HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/19/2018 City Council - Regular Meeting Agenda Packet
November 15, 2018 11:07 AM City Council Regular Meeting Agenda Page1 MAYOR
Mayor Roland Velasco
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Marie Blankley
Dion Bracco
Daniel Harney
Peter Leroe-Muñoz
Fred Tovar
Cat Tucker
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF GILROY
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
7351 ROSANNA STREET
GILROY, CA 95020
REGULAR MEETING 6:00 P.M.
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
CITY COUNCIL PACKET MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.cityofgilroy.org
AGENDA CLOSING TIME IS 5:00 P.M. THE TUESDAY PRIOR TO THE MEETING
COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC WILL BE TAKEN ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE ACTION IS TAKEN BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. Persons wishing to address the Coun cil are requested, but not required, to
complete a Speaker’s Card located at the entrances. Public testimony is subject to reasonable
regulations, including but not limited to time restrictions for each individual speaker. A minimum
of 12 copies of materials should be provided to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council and
Staff. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City will make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to participate
in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk a minimum of 72 hours prior to the meeting at (408)
846-0204. A sound enhancement system is also available for use in the City Council Chambers.
If you challenge any planning or land use decision made at this meeting in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing held at this
meeting, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public
hearing. Please take notice that the time within which to seek judicial review of any final
administrative determination reached at this meeting is governed by Section 1094.6 of the
California Code of Civil Procedure.
A Closed Session may be called during this meeting pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9 (d)(2) if a point has been reached where, in the opinion of the legislative body of the City
on the advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and circumstanc es, there is a
significant exposure to litigation against the City.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the
agenda packet are available for public inspection with the agenda packet in the lobby o f
Administration at City Hall, 7351 Rosanna Street during normal business hours. These materials
are also available with the agenda packet on the City website at www.cityofgilroy.org subject to
Staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Monday of each month, at 6:00 p.m. If a
holiday, the meeting will be rescheduled to the following Monday, with the exception of the single
meeting in July which lands on the first day of the month not a holiday, Friday, Saturday or
Sunday.
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
11/19/2018 Page2 KNOW YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE GILROY OPEN GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE
Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decisions in full view of the public.
Commissions, task forces, councils and other agencies of the City exist to conduct the
people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the
people and that City operations are open to the people's review.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON YOUR RIGHTS UNDER THE OPEN
GOVERNMENT ORDINANCE, TO RECEIVE A FREE COPY OF THE ORDINANCE
OR TO REPORT A VIOLATION OF THE ORDINANCE, CONTACT THE OPEN
GOVERNMENT COMMISSION STAFF AT (408) 846-0204 or
shawna.freels@cityofgilroy.org
I. OPENING
A. Call to Order
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Invocation
3. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
4. Roll Call
B. Orders of the Day
C. Employee Introductions
II. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
A. Proclamations, Awards, and Presentations
1. Certificate of Recognition for Retiring Employee Cathy Mirelez
III. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
PUBLIC COMMENT BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA BUT WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL (This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons desiring to address the Council
on matters not on this agenda. The law does not permit Council action or extended discussion of
any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Council action is requested, the
Council may place the matter on a future agenda. Written material provided by public members for
Council agenda item “public comment by Members of the Public on items not on the agenda” will be
limited to 10 pages in hard copy. An unlimited amount of material may be provided electronically.)
A. Arts and Culture Commission and Public Art Committee Annual
Presentation to Council
B. Historic Heritage Committee Annual Presentation to Council
C. Gilroy Welcome Center Annual Presentation to Council
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
11/19/2018 Page3 IV. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Bracco –Santa Clara Co. Library JPA, SCRWA Board, Street
Naming Committee, SC Valley Joint Water Resources Committee, URM Task Force
Council Member Tucker – Caltrain Citizen's Advisory Committee, Gilroy Welcome
Center, General Plan Advisory Committee, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency
Governing and Implementation Boards, Recycling and Waste Commission
Council Member Blankley - Gilroy Sister Cities Association, HSR Sub-Committee, SC
Valley Joint Water Resources Committee, SCRWA Board, South County United for
Health, Street Naming Committee
Mayor Pro Tempore Harney – Gilroy Downtown Business Association, Gilroy Gardens
Board, Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Governing and Implementation Boards,
Santa Clara Valley Clean Energy Authority, VTA Board (Alternate), VTA Policy Advisory
Committee
Council Member Tovar – Santa Clara Co. Expressway Plan Advisory Board, SCRWA
Board, Street Naming Committee, VTA Committee for Transit Accessibility
Council Member Leroe-Muñoz - ABAG, Economic Development Corporation Board,
Cities Association of Santa Clara Co. Board, HSR Station Area Planning Advisory
Committee & HSR Sub-Committee, Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. Water Comm.,
Silicon Valley Regional Interoperability Authority (SVRIA), V TA Mobility Partnership
Mayor Velasco – Gilroy Youth Task Force, Economic Development Corporation Board,
General Plan Advisory Committee, Historic Heritage Committee, South County Youth
Task Force Policy Team, South County Joint Planning Advisory Committ ee , VTA South
County City Group, URM Task Force
V. FUTURE COUNCIL INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE)
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
request is made by a member of the City Council or a member of the public. Any person desiring
to speak on any item on the consent calendar should ask to have that item removed from the
consent calendar prior to the time the Council votes to approve. If removed, the item will be
discussed in the order in which it appears.
A. Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting
B. Approval of the Gilroy Tourism Business Improvement District (GTBID)
Annual Report for the Period of July 1, 2017 Through June 30, 2018
C. California Assembly Bill 1600 Annual Impact Fee Report for Fiscal Year
2017-18
D. Approval of Carryover of Unspent Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations into
Fiscal Year 2019
E. Approval to Extend the Construction Management Consultant Pre-
Approved List for an Additional Year Through August 2, 2019
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
11/19/2018 Page4 F. Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia Buchanan (The City
Administrator recommends a “yes” vote under the Consent Calendar shall
constitute the denial of the claim)
VII. BIDS AND PROPOSALS
A. Approval of an Amendment to the Agreement with CSG Consultants, and
Matching Budget Amendment in the Amount of $405,000 for Engineering
Plan Review, Construction Inspection and Capital Project Implementation
Support Services
1. Staff Report: Girum Awoke, Public Works Director
2. Public Comment
3. Possible Action:
a) Approval of an amendment to the agreement with CSG Consultants in the
amount of $405,000 for engineering plan review, construction inspectio n, and
capital project implementation support services, and authorize the City
Administrator to execute the agreement; and,
b) Amend the City’s budget in the amount of $227,000 in the General Fund,
$106,800 in the Water enterprise Fund, $35,600 in the Sewer Enterprise fund
and $35,600 in the Gas Tax Fund for a total sum of $405,000.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Zone Change Planned Unit Development and Architectural and Site Review
Request for a Proposed Five-Story Mixed-Use Development on a Two-Acre
Site Located at 8955 Monterey Road, APN: 790-14-025; Jan Hochhauser
Applicant (AS 16-19) (Z 17-03)
1. Staff Report: Sue O'Strander, Deputy Director of Community Development
2. Open Public Hearing
3. Close Public Hearing
4. Possible Action:
Motion to adopt a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and
reporting program for the Monterey Mixed-Use Development project, based on
findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading; and
Motion to introduce an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy
approving zone change planned unit development Z 17-03 for the Monterey
Mixed-Use Development project, subject to certain findings and conditions; and
Motion to adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving
the architectural and site review permit AS 16-19 for the Monterey Mixed-Use
Development project, subject to certain findings and conditions.
IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE
X. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS - NONE
XI. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
XII. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
XIII. CLOSED SESSION
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
11/19/2018 Page5 A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.8 and Gilroy City Code Section 17A.8 (a)
(2) Property: 7541 and 7543 Monterey St and 7440 Gourmet Alley, Gilroy,
APN 799-06-048 (Dick Bruin Building); Negotiators: Gabriel Gonzalez, City
Administrator; Other Party to Negotiations: Jose Montes on Behalf of Sil
Vest LLC; Under Negotiations: Price and Terms of Payment
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957 and Gilroy City Code Section 17A.8 (a) (4)
Name/Title: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
1. Public Comment on Closed Session Items
2. Adjourn to Closed Session
ADJOURN TO OPEN SESSION
Report of any action taken in Closed Session and vote or abstention of each
Councilmember if required by Government Code Section 54957.1 and Gilroy
Code
Section 17A.13 (a); Public Report of the vote to continue in closed session if
required
under Gilroy Code Section 17A.11 (5)
ADJOURNMENT
MEETING DATES
NOVEMBER, 2018
19* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
26* Special Meeting/Study Session on Downtown revitalization and proposed
incentives - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
DECEMBER, 2018
3* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
10* Special Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
17* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
JANUARY, 2019
7* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
28* Regular Meeting - 6:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
* meeting is webstreamed and televised
1
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
City of Gilroy
City Council Meeting Minutes
November 5, 2018
I. OPENING
A. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Mayor Mayor Roland Velasco
1. Pledge of Allegiance
The pledge of allegiance was led by Assemblymember Anna Caballero.
2. Invocation
The invocation was given by Pastor Bill Hawkins of New Hope Community
Church.
3. City Clerk's Report on Posting the Agenda
City Clerk Shawna Freels announced that the agenda had been posted on
October 31, 2018 at 4:50 p.m.
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Mayor Roland Velasco Mayor Present 5:57 PM
Marie Blankley Council Member Present 5:52 PM
Dion Bracco Council Member Present 6:00 PM
Daniel Harney Mayor Pro Tempore Present 6:00 PM
Peter Leroe-Muñoz Council Member Present 6:00 PM
Fred Tovar Council Member Present 6:00 PM
Cat Tucker Council Member Present 5:47 PM
B. Orders of the Day
There were no agenda changes.
C. Employee Introductions
Community Development Director Abrams introduced newly hired Planner Miguel
Contreras.
II. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
A. Proclamations, Awards, and Presentations
1. Certificate of Recognition for Retiring Employee Gary Carpenter
Mayor Velasco presented the certificate of recognition.
III. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
Ron Kirkish spoke on the general election the next day describing his preference
of candidate.
Poonam Chabra spoke on the Indian Association of South Santa Clara County
inviting others to participate with the organization.
6.A
Packet Pg. 6 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
2
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
A. Presentation by Assemblymember Anna Caballero
Assemblymember Anna Caballero presented her annual update.
B. Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Annual Presentation to Council
The presentation was given by the Commissioners.
IV. REPORTS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Council Member Bracco reminded everyone to vote the next day.
Council Member Tucker reported that the Gilroy Welcome Center had been
designated as a California Welcome Center and spoke on the recent meeting
with County Officials, CalTrain and High Speed Rail about CalTrain ridership and
services to Gilroy.
Council Member Blankley spoke on the recent visit from Sister City Angra,
Portugal.
Mayor Pro Tempore Harney detailed the Eagle Scout court of honor event he
had attended as representative of the City.
Council Member Tovar spoke on the Indian Association of South Sant a Clara
County, and the YMCA Board of Directors volunteer event, and then announced
Golden State Brewery's planned re-opening.
Council Member Leroe-Muñoz reported on the Santa Clara Valley Water District
Committee meeting, and then recognized the contributions of Eleanor Villarreal.
Mayor Velasco highlighted the EDC Board meeting and spoke on the renovations
of the Halls and Banning buildings downtown. He spoke on the Sister Cities
Association visits with the Mayor of Angra and students from Takko Machi,
Japan, and concluded by sharing additional details of the meeting with CalTrain,
High Speed Rail and County officials regarding rider-ship in Gilroy.
V. FUTURE COUNCIL INITIATED AGENDA ITEMS
There were none.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE)
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Peter Leroe-Muñoz, Council Member
SECONDER: Daniel Harney, Mayor Pro Tempore
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar, Tucker
A. Minutes of the October 15, 2018 Regular Meeting
B. Claim of Heinzen Manufacturing, Inc. (The City Administrator recommends
a “yes” vote under the Consent Calendar shall constitute the denial of the
claim)
VII. BIDS AND PROPOSALS
There were none.
VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.A
Packet Pg. 7 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
3
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
A. Tentative Map Request to Subdivide a 8.36 Acre Site into 14 Single-family
Residential Lots Ranging From 6,660 Square Feet to 21,890 Square Feet,
With Two Common Parcels and Dedication of 3.7 Acres to the Uvas Creek
Park Preserve, on a Property Located Between the Northern End of
Greenfield Drive and Uvas Creek, APN 808-20-008, The James Group c/o
James Suner, Applicant (continued from 10/15/2018)
The staff report was presented by Senior Planner Tambornini.
The public hearing was opened.
Applicant James Suner answered questions regarding the retaining wall.
John Taft spoke on the project timeline and prior issues of concern.
The public hearing was then closed.
Possible Action:
Adoption of resolution 2018-44 of the City Council of the City of Gilroy
adopting a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and
reporting program and approving Tentative Map TM 16-02 creating 14
single-family residential lots, two common parcels and one public park
parcel located at the northerly terminus of Greenfield Drive and south of
Uvas Creek; APN 808-20-008, filed by James Suner.
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel Harney, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Fred Tovar, Council Member
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar,
Tucker
IX. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy Adding a
New Section 30.38.270 to the Gilroy City Code Entitled "Protected Tree
Removal" (Z16-05)
The staff report was presented by City Administrator Gonzalez.
Public comment was opened.
Mary Yates spoke on sections of the ordinance related to oak tree removal and
replanting, suggesting that a section be removed.
Public comment was then closed.
6.A
Packet Pg. 8 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
4
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
Possible Action:
Motion to adopt ordinance 2018-15 of the City Council of the City of Gilroy
adopting amendments to Article 30.38 of the Gilroy City Code entitled
“Landscaping, Water Efficiency and Stormwater Retention and Treatment”
to add a new section 30.38.270 entitled “Protected Tree Removal
Ordinance”
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Cat Tucker, Council Member
SECONDER: Peter Leroe-Muñoz, Council Member
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar,
Tucker
X. INTRODUCTION OF NEW BUSINESS
A. Approval of Budget Amendments for the Purchase of a Property at 271
Lewis Street and Assignment of the City's Option to Purchase 271 Lewis
Street to HouseKeys
The staff report was presented by Special Projects Planner Carney.
Public comment was opened.
Bill O'Connor asked for clarification of the action being taken.
Public comment was then closed.
Possible Action:
a) Ap proval of budget amendments totaling $125,332.31, consisting of
$50,184 from the Housing Trust Fund, $36,698.48 from the CalHOME
fund, $30,579.13 from the BEGIN Reuse fund; $7,780.70 from the Los
Arroyos fund, to allow HouseKeys to purchase the property at 271
Lewis Street; and
b) Authorize the City Administrator to execute an Assignment of Option
assigning the City’s Option to Purchase 271 Lewis Street, Gilroy to
HouseKeys.
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel Harney, Mayor Pro Tempore
SECONDER: Cat Tucker, Council Member
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar,
Tucker
B. Report on Potable Water Demand and Supply for Imminent Developments
and Budget Appropriation from Water Enterprise Fund for Design of a New
Well System
The staff report was presented by Public Works Director Awoke.
There were no public comments.
6.A
Packet Pg. 9 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
5
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
Possible Action:
a) Receive report on imminent development in the next few years and
projected demand for potable water; and,
b) Authorize a budget appropriation of $200,000 to start design for a new
well site and associated systems.
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Peter Leroe-Muñoz, Council Member
SECONDER: Cat Tucker, Council Member
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar,
Tucker
C. Consideration of a Proposed One-Year Pilot Program to Grant Local Non-
Profit Organizations the Waiving of Facility Reservations Fees
The staff report was presented by Recreation Director De Leon.
Public comment was opened
Diane Ortiz of the Youth Alliance shared her support of the proposal for nonprofit
organizations.
Ernesto Olivares shared his support of the proposal.
Mary Yates shared her support of the proposal suggesting that other
organizations be offered the opportunity, at other city facilities.
Bill O'Connor stated that the city should be recovering the out of pocket
expenses, such as custodial fees.
Connie Rogers spoke in support of the proposal, suggesting that the custodian
attendant fees be recouped from the user.
Andrea Nicolette of the YMCA shared her support of the proposal and suggested
providing a lower fee for nonprofits for all city facilities.
Ron Kirkish suggested that groups such as the Youth Alliance be offered more to
assist them in their efforts for the community.
Public comment was then closed.
6.A
Packet Pg. 10 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
6
City Council Meeting Minutes
11/5/2018
Possible Action:
Approval to amend the Parks and Facility Reservation Policy for a one -year
pilot program from January, 2019-December, 2019, to allow for use of the
Wiley House facility one time a year for the identified nonprofit 501 c 3
organizations that benefit the Gilroy community with a main operation site
in Gilroy, for the purpose of hosting a fundraising event with a recovery of
the custodial and attendant fees, and include the City Administrator and/or
designee to serve as the appeals officer.
RESULT: APPROVE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Fred Tovar, Council Member
SECONDER: Cat Tucker, Council Member
AYES: Velasco, Blankley, Bracco, Harney, Leroe-Muñoz, Tovar,
Tucker
XI. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORTS
City Administrator Gonzalez spoke on the funding provided to the City under SB
1, and proposition 6 on the November 6, 2018 ballot. He then spoke on the
homeless program funding describing the process of adoption of a shelter crisis
resolution to become eligible for the monies.
XII. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
There were none.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
/s/ Shawna Freels, MMC
City Clerk
6.A
Packet Pg. 11 Communication: Minutes of the November 5, 2018 Regular Meeting (CONSENT CALENDAR (ROLL CALL VOTE))
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Approval of the Gilroy Tourism Business Improvement District
(GTBID) Annual Report for the Period of July 1, 2017 Through June
30, 2018
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Administration
Submitted By: Gabriel Gonzalez
Prepared By: Trevin Barber
Gabriel Gonzalez
Strategic Plan Goals
Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
Economic
Development
☐ Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the report.
BACKGROUND
The Gilroy Welcome Center (GWC) Board of Directors representing the Gilroy Tourism
Business Improvement District (GTBID) has submitted the attached report pursuant to
Section 36650 of the Street and Highway Code. Effective in 2013, GTBID provides a
steady and dedicated funding source to the GWC through an assessment levied on
lodging businesses within the GTBID boundaries. The assessment revenue provides
dedicated sales within the GTBID's boundaries.
FISCAL IMPACT
This item has no fiscal impact, it is simply a report. Regardless, since the inception of
6.B
Packet Pg. 12
the TBID in 2013, the TBID has contributed in part to the generation of more than $7.8
million in transient occupancy tax to the City of Gilroy.
Attachments:
1. GVB TBID Report 2018
6.B
Packet Pg. 13
6.B.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: GVB TBID Report 2018 (1902 : Welcome Center Annual Presentation)
6.B.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: GVB TBID Report 2018 (1902 : Welcome Center Annual Presentation)
6.B.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: GVB TBID Report 2018 (1902 : Welcome Center Annual Presentation)
6.B.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: GVB TBID Report 2018 (1902 : Welcome Center Annual Presentation)
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: California Assembly Bill 1600 Annual Impact Fee Report for Fiscal
Year 2017-18
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Finance Department
Submitted By: Jimmy Forbis
Prepared By: Bryce Atkins
Bryce Atkins
Strategic Plan Goals
Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
☐ Economic
Development
☐ Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Receive the California Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 Development Impact Fee Report for
Fiscal Year 2017-18.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Act), Government Code 66000 et seq. the
City must annually review and make a public report on development impact fees.
POLICY DISCUSSION
The Act requires that the City prepare an annual review and report of all established
development impact fees and make the report available to the public. In accordance
with this requirement, staff is presenting the annual impact fee report for the fiscal year
ending June 30, 2018.
BACKGROUND
6.C
Packet Pg. 18
The Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code 66000 et seq., (adopted as AB 1600 and
commonly referred to as “AB 1600 requirements”) governs the establishment and
administration of development impact fees paid by new development projects for public
facilities needed to serve new development.
Fees must be separately accounted for and used for the specific purpose for which the
fee was established and imposed. The City’s adopted development impact fees are
listed in the attachment. Expenditures are authorized by Council through annual capital
and operating budgets.
ANALYSIS
No analysis required. This report is for information purposes only. The establishment
of fees and expending of fee-generated revenue occurs in separate Council actions.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
This report has no direct fiscal impacts as this report only provides information
describing each development impact fee and a list of revenues, expenditures, and fund
balance for each impact fund.
Attachments:
1. Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18
6.C
Packet Pg. 19
Project FY17/18
FUND 420 - STORM IMPACT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Interest 420-2600-0499-3710 10,278$
Storm Impact Fees 420-2600-0000-3660 85,261
Interfund Transfer Interest Income 420-2600-0440-3712 9,037
Transfer from General Fund 420-2600-0100-3910 1,196
TOTAL REVENUE 105,772$
Revenue Expended For
Salaries 420-2600-0000-4110 5,196
Fringe Benefits 420-2600-0000-4171 10
Overhead Expenses 420-2600-0100-4455 338
Total Expenditures 5,544$
Revenue Less Expenditures 100,228$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 1,899,725
Balance as of June 30, 2018 1,999,953$
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
Finance the construction of drainage collection and conveyance systems in conformance with the
Gilroy storm drain master plan in order to accommodate development of new residential, commercial
and industrial uses as well as expand system capacity. Projects are identified and undertaken in
compliance with updated and approved master plans based on population projections, the General
Plan policies, land use needs, and other standards approved by the City Council.
Storm impact fee charges are:
Residential - Low Density $564/acre 420-2600-0000-3660
Residential - High Density $886/acre
Commercial $1,528/acre
Commercial-Assembly Hall $564/acre
Industrial $1,128/acre
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Project FY17/18
FUND 432 - STREET TREES DEVELOPMENT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Interest 432-2600-0499-3710 1,667$
Street Trees Development Impact Fees 432-2600-0000-3660 5,731
Transfer from General Fund 432-2600-0100-3910 27
TOTAL REVENUE 7,425$
Revenue Expended For
Program Expenses 432-2600-0000-4265 -
Overhead Expenses 432-2600-0100-4455 -
Total Expenditures -$
Revenue Less Expenditures 7,425$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 122,072
Balance as of June 30, 2018 129,496$
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
The Street Tree Development Fund collects a front footage fee to plant trees in new developments.
Street Trees Development impact fee charges are:
City Planting and Replacement $3.06/ff 432-2600-0000-3660
Inspection and Replacement $0.41/FF
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Project FY17/18
FUND 433 - TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Interest 433-2600-0499-3710 146,533$
Traffic Impact Fees 433-2600-0000-3660 4,905,021
Transfer from General Fund 433-2600-0100-3910 48,769
TOTAL REVENUE 5,100,323$
Revenue Expended For
Audit Services 433-2600-0000-4211 1,350
Overhead Charges 433-2600-0100-4455 296,550
Int 3rd/Santa Teresa Land/Improve 433-2600-3490-4310 416,303
Traffic Monitoring 433-2600-3745-4215 3,305
Tenth at Uvas Creek Bridge 433-2600-3851-4340 353,395
Signal Luchessa/Princevalle R7 433-2600-3882-4340 458,486
Wren/Welburn Improvements 433-2600-4409-4340 34,094
NW Quad Cohansey 433-2600-4457-4340 44,490
W. Luchessa, Thomas, Monterey Improvements 433-2600-4476-4340 2,672,352
Monterey/Luchessa Improvements 433-2600-4478-4340 453,352
Administration 433-2600-0000-xxxx 132,504
Total Expenditures 4,866,181$
Revenue Less Expenditures 234,142$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 11,640,711
Balance as of June 30, 2018 11,874,853$
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
Finance the construction of streets, bridges, interchanges and traffic signals as identified in the
City's General Plan Circulation Element to accommodate development of new residential, commercial
and industrial uses for the purpose of expanding transportation system capacity. Projects are
completed in conformance with approved master plans based on the General Plan, population
projections, land use, and other standards approved by the City Council.
Traffic impact fee charges are:
Residential - Low Density $11,224/unit 433-2600-0000-3660
Residential - High Density $9,099/unit
Commercial - Low Traffic $12,419/ksf
Commercial - High Traffic $25,087/ksf
Industrial - General $4,921/ksf
Industrial - Warehouse $3,567/ksf
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Project FY17/18
FUND 435 - SEWER IMPACT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Interest 435-2600-0499-3710 150,955$
Sewer Impact Fees 435-2600-0000-3660 2,483,414
Transfer from Interest Income 435-2600-0440-3712 18,074
Transfer from General Fund 435-2600-0100-3910 28,351
TOTAL REVENUE 2,680,794$
Revenue Expended For
Audit Services 435-2600-0000-4211 2,500
Office/Computer Supplies 435-2600-0000-4221 13
Sewer Interfund Transfer 435-2600-0700-4410 697,198
SCRWA Construction Interfund Transfer 435-2600-0839-4410 481,101
Overhead Expenses 435-2600-0700-4455 1,777
Administration 435-2600-0000-xxxx 116,438
Total Expenditures 1,299,027$
Revenue Less Expenditures 1,381,766$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 12,964,740
Balance as of June 30, 2018 14,346,506$
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
Finance the construction of expanded sewer collection, treatment and conveyance systems as
identified in the sewer master plan in order to accommodate development of new residential,
commercial and industrial uses based on standards adopted by the City Council.
Sewer impact fee charges are:
Residential - Low Density $12,501/unit 435-2600-0000-3660
Residential - High Density $6,764/unit
Commercial $3,956/cgpd
Industrial $3,956/cgpd
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Project FY17/18
FUND 436 -WATER IMPACT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Interest 436-2600-0499-3710 50,016$
Water Impact Fees 436-2600-0000-3660 785,609
Transfer from General Fund 436-2600-0100-3910 5,893
TOTAL REVENUE 841,518$
Revenue Expended For
Audit Services 436-2600-0000-4211 600
Office/Computer Supplies 436-2600-0000-4221 -
Overhead Expenses 436-2600-0720-4455 1,748
Administration 436-2600-0000-xxxx 116,438
Total Expenditures 118,786$
Revenue Less Expenditures 722,732$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 3,430,764
Balance as of June 30, 2018 4,153,496$
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
Finance the construction of improvements and expansion of water production, transmission, distribution
and storage systems within Pressure Zone 1 as described in the water master plan necessary to
accommodate the capacity requirements of new residential, commercial and industrial uses and in
accordance with General Plan, population increase projections and other standard established by
the City Council.
Water impact fee charges are:
Residential - Low Density $4,294/unit 436-2600-0000-3660
Residential - High Density $1,737/unit
Commercial $6,731/kgpd
Industrial $6,731/kgpd
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Project FY17/18
FUND 440 - PUBLIC FACILITY IMPACT FEE Number AB 1600
REVENUE
Public Facility Impact Fees 440-2600-0000-3660 7,044,196$
Interest 440-2600-0499-3710 69,587
Trails Grant 440-2600-3862-3410 8,079
Interfund Transfer from General Fund 440-2600-0100-3910 40,763
TOTAL REVENUE 7,162,625$
Revenue Expended For
Audit Services 440-2600-0000-4211 2,500
Improvements 440-2600-0000-4340 155,400
Overhead Expenses 440-2600-0720-4455 20,242
Interfund Interest Expense-Storm Fund 440-2600-0420-4512 9,037
Interfund Interest Expense-Sewer Fund 440-2600-0435-4512 18,074
Lease Rev Bonds 2013 Interfund Transfer Out 440-2600-0514-4410 1,839,269
PFFA Refund 2010 Interfund Transfer Out 440-2600-0516-4410 1,684,506
Interfund Interest Expense-Fleet 440-2600-0600-4512 27,757
Interfund Interest Expense-Equiment Outlay 440-2600-0605-4512 9,683
New Police Staff Resource 440-2600-1658-4320 18,960
Ronan Channel Trail Improvements 440-2600-3822-4340 52,693
SVRIA Interoperability 440-2600-4421-4320 116,501
Lions Creek Gap Closure 440-2600-4426-4340 442
Uvas Creek/Lions Creek Trail 440-2600-4508-4340 527
Gilroy Center for the Arts 440-2600-4780-4330 35,000
Administration 440-2600-0000-xxxx 20,737
Total Expenditures 4,011,328$
Revenue Less Expenditures 3,151,296$
Balance as of June 30, 2017 (5,739,630) *
Balance as of June 30, 2018 (2,588,334)$ *
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AND PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS CHARGED:
Finance the construction of parks, police, fire, library, and general public facilities as identified in
the Public Facilities Master Plan based on the need to expand City facility capacity to
accommodate new development and pursuant to standards approved by the City Council.
Water impact fee charges are:
Residential - Low Density $19,710/unit 440-2600-0000-3660
Residential - High Density $16,583/unit
Commercial $2,970/ksf
Industrial $1,315/ksf
*
City of Gilroy
Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditures
For Fiscal Year 2017/18
Balance includes an $8.4 million loan payable amount that is due in payments over 10 years, but is reflected in full as
a liability in the City's financial system, resulting in the negative balance stated above.
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
Description of Fee Unit of Measure Amount
Fund 420 Residential - Low Density $564/acre
Storm Impact Fee Residential - High Density $886/acre
Commercial $1,528/acre
Commercial-Assembly Hall $564/acre
Industrial $1,128/acre
Fund 432 City Planting and Replacement $3.06/ff
Street Tree Impact fee Inspection and Replacement $0.41/FF
Fund 433 Residential - Low Density $11,224/unit
Traffic Impact Fee Residential - High Density $9,099/unit
Commercial - Low Traffic $12,419/ksf
Commercial - High Traffic $25,087/ksf
Industrial - General $4,921/ksf
Industrial - Warehouse $3,567/ksf
Fund 435 Residential - Low Density $12,501/unit
Sewer Impact Fee Residential - High Density $6,764/unit
Commercial $3,956/cgpd
Industrial $3,956/cgpd
Fund 436 Residential - Low Density $4,294/unit
Water Impact Fee Residential - High Density $1,737/unit
Commercial $6,731/kgpd
Industrial $6,731/kgpd
Fund 440 Residential - Low Density $19,710/unit
Public Facility Impact Fee Residential - High Density $16,583/unit
Commercial $2,970/ksf
Industrial $1,315/ksf
FY 2017-18 Fee Schedule Summary
6.C.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Gilroy Impact Fee Report FY 17-18 (1879 : AB 1600 Impact Fee Report for FY 2017-18)
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Approval of Carryover of Unspent Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations
into Fiscal Year 2019
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Finance Department
Submitted By: Jimmy Forbis
Prepared By: Bryce Atkins
Strategic Plan Goals
Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
☐ Economic
Development
☐ Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy amending the budget for
the City of Gilroy for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and appropriating proposed carryover
expenditure amendments.
BACKGROUND
Each fiscal year, staff makes purchases and initiates programs or projects that do not
reach completion within that particular fiscal year. When this occurs, a carryover is
requested to move remaining unused appropriations in one fiscal year into the following
fiscal year to continue funding the activity.
The carryover process is intended to move the unspent appropriations that have an
encumbrance – meaning the funds have been reserved through the purchase
requisition process.
For Fiscal Year 18 (FY18), below is a table that shows the amount of funding that was
appropriated (by fund type), and the amount that was actually expended in FY 18.
6.D
Packet Pg. 27
Fund Type
Amended
FY 18 Budget
(in millions)
FY 18 Actual
(in millions)
FY 18 Unspent
(in millions)
General Fund (100) $ 56.6 51.1$ 5.4$
Special Revenue Funds (200)12.5$ 7.1$ 5.4$
Capital Project Funds (400)31.7$ 10.6$ 21.1$
Internal Service Funds (600)1 20.2$ 10.1$ 10.2$
Enterprise Funds (700)38.6$ 24.9$ 13.8$
Total 159.6$ 103.7$ 55.9$
1) not including Retirement Fund 699
The FY 18 Unspent column does not imply that these funds are free for reallocation to
any new purpose. These funds were initially appropriated by Council for goods,
services, or operational costs. Some of these totals include savings, while others are
simply deferred costs that will be incurred in the next fiscal year.
ANALYSIS
This year, Council is being asked to approve $14.5 million in carryover requests. Below
is a table identifying the amount of carryover appropriations being requested by fund.
Fund Type FY 18 Unspent
(in millions)
Carryover Request
(in millions)Percentage
General Fund (100) $ 5.4 0.6$ 11%
Special Revenue Funds (200)5.4$ 1.1$ 20%
Capital Project Funds (400)21.1$ 6.5$ 31%
Internal Service Funds (600)1 10.2$ 5.7$ 56%
Enterprise Funds (700)13.8$ 0.6$ 4%
Total 55.9$ 14.5$ 26%
1) not including Retirement Fund 699
100 - General Fund carryover ($600,000) is predominately the General Plan
consultant contract.
200 - Special Revenue Funds carryovers ($1.1 million) are for capital projects,
including Automall Parkway, Ronan Channel Trail, and bridge design work.
400 - Capital Project Funds’ carryovers ($6.5 million) include the Ronan Channel
Trail project, and Property Improvement Agreement reimbursements anticipated
to be paid this year.
600 - Internal Service Funds’ carryovers ($5.7 million) include multiple vehicle
purchases, as well as the Enterprise Resource Planning and Land Management
system replacement.
6.D
Packet Pg. 28
700 - Enterprise Funds’ carryovers ($600,000) are also tied to improvements,
predominately along First Street.
Attached to this staff report is a line-item detail listing of all carryover requests being
recommended to Council. The listing is broken into the same fund types as presented
above. Staff is requesting Council approval to carryover $14.5 million into FY 19,
roughly 26% of the unspent funding from FY 18. Additionally a resolution is attached to
this staff report for approval of the carryovers.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may alternatively amend or reject any and all of the carryovers requested. Not
recommended. Most if not all of the carryovers are tied to purchase orders, contracts,
and other commitments tied to the purchase of goods or services. Other carryovers
include projects that were previously approved by Council but have yet to commence.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact. While the action would increase the City’s FY 19 budget by
$14.5 million overall, this is the result of underspending in FY 18, resulting in no net
increase in use of fund balance. The majority of these expenditures are located in the
City’s Capital and Enterprise funds.
CONCLUSION
The $14.5 million of requested carryovers are for projects, programs and purchases that
are already secured, or are in the midst of being finalized.
NEXT STEPS
Should Council adopt or amend the proposed resolution for carryover approvals, staff
will amend the FY 19 budget.
Attachments:
1. Recommended Carryover List FY 19
2. Resolution FY 19 Carryovers
6.D
Packet Pg. 29
City of Gilroy
Fiscal Year 2019 Appropriation Carryover Requests
Line Item Details
November 19, 2018
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
General Fund
For the City’s General Fund, staff is recommending to Council five of the requests to carry over appropriations from FY 18 into FY 19.
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
AMENDED
BUDGET
17-18 ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
17-18 UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
1 100 0400 3765 4596 Economic Development Corp 250,804$ 183,477$ 67,327$ -$ 55,293$ 55,293$
2 100 1401 0000 4215 Contract Services 156,941$ 138,012$ 18,929$ 156,941$ 6,352$ 163,293$
3 100 1401 0000 4221 Office/Computer Supplies 102,172$ 65,135$ 37,037$ 102,172$ 15,005$ 117,177$
4 100 2601 4054 4215 Contract Services (Automall Pkwy)39,789$ -$ 39,789$ -$ 9,679$ 9,679$
5 100 2602 3428 4215 Contract Services (General Plan)744,067$ 223,958$ 520,109$ -$ 520,109$ 520,109$
TOTAL 1,293,773$ 610,582$ 683,191$ 259,113$ 606,438$ 865,551$
1. Wayfinding Signs Project this project is currently underway and will be completed in FY 19.
2. Police car mounted systems- equipment was not delivered to the City until FY 19.
3. Police tactical vests - product was on backorder and was delivered and invoiced in FY 19.
4. Automall Parkway Project – partial funding for design services.
5. General Plan consultant contract.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
Special Revenue Funds
There are four carryovers recommended for the City’s special revenue funds.
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
AMENDED
BUDGET
17-18 ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
17-18 UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
6 213 2600 4497 4340 Improvements (HBBR Bridges)67,174$ 14,217$ 52,958$ -$ 15,972$ 15,972$
7 224 2600 3822 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chn Trl)1,034,000$ 216,023$ 817,977$ -$ 817,977$ 817,977$
8 224 2600 4416 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chn Trl)178,075$ 15,245$ 162,831$ -$ 124,108$ 124,108$
9 225 2600 4054 4340 Improvements (Automall Pkwy)621,727$ 6,593$ 615,134$ 166,400$ 126,550$ 292,950$
TOTAL 1,900,977$ 252,077$ 1,648,900$ 166,400$ 1,084,607$ 1,251,007$
6. This request is related to bridge deck improvements design work.
7. Improvements to the Ronan Channel Trail is a current project under construction contract that is continuing into FY 19.
8. Another funding portion of the Ronan Channel Trail project.
9. Automall Parkway project design work funding.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
Capital Project Funds
The carryover requests from the capital project funds are predominately appropriations for reimbursements as identified in approved developer
property improvement agreements (PIAs). The appropriations being requested for carryover are only those that are anticipated to be reimbursed in FY
19. The others will be addressed in the upcoming budget development cycle for FY 20 and FY 21.
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
AMENDED
BUDGET
17-18 ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
17-18 UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
10 433 2600 3488 4340 Improvement 10th/Luc Int 293,649.50$ -$ 293,650$ -$ 293,650$ 293,650$
11 433 2600 3492 4340 Improvements 10th/Santa Ter Int 1,602,114.00$ -$ 1,602,114$ -$ 1,602,114$ 1,602,114$
12 433 2600 3496 4340 Improvements Cohansey 842,306.00$ -$ 842,306$ -$ 842,306$ 842,306$
13 433 2600 3497 4340 Improvements Luchessa Grnfld-Santa Ter785,691.00$ -$ 785,691$ 352,800$ 785,691$ 1,138,491$
14 433 2600 3896 4340 Improvement (Las Animas/Monterey)1,422,280$ -$ 1,422,280$ -$ 1,422,280$ 1,422,280$
15 433 2600 4405 4340 Improvement (Cohansey & Wren)410,220$ -$ 410,220$ -$ 410,220$ 410,220$
16 440 2600 3822 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chnl Trl)1,182,334$ 52,693$ 1,129,642$ -$ 1,129,642$ 1,129,642$
TOTAL 6,538,595$ 52,693$ 6,485,902$ 352,800$ 6,485,903$ 6,838,703$
10. through 15. Traffic Impact Fund - contractual obligations of traffic improvement reimbursements from PIAs approved by Council. These are only the
amounts anticipated to be reimbursed in FY 19 per the terms and improvements schedules contained in the PIAs.
16. Ronan Channel Trail project - funding is from the Public Facility Impact Fee and covers construction portion of the improvements that are currently
underway.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
Internal Service Funds
These requests are for utilizing the internal service funds to pay for vehicles, software, hardware, and other equipment that began in FY 18 but are
carrying through into FY 19.
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
AMENDED
BUDGET
17-18 ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
17-18 UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
17 600 0405 0915 4325 Vehicles - Police 1,053,656$ 780,131$ 273,525$ 704,727$ 273,525$ 978,252$
18 600 0405 0925 4325 Vehicles - Public Works 555,130$ 298,032$ 257,097$ -$ 257,097$ 257,097$
19 600 0405 0930 4325 Vehicles - Community Development 36,556$ 25,809$ 10,747$ -$ 10,747$ 10,747$
20 600 0405 0955 4325 Vehicles - Water 749,353$ 95,299$ 654,055$ -$ 654,055$ 654,055$
21 600 0400 0000 4320 Equipment/Furniture 27,986$ 3,400$ 24,586$ 16,000$ 24,586$ 40,586$
22 600 0405 0920 4325 Vehicles - Fire 435,473$ 60,978$ 374,495$ 352,999$ 374,495$ 727,494$
23 605 0400 0915 4320 Equipment/Furniture 456,696$ 299,576$ 157,120$ 209,508$ 23,789$ 233,297$
24 605 0400 0920 4320 Equipment Outlay 434,748$ 175,023$ 259,725$ 404,824$ 41,372$ 446,196$
25 651 0400 1561 4231 Repairs and Maintenance - City Hall 585,686$ 46,997$ 538,689$ 1,070,000$ 3,720$ 1,073,720$
26 651 0400 1571 4231 Repairs and Maintenance - Corp Yard 81,681$ -$ 81,681$ -$ 81,681$ 81,681$
27 690 0400 0000 4212 Consultants 240,000$ 66,411$ 173,589$ 40,000$ 160,000$ 200,000$
28 690 0400 0910 4320 IT - Administration Capital 1,185,000$ 41,786$ 1,143,214$ 18,500$ 1,143,214$ 1,161,714$
29 690 0400 0920 4320 IT - Fire Capital 70,440$ 31,884$ 38,556$ 71,000$ 38,556$ 109,556$
30 690 0400 0930 4320 IT - Community Dev. Capital 1,026,522$ 28,035$ 998,487$ -$ 998,487$ 998,487$
31 690 0400 0935 4320 IT - Recreation Capital 31,500$ -$ 31,500$ -$ 31,500$ 31,500$
32 690 0400 0950 4320 IT - Sewer Capital 660,911$ 15,900$ 645,011$ 100,500$ 645,011$ 745,511$
33 690 0400 0955 4320 IT - Water Capital 722,911$ 15,901$ 707,010$ 100,500$ 707,010$ 807,510$
34 690 1400 0000 4320 Police Admin Equipment/Furniture 411,058$ 193,803$ 217,255$ 25,000$ 217,255$ 242,255$
TOTAL 8,765,308$ 2,178,964$ 6,586,343$ 3,113,558$ 5,686,100$ 8,799,658$
17. through 22. These are purchases that were quoted and ordered before the end of FY 18, but will not be received or paid until FY 19. These purchases
are made for various departments of the City from the Fleet Fund.
23. Contribution towards tactical vests in the Police Department. Ordered last fiscal year, but will not be received or invoiced until FY 19.
24. The Fire Department equipment ordered in FY 18, but won’t be delivered until FY 19.
25. City Hall repairs and maintenance that will be completed in FY 19.
26. Corporation Yard repairs and maintenance that will be completed in FY 19.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
27. This carryover is for maintaining the City’s agreements with various consultants, including the EPC agreement that provides IT network support.
28. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software replacement project, which will continue through FY 19 and into FY 20.
29. IT equipment for the Fire Department that was not able to be ordered within FY 18 and will now be charged to FY 19.
30. Community Development IT Capital request is largely the new Land Management Software (LMS) purchase and implementation. Like the ERP, this
project will continue through FY 19 and into FY 20
31. Funding for Recreation IT needs into FY 19.
32. Sewer IT Capital is mainly carrying over funds for the new ERP system.
33. Water IT Capital carryover is to fund the new ERP system.
34. Police Department’s order for in car camera systems which will be delivered in FY 19.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
Enterprise Funds
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
AMENDED
BUDGET
17-18 ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
17-18 UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
35 700 2460 4582 4340 Improvements (Citywide Repair)1,188,258$ 22,738$ 1,165,520$ 250,000$ 255,431$ 505,431$
36 720 2470 3885 4340 Improvements (1st Street Phase 1)6,918,259$ 274,018$ 6,644,241$ -$ 359,907$ 359,907$
TOTAL 8,106,517$ 296,756$ 7,809,761$ 250,000$ 615,338$ 865,338$
35. Sewer Enterprise Fund - improvements to the sewer line along First Street. Project will be completed in FY 19.
36. Water Enterprise Fund - design work related to improvements to the water line running along First Street are still in design.
6.D.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: Recommended Carryover List FY 19 (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF GILROY AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF GILROY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019 AND
APPROPRIATING PROPOSED CARRYOVER
EXPENDITURE AMENDMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Administrator prepared and submitted to the City Council a budget
for the City of Gilroy for Fiscal Years 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, and the City Council carefully
examined, considered and adopted the same on June 5, 2017; and
WHEREAS, a portion of funding appropriated to Fiscal Year 2017-2018 that was not
charged within that fiscal year are requested to be used in Fiscal Year 2018-2019; and,
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared and submitted to the City Council proposed
amendments to carry over appropriations from Fiscal Year 2017-2018 into Fiscal Year 2018-
2019 for the City of Gilroy in the staff report dated November 19, 2018; and
WHEREAS, Council has approved the list of carryover amendments attached hereto as
Exhibit “A" and incorporated herein by this reference, and the City Council has carefully
examined and considered the same and is satisfied with said budget amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT said proposed carryover budget
amendments for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 are approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2018 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: Resolution FY 19 Carryovers (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-XX
APPROVED:
___________________________
ATTEST: Roland Velasco, Mayor
_________________________
Shawna Freels, City Clerk
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: Resolution FY 19 Carryovers (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-XX
EXHIBIT “A”
Council Approved List of Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Carryover Budget Amendments
Request
Number FUND DEPT PROG ACCT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
17-18
UNSPENT
FUNDS
18-19
APPROVED
BUDGET
CARRYOVER
REQUEST FOR
18-19
REVISED 18-19
BUDGET TOTAL
1 100 0400 3765 4596 Economic Development Corp 67,327$ -$ 55,293$ 55,293$
2 100 1401 0000 4215 Contract Services 18,929$ 156,941$ 6,352$ 163,293$
3 100 1401 0000 4221 Office/Computer Supplies 37,037$ 102,172$ 15,005$ 117,177$
4 100 2601 4054 4215 Contract Services (Automall Pkwy)39,789$ -$ 9,679$ 9,679$
5 100 2602 3428 4215 Contract Services (General Plan)520,109$ -$ 520,109$ 520,109$
6 213 2600 4497 4340 Improvements (HBBR Bridges)52,958$ -$ 15,972$ 15,972$
7 224 2600 3822 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chn Trl)817,977$ -$ 817,977$ 817,977$
8 224 2600 4416 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chn Trl)162,831$ -$ 124,108$ 124,108$
9 225 2600 4054 4340 Improvements (Automall Pkwy)615,134$ 166,400$ 126,550$ 292,950$
10 433 2600 3488 4340 Improvement 10th/Luc Int 293,650$ -$ 293,650$ 293,650$
11 433 2600 3492 4340 Improvements 10th/Santa Ter Int 1,602,114$ -$ 1,602,114$ 1,602,114$
12 433 2600 3496 4340 Improvements Cohansey 842,306$ -$ 842,306$ 842,306$
13 433 2600 3497 4340 Improvements Luchessa Grnfld-Santa Ter 785,691$ 352,800$ 785,691$ 1,138,491$
14 433 2600 3896 4340 Improvement (Las Animas/Monterey)1,422,280$ -$ 1,422,280$ 1,422,280$
15 433 2600 4405 4340 Improvement (Cohansey & Wren)410,220$ -$ 410,220$ 410,220$
16 440 2600 3822 4340 Improvements (Ronan Chnl Trl)1,129,642$ -$ 1,129,642$ 1,129,642$
17 600 0405 0915 4325 Vehicles - Police 273,525$ 704,727$ 273,525$ 978,252$
18 600 0405 0925 4325 Vehicles - Public Works 257,097$ -$ 257,097$ 257,097$
19 600 0405 0930 4325 Vehicles - Community Development 10,747$ -$ 10,747$ 10,747$
20 600 0405 0955 4325 Vehicles - Water 654,055$ -$ 654,055$ 654,055$
21 600 0400 0000 4320 Equipment/Furniture 24,586$ 16,000$ 24,586$ 40,586$
22 600 0405 0920 4325 Vehicles - Fire 374,495$ 352,999$ 374,495$ 727,494$
23 605 0400 0915 4320 Equipment/Furniture 157,120$ 209,508$ 23,789$ 233,297$
24 605 0400 0920 4320 Equipment Outlay 259,725$ 404,824$ 41,372$ 446,196$
25 651 0400 1561 4231 Repairs and Maintenance - City Hall 538,689$ 1,070,000$ 3,720$ 1,073,720$
26 651 0400 1571 4231 Repairs and Maintenance - Corp Yard 81,681$ -$ 81,681$ 81,681$
27 690 0400 0000 4212 Consultants 173,589$ 40,000$ 160,000$ 200,000$
28 690 0400 0910 4320 IT - Administration Capital 1,143,214$ 18,500$ 1,143,214$ 1,161,714$
29 690 0400 0920 4320 IT - Fire Capital 38,556$ 71,000$ 38,556$ 109,556$
30 690 0400 0930 4320 IT - Community Dev. Capital 998,487$ -$ 998,487$ 998,487$
31 690 0400 0935 4320 IT - Recreation Capital 31,500$ -$ 31,500$ 31,500$
32 690 0400 0950 4320 IT - Sewer Capital 645,011$ 100,500$ 645,011$ 745,511$
33 690 0400 0955 4320 IT - Water Capital 707,010$ 100,500$ 707,010$ 807,510$
34 690 1400 0000 4320 Police Admin Equipment/Furniture 217,255$ 25,000$ 217,255$ 242,255$
35 700 2460 4582 4340 Improvements (Citywide Repair)1,165,520$ 250,000$ 255,431$ 505,431$
36 720 2470 3885 4340 Improvements (1st Street Phase 1)6,644,241$ -$ 359,907$ 359,907$
TOTAL 23,214,097$ 4,141,871$ 14,478,386$ 18,620,257$
6.D.b
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: Resolution FY 19 Carryovers (1885 : FY 18 Carryover Requests)
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Approval to Extend the Construction Management Consultant Pre-
Approved List for an Additional Year Through August 2, 2019
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Public Works Department
Submitted By: Girum Awoke
Prepared By: Faranak Mahdavi
Faranak Mahdavi
Strategic Plan Goals
☐ Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
☐ Economic
Development
Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Extension of the pre-qualified list of construction management consultants for an
additional 1 year, until August 2, 2019.
BACKGROUND
The City’s Public Works Department requires the assistance of consultants to manage
construction projects, and to perform extensive project documentation required on
federally funded projects.
In 2014, a request for qualifications (RFQ) for construction management (CM) services
was emailed to approximately 60 engineering firms and advertised in the Gilroy
Dispatch and the San Jose Mercury News. Fourteen statements of qualification were
submitted by the April 15th, 2014 deadline. The submittals were reviewed and ranked
based on the criteria listed in the RFQ. All of these firms provided well -presented
proposals with thoughtful responses to the RFQ. Six of these firms, CALTROP
Corporation, 4Leaf, Inc., MNS Engineers, Inc., Drake Haglan & Associates, Nova
6.E
Packet Pg. 40
Partners, Inc. and Consolidated CM, were selected as the best qualified consultants for
the construction management services.
Selecting multiple firms gives the City the opportunity to select a consultant that is best
suited to a particular job, and to provide the efficiency of having multiple consultants
working on multiple projects simultaneously. The prequalification process streamlines
the consultant selection process for the various capital projects shown in the six-year
Capital Improvement Budget and provides for construction management services on an
as needed basis for a period of three years, with an allowance for two additional one-
year extensions. The pre-qualified list of CM consultants was approved by Council on
August 4, 2014.
DISCUSSION
There is a continued need for CM services for the City’s capital projects. City staff has
determined that the process to select the pre-qualified list of CM consultants is still valid
and that the list of CM consultants approved by Council will still meet the needs of the
City. The previous Council approval allows for two one-year extensions of the validity of
the list. Staff recommends that Council approve the prequalified list for a second one-
year extension as original planned. This will extend the list of pre-qualified CM
consultants through August 2nd, 2019.
ALTERNATIVES
Council may choose to deny this request to extend the short listed consultants and
direct staff to put out a new solicitation. However this option is not recommended due to
the time it takes to advertise, evaluate and select well qualified consultants, which will
likely be a similar list.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Although, the City will generally save staff time and effort in not having to solicit a new
request for qualifications, there is no fiscal impact by extending the validity period for list
of prequalified construction management consultants.
6.E
Packet Pg. 41
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia Buchanan
(The City Administrator recommends a “yes” vote under the
Consent Calendar shall constitute the denial of the claim)
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Human Resources Department
Submitted By: LeeAnn McPhillips
Prepared By: LeeAnn McPhillips
Strategic Plan Goals
☐ Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
☐ Economic
Development
☐ Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the recommendation from Municipal Pooling Authority (MPA) and/or legal
counsel, this claim is recommended for rejection.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Based on the recommendation from Municipal Pooling Authority (MPA) and/or legal
counsel, the following claim is submitted to the City Council for rejection at the
November 19, 2018 meeting:
Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia Buchanan
Attachments:
1. Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO Patricia Buchanan
6.F
Packet Pg. 42
6.F.a
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO Patricia Buchanan (1893 : Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia
6.F.a
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO Patricia Buchanan (1893 : Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia
6.F.a
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO Patricia Buchanan (1893 : Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia
6.F.a
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO Patricia Buchanan (1893 : Claim of Farmers Insurance Exchange ASO: Patricia
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Approval of an Amendment to the Agreement with CSG
Consultants, and Matching Budget Amendment in the Amount of
$405,000 for Engineering Plan Review, Construction Inspection
and Capital Project Implementation Support Services
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Public Works Department
Submitted By: Girum Awoke
Prepared By: Girum Awoke
Gary Heap
Strategic Plan Goals
☐ Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
☐ Economic
Development
Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
a) Approval of an amendment to the agreement with CSG Consultants in the
amount of $405,000 for engineering plan review, construction inspection, and
capital project implementation support services, and authorize the City
Administrator to execute the agreement; and,
b) Amend the City’s budget in the amount of $227,000 in the General Fund,
$106,800 in the Water enterprise Fund, $35,600 in the Sewer Enterprise fund
and $35,600 in the Gas Tax Fund for a total sum of $405,000.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Land Development, Transportation and Capital Project groups in Public Works
continue to experience challenges related to workload; both in development and with
implementation of new capital projects. To meet the operational needs of the
department, CSG Consultants (CSG) has continued providing support in engineering,
construction and project management activities. Staff is requesting Council’s approval to
7.A
Packet Pg. 47
amend the current contract by $405,000 for services from January 1, 2019 through June
30, 2019. This cost is recoverable and the services will be paid out of a combination of
Plan Check and Inspection fees, as well as Capital Projects expense accounts. This
request will require a budget amendment of the same amount from General, Enterprise,
and Special Revenue Funds.
BACKGROUND
The original contract with CSG was signed in July 2015. The contract was for a three
year term with two possible one year extensions. The estimated value of the contract at
the time was $450,000. Since the signing of the original contract, the working
conditions, projects and staffing level in the Engineering Division has prompted four
contract amendments that have been approved by Council. The first contract
amendment, in the amount of $485,000, was approved by the City Council on April 17,
2017.
On March 5, 2018, Council approved a second contract amendment for CSG
consultants in the amount of $950,000. This amendment paid for services render ed
from August 2017 through February 2018. Staff also informed Council of the need to
continue providing services while filling vacant positions and building capacity in the
Engineering Division.
On April 16 2018, Council approved a third contract amendment in the amount of
$400,000, to cover staff augmentation, from March 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018, in
both the Land Development and CIP sections of Engineering. This brought the total
contract amount with CSG Consultants to $2,285,000 from July 2015 through June
2018.
On July 2, 2018, Council approved a fourth contract amendment in the amount of
$482,000, to cover staff augmentation from July 2, 2018 through December 31, 2018 in
the Land Development and CIP sections of Engineering. This brought the tot al contract
amount with CSG Consultants to $2,767,000 from July 2015 through December 2018.
The following table provides a summary of associated contract amendments and the
total contract amounts to date:
Summary of CSG Consultants Contract and Amendments
Contract
Term
Authorized
Amount
Service
Period
(covered by
authorized
amount)
Accumulated
Total Remarks
7.A
Packet Pg. 48
ANALYSIS
This fifth contract amendment seeks to pay for services through the end of the fiscal
year; June 30, 2019. CSG staff will cover a current engineering vacancy, provide
additional inspection coverage in the Development Section, and provide support for the
CIP Section. A number of staffing positions have recently been filled, and these
individuals are being trained and oriented to their various job duties. When fully trained,
land development review and some field inspection support by CSG may become
unnecessary.
The following is a summary of current staffing levels:
Engineering Division Staffing
Engineering
Section Position Responsibilities Recruitment Status
CIP Senior Engineer Oversight of CIP
Projects and Staff
- The new Senior CIP
Engineer is in place
- Start date of July 30, 2018
CIP Civil Engineer I Project
Management
- The new Engineer in CIP
is in place
- Start date of August 6,
2018
Land Development Civil Engineer I
Processing and
Coordination of
Development
Projects
- The new Engineer in
Development is in place
- Start date of March 26,
2018
Land Development Civil Engineer I
Processing of
Development
Projects
- Recruitment for this
position underway
- Interviews scheduled for
Original
Contract
CC July 2015
July 2, 2015 –
June 30, 2018 $450,000 July 2015 –
April 2017 $450,000
Funds exhausted prior
to end of original
contract term
First
Amendment
CC 4/17/17
July 2, 2015 –
May 1, 2019 $485,000 June 2017 –
July 2017 $935,000 Additional funds
exhausted by July 2017
Second
Amendment
CC 3/5/18
July 2, 2015 –
May 1, 2019 $950,000 August 2017 –
February 2018 $1,885,000 Invoices paid thru
February 2018
Third
Amendment
CC 4/16/18
July 2, 2015 –
May 1, 2019 $400,000 March 1, 2018 –
June 30, 2018 $2,285,000 Invoices paid through
June 2018
Fourth
Amendment
CC 7/2/18
July 2, 2015 –
May 1, 2019 $482,000 July 2, 2018 –
Dec. 31, 2018 $2,767,000
Funding to cover CSG
staffing through the end
of calendar year 2018
7.A
Packet Pg. 49
November 2
- Position expected to be
filled early January, 2019
Land Development Tech / Inspector
I
Land Development
Support
- The new Tech/Inspector I
is in place
- Start date of September
17
Land
Development/Traffic
Engineering
Tech / Inspector
II
Land Development
Support and
Inspection
- The new Tech/Inspector II
is in place
- Start date of September
24
Land Development Tech / Inspector
III
Land Development
Inspection
- Recruitment complete
- New Tech/Inspector II
expected to start end of
November
CSG Staffing Augmentation Level
CIP Engineer
Project
Management
(5 days/week)
- For Decision Package
projects and major CIP
projects
- Funded through CIP
project budgets
- To request limited term
FTE for CIP Group with
next Budget Cycle
Land Development Engineer
Processing and
Coordination of
Development
Projects
(3 days/week)
- To cover current vacancy
and workload due to high
level of development
activities
- Funded directly by plan
check and inspection fees
- To request limited term
FTE for Development
Group with next Budget
Cycle.
Land Development Construction
Inspector
Land Development
Inspection
(5 days/week)
- Position to be dedicated to
specific land development
project inspection
- Funded directly by plan
check and inspection fees
- Expect this position to be
on-going through build-out
of the Glen Loma
development project
As identified in the various CSG Amendment City Council staff reports, there are
several land development review and program management activities and functions
7.A
Packet Pg. 50
supported by CSG, including many annual and Decision Package CIP projects that are
in progress. Land development continues at a high level, as demonstrated by the more
than estimated collections of plan check and inspection fees ($1.9 million in budgeted
revenue versus projected actual revenue of $3.2 million by the end of the Fiscal Year)
and the heightened amount of construction activity in various parts of the city.
CSG also provides annual support to Engineering for the annual Government
Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 34 (GASB 34) accounting and reporting
that takes place in July of each year. GASB 34 requires audits of government entities to
report infrastructure assets in their statement of net assets. State and Local
governments are required to report public infrastructure assets, including roads,
bridges, tunnels, water and sewer systems, and dams along with related depreciation or
preservation costs. GASB 34 provides a comprehensive framework for financial
reporting used to prepare audited financial statements for the City’s Comprehensive
Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The process requires an extensive amount of time
and effort to compile and consolidate infrastructure improvements categorized by
material type, size and function.
In the past, the Public Works Director provided this information through an Excel
spreadsheet adding and retiring infrastructure based on each year’s activities.
Approximately ten years prior to that, the City hired a contractor to comply with GASB
34, basing his assessments on the Geographic Information System (GIS). For FY
17/18, the consultant assisted in the preparation of the GASB 34 submittal report to
Finance. It is expected that limited CSG support will be necessary each July-
September to provide this support function. Since this contract amendment is for the
period of January 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019, no CSG GASB support is necessary.
GASB support will be needed in July 2019.
ALTERNATIVES
As an alternative to using CSG for project-specific staff augmentation, the City Council
may choose to approve full time merit positions. While we are not proposing this
alternative during this current contract amendment, Public Works will be proposing two
limited-term positions (one for CIP and one for Development) in the FY 19/20 Budget
Cycle. If those positions are approved and funded, future support service agreements
(with the best qualified consultant selected through the next competitive selection
process) would only include assistance for carefully evaluated work load needs on a
case by case basis.
In addition, the Department of Human Resources supports the option of hiring limited
term employees over continuing the use of consulting firms such as CSG. While
consulting firms have worked in the past and can meet short-term needs, on a longer
term basis, it is best to directly hire employees who can provide continuous and
7.A
Packet Pg. 51
consistent support to the Department. The Department of Industrial Relations and
CalPERS are tightening the regulations related to the use of independent contractors;
the long-term use of consultants to compliment staffing may become a focus. Limited
term City employees will provide consistency and continuity and having employees who
work under the direction of the city management team will allow for more direct
oversight and prioritization of work. Also, a consistent employee team working on public
works projects helps to ensure that the city’s customer service goals are adequately
met.
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
The support services are recommended to be funded by the plan check and inspection
fund balance revenues, and specific funds associated with CIP project budgets. To
meet the core needs of the department, while continuing to build capacity and resiliency
through the end of the next fiscal year, staff is requesting Council’s approval of a budget
amendment for additional funds in the amount of $405,000. The increase will be funded
out of engineering plan check fee revenue, which is performing better than budgeted
amounts, as well as Water, Sewer, and Gas Tax funds, which are all sufficient to fund
the appropriation increase. This Fifth Amendment will bring the total value of the CSG
contract to $3,172,000. Funding for the budget amendment will be drawn from the
following:
1. Plan Check & Inspection Fees – The adopted FY 19 Budget
had $1.9 million in projected revenue for this account. Based
on current actuals, staff is projecting the revenue to reach $3.2
million by fiscal year-end (a projected increase of $1.3 million).
$227,000
2. Water Fund – Support services associated with capital projects
of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
$106,800
3. Sewer Fund – Support services associated with capital projects
of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
$35,600
4. Gas Tax Fund – Support services associated with capital
projects of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
$35,600
Total CSG Amendment No. 5 $405,000
CONCLUSION
The Land Development, Transportation and Capital Project groups in Public Works
provide services and perform functions related to the constru ction, permitting and
preservation of City infrastructure and the environment. In order to address the City’s
short term needs, contract consultants are a valuable resource. CSG has been very
responsive to the City by providing temporary staffing. While th e Public Works
7.A
Packet Pg. 52
Department continues to build capacity and set systems in place, staff requests
approval of this amendment through June 30, 2019.
7.A
Packet Pg. 53
City of Gilroy
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Title: Zone Change Planned Unit Development and Architectural and Site
Review Request for a Proposed Five-Story Mixed-Use
Development on a Two-Acre Site Located at 8955 Monterey Road,
APN: 790-14-025; Jan Hochhauser Applicant (AS 16-19) (Z 17-03)
Meeting Date: November 19, 2018
From: Gabriel Gonzalez, City Administrator
Department: Community Development Department
Submitted By: Kristi Abrams
Prepared By: Sue O'Strander
Pamela Wu
Strategic Plan Goals
☐ Fiscal Stability
☐ Downtown
Revitalization
Economic
Development
☐ Customer Service ☐ Enhanced Public
Safety
RECOMMENDATION
a) Motion to adopt a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and
reporting program for the Monterey Mixed-Use Development project, based on
findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
b) Motion to read the ordinance by title only and waive further reading; and
c) Motion to introduce an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gilroy
approving zone change planned unit development Z 17-03 for the Monterey
Mixed-Use Development project, subject to certain findings and conditions; and
d) Motion to adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gilroy approving
the architectural and site review permit AS 16-19 for the Monterey Mixed-Use
Development project, subject to certain findings and conditions.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Jan Hochhauser, on behalf of Elite Development Inc., requests the approval of
Architectural and Site Review permit (AS 16-19) and Zone change for a Planned Unit
8.A
Packet Pg. 54
Development (Z 17-03) to construct a five-story mixed-use development including 78
residential apartment units and 4 commercial spaces on 8955 Monterey Road. The site
is currently developed with a church and a granite slab supply business. Demolition of
these structures would be the first step in redeveloping the subject site. The project
demonstrates full compliance with the policies and standards stipulated in the City
General Plan, Zoning Code and State Density Bonus provision. Planning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the project as the
development is well designed and can provide additional housing units to the
community.
BACKGROUND
Project Description: The project includes the construction of a five-story mixed-use
development on an approximately 2-acre site at 8955 Monterey Road. Ground level
commercial space facing Monterey Road is approximately 4,435 square feet and can
occupy up to four (4) businesses. A total of 18 parking spaces will be installed to
support the retail uses. At this time, no specific tenants have been identified for these
areas, but possible business may include retail, small grocery store, professional
offices, and/or small scale food service; assuming no additional parking demand would
be generated based on the parking ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet of retail space.
The project would also include public amenities such as a wider sidewalk
(approximately 50-feet wide) with bus shelter, seating area and a public plaza-like
space in front of the commercial units.
Residential units located over the commercial uses would provide 78 apartments
ranging from 1 to 4 bedroom units. The building is designed in the central-most area of
the property and also steps back towards the front, where minimal impact on adjacent
single-family homes will occur. As such, 24 units are located on each of the second and
third floors of the building, with 18 and 14 units each on the fourth and fifth levels,
respectively. Of the 78 residential units, 9 units would be made available to low-income
households for a minimum of 55 years, as required by the State Density Bonus law.
Common areas include a lobby, a social lounge, enclosed playground areas a multi-
purpose room, an indoor gym, a laundry facility, bike storages and extra storage lockers
for the residents. In addition, a rooftop terrace would provide a pleasant retreat and
outdoor space for the residents. Elevators in two different areas would provide vertical
access to residents to their units. The rear of the building would be accessed through a
set of the stairs.
The development includes a Density Bonus request, for a 27.5% increase above the R4
density standards to achieve the total of 78 units. Nine of t he units would be maintained
as low-income affordable units. As part of the Density Bonus request, the applicant
requests allowance for compact spaces as the project concession.
Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses: The subject site is currently
8.A
Packet Pg. 55
developed with a granite slab supply business (Granite Outlet) and a church (Iglesia
Cristiana). The total site area is approximately 2.046 acre and is developed with
several buildings.
The subject site is located to the north of downtown Gilroy, just no rth of Liman Avenue,
on the west side of Monterey Road. Across Monterey Road, to the east are the Union
Pacific railroad tracks and vacant land.
Planning Commission Recommendation: On October 4, 2018, the Planning
Commission voted unanimously to adopt resolutions recommending approval of the
proposed project. The Planning Commission staff report is included as an attachment
to this staff report.
Discussion and deliberation on the project included whether additional affordable units
can be provided, whether the proposed laundry facilities and storage locker area are
sized adequately for the residential needs onsite. Commissioners also discussed how
parking would be enforced and monitored onsite, if adequate privacy is considered for
the existing neighborhood from the proposed rooftop terrace. In conclusion, Planning
Commission expressed high interest in permanently retaining the proposed pedestrian
access from subject site to Weaver Court. As such, a special condition to emphasize
the need to include the pedestrian connection was included in the final action. Other
topics of discussion included the requirement of underground utility along Monterey
Road frontage and the artistic elements of the proposed bike rack.
Several members of the public, mostly from the existing church, spoke in support of the
project. The discussion involved the possibility of hosting the existing church in the
future commercial space should parking can be allowed at the adjacent pre -school site.
The developer and church understand that if the church is to lease one of the
commercial spaces, such proposal is not part of this approval and would require
subsequent and separate review and analysis.
ANALYSIS
General Plan and Zoning Compliance: The project demonstrates full compliance with
policies and standards stipulated in the City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as the
building conforms to the required setback, height limit and minimum parking
requirement. The architectural design of the proposed building tapers from five -story
elevation to three-story in the rear when the building is closest to the existing single-
family residential neighborhood. As the building will be much taller than its surrounding
structures, the design incorporates adequate buffer and landscaping to soften the urban
presence to the adjacent single-family homes and one-story commercial structures.
Mature canopy trees are proposed along Monterey Road, in front of the commercial
stores, to enhance the building elevation to a more human -scale that can be inviting for
pedestrian activity.
In addition, the project complies with findings required to approve a planned unit
development (PUD) combining overlay as it provides the opportunity for project designs
that deviate from specific requirements of the City Code and other development
8.A
Packet Pg. 56
standards, where appropriate and justified. The project requests a commercial
component with the approval of the proposed PUD zoning overlay. The proposal
includes approximately 4,435 s.f. of commercial space on the ground level along
Monterey Road where retail, office and/or small scale food services are anticipated.
The commercial uses will serve both the onsite residents and nearby neighborhoods.
As part of the PUD application, a public plaza-like area will be created in front of the
commercial stores along Monterey as a gathering place as an additional amenity.
Preliminary conceptual drawings of such area are enclosed with this report.
As such, staff recommends approval by the City Council with the conditions included, as
attached to this staff report.
Density Bonus Ordinance: Pursuant to CA Government Code 65915, a density bonus
request is allowed if at least “10% of the total units of housing development” are
reserved “for lower income households.” The development proposes to include 15%
affordable units. As such, the project qualifies for 27.5% density bonus above the R4
base zoning allowance, for a total of 78 units (61 units x 27.5%). With 15% low-income
units proposed, the developer has requested 1 concession for the development. The
requested concession is a modification to the parking space standard to allow compact
parking spaces onsite.
Although staff supports the requested concession to allow compact parking spaces
onsite, staff is concerned that the combination of allowing tandem parking along with
compact spaces may result in significant off -street parking impacts within the existing
residential neighborhood. However, since tandem parking is allowed through Density
Bonus provisions, the Council has no jurisdiction in recommending denial of this design.
It is important to note that approval of the exception request is not discretionary under
the Density Bonus law.
In order to ensure that off -street parking and on-site circulation will not significantly
impact the neighborhood, the applicant has submitted a parking management plan that
was reviewed by staff to address the concern which will be incorporated into conditions
of approval to ensure future enforceability. The parking management plan will requir e
the onsite management company to monitor the resident parking practice and ensure
that there is overflow parking occurring offsite, including Weaver Court.
Environmental Assessment: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), an initial study was prepared to evaluate any potentially significant adverse
effects of the proposed project on the environment. Specific required mitigation
measures are included to reduce the impact to an insignificant level. As such, no
significant adverse effects are expected to result from the proposed project, and the City
Council can make findings to recommend adoption of the mitigated negative declaration
(MND).
Bicycle Pedestrian Committee (BPC): On July 26, 2016, the applicant presented the
proposed project to the BPC with a special focus on pedestrian and bicycle aspects of
8.A
Packet Pg. 57
the proposal. The BPC supported the project with a list of recommendations made by
Commissioner Marandos and seconded by Commissioner Muniz. The BPC
recommended inclusion of bike route signage from the rear pedestrian exit of the project
onto Weaver Court, then onto Woodworth Way towards Church Street . The BPC also
recommended a bike lane along with related improvements on the project’s Monterey
Street frontage, and a donation or pledge toward future bike lane improvements on
Monterey Street when the road surface gets repaved by City. These recommendations
have been included as conditions of approval as part of the Planning Commission
action.
The applicant requested an endorsement amendment from the BPC favoring access
from the west end of the complex onto Weaver Court, then via Woodworth Way to the
Church Street bike lanes. A motion for the additional endorsement was made by
Commissioner Reedy and seconded by Commissioner Marandos.
Gilroy Unified School District (GUSD): Project plans were routed to the GUSD for
review and comments. GUSD representatives (discussion with Alvaro Meza on
8/22/2018) did not have concerns on the proposed project and noted the development
falls within the following school boundaries: Antonio Del Buono Elementary School,
South Valley Middle School and Christopher High School. Staff has confirmed with
GUSD that these nearby schools will have capacity to serve additional students from
the proposed project. In addition, Alvaro Meza from GUSD supports the rear pedestrian
access for the project because this is the safest access point for Safe Routes to School.
Alvaro also noted that if this pedestrian access point were to be removed, then
additional 10-ft sidewalk for extra protection should be included in the improvement
plans along project frontage on Monterey Rd. The additional 10-feet would provide
extra protection for pedestrians when trees align the curb side on any 10 -ft sidewalk.
ALTERNATIVES
Some options for the City Council on this proposed development include:
1) Approval of the Architectural and Site Review (AS 16-19) and Zone Change for a
Planned Unit Development (Z 17-03), as presented herein or otherwise modified
at the Council’s discretion. The project demonstrates full compliance with the
policies and standards stipulated in the City General Plan, Zoning Code and
State Density Bonus provisions and the Planning Commission voted
unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the project as the
development is well designed and can provide additional housing units to the
community. Staff recommends this action.
2) Denial of the Architectural and Site Review (AS 16-19) and of Zone Change for a
Planned Unit Development (Z 17-03), as presented herein. Under Housing
Accountability Act, Council must approve and support the proposed project if
such housing project complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning
standards and criteria. State law also does not allow City Council the discretion
to deny the requested Density Bonus. Staff does not recommend this action.
8.A
Packet Pg. 58
FISCAL IMPACT/FUNDING SOURCE
Adequate fees were collected, thus no fiscal impacts are associated with this request for
council’s consideration and determination. Collection of fees (as established by the City
Council) for subsequent review of construction permits will cover the necessary
resources at that time.
NEXT STEPS
Upon approval of the recommended action, staff would return with the ordinance for
second reading and adoption at the next City Council meeting. After the effective date of
the ordinance, the developer may proceed with processing building permits to begin
construction of the approved plans.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
Property owner information (i.e. list, labels, and map) within 500 feet of the subject site
were generated by DataPro Title Company using current ownership data. On October
24, 2018 notices of this City Council meeting were mailed to the property owners along
within other interested parties. In addition, the property has been posted with on-site
signage notifying passersby of pending development, and the City Council public
hearing packets are available through the City's webpage.
Two community outreach meetings were hosted by the developer on June 18, 2018 and
July 31, 2018, where planning staff attended the July 31, 2018 meeting. At the July 31,
2018 meeting, 2 neighbors were in attendance and a few questions regarding the
development were discussed.
Attachments:
1. Z17-03 CC Resolution
2. AS 16-19 CC Resolution
3. AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B
4. Project Plans
5. Revised site plan
6. Public plaza view 1
7. Public plaza view 2
8. Oct 4 PC staff report
9. BPC comments SRTS 8955 Monterey Rd Apartments
8.A
Packet Pg. 59
ORDINANCE NO. 2019-XX
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GILROY
APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE Z 17-03, A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ZONING AMENDMENT TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE 78 UNIT MIX-USE MONTEREY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT,
FILED BY JAN HOCHHAUSER, 122 EAST ARRELLAGA ST., SANTA
BARBARA, CA 93101.
WHEREAS, Jan Hochhauser submitted a zone change request for a Planned Unit
Development for the Monterey Apartment mix-use development project; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located to the north of downtown Gilroy and is on the
west side of Monterey Road, where Union Pacific railroad tracks and vacant land are on the east of
subject parcel. (APN 790-14-025); and
WHEREAS, the MND prepared for the project determined that while the proposed project
would result in less than significant effects on the environment, the project has been mitigated to a
point where no significant effects will occur; and
WHEREAS, said zone change request was referred to various city departments, including the
Technical Advisory Committee, for recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission of the city of Gilroy has considered the zone change
request (Z 17-03) on October 4, 2018, in accordance with the Gilroy Zoning Ordinance, and other
applicable standards and regulations and recommended to the City Council approval of zone change
request (Z17-03); and
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2018 the City Council of the City of Gilroy considered the staff
report along with testimony received at the duly-noticed public hearing and other materials; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the proposed zone change request for a Planned Unit
Development design complies with all required Planned Unit Development findings; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy
hereby approves zone change for a Planned Unit Development Zone Amendment.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Z17-03 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November 2018 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_____________________________
Roland Velasco, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Shawna Freels, City Clerk
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Z17-03 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
AS 16-19
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GILROY
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW AS
16-19, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE
REVIEW TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 78 UNIT MIX-USE
MONTEREY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT, FILED BY JAN HOCHHAUSER,
122 EAST ARRELLAGA ST., SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101.
WHEREAS, Jan Hochhauser submitted an application requesting an architectural and site
review to approve the architectural and site design of the Monterey Apartment mixed-use
development project; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located to the north of downtown Gilroy and is on the
west side of Monterey Road, where Union Pacific railroad tracks and vacant land are on the east of
subject parcel. (APN 790-14-025); and
WHEREAS, the MND prepared for the project determined that while the proposed project
would result in less than significant effects on the environment, the project has been mitigated to a
point where no significant effects will occur; and
WHEREAS, said architectural and site review application was referred to various city
departments, including the Technical Advisory Committee, for recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission of the city of Gilroy has considered the architectural
and site review request (AS 16-19) on October 4, 2018, in accordance with the Gilroy Zoning
Ordinance, and other applicable standards and regulations and recommended to the City Council
approval of architectural and site review AS 16-19; and
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2018 the City Council of the City of Gilroy considered the staff
report along with testimony received at the duly-noticed public hearing and other materials; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the architectural and site review application conforms to
the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and elements thereof; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gilroy
hereby approves Architectural and Site Review AS 16-19, subject to the conditions attached hereto as
Exhibit A and MMRP attached hereto as Exhibit B.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November 2018 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
_____________________________
Roland Velasco, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Shawna Freels, City Clerk
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Note: The following abbreviations identify the City department or division responsible for
determining compliance with these conditions. The first group listed has responsibility for
compliance at plan check, the second confirms compliance with the condition at final
inspection, prior to final occupancy or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or as
specified in the condition. If only one group is identified, they have responsibilities from
initial review through compliance verification. An internal condition reference number is
located at the end of each condition (e.g. G-1 or MND-S2).
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS
BL Building Division/Inspectors PK Parks/Landscape Design
CA City Attorney PL Planning Division
CC Chemical Control Agency PW Public Works/Engineering
FP Fire Prevention TR Traffic Division
PD Police Department WW Wastewater/Source Control
GENERAL PROJECT CONDITIONS
1. Approval of AS 16-19 & Z 17-03 Located at 8955 Monterey Road, Gilroy, PROJECT
NUMBER (# [16050028 & 17030060] (hereinafter “this permit”) is granted for approved
plans stamped as “Approved on 11/19/2018” (“the plans”) on file with the Planning
Division. Build-out of the project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified
in these conditions. Any future adjustment or modification to the plans shall be considered
by the Community Development Director or designee, may require separate discretionary
approval, and shall conform to all City, State, and Federal requirements, including
subsequent City Code requirements or policies adopted by City Council. The project shall
include the rear pedestrian access from the subject site to Weaver Court, and that access
shall be controlled and monitored by the onsite management company to avoid spillover
parking on Weaver Court. (PL, G-1)
2.
3. Developer means permit applicant, property owner, operator, permitee, lessee, and/or tenants
using the space(s) for the intended use(s). Developer shall comply with project conditions
for the life of the project. (CA, G-2)
4. Developer agrees, as a condition of permit approval, at Developer’s own expense, to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Gilroy (“the City”) and its officers, contractors,
consultants, attorneys, employees and agents from any and all claim(s), action(s) or
proceeding(s) brought against the City or its officers, contractors, consultants, attorneys,
employees, or agents to challenge, attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 4
resolution or any condition attached thereto or any proceedings, acts or determinations
taken, including actions taken under the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, done or made prior to the approval of such resolution that were part of the
approval process. (CA, G-3)
5. Failure to appeal this decision in a timely manner, or commencement of any activity related
to the project, is understood to clarify Developer’s acceptance of all conditions and
obligations imposed by this permit and waiving any challenge to the validity of the
conditions and obligations stated therein. (CA, G-4)
6. Should Developer intend to request an extension to the permit expiration date, Developer
must submit to the Planning Division a written application with applicable fees prior to the
expiration date. Only timely requests may be considered pursuant to the City Code. (PL, G-
5)
7. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall correct all violations of the City Code,
if any, existing on the project property for which the City has open cases. (PL/CE, G-6)
8. If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the
Developer, owner or tenant shall be subject to permit revocation or enforcement actions
pursuant to the City Code. All costs associated with any such actions shall be the
responsibility of Developer, owner or tenant. (CA, G-7)
9. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall complete all required offsite and onsite improvements
related to the project, including structures, paving, and landscaping, unless otherwise
allowed by the Community Development Director, or stated in these conditions. (BL, G-8)
10. Developer shall complete the “Notice of Land Use Restrictions and Conditions” form, using
the form provided by the City, for recording with the Santa Clara County Recorder. Before
the City issues building permits, Developer shall submit the original completed, signed and
notarized document to the Community Development Director or designee. (PL, G-9)
11. Developer shall request a Pre-Con meeting with City staff prior to issuance of building /
grading permit.
12. Developer acknowledges that because of water limitations placed on the City by its water
providers, approval of this permit does not guarantee that the city will issue building
permits. Issuance of building permits may be delayed and subject to implementation and/or
compliance with mandated water conservation or allocation plans. (PL/PW, G-10)
13. Developer shall obtain building permits for the plans within one (1) year from the date of
this permit approval. If such buildings permits are not received within the time frame, this
permit shall automatically become null and void. (PL, G-13)
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 5
14. Approval of this permit is subject to approval of AS 16-19 and Z 17-03. Should any of those
application(s) be rescinded or not approved, this approval shall immediately become null
and void. (PL, G-16)
PLANNING DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS
15. Developer shall obtain necessary permits prior to initiating any new construction or
modifications authorized under this approval, including but not limited to temporary
construction trailers, temporary staging areas, model home sales offices, advertising signs of
any kind, exterior and interior modifications. Developer shall pay all requisite fees in effect
at the time of plan submittal and/or issuance, as applicable. (PL/BL, PL-1)
16. Developer shall submit plans for building permit applications that include all exterior
building materials and colors, including product and finish manufacturer name, color name
and number, and surface finish type (e.g. stucco with sand finish, plaster with smooth finish)
to be used in construction. (PL, PL-2)
17. Developer shall submit plans for building permit applications that include, on all sets, a
reproduction of all conditions of approval of this permit, as adopted by the decision-maker.
(PL, PL-3)
18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall provide to the Planning Division
digital photos or copies of full-size colored elevations, color and material sample boards,
perspective illustrations, and any other colored exhibit approved by the decision-maker. The
colored elevations should be prepared based on the latest and approved plans including
architectural, civil and landscaping plans. (PL, PL-4)
19. Developer may not modify any use approved by this permit unless the Community
Development Director or designee determines that Developer has provided the parking
required by the City Code for the modified use. Such determination may require an
adjustment or modification to this permit approval. (PL, PL-5)
20. Prior to issuance of grading permits, Developer shall submit a combined landscape and
lighting plan to verify all project onsite lighting shall be of a type and in a location that does
not constitute a hazard to vehicular traffic, either on private property or on public property,
including streets. Such lighting shall not conflict with drainage plans, landscape plans, tree
locations, parking spaces, or any other such land use concerns. (PL, PL-6)
21. Parking lot and exterior light fixtures shall be full cutoff type so that lighting is directed
downward only, minimizing glare and light pollution, and shall not cast light on any
adjacent property or roadway. Developer shall recess or conceal any under-canopy lighting
elements so they are not directly visible from any public area. Prior to issuance of building
permits, Developer shall submit a lighting plan with details of the proposed fixtures and
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 6
locations to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-
7)
22. Developer agrees, as a permit of condition approval, that no sign advertising the
development project or components thereof, including individual tenants or subdivisions,
shall be installed or maintained onsite or offsite except as allowed and in conformance with
an approved sign permit. (PL, PL-8)
23. Concurrent with or prior to an application for a grading permit, Developer shall apply for a
Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan permit from the City of Gilroy. The grading permit will be
issued only after payment of assessed fees and approval of the Habitat Plan permit. (PL, PL-
9)
24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, Developer shall present to the Community
Development Director or designee, a receipt issued by Santa Clara County for full payment
of the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan fees for associated with the proposed development.
Such receipt shall be dated within six (6) months of the grading permit issuance date, or the
fee amount may be reassessed and difference collected at the time of grading permit
issuance. (PL, PL-10)
25. To minimize potential construction-related impacts to noise, Developer shall include the
following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the subject
site (PL/BL, PL-11)
“During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the
following measures at the construction site:
(A) Limit construction activity to weekdays between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and on
Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Construction noise is prohibited on Sundays
and City-observed holidays;
(B) Locate stationary noise-generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors
when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction project area;
(C) Construct sound walls or other noise reduction measures prior to developing the project
site;
(D) Equip all internal combustion engine driven equipment with intake and exhaust
mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment;
(E) Prohibit all unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines;
(F) Utilize “quiet” models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where
technology exists; and
(G) Designate a “disturbance coordinator’ who would be responsible for responding to any
complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the
cause of the noise complaint (e.g. bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable
measures be implemented to correct the problem.”
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 7
26. To minimize potential construction-related impacts to air quality, Developer shall include
the following language on any grading, site work, and construction plans issued for the
project site (PL/BL, PL-12):
“During earth-moving, grading, and construction activities, Developer shall implement the
following basic control measures at the construction site:
(A) All exposed surfaces (e.g. parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and
unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day;
(B) All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material onsite or offsite shall be
covered;
(C) All visible mud or dirt tracked out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using
wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited;
(D) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads or pathways shall be limited to 15 miles per hour;
(E) All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as
possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or
soil binders are used;
(F) Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or
reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne
toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations
[CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points;
(G) All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with
manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible
emissions evaluator; and
(H) Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead
agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action
within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure
compliance with applicable regulations.”
27. In the event of an accidental discovery of archaeological resources during grading or
construction activities, Developer shall include the following language on any grading, site
work, and construction plans issued for the project site (BL/PL, PL-13):
“If archaeological or cultural resources are discovered during earth-moving, grading, or
construction activities, all work shall be halted within at least 50 meters (165 feet) of the
find and the area shall be staked off immediately. The monitoring professional archaeologist,
if one is onsite, shall be notified and evaluate the find. If a monitoring professional
archaeologist is not onsite, the City shall be notified immediately and a qualified
professional archaeologist shall be retained (at Developer’s expense) to evaluate the find and
report to the City. If the find is determined to be significant, appropriate mitigation measures
shall be formulated by the professional archaeologist and implemented by the responsible
party.”
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 8
28. In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Developer shall
include the following language in all grading, site work, and construction plans (BL/PL, PL-
14):
“If human remains are found during earth-moving, grading, or construction activities, there
shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably
suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the coroner of Santa Clara County is
contacted to determine that no investigation of the cause of death is required. If the coroner
determines the remains to be Native American the coroner shall contact the Native
American Heritage Commission within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage
Commission shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descendent
(MLD) from the deceased Native American. The MLD may then make recommendations to
the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or
disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods as
provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The landowner or his authorized
representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods
with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance if: a)
the Native American Heritage Commission is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed
to make a recommendation within 24 hours after being notified by the commission; b) the
descendent identified fails to make a recommendation; or c) the landowner or his authorized
representative rejects the recommendation of the descendent, and the mediation by the
Native American Heritage Commission fails to provide measures acceptable to the
landowner.”
29. Developer shall install all roof and building rain gutters and downspouts, vents, and flashing
to integrate as closely as possible with building design elements, including matching the
color of the adjacent surface. (PL, PL-15)
30. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall provide utility meters, mechanical
equipment, mailboxes and address directories, placed in decorative cabinets and clustered
for efficient access by residents and service persons. The final placement and design shall be
to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-16)
31. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall provide screening of all mechanical
equipment, post indicator valves, backflow prevention devices etc. All ground mounted
utility appurtenances such as transformers shall not be visible from any public right-of-way
and shall be adequately screened through the use or combination of concrete or masonry
walls, berms, and landscaping. In addition to the above, backflow preventers shall be painted
dark green, except the fire connection which shall be painted yellow. The final placement
and design of these items shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director or designee. (PL, PL-17)
32. Developer shall provide automatic garage door openers for all garages. All garage entries
closer than 23 feet to the front property line shall be equipped with a sectional roll-up garage
door. (PL, PL-18)
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 9
33. Building additions and patio covers shall conform to the requirements of the R4 zone district
setbacks, or as otherwise approved by this permit or by Z 17-03. The design of such addition
or patio cover shall match the materials and style of the residence. (PL, PL-20)
34. Developer shall provide masonry walls along project perimeter property lines. Interior lot
lines may be delineated by fencing, constructed of wood material. (PL, PL-22)
35. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall include identify the placement and
design of directory sign(s) and location map(s) for multi-family residential projects. Such
signs/maps shall be installed prior to occupancy of the first unit. (PL, PL-23)
36. Light standards illuminating interior walkways shall be not more than eight (8) feet in
height, and shall not intrude into the private living or patio areas. Light standards serving
recreational areas held in common shall be no more than 15 feet in height, and shall be
directed away from dwelling units. PL, PL-26)
37. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall locate rooftop mechanical equipment,
including but not limited to heating and cooling systems, plumbing vents, ducts and other
appurtenances protruding from the roof are recessed or otherwise screened so that they will
not be visible from the front of the property or other major public vantage points. (PL, PL-
29)
38. Developer shall install all roof and building drainpipes and downspouts inside building
elements. These items shall not be visible on any exterior building elevations. (PL, PL-30)
39. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall provide architectural screening for any
exterior utility meters. The final placement and design shall be to the satisfaction of the
Community Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-31)
40. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall provide screening of all ground-level
mechanical equipment, post indicator valves, backflow prevention devices etc. All ground
mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers shall not be visible from any public
right-of-way and shall be adequately screened through the use or combination of concrete or
masonry walls, berms, and landscaping. In addition to the above, backflow preventers shall
be painted dark green, except the fire connection which shall be painted yellow. The final
placement and design of these items shall be to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-32)
41. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall submit and obtain approval of a
master sign program for the project, which shall indicate on the site plan the elevations, the
size, placement, materials, and color of all proposed free-standing and building signs. The
total square footage of all signs for the project should be in compliance with GCC Section
30.37. (PL/BL, PL-33)
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 10
42. Prior to issuance of a sign permit for this site, Developer shall propose well-designed,
quality signs that comply with the allowances of the City Code, and are to the satisfaction of
the Community Development Director or designee. Cabinet or box-style signs will not be
permitted onsite. (PL/BL, PL-34)
43. Prior to issuance of building permit, the identified location and design for onsite temporary
bicycle storage should be verified. Permanent bicycle storage should be shown per the
approved plan. The placement and design shall be to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-35)
44. Prior to issuance of building permit, Developer shall stripe all loading zones, if any, whether
situated outside or inside a structure, for loading and unloading activities only and shall post
a sign prohibiting storage or other non-loading activity within the designated loading zone.
(PL/BL, PL-36)
45. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Developer shall remove all construction
materials, debris, and vehicles from the subject property. (PL/BL, PL-37)
46. This permit approval does not allow for any outdoor storage or outdoor activities as part of
the development and/or operation. Any future consideration of outdoor uses onsite shall only
be considered as allowed by the City Code, including any subsequent permitting for such
outdoor use. (PL, PL-39)
PLANNING LANDSCAPING CONDITIONS
47. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscape plan should include a minimum of 3-ft
landscaping strip around the perimeter of subject property and a 5-foot sound wall along
portion of the southern property line for off-site noise reduction. The should wall should be
incorporated with onsite landscaping element and constructed between the proposed
development and the existing auto dealership.
48. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall identify landscaping or other
screening method to protect glare from headlights on the subject property extending offsite.
At the time of planting, such screening shall be maintained at or below three (3) feet if
located in a required street frontage. Details of required screening shall be to the satisfaction
of the Community Development Director or designee. (PL, PL-41)
49. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall (as part of the irrigation system)
include sensors that suspend or alter irrigation operation during unfavorable weather
conditions (e.g. automatic rain shut-off devices). (PL, PL-42)
50. Prior to initiation of the proposed use, whichever comes first, Developer shall submit a
completed Landscape Documentation Package, including a soil analysis/management report
along with appropriate application review fees, to the Community Development Department,
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 11
including required documentation for compliance verification, and obtain approval of such
plans. (PL, PL-43)
51. As part of the Landscape Plan submittal, Developer shall not include any invasive plant
species, such as those listed by the California Invasive Plant Council. (PL, PL-44)
52. As part of the Landscape Plan submittal, Developer shall clarify a minimum three (3) inch
layer of mulch to be applied on all exposed soil surfaces, as required by the landscape
ordinance. (PL, PL-45)
53. Prior to final occupancy, Developer shall submit a signed Certificate of Completion, along
with all necessary supporting documentation and payment to the Community Development
Department, for compliance verification of the landscape installation. (PL, PL-47)
54. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, Developer shall complete installation of all
landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans. (PL/ PL-48)
55. Developer is required under MWELO to provide a copy of the approved Certificate of
Completion to the property owner or his or her designee. Prior to completion of each build-
out phase of development, Developer shall provide the Community Development Director
or designee a summary of each lot in that phase and timing of compliance with this
requirement. (PL, PL-49)
56. For the life of the project, Developer shall maintain landscaping and irrigation in accordance
with the approved plans, except as otherwise permitted or required by law. Significant
changes to the number, placement, and selection of plant species may require a modification
to this approval, to be determined by the Community Development Director or designee.
(PL, PL-50)
PLANNING DIVISION SPECIAL CONDITIONS
57. Amenities proposed for the residential development as shown on the approved plans include
the following: a multi-purpose room, an indoor gym, a laundry facility, a bike storage for 80
bikes, four separate resident storage areas, a roof top terrace area and two enclosed (2)
playgrounds.
58. Public amenities proposed for the development as shown on the approved plans include the
following: bus shelter, wider sidewalk improvement, and a centralized piazza area with
seating area and low canopy trees in front the commercial businesses on Monterey Road
frontage.
Parking Spaces
59. Total parking provided for both residential and commercial uses is 171 spaces, 5 spaces
exceeding the minimum requirement. Parking is calculated based ratio stipulated in the
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 12
State Density Bonus provisions for 8 one-bedroom units, 32 two-bedroom units, 37 three-
bedroom units and 1 four-bedroom unit (total of 148 spaces for the apartment use).
18 parking spaces and 1 loading space are shown at the front of property to serve the
commercial spaces. All commercial spaces should be reserved and clearly delineated.
Intended commercial uses include retail, office and/or small food establishment. If other
commercial uses are proposed in which additional parking spaces are required, further
planning review and approval may be warranted.
Parking Dimension
60. Standard parking space for residential uses should be 10-ft wide x 20-ft deep. Standard
parking space for commercial uses should be 9-ft wide x 18-ft deep. Of the total parking
spaces provided, 25% of total parking count can be compact spaces which cannot be smaller
than 8.5-ft wide x 14-ft deep. Tandem compact spaces are allowed as a concession through
the Density Bonus approval, and minimum dimension should be 9-ft wide x 14-ft deep.
61. All tandem parking should be provided per approved plans and for residential uses only. No
tandem parking for commercial uses are allowed.
62. Developer shall maintain the parking areas free or liter and debris. Developer shall sweep
sidewalks, drive aisles, and parking lots regularly to prevent accumulation of litter and
debris. When swept or cleaned, debris must be trapped and collected to prevent entry into
the storm drain system. Developer may not discharge any cleaning agent into the storm drain
system.
Parking Management Plan
63. A parking management plan that assigns parking spaces for each residential unit should be
included in the rental agreement. The plan should include and indicate the location of guest
spaces and the assignment of spaces to unit within the development. The onsite
management company shall ensure and monitor that there is no offsite parking affecting the
Weaver Court neighborhood. An annual parking monitoring program should be submitted
to City staff for review. Prior to issuance of final occupancy, a sample rental agreement
should be submitted to City staff for review to ensure its adequacy. Should onsite parking is
found to be insufficient and causing any congestion program to the existing neighborhood,
then the Architecture and Site Review permit may be subject to revocation or modification.
Placement of Satellite Dishes
64. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a plan that will eliminate the
use of any satellite dishes located on the exterior of individual apartment units for review.
Density Bonus and Affordability
65. The project proposes a 27.5% density bonus above the R4 density standards and one
concession to allow compact spaces.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 13
66. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall execute and record an agreement with
the City that will ensure the continued affordability of all units within the project for a
minimum period of 30 years. The agreement should be recorded as a deed restriction with
the Santa Clara County Recorder's Office which explains the affordability requirement and
ensures that continued affordability consistent with GCC Section 30.46.40( i)( 4). A longer
period may be necessary if required by the construction or mortgage financing assistance
program, mortgage insurance program or rental subsidy program. 9 units (15%) shall remain
for low-income households.
67. The developer shall enter into a contract with the city agreeing to restrict the rental rates of
units and age of residents within this development, such that they are consistent with the
provisions of Gilroy City Code section 30.46.40. This condition shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Planning Division Manager.
Trash Enclosure
68. Prior to issuance of building permit, location of the trash enclosure should be shown per the
approved plans (one in the middle of the residential building and one towards the front of
property). The developer shall ensure that the trash enclosure is consistent with the
architecture, exterior color and material of the main building. A solid cover for the trash
enclosure should be included.
Pedestrian Pathway to Weaver Court
69. Entrance from Weaver Court to the proposed residential development should be provided
via an electronic key fob issued to current resident only.
70. Residents and guests should not use Weaver Court for additional parking.
Bus Shelter
71. Prior to issuance of building permit, coordinate with VTA on the location and final design of
the proposed bus shelter.
Public Amenities
72. Prior to final occupancy, install the required public amenities as shown on the approved
plans. The approved public amenities include the bus shelter, wider sidewalk, seating
arrangement, and/or water-fountain feature in a public piazza along Monterey Road.
PLANNING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITONS (MMRP)
Selection of equipment during construction to minimize emissions
73. Prior to the issuance of each demolition or building, developer shall prepared a plan
demonstrating that the off-road equipment used on-site to construct the project would
achieve a fleet-wide average 78 percent reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater.
Common approaches to achieve this reduction could include the use of Tier 4 equipment for
all mobile diesel-powered off-road equipment larger than 25 horsepower that operate on the
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 14
site for more than two days continuously, limiting the use of cranes to no more than four
hours per work day, the use of electrically powered welders, the use of equipment with
CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters or alternatively-fueled equipment, and
added exhaust devices, or a combination of measures, provided that these measures are
approved by the City (MND / AQ-1)
Nesting Bird Surveys
74. If Project-related work is scheduled during the nesting season for smaller bird species such
as passerines (February 15 to August 30); for owls (January 15 to September 15); and for
other raptors (February 15 to September 15), a qualified biologist will conduct two surveys
for active nests of such birds. The first survey shall be within 14 days prior to the beginning
of Project construction. The second survey shall be conducted within 48 hours prior to
construction. The minimum survey radii surrounding the work area shall be the following:
for passerines - 250 feet; for small raptors such as accipiters - 500 feet; and for larger raptors
such as buteos - 1,000 feet. Surveys will be conducted at the appropriate times of day and
during appropriate nesting times. (MND / BIO-1A).
Active Nest Buffers
75. If active nests are found, a qualified biologist will establish an appropriate buffer between
the nest and active construction. The buffer shall be clearly marked. The buffer will be
maintained until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. The qualified
biologist will document pre-construction baseline monitoring of the nest to characterize
“normal” bird behavior and will establish a buffer distance in which the birds exhibit normal
behavior. The qualified biologist will monitor the nesting birds daily during construction
activities and will increase the buffer if the birds are showing signs of unusual or distressed
behavior (e.g. defensive flights and vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and
flying away from the nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, work will cease in the
area until young have fledged and the nest is no longer active.” (MND / BIO-1B)
76. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit incorporate the recommendations of a
site specific geotechnical engineering report, as may be amended, into the construction plans
and permits. (MND / GEO-1)
Reduce Off-site Noise Levels
77. Prior to building occupancy, the developer shall construct a five foot tall sound wall along a
portion of the southern property line. At a minimum the sound wall needs to begin 85 feet
from the centerline of Monterey Road and continue for 200 feet. (MND / NIO-1)
Noise Insulation to Reduce Interior Noise Levels
78. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a report by a qualified acoustical expert shall be
submitted to the City to ensure that interior noise levels within residences do not exceed 45
dBA Ldn. Noise reduction measures may include a suitable form of forced-air mechanical
ventilation, and windows and doors with higher STC ratings. The recommendations of the
report shall be incorporated into the approved construction plan set. (MND / NEO-2)
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 15
Reduction of Ground-borne Vibration during Construction (MND / NOI-3)
79. The use of alternative equipment and construction techniques are possible means for
minimizing the vibration impacts to existing nearby structures. Prior to the issue of any
permit for site preparation or grading the developer shall submit a report documenting the
type of equipment to be used in site construction with thirty feet of the property line. If the
size and type of the proposed equipment has the potential to cause damage to any existing
structure, based upon information contained in Table 9 of the Noise and Vibration
Assessment or other reliable information, the following shall be implemented.
a. The contractor shall alert heavy equipment operators to the close proximity of the adjacent
structures along the northern, western, and southern boundaries so they can exercise extra
care. The contractor shall prohibit the use of techniques involving substantial vibration, such
as vibratory rollers, the dropping of heavy equipment, large drilling machines, and large
bulldozers, within 20 feet of the northern, western, and southern boundaries. Smaller, portable
equipment should be used in place of the heavier equipment.
b. The contractor shall retain a qualified firm to conduct a pre- and post-construction cosmetic
crack survey of the buildings adjacent to the northern, western, and southern boundaries and
shall repair any cosmetic damage attributable to project construction activities. If the property
owner does not allow the pre- and/or post-construction survey to occur, this measure shall be
deemed to have been satisfied
Reduction of Construction-Related Noise (MND / NOI-4)
80. In addition to the provisions of the City Municipal Code relating construction noise, the
developer shall prepare a construction noise control plan for incorporation into the approved
building permit plan set, including, but not limited to, the following available controls.
a. Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen stationary noise-generating
equipment. Temporary noise barrier fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the
noise barrier interrupts the line-of-sight between the noise source and receptor and if the
barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any cracks or gaps.
b. Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with intake and exhaust mufflers that
are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment.
c. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly prohibited.
d. Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air compressors or portable power
generators, as far as possible from sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near
receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and appropriate) shall be used to
reduce noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting
shall face away from sensitive receptors.
e. Utilize quieter models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources where technology
exists.
f. Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will create the greatest
distance between the construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest
the project site during all project construction.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 16
g. Locate material stockpiles, as well as maintenance/equipment staging and parking areas, as far
as feasible from residential receptors.
h. Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they are not audible at
existing residences bordering the project site.
i. The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction schedule for major noise-generating
construction activities. The construction plan shall identify a procedure for coordination with
adjacent residential land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize
Disturbance Coordinator
81. Designate a "disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any
complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause
of the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable measures be
implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a 24-hour telephone number for the
disturbance coordinator at the construction site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors
regarding the construction schedule. (MND / NOI-5)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
82. GENERAL - All improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the
City of Gilroy Municipal Code and Standard Specifications and Details, and is subject to all
laws of the City of Gilroy by reference. Street improvements and the design of all off-site
storm drainage facilities, sewer and water lines, and all street sections shall be in accordance
with City Standards and shall follow the most current City Master Plan for streets, as
approved by the City of Gilroy’s Public Works Director/City Engineer.
83. GENERAL - Until such time as the Improvements are accepted by City, Developer shall be
responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the Improvements constructed or installed.
84. GENERAL - The applicant shall obtain all applicable permits from federal, state, and local
agencies as required to construct the proposed improvements. A copy of these permits will
be provided prior to building permits.
85. GENERAL – A complete plan set for submittal shall include civil plans, landscape plans,
joint trench plans, lighting plans, and photometric plans.
86. GENERAL – Improvement plan set cover sheet shall include an Ownership &
Responsibility table indicating proposed infrastructure ownership and future maintenance
responsibilities.
87. GENERAL – Improvement plans are required for both on-site and off- site improvements;
and improvement plan set cover shall include an index sheet referencing on-site and off-site
improvements.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 17
88. GENERAL - Existing overhead utilities shall be undergrounded and related utility poles
removed along the property frontage.
89. GENERAL - All existing public utilities shall be protected in place and if necessary
relocated as approved by the City Engineer. No permanent structure is permitted within City
easements without the approval of the City of Gilroy.
90. GENERAL - Prior to any work within public right of way or City easement, the developer
shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City.
91. GENERAL – Prior to building permit issuance, developer shall dedicate necessary
easements for the project development, including but not limited to 16-foot Public Service
easement along all the project frontages within existing public streets.
92. GENERAL - The approved construction schedule shall be shared with Gilroy Unified
School District (GUSD) to avoid traffic impacts to surrounding school functions. An
approved construction information handout(s) shall also be provided to GUSD to share with
school parents.
93. GENERAL – Applicant shall obtain will serve and review letter from Recology confirming
serviceability and site accessibility of solid waste pickup. Contact Steven Lucchetti,
Operations Manager 408-842-3358.
94. FEE - The project is subject to the City’s Street Tree, Storm, Sewer, Water, Traffic, and
Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. Latest City impact fee schedule is available on
the City website. Payment of Impact Fees is required at building permit issuance. Fees shall
be based on the current comprehensive fee schedule in effect at the time of fee payment,
consistent with and in accordance with City policy.
95. FEE - At first improvement plan submittal, Developer shall submit a $10,000 (Ten
Thousand) initial deposit for plan check and processing. This deposit will be
credited/accounted for toward final plan check and inspection fee.
96. FEE - Prior to plan approval, developer shall submit a detailed project cost estimate by the
project engineer, subject to City Engineer approval. Cost estimate shall be broken out into
on-site and off-site improvements.
97. FEE - Prior to final plan approval, Developer shall pay 100% of the plan check and
processing fees and other related fees that the property is subject to, enter into a property
improvement agreement, and provide payment and performance bonds.
98. GENERAL - At first improvement plan submittal, project shall show existing topo and
features at least 50’ beyond the project boundary. Clearly show existing topo, label contour
elevations, drainage patterns, flow lines, slopes, label boundary record information (i.e.
bearings/distances), existing easements and all other property encumbrances.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 18
99. GENERAL - Prior to issuance of any building permits, developer shall submit for City
approval water, sewer and storm drain studies for the development. These studies shall
identify the development's effect on the City's present Master Plans and the impact of this
development to surrounding utility lines. If the results of the study indicate that this
development contributes to the over-capacity of the trunk line, developer will be required to
mitigate the impact by remove and replace or upsizing of the existing utilities. These studies
shall provide supporting hydraulic calculation for pipe sizing per City standard design
guideline.
100. GENERAL – Developer is required to confirm the location of existing utility lines along the
project frontage by potholing. Prior to any potholing, developer shall submit a pothole plan
for City review and approval. Developer shall provide the pothole result to the City
Engineer prior to final design.
101. GENERAL – Developer is required to evaluate the conditions of the existing utility lines
along the project frontage by videotaping and providing the result to the City Engineer. If
the integrity of existing utilities found to be compromised, developer will be required to
repair, or remove and replace if necessary, to the City Engineer satisfaction.
102. GRADING & DRAINAGE - Prior to building permit approval, the developer shall submit a
grading plan and a drainage study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. The drainage
study shall analyze the existing and ultimate conditions and facilities. The study and the
design shall be in compliance with the City’s Stormwater Management Guidance Manual
(latest edition). The developer shall satisfy the conclusions and recommendations of the
approved drainage study and storm water management plan.
103. GRADING & DRAINAGE - All grading activity shall address National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. If all or part of the construction occurs during
the rainy season, the developer shall submit an Erosion Control Plan to the Public Works
Director for review and approval. This plan shall incorporate erosion control devices and
other techniques in accordance with Municipal Code § 27C to minimize erosion. The
developer shall have a QSP on site as necessary to ensure implementation and maintenance
of all erosion control measures. Specific measures to control sediment runoff, construction
pollution and other potential construction contamination sediment runoff, construction
pollution and other potential construction contamination shall be addressed through the
Erosion Control Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP
shall supplement the Erosion Control Plan and project improvement plans. These documents
shall also be kept on-site while the project is under construction. A Notice of Intent (NOI)
shall be filed with the State Water Resources Control Board, with a copy provided to the
Engineering Division before a grading permit will be issued. WDID# shall be provided prior
to the commencement of work.
104. GRADING & DRAINAGE - All grading operations and soil compaction activities shall be
per the approved project’s geotechnical report that was prepared for the design of the project
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 19
and shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. Site preparation and
cut/fill construction shall be conducted under the observation of, and tested by, a licensed
soils or geotechnical engineer. A report shall be filed with the City of Gilroy for each phase
of construction, stating that all site preparation and cut/fill construction were performed in
conformance with the requirements of the project’s geotechnical report. This shall be
subject to review and approval by the Engineering Division. The developer shall add this
condition to the general notes on the grading plan.
105. GRADING & DRAINAGE - Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant’s soils engineer
shall review the final grading, pavement design and drainage plans to ensure that designs for
foundations, retaining walls, site grading, and site drainage are in accordance with their
recommendations and the peer review comments. The applicant’s soils engineer’s approval
shall then be conveyed to the City either by letter or by signing the plans.
106. TRANSPORTATION - Any work in the public right-of-way shall require a traffic control
plan prepared by a licensed professional engineer with experience in preparing such plans.
Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the latest
edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The Traffic Control
Plan shall be approved prior to the commencement of any work within the public right of
way.
107. TRANSPORTATION - The Project shall comply with all the traffic mitigation measures
identified in the project’s Traffic Study.
108. TRANSPORTATION - Developer shall submit final photometric plans prior to first
building permit issuance.
109. TRANSPORTATION - Developer shall install all joint trench to have (4) dedicated 11/2”
SCH 80 PVC conduit for City Fiber Optic need in a quad duct arrangement along public
Collector and Arterial streets. Quad duct shall be per City STD EL-11.
110. TRANSPORTATION - Developer shall install all street light conduits as 2” SCH40 PVC
per City Standard EL-1 and related pull boxes shall follow City Standard EL-14.
111. TRANSPORTATION - At first plan submittal developer shall model all Solid Waste
Vehicle circulation movements, as a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be
prepared to the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled with AutoTurn swept analysis
software, all turning and street circulation movements.
112. TRANSPORTATION - At first plan submittal developer shall model all Emergency Vehicle
circulation movements, as a separate plan sheet. The circulation plan shall be prepared to
the City Engineer’s satisfaction, and modeled with AutoTurn swept analysis software, all
turning and street circulation movements.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 20
113. EASEMENTS – Prior to improvement plan approval or building permit issuance, whichever
occurs first, developer shall provide and record necessary easements for the Pedestrian
access, Fire line connection and sanitary sewer line connection to Weaver Court on the
adjacent property.
114. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall obtain
improvement plan approval and bond for the portion of public improvements that are
necessary to serve the proposed developed.
115. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS – Prior to building permit issuance, developer shall execute a
public improvement agreement and post Payment and Performance bonds each for 100% of
cost for improvement with the City that shall secure the construction of the public
improvements. Insurance shall be provided per the terms of the agreement.
116. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - The developer shall repair or replace all existing
improvements not designated for removal that are damaged or removed because of
developer's operations. Developer shall request a walk-through with the Engineering
Construction Inspector before the start of construction to verify existing conditions.
117. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS – Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall obtain
design approval and bond for all necessary public improvements, including but not limited
to the following:
A. Removal and replacement of all existing curb and gutter along Monterey Road
frontage.
B. Removal of existing sidewalk and installation of new 10-foot sidewalk and tree wells
with City approved trees along Monterey Road frontage.
C. Installation of two new City standard streetlights along Monterey Road and one on
Weaver Court frontage at new pedestrian access location. Final streetlight locations
shall be to the satisfaction of the City Transportation Engineer and shall follow City
standards.
D. Installation of a new stormdrain manhole on Monterey Boulevard at southerly point of
connection.
E. Extension of the exiting utilities and installation of new utilities, including but not
limited to, water, sewer and storm drain main lines, services and related facilities.
F. Landscaping and trees along all public street frontages.
G. Existing overhead utilities shall be undergrounded and related utility poles removed
along the property frontage.
H. Grind, overlay and restripe the entire width of Monterey Road frontage with a
minimum 2-1/2” hot mix AC, and with dig-outs and repair as necessary to the City
Engineer satisfaction. Extend of the dig-outs to be determined by field inspection
between Developer and City inspector.
All improvements must be built to the city Engineer’s satisfaction, and accepted by the City
prior to issuance of any first certificate of occupancy for the project.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 21
118. UTILITY – Developer shall provide separate water and sewer service laterals for the
commercial and residential components of the project.
119. WATER – Developer shall provide separate irrigation meter to serve this development
landscaping.
120. WATER QUALITY – Proposed development shall comply with state mandated regional
permits for both pre-construction and post-construction stormwater quality requirements per
chapter 27D of the Gilroy Municipal Code, and is subject to, but not limited to, the
following:
a. At grading permit phase, submit a final design Stormwater Management Plan and final
signed Performance Requirement Certifications specified in the City of Gilroy
Stormwater Management Guidance Manual (latest edition).
b. At improvement plan phase, confirm that the bioretention basin locations shown on
the Stormwater Control Plan match with the locations shown on the Landscape Plans.
c. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer of the site shall enter into a formal
written Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Agreement with the City.
i. The City shall record this agreement against the property or properties involved
and it shall be binding on all subsequent owners of land served by the stormwater
management treatment BMPs. The City-standard Stormwater BMP Operation and
Maintenance Agreement will be provided by Public Works Engineering.
ii. This Agreement shall require that the BMPs not be modified and BMP
maintenance activities not alter the designed function of the facility from its
original design unless approved by the City prior to the commencement of the
proposed modification or maintenance activity.
iii. This Agreement shall also provide that in the event that maintenance or repair is
neglected, or the stormwater management facility becomes a danger to public
health or safety, the city shall have the authority to perform maintenance and/or
repair work and to recover the costs from the owner.
iv. All on-site stormwater management facilities shall be operated and maintained in
good condition and promptly repaired/replaced by the property owner(s) or other
legal entity approved by the City.
v. Any repairs or restoration/replacement and maintenance shall be in accordance
with City-approved plans.
vi. The property owner(s) shall develop a maintenance schedule for the life of any
stormwater management facility and shall describe the maintenance to be
completed, the time period for completion, and who shall perform the
maintenance. This maintenance schedule shall be included with the approved
Stormwater Runoff Management Plan.
d. Stormwater BMP Inspections will be required for this project and shall adhere to the
following:
i. The property owner(s) shall be responsible for having all stormwater management
facilities inspected for condition and function by a knowledgeable third party.
ii. Unless otherwise required by the City Engineer or designee, stormwater facility
inspections shall be done at least twice per year, once in Fall, in preparation for the
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 22
wet season, and once in Winter. Written records shall be kept of all inspections
and shall include, at minimum, the following information:
1. Site address;
2. Date and time of inspection;
3. Name of the person conducting the inspection;
4. List of stormwater facilities inspected;
5. Condition of each stormwater facility inspected;
6. Description of any needed maintenance or repairs; and
7. As applicable, the need for site re-inspection.
e. Upon completion of each inspection, an inspection report shall be submitted to Public
Works Engineering no later than October 1st for the Fall report, and no later than
March 15th of the following year for the Winter report.
f. Before commencing any grading or construction activities, the developer shall obtain a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and provide
evidence of filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control
Board.
121. WATER QUALITY - The developer is responsible for ensuring that all contractors are
aware of all storm water quality measures and implement such measures. Failure to comply
with the approved construction BMPs will result in the issuance of correction notices,
citations or a project stop order.
122. UTILITIES – All new services to the development shall be "underground service" designed
and installed in accordance with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, AT&T (phone)
Company and local cable company regulations. Transformers and switch gear cabinets shall
be placed underground unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director and the City
Engineer. Underground utility plans must be submitted prior to installation.
123. UTILITIES - The following items will need to be completed prior to first building permit
submittal:
a. The Developer shall provide joint trench composite plans for the underground
electrical, gas, telephone, cable television, and communication conduits and cables
including the size, location and details of all trenches, locations of building utility
service stubs and meters and placements or arrangements of junction structures as a
part of the Improvement Plan submittals for the project. Show preferred and
alternative locations for all utility vaults and boxes if project has not obtained PG&E
approval. A licensed Civil or Electrical Engineer shall sign the composite drawings
and/or utility improvement plans. (All dry utilities shall be placed underground).
b. The Developer shall negotiate right-of-way with Pacific Gas and Electric and other
utilities subject to the review and approval by the Engineering Division and the utility
companies.
c. Will Serve Letter” from each utility company for the subdivision shall be supplied to
the City.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 23
124. UTILITIES - A note shall be placed on the joint trench composite plans which states that the
plan agrees with City Codes and Standards and that no underground utility conflict exists.
The Joint consultant shall provide the City a separate “project utility composite plan”
showing all Civil, Landscape, electrical, and joint trench information to confirm that there
are no conflicts with joint trench plan utilities.
125. UTILITIES - Storm and sewer lines in private areas shall be privately owned and
maintained, unless approved by the Public Works Director. This should be noted on the title
sheet of the project improvement plan.
126. UTILITIES - Prior to any construction of the dry utilities in the field, the following will need
to be supplied to the City:
a. A professional engineer- original electrical plan.
b. A letter from the design Electrical or Civil Engineer that states the electrical plan
conforms to City codes and Standards, and to the approved improvement plans
127. UTILITIES - Sanitary sewer laterals and/or water meters located in driveways shall have
traffic rated boxes and lids.
128. UTILTIES - The Developer/Contractor shall make accessible any or all City utilities as
directed by the Public Works Director.
129. UTILTIES - All mainline storm drain piping shall have a minimum diameter of 18 inches
and the lateral connections shall have a minimum diameter of 15 inches.
130. LANDSCAPING - Landscape Plans shall provide a “composite plan” showing Civil,
Landscape, Electrical, and Joint Trench information to confirm that there are no conflicts.
131. WATER CONSERVATION - The project shall fully comply with the measures required by
the City’s Water Supply Shortage Regulations Ordinance (Gilroy City Code, Chapter 27,
Article VI), and subsequent amendments to meet the requirements imposed by the State of
California’s Water Board. This ordinance established permanent voluntary water saving
measures and temporary conservation standards.
132. WATER CONSERVATION - Recycled water shall be used for construction water, where
available, as determined by the Public Works Director. Recycled water shall be billed at the
municipal industrial rate based on the current Santa Clara Valley Water District’s municipal
industrial rate.
133. WATER - The Developer shall perform Fire Hydrant test to confirm water system will
adequately serve the development, and will modify any part of the systems that does not
perform to the standards established by the City. Developer shall coordinate with Fire
Department for the Fire Hydrant test.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 24
134. CONSTRUCTION - All construction water from fire hydrants shall be metered and billed at
the current hydrant meter rate.
135. CONSTRUCTION - Where recycled water is not available, as determined by the Public
Works Director, potable water shall be used. All City potable water will be billed based on
the City’s comprehensive fee schedule under the Portable Fire hydrant meter rate.
136. CONSTRUCTION - It is the responsibility of the contractor to make sure that all dirt
tracked into the public right-of-way is cleaned up on a daily basis. Mud, silt, concrete and
other construction debris shall not be washed into the City’s storm drains.
137. CONSTRUCTION - Blowing dust shall be reduced by timing construction activities so that
paving and building construction begin as soon as possible after completion of grading, and
by landscaping disturbed soils as soon as possible. Further, water trucks shall be present and
in use at the construction site. All portions of the site subject to blowing dust shall be
watered as often as deemed necessary by the City, or a minimum of three times daily, or
apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging
areas at construction sites in order to insure proper control of blowing dust for the duration
of the project. Watering on public streets shall not occur. Streets will be cleaned by street
sweepers or by hand as often as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director, or at least
once a day. Watering associated with on-site construction activity shall take place between
the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and shall include at least one late-afternoon watering to
minimize the effects of blowing dust. All public streets soiled or littered due to this
construction activity shall be cleaned and swept on a daily basis during the workweek to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Director. Demolition or earthwork activities shall be halted
when wind speeds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 MPH. All trucks hauling soil, sand, or
other loose debris shall be covered.
138. CONSTRUCTION - If the project has excess fill or cut that will be off-hauled to a site or
on-hauled from a site within the city limits of Gilroy, an additional permit is required. This
statement must be added as a general note to the Grading and Drainage Plan.
139. CONSTRUCTION - The minimum soils sampling and testing frequency shall conform to
Chapter 8 of the Caltrans Construction Manual. The subdivider shall require the soils
engineer to daily submit all testing and sampling and reports to the City Engineer.
140. CONSTRUCTION – Prior to Final Map approval, the Developer/Applicant shall submit a
proposed construction phasing and schedule for approval by the City Engineer. Schedule
format shall be Microsoft Prospect, and shall identify the scheduled critical path for the
installation of improvements. The schedule shall be updated weekly.
141. CONSTRUCTION - At least one week prior to commencement of work, the Developer shall
post at the site and mail to the Engineering Division and to owners of property within (300')
three hundred feet of the exterior boundary of the project site a notice that construction work
will commence on or around the stated date. The notice shall include a list of contact
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 25
persons with name, title, phone number and area of responsibility. The person responsible
for maintaining the list shall be included. The list shall be current at all times and shall
consist of persons with authority to initiate corrective action in their area of responsibility.
The names of individuals responsible for dust, noise and litter control shall be expressly
identified in the notice.
142. CONSTRUCTION - Prior to final inspections, all pertinent conditions of approval and all
improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City
Engineer.
143. CONSTRUCTION - All work shown on the improvement plans shall be inspected.
Uninspected work shall be removed as deemed appropriate by the Public Works Director.
144. CONSTRUCTION - All public improvements, including the complete installation of all
improvements relative to streets, fencing, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water system,
underground utilities, etc., shall be completed and attested to by the City Engineer before
approval of occupancy of any unit. Where facilities of other agencies are involved, such
installation shall be verified as having been completed and accepted by those agencies.
145. CONSTRUCTION - Construction activity shall be restricted to the period between 7:00 a.m.
to 7:00 p.m. Mondays through Fridays, Saturday 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for general
construction activity. No work shall be done on Sundays and City Holidays. The Public
Works Director may apply additional construction period restrictions, as necessary, to
accommodate standard commute traffic along arterial roadways and along school commute
routes.
146. CONSTRUCTION - The City shall be notified at least two (2) working days prior to the
start of any construction work and at that time the contractor shall provide a project schedule
and a 24-hour emergency telephone number list.
147. CONSTRUCTION - No vehicle having a manufacturer's rated gross vehicle weight
exceeding ten thousand (10,000) pounds shall be allowed to park on the portion of a street
which abuts property in a residential zone without prior approval from the Public Works
Director (§ 15.40.070).
148. MONUMENTS – Any monuments get damaged during the construction shall be replaced
and set per the recorded final map. A certificate letter by the Surveyor or Engineer will be
provided to the City Engineer.
149. ACCEPTANCE - Certification of grades and compaction is required prior to Building
Permit final. This statement must be added as a general note to the Grading and Drainage
Plan.
150. ACCEPTANCE - Until such time as all improvements required are fully completed and
accepted by City, Developer will be responsible for the care maintenance of and any damage
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 26
to such improvements. City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to
the work or Improvements required for this project prior to the completion and acceptance of
the work or Improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby
assumed by the Developer.
151. ACCEPTANCE - The developer shall submit an AutoCAD drawing file for all consultants
composite base map linework showing all public improvements and utility layouts. Separate
AutoCAD file shall be submitted for civil, final map, landscape, joint trench, electrical and
photometric.
152. ACCEPTANCE – Developer shall provide all final construction cost and back-up
documents for City review and approval, and in a format acceptable to City Engineer.
FIRE MARSHAL CONDITIONS
153. Apartment and Community Buildings shall have a fire sprinkler system installed to meet
NFPA 13 with all concealed spaces protected.
154. Emergency lighting shall be provided in any community rooms, commercial areas, laundry
rooms, stairwells and hallways/corridors. These areas shall also have illuminated exit
signage to include and emergency egress lighting in the path of egress and exit discharge.
155. All doors to be compliant for signage, direction of swing and hardware. Note the community
room is an A occupancy and shall have exiting in conformance with A occupancy standards.
Any gates shall provide swing in the direction of travel for exiting the area.
156. Knox Boxes shall be provided at: each stairwell, Fire Riser Room, Fire Alarm Panel
location, Electrical Room and each commercial space. To be located at the upper right hand
side of the main doorway to each, 72” above finished grade.
157. Note deferred submittal for Fire Alarm system on cover page. The Fire alarm system shall
provide water flow monitoring for each floor level, a tamper switch at the DDCA and PIV
(if one is present), a pull station and smoke detector at the riser location. Water flow shall
cause alarm to sound in each unit. The smoke detection and CO monitoring shall only
sound in the unit of alarm and as a supervisory alarm to the main office. Public areas
including the community rooms, laundry rooms, hallways shall have smoke detectors
located in them and send an alarm to the central station.
158. Fire Extinguishers shall be provided so that there is one within 75 ft travel distance.
159. Building to be tested for adequate public safety emergency radio coverage. Any building
which fails to support adequate radio coverage for the city's public safety communication
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 27
systems, shall include an amplification system to provide for voice and data communications
for police and fire division personnel.
160. A parking enforcement (signage and striping plan) shall be provided to ensure fire access is
maintained. This is a deferred item and shall be submitted prior to final inspection with
enough time for review and comment by the Fire Marshal.
161. The Fire Department requires a $200 per unit training fee for buildings over 30 feet tall to
fund equipment and training.
162. A public Hydrant shall be located at each driveway.
163. On sheet C200 the Fire Line shall be looped and connect at both Monterey and Weaver Ct.
The 6 “ DDCA / FDC shall be located adjacent to the driveway to each street and adjacent to
the street hydrant. The North parking lot for the project does not appear to have any fire
hydrants being proposed for installation. Provide proper fire hydrant coverage in the North
lot as provided in the South lot.
164. All fire hydrants on the private fire main shall be dry barrel and painted red with a blue
reflector street marker.
165. A minimum of 2 stairwells diagonally opposed shall be accessible from the exterior. Those
stairways shall be provided with a Fire Department Standpipe. The hose connection shall be
on the intermediate stairway for each floor. You may need to enlarge those stairwells. Those
stairwells shall be 2-hour rated enclosures. Stairwells shall also provide roof access. See
page A 2.2 with pink highlighted notes.
166. Provide stairway roof access from the stairways.
167. The elevator must be at least a 3500lb capacity elevator, able to accommodate an ambulance
gurney size of 80” x 65”. A minimum of one elevator shall meet ADA requirements.
168. The gate from Weaver Ct. to the parking lot must be adequately sized to 1’ wider than the
paved surface.
169.
170. As applicable, any required fire pump must have a pump room. Backup power shall be
required unless it’s a diesel pump.
171. There shall be a fire hose connection within 150 feet of the furthermost point in any room.
This may be connected to the fire sprinkler system.
172. Smoke control fans shall be provided in the garage to meet all applicable codes. The smoke
control system shall be activated by the Fire Sprinkler system with manual override switch
(on and off) for Fire Department use.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 28
173. Need separate (deferred) submittals for the following items: a) fire sprinkler system, b) fire
alarm system, c) fire service underground, d) fire pump system and smoke control system.
174. Private Fire Hydrants and/or Fire Standpipes shall be provided so that one is within 150 ft of
the most remote portion of any building. System shall meet NFPA 24 on the private side of
the system.
175. Buildings shall have fire engine access within 150 feet of any portion of the building.
176. Stairwells shall be sized based on the building code and the plans shall provide exiting
calculations. A minimum of two (2) Fire Access Stairwells diagonally opposed shall be
provided and accessible from the exterior. Stairwells shall have a 2 hour enclosure with
self-closing doors at each level and a Fire Standpipe connection at each intermediate stair
well landing. The stairwell landing shall be sized to allow for the hose standpipe and not
degrade the required stair width. All Fire Access Stairwells shall also provide access to the
roof.
177. Buildings 4 or more stories in height shall have a separate fire standpipe. The standpipe
shall be pressurized by a dedicated fire pump to provide 100 psi at the roof. The fire pump
shall be located in a code compliant pump room. Also, back-up power shall be required
when required by the Fire Code or NFPA 22. A separate plan review and permit are required
for fire pump installation.
178. Fire access road shall include an inside turn radius of 32 feet and outside radius of 40 feet.
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
AS 16-19
Exhibit B
Mitigation Measures Method of
Verification
Responsible
for
Verification
Action Schedule
Verification of
Completion
Air Quality
AQ-1. Selection of equipment during construction to minimize
emissions. Prior to the issuance of each demolition or building, developer
shall prepared a plan demonstrating that the off-road equipment used on-site
to construct the project would achieve a fleet-wide average 78 percent
reduction in DPM exhaust emissions or greater. Common approaches to
achieve this reduction could include the use of Tier 4 equipment for all mobile
diesel-powered off-road equipment larger than 25 horsepower that operate on
the site for more than two days continuously, limiting the use of cranes to no
more than four hours per work day, the use of electrically powered welders,
the use of equipment with CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters or
alternatively-fueled equipment, and added exhaust devices, or a combination
of measures, provided that these measures are approved by the City.
Submittal of design
documents demonstrating
attainment.
City of Gilroy
and
Contractor
Prior to issuance of
grading and building
permits.
________
Biologic Resources
BIO-1A. Nesting Bird Surveys. If Project-related work is scheduled during
the nesting season for smaller bird species such as passerines (February 15 to
August 30); for owls (January 15 to September 15); and for other raptors
(February 15 to September 15), a qualified biologist will conduct two surveys
for active nests of such birds. The first survey shall be within 14 days prior to
the beginning of Project construction. The second survey shall be conducted
within 48 hours prior to construction. The minimum survey radii surrounding
the work area shall be the following: for passerines - 250 feet; for small
raptors such as accipiters - 500 feet; and for larger raptors such as buteos -
1,000 feet. Surveys will be conducted at the appropriate times of day and
during appropriate nesting times.
BIO-1B. Active Nest Buffers. If active nests are found, a qualified biologist
will establish an appropriate buffer between the nest and active construction.
The buffer shall be clearly marked. The buffer will be maintained until the
young have fledged and are foraging independently. The qualified biologist
will document pre-construction baseline monitoring of the nest to characterize
Submit a report documenting
the results of bird surveys.
Submit a report document
next locations and
recommendations for next
protection zones.
City of Gilroy Prior to the issuance
of the first building
permit.
Identify nest
protection zones onto
applicable grading
and building plans.
________
________
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 2
Mitigation Measures Method of
Verification
Responsible
for
Verification
Action Schedule
Verification of
Completion
“normal” bird behavior and will establish a buffer distance in which the birds
exhibit normal behavior. The qualified biologist will monitor the nesting birds
daily during construction activities and will increase the buffer if the birds are
showing signs of unusual or distressed behavior (e.g. defensive flights and
vocalizations, standing up from a brooding position, and flying away from the
nest). If buffer establishment is not possible, work will cease in the area until
young have fledged and the nest is no longer active.”
Geology / Soils
GEO-1. Comply with the Recommendations of Geotechnical
Engineering Report. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit
incorporate the recommendations of a site specific geotechnical engineering
report, as may be amended, into the construction plans and permits.
Incorporate the
recommendations into the
project’s design and
construction documents.
City of Gilroy Verification of
incorporation prior to
the issuance of any
grading and building
permits.
________
Noise
NOI-1. Reduce Off-site Noise Levels. Prior to building occupancy, the
developer shall construct a five foot tall sound wall along a portion of the
southern property line. At a minimum the sound wall needs to begin 85 feet
from the centerline of Monterey Road and continue for 200 feet.
Submittal of design documents
demonstrating attainment; and
verified by an on-site
inspection.
City of Gilroy Prior to building
occupancy.
________
NOI-2. Noise Insulation to Reduce Interior Noise Levels. Prior to the
issuance of a building permit, a report by a qualified acoustical expert shall be
submitted to the City to ensure that interior noise levels within residences do
not exceed 45 dBA Ldn. Noise reduction measures may include a suitable
form of forced-air mechanical ventilation, and windows and doors with higher
STC ratings. The recommendations of the report shall be incorporated into
the approved construction plan set.
Submittal of design documents
demonstrating attainment; on-
site inspection.
City of Gilroy
Prior to the issuance
of building permits.
________
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 3
Mitigation Measures Method of
Verification
Responsible
for
Verification
Action Schedule
Verification of
Completion
NOI-3. Reduction of Groundborne Vibration during Construction. The
use of alternative equipment and construction techniques are possible means
for minimizing the vibration impacts to existing nearby structures. Prior to the
issue of any permit for site preparation or grading the developer shall submit
a report documenting the type of equipment to be used in site construction
with thirty feet of the property line. If the size and type of the proposed
equipment has the potential to cause damage to any existing structure, based
upon information contained in Table 9 of the Noise and Vibration Assessment
or other reliable information, the following shall be implemented.
a. The contractor shall alert heavy equipment operators to the close
proximity of the adjacent structures along the northern, western, and
southern boundaries so they can exercise extra care. The contractor
shall prohibit the use of techniques involving substantial vibration,
such as vibratory rollers, the dropping of heavy equipment, large
drilling machines, and large bulldozers, within 20 feet of the northern,
western, and southern boundaries. Smaller, portable equipment
should be used in place of the heavier equipment.
Brief heavy equipment
operators and all project
superintendents of this
requirement.
City of Gilroy
and
contractor
Prior written
verification that all
Heavy equipment
operators have been
informed of this
requirement no later
than the first day of
grading or site
preparation.
________
b. The contractor shall retain a qualified firm to conduct a pre- and post-
construction cosmetic crack survey of the buildings adjacent to the
northern, western, and southern boundaries and shall repair any
cosmetic damage attributable to project construction activities. If the
property owner does not allow the pre- and/or post-construction
survey to occur, this measure shall be deemed to have been satisfied.
Contact each potentially
affected property owner and
offer to perform pre- and post-
construction inspections (at no
expense to the property
owner) to identify any damage
to structures as a result of
project construction.
City of Gilroy
and
developer
Prior to the issuance
of the first grading or
building permit
involving any
applicable heavy
equipment a copy of
the pre-construction
inspection shall be
provided to the
Planning Division.
________
NOI-4. Reduction of Construction-Related Noise. In addition to the
provisions of the City Municipal Code relating construction noise, the
developer shall prepare a construction noise control plan for incorporation into
Incorporate noise reduction
measures into all construction
documents and post measures
City of Gilroy Prior to issuance of
grading permit and
during construction
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 4
Mitigation Measures Method of
Verification
Responsible
for
Verification
Action Schedule
Verification of
Completion
the approved building permit plan set, including, but not limited to, the
following available controls:
a. Construct temporary noise barriers, where feasible, to screen
stationary noise-generating equipment. Temporary noise barrier
fences would provide a 5 dBA noise reduction if the noise barrier
interrupts the line-of-sight between the noise source and receptor
and if the barrier is constructed in a manner that eliminates any
cracks or gaps.
b. Equip all internal combustion engine-driven equipment with intake
and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for
the equipment.
c. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines should be strictly
prohibited.
d. Locate stationary noise-generating equipment, such as air
compressors or portable power generators, as far as possible from
sensitive receptors as feasible. If they must be located near
receptors, adequate muffling (with enclosures where feasible and
appropriate) shall be used to reduce noise levels at the adjacent
sensitive receptors. Any enclosure openings or venting shall face
away from sensitive receptors.
e. Utilize quieter models of air compressors and other stationary noise
sources where technology exists.
f. Construction staging areas shall be established at locations that will
create the greatest distance between the construction-related noise
sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during
all project construction.
g. Locate material stockpiles, as well as maintenance/equipment staging
and parking areas, as far as feasible from residential receptors.
on site.
activities.
________
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Resolution No. 2018-XX
Page 5
Mitigation Measures Method of
Verification
Responsible
for
Verification
Action Schedule
Verification of
Completion
h. Control noise from construction workers’ radios to a point where they
are not audible at existing residences bordering the project site.
i. The contractor shall prepare a detailed construction schedule for
major noise-generating construction activities. The construction plan
shall identify a procedure for coordination with adjacent residential
land uses so that construction activities can be scheduled to minimize
noise disturbance.
NOI-5. Disturbance Coordinator. Designate a "disturbance coordinator"
who would be responsible for responding to any complaints about
construction noise. The disturbance coordinator will determine the cause of
the noise complaint (e.g., bad muffler, etc.) and will require that reasonable
measures be implemented to correct the problem. Conspicuously post a 24-
hour telephone number for the disturbance coordinator at the construction
site and include in it the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction
schedule.
Submit documentation on the
contact information for
Disturbance Coordination and
provide verification that the
required notice has been
posted on-site and that the
neighbors have been provided
notice.
City of Gilroy Prior to issuance of
grading permit and
during construction
activities.
________
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: AS 16-19 CC Resolution Exhibit B (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
COMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGESUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIOLEVEL 1st level2nd level3rd level4th level 5th levelAREA (SF)--PARKING, VEHICLE ACCESS39087LANDSCAPE, VEGETATIVE, SITE STRUCTURES 11847EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN WALKS4501SITE COVERAGE STATISTICS------TOTAL:833121178516122558355573893830827371612212792667558390517344435----2604-756-8953592252083076--754-8953592252082331-6225978702142149011283(2737)-758-6012459179951618-TOTAL site:89124TOTAL NET ENCL./ COVERED AREA32725 33527 32780 23431 2041533689BUILDING COVERAGE "UNDER ROOF"---BUILDING AREA STATS44351279TOTAL NET HABITABLE AREA7460 28800 20454 1791328800103427122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A0.1COVER SHEET9799MONTEREY MIXED USEGilroy, CaliforniaSHEET INDEXVICINITY MAPPROJECT DIRECTORYPROJECT DATAOWNER/APPLICANT:PROJECT ADDRESS:ZONE:APN:OCCUPANCY TYPE:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:LOT AREAYARD REQUIREMENTSFLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:3311810106632111187371189,123.76 SF / 2.046 ACRESURVEYCIVILMID COAST ENGINEERIS70 PENNY LANE, SUITE AWATSONVILLE CA, 95076TEL. 831.724.2580CIVIL DESIGN STUDIO, Inc.ROBERT WINSLOW, P.E., QSDP.O. BOX 199CAMBRIA, CA 93428TEL. 805.706.04018955 MONTEREY ST., GILROY, CA790 -14-025CALIF. BLDG CODE B, R2, S-2PARKING ANALYSIS / DEMAND8 - 1BDRM UNITS- @ 1/ UNIT832 - 2BDRM UNITS - @ 2/ UNIT 6437 - 3BDRM UNITS - @ 2/ UNIT 741 - 4BDRM UNITS- @ 2.5/ UNIT2.517.4ARCHITECTJAN R. HOCHHAUSER, AIAHOCHHAUSER BLATTERARCHITECTURE + PLANNING122 E. ARRELLAGA STREETSANTA BARBARA, CA 93101T: 805.962.2746 X 102F: 805.962.4984SOILSLANDSCAPEEARTH SYSTEMS PACIFIC500 PARK CENTER DRIVE STE 1HOLLISTER, CA 95023ATTN: GEORGE BANNETTEL: 831.637.2133DAVID BLACK AND ASSOCIATES1718 PAMPAS AVE.SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101TEL. 805.898.8717TOTAL:2424161478SITER4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT)A0.1 COVER SHEETA1.1SITE PLANC100PELIMINERY GRADING PLANPA2.1PELIMINERY LANDSCAPE PLANS1 A.L.T.A. SURVEY S2 A.L.T.A. SURVEYLT1SITE PHOTOMETRICA2.11ST FLOOR PLANA2.22ND FLOOR PLANA2.33RD FLOOR PLANA2.44TH FLOOR PLANA2.55TH FLOOR PLANA2.6ROOF PLANA3.1ELEVATIONSA3.2ELEVATIONSA3.3ELEVATIONSA4.2SITE SECTIONSA5.1DETAILSC200PELIMINERY UTILITY PLANNORTHOWNER / APLICANTELITE DEVELOPMENT, INC.144 WEST LAKE AVENUEWATSONVILLE, CA 95076ATTN.: SON TUT / JUGGY TUTFIVE STORY MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH 78 RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT UNITS, OF WHICH 9 UNITS WILL BE RENT-RESTRICTED TO LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS UNDER THE CITY OF GILROY’S BONUS DENSITY ORDINANCE IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT.BONUS DENSITY CALCULATION:BASE DENSITY IS 30 UNITS / ACRE OR 30 X 2.046 = 61.38 UNITS, WITH 15% OF BASE DENSITY UNITS (.15 X 61) = 9 UNITS RESTRICTED TO LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. THE PROJECT QUALIFIES FOR A 27.5% DENSITY BONUS. 1.275 X 61.38 = 78 UNITSTHE CITY BONUS DENSITY ORDINANCE IS A CONCESSION / INCENTIVE TO ZONING STANDARDS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE65915(D)(2)(A). THIS INCENTIVE IS APPLIED TO MODIFICATION OF STANDARD PARKING STALL DIMENSION STANDARDS.THE MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL COMPONENT IN THE R4 ZONE IS PROPOSED TO BE PURSUED UNDER THE CITY’S UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIDEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER GCC 30.50.50THE PROJECT QUALIFIES FOR 27.5% DENSITY BONUS ABOVE THE R4 ZONE BASE DENSITYA4.1THROUGH BUILDING SECTIONSC300PELIMINERY EROSION CONTROL PLANA1.1aSITE PLAN ON GOOGLE EARTHA3.43D VIEWSA3.53D VIEWSA5.2MATERIAL BOARDA1.2PARKING / CIRCULATION PLANELITE DEVELOPMENT, INC.144 WEST LAKE AVENUEWATSONVILLE, CA 95076ATTN.: SON TUT / JUGGY TUTRESIDENTIAL UNIT MIXRESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENT:SUBTOTAL:148.517148% 80TANDEM PARKING:ADA ACCESSABLE PARKING:8 COMMERCIAL PARKING REQUIREMENT:4447 SF @ 4/1000TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED:166TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED:TUCK UNDER PARKING:50% 845%COMPACT PARKING4125%REQUIRED 1/ UNIT78BICYCLE STORAGEPROVIDED80BUILDING / DEVELOPMENT AREA STATISTICSA2.7TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL UNIT PLANSYARD PROVIDEDBUILDING HEIGHTMAX. PROVIDED75 FT 58 FTSIX STORIES FIVE STORIESREQUIREDFRONTSIDEREAR261215324738.9-- --0---AFFORDABLE UNIT MIX: 3 - 1BDRM UNITS; 3 - 2BDRM UNITS; 3 - 3 BDRM UNITSA3.63D VIEWSC H U R C H S T .
M O N T E R E Y R D .8.A.dPacket Pg. 95Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
M O N T E R E Y ROAD.24FIRST FLOOR TANDEM PARKINGN 13.000 S.F. / FLOORTANDEM PARKING641 8 ' - 0 "
2 5 8 ' - 0 5 9 /2 5 6 "169' - 9 63/256"233' - 7 15/128"199' - 11 115/128"105' - 2"105' - 10"90' - 2"104' - 10"104' - 10"2 1 ' - 0 2 9 /1 2 8 "26' - 0 1/2" 16' - 0" 2' - 0"3' - 6 209/256"26' - 0"16' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 6 125/128"30' - 1 81/128" 18' - 0"SHORT TERMBIKE PARKING, TYP.BUS STOP/SHELTERTO BE PROVIDEDPER PUBLIC WORKS.CIRCULATION1252covered walkpathCIRCULATIONcovered walkpathLOBBYCIRCULATIONPARKINGAMENITIESLOBBYCIRCULATIONCIRCULATION1273EXTERIORWALKS1275130345781112131415161718192223242526272865465758 59 60 61 62 63 647374757678798081MULTI-PURPOSEROOM3132336656484734353637385549 50 51 52 53 54passage throughMECHANICALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEWALKWAYWALKWAYWALKWAY677GATED EMERGENCYVEHICULAR INGRESS EGRESSPERMEABLEEMPEDESTRIANGATENEW 7" HIGHMASONRY SOUND WALLPROPERTY LINEFENCENEW 7" HIGHMASONRY SOUND WALLM A C H IN E R Y
R O O M
trash/recyclingroomCpassage throughCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC29CCCCCCCCCCCCC291039404142437067 68 69828384852021444586877271commercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialloadingcommercialcommercialcommercialPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYTRASH / RECYCLINGloundryrooms ig n a g e signageTRANSFORMERPOWERGENERATORRESIDENT STORAGE40 bikes parking40 bikes parkingcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialTOP OFCURBPROPERTYLINEUTILITYEXSITINGWALKWAYPLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUNDRESIDENT STORAGE26' - 0"25' - 0"3 5 ' - 0 "2 5 ' - 0 "GYMCOMMERCIALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEENTRYPORCHADA COMPLIANT WALK47ft. SIDE YARD47ft. SIDE YARD38ft. REAR YARD32ft FRONT YARD47ft. SIDE YARDMAIL MAIL COMMERCIALCOMMERCIALRES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.BenchBBQOUTDOORTABLEOUTDOORTABLEBenchto th e n e ig h b o r e d d r iv e w a y c e n te r lin e~ 5 3 ' - 0 "to th e n e x t d r iv e w a y~ 7 4 ' - 0 "DRIVEWAYDRIVEWAY122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA1.1PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020SITE PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1SITE PLANPROJECTNORTH8.A.dPacket Pg. 96Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
uman ave.122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA1.1aPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020Aerial Site View9799 1" = 60'-0"1Site Aerial8.A.dPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
M O N T E R E Y R D .200 SFRESIDENTIAL USE, PLAY GROUNDLANDSCAPEGYML A N D S C A P ELANDSCAPELANDSCAPE RESIDENTIAL COMPLEXDRIVEWAY AND PARKINGRESIDENTIAL COMPLEXDRIVEWAY AND PARKINGRESIDENTIAL COMPLEXDRIVEWAY AND PARKINGRESIDENTIAL COMPLEXDRIVEWAY AND PARKINGPEDESTRIAN OUTDOOR WALKWAYCOVERED WALKWAYCOVERED WALKWAYSR SR SR SRSR SR SR SR SR RC RC RC SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR RC RCSRSRSRGG12SC11SC10SC9SC6SC5SC4SC3SCA2SCA1SC8SCA8SCARTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTSRARTRTRTRTRTRTSRARTSR SR SR
SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR RC RC RC SR SR SR SR SR SR SR SR RC RC RC RC SR SR SR SR SR SR SR RC RCSRSRRTRTRTRTRTRT RTSRASRARTRTRTRTRTRTRTCMPCT10X16CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCTCMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCT CMPCTCMPCTGGGSCSCSCSCSC SCLOADINGSR- STANDARD RESIDENTIAL ASSIGNED / RESTRICTEDRT -RESIDENTIALTANDEM - ASSIGNED TO SINGLE DESIGNATED UNIT RESTRICTEDRC- RESIDENTIAL COMPACT SIZE - ASSIGNEDSCA - STANDARD COMMERCIAL ACCESSIBLEG- GUEST / VISITORBICIYCLE AND PEDESRIAN ACCESS THRU WEAVER COURTTO WOODWORTH WAY, CHURCH STREET AND NEIBORHOOD TO WESTEXCLUSIVE EMERGENCY / GATEDPOLICE FIRE VEHICLE ACCESSWEAVER COURTNEW BUSSHELTERFUTURE VEHICULAR ACCESSTO ADJACENT PROPERTYRESIDENTIALCOMMERCIALGUESTPEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTO NORTHBIKESTORAGEBIKESTORAGEPEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONSOUTH TO DOWNTOWNGILROYRESIDENTIALCIRCULATIONCOMMERCIAL CIRCULATIONMULTIPURPOSE ROOMCOMMERCIALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEL A U N D R YLOBBY76' - 8"103'-4 1/4"PARKING SCHEDULEUSE / UNIT TYPE NO. REQUIREMENTS1 BR. UNITS2 BR. UNITS3 BR. UNITS4 BR. UNITSCOMMERCIAL832371864372.51 / 250 (18)4516 S.F.TOTAL REQUIRED166.5172TOTAL PROVIDEDREQUIREMENTS PER A BONUS DENSITYCITY OF GILROY PROGRAM[CA.GOV. CODE] 65915 (P)(1)122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA1.2PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020PARKING / CIRCULATIONPLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1Residential Use8.A.dPacket Pg. 98Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSDSDSSWMWM WMWMSSWMNOPARKINGNOPARKING>>>2%MAX2%MAX (210.4)EG(211.3)EG(211.8)EG(215.5)EG(212.8)EG(214.2)EG(215.2)EG(210.7)EG(211.1)EG(211.3)FL(211.2)FL(210.4)FL(210.3)FL(211.9)EG131111111111111111121213131313131314131313131314141414141414141515171717171818161616161616161616161616161616TYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPTYPRIDGELINERIDGELINE10.00'SS ESMT50.00'INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT2.00'2.00'26.00'26.00'2.00'211.8 TC211.3 FS212.0 TC211.5 FS171717181818181818RIDGELINE12RIGHTOF WAYM O N T E R E Y R O A D PROPOSED BUILDING212.5 FFPROPERTYLINEW E A V E R C O U R T PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINERIGHTOF WAYS89° 13' 16"W512.43'N00° 46' 44"W169.77'N89° 13' 16"E233.60'N68° 20' 06"E199.98'S21° 39' 54"E258.02'212.3TC/FS212.1TC/FS212.5FF212.5FF212.5FF212.5FFRIDGELINE 212.4TC/FS212.4TC/FS212.5FF212.5FF212.5FS212.5FSRIDGELINE191919191919191919192012(E) 16.31'DRIVEWAY11a11a11a11a211.3TG212.1TG210.8TG211.5TG211.2TG212.3TG213.9TG210.1BOT210.6BOT211.4BOT213.2BOT211.5FG211.5FG1212211.5FG211.5FG211.6BOT210.9BOT209.4BOT210.5BOT211.5FG211.5FG210.9TG10.0'S/W10.0'S/WCDS JOB #:SCALE:16-003AS SHOWNDATE:March 9, 2017PREPARED BY:MMMREVIEWED BY:RDWS:\_Work\CDS\Active Jobs\16-003 Monterey Apartments\_Project\1_Prelim Docs\16-003 Prelim Grading Plan.dwg, March 9, 2017ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOABCDEFGHI JKLMNO213456789101112SHEET XX OF 3 SHEETSMONTEREY APARTMENTSPROJECT NAME:PLANS PREPARED FOR: PROJECT LOCATION:ELITE DEVELOPMENTS, INC.144 WESTLAKE AVENUEWATSONVILLE, CA 950768955 MONTEREY ROADGILROY, CA 95020APN: 790-014-025CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANNING PERMITTINGCIVIL DESIGN STUDIOP.O. Box 199 | Cambria | Ca 93428805.706.0401 www.civil-studio.comPLAN PREPARED BY:PRELIMINARY PLANS- NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION NOTESLEGEND11 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVINGPROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVEMENT PER DETAIL "B", THISSHEET12 PROPOSED CONCRETE13 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB14 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER15 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY16 PROPOSED STRIPING17 PROPOSED BUILDING PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS18 PROPOSED ADA PARKING STALLS19 PROPOSED SOUND WALL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS20 PROPOSED BUS STOP21 PROPOSED BIO-PLANTER PER DETAIL "A", THIS SHEETPROPOSED ASPHALT PAVINGPROPOSED PERVIOUSPAVEMENT20 10 015SCALE: 1" = 20'20 40C100PRELIMINARYGRADING PLAN1GRADING PLAN NOTESCONCRETE CURBS AND/OR GUTTERS THAT HAVE BEENCONSTRUCTED AT 0.5% OR LESS SHALL BE PUDDLE TESTED TOVERIFY CORRECT DRAINAGE. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANDREPLACE SECTIONS OF CURB THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH THISPLAN. MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE POND LENGTH SHALL BE 2'.MAXIMUM POND DEPTH SHALL BE .02'MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ALL ADA PARKING STALLS AND LOADINGAREAS SHALL BE 2.0% MAXIMUM IN ANY DIRECTION.11a11AREA BREAKDOWNEXISTING CONDITIONSIMPERVIOUS AREA: 48,277 SQUARE FEET (1.11 ACRES = 54%)PERVIOUS AREA: 40,851 SQUARE FEET (0.94 ACRES = 46%)TOTAL PROJECT: 89,128 SQUARE FEET (2.05 ACRES = 100%)PROPOSED PROJECTBUILDING AREA: 13,400 SQUARE FEET (0.31 ACRES = 15%)PAVING AREA: 60,304 SQUARE FEET (1.38 ACRES = 0.68%)TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 73,704 SQUARE FEET (1.69 ACRES = 83%)PERVIOUS/LANDSCAPE AREA: 15,424 (0.35 ACRES = 17%)TOTAL PROJECT: 89,128 SQUARE FEET (2.05 ACRES = 100%)IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA TABLESITEACREAGENUMBEROF LOTSTOTAL PROJECT AREA OFDISTURBANCE (SQ FT)EXISTING IMPERVIOUSSURFACE AREA (SQ FT)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUSSURFACE AREA (SQ FT)EXISTING OR REPLACED IMPERVIOUSSURFACE AREA (SQ FT)PROPOSED OR REPLACED PERVIOUSSURFACE AREA (SQ FT)LIST OF PLANNED STORMWATERCONTROL MEASURES2.05 189,128 48,277 73,704 48,277 15,424BIO-PLANTER, PERVIOUS PAVEMENT, &TECHNICAL INFEASIBILITYSURFACE STORAGEVARIES (9" MIN)BIO SOIL60% SAND,40% ORGANIC#57 ROCK3/4" WASHED ROCKNATIVE SOIL8" DIAMETERPVC SDR 35 PIPE6.0"4.0"12.0"PARKING LOTASPHALTCURB ANDGUTTER WITH12" OPENINGSBENCH6" MIN45°WIDTH PER PLAN12" MIN4.0"4.0"MINNYOPLASTDRAIN BASINWITH DOMEGRATETOP OF GRATEELEVATION3.0" GORILLA HAIRBARK AND MULCHPLANTINGSOIL3.0"11a12.0"DETAIL "B": PERVIOUS PAVEMENTSCALE: 1" = 1'11a6" DIAMETER PVCSDR 35 PERFORATED PIPE.LOCATION PER PLAN.TO STORMDRAIN SYSTEM11aPROPOSED CONCRETE128.A.dPacket Pg. 99Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
XXXXSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDOHOHOHOHOHOH OH
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSDSDSSWMWM WMWMSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSFF F FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFWMWL>>>SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD212.3 TG208.3 INV213.1 RIM208.6 IE210.8 TG206.8 INVCONNECTTO EXISTMATCHEXIST209.5IE414141414242444453515151525252546162656264717373727374SEWERPOCGASPOCWATERPOCFIREPOC52211.2 TG207.2 INV44210.9 TG206.9 INV444242213.9 TG209.9 INV44211.3 TG207.3 INV44212.1 TG208.1 INV44424242203.6INV203.4INV757565656565656565636366676868686565211.5 TG207.5 INV4442RIGHTOF WAYM O N T E R E Y R O A D PROPOSED BUILDING212.5 FFPROPERTYLINEW E A V E R C O U R T PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINERIGHTOF WAY7371CDS JOB #:SCALE:16-003AS SHOWNDATE:March 9, 2017PREPARED BY:MMMREVIEWED BY:RDWS:\_Work\CDS\Active Jobs\16-003 Monterey Apartments\_Project\1_Prelim Docs\16-003 Prelim Utility Plan.dwg, March 9, 2017ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOABCDEFGHI JKLMNO213456789101112SHEET XX OF 3 SHEETSMONTEREY APARTMENTSPROJECT NAME:PLANS PREPARED FOR: PROJECT LOCATION:ELITE DEVELOPMENTS, INC.144 WESTLAKE AVENUEWATSONVILLE, CA 950768955 MONTEREY ROADGILROY, CA 95020APN: 790-014-025CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANNING PERMITTINGCIVIL DESIGN STUDIOP.O. Box 199 | Cambria | Ca 93428805.706.0401 www.civil-studio.comPLAN PREPARED BY:PRELIMINARY PLANS- NOT FORCONSTRUCTION20 10 015SCALE: 1" = 20'20 40C200PRELIMINARYUTILITY PLAN2UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES41 EXISTING STORM DRAIN INFRASTRUCTURE - PROTECT IN PLACE42 PROPOSED 8" STORM DRAIN PIPE43 NOT USED44 PROPOSED CATCH BASINNOTES 45 TO 50 NOT USED51 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE - PROTECT IN PLACE52 PROPOSED 8" SANITARY SEWER LINE53 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE54 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTNOTE 55 TO 60 NOT USED61 EXISTING WATER INFRASTRUCTURE - PROTECT IN PLACE62 PROPOSED 3" WATER LINE63 PROPOSED DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY64 PROPOSED 2" WATER METER65 PROPOSED 6" FIRE LINE WITH THRUST BLOCKS66 PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION67 PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE68 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTNOTES 69 TO 70 NOT USED71 EXISTING ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - PROTECT IN PLACE72 EXISTING GAS INFRASTRUCTURE - PROTECT IN PLACE73 EXISTING UTILITY POLE - REMOVE AND UNDERGROUND LINES PER THE CITYENGINEER. COORDINATION WITH PG&E SHALL BE REQUIRED74 PROPOSED GAS LINE75 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE8.A.dPacket Pg. 100Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSDSDSSWMWM WMWMSSWMNOPARKINGNOPARKING>>>RIGHTOF WAYM O N T E R E Y R O A D PROPOSED BUILDING212.5 FFPROPERTYLINEW E A V E R C O U R T PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINERIGHTOF WAYCDS JOB #:SCALE:16-003AS SHOWNDATE:March 9, 2017PREPARED BY:MMMREVIEWED BY:RDWS:\_Work\CDS\Active Jobs\16-003 Monterey Apartments\_Project\1_Prelim Docs\16-003 Prelim Grading Plan.dwg, March 9, 2017ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOABCDEFGHI JKLMNO213456789101112SHEET XX OF 3 SHEETSMONTEREY APARTMENTSPROJECT NAME:PLANS PREPARED FOR: PROJECT LOCATION:ELITE DEVELOPMENTS, INC.144 WESTLAKE AVENUEWATSONVILLE, CA 950768955 MONTEREY ROADGILROY, CA 95020APN: 790-014-025CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANNING PERMITTINGCIVIL DESIGN STUDIOP.O. Box 199 | Cambria | Ca 93428805.706.0401 www.civil-studio.comPLAN PREPARED BY:PRELIMINARY PLANS- NOT FORCONSTRUCTION20 10 015SCALE: 1" = 20'20 40C300PRELIMINARYEROSION CONTROLPLAN3CONTRACTORSTAGING AREATC-1SE-5TC-1PROJECT SCHEDULINGPRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATIONWATER CONSERVATIONPAVING AND GRINDINGDISCHARGE REPORTINGPOTABLE WATER / IRRIGATIONVEHICLE CLEANINGVEHICLE FUELINGVEHICLE MAINTENANCEWIND EROSION CONTROLTHE FOLLOWING BMPS ARE SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN:CHECK DAMTHE FOLLOWING BMPS SHALL BE USED IN THE CONTRACTOR STAGING AREA:MATERIAL STORAGEMATERIAL USAGESPILL PREVENTION KITSOLID WASTE (TRASH)CONCRETE WASTE (WASH OUT)SEPTIC / SANITARY FACILITIESSTOCKPILE MANAGEMENTFIBER ROLLSBMP'S SPECIFIED ON THIS PLAN REFERENCE THE NOVEMBER 2009 EDITION OF THECASQA "CALIFORNIA STORMWATER HANDBOOK". IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THECONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN BMP DETAILS AVAILABLE AT WWW.CASQA.ORG.THE FOLLOWING BMPS ARE NOT SHOWN IN SPECIFIC LOCATIONS ON THIS PLANAND ARE APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INCORPORATETHESE BMPS INTO THE PROJECT SCOPE:STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXITSTREET SWEEPINGHAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTEC-1EC-2NS-1NS-3NS-6NS-7NS-8NS-9NS-10SE-7WE-1SE-4SE-5TC-1WM-1WM-2WM-3WM-4WM-5WM-6WM-8WM-9BMP SELECTION AND LEGENDEROSION CONTROL NOTES1. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES FOR WIND, WATER, MATERIAL STOCKPILES, AND TRACKING SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED ON ALLPROJECTS AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL INCLUDE SOURCE CONTROL, INCLUDING PROTECTION OF STOCKPILES, PROTECTION OF SLOPES,PROTECTION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS, PROTECTION OF ACCESSES, AND PERIMETER CONTAINMENT MEASURES. EROSIONCONTROL SHALL BE PLACED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING AND SITE DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES UNLESS THE PUBLICWORKS DEPARTMENT DETERMINES TEMPORARY MEASURES TO BE UNNECESSARY BASED UPON LOCATION, SITE CHARACTERISTICSOR TIME OF YEAR. THE INTENT OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE TO KEEP ALL GENERATED SEDIMENTS FROM ENTERINGA SWALE, DRAINAGE WAY, WATERCOURSE, ATMOSPHERE, OR MIGRATE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR ONTO THE PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY.2. SITE INSPECTIONS AND APPROPRIATE MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES SHALL BE CONDUCTED ANDDOCUMENTED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GENERAL PERMIT.3. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES/DEVICES ASSPECIFIED BY THE APPROVED PLAN UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE PROJECT IS ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE BY THE PUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT OR UNTIL A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN ACCEPTED BY RWQCB. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES/DEVICESMAY BE RELOCATED, DELETED OR ADDITIONAL MEASURES/DEVICES MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON THE ACTUAL CONDITIONSENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT THE DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT QSP. ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROLMEASURES/DEVICES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE QSD, QSP, AGENCY INSPECTOR, OR RWQCB.4. PER THE CALIFORNIA GENERAL PERMIT, THERE IS NO IDENTIFIED RAINY SEASON. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED ATALL TIMES. REFER TO PROJECT SWPPP FOR BMP DETAILS.5. IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE, THE OWNER AND/OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP AND ALLASSOCIATED COSTS OR DAMAGE. IN THE EVENT THAT DAMAGE OCCURS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE AGENCY ISREQUIRED TO PERFORM CLEANUP, THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AGENCY REIMBURSEMENT OF ALL ASSOCIATED COSTSOR DAMAGE.6. IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE AND/OR LACK OF PERFORMANCE BY THE OWNER AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO CORRECT EROSIONCONTROL RELATED PROBLEMS THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAY REVOKE ALL ACTIVE PERMITS.7. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED AND ESTABLISHED WITH 75% COVERAGE ON ALL DISTURBED SURFACES, PRIORTO FINAL INSPECTION. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE FULLY ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. TEMPORARYEROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT MEASURES ARE ESTABLISHED.8. THE AGENCY MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL PROJECT SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR, DEVELOPER, ANDENGINEER OF WORK SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING SELF-REGULATION OF THESE REQUIREMENTS.9. ALL PROJECTS INVOLVING SITE DISTURBANCE OF ONE ACRE OR GREATER SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THECALIFORNIA GENERAL PERMIT. THE OWNER SHALL SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI).10. NAME OF PERSON TO CONTACT 24 HOURS A DAY IN THE EVENT THERE IS AN EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTATION PROBLEM:NAME:________________________________________ PHONE:_________________________STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONSE-10SE-4SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-10SE-4SE-4SE-4SE-4SE-4SE-4SE-4FR FR FR FR FR FR FRSE-5SE-5SE-58.A.dPacket Pg. 101Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
UP
1
30
23456
7891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
65
39
57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
84
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83 M O
N
T
E
R
E
Y
S
T
R
E
E
T
23
LOBBY
5'-0"4'-0"3'-6"26'-0"4'-0"COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
AMMENTIES
FIRST FLOOR TANDEM PARKING
N 13.000 S.F. / FLOOR
TAND
E
M
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
313233
66 67
85
86
64
5'-0"26'-0"
56 68
434241403435363738
554748495051525354464544
corridor lines
MECH
A
N
I
C
A
L
WALKW
A
Y
WALKW
A
YWALKW
A
Y
Blatter
SHEET
THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTED
MATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIP
OF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE
& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUT
EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF
HOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.
SHEET CONTENTS
ISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPA2.1IN PROGRESSLEVEL 1 PLAN
xxxx
1" = 20'-0"1Level 1
D A V I D R.
B L A C K &
A S S O C I A T E S
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E
Telephone 805.898.8717 Fax 898.0373
S A N T A B A R B A R A ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 3 1 0 1
1 7 1 8 P A M P A S A V E .
d b l a c k @ d a v i d b l a c k l a . c o m
U R B A N D E S I G N
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
Calamagrostis a. `Karl Foerster` / Reed Grass
Chondropetalum tectorum / Cape Rush
Juncus patens / California Gray Rush
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Achillea millefolium `Paprika` / Red Yarrow
Achillea x `Moonshine` / Moonshine Yarrow
Erigeron Karvinskianis / Santa Barbara Daisy
Pemstemon spp / Beard Tounge
Rosmarinus o.`Irene` / Trailing Rosemary
Parthenicissus tricuspidata / Boston Ivy
$UFWRVWDSK\ORVG¶(PHUDOG&DUSHW·0DQ]DQLWD
Carex divulsa / Berkeley Sedge
&HDQRWKXVJ¶<DQNHH3RLQW·:LOG/LODF
Cotoneaster d. `Lowfast` / Bearberry
GRASSES
TERRACE PLANTINGS
GROUNDCOVER
'RGRQHDY¶3XUSXUHD·+RSVHHG%XVK
Feijoa sellowiana / Pineapple Guava
Heteromeles arbutifolia / Toyon
Prunus caroliniana / Carolina Cherry
Rhus integrifolia / lemonadeberry
SCREENING SHRUBS
Callistemon viminalis / Weeping Bottlebrush
Chitalpa tashkentensis / Chitalpa
FLOWERING ACCENT TREES
PARKING LOT TREES
Metrosideros excelsa / New Zealand X-mas Tree
Quercus suber / Cork Oak
SCREENING TREES
Melaleuca linarifolia / Paperbark Tree
Geijera parviflora / Australian Willow
STREET FRONTAGE
COURTYARD PLANTINGS
Cistus spp. / Orchid Rockrose
Echium fastuosum / Pride of Madeira
Salvia l. `Santa Barbara` / Mexican Sage
Salvia greggii `Furmans Red` / Red Salvia
Grevillea x `Canberra Gem` / Grevillea
Cotoneaster d. `Lowfast` / Bearberry
Muhlenbergia rigens / Deer Grass
Achillea millefolium `Paprika` / Red Yarrow
Lavatera bicolor / Tree Mallow
Buddleja d. `Black Knight` / Butterfly Bush
Nandina domestica / Heavenly Bamboo
Pemstemon 'Margarita Bop' / Beard Tounge
Heuchera sanguinea / Coral bells
Calamagrostis a. `Karl Foerster` / Reed Grass
Grewia occidentalis / Lavender Starflower
Erigeron Karvinskianis / Santa Barbara Daisy
FOUNDATION PLANTINGS
$UFKWRVWDSK\ORV¶-RKQ'RXUOH\·0DQ]DQLWD
Buddleja davidii `Black Knight` / Butterfly Bush
Cistus spp. / Orchid Rockrose
Grevillea x `Canberra Gem` / Canb Grevillea
Hebe x `Coed` / Hebe
Nandina domestica / Heavenly Bamboo
Rosmarinus o. `Tuscan Blue` / Upright Rosemary
Salvia greggii `Furmans Red` / Red Salvia
Leptospermum s. `Helene Strybing` / Tea Tree
Lavatera bicolor / Tree Mallow
MEDIUM SHRUBS
Carpenteria californica / Bush Anemone
&RUHD¶&DUPLQH%HOOV·&RUHD
&XSKHDK¶/DYHQGHU&XSKHD
Echium fastuosum / Pride of Madeira
Grewia occidentalis / Lavender Starflower
Hypericum calycinum / Hypericum
Kniphofia u `Malibu Yellow` / Yellow Torch Lily
Mahonia aquifolium / Oregon Grape
Phormium spp. / New Zealand Flax
5KDPQXVF¶(YH&DVH·&RIIHHEHUU\
Salvia leucantha `Santa Barbara` / Mexican Sage
UPRIGHT CANOPY TREES
Olea e. 'Majestic Beauty' / Fruitless Olive
Cercis c. Forest Pansy / Canadian Redbud
VINES
Melaleuca quinquenervia / Paperbark Tree
STREET TREE
MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA
SCREENING TREES
MELALEUCA LINARIFOLIA
PARKING LOT TREES
METROSIDEROS EXCELSA
STREET TREE
GEIJERA PARVIFLORA
PARKING LOT TREES
METROSIDEROS EXCELSA
Heteromeles arbutifolia / Toyon
FLOWERING ACCENT TREE
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA
SCREENING TREES
MELALEUCA LINARIFOLIA
SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER TYP.
ENHANCED PAVING
18" SEATWALL TYP.
FLOWERING ACCENT TREE
CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS
UPRIGHT CANOPY TREES
EUCALYPTUS NICHOLAI
COURTYARD WITH ENHANCED
PAVING & SEAT WALLS
UPRIGHT CANOPY TREES
MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA
PARKING LOT TREES
METROSIDEROS EXCELSA
GROUNDCOVER TYP.
SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER TYP.
SHRUBS &
GROUNDCOVER
TYP.
PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST
MONTEREY STREETHerdenbergia violacea / Happy Wanderer
Lonicera hispidula vacillans / California Honeysuckle
FLOWERING VINE TYP.
FLOWERING VINE TYP.
8.A.d
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
UP UP
UP
1
30
2345
7891011121314151617181920212223242526272829
65
3957 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
84
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
78
79
80
81
82
83 M O
N
T
E
R
E Y
ROAD
.
24
LOBBY
COMMERCIAL
SPACE
RESIDENTIAL
AMENITIES
FIRST FLOOR TANDEM PARKING
N 13.000 S.F. / FLOOR
TAND
E
M
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
313233
66
85
64
56
68
4241403435363738
554748495051525354464544
corridor lines
MECH
A
N
I
C
A
L
STOR
A
G
E
WALKW
A
Y
WALKW
A
YWALKW
A
Y
6
43 67
77
GATED EMERGENCY
VEHICULAR INGRESS EGRASS
PERMEABLE
EM
PEDESTRIAN
GATE
NEW 7" HIGH
MASONRY SOUND WALL
NEW 7" HIGH
MASONRY SOUND WALL
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
LCCO
E
MH: 16
WM SR2
S
MH: 12
WM SR2
S
MH: 12
WM SR2
S
MH: 12
WM SR3
SS
MH: 12
WM SR3
SS
MH: 12
T5W
F
MH: 16
T3M
A
MH: 16
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
GARAGE
X
MH: 9
0.1 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.9 2.8 4.4 3.3 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.5 4.3 3.6 2.1 1.3 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.6 2.4 4.2 3.7 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.2 2.0 3.0 4.5 3.3 2.0 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.2 2.0 3.2 4.4 2.9 1.9 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0
0.2 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.7 2.6 3.0 2.7 1.9 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.4 2.9 2.9 2.1 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.9 2.9 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.9 2.9 3.3 2.9 2.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.8 2.7 3.0 2.6 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0
0.3 0.9 1.4 1.8 0.8 1.3 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.2
0.3 1.4 2.1 2.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.1
0.2 1.4 2.5 3.5 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.6 0.6 0.0
0.3 1.4 2.6 3.6 1.2 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 1.4 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.4
0.4 1.5 2.2 2.4 0.7 0.3 1.1 1.7 1.7 0.3 0.2 1.6 1.7 1.2 0.1 0.7 1.7 1.7 0.5 0.9 1.7 1.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 1.2 0.1
0.7 1.3 1.6 1.5 0.2 0.2 1.8 3.2 3.0 0.2 0.1 3.0 3.0 2.2 0.1 0.8 3.3 3.1 0.4 1.4 3.2 3.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.5
1.0 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 2.7 2.5 0.2 0.1 2.7 2.8 1.9 0.1 0.7 2.5 2.3 0.3 1.3 2.6 2.4 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.2
1.6 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.1 1.8 3.0 2.6 0.2 0.1 2.7 3.0 2.0 0.1 0.9 2.9 2.7 0.4 1.5 3.0 2.6 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.0
2.5 2.4 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.8 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.2 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.1 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.4 0.7 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.9 1.9 3.2 1.5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 2.4 0.6
3.8 2.6 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 2.4 1.2 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.1 0.8 0.2 2.4 0.4
3.3 2.6 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.3 1.5 2.5 3.0 1.7 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.8 0.3 0.8 0.9 0.0
2.1 2.0 1.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.8 3.2 2.7 2.8 0.5 0.3
1.3 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.1 3.1 2.3 2.6 0.1 0.1
0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.6 3.0 2.8 1.9 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.4 2.4 3.0 2.9 2.1 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.7 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.0 1.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.8 2.8 4.5 3.3 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.5 4.3 3.7 2.1 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.7 2.8 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
2.7 4.1 3.1 2.0 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.4 2.5 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1
2.3 3.8 3.2 2.3 1.3 1.0 1.7 2.0 1.2 0.7
0.0 2.0 1.2 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.3 1.9
1.3 2.4 5.1 6.3 0.0
8.0
122 E. ARRELLAGA
SANTA BARBARA
805 962 2746
CALIFORNIA 93101
Blatter
Hochhauser
ARCHITECTURE
AND PLANNING
SHEET
PROJECT NO:
THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTED
MATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIP
OF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE
& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUT
EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF
HOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.
SHEET CONTENTS
ISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:
PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016 8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020MONTEREY APPARTMENTSLT1.0 PLANNING SUBMITTALPHOTOMETRIC
STUDY
9799
1" = 20'-0"1PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
PROJECT
NORTH
Luminaire Schedule
Symbol Tag Qty Label Description Arrangement LLF Lum. Watts Filename
A 11 T3M DSX0 LED 20C 1000 30K T3M MVOLT HS SINGLE 0.910 72 DSX0_LED_20C_1000_30K_T3
E 1 LCCO DSX0 LED 20C 1000 30K LCCO MVOLT SINGLE 0.910 72 DSX0_LED_20C_1000_30K_LC
S 3 WM SR2 WST LED 1 10A700/30K SR2 MVOLT SINGLE 0.910 24 WST_LED_1_10A700_30K_SR2
SS 2 WM SR3 WST LED 1 10A700/30K SR3 MVOLT SINGLE 0.910 24 WST_LED_1_10A700_30K_SR3
F 1 T5W DSX0 LED 20C 1000 30K T5W MVOLT SINGLE 0.910 72 DSX0_LED_20C_1000_30K_T5
X 6 GARAGE DSXPG LED 10C 1000 30K T5R MVOLT SINGLE 0.910 37 DSXPG_LED_10C_1000_30K_T
Calculation Summary
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
CalcPts Illuminance Fc 1.12 8.0 0.0 N.A.N.A.
PARKING LOT FIXTURE WALL MOUNT FIXTURE GARAGE CEILING FIXTURE
8.A.d
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
1303457811121314151617181922232425262728654657 58 59 60 61 62 63 647374757678798081M O N T E R E Y R D .24FIRST FLOOR PARKINGN 13.000 S.F. / FLOORPARKING313233666056484734353637385549 50 51 52 53 54passage throughMECHANICALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEWALKWAYWALKWAYWALKWAY839A677GATED EMERGENCYVEHICULAR INGRESS EGRESSPERMEABLEEMPEDESTRIANGATE2 5 8 ' - 0 1 /4 "NEW 7" HIGHMASONRY WALLPROPERTY LINEFENCE169' - 9 1/4"233' - 7"200' - 0"105' - 2"105' - 10"90' - 2"104' - 10"104' - 10"2 1 ' - 0 2 9 /1 2 8 "NEW 7" HIGHMASONRY WALL3' - 7" 18' - 0" 44' - 1 1/2" 16' - 0" 22' - 4" 44' - 1 3/4" 16' - 0" 2' - 0"3' - 6 3/4"30' - 1 81/128" 18' - 0"
M A C H IN E R Y
R O O M
trash/recyclingroomCpassage throughCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC29CCCCCCCCCCCCC291039404142437067 68 698283848520214445868772719' - 0"E12BDC4commercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialloadingcommercialcommercialcommercialAMENITIESPARKINGLOBBYCOMMERCIALcovered walkpathEXTERIORWALKSEXTERIORWALKScovered walkpathPARKINGCIRCULATIONLOBBYCIRCULATIONEXTERIORWALKSCIRCULATIONCIRCULATIONCIRCULATIONEXTERIORWALKSPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYTRASH / RECYCLINGBUSSTOPloundryroom26' - 0"26' - 0"s ig n a g e signageTRANSFORMERPOWERGENERATORRESIDENT STORAGEPARKING40 bikes parking40 bikes parking7' - 3 3/4"SANDSANDcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialALL PAVEMENT / DRIVING AREA39581 SFALL GREENS9622 SFFcommercialTOP OFCURBPROPERTYLINEGYM9' - 0"18' - 0"2' - 0"UTILITY1 1 ' - 9 5 /8 "EXSITINGWALKWAYPLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUNDRESIDENT STORAGE2 6 ' - 0 "274 SF306 SF200 SF2322 SF67 SF47 SF45 SF119 SFMULTI-PURPOSEROOMRESIDENTIALSTORAGEATRIUMADA COMPLIANT WALKENTRYPORCHcommercialcommercial65G710BenchBBQOUTDOORTABLEOUTDOORTABLEBenchCOMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGESUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIO1st levelAREA (SF)PARKING, VEHICLE ACCESS39087LANDSCAPE, VEGETATIVE, SITE STRUCTURES 11847EXTERIOR PEDESTRIAN WALKS4501SITE COVERAGE STATISTICS1612212792667558390517344435----TOTAL site:89124TOTAL NET ENCL./ COVERED AREA3272533689BUILDING COVERAGE "UNDER ROOF"BUILDING AREA STATSTOTAL NET HABITABLE AREA7460FLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:33118101066321111873711TOTAL:2424161478RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX-0------PROPERTY LINEVERTICAL STEEL CHANELPOST SET IN MIN. 24"DEEP CONCRETEBASE @6'-0" O.C. TYP1 X4, 1 X6, & 1 X8 VERTICAL CEDAR BOARDS0' - 1 1/2"0' - 1 1/2"0' - 0 3/4"2 X 6 HORIZONTALCEDAR OR PRESSURETREATED SPANNER7'-0"ABOVE GRADEPROPERTY LINE7'-0"ABOVE GRADE8" REINFORCEDCONCRETE MASONRYUNIT WALL W/ PLASTERFINISHNATURAL / FINISHGRADECONCRETE GRADEBEAM / FOOTING122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.1PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950201ST FLOOR PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1Level 1PROJECTNORTHTYPICAL FENCE AT PROPERTY LINETYPICAL WALL AT PROPERTY LINE8.A.dPacket Pg. 104Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
UPUP1A4.1OPENPATIOOPENPATIOOPENPATIOOPENPATIOA2.71A2.72A2.73A2.7414' - 2"12' - 4"45' - 0"9' - 4"839A1A4.22A4.23 5 ' - 1 1 "
2 9 ' - 5 1 /2 "
3 5 ' - 1 1 "
2 9 ' - 5 1 /2 "
2 ' - 6 "2' - 0"EQ EQLEGEND1BDRM2BDRM3BDRMATRIUMCIRCULATIONCORRIDORDECKUTILITY6' - 0"9' - 3"OPEN TO BELOWCIRCULATIONATRIUM1303CIRCULATIONCIRCULATION1305UTILITY1323UTILITY1324UTILITY1325CIRCULATION13292BDRM201DECK1334CIRCULATION1344CORRIDOR1353UTILITY154365' - 4 1/2"8 0 ' - 1 0 9 /1 2 8 "23' - 8" 23' - 8"23' - 8" 23' - 8"E12BDC490 SFF3A4.176 SF23 SF401 SF3590 SF73 SF202 SF258 SF74 SF294 SF312 SF314 SF313 SF314 SF89 SF90 SF 90 SF 90 SF89 SF 90 SF249 SF2BDRM2022BDRM2031145 SF3BDRM2041243 SF3BDRM2051164 SF3BDRM2061196 SF3BDRM2071211 SF3BDRM2081223 SF3BDRM209622 SF1BDRM210877 SF3BDRM211880 SF3BDRM212886 SF3BDRM2131402 SF3BDRM2141332 SF3BDRM2151329 SF3BDRM2161329 SF3BDRM2171338 SF3BDRM218885 SF2BDRM219893 SF2BDRM220643 SF1BDRM221643 SF1BDRM222885 SF2BDRM2231046 SF2BDRM2246566' - 3"129' - 9"G1 5 6 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "
7 0 ' - 0 "180' - 7 1/2"74' - 5 1/2"710188' - 8"191' - 0"4A4.16 5 ' - 4 1 /2 "94 SFDECK178 SFDECK87 SFDECK88 SFDECK89 SFDECK82 SFDECK95 SFDECK87 SFDECK89 SFDECK89 SFDECK88 SFDECK165 SFDECK47 SFDECK80 SFDECKCOMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGES, ATRIUMUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIO2nd levelAREA-249--756-8953592252083076-TOTAL AREA USAGE PER LEVEL33776FLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:33118101066321111873711TOTAL:2424161478RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX-- --0---122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.2PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950202ND FLOOR PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"2Level 2PROJECTNORTHAREA STATISTICS 2ND LEVEL8.A.dPacket Pg. 105Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
DNDN3585 SFCORRIDOR839ALEGEND1BDRM2BDRM3BDRMATRIUMCIRCULATIONCORRIDORDECKUTILITYCORRIDOR57OPEN TO BELOWCIRCULATION1545ATRIUM1546CIRCULATION1547CIRCULATION1548DECKDECK1551DECK1553UTILITY1554UTILITY1555UTILITY1556DECK1558CIRCULATION1560DECKDECK1569DECK1570DECK1571DECK1572CIRCULATION1575DECK1580UTILITY1598E12BDC4DECK1703F68 SF23 SF399 SF265 SF294 SF137 SF 137 SF137 SF 137 SF85 SF90 SF81 SF81 SF81 SF80 SF68 SF83 SF82 SF83 SF81 SF83 SF83 SF84 SF177 SF82 SF90 SF159 SF873 SF2BDRM301875 SF2BDRM302888 SF2BDRM3031117 SF3BDRM3041224 SF3BDRM3051170 SF3BDRM3061195 SF3BDRM3071212 SF3BDRM3081218 SF3BDRM309630 SF1BDRM310879 SF2BDRM311882 SF2BDRM312882 SF2BDRM3131332 SF3BDRM3151329 SF3BDRM3161329 SF3BDRM3171338 SF3BDRM318885 SF2BDRM319893 SF2BDRM320643 SF1BDRM321643 SF1BDRM322884 SF2BDRM3231031 SF2BDRM32465G7103BDRM95 SFDECK47 SFDECKCOMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGES, ATRIUMUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIO3rd levelAREA---754-8953592252082353-249TOTAL AREA USAGE PER LEVEL33051FLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:33118101066321111873711TOTAL:2424161478RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX-- --0---122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.3PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950203RD FLOOR PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1Level 3PROJECTNORTHAREA STATISTICS 3RD LEVEL8.A.dPacket Pg. 106Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
839AOPEN TO BELOWCIRCULATIONATRIUMCIRCULATIONDECKDECKDECKUTILITYUTILITYUTILITYDECKCIRCULATIONDECKDECKDECK1620DECKDECKDECKDECKDECKUTILITYCORRIDORCIRCULATION1697E12BDC42 ' - 6 "2' - 6"F73 SF22 SF399 SF265 SF2453 SF252 SF79 SF71 SF200 SF137 SF88 SFLEGEND1BDRM2BDRM3BDRM4BDRMATRIUMCIRCULATIONCORRIDORDECKUTILITY877 SF2BDRM401882 SF2BDRM402888 SF2BDRM4031114 SF3BDRM4041236 SF3BDRM4051170 SF3BDRM4061202 SF3BDRM4071223 SF3BDRM4081223 SF3BDRM409629 SF1BDRM410877 SF3BDRM411880 SF3BDRM412872 SF3BDRM4131410 SF3BDRM4141326 SF3BDRM4151778 SF4BDRM41665G710DECKCOMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGES, ATRIUMUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIO4th levelAREA---758-6012459179951640-249TOTAL AREA USAGE PER LEVEL23702FLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:33118101066321111873711TOTAL:2424161478RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX-- --0---122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.4PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950204TH FLOOR PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1Level 4ROOFPROJECTNORTHAREA STATISTICS 4TH LEVELROOFACCESS8.A.dPacket Pg. 107Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
ROOF839AOPEN TO BELOWCIRCULATIONATRIUMCIRCULATIONDECKDECKDECKDECKUTILITYUTILITYUTILITYDECKCIRCULATIONDECKDECKDECKDECKDECKUTILITY1689CORRIDORDECKLOUNGE AREACIRCULATIONE12BDC46' - 0"F2140 SF196 SF75 SF255 SF77 SFLEGEND1BDRM2BDRM3BDRMATRIUMCIRCULATIONCORRIDORDECKLOUNGE AREAUTILITY879 SF2BDRM501882 SF2BDRM502888 SF2BDRM5031115 SF3BDRM5041246 SF3BDRM5051161 SF3BDRM5061197 SF3BDRM5071221 SF3BDRM5081229 SF3BDRM509630 SF1BDRM510877 SF3BDRM511880 SF3BDRM512882 SF3BDRM5131402 SF3BDRM514DECK65G710DECKCOMMUNITYROOF TERRACEFIREPITBAR B. QUEEQUIPMENTDECK2730 SQ FTCOMMERCIAL SPACERESIDENTIAL LOBBYRESIDENTIAL AMENETIES / LOUNGES, ATRIUMUTILITY / STORAGE / MECHANICALINTERIOR CIRCULATION, CORRIDORS, WALKINGVERTICAL CIRCULATION (STAIRS, ELEVATORS)COVERED EXT. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATIONTUCK UNDER PARKINGRESIDENTIAL UNITS / HABITABLERESIDENTIAL DECKS, PATIOSCOMMUNITY DECKS PATIO5th levelAREA--622597111921421490113052737TOTAL AREA USAGE PER LEVEL23423FLOOR LEVEL1 - BEDROOM UNIT2 - BEDROOM UNIT3 - BEDROOM UNIT4 - BEDROOM UNITLEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5TOTAL:33118101066321111873711TOTAL:2424161478RESIDENTIAL UNIT MIX-- --0---122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.5PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950205TH FLOOR PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1Level 5PROJECTNORTHAREA STATISTICS 5TH LEVEL8.A.dPacket Pg. 108Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
839AE12BDC4ROOF ACCESSLADDERF7 ' - 0 "65G710TYP. AWNINGROOF OVERUNIT BALCONYEDPM (GREEN)COMPLIANTROOF MEMBRANEROOFACCESSROOFACCESSTYP. CONDENSINGUNITSKYLIGHT TOATRIUM122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA2.6PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020ROOF PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1ROOF PLANPROJECTNORTH8.A.dPacket Pg. 109Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
D30' - 1"D45' - 1"32' - 3 1/2"12' - 9 1/2"7' - 4 1/2"10' - 7 1/2"19' - 4 1/4"9' - 11 1/8"14' - 8 1/8"15' - 8 1/4"8' - 0"13' - 8"12' - 4"327 SQ FT8' - 0"C53B122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A2.7TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL UNITPLANS9799TYPICAL UNIT -1 BEDROOMTYPICAL UNIT -2 BEDROOM (a)TYPICAL UNIT -3 BEDROOM (A)TYPICAL UNIT -3 BEDROOM (b)LIVING ROOMMASTER BEDROOMBEDROOM BEDROOMBATHROOMOPEN PATIOBATHROOMUTILITYROOMLIVING ROOMMASTER BEDROOMBEDROOMBATHROOMOPEN PATIO - 88 SQ FTOPEN PATIO 85 SQ FTMASTER BEDROOMLIVING ROOMBATHROOMUTILITYROOMUTILITY ROOMLIVING ROOMMASTER BEDROOMBATHROOMOPEN PATIOBATHROOMUTILITY ROOMBEDROOM BEDROOMCLOSETUNIT AREA - 590 SQ FT UNIT AREA -819 SQ FT UNIT AREA - 1232 SQ FT UNIT AREA - 1405 SQ FT 21348.A.dPacket Pg. 110Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A3.1ELEVATIONS9799FRONT VIEWFROM MONTEREY ROAD8.A.dPacket Pg. 111Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"Level 544' - 0"ROOF PLAN58' - 0"A51949494838090E11' - 0"G505253509291919290989799999990515353525190969191945194929091919467545292929292919190905194808199999080515294535350Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"Level 544' - 0"AEG122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A3.2ELEVATIONS9799 1/16" = 1'-0"4EAST MONTEREY RD. ELEVATION50 PAINTED STRUCTURAL TUBING FRAME W/ SS MESH TRELLIS51 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH METAL FASCIA / T&GCEILING AWNING ELEMENT52 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH WINE MESH PANEL GUARDRAIL53 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH GLASS PANEL GUARDRAIL54 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH ADJUSTABLE FABRIC AWNING84 HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME90 CORRUGATED METAL WALL CLADDING91 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 1 "CL 3255DVAULT"92 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 2 "CLW 1033WForgetmenot"94 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 4 "CL 3026D Stigma"96 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 5 "CL 2782WCorduroy"97 DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE ACCENT98 TILE BASE / WAINSCOATING99 PLASTER REGLET REVEAL80 NATURAL ALUMINUM COLOR / VINYL WINDOWSYSTEM81 NATURAL ALUMINUM COLOR / VINYL SLIDINGDOOR SYSTEM83 ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM84 HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME 1/16" = 1'-0"1FULL NORTH ELEVATIONDOORS AND WINDOWSCOLORS, MATERIALS 1/16" = 1'-0"2VIRTUAL VEGETATED MONTEREY RD. EAST ELEVATIONMATERIALS KEY8.A.dPacket Pg. 112Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
92808181909291919191519091919044' - 6"5929490929898525253539080818184845454549480Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"DC929198Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"Level 544' - 0"ROOF PLAN58' - 0"COMMERCIALSIGNAGE, TYP.92948180909751905096122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A3.3ELEVATIONS9799 1/16" = 1'-0"1SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2WEST ELEVATION80 NATURAL ALUMINUM COLOR / VINYL WINDOWSYSTEM81 NATURAL ALUMINUM COLOR / VINYL SLIDINGDOOR SYSTEM83 ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM84 HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME50 PAINTED STRUCTURAL TUBING FRAME W/ SS MESH TRELLIS51 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH METAL FASCIA / T&GCEILING AWNING ELEMENT52 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH WINE MESH PANEL GUARDRAIL53 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH GLASS PANEL GUARDRAIL54 STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH ADJUSTABLE FABRIC AWNING84 HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME90 CORRUGATED METAL WALL CLADDING91 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 1 "CL 3255DVAULT"92 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 2 "CLW 1033WForgetmenot"94 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 4 "CL 3026D Stigma"96 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER W/ COLOR No. 5 "CL 2782WCorduroy"97 DECORATIVE CERAMIC TILE ACCENT98 TILE BASE / WAINSCOATING99 PLASTER REGLET REVEALCOLORS, MATERIALSDOORS AND WINDOWS 3/16" = 1'-0"3EastMATERIALS KEY8.A.dPacket Pg. 113Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA3.4PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950203D VIEWS97991EYE LEVEL SOUTHWEST VIEW2EYE LEVEL COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE NEIN PROGRESSIN PROGRESS8.A.dPacket Pg. 114Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA3.5PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 950203D VIEWS97991RECREATION SPACE FROM W2COMMUNITY ROOF TERRACE AND LOUNGEIN PROGRESSIN PROGRESS8.A.dPacket Pg. 115Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A3.63D VIEWS9799SOUTH VIEWSOUTH WESTNORTH EASTIN PROGRESSIN PROGRESSIN PROGRESS8.A.dPacket Pg. 116Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"Level 544' - 0"Roof 5 lvl54' - 0"ROOF PLAN58' - 0"PARKING1267CORRIDOR1353CORRIDOR57CORRIDOR1693CORRIDOR16922BDRM201COMMERCIAL1272LOBBY1269T.O.P. 153' - 5"PROPERTYLINE20' - 0"T.O.P. CEILINGLOUNGE AREA1700CORRIDOR1693CORRIDOR57CORRIDOR1353covered walkpath1253LOBBY1264Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Roof 5 lvl54' - 0"CORRIDOR1353CORRIDOR57CORRIDOR1693CORRIDOR1692COMMERCIAL1272covered walkpath1259covered walkpath1259T.O.P. CEILINGPROPERTYLINE10' SIDE WALKMONTEREY RD.22' TO CURBCORRIDOR1353CORRIDOR57CORRIDOR1693CORRIDOR1692covered walkpath1259covered walkpath12592BDRM2BDRM2BDRM2BDRM3BDRM3BDRM3BDRM3BDRMCOMMERCIAL122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA4.1PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020THROUGH BUILDINGSECTIONS9799 1/16" = 1'-0"1Section 1 1/16" = 1'-0"3Section 3 1/8" = 1'-0"4Section 3 ENLARGEDSECTION KEY8.A.dPacket Pg. 117Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"CORRIDORPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEADJACENT BUILDINGADJACENT BUILDINGT.O.P. 29' - 0"1BDRM1BDRM3BDRM3BDRM CORRIDORcovered walkpathUTILITYcovered walkpathPARKINGPARKINGLevel 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"Level 544' - 0"Roof 5 lvl54' - 0"ROOF PLAN58' - 0"PROPERTYLINEADJACENTSCHOOL BUILDINGPROPERTYLINECORRIDORMULTI-PURPOSEROOMGREEN OPENSPACEDRIVEWAY3BDRM CORRIDOR 3BDRM3BDRMCORRIDOR3BDRM3BDRM2BDRM3BDRM CORRIDOR 3BDRMcovered walkpathAMENITIES PARKING122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA4.2PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020SITE SECTIONS9799 1" = 10'-0"1SITE SECTION A 1" = 10'-0"2SITE SECTION BSECTIONS KEY8.A.dPacket Pg. 118Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"FLOOR SLABBALCONYFLOOR SLABMETAL MESHMETAL FRAME0' - 3"SLIDINGDOORMETAL FRAMEBALCONYGLAZINGBALCONY FRAME SYSTEM TOSLAB ATTACHMENTS1' - 0"FLOATING PANELEXTERIOR SYSTEMINTERIORWALLEXTERIORWALLLevel 324' - 0"GLAZINGEXTERIOR WALLFLOOR SLABLevel 544' - 0"FLOATING PANELEXTERIOR SYSTEMSTUCCO OVERLATH OVERWATERPROOFINGOVER PLYWOODSHEETHINGOVER FRAMINGSTANDINGMETAL PANELROOFBALCONYSLIDING DOORSYSTEMFLOOR SLABBALCONYSLABBUILDINGROOFING42" ROOF PARAPETCEMENT PLASTERPAINTED WALLEXTERIORWALLT.O.P. 153' - 5"4' - 0"8' - 8"Roof 5 lvl54' - 0"ROOF PLAN58' - 0"BUILDINGTERRACEPARAPETCAPEXTERIORWALL6" THICK ROOF PARAPET3' - 6"0' - 4"0' - 4"T.O.P. 153' - 5"Level 10' - 0"Level 214' - 0"1T.O.P. 29' - 0"CEILINGSYSTEMALUMINUM FRAMINGSTOREFRONTSYSTEMFLOORSLABEXTERIORWALLSUSPENDEDCANOPYEXTERIORSYSTEM9' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"3' - 6"0' - 9" 2' - 3"Level 324' - 0"Level 434' - 0"BALCONY GURADRAILMESH SYSTEMFLOATING PANELEXTERIOR SYSTEMBALCONY FLOORSLABINTERIOR FLOOR SLABSLIDINGDOOR122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSPLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020A5.1DETAILS9799 3/8" = 1'-0"7TYP. GLASS BALCONY SECTION 3/8" = 1'-0"5TYP. RECESSED WINDOW 3/8" = 1'-0"2TYP. PANEL BALCONY WITH ROOF OVER IT 3/8" = 1'-0"1TYP. PARAPET TO ROOF 3/8" = 1'-0"9TYP. EXTERIOR FRONT CANOPIES SYSTEMEXTERIORWALKWAYINTERIOR 3/8" = 1'-0"11TYP. FLAT PNELS BALCONY8.A.dPacket Pg. 119Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA5.2PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020MATERIAL BOARD97998.A.dPacket Pg. 120Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8.A.d
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8.A.d
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Project Plans (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
M O N T E R E Y ROAD.24FIRST FLOOR TANDEM PARKINGN 13.000 S.F. / FLOORTANDEM PARKING641 8 ' - 0 "
2 5 8 ' - 0 5 9 /2 5 6 "169' - 9 63/256"233' - 7 15/128"199' - 11 115/128"112' - 2"105' - 10"90' - 2"104' - 10"104' - 10"2 1 ' - 0 2 9 /1 2 8 "26' - 0 1/2" 16' - 0" 2' - 0"3' - 6 209/256"26' - 0"16' - 0"2' - 0"3' - 6 125/128"30' - 1 81/128" 18' - 0"CIRCULATION1252covered walkpathCIRCULATIONcovered walkpathLOBBYCIRCULATIONPARKINGAMENITIESLOBBYCIRCULATIONCIRCULATION1273EXTERIORWALKS1275130345781112131415161718192223242526272865465758 59 60 61 62 63 647374757678798081MULTI-PURPOSEROOM3132336656484734353637385549 50 51 52 53 54passage throughMECHANICALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEWALKWAYWALKWAYWALKWAY677PERMEABLEEMNEW 7" HIGHMASONRY SOUND WALLPROPERTY LINEFENCENEW 7" HIGHMASONRY SOUND WALLM A C H IN E R Y
R O O M
trash/recyclingroomCpassage throughCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC29CCCCCCCCCCCCC291039404142437067 68 69828384852021444586877271commercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialloadingcommercialcommercialcommercialPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYPOTENTIAL FUTURECONNECTION TOADJACENT PROPERTYTRASH / RECYCLINGloundryrooms ig n a g e signageTRANSFORMERPOWERGENERATORRESIDENT STORAGE40 bikes parking40 bikes parkingcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialcommercialTOP OFCURBPROPERTYLINEUTILITYEXSITINGWALKWAYPLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUNDRESIDENT STORAGE26' - 0"25' - 0"3 5 ' - 0 "2 5 ' - 0 "GYMCOMMERCIALRESIDENTIALSTORAGEENTRYPORCHADA COMPLIANT WALK47ft. SIDE YARD47ft. SIDE YARD38ft. REAR YARD32ft FRONT YARD47ft. SIDE YARDMAIL MAIL COMMERCIALCOMMERCIALRES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.BenchBBQOUTDOORTABLEOUTDOORTABLEBenchto th e n e ig h b o r e d d r iv e w a y c e n te r lin e~ 5 3 ' - 0 "to th e n e x t d r iv e w a y~ 7 4 ' - 0 "DRIVEWAYDRIVEWAYRES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.RES.SF.COMMERCIALPEDESTRIANGATEBIKERACKBIKERACKBUSSTOPCHESSTABLESPLANTERSEAT WALL122 E. ARRELLAGASANTA BARBARA805 962 2746CALIFORNIA 93101BlatterHochhauserARCHITECTUREAND PLANNINGSHEETPROJECT NO:THIS DRAWING IS COPYRIGHTEDMATERIAL UNDER THE SOLE OWNERSHIPOF HOCHHAUSER BLATTER ARCHITECTURE& PLANNING. ANY USE WITHOUTEXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OFHOCHHAUSER BLATTER IS PROHIBITED.SHEET CONTENTSISSUANCE OR REVISIONDATE:PLANNING SUBMITTAL05.05.2016RESUBMITTAL03.27.2017MONTEREY APPARTMENTSA1.1PLANNING SUBMITTAL8955 Monterey Rd Gilroy, CA 95020SITE PLAN9799 1" = 20'-0"1SITE PLANPROJECTNORTH8.A.ePacket Pg. 123Attachment: Revised site plan (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8.A.f
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Public plaza view 1 (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8.A.g
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Public plaza view 2 (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
Community Development
Department
7351 Rosanna Street, Gilroy, California 95020-61197
Telephone: (408) 846-0451 Fax (408) 846-0429
http://www.cityofgilroy.org
DATE: October 4, 2018
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Pamela Wu, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: AS 16-19 & Z 17-03 Mixed-Use Apartments and Commercial
Development, Located at 8955 Monterey Road
1) Request: Architectural and Site Review permit (AS 16-19) and Zone Change for a
Planned Unit Development (Z 17-03) proposes to construct a five-story mixed-use
development on approximately 2-acre site at 8955 Monterey Road. Ground level
commercial space facing Monterey Road would occupy 4,435 square feet with up
to 4 businesses. At this time, no specific tenants have been identified for these
areas, but possible business may include retail, small grocery store, professional
offices, and/or small scale food service, as long as no additional parking will be
generated based on the assumed parking count of 1 space / 250 s.f. of retail
space. Residential units on the upper floors would provide 78 apartments ranging
from 1 to 4 bedroom units. Of the 78 residential units, 9 units will be made
available to low-income households. Residential amenities include a 1,279 s.f.
lobby area, a 1,734 s.f. lounge, two enclosed playground areas with play
structures, a multi-purpose room, an indoor gym, a laundry facility, two bike storage
facilities and extra storage areas for the residents. In addition, a separate
community rooftop terrace with lounge area will be provided on the 5th level for the
residents. The second and third floors each will contain 24 units while the fourth
and fifth floors will include 18 and 14 units, respectively. The location and type of
affordable units will be determined at a later date. Two sets of elevators are
proposed to serve the front lobby area and middle portion of the development. The
rear of the building will be accessed through a set of the stairs. The development
includes a Density Bonus request, for a 27.5% increase above the R4 density
standards to achieve the total of 78 units. Nine of the units will be maintained as
low-income affordable units. As part of the Density Bonus request, the applicant
requests an allowance for compact spaces as a project concession.
2) Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses: The subject site is currently
developed with a granite slab supply business (Granite Outlet) and a church (Iglesia
Cristiana). The total site area is approximately 2.046 acre and is developed with
Kristi A. Abrams
DIRECTOR
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
2
several buildings. The front of the site is paved with asphalt and concrete while the
rear is unpaved and is utilized for outdoor granite storage. Existing landscaping is
minimal except for a few trees that are in the middle of the subject parcel which will
be removed as part of the project.
The subject site is located to the north of downtown Gilroy and on the west side of
Monterey Road. Union Pacific railroad tracks and vacant land are on the east of
subject parcel.
LOCATION EXISTING LAND USE GENERAL PLAN ZONING
Project Site Granite business and church High Density Residential R4
North Preschool High Density Residential R4
South Used car dealership High Density Residential R4
East Vacant Limited Industrial M1
West Single-family residential Single-family residential R1
3) Environmental Assessment: In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), an initial study was prepared to evaluate any potentially
significant adverse effects of the proposed project on the environment. Some areas
of concern identified as potentially being affected include: Air Quality, Biological
Resource, Geology and Soils, and Noise. Specifically, environmental impacts
identified in the IS/MND include possible impacts to the nesting raptors due to the
removal of two existing trees and noise levels that may exceed the standard
threshold affecting both the surrounding neighborhood and the future residents.
The required mitigation measures (BIO-1A) include a nesting raptor survey to be
conducted if construction is to occur between February 15 and September 15. In
addition, if active nests are found, an appropriate buffer between the nest and the
active construction site should be established by a qualified biologist (BIO-1B).
Further, in order to reduce off-site noise levels, mitigations such as a five-foot sound
wall (NOI-1) along portion of the southern property line to will be constructed and
suitable form of AC/mechanical ventilation, insulated windows and doors should be
incorporated into final construction so that the interior noise levels do not exceed 45
dBA (NOI-2).
On January 30, 2018, the applicant agreed to the recommended mitigation
measures to address the identified adverse effects. The Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND) was circulated and made available for public review at the Gilroy
Public Library, the Planning Division public counter, and on the Planning Division
webpage (www.cityofgilroy.org/planning) for the requisite comment period, from
March 9, 2018 through April 9, 2018. (The project has been ready to be considered
by the Planning Commission since May 2018, pending several items to be provided
by developer such as arranging a community outreach meetings, finalizing the public
amenity type and location, refining proposed co lor schemes for the development and
designing the frontage landscaping and rear pedestrian access.)
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
3
The MND is provided as an attachment to this report. Comments were received from
California Department of Transportation and California Department of Fish and
Wildlife but do not directly address the environmental analysis contained in the initial
study/mitigated negative declaration and would not require changes to the MND. As
such, no significant adverse effects are expected to result from the proposed project,
and the Planning Commission can make findings to recommend adoption of the
MND.
4) Background Information: The 2007-2014 Housing Element identified the need to
designate additional properties for high density residential development. To satisfy
that need, the subject parcel, along with 15 other properties, was rezoned to R4,
High Density Residential, in 2013. The adjacent properties to the north and south of
subject parcel were also rezoned to R4, where the density requirement is 20 to 30
dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
5) General Plan Consistency: The City's General Plan designates the subject site for
High Density Residential use, which supports the proposed project request. The
density requirement for High Density Residential use is 16 to 30 dwelling units per
acre whereas the density requirement for R4 zoning is 20 to 30 dwelling units per
acre. High Density Residential use can be combined with a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Combining District overlay to accommodate better design. The
proposed project is a 5-story multi-family development located on Monterey Road, a
major transportation corridor for the City, and is surrounded by compatible uses such
as daycare, commercial shops and single-family residences. As such, the proposal
conforms to the goals and policies of the General Plan. Key goals and policies,
which pertain to the proposed project, are discussed below:
POLICY
#
TITLE AND SUMMARY ANALYSIS
1.01 Pattern of Development:
Encourages contiguous,
compact, infill development.
The project is an infill development and is
adjacent to developed properties on 3
sides. East of the subject property is the
railroad and vacant land beyond the
railroad.
Project is consistent with the policy.
1.02 Mix of Uses: Encourages a
range of housing types.
The project proposes a mixed-use
development including both commercial
and multi-family residential units. The
multi-family residential component would
provide other types of housing units in
addition to single-family residences in the
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
4
POLICY
#
TITLE AND SUMMARY ANALYSIS
current neighborhood.
Project is consistent with the policy.
1.05 Existing Neighborhoods.
Maintain and enhance the
quality of existing residential
neighborhoods.
The project is designed to provide
adequate public facilities such as street
improvements for the new residents. In
addition, bike storage and a walking route
to nearby schools through a pedestrian
path from the existing neighborhood to the
project site will be improved.
Project is consistent with the policy
2.01 Location of Growth.
Direct new growth to under-
utilized lands within the
USA and consistent with the
2016 UGB.
The project site is currently under-utilized
for the designed R4 zoning district and is
within the City’s USA. The proposed
project is within the Urban Growth
Boundary as adopted in 2016.
Project is consistent with the policy.
3.20 North Monterey Street
Improvements. Require
curbs and gutters in the
commercial areas.
Condition of approval requires curb and
gutters to be upgrade along Monterey
Road frontage. Sidewalk has been
improved already at current site.
Project is consistent with the policy.
H-1.1 Encourage a variety of
housing options for Gilroy
residents.
The project will increase the supply of
apartment units, including 9 low-income
units, in the City.
Project is consistent with the policy.
H-2.1 Encourage new affordable
housing.
The project includes 9 low-income units,
which is 15% of total available units.
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
5
POLICY
#
TITLE AND SUMMARY ANALYSIS
Project is consistent with the policy.
H-2.2 Provide incentives for
affordable housing, such as
density bonus and various
provisions in the Residential
Development Ordinance.
The project proposes 1 concession
(allowing compact parking spaces) through
the Density Bonus provision (GCC Section
30.46.40) and qualifies for the RDO
allocation exemption for R4 property (GCC
Section 30.50.60). The project also
proposes a PUD permit to allow ground-
level commercial units.
Project is consistent with the policy.
14.03 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Paths and Facilities.
Provide for the design of
safer, convenient and
attractive bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.
Proposed roadways will be
planned to accommodate
bicycle traffic.
A bike lane along Monterey Road frontage
is required in addition to bike racks and
permanent bike storage area to
accommodate 80 bicycles for the
apartment residents. The 2016 California
Green Building code requires permanent
bike storage for a minimum of nine bikes.
The development will exceeded the
minimum requirement by providing 80 bike
storage units. A pedestrian path through
the development connecting the nearby
school to the existing residential
neighborhood is also included.
Project is consistent with the policy.
14.05 Private Development of
Bike and Pedestrian
Facilities. Provide
bikeways and/or pedestrian
pathways.
A pedestrian circulation diagram that
connects Weaver Court, through the
project site, onto Monterey Road, is
designed to ensure a safe pathway.
Project is consistent with the policy.
6) Conformance with Zoning Code Development Standards: The proposed
development is located in the High Density Residential R4 zone district. In
accordance with the Gilroy City Code (GCC), the proposed project may be permitted
with an approved Planned Unit Development and Architectural and Site Review to
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
6
allow for a mix-use development. Applicable development standards for the project
have been considered and are listed below. Development standards identified in
italics include the Code deviations requested pursuant to Section 30.50.50 of the
Gilroy City Code for the Planned Unit Development design or other applicable
sections.
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED CONFORMS?
Density 1 unit / 1,452 s.f.
89,124 s.f. / 1,452 = 61.3
units
Project includes a total of
78 units, which is 27.5%
above allowed density
No - Density
Bonus approval
requested (see
discussion
under Section
6)
Front building
setback
Minimum 26 feet from
face of curb
Building setback 42-ft
from Monterey Road
frontage
Yes
Side yard
setback
Minimum 12 feet from
interior property line, 21
feet from curb
Closest distance from the
building to any side
property line is 32-feet
Yes
Rear yard
setback
Minimum 15 feet from
property line
Building setback 38-ft
from rear property line
Yes
Height Maximum 75 feet and 6
stories
Building height range from
58-ft (5-story), to 44-ft (4-
story), to 34-ft (3-story).
Yes
Total number
of residential
parking per
Gov Code
65915, Density
Bonus Law
Total number
of commercial
parking per
GCC
30.31.25(a)
Residential Use:
1 space / 1 bdrm unit
2 space / 2-3 bdrm unit
2.5 spaces / 4+ bdrm unit
Commercial Use (retail):
1 space / 250 s.f. for
general retail sales
Residential Use:
8 (8 one-bedroom)
64 (32 two-bedroom) + 74
(37 three-bedroom)
2.5 (1 four-bedroom)
Total = 148.5 spaces
Commercial Use (retail):
4,447 s.f. / 250 s.f = 17.8
spaces
Total required: 166
Total provided: 171
Yes
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
7
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED CONFORMS?
Parking Stall
Dimension
Residential Use:
10-ft wide x 20-ft deep
Commercial Use:
9-ft wide x 18-ft deep
No compact space
allowed
Includes 25% compact
spaces through Density
Bonus concession
allowance
Tandem compact space:
9-ft x 14-ft clear space
(total parking depth 32-ft)
All other compact space:
8.5-ft x 14-ft
All other regular space
9-ft x 18-ft
No
Concession
requested
though Density
Bonus approval
Parking Space
Arrangement
Tandem parking allowed
through Gov Code 65915
80 tandem parking spaces
with one regular sized
stall and one compact
stall proposed (total depth
32-ft)
Yes
Allowed Uses Multi-family residential Mix-use to include multi-
family residential and
commercial uses
No - Exception
requested
through PUD
approval
7) Other Considerations.
RDO Interim Exemption: Effective November 6, 2017, the City Council took action
to not extend the RDO allowances, unless projects were deemed to be ‘complete’ for
processing by November 6th. This project was determined to be ‘complete’ for
processing on July 3, 2017.
Pursuant to GCC Section 30.50.60.(b)(2)(l).3.A, no RDO allocation is required for
any R4 property (high density residential), so long as the project is reviewed by the
Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. If the project receives a
favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission and then approved by
City Council, the project can proceed without needing a separate RDO allocation
approved by Council.
Affordable Housing Policy: In 2006, the Council adopted criteria and guidelines
for affordable housing developments. The goal is to enhance public welfare by
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8
meeting the current and future housing needs of all segments of the community. As
such, the policy encourages housing development for Very Low, Low and Moderate
income households, as defined by HUD for the Santa Clara County thresholds. The
policy also provides RDO exemption for affordable development as long as the
general requirements are satisfied. The policy further specifies guidance on how the
affordable rental units will be awarded and reserved for eligible tenants, and how the
developer should enter an Agreement with the City to ensure these units are to be
provided and remained affordable. Specific criteria will be incorporated into
conditions of approval to ensure such units be retained for the targeted affordable
households. In addition, prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant must
enter into an agreement with the City and record a deed restriction to ensure the
continued affordability of the units in the project.
Density Bonus Ordinance: The City Density Bonus provisions that were adopted
in 2014 are not consistent with the current State Density Bonus law. Therefore,
analysis in this report is conducted under the latest State Density Bonus law
(Government Code 65915) that went into effect on January 1, 2017. Staff
anticipates the City Density Bonus provisions to be updated and revised in 2019.
Gov. Code 65915 allows a housing development to request density bonus if at least
“10% of the total units of housing development” are reserved “for lower income
households.” The development proposes 9 units, which equates to 15% of total
units, to be dedicated for low-income housing, households with earnings less than
80% of the County median income. As such, the project qualifies for 27.5% density
bonus above the R4 base zoning allowance, for a total of 78 units (61 units x
27.5%). With 15% low-income units proposed, the developer has requested 1
concession for the development. The requested concession is a modification to the
parking space standard to allow compact parking spaces onsite. The project
proposes 80 compact spaces to be combined with a tandem parking arrangement.
Per GC 65915, tandem parking is allowed by right for all density bonus projects and
is not considered as a separate concession.
Staff supports the requested concession to allow compact parking spaces onsite.
However, staff is concerned that the combination of allowing tandem parking a long
with compact spaces may result in significant off -street parking impacts within the
existing residential neighborhood. However, since tandem parking is allowed
through Density Bonus provision, the Planning Commission has no jurisdiction in
recommending denial of this design. It is important to note that approval of the
exception request is not discretionary under the Density Bonus law. In order to
ensure that off-street parking and on-site circulation will not significantly impact the
neighborhood, the applicant has submitted a parking management plan that was
reviewed by staff to address the concern which will be incorporated into conditions of
approval to ensure future enforceability. The parking management plan will require
the onsite management company to monitor the resident parking practice and
ensure that there is overflow parking occurring at Weaver Court.
Housing Accountability Act: Since implementation of the Housing Accountability
Act in 1982, the intent of the law is to promote housing development in response to
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
9
the dire housing crisis in California. As a result, the State laws limit the ability of
local government to deny any new housing development. Government Code
Section 65589.5(j) states that a “proposed housing development project cannot be
denied if it complies with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision
standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect at the time that
the housing development project’s application is determined to be complete.” As
such, if a proposed housing project complies with applicable, objective general plan
and zoning standards and criteria, including design review standards, then the local
government decision-making body, such as City Council, must support or otherwise
approve the proposed development.
Staff Analysis for Architecture & Site Approval (A/S 16-19):
a) Building Setbacks and Height: As described in Section 5, previously, the
proposed development is situated on property zoned R4 and conforms to the
required setbacks and height. In fact, the proposed building, which is located in
the center of the site with uncovered parking around the perimeter, provides
setbacks that far exceed the minimum required. There are no residential units
proposed on the ground level. All of the residential units are located on the
upper floor with different types of arrangement provided for each floor. The front
of building is approximately 42-ft from Monterey Road, with bike racks, bus
shelter, city trees, landscaping and wide sidewalks in between. The closest
distance from the side property line to the proposed building is 32 -ft, far
exceeding the required 12-ft setback requirement. The rear clearance between
the building and the property is 38-ft, which is also greater than the 15-ft setback
requirement. Further, the proposed building varies from 5 -story in height
maximum along Monterey Road to 3-story in the rear, where maximum
allowance can be 75-ft or up to 6-story.
b) Architectural Design: The project consists of one building that varies from
five-story in the front to three-story in the rear where the building is closest to the
existing single-family residential neighborhood. The building is proposed at a
maximum height of 58 feet along Monterey Road frontage. The building exterior
is proposed to use a stucco finish and a three-tone (beige, gray and blue) color
scheme. Considerable articulation is proposed on the elevations of the building
including recessed windows, protruding balconies with vertical elements that
provide a visual separation. The entrance to the residential component is located
behind the commercial spaces along Monterey Road. The overall architectural
design of the building is modern with simple geometric forms, rectangular shapes
and clean lines.
As the building will be much taller than its surrounding structures, adequate
buffer and landscaping will be incorporated to soften the urban presence to the
adjacent single-family homes and one-story commercial structures. Mature
canopy trees are proposed along Monterey Road, in front of the commercial
stores, to enhance the building elevation to a more human -scale that can be
inviting for pedestrian activity.
c) Parking
Residential Parking requirement: Pursuant to the Density Bonus law,
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
10
Government Code 65915, all density bonus projects are required to provide
parking based on the following ratio:
1 space / 0-1 bedroom units
2 spaces / 2-3 bedroom units
2.5 spaces / 4+ bedroom units
The proposed project includes (8) 1-bedroom units, (32) 2-bedroom units, (37) 3-
bedroom units and (1) 4-bedroom unit. Therefore, a total of 148.5 parking
spaces are required for the residential uses.
Commercial Parking requirement:
Pursuant to GCC Section 30.31.25(a), one space is required for every 250 s.f. of
gross floor area for general retail sales, repair and services. One space is
required for every 3 seats or 100 s.f. of gross floor area for any restaurant uses.
Since no specific tenants for the ground-level commercial uses are identified,
staff determines that the minimum parking requirement is 18 spaces if all of the
commercial uses are dedicated to retail uses. If any restaurant or food service
use is proposed, then additional parking may be required and can be conditioned
through future request. The 18 parking spaces required for the commercial
establishments will be clustered towards Monterey Road, and be reserved for
such uses, through condition of approval.
Overall Parking Compliance:
As proposed, a total of 171 parking spaces are shown which exceeds the
minimum requirement by 5 spaces (148.5 or 149 residential spaces + 17.8 or 18
retail spaces = 166 spaces). With providing more than the minimum number of
parking spaces, the parking management should ensure the adequacy of onsite
parking. If parking is found to be deficient, through a monitoring report, the
Architecture and Site Review permit can be subject to revocation and
modification at the Council’s discretion.
However, 80 of the residential spaces are shown in a tandem configuration
where one regular stall (9-ft x 18’ft) is stacked with another compact stall (9-ft x
14-ft). None of the commercial spaces are provided in tandem configuration. In
addition, 25% of overall parking spaces (41 compact spaces) are shown in the
compact dimension (8.5ft to 9-ft x 14-ft). Even though the project conforms to the
minimum parking standard per the State Density Bonus law, the project is not in
compliance with the City standard, as stated in GCC Section 30.31.
Further, the allowance for compact parking spaces is a requested concession
through the Density Bonus provision, which has been discussed earlier in this
report. The tandem parking arrangement is not considered a concession, and is
allowed to satisfy the required onsite parking as stated in Government Code
Section 65915 (p)(4).
Therefore, the minimum amount of required onsite parking spaces provided are
in compliance with the State Density Bonus law for residential uses, which
requires less parking spaces than the City requirement. Commercial parking
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
11
spaces are provided in compliance with the City requirement. Because the
project is in compliance with the State provisions, it would supersede the City
parking requirement.
d) Landscaping/Fencing: The landscape plan proposes a variety of plant
material that is well-suited to provide screening, where needed, shade for the
parking lot and an overall attractive design. A grouping of canopy tree such as
brisbane box or paperbark is proposed along Monterey Road in front of the
commercial units. Prior to construction, detailed plans will need to be submitted
that indicate the specific plant material to be used at each location and their
sizes. Additionally, an irrigation plan will be required as well as documentation of
compliance with the City’s landscape water conservation ordinance. Play
structures are proposed for each of the two courtyards of the project. Plans for
those structures will need to be submitted for review and approval.
As proposed, a minimum of three-foot landscape strip along the perimeter is
provided. A five-foot sound wall along portion of the southern property line to
reduce off-site noise levels should be constructed between the proposed
development and the existing auto dealership. The construction should be
incorporated into the final landscaping plan.
e) Trash Pickup: A centralized trash enclosure is provided in the middle portion
of the development for residents while a separate trash enclosure is provided for
the commercial tenants closer to Monterey Road. The applicant is required to
provide a will-serve letter from the City’s waste hauler (Recology) to confirm
regularly scheduled pickups.
8) Staff Analysis for Zoning Application Z 17-03 (Planned Unit Development
Overlay, processed as a Zone Change): The PUD combining district provides the
opportunity for project designs that deviate from specific requirements of the City
Code and other development standards, where appropriate and justified. The
project requests a commercial component with the approval of the proposed PUD
zoning overlay. The proposal includes approximately 4,435 s.f. of commercial space
on the ground level along Monterey Road where retail, office and/or small scale food
services are anticipated. The commercial uses will serve both the onsite residents
and nearby neighborhoods.
a) PUD Intent and Requirement for Project Amenities: The proposed zoning
for the project site is R4 PUD, requiring conformance to Zoning Code Planned
Unit Development (PUD) Combining District. The PUD ordinance Statement of
Intent (Zoning Ordinance section 30.26.10) states
"The intent of the PUD Planned Unit Development combining district is to
allow diversification in the relationships of buildings, structures, and open
spaces in building groups and the allowable heights of said buildings and
structures, while insuring adequate standards related to the public health,
safety and general welfare of the community. By allowing this
diversification, the PUD planned unit development combining district
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
12
intends to promote unified planning and development, economical and
efficient land use, a higher standard of amenities, appropriate and
harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, and an
upgrading of the urban environment."
As part of the PUD application, the applicant must voluntarily offer amenities that
are above-and-beyond the normal course of development for a property. As such,
in addition to the residential amenities that will be provided, the applicant
proposes to install a bus shelter based on VTA’s suggestion of a bus stop
location along Monterey Road as public amenities to satisfy the PUD request and
to further promote a higher standard of amenities, with focus on the project's
relationship and contribution to its nearby condition. In addition, a public plaza -
like area will be created in front of the commercial stores along Monterey as a
gathering place as an additional amenity. Preliminary conceptual drawings of
such area are enclosed with this report.
b) FINDINGS: In accordance with Gilroy City Code Section 30.50.50(d), nine
required findings must all be supported for consideration of a planned unit
development request. Staff has evaluated each required finding and provide a
brief explanation on how each finding is met below:
1. “The project conforms to the Gilroy General Plan in terms of general location
and standards of development.”
Explanation: The project conforms to the Gilroy General Plan in that the
project is located in an area that is designated for multi-family residential
development. The General Plan designation and zoning for the subject
property was updated to high density residential as a mitigation to allow the
City to satisfy the affordable housing needs identified in the 2007 -2014
Housing Element of the General Plan.
2. “The project provides the type of development that will fill a specific need of
the surrounding area.”
Explanation: The project satisfies this finding in that few high -density
residential projects have been developed in the City. Gilroy’s housing stock is
primarily comprised of single-family homes. If approved, this type of
development will offer a needed alternative housing option.
3. “The project will not require urban services beyond those that are currently
available.”
Explanation: No additional urban services such as water, sewer and utilities
will be required to be installed beyond those that are currently available.
Such services are currently available to the existing uses onsite.
4. “The project provides a harmonious, integrated plan that justifies exceptions,
if such are required, to the normal requirements of this ordinance.”
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
13
Explanation: The developer requests an exception through the PUD permit to
allow mix-use development in a R4 zone. The allowance to include ground -
level commercial stores would further engage pedestrian conn ectivity from
nearby residential neighborhood to Monterey Road. The inclusion of
commercial uses can yield a better design for the overall development. Also,
even though the project may seem to have a height disparity with nearby
homes, care in the proposed building articulation and stepping back the tallest
components away from existing homes reduces the potential massing effect.
5. “The project reflects an economical and efficient pattern of land uses.”
Explanation: The project reflects an economical and efficient pattern of land
uses, in that the property is an infill site, surrounded on three sides by urban
development and is proposed at a density of 38 units per acre.
6. “The project includes greater provisions for landscaping and open space than
would generally be required.”
Explanation: The project meets the minimum landscaping buffer of 3 feet
along the perimeters. In addition, the project will install two playgrounds with
picnic tables and a rooftop terrace area as additional open spaces for the
onsite residents. There will also be an indoor gym and other lounge areas
provided within the residential development. A wider sidewalk with a public
plaza-like area to accommodate bike rack, bus shelter, seating area and city
trees with planter boxes is proposed beyond the minimal requirement to
provide additional open space for the commercial units.
7. “The project utilizes aesthetic design principles to create attractive buildings
and open space areas that blend with the character of surrounding areas.”
Explanation: The project proposes a building design that focuses the tallest
portion of the development along Monterey Road and gradually steps down
with lower building height towards the existing residential neighborhood.
Uncovered parking spaces are proposed along the perimeter which further
minimizes structural elements, thereby providing a feeling of open space
between the proposed development and the adjacent residential
neighborhood.
8. “The project will not create traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse
effects on surrounding areas.”
Explanation: The environmental document that was prepared for this project
found no significant traffic congestion, noise, odor or other adverse effects
that will be generated by the project. Further, mitigation measures are
included to address any impact to a less than significant level. If the
proposed parking management plan is effectively executed and monitored by
the onsite management company, then the concern of spillover parking on
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
14
Weaver Court would be alleviated. If onsite parking is found to be deficient
and causing a detriment to the nearby neighborhood, then City Council may
revoke or modify the Arch & Site for further review.
9. “The project provides adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and
storage, as necessary.”
Explanation: With adoption of the conditions of approval, the project will
ensure adequate access, parking, landscaping, trash areas and storage
areas are provided for both residents and the commercial tenants.
As such, staff supports a recommendation of approval by the Planning
Commission with the recommended conditions included as an attachment to this
staff report.
9) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): Project plans were routed to Engineering,
Building, Police, and Fire representatives for internal review and comment. The
TAC considered the project April 4, 2017, May 13, 2017, May 16, 2017 and June 7,
2017. Recommendations of the TAC members have been incorporated into the
project plans and/or are included as recommended conditions in attached
resolutions.
10) Bicycle Pedestrian Committee (BPC): On July 26, 2016, the applicant presented
the proposed project to the BPC with a special focus on pedestrian and bicycle
aspects of the proposal. The BPC approved the project with a list of Conditions
made by Commissioner Marandos and seconded by Commissioner Muniz. The
Conditions include the use of Bike Route signage from the rear pedestrian exit of
the project area onto Weaver Court, then onto Woodworth Way, towards Church
Street and a recommendation of a bike lane along with related improvements on
the project’s Monterey Street frontage and a donation or pledge toward future bike
lane improvements on Monterey Street when the road surface gets repaved by
City. Motion was approved with these conditions and will be recommended to
move forward to Planning Commission and City Council.
The applicant requested an endorsement amendment from BPC favoring access
from the west end of the complex onto Weaver Court, Woodworth Way to the
Church Street bike lanes. A motion for the additional endorsement was made by
Commissioner Reedy and seconded by Commissioner Marandos.
11) Gilroy Unified School District (GUSD): Project plans were routed to the GUSD
for review and comments. GUSD representatives (discussion with Alvaro Meza on
8/22/2018) did not have comments on the proposed project but noted the
development falls within the following school boundaries: Antonio Del Buono
Elementary School, South Valley Middle School and Christopher High School.
Staff has confirmed with GUSD that these nearby schools will have capacity to
serve additional students from the proposed project.
12) Noticing: Property owner information (i.e. list, labels, and map) within 500 feet of
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
15
the subject site were generated by DataPro Title Company using current ownership
data. On September 21, 2018 notices of this Planning Commission meeting were
mailed to the property owners along within other interested parties. In addition, the
property has been posted with on-site signage notifying passersby of pending
development, and the Planning Commission public hearing packets are available
through the City's webpage.
Two community outreach meetings were hosted by the developer on June 18,
2018 and July 31, 2018, where planning staff attended the July 31, 2018 meeting.
At the July 31, 2018 meeting, 2 neighbors were in attendance and a few questions
regarding the development were discussed.
13) Appeal Procedure: The Planning Commission's action is not final, but rather a
recommendation. As such, the matter will be considered by the City Council at a
later date.
Attachments:
1. AS 16-19 PC Reso_100418
2. Z 17-03 PC Reso_090618
3. MND
4. Final MMRP
5. Public plaza view 1
6. public plaza view 2
7. BPC Meeting Minutes
8. Proposed Plans
9. revised site plan (new pedestrian access location)
10. SRTS 8955 Monterey Rd Apartments
8.A.h
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Oct 4 PC staff report (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)
8955 Monterey Rd. Apartments Project
Safe Routes to School Summary
Antonio Del Buono- .47 miles away and accessed in the rear of the project using the bike/ped
path that connects to Weaver Ct, left on Woodworth Way, right on Church St, and left on
Farrell Ave to the school. This route has good sidewalks but only Church St has a bike lane. The
Lions Creek is adjacent to this project. If access were granted at Church St/Lions Creek
overcrossing students could connect to the already existing Lions Creek Trail. This would offer
the most protected route and shorten the distance.
South Valley Middle School- 1.33 miles away for walkers by going south on Monterey Rd,
crossover Monterey Rd at 1st St, and then continue to I.O.O.F. making a left to the school. This
puts you on the correct side of the street and crossing where a signal is located. 1.67 miles
away for bikers by going north on Monterey Rd, right on Las Animas, right on Murray Ave which
takes you all the way to I.O.O.F. and the school. The reason why this route is suggested is that
it was recently paved and has striped bike lanes and signage along the entire route. We do not
encourage middle school kids to ride on sidewalks. Alternatively the bikers could use the rear
bike/ped access onto Weaver Ct, left on Woodworth Way, left on Church St using the bike lane,
left on 2nd St to Monterey Rd and walk their bike over the crosswalk to left on I.O.O.F.
Christopher High School- 2.43 miles away accessed in the rear of the project using the bike/ped
path that connects to Weaver Ct, left on Woodworth Way, left on Church St, right on Mantelli
Rd, and right on Santa Teresa Rd. Once they get to Sunrise Dr they need to cross over Santa
Teresa Blvd at the signal because there are no crosswalks and bike lanes at the intersection of
Day Rd/Santa Teresa Blvd. From Sunrise Dr they have two options. Walk/bike up Sunrise Dr,
right on Tapestry Dr to access the bike/ped bridge to CHS or use the sidewalk along the south
entrance to the CHS. This route has a bike lane on Church St, a narrow shared parking/bike lane
on Mantelli Rd, and a bike lane on Santa Teresa Blvd.
A Measure B funded project is planned to extend the current Lions Creek Trail from Kern/Tatum
to Day Rd/Santa Teresa Blvd. When built this will provide the shortest and most direct
protected route to Christopher High School at 1.95 miles. It could be cut even shorter if the
Lions Creek access was open on Monterey Rd. A crosswalk will need to be placed at the exit of
this bike/ped trail to cross over Santa Teresa Blvd safely.
Zachary Hilton
Chair, Gilroy Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Zachary.Hilton@cityofgilroy.org
#GilroyBPAC
8.A.i
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: BPC comments SRTS 8955 Monterey Rd Apartments (1804 : Monterey Mixed-Use Project)