 4 122 BLC 19,231 4 0 4 93 20,717 4 0 4 100 20,979 4 0 4 101 LCCO 13,734 2 0 3 66 14,796 2 0 4 71 14,983 2 0 4 72 RCCO 13,716 4 0 4 66 14,776 4 0 4 71 14,963 4 0 4 72 60 1250 P13 231W T1S 25,400 4 0 4 110 27,363 4 0 4 118 27,709 4 0 4 120 T2S 25,254 5 0 5 109 27,205 5 0 5 118 27,550 5 0 5 119 T2M 25,710 4 0 4 111 27,696 4 0 4 120 28,047 4 0 4 121 T3S 24,862 5 0 5 108 26,783 5 0 5 116 27,122 5 0 5 117 T3M 25,695 5 0 5 111 27,680 5 0 5 120 28,031 5 0 5 121 T4M 25,210 5 0 5 109 27,158 5 0 5 118 27,502 5 0 5 119 TFTM 25,861 5 0 5 112 27,860 5 0 5 121 28,212 5 0 5 122 T5VS 26,043 5 0 1 113 28,056 5 0 1 121 28,411 5 0 1 123 T5S 25,824 4 0 2 112 27,819 5 0 2 120 28,172 5 0 2 122 T5M 25,818 5 0 3 112 27,813 5 0 3 120 28,165 5 0 3 122 T5W 25,586 5 0 4 111 27,563 5 0 4 119 27,912 5 0 4 121 BLC 21,241 4 0 4 92 22,882 4 0 4 99 23,172 4 0 4 100 LCCO 15,170 2 0 4 66 16,342 2 0 4 71 16,549 2 0 4 72 RCCO 15,150 5 0 5 66 16,321 5 0 5 71 16,527 5 0 5 72 8.C.e Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX1-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 8 of 8COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D-Series Size 1 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology. It is ideal for many commercial and municipal applications, such as parking lots, plazas, campuses, and streetscapes. CONSTRUCTION Single-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED drivers are mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). Low EPA (1.01 ft2) for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and non-textured finishes. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in standard 3000 K, 4000 K and 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. The D-Series Size 1 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime FriendlyTM product, meaning it is consistent with the LEED® and Green GlobesTM criteria for eliminating wasteful uplight. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist of high-efficacy LEDs mounted to metal- core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L85/100,000 hours at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1% failure rate. Easily serviceable 10kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). STANDARD CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire has a number of control options. DSX Size 1, comes standard with 0-10V dimming drivers. Dusk to dawn controls can be utilized via optional NEMA twist-lock photocell receptacles. Integrated motion sensors with on-board photocells feature field-adjustable programing and are suitable for mounting heights up to 30 feet. nLIGHT AIR CONTROLS The DSX1 LED area luminaire is also available with nLight® AIR for the ultimate in wireless control. This powerful controls platform provides out-of-the-box basic motion sensing and photocontrol functionality and is suitable for mounting heights up to 40 feet. Once commissioned using a smartphone and the easy-to- use CLAIRITY app, nLight AIR equipped luminaries can be grouped, resulting in motion sensor and photocell group response without the need for additional equipment. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride can be achieved when used with the nLight Eclypse. Additional information about nLight Air can be found here. INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D-Series Size 1 to withstand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. The D-Series Size 1 utilizes the AERISTM series pole drilling pattern (template #8). NEMA photocontrol receptacle are also available. LISTINGS UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D672,492 S. International patent pending. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/ QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) is available for all products on this page utilizing 3000K color temperature only. WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/support/customer-support/terms-and-conditions Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 1 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Control options Other options Finish (required) Shipped installed NLTAIR2 nLight AIR generation 2 enabled 13 PIRHN Network, Bi-Level motion/ambient sensor 14 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (no controls) 15 PER5 Five-wire receptacle only (no controls) 15,16 PER7 Seven-wire receptacle only (no controls) 15,16 DMG 0-10V dimming extend out back of housing for external control (no controls) 17 DS Dual switching 18,19 PIRH Bi-level, motion/ambient sensor, 15-30’ mounting height, ambient sensor enable at 5fc 20 PIRH1FC3V High/low, motion/ambient sensor, 8-15’ mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc 20 FAO Field Adjustable Output 23 Shipped installed HS House-side shield 22 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 9 DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 9 L90 Left rotated optics 2 R90 Right rotated optics 2 HA 50°C ambient operations 1 Shipped separately BS Bird spikes 21 EGS External glare shield DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black DNAXD Natural aluminum DWHXD White DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DBLBXD Textured black DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white D-Series Size 2 LED Area Luminaire Specifications Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSX2 LED P7 40K T3M MVOLT SPA NLTAIR2 PIRHN DDBXD Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The modern styling of the D-Series is striking yet unobtrusive - making a bold, progressive statement even as it blends seamlessly with its environment. The D-Series distills the benefits of the latest in LED technology into a high performance, high efficacy, long-life luminaire. The outstanding photometric performance results in sites with excellent uniformity, greater pole spacing and lower power density. The Size 2 is ideal for replacing 400-1000W metal halide in area lighting applications with energy savings of up to 80% and expected service life of over 100,000 hours. EPA:1.1 ft2 (0.10 m2) Length:40” (101.6 cm) Width:15” (38.1 cm) Height 1:7-1/4” (18.4 cm) Height 2: (max):3.5” Weight: 36lbs Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. W L H DSX2 LED Series LEDs Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting DSX2 LED Forward optics P1 P5 1 P2 P6 P3 P7 1 P4 P8 1 Rotated optics P10 2 P13 1, 2 P11 2 P14 1, 2 P12 2 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K T1S Type I Short (Automotive) T2S Type II Short T2M Type II Medium T3S Type III Short T3M Type III Medium T4M Type IV Medium TFTM Forward Throw Medium T5VS Type V Very Short 3 T5S Type V Short 3 T5M Type V Medium 3 T5W Type V Wide 3 BLC Backlight control 4 LCCO Left corner cutoff 4 RCCO Right corner cutoff 4 MVOLT 5 XVOLT (277V-480V) 6,7,8 120 9 208 9 240 9 277 9 347 9 480 9 Shipped included SPA Square pole mounting RPA Round pole mounting 10 WBA Wall bracket 3 SPUMBA Square pole universal mounting adaptor 11 RPUMBA Round pole universal mounting adaptor 11 Shipped separately KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 10 H2 8.C.e Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 2 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Drilling Top of Pole 0.563” 2.650” 1.325”0.400”(2 PLCS) Template #8 Tenon O.D. Mounting Single Unit 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @ 90 3 @120 4 @ 90 2-3/8"RPA AS3-5 190 AS3-5 280 AS3-5 290 AS3-5 390 AS3-5 320 AS3-5 490 2-7/8"RPA AST25-190 AST25-280 AST25-290 AST25-390 AST25-320 AST25-490 4"RPA AST35-190 AST35-280 AST35-290 AST35-390 AST35-320 AST35-490 Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Ordering Information NOTES 1 HA not available with P5, P7, P8, P13, and P14. 2 P10, P11, P12, P13 or P14 and rotated optics (L90, R90) only available together. 3 Any Type 5 distribution with photocell, is not available with WBA. 4 Not available with HS. 5 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 6 XVOLT is only suitable for use with P5, P6, P7, P8, P13 and P14. 7 XVOLT works with any voltage between 277V and 480V. 8 XVOLT not available with fusing (SF or DF) and not available with PIRH or PIRH1FC3V. 9 Single fuse (SF) requires 120V, 277V or 347V. Double fuse (DF) requires 208V, 240V or 480V. 10 Suitable for mounting to round poles between 3.5” and 12” diameter. 11 Universal mounting bracket intended for retrofit on existing pre-drilled poles only. 1.5 G vibration load rating per ANCI C136.31. Only usable when pole’s drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8. 12 Must order fixture with SPA option.Must be ordered as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. For use with 2-3/8” diameter mast arm (not included). 13 Must be ordered with PIRHN. Sensor cover only available in dark bronze, black, white or natural aluminum color. 14 Must be ordered with NLTAIR2. For more information on nLight Air 2 visit this link. 15 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Not available with DS option. Shorting Cap included. 16 If ROAM® node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Node with integral dimming. . 17 DMG not available with PIRHN, PER5, PER7, PIR, PIRH, PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V, FAO. 18 Requires (2) separately switched circuits with isolated neutrals. 19 Provides 50/50 fixture operation via (2) independent drivers. Not available with PER, PER5, PER7, PIR or PIRH. Not available with P1, P2, P10. 20 Reference Controls Options table settings table on page 4. Reference Motion Sensor Default table on page 4 to see functionality. 21 Reference controls options table on page 4. 22 Not available with BLC, LCCO and RCCO distribution. Also available as a separate accessories; see Accessories information. 23 Must be ordered with fixture for factory pre-drilling. 24 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER, PER5 and PER7 option. Ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. 25 For retrofit use only. Only usable when pole’s drill pattern is NOT Lithonia template #8. Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (120-277V) 24 DLL347F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (347V) 24 DLL480F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (480V) 24 DSHORT SBK U Shorting cap 24 DSX2HS 80C U House-side shield for 80 LED unit 22 DSX2HS 90C U House-side shield for 90 LED unit 22 DSX2HS 100C U House-side shield for 100 LED unit 22 PUMBA DDBXD U*Square and round pole universal mounting bracket (specify finish) 25 KMA8 DDBXD U Mast arm mounting bracket adaptor (specify finish) 12 DSX2EGS (FINISH) U External glare shield For more control options, visit DTL and ROAM online. Options 14.1019.05 .50 4.25 .50 73˚ 12.05 12.476 HANDHOLE ORIENTATION A Handhole B C D EGS - External Glare Shield Drilling Template Minimum Acceptable Outside Pole Dimension SPA #8 2-7/8" 2-7/8" 3.5"3.5"3”3.5” RPA #8 2-7/8" 2-7/8" 3.5"3.5" 3” 3.5” SPUMBA #5 2-7/8" 3" 4"4" 3.5”4” RPUMBA #5 2-7/8” 3.5” 5” 5” 3.5” 5” Mounting Option Drilling Template Single 2 @ 180 2 @ 90 3 @ 90 3 @ 120 4 @ 90 Head Location Side B Side B & D Side B & C Side B, C & D Round Pole Only Side A, B, C & D Drill Nomenclature #8 DM19AS DM28AS DM29AS DM39AS DM32AS DM49AS Fixture Quantity & Mounting Configuration Single DM19 2 @ 180 DM28 2 @ 90 DM29 3 @ 90 DM39 3 @ 120 DM32 4 @ 90 DM49 Mounting Type DSX2 LED 1.100 2.200 2.120 3.300 2.850 4.064 DSX2 Area Luminaire - EPA *Includes luminaire and integral mounting arm. Other tenons, arms, brackets or other accessories are not included in this EPA data. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 3 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting’s D-Series Area Size 2 homepage. Photometric Diagrams Isofootcandle plots for the DSX2 LED 80C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (30’). LEGEND 0.1 fc 0.5 fc 1.0 fc Test No. LTL22425P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T1ST1S Test No. LTL22434P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T4MT4M Test No. LTL22428P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 Test No. LTL22430P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5VST5VS Test No. LTL22434P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5MT5M Test No. LTL22425P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T5ST5S Test No. LTL22428P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 Test No. LTL22430P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 BLCBLC Test No. LTL22434P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 RCCORCCO Test No. LTL22425P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 LCCOLCCO Test No. LTL22428P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T2MT2M TFTMTFTM T5WT5W Test No. LTL22434P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T2ST2S Test No. LTL22430P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3ST3S Test No. LTL22425P1 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3MT3M 8.C.e Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 4 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.04 5°C 41°F 1.04 10°C 50°F 1.03 15°C 50°F 1.02 20°C 68°F 1.01 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 35°C 95°F 0.98 40°C 104°F 0.97 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM-80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Operating Hours 0 25000 50000 100000 Lumen Maintenance Factor 1.00 0.96 0.92 0.85 Motion Sensor Default Settings Option Dimmed State High Level (when triggered)Phototcell Operation Dwell Time Ramp-up Time Ramp-down Time PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 1FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *for use when motion sensor is used as dusk to dawn control. Current (A) Performance Package LED Count Drive Current Wattage 120 208 240 277 347 480 Forward Optics (Non-Rotated) P1 80 530 140 1.18 0.68 0.59 0.51 0.40 0.32 P2 80 700 185 1.56 0.90 0.78 0.66 0.52 0.39 P3 80 850 217 1.82 1.05 0.90 0.80 0.63 0.48 P4 80 1050 270 2.27 1.31 1.12 0.99 0.79 0.59 P5 80 1250 321 2.68 1.54 1.34 1.17 0.93 0.68 P6 100 1050 343 2.89 1.66 1.59 1.37 1.00 0.71 P7 100 1250 398 3.31 1.91 1.66 1.45 1.16 0.81 P8 100 1350 431 3.61 2.07 1.81 1.57 1.25 0.91 Rotated Optics (Requires L90 or R90) P10 90 530 156 1.30 0.76 0.65 0.62 0.45 0.32 P11 90 700 207 1.75 1.01 0.87 0.74 0.60 0.46 P12 90 850 254 2.12 1.22 1.06 0.94 0.73 0.55 P13 90 1200 344 2.88 1.65 1.44 1.25 1.00 0.73 P14 90 1400 405 3.39 1.95 1.71 1.48 1.18 0.86 Electrical Load Controls Options Nomenclature Description Functionality Primary control device Notes FAO Field adjustable output device installed inside the luminaire; wired to the driver dimming leads. Allows the luminaire to be manually dimmed, effectively trim- ming the light output.FAO device Cannot be used with other controls options that need the 0-10V leads DS Drivers wired independently for 50/50 luminaire operation The luminaire is wired to two separate circuits, allowing for 50/50 operation.Independently wired drivers Requires two separately switched circuits. Consider nLight AIR as a more cost effective alternative. PER5 or PER7 Twist-lock photocell receptical Compatible with standard twist-lock photocells for dusk to dawn operation, or advanced control nodes that provide 0-10V dimming signals. Twist-lock photocells such as DLL Elite or advanced control nodes such as ROAM. Pins 4 & 5 to dimming leads on driver, Pins 6 & 7 are capped inside luminaire PIR or PIRH Motion sensors with integral photocell. PIR for 8-15' mounting; PIRH for 15-30' mounting Luminaires dim when no occupancy is detected.Acuity Controls SBGR Also available with PIRH1FC3V when the sensor photocell is used for dusk-to-dawn operation. NLTAIR2 PIRHN nLight AIR enabled luminaire for motion sensing, photocell and wireless communication. Motion and ambient light sensing with group response. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride when wirelessly connected to the nLight Eclypse.nLight Air rSBGR nLight AIR sensors can be programmed and commissioned from the ground using the ClAIRity Pro app. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 5 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Lumen Output Forward Optics LED Count Drive Cur- rent Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 80 530 P1 140W T1S 17,575 3 0 3 126 18,933 3 0 3 135 19,173 3 0 3 137 T2S 17,556 3 0 3 125 18,913 3 0 3 135 19,152 3 0 3 137 T2M 17,647 3 0 3 126 19,010 3 0 3 136 19,251 3 0 3 138 T3S 17,090 3 0 3 122 18,411 3 0 3 132 18,644 3 0 3 133 T3M 17,604 3 0 3 126 18,964 3 0 3 135 19,204 3 0 3 137 T4M 17,221 3 0 3 123 18,552 3 0 4 133 18,787 3 0 4 134 TFTM 17,593 3 0 3 126 18,952 3 0 4 135 19,192 3 0 4 137 T5VS 18,297 4 0 1 131 19,711 4 0 1 141 19,961 4 0 1 143 T5S 18,312 4 0 2 131 19,727 4 0 2 141 19,977 4 0 2 143 T5M 18,266 4 0 2 130 19,677 4 0 2 141 19,926 4 0 2 142 T5W 18,146 5 0 3 130 19,548 5 0 3 140 19,796 5 0 3 141 BLC 14,424 2 0 2 103 15,539 2 0 3 111 15,736 2 0 3 112 LCCO 10,733 1 0 3 77 11,562 1 0 3 83 11,709 2 0 3 84 RCCO 10,733 1 0 3 77 11,562 1 0 3 83 11,709 2 0 3 84 80 700 P2 185W T1S 22,305 3 0 3 121 24,029 3 0 3 130 24,333 3 0 3 132 T2S 22,281 3 0 4 120 24,003 3 0 4 130 24,307 3 0 4 131 T2M 22,396 3 0 3 121 24,127 3 0 3 130 24,432 3 0 3 132 T3S 21,690 3 0 4 117 23,366 3 0 4 126 23,662 3 0 4 128 T3M 22,342 3 0 4 121 24,068 3 0 4 130 24,373 3 0 4 132 T4M 21,857 3 0 4 118 23,545 3 0 4 127 23,844 3 0 4 129 TFTM 22,328 3 0 4 121 24,054 3 0 4 130 24,358 3 0 4 132 T5VS 23,222 5 0 1 126 25,016 5 0 1 135 25,333 5 0 1 137 T5S 23,241 4 0 2 126 25,037 4 0 2 135 25,354 4 0 2 137 T5M 23,182 5 0 3 125 24,974 5 0 3 135 25,290 5 0 3 137 T5W 23,030 5 0 4 124 24,810 5 0 4 134 25,124 5 0 4 136 BLC 18,307 2 0 3 99 19,721 2 0 3 107 19,971 2 0 3 108 LCCO 13,622 2 0 3 74 14,674 2 0 4 79 14,860 2 0 4 80 RCCO 13,622 2 0 3 74 14,674 2 0 4 79 14,860 2 0 4 80 80 850 P3 217W T1S 26,202 3 0 3 121 28,226 3 0 3 130 28,584 3 0 3 132 T2S 26,174 3 0 4 121 28,196 3 0 4 130 28,553 3 0 4 132 T2M 26,309 3 0 3 121 28,342 3 0 3 131 28,700 3 0 3 132 T3S 25,479 3 0 4 117 27,448 3 0 4 126 27,795 3 0 4 128 T3M 26,245 3 0 4 121 28,273 3 0 4 130 28,631 3 0 4 132 T4M 25,675 3 0 4 118 27,659 3 0 4 127 28,009 3 0 4 129 TFTM 26,229 3 0 4 121 28,255 3 0 4 130 28,613 3 0 4 132 T5VS 27,279 5 0 1 126 29,387 5 0 1 135 29,759 5 0 1 137 T5S 27,301 4 0 2 126 29,410 5 0 2 136 29,783 5 0 2 137 T5M 27,232 5 0 3 125 29,336 5 0 3 135 29,707 5 0 3 137 T5W 27,053 5 0 4 125 29,144 5 0 4 134 29,513 5 0 4 136 BLC 21,504 2 0 3 99 23,166 2 0 3 107 23,459 2 0 4 108 LCCO 16,001 2 0 4 74 17,238 2 0 4 79 17,456 2 0 4 80 RCCO 16,001 2 0 4 74 17,238 2 0 4 79 17,456 2 0 4 80 80 1050 P4 270W T1S 30,963 4 0 4 115 33,355 4 0 4 124 33,777 4 0 4 125 T2S 30,930 4 0 4 115 33,320 4 0 4 123 33,742 4 0 4 125 T2M 31,089 3 0 4 115 33,491 3 0 4 124 33,915 3 0 4 126 T3S 30,108 4 0 4 112 32,435 4 0 5 120 32,845 4 0 5 122 T3M 31,014 3 0 4 115 33,410 3 0 4 124 33,833 3 0 4 125 T4M 30,340 3 0 5 112 32,684 3 0 5 121 33,098 3 0 5 123 TFTM 30,995 3 0 5 115 33,390 3 0 5 124 33,812 3 0 5 125 T5VS 32,235 5 0 1 119 34,726 5 0 1 129 35,166 5 0 1 130 T5S 32,261 5 0 2 119 34,754 5 0 2 129 35,194 5 0 2 130 T5M 32,180 5 0 4 119 34,667 5 0 4 128 35,105 5 0 4 130 T5W 31,969 5 0 4 118 34,439 5 0 5 128 34,875 5 0 5 129 BLC 25,412 2 0 4 94 27,376 2 0 4 101 27,722 2 0 4 103 LCCO 18,909 2 0 4 70 20,370 2 0 4 75 20,628 2 0 4 76 RCCO 18,909 2 0 4 70 20,370 2 0 4 75 20,628 2 0 4 76 8.C.e Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 6 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Lumen Output Forward Optics LED Count Drive Cur- rent Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 80 1250 P5 321W T1S 35,193 4 0 4 110 37,912 4 0 4 118 38,392 4 0 4 120 T2S 35,155 4 0 5 110 37,872 4 0 5 118 38,351 4 0 5 119 T2M 35,336 4 0 4 110 38,067 4 0 4 119 38,549 4 0 4 120 T3S 34,222 4 0 5 107 36,866 4 0 5 115 37,333 4 0 5 116 T3M 35,251 3 0 4 110 37,974 3 0 5 118 38,455 4 0 5 120 T4M 34,485 3 0 5 107 37,149 4 0 5 116 37,620 4 0 5 117 TFTM 35,229 3 0 5 110 37,951 3 0 5 118 38,431 3 0 5 120 T5VS 36,639 5 0 1 114 39,470 5 0 1 123 39,970 5 0 1 125 T5S 36,669 5 0 2 114 39,502 5 0 2 123 40,002 5 0 2 125 T5M 36,576 5 0 4 114 39,403 5 0 4 123 39,901 5 0 4 124 T5W 36,336 5 0 5 113 39,144 5 0 5 122 39,640 5 0 5 123 BLC 28,884 3 0 4 90 31,115 3 0 4 97 31,509 3 0 4 98 LCCO 21,492 2 0 4 67 23,153 2 0 5 72 23,446 3 0 5 73 RCCO 21,492 2 0 4 67 23,153 2 0 5 72 23,446 3 0 5 73 100 1050 P6 343W T1S 37,824 4 0 4 110 40,747 4 0 4 119 41,263 4 0 4 120 T2S 37,784 4 0 5 110 40,704 4 0 5 119 41,219 4 0 5 120 T2M 37,979 4 0 4 111 40,913 4 0 4 119 41,431 4 0 4 121 T3S 36,780 4 0 5 107 39,623 4 0 5 116 40,124 4 0 5 117 T3M 37,886 3 0 5 110 40,814 4 0 5 119 41,331 4 0 5 120 T4M 37,063 4 0 5 108 39,927 4 0 5 116 40,433 4 0 5 118 TFTM 37,863 3 0 5 110 40,789 4 0 5 119 41,305 4 0 5 120 T5VS 39,379 5 0 1 115 42,422 5 0 1 124 42,959 5 0 1 125 T5S 39,411 5 0 2 115 42,456 5 0 2 124 42,993 5 0 2 125 T5M 39,311 5 0 4 115 42,349 5 0 4 123 42,885 5 0 4 125 T5W 39,053 5 0 5 114 42,071 5 0 5 123 42,604 5 0 5 124 BLC 31,043 3 0 4 91 33,442 3 0 4 97 33,865 3 0 4 99 LCCO 23,099 2 0 5 67 24,884 3 0 5 73 25,199 3 0 5 73 RCCO 23,099 2 0 5 67 24,884 3 0 5 73 25,199 3 0 5 73 100 1250 P7 398W T1S 42,599 4 0 4 107 45,890 4 0 4 115 46,471 4 0 4 117 T2S 42,553 4 0 5 107 45,842 4 0 5 115 46,422 4 0 5 117 T2M 42,773 4 0 4 107 46,078 4 0 4 116 46,661 4 0 5 117 T3S 41,423 4 0 5 104 44,624 4 0 5 112 45,189 4 0 5 114 T3M 42,669 4 0 5 107 45,966 4 0 5 115 46,548 4 0 5 117 T4M 41,742 4 0 5 105 44,967 4 0 5 113 45,537 4 0 5 114 TFTM 42,643 4 0 5 107 45,938 4 0 5 115 46,519 4 0 5 117 T5VS 44,350 5 0 1 111 47,777 5 0 1 120 48,381 5 0 1 122 T5S 44,385 5 0 2 112 47,815 5 0 3 120 48,420 5 0 3 122 T5M 44,273 5 0 4 111 47,695 5 0 4 120 48,298 5 0 4 121 T5W 43,983 5 0 5 111 47,382 5 0 5 119 47,982 5 0 5 121 BLC 34,962 3 0 4 88 37,664 3 0 5 95 38,140 3 0 5 96 LCCO 26,015 3 0 5 65 28,025 3 0 5 70 28,380 3 0 5 71 RCCO 26,015 3 0 5 65 28,025 3 0 5 70 28,380 3 0 5 71 100 1350 P8 448W T1S 45,610 4 0 4 106 49,135 4 0 4 114 49,757 4 0 4 115 T2S 45,562 4 0 5 106 49,083 4 0 5 114 49,704 4 0 5 115 T2M 45,797 4 0 4 106 49,336 4 0 5 114 49,960 4 0 5 116 T3S 44,352 4 0 5 103 47,779 4 0 5 111 48,384 4 0 5 112 T3M 45,686 4 0 5 106 49,216 4 0 5 114 49,839 4 0 5 116 T4M 44,693 4 0 5 104 48,147 4 0 5 112 48,756 4 0 5 113 TFTM 45,657 4 0 5 106 49,186 4 0 5 114 49,808 4 0 5 116 T5VS 47,485 5 0 1 110 51,155 5 0 1 119 51,802 5 0 1 120 T5S 47,524 5 0 3 110 51,196 5 0 3 119 51,844 5 0 3 120 T5M 47,404 5 0 4 110 51,067 5 0 5 118 51,713 5 0 5 120 T5W 47,093 5 0 5 109 50,732 5 0 5 118 51,374 5 0 5 119 BLC 37,434 3 0 5 87 40,326 3 0 5 94 40,837 3 0 5 95 LCCO 27,854 3 0 5 65 30,006 3 0 5 70 30,386 3 0 5 71 RCCO 27,854 3 0 5 65 30,006 3 0 5 70 30,386 3 0 5 71 8.C.e Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 7 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Lumen Output Rotated Optics LED Count Drive Cur- rent Power Package System Watts Dist. Type 30K (3000 K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000 K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000 K, 70 CRI) Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 90 530 P10 156W T1S 20,145 4 0 4 129 21,702 4 0 4 139 21,977 4 0 4 141 T2S 20,029 4 0 4 128 21,577 4 0 4 138 21,850 4 0 4 140 T2M 20,391 4 0 4 131 21,967 4 0 4 141 22,245 4 0 4 143 T3S 19,719 4 0 4 126 21,242 4 0 4 136 21,511 4 0 4 138 T3M 20,379 4 0 4 131 21,954 4 0 4 141 22,232 4 0 4 143 T4M 19,995 4 0 4 128 21,540 4 0 4 138 21,812 5 0 5 140 TFTM 20,511 4 0 4 131 22,096 5 0 5 142 22,376 5 0 5 143 T5VS 20,655 4 0 1 132 22,251 4 0 1 143 22,533 4 0 1 144 T5S 20,482 4 0 2 131 22,064 4 0 2 141 22,343 4 0 2 143 T5M 20,477 5 0 3 131 22,059 5 0 3 141 22,338 5 0 3 143 T5W 20,293 5 0 3 130 21,861 5 0 3 140 22,138 5 0 4 142 BLC 16,846 4 0 4 108 18,148 4 0 4 116 18,378 4 0 4 118 LCCO 12,032 2 0 3 77 12,961 2 0 3 83 13,125 2 0 3 84 RCCO 12,016 4 0 4 77 12,944 4 0 4 83 13,108 4 0 4 84 90 700 P11 207W T1S 25,518 4 0 4 123 27,490 4 0 4 133 27,837 4 0 4 134 T2S 25,371 5 0 5 123 27,331 5 0 5 132 27,677 5 0 5 134 T2M 25,829 4 0 4 125 27,825 4 0 4 134 28,177 4 0 4 136 T3S 24,977 5 0 5 121 26,907 5 0 5 130 27,248 5 0 5 132 T3M 25,814 5 0 5 125 27,809 5 0 5 134 28,161 5 0 5 136 T4M 25,327 5 0 5 122 27,284 5 0 5 132 27,629 5 0 5 133 TFTM 25,981 5 0 5 126 27,989 5 0 5 135 28,343 5 0 5 137 T5VS 26,164 5 0 1 126 28,185 5 0 1 136 28,542 5 0 1 138 T5S 25,943 4 0 2 125 27,948 5 0 2 135 28,302 5 0 2 137 T5M 25,937 5 0 3 125 27,941 5 0 3 135 28,295 5 0 3 137 T5W 25,704 5 0 4 124 27,691 5 0 4 134 28,041 5 0 4 135 BLC 21,339 4 0 4 103 22,988 4 0 4 111 23,279 4 0 4 112 LCCO 15,240 2 0 4 74 16,418 2 0 4 79 16,626 2 0 4 80 RCCO 15,220 5 0 5 74 16,396 5 0 5 79 16,604 5 0 5 80 90 850 P12 254W T1S 29,912 4 0 4 118 32,223 4 0 4 127 32,631 5 0 4 128 T2S 29,740 5 0 5 117 32,038 5 0 5 126 32,443 5 0 5 128 T2M 30,277 4 0 4 119 32,616 5 0 5 128 33,029 5 0 5 130 T3S 29,278 5 0 5 115 31,540 5 0 5 124 31,940 5 0 5 126 T3M 30,259 5 0 5 119 32,597 5 0 5 128 33,010 5 0 5 130 T4M 29,688 5 0 5 117 31,982 5 0 5 126 32,387 5 0 5 128 TFTM 30,455 5 0 5 120 32,808 5 0 5 129 33,224 5 0 5 131 T5VS 30,669 5 0 1 121 33,039 5 0 1 130 33,457 5 0 1 132 T5S 30,411 5 0 2 120 32,761 5 0 2 129 33,176 5 0 2 131 T5M 30,404 5 0 3 120 32,753 5 0 4 129 33,168 5 0 4 131 T5W 30,131 5 0 4 119 32,459 5 0 4 128 32,870 5 0 4 129 BLC 25,013 4 0 4 98 26,946 4 0 4 106 27,287 4 0 4 107 LCCO 17,865 2 0 4 70 19,245 2 0 4 76 19,489 2 0 4 77 RCCO 17,841 5 0 5 70 19,220 5 0 5 76 19,463 5 0 5 77 90 1200 P13 344W T1S 38,768 5 0 5 113 41,764 5 0 5 121 42,292 5 0 5 123 T2S 38,545 5 0 5 112 41,523 5 0 5 121 42,049 5 0 5 122 T2M 39,241 5 0 5 114 42,273 5 0 5 123 42,808 5 0 5 124 T3S 37,947 5 0 5 110 40,879 5 0 5 119 41,396 5 0 5 120 T3M 39,218 5 0 5 114 42,249 5 0 5 123 42,783 5 0 5 124 T4M 38,478 5 0 5 112 41,451 5 0 5 120 41,976 5 0 5 122 TFTM 39,472 5 0 5 115 42,522 5 0 5 124 43,060 5 0 5 125 T5VS 39,749 5 0 1 116 42,821 5 0 1 124 43,363 5 0 1 126 T5S 39,415 5 0 2 115 42,461 5 0 2 123 42,998 5 0 2 125 T5M 39,405 5 0 4 115 42,450 5 0 4 123 42,988 5 0 4 125 T5W 39,052 5 0 5 114 42,069 5 0 5 122 42,602 5 0 5 124 BLC 32,419 5 0 5 94 34,925 5 0 5 102 35,367 5 0 5 103 LCCO 23,154 3 0 5 67 24,943 3 0 5 73 25,259 3 0 5 73 RCCO 23,124 5 0 5 67 24,910 5 0 5 72 25,226 5 0 5 73 90 1400 P14 405W T1S 42,867 5 0 5 106 46,180 5 0 5 114 46,764 5 0 5 115 T2S 42,621 5 0 5 105 45,914 5 0 5 113 46,495 5 0 5 115 T2M 43,390 5 0 5 107 46,743 5 0 5 115 47,335 5 0 5 117 T3S 41,959 5 0 5 104 45,201 5 0 5 112 45,773 5 0 5 113 T3M 43,365 5 0 5 107 46,716 5 0 5 115 47,307 5 0 5 117 T4M 42,547 5 0 5 105 45,834 5 0 5 113 46,414 5 0 5 115 TFTM 43,646 5 0 5 108 47,018 5 0 5 116 47,614 5 0 5 118 T5VS 43,952 5 0 1 109 47,349 5 0 1 117 47,948 5 0 1 118 T5S 43,583 5 0 2 108 46,950 5 0 2 116 47,545 5 0 3 117 T5M 43,572 5 0 4 108 46,939 5 0 4 116 47,533 5 0 4 117 T5W 43,181 5 0 5 107 46,518 5 0 5 115 47,107 5 0 5 116 BLC 35,847 5 0 5 89 38,617 5 0 5 95 39,106 5 0 5 97 LCCO 25,602 3 0 5 63 27,580 3 0 5 68 27,930 3 0 5 69 RCCO 25,569 5 0 5 63 27,544 5 0 5 68 27,893 5 0 5 69 8.C.e Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2011-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. DSX2-LED Rev. 11/16/20 Page 8 of 8 COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The sleek design of the D-Series Area Size 2 reflects the embedded high performance LED technology. It is ideal for applications like car dealerships and large parking lots adjacent to malls, transit stations, grocery stores, home centers, and other big-box retailers. CONSTRUCTION Single-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance and future light engine upgrades. The LED drivers are mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). Low EPA (1.1 ft2) for optimized pole wind loading. FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in both textured and non-textured finishes. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses are engineered for superior area lighting distribution, uniformity, and pole spacing. Light engines are available in 3000 K, 4000 K, or 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. The D-Series Size 2 has zero uplight and qualifies as a Nighttime FriendlyTM product, meaning it is consistent with the LEED® and Green GlobesTM criteria for eliminating wasteful uplight. ELECTRICAL Light engine configurations consist of high-efficacy LEDs mounted to metal-core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L85/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers are designed to have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and an expected life of 100,000 hours with <1% failure rate. Easily- serviceable 10kV surge protection device meets a minimum Category C Low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). INSTALLATION Included mounting block and integral arm facilitate quick and easy installation. Stainless steel bolts fasten the mounting block securely to poles and walls, enabling the D-Series Size 2 to withstand up to a 2.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. The D-Series Size 2 utilizes the AERISTM series pole drilling pattern (Template #8). NEMA photocontrol receptacle is available. STANDARD CONTROLS The DSX2 LED area luminaire has a number of control options. DSX Size 2, comes standard with 0-10V dimming drivers. Dusk to dawn controls can be utilized via optional NEMA twist-lock photocell receptacles. Integrated motion sensors with on- board photocells feature field-adjustable programing and are suitable for mounting heights up to 30 feet. nLIGHT AIR CONTROLS The DSX2 LED area luminaire is also available with nLight® AIR for the ultimate in wireless control. This powerful controls platform provides out-of-the-box basic motion sensing and photocontrol functionality and is suitable for mounting heights up to 40 feet. Once commissioned using a smartphone and the easy-to-use CLAIRITY app, nLight AIR equipped luminaries can be grouped, resulting in motion sensor and photocell group response without the need for additional equipment. Scheduled dimming with motion sensor over-ride can be achieved when used with the nLight Eclypse. Additional information about nLight Air can be found here. LISTINGS UL Listed for wet locations. Light engines are IP66 rated; luminaire is IP65 rated. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. U.S. Patent No. D670,857 S. International patent pending. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/ QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) Fixture Seal of Approval (FSA) is available for all products on this page utilizing 3000K color temperature only. WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/support/customer-support/terms-and-conditions Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DSXW2-LED Rev. 04/27/20 Page 1 of 4 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR D-Series Size 2LED Wall Luminaire Ordering Information EXAMPLE: DSXW2 LED 30C 700 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD Catalog Number Notes Type Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. Luminaire Specifications H D W 5-1/2 4 1-1/2 WALL SCONCE BBW (Back Box Wall) MOUNTING H W 5-1/2 4 1-1/2 WALL SCONCE BBW (Back Box Wall) MOUNTING DFor 3/4” NPT side-entry conduit Back Box (BBW) Width:5-1/2” (14.0 cm) Depth:1-1/2” (3.8 cm) Height:4” (10.2 cm) BBW Weight:1 lbs (0.5 kg)Width:18-1/2” (47.0 cm) Depth:10” (25.4 cm) Height:7-5/8” (19.4 cm) Weight: 21 lbs (9.5 kg) DSXW2 LED Series LEDs Drive Current Color temperature Distribution Voltage Mounting Control Options DSXW2 LED 20C 20 LEDs (two engines) 30C 30 LEDs (three engines) 350 350 mA 530 530 mA 700 700 mA 1000 1000 mA1 (1 A) 30K 3000 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K AMBPC Amber phosphor converted2 T2S Type II Short T2M Type II Medium T3S Type III Short T3M Type III Medium T4M Type IV Medium TFTM Forward Throw Medium MVOLT 3 120 4 208 4 240 4 277 4 347 4, 5 480 4, 5 Shipped included (blank)Surface mounting bracket Shipped separately6 BBW Surface- mounted back box (for conduit entry) Shipped installed PE Photoelectric cell, button type 7 PER NEMA twist-lock receptacle only (control ordered separate)8 PER5 Five-wire receptacle only (control ordered separate)8, 9 PER7 Seven-wire receptacle only (control ordered separate)8, 9 DMG 0-10v dimming wires pulled outside fixture (for use with an external control, ordered separately) PIR 180º motion/ambient light sensor,<15' mtg ht10, 11 PIRH 180° motion/ambient light sensor, 15-30' mtg ht10, 11 PIR1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 8-15' mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc11, 12 PIRH1FC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 15-30' mounting height, ambient sensor enabled at 1fc11, 12 Other Options Finish (required) Shipped installed Shipped separately 13 SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) 3 BSW Bird-deterrent spikes DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) 3 VG Vandal guard HS House-side shield 4 SPD Separate surge protection 13 DDBXD Dark bronze DSSXD Sandstone DWHGXD Textured white DBLXD Black DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DSSTXD Textured sandstone DNAXD Natural aluminum DBLBXD Textured black DWHXD White DNATXD Textured natural aluminum A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. Capable Luminaire This item is an A+ capable luminaire, which has been designed and tested to provide consistent color appearance and system-level interoperability. • All configurations of this luminaire meet the Acuity Brands’ specification for chromatic consistency • This luminaire is A+ Certified when ordered with DTL® controls marked by a shaded background. DTL DLL equipped luminaires meet the A+ specification for luminaire to photocontrol interoperability1 • This luminaire is part of an A+ Certified solution for ROAM® or XPoint™ Wireless control networks, providing out-of-the-box control compatibility with simple commissioning, when ordered with drivers and control options marked by a shaded background1 To learn more about A+, visit www.acuitybrands.com/aplus. 1. See ordering tree for details. 2. A+ Certified Solutions for ROAM require the order of one ROAM node per luminaire. Sold Separately: Link to Roam; Link to DTL DLL 8.C.e Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Note: Available with phosphor-converted amber LED’s (nomenclature AMBPC). These LED’s produce light with 97+% >530 nm. Output can be calculated by applying a 0.7 factor to 4000 K lumen values and photometric files. LEDs Drive Current (mA) System Watts Dist. Type 30K 40K 50K Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW Lumens B U G LPW 20C (20 LEDs) 350 mA 25W T2S 2,783 1 0 1 111 2,989 1 0 1 120 3,008 1 0 1 120 T2M 2,709 1 0 1 108 2,908 1 0 1 116 2,926 1 0 1 117 T3S 2,748 1 0 1 110 2,951 1 0 1 118 2,969 1 0 1 119 T3M 2,793 1 0 1 112 2,999 1 0 1 120 3,018 1 0 1 121 T4M 2,756 1 0 1 110 2,959 1 0 1 118 2,977 1 0 1 119 TFTM 2,753 1 0 1 110 2,956 1 0 1 118 2,975 1 0 1 119 530 mA 36W T2S 4,030 1 0 1 112 4,327 1 0 1 120 4,354 1 0 1 121 T2M 3,920 1 0 1 109 4,210 1 0 1 117 4,236 1 0 1 118 T3S 3,978 1 0 1 111 4,272 1 0 1 119 4,299 1 0 1 119 T3M 4,044 1 0 2 112 4,343 1 0 2 121 4,370 1 0 2 121 T4M 3,990 1 0 1 111 4,284 1 0 1 119 4,310 1 0 1 120 TFTM 3,987 1 0 1 111 4,281 1 0 1 119 4,308 1 0 1 120 700 mA 47W T2S 5,130 1 0 1 109 5,509 1 0 1 117 5,544 1 0 1 118 T2M 4,991 1 0 2 106 5,360 1 0 2 114 5,393 1 0 2 115 T3S 5,066 1 0 1 108 5,440 1 0 1 116 5,474 1 0 1 116 T3M 5,148 1 0 2 110 5,529 1 0 2 118 5,563 1 0 2 118 T4M 5,080 1 0 2 108 5,455 1 0 2 116 5,488 1 0 2 117 TFTM 5,075 1 0 2 108 5,450 1 0 2 116 5,484 1 0 2 117 1000 mA 73W T2S 7,147 2 0 2 98 7,675 2 0 2 105 7,723 1 0 1 104 T2M 6,954 2 0 2 95 7,467 2 0 2 102 7,514 2 0 2 103 T3S 7,057 1 0 2 97 7,579 1 0 2 104 7,627 1 0 2 104 T3M 7,172 2 0 3 98 7,702 2 0 3 106 7,751 2 0 3 106 T4M 7,076 1 0 2 97 7,599 1 0 2 104 7,646 1 0 2 105 TFTM 7,071 1 0 2 97 7,594 1 0 2 104 7,641 1 0 2 105 30C (30 LEDs) 350 mA 36W T2S 4,160 1 0 1 116 4,467 1 0 1 124 4,494 1 0 1 125 T2M 4,048 1 0 1 112 4,346 1 0 2 121 4,373 1 0 2 121 T3S 4,108 1 0 1 114 4,411 1 0 1 123 4,438 1 0 1 123 T3M 4,174 1 0 2 116 4,483 1 0 2 125 4,510 1 0 2 125 T4M 4,119 1 0 1 114 4,423 1 0 2 123 4,450 1 0 2 124 TFTM 4,115 1 0 1 114 4,419 1 0 1 123 4,446 1 0 1 124 530 mA 54W T2S 6,001 1 0 1 111 6,444 1 0 1 119 6,484 1 0 1 120 T2M 5,838 1 0 2 108 6,270 2 0 2 116 6,308 2 0 2 117 T3S 5,926 1 0 2 110 6,364 1 0 2 118 6,403 1 0 2 119 T3M 6,023 1 0 2 112 6,467 1 0 2 120 6,507 1 0 2 121 T4M 5,942 1 0 2 110 6,380 1 0 2 118 6,420 1 0 2 119 TFTM 5,937 1 0 2 110 6,376 1 0 2 118 6,415 1 0 2 119 700 mA 71W T2S 7,403 2 0 2 104 8,170 2 0 2 115 8,221 2 0 2 116 T2M 7,609 2 0 2 107 7,949 2 0 2 112 7,998 2 0 2 113 T3S 7,513 1 0 2 106 8,068 1 0 2 114 8,118 1 0 2 114 T3M 7,635 2 0 3 108 8,199 2 0 3 115 8,250 2 0 3 116 T4M 7,534 1 0 2 106 8,089 1 0 2 114 8,140 1 0 2 115 TFTM 7,527 1 0 2 106 8,082 2 0 2 114 8,134 2 0 2 115 1000 mA 109W T2S 10,468 2 0 2 96 11,241 2 0 2 103 11,311 2 0 2 104 T2M 10,184 2 0 3 93 10,936 2 0 3 100 11,005 2 0 3 101 T3S 10,335 2 0 2 95 11,099 2 0 2 102 11,169 2 0 2 102 T3M 10,505 2 0 3 96 11,280 2 0 3 103 11,351 2 0 3 104 T4M 10,365 2 0 2 95 11,129 2 0 2 102 11,198 2 0 2 103 TFTM 10,356 2 0 2 95 11,121 2 0 3 102 11,190 2 0 3 103 DSXW2-LED Rev. 04/27/20 Page 2 of 4 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Lumen Output Ordering Information Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. DLL127F 1.5 JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (120-277V) 14 DLL347F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (347V) 14 DLL480F 1.5 CUL JU Photocell - SSL twist-lock (480V) 14 DSHORT SBK U Shorting cap (Included when ordering PER, PER5 or PER7) 14 DSXWHS U House-side shield (one per light engine) DSXWBSW U Bird-deterrent spikes DSXW2VG U DSXW2BBW DDBXD U Vandal guard accessory Back box accessory (specify finish) NOTES 1 1000mA is not available with AMBPC. 2 AMBPC is not available with 1000mA. 3 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). 4 Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. 5 Available with 30 LED/700mA options only (DSXW2 LED 30C 700). DMG option not available. 6 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 7 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240, 277 or 347 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR or PIRH). 8 Photocell ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. See accessories. Shorting Cap included. 9 If ROAM® node required, it must be ordered and shipped as a separate line item from Acuity Brands Controls. Shorting Cap included. 10 Reference Motion Sensor table on page 3. 11 Reference PER Table on page 3 for functionality. 12 PIR and PIR1FC3V specify the SensorSwitch SBGR-10-ODP control; PIRH and PIRH1FC3V specify the SensorSwitch SBGR-6-ODP control; see Motion Sensor Guide for details. Dimming driver standard. Not available with PER5 or PER7. Separate on/off required. 13 See the electrical section on page 2 for more details. 14 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER option. Ordered and shipped as a separate line item. See PER Table.For more control options, visit DTL and ROAM online. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DSXW2-LED Rev. 04/27/20 Page 3 of 4 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR Performance Data Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.02 10°C 50°F 1.01 20°C 68°F 1.00 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 1.00 40°C 104°F 0.98 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 platform in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM- 80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Operating Hours 0 25,000 50,000 100,000 Lumen Maintenance Factor 1.0 0.95 0.92 0.87 Electrical Load Current (A) LEDs Drive Current (mA) System Watts 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V 20C 350 25 W 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.10 -- 530 36 W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 -- 700 47 W 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.19 -- 1000 74 W 0.68 0.39 0.34 0.29 -- 30C 350 36 W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 -- 530 54 W 0.50 0.29 0.25 0.22 -- 700 71 W 0.66 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.23 0.16 1000 109 W 1.01 0.58 0.50 0.44 -- Control PER (3 wire) PER5 (5 wire)PER7 (7 wire) Wire 4/Wire5 Wire 4/Wire5 Wire 6/Wire7 Photocontrol Only (On/Off)Wired to dimming leads on driver Wired to dimming leads on driver Wires Capped inside fixture ROAM Wired to dimming leads on driver Wired to dimming leads on driver Wires Capped inside fixture ROAM with Motion Wired to dimming leads on driver Wired to dimming leads on driver Wires Capped inside fixture Futureproof*Wired to dimming leads on driver Wired to dimming leads on driver Wires Capped inside fixture Futureproof* with Motion Wired to dimming leads on driver Wired to dimming leads on driver Wires Capped inside fixture Recommended Will not work Alternate *Futureproof means: Ability to change controls in the future. PER Table Motion Sensor Default Settings Option Dimmed State High Level (when triggered)Photocell Operation Dwell Time Ramp-up Time Ramp-down Time *PIR or PIRH 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 5FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min PIR1FC3V or PIRH1FC3V 3V (37%) Output 10V (100%) Output Enabled @ 1FC 5 min 3 sec 5 min *for use with Inline Dusk to Dawn or timer 8.C.e Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) DSXW2-LED Rev. 04/27/20 Page 4 of 4 One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 1-800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. COMMERCIAL OUTDOOR FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The energy savings, long life and easy-to-install design of the D-Series Wall Size 2 make it the smart choice for building-mounted doorway and pathway illumination for nearly any facility. CONSTRUCTION Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance. The LED driver is mounted to the door to thermally isolate it from the light engines for low operating temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). FINISH Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in textured and non-textured finishes. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses provide multiple photometric distributions tailored specifically to building mounted applications. Light engines are available in 3000 K (70 min. CRI), 4000 K (70 min. CRI) or 5000 K (70 min. CRI) configurations. ELECTRICAL Light engine(s) consist of 10 high-efficacy LEDs mounted to a metal-core circuit board to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (L87/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 2.5KV surge rating. When ordering the SPD option, a separate surge protection device is installed within the luminaire which meets a minimum Category C Low (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). INSTALLATION Included universal mounting bracket attaches securely to any 4” round or square outlet box for quick and easy installation. Luminaire has a slotted gasket wireway and attaches to the mounting bracket via corrosion-resistant screws. LISTINGS CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org to confirm which versions are qualified. WARRANTY Five-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at www.acuitybrands.com/CustomerResources/Terms_and_conditions.aspx. Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting’s D-Series Wall Size 2 homepage. Photometric Diagrams Isofootcandle plots for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25’).Distribution overlay comparison to 400W metal halide. LEGEND DSXW2, 0.5 fc TWF2, 0.5 fc 10’ W Sidewalk LLDs: TWF2 = 0.72 DSXW2 = 0.95 Test No. 22700P22 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 Test No. 22602P22 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3MT3M LEGEND 0.1 fc 0.5 fc 1.0 fc DSXW2 LED 30C 40K 1000 T2M, TWF2 400M Pulse, 25’ Mounting HtTest No. 22597P22 tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08.4 3 2 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 4 3 2 1 0 4321 T3ST3ST2MT2M TWF2: 458W DSXW2: 109W 8.C.e Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) (FOR USE IN LANDSCAPED AREAS GREATER THAN 4' FROM CURB) 3000 PSI CONCRETE BASE WITH "V" BARS VERTICAL AND WITH #"T" TIES "T" O.C. LOCATE FIRST 3 TIES WITHIN TOP 5" OF POLE BASE CONDUIT, QUANTITY AND DIRECTION AS REQUIRED POLE ANCHORBOLTS COVER TO MATCH POLE FINISH 1" CHAMFER ALL AROUND FINISHED GRADE HANDHOLE BUSHING (S) BOND METAL CONDUIT (S), EQUIP. GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AND GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR TO POLE 3/4" x 8' - 0" COPPERWELD GROUND ROD 3" MIN"D".BOLT CENTER DIAMETER 3" MIN 4" MIN"E".1 #6 CU GND.2" MINWIND SPEED OF 90 MPH OR LESS POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D)DIAMETER (D)EMBEDMENT (E)"V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 4' - 6" 5' - 3" 5' - 9" 6' - 0" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 4' - 9" 5' - 6" 6' - 3" 6' - 3" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16" WIND SPEED OF 91 MPH TO 100 MPH POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15' 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D) DIAMETER (D)EMBEDMENT (E)"V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 4' - 9" 5' - 6" 6' - 3" 6' - 6" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 3" 6' - 0" 6' - 9" 6' - 9" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16" WIND SPEED OF 101 MPH TO 110 MPH POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15' 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D) DIAMETER (D) EMBEDMENT (E) "V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 9" 6' - 9" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 6" 6' - 6" 7' - 3" 7' - 3" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16" WIND SPEED OF 111 MPH TO 120 MPH POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15' 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D) DIAMETER (D) EMBEDMENT (E) "V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 6" 6' - 3" 7' - 3" 7' - 3" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 9" 7' - 6" 7' - 9" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16" WIND SPEED OF 121 TO 130 MPH POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15' 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D) DIAMETER (D) EMBEDMENT (E) "V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 9" 6' - 9" 7' - 6" 7' - 9" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 6' - 3" 7' - 3" 8' - 0" 8' - 0" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16"12"3' - 0" DESIGNER NOTES: 1.ELIMINATE EITHER CONDITION IF NOT APPLICABLE FOR YOUR PROJECT. SEE NOTE ON DETAILS REGARDING PAVED AREAS AND DISTANCES FROM C 2.THE LIGHT POLE BASE DIMENSIONS CHART SHALL BE ISSUED ALONG WITH THIS DETAIL, FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO UNDERSTAND THE REQUIRED PO DIAMETER. PAUL GRUPE (JSE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER) CALCULATED THIS DATA BASED UPON THE LITHONIA KAD FIXTURE (18" x 18" x 7" NOM.) STRAIGHT, STEEL POLE.READ BEFOREDELETING ORFREEZINGWIND SPEED OF 101 MPH TO 110 MPH POLE HEIGHT ≤ 15' 16' ~ 25' 26' ~ 35' 36' ~ 40' ≤ 2 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE 3 OR 4 LIGHT FIXTURES ON POLE EMBEDMENT (E)DIAMETER (D) DIAMETER (D) EMBEDMENT (E) "V" BARS "T" BARS 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 9" 6' - 9" 1' - 6" 2' - 0" 2' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 6" 6' - 6" 7' - 3" 7' - 3" (6) #5 (6) #6 (6) #7 (6) #8 #3@10" #3@12" #3@14" #3@16" 8.C.e Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. VCPG LED Rev. 01/30/20 VCPG LEDParking Garage Specifications Catalog Number Notes Type Introduction The all new VCPG LED (Visually Comfortable Parking Garage) luminaire is designed to bring glare control, optical performance and energy savings into one package. The recessed lens design of VCPG LED minimizes high angle glare, while its precision molded acrylic lens eliminates LED pixilation and delivers the required minimums, verticals and uniformity. The dedicated up-light module option reduces the contrast between the luminaire and the ceiling creating a more visually comfortable environment. The VCPG LED delivers up to 87% in energy savings when replacing 175W metal halide luminaires. With over 100,000 hour life expectancy (12+ years of 24/7 continuous operation), the VCPG LED luminaire provides significant maintenance savings over traditional luminaires. Diameter:19" Height:3.75" (4.85" with Up-Light) Weight (max, with no options): 18 lbs Hit the Tab key or mouse over the page to see all interactive elements. 19" 19" 4.85" 3.75" Ordering Information EXAMPLE: VCPG LED V4 P4 40K 70CRI T5M MVOLT SRM DNAXD VCPG LED Series LED Light Engines Package Color temperature Color Rendering Index Distribution Voltage Mounting VCPG LED V41 4 Light Engines V81 8 Light Engines P11 P21 P31 P41 P51 P61 P71 30K 3000 K 35K 3500 K 40K 4000 K 50K 5000 K 70CRI 80CRI T5M Type V, medium T5R2 Type V, rectangular T5W Type V, wide T5E Type V entry LANE2 Drive lane MVOLT 347 480 For ordering with fuse 120 208 240 277 347 480 Shipped included PM Pendant mount standard (24-inch length supply leads) SRM Surface mount (24-inch length supply leads) ARM Arm mount (use RSXWBA accessory to mount to a wall) Shipped separately YK Yoke/trunnion mount3 Options Finish (required) Shipped installed UPL1 Up-Light: 500 lumens UPL2 Up-Light: 700 lumens E8WC Emergency battery backup, Certified in CA Title 20 MAEDBS (8W, -20°C min)4,5,6 E10WH Emergency battery backup, Certified in CA Title 20 MAEDBS (10W, 5°C min)4,5,6 HA High ambient (50°C, only P1-P4) SF Single fuse (120V, 277V, 347V) DF Double fuse (208V, 240V, 480V) SPD10KV 10KV Surge Pack LDS36 36in (3ft) lead length LDS72 72in (6ft) lead length LDS108 108in (9ft) lead length DMG External 0-10V leads (no controls)7 Shipped Separately WG Wire Guard BDS Bird Shroud HS House Side Shield Standalone Sensors/Controls2 PIR Motion/ambient sensor for 8-15' mounting heights PIRH Motion/ambient sensor for 15-30' mounting heights PIR3FC3V Motion/ambient sensor for 8-15’ mounting heights, pre programmed to 3fc and 35% light output PIRH3FC3V Motion/ambient sensor for 15-30’ mounting heights, pre programmed to 3fc and 35% light output PIR3FC3V924 UL924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuit for 8-15’ mounting heights, pre programmed to 3fc and 35% light output8 PIRH3FC3V924 UL924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuit for 15-30’ mounting heights, pre programmed to 3fc and 35% light output8 Networked Sensors/Controls2 NLTAIR2 PIR nLIGHT AIR Wireless enabled motion/ambient sensor for 8-15' mounting heights NLTAIR2 PIRH nLIGHT AIR Wireless enabled motion/ambient sensor for 15'-30' mounting heights NLTAIR2 PIR924 nLIGHT AIR Wireless enabled, UL 924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuits for 8-15' mounting heights9 NLTAIR2 PIRH924 nLIGHT AIR Wireless enabled, UL 924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuits for 15-30' mounting heights9 XAD XPoint™ Wireless enabled10 XAD924 XPoint™ Wireless enabled, UL 924 Listed for emergency circuit8,10 XAD PIR XPoint™ Wireless enabled motion/ambient sensor for 8-15' mounting heights XAD PIRH XPoint™ Wireless enabled motion/ambient sensor for 15-30' mounting heights XAD924 PIR XPoint™ Wireless enabled, UL 924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuits for 8-15' mounting heights8 XAD924 PIRH XPoint™ Wireless enabled, UL 924 Listed motion/ambient sensor for emergency circuits for 15-30' mounting heights8 DWHXD White DNAXD Natural aluminum DDBXD Dark bronze DBLXD Black A+ Capable options indicated by this color background. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. VCPG LED Rev. 01/30/20 Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Contact factory for performance data on any configurations not shown here. Performance Data Lumen Output Power Package System Watts Current (A) 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V P1 27W 0.22 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 P2 34W 0.28 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.08 P3 43W 0.37 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.09 P4 56W 0.48 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.16 0.12 P5 82W 0.68 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.24 0.18 P6 108W 0.91 0.52 0.45 0.39 0.32 0.23 P7 124W 1.03 0.59 0.51 0.44 0.37 0.27 Up-light Option Watts Lumens UPL1 6.5W 519 UPL2 8.5W 715 Electrical Load Up-light Lumen Output Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0-40°C (32-104°F). Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the platforms noted in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM-80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Performance Package Watts Distribution Type 30K (3000K, 70 CRI) 35K (3500K, 70 CRI) 40K (4000K, 70 CRI) 50K (5000K, 70 CRI) Lumens LPW Lumens LPW Lumens LPW Lumens LPW P1 27W T5E 3,581 135 3,670 138 3,815 144 3,876 146 T5M 3,620 136 3,710 140 3,856 145 3,917 147 T5W 3,592 135 3,681 139 3,827 144 3,888 146 T5R 3,464 130 3,550 134 3,690 139 3,749 141 LANE 3,507 132 3,594 135 3,736 141 3,796 143 P2 34W T5E 4,577 135 4,691 138 4,876 144 4,954 146 T5M 4,626 136 4,741 140 4,928 145 5,007 147 T5W 4,591 135 4,705 139 4,891 144 4,968 146 T5R 4,427 130 4,537 134 4,716 139 4,791 141 LANE 4,482 132 4,594 135 4,775 141 4,851 143 P3 43W T5E 5,808 134 5,952 137 6,187 143 6,286 145 T5M 5,870 135 6,015 139 6,253 144 6,353 146 T5W 5,825 134 5,970 138 6,205 143 6,304 145 T5R 5,617 130 5,757 133 5,984 138 6,079 140 LANE 5,688 131 5,829 134 6,059 140 6,155 142 P4 56W T5E 7,391 131 7,575 135 7,874 140 7,999 142 T5M 7,470 133 7,656 136 7,958 141 8,085 144 T5W 7,414 132 7,597 135 7,898 140 8,023 143 T5R 7,149 127 7,326 130 7,615 135 7,737 137 LANE 7,238 129 7,418 132 7,711 137 7,834 139 P5 82W T5E 10,189 124 10,442 127 10,854 132 11,027 134 T5M 10,298 125 10,553 128 10,970 134 11,145 136 T5W 10,220 124 10,473 128 10,887 133 11,060 135 T5R 9,855 120 10,099 123 10,498 128 10,665 130 LANE 9,978 121 10,226 124 10,629 129 10,799 131 P6 108W T5E 12,878 120 13,197 123 13,719 127 13,937 129 T5M 13,015 121 13,338 124 13,865 129 14,086 131 T5W 12,917 120 13,237 123 13,760 128 13,979 130 T5R 12,455 116 12,764 119 13,268 123 13,480 125 LANE 12,611 117 12,924 120 13,435 125 13,649 127 P7 122W T5E 15,503 125 15,887 128 16,515 133 16,778 135 T5M 15,668 126 16,057 129 16,691 135 16,957 137 T5W 15,549 125 15,935 129 16,564 134 16,828 136 Operating Hours 0 25,000 50,000 100,000 Lumen Maintenance Factor 1.0 0.97 0.94 0.89 Ordering Information Cont. Ambient Lumen Multiplier 0˚C 32˚F 1.03 10˚C 50˚F 1.02 20˚C 68˚F 1.01 25˚C 77˚F 1 30˚C 86˚F 0.99 40˚C 104˚F 0.98 CCT Multiplier 30K 0.926 35K 0.945 40K 0.967 50K 0.965 Lumen Multiplier for 80CRI NOTES 1 P1-P6 not available with V8. P7 not available with V4. 2 Not available with P7. 3 Only vertical height adjustment. No angle adjustment. Use PM and SLVSQ or SLVRD for mounting to angled ceiling or canopies. 4 Not available with 347V or 480V. 5 E8WC and E10WH only rated up to 35°C ambient. 6 E8WC & E10WH only available with P1-P4 packages. 7 DMG option not available with standalone or networked sensors/controls. 8 Power interruption delay >30 milliseconds required for operation. Refer sequence of operations on page 4 for more details. BDS not available with UPL1 or UPL2. 9 Not available with P6 & P7. Power interruption delay >200 milliseconds required for operation. Refer sequence of operations on page 4 for more details. 10 XAD & XAD924 not available with PIR3FC3V924 and PIRH3FC3V924. Accessories Ordered and shipped separately. VCPGBDS DWHXD U Bird shroud for PM (specify finish) VCPGBDS YK DWHXD U Bird shroud for YK (specify finish) VCPGUBDS DWHXD U Bird shroud for PM with Up-Light (specify finish) VCPGUBDS YK DWHXD U Bird shroud for YK with Up-Light (specify finish) VCPGSRM U Surface mount kit, with no Up-Light VCPGUSRM U Surface mount kit, with Up-Light VCPGWG U Wire guard SLVSQ Quick mount pendant swivel kit, square SLVRD Quick mount pendant swivel kit, round VCPG YK DWHXD U Yoke mount kit (specify finish) RSXWBA DWHXD U RSX WBA wall bracket (specify finish) 8.C.e Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. VCPG LED Rev. 01/30/20 Photometric Diagrams To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit the Lithonia Lighting VCPG LED homepage. Tested in accordance with IESNA LM-79 and LM-80 standards VCPG LED P4 T5M 40K VCPG LED P4 T5E 40K VCPG LED P4 T5R 40KVCPG LED P4 T5W 40K VCPG LED P4 LANE 40K PIRH TOP VIEW 20 10 0 ft 10 20 6.1 3 0 m 3 6.1 20 0 ft 20 6.1 0 m 6.1 SIDE VIEW 0 ft 10 20 30 40 0 m 3 6.1 9.1 12.2 TOP VIEW 20 10 0 ft 10 20 6.1 3 0 m 3 6.1 20 0 ft 20 6.1 0 m 6.1 SIDE VIEW 0 ft 10 20 30 40 0 m 3 6.1 9.1 12.2 PIR HIGH VIEW 0 ft 15 0 m 4.6 30 24 18 12 6 0 ft 6 12 18 24 30 9.2 7.4 5.4 3.6 1.8 0 m 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.4 9.2 30 24 18 12 6 0 ft 6 12 18 24 30 9.2 7.4 5.4 3.6 1.8 0 m 1.8 3.6 5.4 7.4 9.2 LOW VIEW 0 ft 9 0 m 2.7 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 ft 3 6 9 12 15 18 5.4 4.6 3.6 2.7 1.8 0.9 0 m 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.6 5.4 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 ft 3 6 9 12 15 18 5.5 4.6 3.7 2.7 1.8 0.9 0 m 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.6 5.5 Motion/Ambeint sensor (Sensor Switch MSOD, Xpoint MSOD) is integrated into the luminaire. The sensor provides both Motion and Daylight based dimming of the luminaire. For motion detection, the sensor utilizes 100% Digital Passive Infrared (PIR) technology that is tuned for walking size motion while preventing false tripping from the environment. The integrated photocell enables additional energy savings during daytime periods when there is sufficient daylight. Optimize sensor coverage by either selecting PIR or PIRH option. PIR option comes with a sensor lens that is optimized to provide maximum coverage for mounting heights between 8-15ft, while PIRH is optimized for 15-40ft mounting height. Motion/Ambient Sensor (PIR_, PIRH) Control/Sensor Options nLight® AIR is a wireless lighting controls platform that allows for seamless integration of both indoor and outdoor luminaires. Five-tier security architecture, 900 MHz wireless communication and app (CLAIRITYTM Pro) based configurability combined together make nLight® AIR a secure, reliable and easy to use platform. Networked Control (NLTAIR2) Option Dim Level High Level (when triggered) Photocell Operation Motion Time Delay Ramp-down Time Ramp-up Time PIR or PIRH Motion - 3V (37% of full output) Photocell - 0V (turned off)10V (100% output)Enabled @ 5fc 5 min 5 min Motion - 3 sec Photocell - 45 sec PIR3FC3V or PIRH3FC3V Motion - 3V (37% of full output) Photocell - 0V (turned off)10V (100% output)Enabled @ 3fc 5 min 5 min Motion - 3 sec Photocell - 45 sec Motion/Ambient Sensor Default Settings The UL924 listed control/sensor ("device") is designed to provide full light output for 90 minutes following power loss ("Egress Mode"), ignoring both manual and automatic dimming/occupancy/daylight control signals during this time. The sequence of operations is as follows: • Normal condition: device can dim and turn off the luminaire as normal, in response to automatic and manual control. • Utility power fails, and luminaire loses power. • Backup power source activates, transfer switch moves the emergency circuit powering the luminaire onto the backup source, and luminaire regains power. • The device detects this power interruption, if it is >30ms (for PIR3FC3V924, PIRH3FC3V924, XAD924) or >200ms (for NLTAIR2 PIR924, NLTAIR2 PIRH924). • The device ignores all dimming commands and controls the driver to full light output for 90 minutes. • The device resumes normal dimming controls after 90 minutes. These UL924 listed controls/sensors are not intended for use with Non-interruptible central emergency power systems. The power interruption, when transferring from normal utility power to emergency backup power, is required for the controller to activate its Egress Mode and provide full light output. Sequence of Operations for UL924 Listed Controls/Sensors (PIR3FC3V924, PIRH3FC3V924, XAD924, NLTAIR2 PIR924, NLTAIR2 PIRH924) 8.C.e Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800-705-SERV (7378) • www.lithonia.com © 2012-2020 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. VCPG LED Rev. 01/30/20 Mounting, Options & Accessories SRM – Surface Mount with Up-Light D = 19" H = 5.3" YK – Yoke/Trunnion Mount D = 19" H (Yoke) = 10"-18" PM – Pendant Mount (compatible with ¾ NPT, pendant stem provided by others) D = 19" H = 4.1" SRM – Surface Mount D = 19" H = 4.1" BDS – Bird shroud for yoke mount D = 19" H (Yoke) = 10"-18" HS – House side shield D = 19" H = 7.1" (no up-light) or 8.1" (with up-light) ARM – Arm Mount L = 28" W = 19" H = 8" PIR & PIRH – Motion/ Ambient sensor D = 19" H = 4.6" (no up-light) or 5.6" (with up-light) BDS – Bird shroud for pendant mount D = 19" H = 8" WG – Wire guard D = 19" H = 4.9" (no uplight) or 5.9" (with up-light) FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE The visually comfortable optics, energy savings, and long life of the VCPG LED Parking Garage luminaire make it an ideal choice for new commercial installations and retrofit parking garage opportunities. It is designed to meet or exceed recommended illuminance criteria when installed as a direct replacement of most HID parking garage luminaires. Its modern dayform and aesthetics also make it appealing for indoor low-bay applications. CONSTRUCTION Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management through conductive and convective cooling. The LED driver is separated from the heat generating light engines and mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating temperatures, higher lumen maintenance and long life. The housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental contaminants (IP66) and is suitable for hose-down application. FINISH Exterior painted parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. OPTICS Light guide technology provides a diffused light source, reducing glare from direct view of the LEDs. The light source is recessed into the luminaire, further reducing the high angle glare from the luminaire. A combination of precision molded micro prismatic acrylic lenses and back reflectors provide five different photometric distributions tailored specifically to parking garage applications. Up-light option comes with a dedicated light engine and custom optic designed to efficiently spread light on to the ceiling, thus reducing the cave effect. ELECTRICAL Light engine consists of high-efficacy LEDs mounted to metal-core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (up to L89/100,000 hours at 25°C). The electronic driver has a power factor of >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 6.0 KV surge rating. When ordering the SPD10KV option, a separate 10kV (5kA) surge protection device is installed within the luminaire which meets a minimum Category C low operation (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). INSTALLATION Standard configuration accepts a rigid or free-swinging 3/4" NPT stem for pendant mounting. The surface mount option attaches to a 4x4" recessed or surface mount outlet box using a quick-mount kit (included); kit contains galvanized steel luminaire and outlet box plates and a full pad gasket. Kit has an integral mounting support that allows the luminaire to hinge down for easy electrical connections. Luminaire and plates are secured with set screws. Also, available with a yoke/trunnion mount option with 3/4" NPT provision for flexible conduit entry (conduit by others); height can be adjusted from 10-18". Supply leads are 24" in length as standard. Longer supply leads are available as additional options. Design can withstand up to a 3.0 G vibration load rating per ANSI C136.31. LISTINGS CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. IP66 rated for outdoor applications. PIR options are rated for wet location. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. DesignLights Consortium® (DLC) Premium qualified product and DLC qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be DLC Premium qualified or DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org/ QPL to confirm which versions are qualified. WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at: www.acuitybrands.com/support/customer-support/terms-and-conditions Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Specifications subject to change without notice. 8.C.e Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Landscaping and Lighting Plans (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) POST AND PANEL SIGNSMOUNTING U-1E, U-1C, U-2SPECIFICATIONSALSO SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.DESCRIPTION:1. POST AND PANEL SIGNS WITH STANDARD SIZED "MUTCD" AND CUSTOM SIGN FACES.2. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION3. SIGNS TO CONSIST OF ALUMINUM SIGN PANEL ON 2" SQUARE STEEL POST.4. PANEL TO CONFORM TO "MUTCD" SPECIFICATIONS. SOLID ALUMINUM PANEL, 0.08" THICK. COMPOSITE MATERIALS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.5. POSTS ARE TO BE 2" SQUARE STEEL, 12 GA. 7/16" PERFORATION ON 1" CENTERS. FOUR SIDES TO BEAPPROXIMATELY 12' LONG.6. SUPPORTS ARE TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR SECURE MOUNTING OF SIGN.7. ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE NON-CORROSIVE. IF ADDITIONAL THICKNESS OF MATERIAL OR ADDITIONAL INTERNALBRACING IS REQUIRED FOR SECURE INSTALLATION OR TO PROVIDE STABILITY, ALTERATIONS SHALL BEREFLECTED IN SHOP DRAWINGS. WIND LOADING AND DURABILITY SHALL BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THEENGINEERING OF THE SIGN.8. GRAPHICS AND TYPOGRAPHY SIGN GRAPHICS ARE TO BE HEAVY DUTY '3M' REFLECTIVE VINYL.9. CUSTOM GRAPHICS AND TYPOGRAPHY SIGNS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE OWNER AS ELECTRONIC FILES10. COLORS ARE INDICATED ON THE DESIGN INTENT DRAWINGS. ADDITIONAL COLOR AND FINISH SPECIFICATIONS ARE FOUND IN THE GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS.11. ALL SIGNS INDICATED "DOT" SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES12. FROM THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.INSTALLATION:1. LOCATIONS ARE GENERALLY NOTED ON THE ATTACHED LOCATION PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR FILED VERIFYING ALL INSTALLATION CONDITIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATION.2. MOUNTING U-1e SHALL BE USED FOR SIGNS IN COMPACTED EARTH. MOUNTING U-1c SHALL BE USED FOR SIGNS ONCONCRETE OR ASPHALTIC PAVING.3. MOUNTING U-1e PROVIDES A 36" MOUNTING TUBE (2 1/4" SQUARE STEEL POST DRIVE TO 1" TO 2" ABOVE GRADE.THE MOUNTING TUBE IS PAIRED WITH AN 18" BREAKAWAY SUPPORT TUBE (2 1/4" SQUARE STEEL POST). THE SIGN POST SINKS TO THE BASE OF THE ANCHOR TUBE AND FASTENS TO THE ANCHOR TUBE AND BREAKAWAY SUPPORT WITH AN ANGLE BOLT.4. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED.5. TYPICAL SIGN PANEL INSTALLS BOTTOM OF SIGN AT 7'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. THE POST EXTENDS TO WITHIN 2" OF THE TOP OF THE SIGN PANEL. INSTALLATION SHALL BE PLUMB, LEVEL, AND STRAIGHT.6. MOUNTING U-2 PROVIDES TWO POLE SUPPORT SIMILAR TO THE MOUNTING U-1e. ADDITIONALLY, U-2 REQUIRESCROSS BRACING OF STRUCTURAL ANGLE ON THE BACK OF THE SIGN FACE.7. TOP OF U-2 MOUNTED SIGN SHALL BE AT 8'-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. INSTALLATION SHALL BE PLUMB, LEVEL,AND STRAIGHT.8. THE INSTALLATION METHODS AND DETAILS FOR EACH LOCATION SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE SUBMITTED SHOP DRAWINGS. FINAL LOCATION WILL BE APPROVED ON THE SITE BY THE TENANT OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.9. SIGN POSTS INSTALLED IN COMPACTED EARTH OR SIDEWALK SHALL BE 18" MIN. FROM FACE OF CURB.SUBMITTALS:THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION - (3) SETS OF SHOP DRAWINGSAND (3) 6"X6" VINYL SAMPLES OF EACH SIGN FACE COLOR. SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATIONSPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SUBMITTALS.SIGNAGE NOTES:1. REFER TO SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.2. ALL SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL FOR UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).3. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY RESIN AND 4" WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PAVEMENT GRAPHICS SHALL BE HOT-APPLIED THERMOPLASTIC (REFLECTIVE).4. COLOR SHALL BE WHITE ON ASPHALT AND YELLOW ON CONCRETE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. ASPHALT SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS SHALL BE USED IN COLDER CLIMATES WHERE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT IS INTENDED TO BE USED. RUBBER SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS MAY BE USED IN WARMER CLIMATES OR REGIONS WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IS PREVALENT.6. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TENANT FULFILLMENT WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE STANDARDS REVISION 16 DATED QUARTER 2, 2019.7. 7. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED IN FIELD.8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE NOT SHOWN ON GRAPHICS PLAN (E.G. FIRE LANES) MAY BE REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE AND/OR AHJ. SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL AHJ AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED.9. MOUNT SIGNAGE ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODES.10. TYPICAL SIGN FONT IS SET IN AERIAL.LIGHT POLESIGN AS SCHEDULEDSHIM AS REQUIRED FOR PLUMB INSTALLATION*FRONT/REARELEVATIONSIDEELEVATIONLIGHT POLE SIGNS*ALL POLE MOUNTED SIGNS SHALL BE ATTACHED USING "LOCK BOLTS" TO PREVENT LOOSENING FROM WIND OR OTHER VIBRATON.7'-0"3'-6"4"7'-0"3'-6"4"2'-0"5'-0"18" DIA. CONC. BASE (3,000 PSI)SIGN INLANDSCAPE ISLANDU-1eSIGN INPAINTED ISLAND U-1cBREAKAWAYSIGN AS SCHEDULEDGALV. STEEL CHANNELMIN. EMBEDEMENT 2-FT6" DIA. X 8'-6" LONG STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE. PAINT "SAFETY YELLOW"18" DIA. CONC. BASE (3,000 PSI)SIGN AS SCHEDULEDGALV. STEEL CHANNEL8'-0"FRONTBACKPROVIDE 1 1/2" STEEL ANGLE CROSS BRACESBREAKAWAY MOUNT4'-0" SIGN PANEL6'-0" SIGN PANELTENANTSee Placard DetailSee Placard DetailBuilding Adress1'-4"9"6'-0"TOP OF SIGN3"2 1/2"1'-5 1/2"3"5'-6"3"3 1/2"3"3 1/2"5 1/2"4"ALUMINUM SIGN CONSTRUCTION BY SIGN MANUF. CONNECTION TO CONCRETE STEM WALL BY SIGN MANUF.DIRECTIONAL ARROWS -1/2" THICK, SURFACE APPLIED OPAQUE BLACK ACRYLICDIRECTION TEXT -REFLECTIVE BLACK VINYLFRONT ELEVATION4"4"2" X 2" ALUM. SQUARE TUBES PTD WHITEALUMINUM FACES PTD. SATIN WHITE WITH DIGITALLY PRINTED GRAPHICS4" X 4" WOODEN POSTS PAINTED WHITE1/2" THICK SURFACE APPLIED, OPAQUE BLACK ACRYLICREFLECTIVE BLACK VINYLPLANAll TrucksFACING PLAN SOUTHCustomersFACING PLAN SOUTHVisitors and AssociatesAll TrucksFACING PLAN NORTHCustomersFACING PLAN NORTHVisitors and AssociatesDelivery Service Provider ParkingAll TrucksVisitors and AssociatesDelivery Service Provider ParkingPYLON SIGN 1PYLON SIGN 2NOTES:PLACARD LAYOUT SHALL BE SITE SPECIFIC. DETAIL SHOWN IS FOR DELIVERY STATION BUILDING 2W4F LARGE DS PROTOTYPE. ORIENTATION OF ARROWS SHALL BE BASED ON PYLON SIGN LOCATION.architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT10/15/2020 3:55:43 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00SIGNAGE AND STRIPPING DETAILS A0.6PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"5LIGHT POLE SIGNSSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"6DETAIL U-1c & U-1eSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"7DETAIL U-2SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"9TYPICAL PYLON SIGNSCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"10PLACARD DETAIL8.C.fPacket Pg. 164Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) A TTEM PA TTEM PA TTEM PA TTEM PA TTEM P A TTEM P A TTEM PA TTEM PA TTEM P DO NOT ENTERA0.5cA0.5dA0.5aA0.5bPROPOSED DELIVERY STATION BLDGFOOTPRINT:±141,360 S.F.GEN3.0 M-2W4F-SS, V1.0RENZ LNPOWER SUBSTATIONC A M IN O A R R O Y O PACHECO PASS HWYPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINDRAINAGE SETBACKSOH ELECTRICAL EASEMENTPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINPYLON SIGNF U T U R E I N D U S T R I A L B L D G F O O T P R I N T :2 6 6 ,2 2 0 S FCLR.H G T :3 6 'A0.5eA0.5fPROPOSED ACCESS EASMENTPROPOSED TRAIL EASMENTPROPOSED 12' WIDE PAVED TRAIL236'-5"190'-0"169'-9"PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENTBASINPROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN40'-0"35'-0"35'-0"U.O.N.10'-6"18'-0"18'-0"TYP.25'-0"9'-0"18'-0"18'-0"9'-0"U.O.N.TYP.30'-0"10'-6"architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT10/15/2020 3:55:31 PMN. RIVERAC.A.T.DAL20-0001-00OVERALL SITE PLAN A0.5PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKSN040' 80'160' 400'1"=80'PROJECT DATA1. REFER TO SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF SIGNS AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS.2. ALL SIGNAGE, STRIPING, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).3. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LONG LIFE EPOXY RESIN AND 4" WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PAVEMENT GRAPHICS SHALL BE HOT-APPLIED THERMOPLASTIC (REFLECTIVE).4. COLOR SHALL BE WHITE ON ASPHALT AND YELLOW ON CONCRETE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. ASPHALT SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS SHALL BE USED IN COLDER CLIMATES WHERE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT IS INTENDED TO BE USED. RUBBER SPEED HUMPS AND SPEED BUMPS MAY BE USED IN WARMER CLIMATES OR REGIONS WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IS PREVALENT.6. ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE AND STRIPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TENANT FULFILMENT WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE STANDARDS REVISION 16 DATED QUARTER 2, 2019.7. FINAL QUANTITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED IN FIELD.8. ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE NOT SHOWN ON GRAPHICS PLAN (E.G. FIRE LANES) MAY BE REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE AND/OR AHJ. SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL AHJ AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED.9. MOUNT SIGNAGE ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODES.10. TYPICAL SIGN FONT IS SET IN AERIAL.SIGNAGE NOTES:PARKING LEGENDAPPLICABLE TO ALL SITE PARTIAL SHEETS, U.O.N.TRUE NORTHPARKING SUMMARYSCALE: 1" = 80'-0"1OVERALL SITE PLANPARKING SPACES REQUIRED:SITE AREA:19.340(xxACRES)BUILDING AREA266,220S.F.BUILDING COVERAGE (F.A.R.)32%FRONT (25 FT MIN) TO BOONE DRIVE STREET FRONTAGE21FT MINSIDE5FT MINSITE DATAPROPOSED USE:INDUSTRIALFRONT: (25 FT MIN, 40 FT AVERAGE)26FT MINBUILDING SETBACKS:SIDE (10 FT MIN)0FT MINREAR (10 FT MIN)0FT MINLANDSCAPE SETBACKS:REAR (10 FT MIN)5FT MINZoningM-2MAX.COVERAGE:72FTPARKING BREAKDOWN-GEN3.0 M 2W4F V1.01PARKINGREQUIREDPROPOSEDGAPAUTO PARKING STALL (18' X 9')ASSOCIATE PARKING SPACESSUPPORT SPACESDSP MANAGER SPACESVAN DRIVER PERSONAL SPACESTOTAL AUTO PARKING STALLS172153272291174153291312+200+19+21ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLSACCESSIBLE AUTOACCESSIBLE VANTOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS7298210+10+1VAN PARKING STALL (27' X 11')STANDARD VAN PARKING SPACESVAN PERSONAL VEHICLE SPACESVAN BUFFER SPACESTOTAL VAN PARKING STALLS5111443068551814430692+700+7LOADING AND STAGING AREAVAN LOADING SPACESVAN STAGING SPACES6772727200TRUCK YARDTRAILER / BOX TRUCK LOADINGTRAILER PARKING SPACES151315100-3STANDARD:9X18COMPACT:N/ACOMPACT %:N/AOFF-STREET PARKINGDRIVE AISLE:25FTFIRE LANE:26FTOVERHANG:2FTTREE WELL:5FTWAREHOUSE:1/5000SFMANUF. :1/350SFOFFICE:1/300SFREQ. PARKING RATIO BY USENOTES:1. 31 FEET WHEN STREET FACING2. 21 FEET WHEN STREET FACING3. MINIMUM 8FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHEN ADJACENT TO COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL USES. 8.C.fPacket Pg. 165Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28 GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT GLASS: BASE COLOR - PT-1 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW. COLORS: SECONDARY COLOR - PT-2 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7066 GRAY MATTERS ACCENT COLOR - PT-3 MANUFACTURER: PANTONE COLOR/NO: 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUE ACCENT COLOR - PT-4 MANUFACTURER: STANDARD COLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITE F.F.E.0"T.O.P.44'-6"132456789101113 T.O.P.45'-6"SEE ELEVATION 3BSEE ELEVATION 3A12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P.44'-6"789101113 T.O.P.45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.1TYP. 407 TYP. 414 TYP.402 412 TYP. 407 TYP.403 405 TYP. 203 TYP.406TYP.1'-0"12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1324567 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.1TYP. 403 TYP. 402412 TYP. 401 TYP. 406 TYP. 414405 TYP. 203 TYP. 404 TYP. 407 411 TYP. 424 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" CE B A T.O.P. 45'-6" T.O.P. 46'-6" 405 TYP. 414 TYP. 403412 TYP. 402 TYP. 401 TYP. 404 TYP. 415 1'-0"2'-0"411 1" 12" A4.4 2 A4.4 1 D architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 10/8/2020 12:53:37 PMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.2PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKS203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS.401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE ANDFOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL.402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL.403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT.404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS.405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED.406 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCUPPERS.407 DRAIN LEADER. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL.411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES.412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND.414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT.415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUDFRAMING.424 COILING OVERHEAD LOAD OUT DOOR (INSULATED), PRIMED AND FIELDPAINTED.0 16' 32' 64'128'1/32"=1'-0"8' LEGEND 0 8' 16' 32'64' 1/16"=1'-0" GENERAL NOTESSCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"3OVERALL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3APARTIAL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3BPARTIAL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"4OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION SEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTESKEYNOTES:1. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX. U-FACTOR OF & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED ON SHEET CS.2. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE "KNOXBOX: LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL. 1 3 24567 PAGE 110.09.2020PROJECT GILROY GILROY, CA - DAL20-0001-00 MATERIAL BOARD HIGH PERFORMANCE GLAZING VITRO SOLARBLUE 1 NORTH ELEVATION - SCALE: 1/16” = 1’DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM MULLIONS 7 PAC-CLAD HIGHLINE S2 2 BRIGHT WHITE STANDARD 3 NEBULOUS WHITE SW 7063 PT-1 4 PANTONE 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUE SW TO MATCH PT-3 6GRAY MATTERS SW 7066 PT-2 5 8.C.f Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28 GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT GLASS: BASE COLOR - PT-1 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW. COLORS: SECONDARY COLOR - PT-2 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7066 GRAY MATTERS ACCENT COLOR - PT-3 MANUFACTURER: PANTONE COLOR/NO: 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUE ACCENT COLOR - PT-4 MANUFACTURER: STANDARD COLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITE F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 T.O.P. 45'-6" SEE ELEVATION 1BSEE ELEVATION 1A6'-5"14'-5"6'-5"6'-3"8'-11"3'-2"12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1 32 4 5 6 7 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.2TYP. 406 TYP. 402 TYP. 403 TYP. 407 TYP. 401 TYP. 203 411 TYP. 3'-3" TYP. 3'-3" F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 7 8 9 10 11 13 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.2TYP. 407 TYP. 415 411 TYP. 401 TYP. 406 TYP. 404 412 TYP. 403 TYP. 402 TYP.1'-0"TYP. 203 TYP. 3'-3" TYP. 3'-3" A4.4 3 12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" C EBA0.A T.O.P. 45'-6" 405 TYP. 414411 TYP. 209208 TYP. 410 TYP. 408 TYP. 409 TYP. 401 TYP. 402412 TYP. 403 1" 12" D architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 10/8/2020 12:53:32 PMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.1PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKS203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS. 208 EXTERIOR STEEL STAIR, ALL COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND PAINTED. 209 STEEL BOLLARD, CONCRETE-FILLED PAINTED SAFETY YELLOW. 401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE AND FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL. 402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL. 403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT. 404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS. 405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED. 406 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCUPPERS. 407 DRAIN LEADER. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL. 408 DOCK BUMPER. 409 DOCK SHELTER. 410 TRAILER RESTRAINT. 411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES. 412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND. 414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT. 415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUD FRAMING. LEGEND 0 16' 32'64'128' 1/32"=1'-0" 8' 0 8' 16' 32'64' 1/16"=1'-0" GENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"1OVERALL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1APARTIAL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1BPARTIAL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2OVERALL NORTH ELEVATION SEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES: 1. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX. U-FACTOR OF & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED ON SHEET CS. 2. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE "KNOXBOX: LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL. 8.C.f Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: U FACTOR = 0.28 AND SHGC = 0.28 GLASS WIND LOAD RESISTANCE CALCULATIONS ARE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT GLASS: BASE COLOR - PT-1 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7063 NEBULOUS WHITE PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW. COLORS: SECONDARY COLOR - PT-2 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR/NO: SW 7066 GRAY MATTERS ACCENT COLOR - PT-3 MANUFACTURER: PANTONE COLOR/NO: 2995 C TENANT PRIME BLUE ACCENT COLOR - PT-4 MANUFACTURER: STANDARD COLOR/NO: BRIGHT WHITE F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 132456789101113 T.O.P. 45'-6" SEE ELEVATION 3BSEE ELEVATION 3A 12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 789101113 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 3/A4.1TYP. 407 TYP. 414 TYP. 402 412 TYP. 407 TYP. 403 405 TYP. 203 TYP. 406 TYP.1'-0"12 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" 1324567 T.O.P. 45'-6"FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 2/A4.1TYP. 403 TYP. 402412 TYP. 401 TYP. 406 TYP. 414405 TYP. 203 TYP. 404 TYP. 407 411 TYP. 424 F.F.E. 0" T.O.P. 44'-6" CE B A T.O.P. 45'-6" T.O.P. 46'-6" 405 TYP. 414 TYP. 403412 TYP. 402 TYP. 401 TYP. 404 TYP. 415 1'-0"2'-0"411 1" 12" A4.4 2 A4.4 1 D architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering1919 McKinney Avenue, Suite 100Dallas, TX 75201P 281.661.4788JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT 10/8/2020 12:53:37 PMN. RIVERA C.A.T. DAL20-0001-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.2PROJECT GILROYCAMINO ARROYO & HWY 152GILROY, CALIFORNIA 95020DATEREMARKS203 KNOCK-OUT PANEL FOR FUTURE WINDOWS OR DOORS. 401 CONCRETE WALL, SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING, SUBGRADE AND FOUNDATION PER GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL. 402 3" CHAMFER REVEAL. 403 CONCRETE WALL JOINT. 404 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS. 405 METAL CANOPY, PAINTED. 406 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCUPPERS. 407 DRAIN LEADER. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL. 411 FINISH GRADE, VARIES. 412 LINE OF ROOF BEYOND. 414 STEEL STRUCTURE PAINT. 415 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER METAL STUD FRAMING. 424 COILING OVERHEAD LOAD OUT DOOR (INSULATED), PRIMED AND FIELD PAINTED. 0 16' 32' 64'128' 1/32"=1'-0" 8' LEGEND 0 8' 16' 32'64' 1/16"=1'-0" GENERAL NOTES SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0"3OVERALL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3APARTIAL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"3BPARTIAL EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"4OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION SEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES KEYNOTES: 1. ALL FIXED INSULATED GLAZING SHALL BE CERTIFIED & LABELED WITH ITS MAX. U-FACTOR OF & SOLAR HEAT GAIN COEFFICIENT BY AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY LICENSED BY THE NFRC, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE VALUES LISTED ON SHEET CS. 2. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE "KNOXBOX: LOCATION WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALL. 8.C.f Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 1 Project Gilroy CA Address: NE corner of Pacheco Pass Hwy (Hwy 152) & Camino Arroyo Gilroy, California. Existing Site photos Cameron Blvd looking North Cameron Blvd looking North-East 8.C.f Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 2 Cameron Blvd looking North-West Camino Arroyo looking North-East 8.C.f Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 3 Camino Arroyo looking East Camino Arroyo looking South-East 8.C.f Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 4 East side looking North East side looking West 8.C.f Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 5 East side looking South East side looking South-West 8.C.f Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 6 North side looking South North side looking North-West 8.C.f Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 7 North-West Corner looking East North-West looking South-West 8.C.f Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 8 Pacheco-Arroyo Corner looking East Pacheco-Arroyo Corner looking North-East 8.C.f Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 9 Renz Ln looking towards property Renz Ln Cul de sac looking towards property 8.C.f Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 10 Renz Ln Entrance looking North-East Renz Ln entrance looking South-east 8.C.f Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 11 North-East Corner Pump Station in North-East Corner 8.C.f Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 12 Pipe Well inside the property Culvert north of the property 8.C.f Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 13 Culvert entry south of ag ditch View from culvert looking west 8.C.f Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 14 View from culvert looking east View from culvert looking north at ag ditch 8.C.f Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3015 112th Ave NE #205, Bellevue, WA 98004 P 425.670.6706 F 425.774.8219 10.19.2020 PAGE 15 View of Miller Slough from trail looking west View of Miller Slough from trail looking east 8.C.f Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) General Plan Compliance Review Table Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision PUD GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 & CUP 20-02 1 Policy Consistency Analysis Policy LU 1.1 Pattern of Development. Ensure an orderly, contiguous pattern of development that prioritizes infill development, phases new development, encourages compactness and efficiency, preserves surrounding open space and agricultural resources, and avoids land use incompatibilities. Complies. The land use is consistent with the general plan industrial land use designation and PUD overlay designation. LU 5.1 Industrial Design Standards Ensure that new industrial developments contribute to the overall attractiveness of the community through appropriate site design, architectural design, and landscaping. Complies. The project is being developed as a PUD with landscaping designed to enhance the site and be comparable to the designs across Hwy 152. The project will incorporate existing City Gateway signage on 152 and will provide an additional heavy timber trellis element and artwork at the intersection. LU 5.3 Screening in Industrial Areas Encourage the screening of loading areas and open storage areas so that they are not visible from major roads. Substantially complies. The site has been designed to include significant landscaping throughout and locate work areas on the interior sides and rear of the building with office frontage facing towards Hwy 152. LU 5.4 Connectivity within Industrial Areas Encourage greater automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connections within industrial areas. Substantially complies. The project will include new walkways connecting to the site from Camino Arroyo and includes a new bicycle path from Renz Lane to eventually connect with planned pathways on the Llagas Creek (aka, Miller Slough) service road. LU 8.1 Community Beautification Ensure the beaut ification of Gilroy by acquiring easements or development rights for open space, planting street trees, and landscaping public rights-of-way. Complies. The project as proposed and conditioned includes street trees and median landscaping on Hwy 152. Policy LU 8.2 Community Gateway. Require new development at “gateways” to the city (i.e., including Monterey Road, Pacheco Pass, Hecker Pass, and U.S. 101 interchanges) to incorporate high-quality, site and architectural design, distinctive landscaping, public art and/or other improvements that enhance the visual integrity of such areas. Complies. See response to LU 5.1 above. LU 8.5 Public Art Encourage the installation of public art in conjunction with residential and non-residential development. Complies. See response LU 5.1 above. M 1.1 Transportation Network Develop a coordinated transportation network consistent with the Mobility Diagrams (Figures M-1 through M-5) Substantially Complies. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed amendment to Mobility Element Figure M1 and M2 for planned extension of Cameron Blvd. Removal of this planned extension has been analyzed in the June 16, 2021 Project Traffic Analysis (TA), p. 24-58. The modification would not materially affect the planned circulation system and is supported based on the fact the properties that this road was intended to serve are no longer within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary. 8.C.g Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: General Plan Compliance Table (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) General Plan Compliance Review Table Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision PUD GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 & CUP 20-02 2 Policy Consistency Analysis M 1.5 Transportation Network Connectivity Develop a transportation network that connects users of all modes to destinations in Gilroy. Substantially Complies. Local bus route 84 provides service in the area with a stop at Camino Arroyo/Renz (see June 16, 2021 Traffic Analysis (TA) p. 13). The site would also provide a bike path improvement from Renz that would eventually connect to planned pathways on the Llagas Creek levee. M 1.6 Street Safety and Accessibility Design streets and transportation facilities that are safe and accessible to people of all abilities, including those with limited mobility. Complies. The project will provide new sidewalks along Highway 152 connecting with the existing sidewalk that currently ends at the Starbucks building on Camino Arroyo. M 1.7 Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions by developing a transportation network that makes it convenient to use transit, ride a bicycle, walk, or use other non-automobile modes of transportation. Complies. The project mitigated negative declaration MND includes a mitigation measure TR-1 requiring the applicant to implement transportation demand management program that would promote carpooling, transit ridership, facilities to encourage bicycle ridership to work, and telecommuting. M 1.8 Street Landscaping Require landscaping as a part of all new street design, including street trees, landscaped medians and buffers, and high-quality street furniture. Complies. The landscape plan provides street trees and a varied landscape palette along the frontage. M 3.2 New Development Require new development to include a system of sidewalks, trails, and bikeways that link all land uses, provide accessibility to parks and schools, and connect to M-16 City of Gilroy 2040 General Plan | Adopted November 2, 2020 all existing or planned external street and trail facilities in accordance with the Mobility Diagrams. Substantially Complies. See responses M1.1, M1.5 and M1.6 above. M 3.4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Path Network Develop and maintain a network of paths along linear parks, public easements, drainages, and other open space areas to accommodate bicycle and pedestrian traffic (Figures M-2 and M-3). Substantially Complies. See responses M1.1, M1.5 and M1.6 above. M 3.5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Maintain and implement a Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan and Mobility Diagrams M-2 and M-3 that guide investment in Gilroy’s bicycle and pedestrian networks. These networks should connect residential developments with employment centers, public open spaces, parks, schools, shopping districts, and other major destinations. Substantially Complies. See responses M1.1, M1.5 and M1.6 above. M 3.9 Bicycle Parking Require adequate short- and long-term bicycle parking for all land uses except for single-family residential uses Substantially Complies. The MND mitigation TR-1, as well as GHG-2 and AQ-1 and AQ- 2 that require bicycle parking and facilities to support bicycle commuters. Policy M 4.2. Transit and Development. Require new development to fully accommodate, enhance, and facilitate public transit, including pedestrian and bicycle access to transit. Substantially Complies. See response M1.5 above 8.C.g Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: General Plan Compliance Table (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) General Plan Compliance Review Table Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision PUD GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 & CUP 20-02 3 Policy Consistency Analysis M 5.1 Standard Level of Service (LOS) Maintain traffic conditions at LOS C or better at Gilroy intersections and roadways, allowing some commercial and industrial areas (e.g., downtown Gilroy, First Street corridor) to operate at LOS D or better. Existing LOS D areas within City include the Gilroy Premium outlets, Gilroy Crossings, and Regency Commercial areas. Exceptions to this standard will be allowed only where the City Council determines that. the improvements needed to maintain the City’ s standard level of service at specific locations are infeasible Substantially Complies- with conditions. The project complies with the City General Plan Mobility Element Level of Service Policies as documented in the June 16, 2021 Traffic Analysis (p. 32 – 59), with conditions. The project would be required to pay traffic impact fees and additional mitigation fee payment for the following improvements: • Study Intersection 9 - Camino Arroyo and SR 152 existing LOS E deficiency would increase by 4 seconds. The deficiency can be improved by providing a second SB right turn lane from Camino Arroyo to 152. (See TA p. 56-57). This improvement would require coordination with Caltrans thus funding would be required of the applicant to help pay for this future improvement. • Study Intersection 16 – Silacci Way/SR 152 unsignalized intersection would meet traffic signal warrants under General Plan plus Project Conditions. This would be adequately mitigated by payment of traffic impact fees associated with this planned future capital improvement project (TA p. 57). M 5.3 Promote Non-Auto Modes of Transportation Consider offering incentives as part of a multimodal system approach, for projects that incorporate travel demand management techniques and promote transit ridership, biking, and walking in order to reduce air pollution, energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. Substantially Complies. See responses M1.5, M1.6 and M1. 7 above and MND mitigation measures AQ-1, AQ-2, GHG-1, GHG-2, and TR-1. M 5.20 Exceeding the Acceptable Level of Service In addition to paying the transportation impact fee, proposed new development project must fund off-site circulation improvements which are needed as a result of project generated traffic, if: a) The level of service at the intersection drops below the level of service standard established by Policy M 5.1 when the project traffic is added, M-24 City of Gilroy 2040 General Plan | Adopted November 2, 2020 and b) An intersection that operates below its level of service standard under the base year conditions experiences an increase in delay of four or more seconds, and c) The needed improvement of the intersection(s) is not funded in the applicable five-year City Capital Improvement Program (CIP) from the date of application approval. Substantially Complies. See response M5.1. M 5.22 Roadway Improvement Right-of-Way Dedication Require Complies. The TA indicates an additional 8.C.g Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: General Plan Compliance Table (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) General Plan Compliance Review Table Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision PUD GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 & CUP 20-02 4 Policy Consistency Analysis proposed new development to dedicate right-of-way, as shown in Appendix D, necessary for improvements to roadways on which the new development fronts left turn lane from SR 152 to Camino Arroyo (north) could be necessary. This would require acquisition of additional right of way from the commercial parcel. If needed, this could be required as part of future development of the commercial lot. M 6.2 Off-Peak Deliveries Encourage business owners to schedule deliveries during off-peak traffic periods in residential, commercial, or mixed-use areas. Substantially Complies. The Distribution Facility use would generate the majority of trips associated with the site, as a high- volume package receiving and shipping facility (aka, Last-Mile Delivery Station) The TA p. 27-28 evaluated the applicants proposed operating restrictions to schedule shifts and deliveries to avoid peak hour traffic periods. This would be addressed as a condition of approval such that the facility would not exceed the anticipated 95 AM and 132 PM peak weekday trips and 173 Saturday peak hour trips. EP 7.3 Public Art Support private efforts to create art in public places (e.g., murals, statues) as a means to create a vibrant community that attracts residents and businesses . Complies. As a condition of the PUD the project will be required to install a significant public art piece with the project. The applicant is proposing a substantial entry trellis and location for an art sculpture on the commercial parcel at the Camino Arroyo/SR 152 intersection. The applicant will fund the art piece at a cost of up to $40,000.00 and will install the art piece. The piece will be reviewed by the City Arts and Culture Commission and City Council and installed prior to occupancy of the site. EP 8.1 Industrial and Commercial Lands Protect and improve the quantity and quality of lands designated for industrial and commercial uses. Complies. The project promotes the planned land use of the area. EP 8.2 Jobs to Employed Resident Ratio Seek to improve the city’s jobs to employed resident ratio through land use management, in part to support the City’s fiscal health Complies. The project will provide an estimated 530 new jobs. Policy PFS 7.5 Street Trees. Strive to line the City’s streets with trees so that they become enjoyable and beautiful spaces, creating a rich “urban forest” for the enjoyment of future generations. Tree species should be selected that will provide a canopy of shade and have root systems that will not cause sidewalk buckling and other damage, to the extent practicable. Complies. Street trees are required and proposed consistent with City street tree planting programs. NCR 1.1 Habitat Plan Compliance For all covered activities throughout the city, comply fully with permit conditions of the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan. This will protect natural resources by minimizing impacts on sensitive natural communities and 18 covered species, facilitating wildlife movement, and establishing stream setbacks and buffers. Associated permit fees will be used for reserve system preservation, habitat enhancement and Complies. The applicant is required to obtain a Habitat Permit prior to grading. 8.C.g Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: General Plan Compliance Table (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) General Plan Compliance Review Table Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision PUD GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 & CUP 20-02 5 Policy Consistency Analysis restoration, and adaptive management and monitoring. NCR 1.13 Assess Potential Wetland Impacts Applicants of projects on sites where potential jurisdictional wetlands or waterways are present shall retain a qualified biologist/wetland regulatory specialist to conduct a site investigation and assess whether wetland or waterway features are jurisdictional with regard to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan, and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). This investigation will include assessing potential impacts to wetland and riparian habitats and determining whether any stream buffers/riparian setbacks are required by the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan. If a feature is found to be jurisdictional or potentially jurisdictional, the applicant shall comply with the appropriate permitting process with each agency claiming jurisdiction prior to disturbance of the feature, and a qualified biologist/wetland regulatory specialist shall conduct a detailed wetland delineation if necessary. Complies. The project is required to obtain permits from Ca Fish and Wildlife and the Regional Water Quality Control Board for work within the agricultural drainage that drains into Llagas Creek. NCR 1.14 Maintain Pre-Project Stormwater Flows Encourage project design for smaller projects in the areas of the unconfined Llagas sub-basin to maintain pre-project stormwater flows consistent with City stormwater standards that prohibit offsite discharge up to the 95th percentile storm event for Tier 3 projects, allow treat and release for Tier 2 projects, and allow a more passive, ‘best practices’ design to minimize runoff for Tier 1 projects. Complies. The project is required to provide a stormwater management plan and has provided preliminary plans to comply with city and state standards. Goal NCR 3 Contribute to improvements in regional air quality and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions Complies. See MND mitigation measures GHG-1 and GHG-2 8.C.g Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: General Plan Compliance Table (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Project Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study Links; on City webpage Development Activity Projects | Gilroy, CA - Official Website (cityofgilroy.org): Notice of Intent Draft MND Appendix-A_Project-Plans-and-Submittal-Materials Appendix B - Secondary Channel Access Route Appendix C - CalEEMod Results Appendix D - Health Risk Assessment Appendix E - Biological Resources and Peer Review Appendix F - Geotechnical Study Appendix G - Phase 1 Assessment Appendix H(a) Transportation Analysis (TA) Appendix H(b) TA Appendices Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 8.C.h Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: CEQA MND Links (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) October 13, 2021  Kraig Tambornini  Senior Planner  City of Gilroy  7351 Rosanna Street  Gilroy, CA 95020  Re: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration  Response to Late Comments from PG&E  Dear Kraig,  The 30‐day public review period for the above‐referenced project ending on August 30,  2021. A late comment email was received by the City on September 17, 2021. The email  was from Michael Baker International, a consultant to PG&E, which was sent to the  applicant, and then forwarded to the City. The lead agency (City of Gilroy) is not  required to respond to public comments on the proposed MND, but the Planning  Commission and City Council are required to consider all comments prior to  considering adoption of the MND and approval of the project.  Our responses to these comments are intended to help the Planning Commission and  City Council in their decision‐making about the proposed project. The comments in the  email, as well as our responses, are provided below.  1. Comment. Page 4. 1st paragraph. 3rd sentence. The word “approximately”  should be deleted from the beginning of the sentence. It makes it sound as if the  project is unsure of the number of poles that will be replaced, which is not the  case.   8.C.i Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 2  Response. This comment clarifies that four (4) poles would be replaced. Further  communication with the applicant clarifies that it is the four poles that are  interior to the site. The poles adjacent to SR 152 and the West Branch Llagas  Creek (also referred to as Miller Slough) would not be replaced. This comment  does not raise an environmental issue and no changes to the MND are necessary.   2. Comment. Page 4. 1st paragraph. 3rd sentence. Add “as part of construction  activities” to the end of the sentence after “(PG&E)”.  Response. This comment clarifies that pole replacement would occur as part of  construction activities. This comment does not raise an environmental issue and  no changes to the MND are necessary.  3. Comment. Page 4. 1st paragraph. 4th sentence. Replace “with the same material  (treated wood)” with ʺwith weathered, light duty steel poles that will be installed  via direct bury…”  Response. This comment clarifies that the poles would be replaced with  weathered, light duty steel poles rather than treated wood, as described by the  applicant in the project description. This comment does not raise an  environmental issue; however, it does provide a minor change to the project  description. This minor change was reviewed to determine if it would require the  MND to be substantially revised based upon identification of a new, avoidable  significant effect and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in  order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or the lead agency determines that the  proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential  effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required.  (CEQA Guidelines §15073.5).   The analysis in the initial study was reviewed to determine if this minor project  change (weathered, light‐duty steel poles instead of wood poles), would require  a substantial change in the initial study and mitigated negative declaration. The  change from wood poles to weathered, light‐duty steel poles would have no  bearing on the analysis for the following issues in the initial study: agriculture  and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources,  energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous  8.C.i Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 3  materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral  resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation,  transportation, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and  wildlife.  Visual impacts, or aesthetics, is the only issue that may be affected by replacing  wooden poles with weathered, light‐duty steel poles. The following is an  analysis of replacement of wooden poles with weathered, light‐duty steel poles,  in the context of the conclusions in the initial study.   Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or degrade the  existing visual character in the Hecker Pass Specific Plan Area or the hillside areas?  The initial study concluded that the proposed project would have no adverse  effect on a scenic vista or degrade the existing visual character in the Hecker Pass  Specific Plan Area or hillside areas, because the project site is not located within  these areas. Therefore, replacing the wooden power poles with weathered, light‐ duty steel poles would have no effect on this impact determination, and no  changes to the MND are required.  Would the project substantially damage scenic resources viewed from Hecker Pass  Highway or Pacheco Pass Highway?  The initial study concluded that the proposed project would have a less‐than‐ significant impact on scenic resources viewed from Pacheco Pass Highway,  primarily due to the implementation of landscape plans that would soften the  visual effects of development of the site with industrial warehouse uses.  Regarding the replacement poles, the initial study concluded “the replacement of  the existing PG&E poles with in‐kind and same material (treated wood) poles  that would be approximately three feet taller than the existing poles. The new  poles would be located within five feet of the existing pole locations within the  existing 40‐foot‐wide PG&E easement. Due to the replacement being in‐kind, in  the same location, with a minimal increase in height, this would not create any  additional impacts already evaluated in this section.” In the context of the site  developed with the proposal industrial warehouse uses, replacing the wooden  poles with weathered, light‐duty steel poles would have no perceptible effect on  8.C.i Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 4  the overall visual impact of developing the project site. The impact would remain  less than significant, and no changes to the MND are required.  Would the project substantially damage scenic resources (farmland and surrounding  hills) viewed from Highway 101?  The initial study concluded that the proposed project would have no adverse  effect on scenic resources (farmland and surrounding hills) viewed from  Highway 101, because the project site is not visible from Highway 101 due to  intervening vegetation, and existing commercial and industrial development.  Therefore, replacing the wooden power poles with weathered, light‐duty steel  poles would have no effect on this impact determination, and no changes to the  MND are required.  Would the project result in unattractive entrances at the principal gateways to the City  (north and south Monterey Street, Highway 152/Hecker Pass Highway, Highway  152/Pacheco Pass, north and south Santa Teresa Boulevard, and at the Highway 101  interchanges at Masten, Buena Vista, Leavesley, and Tenth Street)?  The project site is located at the Highway 152/Pacheco Pass entrance to the City  of Gilroy. The initial study concluded that the proposed project would not result  in an unattractive entrance at this principal gateway for the following reasons:  the proposed project is consistent with the general plan land use designation and  zoning, the project site is adjacent to existing commercial and industrial  development, and the landscaping plan and project design are consistent with  the City’s design standards, which will ensure the project would not result in an  unattractive entrance. In the context of the site developed with the proposal  industrial warehouse uses, replacing the wooden poles with weathered, light‐ duty steel poles would not result in an unattractive entrance to Gilroy. Therefore,  replacing the wooden power poles with weathered, light‐duty steel poles would  have no effect on this impact determination, and no changes to the MND are  required.  Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would  adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?  8.C.i Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 5  The initial study concluded that existing commercial and industrial development  to the west, east, and south provide night time lighting in the immediate vicinity,  and that development of the project site from agricultural to industrial uses  would add to the existing light and glare; however, that increase would not be  substantial. In the context of the site developed with the proposed industrial  warehouse uses, replacing the wooden poles with weathered, light‐duty steel  poles would not result in an increase in light or glare. Therefore, replacing the  wooden power poles with weathered, light‐duty steel poles would have no effect  on this impact determination, and no changes to the MND are required.  Would the project include or require a wall or fence higher than seven feet above the  existing grade at the property line?  The proposed project does not include or require a wall or fence higher than  seven feet above the existing grade at the property line. Therefore, the initial  study concluded that there would be no impact associated with a wall or fence  higher than seven feet. Therefore, replacing the wooden power poles with  weathered, light‐duty steel poles would have no effect on this impact  determination, and no changes to the MND are required.  4. Comment. Page 4. 2nd paragraph. 1st sentence. Replace “utility activities” with  “utility construction activities”.   Response. This comment clarifies that pole replacement would occur as part of  construction activities. This comment does not raise an environmental issue and  no changes to the MND are necessary.  5. Comment. Page 4. 2nd paragraph. 2nd sentence. Replace “The new poles would  be comprised of treated wood” with “The new poles would be weathered, light  duty steel poles, that will be installed via direct bury, which is the PG&E  standard for replacements and new installations of transmission poles.”  Response. See response to Comment 3 above.  6. Comment. Page 4. 3rd paragraph. Please insert the following sentence after the  first sentence in the 3rd paragraph: “During conductor transfer to the new poles,  it is likely that a temporary power shutdown to Gilroy Food would be required.  8.C.i Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 6  PG&E would coordinate with Gilroy Foods prior to the power shutdown to  ensure impacts are minimized.”  Response. This comment does not raise an environmental issue and no changes  to the MND are necessary.  7. Comment. Page 4: 3rd paragraph. 2nd sentence. Please clarify what “most  activities” means. This seems to imply that there are some construction activities  that would be outside of the hours required in the City of Gilroy noise standards.   Response. The applicant has provided additional information confirming that all  construction activities would be limited to the hours per the City of Gilroy noise  standards. No changes to the MND are necessary.   8. Comment. Page 25: 1st full paragraph. 1st sentence. Replace “and same material  (treated wood) poles…” with “weathered, light duty steel poles that will be  installed via direct bury…”.  Response. See response to Comment 3 above.  9. Comment. Page 25: 1st full paragraph. 3rd sentence. Insert the following sentence  after “with minimal increase in height…”: “, and the use of weathered steel poles  to match existing aesthetics,….”  Response. See response to Comment 3 above.  10. Comment. Page 64: 2nd paragraph after the table. 1st sentence. Add “pole  replacement” to the list after “during site preparation”.   Response. This comment is clarifying that pole replacement is part of the  construction activities. No changes to the MND are necessary.   11. Comment. Page 64. 5th paragraph after the table titled “Construction Emissions”.  There should be a similar statement inserted into this paragraph regarding GHG  as was done with the Air Quality section stating that the power pole replacement  was considered, but was determined to not result in a meaningful difference to  the overall calculations.  8.C.i Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 13, 2021, Page 7  Response. This comment is acknowledged. The air quality and greenhouse gas  emissions evaluation (and associated modeling) in the initial study were  conducted prior to the addition of the power pole replacement in the project  description. Prior to release of the MND for public review, EMC Planning Group  reviewed the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) evaluation and  determined that the addition of the power pole replacement would not result in a  meaningful difference to the overall calculations in the California Emissions  Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Therefore, it is correct to concluded that the  statement in the Air Quality section is also correct for the GHG section of the  initial study. No changes to the MND are necessary.  This concludes our response to these comments. Please let me know if you have any  questions.  Sincerely,  Teri Wissler Adam  Senior Principal  Enc: Comment Email  8.C.i Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) From: Morton, Steven <Steven.Morton@mbakerintl.com>   Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 9:27 AM  To: Jennifer Shively <Jennifer.Shively@kpff.com>; Evins, Tori <VXE8@pge.com>;  sbeauchamp@panattoni.com; Bhatt, Sheetal <Sheetal.Bhatt@kimley‐horn.com>; Subject: RE:  EXTERNAL: RE: PG&E Pole Relocation, Gilroy (Llagas‐Gilroy Foods 115 kV, 1445 Pachecho Pass)    Good morning. On behalf of PG&E, below are Michael Baker’s comments on the MND. Please let me  know if you have any questions. We appreciate the opportunity to review the document.     Page 4. 1st paragraph. 3rd sentence. The word “approximately” should be deleted from the  beginning of the sentence. It makes it sound as if the project is unsure of the number of poles  that will be replaced, which is not the case.    Page 4. 1st paragraph. 3rd sentence. Add “as part of construction activities” to the end of the  sentence after “(PG&E)”.   Page 4. 1st paragraph. 4th sentence. Replace “with the same material (treated wood)” with "with weathered, light duty steel poles that will be installed via direct bury…”   Page 4. 2nd paragraph. 1st sentence. Replace “utility activities” with “utility construction  activities”.    Page 4. 2nd paragraph. 2nd sentence. Replace “The new poles would be comprised of treated  wood” with “The new poles would be weathered, light duty steel poles, that will be installed via  direct bury, which is the PG&E standard for replacements and new installations of transmission  poles.”   Page 4. 3rd paragraph. Please insert the following sentence after the first sentence in the 3rd  paragraph: “During conductor transfer to the new poles, it is likely that a temporary power  shutdown to Gilroy Food would be required. PG&E would coordinate with Gilroy Foods prior to  the power shutdown to ensure impacts are minimized.”   Page 4: 3rd paragraph. 2nd sentence. Please clarify what “most activities” means. This seems to  imply that there are some construction activities that would be outside of the hours required in  the City of Gilroy noise standards.    Page 25: 1st full paragraph. 1st sentence. Replace “and same material (treated wood) poles…”  with “weathered, light duty steel poles that will be installed via direct bury…”.   Page 25: 1st full paragraph. 3rd sentence. Insert the following sentence after “with minimal  increase in height…”: “, and the use of weathered steel poles to match existing aesthetics,….”   Page 64: 2nd paragraph after the table. 1st sentence. Add “pole replacement” to the list after  “during site preparation”.    Page 64. 5th paragraph after the table titled “Construction Emissions”. There should be a similar  statement inserted into this paragraph regarding GHG as was done with the Air Quality section  stating that the power pole replacement was considered, but was determined to not result in a  meaningful difference to the overall calculations.       Steve Morton, AICP| Project Manager‐Environmental  5470 Kietzke Lane, #208 | Reno, NV 89511 | [O] 775‐412‐4624  steven.morton@mbakerintl.com | www.mbakerintl.com   8.C.i Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Response to PGE Comments (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) MEMORANDUM   To: Teri Wissler Adam, Senior Principal  From: Sally Rideout, EMPA, Principal   Cc: File  Date: October 21, 2021     Re: Response to Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 Comment Letter dated October 20,  2021. Subject: Supplemental Comment – “Project Garlic” NOI MND, Project  Numbers GPA 20‐01, Z 20‐07TM 20‐07, AS 20‐21, & CUP 20‐02     This Memorandum responds to comments made in the above‐referenced letter regarding the  analysis of air quality impacts for the above‐referenced project. Many of the comments in the  letter appear to be related to the emissions estimates generated by CalEEMod. Modeling was  conducted pursuant to the guidance provided in the User’s Guide for CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2  (user guide) available online at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/userʹs‐guide.   Responses to comments are provided below:  1. Comment. Page 2, Third Paragraph: “These are ‘default values’ cited throughout the objective  analysis (see IS/MND Appendix C at 14‐35). An applicant nor a lead agency in preparing or  reviewing a CEQA information document is not always bound to any particular standard or set  of inputs; however, it is required to, again, ‘show its work’ and allow the public and decision  makers to understand why one standard is used over another.”  Response. CalEEMod default emissions factors and default information are based on  aggregated information for an air basin, air district, county, or statewide aggregate.  The user guide recommends adjusting model default information based on project‐  and site‐specific information when it is known.   8.C.j Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Teri Wissler Adam  October 21, 2021, Page 2  MEMORANDUM An explanation of changes that were made to the model defaults based on site specific  project data is presented in the Memorandum: Project Garlic Industrial Project –  Emissions Modeling Methodology, dated April 30, 2021 (hereinafter, “memorandum”)  Appendix C:   “For modeling purposes, data inputs to the model take into account the type  and size of proposed uses utilizing CalEEMod default land uses, based on the  size metrics shown on the project plans, construction data information  provided by the project applicant and trip generation provided by the  project’s traffic engineer.” (page 3)  The CalEEMod default land use subtypes utilized for the assessment and size metrics  based on the project plans are listed in Table 1 of the memorandum. As noted in the  memorandum, descriptions of CalEEMod default land use categories and subtypes are  found in the user guide. Specific data inputs for operations and construction based on  review of project information are described in the memorandum and reported in the  CalEEMod output Section 1.3.   2. Comment. Page 3, First Paragraph: Worker Trip Number…no further explanation is provided  for why the CalEEMod standard should not otherwise be used.   Response. As noted in the memorandum (page 3 and page 6) the trip generation and  worker trip defaults were modified based on project‐specific trip generation rates  provided by the traffic consultant. Questions regarding the methodology used in the  traffic analysis are found in the response to Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 Comment  Letter dated August 30, 2021.   CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 vehicle trip generation defaults are based on the Institute  of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition. The manual has since been  updated, but the model has not been updated. Default trip generation rates should be  updated to reflect the most recent ITE rates at minimum and as recommended in the  user guide, to use project‐specific data if known (e.g., new trip rate based on a project‐ specific traffic study conducted by traffic engineers).” (page 18).   3. Comment Page 3, last paragraph: Demolition is stated as “unknown” and Construction  Spreadsheets do not seem to be included”.  8.C.j Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Teri Wissler Adam  October 21, 2021, Page 3  MEMORANDUM Response. The project site is vacant, and therefore demolition activities are not associated  with the project. Data inputs matching the model’s default construction phases were  derived from the attached construction spreadsheet provided by the applicant.   4. Comment. Page 4, first paragraph: No explanation or rationale of why the CalEEMod default  data—still the standard for use in calculating emissions—is not preferable to the PG&E figure,  which is not further justified or substantiated.  Response: Refer to the memorandum page 6, which states:   “The model’s default CO2 intensity factor of 641  pounds/megawatt hour is adjusted to 206 pounds/megawatt  hour to reflect Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) energy intensity  factors for 2019, which is the most recent year reported for the  provider’s energy intensity factors. The intensity factor has  been falling, in significant part due to the increasing  percentage of PG&E’s energy portfolio obtained from  renewable energy. Emissions intensity data is from the  California Energy Commission website.”   The model default CO2 intensity factors predates these improvements and  accordingly, has been updated as stated. Additional information can be found at the  following link, which is referenced in the memorandum sources.  https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/Title_24_2019_Building_S tandards_FAQ_ada.pdf   5. Comment Page 5, first paragraph: Mitigation measure AQ‐1 would not result in significant  reductions in mobile‐source emissions, since it would not apply to vehicle‐miles‐travelled by  delivery drivers.  Response. Mitigation Measure AQ‐1 requires consistency with the Clean Air Plan  Policy TR2 by requiring a plan to reduce commuter trips and vehicle miles travelled.  Policy TR2 is not applicable to delivery vehicle trips. Emissions from delivery vehicles  are included in the CalEEMod mobile‐source estimates. As noted in the initial study,  overall project emissions, including mobile source emissions, would not exceed air  district thresholds and are less than significant. No additional mitigation is required.   8.C.j Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Teri Wissler Adam  October 21, 2021, Page 4  MEMORANDUM 6. Comment Page 5, second‐fourth paragraph: Mitigation measure AQ‐1 does not provide basic  parameters or standards for a commuter program that would reduce emission, and presumes that  the existence of such a plan will create conformity with the Clean Air Plan.   Response. As discussed in the initial study Table 1, Potentially Applicable Control  Measures (2017 Clean Air Plan), the proposed project would be subject to compliance  with the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program. The Commuter Benefit Program  requires these employers to provide one of four alternative commute friendly  strategies: 1) establish the option for employees to set aside pre‐tax salary to pay for  their transit or vanpool costs, 2) provide up to $75/month transit subsidy to all  employees, 3) provide a shuttle service from a transit hub to the work location, or 4)  provide another approved alternative. Mitigation measure AQ‐1 requires the  preparation of a trip reduction program consistent with Policy TR2. No additional  detail is needed.   Additional information regarding the air district’s analysis and conclusions regarding  resultant emissions reductions expected by the air district are directed to the air  district’s 2017 Clean Air Plan, Chapter 5 Climate and Air Pollution Control Strategy.   8.C.j Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Project Name: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision - Phase I See Equipment Type TAB for type, horsepower and load factor Project Size Data Dwelling Units 34.13 s.f. residential s.f. retail s.f. office/commercial 141,360 s.f. other, specify:industrial s.f. parking garage s.f. parking lot 1164 Construction Hours ____6_____am to ___6____pm Work Days per Week 5 Qty Description HP Load Factor Hours/day DEMOLITION Start Date:N/A Total phase: End Date: Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 0.73 Excavators 162 0.38 Rubber-Tired Dozers 255 0.4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 SITE PREPARATION Start Date:10/18/2021 Total phase: End Date:11/8/2021 3 Graders 174 0.41 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 0.4 2 Scrapers 361 0.48 8 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Grading / Excavation Start Date:11/8/2021 Total phase: End Date:6/20/2022 1 Excavators 162 0.38 8 3 Graders 174 0.41 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 0.4 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Other Equipment? Trenching Start Date:12/1/2021 Total phase: End Date:2/1/2022 2 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe 97 0.37 8 4 Excavators 162 0.38 8 Other Equipment? CONSTRUCTION Start Date:11/8/2021 Total phase: End Date:6/8/2022 Building - Exterior/Foundations 1 Cranes 226 0.29 8 5 Forklifts 89 0.2 8 8.C.j Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3 Generator Sets 84 0.74 8 4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 3 Welders 46 0.45 8 Other Equipment? Building - Interior/Architectural Coating Start Date:6/20/2022 Total phase: End Date:8/15/2022 2 Air Compressors 78 0.48 8 4 Aerial Lift 62 0.31 8 Other Equipment? Paving Start Date:6/20/2022 Total phase: Start Date:8/15/2022 Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 0.56 2 Pavers 125 0.42 8 Paving Equipment 130 0.36 2 Graders 174 0.41 8 4 Rollers 80 0.38 8 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Other Equipment? Equipment types listed in "Equipment Types" worksheet tab. Equipment listed in this sheet is to provide an example of inputs It is assumed that water trucks would be used during grading Add or subtract phases and equipment, as appropriate Modify horepower or load factor, as appropriate Modify Total Work Days by Phase - the 1 is included for the excel calculations 8.C.j Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) (as Applicable and to the Best of Your Knowledge) total project acres disturbed Modify Total Work Days by Phase in Column G __10/18/21___________ Estimated Construction Start Date ___8/16/22__________Estimated Operational Date spaces Pile Driving? N spaces Total Work Days by Phase Avg. Hours per day Annual Hours Comments 0 Overall Import/Export Volumes #DIV/0!0 Demolition Volume #DIV/0!0 Square footage of buildings to be demolished #DIV/0!0 (or total tons to be hauled) #DIV/0!0 _0_ square feet or _0_ Hauling volume (tons) 15 Any pavement demolished and hauled? _0_ tons 15 8 360 0 0 15 8 240 15 8 240 40 Soil Hauling Volume 40 8 320 Export volume = 0 cubic yards? 40 8 960 Import volume = 110,000 cubic yards? 0 0 40 8 640 15 15 8 240 15 8 480 160 Cement Trucks? _?_ Total Round-Trips Delivery Trucks? ___ Total Round-Trips 40 2 320 Electric? (Y/N) ___ Otherwise assumed diesel 160 8 6400 Liquid Propane (LPG)? (Y/N) ___ Otherwise Assumed diesel Please Complete ALL Portions in Yellow 8.C.j Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 160 8 3840 Or temporary line power? (Y/N) ___ 120 6 3840 120 6 2880 0 80 80 8 1280 80 8 2560 15 0 0 15 8 240 0 0 15 8 240 15 8 480 15 8 360 Asphalt? ___ cubic yards or ____ round trips? 8.C.j Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Project Name: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision - Phase 2 See Equipment Type TAB for type, horsepower and load factor Project Size Data Dwelling Units 18.9 s.f. residential s.f. retail s.f. office/commercial 266,220 s.f. other, specify:industrial s.f. parking garage s.f. parking lot 204 Construction Hours ____6_____am to ___6____pm Work Days per Week 5 Qty Description HP Load Factor Hours/day DEMOLITION Start Date:N/A Total phase: End Date: Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 0.73 Excavators 162 0.38 Rubber-Tired Dozers 255 0.4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 SITE PREPARATION Start Date:10/18/2022 Total phase: End Date:11/8/2022 1 Graders 174 0.41 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 0.4 2 Scrapers 361 0.48 8 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Grading / Excavation Start Date:11/8/2022 Total phase: End Date:12/30/2022 1 Excavators 162 0.38 8 2 Graders 174 0.41 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 255 0.4 2 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Other Equipment? Trenching Start Date:12/1/2022 Total phase: End Date:2/1/2023 1 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe 97 0.37 8 1 Excavators 162 0.38 8 Other Equipment? CONSTRUCTION Start Date:11/8/2022 Total phase: End Date:6/8/2023 Building - Exterior/Foundations 1 Cranes 226 0.29 8 4 Forklifts 89 0.2 8 8.C.j Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3 Generator Sets 84 0.74 8 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 4 Welders 46 0.45 8 Other Equipment? Building - Interior/Architectural Coating Start Date:6/20/2023 Total phase: End Date:8/15/2023 2 Air Compressors 78 0.48 8 4 Aerial Lift 62 0.31 8 Other Equipment? Paving Start Date:6/20/2023 Total phase: Start Date:8/15/2023 Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 0.56 1 Pavers 125 0.42 8 Paving Equipment 130 0.36 2 Graders 174 0.41 8 4 Rollers 80 0.38 8 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 97 0.37 8 Other Equipment? Equipment types listed in "Equipment Types" worksheet tab. Equipment listed in this sheet is to provide an example of inputs It is assumed that water trucks would be used during grading Add or subtract phases and equipment, as appropriate Modify horepower or load factor, as appropriate Modify Total Work Days by Phase - the 1 is included for the excel calculations 8.C.j Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) (as Applicable and to the Best of Your Knowledge) total project acres disturbed Modify Total Work Days by Phase in Column G __10/18/21___________ Estimated Construction Start Date ___8/16/22__________Estimated Operational Date spaces Pile Driving? N spaces Total Work Days by Phase Avg. Hours per day Annual Hours Comments 1 Overall Import/Export Volumes 0 0 Demolition Volume 0 0 Square footage of buildings to be demolished 0 0 (or total tons to be hauled) 0 0 _0_ square feet or _0_ Hauling volume (tons) 15 Any pavement demolished and hauled? _0_ tons 15 8 120 0 0 15 8 240 15 8 240 20 Soil Hauling Volume 20 8 160 Export volume = 0 cubic yards? 20 8 320 Import volume = 120,000 cubic yards? 0 0 20 8 320 5 5 8 40 5 8 40 160 Cement Trucks? _?_ Total Round-Trips Delivery Trucks? ___ Total Round-Trips 30 1.5 240 Electric? (Y/N) ___ Otherwise assumed diesel 160 8 5120 Liquid Propane (LPG)? (Y/N) ___ Otherwise Assumed diesel Please Complete ALL Portions in Yellow 8.C.j Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 160 8 3840 Or temporary line power? (Y/N) ___ 120 6 2880 120 6 3840 0 40 40 8 640 40 8 1280 5 0 0 5 8 40 0 0 5 8 80 5 8 160 5 8 120 Asphalt? ___ cubic yards or ____ round trips? 8.C.j Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.j Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Response to Teamsters 2 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4109 415.434.9100 main 415.434.3947 fax www.sheppardmullin.com 415.774.2976 direct amerritt@sheppardmullin.com October 18, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Kraig Tambornini Senior Planner City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, California 95020 kraig.tambornini@ci.gilroy.ca.us Re: Response to Comment Letter from Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 Dear Kraig: This firm represents PDC Sacramento LPIV, LLC, the applicant for the proposed Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision located at the northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Highway and Camino Arroyo (“Project”). We write to respond to the comment letter submitted by Doug Bloch, the political director for Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 (“Teamsters”), challenging the City’s environmental and planning review for the Project. The Teamsters purport to submit evidence showing that the Project will have significant impacts on biological resources, hydrology, and traffic and vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”). Accordingly, they contend that the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) for the Project is inadequate and that the City must prepare an environmental impact report (“EIR”) to comply with CEQA. For the reasons explained below, the Teamsters have not identified any legal errors in the MND or provided any evidence that the Project would have significant environmental impacts. Accordingly, we request that the City proceed with the entitlement process and approve the MND and the Project. 8.C.k Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 2 I. The Teamsters Letter Is Not Substantial Evidence Under the “fair argument” test that applies to MNDs, the Teamsters have the burden of proving that substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment. (Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 778.) The Teamsters letter fails to meet this burden because it does not amount to substantial evidence. The letter was submitted by the Teamsters’ political director, who does not have any expert credentials as a biologist, hydrologist, or traffic engineer. As a matter of law, the political director’s lay opinion on technical subjects like biological resources, hydrology, traffic, and VMT does not qualify as substantial evidence. While “members of the public may provide opinion evidence where special expertise is not required,” the courts have consistently held that “interpretation of technical or scientific information requires an expert evaluation.” (Joshua Tree Downtown Business Alliance v. County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 690–691.) “Dire predictions by nonexperts regarding the consequences of a project do not constitute substantial evidence.” (Gentry v. City of Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1417.) In contrast to the Teamsters, the City has retained a team of experts to evaluate biology, hydrology, traffic, and VMT impacts. Those experts have conducted extensive technical studies and analysis, which are included in the MND and supporting appendices. In this context, even under the fair argument test, the City is entitled to “benefit of the doubt on any legitimate, disputed issues of credibility.” (Joshua Tree, supra, at 684.) As explained below, each of the Teamsters’ specific arguments is refuted by expert evidence already in the record. 8.C.k Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 3 II. The MND Complies With CEQA A. The MND Accurately Describes The Environmental Setting The Teamsters claim that the MND violates CEQA by omitting any discussion of the Project’s environmental setting and baseline, except in the technical reports for air quality and soils. (Letter, p. 2.) The first problem with this argument is that the Teamsters mistakenly cite the environmental setting requirements for EIRs. Here, where the City prepared an Initial Study and MND, it was only required to provide in “brief form” “an identification of the environmental setting” for the Project. (CEQA Guidelines § 15063(d)(2) [emphasis added.]) Secondly, contrary to the Teamster’s assertion, the City did comply with the legal requirement. The MND describes the Project’s overall environmental setting in the Background chapter (pp. 1–2), and then provides further detail in specific topical areas, such as greenhouse gas emissions (p. 65) and VMT (p. 93). CEQA requires nothing more. The Teamsters further argue that the MND erred by failing to identify the Cañada de los Osos Reserve (“Reserve”), located four miles east of the Project. (Letter, pp. 2–3.) They speculate, without evidence, that increased traffic and development from the Project will affect the Reserve, including its biological resources and hydrology. In reality, the MND describes the Project’s environmental setting as including the “Mount Diablo Mountain Ranges (approximately three miles east),” which include the Reserve and similar undeveloped open space. (MND, p. 1.) The Teamsters even admit that the Reserve is “part of the larger Diablo Range” disclosed in the MND. (Letter, p. 2.) Thus, in effect, the MND already provides the setting information requested by the Teamsters. Moreover, contrary to their suggestion, there is no legal obligation for the MND to specifically list every named park or open space area within a certain vicinity of the Project site. 8.C.k Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 4 In addition, there is no evidence, much less substantial evidence, that the Project will have impacts on the Reserve’s biological resources and hydrology. As noted above, the Teamsters’ political director is not qualified to opine on these technical subjects. Even if he were, he fails to explain what specific biology and hydrology impacts the Project would cause at the Reserve. Instead, he engages in generalized speculation. CEQA is clear that such speculation does not amount substantial evidence. (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21080(e)(2), 21082.2(c).) And CEQA does not require the City to evaluate speculative impacts in the MND. (Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 266, 293; CEQA Guidelines § 15064(d).) B. The MND Fully Analyzes The Project’s Traffic Impacts The Teamsters spend several pages challenging the MND’s analysis of traffic and VMT impacts, but they raise only three main arguments. (Letter, pp. 2–8.) Each one is premised on a misreading of the City’s expert traffic analysis and unsupported by the evidence. The City should disregard them. First, the Teamsters contend that the formula used to determine the Project’s VMT is “unclear” and that delivery drivers were improperly excluded from the VMT calculation. (Letter, pp. 2–3.) Neither contention is true. The City’s VMT methodology is explained in the Project’s Transportation Analysis (MND, Appendix H, pp. 18–24) and further detailed in the traffic expert’s responses to comments. The City has clarified that the VMT analysis includes all drivers—both those employed directly by the delivery station and those employed by third parties. The Teamsters simply misread the traffic analysis. Under CEQA, “unsubstantiated opinion” and statements that are “clearly erroneous or inaccurate” do not amount to substantial evidence. (CEQA Guidelines § 15384(a).) Second, the Teamsters argue that the MND violates CEQA by failing to identify Amazon as the end user of the Project. This argument is based on a false premise because it is not certain that Amazon will be the end user. The Project is designed for 8.C.k Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 5 potential use by any logistics/delivery station user, and Amazon is simply one of several potential tenants, not a guaranteed tenant. More importantly, CEQA is only concerned with the land use itself, not with the identity of the end user. The courts have repeatedly declined to interpret “CEQA to include a requirement that the end user of a project be identified.” (Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 430.) To the contrary: So long as the project is approved, CEQA has no concern about who uses it. If CEQA compliance required the identification of the project end user, a new EIR would need to be considered every time property was sold or a different tenant moved into a building, regardless of the use to which the property was to be put. In addition to the problems listed above, such a requirement also violates the standard of efficiency required by CEQA. (Id.) Third, the Teamsters claim that the City used an erroneous trip generation rate for the Project. This is not true either. Trip generation rates are often determined by reference to the ITE Trip Generation Manual. In this case, however, the manual does not include a trip generation rate for delivery stations or any other land use that closely matches the Project. Accordingly, NV5, a qualified traffic engineer, prepared a trip generation study based on four other 24-hour delivery stations in California. The City used the NV5 study to develop a customized trip generation estimate for the Project. This custom estimate is supported by substantial evidence and is fully appropriate. The Teamsters suggest that the City should have used a trip generation rate based on a “retail/industrial hybrid” classification. The Project, however, does not include retail characteristics and will not offer point-of-sale services to customers. Accordingly, it would not be appropriate to incorporate retail uses into the trip generation rate. Again, “unsubstantiated opinion” is not substantial evidence. (CEQA Guidelines § 15384(a).) 8.C.k Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 6 C. The MND Analyzes All Reasonably Foreseeable Development The Teamsters argue that Amazon is certain to be the end user of the Project, and that Amazon has a “foreseeable chain of development,” which will involve the future construction of “hubs,” “logistical nodes,” and roads and other infrastructure. They contend that the MND must evaluate the environmental impacts of this additional development. (Letter, pp. 8–9.) The Teamsters’ argument is incorrect for two reasons. First, it is not certain that Amazon will be the end user of the Project. As explained above, the Project is designed for potential use by any logistics/delivery station user. Amazon is simply one of several potential tenants, not a guaranteed tenant. The end user of the Project may also change over time. Thus, even if Amazon were to lease the facility for a period of time, it is not guaranteed to operate it forever. Second, CEQA only requires the MND to address the reasonably foreseeably impacts of the Project; it does not require the MND to address impacts that are speculative or unlikely to occur. (Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 266, 293; CEQA Guidelines § 15064(d).) The Teamsters once again engage in speculation. There is no evidence to show that future development of “hubs,” “logistical nodes,” and additional infrastructure is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the Project. Tellingly, the Teamsters do not explain how many facilities they think would be built, what the characteristics of those facilities would be, where those facilities would be located, or when they would be built. This lack of certainty precludes any meaningful environmental analysis. “Where future development is unspecified and uncertain, no purpose can be served by requiring an EIR to engage in sheer speculation as to future environmental consequences.” (Aptos Council at 294.) D. The Mitigation Measures Are Legally Appropriate The Teamsters argue that the VMT mitigation measures imposed on the Project are legally insufficient and do not meet the intent of the General Plan policy for VMT 8.C.k Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 7 reductions. (Letter, pp. 9–11.) The thrust of the Teamsters’ argument is that Mitigation Measure TR-1 is ineffective to reduce VMT impacts because it is not mandatory and enforceable. To the contrary, Mitigation Measure TR-1 provides that the “applicant shall prepare and implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program.” (MMP, MND, p. 94 [emphasis added].) In the CEQA context, “shall” is mandatory. (Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 48, 64, 81.) Furthermore, Mitigation Measure TR-1 is fully enforceable because the applicant must satisfy the requirement before the City will issue an occupancy permit. (MMP, MND, p. 94.) In other words, if the applicant fails to prepare and implement the TDM plan, it will not be able to operate the facility. The Teamsters also complain that Mitigation Measure TR-1 includes a menu of options for the specific components of the TDM plan. CEQA, however, allows this flexibility because Mitigation Measure TR-1 includes a mandatory and specific “performance standard.” (Communities for a Better Env't v. City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 94.) Specifically, whatever options the applicant selects must reduce VMT to a particular quantitative level that is less than significant. Because Mitigation Measure TR-1 includes each of these components, it will be mandatory and effective in reducing the Project’s VMT below the City’s threshold of significance. In addition, the City used the Valley Transportation Authority’s Santa Clara Countywide VMT Evaluation Tool to affirmatively quantify and demonstrate that Mitigation Measure TR-1 will be effective. As a result, Mitigation Measure TR-1 will also ensure that the Project complies with the General Plan policies regarding VMT reductions. 8.C.k Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 8 Finally, although the applicant believes Mitigation Measure TR-1 is legally appropriate as drafted, the applicant would not oppose the City making minor clarifications to further emphasize that it is mandatory and enforceable. III. The Project Complies With The General Plan And Zoning The Teamsters claim that the Project violates the City’s General Plan because it is inconsistent with VMT policies. (Letter, p. 11.) This argument is incorrect for the same reasons described above. The Teamsters further claim that the Project violates the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance because it is inconsistent with the land use designations applicable to the Project site. (Letter, p. 11.) This argument has no merit. The Project is fully consistent with both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The General Plan designates the Project site for “General Industrial,” which authorizes “heavy industrial uses” requiring “good truck access,” including large scale storage and distribution uses. (General Plan, p. LU-13.) That is precisely what is proposed by the Project. Likewise, the relevant part of the Project site is zoned “General Industrial” (M2) with a “Planned Unit Development” (PUD) overlay. The M2 zoning unconditionally or conditionally permits a wide range of industrial uses, specifically including “warehouse facility,” “distribution facility,” and “office.” (Zoning Ordinance § 30.23.10.) The Project proposes warehouse and distribution facilities with ancillary office, and it is therefore fully consistent with the Zoning. Moreover, even if it were not fully consistent, the PUD overlay would give the City flexibility in approving land uses that deviate from the base zoning. (Id., §§ 30.26.10, 30.26.20.) The Teamsters specifically argue that the “high cube plus hybrid-type facility” proposed by the Project does not fit within the General Plan and Zoning designations. To begin with, however, this statement mischaracterizes the Project description, which 8.C.k Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini October 18, 2021 Page 9 does not propose such a facility. And in any case, the City ’s interpretation of its own land use regulations is presumed correct and entitled to great deference. (Pfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale City Council (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1552, 1563; Friends of Davis v. City of Davis (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1004.) Here, the City has reasonably interpreted its industrial land use classifications as permitting the Project’s warehouse and distribution uses. The fact that the Teamsters would prefer a different interpretation has no legal relevance. IV. Conclusion The City has conducted a thorough environmental and planning review that meets the requirements of CEQA and the Planning and Zoning Law. The letter from the Teamsters’ political director does not constitute substantial evidence of environmental impacts and does not identify any technical flaws in the MND’s analysis. The City should feel confident that it properly executed its CEQA duties and move forward with a decision to approve the MND and the Project. Very truly yours, Alexander L. Merritt for SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 8.C.k Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Applicant Response Letter (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) October 4, 2021  Kraig Tambornini  Senior Planner  City of Gilroy  7351 Rosanna Street  Gilroy, CA 95020  Re: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration  Response to Public Comments  Dear Kraig,  EMC Planning Group and Hexagon Transportation Consultants staff have reviewed  public comments that were received during the 30‐day public review period (July 30,  2021 to August 30, 2021) for the above referenced mitigated negative declaration (MND).  The lead agency (City of Gilroy) is not required to respond to public comments on the  proposed MND, but the Planning Commission and City Council are required to  consider all comments prior to considering adoption of the MND and approval of the  project.  Our responses to these comments are intended to help the Planning Commission and  City Council in their decision‐making about the proposed project. We are only  providing responses to environmental issues, as well as comments on the environmental  review (CEQA) process.  The following public comments were received, and are attached to this letter:  1. Gilroy Bicycle Pedestrian Commission, dated August 29, 2021;  2. Caltrans, dated August 30, 2021;  8.C.l Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 2  3. Teamsters Joint Council No. 7, dated August 30, 2021;  4. Santa Clara Valley Water District, dated August 30, 2021;  5. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, dated August 30, 2021; and  6. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, dated August 31, 2021.  Gilroy Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (August 29, 2021) The Gilroy Bicycle Pedestrian Commission submitted a comment letter on August 29,  2021, which is attached to this response letter. Generally, this comment letter does not  raise environmental issues, but rather recommends additions to the proposed project  that may encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel to and from the project site. Our  responses to these comments are provided below.  1. The proposed project includes a trail easement and 12‐foot‐wide paved trail  that would connect with a future bike trail, to be constructed by others, on the  West Branch Llagas Creek (aka Miller Slough) levee to promote and encourage  residents and commuters to mode shift from vehicles to cycling and walking.  2. The proposed project includes mitigation requiring the preparation and  implementation of a Transportation Demand Management plan, which would  include measures that would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled,  reduction of required amount of parking, and/or an increase in the use of  alternate transportation modes. Please refer to mitigation measure TR‐1 in the  initial study/mitigated negative declaration.  3. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.   4. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.   5. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.   6. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.   8.C.l Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 3  7. The commenter reiterates the various options that could be included in the  project’s Transportation Demand Management program according to the  mitigation measures in the Transportation section of the initial study. However,  this comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  8. The commenter presents various options that could be include in the project’s  Transportation Demand Management program. However, this comment does  not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed project and therefore,  no response is necessary.  9. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  10. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  11. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  12. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  13. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  14. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  15. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  Caltrans (August 30, 2021) The California Department of Transportation, District 4 (Caltrans) submitted a comment  letter on August 30, 2021, which is attached to this response letter. Our responses to  these comments are provided below.  1. Mitigation measure TR‐1 has been modified to require annual monitoring  reports by the end users to demonstrate effectiveness.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 4  2. Hexagon Transportation consultants conducted the following supplemental  queueing analysis for the subject ramps.   US 101 Southbound Off‐ramp to Tenth Street/SR 152   The existing queue lengths at the US 101 southbound off‐ramp to Tenth  Street/SR 152 were obtained from the TRAFFIX level of service calculations at  the ramp intersection with Tenth Street and verified based on field  observations. Observations in the field showed that the peak‐hour southbound  queue length on this off‐ramp do not extend onto the freeway mainline. In fact,  the queue length reported by TRAFFIX appears to be longer than the actual  maximum queue length observed in the field, representing a more conservative  queue length estimate. The queuing analysis at the US 101 Southbound Off‐ Ramp to Tenth Street/SR 152 is summarized in the table below.  With the addition of the project traffic, the queue lengths for the southbound  left‐turn movement are projected to increase. The analysis indicates that the  addition of trips from the proposed project would result in an increase of the  projected southbound left‐turn queue length by approximately 6 vehicles  during the AM peak‐hour and 3 or less vehicles during the PM and Saturday  peak hours. However, the projected queues would continue to be  accommodated entirely on the ramp and would not extend back and disrupt  the freeway mainline, and no improvements would be necessary. No changes  to the MND are required.    Ramp/Scenario SBT/L SBR SBT/L 2 SBR2 Total US 101 Southbound Off-Ramp to Tenth Street/SR 152 Existing Storage Capacity (ft): 2,000 1,900 3,900 Existing AM 23 20 575 500 1,075 PM 49 28 1,225 700 1,925 SAT 58 24 1,450 600 2,050 Background AM 33 26 825 650 1,475 PM 63 40 1,575 1,000 2,575 SAT 64 32 1,600 800 2,400 Background Plus Project AM 39 24 975 600 1,575 PM 66 38 1,650 950 2,600 SAT 66 32 1,650 800 2,450 Maximum Queue (ft): 1,650 950 2,450 Existing Storage - Maximum Queue (ft):350 950 1,450 Notes: 1Queue lengths were obtained from Traffix assuming 25 feet per vehicle. 2SBT/L = southbound shared through and left; SBR = southbound right Per Movement Queue Length (vehicles) 1 Per Movement Queue Length (feet) 1 8.C.l Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 5  US 101 Northbound Diagonal On‐ramp from SR 152  Field observation conducted on two separate occasions (August 2 and  September 9, 2021, between 7:30‐9:00 AM) revealed that currently, the ramp  meter at the US 101 northbound diagonal on‐ramp from westbound SR 152 is  not operational during neither the AM nor PM peak hours. During the AM  peak‐hour, the meter signal was a constant green ball while it was completely  off during the PM peak‐hour. Therefore, no standing queues were observed  within this ramp.  Assuming the ramp meter was operational during the AM peak‐hour (direction  of commute traffic) at the completion of the proposed project, as shown on  Table 10 of the TA report, this ramp is projected to serve a total of 667 AM  peak‐hour trips under background plus project conditions. The ramp currently  has a queue storage capacity of approximately 1,050 feet (approximately 42  vehicles). Assuming a meter rate of 900 vehicles per hour, the projected traffic  volume could be served by the meter service rate and the queue accommodated  within the loop on‐ramp. Therefore, no improvements would be necessary. No  changes to the MND are required.  3. Air quality impacts are discussed in Section D3, Air Quality, of the initial study.  Mitigation measures presented in the initial study would reduce significant air  quality impacts to a less than significant level. The City could consider Caltrans  requests for “on‐site short and long‐term truck parking, on‐site truck  maintenance and on‐site zero emission truck infrastructure to improve safety,  reduce pollution and emissions;” however, they are not required to mitigate the  project’s air quality impacts to less than significant. No changes to the MND are  necessary.  4. Visual impacts are discussed in Section D1, Aesthetics, of the initial study. The  conclusions in the initial study indicate that the proposed landscape plan  sufficient mitigate the visual impacts of the proposed project. No further  mitigation measures are necessary.  5. According to the Project Gilroy – Phase 1 and 2 Stormwater Control Plan,  Hydrology, and Hydraulic Analysis prepared in April 2021 by Kimley Horn (also  found in Appendix A of the initial study), all of the detention ponds have an  infiltration rate of 0.25 in/hour and the biofiltration treatment systems include a  minimum planting medium depth of 24 inches, which must sustain a minimum  8.C.l Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 6  infiltration rate of five (5) inches per hour throughout the life of the project and  must maximize runoff retention and pollutant removal. Detention ponds 1, 6,  and 7 have a drain time of 29 hours, detention ponds 2, 3, and 8 have a drain  time of 34.2 hours, and detention ponds 4 and 5 have a drain time of 31.6 hours.   The detention facilities would be privately owned and maintained by the  project owner. An Operations and Maintenance Agreement will be recorded  against the property where the owner will be required to hire a third‐party  Qualified Stormwater Practitioner (QSP) to perform inspections two times per  year. The owner will be required to provide the third‐party inspection  report/results to the city. No changes to the MND are necessary.  6. On site soil hazards are discussed in Section D9, Hazards and Hazardous  Materials, in the initial study. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was  prepared for the project site and is included as Appendix G of the initial study.  The conclusions in the Phase I ESA reported that no recognized environmental  conditions, controlled recognized environmental conditions, or historical  recognized environmental conditions associated with the property were  identified during the assessment. The report concluded that no further  investigation was recommended. No changes to the MND are necessary.  7. Construction noise is discussed in Section D13, Noise. This comment does not  raise other environmental issues.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  8. This comment is noted. Transportation impacts and mitigation measures are  discussed in Section D16, Transportation/Traffic. No changes to the MND are  necessary.  9. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary. However, the following  information is provided. The Transportation Analysis report made the  recommendation to install ADA‐compliant curb ramps at all corners of the  Camino Arroyo/SR 152 intersection enhancing the existing pedestrian crossings  at this intersection. In addition, recommendations also were made to provide a  crosswalk and pedestrian signal phase/ADA‐compliant curb ramps along the  west leg of the Cameron Boulevard/SR 152 intersection, providing pedestrian  access between the project site and the existing shopping center located at the  southwest corner of the intersection.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 7  There are currently no pedestrian or bicycle facilities along the project site  frontage. With the proposed development of the project, new pedestrian  facilities, including sidewalks along the entire project site frontage, crosswalks  at new and existing intersections, pedestrian signal phase at signalized  intersections, and ADA‐compliant curb ramps will be provided within the  project area enhancing pedestrian connectivity in the immediate project site  area. No changes to the MND are necessary.  10. This comment does not raise an environmental issue regarding the proposed  project and therefore, no response is necessary.  Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 (August 30, 2021) The Teamsters Joint Council No. 7 submitted a comment letter on August 30, 2021,  which is attached to this response letter. Our responses to these comments are provided  below.  1. This comment is introductory and does not raise an environmental issue. No  response is necessary.  2. This comment provides a summary of the commentors concerns, which are  addressed below for each of the topics identified in this comment.  3. This comment does not raise an environmental issue. No response is necessary.  4. This comment does not raise an environmental issue. No response is necessary.  5. CEQA Guidelines section 15063(d) states that an initial study shall contain an  identification of the environmental setting. Environmental setting information  is provided throughout the initial study in sufficient detail to assess the  proposed project’s environmental effects on the existing setting. The  commentor identifies only one resource area, biological resources, where he  believes the environmental setting is not adequate because it fails to  acknowledge the Canada del los Osos Ecological Reserve as part of the  environmental setting for the proposed project.  According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife  (https://wildlife.ca.gov/Lands/Planning/Canada‐de‐los‐Osos‐ER), the ecological  reserve consists of 4,200 acres and is located approximately ten miles east of  Gilroy in southern Santa Clara County, in the southern portion of the Mt.  Hamilton Range. The reserve is north of, but not adjacent to, State Route 152.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 8  Access is from Jamieson Road, a small county paved road off of Cañada Road,  approximately three miles south of the junction of Gilroy Hot Springs Road,  and six miles northeast of the junction of Highway 152.  Biological resources potentially impacted by the proposed project were  analyzed in 2020 by Huffman‐Broadway Group, Inc., and in 2021 by Patrick  Furtado, Associate Biologist, and Janet Walther, Principal Biologist with EMC  Planning Group. There is no evidence to suggest that project impacts would  occur beyond the immediate vicinity of the project site.   The commentor implies that the traffic associated with the proposed project  that would travel on State Route 152 – Pacheco Pass could impact the ecological  reserve, but provides no evidence that such traffic would affect the Reserve.   According to the transportation analysis (TA) prepared for the proposed  project, based on existing travel patterns in the study area, the anticipated  service area for the proposed project, and the locations of complementary land  uses, approximately 5% of the delivery station traffic and approximately 15% of  the industrial site traffic would be generated from/headed to neighborhoods  and communities east of the project site and would utilize SR 152 to/from the  east. Hexagon Transportation Consultants estimates that no more than 8% of  the industrial site traffic and no more than 2% of the delivery station traffic  would continue to travel on SR 152, east of SR 156, representing a maximum of  140 weekday trips and 34 weekend day trips on this segment of SR 152. By  comparison, the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume along the segment of SR  152, east of SR 156, collected by Caltrans in August 2020 (latest available count  data available) is just over 40,000 vehicles in both directions. The project traffic  would represent approximately 0.3% of the roadway segments ADT volume.  Given the distance of the Reserve from State Route 152 and the current high  frequency of traffic, the minor addition of trips along the route as a result of the  proposed project are not expected to impact the Reserve.  The commentor also implies that the construction of the project site with  impervious surfaces would have a hydrological effect on the Reserve, but  provide no evidence for this claim. The project site has an elevation of  approximately 180 feet above sea level. Elevations at the Reserve range from  approximately 800 to 1,500 feet above sea level.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 9  The commentor sites Cañada de los Osos – Coyote Creek as being one of the  most prominent features of the Reserve. Cañada de los Osos – Coyote Creek is  an approximately 27,000‐acre part of the Upper Coyote watershed  (https://indicators.ucdavis.edu/cwip/watersheds). The project site is located in  the adjacent Pajaro River watershed and changes in land use at the project site  would not impact the Upper Coyote watershed.   No changes to the MND are necessary.  6. The VMT analysis presented in the project’s TA report (Chapter 3 of the report)  shows that with implementation of the Transportation Demand Management  (TDM) program being proposed by the project applicant, the project’s VMT  would be reduced by approximately 3.93 miles per job, or employee, reducing  the project’s VMT to 15.3 miles per employee, below the established impact  threshold of 17.12 miles per employee and thus, reducing the project impact to  less than significant. Employment VMT can interchangeably be referred to as  per employee or per job (one employee = one job).  This comment states that the VMT analysis is deficient. It describes the VMT  evaluation of the project by using excerpts from the TA report that describe the  analysis methodology and impact thresholds. As summarized in the paragraph  and documented in the TA report, the VMT analysis was based on OPR’s  technical recommendations regarding assessment of VMT, thresholds of  significance, and mitigation measures, comparing citywide VMT (or baseline  VMT) to the project’s VMT. This comment continues by stating that  “Presumably, included in the analysis should be the activity of the delivery  drivers (who are employees, contractors, and gig workers, in the form of FLEX  drivers) who deliver packages that have arrived at the warehouse.” The  paragraph references back to the report again to a paragraph in the report that  states that the project would generate trips associated with the employees  (including all on‐site associates, managers, dispatchers, and drivers) and trips  associated with the delivery of goods.  As explained in the Project VMT Projections section, Chapter 3 of the TA report  (and referenced in comment paragraph 3.2 above), “The proposed project  would generate trips [and therefore VMT] associated with the employees  (including all on‐site associates, managers, dispatchers, and drivers) and trips  associated with the delivery of goods.” For clarification on which “employees”  are referred to in the above statement, and the expressed confusion in the  8.C.l Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 10  comment distinguishing between employees and contract drivers, there would  be two types of employees: those employed directly by the delivery station and  industrial facility (including on‐site associates/workers, managers, dispatchers)  and those employed by a third party (such as the van drivers and Flex drivers).  As explained in the first paragraph of the “Delivery Station Site Operations”  subsection, Chapter 1, page 1, of the TA report, the project would contract  Delivery Service Partner (DSP) Program drivers, or simply referred to as van  drivers. In addition, the project would also contract Flex Program drivers, or  Flex drivers, who consist of private contractors using personal vehicles to make  deliveries. Therefore, all drivers (van and Flex drivers) would be contract  employees, and employees, as referred to throughout the TA, include on‐site  workers as well as contract van and Flex drivers. However, for the purpose of  the transportation analysis, the employees represent trips to and from the site,  regardless of whether they are employed by the project or by a third party. On  a daily basis, ALL employees would arrive to/depart from the project site at the  beginning/end of their work shift, respectively, and all employee trips were  accounted for in the analysis of the project.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  7. See Response 6 above. Employees include all on‐site workers, including  contract van and Flex drivers. The employee trips (and VMT) represent  passenger vehicle trips as employees arrive to the site at the beginning of their  work shift and leave the site at the end of their work shift. Employee trips were  conservatively assumed to be all new trips to the site, although it is likely that  some of these trips could be Gilroy residents currently traveling outside of  Gilroy for employment and with implementation of the project would instead  travel to the project site, significantly reducing the number of miles they  currently travel each day. Since it is not easily determined where future  employees currently work, conservatively, all employee trips are assumed to be  new trips instead of displaced trips.  Trips associated with the delivery of goods, made by delivery vans, would  originate at the project site and return to the project site once the deliveries  were completed. Contrary to the origin/destination of current employee trips,  the origin of current delivery vans to the Gilroy and surrounding communities  in the South County is known. Currently, because of the lack of similar delivery  stations as the proposed project in the South County area, last‐mile deliveries to  the South County area originate from one of the existing last‐mile delivery  8.C.l Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 11  stations to the north, such as the Milpitas facility. Each delivery van originating  from the north must travel 30 to 40 miles each way between one of the existing  delivery stations to the north and the South County communities. With  implementation of the proposed project, delivery vans would no longer have to  travel from and to the north to make deliveries in South County, reducing the  travel distance of the delivery vans. The travel of delivery vans from the north to  the South County area in the morning and then back northbound in the  evening is evident today by simply observing vehicles traveling on US 101  north of Gilroy. For this reason, it is assumed in the analysis of the project that  the daily VMT associated with the delivery of goods (delivery van trips) is  projected to decrease with the implementation of the project. Miles traveled  while making deliveries by the Flex‐Drivers also can be expected to be reduced,  since some of these trips would have the opportunity to originate and terminate  within the South County area, reducing the number of Flex‐Driver deliveries  that originate from the north.   In summary, the analysis of the project presented in the TA report includes the  following:   A CEQA VMT analysis based on the projected total number of trips (and  trip length) made by ALL employees (including all on‐site workers and  contract van and Flex drivers) that would occupy the proposed delivery  station and adjacent industrial building.     The assumption that VMT associated with the delivery van trips (as the  delivery vans travel to make deliveries) would be reduced from existing  conditions because delivery van trip length would be reduced as these  vans would no longer have to travel 30‐40 miles each way from existing  facilities to the north. Each delivery van trip that is originated and  terminated within Gilroy represents an average reduction of  approximately 70 miles per day. Therefore, VMT associated with the  delivery of goods is anticipated to decrease from existing conditions.   A local transportation analysis (per General Plan policies) based on the  daily and peak‐hour number of trips estimated to be generated by the  project. This includes all vehicular trips to and from the site.    No changes to the MND are necessary.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 12  8. The study referenced in this comment regarding the NV5 letter is a trip  generation study prepared by NV5. The study presents average trip generation  rates for delivery stations derived from data collected at four 24‐hour delivery  stations located in California. The study does not provide any type of findings  related to VMT for any of the sites studied, nor does it state that some of the  trips to the site were made by non‐employees and therefore were not accounted  for in the trip generation rates. As typical trip generation studies are performed,  the NV5 study collected traffic count data at the four study locations to derive  trip generation rates for each facility. Trip generation counts account for ALL  traffic accessing a facility without differentiating whether it is a driver,  dispatcher, manager, contract/non‐contract employee, or any other person  arriving to/leaving the site.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  9. The NV5 study is not a quality check of the VMT analysis prepared for the  project. As discussed in the previous response, the NV5 study is a trip generation  study that was prepared to derive average trip generation rates for delivery  stations since trip generation rates specific to this type of facilities are not  available in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation  manual. The NV5 study has no connection to the VMT analysis. Contrary to  what the comment states, no employees were excluded from either the trip  generation estimates or the VMT analysis for the project. As described in the  TA report, the project was evaluated as a 141,360 square‐foot delivery station  (plus an additional 266,220 s.f. General Light Industrial land use), not as a  warehouse or any other type of land use. In fact, evaluating the proposed  project as a warehouse would result in significantly less traffic generated by the  project as warehouse land use (ITE land use code #150) has lower trip  generation rates compared to the delivery station and General Light Industrial  (ITE land use code #110) land use (daily trip generation rate for warehouse land  use is 1.74 trips per 10,000 s.f. of gross floor area, compared to 12.05 for the  delivery station and 4.96 for the general light industrial use). Therefore, the  land use and trip generation rates utilized provide a more conservative  evaluation of the project compared to the warehouse land use.  The trip generation rates utilized in the analysis are appropriate for the  evaluation of a delivery station (and industrial land use) and therefore are  representative of a last‐mile delivery station making Amazon, or any other  delivery company, a suitable candidate to occupy the facility.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 13  No changes to the MND are necessary.  10. See Response to 7 above. The comment consists of an opinion and does not  provide any factual evidence. The comment does not refer to any specific  CEQA issues or inadequacies of the MND. No changes to the MND are  necessary.  11. The TA and MND consist of the evaluation of a delivery station. Due to the lack  of readily available published information pertaining specifically to delivery  stations, the analysis of the project was performed based on anticipated project‐ specific information and information from other existing similar facilities, such  as the Milpitas Amazon delivery station. The analysis of the project did not  assume that some van/Flex drivers currently have to drive from Gilroy to  Milpitas to fetch packages to be delivered in Gilroy, although this could be the  case, and if in fact this is the case, the VMT associated with these van/Flex  drivers would be reduced with the implementation of the project as they would  no longer have to drive to Milpitas to fetch packages, as the comment suggests.  The comment also implies that the TA assumed all van/Flex drivers (referring  to them in the comment as “approximately 300 non‐employees”), would  originate from within Gilroy and will circulate about the City morning and  night. The evaluation of the project presented in the TA utilizes the Gilroy  Travel Demand Forecasting model to project origin and destination of all  employee trips, including van and Flex drivers. The study never assumed or  described in the report that van/Flex drivers would represent all Gilroy  residents. In addition, the delivery vans are not anticipated to “circulate the city  morning and night” but are anticipated to serve the existing demand that the  existing delivery vans originating from outside of Gilroy serve.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  12. (a) As described in 7 above, the analysis of the project does not rely on  information regarding current van/Flex drivers making the trip to the Milpitas  delivery station and to Gilroy (displaced trips, which would result in a  reduction of VMT) but conservatively assumes that all employee trips to the  proposed project facility represent new trips.  (b) Information on the number of packages and VMT per shift of each of the  current van and Flex drivers is irrelevant for the evaluation of the proposed  project.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 14  (c) The projected decrease in daily VMT as a result of the implementation of the  proposed delivery station, as stated in the TA report, would be associated with  the delivery van trips. The reduction in VMT can be estimated by multiplying  the project’s estimated number of daily delivery van trips by the average  distance traveled between the nearest delivery station to the north (Milpitas  station) and Gilroy/South County, or approximately 30‐40 miles per delivery  van trip. Assuming a total of 223 daily delivery vans (as proposed by the  project) representing one outbound (out for deliveries) and one inbound (after  completion of deliveries) trip, this calculates to a total reduction of  approximately 13,380 daily VMT.  (d) The comment assumes there will be a growth in the number of packages to  be delivered South County as a result of the construction of the proposed  project. However, the comment does not provide any factual evidence to  demonstrate the projected growth it mentions. The proposed delivery station is  projected to serve the existing demand in the South County area. An increase in  demand would augment the need and support for the proposed project.   (e) See response (c) above.   (f) The analysis of the project assumes all employees, including van and Flex  drivers, would originate from all parts of the Bay Area, including the  mentioned Cities of Gilroy, San Jose, San Martin, Milpitas, and others as  projected with the use of the Gilroy TDF model. The VMT analysis takes into  account all trips made by all employees to and from the project site, as it  conservatively assumes all these trips would be new trips generated by the  project, not displaced existing trips.   (g) The Milpitas Amazon delivery station is used as reference in the TA because  it is the nearest existing delivery station to the South County, and most likely  the last‐mile station where the day‐to‐day deliveries to the South County  communities originate. The comment is correct in that the analysis presented in  the project TA relies on information from existing Amazon delivery station  facilities. This is due to the lack of readily available published information  pertaining specifically to delivery stations, such as the proposed project, and  mainly because the project is proposed to have similar daily operations as the  Amazon facilities. Evaluating the project based on an Amazon last‐mile  delivery station characteristics makes Amazon, or any other delivery company,  a suitable candidate to occupy the facility.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 15  No changes to the MND are necessary.  13. See response 7 above. No changes to the MND are necessary.  14. See responses 7, 11, and 12 (g) above. The commenter does not present a fair  argument that the proposed project would result in environmental impacts  requiring preparation of and environmental impact report (EIR). No changes to  the MND are necessary.  15. The project site is zoned General Industrial Planning Unit Development (M‐ 2/PUD). Pursuant to the City’s municipal code, the intent of the M‐2 general  industrial district is to provide areas in Gilroy suitable for large‐scale  manufacturing, assembly, storage, distribution and wholesaling of materials.  The proposed project includes warehouses and office uses on the property,  which are both unconditionally permitted in the M‐2 general industrial district  (refer to the City municipal code section 30.23.10). The PUD requires minimum  of seventy‐five percent (75%) of the land area of those parcels designated as  being in a PUD planned unit development combining district shall be used for  uses permitted by the base zoning district. Other land uses to a maximum of  twenty‐five percent (25%) of the PUD land area may be permitted in  accordance with a planned unit development approval.   City staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the intent  and requirements of the M‐2 General Industrial Zoning District and associated  PUD. No changes to the MND are necessary.  16. See response 15 above. The comment consists of an opinion and does not  provide any factual evidence. The comment does not refer to any specific  CEQA issues or inadequacies of the MND.  17. As stated in the comment and mentioned in the TA report, the Institute of  Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual does not include trip  generation rates for last‐mile delivery stations, such as the proposed project.  Similar land uses included in the ITE manual include high‐cube transload and  short‐term storage warehouse (ITE land use #154), high‐cube fulfilment center  warehouse, both sort and non‐sort (ITE land use #155), and high‐cube parcel  hub warehouse (ITE land use #156). However, none of the above ITE land uses  accurately represent the proposed project. As prescribed in the ITE Trip  Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, when trip generation information for a  8.C.l Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 16  study land use is not available/compatible with an ITE Land Use Code  definition, local trip generation data should be collected.   The collection of trip generation counts at other existing delivery stations in  California was performed and summarized by NV5 in their document titled  Delivery Station California Trip Generation Study, February 2021 (included as  an Appendix in the TA).  This document was provided by the project applicant  for our review and consideration as the needed data for the evaluation of the  project. Hexagon conducted a thorough review of the document, including  collected count data, and concluded that the results of the trip generation study  were somewhat inconclusive, with average trip generation rates for the four  study sites ranging from 0.09 to 0.67 during the AM peak‐hour and from 0.37 to  0.93 during the PM peak‐hour. However, Hexagon also acknowledge that this  study provided the most applicable information for the analysis of the project,  and instead of looking at the average trip generation rates derived from all four  of the sites studied, Hexagon looked at each of the studied sites individually.  Considering the results of the study for the individual sites, one of the study  sites (Site C) was of similar size to the proposed project (128,000 s.f.) and had  the highest trip generation during the AM and PM peak hours, which would  provide the most conservative analysis of the proposed project out of the four  studied sites. Additionally, the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed  project based on the trip generation rates for Site C were compared to  anticipated daily project site vehicular activity information provided by the  project applicant. The trip generation estimates based on the Site C trip  generation rates were higher than those estimated based on the anticipated  daily project site vehicular activity.  For this reason, the project trip generation  for the proposed delivery station was estimated based on trip generation rate  information for Site C of the trip generation study, which was determined to be  the most conservative information.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  18. See response 17 above. No changes to the MND are necessary.  19. See response 17 above. The Delivery Station California Trip Generation Study is  included as Appendix D of the TA report, which is included as Appendix H of  the initial study. No changes to the MND are necessary.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 17  20. The information contained in the Delivery Station California Trip Generation  Study was utilized in the project TA to estimate the number of trips generated  by the proposed project, not VMT. As prescribed in the ITE Trip Generation  Handbook, 3rd Edition, when trip generation information for a study land use  is not available/compatible with an ITE Land Use Code definition, local trip  generation data should be collected.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  21. The project VMT was estimated utilizing the Gilroy TDF model. The Santa  Clara Countywide VMT Evaluation Tool was utilized to quantify the effect of  the proposed project‐sponsored TDM measures. The project is clearly identified  throughout the TA report and MND as a delivery station, never concealed from  the public as the comment implies. The proposed delivery station was not  evaluated as an industrial land use either but as a last‐mile delivery station  based on information from other similar existing facilities. However, in  addition to the delivery station, the TA also includes the analysis of the  proposed industrial building. Therefore, the evaluation of the proposed project  is determined to be adequate as presented in the project TA report.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  22. The project is clearly identified throughout the TA report as a delivery station  and was evaluated as such. The analysis presented in the project TA is based on  information from existing Amazon delivery station facilities of various sizes  and locations within California. Information obtained from the existing  facilities includes information on daily and peak‐hour trip generation rates, trip  arrival and departure characteristics, and hourly vehicular activity which was  also compared to project‐specific information on anticipated daily vehicular  activity at the delivery station. Evaluating the project based on an Amazon last‐ mile delivery station characteristics makes Amazon, or any other delivery  company, a suitable candidate to occupy the facility.  No changes to the MND are necessary.  23. See response 22 above. The proposed delivery station was not evaluated as an  industrial land use as the comment implies but as a last‐mile delivery station  based on information from other similar existing facilities. In addition to the  delivery station, the TA also includes the analysis of the proposed industrial  building. No changes to the MND are necessary.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 18  24. The proposed project was evaluated using the appropriate information and  following CEQA requirements and guidelines. Therefore, the evaluation of the  proposed project is determined to be adequate as presented in the project TA  report. No changes to the MND are necessary.  25. There is no development proposed for the third parcel and therefore,  development of that parcel was not addressed in the project initial  study/mitigated negative declaration. Development of the proposed project, as  well as development of the third parcel, consistent with the general plan  designation of General Industrial, was evaluated in the 2040 Gilroy General  Plan program EIR. Impacts were identified and mitigation measures presented  in the general plan program EIR. Project‐specific CEQA analysis will be  conducted if and when development is proposed on the third parcel. No  changes to the MND are necessary.  26. Hubs are not included in the project description. Evaluation of an unknown  number and location of hubs as “cumulative projects” in this initial study  would be speculative. No changes to the MND are necessary.  27. The effect of implementing the proposed project on the surrounding  transportation network was evaluated in the project TA. As presented in the TA  report, the proposed project would result in the addition of project traffic to the  roadway network in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Outside of the  immediate vicinity of the project site, traffic volumes are anticipated to remain  unchanged (deliveries are being made today and the project would only change  the origin of the delivery trip) or to decrease (delivery vans on US 101 would no  longer need to travel from and to the north). No changes to the MND are  necessary.  28. See response 26, above. The application submitted to the City of Gilroy does not  include the end user for either the industrial warehouse or the last mile  delivery station. However, understanding that Amazon could be an end user,  the TA utilized data from an Amazon facility in the transportation evaluation.  Hubs are not included in the project description. Evaluation of an unknown  number and location of hubs as “cumulative projects” in this initial study  would be speculative. No changes to the MND are necessary.  29. The commenter presents a discussion about CEQA requirements and case law  regarding mitigation measures and states that the “mitigation measures, by the  8.C.l Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 19  project proponent’s own application materials, are insufficient.” However, the  commenter does not indicate how the application materials are insufficient. No  changes to the MND are necessary.  30. Delivery drivers (van and Flex drivers) were not excluded from the VMT  analysis nor assumed to be netted to zero miles because of the Milpitas delivery  station, as the comment implies. Both van and Flex drivers were included in the  calculation of VMT for the project. This is described in more detailed in  Response 7 above.   The proposed compressed work week TDM measure would apply to all on‐site  employees and van drivers. Employees working a compressed work week  schedule would be assigned a four‐day/40‐hour work week. This is the  proposed TDM measure that would have the greatest effect on reducing  employee VMT, requiring 80% of all employees to participate in a compressed  work week schedule. The other proposed TDM measures (Ridesharing  Program and Commuter Benefits, Transit Passes, and Bike Racks), would not be  applicable to contract workers, such as van and Flex drivers. The Ridesharing  Program and Commute Benefits and the Transit Passes programs are required  to have a 20 to 25% of eligible employees participation rate. The project would  be required to achieve the proposed employee participate rate described for  each TMD measure. No changes to the MND are necessary.  31. As described in the VMT analysis in the TA report (Chapter 3), the VMT  reduction associated with the proposed TDM measures was quantified with the  use of the Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) Santa Clara Countywide  VMT Evaluation Tool. The “NV5 Letter”, as the comment refers to, refers to a  memo prepared by NV5, dated May 14, 2021, describing the proposed TDM  program for the project. The document describes the proposed TDM measures  for the project and presents an estimated percent reduction in VMT associated  with each TDM measure. The listed percent reductions in VMT presented in the  NV5 Letter are based on other studies, as the comment notes, and are provided  on this letter for informational purposes only. The anticipated VMT reductions  listed on the NV5 Letter were not in any way utilized to calculate the reduction  in VMT for the project.  The comment also shows concern in regard to the study not referencing “any  impact from “compressed work weeks”, reducing the number of shifts workers  work in a week, or otherwise any reference to what employers can do with  8.C.l Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 20  regards to the work week in order to encourage transit use”. Compressed work  weeks is a known effective method to reduce VMT simply because instead of  employees commuting to work five days a week (10 directional trips), they only  have to commute to work 4 days a week (8 directional trips), reducing the total  number of miles traveled by each employee. The proposed compressed work  week TDM measure would apply to all on‐site employees and van drivers,  including drivers. Eighty percent (80%) of employees is the target goal of the  compressed work week TDM measure, not the number of employees that this  measure is applicable to, as the comment suggests. The compressed work week  TDM measure is applicable to 100% of all on‐site employees and van drivers.  As mentioned on the MND, the TDM program would be prepared prior to  issuance of an occupancy permit and the end users of the project will be  required to submit annual monitoring reports demonstrating the project is  achieving the required employee participation for each of the proposed TDM  measures. No changes to the MND are necessary.  32. The mitigation measure has been modified to clarify that it is not optional. The  TDM measures presented are required and when implemented, would reduce  the VMT to less than significant. The applicant may suggest substitutions to  these measures that are equally or more effective than the presented measures.  Should substitutions be suggested, the applicant shall provide evidence that the  measures are equally or more effective than those presented in this mitigation  measure. End users of the project shall submit annual monitoring reports to the  City of Gilroy to demonstrate effectiveness. See the revised MND for the  revised, clarifying language.  33. The comment states that the “NV5 Letter” (NV5’s memo describing the  proposed TDM program for the project) states that the compressed work week  TDM measure is the only measure out of the four proposed measures that  would apply to delivery drivers, then states that, “plain reading [of the source  referenced in the NV5 Letter for the compressed work week TDM measure]  and reasonable inference would show that this mitigation could not be  applicable to delivery drivers.” As stated before, the proposed compressed  work week TDM measure would apply to van drivers. The comment consists of  an opinion and does not provide any factual evidence. The comment does not  refer to any specific CEQA issues or inadequacies of the MND. No changes to  the MND are necessary.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 21  34. See response to 32 above.   Additionally, without a TMD program that provides the evidence that the  impact is reduced to a less‐than‐significant level, the applicant will not receive a  permit to occupy the buildings. All mitigation measures in the MND will be  included as conditions of project approval. Therefore, the mitigation measure is  fully enforceable through permit conditions.  35. Regarding zoning and general plan consistency, see response to 15 above. The  initial study/MND are adequately prepared pursuant to the California  Environmental Quality Act. No further changes to the MND are necessary, and  no further environmental study is necessary.  36. The initial study and MND are adequate and no further environmental review  is necessary.  Santa Clara Valley Water District (August 30, 2021) The Santa Clara Valley Water District submitted a comment letter on August 30, 2021,  which is attached to this response letter. Our responses to these comments are provided  below.  1. The proposed project includes a Class I bike trail along the project site  boundary from Renz Lane to the northwest corner of the project site, as  presented on the project plans and the site plan presented as Figure 4 in the  initial study. It is anticipated that this Class I bike trail will connect with future  Class I bike trails on Renz Lane and on West Branch Llagas Creek (aka Miller  Slough, aka Ronan Channel). The city’s bicycle and pedestrian plans show a  future Class I bike path along Ronan Channel north of the project site.  However, the construction of the path on Renz Lane and/or on West Branch  Llagas Creek is not included in this project. There are no  improvements/modifications proposed within Valley Water’s right‐of‐way. No  changes to the MND are necessary.  2. No impacts would occur to these plantings as no improvements/modifications  are proposed within Valley Water’s right‐of‐way. No changes to the MND are  necessary.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 22  Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (August 30, 2021) The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority submitted a comment letter on August  30, 2021, which is attached to this response letter. Our responses to these comments are  provided below.  1. Since the implementation of the Senate Bill (SB) 743 legislation, which requires  the use of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for the evaluation  of CEQA impacts on transportation systems due to land use decisions, the City  of Gilroy Travel Demand Forecasting (TDF) model has been used to calculate  VMT in Gilroy. The use of the Gilroy TDF model to calculate VMT for the  evaluation of projects was mainly due to this being the available tool to  calculate VMT in Gilroy at the time SB 743 took effect. Additionally, the Gilroy  model had been recently updated to reflect existing and planned transportation  network and travel patterns with the adoption of the Gilroy 2040 General Plan  in November 2020. In the case of the proposed project, the Gilroy model was  the preferred methodology for the calculation of VMT due to the proposed  change to the planned roadway network (elimination of the planned Cameron  Boulevard extension) that would occur with the implementation of the project.  Projecting future traffic conditions with the project and the elimination of the  planned Cameron Boulevard extension required the use of the Gilroy TDF  model.  As explained in the Transportation Analysis report for the project, the City of  Gilroy does not have adopted VMT guidelines or impact thresholds. As such,  the City of Gilroy has been relying on OPR VMT guidelines and impact  threshold recommendations for the CEQA evaluation of projects in Gilroy. The  Gilroy 2040 General Plan was the first adopted document in Gilroy that applied  OPR’s current CEQA guidelines and impact thresholds, which includes  15 percent (%) below baseline conditions as the threshold to identify potential  VMT impacts. The citywide average daily VMT per capita and per job serves as  the baseline from which a project is evaluated. Therefore, for the evaluation of  the proposed project, and for consistency with the City of Gilroy General Plan,  the VMT analysis applied OPR’s recommended 15% below baseline conditions  impact threshold. This represents an impact threshold of 15% below the  citywide average employment VMT of 20.14 miles per job (or 17.12 miles per  job), as calculated by the Gilroy TDF model.   8.C.l Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 23  Based on Gilroy model VMT projections and the above‐described impact  threshold, the proposed project was determined to have a VMT impact, which  would require TDM measures to reduce the project VMT levels to below the  impact threshold. However, the Gilroy model does not have the capability to  quantify VMT reductions due to TDM measures, such as those being proposed  by the project. For this reason, the effect of the TDM measures was quantified  with the use of the VTA’s Santa Clara Countywide VMT Evaluation Tool.   Using the VMT Evaluation Tool, the project VMT was estimated without and  with the proposed TDM measures. The estimated net change in VMT  (quantified by the VMT Evaluation Tool to be a reduction of 3.93 miles per job)  was determined to be the effect the TDM measures would have on the project  VMT. This VMT reduction was applied to the project VMT obtained from the  Gilroy TDF model to verify (as shown in the VMT Evaluation Tool calculations)  that the proposed TDM measures would reduce the project VMT to below the  identified impact threshold. Thus, for this analysis, the VMT Evaluation Tool  was only used to quantify the change in VMT that would result with  implementation of the proposed TDM measures.  Although, for the reasons explained above, the VMT analysis for the project  was completed with the use of the Gilroy TDF model, VMT results obtained  from the model are shown to be similar to the results obtained from the VTA  VMT Evaluation Tool, which uses data from VTA’s countywide TDF model.  This is because the Gilroy model is based on the VTA’s Bi‐County TDF model.  Several differences between the two models cause the VMT calculations to be  slightly different, however, such as:  • The Gilroy model is more focused on simulating travel patterns between  Gilroy/South Santa Clara County and the three AMBAG counties: San Benito,  Santa Cruz and Monterey counties.  As a result, the Gilroy model base year  traffic assignments on US‐101 and other facilities in the larger Gilroy area  compare much better against observed traffic counts and travel patterns than  those developed with the VTA model. This indicates that the Gilroy model,  as could be expected, is more accurate in producing existing travel patterns,  which affects VMT’s, in the southern part of Santa Clara County than the  VTA model.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 24  • The TAZ and roadway system in Gilroy used in the Gilroy model is much  more refined. The Gilroy model has 262 TAZ’s representing the larger Gilroy  area versus 59 TAZ’s in the VTA model.  • The Gilroy land use data used in the Gilroy model represents 2017  development levels while the VTA model land uses are based on 2015 land  use assumptions.  The citywide employment VMT per job (baseline) obtained from the VMT  Evaluation Tool was 21.25 miles per job, compared to 20.14 miles per job  obtained from the Gilroy Model. Furthermore, the project VMT obtained from  the VMT Tool was 20.93 miles per job compared to 19.23 obtained from the  Gilroy model, with both methods showing a reduction in VMT from baseline  conditions. The proposed TDM measures would reduce the project VMT levels  below the impact thresholds for both, those calculated with the VMT Tool and  the Gilroy model.  Although the City of Gilroy has been working towards developing guidelines  for the evaluation of VMT, there is not an actual document that summarizes  these guidelines. The City continues to rely on and plans to model their future  guidelines on OPR’s CEQA guidelines. Perhaps the use of the word Draft  Guidelines which was meant to describe the City’s decision to base VMT  evaluations on OPR guidelines was misleading and lead to believe the City has  drafted a document summarizing these guidelines, when in fact it is just a plan  to their future guidelines.    2. This comment is noted. The comment does not refer to any specific CEQA  issues or inadequacies of the mitigated negative declaration. The  recommendations made on this comment should be taken into consideration by  City staff and implemented as feasibly possible. No changes to the MND are  necessary.  3. This first comment does not refer to any specific CEQA issues or inadequacies  of the mitigated negative declaration. The recommendation for contribution to  traffic signal improvements along 10th Street/SR 152 for enhanced congestion  management could be taken into consideration by City staff.   Regarding the two nearby freeway interchanges, the Transportation Analysis  for the project, as a conservative approach, assumes that all project traffic  accessing US 101 would do so via the US 101/Tenth Street/SR 152 interchange.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 25  The US 101/Tenth Street/SR 152 interchange is located approximately half one  mile west of the project site, compared to the US 101/Leavesley Road  interchange, which is located more than 2 miles north of the project site. By  assuming that all project traffic originating from/heading to US 101 would  utilize the Tenth Street/SR 152 interchange, we are assuming worst case  scenario rather than distributing project traffic to two interchanges.  As requested by the commenter, an evaluation of the ramp meters at the US  101/Tenth Street/SR 152 interchange was conducted. There are two freeway on‐ ramps at this interchange that would serve project traffic: the US 101  northbound diagonal on‐ramp from SR 152 and the US 101 southbound loop  on‐ramp from SR 152.  US 101 Northbound Diagonal On‐ramp from SR 152  Field observation conducted on two separate occasions (August 2 and  September 9, 2021, between 7:30‐9:00 AM) revealed that currently, the ramp  meter at the US 101 northbound diagonal on‐ramp from westbound SR 152 is  not operational during neither the AM nor PM peak hours. During the AM  peak‐hour, the meter signal was a constant green ball while it was completely  off during the PM peak‐hour. Therefore, no standing queues were observed  within this ramp.  Assuming the ramp meter was operational during the AM peak‐hour (direction  of commute traffic) at the completion of the proposed project, as shown on  Table 10 of the TA report, this ramp is projected to serve a total of 667 AM  peak‐hour trips under background plus project conditions. The ramp currently  has a queue storage capacity of approximately 1,050 feet (approximately  42 vehicles). Assuming a meter rate of 900 vehicles per hour, the projected  traffic volume could be served by the meter service rate and the queue  accommodated within the loop on‐ramp.  US 101 Southbound Loop On‐ramp from SR 152 Analysis  The ramp meter at the US 101 southbound loop on‐ramp from westbound SR  152 was observed to be operational during the PM peak‐hour (direction of  commute traffic) only. However, during the two‐hour long field observations,  no standing queues longer than two vehicles were observed within this ramp.  The measured meter rate was approximately 5 seconds per vehicle per lane, or  720 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl), or a total of 1,460 vehicles per hour for  8.C.l Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 26  the two ramp lanes. Conservatively assuming a maximum ramp capacity of 900  vph for both lanes and based on the existing arrival distribution and projected  traffic volumes, it is estimated that the southbound loop on‐ramp would  adequately serve the projected traffic volumes without resulting in long  standing queues at the ramp meter. The results of the analysis are summarized  in the table on the following page. No changes to the MND are necessary.  4. See response to the Caltrans letter, comment number 1.  No changes to the MND are necessary.    Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (August 31, 2021) The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority submitted an email on August 31,  2021, which is attached to this response letter. Our responses to these comments are  provided below.  Since the implementation of the Senate Bill (SB) 743 legislation, which requires the use of  vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the primary metric for the evaluation of CEQA impacts  on transportation systems due to land use decisions, the City of Gilroy Travel Demand  Forecasting (TDF) model has been used to calculate VMT in Gilroy. The use of the Gilroy  US 101 SB Loop On-Ramp from WB SR 152 Ramp Time Meter Arrival Queue Interval Rate Counts Distribution Volumes Length Existing 5:00-5:15 225 79 24% 79 0 5:15-5:30 225 71 21% 71 0 5:30-5:45 225 89 27% 89 0 5:45-6:00 225 92 28% 92 0 900 331 100% 331 0 Background 5:00-5:15 225 79 24% 116 0 5:15-5:30 225 71 21% 104 0 5:30-5:45 225 89 27% 130 0 5:45-6:00 225 92 28% 135 0 900 331 100% 485 0 Background Plus Project 5:00-5:15 225 79 24% 124 0 5:15-5:30 225 71 21% 111 0 5:30-5:45 225 89 27% 139 0 5:45-6:00 225 92 28% 144 0 900 331 100% 518 0 8.C.l Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 27  TDF model to calculate VMT for the evaluation of projects was mainly due to this being  the available tool to calculate VMT in Gilroy at the time SB 743 took effect. Additionally,  the Gilroy model had been recently updated to reflect existing and planned  transportation network and travel patterns with the adoption of the Gilroy 2040 General  Plan in November 2020. In the case of the proposed project, the Gilroy model was the  prefer methodology for the calculation of VMT due to the proposed change to the  planned roadway network (elimination of the planned Cameron Boulevard extension)  that would occur with the implementation of the project. Projecting future traffic  conditions with the project and the elimination of the planned Cameron Boulevard  extension required the use of the Gilroy TDF model.  As explained in the Transportation Analysis report for the project, the City of Gilroy  does not have adopted VMT guidelines or impact thresholds. As such, the City of Gilroy  has been relying on OPR VMT guidelines and impact threshold recommendations for  the CEQA evaluation of projects in Gilroy. The Gilroy 2040 General Plan was the first  adopted document in Gilroy which applied OPR’s current CEQA guidelines and impact  thresholds, which includes 15 percent (%) below baseline conditions as the threshold to  identify potential VMT impacts. The citywide average daily VMT per capita and per job  serves as the baseline from which a project is evaluated. Therefore, for the evaluation of  the proposed project, and for consistency with the City of Gilroy General Plan, the VMT  analysis applied OPR’s recommended 15% below baseline conditions impact threshold.  This represents an impact threshold of 15% below the citywide average employment  VMT of 20.14 miles per job (or 17.12 miles per job), as calculated by the Gilroy TDF  model.   Based on Gilroy model VMT projections and the above‐described impact threshold, the  proposed project was determined to have a VMT impact, which would require TDM  measures to reduce the project VMT levels to below the impact threshold. However, the  Gilroy model does not have the capability to quantify VMT reductions due to TDM  measures, such as those being proposed by the project. For this reason, the effect of the  TDM measures was quantified with the use of the VTA’s Santa Clara Countywide VMT  Evaluation Tool.   Using the VMT Evaluation Tool, the project VMT was estimated without and with the  proposed TDM measures. The estimated net change in VMT (quantified by the VMT  8.C.l Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 28  Evaluation Tool to be a reduction of 3.93 miles per job) was determined to be the effect  the TDM measures would have on the project VMT. This VMT reduction was applied to  the project VMT obtained from the Gilroy TDF model to verify (as shown in the VMT  Evaluation Tool calculations) that the proposed TDM measures would reduce the  project VMT to below the identify impact threshold. Thus, for this analysis, the VMT  Evaluation Tool was only used to quantify the change in VMT that would result with  implementation of the proposed TDM measures.  Although, for the reasons explained above, the VMT analysis for the project was  completed with the use of the Gilroy TDF model, VMT results obtained from the model  are shown to be similar to the results obtained from the VTA VMT Evaluation Tool,  which uses data from VTA’s countywide TDF model. This is because the Gilroy model is  based on the VTA’s Bi‐County TDF model. Several differences between the two models  cause the VMT calculations to be slightly different, however, such as:   The Gilroy model is more focused on simulating travel patterns between  Gilroy/South Santa Clara County and the three AMBAG counties: San Benito, Santa  Cruz and Monterey counties.  As a result, the Gilroy model base year traffic  assignments on US‐101 and other facilities in the larger Gilroy area compare much  better against observed traffic counts and travel patterns than those developed with  the VTA model. This indicates that the Gilroy model, as could be expected, is more  accurate in producing existing travel patterns, which affects VMT’s, in the southern  part of Santa Clara County than the VTA model.   The TAZ and roadway system in Gilroy used in the Gilroy model is much more  refined. The Gilroy model has 262 TAZ’s representing the larger Gilroy area versus  59 TAZ’s in the VTA model.   The Gilroy land use data used in the Gilroy model represents 2017 development  levels while the VTA model land uses are based on 2015 land use assumptions.    The citywide employment VMT per job (baseline) obtained from the VMT  Evaluation Tool was 21.25 miles per job, compared to 20.14 miles per job obtained  from the Gilroy Model. Furthermore, the project VMT obtained from the VMT Tool  was 20.93 miles per job compared to 19.23 obtained from the Gilroy model, with  both methods showing a reduction in VMT from baseline conditions. The proposed  TDM measures would reduce the project VMT levels below the impact thresholds  for both, those calculated with the VMT Tool and the Gilroy model.  8.C.l Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini  City of Gilroy  October 4, 2021, Page 29  No changes to the MND are necessary.  This concludes our response to public comments. Please let me know if you have any  questions.  Sincerely,  Teri Wissler Adam  Senior Principal  Enc: Comment letters   Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration  8.C.l Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 2 Letter #1 8.C.l Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3 4 5 6 8.C.l Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 7 8 8.C.l Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8 cont. 9 10 8.C.l Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 11 12 14 13 8.C.l Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 14 cont. 15 8.C.l Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.l Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 4 OFFICE OF TRANSIT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING P.O. BOX 23660, MS–10D | OAKLAND, CA 94623-0660 www.dot.ca.gov August 30, 2021 SCH #: 2021070525 GTS #: 04-SCL-2020-00929 GTS ID: 21211 Co/Rt/Pm: SCL/152/10.72 Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St Gilroy, CA 95020 Re: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Dear Kraig Tambornini: Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the environmental review process for the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision. We are committed to ensuring that impacts to the State’s multimodal transportation system and to our natural environment are identified and mitigated to support a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system. The following comments are based on our review of the July 2021 Draft MND. Project Understanding The project proposes to develop a 59.7-acre parcel along SR-152 in three phases. Phase 1 would include the construction of a 141,360 square foot delivery station, including 16,824 square feet of office space and 124,536 square feet of warehouse space. Phase 2 would include construction of a 266,220 square foot industrial building, including 10,000 square feet of office space and 256,220 square feet of warehouse space. Phase 3 would be set aside for future commercial uses. Travel Demand Analysis Caltrans commends the Lead Agency in developing the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan to reduce employee VMT, therefore working towards meeting the State’s goal of a 15-percent reduction. The project VMT analysis and significance determination are undertaken in a manner consistent with the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR) Technical Advisory. The proposed measures identified in the TDM plan should be documented with annual monitoring reports to demonstrate effectiveness. Letter #2 1 8.C.l Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner August 30, 2021 Page 2 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Highway Operations Appendix H, Transportation Analyses, Table 10. Please note that the actual ramp capacity may be lower than the capacity assumed in the ramp analysis due to surges in freeway demand during peak periods. To understand the full impacts of the project on the affected freeway segments, Caltrans recommends that an updated queuing analysis be performed for the following ramp terminal intersections to determine whether vehicle queues can be accommodated within the ramps: භ US 101 southbound off-ramp to Tenth Street/SR-152 භ US 101 northbound diagonal on-ramp from SR-152 Vehicle queues due to project-added traffic shall be accommodated within the ramps and multimodal safety should not impacted. Freight Due to a general shortage in truck parking options withing the greater San Francisco Bay Area, and especially in Santa Clara County, Caltrans is working to better understand the needs of truck drivers and find better ways to accommodate them to improve roadway conditions, reduce congestion and increase safety for both truck drivers and the traveling public. The San Francisco Bay Area is also a nonattainment area for particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter which is primarily generated through the combustion of diesel fuel from trucks and other heavy-duty equipment. Due to these overall concerns, we request considerations for on-site short and long-term truck parking, on- site truck maintenance and on-site zero emission truck infrastructure to improve safety, reduce pollution and emissions. Aesthetics Views of agricultural land and other open space areas can be considered scenic views. Depending on viewer sensitivity, the visual impact of the project may be greater than stated in the visual analysis. Caltrans recommends that the project decrease spacing between tree plantings or plant larger sized trees to provide greater screening to soften buildings and added paved surfaces. Hydrology Please include information regarding the detention times and infiltration rates of the basins, as well information on who will maintain these facilities. 2 3 4 5 8.C.l Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner August 30, 2021 Page 3 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Hazardous Waste Due to previous agricultural land uses, project areas of proposed soil excavation should be tested and characterized for contaminants, including pesticides and herbicides. The following tests are recommended: භ CAM 17 Metals - EPA 6010 භ TPH-mo, TPH-d - EPA 8015-M භ TPH-g - EPA 8015-M භ Cr6+ - EPA 7199 භ Pesticides - EPA 8081A භ Herbicides - EPA 8151 Construction-Related Impacts Potential impacts to the State Transportation Network (STN) from project-related temporary access points should be analyzed. Mitigation for significant impacts due to construction and noise should be identified. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation permit that is issued by Caltrans. To apply, visit: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic- operations/transportation-permits. Prior to construction, coordination may be required with Caltrans to develop a Transportation Management Plan (TMP) to reduce construction traffic impacts to the STN. Lead Agency As the Lead Agency, the City of Gilroy is responsible for all project mitigation, including any needed improvements to the STN. The project’s fair share contribution, financing, scheduling, implementation responsibilities and lead agency monitoring should be fully discussed for all proposed mitigation measures. Equitable Access If any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction. These access considerations support Caltrans’ equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users. Encroachment Permit Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto the State Right-of-Way (ROW) requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating the State ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, 6 7 8 9 10 8.C.l Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner August 30, 2021 Page 4 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” and where applicable, the following items: new or amended Maintenance Agreement (MA), approved Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD), approved encroachment exception request, and/or airspace lease agreement. Your application package may be emailed to D4Permits@dot.ca.gov. To download the permit application and to obtain more information on all required documentation, visit https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep/applications.. Thank you again for including Caltrans in the environmental review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Llisel Ayon at Llisel.Ayon@dot.ca.gov. Additionally, for future notifications and requests for review of new projects, please email LDIGR-D4@dot.ca.gov. Sincerely, MARK LEONG District Branch Chief Local Development - Intergovernmental Review c: State Clearinghouse 10 cont. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Letter #3 1 2 3 4 8.C.l Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 4 cont. 5 8.C.l Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 5 cont. 6 8.C.l Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 7 8 9 8.C.l Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 9 cont. 10 11 12 8.C.l Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 12 cont. 13 14 8.C.l Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 14 cont. 15 16 17 18 19 8.C.l Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 20 21 22 23 24 8.C.l Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 24 cont. 25 26 8.C.l Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 27 28 29 30 8.C.l Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 30 cont. 31 32 33 8.C.l Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 33 cont. 34 35 36 8.C.l Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) CAUTION: This email originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. From:Yvonne Arroyo To:Kraig Tambornini Cc:Kraig Tambornini; Usha Chatwani Subject:EXTERNAL - Project Number: GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, TM 20-07, AS 20-21 and CUP 20-02 Project Title: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Date:Monday, August 30, 2021 4:58:03 PM Attachments:image001.png Dear Mr. Tambornini, Due to time constraints, Valley Water is submitting the following e-mail comments on the proposed mitigated negative declaration (MND) for the subject project: The project description is vague on whether it includes all proposed work on Valley Water’s right of way for West Branch Llagas Creek (called Miller Slough in the MND) for a proposed future trail connection. Any proposed trail connection will require a Joint Use Agreement with the City of Gilroy approved by our respective governing board/council. Additionally, any proposed modification to the West Branch Llagas Creek right of way requires approval from the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service as the federal sponsor who constructed the West Branch Llagas Creek flood protection improvements and from Valley Water as the owner of the right of way and flood protection improvements. The MND must include all proposed improvements to be constructed as part of the project and address all impacts to Valley Water’s right of way due to and resulting from the construction and future operation of a public trail or additional CEQA documentation will need to be prepared by the City of Gilroy, as the Lead Agency, to cover any work proposed on Valley Water’s right of way. Valley Water is a Responsible Agency, under CEQA, for approving any future work on its right of way. The MND states that the riparian corridor ends at the inboard top of bank of the levee; however, mitigation plantings were installed and still remain on the outboard levee slope as part of the flood protection improvements. The biological resources section should address these plantings, discuss their relation to the riparian corridor, and any impacts that may occur to them as a result of any planned construction on Valley Water’s right of way. Please let me know if you have any question regarding our comments. YVONNE ARROYO Senior Water Resources Specialist Community Projects Review Unit YArroyo@valleywater.org Tel. (408) 630-2319 Cell. (408) 529-3792 CPRU Hotline (408) 630-2650 / CPRU@valleywater.org Letter #4 1 2 8.C.l Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5750 Almaden Expressway, San Jose CA 95118 www.valleywater.org Clean Water . Healthy Environment . Flood Protection 8.C.l Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Letter #5 1 2 8.C.l Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Digitally signed by Brent Pearse DN: cn=Brent Pearse, o=Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, ou=Planning and Programming, email=brent.pearse@vta.org, c=US Date: 2021.08.30 15:48:12 -07'00' 2 cont. 3 4 8.C.l Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) From: Pearse, Brent To: Kraig Tambornini Cc: Swierk, Robert Subject: EXTERNAL - VMT Analysis Follow Up Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 2:14:35 PM Hi Kraig,    We wanted to follow up on a few other observations that were made regarding the Gilroy Garlic  Industrial project review. This email is NOT meant for the public record.    In reviewing the IS/MND for the proposed Project Garlic industrial subdivision, we noticed that two  different tools / data sources were used in the VMT analysis in the Transportation section of the  IS/MND.  The City’s travel demand model was used to estimate the current year and year 2040  threshold, as well as the project VMT prior to mitigation measures, while the Santa Clara Countywide  VMT Evaluation Tool (which incorporates data from the VTA countywide travel demand model) was  used to estimate the VMT reduction resulting from the mitigation measures.    We wanted to point out that OPR’s Technical Advisory on implementing SB 743 states that “When  using models and tools for those various purposes, agencies should use comparable data and  methods, in order to set up an “apples‐to‐apples” comparison between thresholds, VMT estimates,  and VMT mitigation estimates” (page 30).    In reviewing the IS/MND during the public comment period, we weren’t sure from the  documentation provided why the City/Hexagon choose to use the two different data sources, which  is why we recommended in our comment letter that further documentation be provided.  If you are  interested, perhaps we can schedule a call of City staff, Hexagon and VTA staff at some point to  discuss the VMT analysis approach for this project, as well as any best practices to apply to future  projects. I'd be happy to coordinate a meeting if you like.    Regards,  Brent    Brent Pearse (He/Him) Transportation Planner Direct 408-550-4559 Office 408-546-7985 CAUTION: This email originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 Community Development Department Planning Division (408) 846-0451 Draft Revised MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA 95020 City File Number: GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07, CUP 20-02 Post Approval HP 21-03 Project Description: Name of Project: Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Nature of Project: The project includes a general plan amendment (eliminate the planned Cameron Boulevard extension through the property) and the subdivision of the 59.7-acre property into three parcels, with future development occurring in three phases: Phase 1 includes construction of 141,360 square foot delivery station, including 16,824 square feet of office and 124,536 square feet of warehouse; Phase 2 includes construction of a 266,220-square foot industrial building, including 10,000 square feet of office space and 256,220 square feet of warehouse; and Phase 3 would be for future commercial uses, with development proposed as part of Phase 3 subject to a separate CEQA review process. Project Location: Location: Northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Highway (SR 152) and Camino Arroyo. Assessor’s Parcel Number: 841-18-082 Entity or Person(s) Undertaking Project: Name: Steve Beauchamp Address: 8775 Folsom Boulevard, Suite #200, Sacramento, CA 95826 Staff Planner: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner Initial Study: An initial study of this project was undertaken and prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether this project might have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of this study is attached. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 2 Findings & Reasons: The initial study identified potentially significant effects on the environment. However, this project has been mitigated (see Mitigation Measures below which avoid or mitigate the effects) to a point where no significant effects will occur. On the basis of the whole record, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The following reasons will support these findings:  The proposal is a logical component of the existing land use of this area.  Identified adverse impacts are proposed to be mitigated and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program have been prepared.  The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the General Plan of the City of Gilroy.  City staff independently reviewed the Initial Study, and this Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of Gilroy.  With the application of the following Mitigation Measures the proposed project will not have any significant impacts on the environment.  The Gilroy Planning Division is the custodian of the documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based. Mitigation Measures Air Quality AQ-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City Planning Division, the applicant shall provide to the city details of a proposed vehicle reduction program for future employees of the project utilizing the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program, 511.org rideshare program, or other local commuter benefits program. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division AQ-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City Planning Division, the applicant for any phase shall include on the project plans the number of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, dedicated vanpool and other high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) carpool spaces, bike racks, changing rooms and/or lockers on site, which would facilitate the use of ride-sharing and bicycles. Implementation of these measures ensures that the proposed project, as mitigated, is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The proposed project, therefore, does not have aspects that would interfere with or hinder implementation of the 2017 Clean Air Plan. Plan consistency related to GHG emissions is discussed in Section D.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this initial study. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3 Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Biological Resources BIO-1 To avoid/minimize impacts to burrowing owls potentially occurring within the project site, the project applicant shall retain a biologist qualified in ornithology to conduct surveys for burrowing owl. The approved biologist shall conduct a two-visit (i.e., morning and evening) presence/absence survey at areas of suitable habitat on and adjacent to the project site boundary no less than 14 days prior to the start of construction or ground disturbance activities. Surveys shall be conducted according to methods described in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). The applicant shall submit evidence of completion of the preconstruction survey to the City of Gilroy Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. Because burrowing owls occupy habitat year-round, seasonal no-disturbance buffers, as outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012), shall be in place around occupied habitat prior to and during any ground disturbance activities. The following table includes buffer areas based on the time of year and level of disturbance (CDFW 2012), unless a qualified biologist approved by the CDFW verifies through non-invasive measures that either: 1) birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. Location Time of Year Level of Disturbance Buffers (meters) Low Med High Nesting Sites April 1 – Aug 15 200 m 500 m 500 m Nesting Sites Aug 16 – Oct 15 200 m 200 m 500 m Nesting Sites Oct 16 – Mar 31 50 m 100 m 500 m If burrowing owl is found and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion may be conducted by qualified biologists only during the non-breeding season, before breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through non- invasive methods, such as surveillance. Occupied burrows shall be replaced with artificial burrows at a ratio of one collapsed burrow to one constructed artificial burrow (1:1). Evicted burrowing owls may attempt to colonize or re-colonize an area that would be impacted, thus ongoing surveillance during project activities shall be conducted at a rate sufficient to detect burrowing owls if they return. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 4 If surveys locate occupied burrows in or near construction areas, consultation with the CDFW shall occur to interpret survey results and develop a project-specific avoidance and minimization approach. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division BIO-2 To avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through September 15), to the extent feasible, construction activities that include any vegetation removal or ground disturbance (such as grading or grubbing) shall be conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird nesting season. If construction activities commence during the bird nesting season, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey for nesting birds to ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project construction. If construction activities are scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15 for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct nesting bird surveys. Two surveys for active nests of such birds shall occur within 10 days prior to start of construction, with the second survey conducted with 48 hours prior to start of construction. Appropriate minimum survey radius surrounding the work area is typically 250 feet for passerines, 500 feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors. Surveys shall be conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities. If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds daily, or as otherwise required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. This measure shall be implemented by the developer prior to start of construction activities. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division 8.C.l Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 5 BIO-3 Based on the current proposed plans, if the aquatic features shown in the Biological Resources Report and Aquatic Resource Delineation Report (Huffman-Broadway Group, Inc. 2020a, 2020b) are considered jurisdictional by the CDFW and/or RWQCB, the project may require one or more regulatory permits. To determine whether the drainage is considered jurisdictional, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist/wetland regulatory specialist to initiate discussions with the RWQCB and CDFW for this purpose. If impacts to a feature subject to state jurisdiction may occur, fill authorization will be sought from the RWQCB and/or the CDFW if determined necessary through the regulatory agency consultation process. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Geology and Soils GEO-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall incorporate all of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations into the project design, subject to review and approval by the City’s Public Works Department. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Public Works Department GEO-2 The developer shall prepare an erosion control plan that details appropriate methods to prevent and/or minimize erosion. The erosion control plan is subject to the review and approval of the City of Gilroy Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. In addition to the mitigation above, the proposed project would be required to comply with the General Plan Policy PH 2.6 with its Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, which requires all new development proposals to include a site plan detailing appropriate methods of erosion and deposition control during site development and subsequent use; and General Plan Policy PH 3.6, which requires new development to include landscaped areas for reducing runoff and increasing runoff absorption capacities and encourages the use of permeable paving materials, which would minimize the erosive effects of storm water (refer to Sheets C300, C600, and L100 illustrating the drainage management and landscaped areas proposed on the site). Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Public Works Department 8.C.l Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 6 GEO-3 Pursuant to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Condor Earth on July 8, 2020 for the project, the following recommendation shall be implemented in order to reduce impacts related to the potential for expansive soils onsite: The foundation should extend below much of the zone of seasonal moisture variation or be constructed sufficiently stiff to move as rigid units with differential movement of foundations from heaving or settlement reduced to a value compatible with the proposed superstructure type and architectural finishes. The project structural engineer should take this into account when designing the foundations. Provided that the site is graded and all building pads are prepared in accordance with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical study, the conventional shallow foundation system would be appropriate for the proposed building foundations. This recommendation shall be implemented prior to issuance of a grading permit subject to the review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works Department. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Public Works Department Greenhouse Gas GHG-1 If the City of Gilroy has adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the time building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall have the option to incorporate applicable GHG reduction measures identified in the GHG reduction strategy into the proposed project. Applicable measures from the reduction strategy shall be confirmed by the City of Gilroy. If the Planning Division finds that the project is consistent with the GHG reduction strategy, the significant project GHG impact would be reduced to less than significant and no further mitigation would be required. If City has not adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the time building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall implement mitigation measure GHG-2. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division GHG-2 Prior to issuance of building permits for the project proposed the applicant shall prepare a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan shall demonstrate, with substantial evidence, that GHG emissions will be reduced to the year 2022 service population threshold of significance of 4.32 MT CO2e per year per service population. This would require that the unmitigated project emissions of 3,173 MT CO2e per year be reduced by 884 MT CO2e per year [3,173 MT CO2e – (4.32 MT CO2e x 530 service population)] to 2,289 MT CO2e. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 7 The GHG Reduction Plan shall prioritize on-site GHG reduction design features. At a minimum, the Reduction Plan should include the GHG reduction measures listed below. Other feasible reduction measures may be substituted for the measures listed below provided that the City of Gilroy Planning Division Manager finds, based on substantial evidence provided by the applicant, that the substitute measures achieve an equal or greater volume of emissions reduction. Additional measures may be added by the applicant. A combination of the following measures can be included in the Reduction Plan:  Implement the Transportation Demand Management Program strategies identified in mitigation measure TR-1 in this initial study to reduce VMT and associated mobile source GHG emissions from employee travel.  Include sufficient plug-in capabilities for transport refrigeration units, if any, to eliminate the time that a transportation refrigeration system is powered by a fossil-fueled internal combustion engine while at the site.  Exceed minimum CALGreen Code standards for bicycle parking and bicycle lockers; parking spaces dedicated for low-emitting, fuel efficient vehicles; and electric vehicle charging stations.  Design buildings to exceed the current 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency standards by a minimum of five percent.  All appliances installed in all buildings shall be Energy Star rated.  Exceed higher than mandated parking lot lighting and area lighting energy efficient standards.  Electrify truck loading docks. In lieu of or in addition to one or more of the on-site measures above, the applicant may include in the Reduction Plan and take credit for GHG reductions resulting from making direct investments in off-site GHG reduction activities/programs in the vicinity. Examples of direct investments include building retrofit programs that pay for cool roofs, solar panels, solar water heaters, smart meters, energy efficient lighting energy efficient windows, and insulation. Other examples include financing programs for installing electric vehicle charging stations, electrifying school buses, or planting local urban forests. The applicant may choose to retain a qualified air quality / GHG professional to quantify the GHG reductions that would result from implementing the Reduction Plan based on substantial evidence to be included in the Reduction Plan. The GHG reduction measures should be implemented even if their implementation would result in a GHG reduction, but the reduction cannot be reliably quantified. The GHG emissions reduction volume resulting from implementing the Reduction Plan measures may then be subtracted from the required 884 MT CO2e per year reduction volume in order to reduce or avoid the significant GHG impact. 8.C.l Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8 If the applicant elects to quantify the GHG emissions reductions from on-site measures and investments in off-site reduction programs and the reductions are insufficient to reduce project emissions by a minimum of 884 MT CO2e per year or more, the applicant may then secure the balance of the required GHG emissions reduction volume by purchasing and retiring carbon offset credits. The carbon offset credits shall meet the following performance standards:  Carbon offset credits shall be issued by a recognized, reputable and accredited registry that mandates the use of established protocols for quantifying and issuing the offset credits. Credits issued based on protocols approved by CARB should be prioritized. Examples of such registries include the Climate Action Reserve, American Carbon Registry, and Vierra.  The carbon offset credits should be generated from projects developed in the United States. Credits from projects developed internationally should not be used unless the applicant demonstrates with substantial evidence that sufficient carbon offsets from projects in the United States are unavailable. International offsets must be quantified and issued using established protocols that are recognized in the United States and that are issued by recognized, reputable and accredited registries.  All carbon offset credits purchased to reduce GHG emissions, must meet the criteria of being real, quantifiable, permanent, verifiable, enforceable, and additional, consistent with the standards set forth in Health and Safety Code section 38562, subdivisions (d)(1) and (d)(2). Prior to issuing building permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit the GHG Reduction Plan for review and approval of the City of Gilroy Planning Division Manager. The Reduction Plan shall demonstrate that GHG emissions from the project will be substantially reduced. If on-site design and off-site program investments do not result in reducing the GHG impact to less than significant, the applicant shall, prior to approval of occupancy permits, provide documentation in the form of an executed contract or other certification that the balance of emissions reduction required to reduce the GHG impact to less than significant has been obtained through purchase of carbon offset credits, subject to the performance standards listed above. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Hydrology and Water Quality HYDRO-1 The project proponent shall prepare and submit Erosion Control Plans to the City of Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The Erosion Control Plans shall illustrate how the project’s grading phases would prevent or 8.C.l Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 9 minimize erosion and siltation on- and off-site, such as the inclusion of Best Management Practices. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Public Works Department HYDRO-2 The project proponent shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify construction and post-construction Best Management Practices to prevent water pollution at the source. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Public Works Department Transportation/Traffic TR-1 The applicant shall prepare and implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program to reduce the project’s VMT impact to a less-than-significant level. The TDM measures shall include, but not be limited to, any combination of the following components, as necessary to which would reduce the project’s VMT impact to less than significant (i.e., below the established impact threshold of 17.12 miles per job): a. Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedule Program (VTA TP08). This program (compressed work week) allows and encourages employees to telecommute from home when possible, or to shift work schedules to reduce vehicle miles traveled. i. 80% of employees shall be assigned a four day/40-hour work shift. b. Ridesharing Program and Commuter Benefits (VTA TP11, TP13). This program matches employees interested in carpooling who have similar commute patterns. This TDM strategy encourages the use of carpooling, which reduces the number of vehicle trips and thereby reduces VMT. i. Employers shall strive to have 20 percent of eligible employees participate in this program through regular communications and incentives. ii. Incentives shall include, but not be limited to, pre-tax benefits. iii. The applicant shall provide dedicated carpool/vanpool parking spaces commensurate with the number of employees participating in this program. iv. Employers shall provide “Guaranteed Ride Home Services,” which provides employees who regularly (twice a week) carpool, vanpool, bike, 8.C.l Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 10 walk or take transit to work with a free and reliable ride home when one of life’s unexpected emergencies arise. Commuters may take advantage of this service up to four times per year to get home for unexpected emergencies such as a personal illness or a sick child. This service can also be used for unscheduled overtime when the employer mandates working late. c. Provide transit passes to employees interested in public transit. i. Transit passes shall off-set at least 25 percent in the participating employees’ transit costs from home to work and back. d. The applicant shall provide a minimum of 10 bike racks (in a secure area) each, for both the phases of the project. The TDM program shall be prepared prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works Department. The applicant may suggest substitutions to these measures that are equally or more effective than the presented measures. The Director of Planning is authorized to allow an amendment (but is not required to allow such amendment) to the TDM program upon making written findings, supported by substantial evidence, that the substituted measure or measures are as effective as those in the adopted TDM plan and that the amended TDM plan will result in meeting the above-referenced threshold (17.12 miles per job) for reducing VMT from the proposed project to a less- than-significant level. End users of the project shall submit annual monitoring reports to demonstrate effectiveness. Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant and End Users Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division and Public Works Department Tribal Cultural Resources After the proposed MND was sent out for public review, City staff received an email from Kanyon Sayers-Roods, a consultant/tribal monitor on behalf of the Indian Canyon Band of Costanoan Ohlone People. The email was in response to the City’s offer of consultation pursuant to SB18 and AB52. The consultation process was subsequently conducted and completed. No new impacts or potential impacts were identified during the consultation process; however, the following mitigation measures were agreed to among the parties. These mitigation measures are in addition to the City’s standard conditions of approval addressing the unexpected discovery of historic resources, unique archaeological resources, and Native American remains. TC-1 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist or Native American Monitor to conduct Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to the start of grading and construction activities. The applicant shall provide evidence that the training has been 8.C.l Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 11 conducted, prior to issuance of a grading permit, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. TC-2 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist and a qualified Native American Monitor to be present on the project site during ground disturbing activities, which will assist in minimizing potential effects on potential cultural resources and ensure inadvertent impacts are mitigated. The applicant shall provide evidence that the qualified Archaeologist and qualified Native American Monitor will be onsite during ground disturbing activities, prior to issuance of a grading permit and subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall prepare weekly reports regarding the monitoring activities until ground disturbing activities have been completed. If tribal resources are discovered during these activities, all work shall be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the find and the area shall be staked off immediately. The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall evaluate the find. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be formulated by the Archaeologist and Native American Monitor and implemented by the responsible party. Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner Planning Division Kraig.Tambornini@ci.gilroy.ca.us 8.C.l Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Karen L. Garner DIRECTOR Community Development Department 7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197 Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429 http://www.cityofgilroy.org DATE: October 21, 2021 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kraig Tambornini, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Request to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve an industrial planned development project, proposing a new distribution facility, speculative warehouse, and commercial parcel on vacant property located at the northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Highway and Camino Arroyo (GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07, and CUP 20-02) RECOMMENDATION: Staff has analyzed the proposed project, and recommends that the Planning Commission: a) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, based on findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and b) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment GPA 20-01 as requested; and c) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the PUD zoning amendment Z 20-07, subject to certain findings; and d) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Architectural and Site Review permit AS 20-21, subject to certain findings and conditions; and e) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Tentative Map TM 20-07, subject to certain findings and conditions; and f) Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit CUP 20-01, subject to certain findings and conditions. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Steve Beauchamp, of PDC Sacramento LPIV, LLC, submitted zoning applications GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, AS 20-21, TM 20-07 and CUP 20-02 for the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Project located on Renz Lane and Pacheco Pass Highway at the northeast corner of Pacheco Pass Highway 152 and Camino Arroyo ; APN: 841-18-082 8.C.m Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 2 Property Owner: John Machado. The project includes a general plan amendment (to modify the circulation plan removing the future planned Cameron Boulevard roadway segment through the property) and the subdivision of the 59.7-acre property into three parcels, with architectural and site approval, tentative map and a conditional use permit for development in three phases, as follows: ➢ Phase 1 includes construction of a 143,153 square foot delivery station, including ancillary office, and on-site parking for delivery vans; located on proposed Lot 2 (34.1 acres). This use requires a Conditional Use Permit as a distribution facility use in the M2 zone. ➢ Phase 2 includes construction of a 266,220 -square foot industrial warehouse building, including ancillary office space and onsite parking; located on proposed Lot 3 (20.4 acres). ➢ Phase 3 would be for future commercial uses, with development proposed as part of Phase 3 subject to a separate CEQA review process; located on proposed Lot 1 (5.2 acres). The project includes on and offsite improvements including modification to raise and replace PG&E overhead utility lines to match new site grade elevations, an improved bicycle and pedestrian trail leading to West Branch Llagas Creek (future trail), and off- site circulation and frontage improvements. The site is zoned PUD and is not covered by a current development plan approval. This PUD is associated with the larger Pacheco Pass commercial center PUD located along Renz Lane and Camino Arroyo. As such, the site can propose a deviation from the base industrial land use designation. The project must also include PUD amenities, and proposes the following: ✓ An entry feature and future art sculpture at the northeast corner of Camino Arroyo and Highway 152. ✓ Enhanced frontage landscaping and fencing that would be in keeping with the McCarthy Business Park located across Highway 152. ✓ Improvement of a required bicycle trail on the property with connection to Llagas Creek trail. ✓ Landscaping the median in Highway 152. The project does not propose any deviations from the zoning standards and would maintain the existing C3 commercial zoning designation for the portion of property located at the corner of Highway 152 and Camino Arroyo. 8.C.m Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 3 BACKGROUND: Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses. The site is presently vacant and used for crop production. The site history and additional characteristics are as follows: • The property is part of a larger C3/M2 PUD that includes Lowes, Costco and Walmart developments, originally established under Ordinance 94 -12 for the Kimball Small Properties (approx. 97 acres). The Newman Center developed with separate tentative map and architectural and site review planned development permits. • The site is subject to agricultural mitigation pursuant to the City agricultural mitigation policy. • The site contains a drainage channel that flows south and empties into Llagas Creek (aka Miller Slough). • The property is within a Community Facilities District (CFD) established by Ordinance 2001-2. • In 2011, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report and approved a commercial subdivision of the property (TM 04-15 and AS 04-62). However, this project was abandoned. The General plan, zoning and lands uses of the site and adjacent properties are as follows: LOCATION EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING Project Site Vacant/Crops General Industrial C3/M2 PUD North W Branch Llagas Creek Channel/Crops Open Space/Rural County NA South Commercial/Industrial General Services & Gen. Industrial HC/M2/PUD East Industrial General Industrial M2 West Commercial General Services C3 Environmental Assessment: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an initial study was prepared to evaluate any potentially significant adverse effects of the proposed project on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15063(c)(3)(D), the analyses in the General Plan EIR adequately addresses many of the proposed project environmental effects. Where applicable, and where earlier analysis from the General Plan EIR is used, the location of that analysis in the EIR is provided. The initial study identified impacts that were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the EIR pursuant to applicable legal standards, and also has identified whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on th at earlier analysis. The MND discusses the following areas of concern identified as potentially being affected: 8.C.m Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 4 ✓ Agriculture. The project consists of prime farmland that has been designated for General Industrial Land Use. Development must comply with the City Agricultural Mitigation Policy that requires mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for the loss of prime agricultural lands. As such, the project would mitigate any impacts through compliance with existing City policy, included as part of the project standard conditions of approval. Further the General Plan EIR adopted a statement of overriding considerations determining that the benefits of placing industrial uses outweighed the impacts of the loss of prime farmland (p. 3-44). With the adoption of overriding findings, no further analysis of the loss of prime farmland is necessary. ✓ Air Quality. The project would create jobs and introduce new mobile sources of criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from employee vehicles. The site is not consistent with the clean area plan because the primary mode of travel to the site will come from vehicles. To mitigate the impact the employer shall be required to provide a vehicle reduction program to the City for review and approval (AQ1), and provide EV charging stations, dedicated Vanpool/HOV carpool spaces, bike racks and changing rooms and lockers to facilitate ride sharing and bicycles (AQ2). Staff has provided the applicant with information from the BAAQMD and state websites that provide strategies for satisfying AQ1. ✓ Biological Resources. The site is in an area that could provide habitat for Burrowing Owl, and/or various species of Nesting Birds. No species were observed on the site. Nevertheless, protected species could occupy the site prior to construction. Therefore, pre-construction surveys will be required to be conducted with specific measures identified to avoid impacts to any protected species found to occupy the site (BIO1 and BIO2). In addition, the site has an agricultural ditch that would be impacted which could result in loss of protected wetlands/waterways under California Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and Regional Water Quality Control (RWQCD) jurisdiction. The applicant will be required to obtain permits from these agencies, for impacts to protected wetlands/waterways, as deemed necessary by the CDFW and RWQCB (BIO3). ✓ Geology and Soils. The site is subject to seismic ground shaking and potentially expansive soils, as well as erosion during construction. Mitigation is required to ensure the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer are incorporated into the project design, and that an erosion control plan is incorporated into the grading permit (GEO1, GEO2 & GEO3). ✓ Greenhouse Gas. Buildout of the project would generate GHG emissions that exceed an established threshold of significance. The impact is derived by dividing the net project emissions generated by the project (3,173.45 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year) by the number of employees that would occupy the site (530); which results in approximately 5.99 metric tons of CO2e per year per service population. The threshold is the year 2022 ratio of total statewide GHG emissions to statewide service population which equals 4.32. The project must reduce its rate of emissions in 2022 to equal or be low the 2022 threshold to comply with the state’s ability to achieve the SB 32 GHG reduction 8.C.m Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 5 target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The project will be required to prepare and implement a GHG reduction plan that would include incorporation of traffic demand management program, exceedance of CALGreen codes, among other strategies. Should the project still exceed the threshold with these measures, the project shall purchase carbon offset credits from an acceptable source, as documented in the MND, for the balance of emissions (GHG1, GHG 2). ✓ Hydrology and Water Quality. Development of the site could lead to erosion or siltation during construction. The project must prepare and implement erosion control plans, and a stormwater pollution prevention plan for review and approval by the City, which would mitigate the impact (HYDRO1, HYDRO2). ✓ Transportation/Traffic. Traffic impacts are measured based on the daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by employees. The City has set its draft VMT threshold at 15-percent below the current average employment VMT of 20.14 miles per job, which equates to a threshold of 17.12. The project would result in a VMT of 19.23 miles per job. The project required Transportation Demand Management program discussed in the MND would provide the ability to reduce VMT below the threshold (TR1). On July 26, 2021, the applicant agreed to the recommended mitigation measures to address the identified adverse effects. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was circulated and made available for on the Planning Division webpage (www.cityofgilroy.org/planning) for the requisite comment period, from July 30, 2021 through August 30, 2021. Additionally, notices were published in the Gilroy Dispatch, posted on the state website CEQAnet (ca.gov) and county CEQA Postings - Office of the County Clerk-Recorder - County of Santa Clara (sccgov.org), and posted at the Gilroy Public Library. Comments on the draft environmental document were received, including comments from responsible and trustee agencies Santa Clara County Valley Water District, Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority, Caltrans. Letters received on the environmental document are included with the attached response to comments document prepared by the City Environmental Consultant , EMC, dated October 4, 2021. EMC has provided minor clarifications to the environmental document and Mitigation Measure TR-1, as shown the Draft Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration. In addition, Mitigation TC-1 and TC-2 have been incorporated into the mitigation program in response to tribal consultation on the project. As revised, no significant adverse affects are expected to result from the proposed development, and the Planning Commission can make findings to adopt the revised document. Additionally, an email from PG&E was forwarded to the City on September 16, 2021 that clarified the existing wood poles would be replaced with metal poles. Staff has asked the environmental consultant to provide a separate letter responding to this item. The consultants review of this minor change in the project will be provided to the Planning Commission by separate transmittal prior to or at the meeting. 8.C.m Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 6 DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS: General Plan Consistency (GP 20-01) The City's General Plan designates the subject site for General Industrial uses, which supports the proposed project request. As such, the proposal conforms to the key goals and policies that pertain to the proposed project, which are listed and discussed in the attached General Plan Compliance Table. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed amendment to Mobility Element Figure M1 and M2, for planned extension of Cameron Blvd. Removal of this planned extension has been analyzed in the June 16, 2021 Project Traffic Analysis (TA), p. 24 -58. The modification would not materially affect the planned circulation system and is supported based on the fact the properties that this road was intended to serve are no longer within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary. Zoning Code Conformance (Z 20-07). The proposed development is located in the C3/M2 PUD zone district. The establishment of the PUD development plan for this site also requires a zone change, consistent with the requirements of the PUD ordinance, given that the current PUD has no adopted standards for the site. In accordance with the Gilroy City Code (GCC), PUD development requires an approved Architectural and Site Review/Planned Unit Development Permit (AS/PUD). A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is also being required for the distribution facility use, consistent with the base M2 zoning table. The CUP and AS permit entitlements along with a concurrent Tentative Map application request are discussed further below. The following table confirms the new industrial buildings would be consistent the M2 development standards, with no PUD exceptions requested, as follows: STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED CONFORMS Lot Coverage 60% Max Lot 1 = Vacant Lot 2 = below 10% Lot 3 = below 31% Yes Front Yard 41’ from curb (Hwy 152) Over 250 feet Yes Street Side 31’ from curb (Renz) Over 100 feet Yes Side Yard None Over 100 feet Yes Rear Yard None Over 30 feet Yes Height 75’/6 stories Lot 2 = 45’6” Lot 3 = 36’-45’ Yes Lot 1 is for future commercial development. Lot 2 contains the Phase 1 distribution facility building. Lot 3 contains the future warehouse building. Architectural and Site Review (AS 20-21) 8.C.m Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 7 As noted in the development standards review above, the project is not requesting any deviations from the zoning district development standards. Future development of the commercial parcel would require a separate administrative Architectural and Site Plan approval, subject to review for compliance with the C3 base zoning district standards and land uses, and design compatibility with the Pacheco Pass Center. The following review of the industrial buildings on Lot 2 and Lot 3 is provided pursuant to the criteria in Zoning Code Sections 30.50.40 and 30.50.50: a) Traffic Safety and Efficiency. The site has been evaluated by the City Traffic Engineer, preliminary plans have been discussed with Caltrans and a detailed Traffic Analysis has been prepared. The environmental document and general plan compliance table discuss compliance with applicable requirements. As proposed, and with mitigations and conditions of approval, the project would not create any traffic safety issues and may be supported. b) Signs. The project includes minimal directional and wayfinding signage, and future building identification signage that would comply with the Sign Regulations in Chapter 30.37. A separate sign permit will be required for future signage. Therefore, staff supports the proposal on the basis that subsequent sign permits will be obtained for building signage. c) Site Development. The applicable criteria are discussed as follows: i) Vehicle and Pedestrian Access. The project includes new driveways and sidewalk improvements designed in compliance with Municipal Code Chapter 20 and City Standards of the Public Works Department. ii) Parcel Map. A Tentative Map has been requested which will include appropriate easements and agreements for access between the three lots. iii) Setbacks. The project exceeds the M2 standards as noted in the zoning compliance table above. Additionally, setbacks from the drainage channel are required and provided in compliance with Chapter 12.6 (Habitat Conservation) and Chapter 27A (Stream Protection) per the municipal code. A minimum 35- foot setback from the drainage channel proposed, which is consistent with the City code and Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan. A separate Habitat Permit is being processed and will be completed prior to issuance of grading permits to confirm compliance with the habitat plan, which addresses the required stream setbacks. iv) Parking Supply. The Industrial parking standards section 30.31.26 requires 1 stall per 350 square feet of gross floor are for speculative buildings and 1 stall per 5,000 square feet of gross floor area for bu ildings over 10,000 square feet. The parking supply has been evaluated and deemed adequate for the buildings as follows: 8.C.m Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8 (1) Phase 1 (Lot 2) – Distribution Facility: The building plan proposes 312 parking spaces for employees, which is anticipated to meet peak shift demand of the facility. The parking supply and demand will be regulated by the Conditional Use Permit and is deemed acceptable. In addition, the facility will have 658 van parking stalls for facility delivery vans. A parking summary is provided on Architectural Plan Sheet A0.5. (2) Phase 2 (Lot 3) – Future Warehouse: A total of 204 parking spaces are proposed for the 266,220 square foot building 2. If the building were parked at the speculative warehouse rate the facility would require over 700 spaces. If parked as one large warehouse facility it would require only 53 spaces. The expectation for this building is that it would be occupied by multiple light industrial business tenants. If calculated at the small warehouse building rate, the total demand would equate to 266 parking spaces. It is reasonable to expect the building will have a range of small and large tenants, thus the parking supply is considered sufficient. Staff would review the parking when new businesses occupy the site, at time of building permit or business license to ensure parking demand does not exceed the supply. v) Parking Design. The parking lot for employees and visitors complies with the City minimum standard dimensions for 9’ wide by 18’ deep spaces, with 25 feet backup space and shade trees every 12 spaces. vi) Loading. (1) The Phase 1 distribution facility operations include van loading area for 67 delivery vans, staging area for 72 vehicles, 15 truck loading areas and 13 trailer parking spaces. The proposal is designed specifically to meet the needs of the facility operations (2) The Phase 2 future warehouse includes loading dock doors consistent with a traditional warehouse facility, in compliance with City standards and expectations. vii) Architectural Design. The City adopted Industrial Design Guidelines Microsoft Word - industrial_design_guidelines.doc (cityofgilroy.org) have been considered for the project and based on review of the site plan, parking, and landscaping details, the project would satisfy the applicable criteria. The project includes trash enclosure areas, equipment screening and designated areas for vehicle parking and loading activities that are 8.C.m Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 9 considered appropriate. No outdoor storage areas are proposed. The buildings have been designed to present the office entryways facing SR 152 with loading and work areas to the interior and rear sides of the site. Further, significant landscape screening is proposed including screen trees along the western boundary and along SR 152. d) Landscaping: The project exceeds the industrial zone landscape requirements of Section 30.38.70. Plans include screen materials and trees along the site boundary, street trees on SR 152 consistent with Chapter 26.5-1 requirements and City expectations, as well as attractive fencing along the pedestrian trail and sidewalks. e) PUD Intent and Requirement for Project Amenities: Zoning Ordinance section 30.26.10 intent is to promote a comprehensive and cohesive plan for efficient and economical development of properties, while allowing for flexibility in standards or land use mix. The project would promote anticipated land uses for the site including retaining commercial use at the corner of the site, pursuant to the current zoning. PUD Amenities. The PUD requires a higher standards of amenities with increased open space and public amenities. As part of the PUD application, the following amenities are recommended to satisfy the PUD application: • Enhanced landscaping along SR 152 with street trees, low pedestrian fence in and groundcover in the right of way in keeping with McCarthy Business Park to the south. • Entry trellis feature and installation of public art, not to exceed a cost of $40,000 located at the corner of Camino Arroyo and SR 152 on Lot 1, commercial parcel. • Irrigate, landscape and provide for establishment and maintenance of landscaping within the SR 152 median in front of the project site, subject to approval of an agreement with Caltrans for installation and maintenance. • Provide a fully improved bicycle and pedestrian path along the western boundary from Renz Lane to connect to Llagas Creek channel, provide area for a ramp connection and install or fund future installation of a connection to a future path along the channel. Staff has evaluated the criteria and findings and based on the discussion herein, staff supports a recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission with the recommended findings and conditions in the draft resolution attached to this staff report Conditional Use Permit (CUP 20-02) The Distribution Facility Phase 1 building on Lot 2 proposes a 24-hour fulfillment center use. Pursuant to the M2 Land use tables a CUP is required. Section 30.50.30(b) provides that the Planning Commission shall approve a CUP as follows: 8.C.m Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 10 (1) If the proposed use is properly located in relation to the general plan and to the community as a whole and to other land uses and to transportation and service facilities in the vicinity. And, (2) If the proposed use, subject to conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity, or cause any damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property. Conditions can be applied to ensure the project will be implemented as proposed, and to support the findings. This could include additional requirements for screening or limitations on operations deemed necessary to ensure compatibility with the City standards and surrounding land uses. Staff has included conditions of approval as part of the CUP to address the following operational items: • The Statement of Operations propose to schedule peak shifts to avoid the peak traffic periods in the City. Staff supports the proposal with the limitations on shifts during the 24-hour operations consistent with the statement of operations. • Consistent with the limitation on peak hour staffing, the maximum traffic volume shall not exceed the Traffic Analysis estimates of 95 AM peak hour and 132 PM peak hour weekday trips and 173 Saturday peak hour trips. The AM peak hour is between 7am and 9am. The PM peak hour is 4pm to 6pm. The Saturday peak hour is between 11am and 2pm. • The roadway pavement along the primary truck routes used by the facility shall be upgraded with an asphalt overlay or other improvement as recommended by the City Engineer prior to operations. Tentative Map (TM 20-07): The project proposes two large industrial parcels and one small commercial lot. The Tentative Map was distributed for consideration by various departments and utility agencies. Standard comments received have been incorporated into the plans and recommended conditions of approval. a) Site Access and Circulation. Each lot has frontage on a major street with secondary access from Renz Lane. Access to Lot 1 has been studied and would be accessible from Camino Arroyo, at the farthest point from the intersection. Access to Lots 2 and 3 would be from Pacheco Pass Highway (SR 152). Caltrans would approve driveway access and associated improvements. Lot 2 would be accessible from east and west on SR 152 at Cameron Boulevard, signalized intersection. 8.C.m Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 11 Lot 3 would require approval of a left turn signal for emergency vehicles, or a bridge connecting to the site from the Lot 2 entrance. This requirement is reflected on the plans and project conditions of approval. b) Property Dedications and Easements: The project would provide cross lot access agreements across Lot 2 benefitting Lot 1 and Lot 3 to maintain secondary access via Renz Lane. A trail access and future connection to Llagas Creek also are required with area dedicated for construction of a ramp up to the top of the Llagas Creek levee. In accordance with Gilroy City Code and the subdivision map act section 66474, staff has evaluated each of the required findings. Based on the discussion herein, staff supports a recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission with the recommended findings and conditions included in the resolution attached to this staff report. In particular, staff has recommended conditions to address the following: • Initial approval of a tentative map is valid for twenty-four (24) months. Such approval may only be extended at the Council’s discretion. • The dedications and easements described above shall be included with the final map. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Project plans were routed to Engineering, Building, Police, and Fire, Santa Clara Regional Waste Management Authority and Valley Water representatives for review and comment. Recommendations of the TAC members have been incorporated into the project plans and/or are included as recommended conditions in attached resolution(s). PUBLIC NOTICING: Property owner information (i.e. list, labels, and map) within 500 feet of the subject site were generated by Chicago Title Company using current ownership data. On October 7, 2021, notices of this Planning Commission meeting were sent via mail to the property owners and by mail or email to other interested parties and agencies. In addition, notice was published in the Mercury News and Gilroy Dispatch a minimum of 10 days prior to the public hearing, the property has been posted with on-site signage notifying passersby of pending development, and the Planning Commission public hearing packets are available through the City's webpage. If any additional comments are received they will be either provided with the agenda packet or at the meeting. APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Planning Commission's action is not final, but rather a recommendation. As such, the matter will be considered by the City Council at a later date. Attachments: 8.C.m Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 12 1. Vicinity Map 2. Project Description 3. Site and Architectural Plans 4. Tentative Map and Civil Plans 5. Landscaping and Lighting Plans 6. Sign Details, Colors and Materials and Photos 7. General Plan Compliance Table 8. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Links) 9. IS/MND Response to Comments, Revised MND 10. Response to PGE Comments 101321 11. PC Resolution 1 - Adoption of ISMND 12. PC Resolution 2 - Amend General Plan Mobility Element 13. PC Resolution 2 - Exhibit A Mobility Figure 1 and 2 14. PC Resolution 3 - Zone Amendment PUD Approval 15. PC Resolution 4 - AS 20-21 Approval 16. PC Resolution 4 - Attachment B Project Garlic MMRP 17. PC Resolution 5 - Conditional Use Permit Approval 18. PC Resolution 6 - Tentative Map Approval 8.C.m Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report 10212021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-13 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH# 2021070525) AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PURPOSES OF APPROVING CUP 20-02 FOR THE PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RELATED APPLICATIONS GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, TM 20-07 AND AS 20- 21 FILED BY STEVE BEAUCHAMP, PANATTTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B,. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment, general plan amendment, architectural and site review, conditional use permit and tentative map for 59.7 acres of property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and circulated for public review for 30 days; and WHEREAS, environmental mitigation measures were agreed to by the applicant as contained in a draft mitigated negative declaration (MND) environmental document prepared for the project, and in compliance with the requirements of CEQA the MND was published, noticed and circulated for a 30-day public review period from July 30, 2021 through August 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, responses to comments received on the MND environmental document were prepared and provided to the Planning Commission for consideration with the draft MND and project entitlements, resulting in no substantial changes to the analysis, conclusions and determinations of the environmental document; and 8.C.n Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-13 WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings, adopting the mitigated negative declaration for the Project: 1. Prior to taking action and approving the project the Planning Commission has independently reviewed and considered the initial study/negative declaration and other information in the record. 2. As documented in the staff report and project record, the initial study/mitigated negative declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and consistent with the state and local guidelines and thresholds of significance. 3. The initial study/mitigated negative declaration represents the independent judgment and analysis of the City as lead agency for the project. 4. Incorporation of the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project would or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environmental would occur, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for incorporate with the project entitlements. 5. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as proposed together with project conditions and mitigation measures, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the project approval is based is the Community Development Department, Planning Division. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021060521), inclusive of the 8.C.n Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program which is attached as Exhibit A hereto, as the environmental review document for the project. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bhandal, Doyle, Lewis, Ridley, Fischer NOES: None ABSTAIN: Elle ABSENT: Jezabel-Moreno, ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________________ __________________________________ Karen L Garner, Director Tom Fischer, Chairperson 8.C.n Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -4- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-13 Exhibit A – Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 8.C.n Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  1  PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Introduction CEQA Guidelines section 15097 requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring  programs when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a  negative declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse  environmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to ensure  compliance with conditions of project approval during project implementation in order to  avoid significant adverse environmental effects.  The law was passed in response to historic non‐implementation of mitigation measures  presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as conditions of project  approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation measures are implemented and  thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.  A definitive set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and  enforcement procedures to ensure the measureʹs compliance. This monitoring program is  designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and subsequent  conditions of project approval are implemented.   Monitoring Program This monitoring program is applicable to the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision based on  the mitigation measures included in the adopted mitigated negative declaration. These  mitigation measures are designed to eliminate or reduce significant adverse environmental  effects to less‐than‐significant levels. These mitigation measures become conditions of project  approval, which the project proponent is required to complete during and after  implementation of the proposed project. The attached checklist is intended for monitoring  the implementation of the adopted mitigation measures.  Monitoring Program Procedures The City of Gilroy shall use the attached monitoring checklist for the proposed project. The  monitoring program should be implemented as follows:  1. The Gilroy Community Development Department should be responsible for  coordination of the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The  Community Development Department should be responsible for completing the  monitoring checklist and distributing the checklist to the responsible individuals or  agencies for their use in monitoring the mitigation measures.  8.C.n Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  2  2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsible for determining  whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have been  complied with. Once all mitigation measures have been complied with, the  responsible individual or agency should submit a copy of the monitoring checklist  to the Community Development Department to be placed in the project file. If the  mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist should  not be returned to the Community Development Department.  3. The Gilroy Community Development Department will review the checklist to  ensure that appropriate mitigation measures and additional conditions of project  approval included in the monitoring checklist have been complied with at the  appropriate time, e.g., prior to issuance of a use permit, etc. Compliance with  mitigation measures is required for project approvals.  4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non‐compliance has  occurred, a written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project  proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Community Development  Department, describing the non‐compliance and requiring compliance within a  specified period of time. If non‐compliance still exists at the expiration of the  specified period of time, construction may be halted and fines may be imposed at  the discretion of the City of Gilroy.   Mitigation Monitoring Checklist Step 1 Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits or Start of Construction Activities and  During Construction Where Noted  Mitigation Measure BIO‐1 To avoid/minimize impacts to burrowing owls potentially occurring within the  project site, the project applicant shall retain a biologist qualified in ornithology to  conduct surveys for burrowing owl. The approved biologist shall conduct a two‐ visit (i.e., morning and evening) presence/absence survey at areas of suitable  habitat on and adjacent to the project site boundary no less than 14 days prior to  the start of construction or ground disturbance activities. Surveys shall be  conducted according to methods described in the Burrowing Owl Survey  Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993)  and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). The applicant  shall submit evidence of completion of the preconstruction survey to the City of  Gilroy Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. Because  burrowing owls occupy habitat year‐round, seasonal no‐disturbance buffers, as  outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines  (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012),  8.C.n Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  3  shall be in place around occupied habitat prior to and during any ground  disturbance activities. The following table includes buffer areas based on the time  of year and level of disturbance (CDFW 2012), unless a qualified biologist  approved by the CDFW verifies through non‐invasive measures that either: 1)  birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the  occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent  survival.   Location Time of Year Level of Disturbance Buffers (meters) Low Med High Nesting Sites April 1 – Aug 15 200 m 500 m 500 m Nesting Sites Aug 16 – Oct 15 200 m 200 m 500 m Nesting Sites Oct 16 – Mar 31 50 m 100 m 500 m If burrowing owl is found and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion may  be conducted by qualified biologists only during the non‐breeding season, before  breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through  non‐invasive methods, such as surveillance. Occupied burrows shall be replaced  with artificial burrows at a ratio of one collapsed burrow to one constructed  artificial burrow (1:1). Evicted burrowing owls may attempt to colonize or re‐ colonize an area that would be impacted, thus ongoing surveillance during  project activities shall be conducted at a rate sufficient to detect burrowing owls if  they return.   If surveys locate occupied burrows in or near construction areas, consultation  with the CDFW shall occur to interpret survey results and develop a project‐ specific avoidance and minimization approach.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure BIO‐2 To avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through  September 15), to the extent feasible, construction activities that include any  vegetation removal or ground disturbance (such as grading or grubbing) shall be  conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird  8.C.n Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  4  nesting season. If construction activities commence during the bird nesting  season, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre‐construction survey for  nesting birds to ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project  construction.  If construction activities are scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to  August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15  for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist  shall conduct nesting bird surveys. Two surveys for active nests of such birds  shall occur within 10 days prior to start of construction, with the second survey  conducted with 48 hours prior to start of construction. Appropriate minimum  survey radius surrounding the work area is typically 250 feet for passerines, 500  feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors. Surveys shall be  conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities.  If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in  nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active  construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and  maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to  construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each  nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which  allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor  the nesting birds daily, or as otherwise required by the California Department of  Fish and Wildlife, during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds  show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and  vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the  nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction  foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until  the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. This measure shall be  implemented by the developer prior to start of construction activities.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.n Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  5  Mitigation Measure BIO‐3 Based on the current proposed plans, if the aquatic features shown in the  Biological Resources Report and Aquatic Resource Delineation Report (Huffman‐ Broadway Group, Inc. 2020a, 2020b) are considered jurisdictional by the CDFW  and/or RWQCB, the project may require one or more regulatory permits. To  determine whether the drainage is considered jurisdictional, the applicant shall  retain a qualified biologist/wetland regulatory specialist to initiate discussions  with the RWQCB and CDFW for this purpose.   If impacts to a feature subject to state jurisdiction may occur, fill authorization  will be sought from the RWQCB and/or the CDFW if determined necessary  through the regulatory agency consultation process.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall incorporate all of the  geotechnical engineer’s recommendations into the project design, subject to  review and approval by the City’s Public Works Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐2 The developer shall prepare an erosion control plan that details appropriate  methods to prevent and/or minimize erosion. The erosion control plan is subject  to the review and approval of the City of Gilroy Public Works Department prior  to the issuance of a grading permit.    8.C.n Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  6  In addition to the mitigation above, the proposed project would be required to  comply with the General Plan Policy PH 2.6 with its Preliminary Grading and  Drainage Plan, which requires all new development proposals to include a site  plan detailing appropriate methods of erosion and deposition control during site  development and subsequent use; and General Plan Policy PH 3.6, which requires  new development to include landscaped areas for reducing runoff and increasing  runoff absorption capacities and encourages the use of permeable paving  materials, which would minimize the erosive effects of storm water (refer to  Sheets C300, C600, and L100 illustrating the drainage management and  landscaped areas proposed on the site).  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐3 Pursuant to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Condor Earth on  July 8, 2020 for the project, the following recommendation shall be implemented  in order to reduce impacts related to the potential for expansive soils onsite:  The foundation should extend below much of the zone of seasonal moisture  variation or be constructed sufficiently stiff to move as rigid units with  differential movement of foundations from heaving or settlement reduced to a  value compatible with the proposed superstructure type and architectural  finishes. The project structural engineer should take this into account when  designing the foundations. Provided that the site is graded and all building pads  are prepared in accordance with the recommendations provided in the  geotechnical study, the conventional shallow foundation system would be  appropriate for the proposed building foundations.  This recommendation shall be implemented prior to issuance of a grading permit  subject to the review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works  Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:   8.C.n Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  7                                            Mitigation Measure HYDRO‐1 The project proponent shall prepare and submit Erosion Control Plans to the City  of Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The  Erosion Control Plans shall illustrate how the project’s grading phases would  prevent or minimize erosion and siltation on‐ and off‐site, such as the inclusion of  Best Management Practices.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer   Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure HYDRO‐2 The project proponent shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan for review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works  Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan shall identify construction and post‐construction Best  Management Practices to prevent water pollution at the source.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             After the proposed MND was sent out for public review, City staff received an email from  Kanyon Sayers‐Roods, a consultant/tribal monitor on behalf of the Indian Canyon Band of  Costanoan Ohlone People. The email was in response to the City’s offer of consultation  pursuant to SB18 and AB52. The consultation process was subsequently conducted and  completed. No new impacts or potential impacts were identified during the consultation  8.C.n Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  8  process; however, the following mitigation measures were agreed to among the parties.  These mitigation measures are in addition to the City’s standard conditions of approval  addressing the unexpected discovery of historic resources, unique archaeological resources,  and Native American remains.  Mitigation Measure TC‐1 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist or Native American  Monitor to conduct Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to the start of grading and  construction activities. The applicant shall provide evidence that the training has  been conducted, prior to issuance of a grading permit, subject to review and  approval by the Planning Division.  TC‐2 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist and a qualified Native  American Monitor to be present on the project site during ground disturbing  activities, which will assist in minimizing potential effects on potential cultural  resources and ensure inadvertent impacts are mitigated. The applicant shall  provide evidence that the qualified Archaeologist and qualified Native American  Monitor will be onsite during ground disturbing activities, prior to issuance of a  grading permit and subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.  The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall prepare weekly reports  regarding the monitoring activities until ground disturbing activities have been  completed. If tribal resources are discovered during these activities, all work shall  be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the find and the area shall be  staked off immediately. The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall  evaluate the find. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate  mitigation measures shall be formulated by the Archaeologist and Native  American Monitor and implemented by the responsible party.    8.C.n Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  9  Step 2 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits  Mitigation Measure AQ‐1 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant shall provide to the city details of a proposed  vehicle reduction program for future employees of the project utilizing the Bay  Area Commuter Benefits Program, 511.org rideshare program, or other local  commuter benefits program.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure AQ‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant for any phase shall include on the project plans  the number of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, dedicated vanpool and  other high‐occupancy vehicle (HOV) carpool spaces, bike racks, changing rooms  and/or lockers on site, which would facilitate the use of ride‐sharing and bicycles.    Implementation of these measures ensures that the proposed project, as  mitigated, is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The proposed project,  therefore, does not have aspects that would interfere with or hinder  implementation of the 2017 Clean Air Plan. Plan consistency related to GHG  emissions is discussed in Section D.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this initial  study.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.n Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  10  Mitigation Measure GHG‐1 If the City of Gilroy has adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the  time building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall have the  option to incorporate applicable GHG reduction measures identified in the GHG  reduction strategy into the proposed project. Applicable measures from the  reduction strategy shall be confirmed by the City of Gilroy. If the Planning  Division finds that the project is consistent with the GHG reduction strategy, the  significant project GHG impact would be reduced to less than significant and no  further mitigation would be required.   If City has not adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the time  building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall implement  mitigation measure GHG‐2.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GHG‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits for the project proposed the applicant shall  prepare a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan shall  demonstrate, with substantial evidence, that GHG emissions will be reduced to  the year 2022 service population threshold of significance of 4.32 MT CO2e per  year per service population. This would require that the unmitigated project  emissions of 3,173 MT CO2e per year be reduced by 884 MT CO2e per year [3,173  MT CO2e – (4.32 MT CO2e x 530 service population)] to 2,289 MT CO2e.  The GHG Reduction Plan shall prioritize on‐site GHG reduction design features.  At a minimum, the Reduction Plan should include the GHG reduction measures  listed below. Other feasible reduction measures may be substituted for the  measures listed below provided that the City of Gilroy Planning Division  Manager finds, based on substantial evidence provided by the applicant, that the  substitute measures achieve an equal or greater volume of emissions reduction.  Additional measures may be added by the applicant. A combination of the  following measures can be included in the Reduction Plan:  8.C.n Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  11   Implement the Transportation Demand Management Program strategies  identified in mitigation measure TR‐1 in this initial study to reduce VMT and  associated mobile source GHG emissions from employee travel.   Include sufficient plug‐in capabilities for transport refrigeration units, if any,  to eliminate the time that a transportation refrigeration system is powered by  a fossil‐fueled internal combustion engine while at the site.   Exceed minimum CALGreen Code standards for bicycle parking and bicycle  lockers; parking spaces dedicated for low‐emitting, fuel efficient vehicles; and  electric vehicle charging stations.   Design buildings to exceed the current 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency  standards by a minimum of five percent.   All appliances installed in all buildings shall be Energy Star rated.     Exceed higher than mandated parking lot lighting and area lighting energy  efficient standards.   Electrify truck loading docks.  In lieu of or in addition to one or more of the on‐site measures above, the  applicant may include in the Reduction Plan and take credit for GHG reductions  resulting from making direct investments in off‐site GHG reduction  activities/programs in the vicinity. Examples of direct investments include  building retrofit programs that pay for cool roofs, solar panels, solar water  heaters, smart meters, energy efficient lighting energy efficient windows, and  insulation. Other examples include financing programs for installing electric  vehicle charging stations, electrifying school buses, or planting local urban  forests.  The applicant may choose to retain a qualified air quality / GHG professional to  quantify the GHG reductions that would result from implementing the Reduction  Plan based on substantial evidence to be included in the Reduction Plan. The  GHG reduction measures should be implemented even if their implementation  would result in a GHG reduction, but the reduction cannot be reliably quantified.  The GHG emissions reduction volume resulting from implementing the  Reduction Plan measures may then be subtracted from the required 884 MT CO2e  per year reduction volume in order to reduce or avoid the significant GHG  impact.   If the applicant elects to quantify the GHG emissions reductions from on‐site  measures and investments in off‐site reduction programs and the reductions are  insufficient to reduce project emissions by a minimum of 884 MT CO2e per year  8.C.n Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  12  or more, the applicant may then secure the balance of the required GHG  emissions reduction volume by purchasing and retiring carbon offset credits. The  carbon offset credits shall meet the following performance standards:   Carbon offset credits shall be issued by a recognized, reputable and  accredited registry that mandates the use of established protocols for  quantifying and issuing the offset credits. Credits issued based on protocols  approved by CARB should be prioritized. Examples of such registries  include the Climate Action Reserve, American Carbon Registry, and Vierra.    The carbon offset credits should be generated from projects developed in the  United States. Credits from projects developed internationally should not be  used unless the applicant demonstrates with substantial evidence that  sufficient carbon offsets from projects in the United States are unavailable.  International offsets must be quantified and issued using established  protocols that are recognized in the United States and that are issued by  recognized, reputable and accredited registries.    All carbon offset credits purchased to reduce GHG emissions, must meet the  criteria of being real, quantifiable, permanent, verifiable, enforceable, and  additional, consistent with the standards set forth in Health and Safety Code  section 38562, subdivisions (d)(1) and (d)(2).    Prior to issuing building permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit  the GHG Reduction Plan for review and approval of the City of Gilroy Planning Division  Manager. The Reduction Plan shall demonstrate that GHG emissions from the project will be  substantially reduced. If on‐site design and off‐site program investments do not result in  reducing the GHG impact to less than significant, the applicant shall, prior to approval of  occupancy permits, provide documentation in the form of an executed contract or other  certification that the balance of emissions reduction required to reduce the GHG impact to  less than significant has been obtained through purchase of carbon offset credits, subject to  the performance standards listed above.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.n Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  13  Step 3 Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit  Mitigation Measure TR‐1 The applicant shall prepare and implement a Transportation Demand  Management (TDM) program to reduce the project’s VMT impact to a less‐than‐ significant level. The TDM measures shall include, but not be limited to, any  combination of the following components, as necessary to which would reduce  the project’s VMT impact to less than significant (i.e., below the established  impact threshold of 17.12 miles per job):  a. Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedule Program (VTA TP08). This  program (compressed work week) allows and encourages employees to  telecommute from home when possible, or to shift work schedules to reduce  vehicle miles traveled.  i. 80% of employees shall be assigned a four day/40‐hour work shift.  b. Ridesharing Program and Commuter Benefits (VTA TP11, TP13). This  program matches employees interested in carpooling who have similar  commute patterns. This TDM strategy encourages the use of carpooling,  which reduces the number of vehicle trips and thereby reduces VMT.   i. Employers shall strive to have 20 percent of eligible employees  participate in this program through regular communications and  incentives.  ii. Incentives shall include, but not be limited to, pre‐tax benefits.  iii. The applicant shall provide dedicated carpool/vanpool parking spaces  commensurate with the number of employees participating in this  program.  iv. Employers shall provide “Guaranteed Ride Home Services,” which  provides employees who regularly (twice a week) carpool, vanpool,  bike, walk or take transit to work with a free and reliable ride home  when one of life’s unexpected emergencies arise. Commuters may take  advantage of this service up to four times per year to get home for  unexpected emergencies such as a personal illness or a sick child. This  service can also be used for unscheduled overtime when the employer  mandates working late.  c. Provide transit passes to employees interested in public transit.  i. Transit passes shall off‐set at least 25 percent in the participating  employees’ transit costs from home to work and back.  8.C.n Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  14  d. The applicant shall provide a minimum of 10 bike racks (in a secure area)  each, for both the phases of the project.   The TDM program shall be prepared prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,  subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works  Department. The applicant may suggest substitutions to these measures that are  equally or more effective than the presented measures. The Director of Planning  is authorized to allow an amendment (but is not required to allow such  amendment) to the TDM program upon making written findings, supported by  substantial evidence, that the substituted measure or measures are as effective as  those in the adopted TDM plan and that the amended TDM plan will result in  meeting the above‐referenced threshold (17.12 miles per job) for reducing VMT  from the proposed project to a less‐than‐significant level.    End users of the project shall submit annual monitoring reports to demonstrate  effectiveness.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant and End Users  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division and Public Works  Department  Monitoring Notes:                                               8.C.n Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-13 MND (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-18 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GILROY GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DISTRIBUTION FACILITY USE LOCATED ON PROPOSED LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON TM 20-07 FOR THAT CERTAIN 59.7 ACRE PARCEL AT THE EAST END OF RENZ LANE, EAST OF CAMINO ARROYO BETWEEN W BRANCH LLAGAS CREEK AND NORTH OF SR 152, 841-18-082. FILE NUMBER CUP 20- 02. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment to establish C3/M2 standards, general plan amendment to amend the mobility element, architectural and site review for site development and planned unit development permit, conditional use permit for a distribution facility use on Lot 2, and tentative map to create three separate lots for the 59.7 acre property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommended for adoption as the project environmental document by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project entitlements, including the conditional use permit CUP 20-02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby find as follows: FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is properly located in relation to the general plan and to the community as a whole and to other land uses and to transportation and service facilities in the vicinity given that the property on which the use would operate will have adequate vehicular access from Renz Lane and SR 152. 2. The proposed use, if it complies with all conditions upon which approval is made contingent, will not adversely affect other property in the vicinity, or cause any damage, hazard, or nuisance to persons or property given that conditions have been established to regulate the delivery schedules to avoid generating significant traffic during peak AM, PM and Saturday 8.C.o Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-18 CUP 20-02 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX peak hours, and to require upgrading of primary truck routes prior to operations to accommodate the additional increased truck traffic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy hereby approves CUP 20-02 subject to action by the City Council granting approval of the related project applications GPA 20-01, Z 20-07 and AS 20-21, and the conditions attached hereto as Attachment A. If the City Council does not approve the related project entitlements, this conditional use permit approval shall be deemed null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Bhandal, Doyle, Lewis, Ridley, Fischer NOES: None ABSTAIN: Elle ABSENT: Jezabel-Moreno, ATTEST: APPROVED: _________________________________ __________________________________ Karen L. Garner, Secretary Tom Fischer, Chairperson 8.C.o Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-18 CUP 20-02 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX ATTACHMENT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 20-02 PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. The distribution facility use is approved on Lot 2 of TM 20-07, for an approximately 141,360 square foot delivery station on a 33.7-acre site, subject to compliance with the statement of operations, as follows: a. Consistent with the project description this use shall consist of a “last mile” delivery station in an industrial building containing approximately 16,824 square feet of office and 124,536 square feet of warehouse space. b. Site improvements will include associated parking, landscaping, utilities, stormwater management and lighting improvements, with 15 recessed docks to the north and van loading area to the east. Associate parking shall be provided to the south of the building whereas van parking spaces shall be provided to the east and west of the building as shown on approved plans. c. The site shall have access from Renz Lane to the west and from Pacheco Pass Hwy via two proposed driveways. Eastern driveway aligns with Cameron Blvd and will be a signalized entrance to the site. d. Anticipated project traffic shown below shall not exceed peak project trips analyzed in the traffic analysis: • Weekdays: 95AM peak hour and 132 PM peak hour trips. The AM peak hour is between 7am and 9am. The PM peak hour is 4pm to 6pm. • Saturday: 173 peak hour trips. The Saturday peak hour is between 11am and 2pm. e. The delivery station may operate 24/7 to support delivery of packages to customer locations starting at 10:30 AM util 9:00 PM. Facility operations include the following key components: • Approximately 21 line haul trucks would deliver packages to the facility daily between 10:00 PM and 8:00 AM. • Packages will be sorted, assigned to delivery routes and staged for dispatch. • Approximately 81 associates and 21 managers support operations between 1:00 AM and 12:00 PM, to mitigate traffic impact during rush hour periods. Additional shifts include 32 managers and dispatchers to supervise delivery operations between 9:30 AM and 10:00 PM, with a third shift arriving 1:30 PM and departing at 10:00 PM. 8.C.o Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-18 CUP 20-02 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -4- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX • Delivery associate arrivals shall start at approximately 9:20 AM. Starting at 9:50 AM and ending at 11:10 AM, 223 delivery vans will load and depart from the delivery station at a rate of 60 vans every 2 0 minutes to facilitate a regulated traffic flow into the surrounding area. The first shift of delivery vans would leave the station at approximately 9:50am. The departure window is designed to mitigate impact on rush hour periods. • Delivery routes will be completed approximately 8-10 hours after dispatch, with vans returning to the station between 7:10 PM and 9:10 PM. • Flex drivers may also be used to deliver packages from this location. Approximately 60 traditional passenger vehicles would be used entering the facility staggered between 4:30 PM and 6:00 PM. Flex vehicles will load and depart every 15 minutes. Approximately 31 associates will work in the delivery station between 12:00 PM and 10:30 PM to support the Flex and DSP drivers as they return to the station. After the check out and release of all delivery vehicles by 9:40 PM, delivery station associates prepare the delivery station for the next day’s packages. 2. Development and use of TM 20-07 Lot 2 shall be subject to compliance with AS 20-21 and TM 20-07 Conditions of Approval. 3. This approval shall be valid for an initial period of two years from the decision date, consistent with the concurrent tentative parcel map approval. If any development for which the conditional use permit and associated a rchitectural and site approval has been granted has not obtained building permits within two years from the date of approval, or within one year following the date of recordation of a final map for the project, this approval shall be deemed automatically revoked. Upon application, an extension of time may be granted by the Community Development Director or designee. Should the Developer intend to request an extension to the permit expiration date, Developer must submit to the Planning Division a written application with applicable fees prior to the expiration date. Only timely requests may be considered pursuant to the City Code. If, however, litigation is filed challenging the City’s approval of any of the project’s entitlements, the time period to exercise each entitlement shall be stayed for the duration of the litigation. 8.C.o Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: PC Resolution 2021-18 CUP 20-02 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH# 2021070525) AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (APN: APN 841-18-082), APPLICATIONS GPA 20-01, Z 20-07, TM 20-07 AND AS 20-21 FILED BY STEVE BEAUCHAMP, PANATTTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B,. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment, general plan amendment, architectural and site review, conditional use permit and tentative map for 59.7 acres of property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and circulated for public review for 30 days; and WHEREAS, environmental mitigation measures were agreed to by the applicant as contained in a draft mitigated negative declaration (MND) environmental document prepared for the project, and in compliance with the requirements of CEQA the MND was published, noticed and circulated for a 30-day public review period from July 30, 2021 through August 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, responses to comments received on the MND environmental document were prepared and provided to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration with the draft MND and project entitlements, resulting in no substantial changes to the analysis, conclusions and determinations of the environmental document; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, 8.C.p Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council at a duly noticed public hearing reviewed and considered the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, together with the project zoning requests, and considered written and oral reports by staff and public testimony; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby makes the following findings, adopting the mitigated negative declaration for the Project: 1. Prior to taking action and approving the project the City Council has independently reviewed and considered the initial study/negative declaration and other information in the record. 2. As documented in the staff report and project record, the initial study/mitigated negative declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and consistent with the state and local guidelines and thresholds of significance. 3. The initial study/mitigated negative declaration represents the independent judgment and analysis of the City as lead agency for the project. 4. Incorporation of the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project would or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environmental would occur, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for incorporate with the project entitlements. 5. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as proposed together with project conditions and mitigation measures, may have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the project approval is based is the Community Development Department, Planning Division. 8.C.p Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525), inclusive of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program which is attached as Exhibit A hereto, as the environmental review document for the project. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.C.p Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) EMC PLANNING GROUP 1 P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING AND R EPORTING P ROGRAM I NTRODUCTION CEQA Guidelines section 15097 requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring  programs when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a  negative declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse  environmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to ensure  compliance with conditions of project approval during project implementation in order to  avoid significant adverse environmental effects.  The law was passed in response to historic non‐implementation of mitigation measures  presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as conditions of project  approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation measures are implemented and  thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.  A definitive set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and  enforcement procedures to ensure the measureʹs compliance. This monitoring program is  designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and subsequent  conditions of project approval are implemented.   M ONITORING P ROGRAM  This monitoring program is applicable to the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision based on  the mitigation measures included in the Certified EIR. These mitigation measures are  designed to eliminate or reduce significant adverse environmental effects to less‐than‐ significant levels. These mitigation measures become conditions of project approval, which  the project proponent is required to complete during and after implementation of the  8.C.p Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 2 EMC PLANNING GROUP proposed project. The attached checklist is intended for monitoring the implementation of  the adopted mitigation measures.  M ONITORING P ROGRAM P ROCEDURES  The City of Gilroy shall use the attached monitoring checklist for the proposed project. The  monitoring program should be implemented as follows:  1. The Gilroy Community Development Department should be responsible for  coordination of the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The  Community Development Department should be responsible for completing the  monitoring checklist and distributing the checklist to the responsible individuals or  agencies for their use in monitoring the mitigation measures.  2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsible for determining  whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have been  complied with. Once all mitigation measures have been complied with, the  responsible individual or agency should submit a copy of the monitoring checklist to  the Community Development Department to be placed in the project file. If the  mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist should not  be returned to the Community Development Department.  3. The Gilroy Community Development Department will review the checklist to ensure  that appropriate mitigation measures and additional conditions of project approval  included in the monitoring checklist have been complied with at the appropriate time,  e.g., prior to issuance of a use permit, etc. Compliance with mitigation measures is  required for project approvals.  4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non‐compliance has occurred, a  written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project proponent within 10  days, with a copy to the Community Development Department, describing the non‐ compliance and requiring compliance within a specified period of time. If non‐ compliance still exists at the expiration of the specified period of time, construction  may be halted and fines may be imposed at the discretion of the City of Gilroy.  8.C.p Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 3 M ITIGATION M ONITORING C HECKLIST Step 1 Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits or Start of  Construction Activities  Mitigation Measure  BIO‐2 To avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through  September 15), to the extent feasible, construction activities that include any  vegetation removal or ground disturbance (such as grading or grubbing) shall be  conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird  nesting season. If construction activities commence during the bird nesting season,  then a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre‐construction survey for nesting birds to  ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project construction.  If construction activities are scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to  August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15 for  owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist shall  conduct nesting bird surveys. Two surveys for active nests of such birds shall occur  within 10 days prior to start of construction, with the second survey conducted with  48 hours prior to start of construction. Appropriate minimum survey radius  surrounding the work area is typically 250 feet for passerines, 500 feet for smaller  raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors. Surveys shall be conducted at the  appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities.  If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in nearby  surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active construction  shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and maintained until the  young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to construction, the  qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each nest to characterize  “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which allows the birds to  exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds  daily, or as otherwise required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife,  during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds show signs of unusual  8.C.p Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 4 EMC PLANNING GROUP or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a  brooding position, and/or flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not  possible, the qualified biologist or construction foreman shall have the authority to  cease all construction work in the area until the young have fledged and the nest is  no longer active. This measure shall be implemented by the developer prior to start  of construction activities.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:           Mitigation Measure  BIO‐3 Based on the current proposed plans, if the aquatic features shown in the  Biological Resources Report and Aquatic Resource Delineation Report  (Huffman‐Broadway Group, Inc. 2020a, 2020b) are considered jurisdictional  by the CDFW and/or RWQCB, the project may require one or more  regulatory permits. To determine whether the drainage is considered  jurisdictional, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist/wetland  regulatory specialist to initiate discussions with the RWQCB and CDFW for  this purpose.   If impacts to a feature subject to state jurisdiction may occur, fill authorization  will be sought from the RWQCB and/or the CDFW if determined necessary  through the regulatory agency consultation process.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  8.C.p Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 5 Monitoring Notes:            Mitigation Measure  GEO‐1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall incorporate all of the  geotechnical engineer’s recommendations into the project design, subject to review  and approval by the City’s Public Works Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:           Mitigation Measure  GEO‐2 The developer shall prepare an erosion control plan that details appropriate  methods to prevent and/or minimize erosion. The erosion control plan is subject to  the review and approval of the City of Gilroy Public Works Department prior to the  issuance of a grading permit.    In addition to the mitigation above, the proposed project would be required to  comply with the General Plan Policy PH 2.6 with its Preliminary Grading and  Drainage Plan, which requires all new development proposals to include a site plan  detailing appropriate methods of erosion and deposition control during site  development and subsequent use; and General Plan Policy PH 3.6, which requires  new development to include landscaped areas for reducing runoff and increasing  8.C.p Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 6 EMC PLANNING GROUP runoff absorption capacities and encourages the use of permeable paving materials,  which would minimize the erosive effects of storm water (refer to Sheets C300, C600,  and L100 illustrating the drainage management and landscaped areas proposed on  the site).  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:            Mitigation Measure  GEO‐3 Pursuant to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Condor Earth on July  8, 2020 for the project, the following recommendation shall be implemented in order  to reduce impacts related to the potential for expansive soils onsite:  The foundation should extend below much of the zone of seasonal moisture  variation or be constructed sufficiently stiff to move as rigid units with differential  movement of foundations from heaving or settlement reduced to a value compatible  with the proposed superstructure type and architectural finishes. The project  structural engineer should take this into account when designing the foundations.  Provided that the site is graded and all building pads are prepared in accordance  with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical study, the conventional  shallow foundation system would be appropriate for the proposed building  foundations.  This recommendation shall be implemented prior to issuance of a grading permit  subject to the review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  8.C.p Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 7 Monitoring Notes:           Mitigation Measure  HYDRO‐1 The project proponent shall prepare and submit Erosion Control Plans to the  City of Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The  Erosion Control Plans shall illustrate how the project’s grading phases would  prevent or minimize erosion and siltation on‐ and off‐site, such as the inclusion  of Best Management Practices.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer   Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:            Mitigation Measure  HYDRO‐2 The project proponent shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan for review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works  Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan shall identify construction and post‐construction Best  Management Practices to prevent water pollution at the source.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  8.C.p Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 8 EMC PLANNING GROUP Monitoring Notes:              8.C.p Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 9 Step 2 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits  Mitigation Measure  AQ‐1 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant shall provide to the city details of a proposed  vehicle reduction program for future employees of the project utilizing the Bay Area  Commuter Benefits Program, 511.org rideshare program, or other local commuter  benefits program.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:           Mitigation Measure  AQ‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant for any phase shall include on the project plans the  number of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, dedicated vanpool and other high‐ occupancy vehicle (HOV) carpool spaces, bike racks, changing rooms and/or lockers  on site, which would facilitate the use of ride‐sharing and bicycles.    Implementation of these measures ensures that the proposed project, as mitigated, is  consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The proposed project, therefore, does not  have aspects that would interfere with or hinder implementation of the 2017 Clean  Air Plan. Plan consistency related to GHG emissions is discussed in Section D.7,  Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this initial study.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  8.C.p Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 10 EMC PLANNING GROUP Monitoring Notes:        Mitigation Measure  GHG‐1 If the City of Gilroy has adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the  time building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall have the option  to incorporate applicable GHG reduction measures identified in the GHG reduction  strategy into the proposed project. Applicable measures from the reduction strategy  shall be confirmed by the City of Gilroy. If the Planning Division finds that the  project is consistent with the GHG reduction strategy, the significant project GHG  impact would be reduced to less than significant and no further mitigation would  be required.    If City has not adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the time  building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall implement mitigation  measure GHG‐2.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:            Mitigation Measure  GHG‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits for the project proposed the applicant shall  prepare a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan shall  demonstrate, with substantial evidence, that GHG emissions will be reduced to the  year 2022 service population threshold of significance of 4.32 MT CO2e per year per  service population. This would require that the unmitigated project emissions of  8.C.p Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 11 3,173 MT CO2e per year be reduced by 884 MT CO2e per year [3,173 MT CO2e – (4.32  MT CO2e x 530 service population)] to 2,289 MT CO2e.  The GHG Reduction Plan shall prioritize on‐site GHG reduction design features. At  a minimum, the Reduction Plan should include the GHG reduction measures listed  below. Other feasible reduction measures may be substituted for the measures listed  below provided that the City of Gilroy Planning Division Manager finds, based on  substantial evidence provided by the applicant, that the substitute measures achieve  an equal or greater volume of emissions reduction. Additional measures may be  added by the applicant. A combination of the following measures can be included in  the Reduction Plan:   Implement the Transportation Demand Management Program strategies  identified in mitigation measure TR‐1 in this initial study to reduce VMT  and associated mobile source GHG emissions from employee travel.   Include sufficient plug‐in capabilities for transport refrigeration units, if any,  to eliminate the time that a transportation refrigeration system is powered  by a fossil‐fueled internal combustion engine while at the site.   Exceed minimum CALGreen Code standards for bicycle parking and bicycle  lockers; parking spaces dedicated for low‐emitting, fuel efficient vehicles;  and electric vehicle charging stations.   Design buildings to exceed the current 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency  standards by a minimum of five percent.   All appliances installed in all buildings shall be Energy Star rated.     Exceed higher than mandated parking lot lighting and area lighting energy  efficient standards.   Electrify truck loading docks.   In lieu of or in addition to one or more of the on‐site measures above, the applicant  may include in the Reduction Plan and take credit for GHG reductions resulting  from making direct investments in off‐site GHG reduction activities/programs in the  vicinity. Examples of direct investments include building retrofit programs that pay  for cool roofs, solar panels, solar water heaters, smart meters, energy efficient  lighting energy efficient windows, and insulation. Other examples include financing  programs for installing electric vehicle charging stations, electrifying school buses, or  planting local urban forests.  8.C.p Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 12 EMC PLANNING GROUP The applicant may choose to retain a qualified air quality / GHG professional to  quantify the GHG reductions that would result from implementing the Reduction  Plan based on substantial evidence to be included in the Reduction Plan. The GHG  reduction measures should be implemented even if their implementation would  result in a GHG reduction, but the reduction cannot be reliably quantified. The GHG  emissions reduction volume resulting from implementing the Reduction Plan  measures may then be subtracted from the required 884 MT CO2e per year reduction  volume in order to reduce or avoid the significant GHG impact.   If the applicant elects to quantify the GHG emissions reductions from on‐site  measures and investments in off‐site reduction programs and the reductions are  insufficient to reduce project emissions by a minimum of 884 MT CO2e per year or  more, the applicant may then secure the balance of the required GHG emissions  reduction volume by purchasing and retiring carbon offset credits. The carbon offset  credits shall meet the following performance standards:   Carbon offset credits shall be issued by a recognized, reputable and  accredited registry that mandates the use of established protocols for  quantifying and issuing the offset credits. Credits issued based on protocols  approved by CARB should be prioritized. Examples of such registries  include the Climate Action Reserve, American Carbon Registry, and Vierra.    The carbon offset credits should be generated from projects developed in the  United States. Credits from projects developed internationally should not be  used unless the applicant demonstrates with substantial evidence that  sufficient carbon offsets from projects in the United States are unavailable.  International offsets must be quantified and issued using established  protocols that are recognized in the United States and that are issued by  recognized, reputable and accredited registries.    All carbon offset credits purchased to reduce GHG emissions, must meet the  criteria of being real, quantifiable, permanent, verifiable, enforceable, and  additional, consistent with the standards set forth in Health and Safety Code  section 38562, subdivisions (d)(1) and (d)(2).    Prior to issuing building permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit  the GHG Reduction Plan for review and approval of the City of Gilroy Planning  Division Manager. The Reduction Plan shall demonstrate that GHG emissions from  the project will be substantially reduced. If on‐site design and off‐site program  8.C.p Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 13 investments do not result in reducing the GHG impact to less than significant, the  applicant shall, prior to approval of occupancy permits, provide documentation in  the form of an executed contract or other certification that the balance of emissions  reduction required to reduce the GHG impact to less than significant has been  obtained through purchase of carbon offset credits, subject to the performance  standards listed above.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:            Step 3 Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit  Mitigation Measure  TR‐1 The applicant shall prepare and implement a Transportation Demand Management  (TDM) program to reduce the project’s VMT impact to a less‐than‐significant level.  The TDM measures shall include, but not be limited to, any combination of the  following components, as necessary to reduce the project’s VMT impact to less than  significant:  a. Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedule Program (VTA TP08). This  program (compressed work week) allows and encourages employees to  telecommute from home when possible, or to shift work schedules to reduce  vehicle miles traveled.  i. 80% of employees shall be assigned a four day/40‐hour work shift.  b. Ridesharing Program and Commuter Benefits (VTA TP11, TP13). This program  matches employees interested in carpooling who have similar commute  patterns. This TDM strategy encourages the use of carpooling, which reduces  the number of vehicle trips and thereby reduces VMT.   8.C.p Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) P ROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM 14 EMC PLANNING GROUP i. Employers shall strive to have 20 percent of eligible employees  participate in this program through regular communications and  incentives.  ii. Incentives shall include, but not be limited to, pre‐tax benefits.  iii. The applicant shall provide dedicated carpool/vanpool parking  spaces commensurate with the number of employees participating in  this program.  iv. Employers shall provide “Guaranteed Ride Home Services,” which  provides employees who regularly (twice a week) carpool, vanpool,  bike, walk or take transit to work with a free and reliable ride home  when one of life’s unexpected emergencies arise. Commuters may  take advantage of this service up to four times per year to get home  for unexpected emergencies such as a personal illness or a sick child.  This service can also be used for unscheduled overtime when the  employer mandates working late.  c. Provide transit passes to employees interested in public transit.  i. Transit passes shall off‐set at least 25 percent in the participating  employees’ transit costs from home to work and back.  d. The applicant shall provide a minimum of 10 bike racks (in a secure area) each,  for both the phases of the project.   The TDM program shall be prepared prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,  subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works  Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division and Public Works  Department  Monitoring Notes:           8.C.p Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) PROJECT G ARLIC I NDUSTRIAL S UBDIVISION M ITIGATION M ONITORING P ROGRAM EMC PLANNING GROUP 15   8.C.p Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: CC Resolution MND 11-4-2021 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION (GPA 20- 01) TO AMEND THE MOBILITY MAP FIGURE M-1 AND FIGURE M-2 TO REMOVE A PLANNED ARTERIAL ROADWAY CONNECTION THROUGH PROPERTY AT APN 841-18-082. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B,. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment, general plan amendment, architectural and site review, conditional use permit and tentative map for 59.7 acres of property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy has considered the General Plan Amendment request (GPA 20-01) in accordance with the Gilroy General Plan and other applicable standards and regulations; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommended for adoption as the project environmental document by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the General Plan Amendment application conforms to the intent of the Gilroy General Plan and elements thereof and recommended to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment application (GPA 20-01) to remove the planned arterial roadway extension through the property and directing staff to update the Mobility Element Figures M-1 and M-2 accordingly, as indicated on Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the general plan amendment request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby approves General Plan Amendment application (GPA 20-01) to remove the planned arterial roadway extension through the property and directing staff to update the Mobility Element Figures M-1 and M-2 accordingly, as indicated on Exhibit A. 8.C.q Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: CC Resolution GPA (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.C.q Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: CC Resolution GPA (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX Exhibit A – Mobility Element Figures M-1 and M2 (Revised) 8.C.q Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: CC Resolution GPA (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) Highlighting indicates segment to be removed LEGEND EXHIBIT A 8.C.q Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: CC Resolution GPA (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 8.C.q Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: CC Resolution GPA (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE AMENDMENT REQUEST, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XXVI OF THE GILROY CITY CODE, TO ESTABLISH ZONING STANDARDS FOR THE C3/M2 PLANNED DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT FOR PROJECT GILROY INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON THAT CERTAIN 59.7 ACRE PARCEL AT THE EAST END OF RENZ LANE, EAST OF CAMINO ARROYO AND NORTH OF SR 152, APN: 841-18-082. FILED BY PANATTONI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, FILE NUMBER Z 20-07. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment to establish C3/M2 standards, general plan amendment to amend the mobility element, architectural and site review for site development and planned unit development permit, conditional use permit for a distribution facility use on Lot 2, and tentative map to create three separate lots for the 59.7 acre property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommended for adoption as the project environmental document by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of the Planned Unit Development Zone Amendment Z 20-07, to create two M2PUD industrial and one commercial C3PUD parcel for the development proposed under permit AS 20-21, incorporated herein by reference, based on the following findings pursuant to Gilroy Code Article XXVI (Planned Development Overlay), Article LII (Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance) and Section 30.50.50 (Planned Unit Development Approval); and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project. 8.C.r Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: CC Resolution Z PUD Approval (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby approves the Planned Unit Development Zone Amendment Z 20-07, to create two M2PUD industrial and one commercial C3PUD parcel for the development proposed under permit AS 20-21, incorporated herein by reference, based on the following findings pursuant to Gilroy Code Article XXVI (Planned Development Overlay), Article LII (Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance) and Section 30.50.50 (Planned Unit Development Approval): 1. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of the City of Gilroy’s General Plan in that it would promote a cohesive redevelopment of property with a planned commercial and industrial development that includes uses promoting the general industrial land use designation and relevant City policies; 2. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not create any adverse environmental impacts in that the project site does not have any unique physical or environmental constraints that would preclude development as proposed and as anticipated by the City General Plan and zoning documents; 3. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not be detrimental to the public peace, health, safety, morals, or welfare given that the property would be required to develop in accordance with an approved PUD development plan adopted pursuant to City Code Section 30.50.50, which has been requested and processed concurrently with this PUD zoning amendment, that would assure all applicable codes and regulations are adhered to at time of development; and 4. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment will not be detrimental to persons or property in the City given that the amendment would continue to allow development of the site which is compatible with the surrounding shopping center commercial and commercial industrial uses existing and anticipated in the area. 8.C.r Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: CC Resolution Z PUD Approval (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.C.r Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: CC Resolution Z PUD Approval (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THAT CERTAIN 59.7 ACRE PARCEL AT THE EAST END OF RENZ LANE, EAST OF CAMINO ARROYO BETWEEN W BRANCH LLAGAS CREEK AND NORTH OF SR 152, APN: 841-18-082. FILE NUMBER AS 20-21. WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment to establish C3/M2 standards, general plan amendment to amend the mobility element, architectural and site review for site development and planned unit development permit, conditional use permit for a distribution facility use on Lot 2, and tentative map to create three separate lots for the 59.7 acre property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommended for adoption as the project environmental document by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the architectural and site and zone change requests, and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project entitlements including AS 20-21; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended findings for approval of AS 20-21 as required pursuant to Article L, Planning department Applications; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the architectural and site review, zone change and related entitlement requests, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project entitlements including AS 20-21. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article L, Planning department Applications, the City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby find as follows: 1) The project as proposed and conditioned has been analyzed and confirmed to comply with Section 30.50.43 scope of review criteria. 2) The project as proposed and conditioned complies with the C3M2PUD zoning standards adopted for the project as Z 20-07 and implemented by permit AS 20-21. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 3) The commercial land use is allowed within the General Industrial land use designation. 4) The findings required pursuant to section 30.50.50 for approval of a planned unit development approval are met as follows: a. The project conforms to the Gilroy general plan in terms of general location and standards of development given that the project consists of a C3/M2PUD development which is anticipated for the site based on the existing PUD zoning designation established for the property upon annexation into the City, and the General Industrial land use designation. b. The project provides the type of development which will fill a specific need of the surrounding area as it will result in a planned commercial and industrial development with high quality landscaping details, public art, internal and external pedestrian connectivity, expanded warehousing opportunities for businesses, and new employment opportunities, which are all encouraged by the general plan. c. The project will not require urban services beyond those which are currently available, as the City has infrastructure available to serve the development as anticipated by the General Plan and the project shall be designed to comply with City standards. d. The project will provide a harmonious, integrated plan with adequate access and circulation provided for in the proposal, and no exceptions are being requested from the base C3 and M2 development standards. e. The project reflects an economical and efficient pattern of land uses in that the site will be fully developed with adequate parking and circulation to accommodate all of the intended uses, as well as providing for pedestrian enhancements. f. The project includes greater provisions for landscaping and open space than would generally be required by providing fully landscaped frontage, landscaping along the future commercial parcel frontage with a new entry feature, landscaping of all space not designated for facility operations or structures, and with pedestrian and bicycle path improvements. g. The project utilizes site design would adequately blend with the character of surrounding areas by providing large building setbacks and landscaping features along SR 152 and preserving the prominent corner at Camino Arroyo and SR 152 for commercial use. h. The project would not create traffic congestion, noise, odor, or other adverse effects on surrounding areas, as detailed in the environmental document prepared for the project. i. The project will provide adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage, as necessary, as indicated on project development plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves AS 20- 21, subject to the conditions Attachment A and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment B. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.C.s Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -4- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX ATTACHMENT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AS 20-21 PLANNING CONDITIONS The following GENERAL conditions authorize specific terms of the project ENTITLEMENT(S). 1. APPROVED PROJECT: The approval for Project Garlic Industrials Subdivision AS 20-21 is granted to construct a warehouse distribution facility (Phase 1) and warehouse (Phase 2) and all site and landscape improvements for the project (Phase 1 through 3) located on Assessor Parcel No. 841-18-082, as shown on the following Project Plans: A. Site Plan for Panattoni by Ware Malcomb dated 01.06.2021, Sheet 1 B. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan for Project Gilroy by Kimley Horn dated 01/12/2021, Sheet C300. C. Architectural Drawings for Project Gilroy by Ware Malcomb dated 4/21/2021, Sheets A0.0 through A 6.1 (20 pages) D. Elevations for Project Gilroy by Ware Malcomb, dated 4/20/2021, Sheets A2.11, A2.12 and A 6.1 revised 2021-01-13 (for the Phase 1 Building) E. Elevations for Phase 2: Spec Warehouse by Ware Malcomb dated 10.12.2020 Sheets 2 through 5. F. Civil and Landscape Plans for Project Gilroy by Kimley Horn dated 04/21/2021, Sheets C000 through C800 (13 pages) G. Landscaping Plan, Project Garlic by Kimley Horn, dated 04/21/2021, Sheets L100 through L102 (4 pages) H. Tentative Parcel Map XX-XX for Project Garlic by Kimley Horn, dated 04/21/2021, Sheets TM01 through TM08. I. Phasing Plan for Project Garlic by Kimley Horn dated 19 Oct 2020, Sheet C101. J. Sign Details for Project Gilroy by Ware Malcomb dated 10/15/2020 Sheets A0.5 and A0.6. K. Photometric Plan for Project Garlic by Ware Malcomb dated 12 Jan 2021, Sheets E1.1a through E1.1F. L. Project Garlic Lighting Details by Lithonia Lighting dated 11.16.20 (8 pages) 2. APPROVED PLANS: Build-out of the project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions. This shall include provision of Frontage landscaping and fencing that would be in keeping with the McCarthy Business Park located across Highway 152, as a feature of the planned unit development; as shown on the Landscaping Plan, Project Garlic by Kimley Horn, dated 04/21/2021, Sheets L100 through L102 (4 pages). 8.C.s Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -5- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX Any future adjustment or modification to the plans, including any changes made at time of building permit submittal, shall be considered by the Community Development Director or designee to ensure compliance with the PUD zoning and all applicable requirements. 3. APPLICABILITY OF PERMIT: The use of the property shall be operated in compliance with the scope and characteristics of the project, and as conditioned herein. Modification of the approved use may require an amendment to this Permit and/or related entitlements and in accordance with applicable City code requirements. 4. PERMIT EXPIRATION: The expiration date of this approval is two years from the decision date, consistent with the concurrent tentative parcel map approval. If any development for which the architectural and site approval has been granted has not obtained building permits within two years from the date of notification of approval, or within one year from the date of recordation of the final map, the approval shall be deemed automatically revoked. Upon application, an extension of time may be granted by the Community Development Director or designee. Should the Developer intend to request an extension to the permit expiration date, Developer must submit to the Planning Division a written application with applicable fees prior to the expiration date. Only timely requests may be considered pursuant to the City Code. If, however, litigation is filed challenging the City’s approval of any of the project’s entitlements, the time period to exercise each entitlement shall be stayed for the duration of the litigation. 5. RELATED ENTITLEMENTS: This permit is subject to the effective date of the related zone change request Z20-07, and the findings conditions of approval, and mitigation measures of TM 20-07 and CUP 20-02, (i.e. related and/or concurrent entitlement requests). 6. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS: If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the Developer, owner or tenant shall be subject to permit revocation or enforcement actions pursuant to the City Code. All costs associated with any such actions shall be the responsibility of Developer, owner or tenant. 7. INDEMNIFICATION: Developer agrees, as a condition of permit approval, at Developer’s own expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Gilroy (“the City”) and its officers, contractors, consultants, attorneys, employees and agents from any and all claim(s), action(s) or proceeding(s) brought against the City or its officers, contractors, consultants, attorneys, employees, or agents to challenge, attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this resolution or any condition attached thereto or any proceedings, acts or determinations taken, including actions taken under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as 8.C.s Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -6- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX amended, done or made prior to the approval of such resolution that were part of the approval process. 8. BUILDING AND SITE SIGNS: No signs are approved as part of this application. Prior to issuance of a sign permit for this site, Developer shall propose well- designed, quality signs that comply with the allowances of the City Code and are to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or designee. 9. CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE: All signage advertising the development project or components thereof, including individual tenants or subdivisions, shall be installed or maintained onsite or offsite as allowed and in conformance with an approved sign permit. 10. WATER LIMITATIONS: Developer shall be advised that the approval is subject to the drought emergencies provisions pursuant to the Gilroy City Code Chapter 27.98. 11. OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES: This permit approval does not allow for any outdoor storage. Any future consideration of outdoor uses onsite shall only be considered as allowed by the City Code, including any subsequent permitting for such outdoor use. 12. MITIGATION MEASURES – All mitigation measures identified in the July 21, 2021 Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) (SCH 2021070525) and Mitigation Monitoring Program, incorporated herein by reference, apply to this project and must be addressed, as applicable, during building permit submittal and construction. 13. MULTI-PHASE DEVELOPMENT: Construction of the industrial project may be done in phases, as described and shown in the approved plan set, with a maximum duration of three years provided that the first phase is initiated in compliance with established deadlines. The construction phases may overlap. However, an easement for emergency vehicle access to the easterly industrial Lot 3 shall be provided prior to occupancy of the Phase 1 development on Lot 2, unless or until Caltrans approves emergency vehicle access to this property from eastbound Highway 152. The following conditions shall be addressed prior to issuance of any BUILDING PERMIT, GRADING PERMIT or IMPROVEMENT PLAN, whichever is first issued, or as otherwise specified in the condition. 14. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Developer shall include a plan sheet(s) that includes a reproduction of all conditions of approval of this permit, as adopted by the decision-maker. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -7- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 15. CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PERMIT PLANS: The project architect shall certify in writing that the architectural design shown in the building permit plans match the plans approved by the Community Development Director or designee/Planning Commission/City Council. Any changes must be clearly noted. The project architect shall also certify that the structural plans are consistent with the architectural plans. In the event of a discrepancy between the structural plans and the architectural plans, the architectural plans shall take precedence, and revised structural drawings shall be submitted to the Building Division. 16. COLORS AND MATERIALS: Plans submitted for building permit applications shall include all exterior building materials and colors, including product and finish manufacturer name, color name and number, and surface finish type (e.g. stucco with sand finish, plaster with smooth finish) to be used in construction. 17. SUBSEQUENT ENTITLEMENTS: a. Developer shall obtain necessary permits prior to initiating any new construction or modifications authorized under this approval, including but not limited to temporary construction trailers, temporary staging areas, model home sales offices, advertising signs of any kind, exterior and interior modifications. Developer shall pay all requisite fees in effect at the time of plan submittal and/or issuance, as applicable. b. Future development of commercial Lot 1 shall require a separate administrative Architectural and Site Review permit approval, subject to review for compliance with the C3/M2 PUD. 18. OTHER REVIEW AGENCIES: This project requires review and approval by outside agencies including, but not limited to the State Department of Transportation and Fish and Wildlife. Approvals from outside agencies shall be obtained at the appropriate stage of development and in no case later than prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 19. PARCEL MAP: The associated Parcel Map approval TM20-07 shall be prepared and approved for recordation, with all necessary easements and improvements as required to implement this project approval in accordance with all conditions and requirements of the City. 20. HABITAT PERMIT: Concurrent with or prior to submitting an application for a grading permit, the Developer shall obtain a final Habitat Permit application approval from the City of Gilroy and shall pay the current habitat permit mitigation fees due prior to the issuance of a grading permit for each phase of development. Application information for private development projects is available on the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency website: https://www.scv-habitatagency.org/. 21. AGRICULTURE MITIGATION POLICY: This site has been identified as Prime 8.C.s Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -8- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance pursuant to the City of Gilroy Agriculture Mitigation Policy. Prior to issuance of building permits, appropriate agriculture mitigation pursuant to the current Policy must be completed for the entire PUD area, which requires 1:1 replacement of agricultural lands. 22. PUBLIC ART: Prior to issuance of building permits, submit a process, timetable, and evidence of commitment acceptable to the City to ensure installation of a suitable, significant piece of public-oriented sculpture or similar public art installation prior to occupancy. As proposed, this shall consist of entry feature and future art sculpture at the northeast corner of Camino Arroyo and Highway 152. This shall include involving the Community Development Director or designee in reviewing preliminary concepts, artist, and type of work. All public art must be reviewed and approved by the City of Gilroy Arts and Culture Commission. The cost of the art piece shall not be required to exceed $40,000.00. This is a Planned Unit Development amenity. 23. BICYCLE TRAIL AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: Plans for building permit shall include details for all required and proposed on and offsite improvements which shall be completed as a part of the project. The bicycle and pedestrian trail improvements are required as a planned unit development amenity. The easement for the bike path shall be dedicated on the project map, as required to comply with General Plan bicycle plan policies. 24. Median Landscaping: Median landscaping shall be provided as a planned unit development amenity. The Applicant shall design, to the approval of the City, landscaping and irrigation improvements consistent with Landscaping Plan, Project Garlic by Kimley Horn, dated 04/21/2021, Sheets L100 through L102 (4 pages) within the Highway 152 median that extends along the project frontage (“Landscaping Improvements”). The Applicant shall then use good faith efforts to obtain approval from Caltrans for installation of the Landscaping Improvements. If Caltrans grants approval, then Applicant shall install the Landscaping Improvements. The Applicant shall also use good faith efforts to enter into a landscape maintenance agreement with the State, under which the Applicant will maintain the Landscaping Improvements. If, alternatively, the City enters into such a landscape maintenance agreement with the State, then Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to reimburse the City on an annual basis for its actual costs of maintaining the Landscaping Improvements. If Caltrans does not approve the Landscaping Improvements, then Applicant shall use reasonable, good faith efforts to obtain approval from Caltrans for the installation of hardscape improvements within the Highway 152 median that extends along the project frontage (“Hardscape Improvements”). If Caltrans grants 8.C.s Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -9- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX approval, then Applicant shall design and construct the Hardscape Improvements. 25. FENCES AND WALLS: All fencing and walls are to be shown on construction drawings submitted for building permit review. The design and location must comply with all height and setback requirements. 26. BICYCLE RACKS OR STORAGE: Developer shall provide minimum required bicycle racks in accordance with building code requirements. The racks shall be an “inverted U,” or equivalent as approved by the Community Development Director, and must secure the frame and both wheels. Racks should be located near the building entrance (i.e., within constant visual range) unless it is demonstrated that they create a public hazard or locating them there is otherwise infeasible. If space is unavailable near building entrances, the racks must be designed so that the lock is protected from physical assault. Bicycle lockers may be provided in addition to bicycle racks. 27. MUTUAL ACCESS: The Developer shall prepare a legal agreement recorded to run with the land providing for mutual access between all three parcels in the development. The agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and Community Development Director or designee and shall state that it may not be modified without the City’s consent. The access easement shall be included on plans. 28. TRASH ENCLOSURE(S): Prior to building permit issuance, details of opaque screen trash enclosures are to be shown on construction drawings and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. The trash enclosure(s) must match the architectural design, color, and materials of the primary structure. 29. SCREENING OF APPERTUNANCES: Developer shall show on construction drawings details of screening for all exterior equipment, including but not limited to mechanical equipment, post indicator valves, backflow prevention devices, utility meters, mailboxes and address directories, etc. Ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers shall not be visible from any public right-of- way and shall be adequately screened through the use or combination of concrete or masonry walls, berms, and landscaping. In addition, the backflow preventers shall be painted dark green, except the fire connection which shall be painted yellow. The final placement and design of these items shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or designee. 30. ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT: Developer shall ensure rooftop mechanical equipment, including but not limited to heating and cooling systems, plumbing vents, ducts, antennas and other appurtenances protruding from the roof are recessed or otherwise screened. Details of the roof equipment and roof screens shall be included in the building permit drawings and approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -10- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 31. ROOF AND BUILDING DRAINPIPES: Developer shall install all roof and building drainpipes and downspouts inside building elements. These items shall not be visible on any exterior building elevations. 32. LIGHTING PLAN: Developer shall submit a lighting plan with the application for building permit. This plan should include photometric contours, manufacturer’s specifications on the fixtures, and mounting heights. Parking lot and exterior light fixtures shall be full cutoff type so that lighting is directed downward only, minimizing glare and light pollution, and shall not cast light on any adjacent property or roadway. Developer shall recess or conceal any under-canopy lighting elements so they are not directly visible from any public area. The lighting plan must be approved by the Community Development Director or designee. 33. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLAN: Prior to issuance of grading permits, Developer shall submit a combined landscape and lighting plan to verify all project onsite lighting shall be of a type and in a location that does not constitute a hazard to vehicular traffic, either on private property or on public property, including streets. Such lighting shall not conflict with drainage plans, landscape plans, tree locations, parking spaces, or any other such land use concerns. 34. LANDSCAPING: a. Prior to building permit issuance, proposed landscaping shall be submitted with the construction drawings for review and approval by the Community Development Director or designee. Landscaping plans shall conform to the Approved Plans, and Zoning Code Chapter 30.38 except as modified by these conditions of approval. b. The Approved Landscaping Plan complies with the industrial zoning landscaping standards of Section 30.38.70, are minimum requirements of the planned development, and shall not be decreased except as may be necessary to accommodate required driveways. Landscaping improvements provided for stormwater management shall be in addition to this required site landscaping. 35. LANDSCAPE MULCH: As part of the Landscape Plan submittal, Developer shall clarify a minimum three (3) inch layer of mulch to be applied on all exposed soil surfaces, as required by the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). 36. INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES: Developer shall not include any invasive plant species, such as those listed by the California Invasive Plant Council. 37. LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE: Prior to issuance of building permits or initiation of the proposed use, whichever comes first, Developer shall submit a completed Landscape Documentation Package, including a soil analysis/management report along with appropriate application review fees, to the 8.C.s Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -11- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX Community Development Department, including required documentation for compliance verification, and obtain approval of such plans. 38. IRRIGATION SENSORS: Prior to issuance of building permits, developer shall (as part of the irrigation system) indicate on construction drawings sensors that suspend or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather conditions (e.g. automatic rain shut-off devices). 39. WELCOME SIGN. The existing City of Gilroy Welcome signage on Pacheco Pass Highway Frontage shall be shown, retained and incorporated into the project landscape plans. The developer shall be responsible for any necessary relocation of the sign. The following conditions shall be met prior to RELEASE OF UTILITIES, FINAL INSPECTION, or ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, whichever occurs first, or as otherwise specified in the condition. 40. ON- AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: Prior to occupancy, Developer shall complete all required offsite and onsite improvements related to the project, including structures, paving, and landscaping, unless otherwise allowed by the Community Development Director, or stated in these conditions. 41. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION: Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or building permit final sign-off, Developer shall complete installation of all landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans. 42. LANDSCAPE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION: Prior to occupancy or initiation of the proposed use, or completion of each build-out phase of development, Developer shall submit a signed Certificate of Completion, along with all necessary supporting documentation and payment to the Community Development Department, for compliance verification of the landscape installation. Developer is required under the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) to provide a copy of the approved Certificate of Completion to the property owner or his or her designee. 43. PLANNING INSPECTION: Inspection(s) by the Planning Division may be required for the foundation, framing, application of exterior materials, and final completion of each structure to ensure that the construction matches the approved plans. 44. SITE CLEAN-UP: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Developer shall remove all construction materials, debris, and vehicles from the subject property. The following conditions shall be met prior to the approval of the FINAL MAP or PARCEL MAP, or other deadline as specified in the condition. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -12- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 45. TENTATIVE MAP: The associated tentative parcel map TM 20-07 shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the approval date and may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Map Act, if the final map is not recorded prior to expiration. If, however, litigation is filed challenging the City’s approval of any of the project’s entitlements, the time period to exercise each entitlement shall be stayed for the duration of the litigation. 46. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS: Any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) applicable to the project property shall be consistent with the terms of this permit and the City Code. If there is a conflict between the CC&Rs and the City Code or this permit, the City Code or this permit shall prevail. The following conditions shall be complied with AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT, or as otherwise specified in the condition. 47. CONSTRUCTION RELATED NOISE: To minimize potential construction-related impacts to noise, Developer shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the subject site, pursuant to City Code 30.41: “During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the following measures at the construction site: a. Limit construction activity to weekdays between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and on Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Construction noise is prohibited on Sundays and City-observed holidays; b. Equip all internal combustion engine driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment; c. Prohibit all unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines; d. Utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology exists; and e. Designate a “disturbance coordinator’ who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g. bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be implemented to correct the problem.” 48. CONSTRUCTION RELATED AIR QUALITY: To minimize potential construction- related impacts to air quality, Developer shall require all construction contractors to implement the basic construction mitigation measures recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) and shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the project site 8.C.s Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -13- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX “During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the following basic control measures at the construction site: a. All exposed surfaces (e.g. parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day; b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material onsite or offsite shall be covered; c. All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited; d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads or pathways shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used; f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points; g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator; and h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.” 49. DISCOVERY OF CONTAMINATED SOILS: If contaminated soils are discovered, the Developer will ensure the contractor employs engineering controls and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize human exposure to potential contaminants. Engineering controls and construction BMPs will include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Contractor employees working on-site will be certified in OSHA’s 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training; b. Contractor will stockpile soil during development activities to allow for proper characterization and evaluation of disposal options; c. Contractor will monitor area around construction site for fugitive vapor emissions with appropriate filed screening instrumentation; d. Contractor will water/mist soil as it is being excavated and loaded onto transportation trucks; 8.C.s Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -14- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX e. Contractor will place any stockpiled soil in areas shielded from prevailing winds; and f. Contractor will cover the bottom of excavated areas with sheeting when work is not being performed. 50. DISCOVERY OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: In the event that a fossil is discovered during construction of the project, excavations within 50’ of the find shall be temporarily halted or delayed until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist, in accordance with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. 51. DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: In the event of an accidental discovery of archaeological resources during grading or construction activities, Developer shall include the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the project site: “If archaeological or cultural resources are discovered during earth-moving, grading, or construction activities, all work shall be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the find and the area shall be staked off immediately. The monitoring professional archaeologist, if one is onsite, shall be notified and evaluate the find. If a monitoring professional archaeologist is not onsite, the City shall be notified immediately and a qualified professional archaeologist shall be retained (at Developer’s expense) to evaluate the find and report to the City. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures shall be formulated by the professional archaeologist and implemented by the responsible party.” 52. DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS: In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Developer shall include the following language in all grading, site work, and construction plans: “If human remains are found during earth-moving, grading, or construction activities, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the coroner of Santa Clara County is contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner determines the remains to be Native American the coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendent (MLD) from the deceased Native American. The MLD may then make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The landowner or his authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human 8.C.s Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -15- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance if: a) the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission; b) the descendent identified fails to make a recommendation; or c) the landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendent, and the mediation by the Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.” The following conditions shall be complied with AT ALL TIMES that the use permitted by this entitlement occupies the premises. 53. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: For the life of the project, Developer shall maintain landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans, except as otherwise permitted or required by law. Significant changes to the number, placement, and selection of plant species may require a modification to this approval, to be determined by the Community Development Director or designee. FIRE INSPECTION CONDITION 54. An approved Fire Truck circulation Plan shall be shown on plans submitted for permits and shall be implemented consistent with Approved Plans Civil Plan Sheet C700. The preferred emergency vehicle access to the Phase 2 building is from Highway 152. An alternative to provide an internal connection between the two industrial sites, from the southern access points, shall only be permitted if Caltrans does not approve the preferred option. This condition applies to the southern access point. Access and driveway along the northern side of the Phase 2 property shall also be provided as shown on approved plans. ENGINEERING CONDITIONS PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TM 20-07 and AS 20-21 Hwy 152 Project Garlic Distribution Center 8.C.s Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -16- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MAKE UP THE ENTITLEMENTS FOR YOUR PROJECT. THEY AUTHORIZE AND APPROVE THE SPECIFIC TERMS OF YOUR PROJECT. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE ADDRESSED ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR ANY BUILDING PERMIT OR GRADING PERMIT, AND SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF WHICHEVER PERMIT IS ISSUED FIRST, OR IF ANOTHER DEADLINE IS SPECIFIED IN A CONDITION, AT THAT TIME. 55. PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE – At the time of first improvement plan submittal, the applicant shall submit a $50,000 (fifty thousand dollar) initial deposit for project plan check and construction inspection. This deposit will be credited/accounted toward final plan check and inspection fee for the project. In addition, the applicant shall submit a detailed project cost estimate prepared by the project engineer, to approval of the City Engineer, with the initial project plan submittal. The cost estimate shall be broken out into on-site and off-site improvements. Prior to plan approval, the applicant shall pay 100% of the plan check and inspection fee based on the approved project cost estimate. Public Works will not sign-off on the issuance of the project building permit without full payment of this plan check and inspection fee. (PUBLIC WORKS). 56. PLAN SUBMITTAL – The Engineering project plans shall be submitted, in full, with the building permit plans. Improvement plans are required for both on-site and off- site improvements, and the improvement plan set cover sheet shall include an index referencing on-site and off-site improvements. All improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City of Gilroy Municipal Code and Standard Specifications and Details, and are subject to all laws of the City of Gilroy by reference. The improvement plans shall include all civil project plans including, but not limited to, site plans, grading plans, utility plans, joint trench, off-site plans, lighting (photometric) plans, and landscaping plans within the public right-of-way. The plan shall clearly identify both public and private utilities. The improvement plans shall be submitted with the Public Works Engineering submittal checklist provided by the City, and available on the City website. Review and approval of these plans shall be completed prior to the issuance of the first building foundation permit. All off-site and frontage improvements shall be designed and constructed as part of, prior to Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1 of the project. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -17- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX In addition: a. A complete set of improvement plans shall consist of Civil site design, landscape site design, Electrical, Joint Trench. Any walls or structural features part of the landscape design shall also be included; b. Improvement plans are required for both on-site and off-site improvements. A separate plan set for each shall be prepared, or at the approval of the City Engineer, onsite and offsite sheets can be combined into one plan set; c. The improvement plan submittal, including utility sheets, shall show appropriate line types and labels to identify different type of utilities and pipe sizes. Utility boxes, hydrants, backflow preventers, etc. shall be relocated/installed behind the back of sidewalk; d. Improvement plans (as second sheet in plan set) shall contain Approved Conditions of Approval; e. Improvement plans shall include General Notes found in the City of Gilroy General Guidelines; f. Improvement plans shall be completed per the Public Works Engineering submittal checklist, which can be found in the City’s website. At first submittal, a completed checklist shall be included in the submittal package, and shall show which items have been included; g. The improvement plan cover sheet shall include a table summarizing all facilities (Streets, Utilities, Parks, Landscaping, etc.), showing the ownership of all facilities, access rights to, and the maintenance responsibilities of all facilities; h. Improvement and grading plans shall show existing topo and features at least 50’ beyond the project boundary. The plan shall clearly show existing topo, label contour elevations, drainage patterns, flow lines, slopes, and all other property encumbrances; i. If the project has excess fill or cut that will be off-hauled to a site or on- hauled from a site within the city limits of Gilroy, an additional Haul Permit is required. A statement indicating the need to obtain a Haul Permit must be added as a general note to the Grading and Drainage Plan; j. All grading and improvement plans shall identify the vertical elevation datum, date of survey, and surveyor; k. A Title Report shall be submitted with first submittal improvement plans. An existing site plan shall be submitted showing all existing site conditions and title report easements. The plan shall include bearing and distance information for all right-of-way and easements; l. The plan shall show any proposed easements to be dedicated for any needed purpose, or any easement expected to be abandoned through separate instrument. This includes PUE, PSE, EVAE, Cross-Property Access Easement, Landscape Easement, Drainage Easement, Pole Line Easement, etc. No private signage, poles, utilities or other appurtenances 8.C.s Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -18- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX shall be permitted within any PSE/PUE; m. To ensure the plans are coordinated and there are no conflicts between disciplines, the applicant shall provide a “composite exhibit” showing Civil, Landscape, Electrical, and Joint Trench design information (as a separate sheet titled “Composite Plan”) to confirm that there are no conflicts; n. All Solid Waste Vehicle circulation movements shall be modeled and shown on a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be prepared to the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled using AutoTurn swept analysis software, and shall include all turning and street circulation movements; o. All Emergency Vehicle circulation movements shall be modeled and shown on a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be prepared to the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled using AutoTurn swept analysis software, and shall include all turning and street circulation movements; p. All utility boxes exposed to traffic or in a driveway, including sanitary sewer and/or water meter boxes, shall have traffic-rated boxes and lids; q. All on-site recycled water system improvements, including appurtenances, shall be located within a PSE. (PUBLIC WORKS) 57. UTILITY PLANS – A utility plan shall be provided for all projects as specified within these conditions of approval. To ensure coordination between the applicant and the relevant utility company: a. The applicant shall provide joint trench composite plans for the underground electrical, gas, telephone, cable television, and communication conduits and cables including the size, location and details of all trenches, locations of building utility service stubs and meters and placements or arrangements of junction structures as a part of the Improvement Plan submittals for the project. Show preferred and alternative locations for all utility vaults and boxes if project has not obtained PG&E approval. A licensed Civil or Electrical Engineer shall sign the composite drawings and/or utility improvement plans. (All dry utilities shall be placed underground). b. The applicant shall negotiate any necessary right-of-way or easement with PG&E, or any other utilities, subject to the review and approval by the Engineering Division and the utility companies. c. A “Will Serve Letter” shall be provided for each utility company expected to service the subdivision. Early coordination with the utility companies is necessary to obtain this letter. Coordination of City utilities shall be through the Engineering Division. d. A note shall be placed on the joint trench composite plans which states that the plan agrees with City Codes and Standards and that no underground utility conflict exists. (PUBLIC WORKS) 58. UTILITY RESPONSIBILITIES – Storm and sewer utilities in private areas shall be privately owned and privately maintained. The water system in Gilroy is owned and maintained by the City. Conversely, public utilities within utility easements on 8.C.s Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -19- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX private property remain the responsibility of the individual utility companies to maintain. The plans shall note the inspection, ownership and maintenance responsibility for each utility shown on the plans within a Table of Responsibilities on the project cover sheet of the improvement plans submitted with the initial plan submittal. The table shall include the list of streets, the responsible party for inspection of the improvements, who is responsible for the ownership of the utility, and who is responsible for the maintenance of the utility. An example of this table, including the types of utilities to be listed, can be provided by the Engineering Division upon request. (PUBLIC WORKS) 59. PREPARATION OF ELECTRICAL PLANS – The project electrical plans shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer experienced in preparing these types of plans. The applicant shall submit, with the improvement plans submitted with the initial plan submittal, a letter from the design Electrical or Civil Engineer that states the electrical plan conform to City Codes and Standards, and to the approved improvement plans. The letter shall be signed and stamped by the professional engineer that prepares the improvement plans. (PUBLIC WORKS) 60. EXISTING FACILITIES PROTECTION – All existing public utilities shall be protected in place and if necessary relocated as approved by the City Engineer. No permanent structure is permitted within City easements without the approval of the City of Gilroy. (PUBLIC WORKS) 61. WATER QUALITY – Project design shall comply with the Stormwater Management Guidance Manual for Low Impact Development & Post-Construction Requirements. The applicant shall submit the Source Control Checklist as well as the appropriate Performance Requirements Checklist found in Appendix A of the manual at the time of the initial submittal for building permit. The manual can be found at the following site: www.cityofgilroy.org/261/Storm-Water-Management (PUBLIC WORKS) 62. DEVELOPER STORM WATER QUALITY RESPONSIBILITY – The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures, and implement such measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations, or a project stop order. (PUBLIC WORKS) 63. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) – The applicant shall perform all construction activities in accordance with Gilroy Municipal Code Section 27C, Municipal Storm Water Quality Protection and Discharge Controls, and Section E.10, Construction Site Storm Water Run-Off Control Program of the Regional NPDES Permit. Detailed information can be located at: www.flowstobay.org/documents/business/construction/SWPPP.pdf. This sheet shall be printed and included in all building construction plan sets permitted for construction in the City of Gilroy. (PUBLIC WORKS) 8.C.s Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -20- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 64. FIRE DEPARTMENT HYDRANT FLOW TEST – The applicant shall perform a Fire Hydrant flow test to confirm the water system will adequately serve the development, and will modify any part of the systems that does not perform to the standards established by the City. Applicant shall coordinate with Fire Department for the Fire Hydrant flow test. The flow test results shall be submitted with the initial plan submittal. (PUBLIC WORKS) 65. WATER CONSERVATION – The project shall fully comply with the measures required by the City’s Water Supply Shortage Regulations Ordinance (Gilroy City Code, Chapter 27, Article VI), and subsequent amendments to meet the requirements imposed by the State of California’s Water Board. This ordinance established permanent voluntary water saving measures and temporary conservation standards. (PUBLIC WORKS) 66. PROJECT STUDIES – The applicant shall submit, for City approval, any applicable water, sewer, storm drain or the development deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. These studies shall provide the supporting hydraulic calculation for pipe sizing per the City Standard Design Guidelines. The study shall be reviewed and approved by Engineering. If the results of the study indicate that this development contributes to the over-capacity of the trunk line, the applicant will be required to mitigate the impact by removing and replacing, or upsizing of the existing utilities to accommodate the appropriate level of project flows to the approval of the City Engineer. The improvements shall be addressed on the construction drawings, to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 67. MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE – The project design shall comply with City Master Plans to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 68. IMPACT FEES – The project is subject to the City’s Street Tree, Storm, Sewer, Water, Traffic, and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. The City’s latest impact fee schedule is available on the City’s website. Payment of all Impact Fees is required at first building permit issuance. Fees shall be based on the current fee schedule in effect at the time of fee payment, consistent with and in accordance with City policy. Note that impact fees increase at the beginning of each fiscal year, July 1. Specific fee language is provided further in these conditions of approval. (PUBLIC WORKS) 69. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN – At first improvement plan submittal, the applicant shall submit a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The SWMP shall analyze the existing and ultimate conditions and facilities, and the study shall include all off-site tributary areas. Study and the design shall be in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Management Guidance Manual (latest edition). Existing off-site drainage patterns, i.e., tributary areas, drainage amount, and velocity shall not be altered by the development. The plan shall be to the approval of the City Engineer and shall be 8.C.s Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -21- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX approved prior to the issuance of the building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 70. STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN – At first improvement plan submittal, the applicant shall submit a design level Stormwater Control Plan Report (in 8 ½ x 11 report format), to include background, summary, and explanation of all aspects of stormwater management. The report shall also include exhibits, tables, calculations, and all technical information supporting facts, including but not limited to, exhibit of the proposed site conditions, which clearly delineates impervious and pervious areas on site. The plan shall provide a separate hatch or shading for landscaping/pervious areas on-site including those areas that are not bio-retention areas. This stormwater control plan report format does not replace, or is not in-lieu of any stormwater control plan sheet in the improvement plans. The stormwater control plan shall include a signed Performance Requirement Certifications specified in the Stormwater Guidance Manual. At applicant’s sole expense, the stormwater control plan shall be submitted for review by an independent third party accepted by the City for compliance. Result of the peer review shall be submittal and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 71. REPAIR OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS – The applicant shall repair or replace all existing improvements not designated for removal, and all new improvements that are damaged during construction or removed because of the applicant’s operations. The applicant shall request a walk-through with the Engineering Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions. Said repairs shall be completed prior to the first occupancy of the project. (PUBLIC WORKS) 72. TRIANGULAR AREA OF VISIBILITY – Landscaping and permanent structures located within the 10' triangular area of visibility at the driveway, and 45’ triangular area of visibility at any project corner, shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 9’, and/or be less than 2’ in height. This includes all PG&E above ground structures and other utility facilities. The sight triangle shall be shown on the site civil plans, to the approval of the City Engineer, to demonstrate this condition. (PUBLIC WORKS) 73. DRIVEWAY DESIGN – Driveway grades shall be designed to keep a standard design vehicle from dragging or “bottoming out” on the street or driveway, and to keep water collected in the street from flowing onto the lots. The details of such design shall be provided on the site civil plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 74. GRADING & DRAINAGE – All grading activity shall address National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) concerns. There shall be no earthwork disturbance or grading activities between October 15th and April 15th unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If approved, the applicant shall submit a Winterization Erosion Control Plan to the City Engineer for review and approval. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -22- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX This plan shall incorporate erosion control devices and other techniques in accordance with Gilroy Municipal Code § 27C to minimize erosion. Specific measures to control sediment runoff, construction pollution and other potential construction contamination sediment runoff, construction pollution and other potential construction contamination shall be addressed through the Erosion Control Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall supplement the Erosion Control Plan and project improvement plans. These documents shall also be kept on-site while the project is under construction. A Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board, with a copy provided to the Engineering Division before a grading permit will be issued. A project WDID# shall be added to the grading plans prior to plan approval. (PUBLIC WORKS) 75. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER – Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant’s Geotechnical Engineer shall review the final grading, pavement design and drainage plans to ensure that said designs are in accordance with the recommendations or the project geotechnical study, and the peer review comments. The applicant’s Geotechnical Engineer’s approval shall then be conveyed to the City either by letter, or by signing the plans. All grading operations and soil compaction activities shall be per the approved project’s design level geotechnical report. All grading activities shall be conducted under the observation of, and tested by, a licensed geotechnical engineer. A report shall be filed with the City of Gilroy for each phase of construction, stating that all grading activities were performed in conformance with the requirements of the project’s geotechnical report. The applicant shall add this condition to the general notes on the grading plan. Certification of grades and compaction are required prior to Building Permit final. This statement must be added as a general note to the Grading and Drainage Plan. (PUBLIC WORKS) 76. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION – (specifically for projects in the flood zone) Site design, including building finished floor elevations, shall comply with the 1995 Uvas Creek Overflow Floodplain Delineation Project prepared by Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers. The project will be required to have a hydrologist review the project grading, to confirm this project does not have cumulative impacts to floodwaters. The City will require a review letter by Schaaf & Wheeler (Contact Caitlin Gilmore at 415-823-4964, Schaaf & Wheeler) be submitted to the approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 77. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT – The applicant shall obtain a Tree Removal Permit from the Engineering Division for removal of existing trees in the public right-of- way, prior to the issuance of a building permit or demolition building permit, whichever is issued first. (PUBLIC WORKS) 8.C.s Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -23- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 78. PHASED PERMITS – The applicant may, with the approval of the City Engineer, phase the permits to expedite the construction process. If this is done, each phase of the work will require a separate and complete set of plans to be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of the said permit. Overlapping of permits may occur, if approved by the City Engineer. No work on the next phase of construction, in advance of the permitted work, may occur. No “at risk” work will be permitted. Only the below phased permitted work will be allowed: a. Rough Grading b. Fine Grading c. Underground Utilities d. Site Improvements e. Landscaping f. Off-Site Plans shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the City Engineer prior to the commencement of work. (PUBLIC WORKS) 79. ENCROACHMENT PERMITS, BONDS, AND INSURANCE – The applicant must obtain an encroachment permit, posting the required bonds and insurance, and provide a one (1) year warranty for all work to be done in the City's right-of-way or City easement. This encroachment permit shall be obtained prior to the issuance of the first foundation building permit, and prior to any work being done in the City's right-of-way. All existing public utilities shall be protected in place and if necessary relocated as approved by the City Engineer. No permanent structures are permitted within the City right-of-way, or within any City easement unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall have street improvement plans prepared for all work in the public right-of-way by a licensed civil engineer, whose signed engineer’s stamp shall appear on the plans. Prior to issuance of the encroachment permit, the applicant shall submit any applicable pedestrian or traffic control plans for any lane or sidewalk closures. The traffic control plan shall comply with the State of California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), and standard construction practices. Offsite improvement plans shall be completed per the Public Works Engineering Checklist found in the Public Works, Engineering, portion of the City’s website. Partial submittals shall not be accepted. Applicant shall make a pre-submittal appointment with the Public Work Land Development Section, to review that all submittal applications items are complete. The submitted plans shall include all improvements along Highway 152, 10th St, Camino Arroyo and Renz Lane as described in the Project Transportation Analysis 8.C.s Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -24- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, and any subsequent traffic studies, and the improvements shown on the approved Architectural and Site Plans. Final construction plans and specifications shall be approved by the City Engineer, and released for construction, prior to the issuance of the encroachment permit. The applicant is required to confirm the location of existing utility lines along the project frontage by potholing. Prior to any potholing, applicant shall submit a pothole plan for City review and approval. Applicant shall provide the pothole result to the City Engineer prior to final design. Right-of-way improvements shall include, at a minimum, the following items: (PUBLIC WORKS) a. STREET TREES - The applicant shall plant new street trees along the project frontages (Camino Arroyo, Renz, and Highway 152) to match the City of Gilroy’s Street Tree Plan in effect at the time of construction. The street tree plans shall be per City Standard Drawings, and will include City Standard tree grates when trees are installed within the sidewalk. b. TREE GRATES – The applicant shall install City Standard Tree Grates when trees are planted within the sidewalk areas. Tree grates shall be 4’x6’, model OT-T24 by Urban Accessories, and shall be black power coated. The tree grates shall be shown on the improvement plans to be located at the back of curb to the approval of the City Engineer, and shall be installed with the street trees prior to the first occupancy. c. STREET MARKINGS - The applicant shall install necessary street markings of a material and design approved by the City Engineer, and replace any that are damaged during construction. These include but are not limited to all pavement markings, painted curbs and handicap markings. All permanent pavement markings shall be thermoplastic and comply with Caltrans Standards. Color and location of painted curbs shall be shown on the plans, and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Any existing painted curb or pavement markings no longer required shall be removed by grinding if thermoplastic, or sand blasting if in paint. d. SIDEWALK - The applicant shall construct, to existing City standards, new sidewalk surrounding the project site along both the Hwy. 152 and Camino Arroyo frontage. e. CURB RAMP(S) - The applicant shall construct new curb ramps at all four corners of the Hwy 152/Camino Arroyo intersection as recommended by the project traffic study. The new curb ramps shall comply to the latest Caltrans State Standard Drawing. The actual ramp "Case" shall be identified on the plans and shall be to the approval of the City Engineer. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -25- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX f. CURB AND GUTTER - The applicant shall install new curb and gutter along the project frontage (Renz and Hwy. 152) to existing City standards. New curb and gutter shall be constructed per the City Standard Drawing STR-12 along Renz per Caltrans Standards along the highway frontage. g. DRIVEWAY APPROACH(ES) - The applicant shall install City Standard Commercial driveway approaches as shown on the approved plans. The new commercial driveway approach shall be constructed per the City Standard Drawing. h. DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT - The applicant is to remove and replace the existing driveway approaches along Renz Lane that are being impacted by the project per the City Standard Drawing. i. SEWER LATERAL – The applicant shall install as a minimum a six (6) inch City Standard sewer lateral connections from the property line to the sewer main located in the street right-of-way. The installation shall be done in accordance with the City Standard Drawing SWR-6 including a 6" property line clean-out. j. SEWER CLEAN-OUT - The applicant shall install a sewer lateral clean-out at the property line in accordance with the City Standard Drawing SWR-6. k. SANITARY AND STORM SEWER MANHOLES - The applicant shall install standard storm and sanitary sewer manhole per approved plans and in accordance with the City Standard Drawing. l. STORM WATER CATCH BASIN(S) - The applicant shall install standard storm water catch basins, per approved plans, and in accordance with the City Standard Drawing. m. SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN(S) – Where necessary, the applicant shall install standard sidewalk underdrains in accordance with the City Standard Drawing STR-19. n. STREETLIGHTS – The applicant shall provide and install new City standard streetlights along the project frontages. The lights shall be standard aluminum electrolier streetlights per City Standard Drawing EL-1 to EL-5. The applicant is responsible for all PG&E service fees and hook-up charges. Any new service point connection required to power the new lights shall be shown on the construction drawings along with the conduit, pull boxes and other items necessary to install the street lights. An Isometric lighting level needs to be provided by the designer/contractor. A separate light study may be required by 8.C.s Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -26- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX the City Engineer. The new street light shall has 32’ mounting height per Standard Drawing EL-3, with mounting arm length per Standard Drawing EL-4, the Fixture shall be Leotek GC1 or GC2 series in an approved configuration per detail EL-2 or approved equal. The arm shall be installed at the location as shown on the approved plans. 80. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS – The applicant shall construct the improvements as recommended by the project Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants dated June 16, 2021. These improvements shall include: a. Hwy 152/Cameron Signal Improvements – The applicant is to add signal equipment for the fourth leg of this intersection. The design shall also accommodate a pedestrian crossing from the project site to the south side of Hwy 152. Design of these improvements shall be done by an engineering firm familiar with signal design. Final plans shall be signed by a licensed traffic engineer. Since this intersection is controlled by Caltrans, the applicant is to submit the plans to both the City and Caltrans for review. Caltrans approval and permit is required prior to the issuance of the City’s encroachment permit for this work. b. Hwy 152/Cameron Driveway Alignment – The project driveway at this location shall be aligned with the intersection and the approach/receiving lanes on the south side of the intersection. The applicant has submitted a separate plan showing this driveway configuration to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Final design of this driveway shall be shown on the construction drawings as previously approved. The City understands that this intersection is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and that the State may require additional modifications to the driveway alignment or location. c. Triple-Left Turn Lane Accommodation – A future eastbound triple-left turn will be required for build-out of this intersection. There is no requirement for dedication for this application, but a future 14’ minimum dedication will be required in the future to accommodate a third receiving lane when the corner parcel is submitted for development. d. Camino Arroyo Southbound Double-Right and Eastbound Hwy 152 Left-Turn Queuing – The applicant has provided conceptual drawing and cost estimate for the addition of a second southbound right-turn lane at the intersection of Camino Arroyo/Hwy 152 and to increase storage in eastbound left-turn lane. The City has reviewed the conceptual drawing and the cost estimate. The applicant shall pay $2,264,150 for this these future improvements to the City in-lieu of constructing the required improvements. The payment shall be made prior to the issuance of building permit. Payment for these future improvements will constitute satisfaction of this 8.C.s Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -27- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX condition. e. Site Access to Eastern Parcel – There is currently no ability for eastbound traffic to access the eastern project parcel via Hwy 152. The applicant is proposing improvements to allow emergency vehicles to access this parcel driveway. These improvements are subject to review and approval by Caltrans. The applicant is to submit the plans for this improvement to Caltrans, and obtain the State Encroachment Permit for this work prior to the issuance of the first project building foundation permit. If the proposal for this driveway access is not acceptable to Caltrans, the applicant shall provide emergency vehicle access to the eastern parcel via the Cameron/Hwy 152 driveway as shown on the alternate access submittal drawing. An Emergency Vehicle Access Easement (EVAE) shall be dedicated along this access road. The easement shall be dedicated by separate instrument or show for dedication on the parcel map. f. Renz Lane Bike Access – The applicant shall provide a Class I asphalt Bike Path, per MUTCD and NATCO Standards, between the Renz Lane terminus and along the northwest property line of proposed Lot 2 up to the bottom of embankment at Llagas Creek. The bike path design and layout shall be shown on the first plan submittal for the approval of the City Engineer. The project site shall provide the space required to accommodate a ramp connection to the trail and provide $46,944 towards the cost of construction of a ramp connection to a future trail planned for the area. 81. TDM PLAN – Annual TDM Status Report – The applicant shall provide an annual TDM Status Report, on July 1 of each year, to the Planning Director. The report shall indicate how the above mitigation measures are being carried out and the number of participants in the program. Should these TDM measures not be sufficient or be maintained, the applicant shall provide a modified TDM program for City review prior to implementation. 82. UTILITIES – All new services to the development shall be "underground service" designed and installed in accordance with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, AT&T (phone) Company and local cable company regulations. Transformers and switch gear cabinets located off-site shall be placed underground unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. Underground utility plans must be submitted to the City prior to installation. (PUBLIC WORKS) 83. EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING STANDARDS – The applicant shall submit a photometric plan for on-site lighting showing lighting levels to Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) Standards. The plan shall comply with the requirement of an average of 1 foot-candle with a 4:1 minimum to average ratio and a minimum lighting of 0.3 foot-candle. This lighting standard is applicable to all publicly- 8.C.s Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -28- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX accessibly parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and publicly-accessible grounds contiguous to all buildings. Private, interior courtyards not accessible to the public are not required to meet this standard. The lighting system shall be so designed as to limit light spill beyond property lines and to shield the light source from view from off site. The photometric plan shall be approved by the City Engineer or their designee and shall be addressed on the construction plans submitted for any demolition permit, building permit, or grading permit and shall be satisfied prior to issuance of whichever permit is issued first. Any subsequent building permits that include any site lighting shall also meet these requirements. (PUBLIC WORKS) 84. STREET LIGHTING STANDARDS – The applicant shall submit plans for street/sidewalk showing lighting levels to Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) Standards. The plan shall comply with lighting requirements as follows: a. Arterial Streets – 1.0 fc with minimum lighting of 0.5 fc b. Collector/Local Streets – 0.6 fc average with a 0.3 fc minimum c. High Volume Intersections – 1.0 fc with a 4:1 minimum to average ratio and a minimum lighting of 0.5 fc d. Low Volume Intersections – 0.6 fc with a 4:1 minimum to average ratio and a minimum lighting of 0.3 fc. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan identifying how these lighting levels are being met given the site geometrics, using the City Standard street lights, and a Type III lighting distribution. The width of the street shall and lighting levels shall determine the lighting spacing. Street lights and pull boxes shall be installed in the planter strip if one is present, or behind the back of walk where feasible so as to maintain sidewalk clear of obstructions to the approval of the City Engineer. The photometric plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of the building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 85. FENCES AND OTHER PERMANENT STRUCTURES WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF- WAY – The applicant shall locate all project fencing and foundation of a permanent nature within the project’s property and out of the City right-of-way whenever possible. If located within the City right-of-way, the applicant shall have a license agreement recorded against the owner’s property that indemnifies and holds harmless the City. The license agreement shall also include language in which the applicant agrees to allow access to any utility company wishing to have access to the public right-of-way for existing or new utility installation. The license agreement shall also include language that requires the removal of the fence and foundation, at the owner’s expense, should the City desire to use the right-of-way for street, sidewalk or other purposes identified by the City Engineer. The license agreement shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney’s Office and shall be recorded against the owner’s property prior to the issuance of any City encroachment permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 86. FLOOR DRAINS – All floor drains shall be plumbed to connect to the sanitary sewer 8.C.s Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -29- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX system, and shall not be connected to stormwater collection system. The plumbing connections shall be shown on the plans to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 87. STORM DRAIN INLETS AND WATERWAYS – Per the City’s Clean Water Program’s requirements, the applicant shall mark with the words “No Dumping! Flows to Bay,” or equivalent, using methods approved by the City standards on all storm inlets surrounding and within the project parcel. Furthermore, storm drains shall be designed to serve exclusively stormwater. Dual-purpose storm drains that switch to sanitary sewer are not permitted in the City of Gilroy. (PUBLIC WORKS) 88. SEPARATE WATER METERS SERVICES – Domestic, landscape, and fire water services, meters, and backflow preventers shall be per City standards. Each water service shall have a separate lateral from the main to each lot. (PUBLIC WORKS) 89. FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT CLEANING –The applicant of any food service facilities must agree to have any sink or other floor mat, container, and equipment cleaning area, connected to a grease interceptor prior to discharging to the sanitary sewer system. The cleaning area shall be large enough to clean the largest mat or piece of equipment to be cleaned. The cleaning area shall be indoors or in a roofed outdoor area; either areas being plumbed to the sanitary sewer. Per Gilroy Municipal Code Section 27C.8 Prohibition of Discharges from Industrial or Commercial Activity outdoor cleaning areas shall be designed to prevent stormwater run-on from entering the sanitary sewer and to prevent stormwater run-off from carrying pollutants to the site storm drains. Signs shall be posted indicating that all food service equipment washing activities shall be conducted in this area. Regular maintenance and cleaning of the grease interceptor is required. (PUBLIC WORKS) 90. LOADING DOCKS – Per Gilroy Municipal Code Section 27C.8 Prohibition of Discharges from Industrial or Commercial Activity, the applicant shall cover loading docks to minimize run-on to and run-off from the loading area. Roof downspouts shall be positioned to direct stormwater away from the loading area. Water from covered loading dock areas shall be drained to the sanitary sewer to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 91. GARBAGE/RECYCLE STORAGE AND SERVICE – The applicant shall provide an adequate area for the purposes of storing garbage and recycling collection containers for scheduled servicing by the franchise solid waste collection service. If required, the containers may be placed on the street within the loading zone for a maximum of two hours; one hour prior to the scheduled servicing time, and must be removed from the street within one hour after the service. The containers shall be placed at the service location allowing enough room for the truck to safely approach the containers. The collection containers shall be brought to the service area on the day of service and returned to the storage enclosure by the property owner. The containers are not to be in public view or in the public right-of-way 8.C.s Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -30- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX prior to, or beyond the scheduled service times. A letter shall be provided, to the approval of the City Engineer, from the City’s franchise solid waste collection service provider (Recology) confirming serviceability and site accessibility of the solid waste pickup as designed and shown on the project plans. Contact Recology at 408-842-3358. (PUBLIC WORKS) 92. CLEAN, INSPECT AND REPAIR SANITARY SEWER – The applicant is required to evaluate the conditions of the existing Sewer Lines along the project frontage by videotaping and providing the result to the City Engineer. The applicant shall clean and inspect (via remote TV camera) the mainline sewer from the manhole upstream to the manhole downstream of the project lateral connection, or the sewer lateral the project is connecting to if not connecting directly to the sewer main. The video inspection shall be done by a professional sanitary sewer video inspection company, to City Standards, and be completed prior to building permit issuance. The video of the inspection shall be reviewed with the Department of Public Works and any cracked or broken areas of the line along the project frontage shall be repaired by the applicant at his expense. If the integrity of existing utilities found to be compromised, applicant will be required to repair, or remove and replace if necessary, to the approval of the City Engineer. The required repairs (spray foam-RazoRooter or flushing, or removal of roots, or replacement), as determined by the City Engineer, shall appear on the improvement plans submitted by the applicant for permit plan check. All necessary repairs to the sewer shall be completed and approved prior to connection of the project lateral to the City sewer system. (PUBLIC WORKS) 93. CLEAN, INSPECT AND REPAIR STORM LINE – The applicant is required to evaluate the conditions of the existing Storm Lines along the project frontage by videotaping and providing the result to the City Engineer. The applicant shall clean and inspect (via remote TV camera) the storm line from the manhole upstream to the manhole downstream of the project area. The video inspection shall be done by a professional video inspection company, to City standards, and be completed prior to building permit issuance. The video of the inspection shall be reviewed with the Department of Public Works and any cracked or broken areas of the line along the project frontage shall be repaired by the applicant at his expense. If the integrity of existing utilities found to be compromised, applicant will be required to repair, or remove and replace if necessary, to the approval of the City Engineer. The required repairs, as determined by the City Engineer, shall appear on the improvement plans submitted by the applicant for permit plan check. All necessary repairs to the storm line shall be completed and approved prior to connection from the project site. (PUBLIC WORKS) 94. UNDERGROUND FRONTAGE UTILITY LINES – The applicant must underground all overhead utilities, and remove all related utility poles, along the project frontage from utility pole to utility pole. The applicant shall also remove all existing underground utilities no longer being used along the project frontage. 8.C.s Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -31- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX The applicant shall be responsible for the coordination with all utility companies existing on the poles and coordinate for their undergrounding or relocation as necessary so that the project frontage is free from utilities to the approval of the City Engineer. The applicant shall submit plans for this undergrounding work with the civil plans submitted with the first building permit. Permitting for this undergrounding work shall occur prior to the issuance of the first building permit unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 95. OVERHEAD UTILITY CLEARANCE – For projects that have overhead utility lines on-site that travel over new buildings, the applicant shall obtain a letter from the utility company indicating that there is adequate overhead clearance from the utility to the proposed building. The letter shall be submitted with the first set of improvement plans submitted. The plans shall show the existing utility pole, any necessary proposed pole protection (including overhead clearance warning identification), and shall be confirmed satisfactory with the utility company. The letter shall be to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 96. DRAINAGE – Drainage designed into landscaping with the purpose of reducing volume or improving quality of runoff from the site shall be implemented according to the requirements of the Stormwater Management Guidance Manual for Low Impact Development & Post Construction Requirements (June 2015) and shall also be, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Where necessary, sidewalk drains per the City Standard Drawing shall be provided to direct the water under the sidewalk and through the curb. No increase to the peak discharge shall be permitted downstream. In addition, discharge must conform to any non-point source permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Drainage improvements made on-site shall conform to standard engineering practices and shall not allow any site drainage to impact adjacent properties. All drainage capacity calculations shall be performed by a licensed Civil Engineer, whose signed engineer’s stamp shall appear on the calculations sheets, and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval with the project civil plans. For projects that include permanent structural controls for water quality protection, the O&M (operation and maintenance) procedures for such control features shall be submitted in a site-specific Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) which shall be reviewed and approved prior to occupancy. A formal O&M Agreement shall specify the owner’s responsibility to ensure their ongoing effective operation and maintenance. Such O&M responsibility requirements shall be recorded on the property deed. All offsite water entering the site must be managed by each lot. No stormwater shall be directed outside of the lot, including overland flow to the top of creek bank. Final design shall comply with all Conditions of Approval and comments by Valley Water. If the project is proposing to connect to an existing storm drain system within or 8.C.s Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -32- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX downstream from the site, the design engineer shall provide calculations with the final design plans to demonstrate that the downstream drainage system has adequate capacity to accommodate the additional site flows being added to the system for the design storm per City Standards. The calculations shall be to the approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 97. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT – At Developer’s sole expense, Developer shall submit results from a third-party review of the project’s stormwater design. The results shall confirm that the project is complying with requirements set in the City of Gilroy Stormwater Management Guidance Manual for Low Impact Development and Post-Construction Requirements. (PUBLIC WORKS) 98. SITE LANDSCAPING COORDINATION – The site landscaping needs to be coordinated between the stormwater treatment area and the overall site landscaping plan area. The landscaping within the stormwater treatment area will not count towards the site landscaping requirement. Stormwater treatment areas should be identified on the site first, and then site landscaping to make sure the correct plant material is identified for each area. Some site landscaping plant material may not be suitable in stormwater treatment areas due to the nature of the facility. Sewer facilities shall not be aligned through stormwater treatment facilities. It is the applicant’s responsibility to coordinate the civil stormwater treatment facilities and the plans from the project landscaper. (PUBLIC WORKS) 99. PARKING LOTS – The applicant shall submit plans for all required off-street parking lots showing proper grading, drainage, ramps profile, and parking dimensions in conformance with City parking standards. The plans shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of the first City permits. (PUBLIC WORKS) 100 BICYCLE PARKING – The applicant shall provide both long-term bicycle lockers and short-term bicycle racks on-site, as shown on the approved site plan, to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 101 DELIVERY TIMES – The applicant shall prepare and submit a final transportation plan showing the expected site trips (both entering and exiting) during a typical 24- hour period. The final transportation plan shall be substantially consistent with the trip generation assumptions of the project’s traffic study (Project Garlic Delivery Station Transportation Analysis, prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., dated May 26, 2021). Project operations must substantially comply with the final transportation plan. To verify compliance, the City may conduct a driveway count at the project site on a typical day within 12 months after issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. The applicant may also conduct its own traffic count on a typical day within 60 days of the City’s count. Should the average of the two counts differ significantly from the trip requirements of the final transportation plan, then the City may require the applicant to take corrective 8.C.s Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -33- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX action. In this scenario, the applicant in its discretion may (i) modify project operations to come into compliance with the final transportation plan; (ii) seek approval of a modification to the final transportation plan and/or other relevant project approvals, which modifications shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Director; or (iii) provide funding for Hexagon (or the City’s current traffic consultant) to prepare an additional traffic study to more fully determine the consistency of actual project operations with the LOS analysis in the initial Hexagon study. Any additional traffic study shall review only the City of Gilroy intersections studied in the initial Hexagon study, shall be fully funded by the project applicant, and shall be approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director. In no event shall the applicant be required to contribute to additional transportation improvements except to the extent that the additional traffic study shows that excess traffic generated by the project has caused peak-hour level of service failures at studied intersections. (PUBLIC WORKS) 102 ADDRESS PLAN – The applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department a final address plan. Said submittal shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the submittal of plans for any demolition permit, building permit, or site development permit and shall be satisfied prior to issuance of whichever permit is issued first. (PUBLIC WORKS) 103 PERMITS REQUIRED BY OTHER AGENCIES – The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits from federal, state, and local agencies as required to construct the proposed improvements. The applicant is hereby informed that permits may be required by one (1) or more of the following: Army Corps of Engineers, UPRR, Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Clara County Roads and Airports, Santa Clara Valley Water District or Habitat Permit. If project is within jurisdiction of any of these agencies, verification of permit or waiver of permit must be given to the Public Works Department prior to issuance of any required City permits. If the City is required to be a party to the permit application and a fee is required, the applicant shall reimburse the City for its cost. A copy of these permits shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the building permit. A portion of Lower Miller Slough runs though the site. Developer shall obtain any permitting necessary by local, state, or federal agencies related to any work within, near, or adjacent with Lower Miller Slough (“the AG ditch”). A copy of these permits shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of the building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 104 CALTRANS PERMIT – Prior to the issuance of the first foundation building permit, the applicant must submit evidence to the Public Works Department of approval by the State of California for the performance of any work within the State right-of-way. If the City is required to be a party to the permit application and a fee is required, the applicant shall reimburse the City for its cost. The Applicant is 8.C.s Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -34- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX encouraged to contact the Caltrans permit office as soon as possible to learn what is required to obtain Caltrans approval and issuance of a State Encroachment Permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 105 STREET TREE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee to prove funding towards additional tree planting in the City. The fee is based on the amount of added hardscape the project is adding. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $252. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 106 STORM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of storm drainage flowing off-site, and shall be used to enhance the City’s storm drainage system based on the recommendations of the adopted Storm Drainage Master Plan. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $39,625. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 107 SANITARY SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee proportional to the project’s share of the increase amount of sewage generated by the project, which shall be used to enhance the City’s sewer system based on the adopted Sewer Master Plan. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $694,788. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. At first improvement plan submittal, applicant’s engineer shall submit a calculation for sanitary sewer and water generation per the City’s Master Plan design criteria. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 108 WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of impact to the City’s water system, and the water needs of the development. The fee shall be used to fund improvements identified in the City’s Water Master Plan. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $189,133. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. At first improvement plan submittal, applicant’s engineer shall submit a calculation for water generation per the City’s Master Plan design criteria. The fee shall be 8.C.s Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -35- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 109 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee proportional to the project's share of transportation improvements needed to serve cumulative development within the City of Gilroy. The funds shall be used to fund improvements identified in the City Traffic Circulation Master Plan. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $782,994. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 110 PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACT FEE – The applicant shall pay a fee proportional to the project’s share of the increase to the use of City Public facilities. The estimated impact fee, based on the approved plans, is $207,234. This fee is only an estimate. The actual impact fee will be calculated based on building permit plans submitted, and the fees approved by the City Council in place at the time of the building permit submittal. The fee shall be collected by the Public Works Department and paid prior to issuance of the first building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 111 CONSTRUCTION NOTICING – At least one week prior to commencement of any on or off-site work, the applicant shall post at the site, and to property owners within (300') three hundred feet of the exterior boundary of the project site a notice that construction work will commence on or around the stated date. The notice shall include a list of contact persons with name, title, phone number and area of responsibility. The person responsible for maintaining the list shall be included. The list shall be current at all times and shall consist of persons with authority to initiate corrective action in their area of responsibility. The names of individuals responsible for dust, noise and litter control shall be expressly identified in the notice. Noticing shall be provided in both English and Spanish. The notice shall be submitted for review to the approval of the City Engineer two weeks prior to the issuance of the building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP OR PARCEL MAP, OR IF ANOTHER DEADLINE IS SPECIFIED IN A CONDITION, AT THAT TIME 112 DRIVEWAY ACCESS EASEMENT – The applicant or owner shall dedicate reciprocal driveway ingress and egress easements, as delineated on the approved plans. Said easements shall be approved by both affected property owners. The easements shall be approved by the City Engineer, recorded with the County Recorder’s Office, and a 8.C.s Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -36- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX recorded copy of the document returned to the City prior to the release of the first building permit. The easement may also be designated on any associated parcel or subdivision map. (PUBLIC WORKS) 113 PARCEL MAP – It shall be the applicant's responsibility to have a parcel map, prepared by a person authorized to practice land surveying in California, delineating all parcels created or deleted and all changes in lot lines in conformance with the Gilroy Municipal Code. The parcel map shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office prior to the issuance of any City permits. A parcel map guarantee shall be submitted to the City, by the applicant’s title company, prior to release of the parcel map to the title company for recordation. Prior to the City’s release of the parcel map to the title company, the applicant may, at the discretion of the City Engineer, be required to submit to the City an electronic copy of the map in the AutoCAD Version being used by the City at the time of recordation. It is the applicant's responsibility to check with their title company and the County Recorder’s Office to determine the time necessary to have the map recorded after City approval. As part of Phase 1 of this project, a Parcel Map shall be completed to subdivide all future lots. Said Parcel map will be presented to the City Council for review and action. The City Council meeting will be scheduled approximately fifty (50) days after the Parcel Map is deemed technically correct, and Subdivision Improvement Plans with supporting documents, reports and agreements are approved by the City. Developer shall dedicate necessary right of way and public easements for the project development. All private easements shall be recorded, and the recording information shown on the parcel map. Prior to Parcel Map approval, all required Private Easements for lot 1, 2, & 3 shall either be recorded by separate instrument, or be shown on the Parcel Map. (PUBLIC WORKS) 114 PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (PIA) – The applicant shall enter into a public improvement agreement with the City per Gov. Code Section 66462(a), and shall arrange to provide Payment and Performance bonds each for 100% of the cost of public infrastructure improvements to be constructed in the public right- of-way. These improvements shall include, but not be limited to, roadway construction, sidewalk, curb and gutter, water lines, storm lines, sewer lines, street lights, and signal equipment. City Standard insurance shall be provided per the terms of the agreement. The agreement will be forwarded to the City Council for approval with project parcel map. The PIA shall be approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of the project building permit. (PUBLIC WORKS) 115 MONUMENTS – The applicant shall arrange for the engineer to have all monuments set per the recorded final map. A certificate letter by the Surveyor or 8.C.s Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -37- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX Engineer will be provided to the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET PRIOR TO RELEASE OF UTILITIES, FINAL INSPECTION, OR ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST, OR IF ANOTHER DEADLINE IS SPECIFIED IN A CONDITION, AT THAT TIME. 116 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE – An elevation certificate per FEMA requirements must be complete by a Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer. The elevation certificate shall be submitted, to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the first building occupancy. (PUBLIC WORKS) 117 RECORD DRAWINGS – The applicant shall submit one full set of original record drawings and construction specifications for all off-site improvements to the Department of Public Works. All underground facilities shall be shown on the record drawings as constructed in the field. The applicant shall also provide the City with an electronic copy of the record drawings in the AutoCAD Version being used by the City at the time of completion of the work. The applicant shall also submit an AutoCAD drawing file of all consultants composite base map linework showing all public improvements and utility layouts. This condition shall be met prior to the release of utilities, final inspection, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. (PUBLIC WORKS) 118 PAVEMENT RESTORATION – HAUL ROUTE – Due to construction activities, new utility cuts along the project frontage, and the anticipated project construction truck traffic, the applicant shall grind and overlay with 0.2 feet of asphalt concrete the roadways anticipated to be damaged as a result of construction activities within the general area of the project or along the designated haul route. For this project, the pavement restoration shall include all of Camino Arroyo between the Hwy. 152 intersection and the construction driveway entrance on Camino Arroyo. Restoration also includes dig-out and repair of any failed sections of roadway along Camion Arroyo as deemed necessary. Repair of failed sections shall be marked out by the City inspector, and shall be made prior to the grind and overlay activities. The City Engineer shall approve the roadway repair prior to the release of utilities, final inspection, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first. (PUBLIC WORKS) 119 PAVEMENT RESTORATION – RENZ LANE – The applicant has indicated that all future semi-truck site deliveries will use Renz Lane to access the site. Renz Lane is not designed to withstand this heavy amount of truck traffic. Therefore, the applicant shall reconstruct or overlay Renz Lane to accommodate a Traffic Index (TI) of 10. These improvements shall be for the entire length of Renz Lane from 8.C.s Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -38- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX the intersection of Camino Arroyo. Design of these improvements shall be to the approval of the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) 120 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT – The applicant shall execute a Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement with the City Engineer as specified in Chapter 7.39.210-230 of the Stormwater Management and Discharge Control ordinance. The agreement shall outline the operation and maintenance (O&M) plan for the permanent storm water treatment facilities. The City-Standard Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Agreement will be provided by Public Works Engineering. The agreement shall include the following: a. This Agreement shall also provide that in the event that maintenance or repair is neglected, or the stormwater management facility becomes a danger to public health or safety, the city shall have the authority to perform maintenance and/or repair work and to recover the costs from the owner. b. All on-site stormwater management facilities shall be operated and maintained in good condition and promptly repaired/replaced by the property owner(s) or other legal entity approved by the City. c. Any repairs or restoration/replacement and maintenance shall be in accordance with City-approved plans. d. The property owner(s) shall develop a maintenance schedule for the life of any stormwater management facility and shall describe the maintenance to be completed, the time period for completion, and who shall perform the maintenance. This maintenance schedule shall be included with the approved Stormwater Runoff Management Plan. This agreement shall be executed prior to the first occupancy of the building. (PUBLIC WORKS) 121 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES INSPECTION – The Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Agreement work shall require inspections be performed which shall adhere to the following: a. To comply with the State Stormwater requirements and the NPDES permit, the applicant shall secure a QSD or QSP to maintain all erosion control and BMP measures during construction. The applicant’s QSD or QSP shall provide the City weekly inspection reports to the approval of the City Engineer. b. Stormwater facility inspections shall be done at least twice per year, once in Fall by October 1st, in preparation for the wet season, and once in Winter by March 15th. Written records shall be kept of all inspections and shall include, at minimum, the following information: 1. Site address; 2. Date and time of inspection; 3. Name of the person conducting the inspection; 4. List of stormwater facilities inspected; 5. Condition of each stormwater facility inspected; 8.C.s Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -39- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX 6. Description of any needed maintenance or repairs; and 7. As applicable, the need for site re-inspection. c. Upon completion of each inspection, an inspection report shall be submitted to Public Works Engineering no later than October 1st for the Fall report, and no later than March 15th of the following year for the Winter report. d. Before commencing any grading or construction activities, the applicant shall obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and provide evidence of filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board. e. The applicant is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are aware of all storm water quality measures and implement such measures. Failure to comply with the approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices, citations or a project stop order. f. Sequence of construction for all stormwater facilities (bioswales, detention/ retention basins, drain rock, etc.) shall be done toward final phases of project to prevent silting of facilities and reduce the intended use of the facilities. g. Prior to final inspection, all stormwater facilities will be tested by a certified QSP or QSD to meet the minimum design infiltration rate. All tests shall be made at on 20 ft x 20ft grid pattern over the surface of the completed stormwater facility unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. h. All soil and infiltration properties for all stormwater facilities shall be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. Percolation tests (using Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing with appropriate safety factors) at horizontal and vertical (at the depth of the stormwater facility) shall be conducted for each stormwater facility. A 50% safety factor shall be applied to the calculated percolation test and shall be used as the basis for design (the design percolation rate). The geotechnical report shall include a section designated for stormwater design, including percolation results and design parameters. i. All stormwater facilities for future lots shall be owned and maintained by the property owner. (PUBLIC WORKS) 122 REGIONAL BOARD STORMWATER REVIEW – This project may be subject to an audit by the Central Coast Regional Board. City may be required to provide the project stormwater design and storm water management plan for Regional Board review and comment. Prior to building permit issuance, the project shall receive approval or acknowledgment by the Regional Board. The project may need to provide the Regional Board any and all necessary documents (including reports, technical data, plans, etc.) for the Regional Board approval. (PUBLIC WORKS) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT, OR IF ANOTHER 8.C.s Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -40- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX DEADLINE IS SPECIFIED IN A CONDITION, AT THAT TIME 123 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES – The City shall be notified at least ten (10) working days prior to the start of any construction work associated with Public Works Engineering inspections, and at that time the contractor shall provide a project construction and phasing schedule, and a 24-hour emergency telephone number list. The schedule shall be in Microsoft Project, or an approved equal, and shall identify the scheduled critical path for the installation of improvements to the approval of the City Engineer. The schedule shall be updated weekly. The approved construction and phasing schedule shall be shared with Gilroy Unified School District (GUSD) to avoid traffic impacts to surrounding school functions. An approved construction information handout(s) shall also be provided to GUSD to share with school parents. (PUBLIC WORKS) a. All work shown on the improvement plans shall be inspected to the approval of the City Engineer as applicable. Uninspected work shall be removed as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. b. Construction activities related to the issuance of any Public Works permit shall be restricted to the weekday between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for general construction activities. No work shall be done on Sundays and on City Holidays unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Please note that no work shall be allowed to take place within the City right-of-way after 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. In addition, no work being done under the issuance of a Public Works encroachment permit may be performed on the weekend unless prior approvals have been granted by Public Works. The City Engineer may apply additional construction period restrictions, as necessary, to accommodate standard commute traffic along arterial roadways and along school commute routes. Signs outlining the project construction times shall be posted at conspicuous locations on site where it is visible to the public. The signs shall be per the City Standard Drawing for posting construction hours. The sign shall be kept free of graffiti at all times. Contact the Public Works Department to obtain sample City Standard sign outlining hours of operation. c. The allowed hours of Public Works construction activities may be waived or modified through an exemption, for limited periods, if the City Engineer finds that the following criteria are met: i. Permitting extended hours of construction will decrease the total time needed to complete the project thus mitigating the total amount of noise associated with the project as a whole; 8.C.s Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -41- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX or, ii. Permitting extended hours of construction are required to accommodate design or engineering requirements, such as a large concrete pour. Such a need would be determined by the project's design engineer and require approval of the City Engineer. iii. An emergency situation exists where the construction work is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition resulting in obvious and eminent peril to public health and safety. If such a condition exists, the City may waive any of the remaining requirements outlined below. iv. The exemption will not conflict with any other condition of approval required by the City to mitigate significant impacts. v. The contractor or owner of the property will notify residential and commercial occupants of property adjacent to the construction site of the hours of construction activity which may impact the area. This notification must be provided three days prior to the start of the extended construction activity. vi. The approved hours of construction activity will be posted at the construction site in a place and manner that can be easily viewed by any interested member of the public. vii. The City Engineer may revoke the exemption at any time if the contractor or owner of the property fails to abide by the conditions of exemption or if it is determined that the peace, comfort and tranquility of the occupants of adjacent residential or commercial properties are impaired because of the location and nature of the construction. The waiver application must be submitted to the Public Works Construction Inspector ten (10) working days prior to the requested date of waiver. d. The following provision to control traffic congestion, noise, and dust shall be followed during site excavation, grading and construction: i. All construction vehicles should be properly maintained and equipped with exhaust mufflers that meet State standards. ii. Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and by landscaping 8.C.s Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -42- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX disturbed soils as soon as possible. iii. Further, water trucks shall be present and in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be watered as often as deemed necessary by the City, or a minimum of three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration of the project. iv. Watering on public streets, and wash down of dirt and debris into storm drain systems will not be allowed. Streets will be cleaned by street sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Construction Inspector, or at least once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity shall take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to minimize the effects of blowing dust. Recycled water shall be used for construction watering to manage dust control where possible, as determined by the City Engineer. Recycled water shall be billed at the municipal industrial rate based on the current Santa Clara Valley Water District’s municipal industrial rate. Where recycled water is not available potable water shall be used. All potable construction water from fire hydrants shall be metered and billed at the current portable fire hydrant meter rate. v. All public streets soiled or littered due to this construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the satisfaction of the Construction Inspector. vi. Construction grading activity shall be discontinued in wind conditions that in the opinion of the Public Works Construction Inspector cause excessive neighborhood dust problems. vii. Site dirt shall not be tracked into the public right-of-way, and shall be cleaned immediately if done, or the project may risk being shut down. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris shall not be washed into the City’s storm drains. viii. Construction activities shall be scheduled so that paving and foundation placement begin immediately upon completion of grading operation. ix. All aggregate materials transported to and from the site shall be covered in accordance with Section 23114 of the California 8.C.s Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -43- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX Vehicle Code during transit to and from the site. x. Prior to issuance of any permit, the applicant shall submit any applicable pedestrian or traffic detour plans, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, for any lane or sidewalk closures. The traffic control plan shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer with experience in preparing such plans. The Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a licensed engineer in accordance with the requirements of the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and standard construction practices. The Traffic Control Plan shall be approved prior to the commencement of any work within the public right-of-way. xi. During construction, the applicant shall make accessible any or all City utilities as directed by the City Engineer. xii. The minimum soils sampling and testing frequency shall conform to Chapter 8 of the Caltrans Construction Manual. The applicant shall require the soils engineer submit to daily testing and sampling reports to the City Engineer. 124 PROJECT CLOSE-OUT – Prior to City acceptance of all tract subdivision and property improvement agreements, the applicant shall comply with all City construction close-out procedures to the approval of the City Engineer. Refer to the City’s website for a copy of these procedure. Prior to final inspections, all pertinent conditions of approval and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Engineer. A letter indicating that all project conditions have been met shall be submitted prior to the first occupancy. All public improvements, including the complete installation of all improvements relative to streets, fencing, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water system, underground utilities, etc., shall be completed and attested to by the City Engineer before approval of occupancy of any unit. Where facilities of other agencies are involved, such installation shall be verified as having been completed and accepted by those agencies. In addition, the applicant shall submit a detailed project cost estimate of all public improvements constructed on-site and within the public right-of-way. The cost estimate shall be prepared by the project engineer, and be to the approval of the City Engineer. The cost estimate shall be broken out into on-site and off-site improvements based on the format provided by the City. Until such time as all improvements required are fully completed and accepted by City, the applicant shall be responsible for the care maintenance of and any damage to such improvements. City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the work or Improvements required for this 8.C.s Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -44- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX project prior to the completion and acceptance of the work or Improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of, and are hereby assumed by the applicant. (PUBLIC WORKS) 125 HOLIDAY CONSTRUCTION MORATORIUM – Due to concerns for businesses within the vicinity of the Gilroy Outlets and within the Downtown area during the holiday season (November 20 to January 1), there shall be no construction activities within the right-of-way which would create lane closures, eliminate parking, create pedestrian detours, or other activities that may create a major disturbance as determined by the City Engineer. This prohibition shall apply to Leavsley Road east of US101, and Camino Arroyo in the vicinity of both the Gilroy Outlets and the Walmart/Costco/Lowes area. For the Downtown, the prohibition shall be along Monterey Road between 4th Street and 8th Street, and for one block east and west of Monterey in the specified restricted zone. (PUBLIC WORKS) 126 MATERIAL HAULING ROUTE AND PERMIT – For material delivery vehicles equal to, or larger than two-axle, six-tire single unit truck (SU) size or larger as defined by FHWA Standards, the applicant shall submit a truck hauling route and receive a haul permit that conforms to City of Gilroy Standards to the approval of the City Engineer. Note that the City requires a Haul Permit be issued for any hauling activities. The project sponsor shall require contractors to prohibit trucks from using “compression release engine brakes” on residential streets. The haul route for this project shall be: Ingress – Hwy 101 to Hwy 152 to Camino Arroyo to Site. Egress – Site to Hwy 152 to US101. A letter from the applicant confirming the intention to use this hauling route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works, and approved, prior to the issuance of any City permits. All material hauling activities including but not limited to, adherence to the approved route, hours of operation, staging of materials, dust control and street maintenance shall be the responsibility of the applicant. All storage and office trailers will be kept off the public right-of-way. Tracking of dirt onto City streets and walks will not be allowed. The applicant must provide an approved method of cleaning tires and trimming loads on-site. Any job-related dirt and/or debris that impacts the public right-of-way shall be removed immediately. No wash down of dirt into storm drains will be allowed. All material hauling activities shall be done in accordance with applicable City ordinances and conditions of approval. Mud, silt, concrete and other construction debris shall not be washed into the City’s storm drains. Violation of such may be cause for suspension of work. (PUBLIC WORKS) 127 CONSTRUCTION WORKER PARKING – The applicant shall provide a construction-parking plan that minimizes the effect of construction worker parking 8.C.s Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -45- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX in the neighborhood and shall include an estimate of the number of workers that will be present on the site during the various phases of construction and indicate where sufficient off-street parking will be utilized and identify any locations for off- site material deliveries. Said plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of City permits and shall be complied with at all times during construction. Failure to enforce the parking plan may result in suspension of the City permits. No vehicle having a manufacturer's rated gross vehicle weight exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the City Engineer (§15.40.070). (PUBLIC WORKS) 128 SITE WATER DISCHARGE – In accordance with the City’s Municipal Code, Prohibition of Illegal Discharges (Gilroy Municipal Code Section 27C.7), the City Engineer may approve the discharge of uncontaminated pumped ground waters to the sanitary sewer only when such source is deemed unacceptable by State and Federal authorities for discharge to surface waters of the United States, whether pretreated or untreated, and for which no reasonable alternative method of disposal is available. Following the verification of the applicable local, state and/or federal approvals, a Discharge Plan will be approved and monitored by the City Engineer. (PUBLIC WORKS) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH AT ALL TIMES THAT THE USE PERMITTED BY THIS ENTITLEMENT OCCUPIES THE PREMISES 129 POST CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) – In accordance with Gilroy Municipal Code Chapter 27D Post Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention all projects that meet the criteria described in the Storm Water Guidance Manual for Low Impact Development and Post- Construction Requirements shall prepare a storm water control plan (SWCP) and shall meet the requirements of the design standards and selection of best management practices and shall be selected and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or designee. Requirements shall include: a. Owner/occupant shall inspect private storm drain facilities at least two (2) times per year and sweep parking lots immediately prior to and once during the storm season. b. The applicant shall be charged the cost of abatement for issues associated with, but not limited to, inspection of the private storm drain facilities, emergency maintenance needed to protect public health or watercourses, and facility replacement or repair in the event that the treatment facility is no longer able to meet performance standards or has deteriorated. Any abatement activity performed on the applicant’s property by City staff will be charged to the applicant at the City’s adopted hourly rate. c. Label new and redeveloped storm drain inlets with the phrase “No Dumping 8.C.s Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -46- RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX – Drains to Bay” plaques to alert the public to the destination of storm water and to prevent direct discharge of pollutants into the storm drain. Template ordering information is available at www.flowstobay.org. d. All process equipment, oils fuels, solvents, coolants, fertilizers, pesticides, and similar chemical products, as well as petroleum based wastes, tallow, and grease planned for storage outdoors shall be stored in covered containers at all times. e. All public outdoor spaces and trails shall include installation and upkeep of dog waste stations. f. Garbage and recycling receptacles and bins shall be designed and maintained with permanent covers to prevent exposure of trash to rain. Trash enclosure drains shall be connected to the sanitary sewer system. (PUBLIC WORKS) 8.C.s Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1  PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Introduction CEQA Guidelines section 15097 requires public agencies to adopt reporting or monitoring  programs when they approve projects subject to an environmental impact report or a  negative declaration that includes mitigation measures to avoid significant adverse  environmental effects. The reporting or monitoring program is to be designed to ensure  compliance with conditions of project approval during project implementation in order to  avoid significant adverse environmental effects.  The law was passed in response to historic non‐implementation of mitigation measures  presented in environmental documents and subsequently adopted as conditions of project  approval. In addition, monitoring ensures that mitigation measures are implemented and  thereby provides a mechanism to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation measures.  A definitive set of project conditions would include enough detailed information and  enforcement procedures to ensure the measureʹs compliance. This monitoring program is  designed to provide a mechanism to ensure that mitigation measures and subsequent  conditions of project approval are implemented.   Monitoring Program This monitoring program is applicable to the Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision based on  the mitigation measures included in the adopted mitigated negative declaration. These  mitigation measures are designed to eliminate or reduce significant adverse environmental  effects to less‐than‐significant levels. These mitigation measures become conditions of project  approval, which the project proponent is required to complete during and after  implementation of the proposed project. The attached checklist is intended for monitoring  the implementation of the adopted mitigation measures.  Monitoring Program Procedures The City of Gilroy shall use the attached monitoring checklist for the proposed project. The  monitoring program should be implemented as follows:  1.The Gilroy Community Development Department should be responsible for coordination of the monitoring program, including the monitoring checklist. The Community Development Department should be responsible for completing the monitoring checklist and distributing the checklist to the responsible individuals or agencies for their use in monitoring the mitigation measures. Attachment B 8.C.s Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  2  2. Each responsible individual or agency will then be responsible for determining  whether the mitigation measures contained in the monitoring checklist have been  complied with. Once all mitigation measures have been complied with, the  responsible individual or agency should submit a copy of the monitoring checklist  to the Community Development Department to be placed in the project file. If the  mitigation measure has not been complied with, the monitoring checklist should  not be returned to the Community Development Department.  3. The Gilroy Community Development Department will review the checklist to  ensure that appropriate mitigation measures and additional conditions of project  approval included in the monitoring checklist have been complied with at the  appropriate time, e.g., prior to issuance of a use permit, etc. Compliance with  mitigation measures is required for project approvals.  4. If a responsible individual or agency determines that a non‐compliance has  occurred, a written notice should be delivered by certified mail to the project  proponent within 10 days, with a copy to the Community Development  Department, describing the non‐compliance and requiring compliance within a  specified period of time. If non‐compliance still exists at the expiration of the  specified period of time, construction may be halted and fines may be imposed at  the discretion of the City of Gilroy.   Mitigation Monitoring Checklist Step 1 Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits or Start of Construction Activities and  During Construction Where Noted  Mitigation Measure BIO‐1 To avoid/minimize impacts to burrowing owls potentially occurring within the  project site, the project applicant shall retain a biologist qualified in ornithology to  conduct surveys for burrowing owl. The approved biologist shall conduct a two‐ visit (i.e., morning and evening) presence/absence survey at areas of suitable  habitat on and adjacent to the project site boundary no less than 14 days prior to  the start of construction or ground disturbance activities. Surveys shall be  conducted according to methods described in the Burrowing Owl Survey  Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993)  and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). The applicant  shall submit evidence of completion of the preconstruction survey to the City of  Gilroy Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. Because  burrowing owls occupy habitat year‐round, seasonal no‐disturbance buffers, as  outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines  (CBOC 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012),  8.C.s Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  3  shall be in place around occupied habitat prior to and during any ground  disturbance activities. The following table includes buffer areas based on the time  of year and level of disturbance (CDFW 2012), unless a qualified biologist  approved by the CDFW verifies through non‐invasive measures that either: 1)  birds have not begun egg laying and incubation; or 2) that juveniles from the  occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent  survival.   Location Time of Year Level of Disturbance Buffers (meters) Low Med High Nesting Sites April 1 – Aug 15 200 m 500 m 500 m Nesting Sites Aug 16 – Oct 15 200 m 200 m 500 m Nesting Sites Oct 16 – Mar 31 50 m 100 m 500 m If burrowing owl is found and avoidance is not possible, burrow exclusion may  be conducted by qualified biologists only during the non‐breeding season, before  breeding behavior is exhibited and after the burrow is confirmed empty through  non‐invasive methods, such as surveillance. Occupied burrows shall be replaced  with artificial burrows at a ratio of one collapsed burrow to one constructed  artificial burrow (1:1). Evicted burrowing owls may attempt to colonize or re‐ colonize an area that would be impacted, thus ongoing surveillance during  project activities shall be conducted at a rate sufficient to detect burrowing owls if  they return.   If surveys locate occupied burrows in or near construction areas, consultation  with the CDFW shall occur to interpret survey results and develop a project‐ specific avoidance and minimization approach.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure BIO‐2 To avoid impacts to nesting birds during the nesting season (January 15 through  September 15), to the extent feasible, construction activities that include any  vegetation removal or ground disturbance (such as grading or grubbing) shall be  conducted between September 16 and January 14, which is outside of the bird  8.C.s Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  4  nesting season. If construction activities commence during the bird nesting  season, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre‐construction survey for  nesting birds to ensure that no nests would be disturbed during project  construction.  If construction activities are scheduled during the nesting season (February 15 to  August 30 for small bird species such as passerines; January 15 to September 15  for owls; and February 15 to September 15 for other raptors), a qualified biologist  shall conduct nesting bird surveys. Two surveys for active nests of such birds  shall occur within 10 days prior to start of construction, with the second survey  conducted with 48 hours prior to start of construction. Appropriate minimum  survey radius surrounding the work area is typically 250 feet for passerines, 500  feet for smaller raptors, and 1,000 feet for larger raptors. Surveys shall be  conducted at the appropriate times of day to observe nesting activities.  If the qualified biologist documents active nests within the project site or in  nearby surrounding areas, an appropriate buffer between each nest and active  construction shall be established. The buffer shall be clearly marked and  maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. Prior to  construction, the qualified biologist shall conduct baseline monitoring of each  nest to characterize “normal” bird behavior and establish a buffer distance, which  allows the birds to exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist shall monitor  the nesting birds daily, or as otherwise required by the California Department of  Fish and Wildlife, during construction activities and increase the buffer if birds  show signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g., defensive flights and  vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and/or flying away from the  nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, the qualified biologist or construction  foreman shall have the authority to cease all construction work in the area until  the young have fledged and the nest is no longer active. This measure shall be  implemented by the developer prior to start of construction activities.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.s Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  5  Mitigation Measure BIO‐3 Based on the current proposed plans, if the aquatic features shown in the  Biological Resources Report and Aquatic Resource Delineation Report (Huffman‐ Broadway Group, Inc. 2020a, 2020b) are considered jurisdictional by the CDFW  and/or RWQCB, the project may require one or more regulatory permits. To  determine whether the drainage is considered jurisdictional, the applicant shall  retain a qualified biologist/wetland regulatory specialist to initiate discussions  with the RWQCB and CDFW for this purpose.   If impacts to a feature subject to state jurisdiction may occur, fill authorization  will be sought from the RWQCB and/or the CDFW if determined necessary  through the regulatory agency consultation process.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall incorporate all of the  geotechnical engineer’s recommendations into the project design, subject to  review and approval by the City’s Public Works Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐2 The developer shall prepare an erosion control plan that details appropriate  methods to prevent and/or minimize erosion. The erosion control plan is subject  to the review and approval of the City of Gilroy Public Works Department prior  to the issuance of a grading permit.    8.C.s Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  6  In addition to the mitigation above, the proposed project would be required to  comply with the General Plan Policy PH 2.6 with its Preliminary Grading and  Drainage Plan, which requires all new development proposals to include a site  plan detailing appropriate methods of erosion and deposition control during site  development and subsequent use; and General Plan Policy PH 3.6, which requires  new development to include landscaped areas for reducing runoff and increasing  runoff absorption capacities and encourages the use of permeable paving  materials, which would minimize the erosive effects of storm water (refer to  Sheets C300, C600, and L100 illustrating the drainage management and  landscaped areas proposed on the site).  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GEO‐3 Pursuant to the Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Condor Earth on  July 8, 2020 for the project, the following recommendation shall be implemented  in order to reduce impacts related to the potential for expansive soils onsite:  The foundation should extend below much of the zone of seasonal moisture  variation or be constructed sufficiently stiff to move as rigid units with  differential movement of foundations from heaving or settlement reduced to a  value compatible with the proposed superstructure type and architectural  finishes. The project structural engineer should take this into account when  designing the foundations. Provided that the site is graded and all building pads  are prepared in accordance with the recommendations provided in the  geotechnical study, the conventional shallow foundation system would be  appropriate for the proposed building foundations.  This recommendation shall be implemented prior to issuance of a grading permit  subject to the review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works  Department.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:   8.C.s Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  7                                            Mitigation Measure HYDRO‐1 The project proponent shall prepare and submit Erosion Control Plans to the City  of Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The  Erosion Control Plans shall illustrate how the project’s grading phases would  prevent or minimize erosion and siltation on‐ and off‐site, such as the inclusion of  Best Management Practices.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer   Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure HYDRO‐2 The project proponent shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan for review and approval by the City of Gilroy Public Works  Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Storm Water Pollution  Prevention Plan shall identify construction and post‐construction Best  Management Practices to prevent water pollution at the source.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Developer  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Public Works Department  Monitoring Notes:                                             After the proposed MND was sent out for public review, City staff received an email from  Kanyon Sayers‐Roods, a consultant/tribal monitor on behalf of the Indian Canyon Band of  Costanoan Ohlone People. The email was in response to the City’s offer of consultation  pursuant to SB18 and AB52. The consultation process was subsequently conducted and  completed. No new impacts or potential impacts were identified during the consultation  8.C.s Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  8  process; however, the following mitigation measures were agreed to among the parties.  These mitigation measures are in addition to the City’s standard conditions of approval  addressing the unexpected discovery of historic resources, unique archaeological resources,  and Native American remains.  Mitigation Measure TC‐1 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist or Native American  Monitor to conduct Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to the start of grading and  construction activities. The applicant shall provide evidence that the training has  been conducted, prior to issuance of a grading permit, subject to review and  approval by the Planning Division.  TC‐2 The applicant shall contract with a qualified Archaeologist and a qualified Native  American Monitor to be present on the project site during ground disturbing  activities, which will assist in minimizing potential effects on potential cultural  resources and ensure inadvertent impacts are mitigated. The applicant shall  provide evidence that the qualified Archaeologist and qualified Native American  Monitor will be onsite during ground disturbing activities, prior to issuance of a  grading permit and subject to review and approval by the Planning Division.  The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall prepare weekly reports  regarding the monitoring activities until ground disturbing activities have been  completed. If tribal resources are discovered during these activities, all work shall  be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the find and the area shall be  staked off immediately. The Archaeologist and Native American Monitor shall  evaluate the find. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate  mitigation measures shall be formulated by the Archaeologist and Native  American Monitor and implemented by the responsible party.    8.C.s Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  9  Step 2 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits  Mitigation Measure AQ‐1 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant shall provide to the city details of a proposed  vehicle reduction program for future employees of the project utilizing the Bay  Area Commuter Benefits Program, 511.org rideshare program, or other local  commuter benefits program.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure AQ‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits, subject to review and approval by the City  Planning Division, the applicant for any phase shall include on the project plans  the number of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, dedicated vanpool and  other high‐occupancy vehicle (HOV) carpool spaces, bike racks, changing rooms  and/or lockers on site, which would facilitate the use of ride‐sharing and bicycles.    Implementation of these measures ensures that the proposed project, as  mitigated, is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The proposed project,  therefore, does not have aspects that would interfere with or hinder  implementation of the 2017 Clean Air Plan. Plan consistency related to GHG  emissions is discussed in Section D.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this initial  study.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.s Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  10  Mitigation Measure GHG‐1 If the City of Gilroy has adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the  time building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall have the  option to incorporate applicable GHG reduction measures identified in the GHG  reduction strategy into the proposed project. Applicable measures from the  reduction strategy shall be confirmed by the City of Gilroy. If the Planning  Division finds that the project is consistent with the GHG reduction strategy, the  significant project GHG impact would be reduced to less than significant and no  further mitigation would be required.   If City has not adopted a qualified GHG reduction strategy prior to the time  building permits are issued for the project, the applicant shall implement  mitigation measure GHG‐2.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             Mitigation Measure GHG‐2 Prior to issuance of building permits for the project proposed the applicant shall  prepare a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan shall  demonstrate, with substantial evidence, that GHG emissions will be reduced to  the year 2022 service population threshold of significance of 4.32 MT CO2e per  year per service population. This would require that the unmitigated project  emissions of 3,173 MT CO2e per year be reduced by 884 MT CO2e per year [3,173  MT CO2e – (4.32 MT CO2e x 530 service population)] to 2,289 MT CO2e.  The GHG Reduction Plan shall prioritize on‐site GHG reduction design features.  At a minimum, the Reduction Plan should include the GHG reduction measures  listed below. Other feasible reduction measures may be substituted for the  measures listed below provided that the City of Gilroy Planning Division  Manager finds, based on substantial evidence provided by the applicant, that the  substitute measures achieve an equal or greater volume of emissions reduction.  Additional measures may be added by the applicant. A combination of the  following measures can be included in the Reduction Plan:  8.C.s Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  11   Implement the Transportation Demand Management Program strategies  identified in mitigation measure TR‐1 in this initial study to reduce VMT and  associated mobile source GHG emissions from employee travel.   Include sufficient plug‐in capabilities for transport refrigeration units, if any,  to eliminate the time that a transportation refrigeration system is powered by  a fossil‐fueled internal combustion engine while at the site.   Exceed minimum CALGreen Code standards for bicycle parking and bicycle  lockers; parking spaces dedicated for low‐emitting, fuel efficient vehicles; and  electric vehicle charging stations.   Design buildings to exceed the current 2019 Title 24 energy efficiency  standards by a minimum of five percent.   All appliances installed in all buildings shall be Energy Star rated.     Exceed higher than mandated parking lot lighting and area lighting energy  efficient standards.   Electrify truck loading docks.  In lieu of or in addition to one or more of the on‐site measures above, the  applicant may include in the Reduction Plan and take credit for GHG reductions  resulting from making direct investments in off‐site GHG reduction  activities/programs in the vicinity. Examples of direct investments include  building retrofit programs that pay for cool roofs, solar panels, solar water  heaters, smart meters, energy efficient lighting energy efficient windows, and  insulation. Other examples include financing programs for installing electric  vehicle charging stations, electrifying school buses, or planting local urban  forests.  The applicant may choose to retain a qualified air quality / GHG professional to  quantify the GHG reductions that would result from implementing the Reduction  Plan based on substantial evidence to be included in the Reduction Plan. The  GHG reduction measures should be implemented even if their implementation  would result in a GHG reduction, but the reduction cannot be reliably quantified.  The GHG emissions reduction volume resulting from implementing the  Reduction Plan measures may then be subtracted from the required 884 MT CO2e  per year reduction volume in order to reduce or avoid the significant GHG  impact.   If the applicant elects to quantify the GHG emissions reductions from on‐site  measures and investments in off‐site reduction programs and the reductions are  insufficient to reduce project emissions by a minimum of 884 MT CO2e per year  8.C.s Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  12  or more, the applicant may then secure the balance of the required GHG  emissions reduction volume by purchasing and retiring carbon offset credits. The  carbon offset credits shall meet the following performance standards:   Carbon offset credits shall be issued by a recognized, reputable and  accredited registry that mandates the use of established protocols for  quantifying and issuing the offset credits. Credits issued based on protocols  approved by CARB should be prioritized. Examples of such registries  include the Climate Action Reserve, American Carbon Registry, and Vierra.    The carbon offset credits should be generated from projects developed in the  United States. Credits from projects developed internationally should not be  used unless the applicant demonstrates with substantial evidence that  sufficient carbon offsets from projects in the United States are unavailable.  International offsets must be quantified and issued using established  protocols that are recognized in the United States and that are issued by  recognized, reputable and accredited registries.    All carbon offset credits purchased to reduce GHG emissions, must meet the  criteria of being real, quantifiable, permanent, verifiable, enforceable, and  additional, consistent with the standards set forth in Health and Safety Code  section 38562, subdivisions (d)(1) and (d)(2).    Prior to issuing building permits for the proposed project, the applicant shall submit  the GHG Reduction Plan for review and approval of the City of Gilroy Planning Division  Manager. The Reduction Plan shall demonstrate that GHG emissions from the project will be  substantially reduced. If on‐site design and off‐site program investments do not result in  reducing the GHG impact to less than significant, the applicant shall, prior to approval of  occupancy permits, provide documentation in the form of an executed contract or other  certification that the balance of emissions reduction required to reduce the GHG impact to  less than significant has been obtained through purchase of carbon offset credits, subject to  the performance standards listed above.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division  Monitoring Notes:                                             8.C.s Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  13  Step 3 Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit  Mitigation Measure TR‐1 The applicant shall prepare and implement a Transportation Demand  Management (TDM) program to reduce the project’s VMT impact to a less‐than‐ significant level. The TDM measures shall include, but not be limited to, any  combination of the following components, as necessary to which would reduce  the project’s VMT impact to less than significant (i.e., below the established  impact threshold of 17.12 miles per job):  a. Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedule Program (VTA TP08). This  program (compressed work week) allows and encourages employees to  telecommute from home when possible, or to shift work schedules to reduce  vehicle miles traveled.  i. 80% of employees shall be assigned a four day/40‐hour work shift.  b. Ridesharing Program and Commuter Benefits (VTA TP11, TP13). This  program matches employees interested in carpooling who have similar  commute patterns. This TDM strategy encourages the use of carpooling,  which reduces the number of vehicle trips and thereby reduces VMT.   i. Employers shall strive to have 20 percent of eligible employees  participate in this program through regular communications and  incentives.  ii. Incentives shall include, but not be limited to, pre‐tax benefits.  iii. The applicant shall provide dedicated carpool/vanpool parking spaces  commensurate with the number of employees participating in this  program.  iv. Employers shall provide “Guaranteed Ride Home Services,” which  provides employees who regularly (twice a week) carpool, vanpool,  bike, walk or take transit to work with a free and reliable ride home  when one of life’s unexpected emergencies arise. Commuters may take  advantage of this service up to four times per year to get home for  unexpected emergencies such as a personal illness or a sick child. This  service can also be used for unscheduled overtime when the employer  mandates working late.  c. Provide transit passes to employees interested in public transit.  i. Transit passes shall off‐set at least 25 percent in the participating  employees’ transit costs from home to work and back.  8.C.s Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision)  14  d. The applicant shall provide a minimum of 10 bike racks (in a secure area)  each, for both the phases of the project.   The TDM program shall be prepared prior to issuance of an occupancy permit,  subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and the Public Works  Department. The applicant may suggest substitutions to these measures that are  equally or more effective than the presented measures. The Director of Planning  is authorized to allow an amendment (but is not required to allow such  amendment) to the TDM program upon making written findings, supported by  substantial evidence, that the substituted measure or measures are as effective as  those in the adopted TDM plan and that the amended TDM plan will result in  meeting the above‐referenced threshold (17.12 miles per job) for reducing VMT  from the proposed project to a less‐than‐significant level.    End users of the project shall submit annual monitoring reports to demonstrate  effectiveness.  Party Responsible for Implementation: Project Applicant and End Users  Party Responsible for Monitoring:  Gilroy Planning Division and Public Works  Department  Monitoring Notes:                                               8.C.s Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: CC Resolution AS 20-21 (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP FOR THE PROJECT GARLIC INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THAT CERTAIN 59.7 ACRE PARCEL AT THE EAST END OF RENZ LANE, EAST OF CAMINO ARROYO BETWEEN W BRANCH LLAGAS CREEK AND NORTH OF SR 152, APN: 841-18-082. FILE NUMBER TM 20-07 WHEREAS, applications filed by Panattoni Development Company, with the consent of the property owner, John B. Machado, were received on October 21, 2020 and accepted as complete May 6, 2021, requesting a planned development zoning amendment to establish C3/M2 standards, general plan amendment to amend the mobility element, architectural and site review for site development and planned unit development permit, conditional use permit for a distribution facility use on Lot 2, and tentative map to create three separate lots for the 59.7 acre property located APN 841-18-082 (east of Renz Lane, south of the West Branch of Llagas Creek, north of Highway 152 and east of Camino Arroyo); WHEREAS, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2021070525) was prepared for the project in full accordance with the procedural and substantive requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and recommended for adoption as the project environmental document by separate resolution; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time the Planning Commission received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the zone change request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project entitlements including TM 20-07. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Gilroy recommended findings for approval of TM 20-07 as required by the City Municipal Code and State Subdivision Map Act; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, received and considered the MND environmental document prepared for the project, together with the tentative map request and related entitlements, the staff report, and all evidence received including written and oral public testimony related to the MND and project entitlements including TM 20-07. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy hereby makes the following findings for approval of TM 20-07 as required by the City Municipal Code and State Subdivision Map Act: FINDINGS 1. The proposed tentative map creating three parcels for further development of the 59.7-acre parcel is consistent with the underlying General Industrial land use designation and the commercial/industrial planned development C3M2/PUD zoning district. 8.C.t Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: CC Resolution TM (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -2- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX 2. The design and improvement of the subdivision is consistent with the applicable general plan in that it will include all necessary roadway and frontage improvements required to comply with the City traffic and pedestrian circulation plans, and can be adequately served by police, fire, water, sewer and drainage systems. 3. The site is physically sited for the proposed development intensity as the project has adequate roadway access and the development intensity is within the floor area ratios anticipated for industrial development of the 59.7-acre site. 4. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements would not cause any substantial environmental damage or injury to wildlife or habitat given that the project includes appropriate stormwater drainage including on-site detention, finish grade elevations of the buildings would be raised to comply with flood elevation minimum requirements, the site does not have any unique environmental features, and a habitat permit is required in compliance with the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan which will result in payment of required fees to mitigate for the project impacts on wildlife and habitat protected under the plan. 5. The design of the subdivision or improvements will not cause serious public health problems given that the site will be designed to comply with City standards for vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation, and the site does not have any hazardous materials or uses associated with the project. 6. The subdivision will not conflict with any public easements and appropriate easements will be recorded for the property with the final map. 7. The site is not subject to unusual flooding or other hazardous conditions that would preclude development of the property as proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy approves TM 20-07, subject to the attached conditions, enactment of concurrent zoning ordinance amendment request Z 20-07 and development consistent with the planned unit development plan approval AS 20-21, and any subsequent amendments. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: 8.C.t Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: CC Resolution TM (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -3- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX Marie Blankley, Mayor ATTEST: LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 8.C.t Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: CC Resolution TM (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) -4- RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX ATTACHMENT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TM 20-07 PLANNING CONDITIONS 1. Initial approval of a tentative map is valid for twenty-four (24) months and may only be extended consistent with the provisions of the subdivision map act. 2. The project shall provide cross lot access agreements across Lot 2 for benefit of Lot 1 and Lot 3; providing driveway aisle access serving the subject properties from Renz Lane. 3. The final map shall provide public trail access easement from Renz Lane along the west side of Lot 2 with a future connection to Llagas Creek. This shall include provision of sufficient area dedicated on the lot for the future construction of an accessible ramp to the top of the Llagas Creek levee. 4. Development of any lot within the subdivision shall only be permitted subject to approval of an Architectural and Site Review permit granted in substantial compliance with the site M2/C3 PUD zoning and associated Architectural and Site Review permit approval(s). 8.C.t Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: CC Resolution TM (3539 : Project Garlic Industrial Subdivision) City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Appointments to Fill Vacancies on Boards & Commissions Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: City Clerk Submitted By: LeeAnn McPhillips Prepared By: LeeAnn McPhillips Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION Appoint members to the vacant seats on the Housing & Neighborhood Revitalization Committee and Open Government Commission. BACKGROUND In September 2021, the City Council opened a recruitment for vacancies on variou s boards and commissions with applications due on October 15, 2021. At the close of the application period, the following applications were received, and interviews were conducted on Monday, November 1, 2021 as scheduled. At this time, the following applicants are available for appointment to the open seats on the below noted Boards/Committees/Commissions. The applications are attached for Council’s reference. 9.A Packet Pg. 429 Board/Committee/Commission Name of Applicants # of Seats Open Housing & Neighborhood Revitalization Committee 1. Alicia Costa 2. Laura One Feather (interviewed on 11/1/21) 3. Jan Guffey (interviewed on 11/1/21) 4. Michael Sanchez (interviewed on 11/1/21) 1 seat open with a term ending 12/31/22 Open Government Commission 1. Kenneth Christopher 2. Tia Enriquez 1 seat open with a term ending 12/31/24 Physically Challenged Board of Appeals None 1 seat open with a term ending 12/31/23 CONCLUSION Any vacant seats not filled through this recruitment process will be folded into the Annual Recruitment process currently open for applications with a closing date of Friday, December 17, 2021. Also, any candidates not selected for appointment on November 15th are encouraged to look at the Annual Recruitment Flyer and reapply for any seats for which they have interest as there are a variety of vacancies available beginning in 2022. 9.A Packet Pg. 430 City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Status Update and Council Direction on the Evaluation of the Boards and Commissions Structure for Efficiency Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Administration Submitted By: Jimmy Forbis Prepared By: Bryce Atkins Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION Council receive report and provide direction. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Council provided direction for staff to bring back to the City Council a plan for a more efficient and effective structure for the City’s commissions and committees (Commissions). Staff has and will continue to cultivate options for the City Council to consider. Staff’s proposed next step in the process is to engage with each of the Commissions to identify options to make each Commission efficient and effective. Once the Commissions have an opportunity to provide feedback and identify options and recommendations, staff will return with a comprehensive listing of all options and a recommendation for Council consideration. BACKGROUND 9.B Packet Pg. 431 At the September 13, 2021 regular meeting of the Gilroy City Council, Council provided direction as part of a future agenda item request for staff to bring back recommendations for a more effective structure to the Commissions. The impetus for the agenda item is the repeated recruitments for new members to the Commissions due to many departures and attendance issues of various Commission members. An example of previous committee restructuring included the consolidation and elimination of the Public Arts Committee and the Housing Committee as stand-alone committees. That consolidation reduced the total number of boards and commissions from 15 to 13. There are currently five Commissions that are established in the City Charter. All ot her Commissions were established either through an ordinance, resolution, or other authorization of the City Council. ANALYSIS Tiers of Boards and Commissions For the purposes of this report, staff has categorized the Commissions of the City into tiers, based on a set of parameters. These parameters include if the board or commission is in the City Charter, if they meet regularly, and if their purpose grants administrative function(s) to the board or commission. Below is a graphic showing which commissions are in which tier, followed by a description of each tier. 9.B Packet Pg. 432 Tier 1 Tier 1 Commissions are those that are created by adoption of the City Charter. Because the Charter can only be amended through a vote during an election, there are very limited options for these Commissions to be reduced, combined with each other, or to change the language to modify/reduce/amend the stated purpose of these Commissions. Tier 2 Tier 2 Commissions meet regularly, most with monthly meetings, and several have administrative functions granted to them to varying degrees, either actively as part of their creation, or passively by decision and permissive approaches in the past. The Open Government Commission is authorized of its administrative functions via the Open Government Ordinance. The Bicycle Pedestrian Commission is granted its administrative functions primarily because of funding sources through Bike Fund donations and Measure B Education and Encouragement funds. The Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization Committee performs evaluations and provides funding recommendations relating to Community Development Block Grant and Housing Trust Fund grants. These authorizations and allowances for subject matter discretion is granted by Council and staff but is not legally required for administering these programs and funds. Should Council determine to remove or relocate these functions to other Commissions or staff, the changes are possible through resolutions or ordinance amendments, if required. Tier 3 Tier 3 Commissions meet as needed to perform limited administrative functions for very specific matters of jurisdiction. Changes Currently Being Evaluated Staff has developed a few options for future consideration by Council to help alleviate recruiting challenges, as well as efficiencies to facilitate less overall demand for the Commissions. There are some that would require a City Charter amendment, and others that would not. To date, these recommendations include the following: • Options requiring a Charter amendment o Eliminate term limits Under this proposal, commissioners would serve repeating terms, without the limitation of the term limits imposed by the current version of the Charter. Commissioners may resign at will, and Council may remove commissioners when needed or appropriate. However, so long as both a commissioner and the Council are pleased with the commissioner’s service, they would be able to remain in service, lessening the number of automatic replacements in the same timeframe. 9.B Packet Pg. 433 o Consolidation or elimination of any Tier 1 Commission(s) Should Council be interested in eliminating or combining commissions that fall under Tier 1, a Charter amendment would be required. Some of the commissions could have shared areas of interest. This includes the Parks and Recreation, Arts and Culture and Library Commissions. In this option, two or all three of these commissions can potentially be combined with a consolidated scope of jurisdiction. • Options that are available without requiring a Charter amendment o Extend the length of terms from four years to a longer term length. This could reduce the commissioner turnover due to term limits. The Council would still have the ability to remove a commissioner if they so choose, as well as the commissioner choosing to resign at their option. o Reduce meeting frequencies to Quarterly or As Needed Some of the Commissions are scheduled by their ordinances or authorizing actions to meet monthly, and most Tier 1 Commissions meet monthly, without any such requirement in the Charter. They could be reduced in frequency to meet quarterly instead, or even as needed for most of them. This would reduce the demand on commissioners’ time, possibly enhancing the longevity of their service, as well as make it more appealing to residents who are interested, but are not willing or able to serve once per month. o Consolidate Commissions further. Although Tier 1 Commissions cannot be eliminated without a vote of the public, there is nothing that prohibits Tier 2 and Tier 3 Commissions from being eliminated, and having their duties and functions added to those in Tier 1. Under this option, there would be many possible scenarios, including but not limited to: ▪ Eliminate the Historic Heritage Committee (HHC) and place their functions under the Planning Commission (PC). This 5-member committee includes 1 City Council representative and 1 PC representative and 3 “at-large” appointed members. One option is that 1 or 3 at-large members act as advisory committee members to the PC. This would mean that the HHC member(s) participate only on items on the PC agenda that involve historic structures or projects. Staff is in the process of updating historic review ordinances and policies with the goal of making the process more clear, simple and objective. After the updates are implemented, review of historic structures will be streamlined. Eliminating another review step will further streamline the process. With the current structure/process, many projects involving a historic 9.B Packet Pg. 434 element require duplicative review by both the HHC and PC. Some projects require review by the HHC, PC and City Council. The HHC is codified in the City Code, by ordinance. ▪ The Bicycle Pedestrian Commission can have their functions folded under either the Planning Commission or the Parks and Recreation Commission. The functions could also be split and placed under both, with the infrastructure and project review components moving under the Planning Commission, and the encouragement and education functions transferring to the Parks and Recreation Commission. ▪ The Street Naming Committee meets only as needed. The Commission could be eliminated, and the duties given to the Planning Commission, or handled as an ad hoc committee of the City Council when needed. ▪ The Physically Challenged Board of Appeals can be converted to meet as needed, the same as the Building Board of Appeals, instead of the current quarterly meetings. ▪ Full Streamline Option – Aside from the Open Government Commission and the two appeal boards, the other Tier 2 and Tier 3 Commissions can all be consolidated under the purposes of the Tier 1 Commissions. Commissions would then be as follows: 1. Planning Commission (inherit duties of Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization Committee; Historic Heritage Committee; and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and development project review in lieu of Bicycle Pedestrian Commission). The same reports and information that would be included in the presentation to these boards would be incorporated in the Planning Commission staff reports. Street Naming Committee could fall under the Planning Commission or an ad hoc committee of Council. 2. Personnel Commission – No change from Charter except meeting times quarterly or as needed. 3. Library Commission – No change from Charter except meeting times quarterly or as needed. 4. Arts and Culture Commission – No change from Charter except meeting times quarterly or as needed. 5. Parks and Recreation Commission (inherit duties of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission regarding education and 9.B Packet Pg. 435 encouragement functions and inherit duties of the Youth Commission - Youth Commission becomes a sub-committee of the Arts and Culture Commission, but not a stand-alone board. Comprised of three ACC members and current Youth Commissioners as non-voting advisory members. Alternatively, they can be voting members if desired and be reduced as term lengths are reached.) – meet quarterly or as needed. 6. Open Government Commission – No change, though it can be changed or even eliminated if desired through an amendment to the Open Government Ordinance. 7. Building Appeals Board – meet as needed. 8. Physically Challenged Appeals Board – meet as needed. ALTERNATIVES None. No action is proposed; however, Council may provide direction regarding: 1. The next phase of the evaluation process 2. If there are options currently listed that the Council wishes for staff to no longer evaluate. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE None. CONCLUSION Staff will continue the evaluation through engaging the City’s Commissions through their staff liaisons to develop options and recommendations from the Commissions, both for consideration of all Commissions, as well as any specific efficiencies or improvements for their Commission specifically. Staff will then return to Council with the results, options, and a recommendation to make the Commissions more efficient and structuring them in a way to reduce demand on, and for, Commission members and the use of staff resources. NEXT STEPS Staff will commence the next phase of the evaluation by engaging the Commissions for their input to share with Council. From this feedback and any more insights from staff a list of options and recommendations will be presented to Council. Due to the approaching holiday season, this will likely return to Council towards the end of the first quarter of 2022. 9.B Packet Pg. 436 City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Approve a School Resource Officer Memorandum of Understanding for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Police Department Submitted By: Pedro Espinoza Prepared By: Pedro Espinoza Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION a) Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy authorizing the City Administrator to participate in a Memorandum of Understanding with the Gilroy Unified School District for two School Resource Officers, and b) Authorize the City Administrator to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with the Gilroy Unified School District sharing the cost of two School Resource Officers for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Gilroy (City) and the Gilroy Unified School District (GUSD) have an established School Resource Officer (SRO) Program, and partnerships dating back to 1985. The SRO’s primary role in schools is to maintain school campus safety, build and 10.A Packet Pg. 437 support the well-being of youth, positive student and family engagement, safety training, and an on-site resource for students and staff in crisis. Since the addition of Christopher High School, an additional SRO supplemented this program. During the FY21 school year, the COVID-19 pandemic caused school campuses to shut down and shift to remote/virtual classroom teaching and learning. Because of this, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with GUSD was not reintroduced . Both SRO’s were not present on campus and redeployed to patrol operations within the Gilroy Police Department. At the October 7, 2021 Gilroy Unified School District Board of Education Meeting, board members voted to renew the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program for FY22. Staff is requesting the City Council to authorize the City Administrator to execute a MOU between the City and GUSD to continue this partnership. BACKGROUND The SRO Program consists of two police officers dedicated to the school resource function of maintaining school campus safety. The officers are tenured officers that are specially trained and carefully selected with the participation of the GUSD Superintendent. The MOU was recently revised to include six best practice primary purposes for having police services on school campuses and adds to a balanced approach to provide a positive and safe school environment. The six principles of the SRO Program include: 1. Maintain a safe and secure campus for both students and staff. 2. Preserve life and property in a manner which promotes com munity. 3. Develop positive relationships with students, staff and community. 4. Support GUSD staff in securing and transporting of prohibited confiscated items that are illegal to have on campus under California State law. 5. Divert youth away from the criminal justice system through Restorative Justice programming. 6. Connect youth with mental health behavior services. ANALYSIS GUSD has a comprehensive plan to keep students safe at school and one piece of the plan includes the renewal of the contract with the City for an SRO Program. The benefits of the SRO Program includes enhancing public safety, maintaining safe and secure school campuses, building positive relationships with students and staff, diverting youth from the criminal justice system through restorative justice guiding principles, and connecting youth with mental health behavioral services. ALTERNATIVES 10.A Packet Pg. 438 Reject the recommendation to participate in a MOU. This is not recommended. Should an incident arise that requires law enforcement, patrol officers will respond to the call for service from the school or school district, but not provide the other services and purposes that an SRO program typically provides. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE This MOU would generate revenue from GUSD paying part of the two SROs cost. The full salary of two SROs for FY22 is $483,383. GUSD’s portion (50%) of the cost is $241,691 and will be prorated for the actual period in which an Officer is assigned to the district. Should the City and GUSD continue the Program in FY23, the full salary of two SRO’s for FY23 is $507,489. GUSD’s portion (50%) of the cost is $253,745. The City’s share of the SROs costs were included in the FY22 and FY23 adopted budget as the SRO program will be staffed with the current officer workforce. Attachments: 1. SRO Resolution 2. SRO MOU FY22 3. Attachment A 4. Attachment A FY23 10.A Packet Pg. 439 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO PARTICIPATE IN AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GILROY AND GILROY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR TWO SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 WHEREAS, the City Administrator prepared and submitted to the City Council a budget for the City of Gilroy for Fiscal Years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, and the City Council carefully examined, considered, and adopted the same on June 7, 2021; and WHEREAS, the City of Gilroy and the Gilroy Unified School District wish to continue the School Resource Officer Program, WHEREAS, the Gilroy Unified School District agreed to participate in a Memorandum of Understanding for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 school year and agree to share the costs associated with the School Resource Officer Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Gilroy authorizes the City Administrator to enter into an agreement between the City of Gilroy and the Gilroy Unified School District to provide two School Resource Officers. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November 2021 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: APPROVED: ___________________________ ATTEST: Marie Blankley, Mayor _________________________ 10.A.a Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: SRO Resolution (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX LeeAnn McPhillips, Interim City Clerk 10.A.a Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: SRO Resolution (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEENTHE GILROY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF GILROY FOR SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) (the “Agreement”) is entered into on ___________, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) by and between the Gilroy Unified School District (the “GUSD”) and the City of Gilroy (the “City”) (which may be referred to hereinafter individually as a “Party” and collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Parties”) to provide fiscal support for the School Resource Officers (the “SROs”) assigned to GUSD. RECITALS WHEREAS, the Parties desire to place two (2) SROs in service to the GUSD; and WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of sharing the cost of two (2) SRO positions for the GUSD 2021-2022 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, GUSD agrees to reimburse the City for its share of the cost, and the purpose of this Agreement is to provide the duties and obligations of both Parties related to these SRO positions, and the terms and conditions for GUSD’s reimbursement to the City; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and the covenants and conditions contained herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows: PURPOSE The parties agree that there are six primary purposes for having police services on school campuses. They are to: 1. Maintain a safe and secure campus for both students and staff; 2. Preserve life and property in a manner which promotes community; 3. Develop positive relationships with students, staff, and the community; 4. Support GUSD staff in securing and transporting of prohibited confiscated items that are illegal to have on campus under California State law; 5. Divert youth away from the criminal justice system through restorative justice programming; 6. Connect youth with mental health behavior services. 1. Obligation of the Parties. a. City: The City shall provide the GUSD with two (2) SROs during the 2021-2022 regular school year and with one (1) SRO during the 2022 summer session. SRO’s shall attend the Restorative Justice and Positive Behavioral Training. 10.A.b Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 i. During the regular school year, each SRO will be assigned to one of the two high schools located in Gilroy - Christopher High School or Gilroy High School, and will be primarily responsible for performing duties and obligations at the high school to which they are assigned, as well as the “feeder” middle and elementary schools associated with it. ii. During the regular school year, the SROs will provide coverage for each other, as needed, including without limitation, performing SRO duties at the school(s) for which the other officer is primarily responsible if the SRO primarily assigned to the school(s) is absent from work or preoccupied for an extended or indefinite period of time with a matter or matters that may require his or her immediate and full attention. iii. Consistent with their regular schedules when performing their general Gilroy Police officer duties, the SROs will each work a 4/10 plan. This means that each SRO will work for ten (10) hours per day, four (4) days per week. During the regular school year, their SRO schedules will be staggered so that every weekday will have at least one SRO providing coverage. iv. The City will provide funding for the two (2) SROs salary throughout the GUSD 2021-2022 fiscal year, and will send an invoice to GUSD for its 50% share of the cost for the SROs at the end of the GUSD 2021-2022 fiscal year. v. Should the employment of either or both of the SROs be terminated during the 2021-2022 school year, the City will provide substitute officers. vi. The city shall involve the then current GUSD superintendent or designee in the process of interviewing and selecting SRO candidates. vii. Any published job description for the SRO shall state bilingual in Spanish candidates are preferred. b. GUSD: GUSD shall reimburse the City for 50% of each officer’s full annual salary for the 2021-2022 GUSD fiscal year (12 months), as calculated by the City, including the cost of any related benefits. GUSD agrees and understands that SROs are entitled to certain contractual rights pursuant to their collective bargaining agreement with the City, including, without limitation, employee breaks and paid time off. GUSD shall not interfere with or prevent the exercise of these rights. GUSD shall also provide Restorative Justice and Positive Behavioral training to the SROs. 2. Term. The term (the “Term”) of this Agreement will commence as of the Effective Date and will continue in effect through the GUSD 2021-2022 fiscal year, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the termination provisions provided in paragraph 6, below. Should the GUSD determine that it has sufficient funding to share the cost of the SRO officers for the 2022-2023 school year and desire to renew its commitment to share the cost of such positions, the GUSD 10.A.b Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 must provide notice to the City by April 30, 2022. The City may at its sole discretion extend this Agreement through the 2022-2023 fiscal year, after determining that the City has the funds to cover its share of the cost of such positions. 3. Reimbursement. GUSD’s reimbursement cost is based on the salary and benefits that each officer assigned to the GUSD would receive for performing their regular patrol duties, as described in the cost summary in “Attachment A” to this Agreement and prorated for the actual periods, which an SRO Officer position is assigned to the district. At the end of the Term, the City will provide the GUSD with an invoice for the GUSD’s share of the annual cost for the two SROs, to be paid in one lump sum payment or in multiple payments as agreed to in writing by both Parties. Should the City provide substitute officers per paragraph 1.a. above, the GUSD’s share of the cost will remain the same and continue to be based on the officer salaries and benefits as calculated per “Attachment A.” The full annual salary of the two SROs is $483,382.86. GUSD’s portion of the cost is $241,691.43. The GUSD’s share of the cost covers the SROs’ on-campus duties and regular patrol duties, as determined by the Gilroy Police Department, performed during the GUSD 2021- 2022 school year. 4. Relationship. The relationship of the Parties is that of independent contractors. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create any principal or agent relationship, partnership, joint venture, or participation in a joint or common undertaking, between the Parties. The SROs are not employees of the GUSD and will at all times during the term of this Agreement remain under the direct control and command of the Gilroy Police Department. The City and its Police Department will supply all necessary equipment for the SROs for the performance of their SRO duties. The SROs may on an emergency basis be called away from their on-campus duties to perform regular duties during GUSD school operational hours, as needed. 5. Indemnification. Neither Party nor any officer, employee, official, or agent thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the other Party under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction arising under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that each Party shall fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and all of its officers, employees, officials, or agents thereof from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth under, including, but not limited to, tortious, contractual, or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by the other Party, under this Agreement. In addition, in lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation, which might otherwise be imposed between the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a Party shall not be shared pro rata but, instead, the Parties agree that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other Parties, their officers, officials, 10.A.b Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying Party, its officers, officials, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to such Party under this Agreement. The obligations set forth in this paragraph will survive termination and expiration of this Agreement. 6. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for cause or convenience at any time upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party, in accordance with paragraph 7, below. Either Party’s failure to comply with the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement may be grounds for termination upon thirty (30) days written notice by the other Party. 7. Notice. Any notices required or permitted hereunder shall be given to the appropriate party at the address specified below or at such other address as the Party shall specify in writing. Such notice shall be deemed given upon personal delivery; or if sent by first class mail, postage prepaid, three (3) days after the date of mailing; or if sent by nationally recognized overnight carrier, on the date of receipt or refused receipt by the receiving party. City: City of Gilroy Attn: __________ 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA 95020 GUSD: Gilroy Unified School District Attn: __________ 7810 Arroyo Circle Gilroy, CA 95020 8. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual, written agreement executed by both Parties. 9. No Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any portion shall be assigned by either Party, without prior written consent of the other Party. 10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way, except that if any of the obligations of the parties under paragraph 1, above, should be determined to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, then this Agreement shall terminate upon such final determination. 10.A.b Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 11. No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties, and no third party or parties will have any claim or right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever. 12. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to the conflict of laws provisions of any jurisdiction. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue with respect any and all actions or disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be in State and Federal courts located in Santa Clara County, California. 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement. 14. Waiver. No waiver by either Party of any breach, default, or violation of any term, warranty, representation, agreement, covenant, condition, or provision hereof shall constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach, default, or violation of the same or any other term, warranty, representation, agreement, covenant, condition, or provision thereof. All waivers must be in writing and signed by the Party against whom enforcement of the waiver is sought. All remedies are cumulative, and the election to pursue less than all remedies shall not be a waiver of the right to pursue any remedy. 15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including any exhibits hereto, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties and supersedes any previous agreement, oral or written. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF GILROY _______________________ ______________________________ City Clerk City Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ City Attorney ATTEST: GILROY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT _______________________ ________________________ 10.A.b Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) 4832-4637-6700v1 ERAMAKRISHNAN\04706083 District Clerk District Superintendent APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________ District General Counsel 10.A.b Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: SRO MOU FY22 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) Gilroy Police Department School Resource Officer Position: Year: EmplID: 715710 EmplID: 407187 Calculation Type Annual Annual FTE 1 1 Total Regular Hours 2,079.96 2,079.96 Total Base Salary 115,478.58 115,466.40 Holiday Pay 7,355.99 7,355.21 Master Officer Pay 5,773.93 5,773.32 Uniform Allowance 1,400.04 1,400.04 Education Incentive 8,660.89 8,659.98 Deferred Comp 360.00 360.00 RMT Benefit 1,800.00 1,800.00 PERS 69,288.03 66,403.57 Medicare 2,016.00 1,933.00 Cafeteria Plan (Health)29,104.44 29,104.44 Life Insurance 22.14 22.14 Employee Assistance Program 168.84 168.84 Unemployment Insurance 1,333.59 1,333.45 Safety Disability 420.00 420.00 Total Employee Cost 243,182.47 240,200.39 243,182.47 240,200.39 50%50% 50% Salary & Benefits 121,591.24 120,100.20 Gilroy Unified School District 241,691.43 Police Officer Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Attachment A 10.A.c Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment A (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) Gilroy Police Department School Resource Officer ESTIMATE Position: Year: EmplID: 715710 EmplID: 407187 Calculation Type Annual Annual FTE 1 1 Total Regular Hours 2,079.96 2,079.96 Total Base Salary 115,478.00 121,240.00 Holiday Pay 7,356.00 7,723.00 Master Officer Pay 5,774.00 5,774.00 Uniform Allowance 1,400.00 1,400.00 Education Incentive 8,661.00 9,093.00 Deferred Comp 360.00 360.00 RMT Benefit 2,700.00 2,700.00 PERS 73,966.00 74,384.00 Medicare 2,016.00 2,028.00 Cafeteria Plan (Health)30,560.00 30,560.00 Life Insurance 22.00 22.00 Employee Assistance Program 169.00 169.00 Unemployment Insurance 1,334.00 1,400.00 Safety Disability 420.00 420.00 Total Employee Cost 250,216.00 257,273.00 250,216.00 257,273.00 50%50% 50% Salary & Benefits 125,108.00 128,636.50 Gilroy Unified School District 253,744.50 Police Officer Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Attachment A 10.A.d Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment A FY23 (3548 : Approve SRO Program MOU) City of Gilroy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Title: Councilmember Zachary Hilton Travel Request Meeting Date: November 15, 2021 From: Jimmy Forbis, City Administrator Department: Administration Submitted By: Jimmy Forbis Prepared By: Jimmy Forbis Strategic Plan Goals ☐ Develop a Financially Resilient Organization ☐ Ensure Neighborhood Equity from City Services ☐ Promote Economic Development Activities ☐ Promote Safe, Affordable Housing for All ☐ Maintain and Improve City Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION Approve or deny the request from Councilmember Hilton to approve City -funded travel to the Local Government Commission and the CalBike Conference in compliance with Government Code Section 53232.2 and AB 1234. BACKGROUND In accordance with Government Code Section 53232.2, AB 1234 and the City’s Expense and Use of Public Resources policy (adopted March 2, 2020), only the City Council can authorize the expenditure of public resources for Councilmember travel and training. Furthermore, on January 20th, 2021 the Council adopted its’ norm which identifies when travel is appropriate and how Council, procedurally, approves a request as shown below: 10.B Packet Pg. 450 Council Travel and Training/Participation on Outside Boards and Memberships • Council Members will check with the full Council when he/she wishes to go to meetings outside “normal” (i.e. League, assigned outside organization meetings) travel and training, such as specialized training and/or meetings of participation groups and Council Members will place a short written explanation of the request on the agenda. • If a Council Member wishes to apply to participate in an outside government organization that is not part of the current City Council Advisory Committees & Representatives list, the Council Member will let Council know through the agenda with a short written explanation of the request. • If the primary Council representative to an organization cannot attend, they will contact the alternate. • The alternate Council representative can attend the outs ide organization meeting, even if the primary is there, to gain experience and knowledge. • If a Council Member must cancel a hotel reservation/registration, or the like, the Council Member will pay all costs associated with that cancellation. The City Clerk will give Council Members the cancellation policy of the event/hotel/etc. in advance if possible. • Any payment for travel and meeting expenses of a Council Member, or reimbursement thereof, shall be in accordance with the City of Gilroy Travel and Meeting Expense Policy, last revised on 3/2/2020. ANALYSIS Per Council norms, the requesting Councilmember is to provide a short summary which is listed below with estimated costs: Local Government Conference (March 17-20, 2022) – Cost estimate = $1,284 The 30th Annual Yosemite Policymakers Conference brings together over 100 mayors, city council members, county supervisors, city managers, and other high-level department heads in the breathtaking beauty of Yosemite National Park. This intimate three-day gathering is designed to support local elected officials with tools and partnership opportunities to implement innovative solutions to our most pressing community challenges. LGC works to build livable communities and local leadership by connecting leaders via innovative programs and network opportunities, advancing policies through participation at the local and state level, and implementing solutions as a technical assistance provider and advisor to local jurisdictions. With roots in California and a national reputation, LGC offers inspiration, information, and partnership for local and regional champions dedicated to building thriving communities that integrate civic engagement with environmental, social, and economic priorities. For over 35 years LGC has connected cutting-edge leaders from across the nation. Together we are advancing transformative policies and implementing innovative solutions for sustainable communities. 10.B Packet Pg. 451 CalBike California Bicycle Summit (April 6-8, 2022) – Cost estimate= $895 CalBike's, California Bicycle Summit will return to Oakland, CA for three days of keynote addresses, plenaries, workshops, and bike rides. Events will be held in the glorious California Ballroom and at the Oakstop Events Center, all steps from the 19th St. BART station. In addition to workshops and discussions on hot topics, the Summit always includes bike rides and other mobile tours, cultural events with the host community, and social gatherings. CalBike advocates for equitable, inclusive, and prosperous communities wh ere bicycling helps to enable all Californians to lead healthy and joyful lives. Focusing on the underserved communities in transportation spending and policy decisions. Improving the built environment for biking, walking and transit. Change our transportation policies to support an equitable, environmentally sustainable, and safe future. Strengthen the power of the transportation justice movement. ALTERNATIVES Council may approve or deny the request. FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE The costs (approximately $2,100) for both conferences can be absorbed in current Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22) budget. 10.B Packet Pg. 452