Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 19 2025 Item #8.2 - Districting Public Hearing - Marty Estrada.pdfCAUTION: This email originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. From:Marty Estrada To:Public Comments Subject:EXTERNAL - Agenda 8.2 Two Draft Map – Maps D and F public comments Date:Monday, May 19, 2025 4:41:20 PM Hello City of Gilroy Council Meeting - I would like to address Final District Elections Map from the Remaining Two Draft Map – Maps D and F on item 8.2. of the Agenda today 5/19/2025 under public comments. Below is my comment. Public Commet from Marty Estrada The City of Gilroy should be formally informed of the potential violation of state law regarding Map F. East Side Gilroy is a vibrant, culturally rich community with deep roots in the city’s agricultural heritage, predominantly consisting of blue-collar Chicano and immigrant families. Map F threatens to break up this community of interest, which would constitute a violation of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). Such a move contradicts the fundamental reasons for implementing district voting in Gilroy, which was to ensure fair and equitable representation for communities of interest. Specifically, Map F appears to pack potential Latino voters into District 6 by adding Latino- dense areas west of Monterey Highway, while simultaneously creating a southeastern District 4 with the highest Latino population percentage (74.4%) but a lower citizen voting age population (58%). This configuration risks disenfranchising Latino residents and diluting their voting power, undermining the core principles of the CVRA. In contrast, Map D would maintain the integrity of our community of interest, preserving the cultural ties, family values, and shared experiences that define East Gilroy—such as our houses of worship, cultural festivals, and schools. I strongly encourage the City of Gilroy to adopt Map D to prevent disenfranchising Latino and Latina communities and to uphold the principles of fair representation. Furthermore, there are concerns about statements made by Councilmember Bracco advocating for Map F, which appear to be influenced by the geographic location of his residence. California law explicitly prohibits drawing district lines that favor or discriminates against incumbents. Given these issues, it is imperative that the City Council carefully consider the legal risks associated with supporting Map F and prioritize adherence to state law and the protection of community interests. Thank you Marty Estrada